Author Topic: "Temporary" = PERMANENT?  (Read 8221 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mindflow

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
"Temporary" = PERMANENT?
« on: August 10, 2007, 10:32:49 pm »
Given that George Bush's fraternity name was "Temporary", and seeing how everything in their backwards world of reverse swastikas and inverted crosses has some symbolic meaning,... and how he evidently is now a Dictator  with no use for further elections, and how these things are planned in advance, PERMANENT seems to fit the puzzle horribly well. 

Offline justin.a

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: "Temporary" = PERMANENT?
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2007, 10:41:58 pm »
Given that George Bush's fraternity name was "Temporary", and seeing how everything in their backwards world of reverse swastikas and inverted crosses has some symbolic meaning,... and how he evidently is now a Dictator  with no use for further elections, and how these things are planned in advance, PERMANENT seems to fit the puzzle horribly well. 

Interesting observation. Unfortunately you're right. It's not surprising that he has these plans ready for becoming a dicator in the case of a national emergency. Many presidents before him have drawn plans like these but I believe G.W. Bush is the first of them who will openly brag of using it. I will be surprised if America allows Bush to become a dictator. We need to hope this next election isn't as pointless as the last two, we need true free un-corrupted elections with candidates that care about what the american people want and not what will make them richer or more powerful.
“Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty or security.”
-Benjamin Franklin

Offline Rattlesnake

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: "Temporary" = PERMANENT?
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2007, 11:12:32 pm »
Mindflow I just love your post. You have excellent views.

Offline Mindflow

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: "Temporary" = PERMANENT?
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2007, 11:23:48 pm »
Mindflow I just love your post. You have excellent views.
Thanks. The idea came to me yesterday,   :o... wanted to share.

Offline Sonja

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 773
Re: "Temporary" = PERMANENT?
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2007, 01:28:42 am »
I have trouble seeing these guys walking out of the WH of their own accord. Alex seems to think they will pass the throne to Hillary, and she seems pretty confident she will get it, but for criminals like Cheney and Billy Kristol, it really means the end of the neo-cons. While she is NWO, she is not a neocon and will oust every single one of them if not least for longstanding revenge against 'the vast right wing conspiracy'. She would likely see them hang than have any of them close to her.( I feel her on this, Id rather see them all drawn and quartered)
I just cant envision them allowing it. This is why Im afraid of a nuclear attack, its the only real hard threat that could justiify a total suspension of elections, I mean an earthquake or other 'natural disaster' wouldnt justify it and couldnt bring the people to buckle.
We may as a nation be total head in the sand , but the majority would not go for dictatorship unless severely provoked.
Its obvious Cheney has lost his f**king mind, who knows where Bush stands. Maybe he'll be happy to pass the buck and leave someone else to clean up his mess. He never was one for the nitty gritty.
Anyway, I have food frozen, plenty of it in the garden still to be stored, propane stored, but I havent dealt with many aspects of survival. I, like many of you have a premonition of impending disaster just around the corner, but then again, I remember the scares of the Commies, bomb shelters and that, which came to nothing.
Now that we are more fearful of our own government begs consideration, like, did Germans do this pre-Nazi Germany? Were people talking and making preparations? Were scare cries ignored, especially the most heartbreaking-by friends and family members, OR, as Im sure you all have heard- we have just lost our minds and got into crazy because of some psychological glitch? I remember my first boyfriend back in the late 70's talking about this stuff. He was a vietnam vet and a Soldier of Fortune, I thought he was just nuts from combat. Now Im in that camp as well but its nearly 30 years later and none of it came true so far.

Some days I see, some days I just want to enjoy my life. Some days I WISH I didnt know. The others dont know and they are doing ok. They say to me, look. Im in TODAY. My best friend says to me, I dont live my life in fear. You are talking about what might happen, I am dealing with the now. Anyway, its late night ramblings. I just hope we are not going into a Nazi thing, but so much indicates.......












Words may show a man's wit but actions his meaning.

Offline Biggs

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,440
Re: "Temporary" = PERMANENT?
« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2007, 12:52:01 pm »
it looks like a Hillary/Obama ticket, I am pretty sure the war on iran and 9-112B have been delayed a bit. The economy will likely sink before then anyway, and they can only fiddle a few percent on the votes or else it starts to look too obvious and they run the risk of sparking an uprising, which they cannot afford to have.

However, once Hillary & Obama win, they will end up with a reason (false flag on US soil or Israel or Gulf of Tonkin incident) which leaves them with no choice other than  to attack Iran, and hence then you have your major war and NWO.

They have both been quite clear that they are prepared to bomb Iran, they were very specific, and both appear to be compromised by CIA and Illuminati.
STOP THE KILLING NOW
END THE CRIMINAL SIEGE OF GAZA - FREE PALESTINE!!!!!!!

Offline scott-rfno

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8
    • Relent For No One
Re: "Temporary" = PERMANENT?
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2007, 06:29:08 pm »
I have a very bad feeling that another 'terrorist attack' will happen right before Bush's term will be up and he'll use it as an excuse to stay in office.

Offline DIG_THE_HEAVY

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
Re: "Temporary" = PERMANENT?
« Reply #7 on: August 11, 2007, 08:02:38 pm »
Given that George Bush's fraternity name was "Temporary", and seeing how everything in their backwards world of reverse swastikas and inverted crosses has some symbolic meaning,... and how he evidently is now a Dictator  with no use for further elections, and how these things are planned in advance, PERMANENT seems to fit the puzzle horribly well. 
I agree.....Temporary being the opposite.........I have a bet with a co-worker that there will be no election.....I also find it very strange that they are having debates well over a year and a half before the election....ant thoughts on that?

Offline Mindflow

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: "Temporary" = PERMANENT?
« Reply #8 on: August 11, 2007, 08:21:16 pm »
"...I also find it very strange that they are having debates well over a year and a half before the election..."

That is a great point. 
Thanks, DTH... yet another piece of the puzzle, albeit a chilling one in it's implications.

Offline dictatorhater

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: "Temporary" = PERMANENT?
« Reply #9 on: August 12, 2007, 05:35:54 am »
There is no difference in the two parties because they are all in on this crap and they are working in tandem. I doubt Hillary is going to extract a pound of flesh out of anyone. One gets in and goes fascist, then here comes a communist and round and round we go. Wheeeeeeeeee!  Chip chop chip chopin' at those old, wonderful documents that Americans used to cherish so. (Of course, there are plenty of us here who don't feel that the Constitution and Bill of Rights are antiquated docs. and need to be upgraded or updated).

This is the weirdest looking bastardized Constitutional Republic with Democratic tendencies imaginable, what we've got here for a government can't make up it's mind if it's extreme socialist or fascist. Guess it doesn't matter that much what you label it because in the end, it's all jackboots, chains, poverty and oppression.  Both extremes are also partial to concentration camps as is proven throughout history.

I'd lay my money on massive terrorist attacks, probably suitcase nukes set off by "Iran" and "Syria" if ya get my drift and grab your shorts cuz here comes da judge.

People HAVE been saying for years that this was going to come down and it has not, but that doesn't mean "they" have not been priming the pump all those decades. In viewing all the laws that have prepared us for the coup de gras , you can't help but see the progression. Those laws are not on the books for nuthin'.  If they're there, they ARE going to use them. It's a matter of when, not if, that's all.

In speaking with some anti-NWO people who have been at this game for over a decade, I've been told that never has any of them seen things progress so quickly in regards to sewing up the loose ends in preparation for declaration of Martial Law.

Offline DIG_THE_HEAVY

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
Re: "Temporary" = PERMANENT?
« Reply #10 on: August 12, 2007, 10:01:00 am »
It wouldn't surprise me if the NWO&Co. puts Ron Paul in.
Just to make him declaring martial law after a new staged terror attack. That would be a nice twist, eh?
What would we do in that case?
However...

what makes you people think that the next election will be indeed an election and not just another selection? I don't think that the NWO&Co. would allow the people to decide anything for them.

And isn't the President just a puppet-position of the NWO anyways?
So, where does this enthusiasm for voting comes from? I think that voting won't change anything...if it could it wouldn't be allowed in the first place.

(sorry for my english...i am still learning)

Kind of like that movie where Robin Williams gets elected president by "computer error."