Author Topic: YES - THERE WAS COLLUSION!-SIMPSON TESTIMONY RELEASED  (Read 852 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jimd3100

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,454
YES - THERE WAS COLLUSION!-SIMPSON TESTIMONY RELEASED
« on: January 14, 2018, 12:48:07 pm »
The collusion and "election meddling" was in 1996

The Fusion GPS founder appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee in Aug. 2017 to answer questions about the dossier on President Trump that the research company compiled with the assistance of Christopher Steele.

What the media doesn't want to report - in his testimony he brings up the fact that it's already a known fact that foreign intelligence operatives colluded with the campaign to influence the election. But it was Clintons' campaign of 1996 and the media didn't seem to concerned about foreign meddling then, or now when it comes to that...

Simpson:

In the 1990s I was working at the Wall Street Journal and I wrote some of the very first stories about the Chinese government's interference in the 1996 presidential election which triggered a massive national security investigation, numerous prosecutions, lots of business for Bob Muse, and a lot of congressional hearings, congressional inquiries. And in that episode it was eventually dug out by congressional investigations that the fundraisers, the Asian fundraisers were Chinese intelligence assets. So there's ample recent historical precedent for a foreign government to interfere in American elections in a really big way and for it to be an intelligence operation. So I knew all of that while reading this and digesting it for the first time. -page 149

I also would add that the China case was for me in my journalistic career a formative event that took -- you know, consumed years of my reporting and was about, you know, a Chinese intelligence operation to swing the '96 election to the Democrats. --page 151/312
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4345522/Read-the-full-transcript-of-Glenn-Simpson-s.pdf

According to Simpson, since Clinton was involved in a foreighn intelligence operation to sway his election in 1996 that lends credibility that Trump was to.  ::)

So all of that was in my head when this came in which, as I say, tended to support the credibility -- the possibility that this information was credible.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4345522/Read-the-full-transcript-of-Glenn-Simpson-s.pdf

But the MSM doesn't care about that collusion, or "meddling".

The Washington Post reported in 1998 that “evidence gathered in federal surveillance intercepts has indicated that the Chinese government planned to increase China’s influence in the U.S. political process in 1996.”
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/449539/chinese-illegally-donated-bill-clinton-reelection-campaign-media-downplayed

More on Chinese meddling in 1996 election...

September 21, 2002
1996 Fund-Raising Scandals Bring Stiff Penalty
Politics: The FEC levies a record $719,000 in fines against DNC and other groups for arranging illegal contributions from foreign sources.


The Federal Election Commission disclosed Friday that it has imposed a record-setting $719,000 in fines against participants in the 1996 Democratic Party fund-raising scandals involving contributions from China, Korea and other foreign sources.

The FEC documents describe Democratic fund-raisers who set specific prices for foreign nationals to make illegal campaign contributions in return for meetings with then-President Clinton and Vice President Al Gore.
http://articles.latimes.com/2002/sep/21/nation/na-fec21

So who was penalized?

Those penalized included the Democratic National Committee, the Clinton-Gore campaign, the Buddhist temple and nearly two dozen people and corporations acting as conduits for illegal contributions. All have agreed to pay, according to the documents.
http://articles.latimes.com/2002/sep/21/nation/na-fec21

The media didn't care and the campaign was slapped on the wrist and all forgotten...

The DNC was fined $115,000, the Clinton-Gore campaign $2,000, and the Buddhist Progress Society $120,000.
http://articles.latimes.com/2002/sep/21/nation/na-fec21

In more than 400 pages of documents, the FEC detailed a variety of illegal fund-raising schemes in the 1996 Clinton reelection group.

In some respects, the 1996 fund-raising efforts by the Clinton White House and the DNC were a Democratic counterpart to the Republican Watergate scandals of 1972.
http://articles.latimes.com/2002/sep/21/nation/na-fec21

No mass hysteria in the MSM when this happened...

Two decades ago, the media weren’t obsessed with Chinese interference in a presidential election.

The most suspect funds were brought in by Johnny Chung, a bagman for the Asian billionaire Riady family.

...a Chinese aerospace executive — a lieutenant colonel in the Chinese military. Chung said the executive had helped him meet three times with General Ji Shengde, the head of Chinese military intelligence. According to Chung’s testimony, General Shengde had told him: “We really like your president. We hope he will be reelected. I will give you $300,000 U.S. dollars. You can give it to . . . your president and the Democratic party.”

The sprawling fundraising scandal ultimately led to 22 guilty pleas on various violations of election laws. Among the Clinton fundraisers and friends who pleaded guilty were John Huang, Charlie Trie, James Riady, and Michael Brown, son of the late Clinton Commerce secretary Ron Brown. But many questions went unanswered, even after the revelations that Clinton had personally authorized offering donors Oval Office meetings and use of the Lincoln bedroom. A total of 120 participants in the fundraising scandal either fled the country, asserted their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, or otherwise avoided questioning. The stonewalling worked — and probably encouraged Hillary Clinton in her own cover-up of her private e-mail server and her ties with the Clinton Foundation.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/449539/chinese-illegally-donated-bill-clinton-reelection-campaign-media-downplayed

The stonewalling worked because the MSM sets the tone for what people should be concerned about.
Beliefs Always Trump Truth and Perception Always Trumps Reality