Author Topic: Does this prove that the planes had missiles on them?  (Read 17619 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mym

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Does this prove that the planes had missiles on them?
« Reply #40 on: June 25, 2009, 03:33:15 am »
Hello,

It does look like there was some type of electrical charge that happened.  When I first saw it, I was thinking it could a missile.  When I looked at it again, I thought, wait, how can a plane such as this be harboring missiles..then I said, well, the NWO can do anything they want, then it occurred to me that I wanted to really see something that would make a difference, but I just could not convince myself that missiles were involved.  So back to reality.  And this "no-plane" crap is just so stupid.


Mike
Quote
PS: this wikipedia page is looking like a total historical WHITE WASH. Where are the mods on wikipedia? They need to be shown some decent evidence and get the corporate porn BANNE

agreed in so many ways!

mym





Offline pcc

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
Re: Does this prove that the planes had missiles on them?
« Reply #41 on: June 26, 2009, 01:42:44 am »
I am ignoring the text, it's nothing to do with the point I'm making.
fine, but it is a great pic of the location of the supposed "nose out" claim..
I put that picture up so that people can clearly see that the walls of the building are really 43% NOTHING (glass).
and your main point is of course true.. anyone with an understanding of basic physics would concede that there are no anomalies in the impact footage we have seen..
The plane impacted, broke up and followed the path of least resistance until the heavier plane parts punched through.
any nit wit should see this..
Yes.. planes are made from things other than aluminium.
of course, mostly honeycombed composite material that would shatter on impact..
except for the keel.. a hardened part running along the underside of the fuselage into the cockpit..

Offline bs

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 365
Re: Does this prove that the planes had missiles on them?
« Reply #42 on: July 04, 2009, 11:53:17 am »
While there may be some doubt as to what hit the pentagon - i think most people are in no doubt as to what hit the twin towers - there is decent enough evidence and we saw it with our own eyes (unlinke the pentagon).
Most people feel that by people shouting there was no planes they are making the truth movement look ridiculous and part of the tin foil hat wearing brigade - and it damages our credibility and our ability to convince more people.


Looked like a cruise missile to me,but i digress.... ::)

Offline Dustbunny

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 326
  • It's better to have a gun and not need it, than...
Re: Does this prove that the planes had missiles on them?
« Reply #43 on: July 07, 2009, 01:10:12 pm »
If the plane went straight through the building, your point would make sense, but it went diagonally... too many columns on the way...
"The issue is not whether you are paranoid, the issue is whether you are paranoid enough."
- Max, Strange Days
"Paranoia is knowing all the facts."
- Woody Allen
"This is the Nineties, Bubba, and there is no such thing as Paranoia. It's all true."
- Hunter S Thompson