PrisonPlanet Forum

Elections, Referendums and Politics => Obama => Topic started by: uwaf on July 27, 2009, 04:40:38 pm

Title: Impeach Obama
Post by: uwaf on July 27, 2009, 04:40:38 pm
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/72492.html

 CHARLOTTE, N.C. — While protesters rallied in his support, the owner of a Concord Mills kiosk that sells conservative merchandise said he met with the mall's manager Sunday to see what arrangements can be made for him to remain after his lease expires Friday.

Nothing was agreed to, except that the two would meet again Monday, said Loren Spivack, owner of Free Market Warrior.

Spivack has contended that he's being kicked out of the mall for political reasons. He's traced his exile to a letter to the editor in the Charlotte Observer criticizing his business, saying it promotes “ideas such as racism, sexism and even slavery.”

He said he was at work again Sunday when he got a call from mall manager Ray Soporowski inviting to talk in his office.

“It was a pleasant, amicable conversation, but we didn't come to any resolution about whether our business would be able to stay in the mall,” Spivack said. “He wanted to include some of his company's senior management and we agreed to talk again Monday.”

Mall officials have repeatedly declined to comment. Reached Sunday, Soporowski continued that policy. “With all due respect, that conversation is between Loren and myself,” he said.

Sunday, about 100 people rallied in front of the mall to support Spivack and his right to free speech.

He opened his Free Market Warrior kiosk last spring, selling such items as “Impeach Obama” bumper stickers and baby bibs that say, “My parents chose life. Thanks Mom and Dad!”

Spivack said he's found other stores in the mall selling T shirts and other merchandise with offensive slogans and feels he's being targeted “purely for politic reasons.”

Since the controversy arose, he said his business has picked up.

Read the full story at charlotteobserver.com

You can't want good things in life. It might hurt someone's feelings that don't.
Title: Impeach Obama
Post by: Lisbeth on October 09, 2009, 09:25:00 pm
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=112098#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
Impeachment suggested to remove 'threats' to America
'Make no mistake. We're now in the middle of a bloodless coup'

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: October 08, 2009
1:00 am Eastern


By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily



A political activist who was behind the famous Willie Horton advertisement that left Gov. Michael Dukakis' candidacy for president floundering and was among the first to sound the alarm on the need for Bill Clinton's impeachment says the United States is collapsing around its citizens right now, but there is a defense.

"Make no mistake. We're now in the middle of a bloodless coup – the takeover of an entire nation by the hate-America crowd – a cold-blooded gang that despises America's prosperity, our standing in the world, our trust in God and our generosity and goodness," says political activist Floyd Brown in a post on the new Impeach Obama Campaign website.

His suggested defense is nothing more or less than a strike at the emperor, plans which are detailed on the website.

"Like so many on the far-left before him, going all the way back to Karl Marx, he [Obama] believes that it's his mission to promote 'equality of outcome' over 'equality of opportunity' even if Americans must learn to live in chains to make it happen," Brown said. "That worldview makes Barack Hussein Obama a very dangerous man and one of the greatest threats to your personal liberty today."

Brown said that view also explains why Obama "has already gobbled-up major banks and why the government now controls more and more of our money – yours and mine. And if you wake up one day to discover you're broke, don't be surprised. Barack Hussein Obama is Bernie Madoff with the political power of the presidency at his disposal."

(Story continues below)

     


"That dangerous worldview explains why his attorney general, Eric Holder, despises the 2nd Amendment… And that dangerous worldview explains why Obama intends to take away your freedom to choose your own doctor …. Your own treatment," he said.

Brown said the only one solution to the problem he described as a "monomaniac."

"Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: 'The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.'"

Brown told WND that first and foremost, "people need to believe that it's possible."

He recalls the campaign to impeach Bill Clinton was begun back in the 1990s when Congress was controlled by the Democrat Party and there was virtually no obvious support for the concept.

"But we were patient and we kept at it, and he was impeached," he said.

"We believe he [Obama] is not qualified to be president, he should have never been allowed to be president, and [impeachment] is the best process for resolving this situation," he said.

Brown said most people remember him for being behind the Horton ad, which highlighted the subsequent crimes of a felon released from prison under Dukakis' watch. He also was among the first to sound the alarm on the Clinton Whitewater scandal as well as the mysterious circumstances of the apparent suicide of White House Counsel Vince Foster.

In a WorldNetDaily column, Floyd and Mary Beth Brown write that the idea already is mushrooming among conservatives, such as those in the discussions on the Expose Obama website where Floyd Brown is a moderator.

"Radio-personality, Tammy Bruce may have captured these activists beliefs about Obama best: '... ultimately, it comes down to... the fact that he seems to have, it seems to me, some malevolence toward this country, which is unabated,'" she said, according to the Browns.

They argue Obama already is guilty of the "high crimes and misdemeanors" for which the U.S. Constitution provides impeachment as a penalty.

"Our Founding Fathers fully intended to allow for the removal of the president for actions which include: gross incompetence, negligence, and distasteful behavior," they wrote.

According to the Impeach Obama Campaign, Obama already has:


Lied to the American people when he said people could keep private insurance, knowing full well that his legislation would inevitably drive private insurers out of business.


Vindictively fired Inspector General Gerald Walpin, who investigated Kevin Johnson, a buddy of the president, for misuse of funds from an AmeriCorps grant.


Supervised the effective takeover by government of banks, the largest insurance company (AIG), and General Motors (GM) and Chrysler... the bulk of the U.S. auto industry, thus depriving bondholders, shareholders, and others of their property.


Pursued cap-and-trade legislation. It would in a manner of speaking tax the very air people exhale and give the government unprecedented control over the economy and American businesses.


Added a trillion dollars to the national debt in just a handful of weeks.


Appointed "Czars" to oversee everything from the closing of Guantanamo to the nation's food.


And finally, Obama has consistently refused to approve the release of his actual birth certificate, college transcripts and his medical records.
Since impeachment proceedings are handled by no one but Congress, Brown writes that it is important now for people to realize the impact of their votes in 2010, because that will determine the makeup of Congress, and very probably whether any impeachment against Obama could proceed.

Brown cited a key opinion from former President Gerald Ford, who while serving in the House of Representatives, said an impeachable offense was, "whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history."

"Impeachment, as written in the Constitution, was tailor-made for Barack Hussein Obama and our Founders placed it in our Constitution for such a time as this," Brown said.

Brown cited his concerns over Obama's attitudes and behaviors, including:


When Obama said America is not a Christian nation.


When, in his book, Obama wrote of Muslims, "I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."


When the White House insisted the name of Jesus be covered before Obama could speak at Georgetown University.


When in 2009 Obama said, "You might say that America is a Muslim nation."


When he treated the Queen of England with casual familiarity, but bowed to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, where Muslims won't permit Christian worship under penalty of death.
WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Complicating the situation is Obama's decision to spend sums probably exceeding $1 million to avoid releasing an original long-form state birth certificate that would put to rest the questions.

WND also has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.

 

Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: rockandroll on December 21, 2009, 03:46:10 pm
we need to impeach this communist obama and vote this idiot congressman out of office
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Overcast on September 21, 2010, 07:21:17 pm
It's time to impeach Obama for high crimes against U.S.

From: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=204149

Posted: September 16, 2010
6:50 pm Eastern

By Joe Kovacs
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

MIAMI – An urgent plea to impeach a "Christianity-hating" President Obama for alleged "high crimes and misdemeanors" was issued today at the start of WND's "Taking America Back Conference" in South Florida.

The call was announced by Floyd Brown, president of the Western Center for Journalism, who asserted in strong terms the commander in chief is deliberately trying to destroy the principles on which the U.S. was founded.

"The Obama presidency is a disease," said Brown. "Article 2, Section 4 (the impeachment clause of the Constitution) is the cure. And it's Obama's hatred of America that makes it absolutely imperative that we take action now."

"Barack Hussein Obama is not some do-gooder that has had his plans go astray," Brown added. "He is not a person of good will just trying his best to make America go the right direction. He is not. Barack Hussein Obama is a liar that absolutely knows what he's doing to the United States of America. He has a plan. He has an agenda. This man knows exactly where he's taking us."

A political innovator, writer and speaker, Brown is now running an online campaign to impeach the president.

"Barack Obama is a very dangerous man," said Brown. "Over the last two years, we have been watching the slow progression of what I call a bloodless coup."

Read all about the grounds for impeachment.

"For the international socialist movement of which Barack Obama is a card-carrying member," he added, "the U.S. must be brought to its knees, and I guarantee you that Barack Hussein Obama is doing everything he can to bring the country to its knees. He wants to bring it to its knees."

Brown warned that a counterculture has risen up, dividing America.

"They don't have the same respect for you as an individual and personal property, and these traditional ideas in the Constitution. That's why they're at war with the Constitution. Everything our forefathers fought and died for to them is just trash to be thrown out on Monday morning."

Brown responded to a common question about what specifically the president has done that rises to the level of impeachment by recalling President Gerald Ford in the 1970s, who indicated an impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at any given moment in history.

The U.S. Constitution states a president can be impeached for treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Brown said the phrase "high crimes and misdemeanors" essentially means "bad behavior."

He went through a list of what he considered bad behavior, saying Obama has "nationalized the banks. He nationalized GM and Chrysler. He's attacked the 2nd Amendment. He's taken over health care. He wants cap and trade legislation, so he literally taxes the air that you breathe. We breathe out CO2. He appointed czars to control your life without congressional oversight. He apologizes for us abroad. I find it personally offensive that he would apologize for this great land."

Brown said the president has committed actual crimes, including offering jobs in exchange for political favors; firing Inspector General Gerald Walpin who was investigating Obama friend Kevin Johnson for allegedly misusing funds; and is now actively trying to bankrupt America, adding more to the national deficit in nine months than in the first 200 years of U.S. history.

He noted the Congressional Budget Office has warned that unless Obama can control his appetite for deficit spending, accumulated debt could spark a U.S. fiscal crisis similar to recent ones in Greece and Ireland.

Brown then turned to matters of faith, and blasted Obama's contention that he's a Christian.

"Obama hates Christianity," Brown declared. "He is a Muslim. Others will say he's just a godless atheist. The bottom line is that this man hates Christianity."

He said at Georgetown University, Obama forced the school to cover the name of Jesus on the podium, and he paraphrased the president's comments suggesting the U.S. was no longer a Christian nation, but could now be considered a Muslim nation.

"Whatever we once were, we're no longer a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of non-believers," Obama stated.

"He said it!" exclaimed Brown. "Have you read about it in the New York Times, the Washington Post, or the Wall Street Journal? There is a conspiracy of silence in the mainstream media to cover up this man's hatred of Christianity."

He quoted American leaders of the past, including President Andrew Jackson, who called the Bible "the rock upon which our republic rests," and Patrick Henry, who said, "It is when a people forget God, that tyrants forge their chains."

"Obama is that tyrant and he's working that anvil right now of forging our chains," said Brown.

Brown admitted that there would have to be a change in the leadership of Congress in the upcoming November elections to make impeachment a reality, but said the issue was pressing.

"Do we wait until he's totally ripped our country apart?" Brown asked.

He closed by invoking President Ronald Reagan, who was noted for saying, "If not us, then who? If not now, when?"

The "Taking America Back Conference" is a three-day event taking place at the Doral Resort in Miami, and includes dozens of speakers including U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., former presidential candidates Alan Keyes and Tom Tancredo, and authors Jerome Corsi, Aaron Klein and David Kupelian.

Other speakers include scientist and Bible teacher Chuck Missler; talk-show host Rusty Humphries, Michael Farris of Home School Legal Defense Association; Robert Knight and Jerry Newcombe of Coral Ridge Ministries; William Murray of the Religious Freedom Coalition and son of notorious atheist Madeline Murray O'Hair; RC Sproul, Jr., author of "Biblical Economics"; "Saturday Night Live" alum Victoria Jackson, author-columnist Erik Rush and author Judith Reisman.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on September 21, 2010, 07:30:47 pm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/21/medal-of-honor-ceremony-o_n_733694.html
"Even though it's been 42 years, it's never too late to do the right thing," Obama said.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Overcast on September 21, 2010, 07:33:19 pm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/21/medal-of-honor-ceremony-o_n_733694.html
"Even though it's been 42 years, it's never too late to do the right thing," Obama said.

Fantastic Quote :)
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: g7enn on March 21, 2011, 02:50:34 pm
TIME TO SET AN EXAMPLE: IMPEACH PRESIDENT OBAMA FOR TRANSGRESSING THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, THE US CONSTITUTION

http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=1828
http://www.parenting-healthy-children.com/Parenting-blog.html
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: bigron on June 25, 2011, 01:27:21 pm
Impeach Obama Now Or Forever Hold Up Peace


By Philip C. Restino, Jr.



http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28405.htm

June 26 2011 "Information Clearing House" -- Twenty years ago after U.S. forces had driven the Iraqi military out of Kuwait and back into Iraq, President George H.W. Bush as Commander in Chief ordered the U.S. military to cease-fire on February 28, 1991.  Years later in his 1998 memoir “A World Transformed”, Bush admitted that the reason he chose to order the cease-fire was because he understood that advancing further into Iraq, a country that had not attacked the U.S., and overthrowing its government could easily be seen as an illegal war of aggression and thus warrant a call from the American people for his removal from office by the constitutional remedy of impeachment.  It was the fear of a call for impeachment by the American people that in effect stopped the President from continuing the war.
 
Since the Presidency of the Democrat Bill Clinton during the 1990’s, which immediately followed the Presidency of the Republican George H.W. Bush, the American people have allowed a practice of the President acting as “unitary executive” unaccountable to the rule of law in ordering the U.S. military into unprovoked, illegal wars of aggression and occupations.  During the Presidency of the Republican George W. Bush, attempts were made to even re-define the office of the Presidency as a “unitary executive” with literally dictatorial powers beyond the rule of law.  Now, because the American people have still not spoken up, the current Presidency of the Democrat Barack Obama has allowed the President of the United States to order young Americans to war without even consulting the American people’s representatives in Congress or having to concoct a lie about the U.S. facing a “justifiable” threat to its national security.
 
President Obama’s ordering of the March 19th, 2011 attack on Libya, without even consulting Congress, let alone getting a Declaration of War or other type of Congressional approval for the attack, has led to a good amount of discussion as to how the President could very well be impeached for having unilaterally ordered such an attack.  People from both ends of the political spectrum, to include members of Congress, have been quite clear in publicly stating that the President’s attack on Libya is not only an impeachable offense, as per Democrat Representative and 2008 Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich from Ohio, but it also makes him accountable for war crimes, as per Republican Representative and 2012 Presidential candidate Ron Paul from Texas.  Notable legal experts and scholars from both the left and the right, to include former Democrat U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark, former Republican Deputy U.S. Attorney General Bruce Fein, and Professor of Law Francis Boyle, have publicly offered their services to assist in carrying out impeachment proceedings against President Obama over his unconstitutional and otherwise illegal war on Libya to any member of Congress willing to step forward and introduce Articles of Impeachment.
 
Let us not forget that it was the former Constitutional Law Professor and U.S. Senator Barack H. Obama who said himself during a December 20, 2007 interview with the Boston Globe that “The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”
 
The sovereign nation of Libya posed no such threat whatsoever to the United States, and Obama’s ordering of more than 120 Cruise Missiles fired into Libya in just the first day of his own March 19th “Shock and Awe” is nothing less than another outright illegal U.S. war of aggression similar to the illegal U.S. war of aggression on Iraq launched 8 years to the day prior, minus the land invasion which is the next step in the process if the American people don’t draw the line and call for a stop to it now.
 
With such a clear cut case ready to make for impeaching President Obama over his war on Libya, along with the legal experts and the political figures ready to proceed with a call for impeachment, then why has there not been a call from the leaders of the national antiwar organizations for impeaching Obama when making such a call now could actually prevent him from going ahead with a land invasion into Libya and even be enough of a threat of impeachment to force him to finally end the 10-year U.S. wars and occupations by using his unique ability as Commander in Chief to order a cease-fire?
 
People involved in the national antiwar organizations have told me that the issue of racism is a major factor in their failure to call for impeachment of President Obama for what amounts to the same crimes cited in their former calls for impeachment and present calls for prosecution of President George W. Bush over his war on Iraq.  If calling for the impeachment of the first Black American U.S. President for prosecuting illegal wars of aggression is racist, then that first needs to be squared with all the brown-skinned people being killed under his command.  Even more so, if calling for the impeachment of the first African-American U.S. President for prosecuting an illegal war of aggression on Libya is racist, then that first needs to be squared with all the brown-skinned Africans being killed under his command before such a claim be taken seriously.  A friend put it to me this way, if racism is applying different standards based on race, then not calling for impeachment because of race is in fact racism as well.
 
I spoke recently with the president of a major national antiwar organization about the silence from his organization regarding a call for impeachment of President Obama and he told me that the reason he and his organization are against applying the same standard of impeachment in their public call for accountability to President Obama, even after his recent attack on Libya, as they had so strongly applied to President George W. Bush in regards to his war on Iraq was the possibility of groups that were “racist” joining their call for the impeachment of Obama not because they agreed with his prosecuting the U.S. war on Libya being impeachable but instead because they were racists and just wanted to remove Obama from office because he was a person of color.  If that’s really the thinking of the leaders of the national antiwar organizations in America, then I say who needs “controlled opposition”?
 
When asked, most Americans want the wars to end and our representatives in government, to include the President of the United States, to once again not be able to act outside the rule of law.  Now the American people have a very clear and present opportunity to achieve just that with President Obama’s unilaterally ordering the March 19th U.S. military attack on Libya.  There comes a point in time when we either “use it or lose it”, and we are at that point in time now with the constitutional remedy of impeachment.  Impeach now or forever hold up peace.
 
Restino is co-chair and a founding member of the Central Florida chapter of Veterans For Peace and a member of Military Families Speak Out - Florida.  He lives in Port Orange, FL.  Veterans For Peace is made up of military veterans working together for peace and justice through non-violence since 1985.  The Central Florida chapter covers from Greater Orlando east to Greater Melbourne and north to Greater Jacksonville.  For more information about Veterans For Peace, please visit the chapter website at www.cflveteransforpeace.org or the national VFP website at www.veteransforpeace.org.
 
To access on line, and for download and printing and distribution, our current resolution and petition to Impeach President Obama for the illegal, unilateral invasion of Libya along with other war crimes please go to:
 http://www.impeachthem.com/files/ptn_resolution_to_impeach_obama19march2011.pdf
 
 
 
Phil Restino’s on-air discussion with the weekly morning radio program The Power Hour with Joyce Riley concerning President Obama's ordering of a U.S. "Shock and Awe" type military attack Libya on Saturday, March 19, 2011 go to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1QsR6D13o4
 
WATCH VIDEO HERE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1QsR6D13o4&feature=player_embedded


ARTICLE HERE

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28405.htm




Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Mr Grinch on January 14, 2013, 06:49:34 pm
Etta James - At Last
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7SyArYofuc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WT-_HZ_xMnc
------=====--------+++++
http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/14/gop-congressman-threatens-impeachment-if-obama-uses-executive-action-for-gun-control/


GOP congressman threatens impeachment if Obama uses executive action for gun control
5:20 PM 01/14/2013

Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman threatened Monday afternoon that he would file articles of impeachment against President Barack Obama if he institutes gun control measures with an executive order.

Stockman warned that such executive orders would be “unconstitutional” and “infringe on our constitutionally-protected right to keep and bear arms.”

“I will seek to thwart this action by any means necessary, including but not limited to eliminating funding for implementation, defunding the White House, and even filing articles of impeachment,” Stockman said in a statement.

At his press conference Monday, Obama floated the possibility of using executive action to enact policies aimed at reducing gun violence..........
cont
http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/14/gop-congressman-threatens-impeachment-if-obama-uses-executive-action-for-gun-control/
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 14, 2013, 06:56:06 pm
  Finally, a Congressman with a nutsack.  Way to go Steve Stockman.

  EXECUTIVE ORDERS THAT ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL ARE NULL AND VOID.

  THE CONSTITUTION TRUMPS EVERYTHING.

  WE DO NOT LIVE IN A BANANA REPUBLIC.

  I WAS HOPING SOMEONE WOULD STAND UP FOR THE RULE OF LAW.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on January 14, 2013, 06:58:13 pm
Well, it looks like someone's has a spine left.

I don't think this gun grab opportunity has gone as 'easy' as the NWO gang of murderers thought it would.

Expect more FF's specially when the UN gun treaty becomes ALL the state run media will talk about.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: jofortruth on January 14, 2013, 07:06:36 pm
Yeah, it took a NEW Congressman to find their spine in the HOUSE. He makes the others look like wimps for not having said they would impeach Obama before now.

The other spineless minions better step up to the plate and find their guts and support Stockman and now. IF THEY DON'T, THEY SHOULD ALL BE TOSSED ASIDE GOING FORWARD AND RIDICULED UNTIL THEY ARE OUT OF OFFICE!

THE JOB OF THE US CONGRESS IS TO WORK FOR THE PEOPLE, AND ANYONE WHO DARES TO TELL US THEY ARE WORKING FOR THE BANKERS, LOBBYISTS, SOME CORPORATION WHO BRIBES THEM, ON AND ON THE SCAMS GO, AS SHOWN BY THEIR ACTIONS OR LACK THEREOF, MUST BE EXPOSED UNTIL THEY LEAVE OFFICE OR ARE RECALLED BY THEIR STATE.

WE ARE SICK OF WIMPS IN CONGRESS. YOU GUYS EITHER MAN UP OR GO THE HELL HOME WITH YOUR GUILT OF HAVING HELPED RUIN YOUR COUNTRY BY BEING WIMPS AND NOT MEN!


 >:(
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 14, 2013, 07:25:28 pm


  Top story at Drudge.  Way to go Matt.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: decemberfellow on January 14, 2013, 08:07:30 pm
Nice  to hear of a constitution believing congressman.  Hats off to ya sir.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Valerius on January 14, 2013, 08:19:25 pm
Of course, it was Republican George Bush, Sr., who first used executive order for gun control.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 15, 2013, 12:28:43 am
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/biden-guns-executive-actions-86187.html?hp=t1_3

More at the link

Biden: W.H. readies 19 executive actions on guns



The White House has identified 19 executive actions for President Barack Obama to move unilaterally on gun control, Vice President Joe Biden told a group of House Democrats on Monday, the administration’s first definitive statements about its response to last month’s mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

Later this week, Obama will formally announce his proposals to reduce gun violence, which are expected to include renewal of the assault weapons ban, universal background checks and prohibition of high-capacity magazine clips. But Biden, who has been leading Obama’s task force on the response, spent two hours briefing a small group of sympathetic House Democrats on the road ahead in the latest White House outreach to invested groups.


The focus on executive orders is the result of the White House and other Democrats acknowledging the political difficulty of enacting any new gun legislation, a topic Biden did not address in Monday’s meeting.

The executive actions could include giving the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention authority to conduct national research on guns, more aggressive enforcement of existing gun laws and pushing for wider sharing of existing gun databases among federal and state agencies, members of Congress in the meeting said.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: egypt on January 15, 2013, 12:40:12 am
Why is the congressman waiting for a "gun control" issue?  There's an incredibly long list of grievances  for impeachment on O and his entourage that could take place!
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 15, 2013, 12:44:20 am
Why is the congressman waiting for a "gun control" issue?  There's an incredibly long list of grievances  for impeachment on O and his entourage that could take place!

  I agree egypt.  What are they waiting for?
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Valerius on January 15, 2013, 01:41:19 am
  I agree egypt.  What are they waiting for?


For the dog to jump on the pony's back.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: JConner on January 15, 2013, 09:19:30 am
Yeah, it took a NEW Congressman to find their spine in the HOUSE. He makes the others look like wimps for not having said they would impeach Obama before now.


He's not quite a 'new' congressman. I remember him back in the 90s. Here, take a look - http://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/steve_stockman/410396
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: jofortruth on January 15, 2013, 09:47:25 am
He's not quite a 'new' congressman. I remember him back in the 90s. Here, take a look - http://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/steve_stockman/410396


He's new in the 113th Congress. He just got elected. Sure, he was there back in the 1990s, but has been a few years.

NEW also means that he wasn't a current brainwashed, bought or spineless Congressman from the 112th Congress (last year).

So, tell us what you know about him from those past years? What do you remember?
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on January 15, 2013, 01:28:58 pm
(http://www.mygen.com/images/Tory_Obama.jpg)

Barack Obama's small town guns and religion comments

Barack's comments that are generating all of the controversy: "You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them," Obama said. "And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not.

And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."   (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTxXUufI3jA)

http://www.myspace.com/wardyg/photos/10351866#%7B%22ImageId%22%3A10351954%7D
(http://a3.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/105/04c764fae5a441cf9b46527b52076ffc/l.jpg)
(http://www.mygen.com/images/georgetown-obama.jpg)
Whitehouse removes INRI  of Jesus at Obama's request before speaking at Georgetown University and put up a BLACK PYRAMID!!!! [ The acronym INRI (Iēsus Nazarēnus, Rēx Iūdaeōrum) represents the Latin inscription which in English reads as "Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Jews" ]

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/01/impeach-obama-guns-edwin-meese.php
Impeachmentum: Reagan AG Says Obama Can Be Impeached Over Guns

Evan McMorris-Santoro-January 15, 2013, 1:56 PM3425
Former Reagan Attorney General Edwin Meese, now a prominent emeritus official at the Heritage Foundation, became the latest conservative to warn that President Obama could risk impeachment if he takes executive action on reducing gun violence in an interview Monday night.

Speaking with Newsmax, Meese said Congress may have to consider impeaching Obama if he were “to try to override the Second Amendment in any way” with an executive order. He did allow that there are some executive actions related to guns that Obama could take wouldn’t be impeachable.

“It would be up to the Congress to take action, such as looking in to it to see if, in fact, he has really tried to override the Constitution itself,” Meese told Newsmax. “In which case, it would be up to them to determine what action they should take — and perhaps even to the point of impeachment.”

He said that there are certain executive actions the White House can take without fear of impeachment.

“An executive order without specific congressional authority can only apply to those portions of the government that are under his control — in their words, the executive branch,” Meese said. “Now there are some things he can probably do in regard to the actions of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, or some other governmental agency in its operations.”

“But to impose burdens or regulations that affect society generally, he would have to have Congressional authorization,” he said
...
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: jofortruth on January 15, 2013, 02:29:56 pm
Calls for Impeachment as the Crimes of Barack Hussein Obama against the Republic mount! CONGRESS, IMPEACH OBAMA! HIS VIOLATIONS ARE VOLUMINOUS, AND HE IS THUMBING HIS NOSE AT YOU! CONGRESS, GROW A PAIR AND DO YOUR DAMN JOB AND IMPEACH HIM NOW!
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showtopic=10235&st=0#entry22009809
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: jofortruth on January 15, 2013, 05:55:28 pm
Ron Paul comments on Clinton Impeachment in 1998:
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=240712.msg1397610#msg1397610
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: egypt on January 15, 2013, 06:20:38 pm
Please.

Impeach Joseph Biden of Delaware at the same time.  There's a long list of persons to be removed from office.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 15, 2013, 06:25:03 pm
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/14227-as-obama’s-anti-gun-agenda-emerges-republican-threatens-impeachment

       more at the link

       THIS ARTICLE IS FROM THE NEW AMERICAN.


Tuesday, 15 January 2013 13:15
As Obama’s Anti-gun Agenda Emerges, Republican Threatens Impeachment
Written by  Alex Newman

 
font size     Print E-mail
 
The White House task force led by Vice President Joe Biden (shown) unveiled some of its proposals to infringe on the right to keep and bear arms Tuesday, a plot that critics say would lay the framework for gun registration and eventual confiscation. Among other schemes, the Obama administration is plotting to adopt almost 20 “executive orders” on gun control while pushing for more draconian legislation, drawing a prompt and fierce rebuke from advocates of the Second Amendment. One Republican in Congress is even threatening to file articles of impeachment.  

According to news reports citing Democrat lawmakers, Obama plans to impose a wide range of controversial measures by executive fiat. In other words, because Congress is unlikely to help assault gun rights at this point — even some Democrats have called his proposals “very extreme” — the president plans to pursue his anti-Second Amendment agenda by issuing unconstitutional decrees. Critics in Congress and in state governments nationwide, however, contend that such lawlessness would be unacceptable.

Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas), for example, warned that if Obama tried to adopt gun control by executive order, Congress could be forced to consider impeachment. “The very purpose of the Second Amendment is to stop the government from disallowing people the means to defend themselves against tyranny,” he explained. “Any proposal to abuse executive power and infringe upon gun rights must be repelled with the stiffest legislative force possible."

Obama's threats are literally an assault on the foundation of America, Stockman continued. “If the president is allowed to suspend constitutional rights on his own personal whims, our free republic has effectively ceased to exist,” he said Monday. "I will seek to thwart this action by any means necessary, including but not limited to eliminating funding for implementation, defunding the White House, and even filing articles of impeachment.”

Lawmakers in Wyoming, meanwhile, are considering a bill that would nullify any unconstitutional gun control efforts within the state — registration schemes as well as restrictions on types of guns or magazines would all be covered. Any federal official attempting to enforce such measures would be committing a felony and could be imprisoned for up to five years. The legislation is expected to pass.

Texas and other states are set to consider similar legislation, and support for nullification is spreading across the country like wildfire. At the same time, local law enforcement officials — sheriffs, police chiefs, state attorney generals — are also promising to protect gun rights in their jurisdictions. Citizens, meanwhile, are openly advocating mass civil disobedience to resist any further infringements.  

Still, Obama is not backing down. Everything from ordering state governments and federal agencies to provide more information for federal databases to unlawfully trying to track firearm sales is on the president’s “executive” agenda, according to new reports. “How we are gathering data, for example, on guns that fall into the hands of criminals, and how we track that more effectively — there may be some steps that we can take administratively as opposed to through legislation,” Obama said on Monday.

Federal law and the Second Amendment, of course, prohibit any effort to register or track weapons. However, experts and gun rights activists say the administration has increasingly been trying to get around the legal prohibition by forcing gun dealers to hand over their records, for example, and that all such lawless efforts must be fiercely opposed.  

“This is a game the anti-gun zealots have played before: They threaten to kill the Second Amendment, and then negotiate their way back to ‘merely’ eviscerating it. Or put another way, they threaten to shoot us in the head to get us to agree to cutting off our fingers,” Gun Owners of America said in an e-mail to supporters asking them to contact their elected officials about the administration’s controversial plan. “The only way that America’s gun owners are going to have peace over the next decade is to stop all gun control — as we did after Columbine — and then defeat compromising legislators running for reelection in 2014.”

Also on the “executive action” agenda is appointing a director to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, which has been without a permanent boss for some six years now. However, lawmakers are already under intense pressure to abolish the anti-gun ATF, or at least slash its budget — especially after the Justice Department agency was caught trafficking heavy weapons to certain Mexican drug cartels under operation Fast and Furious. Disgraced Attorney General Eric Holder has already been held in criminal contempt by Congress for his ham-handed coverup and outright lies about the scandal.  

"The House of Representatives should slash the budget of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives or simply eliminate the agency," gun rights expert and former National Rifle Association editor John Snyder told the Law Enforcement Examiner. "This would be a good first step as sensible U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators work to curtail expenditure of the irresponsible federal establishment."

Judging from news reports, numerous other unconstitutional measures are also being planned by the Obama administration. Much of Obama’s rule-by-decree plot on guns remains a mystery, however, with the president saying he would review Biden’s proposals and make concrete proposals later in the week. Still, some Democrat lawmakers who have worked with the administration’s anti-gun “task force” have offered clues as to what sort of measures will be pursued.  

"We met with the vice president yesterday, and the vice president said we need a comprehensive package to put an end or help put an end to the gun violence," Rep. Mike Thompson (D-Calif.), who chaired the Democrat “gun task force” that met with Biden, told CNN in an interview. "Congress is going to be important. It's going to be a cooperative effort with the two branches of government." Separately, Rep. Thompson said a ban on semi-automatic weapons and standard-capacity magazines would be a centerpiece of the president’s efforts.  

Beyond the “executive order” assault on the Second Amendment, Obama is also planning to lobby lawmakers to support highly controversial legislation. One of the highest priorities, for example, is to reinstate an even more draconian version of the so-called “Assault Weapons Ban,” which expired in 2004. The latest bill by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) would purport to ban 120 types of guns and standard-capacity magazines while creating a federal database of firearm owners complete with fingerprints. Critics, however, have vowed to resist, pointing out that historically, registration general precedes confiscation.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: swimreferee on January 15, 2013, 06:31:50 pm
Don't forget to include his Logan Act violations:

2008 Bilderberg meeting in Virgina
His post of President of the UN Security Council

Wow these and all his other infractions make "I'm not a crook" Tricky Richard Nixon look like he was caught for Speeding in a School Zone.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on January 15, 2013, 06:42:00 pm
Stalin:
"Ideas are more powerful than guns.
We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?"


http://www.fonjallaz.net/Ukraine-Grand-Famine/famine-coupable-complice/FDR.html
Holodomor: The Secret Holocaust in Ukraine
Written by James Perloff    Friday, 06 February 2009 00:00

When Ukraine resisted Soviet attempts at collectivization in the 1920s and '30s, the Soviet Union under Stalin used labor camps, executions, and starvation (Holodomor) to kill millions of Ukrainians.

In 1933, the recently elected administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt granted official U.S. recognition to the Soviet Union for the first time. Especially repugnant was that this recognition was granted even though Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin had just concluded a campaign of genocide against Ukraine that left over 10 million dead. This atrocity was known to the Roosevelt administration, but not to the American people at large, thanks to suppression of the story by the Western press — as we shall show
...

Helping Stalin Hide the Holocaust

How did a holocaust of these dimensions remain unknown in the West? First, the Soviets suppressed all information regarding the famine. Russia's state-controlled press was prohibited from discussing it, and for ordinary citizens, just mentioning the famine carried a penalty of three to five years' imprisonment.

Although some Western observers did report the magnitude of the Ukrainians' plight, such comments were extremely rare. During the famine, the Soviets prohibited foreign journalists from visiting Ukraine. But just as significant was the cooperation of influential Western writers sympathetic to communism. The Fabian Socialist George Bernard Shaw, after receiving a tour carefully orchestrated by the Soviets, proclaimed in 1932: "I did not see a single under-nourished person in Russia, young or old."

But by far the worst offender was Walter Duranty, New York Times' Moscow bureau chief from 1922 to 1936. Duranty enjoyed personal access to Stalin, called him "the greatest living statesman," and even praised the dictator's notorious show trials. To call Duranty a Soviet sympathizer greatly understates his role. Journalist Joseph Alsop termed Duranty a "KGB agent," and Malcolm Muggeridge called him "the greatest liar of any journalist I have met in 50 years of journalism."
...

Some will ask: did the Ukrainians resist the genocide? Yes!

Throughout Stalin's war, hundreds of riots and revolts, on various scales, erupted throughout Ukraine. There are even a number of stories where groups of heroic women overran the communist-guarded kolkhozes and seized grain for their starving children. And it was not unusual for a village's local party tyrant to suddenly be found dead.

However, such resistance was brutally suppressed.

The Soviets had passed gun registration decrees in 1926, 1928, and 1929, and few Ukrainians owned effective weapons.

Resistance largely constituted pitchforks against machine guns.

The GPU and Soviet army dealt with revolts; aircraft were brought in to suppress the more serious ones. And the famine of 1932-33 left peasants too weak to resist.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 15, 2013, 07:19:53 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/citizens-file-articles-of-impeachment-against-obama.html



Citizens File Articles of Impeachment Against Obama
                   

For sedition against the Constitution
Alex Jones
Infowars.com
January 15, 2013
“When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776.
There can no longer be any doubt – the forces of tyranny are running wild across our once great Republic. The time has come for all good men and women to rally to the aid of their country. We have now entered a historic crossroads that will decide the destiny of the United States. Arrogance and corruption has long festered in Washington DC, but the last decade has seen an extreme acceleration of criminal looting and attacks on liberty – every freedom is under sustained assault.

We the People, the rightful masters of this Republic, will either rise up through Congress and the states or we can trade in our birthright of liberty for the chains of a technocratic slavery. Below we list some of the more egregious acts of seditious treason against the Republic of the United States. Anyone who wishes to continue to live in a free country and to pass that birthright on to their children must research this document and then lobby state legislatures and the Congress to do their duty and remove the would-be dictator.
The time has now come for a bill of impeachment to be introduced and debated in Congress. Obama’s crimes are public, and the debate in the House will serve as a court in which to display the tyrannical activities of President Obama and his cohorts. As in the case of Richard Nixon, the exposure of Obama’s crimes may cause him to resign in disgrace. If he does not step down, the full House will then vote to begin the impeachment trial in the US Senate. The time has now come to make your decision – to stand up to evil or get on your knees as a willing slave.
Articles of Impeachment Against Barack Hussein Obama – Filed by Citizen Alexander Emric Jones, January 15, 2013.
- He has clearly communicated his intent to eviscerate the second amendment rights of American citizens by pursuing executive orders to curtail the right to keep and bear arms without congressional authorization and in violation of the second amendment.
Below, Congressman Stockman has pledged to move for impeachment against Obama. I am standing up against Obama right beside him, will you?
“The President’s actions are an existential threat to this nation,” reads a statement by Rep. Steve Stockman. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms is what has kept this nation free and secure for over 200 years. The very purpose of the Second Amendment is to stop the government from disallowing people the means to defend themselves against tyranny. Any proposal to abuse executive power and infringe upon gun rights must be repelled with the stiffest legislative force possible.”
- He has aided America’s enemies, violating his oath, by sending funds to insurgents in Syria who are being commanded by Al-Qaeda terrorists.
- He has violated federal law by overseeing a cover-up surrounding Operation Fast and Furious, the transfer of guns to Mexican drug cartels direct from the federal government.
- He has lied to the American people by overseeing a cover-up of the Benghazi attack which directly led to the deaths of four American citizens. The cover-up has been called “Obama’s Watergate,” yet four months after the incident, no one in the administration has been held accountable.
- He has brazenly undermined the power of Congress by insisting his authority came from the United Nations Security Council prior to the attack on Libya and that Congressional approval was not necessary. “I don’t even have to get to the Constitutional question,” said Obama. This is an act that “constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution,” according to Congressman Walter Jones.
- He has ignored Congressional rejection of the cybersecurity bill and instead indicated he will pursue an unconstitutional executive order.
- He has signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act which includes provisions that permit the abduction and military detention without trial of U.S. citizens, violating Habeas Corpus. Despite Obama claiming he would not use the provisions to incarcerate U.S. citizens, it was his administration that specifically demanded these powers be included in the final NDAA bill.
- He has enacted universal health care mandates that force Americans to buy health insurance, a clear violation of the Constitution in exceeding congressional power to regulate interstate commerce. Obama has also handed outpreferential waivers to corporations friendly to his administration.
- He has declared war on America’s coal industry by promising to bankrupt any company that attempts to build a new coal plant while using unconstitutional EPA regulations to strangle competition, ensuring Americans see their energy costs rise year after year.
- He has violated the Constitution’s Takings and Due Process Clauses when he bullied the secured creditors of automaker Chrysler into accepting 30 cents on the dollar while politically connected labor unions and preferential others received better deals.
- He has violated Article II of the Constitution by using signing statements as part of his executive usurpation of power.
“I will seek to thwart this action by any means necessary, including but not limited to eliminating funding for implementation, defunding the White House, and even filing articles of impeachment.”
Rep. Steve Stockman, Texas.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 15, 2013, 07:26:28 pm
  IMPEACH OBAMA NOW AND THEN FOREVER HOLD UP YOUR PIECE

(http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/red/blue_pics/2011/02/18/chuckheston_460x276.jpg)
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Dorrogeray on January 15, 2013, 07:34:25 pm
WLKY-TV: 2 dead, 1 injured in shooting at Hazard Community and Technical College in Kentucky
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 15, 2013, 08:10:26 pm
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAlexJonesChannel


  Americans Move to Impeach Obama

   ALEX JONES ON VIDEO
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on January 15, 2013, 08:13:26 pm
http://www.youtube.com/user/PastorDowell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t40-XuBbAa0&feature=player_profilepage
Fear The People Fear The Government
by PastorDowell

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzIhBgI-be0
No More Guns or Ammo 2 BUY!
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on January 16, 2013, 11:57:01 am
http://redflagnews.com/opinion/obamas-impeachable-offenses-updated-by-michael-connelly-jd-carrollton-tx
UPDATE: 'Obama's Impeachable Offenses' by Michael Connelly, J.D.
November 11, 2012.

Editor's Note:  Sunday, November 11, 2012. In the 8 months that has passed since the original publication of this op-ed, ask yourself if President Obama's actions have led him more, or less, in the direction of an impeachment and imprisonment. This op-ed (now with more than 25 million views) has been updated with the most current facts for the case of Obama's Impeachable Offenses. Stay tuned right here at RedFlagNews.com for future updates!

have repeatedly been asked by a number of different people if I think that the President of the United States, Barack Obama, has committed any offenses that subject him to being impeached by the Congress of the United States. The answer is without a doubt, yes because he has repeatedly breached his oath of office. The oath of office of the President of the United States is simple and concise. It reads:

"I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Instead of living up to that oath, President Obama has actively attempted to subvert, ignore, and completely destroy large parts of the Constitution. I believe the President of the United States is well aware of what he is doing, and it is completely intentional. Based from my years as a constitutional attorney, listed below are what I believe are impeachable offenses, and the list continues to grow.

    1. President Obama has appointed numerous people to cabinet level positions without the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate, as is required by the Constitution. These individuals are given extraordinary power and independent funding, and are not under the scrutiny of Congress. The fact that Obama calls them Czars does not make them legal. He has also made illegal recess appointments of other members of his cabinet that required Senate approval. He simply declared that the U.S. Senate was in recess despite the fact that no such declaration had been made by the Senate. The President has no Constitutional authority to do this.

    2. The push by Pres. Obama to pass healthcare legislation in the Congress of the United States that he was fully aware was unconstitutional. He has continued to use his powers and executive branch of government to implement this legislation despite the fact that a federal judge had declared the entire law unconstitutional, and ordered that it not be implemented. In addition, Obama has directed members of his administration to violate the right to freedom of religion protected by the 1st Amendment to the Constitution.

      Religious institutions such as churches and schools have been ordered to provide contraceptives and abortion inducing morning after pills to employees as part of the health care bill requirements. The fact that this is a direct violation of their religious teaching is of no concern to Obama.

      3. Despite the fact that the United States Senate refused to pass the Cap and Trade bill, the President has ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to use regulations to implement key portions of the bill, including those regulating so-called greenhouse gases. Obama himself has acknowledged that this will force energy prices in this country to skyrocket. He is taking these actions in direct defiance of the will of the people of the United States, the will of Congress, and the Constitution. The actions of the EPA include regulations that will force many coal burning power plants to close.

      4. Through the Department of the Interior (DOI) Obama has placed a moratorium on offshore oil drilling or exploration off both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the United States and in parts of the Gulf of Mexico. He has also prohibited new drilling exploration on federal land in any states in the United States. These actions by the DOI have continued in direct defiance of several court orders issued by Federal Judge Martin Feldman in New Orleans, Louisiana declaring that the department had no authority to issue such a moratorium on drilling in the Gulf. In fact, the Secretary of the Department of the Interior (DOI) has been held in contempt by the same judge. The administration has claimed to be complying, but has tied up the drilling permits in so much red tape that the effect is the same.

      5. Instead of allowing American companies to drill for oil domestically, Obama has betrayed the American people and authorized loans of billions of dollars to countries like Brazil and Mexico so that they can drill for oil, and then sell that oil to the United States. This will dramatically increase our dependence on foreign nations including Venezuela, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and even Libya that do not serve the interest of America or the American people.

      Obama has also refused to approve the keystone pipeline from Canada to the United States that would not only lessen our dependence on oil from countries like Venezuela and Saudi Arabia, but create thousands of new jobs in the United States. The decision on the pipeline is one that belongs in the hands of the members of Congress, not the President. 

      6. President Obama has abdicated his responsibility to enforce the laws of the United States against illegal immigration. He has virtually declared our southern border an open border by declaring certain areas of federal land in states like Arizona as off-limits to federal, state, and local authorities. This is despite the fact that these areas are being used to bring in thousands of illegal immigrants, massive amounts of drugs, and also being used by foreign terrorists to infiltrate the United States. He has also ordered the border patrol not to arrest most illegal immigrants entering the country, and has stopped deportation proceedings against thousands of people in this country illegally. He is in effect instituting the so-called “dream act” bypassing the Congress of the United States which has sole authority over immigration matters.

      7. The President and his Attorney General Eric Holder have clearly violated their oath of office by joining with foreign countries such as Mexico, Bolivia, and Columbia, in lawsuits against the sovereign states of Arizona, Georgia, and Alabama to stop them from enforcing the federal immigration laws.

      8. President Obama has ordered the Federal Communications Commission to adopt regulations giving the federal government control of the Internet and its contents, including providing Obama with a kill switch that gives him authority to shut down the Internet if he sees fit. This is in direct violation of a decision by the United States Supreme Court that the FCC has no Constitutional authority to control the Internet.

      There were two bills pending in Congress to effectively give Obama the kill switch he wants over the Internet. When these two proposals, the Stop Internet Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA) were withdrawn amid public outcry Obama announced he will sign an international treaty that purports to give him the same authority. He has signaled his intention to do this as an “Executive Act” and not bring the treaty to the Senate for ratification as required by Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution. I believe he intends to take the same action in regard to the United Nations Small arms treaty and the UN Law of the Sea treaty that are both unlikely to get Senate approval.

      9. One of the paramount responsibilities of the President of the United States and his executive branch of government is to enforce and defend laws adopted by Congress unless they are declared unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court. Obama has decided that he should ignore this Constitutional mandate, and that as President he is more powerful than either the Congress of the United States or the Supreme Court. He has unilaterally declared that the Defense of Marriage Act passed by the Congress is unconstitutional, and further declared that he will not have the Justice Department defend it against lawsuits.

      His administration has also refused to enforce laws against voter intimidation and federal law that requires states to purge their voter registration lists of deceased individuals and those that are registered illegally. In addition, the Justice Department is refusing to allow states to enforce laws requiring proof of identity by voters at the polls. Obama has essentially said that he is the supreme ruler of the United States, and that the Congress and the Federal Judiciary are irrelevant.

      10. It has been widely reported that acting through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms the Obama administration was involved for months in getting legitimate and law-abiding gun store owners along our southern border to supply weapons to straw buyers who the government knew would deliver them to the drug cartels in Mexico. This was billed as a sting operation against the cartels when in fact it was designed to produce fraudulent data showing that large numbers of weapons were going from the United States to the Mexican drug dealers.

      This data was then to be used, and is being used, to try to justify new gun control regulations to limit the rights of American citizens to keep and bear arms. It has nothing to do with arresting members of the drug operations. The administration has, in effect, armed our enemies, and one border patrol agent has already been killed by one of these weapons. Now, Obama continues to impose gun control laws by Executive order so he will not have to deal with Congress. The administration is also refusing to cooperate with the committees in the House of Representatives that are investigating the entire operation. It is even defying Congressional subpoenas.

      11. The President of the United States is not authorized by the Constitution to take our nation to war without the consent of the Congress of the United States. The only exception to this is the authority granted to the President by Congress under the War Powers Act. This law allows the President to take immediate action without the consent of Congress if there is an imminent threat to the security of the United States, or its citizens. Although there was clearly no such imminent threat caused by the Civil War in Libya, the President committed members of the United States military to combat missions in a foreign country without the consent of Congress. He based his authority on a United Nations resolution, and a resolution by the Arab League.

      Now, the President has carried it one step further. During testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee on March 7, 2012, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta told Senators that the President has authority to take our country to war without the Congressional approval required by Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution. The administration is taking the position that it can ignore Congress as long as it has United Nations approval or NATO approval.

      However, these actions may be the least of the worries facing the American people. The White House insisted that language be included in the recently passed National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that gives the President sole authority to order the military to arrest and indefinite detain American citizens on U.S. soil if the President suspects them of terrorist ties. This was amazingly passed overwhelmingly by Congress. It appears to be another situation where few members read the bill before voting on it.

      This was almost immediately followed by another unconstitutional executive order titled the National Defense Resources Preparation order. It is similar to orders signed by past Presidents, but this one includes language that appears to give Obama the authority to declare martial law in peacetime, and take over the allocation of everything from food and fuel to transportation and health care. This violates the Constitution in a number of different ways.

      12. Last but not the least of my dirty dozen of impeachable offenses, is the fact that since taking office the President has used executive orders, laws pushed through Congress in the dark of night, and administrative actions by his departments to nationalize and control automobile manufacturers, banks, insurance companies, and portions of the healthcare industry. This is designed to take our country from a free enterprise economy to a socialist economy. There is absolutely no authority in the Constitution of the United States that allows the President to do this.
...

-- Michael Connelly, retired constitutional lawyer

http://www.change.org/petitions/to-the-house-and-senate-of-the-united-states-of-america-arrest-barack-hussein-obama-for-treason-now
Petitioned To the House and Senate of the United States of America 2
To the House and Senate of the United States of America: Arrest Barack Hussein Obama for TREASON now!
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on January 16, 2013, 11:59:07 am
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/26650
50 Impeachable Crimes and Counting
Tuesday, August 17, 2010

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/25831
From the White House to the Big House: 25 Impeachable Crimes and Counting


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights

The Bill of Rights is the collective name for the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. These limitations serve to protect the natural rights of liberty and property.

They guarantee a number of personal freedoms, limit the government's power in judicial and other proceedings, and reserve some powers to the states and the public.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: jofortruth on January 17, 2013, 12:56:54 pm
Impeachment Guide for Senate Trial:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CDOC-99sdoc33...OC-99sdoc33.pdf (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CDOC-99sdoc33/pdf/CDOC-99sdoc33.pdf)


(http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x222/jo56_photos/f1ff32db6e131bdf955dca8e018f95e8.jpg)
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Constitutionary on January 17, 2013, 01:28:39 pm
We need to be establishing a new Federal Government, and nullify the Globalist occupied one in Washington DC.

I mean Obama is already acting like a dictator and the congress and senate do nothing.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on January 21, 2013, 03:32:45 pm
http://impeachobamatoday.blogspot.com/
Impeach Obama Today

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/obama-impeachment

Obama Impeachment
Another Rep Joins House GOP's Obama Impeachment Caucus

The Huffington Post| Nick WIng | Posted 01.16.2013

Rep. Trey Radel (R-Fla.) became the second House Republican this week to suggest that President Barack Obama could be impeached over his executive actions on gun violence.
...
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on June 14, 2013, 05:51:27 pm
bump
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on June 14, 2013, 06:03:27 pm

  I would consider ANY congressman/woman or senator that wouldn't consider impeachment of Obama at this time A TRAITOR.

  What are they afraid of?
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: chris jones on June 14, 2013, 06:15:21 pm
America to Congress: You Suck!

THEYObey-Obama!! The millionares club, why do they go along, whats the real deal. Is it becasue they have life waxed, their skeletons in the closet or are they scared shiitless of getting on the LIST. Maby all three? By Ron Fournier | National Journal – 10 hrs ago

America to Congress: You Suck!
MORE FROM
When Ordinary Americans Accomplish What the Government Can’t
Americans Know They’ve Already Lost Their Privacy
Meet Obama's Leak Plumber
A bit of news for members of Congress on their way home for the weekend: America hates you.
Nearly eight in 10 Americans told Gallup pollsters this month they disapprove of the way Congress is handling its job, the 45th consecutive month that more than two-thirds of Americans graded Congress poorly.
The problem isn't as much what Congr
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on June 14, 2013, 06:19:08 pm
America to Congress: You Suck!



By Ron Fournier | National Journal – 10 hrs ago
MORE FROM
Marco Rubio and Rand Paul's Immigration Bromance
When Ordinary Americans Accomplish What the Government Can’t
Americans Know They’ve Already Lost Their Privacy
Meet Obama's Leak Plumber
A bit of news for members of Congress on their way home for the weekend: America hates you.
Nearly eight in 10 Americans told Gallup pollsters this month they disapprove of the way Congress is handling its job, the 45th consecutive month that more than two-thirds of Americans graded Congress poorly.
The problem isn't as much what Congr

  I can't figure out Rand Paul.  Sometimes he thinks like his dad and sometimes he thinks like these stupid Democrats.  HE IS A SEMI-WEASEL.

  I HOPE RON PAUL STAYS HEALTHY---WE STILL NEED HIS OPINIONS AS AMERICA KEEPS FALLING.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on July 01, 2013, 08:07:45 pm
bump - talking about it on tonight's AJ news report
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on July 01, 2013, 08:33:13 pm
bump - talking about it on tonight's AJ news report

  Hi Tahoe, tell us what AJ and his staff said about this tonight---give us a summary.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on July 02, 2013, 10:39:06 am
 Hi Tahoe, tell us what AJ and his staff said about this tonight---give us a summary.

With all the scandals the possibility of an impeachment "strategy" is brought up again due to the similarities to the Nixon era mode of criminality.

http://prisonplanet.tv/index/display/category/nnews/id/4882
Mike Zullo On The New Evidence Regarding Obama's Doctored Birth Certificate.

On The July 1, 2013 Broadcast of The Infowars Nightly News, David Knight speaks with Mike Zullo regarding new findings and the media silence on the Obama Birth Certificate Issue ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3ZRfe13E7s
Published on Jun 12, 2013

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7z0thymgfM
Sheriff Joe And Mike Zullo's Strategy!

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/06/carl-gallups-rep-stockman-interview.html

http://ppsimmons.blogspot.com/2013/06/mike-zullo-be-patient-congressmen-on.html
Mike Zullo: 'BE PATIENT!' Congressmen on board with BC Investigation - Takes Callers on show!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mB9ETXbRxoc

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/06/team-arpaio-federal-law-violated-in-obama-fraud.html
Rep. Steve Stockman Meeting; Federal Law Violated In Obama ID Fraud Scandal - Aired 6/28/2013:
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on July 04, 2013, 08:41:24 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97H3drDQyHA
OBAMA FORGETS HIS BIRTHDAY NWO ILLUMINATI EXPOSED COMMUNIST 2012
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on July 04, 2013, 08:47:30 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97H3drDQyHA
OBAMA FORGETS HIS BIRTHDAY NWO ILLUMINATI EXPOSED COMMUNIST 2012


  Good video.  How can we expect him to know how old he is?  I mean the guy thinks the USA has 57 states.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on July 05, 2013, 02:01:24 am
Saying goodbye is so hard.  Maybe we should just say "adieu'?  ;)
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 19, 2014, 12:44:24 pm
Today's AJ -  LaRouche on calling for Impeach Obama NOW!
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: jofortruth on February 19, 2014, 12:49:13 pm
Steve Stockman says IMPEACH OBAMA!
http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/articlesofimpeachment/




Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: chris jones on February 19, 2014, 01:39:54 pm
Jo.         ** Bumped.
  I say get rid of ( ban from public service)-any Gov employee, politician, Czar who has played on this global crew. *Clean house.
                                                         
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 20, 2014, 11:40:58 am
Today's AJ -  LaRouche on calling for Impeach Obama NOW!

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2014/4106nuke_war_impeachment.html
This article appears in the February 7, 2014 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.
LAROUCHE SEES DANGER BY MARCH

Thermonuclear War Countdown
 Demands Impeachment Now
!

...
"So therefore, the question is: We're now looking at a global thermonuclear war. The parties are, on the one side, the trans-Atlantic region—the United States, and so forth, and Western Europe; on the other side, the Slavic area, Russia in particular, Ukraine actually involved in this; China, a major power; India, a major power. And therefore you have these two regions of the planet, who are now armed, and mobilizing, and playing the preliminary games of pre-warfare, aiming: We are now at the point that the real war has begun. The real thermonuclear war has begun by various actions to prepare for that war. We are in a short-time countdown, between now and probably sometime in early March, by which time a thermonuclear war under present conditions will happen.

"Now, the question is how do we stop it from happening? Well, there are two things I have to say at that point: First is, remove Obama from the Presidency. He's a liar, he's no good, he's really an enemy agent, and whatever the guy is: He's may be just a bomb. But we know what he is—he's useless. Pulling Obama out of the Presidency by impeachment—and all the preconditions for impeachment, summary impeachment, exist. If he were removed, my guess is that by releasing the British control represented by Obama from the United States government, you would actually create a situation in which other reactions would occur, and the United States would refuse to go into a thermonuclear war. As long as Obama is able to continue his role as leadership in the United States, we are headed for a thermonuclear war of mutual destruction.
...
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Honor18 on February 20, 2014, 11:45:23 am
Impeachment gets my vote .....
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: iamc2 on February 20, 2014, 06:55:57 pm
Some 70% of those dummies, who voted for O'Dumbo, would Not vote for him today [too late for that].

The point is Most Americans Want this liar Out Of The white House and into A JAIL CELL!

The Congress is a House of Fools and will leave The King Fools in Power: sad to say, but that is how I see it.

Only We The People could do it [throw O'Dumbo under the bus 3x's at least]: But once again; most Americans talk a lot and do very little.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on July 25, 2014, 03:21:44 pm
new poll 30 percent want to impeach the BO...

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/poll-impeach-obama-support-33-percent-109369.html
Poll: One-third say impeach Obama
By JONATHAN TOPAZ | 7/25/14 7:09 AM EDT  Updated: 7/25/14 9:40 AM EDT   

One third of Americans think President Barack Obama should be impeached, a new poll says.

According to a CNN/ORC International poll released Friday, 33 percent of Americans think the president should be impeached and removed from office, compared with 65 percent who say they don’t support impeachment.

[ONLY!] Fifty-seven percent of Republicans say they support impeaching Obama, compared with just [ONLY] 35 percent of independent voters and 13 percent of Democrats
...

A plurality of Americans — 45 percent — believe Obama has gone too far in expanding his presidential powers.

Thirty percent said the president has been about right in terms of presidential powers, while 22 percent he has not gone far enough.
...
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/poll-impeach-obama-support-33-percent-109369.html#ixzz38VuKsdqh
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on July 31, 2014, 10:59:55 am
Reverse psychology?

http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2014/07/30/MSNBC-is-Obsessed-with-Impeachment-Mentioning-It-Every-22-Minutes-on-Average
MSNBC Obsessed with Impeachment, Mentions It Every 22 Minutes on Average
by John Sexton  30 Jul 2014


...
This sudden surge in impeachment talk on the progressive news network just happens to coincide with a similar surge in fundraising emails emanating from the Democratic Party. Yesterday Ron Fournier at National Journal reported on the the White House's involvement in a scheme to use impeachment talk to scare up cash. So far it seems to be working. The DCCC announced their impeachment push had helped them raise $2.1 million over the weekend.
...
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on August 19, 2014, 12:52:21 pm
When will the public say enough is enough and admit this potus is a complete failure ... ( or complete success for the NWO) ...

http://www.infowars.com/barack-obama-the-naked-emperor/
Barack Obama: The Naked Emperor

David Icke Infowars
 December 26, 2008

I am writing this in the last days of 2008 as I watch with dismay as vast numbers of people across the world, including many who should know better, have been duped by the mind-game called Operation Obama.

Even people with some understanding of the conspiracy have said things like: ‘Well, at least he’s not Bush’ and ‘Well, at least it’s great to see such a new spirit of hope’. No, he’s not Bush – he’s potentially far more dangerous; and what is the use of a spirit of ‘hope’ if it’s based on a lie? In fact, what use is ‘hope’ at all
...
It has been vital to his success, and that of his controllers, that he has never specified what his ‘hope’, ‘change’, and that other mind-control trigger-word, ‘believe’, were referring to in terms of policy and the way society in general will be affected. Hope for what? Change what? Believe in what? To answer those questions with specifics would have been fatal to Obama’s appeal.

I studied the military/government mind-control programmes and techniques in great detail for many years during the late-1990s and across 2000, and the Obama ‘phenomenon’ is the most blatant mass-mind control operation you could wish to see.
...
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Geolibertarian on November 21, 2014, 10:49:33 am
In June 2008 we had the reverse situation of what we have now: (a) an out-of-control and increasingly unpopular Republican President well into his second term in office, and (b) a Democratically-controlled House and Senate.

It was at this point and in this context that Dennish Kucinich single-handedly initiated impeachment efforts against George W. Bush.

He didn't just whine and complain about how horrible Bush was.

He didn't just whine and complain that the Democratic Party "leadership" (Pelosi, Reid, Clyburn, Feinstein, Schumer, etc.) didn't share his view on the urgent need for impeachment.

He simply went ahead and did it:

---------------------------------------

http://www.infowars.com/kucinich-will-come-back-with-60-articles-of-impeachment-if-stymied-in-the-house/ (http://www.infowars.com/kucinich-will-come-back-with-60-articles-of-impeachment-if-stymied-in-the-house/)

KUCINICH TO INTRODUCE 60 IMPEACHMENT ARTICLES IF STYMIED IN HOUSE

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
June 13, 2008

Appearing on the Alex Jones Show today, Dennis Kucinich, the Ohio Congressman and former 2008 Democrat presidential candidate, said if the House fails to act on his articles of impeachment, or if the articles are sabotaged in committee, he will come back with 60 articles. Earlier this week, the maverick Congressman introduced 35 articles of impeachment against Bush. The articles follow:

Article I

Creating a Secret Propaganda Campaign to Manufacture a False Case for War Against Iraq.

Article II

Falsely, Systematically, and with Criminal Intent Conflating the Attacks of September 11, 2001, With Misrepresentation of Iraq as a Security Threat as Part of Fraudulent Justification for a War of Aggression.

Article III

Misleading the American People and Members of Congress to Believe Iraq Possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction, to Manufacture a False Case for War.

Article IV

Misleading the American People and Members of Congress to Believe Iraq Posed an Imminent Threat to the United States.

Article V

Illegally Misspending Funds to Secretly Begin a War of Aggression.

Article VI

Invading Iraq in Violation of the Requirements of H. J. Res114.

Article VII

Invading Iraq Absent a Declaration of War.

Article VIII

Invading Iraq, A Sovereign Nation, in Violation of the UN Charter.

Article IX

Failing to Provide Troops With Body Armor and Vehicle Armor.

Article X

Falsifying Accounts of US Troop Deaths and Injuries for Political Purposes.

Article XI

Establishment of Permanent U.S. Military Bases in Iraq.

Article XII

Initiating a War Against Iraq for Control of That Nation’s Natural Resources.

Article XIIII

Creating a Secret Task Force to Develop Energy and Military Policies With Respect to Iraq and Other Countries.

Article XIV

Misprision of a Felony, Misuse and Exposure of Classified Information And Obstruction of Justice in the Matter of Valerie Plame Wilson, Clandestine Agent of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Article XV

Providing Immunity from Prosecution for Criminal Contractors in Iraq.

Article XVI

Reckless Misspending and Waste of U.S. Tax Dollars in Connection With Iraq and US Contractors.

Article XVII

Illegal Detention: Detaining Indefinitely And Without Charge Persons Both U.S. Citizens and Foreign Captives.

Article XVIII

Torture: Secretly Authorizing, and Encouraging the Use of Torture Against Captives in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Other Places, as a Matter of Official Policy.

Article XIX

Rendition: Kidnapping People and Taking Them Against Their Will to “Black Sites” Located in Other Nations, Including Nations Known to Practice Torture.

Article XX

Imprisoning Children.

Article XXI

Misleading Congress and the American People About Threats from Iran, and Supporting Terrorist Organizations Within Iran, With the Goal of Overthrowing the Iranian Government.

Article XXII

Creating Secret Laws.

Article XXIII

Violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.

Article XXIV

Spying on American Citizens, Without a Court-Ordered Warrant, in Violation of the Law and the Fourth Amendment.

Article XXV

Directing Telecommunications Companies to Create an Illegal and Unconstitutional Database of the Private Telephone Numbers and Emails of American Citizens.

Article XXVI

Announcing the Intent to Violate Laws with Signing Statements.

Article XXVII

Failing to Comply with Congressional Subpoenas and Instructing Former Employees Not to Comply.

Article XXVIII

Tampering with Free and Fair Elections, Corruption of the Administration of Justice.

Article XXIX

Conspiracy to Violate the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Article XXX

Misleading Congress and the American People in an Attempt to Destroy Medicare.

Article XXXI

Katrina: Failure to Plan for the Predicted Disaster of Hurricane Katrina, Failure to Respond to a Civil Emergency.

Article XXXII

Misleading Congress and the American People, Systematically Undermining Efforts to Address Global Climate Change.

Article XXXIII

Repeatedly Ignored and Failed to Respond to High Level Intelligence Warnings of Planned Terrorist Attacks in the US, Prior to 911.

Article XXXIV

Obstruction of the Investigation into the Attacks of September 11, 2001.

Article XXXV

Endangering the Health of 911 First Responders.

For a detailed description of each article, go to Kucinich’s website (https://web.archive.org/web/20080625195710/http://kucinich.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=93581).

Asked on the Alex Jones Show if he fears retaliation for going up against Bush and the neocons, Kucinich said he really has no choice and he is guided by his faith and motivated by outrage over what Bush and his criminal crew have done to the Constitution and the republic.

“Thirty days from now, if there is no action, I will be bringing the resolution up again, and I won’t be the only one reading it. We’ll come back and many of us will be reading this [on the House floor], and we’ll come back with 60 articles, not 35,” Kucinich told the Washington Post. “Leadership wants to bury it, but this is one resolution that will be coming back from the dead.”

Mr. Kucinich’s impeachment effort came a week after a report by the Senate Intelligence Committee concluding that Bush, vice president Cheney and the neocons “knowingly exaggerated available intelligence and over-stated the Iraqi threat in building their case for war,” as the Voice of America reported Wednesday. In other words, Bush and the neocons lied the nation into the invasion and occupation of Iraq, thus far resulting in the murder of over a million Iraqis and an under-reported number of U.S. soldiers.

Alex and Mr. Kucinich agreed that the crimes enumerated above make those committed by Richard Nixon during the Watergate era pale by way of comparison.

---------------------------------------

What excuse do "Tea Party" Republicans (Mike Lee, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, etc.) now have for not following the example set by Kucinich over six years ago?

"Don't blame us -- our party only controls both houses of Congress"??

Do they honestly want to go down in political history as having less testicular fortitude combined than Kucinich had all by himself?

If not, then my message to them is: stop acting like you're still running for office and actually do something legislatively.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on November 21, 2014, 11:07:18 am
You can't impeach a dictator
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Geolibertarian on November 21, 2014, 11:18:25 am
You can't impeach a dictator

If Obama is that all-powerful, and the situation is that hopeless, then what was the point of even voting earlier this month?

So we could listen to the Republican majority thus elected spend the next two years making excuses for being all whine and no solution?

Is that what they're being paid nearly $200 thousand a year each in tax dollars to do?
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on November 21, 2014, 11:38:07 am
Remember what the Republican' excuse was fro NOT impeaching Obummer when the Bengazi ordeal went down?  "We don't have the numbers needed to impeach."

OK, now that they do have numbers what will their excuse be this time?
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Geolibertarian on November 21, 2014, 04:49:26 pm
Dennis Kucinich on Alex Jones:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKwaXe-9wwc (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKwaXe-9wwc) (part 1)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrMeDGSErNw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrMeDGSErNw) (part 2)
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: decemberfellow on November 21, 2014, 05:48:44 pm
Remember what the Republican' excuse was fro NOT impeaching Obummer when the Bengazi ordeal went down?  "We don't have the numbers needed to impeach."

OK, now that they do have numbers what will their excuse be this time?


They meant they have not been given  the orders to impeach.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: chris jones on November 21, 2014, 06:49:01 pm

They meant they have not been given  the orders to impeach.
                          A question of HONOR. I just listened to AJ & DK, it appeared to me AJ was was definitely choked up, not ranting.
             True Americans need to feel proud of this nation as one, given the past 1/2 century I have seen very little to be proud of.
D hit on a good point, are they on orders, do the elites have the dirt on em, are they terrified of standing up, or is it simply they enjoy riding the suk train...or just maby all the above.
                        Smedly B., Eisenhower warned , JFK died trying, RFK, the military are being used as hit men for the corporations and banksters.       Some country's I have been in folks used to fly our flag next to theirs, hang them out their windows, in awe of our freedoms and liberty......     Not anymore..........The tide is turning folks.
             GOP VS DEMS, NFL status..Which ones are Americans maintaining National honor and dignity.
           
PS:  Just tossing it in there...  It bothers me to think the illegals will be conscripts like the Irish were so many years ago.

                         
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Geolibertarian on November 22, 2014, 05:36:33 am
Smedly B., Eisenhower warned , JFK died trying, RFK, the military are being used as hit men for the corporations and banksters.       Some country's I have been in folks used to fly our flag next to theirs, hang them out their windows, in awe of our freedoms and liberty......     Not anymore..........The tide is turning folks.

And we have lesser-evil voting to thank for it:

     http://www.nolanchart.com/article8864-voting-for-the-lesser-of-two-evils-html (http://www.nolanchart.com/article8864-voting-for-the-lesser-of-two-evils-html)

Quote
GOP VS DEMS, NFL status..Which ones are Americans maintaining National honor and dignity.

Beware of loosely-defined terms like "national honor."

-----------------------------------

http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=october-19-1992-debate-transcript (http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=october-19-1992-debate-transcript)

PEROT: And [for] the rest of my minute, I want to make a very brief comment here in terms of Saddam Hussein. We told him (http://www.truthaboutwar.org/claim4.shtml) that we wouldn't get involved with his border dispute, and we've never revealed those papers that were given to Ambassador Glaspie on July the 25th. I suggest, in the sense of taking responsibility for your actions, we lay those papers on the table. They're not the secrets to the nuclear bomb.

Secondly, we got upset when he took the whole thing, but to the ordinary American out there who doesn't know where the oil fields are in Kuwait, they're near the border. We told him he could take the northern part of Kuwait, and when he took the whole thing, we went nuts. And if we didn't tell him that, why won't we even let the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee see the written instructions for Ambassador Glaspie?

BUSH: I've got reply on that. That gets to the national honor. We did not say to Saddam Hussein, Ross, you can take the northern part of Kuwait.

PEROT: Well, where are the papers?

BUSH: That is absolutely absurd.

PEROT: Where are the papers?

BUSH: Glaspie has testified --

(APPLAUSE)

-- and Glaspie's papers have been presented to the US Senate. Please, let's be factual.

PEROT: If you have time, go through Nexis and Lexis, pull all the  old news articles (http://www.chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/glaspie.html), look at what Ambassador Glaspie said all through the fall and what-have-you, and then look at what she and Kelly and all the others in State said at the end when they were trying to clean it up. And talk to any head of any of those key committees in the Senate. They will not let them see the written instructions given to Ambassador Glaspie. And I suggest that in a free society owned by the people, the American people ought to know what we told Ambassador Glaspie to tell Saddam Hussein, because we spent a lot of money and risked lives and lost lives in that effort, and did not accomplish most of our objectives.

We got Kuwait back to the emir but he's still not his nuclear, his chemical, his bacteriological and he's still over there, right? I'd like to see those written instructions.

-----------------------------------

Is it not obvious in the above exchange that it wasn't the "national honor" Bush Sr. was protecting, but his political ass?
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: chris jones on November 22, 2014, 08:25:18 am
Hi Geo, understood. I would not expectany less from the pols, this term(national Honor) to be used in a truthfull manner by these guys?
Honor by definition, websters:respect that is given to someone who is admired. : good reputation : good quality or character as judged by other people. : high moral standards of behavior.
      On a individual bases it's a simple matter of knowing right from wrong, doing the right thing. Slaughtering innocents is no honorable,, no matter what justifications the regime spins.
       Had the American people, 10% or 20 million people surrounded the WDC and demanded an accounting as to why we were deceived about the WMD's in Iraq, that would have sent an honorable message to the world. We are not the regime and will not tolerate this madness.
       These guys use any term they see fit to get the people pumped up, the bible & flag in one hand and a drone in the other.
                                                                               
To serve the liege lord in valour and faith..........  The lords, CIO', elites;
To protect the weak and defenceless..                  Grid bomb em, drone em, muck their minds.
To give succour to widows and orphans..             """""""""""""""""""""
To refrain from the wanton giving of offence. .......No offence, just wack em.
To live by honour and for glory.........................deception.
To despise pecuniary reward............................Big bucks,
To fight for the welfare of all............................for the rich.
To eschew unfairness, meanness and deceit........Getting off on deception..
To keep faith................................................Power
At all times to speak the truth...........................what for, no gain.
To persevere to the end in any enterprise begun.....When serving the pupose of the crew on high.
To respect the honour of women........................Wack em out or get the dirt on em.
Never to refuse a challenge from an equal.............Only if it makes money, controll
Never to turn the back upon a foe.......................Just blow em up...
 
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on November 24, 2014, 11:00:47 am
bump  Nope never happen ...

(http://www.mygen.com/images/Tory_Obama.jpg)
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on November 24, 2014, 11:11:15 am
bump  Nope never happen ...

(http://www.mygen.com/images/Tory_Obama.jpg)


  I can agree with you.

  The Republicans won their seats.  They still don't have nutsacks.
 
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: iamc2 on November 25, 2014, 05:10:07 pm
What a laugh riot---Ha ha ha!

This fool in the so-called white house---is a Jack Ass that never knew he was a Jack- Ass!

Should this lowly bastard be impeached?

Most certainly!  ;)

ps. 'peace will not come to earth; until Jesus Christ Returns!'

Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Geolibertarian on December 09, 2014, 12:03:33 am
http://www.wnd.com/2014/12/judge-napolitano-impeach-obama-for-amnesty/ (http://www.wnd.com/2014/12/judge-napolitano-impeach-obama-for-amnesty/)

Judge Napolitano: Impeach Obama for amnesty

By Greg Corombos
WND.com
December 06, 2014

Fox News Channel Senior Judicial Analyst Andrew Napolitano is unimpressed by states suing the federal government over President Obama unilaterally changing immigration laws or by House Republicans pushing legislation to forbid Obama from moving forward in implementing his policies.

Napolitano, who has a weekly column at WND, is also not urging lawmakers to defund enforcement of what many on the right consider amnesty. Instead, the former New Jersey Superior Court judge thinks Obama’s actions warrant his removal from office.

Earlier this week, 17 states, led by Texas Attorney General and Governor-Elect Greg Abbott, filed suit against the federal government. Napolitano said that’s not going to get the job done.

“They can file all the lawsuits they want and the court is going to say, ‘Tell your client, Mr. Boehner, tell your client, Senator McConnell, that there’s a perfectly acceptable remedy right there in the Constitution that’s bloodless, and they can do it by taking a couple of votes,” Napolitano said. “It’s called impeachment.’”

Republicans from leadership to moderates to the most rock-ribbed conservatives have all dismissed any speculation about impeachment since they clearly don’t have the votes to convict Obama in the Senate and they believe it will backfire politically heading into 2016. Nonetheless, Napolitano finds that GOP position baffling.

“For some bizarre reason that I have yet to understand, the Republican leadership in Washington believes that if they file articles of impeachment, this is going to elect Hillary president,” he said. “What? That’s a disconnect to me.”

[Continued... (http://www.wnd.com/2014/12/judge-napolitano-impeach-obama-for-amnesty/)]
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on December 09, 2014, 12:23:31 am
^^^^^^^

  I like these ideas from Judge Napolitano.

  I just read its 17 + 3 more states in that suing the federal government.  There will be more.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on December 17, 2014, 08:47:48 pm
bump
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: decemberfellow on December 28, 2014, 04:16:05 pm
Quote
A decent nation would have impeached Bush and Obama


Anybody know of one?
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: chris jones on December 28, 2014, 04:59:37 pm
Nixon was  to be impeached , (Watergate)......... for Chump change compared to the following regimes.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on February 21, 2015, 09:17:18 am
http://www.nydailynews.com/giuliani-claims-obama-influenced-communism-article-1.2123541

  Of course we have known this for years.
  Nice to see Rudy slamming Obama and rightly so.
  Main headline at Drudge.
  more at the link...




Rudy Giuliani clarifies Obama comments by claiming the President has been influenced by communism, socialism

Trying to explain his controversial comments that President Obama doesn’t love America, Rudy Giuliani said Friday that he believes the President has been influenced by communism and socialism.

“Look, this man was brought up basically in a white family, so whatever he learned or didn’t learn, I attribute this more to the influence of communism and socialism” than to his race, Giuliani told the Daily News.

“I don’t (see) this President as being particularly a product of African-American society or something like that. He isn’t,” the former mayor added. “Logically, think about his background. . . The ideas that are troubling me and are leading to this come from communists with whom he associated when he was 9 years old” through family connections.

When Obama was 9, he was living in Indonesia with his mother and his stepfather. Giuliani said he was referencing Obama’s grandfather having introduced him to Frank Marshall Davis, a member of the Communist Party.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on February 21, 2015, 09:28:59 am


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/giuliani-claims-obama-influenced-communism-article-1.2123541


RUDY'S RED FLAG: After declaring Obama doesn't love America, Giuliani now thinks President was influenced by SOCIALISM because he met a communist at AGE 9
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: chris jones on February 21, 2015, 05:31:57 pm
Rudy surfed onto prison planet.......
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: larsonstdoc on February 22, 2015, 04:23:30 pm
http://toprightnews.com/?p=8439

Former neurosurgeon at John Hopkins Hospital, author, and 2016 Republican presidential hopeful Dr. Ben Carson joined Newsmax TV’s America’s Forum to discuss a multitude of topics when he dropped a bombshell on President Obama about national security.


 Carson was asked by host J.D. Hayworth on what advice he could give to the Senate and House leadership regarding the funding for DHS, and he opened up with a verbal salvo.

“I would say break the funding for Homeland Security up into parcels. Don’t present it as a whole bill. That makes it much more difficult for him to stand in the way,” Carson began. “And, if he does stand in the way, particularly with things that are vital to the security of this county, then I think we can start talking about treason.”

Taken aback, Hayworth had to stop and make sure Carson said what he meant. The Doctor was adamant.

“If things are done that are on the contrary to the security of this country, whoever does them is guilty of treason,” he explained.

Now let’s see the New York Times accuse Ben Carson of racism for daring to speak the truth about Obama. And frankly, Carson’s strategy of splitting up the funding is brilliant, and not anything the Congress has even discussed.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: decemberfellow on February 22, 2015, 04:30:11 pm
Yeah   he was my choice until I found about his stance on mandatory vaccines.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: decemberfellow on February 22, 2015, 04:44:46 pm
Opps  heres the linkhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/02/2016-candidates-child-vaccinations_n_6598186.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/02/2016-candidates-child-vaccinations_n_6598186.html)

from  link:
Quote
Ben Carson, a retired neurosurgeon and outspoken conservative, is the chairman of the board of a company called Vaccinogen, which is working to make a vaccine for colon cancer.

“I believe that Vaccinogen has developed the first truly personalized -- and potentially commercializable -- approach to combat cancer and that is why I’m joining the Board and accepting the role of Chairman,” Carson said in a 2013 statement.

He affirmed his belief in "safe" vaccinations on Monday night.

“Certain communicable diseases have been largely eradicated by immunization policies in this country and we should not allow those diseases to return by foregoing safe immunization programs, for philosophical, religious or other reasons when we have the means to eradicate them,” he said in a statement obtained by The Hill.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 26, 2015, 03:46:05 pm
bump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI77cU3jsFs

Barack Obama's small town guns and religion comments

Barack's comments that are generating all of the controversy: "You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them," Obama said. "And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not.

And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." 
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: chris jones on February 26, 2015, 04:33:31 pm
 It would be simple to lay all the blame on this mucker. Oby could care less, he is not capable of being strait up. Muppets have masters.
 He is lapping up the gravy, on stage, Ego Inc,,,Give him an oscar and send him off to Gitmo.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: JT Coyoté on February 26, 2015, 05:32:19 pm
It would be simple to lay all the blame on this mucker. Oby could care less, he is not capable of being strait up. Muppets have masters.
 He is lapping up the gravy, on stage, Ego Inc,,,Give him an oscar and send him off to Gitmo.

All the more reason to Impeach Him NOW... No more edicts... Can his traitorous ass!

Oldyoti

"Truth will ultimately prevail where there
is pains taken to bring it to light."

~George Washington -- in a letter to
Charles M. Thruston, Aug. 10, 1794
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: iamc2 on February 26, 2015, 06:33:07 pm
 O'bumbles will never be impeached as he is in the in crowd [of clowns]...and this stinks!
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: chris jones on February 27, 2015, 12:56:11 pm
O'bumbles will never be impeached as he is in the in crowd [of clowns]...and this stinks!
               Minions of professional hit teams available 24/7...Yup, iamac, they are not terrified of Mr. Obama, they are however scared sh*tless of hitters & his masters....
              Congress, is to busy playing the 2 party game, lets all chip in and buy these guys some testicles, they have been neutered.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: decemberfellow on February 27, 2015, 01:10:43 pm
It will never happen,  congress and white house under same masters. (ok won't say can never happen,  ) Big O expendable in masters eyes.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on September 23, 2015, 02:55:59 pm
bump - It's never too late to do the right thing ...
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on November 18, 2015, 04:43:51 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddKcJy2i6QE
Michael Savage on increasing concern about state of Obama's mental health
Published on Oct 15, 2015

Michael Savage (10/14/15): "... the man is showing all signs of cracking up and being mentally ill ..."
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: Al Bundy on November 22, 2015, 05:50:55 pm
Don`t worry be happy

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-us-not-relent-islamic-state-campaign-080929228--politics.html#http://

AP> Trying to reassure a nation on edge, President Barack Obama said Sunday the Islamic State group "cannot strike a mortal blow" against the U.S., and he warned that overreacting to the Paris attacks would play into extremists' hands. "We will destroy this terrorist organization," he vowed.
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: iamc2 on November 25, 2015, 05:29:19 pm
 O'Bumbles will never be Impeached---because all of the USA GOV., is in on, The Dialectical Program!
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on January 07, 2016, 01:05:00 pm
no that couldn't happen ...

http://www.infowars.com/report-rnc-will-consider-obama-impeachment-proceedings/
Report: RNC Will Consider Obama Impeachment Proceedings
Resolution consists of 48 criminal charges
Steve Watson | Infowars.com - January 5, 2016

Reports circling online are suggesting that the Republican National Committee is to consider a resolution drafted for the impeachment of President Barack Obama.

The resolution, which seems to have been drafted by the North American Law Center, is to be weighed up at a January 13th meeting of the RNC, reports Brandon Hall of West Michigan Politics blog.

The document is titled, “Articles of Impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama,” it begins, “Resolved, That Barack Hussein Obama, acting President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following articles of impeachment to be exhibited to the Senate.”
...
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on June 29, 2016, 12:22:54 pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3665178/Now-feast-Michelle-Obama-girls-joined-Meryl-Streep-lavish-dinner-Moroccan-princess-palace-Marrakesh.html
Now we feast!
Michelle Obama and the girls are joined by Meryl Streep for lavish dinner with Moroccan princess at palace in Marrakesh
Michelle Obama indulged in a traditional Moroccan iftar with Princess Lalla Salma, the wife of King Mohammed VI 
The first lady and her daughters were joined by several members of  the Moroccan Royal family at the palace
Earlier, Mrs Obama spoke to teenage girls about the value of education with Streep and actress Frieda Pinto
She is on the second leg of a six-day trip to Liberia, Morocco and Spain to promote education for girls 

By Khaleda Rahman For Dailymail.com
Published: 20:34 EST, 28 June 2016  | Updated: 12:05 EST, 29 June 2016

(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/06/29/05/35C5359500000578-3665178-image-a-2_1467174160467.jpg)
The Obamas (from left, Sasha, Malia and their mother Michelle) donned traditional patterned outfits to dine with Morocco's Princess Lalla Salma (right) in Marrakesh on Tuesday evening





Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3665178/Now-feast-Michelle-Obama-girls-joined-Meryl-Streep-lavish-dinner-Moroccan-princess-palace-Marrakesh.html#ixzz4CzRmBdiv
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Title: Re: Impeach Obama
Post by: TahoeBlue on August 02, 2016, 09:47:37 pm
http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-sent-cash-to-iran-as-americans-were-freed-1470181874
U.S. Sent 400 MILLION in Cash to Iran as Americans Were Freed

Obama administration insists there was no quid pro quo, but critics charge payment amounted to ransom
By Jay Solomon and Carol E. Lee
Aug. 2, 2016 7:51 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON—The Obama administration secretly organized an airlift of $400 million worth of cash to Iran that coincided with the January release of four Americans detained in Tehran, according to U.S. and European officials and congressional staff briefed on the operation afterward ...