Author Topic: DHS/NCS/Gingrich (?) are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11  (Read 31004 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2011, 06:51:24 pm »
Breaking now on CNBC.

From Pakistan/Afganistan region targeting carbombs in NY and/or Washington.
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2011, 06:54:39 pm »
U.S. sees credible but unconfirmed terrorism threat
WASHINGTON | Thu Sep 8, 2011 7:47pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States has credible but unconfirmed information about a possible terrorism threat surrounding the 10th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks, a U.S. official told Reuters on Thursday, speaking on condition of anonymity.

"The context is still forming," the U.S. official cautioned, adding the threat appeared connected to Washington and New York City but other cities could not be ruled out.

(Reporting by Phil Stewart and Mark Hosenball)

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/08/us-usa-security-threat-idUSTRE7877S220110908
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2011, 06:55:36 pm »
White House official: President was briefed on threat information; Govt has enhanced security in advance of 9/11 anniversary - NBC News
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline IridiumKEPfactor

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,668
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2011, 06:55:48 pm »
Right on Time.


Obama unveils his jobs speech and then the MID threats the people with an AL CIADA threat perhaps a Lone Wolf threat.

Reading right from a script.

Offline IridiumKEPfactor

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,668
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2011, 07:01:42 pm »
ABCNEWS: two rental trucks sought.  3 people sought.

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2011, 07:02:44 pm »
Right on Time.


Obama unveils his jobs speech and then the MID threats the people with an AL CIADA threat perhaps a Lone Wolf threat.

Reading right from a script.

Act 1, Scene 1:  Politically battered President  gives first major election speech of 2012 election using Congress as a prop for the crediblity, then, minutes before he end of the speech DHS releases the preconditioning for the false-flag of reelection campaign.
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2011, 07:06:43 pm »
NBC reporting overseas intelligence refering to targets of bridges and tunnels.
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Catalina

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,511
  • Government Censorship, Protecting You From Reality
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2011, 07:07:40 pm »
Just in time for another 10 year event.

FLASHBACK: NWO DOCUMENT DISCUSSES 4 SCENARIOS & 2010, 2020 TO PUSH AGENDA

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=46071.0
Spare no cost for truth's sake, neither depart from it for any gain. -Proverbs 23:23

Bestow not the gifts that God has given you to get worldly riches. -Proverbs 23:4

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2011, 07:19:09 pm »
Anderson Vanderbilt is babbling with Senator McCan't about it,... no worries everybody go back to sleep.

Bloomberg will however be giving a press conference later on.
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2011, 07:21:34 pm »
US chasing down "credible" threat info
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2011/09/08/us-chasing-down-credible-threat-info/
Update 8:08 PM

A senior administration official tells CNN Pentagon Correspondent Barbara Starr:

“We have received credible information very recently about a possible plot directed at the homeland that seems to be focused on New York and Washington, DC”

It is believed to have involved three individuals who have possibly entered the US, at least one believed to be a US citizen.

US officials believe the threat is a vehicle laden with explosive bomb but “the intelligence picture is not completely formed. Not enough is known about the potential operatives and their plotting.

ADD: The source says part of the suspects travel itinerary included going through Afghanistan to Iran.  At the moment the U.S. does not believe Iran was involved. 

Updated 7:54 PM

A U.S. intelligence official told CNN National Security Producer Pam Benson, “We’re trying to sort out” if what they are seeing “is accurate.”   

  “We can’t tell if anything is going to happen, “ said the official, who added,  “This is a very sensitive period which adds to the anxiety.”

 A federal  law enforcement official tells CNN’s National Correspondent Susan Candiotti that the administration is fully aware of a threat attack on the U.S. on or about September 11th, and that “we’re taking it very seriously.”  The official said the threat is not specific as in being detailed in nature.

“We’re running it down vigorously, “ the official tells CNN. “The FBI, JTTF (Joint Terrorism Task Force), and others are fully aware of it,” the official added.

The official added that the threat appears to go beyond intelligence gathered from Osama Bin Laden’s compound after he was killed by Navy Seals. That information talked about aspirations to carry out an attack on U.S interests on the tenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

 “Like any threat, we’re taking it very seriously,” the official said.

Update 7:50 PM

CNN contributor Fran Townsend is told by senior administration official that there are a lot of questions about this information—“weird things” – the official said.

The official said the information just came in and has to be run down– that there are some questions about sourcing– but that due to the sensitivities around the coming 9/11 anniversary officials felt they should inform people.

Update 7:47 PM

Department of Homeland Security Press Secretary Matt Chandler issued this statement in response to news reports about a possible threat:

 “As we know from the intelligence gathered from the OBL raid, AQ has shown an interest in important dates and anniversaries, such as 9/11. In this instance, it’s accurate that there is specific, credible but unconfirmed threat information. As we always do before important dates like the anniversary of 9/11, we will undoubtedly get more reporting in the coming days. Sometimes this reporting is credible and warrants intense focus, other times it lacks credibility and is highly unlikely to be reflective of real plots underway. Regardless, we take all threat reporting seriously, and we have taken, and will continue to take all steps necessary to mitigate any threats that arise. We continue to ask the American people to remain vigilant as we head into the weekend.”



Reporting from Lesa Jansen, Pam Benson, Mike Ahlers, Jessica Yelling, Carol Cratty and CNN contributor Fran Townsend

White House, intelligence and other officials briefed members of Congress Thursday about a "specific, credible but unconfirmed threat" to the U.S. homeland, a government official told CNN.

The source said New York City and Washington were cited as possible targets.
The legislators were told that officials are "strongly concerned" and "are not taking anything for granted," the source told CNN.

President Barack Obama was informed and "directed that the intelligence community and the Administration take all necessary steps to ensure vigilance," senior administration official tells CNN Chief White House Correspondent Jessica Yellin.

Additionally, a senior administration official with first-hand knowledge told CNN National Security Contributor Fran Townsend that there is "specific, credible but unconfirmed threat information," although the official added there are a lot of questions about the information.

The official noted that al Qaeda has shown an interest in important dates and anniversaries.

Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Jackson Holly

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,582
  • It's the TV, stupid!
    • JACKSON HOLLY'S OLD HOME PLACE
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #11 on: September 08, 2011, 07:26:22 pm »


 ... probably a tweet from
a nine-year-old in Kalamazoo.

St. Augustine: -The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it.
Let it loose; it will defend itself.-

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #12 on: September 08, 2011, 07:30:12 pm »
Just in time for another 10 year event.

FLASHBACK: NWO DOCUMENT DISCUSSES 4 SCENARIOS & 2010, 2020 TO PUSH AGENDA

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=46071.0

That's gonna take some time to read but it looks promising.  Do you know where to find the 2010 stuff specifically?
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Catalina

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,511
  • Government Censorship, Protecting You From Reality
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #13 on: September 08, 2011, 07:31:49 pm »
Nevermind the financial collapse, they're out to get us!  ::)







Spare no cost for truth's sake, neither depart from it for any gain. -Proverbs 23:23

Bestow not the gifts that God has given you to get worldly riches. -Proverbs 23:4

Offline Catalina

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,511
  • Government Censorship, Protecting You From Reality
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #14 on: September 08, 2011, 07:33:22 pm »
That's gonna take some time to read but it looks promising.  Do you know where to find the 2010 stuff specifically?

it's buried in here;
Toward A Dangerous World: U.S. National Security Strategy for the Coming Turbulence [336 Pages] (LONG BUT VERY INTERESTING FIND)
http://www.theblackvault.com/documents/dangerousworld.pdf
Spare no cost for truth's sake, neither depart from it for any gain. -Proverbs 23:23

Bestow not the gifts that God has given you to get worldly riches. -Proverbs 23:4

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #15 on: September 08, 2011, 07:38:16 pm »
their condensed report from the earlier updates
____________________________
Officials confirm 'credible but unconfirmed' 9/11 threat
From Barbara Starr, Mike M. Ahlers and Lesa Jansen, CNN
September 8, 2011 8:21 p.m. EDT


Homeland Security Secretary Janet Ogretano says officials have picked up "lots of chatter" on jihadi websites.

Washington (CNN) -- U.S. officials said Thursday evening they have "specific, credible but unconfirmed" information about a threat against the United States coinciding with the 10th anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks.

"We have received credible information very recently about a possible plot directed at the homeland that seems to be focused on New York and Washington, D.C.," a senior administration official told CNN Pentagon Correspondent Barbara Starr.

The plot is believed to involve three individuals who have possibly entered the United States, at least one believed to be a U.S. citizen, the official said.

U.S. officials believe the threat is a vehicle laden with explosives but "the intelligence picture is not completely formed," the official said. "Not enough is known about the potential operatives and their plotting."

The official said the information came in around noon Wednesday.

Officials said they were taking the threat seriously, while evidently trying to temper the news by saying such threats are commonplace during key events.

"It's accurate that there is specific, credible but unconfirmed threat information," said Matthew Chandler, spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security. "As we always do before important dates like the anniversary of 9/11, we will undoubtedly get more reporting in the coming days. Sometimes this reporting is credible and warrants intense focus, other times it lacks credibility and is highly unlikely to be reflective of real plots under way.

"Regardless, we take all threat reporting seriously, and we have taken, and will continue to take, all steps necessary to mitigate any threats that arise. We continue to ask the American people to remain vigilant as we head into the weekend," Chandler said in a prepared statement.

A government official told CNN that members of Congress were briefed by White House, intelligence and other officials Thursday about the threat.

The lawmakers were told that officials are "strongly concerned" and "are not taking anything for granted," the source told CNN.

In addition, a senior administration official with first-hand knowledge told CNN National Security Contributor Fran Townsend that there is "specific, credible but unconfirmed threat information."

But the official added that there are a lot of questions about this information -- "weird things."

There are questions about sourcing and other points that need to be clarified, the official said, but because of the sensitivities about the coming 9/11 anniversary officials felt they should inform people.

Multiple senior counterterrorism officials told Townsend on Thursday evening that the information came in the previous 12 to 14 hours. Such last-minute information is inevitable, the sources said.

A U.S. intelligence official told CNN National Security Producer Pam Benson, "We're trying to sort out" if what they are seeing "is accurate."

"We can't tell if anything is going to happen, " said the official, who added, "This is a very sensitive period, which adds to the anxiety."

A federal law enforcement official told CNN National Correspondent Susan Candiotti that the administration is fully aware of a threat of an attack on the United States on or about September 11, and that "we're taking it very seriously." The official said the threat is not specific as in being detailed in nature.

"We're running it down vigorously," the official said. "The FBI, JTTF (Joint Terrorism Task Force), and others are fully aware of it."

The official added that the threat appears to go beyond intelligence gathered from Osama bin Laden's compound after he was killed by Navy SEALs. That information talked about aspirations to carry out an attack on U.S. interests on the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

"Like any threat, we're taking it very seriously," the official said.

A senior administration official told: "The president was briefed. He directed that the intelligence community and the administration take all necessary steps to ensure vigilance."

Earlier Thursday, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told reporters that intelligence officials had picked up "lots of chatter" on jihadi websites and elsewhere about the impending 10th anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks "and we're taking it all seriously," but nothing yet that warranted issuing a threat advisory.

Nonetheless, the department will be at a heightened level of readiness as the nation commemorates the anniversary, "staffing up" the Federal Air Marshals Service and other agencies, she said.

"We don't have something that would reach that standard (of a credible threat), but we still have lots of chatter out there. And we take every bit of that seriously and are tracking it down," Napolitano said. "In the intel world, there's lots of chatter, and we're taking it all seriously. And should there be something that rises to the level where I have to issue a threat advisory, we will issue a threat advisory."

A federal official told CNN's Mike Ahlers that Napolitano was aware of the threat when she made those remarks.

Napolitano said it is not uncommon to see increased chatter before major events. "We know it's an iconic day to al Qaeda, in part because of what was found at the (Osama bin Laden) compound. So we are preparing accordingly," she said.

"I don't want to give those (details) out because I don't want to tell the bad guys exactly what we're doing," Napolitano said. "But I think it's fair to say that in addition to asking citizens to be vigilant and so forth, that we have ourselves leaned forward and have made sure that we are doing all that we can from the DHS perspective."

One U.S. official told CNN that al Qaeda "has long been focused on commemorative dates for attacks, to include the anniversary of 9/11."

"U.S. counterterrorism entities have been alert for any leads, and for the first time we've received specific and credible -- but unconfirmed -- threat information linked to the 9/11 anniversary," the official said. "Any and all leads related to possible plots are of course being run to ground."

The official said the threat is based on one report. "It has a date and a few details, which makes it specific and credible," said the official, "but that doesn't mean we are going to be attacked. ... It's not necessarily true, however we know there is interest in an attack around 9/11."

CNN's Jessica Yellin also contributed to this report
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2011, 07:41:30 pm »
NYPD, Mayor Bloomberg, and The FBI Will Hold a Presser At 9:30pm
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #17 on: September 08, 2011, 07:59:32 pm »
2 Trucks located from Kansas City (?!?!), no terror threat from them -CNN
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #18 on: September 08, 2011, 08:14:17 pm »
9/11 Terror Threat: Have You Seen 2 Missing Rental Trucks?
By Mark Berman Opposing Views on Sep 8, 2011
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/headlines/911-terror-threat-have-you-seen-2-missing-rental-trucks

A developing story out of Washington, where federal officials reportedly have uncovered a "credible threat" of an al-Qaeda attack in New York City or Washington, D.C. on or around the 10th anniversary of 9/11.

ABC News is reporting that three people entered the United States from Afghanistan, possibly via another country, sometime in August with the intent of pulling off a "vehicle-borne attack," according to senior officials.

ABC reports:

One of those officials added that at least two rental trucks -- one from Penske and one from Budget -- were being sought nationwide. The Budget GMC truck and the Penske GMC both were missing from locations in Kansas City, Missouri. It was not immediately known if that search was connected to the plot.
Officials say the information is "very specific," that "it seems like the information has been worked for a while."

Federal officials are said to be working on an urgent bulletin to send to law enforcement all over the country.

Fox News reports that the names of the suspected terrorists are not known and that the threat is "specific enough to elicit worry," according to one U.S. official.

"As we know from the intelligence gathered from the [bin Laden] raid, al-Qaeda has shown an interest in important dates and anniversaries, such as 9/11," Department of Homeland Security spokesman Matt Chandler said in a statement. "In this instance, it's accurate that there is specific, credible but unconfirmed threat information."

Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline NWOSCUM

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,344
  • "Yuppie Scum"
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #19 on: September 08, 2011, 08:20:54 pm »
Timothy McVeigh with a rental truck??  Rinse and repeat.......these azzholes are TOO predictable.
"The receptivity of the great masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, and their power of forgetting is enormous." --Adolph Hitler, "Mein Kampf"

Offline Georgiacopguy

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,497
  • 'Cause it's a revolution for your mind...K?!
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #20 on: September 08, 2011, 08:30:41 pm »
Car bombs for the 9/11 anniversary??? There's his jobs plan, somebody has to handle all the infrastructure that goes with such an auspicious and daring false flag. And all those people involved will surely get disappeared, creating even more job vacancies to be filled. And hey, the suicide bombers get jobs, short lived though they are...
The resistance starts here. Unfortunately, the entire thing is moving beyond the intellectual infowar. I vow I will not make an overt rush at violent authority, until authority makes it's violent rush at me and you. I will not falter, I will not die in this course. For that is how they win.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: DHS/NCS are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #21 on: September 08, 2011, 08:34:27 pm »
Once again, we know who the *real* terrorists are

http://washingtontechnology.com/articles/2011/09/08/mantech-appointment-svp.aspx

ManTech names ex-NRO officer senior VP of advanced tech unit

Deborah Thurman will help oversee program development, business unit performance


    By David Hubler
    Sep 08, 2011

ManTech International Corp. has named Deborah Thurman senior vice president and group deputy in the Systems Engineering and Advanced Technology group. She formerly served as senior vice president of contracts responsible for all contract-related functional areas within the company.

In her new role, Thurman will assist group president Terry Ryan in overseeing program development and business unit performance goals, the company said in an announcement Sept. 8.

Thurman spent more than 24 years on active duty with the Air Force, providing support to various weapons systems programs, including the B-52, F-16 and Tri-Service Standoff Attack Missile. Thurman is a Vietnam veteran and also served tours in the Pentagon and the White House.

Her last Air Force assignment before retiring in 1997 was as a contracting officer at the National Reconnaissance Office supporting research and development and operational systems.

ManTech’s Systems Engineering and Advanced Technology group provides integrated solutions to customers including the NRO, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps, and Homeland Security Department.
_______________________
http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.com/2007/11/rick-renzi-and-mantech.html

MANTECH BOARD OF DIRECTORS

George J. Pedersen, Chairman: (ManTech CEO and Co-Founder)

George J. Pedersen is the Chairman of the Board and CEO of ManTech International Corporation, a company he co-founded as two-person operation in 1968. ManTech has grown to become one of the U.S. government’s leading providers of innovative technologies and solutions for mission-critical national security programs supporting the Intelligence Community and departments of Defense, State, Homeland Security and Justice; the Space Community; and other U.S. federal government agencies. ManTech has approximately 6,800 employees with operations in 40 countries. Revenues have steadily increased from $431 million in 2001, just prior to the company’s initial public offering (IPO), to $1.137 billion in 2006. Since 2002, the company’s revenue has grown by a compounded annual rate of 23 percent and during the same period its operating income has grown by a rate of 24 percent.

Mr. Pedersen is Chairman of the Board of the Institute for Scientific Research, Inc.; a member of the Board of Directors of GSE Systems and Chairman of their Executive Committee; and a member of the Board of Directors of the Association For Enterprise Integration and the National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA). In 2005, he received the James Forrestal Industry Leadership Award from the NDIA for his "demonstrated record of business accomplishment" and his active role in "helping to preserve and strengthen the nation's defense industrial base." Mr. Pedersen was chosen for his "astute business judgment, keen political instincts and a broad understanding of the vital role the industrial base plays in ensuring the nation's security," according to NDIA.

In 2006, Mr. Pedersen received the Lifetime Achievement Award from the Association for Corporate Growth National Capital Chapter. The award is given annually to individuals in the region that have contributed significantly to the region’s corporate growth over a number of years.

Mr. Pedersen is on the Board of Directors of the National Defense Industrial Association, the Institute for Scientific Research, Inc., and the Association For Enterprise Integration. He also serves on the boards of GSE Systems, MASI UK Limited and MARE, Inc.

Robert A. Coleman

Mr. Coleman is President and Chief Operating Officer of ManTech. Mr. Coleman was named President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company in September 2004 and elected as a Director of the Company in March 2006. Prior to that, he was the President of ManTech's Information Systems and Technology organization. Before joining ManTech, Mr. Coleman was the CEO and President of Integrated Data Systems Corporation (IDS), a highly regarded provider of software engineering, computer security and enterprise architecture solutions to the Intelligence Community and the Department of Defense that had revenues of approximately $40 million at the time it was acquired by ManTech. Founded by Mr. Coleman in 1990, IDS was acquired by ManTech in February 2003.

Richard L. Armitage

Mr. Armitage has served as a Director of ManTech since 2005. From 1995 to 2001, Mr. Armitage served on our Advisory Board. Since 2005, Mr. Armitage has served as President of Armitage International, L.C., which provides multinational clients with critical support in the areas of international business development, strategic planning, and problem-solving. From 2001 through 2005 he served as the Deputy Secretary of State, and prior to that assignment, he was President of Armitage Associates, L.C., a world-wide business and public policy firm. Beginning in the late 1980's, Mr. Armitage held a variety of high-ranking diplomatic positions, including as Presidential Special Negotiator for the Philippines Military Bases Agreement; as Special Mediator for Water in the Middle East; as a Special Emissary to Jordan's King Hussein during the 1991 Gulf War; and as an Ambassador, directing U.S. assistance to the new independent states of the former Soviet Union. Mr. Armitage has received numerous U.S. military decorations and has been awarded the Department of Defense Medal for Distinguished Public Service four times, and has received the Presidential Citizens Medal and the Department of State Distinguished Honor Award. Mr. Armitage currently serves on the board of directors of ConocoPhillips, a NYSE-listed international, integrated energy company.

Mary K. Bush

Ms. Bush was appointed a Director of ManTech on October 5, 2006. Ms. Bush founded Bush International, a global consulting firm in 1991. From 1989 to 1991, Ms. Bush served as managing director of the Federal Housing Finance Board, the oversight body for the nation's 12 Federal Home Loan Banks. Prior to 1989, Ms. Bush was the Vice President of International Finance at the Federal National Mortgage Associate (Fannie Mae). From 1982 to 1984, Ms. Bush served as U.S. Alternate Executive Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), a position appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. In that capacity, she worked with the U.S. Treasury Department to formulate policy on IMF lending and global economic matters. Ms. Bush serves on the board of directors of The Pioneer Family of Mutual Funds, Brady Corporation, Briggs & Stratton Corporation, and UAL Corporation (United Airlines).

Barry G. Campbell

Mr. Campbell has served as a Director of ManTech since 2002. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Campbell served as a director, President and Chief Executive Officer of Allied Aerospace Industries, Inc., a Virginia-based aerospace and defense engineering firm. From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Campbell served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Vitro Corporation, the largest subsidiary of Tracor, Inc. In 1997 he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Tracor’s subsidiary, Tracor Systems Technologies, Inc. until the sale of Tracor, Inc. to GEC Marconi, Plc in 1998.

Walter R. Fatzinger, Jr.

Mr. Fatzinger has served as a Director of ManTech since 2002. Mr. Fatzinger joined ASB Capital Management, Inc., an asset management firm, in February 1999 and currently serves as Vice Chairman and director of the firm. Mr. Fatzinger served as Executive Vice President of Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B., the parent of ASB Capital Management, Inc., from 1999 to 2002. Mr. Fatzinger currently serves on the board of directors of Optelecom Inc., a Nasdaq-listed company and a manufacturer of communications products that transport data, video and audio over the internet and fiber-optic cable. Mr. Fatzinger currently serves as Vice-Chairman and Director of Chevy Chase Trust Co., also a subsidiary of Chevy Chase Bank and is Chairman of the University of Maryland Foundation.

Admiral David E. Jeremiah, USN Ret.

Admiral Jeremiah has served as a Director of ManTech since 2004. From 1994 to 2005, Adm. Jeremiah served on our Advisory Board. Admiral Jeremiah currently serves as Chairman of Technology Strategies & Alliances Corporation, a strategic advisory and investment banking firm engaged primarily in the aerospace, defense, telecommunications, and electronics industries. Admiral Jeremiah serves on the board of directors for Todd Shipyards Corporation, a NYSE-listed company engaged in shipbuilding, ship overhaul, conversion and repair in the United States. During his military career, Adm. Jeremiah earned a reputation as an authority on strategic planning, financial management and the policy implications of advanced technology. From 1990 to 1994, Adm. Jeremiah served as Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for Generals Powell and Shalikashvili.

Richard J. Kerr

Mr. Kerr has served as a Director of ManTech since 2002. From 1994 to 2002, Mr. Kerr served as Chairman of our Advisory Board. From 1996 to 2001, Mr. Kerr served as President of the Security Affairs Support Association, an organization composed of government and industry members that is focused on national security policy. Prior to that, Mr. Kerr worked at the Central Intelligence Agency for 32 years, including as Deputy Director for Central Intelligence. Mr. Kerr headed a small team that assessed intelligence produced prior to the Iraq war, at the request of the Secretary of Defense and Director of Central Intelligence. He currently serves on a commission responsible for monitoring compliance with the Belfast Treaty (Good Friday Agreement).

Lt. Gen. Kenneth A. Minihan, USAF Ret.

Lt. Gen. Minihan was appointed a Director of ManTech on June 6, 2006. Since 2002, Lt. Gen. Minihan serves as Managing Director of the Homeland Security Fund for Paladin Capital Group. From 1999-2002, Lt. Gen. Minihan served as President of the Security Affairs Support Association. Lt. Gen. Minihan spent 33+ years of service in the Air Force, serving from 1996 to 1999 as the 14th Director of the National Security Agency/Central Security Service. From 1995 to 1996 he was a Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. Lt. Gen. Minihan is a Founder of the Intelligence and National Security Alliance in Washington, D.C., and serves on the board of directors of BAE Systems, NA, MTC Technologies, Inc., Verint Systems, Inc. and Lucent Government Solutions.

Stephen W. Porter, Esq.

Mr. Porter has served as a Director of ManTech since 1991. Mr. Porter is Senior Counsel with the law firm of Arnold & Porter, where he has practiced law since June 1993, focusing on real estate, tax and corporate law. Mr. Porter became a certified public accountant in 1961. Mr. Porter currently serves on the Executive Committee of the Greater Washington Board of Trade and is Immediate Past Chairman of the Board of the District of Columbia Chamber of Commerce. From 1992 to 1994, he served as a member of the Advisory Board of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a non-partisan public policy institute.

http://www.mantech.com/about/board.asp
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: DHS/NCS are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #22 on: September 08, 2011, 08:37:51 pm »
This was live in front of millions of viewers for the GOP debate on MSNBC....


Newt Gingrich actually said that the next false flag terror attack will kill hundreds of thousands of Americans.
THAT CLIP NEEDS TO GO VIRAL ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It was so shocking no one could even understand it and it was ignored, but we know exactly what he means. It was the same warning that Gary Hart made which caused AJ to get on the air before 9/11. The timing of the movie contagion is very suspect as well as CSIS white papers. MITRE, SAIC, and Booz Allen are also primary suspects for 9/11 and other false flags so they likely will be leading the nexct false flag that Newt Gingrich is exposing.


TRANSCRIPT:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/08/us/politics/08republican-debate-text.html?pagewanted=12&_r=1

GINGRICH: Yeah, I just want to go back, frankly, to the homeland security question, because it's important for us to confront this. I helped develop the model for homeland security. It hasn't been executed well.

The fact is, we have enemies who want to use weapons against us that will lead to disasters on an enormous scale. And the original goal was to have a Homeland Security Department that could help us withstand up to three nuclear events in one morning.

And we need to understand, there are people out there who want to kill us. And if they have an ability to sneak in weapons of mass destruction, they're going to use them. We need to overhaul and reform the department, but we need some capacity to respond to massive events that could kill hundreds of thousands of Americans in one morning.

Newt Gingrich helped set up Homeland Security right after 9/11, but Homeland Security was developed before 9/11 by a grant from the RAND Corporation. Also, the fact that he says it was built to respond to 3 nuke attacks in one morning is the craziest batshit insanity I have ever heard in my life. The implications of that statement are mind boggling. Three nuclear attacks in one morning? A Nixon/Johnson 3AM call x 3?!?!?!?!

There needs to be immediate grand jury investigations into Newt Gingrich, RAND Corporation, MITRE, and DHS needs to be defunded ASAP!
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: DHS/NCS are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #23 on: September 08, 2011, 08:39:08 pm »
How long have they been planning this transformation?


The Institute for Homeland Security is an off-shoot of the ANSER Institute, which was established by the RAND Corporation in 1958.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=ANSER_Institute_for_Homeland_Security

TSA and DHS are not the government. Just like the Gestapo, they will be found guilty of crimes against humanity. This has already been planned, look at the history. The company, ANSER Institute of Homeland Security was originally funded by RAND corporation. They set up PROMIS and PTECH and work for outside interests and not the interests of the US nor its legal government. They set up 9/11 and then got power after 9/11. People like Gannon and Ruth David are open conspirators, so is CSIS, Kissinger, and his interns. People are waking up to this fact and can see clearly that this beast called DHS are the actual anti-government radical violent trilateral terrorists who mean to bring our entire country down.

The following speech is from February 2000, 18 months before 9/11 terror attacks. The entire agenda is laid out. Who is John C. Gannon? HE WAS A DIRECTOR OF THE RAND FUNDED 'ANSER INSTITUTE OF HOMELAND SECURITY BEFORE 9/11!!!!



The CIA in the New World Order:
Intelligence Challenges Through 2015
Remarks by John C. Gannon

Chairman, National Intelligence Council
to the
Smithsonian Associates’
"Campus on the Mall"
1 February 2000

http://www.nti.org/e_research/official_docs/cia/2100CIA.pdf

Thank you for the warm introduction. I’m delighted to represent our Director, George Tenet, at the Smithsonian Associates’ "Campus on the Mall." This is an exceptional public education program that takes on today’s challenging issues in a creative and stimulating manner that is in keeping with benefactor James Smithson’s well-known commitment to what he called the "increase and diffusion of knowledge." I look forward after my remarks to your comments and questions, which, for me, is the "value added" of having to listen to myself talk.

When my former boss, Bob Gates, was here in 1992, he entitled his address, "The End of the Cold War: Where Do We Go From Here?" I actually had thought of calling mine, "Ten Years After the Cold War: Where Do We Go From Here?" Now, the typical Washington cynic would say that this just proves intelligence bureaucrats are notoriously slow in responding to change.

[...]

FULL SPEECH: http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/speeches/archives/2000/dci_speech_020200smithson.html

John C. Gannon

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=ANSER_Institute_for_Homeland_Security

Dr. John C. Gannon[1] is on the Board of Advisors at the ANSER Institute for Homeland Security.

Gannon is "Vice-Chairman of Intellibridge Corporation, a Washington firm that provides web-based analysis to corporate and government clients. Previously he served as Chairman of the National Intelligence Council (1997-2001) after serving for two years (1995-1997) as the Deputy Director for Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency. In June 1998, Mr. Gannon was also appointed the Assistant Director of Intelligence for Analysis and Production.

"From 1992 until 1996, Mr. Gannon was the Director of the Office of European Analysis in the Directorate of Intelligence (DI). Before that, he held many assignments in the DI, including various management positions in the Office of European Analysis and tours on the staff of the President's Daily Brief, in the Office of Economic Research, and as a Latin America analyst.

"Mr. Gannon served as a Naval Officer in Southeast Asia and later, while in the Naval Reserves, was an instructor of navigation at the Navy Officer Candidate School in Newport, Rhode Island. He has been active in civic affairs in Falls Church, Virginia, serving on the City Council and Planning Commission (as Vice Chairman and Chairman). Early in his career, Mr. Gannon taught social studies and science in a secondary school in Jamaica as a member of the Jesuit Volunteer Corps. He also taught high school in Saint Louis.

"Mr. Gannon earned a Ph.D. and an M.A. in history from Washington University in Saint Louis and a B.A. in psychology from Holy Cross College in 1966. His graduate studies focused on Latin America, and his doctoral dissertation documented the evolution of political parties in Jamaica. He speaks Spanish."


ANSER Institute for Homeland Security
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=ANSER_Institute_for_Homeland_Security

The ANSER Institute for Homeland Security is the Department of Homeland Security's first "government think tank," or Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC), focused on providing independent analysis on homeland security concerns. [1] The Institute operates within Analytic Sytems Inc. (also known as the ANSER Institute).

Although the DHS Science and Technology Directorate announced in 2004 that they "selected [ANSER] to operate the Homeland Security Institute . . . [f]ollowing a full and open competition procurement process conducted by Science and Technology,"[1] the Institute was "initiated and funded by ANSER's Board of Trustees in October 1999" and "formally established in April 2001."[2].

The Institute
Governance and Enabling Legislation


According to the Institute's website, it "is a not-for-profit center that operates under an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract vehicle between DHS and Analytic Services Inc."[3] The Under Secretary for the DHS Science and Technology Directorate was authorized to fund FFRDCs like the Institute under The Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Section 305 of PL 107-296, as codified in 6 U.S.C. 185), and ANSER operates the Institute as an FFRDC for DHS under contract HSHQDC-09-D-00003.[4]

Background

The Institute for Homeland Security is an off-shoot of the ANSER Institute, which was established by the RAND Corporation in 1958.[1] As Margie Burns wrote June 29, 2002, in Online Journal: "Although funded and initiated in October 1999, the institute was formally established only in April 2001, following a month of high-tech and heavy-hitter-security-type buzz assisted by its ties to the military and to the intelligence community. On March 13-15, 2001, the Homeland Security (HLS) Mini-Symposium was held by the Military Operations Research Society (Alexandria, VA), at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab in Laurel, MD.

"Also on March 13, [2001] by coincidence, George Walker Bush released his first National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD) (dated February 13, 2001), which expanded the National Security Council and added 11 new coordinating committees." [2] The NSPD directed the Deputy National Security Adviser -- Bush appointee Stephen J. Hadley, formerly with the National Institute for Public Policy and a former member of ANSER's Board of Trustees -- to attend NSC meetings, and makeing him Executive Secretary of the NSC. "Interestingly -- given today's emphasis on 'coordinating' and 'information-sharing' -- the directive also stated, 'The existing system of Interagency Working Groups is abolished.'" ibid. Homeland Security? Burns continued: "Perhaps as part of the same push last March, a now-gone web page from the Institute for Homeland Security answers a question posed on March 30, 2002, by Mark Bower of the Air National Guard: why homeland?" ibid.

The Institute's answer conceded that the catch phrase homeland defense had only "recently entered the lexicon of public discourse," although "the concept of 'defending the homeland' is an idea dating back through the better part of human history. To the best of knowledge, the Burns added, the term homeland defense is attributed to a 1997 report by the National Defense Panel. "News reports credit it to panel member Richard L. Armitage, former CIA officer and now deputy secretary of State, though Mr. Armitage has not taken full credit for it -- understandably." [3]

Writing for Buzzflash, Margie Burns postulated, "If Congress actually creates a Cabinet-level Department of Homeland Security [which occurred through Executive Order on February 28, 2003], we will have a Cabinet office named after a corporation. Members of the House Committee on Government Reform and the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee should be watchful. The government has already given the company lavish free advertising, with assistance from the Reverend Sun Myung Moon's publications. In spite of the Institute, the phrase homeland security was little seen in the popular media before September 2002 (at least in this country); aside from a sprinkling of journals and think tanks, only the Reverend Sun Myung Moon's Washington Times newspaper, Insight Magazine, and UPI boosted the Institute and its central catch phrase with any frequency." ibid.

Burns continued in Online Journal, "Immediately after September 11, the Washington Times was foremost in aggressively touting and defending -- indeed, insisting on -- instant adoption of homeland as the term of the hour, in articles published on September 16, 22, 30, and October 3 [2001], also citing ANSER. Predictably, the institute's web site also references articles from the Washington Times." ibid.


Mission

According to the ANSER Institute web site, in May 2001, the ANSER Institute of Homeland Security "was established to enhance public awareness and education and contribute to the dialog on a national, state, and local level." [4] However, when Dr. Ruth A. David, Ph.D., the Institute's CEO, was named the 2001 Bloomfield Distinguished Engineer-in-Residence at the College of Engineering at Wichita State University, the university's web pages stated: "ANSER ... performs technical, program, and policy analyses for the Department of Defense."

Additionally, at a plenary session presentation held at MORS from February 29 to March 2, 2000, and attended by Dr. David, ANSER was described as a "Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC)." [5]

On another occasion, "Mark DeMier of ANSER Analytic Services, a nonprofit U.S. Air Force-funded think tank, and editor of its Homeland Security Bulletin is quoted as saying. 'There is no single, coordinated U.S. government definition of homeland defense.'" [6]


Institutional Goals

"The Institute believes that preparing for these new challenges will require a determined, integrated effort at every stage of the process: deterrence, prevention, preemption, crisis management, consequence management, attribution and response." The Institute states that it is "leading the debate through executive-level education, public awareness programs, workshops for policy makers and online publications." ANSER produces a weekly 15,000-subscriber newsletter and the Journal of Homeland Security, "which features articles by senior government leaders and leading homeland security experts."

In the spring of 2002, one analysis of the Institute's performance stated that the then less than two years old Institute had "already gained recognition outside of the Beltway as a landmine of information regarding timely and in-depth debates concerning national security policy." The Institute's newsletter provided "one example of ANSER's increasing position of influence, as initially fewer than 100 people subscribed to the weekly email," which had then "grown to include over 100,000 readers." The Institute's Journal of Homeland Security quickly become "a staple for those involved in national security industries, as it provides a comprehensive overview of homeland defense, with article authorship being balanced between defense experts and academics alike." ibid.

Further evidence of ANSER's influence comes from none other than the Council on Foreign Relations: "Due to its rising influence, earlier this year [2002], Foreign Affairs published a review of the Institute for Homeland Security, noting that the Institute's 'Web site presents an array of resources, including an online journal, access to the syllabi of several courses on terrorism and homeland security, links to a wide variety of Internet sources, and a virtual library' on homeland defense.'" ibid.

'Partnership agreements' with other policy-oriented agencies such as the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the RAND Corporation were also praised. Additionally, the Secretary of the United States Air Force "hailed ANSER for producing products for the defense industry 'marked by quality, responsiveness, and objectivity.'" ibid.


Other Programs

"ANSER has also been offering online programs in cooperation with American Military University in Manassas, VA, leading to certificates in Homeland Defense, Forecasting Terrorism, and Homeland Security. A course called Homeland Security, conducted by the Institute's Director Colonel Randall Larsen, was geared up to begin fall 2001 at the National War College, with the first lecture by Col. (ret) Randall Larsen and Col. Robert Kadlec on homeland security coincidentally scheduled for September 11." ibid.

The Washington Post, according to its 1998 annual report, engaged in a joint venture with ANSER: "'Legi-Slate, a subsidiary of the Washington Post Company ... and ANSER ... [April 15] announced the partnership to provide ANSER's summaries of congressional hearings on defense acquisition and readiness on Legi-Slate's online service.' ... The Post Company 'disposed of substantially all' its Legi-Slate assets in 1999 ... "ibid.


Leadership Team (as of September, 2010)[5]

Corporate Officers
Dr. Ruth A. David, Ph.D. (President & Chief Executive Officer)
Philip Anderson, Ph.D (Senior Vice President & Chief Operating Officer, HSI Operating Unit)
Mr. George Thompson (Vice President, Deputy Director for Homeland Security Programs, (HSP), Mission Area Director for Departmental Unification and Integration)
Mr. Robert Tuohy (Vice President, Deputy Director for Homeland Security Operations, (HSO), Mission Area Director for Resilience, Emergency Preparedness, and Response)

Director's Staff
Richard Kohout (Mission Area Director, Counterterrorism, Borders, and Immigration)
Glenn Price (Fellow, Outreach Program Director)
Margaret "Jo" Velardo, PhD (Research Director)

Division Managers
Gerald "Jerry" Diaz, Ph.D (Fellow, HSO Directorate, Manager, Operations Analysis Division)
Mark Hanson (Fellow, HSO Directorate Manager, Threat and Risk Analysis Division)
Sarah Maloney (Fellow, HSP Directorate Manager, Business Enterprise Analysis Division)
Stephen Ries, PhD (Fellow, HSP Directorate Manager, Work Force Analysis Division)
Shelby Syckes (Fellow, HSP Directorate Manager, Program Analysis Division)

Senior Research Staff
John Baker (Fellow, HSO Directorate)
Charles Brownstein, PhD (Fellow, HSP Directorate)
Joseph Chang, PhD (Fellow, HSO Directorate)
Samuel Clovis, PhD (Fellow, HSO Directorate)
Kim Corthell (Fellow, HSP Directorate)
Gary Foster (Fellow, HSO Directorate)
Jerome Kahan (Fellow, HSO Directorate)
Curt Mann (Fellow, HSP Directorate)
David McGarvey, Ph.D (Fellow, HSO Directorate)
Howard Smith (Fellow, HSO Directorate)
Peter Zimmerman, PhD (Fellow, HSO Directorate)
Robert Zimmerman (Fellow, HSP Directorate)

Past Institute Personnel
Col. Randy Larsen (USAF, Ret.)
Peter Roman, Ph.D.
Col. Dave McIntyre, Ph.D. (USA, Ret)
Dr. Elin Gursky
Lloyd Salvetti
Alan Capps
Jennifer Crook
Sonita Almas
Steve Dunham
Trisha Anderson
Madhavi Patil

Board of Advisors
Dr. Jay C. Davis
Michael J. Bayer
John C. Gannon
Admiral Harold W. Gehman Jr. (USN, Ret)
Dr. John A. Hamre
Phil E. Lacombe
Dr. Joshua Lederberg
Judith A. Miller
Dr. Michael C. Moriarty
Dr. Tara O'Toole

Contact details

ANSER (Analytic Services Inc.)
Arlington, Virginia


External links
Chapter 4: U.S. Reflexive Modernization by Ian Alexander Oas. Re U.S. as "world hegemon" and the ANSER Institute and RAND Corporation influence on shaping U.S. defense policy.
ANSER Homeland Security entry from 911Review.Org, accessed August 30, 2010.

References
↑ 1.0 1.1 Homeland Security Establishes Its First Government "Think Tank", Department of Homeland Security press release, April 23 2004, from the DHS website], accessed August 31, 2010.
↑ ANSER Homeland Security Institute newsletter, August 21, 2003, accessed August 31, 2010
↑ "Governance" page on the ANSER Homeland Security Institute website, accessed August 31, 2010.
↑ Home Page, ANSER Homeland Security Institute website], accessed August 31, 2010.
↑ "Leadership" page on the ANSER Homeland Security Institute website, accessed August 31, 2010.
Category: Homeland security



Address by John C. Gannon
Assistant Director of Central Intelligence for Analysis and Production
to
The National Security Telecommunications
and  
Information Systems Security Committee

3 April 2001


Thank you.  It is a special pleasure to be among such distinguished speakers today to address such an important organization as the NSTISSC.  Your conference organizers asked me to share our perspective on the cyberthreat, over the next several years. I’ll be happy to do that this morning.  To assist in my discussion of this important topic, I will draw from the work the National Intelligence Council has done on Global Trends 2015, with which I hope you are familiar, and on other estimative work undertaken by the NIC over the past year, especially by our National Intelligence Officer for Science and Technology, Larry Gershwin.  It is useful, I think, to put the cyber threat into the context of a major S&T revolution over the next fifteen years.  In Global Trends 2015 we anticipate that the world will almost certainly experience quantum leaps in information technology (IT) and in other areas of science and technology.  The continuing diffusion of  IT and new applications of biotechnology will be at the crest of the wave.  Information Technology will be the major building block for international commerce and for empowering nonstate actors.  Most experts agree that the IT revolution represents the most significant global transformation since the Industrial Revolution beginning in the mid-eighteenth century.
  
The integration--or fusion--of continuing revolutions in information technology, biotechnology, materials science, and nanotechnology will generate dramatic increases in technology investments, which will further stimulate innovation in the more advanced countries. Older technologies will continue lateral “sidewise development” into new markets and applications through 2015, benefiting US allies and adversaries around the world who are interested in acquiring early generation ballistic missile and weapons of mass destruction (WMD) technologies. Biotechnology will generate medical breakthroughs that will enable the world’s wealthiest people to improve their health and increase their longevity dramatically.  At the same time, genetically modified crops will offer the potential to improve nutrition among the billions of malnourished people in the world. Breakthroughs in materials technology will generate widely available products that are multi-functional,environmentally safe, longer lasting, and easily adapted to particular consumer requirements. On the downside, disaffected states, terrorists, proliferators, narcotraffickers, and organized criminals will take advantage of the new high-speed information environment and other advances in technology to integrate their illegal activities and compound their threat to stability and security around the world.

Globalization

The networked global economy will be driven by rapid and largely unrestricted flows of information, ideas, cultural values, capital, goods and services, and people:  that is, globalization.  This globalized economy will be a net contributor to increased political stability in the world in 2015, although its reach and benefits will not be universal.  In contrast to the Industrial Revolution, the process and timelines of globalization will be more compressed.  Its evolution will be rocky, marked by chronic financial volatility and a widening economic divide.
  
Regions, countries, and groups left behind will face deepening economic stagnation, political instability, and cultural alienation.  These entities will foster political, ethnic, ideological, and religious extremism, along with the violence that often accompanies these phenomena .   These disaffected entities will force the United States and other developed countries to remain focused on “old-world” challenges while simultaneously concentrating on the implications of “new-world” technologies.

GT2015 “Bottom Line”

We do make an effort in GT2015 to cut through the scary scenarios to a broad judgment about the cyber threat:
  
Increasing reliance on computer networks is making critical US infrastructures more attractive as targets.  Computer network operations today offer new options for attacking the United States within its traditional continental sanctuary—potentially anonymously and with selective effects.  Nevertheless, we do not know how quickly or effectively adversaries such as terrorists, proliferators, narcotraffickers or disaffected states will develop the tradecraft to use cyber warfare tools and technology, or, in fact, whether cyber warfare will ever evolve into a decisive combat arm. We need, therefore, to assess carefully the capabilities of these varied groups in a continuing integrated threat assessment rather than panic and run.  The cyber threat is a call to action—collaborative and concerted action across NSTISSIC agencies—not a cry to surrender.  For those nations with a decisive technological advantage, like the United States, we need to remind ourselves that keeping that technological advantage will be our best line of both defense and offense. Which is to say, we need to do a lot more work on this and to keep you all in the loop as we go along.

[NOTE: This is contrary to all ideas of freedom and the rights of man. The CIA proposes to have more central control rather than more localized control such that we are protected by millions of people grounded in the traditions of America. They are saying that as threats get greater and greater, any attempt at sovereignty is a sign of weakness, a sign of panic, a sign of surrender. The CIA is saying that the only way to show America is powerful is by destroying the constitution and all sovereignty. Allen Dulles had the exact same mentality and that is why JFK fired his ass!]

Perspective from 2001

Let’s jump back from 2015 for a few moments and talk more concretely about the threats we face today.  Hostile cyber activity today is ballooning.  The number of FBI computer network intrusion cases has doubled during each of the past two years.  Meanwhile, several highly publicized intrusions and computer virus incidents since 1998 have fed a public—and perhaps foreign government—perception that the networks upon which US national security and economic well-being depend are vulnerable to attack by almost anyone with a computer, a modem, and a modicum of skill.  This impression, of course, overstates the case.

US Networks as Targets

It is true that information from industry security experts suggests that US national information networks have become more vulnerable—and therefore more attractive as a target of foreign cyber attack. The growing connectivity among secure and insecure networks creates new opportunities for unauthorized intrusions into sensitive or proprietary computer systems within critical US infrastructures, such as the nation’s telephone system. The complexity of computer networks is growing faster than the ability to understand and protect them by identifying critical nodes, verifying security, and monitoring activity.  The prospects for a cascade of failures across US infrastructures are largely known and understood. Business firms are dedicating growing, but still insufficient, resources to the defense of critical US infrastructures against foreign cyber attack—a low likelihood threat compared to routine disruptions such as accidental damage to telecommunications lines.

Nonetheless, mainstream commercial software—whose vulnerabilities are widely known—is replacing relatively secure proprietary network systems by US telecommunications providers and other operators of critical infrastructure. US government and defense networks similarly are increasing their reliance on commercial software.  Such commercial software includes imported products that provide opportunities for foreign implantation of exploitation or attack tools. Finally, opportunities for foreign placement or recruitment of insiders have become legion.  As part of an unprecedented churning of the global information technology work force, US firms are drawing on pools of computer expertise that reside in a number of potential threat countries, such as Russia. Access to US proprietary networks by subcontractors of foreign partners is creating “virtual” insiders whose identity and nationality often remain unknown to US network operators. Despite these growing vulnerabilities, however, the most important US targets remain difficult to compromise.  Compromising such targets requires more advanced tools and tradecraft, such as recruiting an insider.
  
Foreign or US insiders were responsible for 71 percent of the unauthorized entries into US corporate computer networks reported to an FBI-sponsored survey last year.
Despite the growing interconnectivity I’ve stressed this morning, control networks-whose compromise could disrupt critical US infrastructures such as power or transportation—are designed to be less accessible from outside networks, according to industry experts.  In addition, many control networks use unique, proprietary, or archaic programming languages thought to be--and clearly intended to be--poorly understood by hackers.

Growing Foreign Capabilities

Advanced technologies and tools for computer network operations are becoming more widely available, resulting in a basic, but operationally significant, technical cyber capability for US adversaries.
Most US adversaries have access to the technology needed to pursue computer network operations.  Computers are almost globally available, and Internet connectivity is both widespread and increasing.  Both the technology and access to the Internet are inexpensive, relative to traditional weapons, and require no large industrial infrastructure.
  
The tradecraft needed to employ information technology and tools effectively however—particularly against more difficult targets such as classified networks or critical infrastructures—remains an important limiting factor for many of our adversaries.

Hackers since the mid-1990s have shared increasingly sophisticated and easy-to-use software on the Internet, providing tools that any computer-literate adversary could obtain and use for computer network reconnaissance, probing, penetration, exploitation, or attack.  Moreover, programming aids are making it possible to develop sophisticated tools with only basic programming skills.
  
Globally available tools are particularly effective against the mechanisms of the Internet, but specialized tools would be needed against more difficult targets, such as  the networks that control many critical infrastructures.

Even with technology and tools, considerable tradecraft also is required to penetrate network security perimeters and defeat intrusion detection systems—particularly against defensive reactions by network security administrators.  Tradecraft also will determine how well an adversary can achieve a targeted and reliable outcome, and how likely the perpetrator is to remain anonymous.  Attackers must tailor strategies to specific target networks—requiring advanced and continued reconnaissance to characterize targets and ensure that exploitation tools remain effective in the face of subtle changes to computer systems and networks.
  
Cyber attacks against less well defended military networks, such as logistics for example, still would require prior identification of critical nodes and a preplanned campaign, if the attacks were to achieve a strategic impact such as delaying a US force deployment.

Potential Actors and Threats

Let me talk about some of the groups that will challenge us on the cyber front:

Hackers

Although the most numerous and publicized cyber intrusions and other incidents are ascribed to lone computer-hacking hobbyists, such hackers pose a negligible threat of widespread, long-duration damage to national-level infrastructures.  The large majority of hackers do not have the requisite tradecraft to threaten difficult targets such as critical US networks—and even fewer would have a motive to do so.  Nevertheless, the large worldwide population of hackers poses a relatively high threat of an isolated or brief disruption causing serious damage, including extensive property damage or loss of life.  As the hacker population grows, so does the likelihood of an exceptionally skilled and malicious hacker attempting and succeeding in such an attack. In addition, the huge worldwide volume of relatively less skilled hacking activity raises the possibility of inadvertent disruption of a critical infrastructure.

Hacktivists

A smaller foreign population of politically active hackers—which includes individuals and groups with anti-US motives—poses a medium-level threat of carrying out an isolated but damaging attack.  Most international hacktivist groups appear bent on propaganda rather than damage to critical infrastructures.  Pro-Beijing Chinese hackers over the past two years have conducted mass cyber protests in response to events such as the 1999 NATO bombing of China’s embassy in Belgrade. Pro-Serbian hacktivists attacked a NATO Website during Operation Allied Force.  Similar hacktivism accompanied the rise in Israeli-Palestinian clashes last year.

Hackers for Hire

Government and criminal organizations have the resources to recruit hacker talent and the motivation to guide that technical talent with sophisticated tradecraft in order to turn it toward long-term objectives that could threaten the United States.

Industrial Spies and Organized Crime Groups

International corporate spies and organized crime organizations pose a medium-level threat to the United States through their ability to conduct industrial espionage and large-scale monetary theft, respectively, and through their ability to hire or develop hacker talent. Japanese syndicates used Russian hackers to gain access to law enforcement databases, evidently to monitor police investigations of their operations and members, according to a press report last year. According to press reports, a Mafia-led syndicate last year used banking and telecommunications insiders to break into an Italian bank’s computer network.  The syndicate diverted the equivalent of $115 million in European Union aid to Mafia-controlled bank accounts overseas before Italian authorities detected the activity.

Foreign corporations also could use computer intrusions to tamper with competitors’ business proposals, in order to defeat competing bids. Computer network espionage or sabotage can affect US economic competitiveness and result in technology transfer--directly through product sales, or indirectly-to US adversaries. Because cyber criminals’ central objectives are to steal, and to do so with as little attention from law enforcement as possible, they are not apt to undertake operations leading to high-profile network disruptions, such as damage to US critical infrastructures. Major drug trafficking groups, however, could turn to computer network attacks in an attempt to disrupt US law enforcement or local government counternarcotics efforts. Organized crime groups with cyber capabilities conceivably could threaten attacks against critical infrastructure for purposes of extortion. Moreover, rampant criminal access to critical financial databases and networks could undermine the public trust essential to the commercial health of US banking institutions and to the operation of the financial infrastructure itself.  In addition, criminal computer network exploitation could inadvertently disrupt other infrastructures.

Terrorists

Traditional terrorist adversaries of the United States, despite their intentions to damage US interests, are less developed in their computer network capabilities and propensity to pursue cyber means than are other types of adversaries.  They are likely, therefore, to pose only a limited cyber threat.   In the near term, terrorists are likely to stay focused on traditional attack methods. (Nonetheless, we will be on the alert for new information that could alter this judgment. We anticipate that more substantial cyber threats are possible in the future as a more technically competent generation enters the ranks.

National Governments

National cyber warfare programs are unique in posing a threat along the entire spectrum of objectives that might harm US interests.  Among the array of cyber threats, as we see them today, only government-sponsored programs are developing capabilities with the prospect of causing widespread, long-duration damage to US critical infrastructures.  China (to name just one example) is expanding cyber related military training and is already incorporating cyber warfare into military exercises, according to press reporting.  President Jiang last year stated that wars were passing from the stage of “mechanized warfare” to that of “information warfare.” A Chinese presidential decree last year established a military university whose mission includes training soldiers in information warfare, among other communications-related fields, according to a Chinese press report.

Future Tools and Technology

New cyber tools and technologies are on the way for both the offense and defense.  For example, because networks-and their vulnerabilities-are evolving so rapidly, new tools for network mapping, scanning, and probing will become increasingly critical to both attackers and defenders.  Either side could apply research in autonomous software “agents”-intelligent, mobile, and self-replicating software intended to roam a network gathering data or to reconnoiter other computer network operations. For defenders, incremental deployment of new or improved security tools will help protect against both remote and inside threats.  Technologies include better intrusion detection systems, better methods for correlating data from multiple defensive tools, automated deployment of security patches, biometric user authentication, wider use of encryption, and public key infrastructures to assure the authenticity and integrity of e-mail, electronic documents, and downloaded software.  For attackers, viruses and worms are likely to become more controllable, precise, and predictable-making them more suitable for weaponization.  Advanced modeling and simulation technologies are likely to assist in identifying critical nodes for an attack and conducting battle damage assessments afterward.  Other capabilities likely by 2005 include self-modification to defeat signature recognition, remote control, stealthy propagation, and the ability of a single tool to affect multiple, mainstream operating systems.
  
In addition, tools for distributed hacking or denial of service-the coordinated use of multiple, compromised computers or of independent and mobile software agents-will mature as network connectivity and bandwidth increase.  The rapid pace of change in information technology suggests that the appearance of new and unforeseen computer and network technologies and tools could  provide advantages in cyber warfare  to either the defender or the attacker.  Wildcards for the years beyond 2005 include the possibility of fundamental shifts in the nature of computers and networking, driven, for example, by emerging optical technologies.  These changes could improve processing power, information storage, and bandwidth enough to make possible application of advanced software technologies-such as artificial intelligence-to cyber warfare. Such technologies could provide the defender with improved capabilities for detecting and attributing subtle malicious activity, or could enable computer networks to respond to attacks automatically.
They could provide the attacker with planning aids to develop an optimal strategy against a potential target and to more accurately predict effects.

Implications

Despite the fundamental and global impact of the information revolution, the reliance of critical US activities on computer networks, and the attention being devoted to information operations, uncertainty remains whether computer network operations will evolve into a decisive military weapon for US adversaries.  To a degree that we cannot estimate, emergency measures to compensate for computer network disruptions will be available to maintain some basic level of services-as demonstrated during the Y2K rollover.  Adversaries, therefore, may never overcome the planning uncertainties that derive from a US potential to work around even severe degradations in network performance.  Let us hope I am right in this judgment. Whether or not foreign computer network operations mature into a major combat arm, however, they will offer an increasing number of adversaries new options for exerting leverage over the United States-including selection of either nonlethal or lethal damage and the prospect of anonymity.  Adversaries will be able to use cyber attacks to attempt to deny the United States its traditional continental sanctuary with attacks on critical infrastructures. They could exploit US legal and conceptual controversies relating to defending privately operated networks with US Government resources and the separation of the US domestic and foreign security establishments. Adversaries also could use cyber attacks to attempt to slow or disrupt the mobilization, deployment, combat operations, or resupply of US military forces.  Attacks on logistic and other defense networks would be likely to exploit heightened network vulnerabilities during US deployment operations-complicating US power projection in an era of decreasing permanent US military presence abroad.
Implications for Intelligence

Whatever direction the cyberthreat takes, the United States Government will be confronting an increasingly interconnected world in the years ahead.  This is the core message of GT2015.  We will have to develop, in response, greater communications and collaboration across the agencies of our own Government, with other governments, and with the corporate world.  Interagency cooperation will be essential to understanding the cyberthreat, as well as other transnational threats that will crowd our agenda, and to responding effectively with interdisciplinary strategies.  Consequence management of a major attack on a critical US infrastructure would involve virtually all agencies of the Federal Government, State, and local governments, foreign governments, law enforcement, the military, the medical community, and the media.  NSTISSC and the Intelligence Community clearly have a lot of work to do if we are to understand this evolving threat and to be prepared to deal with it.

Remember that the following speech was given in April of 2001 by the Central Intelligence Agency. It says that electronic threats are "limited". This of course limited scrutiny with the Stephens/Mossad/Saudi funded PTECH component of the 9/11 terrorists attacks. Remember that PTECH and MITRE (CIA well aware of all MITRE activity) were in the basement of the FAA for two years before 9/11/2001. This means that the CIA who knew about MITRE and PTECH were guiding other agencies, namely, in this specific speech...

The National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems Security Committee,

away from being alert to any electronic crimes prior to the 9/11 false flag. They likely did the same speech to other agencies like the FAA, etc.

But, the NSTISSC (created by George HW Bush in 1990) had accountabilities to the systems in use at all government agencies (FAA, SS, FBI, WH, etc.) for PTECH to run wild during the 9/11 event with limited scrutiny thanks to the CIA's internal propaganda!

"Ptech was with MITRE Corporation in the basement of the FAA for two years prior to 9/11"


Indira Singh & P-Tech
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1_HHNtXqes

Indira Singh on Mitre and Ptech - Pt. 1
http://www.myspace.com/video/decompartmentalized/indira-singh-on-mitre-and-ptech-pt-1/19481838
Indira Singh on Mitre and Ptech - Pt. 2
http://www.myspace.com/video/decompartmentalized/indira-singh-on-mitre-and-ptech-pt-2/19484919



MORE:

Anti_Illuminati for dummies. The ultimate study guide for the layman.
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=192063.0

Developing Cybernetic dictatorship based on Nazi, Soviet & Stasi BETA-TESTS
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=191076.0



http://cryptome.org/nstissc.htm

29 March 2006.
nstissc.gov has been superceded by cnns.gov

April 2005 index of issuances:
http://www.cnss.gov/Assets/pdf/CNSS-INDEX_APR_2005.pdf

Unclassified National Security System issuances:
http://www.cnss.gov/full-index.html

8 October 2000
http://constitution.ncsc.mil/wws/nstissc/html/overview.html

The National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems Security Committee (NSTISSC) was established by President Bush under National Security Directive 42 (NSD 42) entitled, "National Policy for the Security of National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems," dated 5 July 1990. It reaffirms the Secretary of Defense as the Executive Agent and the Director, National Security Agency as the National Manager for National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems Security. In addition, the Directive establishes the NSTISSC.

The NSTISSC provides a forum for the discussion of policy issues, sets national policy, and promulgates direction, operational procedures, and guidance for the security of national security systems through the NSTISSC Issuance System. National security systems contain classified information or:
a. involves intelligence activities;
b. involves cryptographic activities related to national security;
c. involves command and control of military forces;
d. involves equipment that is an integral part of a weapon or weapons system(s); or
e. is critical to the direct fulfillment of military or intelligence missions (not including routine administrative and business applications).

Images source: http://constitution.ncsc.mil/wws/nstissc/Assets/images/
http://constitution.ncsc.mil/wws/nstissc/Assets/images/nsd42.gif
http://constitution.ncsc.mil/wws/nstissc/Assets/images/orgchart.gif
http://constitution.ncsc.mil/wws/nstissc/Assets/images/nstissc20002.gif
http://constitution.ncsc.mil/wws/nstissc/Assets/Flash/nstissc%20Report.txt

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS/NCS are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #24 on: September 08, 2011, 08:57:39 pm »
This will also allow for a sharp crackdown on any protesting 9/11 Family and First Responders at ground zero.


CNN just reported that the three suspects have rather common names, making it that much harder to track down,... even with global sat, and eschelon, and a 1000 mile commute from truck rental to terror site,... boy, they underestimate us.
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS/NCS are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #25 on: September 08, 2011, 09:08:38 pm »
CSPAN right now, David Cohen, Treasury Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Terrorism

Al Qaeda budget duscussion and tactical possibilities from a speech earlier today
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #26 on: September 08, 2011, 09:10:29 pm »
Anderson Vanderbilt is babbling with Senator McCan't about it,... no worries everybody go back to sleep.

Bloomberg will however be giving a press conference later on.

FLASHBACK...

Astor Heir to the throne Anderson Cooper proves he is the American Al-Qaeda
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=169794.0

"Terrorizing the American people has made me..."
"Mo Money, Mo Money Mo Money!"
"Anderson Cooper is rich, biaaaatch!"

Week-long series begins the week of May 10 followed by one hour special on Sat., May 15, & Sun., May 16, at 8 p.m., 11 p.m., 2 a.m. (one hour; all times Eastern)
Bryant Neal Vinas, born and raised in New York, a once friendly, baseball-playing Catholic altar boy, is now a sworn enemy of the U.S. CNN senior international correspondent Nic Robertson spent a year tracing Vinas’ life’s journey, learning how and why he became a hate-filled terrorist helping al Qaeda plan a bomb attack on New York City. Exclusive images and first-time interviews yield the most intimate portrait ever of an American homegrown terrorist.

Do not be fooled by CIA's latest decepti-CON...
Astor Jesus

[Again thanks to Brocke for this awesome work!]

Latest headline:

Mubarak thugs force Anderson Cooper into hiding
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/02/anderson-cooper-a-bit-scared-attacks-egypt/


CNN is now in control of the spin along with the Astor/Vanderbilt savior Jesus figure a.k.a. AC360! And since AC is also officially CIA by his own admission (confirmed over 4 years ago by Radar), CIA has boots on the ground manufacturing regime change. How much more obvious does it get? The media is running 1,000 headlines about Mubarak's men having CIA connections and zero about AC. But, 4 years ago it was disclosed, hundreds of millions of people know about it, WTF?
And now we learn that CNN is connected to the ASPEN INSTITUTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AC's hiding of CIA ties puts all American journalists and CIA officers at risk
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=15416
Article posted Sep 06 2006, 9:43 PM

Anderson Cooper has long traded on his biography, carving a niche for himself as the most human of news anchors. But there's one aspect of his past that the silver-haired CNN star has never made public: the months he spent training for a career with the Central Intelligence Agency.

Following his sophomore and junior years at Yale, a well-known recruiting ground for the CIA, Cooper spent his summers interning at the agency's monolithic headquarters in Langley, Virginia, in a program for students interested in intelligence work. His involvement with the agency ended there, and he chose not to pursue a job with the agency after graduation, according to a CNN spokeswoman, who confirmed details of Cooper's CIA involvement to Radar.

[...]

Bob Woodruff and others have learned, American journalists are already prime targets in the world's conflict zones, and are typically accused of having CIA ties even where none exist. And by not disclosing his training before now, Cooper has arguably made it into a potential issue. "It creates the appearance of something smelly there," says a former CNN official who knows Cooper. (Particularly in light of the period Anderson spent studying Vietnamese at the University of Hanoi after college. Soon after, Cooper apparently gave up his Bond fantasy to pursue a career in journalism--except for a brief period when he starred as host of ABC's reality show, The Mole.)

According to the spokeswoman, Cooper told his bosses at CNN about his time with the agency. But even if he hadn't, says Walter Isaacson, who headed the network from 2001 to 2003 and is now president of the Aspen Institute, it's not the sort of thing that would automatically require disclosure, since the stint was brief and far in the past. "I think what he did was probably fine and cool, and I've got no problems with it," he added.

I am reading a book on the Vanderbilt Empire and I thought this would be good post I don't know if anyone has posted this, seen it before or not so I am just putting it out there. It is interesting. I mean we know the guy is a paid government operative furthering the lies of the war in Iraq and and now a global warming shill  so......yeah.  Personally I think he is under mind control but what do I know, I am a whacko conspiracy theorist.

From Anderson Cooper's blog and then the Skull & Bones article too.
Wednesday, September 06, 2006
My summer job ... nearly 20 years ago

So an interesting thing happened today. A Web site has published an article saying that I once worked for the CIA.  CNN received a call from the Web site yesterday informing us that they were going to publish this story. They didn't have all their facts straight, and I've received some questions about it, so I decided to just write this blog post, hoping to get the facts out there. As a college student, I had a number of summer jobs and internships, including working at the CIA. Keep in mind, we are talking about nearly 20 years ago. The Bangles "Walk Like An Egyptian" was on the radio. I was 19 years old, and like many college students was curious about a variety of careers.  There was a flyer for the CIA in my college career counseling office, and I applied for a summer job. I was a political science major and was interested in serving my country.  For a couple months over the course of two summers, I worked at the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. There are reporters who've been in the military, others who've interned on Capitol Hill while they were in college.  I know the CIA may sound more exotic and mysterious, but it was actually pretty bureaucratic and mundane, at least the little bit that I saw of it. By the end of the second summer, I realized it was not a place I wanted to work after college.  I've told all my employers about it over the years, but have chosen not to talk about it publicly. When I began to travel overseas to war zones as a reporter, I realized that some Jihadist might not understand that what people do for summer jobs in college doesn't mean they make a career out of it.

Oh, yeah, in case you're interested, after I graduated college, I briefly worked as a waiter, but I decided not to make a career out of that job either.


Anderson Vanderbilt Cooper - Skull & Bones 1989??


The below information has been taken (with some paraphrasing) almost entirely from biographies published on Wikipedia.com; of which I have contributed to the authoring of and correcting of numerous entries. (see additional sources below)


Anderson Hays Vanderbilt Cooper (Yale '89) is the youngest son of the late author Wyatt Emory Cooper and clothing designer, artist and author Gloria Morgan Vanderbilt. Gloria Vanderbilt is the daughter of American railroad heir Reginald Claypoole Vanderbilt (1880-1925) and his second wife, Gloria Laura Mercedes Morgan. Known as Reggie, he was the son of Cornelius Vanderbilt II and his wife Alice Claypoole Gwynne (1845-1934). He attended Yale University, as did his grandson Anderson, where Reggie acquired a reputation for dissipation—and no degree. (1904-1965).  Reginald Vanderbilt left a $4 million trust for Anderson's mother Gloria, which was to have been administered by his grandmother, but it caused a much publicized civil court case for the custody of his mother with Reginald's sister, Gertrude Vanderbilt-Whitney, who did eventually win the custody battle in 1934. The custody case for Anderson's mother was largely won on the grounds that Gloria Laura Mercedes Morgan-Vanderbilt frequently made long trips to Europe without her daughter and that Morgan-Vanderbilt had also repeatedly exposed Anderson's mother Gloria to the intimate relationships of both her male & female partners; thus causing the New York City courts to find Gloria Laura Mercedes Morgan-Vanderbilt to be an unfit mother and sending Cooper's mother Gloria Vanderbilt to live with his great-aunt Gertrude Vanderbilt-Whitney . As there is currently no confirmed listing of the fifteen members of the 1989 Class of Skull & Bones...one can only speculate as to whether Anderson Hays Cooper only followed his famous ancestor's footsteps to the gates of Yale University...or if he continued over to the doorway of Skull & Bones' tomb (house) as well.

SIDE NOTE:
Gertrude was the wife of Harry Payne Whitney (S&B 1894), who's father was U.S. Secretary of the Navy William Collins Whitney (S&B 1863), US Secretary of the Navy. Thus making CNN's Anderson Vanderbilt Cooper's also the great-nephew of Alfred Gywenne Vanderbilt (S&B 1900), who on May 1, 1915 boarded the RMS Lusitania bound for Liverpool, England; which on May 7th, in the Irish Channel, the German submarine Unterseeboot 20 torpedoed, triggering a secondary explosion (widely believed to be a huge shipment of weapons from Remington Arms) that sank the Cunard ocean liner in just eighteen minutes. Vanderbilt's body was never recovered.

Harry Payne Whitney's brother William Payne Whitney (S&B 1898) married Helen Hay and they had a daughter Joan Whitney Payson and son John "Jock" Hay Whitney (Yale's Scroll and Key). Joan & Jock both inherited huge trust funds from their father and their grandfather William Collins Whitney when their passed away in 1927. Jock Whitney went on to become a pioneer in the production of color-movies, financier, philanthropist, art-collector, a U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom as well as the publisher of the New York Herald Tribune.

Joan Whitney Payson married Yale University alumni Charles Shipman Payson, she also cofounded the New York Mets baseball team with George Herbert Walker, Jr. (S&B 1927) in 1960. He was also the brother-in-law of former U.S. Senator Prescott Sheldon Bush (S&B 1917), and the father of the current U.S. Ambassador to Hungary George Herbert Walker III (S&B 1953). He was also the uncle of former U.S. President George Herbert Walker Bush (S&B 1947), to whom he was extremely close. "Uncle Herbie" helped fund the former President George H.W. Bush's initial entry into the oil business in the early 1950s.

U.S. President George H. W. Bush (S&B 1968) is son of former President George Herbert Walker Bush (S&B 1947), the grandson son former Connecticut U.S. Senator Prescott Sheldon Bush (S&B 1917), the great-nephew of James Smith Bush (S&B 1922), George Herbert Walker, Jr. (S&B 1927), Dr. John Mercer Walker, Sr. (S&B 1931), Louis Walker (S&B 1936), the nephew of Jonathan James Bush (S&B 1953) and the cousin U.S. Ambassador George Herbert Walker III (S&B 1953)of Ray Carter Walker (S&B 1955) and several others.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline America2

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,299
  • Romans 10:9-10 King James Version
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #27 on: September 08, 2011, 09:12:43 pm »
Breaking now on CNBC.

From Pakistan/Afganistan region targeting carbombs in NY and/or Washington.


CNN is going on and on about it tonight.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: DHS/NCS are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #28 on: September 08, 2011, 09:17:32 pm »
CSPAN right now, David Cohen, Treasury Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Terrorism

Al Qaeda budget duscussion and tactical possibilities from a speech earlier today

I thought you were joking!

That is an actual position in the United States Treasury Department!

WTF?

Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan are the number 1 and 2 financial terrorists in the country and Rothschilds are the number one financial terrorists on the planet!

What has Dacvid Cohen done for the past 2 years while these financial terrorists have been stealing over $30 Trillion from the US?!?!?!?!



David S. Cohen
Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence

http://www.treasury.gov/about/organizational-structure/Pages/cohen-e.aspx

David S. Cohen was confirmed by the United States Senate to serve as Treasury’s Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence on June 30, 2011. As Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, Cohen leads the Treasury Department’s policy, enforcement, regulatory, and intelligence functions aimed at identifying and disrupting the lines of financial support to international terrorist organizations, proliferators, narcotics traffickers, and other illicit actors posing a threat to our national security. He is also responsible for directing the Department’s efforts to combat money laundering and financial crimes. In this role, Cohen serves as a member of the Obama Administration’s national security team in developing financial strategies to combat these wide ranging threats and protect the U.S. and international financial systems from abuse.

David S. Cohen was confirmed by the United States Senate on May 1, 2009 as the Department of the Treasury's Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing. In his role as Assistant Secretary, Cohen was responsible for formulating and coordinating the counterterrorist financing and anti-money laundering efforts for the Department of the Treasury. He supervised the work of the Treasury Department's Office of Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes and the Treasury Executive Office of Asset Forfeiture.

Obama Nominates CFR Member David Cohen to Treasury
http://www.chartingstocks.net/2009/03/obama-nominates-cfr-member-david-cohen-to-treasury/
Sunday, March 8, 2009 14:56

President Barack Obama will nominate David Cohen to serve in the US Treasury as assistant secretary for “terrorist” financing.  Mr. Cohen will work directly under US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Bloomberg  reports that the nomination of Mr. Cohen and 2 others were needed because “efforts to revive the economy have been hampered by vacancies in key posts.”

I’m not quite sure what role David Cohen, who is an attorney by trade, will play in “reviving” the economy.

Mr. Cohen has served as Deputy Director of Operations for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)  as well as the Deputy Commissioner of Intelligence to the NYPD, a position newly created  after 9-11.

David Cohen is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
  In October of 2002 he and 12 other CFR members authored a book titiled “Terrorist Financing” which was published in the Council on Foreign Relations Press. The book’s overview argues that the  “Bush administration’s current efforts are strategically inadequate to assure the sustained results needed to protect U.S. security.”

It goes on to say that “Bush administration appears to have made a policy decision not to use the full power of U.S. influence and laws now on the books to pressure other governments to more effectively combat terrorist financing…. urges the Bush administration to reconsider the recently announced “second phase” of its policy to curb terrorist financing, which will rely more on foreign leadership and less on blocking orders”

President Obama, who ran on the slogan of change, will nominate someone more hawkish than George Bush to the US Treasury. What exectly does the assistant secretary to the treasury for terrorist financing do? What role will Mr. Cohen to have in “reviving the economy.” Does  a CIA background qualify someone to influence economic policy??

Cohen returned to the Treasury in 2009 from the Washington law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, where he practiced for seven years. His practice at Wilmer Hale focused on civil and criminal litigation, the defense of regulatory investigations into accounting and financial fraud, and anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance advice for a broad range of financial institutions including banks, broker-dealers, insurance companies, mutual funds and hedge funds.

Cohen first joined the Department of the Treasury in 1999, working in the Office of the General Counsel as Senior Counsel to then General Counsel, Neal S. Wolin. In that position, Cohen was involved in crafting legislation that formed the basis of Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act, the 2001 update to the Bank Secrecy Act that provided Treasury new tools to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Serving under two administrations in the General Counsel's Office, first as Associate Deputy General Counsel and later as Acting Deputy General Counsel, Cohen advised senior officials on a range of legal and policy issues, including the Department's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing policies

Prior to joining Treasury, Cohen practiced law for nine years at the Washington law firm Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin LLP, where he specialized in white collar criminal defense and civil litigation. From 1989 to 1990, Cohen served as a law clerk to the Honorable Norman P. Ramsey, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland. He conducted post-graduate research on nuclear crisis management from 1985-1986.

Cohen received his J.D. from Yale Law School in 1989, and his B.A., magna cum laude, from Cornell University in 1985.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #29 on: September 08, 2011, 09:21:18 pm »
CNN is going on and on about it tonight.

yup, and on and on and on, like Dig is pointing out, it seems Anderson 360 might be part of the conditioning for this op.
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #30 on: September 08, 2011, 09:24:05 pm »
Breaking now on CNBC.

From Pakistan/Afganistan region targeting carbombs in NY and/or Washington.


Bilderberg's Pakistan Agenda Uncovered
Blackwater/XE/CIA control the entire region between Pakistan and Afghanistan
The only terrorists there are the ones your taxes pay for

By: Saad Ali
http://911blogger.com/node/21841
Submitted by bbruhwiler8 on Thu, 11/12/2009 - 9:06pm

Pakistan has been labeled the most dangerous country in the world, (a safe haven for terrorists). The leaders of our country are eager to invade and the mainstream media is working tirelessly to create the fear that will allow them do so. The fact that only six corporations dominate our major media outlets, it’s obvious that our information sources serve the interests of the controlling. For that reason, I set out on a trip to Pakistan to find out what is actually going on in that country. What I discovered shocked me.

The first stop of my trip was Islamabad, Pakistan, the nation’s capital. Islamabad has been victim to many suicide attacks in recent years. Thousands of people have been murdered by the hands of the terrorists, aka Blackwater. Blackwater has been confirmed by former CIA officials to having over 3,000 operatives present throughout the country. Pakistan’s International News reported on the increasing suspicious movement of foreigners in Peshawar, Pakistan. A local resident stated, “What we have been hearing about the presence of Blackwater or other suspicious foreigners in Peshawar and Pakistan is alarming.” Investigative Journalist, Wayne Madsen, in a Russia Today interview stated, “I’ve been told by private military contract sources that a former British SAS officer is basically putting ads in local newspapers in Pakistan looking to rent compounds for this influx of private military contractors.” Madsen also talked about how three former Pakistani generals have been giving speeches, stating that private military contractors are present in Islamabad and Peshawar.

We all know about the ruthless killings of countless innocent civilians Blackwater is responsible for in Iraq and Afghanistan. These murderers are loyal to nothing but a paycheck, and their presence in Pakistan has angered many. I set out to find where I can find these mercenaries, and what their agenda is in Pakistan. By talking to different independent media outlets I was able to locate the area which has been allotted to Blackwater mercenaries in Islamabad (In case you’re wondering, they stay in the F-7 region.) Now it’s not easy getting close to the area because security is extremely tight. Driving by was about as close as I could get.

However, talking to different people about Blackwater and their agenda opened a lot of doors for me. The US can’t invade Pakistan without a reason. Blackwater USA has been contracted to destabilize the country and pave a reason to invade. Along with Blackwater, intelligence agencies CIA, Mossad, and Raw have been reported to be working in Pakistan as well. Now you’re probably questioning, how would Blackwater and these agencies destabilize Pakistan? Well they are playing with the ‘terror’ card, like they did in Iraq and Afghanistan. Who is really behind these suicide bombings that occur on a daily basis in Pakistan? In order to answer this, let’s look at the facts.

On September 20, 2008 a dump truck filled with explosives detonated in front of the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, killing 54 and wounding 266. The media fed us the usual ‘terrorist attack’ story, like they did on 9/11. But according to a report by Tariq But of the Saudi Gazette, witnesses said that Marines unloaded a US embassy truckload of steel boxes and shifted them inside the Marriott Hotel on Wednesday, three days before the bombing. It was a high-security operation carried out with both the main gates of the hotel closed. Only the US Marines could approach the truck to unload the steel boxes and shift them inside the hotel. Hotel sources said the boxes were not passed through the scanners installed at the entrance of the lobby and were shifted to the fourth and fifth floors of the Marriott.

Incidents like the Marriott Hotel bombing occur on a daily basis in Pakistan. Circumstantial evidence proves the fact that Blackwater and other intelligence agencies are heavily involved in these bombings, and are using them to destabilize the country and create a scare by pointing the blame to the so called ‘extremists.’ Recently, Peshawar was victim to a devastating bomb blast in which 117 innocent Pakistani’s were killed. Local news agency NNI has reported that Hakimullah Mehsud, the Chief of the Pakistani- Pashtun Movement in Pakistan, has blamed Blackwater for the bomb blast. Mehsud claimed that “Blackwater and Pakistani agencies are involved in attacks in public places to [maliciously] blame the militants.”

Blackwater and other intelligence agencies are playing their cards differently throughout the country. In some parts, including Islamabad, they created a war between the militants and the government. In others, however, we see a war between Shi’ites and Sunnis. This topic takes me to my next stop, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan. This city has seen more bomb blasts than any other city in the country. Over 4,000 people have been killed in the last few years. As I entered the city I was in complete shock from what I saw. What was once a peaceful, growing city was now a chaotic police state. The military roamed the streets fully armed with machine guns and tanks. Soldiers with AK-47’s were stationed on every corner of the city. All schools and universities were shut down, and we were living under a curfew. I had to watch my back 24/7 with the worry that a bomb could explode, or someone, out of nowhere, would start shooting innocent people.

Most days, while reporting, people would tell me to go home and stay safe; there has been a bomb threat. I could sense the tension between the Sunnis and the Shi’ites everywhere I went. Many sources told me that a war was created between the two sects. What confused me was that Sunni’s and Shi’ites have lived in Pakistan for decades, and have never fought like this. Why have they begun to kill each other now? I spoke with Sunni and Shi’ite leaders, and both agreed that a third party is involved.

Immediately, I thought of Blackwater’s involvement in the Sunni/Shiite war in Iraq. I then spoke with local media outlets and party leaders about Blackwater, and like I had predicted, they confirmed their presence. Blackwater is out there buying and recruiting terrorists. According to locals I spoke with, Blackwater is recruiting by offering money to poverty stricken individuals for carrying out missions. These recruits are completely blind to what they will commit. For example, a paid recruit could be assigned to deliver a package, that package would then automatically detonate along the way, successfully completing the mission. I spoke with former members of the Taliban, and they said, “These bomb blasts are not the work of Muslims willingly killing themselves along with hundreds of brothers, sisters, and children. Pakistan has been stained with bloodshed by the hands of Blackwater, Mossad, CIA, and Raw.”

The reason we have not heard much about Blackwater in Pakistan, is because journalists in the country are being silenced for speaking out. A recent example of this is that of Dr. Shireen Mazari, a respected journalist for The News and a defense analyst. Two months back, Dr. Mazari’s weekly column was censored when she exposed the presence of Blackwater mercenaries in Pakistan. According to Crescent Online, US Ambassador to Pakistan, Anne Patterson, accused Dr. Mazari of spreading “wildly incorrect” information that had “compromised the security of Americans.” I spoke with a journalist (for security purposes, he wished to remain anonymous) in Islamabad, Pakistan, about why journalists are being silenced. He said, “Saying the word ‘Blackwater’ is a crime for journalists, there is no code of conduct, they’ll either kill you or your family, it’s that simple.” He told me how Blackwater has supreme authority in Pakistan, because of the corrupt government. The so called ‘democratic’ government of Pakistan has been sold to the interests of the New World Order. There is no law or order coming from Islamabad. The politicians, the media, and the military officials are puppets being pulled by President Obama and his handlers.

President Obama once said, “I have great respect for the Pakistani people.” Murdering over 800 reported innocent Pakistani men, women, and children Mr. President is not respect. The media jumped all over the fact that we successfully killed leading Taliban militant, Baitullah Mehsud, but barely touched on the hundreds murdered along the way. D.I. Khan is now home to many of the surviving refugees from Waziristan. I had the opportunity to speak with these individuals about their situation and feelings towards this heinous crime. Hamid Abdullah, a refugee barely surviving, lost his wife and children in the attacks. In his native tongue, Pashto, he said, “America has been ruthless to us, they have killed our families and we have nothing left, but our faith in Allah. Obama believes his plan will succeed, however, in the words of the Holy Qur’an, Although they plan, Allah also plans. And Allah is the Best of Planners.” Abdullah and others currently live in refugee camps whose conditions are the worst of the worst.

What is the real reason behind this agenda to deteriorate Pakistan? In order to put the puzzle pieces together, let’s start by looking at what the media and our leaders are feeding us. To start off, PNAC signer, Richard Holbrooke, has urged the absolute necessity for passing the Kerry-Lugar bill, the 5 year $1.5 billion aid package given to Pakistan to help fight the so called “war on terror”. Furthermore, an article from the Huffington Post, reports that advisors to President Obama’s administration say their worst security nightmare is the possibility that Pakistan — a nuclear-armed country — might fall under the control of Al-Qaeda militants. Lastly, PNAC contributor Henry Sokolski, in an article, implies that Pakistani-Chinese relations pose a threat to the world, and that something must be done to suppress it. Further investigating these assumptions reveals a far larger picture from what they are showing us.

The Kerry-Lugar bill drafted by Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman John Kerry and ranking Republican Richard Lugar, authorizes a grant of $1.5 billion annually for 5 years. The bill explicitly and falsely states that “Pakistan has been a nuclear proliferator; and that parts of its territories are safe havens for terrorist networks.” The bill gives President Obama the power to “develop a comprehensive interagency regional security strategy to eliminate terrorist threats and close safe havens in Pakistan, by working with the government of Pakistan — to best implement effective counterinsurgency and counterterrorism efforts in and near the border areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan, including the FATA, the NWFP, parts of Balochistan and parts of Punjab.” In other words, the President of the United States’ power has now been extended to the different provinces of Pakistan. He may now make decisions for not only the US, but also for the sovereign state of Pakistan. The Kerry-Lugar bill will successfully end Pakistan’s sovereignty. The people are very angered by it, in fact it is known in Pakistan as the “document of surrender.”

Pakistan is one of the few sovereign nations with nuclear power and it has been increasingly evident that the globalists wish to suppress it. The media has created this false scare among the American public that the so called “terrorists” are living freely in Pakistan, and they will overthrow the deteriorating government and establish Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism. So therefore, America must invade Pakistan, and stabilize the situation, before the ‘terrorists’ get their hands on the nuclear weapons. An example of this would be Fredrick W. Kagen’s article for the New York Times, he writes, “As the government of Pakistan totters, we must face a fact: The United States simply could not stand by as a nuclear-armed Pakistan descended into the abyss.” The fact of the matter is, Pakistan is suffering the effects of a U.S. led war. Why invade a sovereign country that has neither threatened nor attacked the United States?

The next threat to the agenda for the New World Order lies behind the growth of Pakistani and Chinese relations. In order for China to sustain its status as the emerging economic superpower, it must take all the necessary steps required in order to have sufficient energy resources for the near future. According to Pakistani think tank, BrassTacks, Chinese interests in the Indian Ocean became visible in 2002, when they invested heavily and began work on the Gwadar Port, located in Baluchestan, a province of Pakistan. The Gwadar Port has its benefits for both Pakistan and China. According to Abdus Sattar Ghazali, executive editor for American Muslim Perspective, “The cost benefits to China of using Gwadar as the port for western China’s imports and exports are as evident as the long-term economic benefits to Pakistan of Gwadar becoming a port for Chinese goods.” Not only does Gwadar enable China to fulfill its energy needs, but it will also provide a strategic military footprint in the Arabian Sea, which has the United States worried.

In order to halt this, the globalists need to block China’s access to the Arabian Sea by way of Gwadar. According to BrassTacks, to do this, “there needs to be a ‘new Pakistan’ as indicated in Operation Enduring Turmoil.” Operation Enduring Turmoil is PNAC’s plan to disassemble Pakistan into three parts. According to a “game plan” drawn out by Lt. Col. Ralph Peters, in a 2006 article of the Armed Forces Journal, “Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier tribes would be reunited with their Afghan brethren [and] would also lose its Baluch territory to Free Baluchistan. The remaining ‘natural’ Pakistan would lie entirely east of the Indus, except for a westward spur near Karachi.” With this done, what was once the NWFP, a province of Pakistan, is now part of Afghanistan, and what was once Baluchistan, a province of Pakistan, is now its own state, Free Baluchistan. This would force China to impossibly go through Afghanistan and Free Baluchistan in order to reach the Arabian Sea. Such an arrangement would cut China’s route to the Arabian Sea. See the map below for a detailed summary of the plan.

Pakistan has become a product of the New World Order. The agenda has been outlined, and is in effect as we speak. The country has been invaded from all ends and the people have been silenced. My trip to Pakistan answered so many questions I had about the region. Seeing the destruction of Pakistan with my own eyes really blew me away. I realize that after Pakistan, they will move along to another region and continue their plan for a New World Order. What we see happen in these countries will very well happen here in America, some of which we have already seen. The destruction of these countries are not only accomplishing an agenda, but are also being used as testing grounds. We need to get out there and expose the New World Order agenda before it is too late. I hope my report answered questions that you might have had, and gave you a broader scope on what is actually going on in Pakistan. Keep fighting the New World Order and may god be with us all.

Operation enduring turmoil
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS/NCS are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #31 on: September 08, 2011, 09:25:10 pm »
Found the Gingrich quote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMjwVVkFl4g&feature=related
25:36

AND, not only does he go on about his roll, but the speech he gives is a special plant non-question that led off from a commercial break, i.e. a special announcement.

...transcribing.
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: DHS - While Obama gabs - Spec, Cred Unconfirmed Threat Pre-9/11 Anniver
« Reply #32 on: September 08, 2011, 09:37:28 pm »
yup, and on and on and on, like Dig is pointing out, it seems Anderson 360 might be part of the conditioning for this op.

How credible is CNN/CIA?

CNN/CIA/AOL/SKULL BONES promotes struggling soldier's wives to sell their bodies
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=107554.0

CNN/CIA/AOL/SKULL BONES teaches 8 year old girls how to kill classmates
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=107553.0

CNN Debate Scorecard "Strategists" EXPOSED!
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=16472.0

CNN: American children are too fat and need testing to help them
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=17877.0

Cops fire taser at 10-year old boy, CNN commentators laugh about it
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=16849.0

CNN Exploits Southern California Fires to market their "Planet in Peril" Kickoff
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=10560.0

CNN promoting the new CIA Black Operations (Los Zetas) as Al Qaeda of Mexico
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=125185.0

Alex Jones obliterates the CNN deception

Alex Jones Inside CNN Attack Piece 1/2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYE5hcS_x5M

Alex Jones Inside CNN Attack Piece PT 2/2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukWGnph1PIs

In this important interview, Alex Jones shows us what goes on behind the scenes of the CNN attack piece apparently set on demonizing tea parties and pro-Constitutional movements as "violent".

Alex instantly recognize the attempt to demonize him personally, as well as to discredit other grassroots political movements by the tone of the producers questions.

The interview, filmed on Friday, was set-up by Anderson Cooper's producers, but so far hasn't aired. Was Alex too controversial, or will excerpts of the footage be used in a future segment? We don't know for sure, but all that Anderson Cooper's program showed on Friday in connection with the alleged "violent" tendencies was Sarah Palin and John McCain.

Regardless of what CNN chooses to air in the future, or how they might distort Alex's responses, here is a record of what really happened. It was filmed on a pocket camera, and no audio of CNN's questions is available, but Alex Jones' responses are all here, as he denies their attempt to frame his influence over talk radio and in documentary films as connected with "violence" "anarchy" or other such demonized terms.

Alex calls out CNN for their complicity in "violence" through the promotion of the Iraq War-- which resulted in more than 1 million dead Iraqi civilians, including women and children. Alex dares CNN to mention over the airwaves the fact that Anderson Cooper was admittedly in the CIA and is part of the elite Astor family, or the fact that CNN reported the collapse of WTC Building 7 more than an hour ahead of attempt, likely in response to an early Reuters wire report. Yet, no retraction has been made.

Whether or not Alex's strong response to the attempts at painting political dissent as "violent" terrorism will ever be aired or not remains to be seen.


www.infowars.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAlexJonesChannel
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS/NCS are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #33 on: September 08, 2011, 09:38:32 pm »
I thought you were joking!

That is an actual position in the United States Treasury Department!

WTF?

Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan are the number 1 and 2 financial terrorists in the country and Rothschilds are the number one financial terrorists on the planet!

What has Dacvid Cohen done for the past 2 years while these financial terrorists have been stealing over $30 Trillion from the US?!?!?!?!

I know it!  I had to read the TV screen several times while blinking heavily.
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS/NCS are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #34 on: September 08, 2011, 09:47:17 pm »
Newt's Special Announcement for DHS and the Comming False Flag from the Regean Shrine

"Yeah, yeah.  I just wanna go back to the Homeland Security question cause its important for us to confront this.  I, uh, I helped develop the model for Homeland Security.  Its, ah, hasn't been executed well, but the fact is, we have enemies that want to use weapons against us that will lead to disasters on an enormous scale,... and the original goal was to have a Homeland Security that could help us withstand up to 3 nuclear events in one morning.  And we need to understand, there are people out there who wanna kill us, and if they have an ability to sneak in weapons of mass destruction, they're gonna use 'em.  We need to overhaul and reform the Department, but we need some capacity to respond to massive events that could kill hundreds of thousands of Americans in one morning.  Yep."

 
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: DHS/NCS are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #35 on: September 08, 2011, 09:52:36 pm »
Newt's Special Announcement for DHS and the Comming False Flag from the Regean Shrine

"Yeah, yeah.  I just wanna go back to the Homeland Security question cause its important for us to confront this.  I, uh, I helped develop the model for Homeland Security.  Its, ah, hasn't been executed well, but the fact is, we have enemies that want to use weapons against us that will lead to disasters on an enormous scale,... and the original goal was to have a Homeland Security that could help us withstand up to 3 nuclear events in one morning.  And we need to understand, there are people out there who wanna kill us, and if they have an ability to sneak in weapons of mass destruction, they're gonna use 'em.  We need to overhaul and reform the Department, but we need some capacity to respond to massive events that could kill hundreds of thousands of Americans in one morning.  Yep."

And that is the 'solution' for Bilderberg/DHS's planned false flag to come!
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Sasha

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,781
    • Sasha
Re: DHS/NCS are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #36 on: September 08, 2011, 10:00:53 pm »
And that is the 'solution' for Bilderberg/DHS's planned false flag to come!

What's his fixation on, "one morning", too?  Did DHS used to have the rest of the day off, or was he hinting at somthing.
Morality is contraband in war.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: DHS/NCS are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #37 on: September 08, 2011, 10:01:02 pm »
And that is the 'solution' for Bilderberg/DHS's planned false flag to come!


This planned false flag could be used to declare Newt 'a prophet' and re-engage the War on Terror Deception because the Global Warming Deception has failed and Rick Perry is turning into a complete loser...

Here is what Newt wrote before 9/11/2001...



http://holtz.org/Library/Social%20Science/The%20Age%20of%20Transitions%20by%20Newt%20Gingrich.htm


Age of Transitions - Exposure of Gingrich's Transhumanist Agenda

http://conspiracyrealitytv.com/the-age-of-transitions-eugenics-and-transhumanism-your-future-has-been-planned/

It’s important to realize that this report clearly states that cybernetic enhancement of human performance is inevitable. With Newt Gingrich proclaiming “those countries that ignore these patterns of change will fall further behind and find themselves weaker, poorer, and more vulnerable than their wiser, more change-oriented neighbors”. Mr Gingrich conservatively calls for a tripling of the National Science Foundation budget. He also mentions George Bush’s approval of a $604 million dollar increase towards the nano budget. Convergence is the priority of importance in implementing the promise of a new day for the 21st century.

One group stands above all others for applauding this convergence. They are known as transhumanists. Most prominent among which are professors, philosophers, scientists and celebrities. The transhumanists see a world of problems just begging to be solved with converging technology.

What most people don’t realize is that this concept is not new. It is in fact a repackaging of what was once called eugenics. The term eugenics means good genes, or good origin. It was coined in 1883, by British scientist Sir Francis Galton. He defined eugenics as “A moral philosophy to improve humanity by encouraging the best and brightest to breed”. Galton was the half-cousin of Sir Charles Darwin, the famous originator of the theory of evolution, which also would come to be known as Darwinism.

Galton actually used the theory of evolution to substantiate his new science of eugenics. In his book, Studies on Hereditary Genius, he attempted to prove that the aristocratic families of the British empire were in fact a superior race. The fact that in the struggle for life, they had made it to the very top of society proved that they were the best that humanity had to offer. It is important to note that Darwin’s famous The Origin of Species is subtitled Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Not surprisingly, the Royal Society, a scientific institution dedicated to the improvement of natural knowledge, picked up on these new ideas and promoted Darwin heavily. Being a creation of the British monarchy, the Royal Society was obviously in favor of promoting the idea of the genetic superiority of the royal family. Science itself was being positioned to replace the old religious appeal, with the divine right of Kings to rule over the inferior masses.

Darwin himself stated “Elite status is prima facie evidence of evolutionary superiority”. Through scientism, science as religion, Darwinism could in fact bring about social change. Social Darwinism would manifest itself as eugenics. To eugenicists, the masses were cattle, with Galton calling eugenics ‘the science of improving the stock’. The rise of scientism began the widespread proliferation of eugenics as it reached American shores at the turn of the century. The Eugenics Record Office in Cold Springs Harbor New York went to work amassing hundreds of thousands of family pedigrees for genetic research. They also lobbied for state sterilization acts and other eugenic legislation. In 1899, Henry Clay Sharp, a prison physician, began sterilizing degenerate prisoners, and later in 1907 he was a key advocate for a law in Indiana that was passed, mandating the compulsory sterilization of degenerates throughout the state.

In 1921, the American Eugenics Society was formed and began propaganda campaigns which included the promotion of eugenics in churches, schools, and state fair exhibitions. Funding for American eugenics came from the Carnegie, Harriman, and Rockefeller families among others. Eugenics was being accepted as a genuine form of science. Social Darwinism made strong advances toward a world in which scientism would fulfill Galton’s dream of having eugenics be the religion of the future.

But a major setback occurred at the end of World War II. It was discovered that American eugenics had been a major influence on Hitler’s Final Solution. In 1934, Rudolf Hess had stated that “national socialism is nothing but applied biology”. Hitler had only wanted to preserve the best German stocks and elevate them to a dominate position in society. It was at this point in eugenics history that a crucial move had to be made in order to hide eugenics from the now aware masses of humanity.

Prominent eugenicist Sir Julian Huxley stepped up and offered a solution. He simply invented a new word to replace eugenics. That term being, TRANSHUMANISM, which he defined as the need for mankind to realize the importance of steering the direction of its own evolution. Yes, eugenics was one of the original aspects of transhumanism. And it is no surprise as Julian was the grandson of Thomas Henry Huxley, who had been a president of the Royal Society, and one of the most well known advocates of Darwinism in its early days.

Julian, being properly raised, was educated at Oxford. His specialty being evolutionary biology. He went on to many high level positions, which included the titles of Vice President and President of the British Eugenics Society, which of course had the task of removing undesirable variants from the human gene pool. Julian Huxley had said the following of eugenics “The lowest strata are reproducing too fast. Therefore… they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive; Long unemployment should be a ground for sterilization”.

At this point it’s important to understand the legal definition of the word terrorist. Since 9/11, a mountain of legislation has been passed, including the Patriot Act, the Military Commission Act, the John Warner Defense Act and countless others. All of which have, through their legislative cunning, rendered the term terrorist so ambiguous that you can be deemed a terrorist for any reason at all. You can be taken to a secret prison without charges, without Habeas Corpus, and with no rights whatsoever.
These laws were not written on a whim. They were specifically designed to give the government carte blanche authority over the people during the chaos and confusion of the Age of Transitions.

And so, this transition is perhaps the most important transition of all time. Some people don’t want it. They fear this transition because this transition is to a planetary civilization tolerant of many cultures. These are the terrists. In their gut, they fear this, because they know they are witnessing the birth plans of a beginning of a new planetary civilization and the terrists want nothing to do with it. -Michio Kaku
(terrist as in terra firma, the Earth, etc. Sounds a bit like another word though, doesn’t it?)

The British Ministry of Defence has published its “Strategic Trends” report. The report has attempted to predict what will happen from 2007 until 2035. It predicts global chaos. It states that as global interdependence increases, every aspect of human life will change. Climate change, competition for resources, shortages of food and water, and the constant threat of pandemics, will keep people in a world wide state of shock.
During the next 30 years, every aspect of human life will change…
As the middle class in the west declines, extremist politics will be embraced by some out of desperation. Flash mobs will threaten military forces which admittedly will be working alongside police. As America and Europe decline in power, China and India are expected to gain prominence on the global stage. The population of the west will decrease due to declining fertility.

The report mentions this declining fertility on three separate occasions, but interestingly never explains the cause of this problem. Amid all this crisis, technological breakthroughs will develop at an unprecedented rate. Human computer interfaces will stimulate cultural change.

By 2035, an implantable information chip could be developed and wired directly to the user’s brain… synthetic sensory perception beamed directly to the user’s senses. It is likely that the majority of the global population will find it difficult to ‘turn the outside world off’. ICT is likely to be so pervasive that people are permanently connected to a network or two-way data stream with inherent challenges to civil liberties; being disconnected could be considered suspicious.

A small super-rich elite and a substantial underclass of slum and subsistence dwellers…

A more permissive R&D environment could accelerate the decline of ethical constraints and restraints. The speed of technological and cultural change could overwhelm society’s ability to absorb the ethical implications… The nearest approximation to an ethical framework could become a form of secular utilitarianism, in an otherwise amoral scientific culture. Declining youth populations in Western societies could become increasingly dissatisfied with their economically burdensome ‘baby boomer elders’… This could lead to a civic renaissance, with strict penalties for those failing to fulfill their social obligations. It might also open the way to policies which permit euthanasia as a means to reduce the burden of care for the elderly.

The problem is that we are living in a virtual reality. We’re living in a totally controlled environment. An environment that has been created by mass media. Now, many people, especially young people, accept unquestioningly the reality that is presented by the media. Popular culture, movies, television, music–carry messages about how society works and how people should behave, and so entertainment is not value free. It has ideological content it presents itself. It presents a world view that influences the people who watch the programming. There is a reason why television networks and the music industry, the various companies, they have programming departments. The programming that we are constantly assaulted by throughout our life, conditions us. It programs a particular world view.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: DHS/NCS are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #38 on: September 08, 2011, 10:05:06 pm »
In case you did not know...the agenda is cybernetics/transhumanism...

Global War on Terror and Global Warming fraudulent solutions pushed on us by Bilderberg psychos are exactly the same!



The Story of the Millennium:
The A.G.I. Manhattan Project
Are you ready for the future?

http://agimanhattanproject.com/index.html

What does this man mean by becoming "gods", and has his war already begun?

What is AGI, and how large is the effort to make it happen? Will humans as we know ourselves today remain the dominant species on the planet in the near future? Why did the economic meltdown occur? Can we look forward to a future of economic prosperity? What do we have to fear, and what don't we? What does the War on Terror have in common with Global Warming? What will government look like in the near future? Are we becoming slaves, and how can we be empowered like never before? What is the true struggle of the 21st Century? What are the dangers of emerging technology?

These are just some of the realities and implications you're about to discover, and the AGI Manhattan Project is the key to it all.

Part 1: The AGI Manhattan Project
Page last updated: 7/15/2010


First we must establish the what the AGI Manhattan Project is, and what is is about.

Radical life extension and cognitive augmentation are the overarching goals of the technological establishment. These types of advances are each aspects of the growing movement known as "Transhumanism", where the goals is to modify humans using various technologies to transform into a dominant new species of "posthumans". They literally believe they'll be able to live for hundreds upon hundreds of years, and have superior cognitive and physical abilities by utilizing various emerging technologies such as biotechnology and nanotechnology.  
The first and foremost "holy grail" in this overall effort is Strong AI, aka Artificial General Intelligence. The world is full of AI: from video games to the stock market. But these AI's are "narrow" in ability. AGI refers to a "general" intelligence. Generally intelligent, not narrowly. Human level and beyond intelligence would greatly accelerate their other technological goals kicking off what they call the "Technological Singularity".

Regardless of whether or not you believe this to be possible they're actively doing it. Regardless of whether or not you agree they're taxing you to do it. There is absolutely no debate or refutation to this fact whatsoever. This isn't even to say their dreams are possible, but they're trying with all of their might (and your money) to do it. It's right on public military websites, and in video statements by the higher ups and even heads of top tech corporations. The New York Times even recently did a piece, titled "Merely Human? That’s So Yesterday", that championed Ray Kurzweil, Sergey Brin, Larry Page, Peter A. Thiel, Peter H. Diamandis and Keith Kleiner as being at the forefront of the Singularian Movement. The Singularity University, located at NASA's Ames Research Center, is their epicenter.

Perhaps most importantly, especially considering how if they succeed it would be undoubtedly the biggest event in human history, and most potentially devastating, with almost no chance of turning back, it's all happening without an ounce of public discourse or debate.

This overall effort openly involves virtually every government agency and department, every branch of military, which are all funded by Congress, and led by the administrations of both George Walker Bush and Barack Hussein Obama. It also involves the projects and supercomputers at literally all major all national laboratories, along with virtually all national universities, and all of the above tied in with the majority of the crony heads of the top technology corporations.

The Intelligence Industrial Complex
In July of 2010, the Washington Post unveiled "Top Secret America", a massive 2 year investigative journalism story with an interactive presentation detailing the post-9/11 security and intelligence apparatus. Their investigation into this realm of the Military Industrial Complex uncovered some 1,271 government organizations, 1,931 private companies in about 10,000 locations, an estimated 854,000 contractors holding top-secret security clearances,  all working on programs related to counter-terrorism, homeland security and intelligence  across the United States. In Washington, and the surrounding area 33 building complexes for top-secret intelligence work are under construction or have been built since September 2001. Together they occupy the equivalent of almost three Pentagons or 22 U.S. Capitol buildings - about 17 million square feet of space.

All of that based on the premise of stopping Al Qaeda. Now 100% of the above wouldn't be exactly be specifically about building AGI, but that is the overall security and domestic spying apparatus. What their massive report didn't tabulate is the direct AGI Manhattan Project efforts being conducted primarily by DARPA, NASA, NIST and the NSF.

DARPA

The Pentagons mad science coordination division, aka Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), sits at the top of this dragnet of science research & development (R&D) gathering. Enter the heart of science pyramid... the AGI Manhattan Project.

DARPA is the lead agency. They are both the capstone, and the foundation. They coordinate national labs & universities, companies and corporations, and agencies with all branches of military. Their scientific "thrusts" run the entire gauntlet of transhumanism related efforts, from cybernetics to life extension to next-gen Skynet level artificially intelligent cognitive computers. They direct the R&D to the most appropriate groups and institutions, and then help orchestrate systems wide integration upon completion.

To cite all relevant quotes from their various programs could take half a book. At this juncture there's only space to list and link the programs, which are basically all modules of the same goal:
Architectures for Cognitive Information Processing (ACIP), Biologically-Inspired Cognitive Architectures (BICA), Omnipresent High Performance Computing (OHPC), Real-World Reasoning (REAL), Cognitive Assistant that Learns (CALO), Deep Green (DG), Cognitive Information Processing Technology, Physical intelligence (PI), NetTrack (NT), Bootstrapped Learning (BL), Deep Learning, Integrated Learning (IL), Transfer Learning (TL), Accelerated Learning, Machine Reading (MR), Robustness of Biologically-Inspired Networks (RoBIN), Ubiquitous High Performance Computing (UHPC), Neurotechnology for Intelligence Analysts, Bio-Molecular Nano-Devices/Systems (MOLDICE), Biomimetic Computing, RealNose, Towards a Unification of Inference, Reasoning and Learning, Global Autonomous Language Exploitation (GALE), Self-Regenerative Systems (SRS), and Systems of Neuromorphic Adaptive Plastic Scalable Electronics (SyNAPSE).

This video was made using all government / military quotes and imagery.

It's very difficult to even attempt to place budget figures on DARPA. They have their budget, as well as their cousins IARPA & HSARPA, while a lot of work by NASA, the NSF is in lockstep, not to mention military black budgets and secretive CIA & DIA budgets.

Funding for virtually every aspect of government agendas has hardly even decreased, while many areas have seen increases. The unique thing about DARPA is they aren't limited by their budget alone.

NASA

Singularity University, Intelligent Archives (IA), Intelligent Systems, High-End Computing Capability (HECC), Integrated Systems Research, Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Cognitive Sciences, and a dizzying array of other complex projects in those research areas. One project in particular stands out here:

NASA's "Planetary Skin" program seeks to build a "global nervous system" network of sensors to monitor the entire planet, with all nations hooked into the system. It's being sold on over-hyped Global Warming alarmism, and it intends to help the global management of resources, building a new carbon based economy. Watch the video. By its very nature it's the ultimate act of high treason, a total stampede over national privacy and sovereignty, that's costing us $100 million in it's initial phase.

National Science Foundation (NSF)

Adaptive Systems Technology (AST), Cyber-enabled Discovery and Innovation (CDI), Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences (BCS), Emerging Frontiers (EF), Core BIO Investments, Adaptive Systems Technology (AST), Information and Intelligent Systems (IIS), Science and Engineering Beyond Moore’s Law, Cyber-physical Systems, Cognitive Engineering, Mapping the Brain in Time and Space, Cognitive Engineering,

NNI

One good example of virtually every government agency working in lockstep towards the Technological Singularity is the National Nanotechnology Initiative. The following institutions are all coordinated under the NNI, by the cabinet level National Science and Technology Council (NSTC):
Bureau of Industry and Security, Consumer Product Safety Commission,USDA, Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR), Army Engineering R&D Center, Army Research Laboratory (ARL), Army Research Office (ARO), DARPA, Defense Research & Engineering (DDR&E), Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), Office of Naval Research (ONR), Department of Education, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, Department of Labor, Department of State, Department of Transportation, Department of Treasury, EPA, FDA, Forest Service, US Intelligence Community, U.S. International Trade Commission, NIH, NIST, NASA, NSF, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Patent and Trademark Office and the US Geological Survey.



NBIC Conference

Another prime example of the system wide drive for the Singularity is a 2001 conference organized by the Dept. of Commerce and the NSF, which produced a 482 page document titled "Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance". It had representatives and speakers from the following institutions:

The White House, National Science Foundation (NSF), Department of Commerce, Newt Gingrich, NASA, National Institutes of Health, Hewlet Packard, Institute for Global Futures, National Science and Technology Councils Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science Engineering and Technology (NSET), IBM, Raytheon, Lucent, University of California, Stanford University, Sandia National Labs, Brandeis University, MIT, University of Washington, University of Strathclyde, Tissue Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, University of Louisville, NYU Medical School, University of Calgary, Duke University, University of Texas, UCSB, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Carnegie Melon University, Department of Defense, DARPA, Naval Research Laboratory, Defense For Research, New England Complex Systems Institute, University of Virginia, University of Maryland, Institute of Nanotechnology, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Commission on the Future of Aerospace, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, The EPA, Department of Chemistry, Princeton Materials Institute …

The goal of the meeting wasn't merely to promote the 4 "NBIC" technologies:

"Four transforming tools have emerged: nanotechnology for hardware, biotechnology for dealing with living systems, information technology for communication and control, and cognition-based technologies to enhance human abilities and collective behavior."

Instead it was about structuring collaborative research to promote the converging of the 4 revolutionary science paradigms into an all new form of substrate. The goal being eventually to create and merge humans with new forms of synthetic "life", to become "Post Humans", and to merge humans into a brain implant enabled "hive mind" (that's a quote):

Hive Mind
If we can easily exchange large chunks of knowledge and are connected by high-bandwidth communication paths, the function an d purpose served by individuals becomes unclear. Individuals have served to keep the gene pool stirred up and healthy via s exual reproduction, but this data-handling process would no longer necessarily be linked to individuals. With knowledge no longer encapsulated in individuals, the distinction between individuals and the entirety of humanity would blur. Think Vulcan mind-meld. We would perhaps become more of a hive mind —an enormous, single, intelligent entity.

Singularity University
Another choice example of cross-sector collaboration to construct the Singularity, is the Singularity University, which is housed at none other than the NASA Ames Reserch Center (ARC), in Silicon Vally. It's partners include Google, ePlanet, Autodesk, Motorola, FIAP, Steelcase, 23andMe, Canon, LinkedIn, Wordpress, KurzweilAI, University of California, Stanford and others.

Google
Google was the primary institution behind the Singularity University, which is no surprise considering Google's co-founders have repeatedly stated on the record that they intend to develop AI that in their words "would be like the mind of God", which by default would be AGI. AGI is in effect the first sentence on their corporate philosophy page. Their mission statement is to gather and organize all of the worlds information (literally all of it), and their statements are for their machine to understand all it it better than you or I ever could. This includes every book, scientific paper, web page, email, instant message, news & magazine article,      ever written by humans that they can manage to get their hands on. It also includes images, user made videos (not even only those posted on YouTube), every movie and TV show ever recorded.

GOOGLE GODzilla from IIB IIF on Vimeo.
From there, Google is rapidly expanding into the phone and soon to be TV markets. While the TV side will only let them spy on you as well as the TV can, the phone market gives them real time GPS tracking with audio & camera monitoring. They're on the record saying they already monitor everyone via their PC microphones, and it doesn't end there. Google’s model from the ground up is in building what they call “the mind of god”, knowing and "understanding everything in the world", and in this pursuit they’re connected to the government and military to the core. The Google Boys truly are brilliant, as they’ve designed their system and all of their products to make the system smarter every time all of their users use them. Meaning, every time you use their ‘free’ services, and things like their phones, you help bring their “mind of god” scenario closer to reality. It's important to note that Google has a 1.2 million square foot research complex leased on NASA's ARC, which is a borderline military facility. The main Googleplex HQ is almost literally next door neighbors of the ARC, and they use it to land their corporate and private aircraft. Google was a NASA / DARPA / NSF / CIA funded startup, and today they're openly partnered with the NSA which has an open record of spying on the U.S. populace.


Google is but one corporate example.

Apple
Apple recently purchased a DARPA AGI-precursor pet project named "Siri" (PAL / CALO), for a cool $200 million. They didn't actually buy it from DARPA, instead they bought it from Stanford Research Institute (SRI) who DARPA paid $150 million to make. That's right, US taxpayers paid SRI $150 million to then turn around and sell the product to Apple for another $200 million, while themselves keeping what they need to build even more powerful AI in less time.

IBM
While Google is at the AGI forefront in software, IBM is leading the AGI renaissance in revolutionary hardware and mammalian brain simulation. Projects range from their Blue Brain to DARPA's SyNAPSE (as explained by them in the video above). IBM's Almaden Research Center is a major hub in AGI coordination where they host annual conferences for AGI luminaries to have a gathering of the minds.

Intel
When talking about hardware don't leave out Intel. The Singularity is the passion of their CTO, as he explains in the video above and countless others. They're even working on brain implants, perhaps to help Google reach their dream of everyone having Google built into their brains.

HP
Hewlet Packard's 10 year "Central Nervous System for the Earth" (CeNSE) program is likely the inspiration behind NASA's Planetary Skin. They seem to have been in the lead of their own little realm of AGI Panopticon, while the other bigshot corporations take care of the rest of its aspects.

Microsoft, Cisco, Oracle, Yahoo, Sun, and endless others are also lockstep in the AGI Manhattan Project, all envious of Google's leading role. It needs to be noted that federal funding budgets don't include the funding allocated by these corporations themselves, or other outsiders, making assessing the true funding of the AGI Manhattan Project virtually impossible, but just going by non-secretive federal budget numbers it's in the billions annually, not to mention parallel efforts in the UK & EU.


Congress
The 110th U.S. Congress, released a report on the Singularity, in 2007:

Every exponential curve eventually reaches a point where the growth rate becomes almost infinite. This point is often called the Singularity. If technology continues to advance at exponential rates, what happens after 2020? Technology is likely to continue, but at this stage some observers forecast a period at which scientific advances aggressively assume their own momentum and accelerate at unprecedented levels, enabling products that today seem like science fiction. Beyond the Singularity, human society is incomparably different from what it is today. Several assumptions seem to drive predictions of a Singularity. The first is that continued material demands and competitive pressures will continue to drive technology forward. Second, at some point artificial intelligence advances to a point where computers enhance and accelerate scientific discovery and technological change. In other words, intelligent machines start to produce discoveries that are too complex for humans. Finally, there is an assumption that solutions to most of today’s problems including material scarcity, human health, and environmental degradation can be solved by technology, if not by us, then by the computers we eventually develop.

Obama

While the AGI Manhattan Project really came to being under Bush (the "Christian"), Obama has brought it out of the lab and into his house. Obama, who likes to talk about innovation in technological revolutions, put one Zachary Lemnios as DoD Director of Defense Research & Engineering. This guy helped setup DARPA’s IPTO to spearhead the type of AI you see in the movies.

“America risks being left behind in the global economy: Revolutionary advances in information technology, biotechnology, nanotechnology and other fields are reshaping the global economy. Without renewed efforts, the United States risks losing leadership in science, technology and innovation.”

That's what Obama's campaign website said the day he was elected (which is completely removed now). The “Revolutionary” advances he’s talking about are Artificial General Intelligence (“information technology”), genetic engineering / synthetic biology & designer babies (“biotechnology”), and too much in terms of nanotechnology to sound-byte like the others. The “other fields” he mentioned is almost certainly the other field he didn’t mention, cognitive sciences.

Google is at the forefront of this thing, with as deep of governmental integration as is possible (literally), including today with agents embedded in the Obama administration. Google CEO Eric Schmidt and their "Chief Internet Evangelist" Vint Cerf were on Obama's campaign team, and campaigned with him on the Obama jet, and was then immediately appointed 'Special Economic Adviser' on a panel of Federal Reserve and Goldman Sachs henchmen. Today he sits on Obama's President's Council of Advisers on Science and Technology. Google managers and employees were some of the strongest supporters of candidate Obama, donating around $803,000 to his presidential campaign, according to the website OpenSecrets.org. Among corporate employees, only staffers at Goldman Sachs and Microsoft gave more.
...
Google's fingerprints are visible on a broad new report on the future of the Internet and information commissioned by the Knight Foundation and the Aspen Institute. The paper calls for greater broadband deployments and "open-access policies." FCC chairman Julius Genachowski and the administration's chief technology officer, Aneesh Chopra, praised the report, saying it would guide Obama's web policy. The co-chair of the commission that wrote the report? Google vice president Marissa Mayer.

Read my lips: 'No Lobbyists In My Administration'! Some other Google agents in the Obama administration include Sonal Shah, Sumit Agarwal, Andrew McLaughlin and formerly Katie Jacobs Stanton.

Ray Kurzweil is essentially the messiah of the transhumanist movement, and in 2007 he did a double-header keynote speech with Obama in front of United Church of Christ in Hartford, Connecticut.

Al Gore

At the SC09 (Supercomputing 2009) conference, Gore, the main keynote speaker at the event, in his speech titled "Building Solutions - Energy, Climate and Computing for a Changing World", to an audience of 11,000 top technologists and technocrats, he argued that 'supercomputing' will save us from Global Warming.  This wouldn't be the first time he's implied supercomputers will be our savior. In 2005, in front of nearly 2,000 technologists and technocrats, at Stanford's Memorial Auditorium, Al Gore had then also appealed to massive supercomputers as being the savior from global warming. The audience was filled with Silicon Valley luminaries: Apple's Steve Jobs; Google's Larry Page and Eric Schmidt; Internet godfather Vint Cerf; Yahoo!'s Jerry Yang; venture capitalists John Doerr, Bill Draper, and Vinod Khosla; former Clinton administration defense secretary William Perry; and a cross section of CEOs, startup artists, techies, tinkerers, philanthropists, and investors of every political and ethnic stripe.

The goal: to enlist the assembled leaders in finding market-driven, technological solutions to global warming and then, in quintessential Silicon Valley style, to rapidly disseminate their ideas and change the world. "I need your help here," an emotional Gore pleaded at the end of the evening. "Working together, we can find the technologies and the political will to solve this problem." The crowd fell hard. "People were surprised," says Wendy Schmidt, who helped organize the event and, with her husband, Google CEO Eric Schmidt, supported Gore's 2000 presidential campaign.

Ever since Al "lost" the 2000 election, he's been serving on the Senior Board of Directors at Google, as well as at Apple Computer since 2003. The 1986 “National Science Foundation Authorization Act”, which was, in part, for the establishment of a global warming policy. What’s typically overlooked is the 2nd part of that same Act that was for the drive for the NSF/DARPA “supercomputing” program. Then, only 2 years later, in 1988, Gore authored legislation to:

“ESTABLISH A HIGH-CAPACITY NATIONAL RESEARCH COMPUTER NETWORK, DEVELOP AND DISTRIBUTE SOFTWARE, DEVELOP ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS“

Al also campaigned for U.S. President that year, and according to him, his main goal of that campaign was more about increasing awareness of global warming than it was about actually winning.

Today Google enjoys perhaps the deepest government integration in history, with their primary operations being centered around AGI, and Apple just recently bought DARPA's 'Skynet precursor' from SRI. Until 2009, Eric Schmidt sat on Apple's Board of Directors with Al Gore, both of whom were implicated in a 2006 stock options backtrading scandal with Steve Jobs.

Newt Gingrich

Decades ago he was closely allied with Al Gore's "Atari Democrats", and futurist Alvin Toffler, which had left a lot of people scratching their heads as to why he was the top "Republican" for so long. At that "Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance" event, Newt Gingrich did the key keynote presentation, and in it he refers to our current era in time as the “Age of Transitions”:

We are starting to live through two patterns of change. The first is the enormous computer and communications revolution described above. The second, only now beginning to rise, is the combination of  the nanotechnology-biology-information revolution. These two S curves will overlap. It is the overlapping period that we are just beginning to enter, and it is that period that I believe will be an Age of Transitions.

Focusing on computers and communications is only the first step toward understanding the Age of Transitions. While we are still in the early stages of the computer-communications pattern of change, we are already beginning to see a new, even more powerful pattern of change that will be built on a synergistic interaction between three different areas: the nano world, biology, and information. The sciences have reached a watershed at which they must combine in order to advance most rapidly. The new renaissance must be based on a holistic view of science and technology that envisions new technical possibilities and focuses on people. The unification of science and technology can yield results over the next two decades on the basis of four key principles: material unity at the nanoscale, NBIC transforming tools, hierarchical systems, and improvement of human performance. After he resigned (right while Bill Clinton was being impeached), he went on to stand together with Hillary Clinton in setting up computerized health records. One the one hand it can help some people, on the other it completely deprivatizes our health records by allowing the federal government instant access.

Bill Clinton

Quote:

"We want to live forever, and we're getting there."



Manhattan Project v2.0
National laboratories are the final "public" realm. Literally all of them, and their supercomputers are fully integrated into the aforementioned apparatus. One example of choice would be Los Alamos, which was the home of the original Manhattan Project. They're hooked up, along with many leading universities, into the NSF's TeraGrid network, which is a super high speed advanced version of the Internet, designed specifically for large scale science collaboration across institutions, enabling access to the various different top-in-class supercomputers. What puts DARPA at the top of the scientific pyramid is that they have access to mining literally every resource, meaning even indirectly supportive work done at different levels are still at their disposal for concept and results mining.

It can be ascertained that the countless thousands of people indirectly involved in it don't even realize what they're a part of. With global telecommunications now being radically different than 60 years ago, private intranets can connect up any remote office or personal computer as a collective.

This means that a modern day Manhattan Project could be operated across the planet in 'secret' with great ease. This would especially be the case if you had literally a million or more parallel platformed CPU’s at your disposal (like Google does). Consider that computing power per $1,000 is literally less than millionth what was during the Manhattan Project, and that project only cost about US$24 billion. Anything even resembling a modern semiconductor computer hadn’t even been invented yet. Meanwhile, every year their capabilities expand as CPU prices drop and work gets easier, exponentially, thanks to Moore’s Law and the Law of Accelerating Returns. The original Manhattan Project had about 100,000 workers, mostly all doing physical labor. The AGI Manhattan Project can easily have more than that figure, mostly all doing direct scientific research.

The Debate Over The AGI Manhattan Project Is Over!
Unlike the issues being exploited to operate it, there's no debating the existence of the AGI Manhattan Project. It can be ascertained that the countless thousands of people indirectly involved in it don't even realize what they're a part of. With global telecommunications now being radically different than 60 years ago, private intranets can connect up any remote office or personal computer as a collective. This means that a modern day Manhattan Project could be operated across the planet in 'secret' with great ease. This would especially be the case if you had literally a million or more parallel platformed CPU’s at your disposal (like Google does).

Consider that computing power per $1000 is literally less than millionth what was during the Manhattan Project, and that project only cost about US$24 billion. Anything even resembling a modern semiconductor computer hadn’t even been invented yet. Meanwhile, every year their capabilities expand as CPU prices drop and work gets easier, exponentially, thanks to Moore’s Law and the Law of Accelerating Returns. The original Manhattan Project had about 100,000 workers, mostly all doing physical labor. The AGI Manhattan Project can easily have more than that figure, mostly all doing direct scientific research.

The issue is what the intentions of the true elites that shape U.S. policy have in mind for all of this. Listening to the PR people of transhumanism should offer a safe insight: becoming "gods".

There's a war being waged against us. A great many of the people on the planet are feeling the effects from this already, via the economic meltdown. While the economic war didn't against us started generations ago, the modern technological war came before the economic assault, so we'll explore that first.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: DHS/NCS/Newt Gingrich are determined to attack targets in the US on 9/11/11
« Reply #39 on: September 08, 2011, 10:22:09 pm »
Time for some comic relief concerning the Newt...

What happens when an MSM "Newsman" can no longer handle the hypocricy of Newt Giingrich?

When a fake republican and true globalist assface like Newt Gingrich gets totally pwned by an average citizen who cares about his country, Scarborough cannot help but sound off an uncontrollable euphoria of elation which lasts a really long time...eventually Zbigniew Brzezinski's daughter has to jump in.

http://vodpod.com/watch/9135160-joe-scarborough-loses-it-over-newt-gingrichs-awkward-encounter-video

Hey Joe, a lot of times you seem to be shilling big time for your Harriman/GE masters, and lots of members call you on it.

But, I have to say...thanks for that one.

Priceless!

Hey Bilderberg...the American people are awake and will not buy the Gingrich Deception.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately