Author Topic: Rothschild and Rockefeller interests created the Libertarian-Communist dialectic  (Read 8981 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,239
Before reading the article below, I urge everyone to watch either the following excerpt from a David Icke presentation, wherein Icke correctly explains why it is wrong to equate being a "Rothschild Zionist" (as he rightly calls it) with being "Jewish," particularly since Jewish people are one of the main victims of Rothschild Zionism...

...or, if you dislike Mr. Icke for whatever reason, the following speech by Alan Hart:

This critical distinction is unfortunately lost on whoever authored the following, because he repeatedly uses those two terms as though they were interchangeable.

He also fails to acknowledge what in my view is a critical distinction between "royal libertarians" and "real libertarians," preferring instead to use the term "libertarian" in an overly broad sense:

If, in the spirit of separating the wheat from the chaff, you mentally filter out those rhetorical blemishes and leave the rest, you will perhaps agree with me when I say that this analysis dovetails perfectly with what I've been saying for years about how the ridiculously false Austrian School "capitalism"-vs.-Marxist "socialism" paradigm is nothing more than an intellectual prison in which millions of people have (as a result of elite-funded propaganda campaigns) allowed their minds and intellects to become literally enslaved:


Old Rothschild- and Rockefeller hands controlled the Libertarian-Communist dialectic

Closing the circle, in this article Memehunter connects the founding fathers of the Libertarian party directly to the top of the Money Power chain of command. It was Alfred Kohlberg, fronting for his boss Bernard Baruch, who played a key role in both the cover up of Jewish involvement in Bolshevism and building up the other side of the dialectic: Libertarianism.

By Memehunter
For Henry Makow and Real Currencies
March 11, 2012

In How the Illuminati $pawn Libertarians, Anthony Migchels explained how a myriad Libertarian organizations were funded by the Illuminati Money Power. Today, we follow up on this article by explaining a key incentive behind this funding: To cover up the Illuminati Money Power’s connection with Communism.

The Illuminati Jewish bankers who were promoting Communism and had organized the Bolshevik Revolution were aware that many observers were beginning to connect the dots and to notice the importance of the Jewish involvement in Communism. Thus, in order to deflect criticism, they sought to show that there were Jews against Communism.

The American Jewish League against Communism

As explained in Illuminati Bankers controlled Joseph McCarthy, there were only two purposes for the founding of the American Jewish League against Communism, or AJLAC: “the number one purpose was to take the heat off the Jewishness of Communism, and a secondary aim was to get the Jews out of Communism and to support Zionism.”

The chairman of the AJLAC was Jewish businessman Alfred Kohlberg, head of the so-called “China Lobby”. The same Kohlberg, a close ally of Senator McCarthy, also co-founded the John Birch Society with Robert Welch and Fred Koch, head of Koch Industries.

Moreover, Kohlberg was a major sponsor of Plain Talk, which merged with the Freeman, a libertarian journal still published today by the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE), itself a direct offshoot of the William Volker Fund and an active supporter of the Mont Pelerin Society (see Proof Libertarianism is an Illuminati Ploy).

Who was hiding behind Alfred Kohlberg?

Although the connections between the AJLAC, the John Birch Society, and Libertarian outlets such as the FEE are already very revealing, Kohlberg seems at first to be merely another wealthy sponsor of Libertarianism. Things get more interesting, however, when we consider who Kohlberg was fronting for.

In fact, 90% of the funding for the AJLAC came from prominent Zionist millionaire Bernard Baruch, according to Norman Marks, a member of the national board of the AJLAC. But Baruch explicitly asked for his contribution to be unknown. He was essentially hiding behind Kohlberg.

Baruch, who had bought Woodrow Wilson’s letters to his mistress for $65,000 (an enormous sum at the time), wound up directing Wilson’s presidency from behind the scenes along with “Colonel” Edward Mandell House. As head of the War Industries Board during World War I, Baruch practically controlled the entire industrial output of the United States.

After the war, Baruch went to Versailles as a major advisor to the Zionist delegation who brought up the Rothschild-concocted Balfour Declaration and clamored for the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine.

Later, the same Baruch was, once again, the unofficial dictator of the United States during Franklin Roosevelt’s presidency.

Of course, Baruch himself was an agent of the Rothschilds, as several conspiracy historians have pointed out.

So, in a nutshell: The Rothschilds, who controlled the “socialist” Roosevelt administration and backed the Bolshevik Revolution, were also, via Baruch, via Kohlberg, behind the “right-wing” John Birch Society and the funding of the Libertarian movement in the United States.

The Rockefeller connection

The Rothschild dynasty was not the only one involved with funding Libertarian outlets and sponsoring Austrian economists. Not wanting to be outdone, the Rockefeller family also contributed its fair share.

Initially, William Volker did not apparently intend for his foundation to support Libertarian think tanks. However, when Volker’s nephew Harold Luhnow took control of the Volker Fund, its orientation changed.

During the 1930s, Luhnow had come into contact with longtime activist Loren Miller, who worked for and eventually headed the Detroit Bureau of Governmental Research (BGR). The BGR was directly funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, and Miller was most probably a Rockefeller agent.

It was Miller who introduced Luhnow to Austrian economist Friedrich von Hayek and convinced him to bring Hayek to Chicago. Miller went on to oversee the activities of the Volker Fund and attended the first Mont Pelerin Society meeting. In fact, both the Volker Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation supported the Mont Pelerin gatherings for over a decade.

Miller and Luhnow pulled out all the stops in bringing Milton Friedman and Hayek to Rockefeller-controlled University of Chicago. As pointed out by scholars Philip Mirowski and Robert Van Horn, “Luhnow and the Volker officers were not mere accessories to the rise of the Chicago school: they were hands-on players, determined and persistent in making every dollar count.”

Importantly, the involvement of the Rockefeller dynasty in promoting Austrian economics predates the Volker Fund. Indeed, Rockefeller, who was taught by Hayek in London, “had been intermittently subsidizing Hayek since his Vienna days at Mises’ business cycle institute” according to Mirowski and Van Horn.

Already in 1926, Ludwig von Mises’s first tour in the United States was paid by the Rockefeller Foundation. The National Bureau of Economic Research, which supported Mises in the 1940s, was also heavily sponsored by the Rockefeller Foundation. Mises’s salary in New York was paid by Lawrence Fertig, Kohlberg’s colleague at the AJLAC, and by the Volker Fund.

Working both sides of the dialectic

As shown by Antony Sutton, the Wall Street funding for the Bolshevik Revolution was organized from 120 Broadway Street in New York, in what Sutton called “the Morgan-Rockefeller complex”, which also included Rothschild agents such as Baruch and Jacob Schiff. In the late 1910s and 1920s, both Roosevelt and Baruch worked at 120 Broadway Street, where several major financial concerns were located, including the general offices of the American International Corporation and the New York branch of the Federal Reserve.

Working both sides of the dialectic, Baruch, who was a lover of Clare Booth Luce, future wife of media mogul Henry Luce, and a friend of editor William L. White, arranged for the Reader’s Digest to publish, in 1945, a widely circulated condensed version of Hayek’s Road to Serfdom. This successful marketing ploy greatly contributed in disseminating Hayek’s work and in paving the way to increased funding and support for Libertarian thinkers and Austrian economists in the United States.

Ironically, it is Baruch, once again, who is credited with coining the term “Cold War” in a speech given in 1947. He must certainly have known what he was talking about.

Escaping the Illuminati dialectic

Both the Rothschild and Rockefeller dynasties supported and backed, directly or through their agents, frontmen, and puppets, the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and the rise of the Libertarian movement in the United States.

As we have shown in previous articles, the Illuminati elites did not merely provide financial support for both sides of the dialectic. Indeed, the Jesuits a.k.a Illuminati formulated the ideological content that led to the modern versions of both Libertarianism and Communism. Moreover, both movements were corrupted by Satanic influences.

The Illuminati elites are toying with us, trapping people into a deceitful dialectic whose poles both lead to a domination by a transnational plutarchy, and sidetracking them away from the truth. More than ever, it is time for us to exit the Matrix by escaping the Illuminati dialectic and starting to devise our own solutions.

"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

Offline bento

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 608
Thank you for posting this. I recently was trying to express George Henry ideas to a libertarian and was then summarily dismissed as a socialist. I think the illuminati always new the Republican/Democrat dielectric world eventually collapse because of their increased raping of the people, so they decided to enhance the class warfare by making the new narrative either "total control monolithic state communism" vs. "complete lack of regulation anarcho-capitalism". So we now have the unfortunate choice between cradle to grave state control over every aspect of your life "scientific dictatorship" vs. absolute zero safety net/government "survival of the fittest" social Darwinism.

What we really need is the opposite of fascism where the government and private interest work together to screw the public. What is needed is a level playing field, then you can start to remove the safety nets because they are not needed anymore. It seems that the current though is right in line with "austerity policy" in that removing the safety nets comes first(for the little guy) then maybe doing something about the massive fraud if we get around to it. So how much austerity do you see the 1% banker elite taking part in?
We are all the sum of our tears. Too little and the ground is not fertile, and nothing can grow there. Too much and the best of us is washed away.

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,239
I've said it before and I'll say again: the Austrian School is not about "ending" tyranny; it's merely about privatizing it and calling it "liberty."


"In essence, the Rockefellers maintain a monopoly on economic theory. To understand how they gained such control takes us back to the 1920s, when two economists rose to prominence: Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich A. Hayek. Both were helped by Rockefeller money. Von Mises toured the United States in 1926. The tour of American Universities was sponsored by the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Foundation and was greatly successful in promoting the views of the Austrian School of Economics. Hayek personally tutored David Rockefeller in economics.

"In 1950 von Hayek was brought to the United States to teach at the University of Chicago, but he didn't teach economics, he was actually made a professor on the Committee on Social Thought. This was an exceptionally dangerous position for a man that held the views von Hayek did. In 1945, von Hayek's The Road to Serfdom was published. This poorly written book was an attack on the concept of the nation-state. In it, von Hayek argued that the nation-state was a hinderance to peace, and socialism led to totalitarian systems, which treated their citizens as serfs. In place of the nation-state, von Hayek proposed a super-national authority or world federation consisting of the financial elite.

"The elite would then be free to rule the world according to their own interest. In 1947, von Hayek created the Mount Pelerin Society, made up of the financial elite of Europe, as a first step toward his supernational authority. In the years since, the Mount Pelerin Society has been influential in creating numerous 'conservative' think tanks, which promote free market economic policies for the Establishment. The society has expanded to include the following think tanks: the Heritage Foundation in 1973, the Fraser Institute in 1974, the Manhattan Institute in 1977, and the Pacific Institute for Public Policy Research in 1978....

"The connection between the University of Chicago and fascism was renewed in the 1960s under Gen. Pinochet in Chile. It was the 'boys from Chicago,' students of Milton Friedman, who destroyed the economy and reduced the citizens to serfdom in Pinochet's fascist Chile, where dissent was eliminated by right-wing death squads.

"According to von Hayek's prescription, corporations are given the status of sovereign nations while the nation-states are reduced to mere quislings of the corporate sate and enforcer of their laws. This is the same agenda as that of the World Trade Organization, the International Monetary Fund and the many so-called 'free trade agreements.' Many of the Bush neocons are further linked with von Hayek by their beliefs in Mandeville. Von Hayek rejected the idea that man was created in the image of god and traced his philosophical ancestry to the early eighteenth century Satanist, Bernard Mandeville.

"Thus, the Bush administration's philosophy is clearly rooted in fascist ideology and in the fascist dogma of the corporate state. That these roots come from two of America's richest families confirms fascism as a top-down revolution by the elite to maintain their control and power."

-- Glenn Yeadon & John Hawkins, The Nazi Hydra in America: Suppressed History of a Century, pp. 18-20

"Marx's biggest error was to suppose that society could be improved by grand design: that the solution was to impose a new order, rather than to abolish privileges embedded in the existing order. His scheme actually rescued the aristocracy he had condemned, as it required an aristocracy to run it, and it pitted labor against capital, when, in fact, true capital is nothing more than the fruits of labor, and is a natural ally of labor against privilege....

"The errors of anti-Marxists derive mostly from overreaction -- from denying whatever Marx asserted, replacing Marxist half-truths with equally false anti-Marxist half-truths. Often, in so doing, they fall into the trap of accepting underlying Marxist assumptions....

"While Marx treated land as capital to attack it, anti-Marxists treat land as capital to defend it. This not only accepts the Marxist redefinition of capital, but causes anti-Marxists to say absurd things about land that make sense only with regard to true capital.

"Buying into the Marxist equation of wealth and privilege, anti-Marxists defend privilege as if it were wealth. They do this with regard not only to land, but to banking, incorporation, franchises, the overextension of patents, etc. While there are sometimes glimmers of theoretical distinctions, there is a near constant defense of those parties whose wealth comes almost entirely from capitalized privilege, and only minimally from true capital. Such errors defy logic, are inconsistent with classical liberalism, and are intuitively rejected by the unindoctinated....

"The true opposite of collectivism is not neoconservatism, but classical liberalism. The opposite of collective rights is not private rights purchased from the collective, but of common rights that precede the collective. The answer to attacking property as if it were privilege is not to defend privilege as if it were property, but to clearly distinguish between property and privilege. Most importantly, the answer to Marxist mythology is not to react with an anti-Marxist mythology, but to begin with principles of liberty and follow them wherever they might lead."


"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

Offline BoxcarJack

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Geo, You're inspiring me to dig out my copy of "Nazi Hydra" and begin reading it again. I was blown away by it when I first started looking through it. It took many of my carefully compiled beliefs and shattered them. The information on the "John Birch Society's" origins and purpose shook me awake. I was a member in the mid-80's and found the JBS narrative to be quite sanitized by then. It is an excellent book by a little known author, published by a small press. I hardly knew what I was looking at when I held it in my hands. It's a gold mine of information. Progressive press was looking for reviews, but I never got it together to write one. I've spent decades wading through the constant stream of propaganda spewing forth from every American orifice. I am trying to keep my sea legs long enough to begin review writing. Reading books is so time consuming for me. I'm a slow reader. But it's the most important thing I do. I want to thank you for this whole thread. I am constantly trying to unwind the whole communism/socialism/Marxism/capitalism/libertarian/fascism mess we've been fed---- to break clear and propose something new and workable.

I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of society, but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. - Thomas Jefferson.

Offline TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,280
I've said it before and I'll say again: the Austrian School is not about "ending" tyranny; it's merely about privatizing it and calling it "liberty."

In this world we need to break the old frameworks and expand our minds into new horizons of freedom 
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5