Author Topic: Terrorist Peter King scared to death that Wikileaks will expose his TREASON!  (Read 3496 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Peter King is the latest terrorist in the congress demanding that the United States nuke every Wikileaks server and burn the eyes out of every American who reads the publicly owned information.

Way to go King...YOU ARE EXPOSED AS A BONA FIDE TERRORIST

Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

"I am Peter King, and I hate America, Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr"



GOP Rep. asks Clinton to declare WikiLeaks a ‘foreign terrorist organization’
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/gop-rep-wikileaks-deemed-foreign-terrorist-organization/
[NOTE: Peter King is saying that now confirmed terrorist Hilary Clinton has the power to declare anyone a 'foreign terrorist organization'? Perhaps Peter needs to review the CONSTITUTION which he took an oath to protect against enemies foreign and domestic!]
By Stephen C. Webster
Sunday, November 28th, 2010 -- 7:20 pm

A Republican Congressman from New York has invented a new definition for the word "terrorism" that doesn't require guns, bombs, vast underground networks of sleeper cells, a criminal conspiracy or even violence. All that's needed to be a terrorist, according to Rep. Peter King, is a website and some inconvenient information.  That's why King sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder on Sunday, demanding that whistleblower website WikiLeaks be deemed a "foreign terrorist organization" and it's founder declared a terror ringleader. "To me they are a clear and present enemy to the United States of America," he told a CBS radio reporter on Sunday. King said the website's release of sensitive -- but not "top secret" -- US diplomatic cables was "worse than a military attack." Declaring the site a "terrorist" group, King suggested, would allow the US "to seize their funds and go after anyone who provides them with any help or contributions or assistance whatsoever." He also called for site founder Julian Assange to be prosecuted under the Espionage Act. That may prove difficult, however, given that WikiLeaks did not steal any of the documents it released to the media -- they was given to them by a whistleblower, allegedly a young soldier named Bradley Manning. That sequence of events, of a whistleblower contacting a high profile news venue with explosive information that needs to be made public, happens in newsrooms all across the country every week. Though inconvenient for officials, the revelation of information contained in any of the WikiLeaks files, much like the Pentagon Papers amid the Vietnam war, is crucial to maintaining an enlightened public -- a point the US Supreme Court made abundantly clear in New York Times Co. v. United States in 1971. "In seeking injunctions against these newspapers and in its presentation to the Court, the Executive Branch seems to have forgotten the essential purpose and history of the First Amendment," Justices Hugo Black and William Douglas wrote, taking the side of the Times, which had recently published what was then considered the largest cache of secret military information in US history. "In the First Amendment the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy," they continued. "The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government." After the release of the Pentagon Papers, Justices Black and Douglas opined that "newspapers nobly did precisely that which the Founders hoped and trusted they would do." According to Daniel Ellsberg, the man responsible for leaking the Pentagon Papers, WikiLeaks has done just the same. Concurring with the court's majority, Justice Potter Stewart added: "In the absence of the governmental checks and balances present in other areas of our national life, the only effective restraint upon executive policy and power in the areas of national defense and international affairs may lie in an enlightened citizenry - in an informed and critical public opinion which alone can here protect the values of democratic government. For this reason, it is perhaps here that a press that is alert, aware, and free most vitally serves the basic purpose of the First Amendment. For without an informed and free press there cannot be an enlightened people." “[The WikiLeaks] documents serve an important public interest, illuminating the goals, successes, compromises and frustrations of American diplomacy in a way that other accounts cannot match," the Times added. “The Attorney General and I don’t always agree on different issues, but I believe on this one, he and I strongly agree that there should be a criminal prosecution [of WikiLeaks],” Rep. King told CBS radio. Attorney General Holder has not made any announcement regarding a criminal prosecution of the site or it's founder. The White House strongly condemned the site's actions on Sunday, calling the publication of State Dept. documents a continuation of a violation of law. King's call for prosecution was echoed Sunday by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-GA), Clair McCaskill (D-MO) and former State Department official Liz Cheney.  Julian Assange is currently wanted for questioning by Swedish authorities who are investigating a claim of rape and molestation. Assange has maintained that the charges are baseless and part of a campaign to discredit him.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Letsbereal

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,615
  • Know Thyself
Hillary Clinton Ordered Diplomats to Steal UN Officials’ Credit Card Numbers
28 November 2010
, by Jason Ditz (Anti War)
http://news.antiwar.com/2010/11/28/hillary-clinton-ordered-diplomats-to-steal-un-officials-credit-card-numbers/

Excerpt:

'National Humint Collection Directive' Also Called for Them to Steal Passwords, DNA

One of the first eye-opening revelations from the massive WikiLeaks diplomatic logs release is the length to which the US State Department is being treated as just another of America’s many spying apparatus.

Among the leaks was something called the “National Humint Collection Directive,” a secret document signed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton last year.

The document orders officials at the State Department to conduct mass surveillance and in some cases outright theft against high ranking UN officials.
->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-

Offline TBPauly

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
    • The World Of Big Pauly
God forbid the American people start deducing who the true terrorists are...
"Let justice be done though the heavens fall."
Jim Garrison, c. 1969

Offline NWOSCUM

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,344
  • "Yuppie Scum"
God forbid the American people start deducing who the true terrorists are...

That's WHY they are freaking out.  We get it.............
"The receptivity of the great masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, and their power of forgetting is enormous." --Adolph Hitler, "Mein Kampf"

Offline Letsbereal

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,615
  • Know Thyself
For more info - I think this is the main thread now:

*WIKILEAKS: Hillary Clinton ordered staff to steal BIOMETRIC data of UN members http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=193520.0
->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-

Offline kevlar442

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
This is all sooo delicious.  8)
"So make your move and plead the fifth cuz you can't plead the first"  -Rage Against the Machine

Offline James Madison

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 293
Peter King is the latest terrorist in the congress demanding that the United States nuke every Wikileaks server and burn the eyes out of every American who reads the publicly owned information.

Way to go King...YOU ARE EXPOSED AS A BONA FIDE TERRORIST

Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

"I am Peter King, and I hate America, Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr"



GOP Rep. asks Clinton to declare WikiLeaks a ‘foreign terrorist organization’
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/gop-rep-wikileaks-deemed-foreign-terrorist-organization/
[NOTE: Peter King is saying that now confirmed terrorist Hilary Clinton has the power to declare anyone a 'foreign terrorist organization'? Perhaps Peter needs to review the CONSTITUTION which he took an oath to protect against enemies foreign and domestic!]
By Stephen C. Webster
Sunday, November 28th, 2010 -- 7:20 pm

A Republican Congressman from New York has invented a new definition for the word "terrorism" that doesn't require guns, bombs, vast underground networks of sleeper cells, a criminal conspiracy or even violence. All that's needed to be a terrorist, according to Rep. Peter King, is a website and some inconvenient information.  That's why King sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder on Sunday, demanding that whistleblower website WikiLeaks be deemed a "foreign terrorist organization" and it's founder declared a terror ringleader. "To me they are a clear and present enemy to the United States of America," he told a CBS radio reporter on Sunday. King said the website's release of sensitive -- but not "top secret" -- US diplomatic cables was "worse than a military attack." Declaring the site a "terrorist" group, King suggested, would allow the US "to seize their funds and go after anyone who provides them with any help or contributions or assistance whatsoever." He also called for site founder Julian Assange to be prosecuted under the Espionage Act. That may prove difficult, however, given that WikiLeaks did not steal any of the documents it released to the media -- they was given to them by a whistleblower, allegedly a young soldier named Bradley Manning. That sequence of events, of a whistleblower contacting a high profile news venue with explosive information that needs to be made public, happens in newsrooms all across the country every week. Though inconvenient for officials, the revelation of information contained in any of the WikiLeaks files, much like the Pentagon Papers amid the Vietnam war, is crucial to maintaining an enlightened public -- a point the US Supreme Court made abundantly clear in New York Times Co. v. United States in 1971. "In seeking injunctions against these newspapers and in its presentation to the Court, the Executive Branch seems to have forgotten the essential purpose and history of the First Amendment," Justices Hugo Black and William Douglas wrote, taking the side of the Times, which had recently published what was then considered the largest cache of secret military information in US history. "In the First Amendment the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy," they continued. "The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government." After the release of the Pentagon Papers, Justices Black and Douglas opined that "newspapers nobly did precisely that which the Founders hoped and trusted they would do." According to Daniel Ellsberg, the man responsible for leaking the Pentagon Papers, WikiLeaks has done just the same. Concurring with the court's majority, Justice Potter Stewart added: "In the absence of the governmental checks and balances present in other areas of our national life, the only effective restraint upon executive policy and power in the areas of national defense and international affairs may lie in an enlightened citizenry - in an informed and critical public opinion which alone can here protect the values of democratic government. For this reason, it is perhaps here that a press that is alert, aware, and free most vitally serves the basic purpose of the First Amendment. For without an informed and free press there cannot be an enlightened people." “[The WikiLeaks] documents serve an important public interest, illuminating the goals, successes, compromises and frustrations of American diplomacy in a way that other accounts cannot match," the Times added. “The Attorney General and I don’t always agree on different issues, but I believe on this one, he and I strongly agree that there should be a criminal prosecution [of WikiLeaks],” Rep. King told CBS radio. Attorney General Holder has not made any announcement regarding a criminal prosecution of the site or it's founder. The White House strongly condemned the site's actions on Sunday, calling the publication of State Dept. documents a continuation of a violation of law. King's call for prosecution was echoed Sunday by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-GA), Clair McCaskill (D-MO) and former State Department official Liz Cheney.  Julian Assange is currently wanted for questioning by Swedish authorities who are investigating a claim of rape and molestation. Assange has maintained that the charges are baseless and part of a campaign to discredit him.

Awesome now we know who the real terrorists are!
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
                                                            -Benjamin Franklin-

Offline Letsbereal

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,615
  • Know Thyself
:D


Yeah, otherwise Hitlary Clinton wouldn't be Hitlary Clinton
->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-

Offline s3d1t0r

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 789
  • F̱̹̳̖o̤llow the mon̐ͫ͂̓̊̓͊ë́͐͒̍ȳ̏ͨ̾͆
    • Seditious Blasphemy doth appear here!

According to Daniel Ellsberg, the man responsible for leaking the Pentagon Papers (circa 1971), WikiLeaks has done just the same. Concurring with the court's majority, Justice Potter Stewart added: "“In the absence of the governmental checks and balances present in other areas of our national life, the only effective restraint upon executive policy and power in the areas of national defense and international affairs may lie in an enlightened citizenry - in an informed and critical public opinion which alone can here protect the values of democratic government. For this reason, it is perhaps here that a press that is alert, aware, and free most vitally serves the basic purpose of the First Amendment. For without an informed and free press there cannot be an enlightened people."

That's all anybody needs to understand, right there.

These Peter King and Hillary Clinton types unashamedly seek to stifle and constrain the press, and as such the only conclusion is their intention is to impede the citizenry from existing as an "enlightened people".

And the Supreme Court (New York Times Co. v. United States in 1971) agreed.

“go to work, send your kids to school
follow fashion, act normal
walk on the pavement, watch T.V.
save for your old age, obey the law
Repeat after me: I am free

T0RN

  • Guest
Rep. Peter King wants Wikileaks declared a terrorist group
« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2010, 10:41:24 am »
(11/29/10) WOODBURY - Wikileaks has released more than 250,000 classified State Department documents.

The documents contain embarrassing comments made by U.S. diplomats about the nation's allies, and show that the diplomats were asked to collect information on UN officials. Other papers show King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia urged the U.S. to attack Iran to destroy its nuclear program.

http://www.news12.com/articleDetail.jsp?regionId=1&articleId=267469&position=1&news_type=news

Offline donnay

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,956
  • Live Free Or Die Trying!
Re: Rep. Peter King wants Wikileaks declared a terrorist group
« Reply #10 on: November 29, 2010, 11:11:35 am »
Peter King is such a sycophant! 
Please visit my website: https://www.theherbsofthefield.com/