ClimateGate - They want you to live like a slave

[TahoeBlue]

Bump for Armand Hammer and the Ukraine Starvation culling

http://www.autographdomain.com/detail.aspx?ID=7051


INDUSTRIALIST & PHILANTHROPIST ARMAND HAMMER — SIGNED PHOTO
HE BRAGGED THAT HE WAS THE ONLY MAN TO HAVE KNOWN BOTH LENIN AND RONALD REAGAN
 
Armand Hammer (1898–1990) ... He went to the Soviet Russia in 1921 to provide medical aid to famine victims and was persuaded by Lenin to remain. His ventures, including a pencil-manufacturing firm, were bought out by the Soviets in the late 1920s, and he returned to the U.S. laden with artworks formerly owned by the Romanov family.
...
He often bragged that he was the only man to have known both Vladimir Lenin and Ronald Reagan.
...
Color 8x10 photo is signed by Hammer in white margin at the bottom. Note: Top margin has NOT been trimmed; photo measures a full 8 x 10”. In exc. condition. net
 
$125.00

[TahoeBlue]

http://iceagenow.info/2012/01/glaciers-growing-kilimanjaro-guide-insists/
Glaciers are growing on Kilimanjaro, guide insists
 By Robert On January 25, 2012

“From 2010 to now, we have been seeing new glaciers,” says guide.
 
Athumani Juma, a guide who’s been hiking Mount Kilimanjaro for the past seven years, laughed when asked about the likelihood that Kilimanjaro’s snowcap would soon disappear.
 
The glaciers are no longer are shrinking, but growing, Juma replied.
 
“Before, we were seeing glaciers melting,” Juma explained during a recent descent from the summit. “But from 2010 to now, we have been seeing new glaciers.”
 
Some scientists and environmental activists claim that the mountain’s glaciers could disappear perhaps before the end of the decade, another victim of rising global temperatures.
 
See entire article:
 http://www.wenatcheeworld.com/news/2012/jan/24/glaciers-are-growing-back-on-kilimanjaro-guide/

...

The glaciers atop Kilimanjaro’s highest peak, Kibo, are indeed melting, but not because of climate change, he said. They’ve been receding steadily since at least 1880.

“According to our understanding, the Kibo glaciers shrink and will disappear not because of changing climate conditions but because of conditions that are unfavorable in principle: It is simply too dry for these glaciers to exist under normal Holocene conditions,” he emailed.

[TahoeBlue]

Hudson Bay polar bear population defying predictions, Nunavut survey says

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/1156756--hudson-bay-polar-bear-population-defying-predictions-nunavut-survey-says?bn=1

April 04, 2012

IQALUIT, NUNAVUT—Nunavut says a new survey shows Canada’s polar bear population hasn’t significantly declined in the last seven years as predicted and that the iconic mammal has not been hurt by climate change.

An aerial survey done in August by the Nunavut government, in response to pressure from Inuit, estimated the western Hudson Bay bear population at around 1,000.

That’s about the same number of bears found in a more detailed study done in 2004. That study, which physically tagged the bears, predicted the number would decline to about 650 by 2011.

Last year’s survey found fewer cubs — about 50 — than in previous years, but officials say the new figures show the “doom-and-gloom” predictions of environmentalists about the demise of the polar bear have failed to come true.

“People have tried to use the polar bear as a bit of a poster child — it’s a beautiful animal and it grabs the attention of the public — to make people aware of the impact of climate change,” said Drikus Gissing, Nunavut’s director of wildlife management.

“We are not observing these impacts right at this moment in time. And it is not a crisis situation as a lot of people would like the world to believe it is.”

(cont'd at above link)

[TahoeBlue]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2217286/Global-warming-stopped-16-years-ago-reveals-Met-Office-report-quietly-released--chart-prove-it.html

Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... and here is the chart to prove it

•The figures reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012 there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures
•This means that the ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996

By David Rose
 
PUBLISHED: 16:42 EST, 13 October 2012 | UPDATED: 20:21 EST, 13 October 2012
...

[TahoeBlue]

http://blog.heritage.org/2012/10/18/president-obamas-taxpayer-backed-green-energy-failures/
President Obama’s Taxpayer-Backed Green Energy Failures
Ashe Schow
October 18, 2012

It is no secret that President Obama’s and green-energy supporters’ (from both parties) foray into venture capitalism has not gone well. But the extent of its failure has been largely ignored by the press. Sure, single instances garner attention as they happen, but they ignore past failures in order to make it seem like a rare case.
...

The complete list of faltering or bankrupt green-energy companies:
 1.Evergreen Solar ($24 million)*
 2.SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
 3.Solyndra ($535 million)*
 4.Beacon Power ($69 million)*
 5.AES’s subsidiary Eastern Energy ($17.1 million)
 6.Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
 7.SunPower ($1.5 billion)
 8.First Solar ($1.46 billion)
 9.Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
 10.EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
 11.Amonix ($5.9 million)
 12.National Renewable Energy Lab ($200 million)
 13.Fisker Automotive ($528 million)
 14.Abound Solar ($374 million)*
 15.A123 Systems ($279 million)*
 16.Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($6 million)
 17.Johnson Controls ($299 million)
 18.Schneider Electric ($86 million)
 19.Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
 20.ECOtality ($126.2 million)
 21.Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
 22.Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
 23.Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
 24.Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
 25.Range Fuels ($80 million)*
 26.Thompson River Power ($6.4 million)*
 27.Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
 28.LSP Energy ($2.1 billion)*
 29.UniSolar ($100 million)*
 30.Azure Dynamics ($120 million)*
 31.GreenVolts ($500,000)
 32.Vestas ($50 million)
 33.LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($150 million)
 34.Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
 35.Navistar ($10 million)
 36.Satcon ($3 million)*
 
*Denotes companies that have filed for bankruptcy

[ As a side note - as the fedres needs to print money (to print the money they need a request from the treasury) - a reverse flow occurs where the congress has to create budget requirements to keep up with all the dollars that fedres needs to create. So the powers that be don't care what the money is spent on except preferrably directed to thier friends. ]

[TahoeBlue]

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/22/us/politics/climate-change-prominent-in-obamas-inaugural-address.html?_r=0
Climate Change Given Prominence in Obama’s Address
 
By RICHARD W. STEVENSON and JOHN M. BRODER
 
Published: January 21, 2013

WASHINGTON — President Obama made addressing climate change the most prominent policy vow of his second Inaugural Address on Monday, setting in motion what Democrats say will be a deliberately paced but aggressive campaign built around the use of his executive powers to sidestep Congressional opposition.

"We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that failure to do so would betray our children and future generations,” Mr. Obama said, at the start of eight full sentences on the subject, more than he devoted to any other specific area. “Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms.”
...

[TahoeBlue]

Here we go again .... They needed to keep coming up with studies to keep their Globalist paid jobs...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/mar/08/hawaii-climate-change-second-greatest-annual-rise-emissions
Large rise in CO2 emissions sounds climate change alarm

Hopes for 'safe' temperature increase within 2C fade as Hawaii station documents second-greatest emissions increase
John Vidal
guardian.co.uk, Friday 8 March 2013 05.55 EST

The chances of the world holding temperature rises to 2C – the level of global warming considered "safe" by scientists – appear to be fading fast with US scientists reporting the second-greatest annual rise in CO2 emissions in 2012.

Carbon dioxide levels measured at at Mauna Loa observatory in Hawaii jumped by 2.67 parts per million (ppm) in 2012 to 395ppm, said Pieter Tans, who leads the greenhouse gas measurement team for the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The record was an increase of 2.93ppm in 1998.

The jump comes as a study published in Science on Thursday looking at global surface temperatures for the past 1,500 years warned that "recent warming is unprecedented", prompting UN climate chief, Christiana Figueres, to say that "staggering global temps show urgent need to act.

 Rapid climate change must be countered with accelerated action."

Tans told the Associated Press the major factor was an increase in fossil fuel use. "It's just a testament to human influence being dominant", he said. "The prospects of keeping climate change below that [two-degree goal] are fading away."
...

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/339/6124/1198.abstract
Science 8 March 2013:
Vol. 339 no. 6124 pp. 1198-1201
DOI: 10.1126/science.1228026
•Report
A Reconstruction of Regional and Global Temperature for the Past 11,300 Years

Surface temperature reconstructions of the past 1500 years suggest that recent warming is unprecedented in that time. Here we provide a broader perspective by reconstructing regional and global temperature anomalies for the past 11,300 years from 73 globally distributed records. Early Holocene (10,000 to 5000 years ago) warmth is followed by ~0.7°C cooling through the middle to late Holocene (<5000 years ago), culminating in the coolest temperatures of the Holocene during the Little Ice Age, about 200 years ago. This cooling is largely associated with ~2°C change in the North Atlantic. Current global temperatures of the past decade have not yet exceeded peak interglacial values but are warmer than during ~75% of the Holocene temperature history.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change model projections for 2100 exceed the full distribution of Holocene temperature under all plausible greenhouse gas emission scenarios

[TahoeBlue]

AL GORE HAMMER and Sickle is at it again:

http://blog.algore.com/2013/03/time_has_come_for_a_carbon_tax.html

"Time has come" for a carbon tax March 21, 2013 : 8:28 PM

Last weekend, the Financial Times published a must-read editorial on the need for a national carbon tax:

"Taxes are always a regrettable necessity, but some are less regrettable than others. A tax that strengthens energy security and cuts pollution, while minimising the damage done to employment and investment, is one of the least regrettable of all."

"Yet a carbon tax, which has all those characteristics, is struggling to find support from the US administration or in Congress. It deserves much wider enthusiasm."
...
"Carbon taxes have their drawbacks, it is true, but their problems are mostly fixable. They are regressive, but that could be offset by changes to other taxes. They can create difficulties for energy-intensive sectors, but those could be eased with targeted reliefs."

[TahoeBlue]

notice that "peer reviewed" paid for papers say:

"A survey of thousands of peer-reviewed papers in scientific journals has found 97.1% agreed that climate change is caused by human activity"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/may/16/climate-research-nearly-unanimous-humans-causes
[Paid for ] Climate research nearly unanimous on human causes, survey finds

Of more than 4,000 academic papers published over 20 years, 97.1% agreed that climate change is anthropogenic

Suzanne Goldenberg, US environment correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 15 May 2013 19.01 EDT

A survey of thousands of peer-reviewed papers in scientific journals has found 97.1% agreed that climate change is caused by human activity.

Authors of the survey, published on Thursday in the journal Environmental Research Letters, said the finding of near unanimity provided a powerful rebuttal to climate contrarians who insist the science of climate change remains unsettled.

The survey considered the work of some 29,000 scientists published in 11,994 academic papers. Of the 4,000-plus papers that took a position on the causes of climate change only 0.7% or 83 of those thousands of academic articles, disputed the scientific consensus that climate change is the result of human activity, with the view of the remaining 2.2% unclear.

The study described the dissent as a "vanishingly small proportion" of published research.

"Our findings prove that there is a strong scientific agreement about the cause of climate change, despite public perceptions to the contrary," said John Cook of the University of Queensland, who led the survey.

Public opinion continues to lag behind the science. Though a majority of Americans accept the climate is changing, just 42% believed human activity was the main driver, in a poll conducted by the Pew Research Centre last October.

"There is a gaping chasm between the actual consensus and the public perception," Cook said in a statement.
...
"The public perception of a scientific consensus on AGW [anthropogenic, ie man-made, global warming] is a necessary element in public support for climate policy," the study said.
...
Jon Krosnick, professor in humanities and social sciences at Stanford university and an expert on public opinion on climate change, said: "I assume that sceptics would say that there is bias in the editorial process so that the papers ultimately published are not an accurate reflection of the opinions of scientists."

[TahoeBlue]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420783/Global-warming-just-HALF-said-Worlds-climate-scientists-admit-computers-got-effects-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html
Global warming is just HALF what we said: World's top climate scientists admit computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong
Leaked report reveals the world is warming at half the rate claimed by IPCC in 2007
Scientists accept their computers 'may have exaggerated'

By David Rose
PUBLISHED: 16:01 EST, 14 September 2013 | UPDATED: 03:21 EST, 15 September 2013

A leaked copy of the world’s most authoritative climate study reveals scientific forecasts of imminent doom were drastically wrong.
The Mail on Sunday has obtained the final draft of a report to be published later this month by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the ultimate watchdog whose massive, six-yearly ‘assessments’ are accepted by environmentalists, politicians and experts as the gospel of climate science.

They are cited worldwide to justify swingeing fossil fuel taxes and subsidies for ‘renewable’ energy.

Yet the leaked report makes the extraordinary concession that the world has been warming at only just over half the rate claimed by the IPCC in its last assessment,  published in 2007.

Back then, it said that the planet was warming at a rate of 0.2C every decade – a figure it claimed was in line with the forecasts made by computer climate models.

But the new report says the true figure since 1951 has been only 0.12C per decade – a rate far below even the lowest computer prediction.
The 31-page ‘summary for policymakers’ is based on a more technical 2,000-page analysis which will be issued at the same time. It also surprisingly reveals: IPCC scientists accept their forecast computers may have exaggerated the effect of increased carbon emissions on world temperatures  – and not taken enough notice of natural variability.

They recognise the global warming ‘pause’ first reported by The Mail on Sunday last year is real – and concede that their computer models did not predict it. But they cannot explain why world average temperatures have not shown any statistically significant increase since 1997.

They admit large parts of the world were as warm as they are now for decades at a time between 950 and 1250 AD – centuries before the Industrial Revolution, and when the population and CO2 levels were both much lower.

The IPCC admits that while computer models forecast a decline in Antarctic sea ice, it has actually grown to a new record high. Again, the IPCC cannot say why.

A forecast in the 2007 report that hurricanes would become more intense has simply been dropped, without mention.
...


...
Despite the many scientific uncertainties disclosed by the leaked report, it nonetheless draws familiar, apocalyptic conclusions – insisting that the IPCC is more confident than ever that global warming is mainly humans’ fault.

...

For example, in the new report, the IPCC says it is ‘extremely likely’ – 95 per cent certain – that human  influence caused more than half  the temperature rises from 1951 to 2010, up from ‘very confident’ –  90 per cent certain – in 2007.

Prof Curry said: ‘This is incomprehensible to me’ – adding that the IPCC projections are ‘overconfident’, especially given the report’s admitted areas of doubt.
...


As things stand, the atmosphere is expected to have twice as much CO2 as in pre-industrial times by about 2050. In 2007, the IPCC said the ‘likeliest’ figure was 3C, with up to 4.5C still ‘likely’.

...

[TahoeBlue]

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100238047/global-warming-believers-are-feeling-the-heat/
Global warming believers are feeling the heat
By James Delingpole Environment Last updated: September 25th, 2013

On Friday the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change delivers its latest verdict on the state of man-made global warming. Though the details are a secret, one thing is clear: the version of events you will see and hear in much of the media, especially from partis pris organisations like the BBC, will be the opposite of what the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report actually says.

Already we have had a taste of the nonsense to come: a pre-announcement to the effect that “climate scientists” are now “95 per cent certain” that humans are to blame for climate change; an evidence-free declaration by the economist who wrote the discredited Stern Report that the computer models cited by the IPCC “substantially underestimate” the scale of the problem; a statement by the panel’s chairman, Dr Rajendra Pachauri, that “the scientific evidence of… climate change has strengthened year after year”.
...
At the heart of the problem lie the computer models which, for 25 years, have formed the basis for the IPCC’s scaremongering: they predicted runaway global warming, when the real rise in temperatures has been much more modest. So modest, indeed, that it has fallen outside the lowest parameters of the IPCC’s prediction range. The computer models, in short, are bunk.

To a few distinguished scientists, this will hardly come as news. For years they have insisted that “sensitivity” – the degree to which the climate responds to increases in atmospheric CO₂ – is far lower than the computer models imagined. In the past, their voices have been suppressed by the bluster and skulduggery we saw exposed in the Climategate emails. From grant-hungry science institutions and environmentalist pressure groups to carbon traders, EU commissars, and big businesses with their snouts in the subsidies trough, many vested interests have much to lose should the global warming gravy train be derailed.

This is why the latest Assessment Report is proving such a headache to the IPCC. It’s the first in its history to admit what its critics have said for years: global warming did “pause” unexpectedly in 1998 and shows no sign of resuming. And, other than an ad hoc new theory about the missing heat having been absorbed by the deep ocean, it cannot come up with a convincing explanation why. Coming from a sceptical blog none of this would be surprising. But from the IPCC, it’s dynamite: the equivalent of the Soviet politburo announcing that command economies may not after all be the most efficient way of allocating resources.

Which leaves the IPCC in a dilemma: does it ’fess up and effectively put itself out of business? Or does it brazen it out for a few more years, in the hope that a compliant media and an eco-brainwashed populace will be too stupid to notice? So far, it looks as if it prefers the second option – a high-risk strategy. Gone are the days when all anybody read of its Assessment Reports were the sexed-up “Summary for Policymakers”. Today, thanks to the internet, sceptical inquirers such as Donna Laframboise (who revealed that some 40 per cent of the IPCC’s papers came not from peer-reviewed journals but from Greenpeace and WWF propaganda) will be going through every chapter with a fine toothcomb.

Al Gore’s “consensus” is about to be holed below the water-line – and those still aboard the SS Global Warming are adjusting their positions. Some, such as scientist Judith Curry of Georgia Tech, have abandoned ship. She describes the IPCC’s stance as “incomprehensible”. Others, such as the EU’s Climate Commissioner, Connie Hedegaard, steam on oblivious. Interviewed last week by the Telegraph’s Bruno Waterfield, she said: “Let’s say that science, some decades from now, said: 'We were wrong, it was not about climate’, would it not in any case have been good to do many of the things you have to do in order to combat climate change?” If she means needlessly driving up energy prices, carpeting the countryside with wind turbines and terrifying children about a problem that turns out to have been imaginary, then most of us would probably answer “No”.

[TahoeBlue]

bump - -  - the lowering standards of living in America - agenda21 - etc ....
It's a race to the bottom with the insistence from Rockefeller buffett gates and pals .... 

Notice where China is on this graph (Low Productivity) :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_intensity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gdp-energy-efficiency.jpg

[ update ( Feb 2014) ]

oh I love this... John FORBES Kerry . .. ( yes please for the love of pete understand that Kerry is a FORBES! )
Climate change in Communist China!!! I'd laugh but it just makes me _____


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/15/john-kerry-china-unique-cooperative-climate-change
Kerry announces 'unique co-operative effort' with China on climate change

•US secretary of state is currently on Asia tour
•Kerry: countries have ‘special role’ to play to reduce emissions

Martin Pengelly in New York
theguardian.com, Saturday 15 February 2014 11.37 EST   


John [FORBES] Kerry torques an engine bolt during a tour of the Foton Cummins Engine plant in Beijing. Photograph: Evan Vucci /AFP /Getty Images

Secretary of State John Kerry on Saturday announced a “unique co-operative effort” with China on the issue of combating climate change.

In a press conference at a Beijing car-making factory, the Cummins-Foton Joint-Venture Plant, which he visited as part of an Asia tour, Kerry said he and local representatives had “succeeded in completing our agreement with respect to some steps we are going to take to move the climate change process forward”.
...
Kerry said China and the US, the world’s largest emitters of greenhouse gas, had a “special role” to play in reducing those emissions, and cited progress made on the issue during vice-president Joe Biden’s visit to Beijing last year.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_family

The Forbes family is a wealthy extended American family originating in Boston. The family's fortune originates from trading between North America and China in the 19th century plus other investments in the same period. The name descends from Scottish immigrants, and can be traced back to Sir John de Forbes in Scotland in the 12th century. Notable family members are businessman John Murray Forbes (1813–1898), part of the first generation who accumulated wealth, and politician John Forbes Kerry (born 1943).
...

The Boston trading firm Perkins & Co. sent many young men of their extended family to participate in their business activities abroad. Ralph Forbes being married to Margaret Perkins, their children were encouraged in the business. Following the death overseas of his older brother, Thomas Tunno Forbes, the Perkinses encouraged John Murray Forbes to travel to China, too. There John was mentored by the Chinese merchant Houqua who treated him like a son.

Perkins & Co., like many other Boston trading firms in the early 19th century, sent ships to China to get tea for sale in America (although some was ultimately re-exported to Britain and Europe). To pay for the tea, they exported to China large quantities of silver and also furs, manufactured goods, cloth, wood, opium and any other items that they thought the Chinese market would absorb.
...

[ they never mention his Mother ... ]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosemary_Forbes_Kerry
Rosemary Isabel Forbes (October 27, 1913 – November 14, 2002 ...  the mother of John Forbes Kerry

She was one of eleven children of James Grant Forbes of the Protestant Forbes family and Margaret Tyndal Winthrop of the Dudley–Winthrop family
...
During her lifetime, she was the beneficiary of Forbes family trusts, which her son John Kerry is now the partial beneficiary; as Rosemary was one of 11 children, there is not much that remained.
...
Rosemary was also the mother of another son, Cameron, who is General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Commerce, and was formerly a Boston lawyer, an adjunct law professor at Suffolk Law School

[ Commerce for the Chinese and the Forbes ?? ]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameron_Kerry


 Cameron Forbes Kerry (born September 6, 1950) is the younger brother and political confidant of John Forbes Kerry and the General Counsel of the US Department of Commerce.[1]

He was appointed Acting United States Secretary of Commerce on June 1, 2013 [2] and resumed his position as General Counsel on June 26, 2013 when Penny Pritzker was sworn in as the 38th United States Secretary of Commerce.

As the General Counsel of the Department of Commerce, Cameron Kerry is the principal legal advisor to the Secretary of Commerce and third ranking secretarial officer. President Obama nominated him on April 20, 2009 and he was confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate on May 21, 2009.

| - - - -

Update - I won't even go into how John's last name Kerry is really Kohn ! :

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/16/us/kerry-s-grandfather-left-judaism-behind-in-europe.html
Kerry's Grandfather Left Judaism Behind in Europe
By JOSEPH BERGER
Published: May 16, 2004

On May 18, 1905, Frederick A. Kerry, a 32-year-old Viennese, arrived in New York City by steamship, the Königin Luise, with his wife and 4-year-old son, hopeful that his new country would bring him the success and social acceptance that had eluded him in Europe.

Mr. Kerry probably could not have imagined that within a century a grandson, John Forbes Kerry, would find himself the Democratic candidate for president.

Frederick Kerry brought with him a secret: he was born a Jew, Fritz Kohn, in what is now the Czech Republic, but he and his wife, Ida, had converted to Roman Catholicism. Senator Kerry, a Catholic whose maternal side includes such blueblooded names as Winthrop and Forbes, said he did not know his paternal grandfather was Jewish until a reporter for The Boston Globe told him last year that it had been discovered by a genealogist in Vienna who scoured church records from the Austro-Hungarian empire.

Tomas Jelinek, chairman of the Jewish community in Prague, and Rabbi Norman R. Patz, president of the New Jersey-based Society for the History of Czechoslovak Jews, said that Czech Jews, in contrast to those in Poland, wore their identity somewhat more lightly. Given periodic spasms of anti-Semitism and the difficulty of advancing in the government and military as a Jew, many, like the parents of Madeline K. Albright, the former secretary of state, found conversion made their lives immeasurably easier.

http://forward.com/articles/6385/czech-records-tell-the-story-of-how-jewish-kohn-be/
Czech Records Tell the Story of How Jewish Kohn Became Catholic Kerry
Published February 27, 2004

OPAVA, Czech Republic — Ever since The Boston Globe broke the story of Senator John Kerry’s Jewish roots last year, the rise of the humble Kohn family of Silesia to Boston Brahmanism has been presented to the public as a prime example of the American Dream.
...
In the now-heavily publicized ledger, we found a man named Fritz Kohn, born a Jew in 1873 in the town of Horni Benesov (then Bennisch) to Benedict Kohn, and, on the very last page, appended to the ledger, is a notation that “Kohn, Fritz” received permission on March 17, 1902, from Viennese authorities to change his surname to Kerry. By the time this decree had reached the priest who made the ledger notation in Opava, Fritz Kerry was living in Vienna and had converted to Catholicism, following the lead of his brother Otto, who had converted and changed his name in 1897. Later, Fritz Kohn left for America, changed his first name to Fredrick, and eventually shot himself in the head in a Boston hotel, leaving behind a few hundred dollars in stock and a Cadillac.

Now his grandson — a lifelong Boston Catholic, a senator and a member of the Forbes and, through marriage, Heinz clans — is set to become the Democratic nominee for the presidency of the United States. If he wins, he’ll be the first American president with known Jewish roots.
...

[TahoeBlue]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/10916086/The-scandal-of-fiddled-global-warming-data.html
The scandal of fiddled global warming data

The US has  been cooling since the Thirties, the hottest decade on record

By  Christopher Booker

4:04PM BST 21 Jun 2014

...

But now another damning example has been uncovered by Steven Goddard’s US blog Real Science, showing how shamelessly manipulated has been one of the world’s most influential climate records, the graph of US surface temperature records published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Goddard shows how, in recent years, NOAA’s US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been “adjusting” its record by replacing real temperatures with data “fabricated” by computer models.

The effect of this has been to downgrade earlier temperatures and to exaggerate those from recent decades, to give the impression that the Earth has been warming up much more than is justified by the actual data.

In several posts headed “Data tampering at USHCN/GISS”, Goddard compares the currently published temperature graphs with those based only on temperatures measured at the time. These show that the US has actually been cooling since the Thirties, the hottest decade on record;

whereas the latest graph, nearly half of it based on “fabricated” data, shows it to have been warming at a rate equivalent to more than 3 degrees centigrade per century.

... that ludicrous “hockey stick” graph, pretending to prove that the world had suddenly become much hotter than at any time in 1,000 years.

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/author/stevengoddard/
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/summers-used-to-be-much-hotter-in-the-us-2/
Summers Used To Be Much Hotter In The US
Posted on June 23, 2014   by stevengoddard    
 
One year ago this week, President Barack Obama waited for a hot day in Washington and hurriedly held an outdoor speech, where he could perspire, engage in third rate acting,  and blame global warming.
...

[TahoeBlue]

IPCC doubles down - Millions must freeze and starve to "save the planet" from a change in the weather even tho there is no evidence except that CO2 helps plants grow faster

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/nov/02/rapid-carbon-emission-cuts-severe-impact-climate-change-ipcc-report
IPCC: rapid carbon emission cuts vital to stop severe impact of climate change
 
Most important assessment of global warming yet warns carbon emissions must be cut sharply and soon, but UN’s IPCC says solutions are available and [UN-]affordable

....

“Science has spoken. There is no ambiguity in the message,” said the UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, attending what he described as the “historic” report launch. “Leaders must act. Time is not on our side.” He said that quick, decisive action would build a better and sustainable future, while inaction would be costly.

Ban added a message to investors, such as pension fund managers: “Please reduce your investments in the coal- and fossil fuel-based economy and

to renewable energy.”

The report, released in Copenhagen on Sunday by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), is the work of thousands of scientists and was agreed after negotiations by the world’s governments. It is the first IPCC report since 2007 to bring together all aspects of tackling climate change and for the first time states: that it is economically affordable; that carbon emissions will ultimately have to fall to zero; and that global poverty can only be reduced by halting global warming. The report also makes clear that carbon emissions, mainly from burning coal, oil and gas, are currently rising to record levels, not falling.

[TahoeBlue]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html
The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

New data shows that the “vanishing” of polar ice is not the result of runaway global warming
By  Christopher Booker
10:15PM GMT 07 Feb 2015

When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.

Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.

This was only the latest of many examples of a practice long recognised by expert observers around the world – one that raises an ever larger question mark over the entire official surface-temperature record
...

Of much more serious significance, however, is the way this wholesale manipulation of the official temperature record – for reasons GHCN and Giss have never plausibly explained – has become the real elephant in the room of the greatest and most costly scare the world has known.

This really does begin to look like one of the greatest scientific scandals of all time.

[TahoeBlue]

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/06/29/robert-redford-moderate-weather-going-extinct-december-may-be-our-last-chance/

...
Monday at the United Nations in New York City, actor and activist Robert Redford said the U.N. climate conference in Paris in December is the world’s “last chance” to save the planet from climate change.

Redford said, “This December, the world must unite behind a common goal. Because look, this is it. This is our only planet, our only life source. This may be our last chance.”

He told the Untied Nations, “Your mission is as simple as it is daunting: save the world before it’s too late.”

“Everywhere we look, moderate weather seems to be going extinct,” Redford added, “The time for half measures and climate denial is over. Unless we move quickly away from fossil fuels, we’re going to destroy the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the health of our children, grandchildren and future generations.”

Follow Pam Key On Twitter @pamkeyNEN

[TahoeBlue]

He wants a job in the future new global "governance"
and now the Pope's in on the new Global Governance via "climate" scam

http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article27998554.html
Jerry Brown’s climate warning: ‘We are talking about extinction’

California governor delivers ominous climate change speech at Vatican
Brown calls climate change an ‘area where I can be constructive’
Pope Francis expresses ‘great hope’ for global climate talks in Paris
By David Siders
[email protected]
VATICAN CITY —

Gov. Jerry Brown, issuing an ominous appeal on climate change, said Tuesday that the world may already have “gone over the edge” on global warming and that humanity must reverse course or face extinction.

Brown, speaking at a summit of mayors from around the world, has increased his already-high profile on climate change in recent months, working to coalesce support for carbon reduction policies ahead of global climate talks in Paris in December.
...

Brown is scheduled to speak again Wednesday at the summit. The Vatican is combining talks on climate change and human trafficking, emphasizing the impact of global warming on the world’s poorest people.

The pope’s address filled a large auditorium, and when the pontiff posed for a photograph with the politicians, two rows back stood Brown.

He and his wife, Anne Gust Brown, plan to remain in Italy for several days after the conference concludes, vacationing in Florence.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article27998554.html#storylink=cpy

[TahoeBlue]

So, You don't believe in global warming, well so what ....  you're going to pay and live like a slave in your own country
let the EPA decide ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wj58YhrtesU
Darrell Issa threatens to hold EPA Head Gina McCarthy in contempt for failing to turn over documents

http://freebeacon.com/issues/epa-chief-gina-mccarthy-doesnt-know-percentage-of-co2-in-atmosphere/
EPA Chief Gina McCarthy Doesn’t Know Percentage of CO2 in Atmosphere
Information is fundamental to EPA’s Regulations
https://youtu.be/QT65MXW5G-I
...
Opponents of the plan, such as Rep. Lamar Smith (R., Texas) who chaired the hearing, call it a “power grab” and say it gives “government more control over Americans’ daily lives.”

“These regulations stifle economic growth, destroy American jobs, and increase energy prices,” said Smith. “That means everything will cost more—from electricity to gasoline to food, which disproportionately hurts low income Americans.”

“Even EPA data shows that this regulation would reduce sea level rise by only 1/100th of an inch, the thickness of three sheets of paper,” he added. “This rule represents massive costs without significant benefits. In other words, it’s all pain and no gain.”




http://www.wsj.com/articles/obamas-new-climate-change-regulations-to-alter-challenge-industry-1438560433
Obama’s New Climate-Change Regulations to Alter, Challenge Industry

The first-ever federal limits on power-plant carbon emissions aim to change the way Americans make and consume electricity and ease climate change

By Amy Harder, Colleen McCain Nelson and Rebecca Smith
Aug. 2, 2015 8:07 p.m. ET
 
 516 COMMENTS   
 
WASHINGTON—A new rule mandating the first-ever federal limits on power-plant carbon emissions aims to change the way Americans make and consume electricity, accelerating a shift already under way toward cleaner fuels, renewable energy and consumer-generated power.

The regulations, which will be unveiled by President  Barack Obama at a White House event Monday, are part of a broader push by the administration to position the U.S. as a leader in tackling climate change. The Environmental Protection Agency regulations are central to the administration’s submission to an international climate conference set for December in Paris.

...

White House officials say Mr. Obama views addressing climate change as part of his legacy. He announced an aggressive climate deal with China in November and has put the issue high on the agenda in meetings with world leaders in recent months. The president also will discuss climate change with  Pope Francis during his visit to the U.S. next month, following the pope’s release of an encyclical on the issue in June.

...

Industry officials say they are worried about the plan’s cost and timetable. Republicans in Congress and states hardest hit by the plan say they will fight it. More than a dozen states and the coal industry have vowed to sue the EPA, and several states have threatened to refuse to comply with the rule.

The rule would require a 32% cut in power-plant carbon dioxide emissions by 2030 from 2005 levels, an increase from the 30% target proposed last year. EPA Administrator  Gina McCarthy said Sunday the rule would result in an estimated annual cost of $8.4 billion by 2030 and have total benefits, including public-health benefits, of $34 billion to $54 billion per year by then.


update:

 http://www.epa.gov/airquality/cpp/cpp-final-rule.pdf

The EPA Administrator, Gina McCarthy, signed the following notice on 8/3/2015, and EPA is submitting it for
publication in the Federal Register (FR). While we have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this Internet version
of the rule, it is not the official version of the rule for purposes of compliance. Please refer to the official version in
a forthcoming FR publication, which will appear on the Government Printing Office's FDSys website
(http://gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action) and on Regulations.gov (http://www.regulations.gov) in Docket No.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2013‐0602. Once the official version of this document is published in the FR, this version will be
removed from the Internet and replaced with a link to the official version.

...

SUMMARY: In this action, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is establishing final emission guidelines for states to
follow in developing pans to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating
units (EGUs). Specifically, the EPA is establishing:

1) carbon dioxide (CO2) emission performance rates representing the best system of emission reduction (BSER) for two subcategories of
existing fossil fuel-fired EGUs – fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam generating units and stationary combustion
turbines,

2) state-specific CO2 goals reflecting the CO2 emission performance rates, and

3) guidelines for the development, submittal and implementation of state plans that establish emission standards or other measures to implement the CO2 emission performance rates, which may be accomplished by meeting the state goals. This final rule will continue progress already
underway in the U.S. to reduce CO2 emissions from the utility power sector.

[larsonstdoc]

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/kerry-americans-wont-elect-president-anyone-who-doesnt-embrace

  Hey Kerry, where did you come up with this false idea?  A ouija board?

  Kerry is totally sold out to the NWO.....


Kerry: Americans Won’t Elect a President Who is Not Committed to Climate Accord

[TahoeBlue]

before he leaves office ... the nwo stamp of a carbon footprint also a step closer to legislating towards a NAU ( North American Union) ...

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/mar/10/us-canada-promise-lead-world-low-carbon-economy-obama-trudeau
US and Canada promise to lead world to low-carbon economy

Countries previously seen as climate change villains present shared vision on cutting emissions as Justin Trudeau meets Barack Obama at White House

The US and Canada declared they would help lead the transition to a low-carbon global economy on Thursday, in a dramatic role reversal for two countries once derided as climate change villains.


The shared vision unveiled by Barack Obama and Justin Trudeau ahead of a meeting at the White House commits the two countries to a range of actions to shore up the historic climate agreement reached in Paris last December.

The two leaders committed to rally G20 countries behind the accord, promote North American carbon markets, cap emissions from hundreds of thousands of existing oil and gas wells, and protect indigenous communities in a region which is warming beyond the point of no return, according to a statement from the White House.

The initiative announced on Thursday brings the US a big step closer to meeting its own Paris target by committing for the first time to cut emissions of methane - a powerful greenhouse gas responsible for about a quarter of warming - from existing oil and gas wells.

....

Under the initiative, the US and Canada will work to ratify the Paris agreement as soon as possible, lending an important symbolic boost to prospects for bringing the Paris agreement into force as soon as possible after the 22 April signing ceremony. The agreement must be ratified by at least 55 countries representing 55% of global emissions.
...

| - - - -

http://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2016/03/10/us-canada-joint-statement-climate-energy-and-arctic-leadership
U.S.-Canada Joint Statement on Climate, Energy, and Arctic Leadership

Washington, D.C., United States of America
10 March 2016

President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau share a common vision of a prosperous and sustainable North American economy, and the opportunities afforded by advancing clean growth.  They emphasize and embrace the special relationship between the two countries and their history of close collaboration on energy development, environmental protection, and Arctic leadership.  The two leaders regard the Paris Agreement as a turning point in global efforts to combat climate change and anchor economic growth in clean development.  They resolve that the United States and Canada must and will play a leadership role internationally in the low carbon global economy over the coming decades, including through science-based steps to protect the Arctic and its peoples. Canada and the U.S. will continue to respect and promote the rights of Indigenous peoples in all climate change decision making. Furthermore, the leaders emphasize the importance of the U.S. and Canada continuing to cooperate closely with Mexico on climate and energy action and commit to strengthen a comprehensive and enduring North American climate and energy partnership.

Implementing the Paris Agreement

Canada and the U.S. will work together to implement the historic Paris Agreement, and commit to join and sign the Agreement as soon as feasible.  As we implement our respective Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), the leaders also commit to, in 2016, completing mid-century, long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategies pursuant to the Paris Agreement and encouraging this approach with members of the G-20.
...
- See more at: http://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2016/03/10/us-canada-joint-statement-climate-energy-and-arctic-leadership#sthash.x2SDycMi.dpuf

| - - - -

[ 1984 - thought control doublespeak:  No first amendment here ]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3485864/Attorney-General-Loretta-Lynch-considered-taking-legal-action-against-climate-change-deniers.html

Attorney General Loretta Lynch has 'considered taking legal action against climate change deniers'
Lynch told the Senate Judiciary Committee she has 'discussed' the possibility of a civil suit against the fossil fuel industry
She said any information her office has received has been sent to the FBI in a bid to build a case
Her comments came as she was questioned by Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse from Rhode Island
He compared the climate change deniers to members of the 'mischievous' tobacco industry

By Wills Robinson For Dailymail.com 

Published: 09:33 EST, 10 March 2016  | Updated: 11:36 EST, 10 March 2016

...
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3485864/Attorney-General-Loretta-Lynch-considered-taking-legal-action-against-climate-change-deniers.html#ixzz42WGEMfRZ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[TahoeBlue]

Mission complete? Notice the switching between Treaty and agreement terms ... non binding ? really ?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/04/22/paris-climate-agreement-signing-united-nations-new-york/83381218/
Historic Paris climate pact signed at U.N.
 Doyle Rice, USA TODAY 1:01 p.m. EDT April 22, 2016

World leaders converged at United Nations headquarters in New York on Friday — Earth Day — to sign the historic Paris climate accord.

Approved by 195 countries in December, the non-binding treaty seeks to slow the rise of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, that are blamed for putting Earth on a dangerous warming path. The agreement sets a target of limiting global warming by 2100 to “well below” 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees F), as compared to pre-industrial levels.

Over 170 countries representing more than 93% of global greenhouse gas emissions were expected to sign the agreement Friday, according the World Resource Institute (WRI).
...

| - - - -

De- Growth !!! ? :

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/6534116_Guercio_Sustainability%20and%20economic%20degrowth.pdf

Brief for GSDR 2015
Sustainability and economic de-growth
Maria Rita Guercio - University of São Paulo*

...

The mistake is to believe that the resumption of indiscriminate economic growth and increased consumption is the solution to this situation. The new paradigm that is established is the need for economic-growth which in turn would cause a decrease in consumption. Only with this retraction is possible to leverage a stronger economy and without stress to the already aggravated ecosystem. The United Nations University (UNU - Wider) states that in 2000, 1% of the richest adults in the world own 40% of the world's wealth while the disadvantaged half of humanity has only 1% of global wealth.

[TahoeBlue]

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/28/icegate-now-nsidc-caught-tampering-with-climate-records/
Icegate: Now NSIDC Caught Tampering With Climate Records
by James Delingpole
28 Apr 2016

You’ve read about the climate fraud committed ‘on an unbelievable scale’ by the shysters at NASA.

You’ve read about how NOAA overestimated US warming by 50 percent.

Now it’s NSIDC’s turn to be caught red-handed fiddling the data and cooking the books.

NSIDC – National Snow and Ice Data Center – is the US government agency which provides the official statistics on such matters as sea ice coverage in the Arctic.

Naturally its research is of paramount importance to the climate alarmists’ narrative that man-made global warming is causing the polar ice caps to melt. At least it was until those ice caps refused to play ball…

Where the alarmists have for years been doomily predicting ice free summers in the Arctic –  according to Al Gore in 2007, 2008 and 2009 it would be gone by 2013 – the truth is that multi-year ice has been staging a recovery since 2009.

o what do you do if reality doesn’t suit your narrative? Simple. If you’re NSIDC (and NASA and NOAA…) you just change reality.

NSIDC’s latest attempt to breathe new life into the corpse of the alarmist narrative comprised a press release a few weeks ago claiming that 5+ year old sea ice is at its smallest level on record. To prove it, they’ve produced a new chart that looks like this.



But according to Steven Goddard of the Real Science website this claim needs to be taken with a huge pinch of salt.

Note how, to confuse matters, NSIDC have upended their chart so that 5+ year ice instead of being at the bottom is now at the top. Far worse, though, they’ve gone and deleted all the old style maps from their archive.

At least they thought they had.

But a sharp eyed reader of Goddard’s managed to find one old style map that NSIDC had forgotten to delete. This enabled Goddard to compare the new style map with an old style map for the same week. What he discovered is that NSIDC has been making some dramatic and unexplained adjustments to the record: about half the 5+ year sea ice which should be there, for example, has been mysteriously erased.

Here is a chart Goddard has composed showing the differences.



And here are the two maps, new and old. Note how much larger the 5+ year sea ice coverage is on the old one than on the new one. Note also that there is no scientific reason for this.





NSIDC must know that what they are doing is unethical. Why else would they have gone to the trouble not just of deleting their old records – but of trying to block the auto-archiving of that data?

[TahoeBlue]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/29/obama-will-bypass-senate-ratify-paris-climate-acco/
White House defends Obama evading Senate on Paris climate deal
By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times - Monday, August 29, 2016

The White House on Monday defended President Obama’s decision to enter into the Paris climate accord without Senate ratification but stopped short of confirming a Chinese report that he will do so this week during his trip to China.

Still, it would surprise no one if Mr. Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping were to announce the ratification of the sweeping climate change agreement before the Sunday opening of the Group of 20 summit in Hangzhou, Zhejiang.

White House senior adviser Brian Deese said the president has the legal authority to ratify the accord without the two-thirds Senate vote required for treaties. He said the pact negotiated by 195 countries in December is merely an “executive agreement.”

“The president will use his authority that has been used in dozens of executive agreements in the past to join and formally deposit our instrument of acceptance, and therefore put our country as a party to the Paris Agreement,” Mr. Deese said at a White House press conference.

He noted that both presidents announced in March that they “would seek to formally join the Paris Agreement in 2016.”

“That’s a process that is quite well-established in our existing legal system and in the context of international agreements and international arrangements,” Mr. Deese said. “There is a category of them that are treaties that require advice and consent from the Senate, but there’s a broad category of executive agreements where the executive can enter into those agreements without that advice and consent.”
   

Republicans have insisted that the accord requires Senate ratification and warned the Obama administration as well as international leaders that Congress will not be bound by an agreement ratified by unilateral executive action.

Myron Ebell, director of the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Center for Energy and Environment, predicted Monday that Mr. Obama will “pretend to ratify the treaty in China.”

“What could be more insulting to our Constitution than ‘ratifying’ it in the presence of the Chinese president-dictator?” asked Mr. Ebell, who opposes the deal. “And what could be more appropriate, since, like Xi, Obama is unaccountable?”

Speculation about the ratification soared after the South China Morning Post reported that two leaders are “set to jointly announce their ratification” as early as Friday. The report cited sources who said that “senior climate officials from both countries worked late into the night in Beijing on Tuesday to finalize details.”

Mr. Deese confirmed that he traveled to China last week to meet with officials on the Paris Agreement, which calls for nations to adopt emissions limits with the aim of holding increases in global temperatures “well below” 2 degrees Celsius from pre-industrial levels.

“I anticipate when the presidents meet, they will discuss topics that will include this issue of trying to get the Paris Agreement to enter into force as quickly as possible,” Mr. Deese said.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon issued a plea last month for world leaders to accelerate the ratification process, which lost steam after the agreement was announced in December.

To take effect, the accord must be signed and ratified by 55 nations responsible for at least 55 percent of global emissions. So far, 23 nations emitting about 1 percent of greenhouse gases have completed the ratification process, according to Climate Analytics’ ratification tracker.

“Together, the U.S. and China represent just under 40 percent of global emissions,” said Mr. Deese. “So the act of our two countries joining and when that happens will help move us closer to that goal.”

Climate change skeptics dismissed the anticipated executive ratification as a sham designed to prop up Mr. Obama’s legacy.

Climate Depot’s Marc Morano predicted that “Obama will surely do his best play-acting and pretend the ‘ratification’ has actual meaning, but as a former constitutional law professor, even he knows better.”

“What they need right now is a game-changer, and if they can’t get it then, true to form, they will manufacture the illusion of it,” Australian science writer Joanne Nova said on her JoNova blog.

Sen. James M. Inhofe, Oklahoma Republican and Senate Environment and Public Works Committee chairman, has repeatedly said that the Paris Agreement will change nothing. He issued a white paper in April that said the pact amounts to “empty promises that will have no meaningful impact on the climate.”

“The problem with international climate change agreements is that they ignore basic economic and political realities and therefore are doomed to failure,” said Mr. Inhofe. “When the hype over the signing fades, the reality will set in that the policies President Obama is promising will not last.”

Critics fear that the executive branch will use the Paris Agreement, while not legally binding, to enact sweeping climate policies without Congress.

Mr. Obama has argued that urgent action is needed. “No challenge poses a great threat to future generations than climate change,” he said last year.

Mr. Deese credited the president with reaching out to China to reset the international malaise on climate change that followed the failed 1997 Kyoto Protocol and the 2009 Copenhagen Summit, which resulted in a weak accord that was not adopted.

“I think the second significant thing about president’s approach to climate change is seen in his engagement with China,” Mr. Deese said. “The president recognized early on in the administration that if we were going to have an effective global response to climate change, we were going to have to write a new playbook. That the old approaches had not succeeded.”

The Paris Agreement was the result of “a very consistent and steady diplomatic effort that the president prioritized year after year, working to restore U.S. credibility on climate issues through our Climate Action Plan, demonstrating that we actually could make progress in reducing emissions,” he said.

Mr. Obama is scheduled to embark Wednesday on a Pacific Rim trip that includes a stop in Honolulu for the World Conservation Congress, the G-20 Summit in China and a visit to Laos for the first such presidential visit in history.

...

[TahoeBlue]

this thread got trashed?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html

Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data
The Mail on Sunday can reveal a landmark paper exaggerated global warming
It was rushed through and timed to influence the Paris agreement on climate change
America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration broke its own rules
The report claimed the pause in global warming never existed, but it was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data

By David Rose for The Mail on Sunday

Published: 17:57 EST, 4 February 2017  | Updated: 10:12 EST, 5 February 2017


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html#ixzz4XvcnWgJ4
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[TahoeBlue]

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/exclusive-study-finds-temperature-adjustments-account-for-nearly-all-of-the-warming-in-climate-data/
EXCLUSIVE: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data
Michael Bastasch
07/05/2017

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”

“Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.

The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.

Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.
....

[jofortruth]

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/exclusive-study-finds-temperature-adjustments-account-for-nearly-all-of-the-warming-in-climate-data/
EXCLUSIVE: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data
Michael Bastasch
07/05/2017

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”

“Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.

The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.

Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.
....

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vIdTHFujDnI


http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=319796.msg1627732;topicseen#msg1627732

[Dude447]

Quit farting Mofo's it's screwing up planet earth , The Sun doing its cycle thing ? That's Tinfoil red neck land move along folks nothing to see here

[TahoeBlue]

I think ... no this is the end of it .... they've been discredited ... BUT NO! THEY double down !!!!

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/25/britain-to-ban-sale-of-all-diesel-and-petrol-cars-and-vans-from-2040

Britain to ban sale of all diesel and petrol cars and vans from 2040
 
Plans follow French commitment to take polluting vehicles off the road owing to effect of poor air quality on people’s health

...
Britain is to ban all new petrol and diesel cars and vans from 2040 amid fears that rising levels of nitrogen oxide pose a major risk to public health.

The commitment, which follows a similar pledge in France, is part of the government’s much-anticipated clean air plan, which has been at the heart of a protracted high court legal battle.

...

The French president took the steps to help his country meet its targets under the Paris climate accord, in an announcement that came a day after Volvo said it would only make fully electric or hybrid cars from 2019 onwards.

That decision was hailed as the beginning of the end for the internal combustion engine’s dominance of motor transport after more than a century.
...

| - - - -

https://banyanhill.com/exclusives/o-massive-infinite-energy-spans-entire-u-s-2/?z=642893

Massive INFINITE Energy Spans Entire U.S.
July 25, 2017
July 25, 2017  Jeff L. Yastine   

The map below is the most incredible map you will ever see … it reveals a huge untapped energy reserve that spans the entire United States.

Experts at the U.S. Department of Energy believe this fuel could provide America with a “30,000-year energy supply.”

In a new video, world-renowned investment analyst Paul Mampilly, reveals why “this could be bigger than ExxonMobil, Chevron and Shell Oil combined … and early investors stand to make John D. Rockefeller-type fortunes.”

https://pro.banyanhill.com/p/PRLGE/PPRLT309/?h=true

[TahoeBlue]

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/11/25/experts-climate-change-assessment-every-conclusion-latest-government-report-false/
Experts on Climate Change Assessment: ?Every Conclusion of This Latest Government Report Is False?
25 Nov 2018

The federal government?s Fourth National Climate Assessment, released on Friday, has gained praise from leftists and left-wing environmental groups as a dire warning of the coming death and destruction in the United States if we don?t stop global warming.

But critics of the report, including scientists, have slammed it as ?exaggeration,? bad science and even said its conclusions are ?false.?

?This latest climate report is just more of the same ? except for even greater exaggeration, worse science, and added interference in the political process by unelected, self-serving bureaucrats,? Tim Huelskamp, president of the Heartland Institute said in statements released by the free-market think tank following the report?s release.

?With a new volume out in December, The Heartland Institute has published 4,000 pages of the Climate Change Reconsidered series by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), Huelskamp said. ?Those reports cite many hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific papers that show how every conclusion of this latest government report [is] false.?

?This report from the climate alarmist Deep State in our government is even more hysterical than some United Nations reports,? Huelskamp noted. ?The idea that global temperatures could rise as much as 12 degrees in the next 80 years is absurd and not a shred of actual data and observation supports that.?

?This report is a scientific embarrassment,? Jay Lehr, science director at the Heartland Institute, said. ?Not only does it rely on computer models to predict the climate through the end of the century, it relies on computer models from five years ago that have been laughably wrong, failing to get even close to reality since 2013.?

Lehr said the report is filled with ?blatantly absurd conclusions? designed to put more money and power into the hands of the United Nations.
...
Lehr and 18 reputable scientists wrote a 54-page critique of the Global Change Research Program?s 2017 report, which was similarly alarmist, according to Heartland.

The critique can be found here.
https://www.heartland.org/publications-resources/publications/a-critique-of-the-us-global-change-research-programs-2017-climate-science-special-report
A Critique of the U.S. Global Change Research Program?s 2017 Climate Science Special Report
February 28, 2018
By Jay Lehr

[TahoeBlue]

fyi:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2018/01/10/breaking-darrell-issa-will-not-seak-reelection-n2432610
Darrell Issa Will Not Seek Re-election
Katie Pavlich
Posted: Jan 10, 2018

Republican California Congressman and former House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa will not seek re-election in 2018.

"Two decades ago, when I stepped away from the business I'd built to enter public service, I never could have imagined that a long-shot bid for U.S. Senate would lead to 18 years in the House of Representatives and endless opportunities to make a meaningful impact," Issa released in a statement Wednesday. "Together, we put an end to abusive Congressional earmarks, strengthened the Violence Against Women Act, empowered better oversight of the executive branch, and cleared the course for better intellectual property protections to stop the piracy of American ingenuity."
 
"Throughout my service, I worked hard and never lost sight of the people our government is supposed to serve.  Yet with the support of my family, I have decided that I will not seek re-election in California's 49th District," he continued.

...

So, You don't believe in global warming, well so what ....  you're going to pay and live like a slave in your own country
let the EPA decide ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wj58YhrtesU
Darrell Issa threatens to hold EPA Head Gina McCarthy in contempt for failing to turn over documents

http://freebeacon.com/issues/epa-chief-gina-mccarthy-doesnt-know-percentage-of-co2-in-atmosphere/
EPA Chief Gina McCarthy Doesn’t Know Percentage of CO2 in Atmosphere
Information is fundamental to EPA’s Regulations
https://youtu.be/QT65MXW5G-I
...
Opponents of the plan, such as Rep. Lamar Smith (R., Texas) who chaired the hearing, call it a “power grab” and say it gives “government more control over Americans’ daily lives.”

“These regulations stifle economic growth, destroy American jobs, and increase energy prices,” said Smith. “That means everything will cost more—from electricity to gasoline to food, which disproportionately hurts low income Americans.”

“Even EPA data shows that this regulation would reduce sea level rise by only 1/100th of an inch, the thickness of three sheets of paper,” he added. “This rule represents massive costs without significant benefits. In other words, it’s all pain and no gain.”

...

[TahoeBlue]

The world has been coming out of an Ice Age for 10,000 years and yes the earth is getting warmer ... with increased bio activity the CO2 carbon dioxide levels have been increasing ...

Man can do very little to  reduce the temp  increase and the resulting changes  ...  (there is every indication is that there will be another ice age coming in the next 100 to 500 years  btw )  It maybe that an ecological collapse results in a co2 decrease and that produces a resulting ice age  as seen in the graphs :  read the graph this way : <---



Because oxygen isotope data are used to establish these periods of warmer or colder temperature, the sequence is referred to as the Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) timescale, or alternatively as the Oxygen Isotope Stage (OIS) timescale. By convention, the warmer periods are assigned odd-numbered stages, starting with the Holocene (MIS 1), and the colder periods are assigned even-numbered stages, starting with the most recent glacial period (Wisconsin - MIS 2). The boundaries between cold and subsequent warm stages roughly correlate with glacial terminations, as delimited by an abrupt decrease in the oxygen isotope ratio indicating rapid ice sheet melting and deglaciation. Glacial terminations are indicated by Roman Numerals, starting with Termination I at the end of the most recent glaciation (Wisconsin period). 




https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/weather/

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/weather/ct-met-trump-chicago-cold-global-warming-20190129-story.html
As Chicago braced for dangerous cold, Trump joked about global warming
Tony BriscoeChicago Tribune

As Chicago and much of the Midwest braced for a dangerous blast of arctic air ? the worst in recent memory ? President Donald Trump leaped at the chance to take a questionable swipe at one of his favorite targets, global warming.


?In the beautiful Midwest, windchill temperatures are reaching minus 60 degrees, the coldest ever recorded," Trump tweeted.

"In coming days, expected to get even colder. People can?t last outside even for minutes. What the hell is going on with Global Waming (sic)? Please come back fast, we need you!?
...

[TahoeBlue]

https://www.drudgereport.com/
01/30/2019



Power Outages Across Minneapolis Leaves Thousands Without Heat...
Extreme Cold Strains Natural Gas System...
Snowplows idled...
No mail delivery...
Group Urges Residents To Help Protect Feral Cats...
Train tracks set on fire to keep running...
Body Found Frozen In Garage After Shoveling Snow...

What happened to 'Global Warming'?


CHICAGO ON BLAST!
MIDWEST FEELS LIKE -75?
CHILL MAP

| - - - -

A Lot earlier ..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orkney



http://museopics.com/Prehistory-Sites-Artefacts-Art/MuseoPics-Prehistoric-Britain/Neolithic-Age-Britain/Ring-of-Brodgar-Neolithic-Standing-Stones-Ring/Ring-Brodgar-Neolithic-Standing-Stones-Pictures-History.html#1.
The History of the Ring of Brodgar

The Ring of Brodgar (circa 2,500 to 2,000 BC) is a Neolithic Age henge and stone ring circle, the third largest and most northern in the British Isles. It is situated on a spit of moorland that runs between two inland lochs at Stenness in the heart of Orkney. The lochs were not there when the stone ring was built and it is estimated that the sea broke through at a gap in Brig o' Waithe in Stenness in about 1500BC, 500-1000 years before the Ring of Brodgar was made.



4000 years ago the climate of Orkney was a lot warmer than today.

The Island could support a large community who lived off fish and shellfish and burnt peat from the inland moors of Orkney. The everyday dwellings of these Neolithic people can be seen at the incredibly well preserved Neolithic village of Skara Brae. Orkney was able to support a large community who lived on the island full time so and lived easy enough to have spare time to work on the great Neolithic monuments of the island.


| - - -

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8320938/uk-weather-snow-workers-school-children-told-go-home/
FLIGHT OUT British Airways has cancelled flights from Heathrow as a 30-hour snowbomb hits the UK with
London forecast to get snow tonight
Heavy snow is wreaking havoc across South West England and is forecast to to hit London tonight
By Annabel Murphy and Dan Hall
31st January 2019, 10:45 am


FLIGHTS out of Heathrow Airport have been cancelled due to the 30-hour snowbomb set to hit London tonight.

British Airways has halted dozens of short-haul flights out of the London airport causing more chaos across the country as amber and yellow weather warnings for snow are issued across the country.
...
Up to 100 people are stranded on the A30 in Cornwall tonight as snow and ice cover the dual carriageway. Drivers are being urged to avoid travel unless 'necessary'