Author Topic: Global Islamification and of America  (Read 19188 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline A K

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,132
Global Islamification and of America
« on: October 10, 2008, 06:17:36 pm »
Islamic plot?  Goofy paranoia?  Or maybe a Neocon false flag to make people more scared of Islam and Barack Obama?  Watch the video.

http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/09/pro-islam-talking-doll-too-silly-not-to-mention/

Offline A K

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,132
Re: Toy Doll Says "Islam Is The Light"?
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2008, 08:45:13 pm »
No comments?  Probably just a strange blip, but the doll really does sound like it is saying "Islam is the light" and  (supposedly) "Satan is king".

Offline DCUBED

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,882
  • Sieg Heil!
Re: Toy Doll Says "Islam Is The Light"?
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2008, 09:04:49 pm »
Reminds me of the Krusty the Clown doll.

“Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”  - Arthur Conan Doyle

"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." J. Edgar Hoover

Offline Nailer

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,448
Re: Toy Doll Says "Islam Is The Light"?
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2008, 09:14:20 pm »
Islam is the plight maybe..
I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE

Offline xatom227

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 593
Islamification of America
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2008, 09:56:56 pm »
http://www.gastongazette.com/video/index.php?bcpid=1155201824&bclid=1155106715&bctid=1856933237

1st video of the doll saying "Islam is the light"
2nd video is stupid brain dead people hearing what it says, but not thinking it is saying that. 
"Presidents are not elected by ballot, they are selected by blood."   -  David Icke

"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."  -  J. Edgar Hoover

Anti_Illuminati

  • Guest

Offline 106419WTF

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
NWO'S WAR ON ISLAM IN THE NAME OF DEMOCRACY
« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2009, 11:34:13 am »
Dr. Morgan Job has questioned our continuing failure, as Muslims, to establish constitutional democracy in the Muslim world (Conference on Constitutional Reform, November 28th 2004). But modern political democracy originated in modern secular western civilization, and required the adoption of political secularism as the basis for the establishment of polity and state. Political secularism, however, like all other applications of secularism, denied religion any significant role in the public order. This, in turn, facilitated the decline of religion and of absolute moral values, and has led, around the world, to the emergence of ever-changing materialistic values and, eventually, to an essentially godless way of life.

Let us recall that when the British colonized countries such as India they found Muslims with a political culture derived basically from Islam. British colonial rule imposed European political secularism ‘at the point of the sword’ as the alternative to Islam. Both Hindus and Muslims eventually challenged the new European religion of ‘secularism’, and sought to restore and preserve their own indigenous political culture. This led eventually, and alarmingly so for the British, to an ominous political alliance of Muslims and Hindus in what was called the Khilafat Movement — a struggle to preserve the institution of the Islamic Caliphate located at the very heart of Muslim political culture. Gandhi himself forged the alliance with the Muslim Khilafat Movement since he, also, wanted to restore (for Hindus) indigenous Hindu political culture and a Hindu model of a state.

The Khilafat Movement threatened to topple the entire system of European political secularism and constitutional democracy that the colonial West was forcing upon the non-white world. And so a British strategy was devised, in collaboration with Mustafa Kamal’s newly emerging secular Republic of Turkey, to abolish the Turkish Caliphate and, in so doing, to sabotage and to bring about the collapse of the Khilafat Movement with its alarming Hindu-Muslim alliance.

The strategy succeeded. The Caliphate was abolished in Turkey in March 1924. By the end of that same year the old Indian Muslim leadership, comprised of men who knew and lived Islam, went into irreversible decline. They were replaced by the secularly inclined ‘All India Muslim League’, led by men who hardly knew or lived Islam. They presided over the cleverly disguised passage from Islam as the basis of political culture, to the new European political secularism. It was deceptively empowered by way of religious nationalism, and emerged as a curious creature named ‘Muslim nationalism’. The passage from the one to the other was so cleverly disguised that it is still not discernible to many Muslims in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

The turbulent history of European constitutional democracy in the Muslim world cannot be understood without a recognition of the fundamental change in political culture from Islam to the European model of political secularism. Indeed the passage from the one to the other has not as yet been accomplished in any final way, even in Pakistan or Turkey. Time and again the religious beliefs of the Muslim peoples in Africa, the Arab world, South and South-East Asia, etc., have impacted on politics in such wise that the West has been forced to continuously resort to devious means, including brute force and barbarism in present-day Iraq, Palestine and Afghanistan, to thwart the effort to restore Islam as the basis of polity.

• THE ISLAMIC MODEL OF A STATE (KHILAFAH)
Will Muslim society be secularized, and secular constitutional democracy finally established in the Muslim world? Or, will destiny witness the restoration indeginous Muslim political culture and the Islamic model of a state (Khilafat)? Before we attempt to answer that fascinating question which lies at the very heart of political discourse on contemporary international affairs, let us briefly describe the Khilafat or the (Sunni) Islamic model of polity and state.

It would surely surprise some of our readers to learn that Islam has never claimed to be a new religion. Rather it has consistently proclaimed that it is the original religion of Abraham, Moses, David, Solomon, and Jesus (peace and blessings of Allah be upon them all). It was therefore natural that Prophet Muhammad (sallalahu ‘alaihi wa sallam) should have preserved in the Islamic State of Madina the essential model of a polity and state that was established by the Prophet-Kings, David and Solomon (‘alaihima al-Salam) in the Holy State of Israel. What was that model?

Firstly, political culture in Holy Israel tolerated no secular separation of politics from religion. In both David and Solomon, the religious/spiritual head of the community (i.e., the Prophet), was also, himself, king or head of state. Secondly, the polity and state recognized God as Sovereign (al-Malik), and to Him belonged the Kingdom (al-Mulk), and hence Holy Israel was the Kingdom of God on earth. Thirdly, God’s authority and law were both supreme in this model of a state.

In the secular European model, on the other hand, sovereignty was taken away from God and vested in the polity and state. That was blasphemy (Shirk). God was further stripped of supreme authority and law and these, also, were vested in the people and the state, and were institutionalized in secular government (administration, judiciary and legislature). That, also, was blasphemy (Shirk). The people not only assumed supreme authority and installed their own man-made law as supreme law, they even went on, and recklessly so, to make legally permissible that which God Himself had prohibited. Such was the case, for example, with the divine prohibition of ‘lending money on interest’, gambling and lottery. The Qur’an has described all these efforts to ‘play God’ as blasphemy (Shirk), which is the one sin that Allah Most High has warned that He would never forgive. I guess that someone would respond by accusing God of being fundamentalist.

When a people turn away from God, as they most certainly do in political secularism and in the secular state, the Qur’an has warned that they would eventually forget Him and would pay the price of forgetting themselves (i.e., their human status). Their conduct would eventually become worse than that of wild beasts. Prophet Muhammad prophesied that they would eventually “engage in sexual intercourse in public like donkeys”. Trinidad’s Carnival confirms, year after year, that mainstream society in this ‘progressive’ country is heading down that road and is already approaching the fulfillment of the prophecy of preference for sex in public.

The Islamic Khilafat differs in no way whatsoever from the model of the Holy State of Israel except that Prophet Muhammad, the Prophet/head of state, was recognized as servant of Allah rather than king! Prophet Muhammad has prophesied that the Islamic Khilafat would be restored at that time when Jesus (‘alaihi al-Salam) returns. We may not have to wait more than a few decades to witness the return of Jesus and the restoration of the Islamic model of a state (Khilafat). My book ‘Jerusalem in the Qur’an’ has explained the subject.

http://www.imranhosein.org/articles/islam-and-politics/84-islam-and-constitutional-democracy.html

nofakenews

  • Guest
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHcwL5S1OSw

UNITED NATIONS -- For the last nine years, the U.N.'s annual ban on defaming Islam has been non-binding. In March, the United Nations may try to impose its view on Islamic blasphemy on all of its member nations -- including the United States -- thus making criticism of Islam a crime.

In December, the U.N. General Assembly, as it has every year since 1999, passed a resolution titled "Combating Defamation of Religions."

The vote was 86-53, with 42 nations abstaining. The United States opposed the measure.

Originally titled "Defamation of Islam," the name of the resolution has changed over the years but not the intent. The only religion mentioned in the seven-page document is Islam.

The resolution's main sponsor is the 57-member Organization of the Islamic Conference. Critics charge the OIC's membership, which includes Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia, reads like a Who's Who of religious intolerance.

Saudi Arabia has its own religious police force that cracks down on those who violate the Kingdom's hyper-strict Islamic dress and behavior codes.

In early February, members of Saudi Arabia's Commission for Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice arrested a married 37-year-old American businesswoman and mother of three for sitting inside a Starbucks coffee shop with a male colleague, according to The Times Online.


"The religious police took (the woman's) mobile phone, pushed her into a cab and drove her to Malaz prison in Riyadh," the article said. "She was interrogated, strip-searched and forced to sign and fingerprint a series of confessions pleading guilty to her 'crime.'"

Afghanistan and some other OIC member nations impose the death penalty on those who convert from Islam to another religion. 

A copy of the United Nations resolution dated Nov. 12, 2008, says the U.N. General Assembly, "Notes with deep concern ... the ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of the tragic events of 11 September 2001."

In the document, the United Nations also, "Expresses deep concern ... that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism."

The resolution urges all member states to enact laws consistent with the U.N.'s ban on blasphemy. Although the current resolution is non-binding, recent reports suggest the U.N. Human Rights Council will attempt to pass a binding version of the resolution when the council meets in Geneva in March.

In November, when the most recent version of the anti-blasphemy resolution was introduced, Pakistan's Ambassador Masood Khan told the Human Rights Council the OIC wants to see a "new instrument or convention" that addresses the issue of blasphemy, one that would be binding on member states, according to Canwest News Service.

On Feb. 25, CNN's Lou Dobbs reported that the United Nations will seek to impose its religious defamation resolution on all of its members.

"The United Nations has adopted what it calls a Resolution to Combat Defamation of Religion," Dobbs said. "The U.N. now wants to make that anti-blasphemy resolution binding on member nations, including, of course, our own. That would make it a crime in the United States ... to criticize religion, in particular, Islam."

Floyd Abrams, a constitutional lawyer, told CNN, "What they would do would be to make it illegal to put out a movie or write a book or a poem that somebody could say was defamatory of Islam."

February marked the 20-year anniversary of the death fatwa issued against British author Salman Rushdie, whose 1989 novel The Satanic Verses earned the ire of Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini, who ordered that any "good" Muslim should kill Rushdie on sight.

Opponents of the United Nations' annual defamation resolutions charge the documents are nothing more than an attempt to shield Islam from criticism and a way to silence its critics.

In a 2007 letter to the U.N. General Assembly, the International Humanist and Ethical Union called the resolutions "unnecessary, flawed, and morally wrong."

In the letter, the Amsterdam-based human rights group expressed its concern that "during debates on the defamation of religions, the focus has been almost entirely on Islam. There is a tendency to ignore anti-Semitism."

The IHEU charged that the documents do not define "defamation," and it called the U.N.'s anti-defamation effort an attempt to "stifle religious dissent."

Critics say that although the religious defamation resolutions are not yet binding on U.N. member nations, the campaign to stamp out any criticism of Islam is working.

In February, police in Kolkata, Indian arrested the editor and the publisher of the respected English-language newspaper The Statesman after they reprinted a British newspaper article titled "Why Should I Respect These Oppressive Religions?"

The article, which led with the sentence, "The right to criticize religion is being slowly doused in acid," was critical of the intolerance of the world's three dominate religions -- Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.

After several days of Muslim rioting, police charged the newspaper executives with "hurting the religious feelings" of Muslims.

Last year in the United States, book publishing giant Random House canceled its planned publication of the novel "The Jewel of Medina," which told the story of one of the Prophet Muhammad's many wives. In a written statement Random House said part of the reason it decided not to publish the novel was because company executives feared the book might offend Muslims and incite some of them to "acts of violence."

In the last couple of years, school administrators at the University of Michigan caved in to pressure from the Muslim Student Association and spent taxpayer money to install foot baths in restrooms so Muslim students could wash their feet before prayers. At Harvard, the school changed its long-standing co-ed gym policy to exclude men during certain hours so as not to offend Muslim students.

Legal experts in the United States say religious defamation laws as vague as those the United Nations wants to impose on its members stand little chance of success because of the free speech protections guaranteed under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

http://www.rightsidenews.com/200903063890/culture-wars/u.n.-may-try-to-criminalize-criticism-of-islam.html

Offline KittyAK47

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 62
  • Live Free or Die!
I read this earlier too.  Very scary, how the UN is trying to control all the nations.  Will other religions be protected or just Islam?

Is seems like then world is caving into the Islamic people at the cost of sovereignty and freedom.
Fighting the good fight of faith!!!!

Offline jerickson

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 71
I read this earlier too.  Very scary, how the UN is trying to control all the nations.  Will other religions be protected or just Islam?

Is seems like then world is caving into the Islamic people at the cost of sovereignty and freedom.

That's just it, Kitty. You and I both know this won't stop with Islam. Pretty soon it'll be Catholicism and then pretty much all religions. Soon you may not be able to preach some parts of Bible prophecy because you'll get arrested for "hate crimes" and "defamation."

Offline JonTheSavage

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,655
I'll critisize it just to see what they will try and do about it. I dare em.

Offline InfoTruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,310
Is seems like then world is caving into the Islamic people at the cost of sovereignty and freedom.

Don't spew your neo-con propaganda crap here. Are you one of those who believe the 1 world religion will be Islam? I don't like any religion so this really upsets me but lets not just go blame Islam.
It's bullshit and it's bad for ya.

George Carlin

Offline Amd304912

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,576
  • Ietsism (Dutch “ietsisme” - "Somethingism")
    • Israel-centered-neoconservative-death-cult-of-evangelican-born-again-Xtians-Are-you-one?                                      Im Not.
how can anyone criticize the un past saying withdrawl.. it is amazing..
faith basers make me as sick as free basers Surah 75 سورة القيامة - محمد [ http://powerofthadolla.freeforums.org/ ] An Almond for a Parrot
€∀§M_ ³ حتى الآلهة الحمار الاحتفاظ زنجي الخراء تمشيا   أنت كافر نكاح تفرز من الشيطان الاكبر يا  ح

Offline PTTurboe

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 596
  • "Keep honking while I reload..."
    • GoldMoney.com The best way to own gold or silver...
f**k ISLAM!!!!
Saddam Hussein
Barack Hussein Obama
Joseph Robinette Biden
Osama Bin Laden

Its a Game. A Spiritual Game...

You need to Cross The River....

Offline America2

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,299
  • Romans 10:9-10 King James Version
NYC forced to honor Islam Sept. 11?
« Reply #14 on: July 02, 2009, 02:11:10 pm »
So is the NWO *admitting* 9/11 was an inside job now?

http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=102842

Will the New York City school system be compelled to commemorate Islam on Sept. 11?

It has been widely reported the New York City Council passed a resolution Tuesday recommending the school system shut down to commemorate two of the most important Muslim holidays, however the reports did not note the holidays fall on Sept. 11 in some years.

The council vote, which was non-binding, is at odds with the opinion of Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who has said he is opposed to adding any more days off to the school calendar. Bloomberg, however, recently relinquished control of the school system to a newly appointed board of education, which could approve the holiday plan.

The Islamic holidays being considered for commemoration are Eid al-Adha and Eid al-Fitr. The former commemorates the Islamic belief Abraham was willing to sacrifice Ishmail. The latter marks the end of the Islamic fast period of Ramadan. Jewish and Christian tradition relates Abraham was willing to sacrifice his son Isaac, not Ishmail.

Islamic holidays are set based on the lunar calendar, meaning the dates corresponding to the Gregorian calendar change each year. As first noticed by Andrew Walden, publisher and editor of the Hawaii Free Press Eid al-Adha falls on Sept. 11 in the year 2016, according to the accepted Umm al-Qura calendar.

Eid al-Fitr, meanwhile, will begin at sunset Sept. 9 and continue to sunset Sept. 10 next year. The dates, though, depend on the official citing of the new crescent moon as certified by the Saudi "hilal committee," which at times has shifted holidays by one or two days, meaning Eid-al-Fitr could technically also be celebrated on Sept. 11 in 2010.

The council's vote reportedly comes as the culmination of a three-year lobbying effort by U.S. Muslim groups, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR. The council resolution cited New York City's growing Muslim population as well as the fact that the system observes major Jewish and Christian holidays.

The resolution's advocates have cited a statistic claiming Muslims make up 12 percent of the city's public school students and, therefore, they deserved recognition.

Bloomberg told reporters before the vote that not all religions could be accommodated on the school system's holiday schedule, only those with "a very large number of kids who practice."

"If you close the schools for every single holiday, there won't be any school," Bloomberg said. "Educating our kids requires time in the classroom, and that's the most important thing to us."

While Bloomberg recently handed control of the school system to a new education board, the state Senate could take action to put the mayor back in control.

"Right now the degree of control the mayor has over the education system is completely unclear," Councilman G. Oliver Koppell, the only council member to vote against the resolution, told FoxNews.com.


Offline Unintelligable Name

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,630
Re: NYC forced to honor Islam Sept. 11?
« Reply #15 on: July 02, 2009, 02:24:14 pm »
So is the NWO *admitting* 9/11 was an inside job now?

Say what? Where'd you get that from?

PatAndrews

  • Guest
Re: NYC forced to honor Islam Sept. 11?
« Reply #16 on: July 02, 2009, 02:26:33 pm »
Say what? Where'd you get that from?

I was wondering the same thing.  Did I miss something?

Offline America2

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,299
  • Romans 10:9-10 King James Version
Re: NYC forced to honor Islam Sept. 11?
« Reply #17 on: July 02, 2009, 02:29:48 pm »
Say what? Where'd you get that from?

What are you talking about? Did you even read the article?

My pt was that if the culprits were indeed these "Muslim terrorist extremists", then why is NYC making an effort to honor Islam this 9/11? Is the NWO trying to send us a subliminal message here?

Offline Unintelligable Name

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,630
Re: NYC forced to honor Islam Sept. 11?
« Reply #18 on: July 02, 2009, 02:37:21 pm »
My pt was that if the culprits were indeed these "Muslim terrorist extremists", then why is NYC making an effort to honor Islam this 9/11? Is the NWO trying to send us a subliminal message here?

There's only one confirmed date of one of the holiday's being on September 11th and that is once in 2016. The other "might" fall on September 11th 2010, depending on what the "Saudi commitee" decides.

By that I would not say they are making an effort, and I also wouldn't say that it has anything to do with 9/11.

You can think the NWO lerks in mysterious ways in the NYC city council, but I don't happen to. The mayor on the other hand is a different story -- but he's saying "No more school holidays"

As far as subliminal messages go.... I just don't see it, at all. Your thread title is also misleading...

Here's your motive: "The council's vote reportedly comes as the culmination of a three-year lobbying effort by U.S. Muslim groups, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR. The council resolution cited New York City's growing Muslim population as well as the fact that the system observes major Jewish and Christian holidays. "

Offline America2

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,299
  • Romans 10:9-10 King James Version
Re: NYC forced to honor Islam Sept. 11?
« Reply #19 on: July 02, 2009, 02:41:34 pm »
There's only one confirmed date of one of the holiday's being on September 11th and that is once in 2016. The other "might" fall on September 11th 2010, depending on what the "Saudi commitee" decides.

By that I would not say they are making an effort, and I also wouldn't say that it has anything to do with 9/11.

You can think the NWO lerks in mysterious ways in the NYC city council, but I don't happen to. The mayor on the other hand is a different story -- but he's saying "No more school holidays"

As far as subliminal messages go.... I just don't see it, at all. Your thread title is also misleading...

Here's your motive: "The council's vote reportedly comes as the culmination of a three-year lobbying effort by U.S. Muslim groups, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR. The council resolution cited New York City's growing Muslim population as well as the fact that the system observes major Jewish and Christian holidays. "

The thread title is the title of the WND article - other than that, you cleared up alot of things here.(had different perceptions myself)

Offline Unintelligable Name

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,630
Re: NYC forced to honor Islam Sept. 11?
« Reply #20 on: July 02, 2009, 02:46:59 pm »
The thread title is the title of the WND article - other than that, you cleared up alot of things here.(had different perceptions myself)

Oh ha, they're funny then. WND needs to get a clue a realize it wasn't Islam that attacked the US on 9/11, so it really doesn't matter (to the informed) if we celebrate Islam on 9/11 or not...

That would send the wrong message though to the sheeple, granted.

Offline Femacamper

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,385
  • TRUNEWS
    • TRUNEWS
Is America Turning Into The United States Of Islam?
« Reply #21 on: December 08, 2011, 06:07:02 pm »


Robert Spencer discusses the threat we face from radical Islam and the political correctness that is allowing elements of Sharia law to slowly creep into American society. Second guest Amil Imani shares his insight into the history of the Iranian people and the desire to dispose of the current Iranian regime.

Related Links:

http://www.amilimani.com
http://www.jihadwatch.org

War is ugly. There is nothing glamorous about it. That’s why it disturbs me when I hear political candidates in America bragging about who would be the first to launch the war. Likewise, I cringe when I hear Bible prophecy teachers salivate at the prospects of bombing Tehran. Don’t they know thousands of innocent people will die? Don’t they know it will lead to World War III?.....Rick

TOP 5 HEADLINES Thurs. 12/8/11

The Endtimes Newscast
1.Billionaire Jim Rogers: Euro collapse will lead to end of world as we know it.
2.UBS economist's advice for a euro collapse: Stock gold, silver, canned food, and small caliber weapons.
3.EU comes under threat of downgrade by S&P.
4.Doomsday war games: Pentagon's 3 nightmare scenarios.
5.Huge Japanese earthquake cracked open the seafloor.

Larry Hatheway (United Bank of Switzerland economist) said he and his fellow bankers believe a euro collapse would result in an end of the world scenario. He predicted a run on Euro banks and a collapse of financial sectors and economies. When asked what people should do, he said buy gold, silver and stock their pantry with canned food, and buy small caliber weapons for self defense. When is the last time you’ve heard a banker give out that investment advice? I don’t make up this stuff. I simply report it. The news is more weird than anything I could make up. OH BUT I STAND ON THE ROCK!....Rick Psalm 62:2 He only [is] my rock and my salvation; [he is] my defence; I shall not be greatly moved.

TRUNEWS is the news network that is reporting the two biggest stories in the world.

Today's world news headlines look like passages from the Holy Bible. War in the Middle East... terrorism... weapons of mass destruction... globalization... implanted microchips in humans... Big Brother surveillance technology... a cashless society... human cloning... hybrid chimeras... genetically modified food... robotics and artificial intelligence... 3-D holographic images... global warming, extreme climate changes, and weather modification... bizarre new diseases... the removal of the Ten Commandments and Christian symbols from public display... the persecution of Christians around the world... super volcanoes... mega-earthquakes... tsunamis... the risk from asteroids... extreme solar eruptions... and much more...



Download the daily radio show free at: http://trunews.com



Tags: TRUNEWS 12/8/11 Thursday December 8 2011 12 12-8 8-12 12-8-11 Dec Thur Thurs 9/11 Trunews 911 terrors "rick wiles" new world order illuminati infowars alex jones prisonplanet rick wiles nightly news live infowarsnews bob chapman terrorism george noory coast 2 jihad to Robert Spencer the threat we face from radical Islam political correctness allowing elements Sharia law slowly creep American society Amil Imani history Iranian people dispose current Iranian regime jihad watch amilimani jihadwatch


Offline America2

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,299
  • Romans 10:9-10 King James Version
Re: Is America Turning Into The United States Of Islam?
« Reply #22 on: December 08, 2011, 06:26:56 pm »
saved

Offline Catalina

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,511
  • Government Censorship, Protecting You From Reality
Islamification of America
« Reply #23 on: December 15, 2011, 02:56:15 pm »
What will all those church members do when they aren't raptured and arrested?

Are evangelicals a national security threat?

If you have the stomach to listen to enough right-wing talk radio, or troll enough right-wing websites, you inevitably come upon fear-mongering about the Unassimilated Muslim. Essentially, this caricature suggests that Muslims in America are more loyal to their religion than to the United States, that such allegedly traitorous loyalties prove that Muslims refuse to assimilate into our nation and that Muslims are therefore a national security threat.

Earlier this year, a Gallup poll illustrated just how apocryphal this story really is. It found that Muslim Americans are one of the most — if not the single most — loyal religious group to the United States. Now, comes the flip side from the Pew Research Center’s stunning findings about other religious groups in America (emphasis mine):

    American Christians are more likely than their Western European counterparts to think of themselves first in terms of their religion rather than their nationality; 46 percent of Christians in the U.S. see themselves primarily as Christians and the same number consider themselves Americans first. In contrast, majorities of Christians in France (90 percent), Germany (70 percent), Britain (63 percent) and Spain (53 percent) identify primarily with their nationality rather than their religion. Among Christians in the U.S., white evangelicals are especially inclined to identify first with their faith; 70 percent in this group see themselves first as Christians rather than as Americans, while 22 percent say they are primarily American.

If, as Islamophobes argue, refusing to assimilate is defined as expressing loyalty to a religion before loyalty to country, then this data suggests it is evangelical Christians who are very resistant to assimilation. And yet, few would cite these findings to argue that Christians pose a serious threat to America’s national security. Why the double standard?

Because Christianity is seen as the dominant culture in America — indeed, Christianity and America are often portrayed as being nearly synonymous, meaning expressing loyalty to the former is seen as the equivalent to expressing loyalty to the latter. In this view, there is no such thing as separation between the Christian church and the American state — and every other culture and religion is expected to assimilate to Christianity. To do otherwise is to be accused of waging a “War on Christmas” — or worse, to be accused of being disloyal to America and therefore a national security threat.

Of course, a genuinely pluralistic America is one where — regardless of the religion in question — we see no conflict between loyalties to a religion and loyalties to country. In this ideal America, those who identify as Muslims first are no more or less “un-American” than Christians who do the same (personally, this is the way I see things).

But if our politics and culture are going to continue to make extrapolative judgments about citizens’ patriotic loyalties based on their religious affiliations, then such judgments should at least be universal — and not so obviously selective or brazenly xenophobic.

http://www.salon.com/2011/11/29/are_evangelicals_a_national_security_threat/print/
Spare no cost for truth's sake, neither depart from it for any gain. -Proverbs 23:23

Bestow not the gifts that God has given you to get worldly riches. -Proverbs 23:4

Offline freedomrik

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 588
Radical Islam Joins the DNC
« Reply #24 on: August 28, 2012, 11:44:27 am »
DNC inviting Islamic terrorist ......

DNC Proceeds With 2-Hour Islamic ‘Jumah’ Prayers After Rejecting Cardinal’s Blessing. Hough and Wahhaj are leaders in the separatist American Islamist movement. While they may be able to get a few thousand Muslims to attend the event, they are NOT going to be mainstream Muslims.? Most will likely come from Hough and Wahhaj?s radical networks that have long been entrenched in the Charlotte area. Make no mistake they are part of the Islamist movement.


"Starting at the end of this month the Democratic National Convention will open with a focus on Islam. ?20,000 Muslims are expected to attend according to the?Bureau of Indigenous Muslim Affairs (BIMA), the national Muslim American non-profit coordinating the two days of events they?claim?are non-political. ?”Jumah at the DNC” begins August 29 and will start with a Friday afternoon jummah prayer followed by other unnamed programs and events, leading up to the Islamic Regal Banquet. The following day will be an all day Islamic Cultural and Fun Fest which will include discussions on the topics of?Islamaphobia, Anti-Shariah, Middle Eastern Crisis, Patriot Act, National Defense Authorization Act and more. ?The purpose, according to BIMA, is to attract national and international attention to the plight of American Muslims and to hold political parties accountable for issues that affect them. ?However, not all Muslims feel that BIMA represents them and M. Zuhdi Jasser M.D., Founder and President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, has expressed serious concerns.

    It is troubling that the Democratic National Convention has decided to promote and lend its name and national political platform to the organizers of the ?Jummah at the DNC?. The leaders of this event ? Jibril Hough and Imam Siraj Wahhaj as advertised are no moderates. They are radicals. These individuals embrace Islamist supremacy and have demonstrated support for radical ideologies."
http://www.redstate.com/breeanneh/2012/08/21/radical-islam-joins-the-dnc/


ICNA was named in a May 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document — titled “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America” – as one of the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded "organizations of our friends” that shared the common goal of destroying America and turning it into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were identified by the Brotherhood as groups that could help teach Muslims “that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”



"A controversial imam who was an "unindicted co-conspirator" in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing was among a group of Muslim leaders invited yesterday to a meeting with Mayor Bloomberg at City Hall.

Siraj Wahhaj has defended the convicted WTC bomb plotters, called the FBI and CIA the "real terrorists," and said he hopes all Americans eventually become Muslim."

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/item_fz9VZgb1doDTBH3ROWzYdJ#ixzz24rMhf1SE




"Believe nothing you are told"

Offline truckthesystem

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 40
Re: Radical Islam Joins the DNC
« Reply #25 on: August 29, 2012, 12:46:43 am »
When Huma Abedin (a known associate of the Brotherhood) is basically Hillary's lesiban lover what do you expect!

I guess Man Love Thursday isn't limited to men!

Offline Freebird100

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,951
Islamification of America
« Reply #26 on: May 12, 2013, 10:55:11 am »
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/05/11/fireworks_bill_maher_vs_glenn_greenwald_on_islams_history_of_violence_.html

On the Friday broadcast of his HBO program Real Time, host Bill Maher spars with Glenn Greenwald over Islam's history of violence and if the United States is mostly responsible for it after decades of intervention in Muslim and Arab countries.

GLENN GREENWALD: How can you be a citizen of the United States, the country that has generated more violence and militarism in the world over the last five or six decades and say, 'Look at those people over there. They are incredibly violent.' We play a significant role in what is happening in the Middle East because we've been interfering and dominating that region is order to have access to their oil and protect Israel.

BILL MAHER: Well, I wasn't talking about violence, I was just talking about theocracy. That doesn't happen here.

GREENWALD: Okay, that doesn't happen here, but at the same time, Iran isn't invading lots of other countries and occupying them for a decade. Nor are fundamentalist Muslim countries like the United States is. These things are interlinked because we're continuously interfering in that part of the world. So to say --

MAHER: So it's all our fault?

GREENWALD: It's not all our fault, but when you send your military for 6 straight decades into other countries to bomb them, kill their children and women and innocent men, prop up dictators.


GREENWALD: Yeah, you take responsibility for your actions and say to the extent of that region --

MAHER: That religion goes back a 1,000 years before our revolution. So, I don't think we can take all the blame.

GREENWALD: I don't think we should. I think we should take a lot of it. And there's been lots of bodies and corpses that have piled up in the name of Christianity and Judaism as well.

MAHER: Not recently.

GREENWALD: Have you heard about the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza for the last 50 years -- motivated in part by extremists views by Judaism? Or the wars in Europe? Or generals in the United States saying we have to go invade and destroy Iraq, a country of 26 million people, because our God is bigger?

Lots of religions, not just Islam, produce violence.

MAHER: Well, it's that silly liberal view that all religions are alike because it makes you feel good.

GREENWALD: No, it makes you feel good to say our side is better.

MAHER: No, it makes you feel good to put a crown on your head and say, 'I'm a good person, how do I prove that?'

GREENWALD: You get to ignore the responsibility that your own government has for the violence and instability in the world by saying, 'Look, it's that primitive religion over there that's to blame.' (HBO's Real Time, May 10, 2013)
"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first."

Thomas Jefferson

Offline Monkeypox

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,844
  • He Loved Big Brother
    • Monkeypox
State Department Denounces 'Enemies of Islam'
« Reply #27 on: August 12, 2013, 05:36:43 pm »
State Department Denounces 'Enemies of Islam'



State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki issued a press release denouncing the "enemies of Islam " following car bombings in Baghdad that appear to have been timed to target Shi'ite "festivities marking the end of Ramadan."

Reuters reported that the bombings consisted of "twelve separate blasts targeting markets, busy shopping streets, and parks." The explosions killed almost 80 people.

The August 10 press release on the State Department website reads:

    The United States condemns in the strongest possible terms the cowardly attacks... in Baghdad. These attacks were aimed at families celebrating the Eid al-Fitr holiday that marks the end of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. The terrorists who committed these acts are enemies of Islam and a shared enemy of the United States, Iraq, and the international community.


READ MORE:  http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/08/11/State-Dept-Spokeswoman-Issues-Press-Release-Denouncing-Enemies-Of-Islam
War Is Peace - Freedom Is Slavery - Ignorance Is Strength


"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."

—Thomas Jefferson

Offline larsonstdoc

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,341
Re: State Department Denounces 'Enemies of Islam'
« Reply #28 on: August 12, 2013, 06:13:10 pm »


  Aren't we suppose to be the enemies of Islam?---  i.e. the Great Satan
I'M A DEPLORABLE KNUCKLEHEAD THAT SUPPORTS PRESIDENT TRUMP.  MAY GOD BLESS HIM AND KEEP HIM SAFE.

Offline chris jones

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,832
Re: State Department Denounces 'Enemies of Islam'
« Reply #29 on: August 12, 2013, 08:42:38 pm »

  Aren't we suppose to be the enemies of Islam?---  i.e. the Great Satan
             Manipulation. Look diligently to mass cotroll of any developed force, in general they are controlled by individuals who have used mens weaknesses, the mind and nature of man. Political obedience, religions, race, ethic dominance, fear, hatred, power/ money .
             Hearts and minds manipulated with the assistance of human nature and skilled pyschopats.
Many cling to the concepts initiated by the eleite, we are Americans therefor we are the righteous. , The peons with any common sence or IQ over 60 will come to the realization we have been had.
.

Offline Monkeypox

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,844
  • He Loved Big Brother
    • Monkeypox
Re: State Department Denounces 'Enemies of Islam'
« Reply #30 on: August 12, 2013, 10:24:56 pm »
They never denounce "enemies of Christianity", do they?
War Is Peace - Freedom Is Slavery - Ignorance Is Strength


"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."

—Thomas Jefferson

Offline Monkeypox

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,844
  • He Loved Big Brother
    • Monkeypox
Re: State Department Denounces 'Enemies of Islam'
« Reply #31 on: August 12, 2013, 10:27:02 pm »

  Aren't we suppose to be the enemies of Islam?---  i.e. the Great Satan

Not with Ovomit in charge.
War Is Peace - Freedom Is Slavery - Ignorance Is Strength


"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."

—Thomas Jefferson

Offline larsonstdoc

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,341
Kansas Elementary Students Learning About the 5 Pillars of Islam
« Reply #32 on: August 19, 2013, 05:59:24 pm »
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/08/16/kansas-students-at-minneha-core-knowledge-magnet-elementary-school-in-wichita-were-greeted-with-this-on-the-wall-wednesday/

  WELCOME TO OBAMA'S AMERICA WHERE ANYTHING GOES BUT CHRISTIANITY, JUDAISM, MORMONISM, CATHOLICISM,....

KANSAS: Students at Minneha Core Knowledge Magnet Elementary School in Wichita were greeted with this on the wall Wednesday:


I'M A DEPLORABLE KNUCKLEHEAD THAT SUPPORTS PRESIDENT TRUMP.  MAY GOD BLESS HIM AND KEEP HIM SAFE.

Offline Monkeypox

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,844
  • He Loved Big Brother
    • Monkeypox
Re: Kansas Elementary Students Learning About the 5 Pillars of Islam
« Reply #33 on: August 19, 2013, 06:56:42 pm »
The Left's precious "Separation of Church and State"  only applies to Christianity.

This would only be acceptable if they learn about ALL the major religions - not just Islam.
War Is Peace - Freedom Is Slavery - Ignorance Is Strength


"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."

—Thomas Jefferson

Offline chris jones

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,832
Re: Kansas Elementary Students Learning About the 5 Pillars of Islam
« Reply #34 on: August 19, 2013, 07:02:26 pm »
 That wall is advertising, not learning.
 I have no problem teaching relgions to students, all religions that is. AN Unbiased educational system...
 
 Who was it that said, get "em" when their young...
  

Offline Monkeypox

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,844
  • He Loved Big Brother
    • Monkeypox
War Is Peace - Freedom Is Slavery - Ignorance Is Strength


"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."

—Thomas Jefferson

Offline FrankRep

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 602
Islamification of America
« Reply #36 on: August 22, 2014, 08:55:50 am »
Attacking Islam

Charles E. Carlson | The New American
March 21, 1994

    The Americans, Russians and Pakistanis do not want stability in Afghanistan. They are afraid of a cohesive alliance of non-Arab countries in central Asia. And they need a bogeyman in foreign affairs. At this time, Islam is that bogey-man.
    -- Official of the interim
    Afghan mujahaddin government
    as quoted by Kurt Lohbeck in
    Holy War, Unholy Victory, 1993

    [T]here is at least still one ideology of violent conflict -- Islamic fundamentalism.
    -- Stanley Hoffman,
    Council on Foreign Relations study,
    Sea Changes, 1990

    Still another highly undesirable outcome from a U.S. point of view would be an upsurge of Islamic fundamentalism among the Soviet (or ex-Soviet) Muslims of Central Asia and Azerbaijan.
    -- Jeremy R. Azrael,
    Council on Foreign Relations study,
    The Rise of Nations in the Soviet Union, 1991


"A spectre is haunting Europe -- the spectre of Communism." So wrote Karl Marx in his opening line of The Communist Manifesto in 1848. And indeed the communist spectre has haunted not only Europe but our entire planet, rising from small revolutionary bands in the latter half of the 19th century to world hegemonic powers girdling the globe and controlling nearly two billion lives in the 20th century. But now "communism is dead"; the "experts" tell us so -again and again. And these same epitaph writers tell us a new spectre now haunts the world: Islamic fundamentalism.

Communist Slaughter

Before we heed their increasingly strident call to arms against this new spectre, however, it behooves us to pause for an autopsy on the "dead" one. The spectacular rise of militant, atheistic communism has been the most striking geo-political phenomenon of our century, and one of the most significant -- and certainly one of the most terrifying -- developments in all of human history. The communist menace, and the Western response to it, has been the central and defining political (as well as economic and spiritual) concern of our time. And justly so.

Professor R.J. Rummel, in his monumental study, Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917, pointed out that "from 1918 to 1953 [the Lenin-Stalin years], the Soviet government executed, slaughtered, starved, beat or tortured to death, or otherwise killed some 39.5 million of its own people .... In China under Mao Tse-tung, the communist government eliminated ... 45 million people. The number killed in just these two nations is about 84.5 million, or a lethality of 252 percent more than both world wars together." The only thing stopping the communist juggernaut from laying waste the entire planet was, of course, the resolve and combined military might of the "Free World," led by the United States of America. So say the conventional wisdom and standard history texts. But, as usual, the conventional wisdom is all wrong and the standard texts are false. While U.S. Presidents and other Western leaders have for decades maintained a facade of anti-communist rhetoric, their policies have been remarkably consistent for their pro-communist slant.

Western Aid

Even more mind-numbing than the horrendous statistics cited by Dr. Rummel is the fact that all of this horrible communist slaughter was made possible by a continuous flow of aid -money, food, weapons, technology, industrial plants, expertise -- from the West, and principally the United States, to the very communist regimes responsible for the carnage. Year after year, decade after decade, one presidential Administration after another, the Western subsidy of the communists' brutal oppression continued, often even as the politicians providing the subsidies condemned and castigated the very parties they were aiding.

The incredible story of the free world's suicidal underwriting of the communist world's slave empire and its imperialist war machine has been thoroughly documented over the years in many authoritative works: American Might and Soviet Myth by Jameson G. Campaigne (1960); East Minus West = Zero by Werner Keller (1961); From Major Jordan's Diaries by Major George Racey Jordon (1952); Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development (three volumes, 1968, 1971, and 1973), National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union (1973), Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution (1974), and The Best Enemy Money Can Buy (1986), all by Professor Antony Sutton; and Vodka-Cola (1978) by Charles Levinson.

Professor Sutton's massive research alone showed, incredibly, that 90 to 95 percent of Soviet technology since 1918 has come from America and its allies -- that we built for, sold, traded, or gave outright to the communists everything they needed to become and remain a world power and a world threat. And in response, of course, America and its allies were then required to expend trillions of tax dollars and many thousands of lives, ostensibly to protect ourselves from the monster we had created.

An understanding of these basic facts is essential for making any sense of the paramount conflict of our century and to form an intelligent opinion concerning the worldwide struggle between East and West, between militant, atheistic communism and Western civilization. Unfortunately, far too few Americans ever learned of this information. And many of those who did become aware of it attributed the ongoing betrayal to the folly of blundering politicians or the greed of unscrupulous businessmen.

There were others, however, who saw purpose and design in the "blundering," and who pointed out that when we see over and over again the same individuals and groups making the same disastrous "mistakes," all of which lead toward the accomplishment of an evil purpose that the same individuals and groups have both publicly and privately supported and committed themselves to, then we are no longer dealing with folly, but with treachery and conspiracy.

Foremost among those groups that have been identified with the ongoing treachery and conspiracy in the highest levels of American government is the Council on Foreign Relations, or CFR. Friends and critics alike agree that the 3,000-member Council constitutes an elite "ruling class" with immense power in the federal government, the national media, academia, the major corporations, and the big tax-exempt foundations. The Council's members and friends refer fondly to the CFR and the organized forces it represents as "the Establishment," or "the Wise Men."

The late Admiral Chester Ward, who was a CFR member for 16 years, charged that the organization is dominated by "one-world-global-government ideologists" who are "promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful world government." Those of us who share the admiral's view of the CFR commonly refer to the coterie it represents as "the Insiders," or "the Conspiracy." To these designations we would like to add, for the purpose of this essay, "the Warmakers." The reasons for this will become obvious.

The Establishment-Insiders-Conspiracy-Warmakers and their front organizations such as the CFR and the Trilateral Commission have been identified and exposed in this magazine and in many excellent books that have appeared over the last 30 years. The Invisible Government by Dan Smoot, None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen, Architects of Conspiracy by William Hoar, The Insiders by John McManus, The Shadows of Power by James Perloff, and Global Tyranny... Step by Step by William Jasper are a few of the excellent studies that have exposed the CFR-Insider motives and long-range plans behind building the Soviets into a nuclear superpower. The purpose: To provide a credible (but controllable) threat that could be used to bring about their ultimate goal -- world government under an all-powerful United Nations -- run by an Insider oligarchy.

It has been a common ploy of rulers and would-be rulers throughout the ages to manufacture enemies and foment wars as a means of retaining or increasing control over their subjects. Plato noted in Book VIII of The Republic, "When the tyrant has disposed of foreign enemies by conquest or treaty, and there is nothing to fear from them, then he is always stirring up some war or other, in order that the people may require a leader." Likewise, Machiavelli, in The Prince, observed: "Without doubt princes become great when they overcome difficulties and opposition, and therefore fortune ... raises up enemies and compels him [the prince] to undertake wars against them, so that he may have cause to overcome them, and thus climb up higher by means of that ladder which his enemies have brought him. There are many who think therefore that a wise prince ought, when he has the chance, to foment astutely some enmity, so that by suppressing it he will augment his greatness." Mussolini was honoring this salutary (for him) aspect of war when he proclaimed, "Three cheers for war in general!"

Report From Iron Mountain

In 1963 the Kennedy State Department under Dean Rusk (CFR) commissioned a study by Professor Lincoln P. Bloomfield (CFR), the purpose of which was to show how disarmament could be used to lead to world government under the United Nations. The classified study carried the revealing title, A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations. It acknowledged that exploitation of the fear of communism provided a primary impetus for the movement toward global rule. Dr. Bloomfield noted, however, that if the communists remained too militant and threatening "the subordination of states to a true world government appears impossible, but if the communist dynamic were greatly abated, the West might well lose whatever incentive it has for world government." It was obvious that at some point in the near future, the Insiders would have to tone down the Soviet threat and bring to the fore another credible global threat (or threats) to take its place.

It was to devise that alternative threat that Insiders in the Kennedy Administration convened a secret special study group of 15 men in 1963 at an unnamed facility at Iron Mountain, New York. In 1967, the secret report of that study group leaked out and was published under the title Report From Iron Mountain on the Possibility and Desirability of Peace. The report's author and the participants in the study group remained anonymous, which is understandable considering the incredible conclusions and proposals set forth by this brain trust. Consider, for instance, this gem: "When asked how best to prepare for the advent of peace, we must first reply, as strongly as we can, that the war system cannot responsibly be allowed to disappear...." These academicians concluded, at taxpayer expense, that war was needed in order to control the American people. The Warmaker sobriquet, you see, is indeed fitting.

"When it comes to postulating a credible substitute for war capable of directing human behavior patterns in behalf of social organization," the Iron Mountain group reported, "few options suggest themselves." "It is more probable in our judgement," they said, "that such a threat will have to be invented." One interesting Iron Mountain recommendation was to invent a climate of international crisis and panic over the supposed threat of pollution and overpopulation to the global environment. However, the report also advised that such a benign program lacked the punch to replace a real shooting war as a method of controlling population.

The Warmakers selected the far flung nations of Islam as a replacement for the old Marxist-Leninist enemy long before the American people suspected the Cold War had "ended." With shocking abruptness, the Red Peril has "greatly abated" (some say it has disappeared) to be replaced by a new Green Peril -- green being the color of Islam. Meanwhile, the USSR is being remolded from the carefully tailored image of world super-enemy into the new role of international welfare urchin and "ally," to be rebuilt by the American taxpayer.

An anti-Islamic hate campaign to poison the peoples of the world and especially the American public against Muslims has been underway for quite some time. Fabricating the Islamic demon has not been difficult for the Insider-controlled press. The CFR, as usual, has been leading the way with its flagship journal, Foreign Affairs, the publication Time magazine has called "the most influential periodical in print." Once Foreign Affairs began to equate Muslims with terrorists the malleable international press quickly took the cue and began a campaign to paint resurgent fundamentalist Islam as the looming world enemy.

The CFR has been conditioning its new enemy as a picador taunts a fighting bull; no abuse or insult is too strong. The enemy, like the bull, has been selected for courage in the face of overwhelming odds. With 1.2 billion people blanketing the globe, a naturally militant faith, and no organized movement of pacifist clergy such as we have in the West, Muslims can be counted on to fight back when invaded, insulted, or threatened -- as was proved in Afghanistan.

Islam-Baiting

Examples of the vicious Islam-baiting media campaign are legion, but we have space here to present only a few of the more notorious and influential. Of these, the Spring 1993 Foreign Affairs offers a particularly noteworthy case. The keynote "debate" of that issue of the journal is framed by the article, "Is Islam a Threat?" by CFR member Judith Miller, a New York Times writer and author of a new book entitled The Arabs and Islam. Ms. Miller's article makes negative generalizations about all of Islam, associating the vast majority of peaceful, law-abiding Muslims with the relatively small minority of those involved in outlaw activity. She depicts a warlike, united Islam, which she claims (without offering a shred of evidence) has executed a secret manifesto committing Islam to war against the West.

Anyone with even a superficial familiarity of the Islamic world realizes that Islam is about as unified as "Christendom." Islamic theological and sectarian divisions -- between Sunni, Shia, Sufi, Wahhabi, etc. -- run nearly as deep and strong as those between Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant, and Mormon. Added to this are equally divisive racial, tribal, national, regional, political, cultural, dynastic, linguistic, and historic factors that militate against any grand green coalition. But Miller simply assumes we have already been sufficiently conditioned to accept the idea that Islam equals radical "fundamentalism," which equates to terrorism -- on a global scale. Miller states, "Islam has its own version of a New World Order and a strategy to obtain it."

Then Miller prepares us to fight back. She stirs the reader by vague references to atrocities against "Christians" in Sudan and the "lashing" of women in unnamed Arab states. Ms. Miller makes no attempt to prove her assertions, and her reference to Christians in mentioning the Sudanese tribesmen is curious, again playing up what may be tribal or political conflicts as a Muslim-vs.-Christian war. Ms. Miller concedes that Islam may not be militarily strong enough "to attack the U.S. openly or directly," but she suggests that the Muslims can never be trusted because they are fanatically anti-American. Foreign Affairs made a flimsy effort to appear even-handed by publishing a counterpoint to Miller, "Islam Is No Threat," by Leon Hadar of American University, in the same Spring 1993 issue. However, Hadar merely served as an intellectual punching bag for Miller, offering a less-than-convincing defense and never going on the offensive.

A key kick-off piece in the Islam-as-world-enemy campaign, "Fundamentalist Muslims Between America and Russia," appeared in the Summer 1986 issue of Foreign Affairs. The author was Daniel Pipes (CFR), director of the Foreign Policy Research Institute in Philadelphia. Unlike Miller, Pipes did at least distinguish between violent and peaceful Muslims; however, in similar fashion he applied the fundamentalist label liberally. Pipes, an Establishment Insider, correctly predicted that the USSR would fall and he rationalized why Islam is likely to become an organized enemy of the U.S. According to Pipes, "fundamentalist Islam" views the U.S. as a more threatening adversary than the USSR because "America presents the greater set of obstacles to life under the Islamic Law." And, he says, "Little can be done to avert collisions between America and the fundamentalists." It's an inescapable kismet: The Warmakers have spoken.

Worse Than Communism?

Interestingly, Pipes showed considerable concern about the potential hostile actions of the 50 million Muslims within the USSR toward the centralized communist government, and he clearly indicated he was on the Soviet side. In his CFR-certified analysis, "radical fundamentalists are the real danger. As even more profound enemies of the United States than Marxists, their ascension to power almost always harms the United States and its allies." He warned that "in the case of fundamentalist Muslims opposing governments allied with the Soviet Union, the U.S. is naturally tempted to provide aid to the fundamentalists." Pipes cautioned that this would be a mistake, as it might "make them the only alternative to communists." He called for "strict limitations to any aid to be given to fundamentalist Muslims," even when they are trying to escape the old USSR system.

In other words, Pipes warned government officials and the Establishment Insider press that when Muslim states -- like Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, or even Bosnia -- revolt against the communist system, the U.S. must not help the state seeking independence because the Islamic state is less desirable to the U.S. than communism. Please remember that Pipes presented this thesis in 1986, five years before the USSR collapsed and independence-minded Muslim countries began to seek their freedom. Pipes also wrote a similar feature article in the October 30, 1992 Wall Street Journal with the inflammatory title, "Fundamental Questions About Muslims." Imagine the outcry that would result from a article entitled, "Fundamental Questions About Jews (or American Indians, Blacks, Protestants, Catholics, etc.)"!

This theme of the danger of Islamic fundamentalism has echoed through many other CFR publications, such as, for instance, Sea Changes: American Foreign Policy in a World Transformed, a path-breaking 1990 collection of essays by the CFR's one-world policy wonks. In the summation essay by Stanley Hoffman (a CFR director and professor of government at Harvard) entitled "A New Word and Its Troubles," we are reminded once again that "a post-Cold War world will be anything but harmonious." "First, there is a huge array of possible 'traditional' quarrels," says Hoffman, "in a world where there is at least still one ideology of violent conflict -- Islamic fundamentalism..." (emphasis added).

The same alarm is sounded in The Rise of Nations in the Soviet Union, an influential 1991 anthology produced by the CFR's Project on East-West Relations and edited by the Project's director, Michael Mandelbaum (CFR). In the book's introduction, Mandelbaum reiterates the CFR line that recognizing sovereignty and independence of states breaking away from the Soviet empire would "contradict a widely honored postwar international principle: the sanctity of existing borders almost regardless of their origins."

"Nationalist turmoil may, finally, give rise," warns Mandelbaum, "... to one or more forms of political extremism in the Soviet Union, which could make the country as dangerous to its neighbors as it was during the long years of the Cold War." RAND Sovietologist Jeremy R. Azrael, one of Mandelbaum's co-authors, writes in the same volume, "Still another highly undesirable outcome from a U.S. point of view would be an upsurge of Islamic fundamentalism among the Soviet (or ex-Soviet) Muslims of Central Asia and Azerbaijan" (emphasis added). We are reminded of this again in "The Clash of Civilizations" by Professor Samuel P. Huntington (CFR) in the Summer 1993 issue of Foreign Affairs. "After World War II," says Huntington, "... first Arab nationalism and then Islamic fundamentalism manifested themselves" (emphasis added). A little further on he warns us that "Islam has bloody borders."

Opinion Cartel

What appears in Foreign Affairs soon makes its way into news stories, editorials, and commentaries in the major print and electronic media. One of many factually absurd examples of this CFR-led, fundamentalist-bashing ripple effect is found in "Fundamentalism, the Zeal to Heal, or to Kill," an inflammatory story by Sharon Cohen of the Associated Press that appeared on May 15, 1993. This bizarre story is only one of hundreds that are inundating the public with vitriol aimed at religious activists of all kinds. Muslims are the author's primary target, but Ms. Cohen conveniently lumps all "fundamentalists" into a sort of global super-cult threat. She cautions darkly against the threat of "fundamentalism, one of the fastest growing religious movements." In this "movement" she links "radical religious Zionists," "the Islamic Group in Egypt," the pro-life group "Operation Rescue," and Muslims of various stripes in an ideologically semi-homogeneous, terrorist-inclined aggregation.

Similar media attacks on "fundamentalists" -- Muslim and otherwise -- are too numerous and too uniformly skewed to be accidents. They appear to be orchestrated for the purpose of initiating and perpetuating seemingly unrelated world conflicts by: 1) creation of a perceived ideological enemy in the minds of the American people; 2) provocation of incidents that cause hatred on both sides; and 3) creation of a vehicle to keep the war going regardless of public opinion -- a fighting machine outside the control of Congress and the voters.

Through the Establishment opinion cartel (CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, CNN, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Newsweek, Time, etc.) the Warmakers have already largely succeeded in creating the ideological enemy. An attitude of deep distrust between Muslims and Americans is being created; and Christians and nominal Christians are being conditioned to fear and loathe adherents of Islam. The incidents needed to trigger new conflicts can easily be provoked (and are being provoked) by blowing small events out of proportion, by completely fabricating non-events into incidents, and by actually creating situations sufficiently grave or so morally offensive as to demand international intervention. The Warmakers already possess their rudimentary fighting machine in the United Nations, created 50 years ago and now being built into a world army (together with such subsidiaries as NATO, OAU, OAS, CSCE, WEU, etc.) ostensibly to carry out "peacekeeping," "police actions," and other noble dictates of the UN.

Bloody Track Record

The Gulf War marked the first time America initiated an unprovoked attack on a foreign power in another hemisphere. This war was to be a test of public response to the televised horror of mass annihilation. The resultant death and devastation were sanitized, but not hidden from the American public. The horrors of the war were visible to anyone who really cared to know, and a number of well written books now detail the horror of the Gulf War aftermath. America's moral leaders in the churches failed the test; few questioned the politically acceptable blood letting. Step one in the Warmakers' plan was in place and tested; an enemy had been created from thin wisps of smoke.

The Warmakers forged quickly ahead. UN troops were reported present in Bosnia in 1991, before Bosnian Muslims even declared independence. The United Nations first promised protection if Bosnia's leaders committed to independence; but afterwards the UN switched sides and employed a deadly embargo and a patient stalling strategy to allow systematic genocide of the Muslim population (about 44 percent of the Bosnian population) as well as of many non-Muslims. News photos show the UN "peacekeepers" standing impotently aside under order to stay uninvolved. Mehmed Kozlica, the Phoenix director of the Bosnian Relief Fund, has stated that the UN is effectively preventing anything of value from getting through to the trapped and besieged Bosnians, rendering them helpless while under deadly siege. Adding insult to injury, the U.S. peace plan would intern the Muslim survivors in concentration camps under the guise of protection -- a sure-fire formula for perpetual hatred and conflict, as we have seen so well in the similar situation of the Palestinians.

Five senior State Department officials from both the Bush and Clinton Administrations have resigned in protest over the continuing callous U.S. policy, which has amounted to complicity in genocide. The most senior and most recent resignee is Warren Zimmerman, who served as Ambassador to Yugoslavia. The others are George Kenney, Marshall Freeman Harris, Steven Walker, and John Western. The slaughter has been too much for even these seasoned, Insider-appointed foreign service officers to take.

In Somalia, the UN "humanitarian mission" quickly turned into an invasion the stated purpose of which was to remove General Mohammed Aidid, a Muslim leader. Whatever his image in the West, General Aidid is apparently popular with many of the Somali people, as evidenced by the fact that the UN was unable to apprehend him even with the promise of huge bribes (to be paid with U.S. taxpayers' money) to dirt-poor Somalis. The UN occupying forces have repeatedly killed and tortured Somali civilians who challenge their authority. And the Somalis have little reason not to hold the U.S. accountable for these atrocities.

The Warmaker-dominated press and their dupes are prophetically warning the world to prepare for retribution, while Muslims are deliberately being conditioned to think Americans are racial bigots, bloody international bully boys, and suppressors of those seeking independence from socialistic governments. Since the U.S. taxpayer supplies more than 30 percent of the United Nations operating budget and about 50 percent of the UN's war budget, many in the Islamic world hold American citizens responsible for these diabolical "peace" operations that have already resulted in an estimated 400,000 deaths in Iraq, Bosnia, and Somalia alone.

It should be clear that the Insider-Warmaker's program to instigate perpetual conflicts with Muslim countries is being planned and carried out through the United Nations hydra, with the support of such U.S. agencies as the CIA. The United Nations "peacekeeping" forces are in various stages of occupying at least ten Muslim countries. The UN has a stated plan to occupy 19 additional "trouble spots," many of which are Muslim.

In late 1992, the U.S. government published a very revealing world map and report, entitled Worldwide Peacekeeping Operations 1993, by the Directorate of Intelligence of the Central Intelligence Agency. The countries listed by the CIA as sites of current or proposed UN peacekeeping operations are: Cyprus, Croatia, El Salvador, Angola, Somalia, Sudan, Liberia, Eritrea (Ethiopia), South Ossetia (Georgia), Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkahazia, Sinai, Rwanda, Cambodia, Jerusalem, Western Sahara, Mozambique, Lebanon, the Republic of South Africa, Bosnia-Hercegovina, Haiti, Moldova, Tajikistan, the Golan Heights, Kashmir, Kuwait, Sri Lanka, the Solomon Islands, and Liberia. When the CIA map was made, Bosnia, Kashmir, and Moldovia were all listed as "proposed operations," but we now know the UN was already in Bosnia at that time.

Note that "peacekeeping" (war-making) operations are proposed wherever Muslim-led independence movements are challenging former Soviet-Warsaw Pact communist leaders, as in Bosnia, Moldova, Abkahazia, Georgia, and Tajikistan. As CFR operative Pipes predicted in 1986, these former USSR states are now seeking independence and the UN is there to assure their failure. Interestingly, the world peacekeeping map neatly overlays the CFR map depicting the population distribution in the Muslim-controlled countries around the world, published with Mr. Pipes' Foreign Affairs article. The CFR and CIA are both talking about occupying the same Muslim-controlled real estate, but both maps omit mention of the American Muslim population, variously estimated at three to six million, most of whom are productive, patriotic, and hardworking citizens. Perhaps the Warmakers do not want Americans to think about the millions of potential victims here at home.

The death toll in Bosnia and Iraq already runs into the hundreds of thousands each, with a significant death count of women and children now mounting in Somalia. However, Americans are not supposed to be unduly concerned because these are "peacekeeping" operations, and, besides, the lives being lost are primarily troublesome "radical fundamentalists." Meanwhile, Muslims are also being programed to despise the Americans for our government's war acts against civilians.

Planning for Terrorism

If these UN atrocities are allowed to continue, the Islamic Peril will become a self-fulfilling prophesy, as various Muslim groups and countries seek revenge on those they deem responsible. The Warmakers are not content to wait for this to happen on its own, however. As the article beginning on page 15 reveals, the same CFR Insiders who are decrying the fundamentalist danger have been in the forefront of a massive effort to build the most dangerous "Islamic fundamentalist" terrorist regimes and groups into genuine global menaces.

If terrorism fails to materialize, the Warmakers may even encourage, pay for, or stage incidents, as some evidence already suggests may be the case with regard to the World Trade Center explosion and the alleged plot to kill former President George Bush in Kuwait. Peculiar about the Bush mission to Kuwait is that the former President was visiting the El Sabah family, who paid bribes to three Americans, including a former Ambassador, to gain influence with the same George Bush to enter the war on the side of Kuwait.

In other words, Warmaker Bush was in Kuwait on a taxpayer-financed visit to a head of state who is accused of bribing Mr. Bush's former employees. This alleged assassination attempt was used as yet another excuse to drop 23 American missiles on Baghdad, killing eight civilians and an unknown number of military personnel. Besides possibly serving to destroy more evidence of Saddam's war machine that had been illegally provided to the dictator by the Insiders, another result of the raid certainly was to incite more hatred toward America among Muslims, which is exactly the Warmakers' intent.

If allowed to succeed, the unholy UN wars (both those now underway and those still to come) ultimately will be brought home to our own shores, resulting in the abrogation of our sovereignty by international treaty enforced by the UN mercenary army. Temporary suspension of constitutional guarantees is likely, including gun confiscation, ostensibly to control the three to six million "Muslim Fundamentalists" residing in the U.S. The ultimate aim of the Warmakers can only be to force UN troops onto U.S. soil on some peacekeeping pretext -- including the pretext of Muslim terrorism here or the pursuit of international terrorists in our midst. What elected or appointed official will resist an international treaty enforced by the United Nations? If and when fundamentalist Christians, Jews, or anyone else finally stand up for the rights of their Muslim neighbor they too may become a persecuted class, as German Christians were persecuted by the Nazis for acting out their faith in defense of Jews.

Get US Out!

Exposure of the Warmakers' plan is the way to avert this world tragedy. Men and women of fundamental principles of all faiths must put aside establishment-fostered differences, for the threat is from anti-religious Godless Insiders, not from marauders without. Not only should these international death dealers be exposed but they should not be allowed to escape. The best possible beginning is to expose the war-making activities of the United Nations. The UN would likely collapse overnight if Congress could be made to withdraw U.S. financial support. Without their international war machine, the Warmakers will be exposed and will begin to loose their grip on our government. It is past time to get the U.S. out of the UN and the UN out of the U.S.


Related Article:

How to Create an "Islamic Enemy" (1994)

Offline TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,615
Islamification of America
« Reply #37 on: November 20, 2015, 10:01:27 am »
thread devoted to the Islamification of America

http://www.usworldreport.com/muslims-currently-receiving-food-stamps-demand-food-meets-islamic-specifications/
Muslims Currently Receiving Food Stamps Demand Food Meets Islamic Specifications

...

...  in Minnesota some Muslims are saying that receiving free food via food stamps is not enough. They are enraged that the food does not meet islamic specifications. Changing the food to meet their requirements would cost an additional 150k. This is money that would come from US taxpayers.
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Offline TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,615
Re: Islamification of America
« Reply #38 on: November 20, 2015, 10:19:26 am »
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/09/10/tennessee-public-middle-school-is-forcing-non-muslim-students-to-praise-islam-and-allah-as-the-only-god/
TENNESSEE: Public Middle School is forcing non-Muslim students to praise Islam and “Allah as the only god”
Sept 10 1015

Middle school parents in Tennessee are up in arms upon learning that their children were being forced to recite and write the Islamic Shahada conversion creed: “Allah is the only god and Muhammad is his prophet,” as part of an alleged ‘world history’ project.
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Offline TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,615
Re: Islamification of America
« Reply #39 on: November 20, 2015, 10:21:37 am »
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/teacher-writes-song-7th-graders-sing-about-islam
Teacher Writes Song for 7th Graders to Sing About Islam
In California?! No way!!
11.19.2015

A middle school teacher in Anaheim, California, rewrote the lyrics to a popular hit song as a way to teach her 7th graders about Islam. But one mother is upset because she feels it promotes the religion.

According to EAGnews.org, Nichole Negron's son mistakenly brought home a learning journal that is normally kept at school. But being that she is an involved mother, she looked through it and found the teacher's lyrics pasted to a page. Her son said they sang it several times in the classroom.

Here are the lyrics (sung to the tune of Rachel Platten's "Fight Song"):


Like a sandstorm
 On the desert
 Sending camels
 Into motion

Like how a single faith
 Can make a heart open
 They might only have one god
 but they can make an explosion

Chorus:

And all those things they have to say
 Islam … Allah’s on the way
 They will preach them loud tonight
 Can you hear their voices this time?

This is their fight song,
 Spread Islam now song,
 Prove that they’re right song,

Their power’s turned on,
 Starting right now they’ll be strong
 They’ll play their fight song,

And they don’t really care,
 If no Jews or C’s believe,
 Cause they still have
 A lot of others to reach

Umayyads, and Abbasids
 Seljuk turks and ottomans,
 Spread the faith,
 Say Spread the faith

The Moguls rule in India,
 Spreading Islam from their bones,
 Still believe,
 Yeah they still believe

Chorus

Like a sandstorm
 On the desert
 Sending camels
 Into motion

Negron brought her concerns before the teacher and the assistant principal, but wasn't taken seriously. The teacher said she was only trying to prepare the students for a test, but admitted to thinking it might be problematic. The assistant principal blamed the mother's faith for finding the song offensive.


"I am a Christian," the mother said, "but that shouldn't matter."
...
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5