Author Topic: HELP NEEDED: “Time Perspective and Morale” by Bernard Levin (Club of Rome)  (Read 16997 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Durant

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Reading the "Committee of 300" by John Coleman and he referenced a book called  “Time Perspective and Morale” which is a Club of Rome publication by Bernard Levin. It says all sorts of things concerning "softening up" people to be more accepting of the New World Order. Only problem is that every where I search comes up zero on finding this book. Anybody got it or scribd it? Im striking out bigtime. ???

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Help me find this one....
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2010, 10:32:43 pm »
Are You Brainwashed? Part I
Lonnie Wolfe at Executive Intelligence Review

Are you brainwashed? What about some of your neighbours, are they brainwashed? Before you answer that, let us ask you a few preliminary questions: Do you believe that the United States was struck by a terrorist attack on Sept. 11? Do think that the people behind that attack were “Arabs” and that its “mastermind” was this fellow Osama bin Laden, operating from a cave in Afghanistan? Do you believe that the way to stop terrorism is to hit them hard, to hit them at their “bases” in such places as Afghanistan, and to hit the nations who might sponsor them, like, say Iraq?

And what about the economy? Do you think that the recent fall of the stock market, and the weakness in the economy, have been caused by the Sept. 11 attacks? Well, if you answered "yes" to any of these questions, you probably are brainwashed! If you answered “yes” to more than one, you are definitely a “goner.”

“But,” you, reply, “isn't that what most people think? Wouldn't they answer those questions the same way I do?” Well, the answer to that is, yes. But, we would remind you: Just because the majority of people might BELIEVE something to be true, doesn't make it true. All it means, is that you and most of your neighbours are suffering from a mass delusion--or, put more bluntly: YOU ARE BRAINWASHED. So, the question is, really, how did you get this way? How did you come to believe things like those statements in the first questions were true? “Well, I heard it on.... Well, I saw it on.... Well, I read it in....”

You needn't bother finishing those statements; we can do it for you: You, and your neighbours were told the “truth” by the mass media. The American “news” media, which is so proud of calling itself “free,” and has been patting itself on it back for the wonderful job it has done for all us during and after Sept. 11, is the largest, most expensive, mass-brainwashing machine ever assembled in human history. It is a machine that so completely brainwashes the nearly 300 millions Americans, that the Nazis' infamous Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels would be envious.

Here are the essential facts of what happened on Sept. 11: According to Democratic Presidential pre-candidate Lyndon LaRouche, whose assessment is shared by many competent specialists on terrorism and irregular warfare, in this country and around the world, what took place was not a terrorist attack, but strategic, covert special operation, organized to have the appearance of a “terrorist” attack. Mr. LaRouche and others concur that, given both its scope, and the extent of the cover-up and misdirection which followed, such an operation could not have been organized by any Arab terrorist cells or networks, nor by an Arab or Middle Eastern state, nor any combination of the above; it had to be organized from within the United States, with the participation and connivance of a rogue network within the Anglo-American intelligence and military establishment.

As with any such covert special operation, there is a psychological warfare component, intended to maximize its effectiveness against a targeted enemy, to confuse that enemy and misdirect him. In the case of the Sept. 11 attack, the targeted enemy is the POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES AND ITS CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT. The “psywar” component of the operation is being carried out by the American media-machine, with the intent to brainwash the American people INTO ACCEPTING THE ONGOING COUP D'ETAT AGAINST OUR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT.

Does that mean that the directors of the U.S. mass media are involved in the operation? No; it doesn't work that way. As EIR explained and documented in a 1997 special report, the U.S. media are controlled and run as a cartel, by the Anglo-American establishment. As such, it routinely serves the interest of that establishment, reporting what it wants, and suppressing what it doesn't want reported; or slanting reporting to conceal reality. Thus, the media's performance before, during and after Sept. 11 could be pre-discounted by those who planned the operation, so as to become a feature of it; it were merely required to insert certain specific “psyops” content into this media - brainwashing apparatus, for it to be spread far and wide with the desired effects on you and your neighbours.

The brainwashing methods are relatively simple and classic. First, use the terror itself to put people into a state of shock, making them more susceptible to suggestion. Then resort to the “Big Lie” technique to repeatedly hammer home your psywar message--those affirmative answers to the questions we first asked. And most importantly, lie, by suppressing all counter-evidence, by refusing to report anything that might point to the assessment shared by Mr. LaRouche and others: the cover-up. All this has been done, along with initial softening of the population to the mass delusional suggestion of the enemy image and the alleged capabilities and motivations of the so-called terrorists, PRIOR TO THE LAUNCHING OF THE ATTACK ITSELF.

Don't be so hasty in dismissing the possibility of your own brainwashing. The enemy knows your profile and uses it. Doesn't that make you a bit angry--maybe for the right reasons, for the first time in a few weeks?

Our report below is designed to give you a view from inside this brainwashing process, to see how it has worked on you and your neighbours. And, while we can't yet say who precisely is behind what was done to this country--is still being done--we can show you how they think about brainwashing and use your weaknesses against you.

Psychological Terror as a Means of Warfare: Dresden Redux
Before discussing the brainwashing operation itself, we provide a little background on the use of terror against mass civilian populations. Not surprisingly, this was pioneered by the brainwashers of the Anglo-American establishment.

As commentators on the scene at "Ground Zero" of the World Trade Center (WTC) attack on Sept. 11 surveyed the devastation, they reached for metaphors to describe the incredible scene. “It looks like Dresden,” said one, referring to the firebombing of that German city by the Allies in 1944.

Dresden had no military value as a target. For centuries, it had been a center of German cultural heritage--a heritage that had everything to do with positive developments in human civilization, and nothing to do with the Nazi disease that had been imposed on Germany by the Anglo-American financial elite. Dresden was chosen for destruction as an act of TERRORISM, directed, not against the Nazis, per se, but the German people.

The firebombing of Dresden, creating a raging inferno of destruction that slaughtered more that 100,000 human beings, was conceived and directed by a group of social psychiatrists at the Strategic Bombing Survey, affiliated with the Special Operations Command of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). This group was effectively overseen by the head of the British Psychological Warfare Directorate, Brig. Gen. John Rawlings Rees, the director of the Tavistock Clinic in London, which, since the 1920s, had served as a center of psychological warfare operations of the British Empire.

The team at the Strategic Bombing Survey, which included a host of U.S.-based Tavistock operatives, such as Kurt Lewin, Rensis Likert, and Margaret Mead, theorized that the terror inflicted on the German population through the “message of Dresden” would break their will to fight, leaving them fearful, frightened, and disorganized. They projected that it would have a lasting effect on Germany, removing that nation from among the great states of Europe, making it a permanently psychologically scarred entity. The German people, they argued, would be made to realize that “all that is German” could be wiped away, all of its culture and history, in an instant, as it were, by powers who would oppose an assertive future Germany.

In his 1941 book, “Time Perspective and Morale,” Kurt Lewin described the psychology behind the use of this terror tactic for mass effect:

“One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a `strategy of terror' consists in exactly this tactic--keep the person hazy as to where he stands and what just he may expect. If, in addition, frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and promises of good treatment, together with the spreading of contradictory news, make the cognitive structure of this situation utterly unclear, then the individual may cease to know when a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal. Under these conditions, even those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks will be paralyzed with severe inner conflicts in regard to what to do.”

As the pilots and their crews came to realize what they had done—the creation of a raging inferno, burning civilian targets and civilians—many returned to their bases horrified. At the instruction of the psyops warriors, the crews had not been fully briefed on the mission. Now, they were greeted by teams of psychologists and others, who would profile their responses to the terror they had unleashed; they were told, as the crews who later dropped, unnecessarily, atomic bombs on two Japanese cities, that it would “shorten the war.”

As one former intelligence officer remarked decades later, “we killed for pure terror, slaughtered people as A TERRORIST WOULD. And, it had no effect on shortening the war. In fact, it seemed to help rally the German people to the Hitler government. The fools who designed this mission probably extended the war” (emphasis added).

The attack on the U.S. Sept. 11, in particular the WTC attack, was designed for a similar PSYWAR brainwashing effect.

The Sept. 24 issue of “The New Yorker,” commented that, according to “defence experts,” the Sept. 11 strike “was clearly an example of what military strategists call `psyops'; that is, a brand of warfare whose aim is not to disable military targets, but to sap the overall will of a nation and its people.”

The article goes on to quote from a 1999 paper by military strategist and analyst Joseph Cyrulik of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., “Asymmetric Warfare and the Threat to the American Homeland”: “By killing and wounding people, damaging and destroying their homes and communities, disrupting their jobs and economic livelihoods, and undermining their confidence and sense of security, an enemy can inflict pain to the point that people demand a change in their government's policies.

“Used at the right time and place ... an attack could destroy the people's faith in their government, their military, and themselves. It could become a decisive attack against the political will of an entire populace.”

Cyrulik is part of a network of “thinkers” who seek to change all military doctrine to meet alleged 21st Century threats; in so doing, this network wants to activate psyops, including “covert warfare” such as assassinations. While we can't say that such people are directly responsible for what occurred on Sept. 11, their assumptions about strategy, tactics, and the elevated value of psychological warfare, as well as the misdirection involved in their ascribing powers to “terrorist organizations” or “rogue states” fit nicely into the overall operation.

There are new methods, not available at the time of the Dresden attack, for maximizing the psychological effects of a TERROR CAMPAIGN that parallel standard brainwashing techniques. One involves the repetition of terrifying images, the kind that would make a person recoil, and then compelling that person to continue viewing them. Such terrifying images weaken the ability of the mind to reason, making it more susceptible to suggestion and manipulation.

In the hours following the attack on the World Trade Center, every television media outlet in the United States broadcast, again and again, the images of the airplanes smashing into the Twin Towers, from all conceivable angles, and then, the shots of the two towers collapsing. It was easily the most terrifying real-life image that most Americans had ever seen.

A population induced into a state of terror and shock was then bombarded with SUGGESTION: images started to appear, the mugshot-like photos of the alleged perpetrators, and the image of the “evil mastermind” behind the deed, Osama bin Laden.

And, you still believe that you weren't brainwashed?

The Movies in Our Heads

“God, this is just like a movie,” exclaimed CBS anchor Dan Rather as the first of the World Trade Center towers collapsed. “Only, it's the real thing.” Did you have the sense, as you were witnessing the horror of the WTC attack, that you, too, had seen this before? You probably had--and that is part of the brainwashing operation.

In the last five years, there have been at least a half-dozen movies, whose plots have centered on a terrorist attack on the United States. Hollywood statisticians have estimated that these have been viewed, both in movie theaters and home videos, by more than 100 million people. And, many of these movies, in the recent period, have portrayed “Arabs” or “Islamic fundamentalists” as being behind the terrorist assaults.

Each of these latter films has some “expert” advisor, usually a “former counterterrorism expert” and, in some cases, someone who has worked in the military. While it would be a leap to say that the movie-production companies or the “experts” are necessarily witting accomplices in the current plot, the movies, with their “steered” scripts helped people believe that “Arab” terrorists might be capable of what was done on Sept. 11.

Long before there was television, images were placed, for “playback” in America's memory banks--first by the print media, and then, starting early in the 20th Century with the first of the real mass media, the movies. Hollywood is a component of the Anglo-American media cartel, a point made more obvious by recent creation of “entertainment conglomerates” through mergers and acquisitions. Thus, a mere handful of companies, with interlocking boards, comprised of people within the Anglo-American establishment, controls all of what we see in the multiplexes, on television, in the print media, and, more lately, on the Internet.

As movies were becoming a truly mass-media phenomenon, the Anglo-American commentator Walter Lippmann described their power, along with the power of media generally, in shaping “public opinion”--what you and your neighbours think. In his 1921 “handbook” on the mass manipulation of the public mind, “Public Opinion”, Lippmann, who had been trained by Rees, among others, at the British propaganda directorate during World War I, writes in his introductory chapter, “The World Outside and the Pictures in Our Heads”:

“Public opinion deals with indirect, unseen, and puzzling facts, and there is nothing obvious about them.... The pictures inside the heads of these human beings, the pictures of themselves, of others, of their needs, purposes and relationships, are their opinions. Those pictures acted on by groups of people, or by individuals acting in the name of groups, are Public Opinion with capital letters.... The picture inside [the head] so often misleads men in their dealings with the world outside.”

Somewhere in your memory banks, were planted the “pictures in your head” of the WTC attack. New Yorker film critic Anthony Lane writes in the magazine's Sept. 24 issue, “How often have we listened to these words [since Sept. 11]. The statement of fact: `The worst terrorist bombing since Oklahoma City.' The promise: `Make no mistake about it--we will hunt down the enemy, we will find the enemy, and we will kill the enemy.' The caution: `You can't fight a war against an enemy you can't see.' And the ominous look ahead: `This is a time of war; the fact that it is inside our border means that it is a new kind of war.' We have learned such sentiments like a script; that we have heard it again and again [in the days since Sept. 11] has not diminished the sternness with which we have given our assent.

“Just one problem: it IS a script. All the lines quoted come from `The Siege,' a 1998 thriller directed by Edward Zwick.”

The plot of that movie involves a network of “Arab” terrorist cells, which commit acts of increasingly violent intensity, against civilian targets in New York City. Video clips of President Clinton commenting on the attacks launched, by his administration, against the networks of Osama bin Laden are spliced into the movie footage. As the terrorists wreak more havoc and kill more people, New York City is placed under martial law; anyone who looks “Arab” is rounded up and placed in internment camps, even as the violence continues.

In the end, the movie becomes a sermon on how to moderate attacks on the Constitution, and on ethnic profiling of Americans, while the nation goes on to fight the foreign, “Arab”-terrorist enemy.

When “The Siege” opened in November 1999, it was greeted with protests from the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee, who charged that it “portrays Arabs and Muslims as an homogeneous, threatening mass,” and labelled the film, produced by Rupert Murdoch's 20th Century Fox, “dangerous and incendiary.”

Despite such protests, and relatively poor reviews, the movie sold several score millions of dollars worth of tickets and has done well in its video release. In remarking how successful the movie-brainwashing effort has been, Lane noted, in the “New Yorker,” that the majority of Americans reacted to those events with the same kind of unreasoned emotion that they express at the multiplex or in the home theaters:

“And the exclamations from below, from the watchers of the skies caught on video, as they see the aircraft slice into the side of the tower: where have you heard those expressions most recently--the wows, the whoohs, the `holy shits'--if not in the movie theaters, and even on your own blaspheming tongue.” Hollywood, through films like the “The Siege” and “Die Hard,” writes Lane, has provided a “sensory education ... fed to a hungry public.”

In the days following the attack, President Bush's approval rating shot up to above 90%, and stayed there, especially after his nationally televised address of Sept. 13. Following the speech, a CNN commentator observed that President's approval was so high because he was behaving the way Americans expected him to: “Like the President in `Independence Day' [a blockbuster movie about an attack on Washington and the U.S. by aliens] or the guy from the `West Wing' [a popular television show].”

And, you think you haven't been brainwashed?

Part II at:
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Help me find this one....
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2010, 10:33:40 pm »
A bibliography of the works of Kurt Lewin [HOLY SHIT!]

"Kriegslandschaft." Zeitschrift für Angewandte Psychologie, 1917, 12, 440-447.

"Die psychische Tätigkeit bei der Hemmung von Willensvorgangen und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation." Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 1917, 77, 212-247.

"Die Verwandtschaftsbegriffe in Biologie und Physik." Abhandlungen zur theoretischen Biologie, 1920, 5, 1-34.

"Die Sozialisierung des Taylorsystems." Praktischer Sozialismus, No. 4, ca.1920.

"Kindlicher Ausdruck." Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, ca. 1920.

Der Begriff der Genese in Physik, Biologie und Entwicklungsgeschichte. Berlin: Julius Springer, 1922.

"Die Verwechslung von Wissenschaftssubjekt und Psychischen Bewusstein in ihrer Bedeutung für die Psychologie. I and II." Psychologische Forschung, 1922, I, 47-65; and ibid., 1922, 2, 66-140.

"Über den Einfluss von Interferenz auf die Intensität obertonfreier Tone."
Psychologische Forschung, 1922, 2, 328-335.

"Über einen Apparat zur Messung von Tonintensitäten."
Psychologische Forschung, 1922, 2, 317-326.

"Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation: I & II."
Psychologische Forschung, 1922, I, 191-302; and ibid. 1922, 2, 65-140.

"Über die Umkehrung der Raumlage auf dem Kopf stehender Worte und Figuren in der Wabrnemung." Psychologische Forschung, 1923, 4,110-261.

"Über Idee und Aufgabe der vergleichenden Wissenschaftslehre." Symposion, 1925, I, 61-94.

(with K. sakuma) "Die Schrichrung monolularer und binocularer Objekte bei Bewegung und das Zustendekommen das Tiefeneffekts." Psychologische Forschung, 1925, 6, 298-357.

"Idee und Anfgabe der vergleichenden Wissenchaftslehre."Sonderdrucke des Symposion, 1926, 2,61-93.

Vorsatz, Wille und Bedurfnis (mit Vorbemerkungen über die psychischer Krafte und Energien
und die Struktur der Seele). Berlin: Springer, 1926.

"Filmaufnahmen über Tricb- und Affektausserungen psychopathischer Kinder
(verglichen mit Normalen und Schwachsinnigen)." Zeitschrift für Kinderforschung, 1926, 32, 414-448.

"Ein verbesserter Zeitsinnapparat." Psychologische Forschung, 1926, 7, 273-275.

"Ein zahlender Chronograph." Psychologische Forschung, 1926, 7, 276-28l.

"Gesetz und Experiment in der Psychologie." Symposion, 1927, I, 375-421.
Gesetz und Experiment in der Psychologie. Berlin-Schlachtensee: Weltkris-Verlag, 1927.

"Die Entwicklung der experimentellen Willens- und Affektpsychologie und die Psychotherapie."
Archiv für Psychiatrie, 1928, 85, 515-537.

"Die Bedeutung der Psychischen Sattigung für einige Probleme der Psychotechnik."
Psychotechnische Zeitschrift, 1928-1929, 3, 182-187. (with H. rupp)

"Untersuchungen zur Textil-Industrie." Psycbotechnische Zeitschrift, 1928, 2, 8-23, 51-63.

"Zwei Grundtypen von Lebensprozessen." Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 1929, 113, 209-238.

"Les Types et les lois de la psychologie." Pour l’Ere nouvelle, 1929, 8, 251-252.

"Gestalttheorie und Kinderpsychologie." Werdende Zeitalter, 1929, 10, 544-550.

Die Entwicklung der experimentellen Willenpsychologie und die Psychotherapie. Leipzig: Herzel, 1929.
"Die Auswirkung von Umweltkraften." Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Psychology, 1929, 286-188.

"Kindliche Ausdrucksbewegungen." In W. Stern (ed.) Psychologie der Frühen Kindheit. 6th ed. Leipzig:
Quelle und Meyer, 1930. English translation: Psychology of Early Childhood. New York; Holt, 1930.

An address given in February 1931 at a convention on problems of the Montessori method.
Die Neue Erziehung, 1931, 2,99-103.

Die psychologische Situation bei Lohn und Strage. Leipzig: Herzel, 1931.

"Ersatzhandlung und Ersatzbefriedigung." Bericht über den XII Kongr. d. dtsch. Ges. für Psychol.
Hamburg: 1931, pp. 382-384.

"Der Richtungsbegriff in der Psychologie. Der spezielle une allgemeine hodologische Raum."
Psychologische Forschung, 1934, 19, 249-299.

"The Conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian Modes of Thought in Contemporary Psychology."
Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1931, 5, 141-177.

"Environmental Forces in Child Behavior and Development." In A Handbook of Child Psychology.
Worcester, Mass.: Clark University Press, 1931. Pp. 94-127.

"Vectors, Cognitive Processes, and Mr. Tolman's Criticism." Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1933, 8,318-345.

"The Psychological Situation Attending Reward and Punishment." Shr. Psychol. Pedag., 1933, I, 31-76.

"Théorie des Schwachsinns. Hommage au Dr. Decroly par les Usines réunies Scheerders
van Kerchove à St.-Nicholas-W." Belgium, 1933.

"Psycho-Sociological Problems of a Minority Group." Character and Personality, 1935, 3, 175-187.

A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1935.

"Some Social Psychological Differences between the United States and Germany."
Character and Personality, 1935, 4,265-293.

"Psychology of Success and Failure." Occupations, 1936, 14, 926-930.

Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.

"Psychoanalysis and Topological Psychology." Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 1937, I,202-212.

(with R. barker and T. dembo) "Experiments on Frustration, and Regression in Children."
Psychological Bulletin, 1937, 34, 754-755. (Abstract.)

"Carl Stumpf." Psychology Review, 1937, 44,189-194.

"Experiments on Autocratic and Democratic Atmospheres." The Social Frontier, 1938, 4, No. 37,316-319.

"The Conceptual Representation and Measurement of Psychological Forces." Duke University
Contributions to Psychological Theory, 1938, I, No. 4, 247.

(with R. lippitt) "An Experimental Approach to the Study of Autocracy and Democracy:
A Preliminary Note." Sociometry, 1938, I, 292-300.

(with R. lippitt and R. white) "Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created 'Social Climates.' " Journal of Social Psychology, 1939, 10, 271-299.

"When Facing Danger." Jewish Frontier, 1939.

"Reply to Dr. Garrett." Psychology Review, 1939, 46, 591-595.

"Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology: Concepts and Methods."
American Journal of Sociology, 1939, 44, No. 6, 868-897.

"Experiments in Social Space." Harvard Educational Review, 1939, 9, No. I, 21-32.

"Formalization and Progress in Psychology." University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare, 1940, 16, No. 3, 7-42.

"Intelligence and Motivation." Yearb. Nat. Soc. Stud. Educ., 1940, 39, No. I, 297-305.

"Bringing up the (Jewish) Child." The Menorah Journal, 1940, 28, No. I, 29-45.

"The Background of Conflict in Marriage." In M. Jung (ed.), Modern Marriage.
New York: S. S. Cross, 1940. Pp. 52-69.

"Analysis of the Concepts Whole, Differentiation, and Unity." University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare, 1941, 18, No. I, 226-261.

"Personal Adjustment and Group Belongingness." Jewish Social Service Quarterly, 1941, 17, No. 64,  362-366.

"Regression, Retrogression, and Development." University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare, 1941,
18, No.I.
(with R. barker and T. dembo) "Frustration and Regression: An Experiment with Young Children." University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare, 1941, 18, No. I. XV and 314.

"Self-Hatred Among Jews."Contemporary Jewish Record, 1941, 4, No. 3, 219-232.

"Democracy and the School."Understanding the Child, 1941, 10, 1-7.

"Field Theory of Learning."Yearb. Nat. Soc. Stud. Educ., 1942, 41, part 2, 215-242.
(with A. bavelas) "Training in Democratic Leadership." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1942, 37, 115-119.

"Time Perspective and Morale." In G. Watson (ed.), Civilian Morale,
second yearbook of the S.P.S.S.L. Boston: Published for Reynal & Hitchcock by Houghton Mifflin, 1942.

"The Relative Effectiveness of a Lecture Method and a Method of Group Decision for Changing Food Habits." Mimeographed. Committee on Food Habits, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1942.

"Changes in Social Sensitivity in Child and Adult." Childhood Education, 1942, 19, 53-57.

"A Profile Measure of Morale." Psychological Bulletin, 1942, 39, 449. (Abstract.)

"Psychology and the Process of Group Living." journal of Social Psychology, 1943, 17, 113-131.

"Forces behind Food Habits and Methods of Change."
National Research Council Bulletin, 1943, No. 108, 35-65.

"Cultural Reconstruction." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1943, 38, 166-173.

"Defining the 'Field at a Given Time.'" Psychology Review, 1943, 50, No.3, 292-310.

"The Special Case of Germany." Public Opinion Quarterly, 1943, 7, 555-566.

"Authority and Frustration—Studies in Topological and Vector Psychology, III."
University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare, 1944, 20.

"Constructs in Psychology and Psychological Ecology."
University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare, 1944, 20, 1-29.

"The Solution of a Chronic Conflict in a Factory." Proceedings of the Second Brief Psychotherapy Council. Chicago, Ill.: Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1944. Pp. 36-46.

(with T. dembo, L. festinger, and P. sears) "Level of Aspiration." In Personality and the Behavior Disorders. New York: Ronald Press, 1944. I, 333-378.

"Dynamics of Group Action." Educational Leadership, 1944, I, 195-200.

"Constructs in Psychology and Psychological Ecology." Studies in Topological and Vector Psychology. University of Iowa, 1944. III, 1-29.

"Jewish Education and Reality." Jewish Education, 1944, 15, No. 3.

"A Research Approach to Leadership Problems." Journal of Educational Sociology, 1944, 17.
(with paul grabbe) "Conduct, Knowledge, and Acceptance of New Values." Journal of Social Issues, 1945, I, 53-63. (ed., with paul grabbe) "The Problems of Re-education." Journal of Social Issues, 1945, I, No. 3.
"Action Research and Minority Problems." Journal of Social Issues, 1946, 2, 34-46.

"Behavior and Development as a Function of the Total Situation." In L. Carmichael (ed.), Manual of Child Psychology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1946. Pp. 791-844.

"Research on Minority Problems." The Technology Review, 1946, 48, No. 3.

"Problems of Group Dynamics and the Integration of the Social Sciences: I. Social Equilibria."
Human Relations, 1946.

Psychological Problems in Jewish Education. New York: Jewish Education Committee, 1946.
"The Research Center for Group Dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology." Sociometry, 1946, 2, 126-136.

"Frontiers in Group Dynamics: I. Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science; Social Equilibria
and Social Change." Human Relations, 1947.

"Frontiers in Group Dynamics: II. Channels of Group Life, Social Planning and Action Research."
Human Relations, 1947.

"Group Decision and Social Change." In T. H. Newcomb and E. L, Hartley (eds.), Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Henry Holt, 1947.

"Studies Towards the Integration of the Social Sciences."
Human Relations (Tavistock Institute of Human Relations), 1947, I, 1-140.

Resolving Social Conflicts. New York: Harper's, 1948.

"Cassirer's Philosophy of Science and Social Science." In Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.).
The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer. New York: Tudor Publishing Co., 1949,

Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. Dorwin Cartwright (ed.).
New York: Harper & Row, 1951.

"Intention, Will, and Need." In D. Rapaport (ed.). Organization and Pathology of Thought.
New York: Columbia University Press, 1951. Pp. 95-151.

Group Decision and Social Change. G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, and E. E. Hartley (eds.).
New York: Holt, 1952.

(with R. lippitt and R. white) Autocracy and Democracy: An Experimental Inquiry.
New York: Harper & Row, 1960.

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Help me find this one....
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2010, 10:47:46 pm »
As Kevin Costner said in the movie JFK...

"Damn it we got one"
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Help me find this one....
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2010, 10:48:10 pm »


Gets contracts from the National Institute of Health.

Gets contracts from the U.S. Navy, analyzes data from satellites.

Does work in the field of pollution control.

Part of approximately 350 firms who conduct research and conduct surveys, make recommendations to government. They are part of what President Eisenhower called “a possible danger to public policy that could itself become captive of a scientific-technological elite.”

Dedicates its work to what it calls a “national agenda.” Wrote President Hoover’s program, President Roosevelt’s “New Deal,” the Kennedy Administration’s “New Frontiers” program (deviation from it cost John F. Kennedy his life), and President Johnson’s “Great Society.” Brookings has been telling the United States Government how to conduct its affairs for the past 70 years and is still doing so on behalf of the Committee of 300.

Under the direction of Herman Khan, this institution has done more to shape the way Americans react to political and social events, think, vote and generally conduct themselves than perhaps any except the BIG FIVE. Hudson specializes in de-fense policy research and relations with the USSR. Most of its military work is classified as SECRET. (One idea during the Vietnam War was to build a moat around Saigon.) Some of its earlier papers were entitled “Stability and Tranquility Among Older Nations,” and “Analytical Summary of U.S. National Security Policy Issues.”

Hudson prides itself on its diversity; it helped NASA with its space programs and helped to promote new youth fashions and ideas, youth rebellion and alienation for the Committee of 300, ostensibly funded by Coca Cola. Hudson may be quite properly classified as one of the Committee of 300’s BRAIN-WASHING establishments. Some of its nuclear war scenarios make for very interesting reading and, if they can be obtained, I would recommend “The 6 Basic Thermonuclear Threats” and “Possible Outcomes of Thermonuclear War” and one of its more frightening papers entitled “Israeli-Arab Nuclear War.”

Hudson also does corporate advising for Committee of 300 companies, Rank, Xerox, General Electric, IBM and General Motors, to name but a few of them, but its really big client remains the U. S. Department of Defense which includes matters of civil defense, national security, military policy and arms control. To date it has not got into “wet NASA,” that is to say, the National Oceanographic Agency.

NTL is also known as the International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences. This institute is definitely a brainwashing center based on Kurt Lewin principles which include so-called T-Groups (training groups), artificial stress training whereby participants suddenly find themselves immersed in defending themselves against vicious accusations. NTL takes in the Na-tional Education Association, the largest teacher-group in the United States.

While officially decrying “racism,” it is interesting to note that NTL, working with NEA, produced a paper proposing education vouchers which would separate the hard-to-teach children from the brighter ones, and funding would be allocated according to the number of difficult children who would be separated from those who progressed at a normal rate. The proposal was not taken up.

Founded by Eric Trist, one of the “brain trusts” of Tavistock, Wharton has become one of the more important Tavistock in-stitutions in the U.S. in so far as “Behavioral Research” is concerned. Wharton attracts clients such as the U.S. Department of Labor—which it teaches how to produce “cooked” statistics at the Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates Incorpo-rated. This method is very much in demand as we come to the close of 1991 with millions more out of work than is reflected in USDL statistics.

Wharton’s ECONOMETRIC MODELING is used by every major Committee of 300 company in the United States, Western Europe and by the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations and the World Bank. Wharton has produced such note-worthy persons as George Schultz and Alan Greenspan.

This is the institute set up by “brain trusters” from Tavistock Rensis Likert, Dorwin Cartwright and Ronald Lippert. Among its studies are “The Human Meaning of Social Change,” “Youth in Transition” and “How Americans View Their Mental Health.” Among the institute’s clients are The Ford Foundation, U.S.
Department of Defense, U.S. Postal Service and the U.S.
Department of Justice.

This is not a typical Tavistock institution in that it is funded by the Ford Foundation, yet it draws its long-range forecasting methodology from the mother of all think tanks. Institute for the Future projects what it believes to be changes that will be taking place in time frames of fifty years. The institute is supposed to be able to forecast socioeconomic trends and to blow the whistle on any departures from what it has laid down as normal.

Institute for the Future believes it is possible and normal to intervene now and give decisions for the future. So-called “Delphi Panels” decide what is normal and what is not, and prepare position papers to “steer” government in the right direction to head off such groups as “people creating civil disorder.” (This could be patriotic groups demanding abolition of graduated taxes, or demanding that their right to bear arms is not infringed.)

The institute recommends actions such as liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that cars entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of firearms, making the use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing homosexuality, paying students for scholastic achievements, making zoning controls a preserve of the state, offering bonuses for family planning and last, but by no means least, a Pol Pot Cambodia-style proposal that new communities be established in rural areas. As will be observed, many of the Institute for the Future’s goals have already been more than fully realized.

One of the “Big Three,” IPS has shaped and reshaped United States policies, foreign and domestic, since it was founded by James P. Warburg and the Rothschild entities in the United States, bolstered by Bertrand Russell and the British Socialists through its networks in America which include the League for Industrial democracy in which Leonard Woodcock played a leading, if behind-the-scenes role. Local lead players in the League for Industrial Democracy included “conservative” Jeane Kirkpatrick, Irwin Suall (of the ADL), Eugene Rostow (Arms Control nego-tiator), Lane Kirkland (Labor leader), and Albert Shanker.

For record purposes only, IPS was incorporated in 1963 by Marcus Raskin and Richard Barnett, both highly-trained Tavistock Institute graduates. Most of the funding came from Rothschild associates in America like the James Warburg Fam-ily, the Stern Family Foundation and the Samuel Rubin Foun-dation. Samuel Rubin was a registered member of the Commu-nist Party who stole the Faberge name (Faberge was “Jeweler of the Imperial Russian Court”) and made a fortune out of the Faberge name.

The objectives of IPS came from an agenda laid down for it by the British Round Table, which agenda in turn came from Travistock Institute, one of the most notable being to create the “New Left” as a grass roots movement in the U.S. IPS was to engender strife and unrest and spread chaos like a wildfire out of control, proliferate the “ideals” of left wing nihilistic socialism, support unrestricted use of drugs of all types, and be the “big stick” with which to beat the United States political establishment.

Barnett and Raskin controlled such diverse elements as the Black Panthers, Daniel Ellsberg, National Security Council staff member Halperin, The Weathermen Underground, the Venceramos and the campaign staff of candidate George McGovern. No scheme was too big for IPS and its controllers to take on and manage.

Take the plot to “kidnap” Kissinger, which was in the hands of Eqbal Ahmed, a British M16 intelligence agent of Pakistani origin, laundered through “TROTS” (Trotskyite terrorists based in London). The “plot” was “discovered” by the FBI so that itcould not go too far. Ahmed went on to become the director of one of IPS’s most influential agencies, The Transnational Institute which, chameleon-like, changed from its former name, Institute of Race Relations, when intelligence agents of BOSS (Bureau of State Security) in South Africa unmasked the fact that it was tied directly to Rhodes Scholarship-Harry Oppen-heimer and Anglo-American-British mining interests in South Africa. BOSS also discredited the South Africa Foundation at the same time.

Through its many powerful lobbying groups on Capitol Hill, IPS relentlessly used its “big stick” to beat Congress. IPS has a network of lobbyists, all supposedly operating independently but in actual fact acting cohesively, so that Congressmen are pummeled from all sides by seemingly different and varied lobbyists. In this way, IPS was, and is still, able to successfully sway individual Representatives and Senators to vote for “the trend, the way things are going.” By using key point men on Capitol Hill, IPS was able to break into the very infrastructure of our legislative system and the way it works.

To give only a single concrete example of what I am talking about: in 1975, an IPS point man persuaded representative John Conyers (D-Michigan) and forty-seven members of the House to request IPS to prepare a budget study that would oppose the budget being prepared by President Gerald Ford. Although not adopted, the request was reinstated in 1976, 1977, and 1978 gathering sponsors as it went.

Then in 1978, fifty-six Congressmen signed their names to sponsor an IPS budget study. This was prepared by Marcus Raskin. Raskin’s budget called for a fifty percent cut in the Defense Budget, a socialist housing program “that would com-pete with and steadily replace private housing and mortgage markets,” a national health service, “radical changes in the educational system that would disrupt capitalist control over the distribution of knowledge,” and several other radical ideas.

The influence of IPS on Arms Control negotiations was a major factor in getting Nixon to sign the treasonous ABM Treaty in 1972, which left the United States virtually defenseless against ICBM attack for almost 10 years. IPS became, and remains to this day one of the most prestigious “think tanks” controlling foreign policy decisions, which we, the people, foolishly believe are those of our law makers.
By sponsoring militant activism at home and with links to revolutionaries abroad, by engineering such victories as “The Pentagon Papers,” besieging the corporate structure, bridging the credibility gap between underground movements and ac-ceptable political activism, by penetrating religious organizations and using them to sow discord in America, such as radical racial politics under the guise of religion, using the establishment media to spread IPS ideas, and then supporting them, IPS has lived up to the role which it was founded to play.

Jesse Hobson, the first president of Stanford Research Institute, in a 1952 speech made it clear what lines the institute was to follow. Stanford can be described as one of the “jewels” in Tavistock’s Crown in its rule over the United States. Founded in 1946 immediately after the close of WW II, it was presided over by Charles A. Anderson, with emphasis on mind control re-search and “future sciences.” Included under the Stanford umbrella was Charles F. Kettering Foundation which developed the “Changing Images of Man” upon which the Aquarian Conspiracy rests.

Some of Stanford’s major clients and contracts were at first centered around the defense establishment but, as Stanford grew, so did the diversity of its services:

Applications of Behavioral Sciences to Research
Office of Science and Technology.
SRI Business Intelligence Program.
U.S. Department of Defense Directorate of Defense
Research and Engineering.
U.S. Department of Defense Office of Aerospace Research.

Among corporations seeking Stanford’s services were Wells Fargo Bank, Bechtel Corporation, Hewlett Packard, Bank of America, McDonnell-Douglas Corporation, Blyth, Eastman Dillon and TRW Company. One of Stanford’s more secret projects was extensive work on chemical and bacteriological warfare (CAB) weapons.

Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller “think tanks” doing research into every facet of life in America. This is known as ARPA networking and represents the emergence of probably the most far-reaching effort to control the environment of every individual in the country. At present Stanford’s comput-ers are linked with 2500 “sister” research consoles which in-clude the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Bell Telephone Laboratories, U.S. Army Intelligence, the Office of Naval Intel-ligence (ONI), RANI), MIT, Harvard and UCLA. Stanford plays a key role in that it is the “library,” cataloging all ARPA documentation.
“Other agencies”—and one can use one’s imagination here, are allowed to search through SRI’s “library” for key words, phrases, look through sources and update their own master files with those of Stanford Research Center. The Pentagon, for instance, uses SRI’s “master files” extensively, and there is little doubt that other U.S. Government agencies do the same. Pentagon “command and control” problems are worked out by Stanford.

While ostensibly these apply only to weapons and soldiers, there is absolutely no guarantee that the same research could not, and will not, be turned to civilian applications. Stanford is known to be willing to do anything for anyone, and it is my belief that if ever SRI were to be fully exposed, the hostility which would arise from revelations as to what it actually does would most probably force SRI to close.

This major institute is not generally recognized as being a part of Tavistock U.S.A. Most people look upon it as a purely American institution, but that is far from being the case. MIT-Alfred Sloan can be roughly divided into the following groups:

Contemporary Technology.
Industrial Relations.
Lewin Group Psychology.
NASA-ERC Computer Research Laboratories.
Office of Naval Research Group, Psychology.
Systems Dynamics.

Forrestor and Meadows wrote The Club of Rome’s “Limits of Growth” zero growth study.


Some of MIT’s clients include the following:

American Management Association.
American Red Cross.
Committee for Economic Development.
Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA).
National Academy of Sciences.
National Council of Churches.
U.S. Army.
U.S. Department of State.
U.S. Navy.
U.S. Treasury.
Volkswagen Company.

So vast is the reach of IDA that it would take hundreds of pages to describe the activities in which it is engaged, and IDA is fully described in my book on the role played by Institutions and Foundations in committing treason against the United States of America, which will be published early in 1992.


Without a doubt, RAND is THE think tank most beholden to Tavistock Institute and certainly the RIIA’s most prestigious vehicle for control of United States policies at every level.

Specific RAND policies that became operative include our ICBM program, prime analyses for U.S. foreign policy making, instigator of space programs, U.S. nuclear policies, corporate analyses, hundreds of projects for the military, the Central intelligence Agency (CIA) in relation to the use of mind altering drugs like peyote, LSD (the covert MK-Ultra operation which lasted for 20 years).

Some of RAND’s clients include the following:

American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T).
Chase Manhattan Bank.
International Business Machines (IBM).
National Science Foundation.
Republican Party.
U.S. Air Force.
U.S. Department of Energy.
U.S. Department of Health.

There are literally THOUSANDS of highly important companies, government institutions and organizations that make use of RAND’s services, and to list them all would be an impossible task. Among RAND’s “specialities” is a study group that predicts the timing and the direction of a thermonuclear war, plus working out the many scenarios based upon its findings.


RAND was once accused of being commissioned by the USSR to work out terms of surrender of the United States Government, an accusation that went all the way to the United States Senate, where it was taken up by Senator Symington and subsequently fell victim to articles of scorn poured out by the establishment press.


BRAIN WASHING remains the primary function of RAND.

To summarize, the major Tavistock institutions in the United States engaged in brainwashing at all levels, including government, the military, business, religious organizations and education are the following:

Brookings Institution.
Hudson Institute.
Institute for Policy Studies.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
National Training Laboratories.
Rand Research and Development Corporation.
Stanford Research Institute.
Wharton School at University of Pennsylvania.

It is estimated by sources of mine that the total number of people employed by these institutions is in the region of 50,000 with funding close to $10 billion dollars.

Some major world-wide Committee of 300 institutions and organizations are as follows:

Americans for a Safe Israel.
Biblical Archaeology Review.
British Petroleum.
Canadian Institute of Foreign Relations.
Christian Fundamentalism.
Council on Foreign Relations, New York.
Egyptian Exploration Society.
Imperial Chemical Industries.
International Institute for Strategic Studies.
Order of Skull and Bones.
Palestine Exploration Fund.
Poor Knights of the Templars
Royal Dutch Shell Company.
Socialist International.
South Africa Foundation.
Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.
Temple Mount Foundation.
The Atheist Club.
The Fourth State of Consciousness Club.
The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn.
The Milner Group.
The Nasi Princes.
The Order of Magna Mater.
The Order of the Divine Disorder.
The Round Table.
Trilateral Commission.
Universal Freemasonry.
Universal Zionism.
Vickers Armament Company.
Warren Commission.
Watergate Committee.
Wilton Park.
World Council of Churches.

Go Back





Abergavemy, Marquis of.
Acheson, Dean.
Adeane, Lord Michael.
Agnelli, Giovanni.
Alba, Duke of.
Aldington, Lord.
Aleman, Miguel.
Allihone, Professor T. E.
Alsop Family Designate.
Amory, Houghton.
Anderson, Charles A.
Anderson, Robert 0.
Andreas, Dwayne.
Asquith, Lord.
Astor, John Jacob and successor, Waldorf.
Aurangzeb, Descendants of.
Austin, Paul.

Baco, Sir Ranulph
BalFour, Arthur.
Balogh, Lord.
Bancroft, Baron Stormont.
Barnato, B.
Barran, Sir John.
Baxendell, Sir Peter.
Beatrice of Savoy, Princess.
Beaverbrook, Lord.
Beck, Robert.
Beeley, Sir Harold.
Beit, Alfred.
Benn, Anthony Wedgewood.
Bennet, John W.
Benneton, Gilberto or alternate Carlo.
Bertie, Andrew.
Besant, Sir Walter.
Bethal, Lord Nicholas.
Bialkin, David.
Biao, Keng.
Bingham, William.
Binny, J. F.
Blunt, Wilfred.
Bonacassi, Franco Orsini.
Bottcher, Fritz.
Bradshaw, Thornton.
Brandt, Willy.
Brewster, Kingman.
Buchan, Alastair.
Buffet, Warren.
Bullitt, William C.
Bulwer-Lytton, Edward.
Bundy, McGeorge.
Bundy, William.
Bush, George.

Cabot, John. Family Designate.
Caccia, Baron Harold Anthony.
Cadman, Sir John.
Califano, Joseph.
Carrington, Lord.
Carter, Edward.
Catlin, Donat.
Catto, Lord.
Cavendish, Victor C. W. Duke of Devonshire.
Chamberlain, Houston Stewart.
Chang, V. F.
Chechirin, Georgi or Family Designate.
Churchill, Winston.
Cicireni, V. or Family Designate.
Cini, Count Vittorio.
Clark, Howard.
Cleveland, Amory.
Cleveland, Harland.
Clifford, Clark.
Cobold, Lord.
Coffin, the Rev William Sloane.
Constanti, House of Orange.
Cooper, John. Family Designate.
Coudenhove-Kalergi, Count.
Cowdray, Lord.
Cox, Sir Percy.
Cromer, Lord Evelyn Baring.
Crowther, Sir Eric.
Cumming, Sir Mansfield.
Curtis, Lionel. d’Arcy, William K.

D’Avignon, Count Etienne.
Danner, Jean Duroc.
Davis, John W. de Benneditti, Carlo.
De Bruyne, Dirk.
De Gunzberg, Baron Alain.
De Lamater, Major General Walter.
De Menil, Jean.
De Vries, Rimmer.
de Zulueta, Sir Philip.
de’Aremberg, Marquis Charles Louis.
Delano. Family Designate.
Dent, R.
Deterding, Sir Henri.
di Spadaforas, Count Guitierez, (House
Douglas-Home, Sir Alec.
Drake, Sir Eric.
Duchene, Francois.

Edward, Duke of Kent.
Eisenberg, Shaul.
Elliott, Nicholas.
Elliott, William Yandel.
Elsworthy, Lord.

Farmer, Victor.
Forbes, John M.
Foscaro, Pierre.
France, Sir Arnold.
Fraser, Sir Hugh.
Frederik IX, King of Denmark Family Designate.
Freres, Lazard.
Frescobaldi, Lamberto.
Fribourg, Michael.

Gabor, Dennis.
Gallatin, Albert. Family Designate.
Gardner, Richard.
Geddes, Sir Auckland.
Geddes, Sir Reay.
George, Lloyd.
Giffen, James.
Gilmer, John D.
Giustiniani, Justin.
Gladstone, Lord.
Gloucestor, The Duke of.
Gordon, Walter Lockhart.
Grace, Peter J.
Greenhill, Lord Dennis Arthur.
Greenhill, Sir Dennis.
Grey, Sir Edward.
Gyllenhammar, Pierres.

Haakon, King of Norway.
Haig, Sir Douglas.
Hailsham, Lord.
Haldane, Richard Burdone.
Halifax, Lord.
Hall, Sir Peter Vickers.
Hambro, Sir Jocelyn.
Hamilton, Cyril.
Harriman, Averill.
Hart, Sir Robert.
Hartman, Arthur H.
Healey, Dennis.
Helsby, Lord.
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.
Her Majesty Queen Juliana.
Her Royal Highness Princess Beatrix.
Her Royal Highness Queen Margreta.
Heseltine, Sir William.
Hesse, Grand Duke descendants, Family Designate.
Hoffman, Paul G.
Holland, William.
House of Braganza.
House of Hohenzollern.
House, Colonel Mandel.
Howe, Sir Geoffrey.
Hughes, Thomas H.
Hugo, Thieman.
Hutchins, Robert M.
Huxley, Aldous.

Inchcape, Lord.

Jamieson, Ken.
Japhet, Ernst Israel.
Jay, John. Family Designate.

Jodry, J. J.
Joseph, Sir Keith.

Katz, Milton.
Kaufman, Asher.
Keith, Sir Kenneth.
Keswick, Sir William Johnston, or Keswick, H.N.L.
Keswick, William Johnston.

Keynes, John Maynard.
Kimberly, Lord.
King, Dr. Alexander.
Kirk, Grayson L.
Kissinger, Henry.
Kitchener, Lord Horatio.
Kohnstamm, Max.
Korsch, Karl.

Lambert, Baron Pierre.
Lawrence, G.
Lehrman, Lewis.
Lever, Sir Harold.
Lewin, Dr. Kurt.
Lippmann, Walter.
Livingstone, Robert R. Family Designate.
Lockhart, Bruce.
Lockhart, Gordon.
Linowitz, S.
Loudon, Sir John.
Luzzatto, Pieipaolo.

Mackay, Lord, of Clasfern.
Mackay-Tallack, Sir Hugh.
Mackinder, Halford.
MacMillan, Harold.
Matheson, Jardine.
Mazzini, Gueseppi.
McClaughlin, W. E.
McCloy, John J.
McFadyean, Sir Andrew.
McGhee, George.
McMillan, Harold.
Mellon, Andrew.
Mellon, William Larimer or Family Designate.
Meyer, Frank.
Michener, Roland.
Mikovan, Anastas.
Milner, Lord Alfred.
Mitterand, Francois.
Monett, Jean.
Montague, Samuel.
Montefiore, Lord Sebag or Bishop Hugh.
Morgan, John P.
Mott, Stewart.
Mountain, Sir Brian Edward.
Mountain, Sir Dennis.
Mountbatten, Lord Louis.
Munthe, A., or family designate.

Naisbitt, John.
Neeman, Yuval.
Newbigging, David.
Nicols, Lord Nicholas of Bethal.
Norman, Montague.

O’Brien of Lotherby, Lord.
Ogilvie, Angus.
Okita, Saburo.
Oldfield, Sir Morris.
Oppenheimer, Sir Earnest, and successor, Harry.
Ormsby Gore, David (Lord Harlech).
Orsini, Franco Bonacassi.
Ortolani. Umberto.
Ostiguy, J.P.W.

Paley, William S.
Palme, Olaf.
Palmstierna, Jacob.
Pao, Y.K.
Pease, Richard T.
Peccei, Aurellio.
Peek, Sir Edmund.
Pellegreno, Michael, Cardinal.
Perkins, Nelson.
Pestel, Eduard.
Peterson, Rudolph.
Petterson, Peter G.
Petty, John R.
Philip, Prince, Duke of Edinburgh.
Piercy, George.
Pinchott, Gifford.
Pratt, Charles.
Price Waterhouse, Designate.

Ranier, Prince.
Raskob, John Jacob.
Rees, John Rawlings.
Rees, John.
Rennie, Sir John.
Rettinger, Joseph.
Rhodes, Cecil John.
Rockefeller, David.
Role, Lord Eric of Ipsden.
Rosenthal, Morton.
Rostow, Eugene.
Rothmere, Lord.
Rothschild Elie de or Edmon de and/or Baron RothschiLd Runcie, Dr.Robert.
Russell, Lord John.
Russell, Sir Bertrand.

Saint Gouers, Jean.
Salisbury, Marquisse de Robert Gascoiugne Cecil. Shelburne, The Salisbury, Lord.
Samuel, Sir Marcus.
Sandberg, M. G.
Sarnoff, Robert.
Schmidheiny, Stephan or alternate brothers Thomas, Alexander.
Schoenberg, Andrew.
Schultz, George.
Schwartzenburg, E.
Shawcross, Sir Hartley.
Sheridan, Walter.
Shiloach, Rubin.
Silitoe, Sir Percy.
Simon, William.
Sloan, Alfred P.
Smuts, Jan.
Sproull, Robert.
Stals, Dr. C.
Stamp, Lord Family designate.
Steel, David.
Stiger, George.
Strathmore, Lord.
Strong, Sir Kenneth.
Strong, Maurice.
Swathling, Lord.
Swire, J. K.

Tasse, G. Or Family Designate.
Temple, Sir R.
Thompson, William Boyce.
Thompson, Lord.
Thyssen-Bornamisza, Baron Hans Henrich.
Trevelyn, Lord Humphrey.
Turner, Sir Mark.
Turner, Ted.
Tyron, Lord.

Urquidi, Victor.

Van Den Broek, H.
Vance, Cyrus.
Verity, William C.
Vesty, Lord Amuel.
Vickers, Sir Geoffrey.
Villiers, Gerald Hyde family alternate.
Volpi, Count. von Finck, Baron August. von Hapsburg, Archduke Otto, House of Hapsburg-Lorraine. Von Thurn and Taxis, Max.

Wallenberg, Peter or Family Designate.
Wang, Kwan Cheng, Dr.
Warburg, S. C.
Ward Jackson, Lady Barbara.
Warner, Rawleigh.
Warnke, Paul.
Warren, Earl.
Watson, Thomas.
Webb, Sydney.
Weill, David.
Weill, Dr. Andrew.
Weinberger, Sir Caspar.
Weizman, Chaim.
Wells, H. G.
Wheetman, Pearson (Lord Cowdray).
White, Sir Dick Goldsmith.
Whitney, Straight.
Wiseman, Sir William.
Wolfson, Sir Isaac.
Wood, Charles.

Young, Owen.


Go Back





1980’S PROJECT, Vance, Cyrus and Yankelovich, Daniel.

1984, Orwell, George.


AIR WAR AND STRESS, Janus, Irving.

AN INTRODUCTlON TO THE PRINCIPLES AND MORALS OF LEGISLATION, Bentham, Jeremy. In this 1780 work Bentham claimed that “nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure... They govern us in all we do.” Bentham went on to justify the horrors of the Jacobin terrorists in the French Revolution.


AT THAT POINT IN TIME: THE INSIDE STORY OF THE SENATE WATERGATE COMMITTEE, Thompson, Fred. I was told where to find Thompson, who was the Minority Counsel on the Ervin Committee, by Bernard Barker, one of the Watergate Burglars. My meeting with Barker took place outside an A&P supermarket quite close to the Coral Gables Country Club in Coral Gables, Florida. Barker said Thompson was with his law partner who was on a short visit to his mother in Coral Gables, which was only about five minutes away from the A&P Super-market. I went there and met Thompson who expressed his disappointment over the way Ervin had imposed such severe restrictions on evidence he, Thompson, could admit.


BEASTS OF THE APOCALYPSE, O’Grady, Olivia Maria. This remarkable book gives details about a large number of historical figures, including William C. Bullitt, who conspired with Lloyd George to pull the rug out from under White Russian Generals Denekin and Rangle at a time when they had the Bolshevik Red Army on the very brink of defeat. It also gives a great deal of information about the utterly corrupt Petroleum Industry. Of particular interest is the information it provides on Sir Moses Montefiore, of the ancient Venetian Black Nobility Montefiores.

BRAVE NEW WORLD, Aldous Huxley.



CECIL RHODES, Flint, John.



CONVERSATIONS WITH DZERZHINSKY, Reilly, Sydney. In British Intelligence documents not published.




ERVIN, SENATOR SAM. Apart from obstructing the introduction of vital evidence in the Watergate hearings, Ervin, in my opinion, while holding himself out as a Constitutional authority, consistently betrayed this nation by opposing aid to church schools, citing the judicial opinions in the Everson case. Ervin, a Scottish Rite Freemason—which in my opinion is why he was given the Watergate Committee chair, was eventually honored receiving the prestigious Scottish Rite “Individual Right’s Sup-port” award. In 1973, Ervin held a luncheon in the Senate Dining Room in honor of Sovereign Grand Commander Clausen.




GOALS OF MANLL, Lazlo, Ernin.

GOD’S BANKER, Cornwell, Rupert. This book gave some insight into P2 and the murder of Roberto Calvi—P2 Masonry.



INTRODUCTION TO THE SOCIOLOGY OF MUSIC, Adorno, Theo. Adorno was kicked out of Germany by Hitler because of his Cult of Dionysus music experiments. He was moved to England by the Oppenheimers where the British royal family gave him facilities at Gordonstoun School and their support. It was here that Adorno perfected “Beatlemusic Rock,” “Punk Rock” “Heavy Metal Rock” and all of the decadent clamor that passes for music today. It is worthy of note that the name “The Beatles” was chosen to show a connection between modern rock, the Isis cult and the Scarab Beatle, a religious symbol of ancient Egypt.

INVASION FROM MARS, Cantril. In this work Cantril ana-lyzes the behavior patterns of people who fled in panic following the Orson Wells experiment in mass hysteria, using H.G Wells’ “WAR OF THE WORLDS.”


IPS REVISITED, Coleman, Dr. John.



JUSTICE BLACK’S PAPERS, Box 25, General Correspon-dence, Davies.


LIBERATION THEOLOGY. Information was drawn from work by Juan Luis Segundo, who in turn drew heavily upon the writings of Karl Marx. Segundo savagely attacked the Catholic Church instruction against Liberation Theology as found in “Instruction on Certain Aspects of the ‘Theology of Libera-tion’” published August 6th, 1984.

LIES CLEARER THAN TRUTH, Barnett, Richard (Founder member of IPS).

McCalls Magazine, January 1983.

McGRAW HILL GROUP, ASSOCIATED PRESS. Portions of reports from 28 magazines owned by McGraw Hill, and AP stories.

MEMOIRS OF A BRITISH AGENT, Lockhart, Bruce. In this book we are told how the Bolshevik Revolution was controlled out of London. Lockhart was Lord Milner’s representative who went to Russia to watch over Milner’s investment in Lenin and Trotsky. Lockhart had access to Lenin and Trotsky at short notice even though Lenin frequently had a waiting room full of high-ranking officials and foreign delegates, some having been waiting to see him for as long as five days. Yet Lockhart never had to wait more than a few hours to see either man. Lockhart carried a letter signed by Trotsky informing all Bolshevik officials that Lockhart had special status and should be given the utmost cooperation at all times.

MIND GAMES, Murphy, Michael.

MISCELLANEOUS OLD RECORDS, India House Documents, London.



MURDER, Anslinger, Henry. Anslinger was at one time the Number 1 agent in the Drug Enforcement Agency and his book is highly critical of the so-called war on drugs allegedly being waged by the U.S. Government.




PAPERS OF SIR GEORGE BIRDWOOD, India House Documents, London.




PUBLIC AGENDA FOUNDATION. Founded in 1975 by Cyrus Vance and Daniel Yankelovich.

PUBLIC OPINION, Lippmann, Walter.


ROCKEFELLER, INTERNATIONALIST. Josephson details how the Rockefellers used their wealth to penetrate the Christian Church in America and how they later used their Number 1 agent, John Foster Dulles—who was related to them—to maintain their grip on every aspect of church life in this country.

ROOM 3603, Hyde, Montgomery. The book gives some detail about M16 British Intelligence operations run by Sir William Stephenson out of the RCA Building in New York; but, as is usual with “cover stories,” the REAL events have been omitted.


STEPS TO THE ECOLOGY OF THE MIND, Bateson, Gregory. Bateson was one of the Tavistock new-science scientists in the top five at Tavistock and later did much to formulate and manage the 46-year war on America conducted by Tavistock.

STERLING DRUG. William C. Bullitt was once on its board of directors and was also on the board of I.G. Farben.


THE CAIRO DOCUMENTS, Haikal, Mohammed. Haikal was the grand old man of Egyptian journalism, and he was present at the interview given to Chou En-lai by Nasser in which the Chinese leader vowed to “get even” with Britain and the U.S over their opium trade in China.



THE ENGINEERING OF CONSENT, Bernays. In this 1955 book, Bernays lays out the modus operandi of how to persuade targeted groups to change their minds on important issues that can and do alter the national direction of a country. The book also deals with the unleashing of psychiatric shock troops such as we see in lesbian and homosexual organizations, environ-mental groups, abortion rights groups and the like. “Psychiatric shock troops” was a concept developed by John Rawlings Reese, the founder of the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.

THE FEDERAL BUDGET AND SOCIAL RECONSTRUCTION, IPS Fellows Raskin and Barnett. A list of members of Congress who asked IPS to produce the alternative budget study and/or supported it is too long to include here but contained such prominent names as Tom Harkness, Henry Ruess, Patricia Schroeder, Les Aspin, Ted Weiss, Don Edwards, Barbara Mikulski, Mary Rose Oakar, Ronald Dellums and Peter Rodino.



THE JESUITS, Martin, Malachi.

THE LATER CECILS, Rose, Kenneth.


THE MANAGEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE GROWTH, Cleveland, Harlan. Cleveland was commissioned by NATO to report on just how far the Club of Rome’s Post Industrial Society-Zero Growth blueprint to wreck the industrial base of the United States had succeeded. This shocking document should be read by every patriotic American who feels an urgent need for an explanation as to why the U.S. is in a deep economic depression at the end of 1991.

THE MEN WHO RULED INDIA, Woodruff, Philip.

THE OPEN CONSPIRACY, Wells, H. G. In this work, Wells describes how in the New World Order (which he calls the New Republic) “useless eaters,” excess population, will be gotten rid of: “The men of the New Republic will not be squeamish either in facing or inflicting death.... They will have an ideal that will make killing worthwhile; like Abraham, they will have the faith to kill, and they will have no superstitions about death.... They will hold, I anticipate, that a certain portion of the population exists only on sufferance out of pity and patience, and, on the understanding that they do not propagate, and I do not foresee any reason to oppose that they will not hesitate to kill when that sufferance is abused.... All such killings will be done with an opiate.... If deterrent punishments are used at all in the code of the future, the deterrent shall be neither death, nor mutilation of the body...but good scientifically caused pain.” The United States has a very large contingent of Wells converts who would not hesitate to follow the dictates of Wells, once the New World Order becomes a reality. Walter Lippmann was one of Wells’ most ardent disciples.

THE POLITICS OF EXPERIENCE, Laing, R.D. Laing was the Staff Psychologist at Tavistock and, under Andrew Schofield, a member of the Governing Council.

THE POLITICS OF HEROIN IN SOUTH EAST ASIA, McCoy, Alfred W., Read, C.B and Adams, Leonard P.

THE PROBLEM OF CHINA, Russell, Bertrand.

THE PUGWASH CONFEREES, Bertrand Russell. In the early 1950’s Russell led a movement urging a nuclear attack on Russia. When it was discovered, Stalin warned that he would not hesitate to retaliate in kind. This led to a quick “rethink” on he part of Russell, who almost overnight became a pacifist thus was born the “Ban the Bomb” Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) out of which arose the Pugwash anti-nuclear scientists. In 1957 the first group met at the home of Cyrus Eaton in Nova Scotia, a long-time American Communist. The Pugwash Conferees dedicated themselves to anti-nuclear and environmental issues and were a thorn in the side of U.S. efforts to develop nuclear weapons.


THE STRUCTURE OF THE POPULAR MUSIC INDUSTRY; THE FILTERING PROCESS WHEREBY RECORDS ARE SELECTED FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION, Institute for Social Research. This work explains how “Hit Parades,” “The Top Ten”—now expanded to the “Top Forty”—and other charades are constructed to deceive listeners and convince them what they hear is what “THEY” like!

THE WORKS OF JEREMY BENTHAM, Bowering, John. Bentham was the liberal of his day and the agent for Lord Shelburne, British Prime Minister at the end of the American War of Independence. Bentham believed that man was no more than a common animal, and Bentham’s theories were later written up by his protege, David Hume. Writing about instinct in animals Hume said, “...which we are so apt to admire as extraordinary and inexplicable. But our wonder will perhaps cease or diminish when we consider that the experimental reasoning itself which we possess in common with beasts, and upon which the whole conduct of life depends, is nothing but a species of instinct, or mechanical power that acts in us unknown to our-selves.... Though the instincts be different, yet still it is an instinct.”



TREND REPORT, Naisbitt, John.

U.S. CONGRESS, HOUSE COMMITTEE ON INTERNAL SECURITY, REPORTING ON THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES (IPS) AND THE PENTAGON PAPERS. In the spring of 1970, FBI operative William McDermott went to see Richard Best, who at that time was Rand’s top security officer, to warn him of the possibility that Ellsberg had removed Vietnam study papers done by Rand and had copied them outside of Rand premises. Best took McDermott to see Dr. Harry Rowan who headed Rand and who was also one of Ellsberg’s closest friends. Rowan told the FBI that a Defense Department inquiry was going on and on his assurance, the FBI apparently dropped its investigation of Ellsberg. In fact, no inquiry was in progress, nor did the DoD ever conduct one. Ellsberg retained his security clearance at Rand and blatantly went on removing and copying Vietnam War documents right up to the time of his exposure during the Pentagon Papers affair which rocked the Nixon Administration to its foundations.

UNDERSTANDING MAN’S SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, Cantril. Cantril was primarily responsible for establishing the Association for Humanistic Psychology based in San Francisco that taught Tavistock methods. It is in institutions of this type that we find the lines between pure science and social engineering become totally obliterated. The term “social engineering” covers every aspect of methods used by Tavistock to bring about massive charges in group orientation toward social, economic, religious and political events and brainwashing of target groups who then believe that opinions expressed and viewpoints taken are their own. Selected individuals underwent the same Tavistockian treatment, resulting in major shifts in personality and behavior. The effect of this on the national scene was, and still is, devastating and is one of the principal factors in bringing the United States into the twilight, decline and fall state-of-being in which the country finds itself at the close of 1991. I did a report on this national condition under the title: “Twilight, Decline and Fall of the United States of America” which was published in l987. The Association for Human Psychology was founded by Abraham Maselov in l957 as a Club of Rome project. Another Tavistock-Club of Rome Commissioned opinion-making research center was established by Risis Likhert and Ronald Lippert who called it The Center for Research in the Utilization of Scientific Knowledge. The facility was under the directorship of Club of Rome’s Donald Michael. The center drew heavily on the Office of Public Opinion Research established at Princeton University in l940. It was from here that Cantril taught many of the techniques used by today’s pollsters-opinion makers.

UNPUBLlSHED LETTERS, Kipling, Rudyard. Kipling was a Wells disciple and, like Wells, believed in Fascism, as a means of world control. Kipling adopted the Running Cross as his personal emblem. The Running Cross was later adopted by Hitler and with slight modifications became known as the swastika.

UNPUBLISHED LETTERS, Wells, H. G. Gives interesting details of how Wells sold the rights to “WAR OF THE WORLDS” to RCA.


WHO’S WHO IN CANADA, several editions.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Help me find this one....
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2010, 10:50:31 pm »

Section 2

What are the goals of the secret elite group, the inheritors of Illuminism (Moriah Conquering Wind), the Cult of Dionysius, the Cult of Isis, Catharism, Bogomilism?

This elite group that also calls itself the OLYMPIANS (they truly believe they are equal in power and stature to the legendary gods of Olympus, who have, like Lucifer their god, set themselves above our true God) absolutely believe they have been charged with implementing the following by divine right:

(1) A One World Government-New World Order with a unified church and monetary system under their direction. Not many people are aware that the One World Government began setting up its “church” in the 1920’s/ 1930’s, for they realized the need for a religious belief inherent in mankind to have an outlet and, therefore, set up a “church” body to channel that belief in the direction they desired.

(2) The utter destruction of all national identity and national pride.

(3) The destruction of religion and more especially the Christian religion, with the one exception, their own creation mentioned above.

(4) Control of each and every person through means of mind control and what Brzezinski call “technotronics” which would create human-like robots and a system of terror beside which Felix Dzerzinski’s Red Terror will look like children at play.

(5) An end to all industrialization and the production of nuclear generated electric power in what they call “the post-industrial zero-growth society.” Exempted are the computer and service industries. United States industries that remain will be exported to countries such as Mexico where abundant slave labor is available. Unemployables in the wake of industrial destruction will either become opium-heroin and or cocaine addicts, or become statistics in the elimination process we know today as Global 2000 Report.

(6) Legalization of drugs and pornography.

(7) Depopulation of large cities according to the trial run carried out by the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia. It is interesting to note that Pol Pot’s genocidal plans were drawn up here in the United States by one of the Club of Rome’s research foundations. It is also interesting that the Committee is presently seeking to reinstate the Pol Pot butchers in Cambodia.

(8 ) Suppression of all scientific development except for those deemed beneficial by the Committee. Especially targeted is nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Particularly hated are the fusion experiments presently being scorned and ridiculed by the Committee and its jackals of the press. Development of the fusion torch would blow the Committee’s conception of “limited natural resources” right out of the window. A fusion torch properly used could create unlimited untapped natural resources from the most ordinary substances. Fusion torch uses are legion and would benefit mankind in a manner which is as yet not even remotely comprehended by the public.

(9) Cause by means of limited wars in the advanced countries, and by means of starvation and diseases in Third World countries, the death of 3 billion people by the year 2000, people they call “useless eaters.” The Committee of 300 commissioned Cyrus Vance to write a paper on this subject of how best to bring about such genocide. The paper was produced under the title the “Global 2000 Report” and was accepted and approved for action by President Carter, for and on behalf of the U.S. Government, and accepted by Edwin Muskie, then Secretary of State. Under the terms of the Global 2000 Report, the population of the United States is to be reduced by 100 million by the year 2050.

(10)To weaken the moral fiber of the nation and to demoralize workers in the labor class by creating mass unemployment. As jobs dwindle due to the post industrial zero growth policies introduced by the Club of Rome, demoralized and discouraged workers will resort to alcohol and drugs. The youth of the land will be encouraged by means of rock music and drugs to rebel against the status quo, thus undermining and eventually destroying the family unit. In this regard The Commit-tee of 300 commissioned Tavistock Institute to prepare a blueprint as to how this could be achieved. Tavistock directed Stanford Research to undertake the work under the direction of Professor Willis Harmon. This work later became known as “The Aquarian Conspiracy.”

(11) To keep people everywhere from deciding their own destinies by means of one created crisis after another and then “managing” such crises. This will confuse and demoralize the population to the extent where faced with too many choices, apathy on a massive scale will result. In the case of the United States, an agency for crisis management is already in place. It is called the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), whose existence I first disclosed in 1980. There will be more on FEMA as we proceed.

(12) To introduce new cults and continue to boost those already functioning which includes rock “music” gangsters such as the filthy, degenerate Mick Jagger’s “Rolling Stones” (a gangster group much favored by European Black Nobility) and all of the Tavistock-created “rock” groups which began with “The Beatles.”

(13) To continue to build up the cult of Christian fundamentalism begun by the British East India Company’s servant, Darby, which will be misused to strengthen the Zionist state of Israel through identifying with the Jews through the myth of “God’s Chosen People” and by donating very substantial amounts of money to what they mistakenly believe is a religious cause in the furtherance of Christianity.

(14) To press for the spread of religious cults such as the Moslem Brotherhood, Moslem fundamentalism, the Sikhs, and to carry out experiments of the Jim Jones and “Son of Sam” type of murders. It is worth noting that the late Ayatollah Khomeini was a creation of British Intelligence Military Intelligence Division 6, commonly known as M16, as I reported in my 1985 work, “What Really Happened In Iran.”

(15) To export “religious liberation” ideas around the world so as to undermine all existing religions but more especially the Christian religion. This began with “Je-suit Liberation Theology” which brought about the downfall of the Somoza family rule in Nicaragua and which is today destroying EI Salvador, now 25 years into a “civil war,” Costa Rica and Honduras. One very active entity engaged in so-called liberation theology is the Communist oriented Mary Knoll Mission. This accounts for the extensive media attention to the murder of four of Mary Knoll’s so-called nuns in EI Salvador a few years ago.

The four nuns were Communist subversive agents and their activities were widely documented by the government of EI Salvador. The United States press and news media refused to give any space or coverage to the mass of documentation in possession of the Salvadorian government, documentation which proves what the Mary Knoll Mission nuns were doing in the country. Mary Knoll is in service in many countries, and played a leading role in bringing Communism to Rhodesia, Mozambique, Angola and South Africa.

(16) To cause a total collapse of the world’s economies and engender total political chaos.

(17) To take control of all Foreign and domestic policies of the United States.

(18) To give the fullest support to supranational institutions such as the United Nations (UN), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the World Court and, as far as possible, make local institutions of lesser effect by gradually phasing them out or bringing them under the mantle of the United Nations.

(19) Penetrate and subvert all governments, and work from within them to destroy the sovereign integrity of nations represented by them.

(20) Organize a world-wide terrorist apparatus and negotiate with terrorists whenever terrorist activities take place. It will be recalled that it was Bettino Craxi who persuaded the Italian and U.S. governments to negotiate with the Red Brigades kidnapers of Prime Minister Moro and General Dozier. As an aside, General Dozier is under orders not to talk about what happened to him. Should he break that silence, he will no doubt be made “a horrible example of” in the manner in which Kissinger dealt with Aldo Moro, Ali Bhutto and General Zia ul Haq.

(21) Take control of education in America with the intent and purpose of utterly and completely destroying it.


Much of these goals, which I first enumerated in 1969, have since been achieved or are well on their way to being achieved.


Of special interest in the Committee of 300 program is the core of their economic policy, which is largely based on the teachings of Malthus, the son of an English country parson who was pushed to prominence by the British East India Company upon which the Committee of 300 is modeled.

Malthus maintained that man’s progress is tied to the earth’s natural ability to support a given number of people, beyond which point earth’s limited resources would rapidly be depleted.

Once these natural resources have been consumed, it will be impossible to replace them. Hence, Malthus observed, it is necessary to limit populations within the boundaries of decreasing natural resources. It goes without saying that the elite will not allow themselves to be threatened by a burgeoning population of “useless eaters,” hence culling must be practiced. As I have previously stated, “culling” is going on today, using the methods mandated in the “Global 2000 Report.”

All economic plans of the Committee meet at the crossroads of Malthus and Frederick Von Hayek, another doom and gloom economist who is sponsored by the Club of Rome. The Austrian born Von Hayek has long been under the control of David Rockefeller, and Von Hayek theories are fairly widely accepted in the United States.


According to Von Hayek, the United States economic platform must be based on,

(a) Urban Black Markets

(b) Small Hong Kong-type industries utilizing sweat-shop labor

(c) The Tourist Trade

(d) Free Enterprise Zones where speculators can operate unhindered and where the drug trade can flourish

(e) End of all industrial activity

(f) Close down all nuclear energy plants

Von Hayek’s ideas dove-tail perfectly with those of the Club of Rome, which is perhaps why he is so well promoted in rightwing circles in this country.


The mantle of Von Hayek is being passed to a new, younger economist, Jeoffrey Sachs, who was sent to Poland to take up where Von Hayek left off. It will he recalled that the Club of Rome organized the Polish economic crisis which led to political destabilization of the country. The exact same economic planning, if one dare call it that, will be forced upon Russia, but if widespread opposition is encountered, the old price-support system will quickly be restored.

The Committee of 300 ordered the Club of Rome to use Polish nationalism as a tool to destroy the Catholic Church and pave the way for Russian troops to reoccupy the country. The “Solidarity” movement was a creation of the Committee of 300’s Zbigniew Brzezinski, who chose the name for the “trade union” and selected its office holders and organizers. Solidarity is no “labor” movement, although Gdansk shipyard workers ere used to launch it, but rather, it was a high-profile POLITICAL organization, created to bring forced changes in preparation for the advent of the One World Government.

Most of Solidarity’s leaders were descendants of Bolshevik Jews from Odessa and were not noted for hating Communism. This helps to understand the saturation coverage provided by the American news media. Professor Sachs has taken the process a step further, ensuring economic slavery for a Poland recently freed from the domination of the USSR. Poland will now become the economic slave of the United States. All that has happened is that the master has changed.

Brzezinski is the author of a book that should have been read by every American interested in the future of this country. Entitled “The Technotronic Era,” it was commissioned by the Club of Rome. The book is an open announcement of the manner and methods to be used to control the United States in the future.


It also gave notice of cloning and “robotoids,” i.e. people who acted like people and who seemed to be people, but who were not. Brzezinski, speaking for the Committee of 300 said the United States was moving “into an era unlike any of its predecessors; we were moving toward a technotronic era that could easily become a dictatorship.” I reported fully on “the Technotronic Era” in 1981 and mentioned it in my newsletters a number of times.

Brzezinski went on to say that our society,

“is now in an information revolution based on amusement focus, spectator spectacles (saturation coverage by television of sporting events) which provide an opiate for an increasingly purposeless mass.”

Was Brzezinski another seer and a prophet? Could he see into the future? The answer is NO; what he wrote in his book was simply copied from the Committee of 300’s blueprint given to the Club of Rome for execution.


Isn’t it true that by 1991 we already have a purposeless mass of citizens? We could say that 30 million unemployed and 4 million homeless people are a “purposeless mass,” or at least the nucleus of one.

In addition to religion, “the opiate of the masses” which Lenin and Marx acknowledged was needed, we now have the opiates of mass spectator sport, unbridled sexual lusts, rock music and a whole new generation of drug addicts. Mindless sex and an epidemic of drug usage was created to distract people from what is happening all around them. In “The Technotronic Era” Brzezinski talks about “the masses” as if people are some inanimate object—which is possibly how we are viewed by the Committee of 300. He continually refers to the necessity of controlling us “masses.”

At one point, he lets the cat out of the bag:

“At the same time the capacity to assert social and political control over the individual will vastly increase. It will soon be possible to assert almost continuous control over every citizen and to maintain up-to-date files, containing even the most personal details about health and personal behavior of every citizen in addition to the more customary data.

“These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. Power will gravitate into the hands of those who control information. Our existing institutions will be supplanted by pre-crisis management institutions, the task of which will be to identify in advance likely social crises and to develop pro-grams to cope with them. (This describes the structure of FEMA which came much later. )

“This will encourage tendencies through the next several decades toward a TECHNOTRONIC ERA, A DICTATORSHIP, leaving even less room for political procedures as we know them. Finally, looking ahead to the end of the century, the possibility of BIOCHEMICAL MIND CONTROL AND GENETIC TINKERING WITH MAN, INCLUDING BEINGS WHICH WILL FUNCTION LIKE MEN AND REASON LIKE THEM AS WELL, COULD GIVE RISE TO SOME DIFFICULT QUESTIONS.”

Brzezinski was not writing as a private citizen but as Carter’s National Security Advisor and a leading member of the Club of Rome and a member of the Committee of 300, a member of the CFR and as a member of the old Polish Black Nobility. His book explains how America must leave its industrial base behind and enter into what he called “a distinct new historical era.”

What makes America unique is its willingness to experience the future, be it pop-art or LSD.


Today, America is the creative society, the others, consciously or unconsciously, are emulative. What he should have said was that America is the proving ground for Committee of 300 policies which lead directly to a dissolution of the old order and an entry into the One World Government-New World Order.

One of the chapters in “The Technotronic Era” explains how new technology will bring in its wake intense confrontation that will strain social and international peace. Oddly enough we are already under intense strains through surveillance. Lourdes in Cuba is one place where this is happening. The other is NATO headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, where a giant computer designated “666” can store data of every type mentioned by Brzezinski, plus possessing an expanded capacity to take in data for several billions more people than presently exist, if it ever comes to that, but which, in the light of the Global 2000 Report, will probably never need to be utilized.

Retrieval of data will be simple in the United States where social security and or driver license numbers could simply be added to 666 to provide the surveillance recording announced by Brzezinski and his Committee of 300 colleagues.


The Committee already in 1981 warned governments, including the government of the USSR, that there,

“will be chaos unless the Committee of 300 takes complete control of preparations for the New World Order. CONTROL WILL BE EXERCISED THROUGH OUR COMMITTEE AND THROUGH GLOBAL PLANNING AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT.”

I reported this factual information a few months after I received it in 1981.


When I wrote these things in 1981, the conspirators’ global plans were already in an advanced state of preparedness. Looking back over the past 10 years, it can be seen just how rapidly the Committee’s plans have advanced. If the information provided in 1981 was alarming, then it should be even more alarming today as we near the final stages of the demise of the United States as we know it. With unlimited funding, with several hundred think tanks and 5000 social engineers, the media banking and control of most governments a reality, we can see that we are tracing a problem of immense proportions, one that cannot he opposed by any nation at this time.

As I have so often stated, we have been misled into believing that the problem I am talking about has its origin in Moscow. We have been brainwashed into believing that Communism is the greatest danger we Americans are facing. This is simply not so.


The greatest danger arises from the mass of traitors in our midst. Our Constitution warns us to be watchful of the enemy within our gates. These enemies are the servants of the Committee of 300 who occupy high positions within our governmental structure. The UNITED STATES is where we MUST begin our fight to turn back the tide threatening to engulf us, and where we must meet, and defeat these internal conspirators.

The Club of Rome also had a direct hand in creating the 25-year old war in EI Salvador, as an integral part of the wider plan drawn up by Elliot Abrams of the U.S. State Department. It was Committee of 300 member Willy Brandt, leader of the Socialist International and a former chancellor of West Germany, who paid for the “final offensive” by the Salvadorian guerrillas which, fortunately, was not successful.


EI Salvador was chosen by the committee to turn Central America into a zone for a new Thirty-Year War, which task was allocated to Kissinger to carry out under the innocuous title of “The Andes Plan.”

Just to demonstrate how the conspirators operate across all national boundaries, the “final offensive” action planned by Willy Brandt came about as a result of a visit to Felipe Gonzalez, who at the time was preparing himself for his Club of Rome-ordained role as Spain’s future prime minister. Apart from myself and one or two of my intelligence colleagues and former colleagues, no one appeared to have heard of Gonzalez before he surfaced in Cuba. Gonzalez was the Club of Rome’s case officer for EI Salvador, and the first Socialist to be elevated to political power in Spain since the death of General Franco.

Gonzalez was on his way to Washington to attend the Club of Rome Socialist “get Reagan” meeting which took place in December 1980. Present at the Gonzalez-Castro meeting was the left-wing guerrilla, Guillermo Ungo, run by the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), the Committee of 300’s most notorious Washington-based leftwing think tank. Ungo was run by an IPS fellow who died in a mysterious plane crash while enroute from Washington to Havana to visit Castro.

As most of us know, both the left and the right of the political spectrum is controlled by the same people, which will help to explain the fact that Ungo was a life-long friend of the late Napoleon Duarte, leader of the rightwing in EI Salvador. It was after the Cuban meeting that the “final offensive” by the Salvadorian guerrillas was carried out.

The polarizing of South America and the U.S was a special assignment given to Kissinger by the Committee of 300. The Malvinas War (also known as the Falklands War) and the sub-sequent overthrow of the Argentine government, followed by economic chaos and political upheavals, were planned by Kissinger Associates acting in concert with Lord Carrington, a top-ranking member of the Committee of 300.

One of the principal Committee of 300 assets in the U.S., the Aspen Institute of Colorado, also helped plan events in Argentina even as it did in the case of the fall of the Shah of Iran. Latin America is important to the United States, not only because we have so many mutual defense treaties with countries there, but also because it has the potential of providing a huge market for American exports of technology, heavy industrial equipment which world have galvanized many of our faltering companies and provided thousands of new jobs.


This was to be prevented all costs, even if it meant 30 years of war.

Instead of seeing this huge potential in a positive light, the Committee of 300 saw it as a dangerous threat to its post-industrial zero-growth U.S. plans and immediately acted to make an example of Argentina as a warning to other Latin American nations to forget any ideas they may have had to promote nationalism, independence and sovereign integrity. This is the reason why so many Latin American countries turned to drugs as their sole means of support, which may very well have been the intention of the conspirators in the first place.

Americans in general look down on Mexico, which is precisely the attitude with which the Committee wants the people of the United States to regard Mexico. What we need to do is change our thinking about Mexico and South America in general. Mexico represents a potentially huge market for all types of U.S. goods which could mean thousands of jobs for Americans and Mexicans alike. Transferring our industries “south of the border” and paying the maquilladores slave wages is not in the interests of either country. It benefits nobody but the “Olympians.”

Mexico received most of its nuclear power technology from Argentina, but the Malvinas War put an end to that. The Club of Rome decreed back in 1986 that it would stop exports of nuclear technology to developing countries. With nuclear power stations generating abundant cheap electricity, Mexico would have be-come the “Germany of Latin America.” Such a state of affairs would have been a disaster for the conspirators who have, by 1991, stopped all exports of nuclear technology except that destined for Israel.

What the Committee of 300 has in mind for Mexico is a feudal peasantry, a condition that allows for easy management
and looting of Mexican oil. A stable and prosperous Mexico can only be a plus for the United States. This is what the conspirators wish to prevent, so they have engaged in decades of innuendo, slander and direct economic war on Mexico. Before former President Lopes Portillo took office and nationalized the banks Mexico was losing $200 million a day to capital flight, organized and orchestrated by the Committee of 300’s representatives in banks and brokerage houses on Wall Street.

If only we in the United States had statesmen and not politicians running the country, we could act together and set back the One World Government-New World Order plans to return Mexico to a state of helplessness. If we were able to defeat the Club of Rome’s plans for Mexico, it would come as a shock to the Committee of 300, a shock from which they would take a long time to recover.


The inheritors of the Illuminati pose as great a threat to the United States as they do to Mexico. By seeking common ground with Mexican patriotic movements we in the United States could forge a formidable force to be reckoned with. But such action requires leadership, and we are more lacking in leadership than in any other area of endeavor.

The Committee of 300 through its many affiliated organizations was able to nullify the Reagan presidency.


Here is what Stuart Butler of the Heritage Foundation had to say on the subject

“The right thought it had won in 1980 but in fact it have lost.”

What Butler was referring to was the situation in which the Right found itself when it realized that every single position of importance in the Reagan administration was filled by Fabianist appointees recommended by the Heritage Foundation. Butler went on to say that Heritage would use rightwing ideas to impose leftwing radical principles upon the United States, the same radical ideas which Sir Peter Vickers Hall, top Fabianist in the U.S. and the number one man at Heritage, had been openly discussing during the election year.

Sir Peter Vickers Hall remained an active Fabianist even though he was running a conservative “think tank.” As a member of the British oligarchical Vickers armament manufacturing family, he had position and power. The Vickers family supplied both sides in the First World War and again during Hitler’s rise to power. Vickers’ official cover was the University of California's Urban and Regional Development Institute. He was a longtime confidant of British Labour leader and Committee of 300 member Anthony Wedgewood Benn.

Both Vickers and Benn are integrated with the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, the premiere brainwashing institution in the world.


Vickers uses his Tavistock training to very good effect when speech-making.


Consider the following example:

“There are two Americas. One is the nineteenth century heavy-industry based society. The other is the growing post industrial society, in some cases built on the shards of the old America. It is the crisis between these two worlds which will produce the economic and social catastrophe of the next decade. The two worlds are in fundamental opposition, they cannot co-exist. In the end the post industrial world must crush and obliterate the other one.”

Remember, this speech was made in 1981 and we can see from the state of our economy and our industries just how accurate was Sir Peter’s prediction.


When concerned people ask me how long the 1991 recession will last, I refer them to Sir Peter’s statements and add my own opinion that it will not end until 1995/1996, and even then what emerges will not be the America we knew in the 1960’s and 1970’s. That America has already been destroyed.

I reported Sir Peter’s speech in my newsletter soon after it was delivered. How prophetic it was, but then it was easy to predict a future already written for America by the Committee of 300 and its executive Club of Rome. What was Sir Peter saying in a euphemistic manner? Translated into ordinary everyday English, he was saying that the old American way of life, our true and trusted republican form of government based upon our Constitution, was going to be crushed by the New World Order. America as we knew it was going to have to go, or be crushed to pieces.

As I said, Committee of 300 members often make them-selves highly visible. Sir Peter was no exception.


To make it clearly understood where he was coming from, Sir Peter rounded off his speech by declaring:

“I am perfectly happy working with the Heritage Foundation and groups like that. True Fabians look to the New Right to push through some of their more radical ideas. For more than a decade the British population has been subject to a constant propaganda barrage of how it was on the industrial skids. All of this is true, but the net effect of the propaganda was to demoralize the population. (Exactly as intended by the new-science scientist at Tavistock.)

“This will happen in the United States as the economy worsens. This (demoralizing process) is necessary to make people accept difficult choices. If there is no planning for the future or if constituencies block progress there will be social chaos on a scale which is currently hard to imagine. The outlook for urban America is bleak. There is a possibility of doing something with the inner cities, but basically the cities will shrink and the manufacturing base will decline. This will produce social convulsions.”

Was Sir Peter a psychic, a magician of great report or merely a charlatan fortune teller with a great deal of luck?


The answer is “none of these.” All Sir Peter was doing was reading off the blueprint of the Committee of 300-Club of Rome for slow death of the United States as a former industrial giant. Looking back over the ten years of Sir Peter’s predictions, can anybody doubt that the Committee of 300’s plans for the demise of an industrialized United States has become a fait accompli?

Haven’t Sir Peter’s predictions proved to be remarkably accurate? Indeed they have, almost down to the last word. It is
worth noting that Sir Peter Vickers (Sir Peter Vickers-Hall’s father-in-law) worked on the Stanford Research paper, “Changing Images of Man,” from which much of the 3000 pages of material advice sent to the Reagan Administration was taken. Moreover, as a senior MJ6 British intelligence officer, Sir Peter Vickers was in a position to give Heritage a great deal of advance information.

As a member of the Committee of 300 and NATO, Sir Peter Vickers was around when NATO directed the Club of Rome to develop a social program which would utterly change the direction in which America wanted to go. The Club of Rome, under Tavistock direction, ordered Stanford Research Institute (SRI) to develop such a program, not only for America, but for every nation in the Atlantic Alliance and the OECD nations.

It was Sir Peter’s protégé, Stuart Butler, who gave President Reagan 3000 pages of “recommendations,” which no doubt contained some opinions expressed by Anthony Wedgewood Benn, a member of parliament and a ranking member of the Committee of 300.


Benn told members of the Socialist International who met in Washington on December 8, 1980:

“You can thrive under Volcker’s credit collapse if you profile Reagan to intensify the credit collapse.”

That Butler’s advice was taken and applied to the Reagan administration can be seen in the collapse of the Savings and loan and banking industries which accelerated under Reagan economic policies.


While Benn called it “profiling,” he really meant that Reagan should be brainwashed. It is worth noting that Von Hayek-who is a founder member of Heritage-used his student, Milton Friedman, to preside over the Club of Rome’s plans to deindustrialise America using the Reagan presidency to accelerate the collapse of first the steel industry, and then the auto and housing industries, for example.

In this regard a French Black Nobility member, Etienne D’Avignon, as a member of the Committee of 300, was assigned the task of collapsing the steel industry in this country. It is doubtful that any of the hundreds of thousands of steel workers and shipyard workers who have been without jobs for the past decade have ever heard of D’Avignon. I fully reported the D’Avignon Plan in April 1981 Economic Review. Attending that fateful December 10th Club of Rome meeting in Washington D.C. was a mystery man from Iran who turned out to be Bani Sadr, the Ayatollah Khomeini’s special envoy.

One speech in particular at the December 1Oth, 1980 conclave caught my attention, mainly because it came from Francois Mitterand, a man the French establishment had discarded and thought to be washed up.


But my intelligence source had previously told me that Mitterand was in the process of being picked up, dusted off and returned to power, so what he said carried a good deal of weight for me:

“Industrial capitalist development is the opposite of freedom We must put an end to it. The economic systems of the 20th and 21st century will use machines to crush man, first in the domain of nuclear energy which is already producing formidable results.

Mitterand’s return to the Elysee Palace was a great triumph for socialism. It proved that the Committee of 300 was powerful enough to predict happenings and then make them happen, by force, or by whatever means it took to make its point that it could crush any and all opposition even if, as in the case of Mitterand, he had been totally rejected a few short days before by a discerning political power group in Paris.

Another group representative at the December 1980 Washington meetings with “observer status” was John Graham, also known as “Irwin Suall,” head of the fact-finding committee of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). The ADL is an outright British intelligence operation run by all three branches of British intelligence, that is, M16 and the JIO.


Suall’s extensive bag of dirty tricks was garnered from the sewers of the East End of London. Suall is still a member of the super-secret SIS, an elite James Bond type of operation. Let nobody underestimate the power of the ADL, nor its long reach.

Suall works closely with Hall and other Fabianists. He was singled out as useful to British intelligence while at Ruskir Labour College at Oxford University in England, the same communist education center that gave us Milner, Rhodes, Burgess, McLean and Kim Philby.


Oxford and Cambridge Universities have long been the province of the sons and daughters of the elite, those whose parents belong to the “upper crust” of British high society. While at Oxford, Suall joined the Young People’s Socialist League, and was recruited by British intelligence shortly thereafter.

Suall was posted to the United States where he came under the protection and sponsorship of one of the most insidious leftists in the country, Walter Lippmann. Lippmann founded and ran the League for Industrial Democracy, and Students for Democratic Society, both leftist spoiler operations to set industrial workers at variance with what it called “the Capitalist class” and management. Both of Lippmann’s projects were an integral part of the Committee of 300 apparatus that stretched right across America, of which Lippmann was a most important member.

Suall has strong connections with the Justice Department and can secure FBI profiles of any person he targets. The Justice Department has orders to give Suall everything he wants when he wants it. Most of Suall’s activities center around “keeping an eye on rightwing groups and individuals.” The ADL has an open door to the State Department and makes good use of State’s impressive intelligence agency.

The State Department has a layer of agents in the right wing, posing as “fearless anti-Semitic fighters.” There are four leaders in this group of informers, three of whom are discreet Jewish homosexuals. This spy group has been in operation for the past two decades. They publish virulently anti-Jewish “newspapers” and sell a wide variety of anti-Semitic books.


One of the principal operators works out of Louisiana. A member of this group is a writer who is dearly beloved in Christian rightwing circles. The group and the individuals who go to make it up are under the protection of the ADL. Suall was deeply involved in ABSCAM and is often called upon by law enforcement agencies to assist them in investigations and sting operations.

Suall was assigned to “dog Reagan,” in terms of the course laid out for the newly-elected President by the Heritage Foundation, and to figuratively fire a few warning shots if Reagan looked like deviating or taking off his blinders at any time. Suall helped to get rid of any troublesome rightwing advisor not beholden to Heritage for his or her job with the Reagan administration. Such a person was Ray Donovan, Reagan’s Secretary of Labor, who was eventually removed from his post thanks to the Dirty Tricks department of the ADL. James Baker III, one of those on the list of 3000 recommendations made by the Heritage Foundation, was the go-between who carried Suall’s messages of hate about Donovan to the President.

Another important conspirator was Philip Agee, the so-called CIA “defector.” Although not a member of the Commit-tee, he was nevertheless its case officer for Mexico, and run by the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA) and the Council on Foreign Relations.


For the record, nothing that happens in the U.S. happens without the sanction of the RIIA. It is a continuing and ongoing agreement first OPENLY entered into (there were many such secret agreements before that) by Churchill and Roosevelt in 1938, under the terms of which U.S. intelligence services are obliged to share intelligence secrets with British intelligence.

This is the basis of the so-called “special relationship” between the two countries about which Churchill and Lord Halifax boasted and which “special relationship” was responsible for the U.S. fighting the Gulf War against Iraq for and on behalf of British interests, more especially British Petroleum, one of the most important companies in the Committee of 300 in which Queen Elizabeth’s immediate family has a big stake.

No intelligence activity has taken place since 1938 except through this special joint command structure. Philip Agee joined the CIA after graduating from Notre Dame where he was inducted into its Jesuit Freemason ring. Agee first came to my attention in 1968 as the intelligence officer behind the riots at the University of Mexico. One of the most important things about the Mexican student riots was that they occurred at the same time as student rioting in New York, Bonn, Prague and West Berlin.

With the coordination expertise and its special intelligence network of which INTERPOL is an integral part, it is not as difficult as it might seem at first sight for the Committee to set in motion carefully timed global actions, whether they be student rioting or deposing leaders of supposedly sovereign nations. It is all in a day’s work for the “Olympians.” From Mexico, Agee moved on to align himself with Puerto Rican terrorist groups. During this time he became a trusted confidant of the Cuban dictator, Fidel Castro.

It should not be imagined that while Agee was carrying out these operations, he was doing so as a “rogue” agent.


On the contrary, he was working for the CIA all during these assignments. Trouble came when Castro’s DGI (Cuban intelligence service) was able to “turn” him. Agee continued to work in his capacity as a member of the CIA until his double role was uncovered. This involved the biggest Soviet listening post in the West located at Lourdes, Cuba.


Staffed by 3000 Soviet specialists in signals monitoring and deciphering, Lourdes has the capability of monitoring thousands of electronic signals simultaneously. Many a private phone conversation between a member of Congress and his mistress was picked up at Lourdes and used to telling effect.

Although we are told today in 1991 that “Communism is dead,” the United States has done nothing to close down the vast spy operation which sits on our doorstep. Incidentally Lourdes has the capability of picking up even the weakest “tempest” signal, which is the type given off by a fax machine or an electric typewriter which, when deciphered, will give the contents of whatever is being typed or faxed.


Lourdes remains dagger in the heart of the United States. There is absolutely no reason for its continued existence. If the U.S. and USSR are truly at peace with each other, why the continued need for so massive a spy operation? The simple truth is that, rather than retrenching personnel as we are led to believe, the KGB has taken on additional recruits during 1990 and 1991.

Bernard Levin is probably not a name that is well-known in the United States. Unlike decadent “pop stars” or Hollywood’s latest miserable “discovery,” academics seldom if ever come before the public eye.


Of the hundreds of academics in the United States working under the Control of the Club of Rome, Levin is worthy of special mention, if for no reason other than his role in undermining Iran, the Philippines, South Africa, Nicaragua and South Korea. The demise of the Shah of Iran was run to a plan devised by Bernard Levin and Richard Falk, and supervised by Robert Anderson’s Aspen Institute.

Levin was the author of a work entitled “Time Perspective and Morale” which is a Club of Rome publication concerning how to break down the morale of nations and individual leaders.

Here is an extract of the document:

“One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a strategy of terror consists in exactly this tactic: keep the person hazy as to where he stands and just what he may expect. In addition, if frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and promise of good treatment together with the spreading of contradictory news make the structure of the situation unclear, then the individual may cease to know whether a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal.

Under these conditions, even those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks are paralyzed by the severe inner conflict in regard to what to do.”

This Club of Rome blueprint applies to COUNTRIES as well as to individuals, particularly the government leaders of those countries. We in the U.S. need not think that “Oh well, this is America, and those kinds of things just do not happen here.” Let me assure you that they ARE happening in the U.S., and perhaps more so than in any other country.

The Levin-Club of Rome plan is designed to demoralize us all so that in the end we feel we should follow whatever it is that is planned for us. We WILL follow Club of Rome orders like sheep. Any seemingly strong leader who SUDDENLY APPEARS to “rescue” the nation must be regarded with the utmost suspicion. Remember that Khomeini was groomed for years by British intelligence, especially during his time in Paris, before he suddenly appeared as the savior of Iran. Boris Yeltsin is from the same M16-SIS stable.

The Club of Rome feels confident that it has carried out it Committee of 300 mandate to “soften up” the United States. After 45 years of waging war on the people of this nation, who will doubt that it has indeed accomplished its task? Look around and see how we have been demoralized. Drugs, pornography rock and roll “music,” free sex, the family unit all but totally undermined, lesbianism, homosexuality and finally the ghastly murder of millions of innocent babies by their own mothers. Has there ever been a crime so vile as mass abortion?

With the U.S. spiritually, morally bankrupted, with our industrial base destroyed throwing 30 million people out of work with our big cities ghastly cesspools of every imaginable crime with a murder rate almost three times higher than any other country, with 4 million homeless, with corruption in government reaching endemic proportions, who will gainsay that the United States is ready to collapse from within, into the waiting arms of the New Dark Age One World Government?

The Club of Rome has succeeded in splitting the Christian churches; it has succeeded in building up an army of charismatic fundamentalists and evangelicals who will fight for the Zionist State of Israel. During the Gulf War of genocide I received scores of letters asking me how I could oppose “a just Christian war against Iraq.”

How could I doubt that Christian fundamentalist support for the (Committee of 300’s) war against Iraq was not Biblical—after all didn’t Billy Graham pray with President Bush just before the shooting started? Doesn’t the Bible speak of “wars and rumors of wars” ?

These letters give an insight into just how well the Tavistock Institute has done its work. The Christian fundamentalists will be a formidable force behind the state of Israel, exactly as planned. How sad that these fine people do not realize that they have been GROSSLY MISUSED by the Club of Rome and that their opinions and beliefs are NOT THEIR OWN, but those created for them by the hundreds of Committee of 300 “think tanks” that dot the American landscape. In other words, like any other segment of the United States population, the Christian fundamentalists and evangelicals have been thoroughly brainwashed.

We as a nation are ready to accept the demise of the United States of America and the American way of life, once the envy of the entire world.
Do not think this has happened on its own— the old “times are changing” syndrome. Time does not change anything, PEOPLE do. It is a mistake to think of the Committee of 300 and the Club of Rome as European institutions. The Club of Rome exercises great influence and power in the United States, and has its own chapter based in Washington D.C.

Senator Claiborne Pell is its leader, and one of its members is Frank M. Potter, a one-time staff director of the House Sub-committee on Energy. It is not difficult to see how the Club of Rome has maintained its grip on U.S. energy policies and where “environmentalist” opposition to nuclear energy is coming from. Perhaps the Club’s greatest success story is its hold over Congress in regard to nuclear energy which has had the effect of preventing the U.S. from entering the 21st century as a strong industrial nation.

The effect of the anti-nuclear policy of the Club of Rome can be measured in terms of silent blast furnaces. derelict railroad yards, rusting steel mills, shipyards long since closed down and a valuable trained work force scattered across the United States, which may never again be assembled. Other Club of Rome members in the U.S. are Walter A.Hahn of the Congressional Research Service, Ann Cheatham and Douglas Ross, both senior economists.

Ross’s task, in his own words, was to “translate Club of Rome perspectives into legislation to help the country get away from the illusion of plenty. “ Ann Cheatham was the director of an organization called “Congressional Clearing House For The Future.”

Her task was to profile members of Congress who would be susceptible to astrology and New Age mumbo-jumbo. At one stage she had in excess of 100 Congressmen in her classes. Daily sessions were held in which a variety of astrological “forecasts” were made based on her “occult perceptions.” Besides Congressmen, other prominent people who attended her sessions were Michael Walsh, Thornton Bradshaw -A LEADING MEMBER OF THE COMMITTEE OF 300- and David Sternlight, a senior vice-president of Allstate Insurance Company.

Some of the more important members of the Committee of 300 are also members of NATO, a fact which we ought to remember. These Committee of 300 members often hold several offices. Among the NATO-Club of Rome membership are found Harland Cleveland, a former U.S. ambassador to NATO, Joseph Slater, a director of the Aspen Institute, Donald Lesh, a former staffer in the U.S. National Security Agency, George McGhee and Claiborne Pell, to name a few examples.

It is important that we remember these names, make a list of them if you wish, so as to recall who they are and what they stand for when their names come up in television programs and news services. Following intelligence modus vivendi, leaders of the Committee often appear on television, usually in the most innocent of guises. We ought to be aware that nothing they do is innocent.

The Committee of 300 has planted its agents in the muscle and sinew of the United States, in its government, in Congress, in advisory posts around the President, as ambassadors and as Secretaries of State. From time to time the Club of Rome holds gatherings and conferences which, although they appear under innocuous titles, break up into action committees, each of which is assigned a specific task and a specific target date by which time their assignments must be completed. If it does nothing else, the Committee of 300 is working to a very specific time-table.

The first Club of Rome conference in the United States was called by the Committee of 300 in 1969 under the title: “The Association of the Club of Rome.” The next meeting was held in 1970 under the title “Riverdale Center of Religious Research” and was directed by Thomas Burney. Then followed the Wood-lands Conference held in Houston, Texas, starting in 1971 Thereafter, regular conferences have been held at Woodlands every year.

Also in 1971, at a later date, the Mitchell Energy and Development Corporation held its energy strategy meeting for the Club of Rome: The recurring theme: LIMIT THE GROWTH OF THE U.S.A. Then to crown it all, the First Global Conference on the Future was held in July of 1980, attended by 4000 social engineers and members of think tanks, all of whom were members of or affiliated with various institutions operating under Club of Rome umbrella organizations.

The First Global Conference on the Future had the blessing of the White House which held its own conference based on the transcripts of the First Global Conference forum. It was called the “White House Commission on the 1980’s” and OFFICIALLY recommended the policies of the Club of Rome “as a guide to future U.S. policies” and even went so far as to say that the United States economy is moving out of the industrial phase.

This echoed the theme of Sir Peter Vickers Hall and Zbibniew Brzezinsky and provides further proof of the control exercised by the Committee of 300 over U.S. affairs, both domestic and foreign.

As I said in 1981, we are set up, politically, socially and economically so that we remain locked into the Club of Rome’s plans. Everything is RIGGED against us. If we are to survive then we must break the stranglehold the Committee of 300 has on our government. In every election since Calvin Coolidge ran for the White House, the Committee of 300 has been able to plant its agents in key positions in government so that it matters not who gets the White House post.

For example, every one of the candidates who ran for the Presidency, from the time of Franklin D. Roosevelt, were selected, some like to call it “hand picked,” by the Council on Foreign Relations acting on the instructions of the RIIA.

Especially in the 1980 election, every candidate for the highest office in the United States was run by the CFR. Therefore it was of no consequence to the conspirators who won the presidential race. Through such Trojan Horses as the Heritage Foundation and the CFR, ALL key policy making positions in the new administrations were filled by the Council on Foreign Relations nominees, and before that, since the 1960’s, by NATO-Club of Rome yes-men, thereby ensuring that key policy decisions bore the indelible stamp of the Club of Rome and the CFR, acting as the executive arms of the Committee of 300.

Both the 1984 and 1988 elections followed this long-established pattern. Secretary of State George Schultz was the perfect choice of the Committee of 300 for the office of Secretary of State. Schultz was always a creature of Henry Kissinger, the ruling order-giver for the CFR. Moreover, his position with Bechtel, a key Committee of 300 company of global dimensions, gave him access to countries that might otherwise have been suspicious of his Kissinger connection.

The Carter Administration accelerated the process of key pro-conspiracy personnel in key positions. Before Carter was elected, his key campaign strategist, Hamilton Jordan, said that if Cyrus Vance or Brzezinski received appointments in the Carter cabinet, he, Jordan, would resign. They did. Jordan did not resign.

Carter’s choice of Paul Volcker (in fact he was told to appoint Volcker by David Rockefeller) started the collapse of
the U.S. economy according to the plan laid down by the Club of Rome. We are up against powerful forces who are dedicated to the goal of a One World Government. We have been engaged in a devastatingly crippling war for the past 45 years, only it is not perceived as such. We are brainwashed, methodically and systematically, without ever being aware of it.

The Tavistock Institute provided the system for this to take place, and then set its operations in motion.

The only way we can fight back is by exposing the conspirators and their multiplicity of front organizations. We need men with experience who can formulate strategy to defend our priceless heritage which, once lost, will never again reappear. We need to learn the methods the conspirators use; learn them and adopt counter-measures. Only a crash program will stop the rot which is consuming our nation.

Some may have difficulty in accepting the idea of a global conspiracy because so many writers have made financial gain from it. Others doubt that activity on a global scale can be successfully advanced. They see the huge bureaucracy of our government and then say, “Well, how are we supposed to believe that private people can do more than the government does? This overlooks the fact that government is part of the conspiracy. Hard evidence is what they want and hard evidence is difficult to come by.

Others say, “So what. What do I care about a conspiracy, I don’t even bother to vote.” That is exactly the way the general population of America was profiled to react. Our people have become discouraged and confused, the results of 45 years of warfare conducted against us. How this is done is explained in Bernard Lewin’s book, but how many people would bother to read an academic’s non-fiction book? We are reacting exactly as we were profiled to act. Demoralized and confused people will be far more ready to welcome the sudden appearance of a great man who promises to solve every problem and guarantee a well-ordered society in which people are fully employed and domes-tic strife is minimal. Their dictator, for that is who it will be, will be welcomed with open arms.

Knowing WHO the enemy is a vital necessity. No one can fight and against an unidentified enemy. This book could be used as a military field manual. Study its content and memorize all names.

I have mentioned profiling techniques quite frequently in this chapter. A full explanation of “profiling” is contained in the next chapter. One of the most profound pieces of information to come out of the science of profiling is the relative ease in which this can be accomplished in individuals, party groups, political entities and so on right on down the line. Once we wake up as to how easy this is to do, the conspiracy will no longer be more than we can comprehend.


The assassination of President Kennedy and the attempt on the life of President Reagan become easy to understand.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: Help me find this one....
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2010, 10:52:49 pm »
Lewin on “Time Perspective and Morale”
2005 November 7
by manasclerk

Reading Lewin, Kurt (1948 [1942]), “Time Perspective and Morale” in Resolving Social Conflicts (New York: Harper & Brothers), pp. 103-124.

Studies in unemployment show how a long-drawn-out idleness affects all parts of a person’s life. Thrown out of a job, the individual tries to keep hoping. When he finally gives up, he frequently restricts his action much more than he has to. Even though he hasplenty of time, he begins to neglect his home duties. He may cease to leave his immediate neighborhood; even his thinking and his wishes become too narrow. This atmosphere spreads to his children, and they, too, become narrow-minded even in their ambitions and dreams. In other words, the individual and family as a whole present a complete picture of low morale.

An analysis of this behavior shows the importance of that psychological factor which commonly is called “hope”. Only when the person gives up hope does he stop “actively reaching out”; he loses his energy, he ceases planning, and, finally, he even stops wishing for a better future. Only then does he shrink to a primitive and passive life. [p. 103]

David Copperrider, of Appreciative Inquiry fame, reported during a talk in Chicago in 2003 that a study of those with possibly terminal diseases showed marked differences in survival rates of those who had a particular kind of hope. He reported that those who had the best survival rates were those whose rosy pictures of the future outnumbered their bleak ones 2 to 1. Those who had even numbers fell into despair. Those who had only rosy pictures also died, at similar rates. Hope is not being pollyanna-ish, or even even-keeled, but more hopeful than bleak in one’s imagination of the future.

Lewin discusses M.L. Farber’s work with prisoners, measuring their felt sufferring against how bad their actual lot was. He found that the correlation between the “objective” advantage of their prison work and their felt suffering was .01 (none, in other words). However, whether you felt that your lot was going to improve, that you would leave prison early or that your sentence was just, had a strong correlation with your level of suffering.

The actual length of the sentence and the length of time served do not correlate strongly with the ammount of suffering; however, a marked relationship does exist between the suffering and a man’s feeling that he has served longer than he justly should have served (r=.66). [pp 107]

He moves on to the use of success to breed success:

Experimental data show that although past successes are most effective if they have been won in the same field of activity, nevertheless “substitute successes” and, to a lesser degree, mere praise and encouragement still bolster persistency. An individual may likewise be taught to be more persistent and to react less emotionally to obstacles if encouraging past experiences are built up. [108]

Of course, Lewin was writing in 1941. Recent research (which I’ve cited here before) on motivation shows that praise can be self-defeating. You have to be careful what you praise someone for. If you praise them for being something (“You are so smart!”) you actually undermine their potential persistency. If you praise them for working hard, you increase their persistency.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
by Anton Chaitkin   Posted 11 April 2009 - 05:19 AM

{Time} magazine misnamed as the "Consortium of Behavioral Scientists" what {Time} described as "a secret advisory group of 29 of the nation's leading behaviorists," directing President Barack Obama's catastrophic policy, of pouring out trillions of dollars to prop up the London-centered offshore finance swindle. The group of economists is actually called the Behavioral Economics Roundtable, based at the Russell Sage Foundation in Washington D.C. The "behavioral economics" project has been tightly organized and run jointly since 1986 by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the Russell Sage Foundaton.

Through these and related institutions, the project's sponsors are the same clique of London-directed strategists who created the Hitler and Mussolini regimes, and ran the propaganda war against President Franklin Roosevelt. After World War II, these British empire strategists revived fascist economics and psychological manipulation methods to attack and reverse Roosevelt's legacy.

The Empire's Irrational Subjects
The Israeli kook psychologist Daniel Kahneman, called the founder of behavioral economics, was an apostle of brainwashing expert Kurt Lewin. Kahneman has described his own Israeli army experiments, based on the psychological warfare methods of Lewin's bosses in London's Tavistock Institute: the study of soldiers' vulnerable minds in "leaderless groups." Kahneman met Alfred P. Sloan Foundation vice president/psychologist Eric Wanner in 1982. Wanner, previously employed by Britain's Sussex University, home of the Tavistock Institute, took Kahneman under his wing. Wanner soon afterwards became chief executive of the Russell Sage Foundation, and, in 1986, he instituted the Behavioral Economics Project, run jointly by the Sloan and Sage Foundations. Both foundations, as will be reported below, were central to London's post-World War II fascist revival.

This began before the war was even won. In 1944, Montagu Norman had stepped down as governor of the Bank of England, after two decades directing the London and Wall Street promotion and funding of the Hitler dictatorship. Norman next created the World Federation for Mental Health, managed by leaders of the pro-Hitler Cliveden Set under the presidency of Tavistock Institute director John R. Rees. Heading this London initiative within the U.S.A. was Kurt Lewin, working for Tavistock with Rockefeller money arranged by Russell Sage Foundation operative Raymond Fosdick. Lewin set the tone for what is now called "behavioral economics"--instead of a republic's government serving rational citizens, an empire's oligarchy rules its subjects by playing on popular ignorance and irrationality. Lewin mused in his 1941 book, {Time Perspective and Morale}: "One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a 'strategy of terror' consists in exactly this tactic--keep the person hazy as to where he stands and what just he may expect. If, in addition, frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and promises of good treatment, together with the spreading of contradictory news, make the cognitive structure of this situation utterly unclear, then the individual may cease to know when a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal. Under these conditions, even those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks will be paralyzed with severe inner conflicts in regard to what to do."

Sloan, Sage and the Project
The two foundations running the Behavioral Economics Roundtable have extended this project and put their Behavioral operatives into the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER--an anti-labor think-tank funded entirely the right-wing Olin, Bradley, Scaife, and Smith Richardson Foundations), giving many Roundtable Sage-Sloan paid operatives an NBER label. Arrangments with NBER, have been supervised by Sloan Foundation Program Director Michael S. Teitelbaum, who epitomizesthe unashamed Hitler legacy at Sloan. A former Oxford University faculty member, Teitelbaum was a key American instigator of the return of the Nazi race psuedo-science called eugenics. From his Sloan base since 1983, Teitelbaum spread eugenics and anti-immigrant filth into Congressional deliberations. He was presient of the American Eugenics Society from 1985 to 1990, and vice president of Sloan Foundation in the late 1990s, as "behavioral economics" was revved up.

This effort bears rotten fruit in the person of a leading behavioral economist Alan Kreuger, whom President Obama has nominated to be Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Policy.  Though not yet confirmed, Krueger has already been advising Treausury Secretary Tim Geithner during the catastophic bailouts. Kreuger has been a director of the Russell Sage Foundation, a Sloan Fellow, an NBER Olin Fellow, and Krueger is a longtime staff leader at the eugenics movement's Office of Population Research at Princeton University. American Eugenics Society founder Frederick Osborn created that office at Princeton in 1936, the year after the eugenics movement triumphed with the passage of Hitler's Nuremberg race laws. (The office now advertises a workers' efficiency survey being conducted by Treasury-designee Krueger and his fellow Princeton faculty member, behavioral economics originator Daniel Kahneman.) In that nightmare of the 1930s, Alfred P. Sloan was among the small circle of leading pro-Hitler industrialists in the United States. Sloan had been made chief executive of General Motors in 1923 by GM's co-owners, the J.P. Morgan bank and the DuPont chemical enterprise. In 1934, Alfred P. Sloan and Morgan-DuPont financial executive John J. Raskob founded the American Liberty League, and at the same time, the Sloan Foundation. The Liberty League organized American pro-fascists to attack President Franklin Roosevelt, while carrying on propaganda favorable to Mussolini and Hitler.

The Sloan Foundation's assets were based on shares of General Motors, whose Opel division produced a large proportion of Germany's exports for the Hitler regime throughout the 1930s. The Russell Sage Foundation, a British Empire agency planted within the United States (with money from Wall Street speculator Russell Sage's widow), was X-rayed in the 1976 reference work {Carter and the Party of International Terrorism}, published by the U.S. Labor Party: "Since its incorporation in New York State in 1907, the Russell Sage Foundation has served as the major Fabian Society-Fabian Research Bureau operation in North America. Russell Sage has been the pioneer institution in the building of a 1984 [Orwellian]-style police infrastructure in this country: in the nazification of the federal judicial system; and the development of computer technology as a technical up grading of centralized Wall Street black propaganda control over every facet of the mass media in the field of overt criminal and terrorist activity ... since its engineered takeover of the New York City rackets during the late 1910s [Sage] has been maintaining an ongoing program of crime profiling....

"Under the stated purpose of scientific social work, Russell Sage initiated a wide range of projects [aiming at] the creation of a centrally controlled, mass-social-control apparatus. Russell Sage conducted the earliest program in co-participation (Mackenzie King's profiles of the Rockefeller family Colorado mining companies) and working-class profiling [in] Pittsburgh and San Francisco....)

"[In World War One] Russell Sage moved its offices to Washington DC, and took over the Department of War. The Foundation [with its London background]--in that government capacity--organized the entire logistical and support operations for the U.S. war effort [in the alliance with Britain]. Personnel placed in the State Department took control over all German-American assets for the duration of the war. Col. Ayer of Russell Sage was one of President Wilson's chief negotiators and advisers at Versailles; he later assumed charge of the postwar German reparations and through this, was instrumental in creating the Anglo-American networks epitomized by the activities of [Hitler intelligence executive] Adm. Canaris and [London-controlled Nazi regime-designer] Hjalmar Schacht. "Russell Sage [later concentrated on] funding of Raymond Fosdick [head of Rockefeller Foundation who coordinated with publicist Ivy Lee and Morgan partner Thomas Lamont in directinginternational finances and public relations for the Mussolini and Hitler regimes] and supervision of German military buildup during the Weimar period.

"[Just as] the original Fabian Society used visiting fellow programs [to recruit] long-term agents of influence, the Russell Sage maintains a network of leading operatives in every major university in the United States.... Among the notable individuals [created as Russell Sage projects were]: "Charles Hamilton, sponsor of Stokely Carmichael's Black Power project; ... Daniel Bell, [author of {The Coming of Post-Industrial Society}]; Alvin Toffler, author of {Future Shock}; Kenneth Boulding, the zero-growth convergence theory planner; University of Chicago psychological warfare [strategist] Morris Janowitz; top brainwasher Edward Shils; Columbia University counterinsurgency warfare planner Amitai Etzioni; LEAA founder James Vorenburg; Institute for Policy Studies terrorist controller and labor counterinsurgency expert Paul Jacobs; and the leading European-based linguistic brainwasher and left countergang controller, Alvin Gouldner of {Theory and Society}."

The Obama Vortex
This London "black-ops" project, behavioral econonomics, has embedded its operatives all over the Obama Administration. Sage Foundation director Thaler is a linchpin of the scheme. Thaler originally managed the Sloan-Sage sponsorship of Daniel Kahneman to "define that field" of economics" Thaler runs a multi-billion dollar private asset fund (Fuller & Thaler) employing Kahneman as a director. Thaler's private fund took over from Russell Sage the financing of the Project inside NBER.

A University of Chicago professor, Thaler closely consults his younger faculty colleagues Austan Goolsbee and Cass Sunstein, two Obama advisors who were initiated into Thaler's behavioral economics clique.

Sunstein co-authored Thaler's book, {Nudge}, on how the regime can engineer people's choices without their knowledge. President Obama has chosen Sunstein as U.S. Regulatory czar--administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Sunstein's wife is Samantha Power, a longtime paid George Soros agent specializing in provoking wars in Africa, who now runs "multi-lateral affairs" (the London connection) in Obama's National Security Council. Goolsbee was notorious as the radical Free Trade chief economic adviser to Obama's Presidential campaign. Like current Obama chief economic adviser and fellow behavioral economist Larry Summers, Goolsbee worships the late University of Chicago economist Milton Friedman. Goolsbie eulogized Friedman ({New York Times}, Nov. 17, 2006) for "scientific economics."

The London-Wall street sponsors of behavioral economics want to get away with crushing austerity as policy outcome in the present systemic collapse. From the Aug. 6, 1923 {Time{ magazine cover lionizing Benito Mussolini, throughout the 1930s, they claimed that {Il Duce} was brutal, but "he made the trains run on time."

Goolsbee invoked that Mussolini legacy in the title of an article, "Where the Buses Run on Time" (Slate, March 16, 2006), to praise the behaviorist speed-up of bus drivers made possible by Milton Friedman's economic program under the Pinochet dictatorship in Chile. Goolsbee argued that Chicago should use the methods for reducing wages and speeding up bus drivers, that had been successful outcomes of the Chilean fascist regime.


{The Russell Sage Foundation identifies the "Behavioral Economics Roundtable" members as:}

1. Henry Aaron, Brookings Institution;
2. George Akerlof, University of California, Berkeley;
3. Linda Babcock, Carnegie Mellon University;
4. Nicholas C. Barberis, Yale University;
5. Marianne Bertrand, University of Chicago;
6. Roland J. M. Benabou, Princeton University.;
7. Colin Camerer, California Institute of Technology;
8. Peter Diamond, Massachusetts Institute of Technology;
9. Jon Elster, Columbia University;
10. Ernst Fehr, University of Zurich;
11. Robert H. Frank, Cornell University;
12. Christine Jolls, Harvard University;
13. Daniel Kahneman, Princeton University;
14. David Laibson, Harvard University;
15. George Loewenstein, Carnegie Mellon University;
16. Brigitte Madrian, University of Pennsylvania;
17. Sendhil Mullainathan, Massachusetts Institute Technology;
18. Edward D. O'Donoghue, Cornell University;
19. Terrance Odean, University of California Berkeley;
20. Drazen Prelec, Massachusetts Institute Technology;
21. Matthew Rabin, University of California Berkeley;
22. Thomas Schelling, University of Maryland;
23. Eldar Shafir, Princeton University;
24. Robert Shiller, Yale University;
25. Cass Sunstein, University of Chicago
26. Richard Thaler, University of Chicago;
27. Jean Tirole, University Sciences Soc. Toulouse;
28. Richard Zechhauser, Harvard University; and (until his death), Amos Tversky, Stanford University.


The knives are out for Larry Summers, former Harvard president, behaviorial economist, director of the National Economic Council for President Barack Obama. The {New York Times} (April 6, 2009, "A Rich Education for Summers (After Harvard)") speared him as a fanatical hedge-fund operator and multi-millionaire.

His Harvard protege, the prominent behavioral economist and mass corruptionist Andrei Shleifer, is part of what the {Times} called the "small circle of financial professionals, particularly hedge fund managers," that Summers has "cultivated ... to serve as an informal brain trust. He consults with them on policy matters from his perch in the White House." In the early 1990s, Summers was chief economist for the World Bank, coordinating the privatization and looting of Russia with Vice Premier Anatoly Chubais. While Summers' man Shleifer and Harvard University were then being paid by the U.S. government to advise Chubais and the Russians on privatization, Shleifer's wife Nancy Zimmerman was running a hedge fund out of the back room of Harvard's USAID-funded privatization project office in Moscow.

Put in charge of setting up a stock market, and engineering other post-Soviet projects, Shleifer engorged himself on the resultant stocks and bonds, while Russia slid into misery. The U.S. government sued Harvard, Shleifer, and Zimmerman under the False Claims Act. Harvard and Shleifer reached an agreement with the Justice Department in 2005: Harvard paid $26.5 million to settle; Shleifer paid $2 million in damages, on top of his wife's firm's $1.5 million in damages.

As Summers defended the looting of Russia and Shleifer's role in it, Harvard paid most of Shleifer's damages and kept him on the faculty.

The cited {Times} article names only Nancy Zimmerman, and not Shleifer himself, as being in that Summers circle of hedge fund managers. The same {Times} article makes a reference that points in the direction of the underlying behavioral economist takeover of the Obama Administration: "Among these [hedge fund] insiders are Kenneth D. Brody and Frank P. Brosens, the founding partners of another hedge fund, Taconic Capital Advisors, for whom Mr. Summers did consulting work from 2004 to 2006. Mr. Summers reached out to Mr. Brosens in December to discuss the Obama administration's economic priorities. This year, he campaigned to have him run the federal office overseeing the $700 billion bailout program. Mr. Brosens withdrew his name from consideration last month." The cited Kenneth D. Brody (Brosens' partner) is himself the Treasurer of the Russell Sage Foundation, the central channel through which the behavioral economics project has been foisted on the American government.
{--Anton Chaitkin}

Paolo Sarpi:

While {Time} magazine's (April 13, 2009) expose of the "behavioral economists" surrounding President Barack Obama has put an important spotlight on a dangerous disease, infecting the economic decision-making at the Oval Office, the author of the expose only scratched the surface of the actual evil underlying this hedonistic madness.

The bestial notion of man as an irrational creature, driven by overwhelming impulses to seek pleasure and avoid pain, which is at the heart of the so-called "behavioral economics" dogma, came directly from Venice, the wellspring of all modern financier oligarchism. The author of this schema, which ruthlessly rejects actual human creativity, was Paolo Sarpi (1552-1623).

A Servite monk who rose to be the leading theological and juridical authority for the Venetian doge, Sarpi waged a war against the Catholic Church, and, despite his nominal status as a leading theologian, argued against the existence of God. In correspondence with Francis Bacon, mediated through the English ambassador to Venice, Henry Wooten, Sarpi argued that man can only know the world through his senses. Thus, Sarpi was the author of the radical, anti-cognitive empiricist doctrine, later codified by successive generations of English utilitarians, from John Locke, to Bernard de Mandeville, to Adam Smith, to Jeremy Bentham.

Sarpi took a leading role in the Venetian faction known as the Giovanni (Youth), who argued that Venice could not retain its financial and political power over Europe through its base in the Venetian lagoon. Sarpi and the Giovanni not only promoted the Protestant break with Rome, they redeployed Venetian power into northern Europe, through the successive takeover of the Netherlands and England, via the creation of Venetian-controlled trading companies, including the Venice, Turkey, Levant, and, eventually, the Dutch and British East India companies. It was this financier-oligarchy, that took over England, and, at the same time, promoted the radical empiricist dogma that has beenthe key to oligarchical power ever since. It is from Sarpi's descendents, particularly the radical hedonist Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), that all of the essentials of "behavioral economics" derive. Indeed, a 2004 paper, published by the British Fabian Society's London School of Economics, titled "Utility Theory from Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman," makes the case explicitly.

Essentially plagiarizing Sarpi, Bentham, in his infamous {An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation} (1780) wrote, "Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do.... Every effort we make to throw off our subjection, will serve but to demonstrate and confirm it. The principle of utility--the greatest happiness or greatest felicity principle--recognizes this subjection, and assumes it for the foundation.... Systems which attempt to question it deal ... in caprice instead of reason, in darkness instead of light." Bentham was not only the chief philosopher for the British East India Company, during the tenure of its Secret Committee chairman, Lord Shelburne. During Shelburne's brief tenures as foreign Secretary and Prime Minister, Bentham founded modern British intelligence.

Bentham first caught the attention of the Venetian-minded Shelburne for his diatribe against the American Declaration of Independence. In October 1776, Bentham wrote: "This, they 'hold to be' a 'truth self-evident.' At the same time, to secure these rights they are satisfied that government should be instituted. They see not ... that nothing that was ever called government ever was or ever could be exercised but at the expense of one or another of those rights, that ... some one or other of those pretended unalienable rights is alienated.... In these tenets they have outdone the extravagance of all former fanatics." Bentham's hatred of the American Revolution and the principles of republican government were totally consistent with his Sarpian belief that man is a beast, pure and simple. That Sarpi and Bentham are the intellectual architects of the perverse doctrine of hedonistic "behavioral economics" ought to wake up some patriotic stirrings among some in and around the Obama White House--before it is too late.
{--Jeffrey Steinberg}


April 8 (EIRNS)--The short version of Behaviorist Economics is that it can be considered as the carryover of the pseudo-science behind the Revolution in Military Affairs into the civilian sphere. On the other hand, it also clearly reflects the hedonistic calculus of Jeremy Benthem and Bernard Mandeville. Its origins can be traced to two Israeli behavioral psychologists, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tverski, both with experience in and employed by the Israeli Defense Forces, who began a long collaborative career by 1968.

Born in Tel Aviv in 1934, Kahneman spent his youth in France, where his father was director of research for a chemical company "directed by the financial mainstay of the Fascist anti-Semitic movement in France in the 1930s," as Kahneman recalled in his autobiography ({A History of Psychology in Autobiography}). At the end of the war, the family embarked for Palestine. Kahneman received his Bachelor's degree from Hebrew University in Jerusalem in 1954, majoring in psychology with a minor in mathematics. A favorite professor there introduced him to the work of Kurt Lewin, especially Lewin's "force field from the outside." He was so taken by Lewin's theories that he still teaches them today.

After graduating, he served in the Israeli Army for four years, three of them in the psychology branch of the IDF. One of the projects he worked on was selection of individuals for officer training, using methods based on World War II British manuals. In a test involving a leaderless group, he experienced what he called the "first cognitive illusion I described," which he named "the illusion of validity." In his Nobel Prize-winning autobiography, he wrote, "puzzles with which I struggled at the time were the seed of the paper on the psychology of intuitive prediction which Amos Tversky and I published later." Kahneman is known as a leader in the field of hedonics, with a emphasis on the matter of the "framing" of decision-making (how a question is "framed" will affect the answer).

The two began publishing in the early 1970s, with the seminal work, "Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases," published in {Science} magazine in 1974. At the end of that detailed work is a note, indicating that their research "was supported by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Department of Defense [DARPA] and was monitored by the Office of Naval Research" under a contract to the Oregon Research Institute, with additional support "provided by the Research and Development Authority of the Hebrew University."

Behavioral Economics Is Born
Kahneman and Tversky spent time in Israel, the United States, and Britain, each spending time at Cambridge, and, in 1978, both arrived at Stanford University, at the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences. It was here that they met University of Rochester-trained economist Richard Thaler, and the "science" of Behavioral Economics was born. The next year, 1979, saw the publication of the fundamental work of the new science, {Prospect Theory, Analysis of Decisions Under Risk,} by Kahnemann and Tverski. Subsequently, the two also published works along with Thaler, and others, notably, a British Columbia-based behavioralist Jack Knetsch.

In 1982, the grouping was "institutionalized," one might say, by Eric Wanner, who was then the head of the Sloan Foundation, and who proposed funding an integration of behavioral psychology and economics. A year later, when Wanner became president of the Russell Sage Foundation, he brought the psychos along with him, and began to fund the project, which continues today. The first step was to send Thaler to the University of British Columbia, where Kahneman was teaching, to work with him for a year. At this time, Jack Knetsch, another economist who figures prominently in this field, would have been at UBC, as well.

It was at Sage, that Kahneman and Tversky, along with Knetsch produced a work in which they tried to give their "Prospect Theory" a historical grounding, citing four works of theoretical "heritage," one of which is the work of John von Neumann and David Morgenstern. The result was "Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics," published in a special issue of {The Journal of Business}. Kahneman received half a Nobel Prize in 2002, for "having integrated insights from psychological research into economic science, especially concerning human judgment and decision making under uncertainty." He is today at Princeton. Tversky died from cancer in 1996.

In 1995, Thaler, who continues as a director at the Russell Sage Foundation, came to the University of Chicago. At Chicago, Thaler made a quick convert and lifetime associate of Cass Sunstein, a professor of law, who quickly picked up on the ideas and spread them to the legal profession, causing a minor revolution in teaching methods which continues today. Sunstein became a close associate of Barack Obama, who was also resident at UC at that time, and led Thaler to him at a 2004 Illinois Senate campaign event. Thaler's response at the time: "You know, he seems like the real deal."

Thaler, in addition to being an economics professor at the University of Chicago, is still on the board of the Sage Foundation, which also houses the vaunted Consortium of 29, the Behaviorist Economics Roundtable, founded in 1992.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline attietewd

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,667
Damn this makes me so mad!  I hate this crap!  It's so evil.  If Brzezski was standing here I'd smack him.
“Thus, condemnation will never come to those who are in Christ Jesus…”

Offline citizenx

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,086

I especially dug that last post from the Education Forum.  Excellent article.

"Behaviorist economics" indeed.  Goolsbee and Sunstein want to "nudge" us all into fascism -- Liberal Fascism.

It's gotten me interested to learn much more about this fine intellectual tradition.  Don't know if it really stretches all the way back to Sarpi -- I think it's largely a creation of the twentieth century (the "Century of Self"), and a monstrous creation at that.

Nevertheless, this is fascinating material, and I find the vast majority of this web of influences highly believable.


  • Guest
SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Ave, Menlo Park

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,163
    • From Hell to Veins
I keep trying to tell the young bucks... Not everything is on the 'internet'.  Sometimes you have to use your feet and follow the trail through the 'stacks' at certain universities.  In this case Tavistock Institute would probably be a good start.

The book you speak of lays out the guild lines for what would later be called... 'Strategy of Tension'

The book has been a 'blue print' (so to speak) from Dresden all the way to 911 and our current 'global' police state that 'conspirator apologists' say doesn't exist.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
I keep trying to tell the young bucks... Not everything is on the 'internet'.  Sometimes you have to use your feet and follow the trail through the 'stacks' at certain universities.  In this case Tavistock Institute would probably be a good start.

The book you speak of lays out the guild lines for what would later be called... 'Strategy of Tension'

The book has been a 'blue print' (so to speak) from Dresden all the way to 911 and our current 'global' police state that 'conspirator apologists' say doesn't exist.

He speaks the truth!
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Overcast

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,133
He speaks the truth!

Yes, and it's interesting that it's not on his Wiki Page.

So.. yeah, I'm going to find this now, lol.

Any luck yet?
And dying in your beds, many years from now, would you be willin' to trade ALL the days, from this day to that, for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take... OUR FREEDOM!

Offline Overcast

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,133
You don't mean this one do you? (Different author)..

"The psychological future is part of what L. K. Frank has called "time perspective." The life-space of an individual, far from being limited to what he considers the present situation, includes the future, the present, and also the past. Actions, emotions, and certainly the morale of an individual at any instant depend upon his total time perspective. The conduct of the unemployed, then, is an example of how time perspective may lower morale. How morale may, on the contrary, be heightened by time perspective is illustrated by the conduct of the Zionists in Germany shortly after Hitler came to power. The great majority of Jews in Germany had believed for decades that the pogroms of Czarist Russia "couldn't happen here." When Hitler came to power, therefore, the social ground on which they stood suddenly was swept from under their feet. Naturally, many became desperate and committed suicide; with nothing to stand on, they could see no future life worth living. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)"

Quote from the book I found elsewhere...

"One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a strategy of terror consists in exactly this tactic--keep a person hazy as to where he stands and just what he may expect. In addition, if frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and promises of good treatment together with spreading contradictory news make the cognitive structure of this situation utterly unclear, then the individual may cease to even know a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal. Under these conditions, even those individuals who have definate goals and are ready to take risks are paralyized by severe inner conflict in regard to what to do."

That's indeed interesting and it sounds JUST like what's happening now. No offense to anyone, but with the news from the 'left', the news from the 'right' and then mix in PrisonPlanet/Truther stuff and we have the scenario above.
And dying in your beds, many years from now, would you be willin' to trade ALL the days, from this day to that, for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take... OUR FREEDOM!

Offline Overcast

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,133
And dying in your beds, many years from now, would you be willin' to trade ALL the days, from this day to that, for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take... OUR FREEDOM!

Offline Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,939
Reading the "Committee of 300" by John Coleman and he referenced a book called  “Time Perspective and Morale” which is a Club of Rome publication by Bernard Levin. It says all sorts of things concerning "softening up" people to be more accepting of the New World Order. Only problem is that every where I search comes up zero on finding this book. Anybody got it or scribd it? Im striking out bigtime. ???

Here you go:

You can probably order it here: or ask a reference librarian to get it for you...

(Referenced in...)

And  the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, 
Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren,  ye have done it unto me.

Matthew 25:40

Offline jofortruth

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,061
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!