PrisonPlanet Forum

Elections, Referendums and Politics => 2016 Presidential Election => Topic started by: Geolibertarian on August 07, 2013, 05:32:34 pm

Title: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 07, 2013, 05:32:34 pm
For crying out loud, ALREADY!!??  ::) ::)

     https://www.facebook.com/ReadyForHillary (https://www.facebook.com/ReadyForHillary)

It already has over a half-million likes.

You lesser-evil voters (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=81509.msg959150#msg959150) are friggin hopeless!
Title: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: madasheck on August 07, 2013, 05:39:00 pm
Oh god, not Throwback Thursday!  ::) The Twitter "welcome" picture is enough to scare off her fellow cows.
Title: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: WarChest on August 07, 2013, 06:08:16 pm
For crying out loud, ALREADY!!??  ::) ::)

     https://www.facebook.com/ReadyForHillary (https://www.facebook.com/ReadyForHillary)

It already has over a half-million likes.

You lesser-evil voters are friggin hopeless!
Let me get this strait. 598k+ likes vs. 600k+ negative comments. Hmmm What am I not seeing here? ::)

And yes, I am ashamed that I even visited the page.   :-[
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 11, 2013, 10:08:37 am
Remind you of someone?

(http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110830100014/disney/images/f/f6/Snowwhite-disneyscreencaps.com-8944.jpg) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxpXqcfz_R0)


http://www.prisonplanet.com/hillary-cackles-demonically-at-thought-of-mass-murder.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/hillary-cackles-demonically-at-thought-of-mass-murder.html)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on August 11, 2013, 10:26:11 am
Let me get this strait. 598k+ likes vs. 600k+ negative comments. Hmmm What am I not seeing here? ::)

And yes, I am ashamed that I even visited the page.   :-[

It has to be faked numbers. I live in LIBTARD VILLAGE and even they puke at the thought of Hillary!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 11, 2013, 10:38:52 am
It has to be faked numbers.

That's exactly what people were saying about Obama (even when there were Obama yard signs and bumper stickers everywhere).

Yet then, as now, they were wrong, because they continually make the mistake of assuming that, if they don't see evidence of a political trend in their own figurative backyard, then it must not be happening elsewhere.

Nothing, of course, could be further from the truth.

How many more times must we learn that lesson the hard way?

     http://www.pollingreport.com/2016.htm (http://www.pollingreport.com/2016.htm)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Monkeypox on August 11, 2013, 11:19:50 am
TPTB have chosen Hitlary...so Hitlary is whom we shall get.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 11, 2013, 11:35:30 am
TPTB have chosen Hitlary...so Hitlary is whom we shall get.

Unless, of course, there's a mass awakening between now and then, in which case all bets are off.

But it must be a full awakening, not just a partial one.

And for that to happen, a critical mass of Americans must awaken to the fact that Democrat-vs.-Republican is not the only "false paradigm" in which they've heretofore allowed their minds and intellects to become and remain literally enslaved.

There are false economic paradigms as well:

     http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=192293.0 (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=192293.0)

And, yes, Austrianism (http://recoveringaustrians.wordpress.com/top-ten-austrian-economic-lies-and-mistakes/)-vs.-Keynesianism (http://www.cooperativeindividualism.org/allen-john_economic-consequences-of-john-maynard-keynes-1983.html) is one of them.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on August 11, 2013, 11:37:49 am
 This creature wants the throne and her backup is super bucks.
 Sociopaths in public office, it just doesn't make my day.

 IF Jesse Ventura runs independent, he will bury her.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: One Revelator on August 11, 2013, 01:37:36 pm
TPTB have chosen Hitlary...so Hitlary is whom we shall get.

^^^^ That. Why should I even believe FB “polls”? It’s THEIR system and part of PRISM. They can make it say whatever they want.

All your internets are belong to us.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 11, 2013, 01:53:52 pm
^^^^ That. Why should I even believe FB “polls”? It’s THEIR system and part of PRISM. They can make it say whatever they want.

In 2008 (the year when all 3rd party candidates combined got a mere one percent of the vote), I vividly recall seeing both Obama yard signs and McCain yard signs all over the place, yet not a single yard sign for either Ralph Nader or Chuck Baldwin (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmZpSCMBy4k).

Did the ruling elite make that happen, too, or did lesser-evil voters do it all by themselves?

     http://www.pollingreport.com/2016.htm (http://www.pollingreport.com/2016.htm)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: One Revelator on August 11, 2013, 02:03:10 pm
In 2008 (the year when all 3rd party candidates combined got a mere one percent of the vote), I vividly recall seeing both Obama yard signs and McCain yard signs all over the place, yet not a single yard sign for either Ralph Nader or Chuck Baldwin (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmZpSCMBy4k).

Did the ruling elite make that happen, too, or did lesser-evil voters do it all by themselves?

     http://www.pollingreport.com/2016.htm (http://www.pollingreport.com/2016.htm)

Maybe. But suddenly showing a half million likes just does not seem reasonable. I wouldn't trust the poll to accurately reflect public opinion. But, I would use it as an indicator of intent in the selection, not election process. If YouTube is already known to alter view counts, then I definitely wouldn't put it past FB to "adjust" their software to meet an agenda. In some ways, they already have.

With FB, you can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 11, 2013, 02:06:53 pm
Maybe. But suddenly showing a half million likes just does not seem reasonable. I wouldn't trust the poll to accurately reflect public opinion.

I'm not relying just upon FB (or even primarily upon it).

Apparently you missed it the first two times in this thread I posted the following link, so here it is again:

     http://www.pollingreport.com/2016.htm (http://www.pollingreport.com/2016.htm)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: One Revelator on August 11, 2013, 02:43:29 pm
I'm not relying just upon FB (or even primarily upon it).

Apparently you missed it the first two times in this thread I posted the following link, so here it is again:

     http://www.pollingreport.com/2016.htm (http://www.pollingreport.com/2016.htm)

I wouldn’t trust that either. Seen too many surveys sent to me with loaded questions. Gotten phone calls polling with loaded questions. Even gotten a RAND survey with...loaded questions. Personally witnessed doctored numbers in a republican presidential opinion poll years ago. Personally talked to four people that voted for Ron Paul in my town. Final tally reflected one vote only.

I’ve also witnessed an online poll for a gun manufacturer that I tracked for a month. A day before the poll ended, hundreds of “votes” showed up for a choice that was dead last. It was obviously what the company wanted to do in the first place.

Then I stumbled upon a hacker forum talking about poll bots. People were showing up begging the hacks to write up code to alter polls. And some were getting their requests.

Back to Hillary though. Could people be that brain dead? Maybe. But I’ve noticed that nobody ever hears about her until it’s time to put her in an “elected” vice appointed position. Then overnight polls show up in her favor. She’s already part of the club and needs no public support. They’ll just put her wherever they want her. Bilderberg showed me that. It was Hillary vs. Obama until the meeting at Chantilly that year. Immediately after that, they got along just fine. Like turning a light switch on and off.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 11, 2013, 03:07:25 pm
I wouldn’t trust that either.

People were saying not to trust it during last year's primary when Romney was way ahead of Ron Paul in the polls, yet as we all know, the polls proved to be far more right than wrong.

Whether there's vote fraud or not, and whether certain polls are being manipulated to produce certain results or not, is besides the point. The point is that, when the writing is on the wall yet again, it is unwise if not outright foolish to think you can make that writing disappear simply by disagreeing with it or denying its accuracy. That's called living in denial so that one can go on doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result.

That's what happened last year...

     http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=231772.0 (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=231772.0)

...and if people don't start learning from past mistakes and begin evolving intellectually, emotionally and politically, then 2016 will end up being 2012, 2008 -- and virtually every presidential "election" before that -- all over again.

Don't say you weren't warned.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: One Revelator on August 11, 2013, 04:06:41 pm
Quote
when the writing is on the wall yet again, it is unwise if not outright foolish to think you can make that writing disappear simply by disagreeing with it or denying it's accuracy

Obviously can’t make any presented information disappear. But, once again, does it reflect intent of an agenda? (which I tend to think) Or is it an accurate reflection of public opinion as a whole?

Polls have always been intentionally broadcast or propagated by media and government to influence public opinion rather than reflect it. One can easily capture the go-along-get-along types with this technique.

For example, poll question is “Do you think guns should be managed through self-destructive nanotechnology or through mental background checks?” Doesn’t matter how one answers because the propagated statement will be “Seventy five percent of people polled say that guns should be managed through mental background checks.”

Then again, does it even matter? Does the American public have any say or control over the government anymore? A lot of people think “No”.

Quote
...and if people don't start learning from past mistakes and begin evolving intellectually, emotionally and politically, then 2016 will end up being 2012, 2008 –

I think many have, but nobody in charge is going to let them get any traction. I don’t think we’ll ever know the real percentages. More people are catching on to techniques of spin and propaganda every day. Seeing is no longer necessarily believing. People like Snowden and Dorner are a surprise to everybody, including the government.

Yet I still see people today, despite the preponderance of evidence, afraid of discussing 9/11 – the single event that opened the floodgates into the mess we’re in. That one big lie has been used to buffalo people into thinking that if they go along, even knowing it’s a lie, they will be able to maintain their quality of life. Government employees and affiliates, corporate associates of the security industrial complex - I don’t see those people changing their position anytime soon.
Title: Selling Madame War Horse
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 11, 2013, 04:46:19 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/selling-madame-war-horse.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/selling-madame-war-horse.html)

Selling Madame War Horse

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
August 11, 2013

(http://static.infowars.com/bindnfocom/2013/08/general-hillary.jpg)

Dan Balz (http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/will-hillary-clinton-be-ready-in-2016/2013/08/10/a99162ce-01bc-11e3-9711-3708310f6f4d_story.html), writing for the former crown jewel of the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird, the Washington Post – a onetime media giant now a midget worth the fire sale price of a paltry $250 million – has come out swinging for Hillary in 2016.

“At this point, Hillary Rodham Clinton has been awarded the Democratic nomination virtually by default and declared the clear favorite to win the general election against her as yet unknown Republican opponent,” writes Balz a full three years plus before the election.

Presagious? Hardly. It’s not difficult to predict the establishment’s choices, especially when the competition out on the Republican fringe will consist of Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.

Between now and the Iowa caucuses the Democrats will do a lot of Hillary Clinton wheedling and peddling along with a copious amount of Paul and Cruz bashing – expect a hearty playing of the race card – and the establishment media will do its part to gussy up Hillary as Madame President.

Maureen Dowd (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/11/opinion/sunday/dowd-madam-president.html?_r=0), the liberal polemicist for another newspaper drawing near the chopping block, the New York Times, writes that we can’t hear summer cicadas or ourselves “over the roar of the Clinton machine — and the buzzing back to life of old Clinton enemies” already preparing to do battle early this time around.

Dowd reminds us that Team Hillary ran a “shadow campaign” after she was appointed secretary of state under Barry. “Obama granted his former rival special privileges and allowed her to move Hillaryland, with all her loyal image-buffers and political aides, into the State Department intact,” Dowd writes.

2016 will be a watershed. The Republican establishment will attempt to counter Hillary with Condoleezza Rice, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio or Paul Ryan, but all of these will play out as sure losers against Hillary.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/selling-madame-war-horse.html)]
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on August 12, 2013, 01:38:47 pm
This reminds me of the Replicants McLame push ... Enjoy the raining bs from the msm for the next couple of years...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on August 12, 2013, 01:45:02 pm


  If she gets elected, I'm beting she will be worse than BS (Barry Soetoro).
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Monkeypox on August 13, 2013, 01:56:15 am
Don't forget The Klinton Body Count:

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 13, 2013, 09:05:38 am
"And then I told Hilldog: 'Hey, you see my ass? That's you!' LOL!"

(http://dailypicksandflicks.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/girl-and-horse-laughing.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on August 14, 2013, 07:27:37 pm


  I heard Joel Skousen say that he thinks TPTB want a Republican dog in in 2016.  It doesn't matter.  A DOG IS A DOG.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: ES on August 15, 2013, 12:04:57 am

  I heard Joel Skousen say that he thinks TPTB want a Republican dog in in 2016.  It doesn't matter.  A DOG IS A DOG.

Yeah. it seems like that's their formula. Have a dem for 8 years and when people can't stand them anymore put in a republican like George Bush. Obama then Jeb Bush or some other fake conservative.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: madasheck on August 15, 2013, 04:05:40 pm
"And then I told Hilldog: 'Hey, you see my ass? That's you!' LOL!"

(http://dailypicksandflicks.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/girl-and-horse-laughing.jpg)

Ha ha. Nice one! (After a very trying day at the "office".)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 18, 2013, 02:12:07 pm
Hilldog, after being told by a practical joker that the "Clinton body count (http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html)" was about to be exposed on MSNBC!

(http://jhpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Hill10.png)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on August 18, 2013, 05:01:37 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/hillary-cackles-demonically-at-thought-of-mass-murder.html

    She is definitely a sadisticall psychopath, thats not news for us, but this vid sums it up.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on August 18, 2013, 05:40:09 pm
Hilldog, after being told by a practical joker that the "Clinton body count (http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html)" was about to be exposed on MSNBC!

(https://sphotos-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/1001570_624934784207299_2094920932_n.jpg)

  I think Jimmy Hoffa is under all that make-up.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Monkeypox on August 18, 2013, 06:41:13 pm
  I think Jimmy Hoffa is under all that make-up.

Hoffa was much more feminine and attractive.

(http://mburgan.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/jimmy_hoffa_320x240.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on September 15, 2013, 05:40:13 pm


(https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/1941684480/h1BA3292E/)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on September 15, 2013, 07:55:55 pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420311/Hillary-Clinton-awarded-honorary-degree-marks-St-Andrews-600th-anniversary.html
Hillary gets her gown: Clinton awarded honorary degree as she marks St Andrews' 600th anniversaryFormer First Lady presented with honorary degree at St Andrews
Hillary Clinton received a Doctor of Laws at 600th anniversary ceremony

By Daily Mail Reporter
PUBLISHED: 12:54 EST, Friday 13 September 2013

Hillary Clinton has been awarded an honorary doctors degree from one of the UK’s oldest universities to celebrate her success as a politician and diplomat.

The former US secretary of state attended a graduation address at a ceremony marking the 600th anniversary of the founding of St Andrews University in Scotland.

It is Mrs Clinton's first foreign visit since her term as secretary of state ended in February, which saw her join a group of over a dozen honorary graduates in the picturesque Fife coastal town.
Scroll down for video

...
She was conferred with a Doctor of Laws degree by Liberal Democrat politician and chancellor of St Andrews, Sir Menzies Campbell, alongside other honorary doctors, including former Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams and inventor of the world wide web Professor Sir Tim Berners-Lee.

As well as her achievements in politics, the degree also celebrates her efforts to champion the causes of education, human rights, democracy, civil society and promoting opportunities for women around the world, according to the university.

(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/09/13/article-2420311-1BCD0A3D000005DC-587_634x529.jpg)

Mrs Clinton was one of a handful recipients of honorary degrees at the ceremony to mark the 600th anniversary of the founding of the University
...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on September 15, 2013, 09:01:14 pm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  There is no end to the licking of the feet of the scoundrel Hillary.

  They give anybody honorary degrees.  A university even gave one to Oprah.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on September 19, 2013, 01:41:09 pm
There is no end to the licking of the feet of the scoundrel Hillary.

Nor to (ahem) other kinds of "licking," apparently...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/gennifer-flowers-bill-clinton-told-me-hillary-had-eaten-more-pssy-than-he-had.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/gennifer-flowers-bill-clinton-told-me-hillary-had-eaten-more-pssy-than-he-had.html)

Gennifer Flowers: Bill Clinton told me “Hillary had eaten more p*ssy than he had”

LAURA COLLINS
Daily Mail
September 19, 2013

In an exclusive interview with MailOnline, Gennifer has spoken of her deep regret at turning down Clinton’s pleas to talk some eight years ago and revealed her belief that they would still be together today, were it not the birth of Clinton’s daughter, Chelsea.

When rumours surfaced recently of an affair between Hillary Clinton and her transition office chief, Huma Abedin, 37, Gennifer was not surprised.

Gennifer said: ‘I don’t know Huma or the Weiners. I just know what Bill told me and that was that he was aware that Hillary was bisexual and he didn’t care. He should know.

‘He said Hillary had eaten more p***y than he had.’

Full story here (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2424555/Bill-Clintons-mistress-Gennifer-Flowers-Wed-today-wasnt-Chelsea.html).
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: One Revelator on September 19, 2013, 01:54:13 pm
^^^This is kind of an open secret. It also confirms Kathy O’Brien’s statement that Hillary Clinton was the only person to get sexually aroused upon viewing ritualistic vaginal mutilation.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on September 19, 2013, 02:03:34 pm
(http://viciousbabushka.typepad.com/.a/6a010536b72a74970b01347feae274970c-800wi)

CIA Agent: "We can't wait for them to find the detonator. If we can get to the bomb, then maybe we can deactivate it. Can't somebody go and take a look inside Mrs. Clinton's snizz?"

Officer: "I'm not sending any of my men in there."

http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s11e04-the-snuke (http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s11e04-the-snuke)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on September 23, 2013, 12:48:38 pm
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/22/hillary-clinton-2016-president-new-york-magazine
Hillary Clinton admits to 'wrestling' with run for president in 2016

Former secretary of state gives interview to New York Magazine and says: 'I'm both a pragmatist and realistic'

Karen McVeigh in New York   
theguardian.com, Sunday 22 September 2013 16.25 EDT   

Hillary Clinton has acknowledged that she is "wrestling" with the idea of running for president again, but said that she remains "pragmatic and realistic" as she considers her prospects for 2016.

In her first major interview since leaving the Obama administration eight months ago, the former secretary of state told New York Magazine she was considering a bid but that it was not a decision that "has to be made soon".

"I do" Clinton said, when asked if she "wrestles with running".

"But I'm both a pragmatist and realistic. I think I have a pretty good idea of the political and governmental challenges that are facing our leaders, and I'll do whatever I can from whatever position I find myself in to advocate for the values and the policies I think are right for the country. I will just continue to weigh what the factors are that would influence me making a decision one way or another."

The former first lady and New York senator did not elaborate on a timetable for her decision.

"I'm not in any hurry" she said "I think it's a serious decision, not to be made lightly, but it's also not one that has to be made soon. The election is more than three years away and I just don't think it's good for the country."
...

http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/20/no-pictures-please-shes-hillary-clinton/
No pictures, please, she’s Hillary Clinton

...


Hillary Clinton quietly slipped into Miami on Thursday to address a travel agents convention in a speech where the former secretary of state said little about troubles abroad or the future ambitions of the likely presidential-race frontrunner…

At one point, a member of the audience, Andrew Rothberg, had his Galaxy Note II smartphone taken from him by security, which removed his picture of Clinton onstage and then gave his device back in front of a Miami Herald reporter in the auditorium stands

Rothberg said he was more puzzled than upset. He said he guessed at one point that Clinton’s handlers might have wanted to control the event to keep activists from infiltrating the event and raising awareness about issues like the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012. But he wasn’t sure.

...
Clinton’s speech came a day after congressional Republicans led another hearing into the attacks and faulted her and the administrations preparations am response to the Sept. 11 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya that killed four Americans: Ambassador Christopher Stevens, information management officer Sean Smith and Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, security officers and former Navy SEALs.

Read more here: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nakedpolitics/2013/09/hillary-clintons-image-control-security-swipes-mans-phone-erases-pic-of-her-at-speech.html#storylink=cpy
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/20/no-pictures-please-shes-hillary-clinton/#ixzz2fjt6xdlF
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on October 06, 2013, 01:31:57 pm
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/09/30/cnn-hillary-clinton-film-canceled/
CNN, NBC Hillary Clinton films canceled
September 30th, 2013

Update 6:01 p.m. ET: NBC is dropping plans to move forward with "Hillary," a television miniseries that was set to star Diane Lane as the former first lady.

"After reviewing and prioritizing our slate of movie/mini-series development, we’ve decided that we will no longer continue developing the Hillary Clinton mini-series,” an NBC spokeswoman said.

(CNN) – A feature length documentary about Hillary Clinton, commissioned by CNN Films, has been canceled after the director cited lack of cooperation from people associated with the former secretary of state.

Charles Ferguson, director of the film, made the announcement Monday morning in an item on The Huffington Post where he also described pressure placed on him by various people to try an dissuade him from moving forward with the project.

 "After painful reflection, I decided that I couldn't make a film of which I would be proud," Ferguson wrote. "And so I'm canceling. (Not because of any pressure from CNN - quite the contrary.)"

CNN released a statement acknowledging that the project would not move forward.

"Charles Ferguson has informed us that he is not moving forward with his documentary about Hillary Clinton. Charles is an Academy Award winning director who CNN Films was excited to be working with, but we understand and respect his decision," said a statement from CNN Monday morning


http://www.darkhorizons.com/news/28882/cnn-cancels-hillary-clinton-documentary

Ferguson's reason for departing? It has apparently been very difficult to get potential interviewees to talk. In a piece for The Huffington Post posted a few hours ago, Ferguson says:


"[W]hen I approached people for interviews, I discovered that nobody, and I mean nobody, was interested in helping me make this film. Not Democrats, not Republicans – and certainly nobody who works with the Clintons, wants access to the Clintons, or dreams of a position in a Hillary Clinton administration.

After approaching well over a hundred people, only two persons who had ever dealt with Mrs. Clinton would agree to an on-camera interview, and I suspected that even they would back out. After painful reflection, I decided that I couldn’t make a film of which I would be proud. And so I’m cancelling."
Title: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Letsbereal on October 07, 2013, 03:53:58 am
Hillary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
2 October 2013
, by Roger Runningen (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2013-10-02/hillary-clinton-tops-in-2016-race-would-topple-top-republicans.html

Hillary Clinton has the most support of any potential Democratic candidate for the 2016 presidential sweepstakes and would defeat any of three Republican candidates tested in a poll released today.

The former secretary of state, 65, has the support of 61 percent of Democrats, according to the Quinnipiac University national poll.

In the Democratic field, Clinton tops Vice President Joseph Biden 61% to 11%, with 7% favoring U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and 2% supporting New York Governor Andrew Cuomo.

“As she watches the hand-to-hand political combat in Washington, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton remains above the fray and the queen of the 2016 mountain,” said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.

Asked about the Republican field, 17% of those polled said they’d support Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, 13% were for New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, 12% backed Senator Marco Rubio of Florida and 11% said they’d support former Florida Governor Jeb Bush.

Senator Ted Cruz of Texas and Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin each had 10%.

In a head-to-head contest against Republicans, Clinton would defeat Christie 49% to 36%, Paul 53% to 36%, and Cruz 54% to 31%.

The survey conducted among 1,497 registered voters between Sept. 23-29 has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5%.


LOlz
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: iamc2 on October 07, 2013, 04:38:50 am
 The polls may have Hillbilly Clinton posed to win in 2016; but I believe when this Shutdown is over [if ever], that Hillbilly Clinton will be tossed under the bus.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: jofortruth on October 07, 2013, 06:30:54 am
Like I have said many times before, the Clinton's have helped the Bushes run this country for far too long, and then we have Obama the newest minion. LOOK AT THE ABSOLUTE MESS THEY HAVE CREATED! THEY ALL ARE GLOBALIST MINIONS AND SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO EVEN SERVE AS DOG CATCHER GOING FORWARD! THEY DON'T SERVE YOU, THEY SERVE THEIR MASTERS THE GLOBALISTS!

The only way America is going to survive, is if the stupid Americans wake up and stop allowing these minions (FROM A FEW FAMILIES WHO ARE OWNED BY THE GLOBALISTS AND DO ONLY THEIR BIDDING) to keep being elected! STOP IT!

DO NOT SUPPORT HITLARY, OR JEB (THEY ARE CLINTONS AND BUSHES) OR ANYONE WHO HAS CFR, TRILATERAL, OR ANY OTHER ALPHABET SOUP MANIPULATOR THINK TANK TIES!

AMERICA NEEDS NEW LEADERSHIP AND FROM REAL AMERICANS WHO USE THEIR BRAINS AND HEART TO LEAD, INSTEAD OF WANNABE PUNKS WHO LIE, CHEAT, DECEIVE, TAKE BRIBES, AND FRONT FOR THE GLOBALISTS AND WHO PRETEND TO WORK FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!

THE PEOPLE MUST RAISE UP THEIR OWN LEADERS, AND GET BEHIND THEM! THE POWERS THAT BE WILL NEVER GIVE YOU A REAL AMERICAN TO VOTE FOR ON YOUR BALLOT. THEY RUN THE MAIN ONES ALLOWED TO GET ON THE BALLOT, AND WE ARE TALKING BOTH PARTIES WHICH OPERATE AS ONE BEHIND THE SCENES BECAUSE THEY ARE OWNED BY THE ESTABLISHMENT. ONLY MASSES DEMANDING DIFFERENT WILL HAVE A CHANCE TO CHANGE THIS FRAUD AT THE BALLOT BOX!

GET BUSY, PEOPLE! RAISE UP AND GET BEHIND A REAL AMERICAN AND TRUE LEADER, AND STOP SUPPORTING AND BEING CONNED BY THE LIKES OF A BUSH, CLINTON, AND OTHER ESTABLISHMENT GOONS! ON THEIR WATCH OVER DECADES, THIS COUNTRY HAS BEEN TORN APART. WOULD YOU REALLY REWARD FAILURE GOING FORWARD? WE MUST DEMAND BETTER!



Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Monkeypox on October 07, 2013, 09:12:51 pm
If that doesn't show you just how stupid the voters are in this country, then nothing will.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: chris jones on October 07, 2013, 09:29:28 pm
If that doesn't show you just how stupid the voters are in this country, then nothing will.
  I can't beleive people even consider this witch!!         It has to be propaganda!
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Monkeypox on October 07, 2013, 09:31:40 pm
 I can't beleive people even consider this witch!!         It has to be propaganda!

My first thought too - but then again, ObaMarx was re-elected after showing what he was for 4 years and 40% of the public still has a favorable view of him.

Plus the problem is, the Re-pube-lickins will probably nominate a complete idiot to run against her in 2016.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Letsbereal on October 07, 2013, 10:31:05 pm
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v393/youricarma/Miscellaneous/fotomontagefahndungsfoto17.jpg)
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: jerryweaver on October 07, 2013, 10:42:53 pm


                     I wonder who will be 2nd in charge?            (http://rlv.zcache.com/hillary_michelle_in_2016_buttons-rc1813810b6ed48a0bd08dbd6ebd9ee3d_x7j1f_8byvr_324.jpg)

Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Geolibertarian on October 07, 2013, 11:10:24 pm
"And then I told Hilldog: 'Hey, you see my ass? That's you!' LOL!"

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/972184_222140834602863_1874598974_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: larsonstdoc on October 08, 2013, 12:07:25 pm

                            (http://rlv.zcache.com/hillary_michelle_in_2016_buttons-rc1813810b6ed48a0bd08dbd6ebd9ee3d_x7j1f_8byvr_324.jpg)



  With these two in charge, believe it or not,  things would get worse.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: chris jones on October 08, 2013, 12:23:45 pm
2016,  THATS a long way off, a lot can happen in the near future as if enough shiite hasn't allready.
  I'm still hung up on this coming week!
Hillary/same crew, same bosses...Do you guys remember them both discussing involuntary service before Oby got the throne, same crew different skinsuits.
 
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Letsbereal on October 09, 2013, 04:24:56 am
Jeff Rense & Larry Nichols - The Truth About Hillary & 2016 Pt 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Akb8XXM8T08

3 October 2013, Jeff Rense


Jeff Rense & Larry Nichols - The Truth About Hillary & 2016 Pt 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4NdtLrBEIM

9 October 2013, Jeff Rense
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Letsbereal on October 12, 2013, 09:35:37 am
Yellen The First Female Fed Chairman ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DSCFkw3xms

First the firts black President and now the first female FED chairman and maybe later the first female president with Hitlary Clinton.

The were all set up to fail enormously or in the bizarro skull and bones Satanist mind, succeed.

The Ultimate "What Would Janet Yellen Do?" Cheatsheet http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-10-11/ultimate-what-would-janet-yellen-do-cheatsheet
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Honor18 on October 12, 2013, 09:40:14 am
Hard for me to even fathom what kind of dumbed down idiot would even conside throwing a vote to Hillary
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Anon27 on October 12, 2013, 10:01:35 am
If that doesn't show you just how stupid the voters are in this country, then nothing will.

What if Jeb Bush campaigns against Hillary and secures the Presidency?

Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Honor18 on October 12, 2013, 10:05:54 am
Neither of them needs to be in office ...Jeb was the Gov here in Fla where I live and he damn sure would not get my vote ....then again if they have  REP. or a DEM. near their names they would not get it anyway..... Just the name Clinton and damn sure Bush should be enough to prevent them getting any votes !
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Geolibertarian on October 12, 2013, 10:09:18 am
What if Jeb Bush campaigns against Hillary and secures the Presidency?

What if someone gets lung cancer instead of pancreatic cancer?
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Honor18 on October 12, 2013, 10:11:49 am
Nice !!!!
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Anon27 on October 12, 2013, 10:25:11 am
What if someone gets lung cancer instead of pancreatic cancer?

Agreed. The circus plows forward.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on October 16, 2013, 10:22:20 am
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/is-this-the-year-of-honoring-hillary-clinton-racks-up-accolades-as-she-weighs-2016-run/2013/10/15/a1d6ac76-359a-11e3-be86-6aeaa439845b_story.html

Is this the year of honoring Hillary? Clinton racks up accolades as she weighs 2016 run
By Philip Rucker
10/15/2013

 NEW YORK — When Sir Elton John bestowed his foundation’s first Founders Award on Hillary Rodham Clinton on Tuesday night, it was ostensibly meant to honor her work combatting AIDS. But it came at a moment when everyone seems to be honoring the former secretary of state for something.
...
In all, Clinton has racked up at least 15 awards in the nine months since she left the State Department, with more to come at the same time she is weighing a presidential campaign in 2016. Her supporters say the accolades are well deserved. But it also appears that Clinton has figured out how to leverage the awards to her political advantage, just as the groups honoring her benefit from having the would-be candidate promote their causes.
...
Most of Clinton’s public appearances this year have come at tightly choreographed awards ceremonies or at closed-press trade conventions, such as one held Tuesday morning in Atlanta by the National Association of Convenience Stores. Some appearances net her upward of $200,000.

It appears the only way to get Hillary to do an event is to either write her a big check or to give her a trophy,” said Tim Miller, executive director of America Rising PAC, the leading Republican group going after Clinton in anticipation of her 2016 candidacy.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on October 16, 2013, 10:24:57 am
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/is-this-the-year-of-honoring-hillary-clinton-racks-up-accolades-as-she-weighs-2016-run/2013/10/15/a1d6ac76-359a-11e3-be86-6aeaa439845b_story.html

Is this the year of honoring Hillary? Clinton racks up accolades as she weighs 2016 run
By Philip Rucker
10/15/2013

 NEW YORK — When Sir Elton John bestowed his foundation’s first Founders Award on Hillary Rodham Clinton on Tuesday night, it was ostensibly meant to honor her work combatting AIDS. But it came at a moment when everyone seems to be honoring the former secretary of state for something.
...
In all, Clinton has racked up at least 15 awards in the nine months since she left the State Department, with more to come at the same time she is weighing a presidential campaign in 2016. Her supporters say the accolades are well deserved. But it also appears that Clinton has figured out how to leverage the awards to her political advantage, just as the groups honoring her benefit from having the would-be candidate promote their causes.
...

  This is sick.  The Zombies don't even know that Hillary will be Obama Part 2 or worse.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on October 16, 2013, 10:40:09 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Akb8XXM8T08
Larry Nichols - The Truth About Hillary & 2016 Pt 1
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on October 16, 2013, 10:49:17 am
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  Larry is such a cool dude.

  It is surprising that Clinton and Clinton didn't ARKANCIDE him.

  Jeff Rense does an amazing job with his video/audios.  Of course he is the best voice in radio besides being a great interviewer.

  DON'T FORGET TO LISTEN TO PART 2.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on October 16, 2013, 10:59:15 am
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  Larry is such a cool dude.

  It is surprising that Clinton and Clinton didn't ARKANCIDE him.
  Jeff Rense does an amazing job with his video/audios.  Of course he is the best voice in radio besides being a great interviewer.
  DON'T FORGET TO LISTEN TO PART 2.

yes seems to be a lot of truth in those two videos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4NdtLrBEIM
Larry Nichols - The Truth About Hillary & 2016 Pt 2
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on October 16, 2013, 11:45:27 am
Obama:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRBPS3o_IvU
Dune "Squeeze" Scene

Hillary:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNKh7ggZnkQ
lieblicher Feyd Rautha

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWq15lDh8yM
Dune (4/9) Movie CLIP - Baron Harkonnen (1984) HD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0HW0789H8A
Feyd torments Yueh
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on October 24, 2013, 09:21:13 am
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/10/24/hillary-clinton-turns-tables-on-heckler-in-buffalo/

(http://l3.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/J4vkS7FLBBmD0suk2S3RSA--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9ZmlsbDtoPTQyMTtweG9mZj01MDtweW9mZj0wO3E9NzU7dz03NDk-/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/afp.com/045f095a11ecc1579b728f65962a8ea4c73622f0.jpg)

  Excerpt from Hilldog's speech to 6500 people in Buffalo, NY
 Hey Hillary, maybe the Chinese/Russians know that our currency is as phony as their currencies.

 Hey Hillary, time for a facelift.  This time the doctors will have to take your belly button off your chin.


“I’m hoping we will — move away from the slash and burn politics, the name calling, the excessive partisanship that we’ve seen too much of lately,” she said.

In her talk, which was part of the university’s Distinguished Speakers Series, Clinton said the partial government shutdown that forced President Barack Obama to cancel a recent trip to Asia could negatively affect the way the U.S. is perceived in other countries.

“It’s important that the president of the United States shows up at these meetings,” she said.

“The Chinese president, Xi Jinping, showed up. Russian President Vladimir Putin showed up, and they were able to dominate the proceedings,” Clinton said, “and they were able to cock an eyebrow and ask a question like, well, maybe we can’t count on the Americans any more. Maybe it’s time to, in the words of one Chinese official, de-Americanize the world. Maybe we should even start thinking about a different reserve currency than the American dollar.”
Title: McCain Thinks Hilldog is a Strong Candidate for 2016
Post by: Geolibertarian on October 29, 2013, 02:58:33 am
http://www.infowars.com/mccain-thinks-hillary-is-a-strong-candidate-for-2016/ (http://www.infowars.com/mccain-thinks-hillary-is-a-strong-candidate-for-2016/)

McCain Thinks Hillary is a Strong Candidate for 2016

Arizona Republican thinks more highly of Democrat Clinton than Tea Party contenders in his own party.

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
October 28, 2013

(http://static.infowars.com/bindnfocom/2013/10/mccaincartoon.jpg)

Establishment Republican, Arizona Senator John McCain, has once again demonstrated there is not a dime’s worth of difference between Democrat and Republican presidential candidates.

“I don’t think there’s any doubt that Secretary Clinton would be a very strong candidate,” McCain said in Chicago at an event with Democrat Sen. Dick Durbin. “I don’t think there’s any doubt she has widespread support. Her work as secretary of state, with the exception of this issue of Benghazi — which isn’t going away — I think has been outstanding. I think she would be viewed by anyone, Republican or Democrat, as a very formidable candidate for 2016.”

McCain also piled kudos on foot-in-the-mouth Joe, vice president Biden. He said Biden is a “wonderful guy” and added that it would be a mistake to “rule Joe Biden out of [2016 presidential] mix.”

[Continued... (http://www.infowars.com/mccain-thinks-hillary-is-a-strong-candidate-for-2016/)]
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on October 29, 2013, 01:19:32 pm
In relation to McCain's comments about Hilldog...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/22/john-mccain-2016-reelection_n_4144825.html
John McCain Considering Running For Reelection In 2016
The Huffington Post  |  By Paige Lavender       Posted: 10/22/2013 4:40 pm EDT

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is considering running for [Senate] reelection in 2016.

"I'm seriously thinking about maybe giving another opportunity for you to vote for or against me in a few years from now," McCain said during an interview on KFYI-AM in Phoenix. "I'm seriously giving that a lot of thought."

McCain will be 80 years old in 2016, when his current term -- his fifth in the Senate -- ends.

McCain has been more outspoken against others in the GOP in light of the recent government shutdown. He blamed the tea party for the shutdown, criticizing Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) for his efforts aimed at defunding President Barack Obama's health care law as part of any budget agreement
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on October 29, 2013, 06:55:51 pm
In relation to McCain's comments about Hilldog...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/22/john-mccain-2016-reelection_n_4144825.html
John McCain Considering Running For Reelection In 2016
The Huffington Post  |  By Paige Lavender       Posted: 10/22/2013 4:40 pm EDT

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is considering running for [Senate] reelection in 2016.

"I'm seriously thinking about maybe giving another opportunity for you to vote for or against me in a few years from now," McCain said during an interview on KFYI-AM in Phoenix. "I'm seriously giving that a lot of thought."

McCain will be 80 years old in 2016, when his current term -- his fifth in the Senate -- ends.

McCain has been more outspoken against others in the GOP in light of the recent government shutdown. He blamed the tea party for the shutdown, criticizing Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) for his efforts aimed at defunding President Barack Obama's health care law as part of any budget agreement

GOVERNMENT WASTE
Title: Goldman Sachs pays Hilldog nearly half a million for two speeches
Post by: Geolibertarian on October 31, 2013, 05:57:41 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/goldman-sachs-pays-hillary-nearly-half-a-million-for-two-speeches.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/goldman-sachs-pays-hillary-nearly-half-a-million-for-two-speeches.html)

Goldman Sachs pays Hillary nearly half a million for two speeches

Alec Torres
National Review Online
October 31, 2013

(https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1381423_10202337781948306_190943453_n.jpg)

Hillary Clinton spoke at two separate Goldman Sachs events on the evenings of Thursday, October 24 and Tuesday, October 29. As both Politico (http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/hillary-clinton-goldman-sachs-98958.html) and the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/12/us/politics/hillary-clinton-hits-the-lucrative-speechmaking-trail.html?hp&_r=1&#h) report, Clinton’s fee is about $200,000 per speech, meaning she likely netted around $400,000 for her paid gigs at Goldman over the course of six days.

Last Thursday, Clinton spoke for the AIMS Alternative Investment Conference hosted by Goldman Sachs, a closed event exclusively for Goldman clients. AIMS is an annual conference that explores the latest strategies and products available to financial advisers. At the event, Clinton offered what one attendee described to me as “prepared remarks followed by questions.”

On Tuesday, Clinton spoke at the Builders and Innovators Summit (http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/our-conferences/builders-and-innovators-2013/index.html), devoted to discussing entrepreneurship and how to help innovators expand and grow their businesses. According to Politico, Clinton conducted a question-and-answer session with Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein. Goldman Sachs declined to comment on the subject of her remarks or why Mrs. Clinton in particular was invited to the events.

Full story here (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/362637/hillary-clintons-lucrative-goldman-sachs-speaking-gigs-alec-torres).
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on October 31, 2013, 06:56:56 pm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  Sadder than giving Hitlery the money, is that Goldman Sucks stole the money from the American people.

  We've got to go to the $23.7 TRILLION DOLLAR BAILOUT OF THE ZOMBIE BANKERS THAT THEY DIDN'T PAY BACK AND AREN'T GOING TO PAY BACK.

             
               http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aY0tX8UysIaM
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Monkeypox on November 01, 2013, 04:14:48 am
I wonder if the plan now isn't to tear down Obamarx, throw this country into chaos, and then position Hitlary as the "savior".
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on November 01, 2013, 05:45:31 am
I wonder if the plan now isn't to tear down Obamarx, throw this country into chaos, and then position Hitlary as the "savior".
                Congressman questions LIL Hillary: We are trying to find out why we didn't save the Americans why they were left defenseless and killed in Benghazi, why troops were ordered to stand down...?      A very pizzed off  Hillary replies, "what difference does it make".
     Presidential material :D............Monkeypox, the game is rigged, The USA is in a state of CHAOS right now, Americans in general simply won't admit it...........Be it Hillary, Biden, Romney, Cruz, it truly doesn't matter , different skinbags , same agenda..NWO...
       From LBJ -Obama the candidates have been set in place by the true power,Ronny was run by Bush, even Ole Jimmy Carter was stuck in there to give the appearence we were coming back to an assemblance of sanity & integrity..
       Its a controlled society in general who want to hold on to the OLE dream and can't accept the fact a elite syndicate runs this country.  Across the globe this administration and Gov have gone from what was  the beacon of light and freedom to the Darth Vader image.. The only man who could stomp on the parasites is JV.  We are in for a shiite strom no matter what.
                                 
               

               
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Honor18 on November 01, 2013, 09:04:04 am
You have got that right Monkeypox ..... I see and talk to at least 50 of these sheeples a day where I work the "public" in general are just ignorant .... I have a interstate 1 city block from where I work and I get asked by these ignorant people at least twice a day how do I get back on the interstate ... hell they just got off the damn thing 8 hours prior ... you mean to tell me you are so damn stupified you cannot remember where a damn interstate is ... you can see the damn thing from the front door but you still have to ask how to get to it ...... sorry about the rant but most Americans are not just stupid they are walking zombies ... how the hell they can drive from way up North and get to Florida alive is beyond me .... God Help US !
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on November 01, 2013, 12:01:50 pm
It seems to me that TBTB (notice that Bush-Clinton-McCain are all MOB-CIA connected) are running out of "vetted" candidates like Bushes, Clintons or McCain , Obama was years in grooming . Do they have another up their sleeves?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: resist.tyranny on November 01, 2013, 12:31:26 pm
It seems to me that TBTB (notice that Bush-Clinton-McCain are all MOB-CIA connected) are running out of "vetted" candidates like Bushes, Clintons or McCain , Obama was years in grooming . Do they have another up their sleeves?

I think they have an endless supply.  Maybe not true believers, but they can threaten any candidate to make them toe the line.  Hence the reason for all the spying.  They can blackmail anyone they need to.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on November 01, 2013, 12:37:07 pm
Sliding, but it's still high and there's a long time to go before 2016.  I believe that Hitlary was promised the 2016 nomination and the DemocRATS will do anything to give it to her.

  Well, if the DiMocrats get amnesty, it's all over for the GOP.

  With 11+ million new Democratic voters Hillary will win no matter what.

  The Democrats can thank people like John Insane McCain and Miss Lindsey Graham for them supporting amnesty.

  IF they get amnesty, my family and I are planning to move to the province of Alberta, Canada.

  Then Hitlery can be president of NORTH MEXICO.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on November 01, 2013, 01:32:12 pm
Elites' writing about elites' - Dan Blumenthal is on the China Technology Board!  

http://shadow.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/07/23/what_clinton_left_unfinished_in_asia
Clinton's unfinished business

 Posted By Daniel Blumenthal   Friday, July 23, 2010 - 4:16 PM
(http://shadow.foreignpolicy.com/files/103047120.jpg)
...

China Spying (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=83759.0)
(http://www.mygen.com/images/Reinsch_Rockefeller_Heinz_US_Engage_Muckety.jpg)

http://www.aei.org/scholar/dan-blumenthal/

(http://www.aei.org/files/2013/08/19/img-danblumenthal300x225_170347467203.jpg_item_hero_bw.jpg)

Dan Blumenthal is the director of Asian Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, where he focuses on East Asian security issues and Sino-American relations.  Mr. Blumenthal has both served in and advised the U.S. government on China issues for over a decade.  From 2001 to 2004, he served as senior director for China, Taiwan, and Mongolia at the Department of Defense.  Additionally, he served as a commissioner on the congressionally-mandated U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission since 2006-2012, and held the position of vice chairman in 2007.  He has also served on the Academic Advisory Board of the congressional U.S.-China Working Group. Mr. Blumenthal is the co-author of "An Awkward Embrace: The United States and China in the 21st Century" (AEI Press, November 2012).


http://shadow.foreignpolicy.com/blog/12340
A Sino-American Proxy War?
 Posted By Daniel Blumenthal   Wednesday, September 18, 2013
...
A public debate about a U.S. military strategy for China is most welcome. While the debate's particulars are important, it is equally significant that the U.S. national security community is now openly discussing ways to deter Chinese aggression and defeat it should deterrence fail.

This was hardly the case just a decade ago. Most in the U.S. national security elite were dismissive of China's military capabilities and believed that even talking about possibilities of conflict with China was provocative. Not only was this line of argument misguided -- taking seriously the possibility of conflict with China should lead to more robust deterrence and reassurance -- but it also wished away the fact that the Chinese security elite had been thinking about war with the United States for a long time.

If Washington is now more or less settled on a policy of engaging China while balancing its power and hedging against greater aggression, it is incumbent upon national security leaders to think as much about the balance and hedge part of the equation as they do the engage side. In an attempt to fill this gap, the Defense Department has developed a new concept, Air-Sea Battle (ASB). While much of ASB is classified, enough has been said to piece together its various moving parts. The operational concept requires that the U.S. military position itself to: 1) operate in an environment in which Chinese cyber-, anti-satellite, and electronic forces are seeking to degrade the C4ISR network upon which U.S. military effectiveness has become so reliant; 2) create better synergies between naval and air forces so they can effectively combat "anti-access" forces; and 3) hit targets on China's mainland to end Chinese salvos against U.S. allies and interests.

ASB is a direct descendent of the Cold War's AirLand Battle concept. Then, defense planners were worried that Soviet forces could quickly overrun allied forces at the central front of the Cold War -- Western Europe. AirLand Battle took a more offensive approach against the Soviet Union, using joint air and army forces to attack the Warsaw Pact states and targeting forces deep in Soviet- held territories before they had a chance to stage mass sweeps into Europe.
...

A public debate about a U.S. military strategy for China is most welcome. While the debate's particulars are important, it is equally significant that the U.S. national security community is now openly discussing ways to deter Chinese aggression and defeat it should deterrence fail.

This was hardly the case just a decade ago. Most in the U.S. national security elite were dismissive of China's military capabilities and believed that even talking about possibilities of conflict with China was provocative. Not only was this line of argument misguided -- taking seriously the possibility of conflict with China should lead to more robust deterrence and reassurance -- but it also wished away the fact that the Chinese security elite had been thinking about war with the United States for a long time.

If Washington is now more or less settled on a policy of engaging China while balancing its power and hedging against greater aggression, it is incumbent upon national security leaders to think as much about the balance and hedge part of the equation as they do the engage side. In an attempt to fill this gap, the Defense Department has developed a new concept, Air-Sea Battle (ASB). While much of ASB is classified, enough has been said to piece together its various moving parts. The operational concept requires that the U.S. military position itself to: 1) operate in an environment in which Chinese cyber-, anti-satellite, and electronic forces are seeking to degrade the C4ISR network upon which U.S. military effectiveness has become so reliant; 2) create better synergies between naval and air forces so they can effectively combat "anti-access" forces; and 3) hit targets on China's mainland to end Chinese salvos against U.S. allies and interests.

ASB is a direct descendent of the Cold War's AirLand Battle concept. Then, defense planners were worried that Soviet forces could quickly overrun allied forces at the central front of the Cold War -- Western Europe. AirLand Battle took a more offensive approach against the Soviet Union, using joint air and army forces to attack the Warsaw Pact states and targeting forces deep in Soviet- held territories before they had a chance to stage mass sweeps into Europe.
...

http://www.defense.gov/pubs/ASB-ConceptImplementation-Summary-May-2013.pdf
FOREWORD: The Air-Sea Battle Concept

http://www.cipe.org/content/william-reinsch
William A. Reinsch

Bill Reinsch currently serves as President of the National Foreign Trade Council. The NFTC, founded in 1914, is the oldest and largest business association dedicated solely to trade policy, export finance, international tax, and human resource issues. The organization represents 300 companies through its offices in New York and Washington, D.C. As president, Reinsch oversees NFTC’s efforts in favor of open markets, in support of Eximbank and OPIC, against unilateral sanctions and in support of sound international tax policy, among many other international trade and tax issues of concern to U.S. business. Concurrently, Mr. Reinsch also serves as a member of the U.S.-China Security Review Commission.

Prior to joining the NFTC, Reinsch served as the Under Secretary for Export Administration in the U.S. Department of Commerce. In that position he administered and enforced the export control policies and anti-boycott laws of the U.S. government and monitored the condition of the nation’s defense industrial base. Prior to taking this position, Mr. Reinsch spent twenty years on Capitol Hill from 1973 to 1993, most of them as senior Legislative Assistant to the late Senator John Heinz and subsequently to Senator John D. Rockefeller IV. He received a B.A. in International Relations from The Johns Hopkins University and an M.A. degree from The Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. He lives in Bethesda, Maryland, with his wife and two sons.


http://www.c-spanvideo.org/williamareinsch
(http://images.c-spanvideo.org/Files/20e/39266-297020-3.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on November 05, 2013, 11:01:33 am
Buffett: Hillary for president in 2016
Warren Buffett says nobody is 'better qualified' to run the country; he also believes donating to super PACs is 'wrong
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKQAbU1CL5Q
Title: The Main Danger to Peace and Liberty
Post by: Geolibertarian on November 07, 2013, 02:20:59 am
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2013/11/05/the-main-danger-to-peace-and-liberty/ (http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2013/11/05/the-main-danger-to-peace-and-liberty/)

The Main Danger to Peace and Liberty

It’s Hillary Clinton

by Justin Raimondo
Antiwar.com
November 06, 2013

I know it’s early to talk about the 2016 presidential race, but that’s only true for normal people: ideologues of one sort or another like me and my Twitter followers are already deep into it, and with good reason. That’s because the stakes have never been higher. It’s important who sits in the Oval Office, yes, but this time around it’s crucial – because the survival of our republic, the future of constitutional government in America, and the peace of the world hinges on it. And that dark cloud on the presidential horizon, which is already casting a huge shadow over the political landscape, is none other than Hillary Clinton.

Hillary is bad on … everything. From foreign policy to civil liberties to you-name-it, she’s the ultimate Un-libertarian. And I’m not just talking about her formal positions on the issues, although those are horrific enough: it’s her self-righteous mien in taking those positions, her moralistic preening combined with a sensible-shoes "pragmatism" that really does more than merely irk.

[Continued... (http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2013/11/05/the-main-danger-to-peace-and-liberty/)]
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on November 07, 2013, 06:49:50 am

"Two for the price of one …."

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/8844aefa57c529ac39c7a79f316bd7f0.jpg)

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/Hillary_and_Bill_Clinton_form_a_Hillbilly.jpeg)

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on November 18, 2013, 10:01:42 pm
Seems like there is an article everyday about the b,,,,


http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/232393731.html
Democratic outside groups taking steps to promote a potential Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign
 Article by: KEN THOMAS , Associated Press
 Updated: November 18, 2013 - 4:15

WASHINGTON — As Hillary Rodham Clinton privately weighs a second White House run, pieces of the Democratic establishment are beginning to fall into place publicly to help her possible candidacy.

Several super political action committees are collectively acting as an early de facto campaign organization to ensure Clinton is ready to compete vigorously if she decides to try again to become the first female president.

They're building a network without her direct consent. But she's not objecting either, and some Democrats are interpreting that as encouragement to push forward in anticipation of a campaign.

"There's a lot of energy out there and it would be a mistake not to channel and use it as an opportunity to organize," said Craig Smith, an adviser to Ready for Hillary.

The super PAC American Bridge 21st Century has launched Correct the Record, a group staffed by former Clinton aides who intend to defend the former secretary of state and other potential 2016 candidates against Republican critics. Priorities USA Action, which ran searing ads against rivals of President Barack Obama to support his re-election, is discussing bringing onboard a former White House chief of staff under her husband.

Ready for Hillary, formed after the 2012 elections, is working to keep grass-roots supporters around the country energized. And EMILY's List, a group that has 3 million members and supports women candidates who back abortion rights, has been holding forums promoting the need to elect the America's first female president.
...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on November 24, 2013, 01:20:32 pm
In NWO News today ...

http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/political/jeb-bush-hillary-clinton-presidential-favorites-among-florida-voters-quinnipiac-poll-says
Jeb Bush, Hillary Clinton presidential favorites among Florida voters, Quinnipiac poll says

Posted: 11/22/2013
•By: Ashley Killough CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- In the crucial swing state of Florida, former Gov. Jeb Bush appears to be the top contender among a crop of potential GOP presidential candidates, while former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is the overwhelming favorite for Democratic voters, according to a new poll.

The Quinnipiac University survey also indicates that if the two were to square off in an election held today, Clinton would barely edge out Bush, 47%-45%.
...

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on November 24, 2013, 03:25:12 pm
 Great choices, Adolf or Mau.

 I never got over Lil Jeby and his silverado fraud, how he was even considered for political office and as to why he wasn't he wasn't doing time.
What is Jeb Bush's role in the Lehman Brothers meltdown? | THE ...
theinternetpost.net/.../what-is-jeb-bushs-role-in-the-l...‎
16/09/2008 - Yet after hiring Jeb Bush in late August of 2007, the firm suddenly goes belly up in a year. ... This was known as the Savings and Loan scandal (S&L). ... in his help in facilitating the largest HMO Medicare fraud in U.S. history.
TRUST OR HUSTLE: The Bush Record - Bush, George W. and ...
www.campaignwatch.org/more1.htm‎
SILVERADO Lil Jeby  and his crew robbed this nation.
The failure of hundreds of U.S. Savings and Loans during the 1980s, ... In other instances, as exemplified by Jeb's S&L dealings, loans were made for ... million in unpaid bills,3 and was suspected of up to $100 million in Medicare fraud.4 “IMC .
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on January 05, 2014, 03:52:28 am
If she does run, she we will win.

Probably against some sort of Tea Party candidate to prove the Tea Party is finished. In fact it will be the Tea Party Taliban that get her elected.

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Honor18 on January 05, 2014, 07:36:12 am
Thats just to depressing to contemplate
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on January 05, 2014, 09:16:39 am
Thats just to depressing to contemplate

Trouble is that a significant section of Tea Party Taliban in alliance with Austrians will be putting her in office.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jofortruth on January 05, 2014, 12:25:10 pm
She is a DOG alright!  Anyone who supports this DOG is an absolute moron! Apparently those people have no clue how they have been screwed by the CLINTONISTAS every since they came into existence in public life! They are nothing more than GLOBALIST MINIONS who get paid well, just like the Bush family and Obama family! THEY ARE ALL THE SAME GANG BETRAYING THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA!

 ::)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on January 05, 2014, 05:14:19 pm
drudge:
(http://www.drudgereport.com/hr.jpg)
SHE MAKES IT OFFICIAL?
 http://www.drudgereport.com/flash3b.htm
Have you picked up your free Ready for Hillary bumper sticker yet?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on January 05, 2014, 06:00:49 pm
Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters - Full


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOy6ZagodUE
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on January 05, 2014, 11:24:01 pm
Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters - Full


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOy6ZagodUE

Thanks for the link .... think about what happened to John Jr when he was going to run for the Senate, Then Caroline was going to run and got beat up , now she is amb. for Japan....

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2009/01/23/why-caroline-kennedys-senate-bid-flamed-out
Why Caroline Kennedy's Senate Bid Flamed Out
January 23, 2009

By the time Caroline Kennedy finally announced she wanted to be New York's junior senator, her bid to replace Hillary Clinton was already in serious trouble. ....
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on January 06, 2014, 12:48:52 am
Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters - Full


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOy6ZagodUE

Hillary: The Movie

You know I have not watched the actual film, but tell me is it just Left versus Right shite or is it a real attack on her Organised Crime activities MENA Connection and Rose Law Firm ?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on January 06, 2014, 12:12:24 pm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1099766/posts
Hillary Short-circuited JFK Jr. Senate Run
Newsmax ^  | 3/17/03 | Limbacher
Posted on Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:40:17 AM by Tumbleweed_Connection

Before he died in a tragic plane crash in July 1999, John F. Kennedy, Jr. was weighing a decision to run for Senate in New York. But according to a new book, then first lady Hillary Clinton short-circuited the plan by declaring her interest in the same office.

"John watched with growing dismay as Hillary subtly insinuated herself into what he considered his state," Laurence Leamer writes in "Sons of Camelot."

Leamer says Kennedy was considering abandoning his job as publisher of George Magazine to make his first run for office - and had begun polling on the prospect of replacing then incumbent Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

Fox News chief Roger Ailes - a one-time GOP strategist - was sounded out on the idea of a Kennedy run. And according to the New York Post, he concluded that Kennedy would be "a viable candidate."

But when Hillary signaled she wanted to make the run herself, Kennedy quietly shelved the idea.

"He was too much of a gentleman" to object, Leamer told the Post.

Privately, however, the heir to the Kennedy political dynasty was "upset" that Mrs. Clinton had elbowed him out of the race, contends Leamer.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on January 12, 2014, 02:36:14 pm
http://www.hillaryclintonmeme.com/Hillary_-1/Hillary_-7/hillary_-7.html
The Hillary Clinton 2016 Presidential Campaign Poster Meme and other Goodies

Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential Campaign Poster
(http://www.hillaryclintonmeme.com/Hillary_-1/Hillary_-7/Hillary-Clinton-2016-Presidential-Campaign-Poster-Meme-Mike-Meshew.jpg)
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Letsbereal on January 12, 2014, 02:56:37 pm
Former Hillary Associate Claims to Have Been Her Personal Hit Man… Admits to Killing for Money
11 October 2013
, by Dean Garrison (Freedom Outpost)
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/10/former-hillary-associate-claims-personal-hit-man-admits-killing-money/

The Pete Santilli Show LIVE!!!! Episode #517 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpakOBFa7LE

Clinton First Campaign Trip Aims to Rally Virginia Votes
18 October 2013
, by John McCormick (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2013-10-18/clinton-first-campaign-trip-aims-to-rally-virginia-votes.html

Hillary Clinton Campaigns in VA for McAuliffe http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0C6g2sy1XsM
20 October 2013, AssociatedPress

Hillary Clinton’s Early Moves Gives Fodder to 2016 Foes
24 October 2013
, by Julie Hirschfeld Davis (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2013-10-24/hillary-clinton-s-early-moves-gives-fodder-to-2016-foes.html

George Soros backs pro-Hillary Clinton super PAC - Billionaire is the biggest Democratic donor to back the group
24 October 2013
, by Fredreka Schouten - Washington  (USA TODAY)
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/10/24/george-soros-joins-fundraising-effort-to-promote-hillary-rodham-clinton-presidential-bid-ready-for-hillary-super-pac/3177411/

Billionaire financier George Soros is joining forces with others urging Hillary Rodham Clinton to run for president in 2016, becoming the best-known Democratic donor to provide his money and name to the Ready for Hillary super PAC.

Hillary Clinton to get American Patriot award from Bill’s closest cronies
25 October 2013
, by Joel Gehrke (Washington Examiner)
http://washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-to-get-american-patriot-award-from-bills-closest-cronies/article/2537873

Bill Clinton Campaigns in Virginia Gov. Race http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdCfQEsBHIU
28 October 2013, AssociatedPress

Hillary Clinton would make ‘formidable’ candidate, McCain says
28 October 2013
, by Robert Schroeder (MarketWatch - Blogs)
http://blogs.marketwatch.com/capitolreport/2013/10/28/hillary-clinton-would-make-formidable-candidate-mccain-says/

Jeff Rense & Jay Weidner - Psychopaths In Charge http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=251333.0
Title: Clinton’s Non-Campaign Already Needs Someone in Charge
Post by: Letsbereal on January 12, 2014, 03:00:13 pm
Clinton’s Non-Campaign Already Needs Someone in Charge
12 January 2013
, by Albert R. Hunt (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2014-01-12/clinton-s-non-campaign-already-needs-someone-in-charge.html

The hottest story in U.S. politics last week, at least before the implosion of New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, was an article in Politico detailing Hillary Clinton’s shadow 2016 presidential campaign.

On one level, it should make Democrats feel good. She hasn’t made a final decision, but she is preparing and planning.

She is making sure she understands the rules, dates and modern news media, a lesson from her unsuccessful 2008 run, when her campaign didn’t master any of this.

Almost every Democratic strategist, activist or fundraiser seems eager to jump on the Hillary bandwagon. There are even dueling super political action committees.

This picture -- of a Washington and establishment-heavy machine with inevitable and outsize factions and frictions -- should raise caution flags.

There are the angles. Jim Messina, President Barack Obama’s 2012 campaign chief, wants in; just don’t tell Vice President Joe Biden.

The Hollywood mogul Jeffrey Katzenberg wants to be the chief money man; other fat cats are clamoring to get in as long as Mark Penn, the discredited campaign czar of the failed Clinton presidential quest, isn’t around.

A Clinton confidant worries the Hillary machine is like a huge, luxury ocean liner that has collected lots of barnacles.

Given the crazy-quilt presidential-election system, it isn’t premature to plan for 2016; the process is interminable.

There are a few certainties even this early: It is very likely that she will run; one smart Clintonite puts the odds at 80 percent.

If she is in, Biden probably won’t be, and neither will be Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren or any other prominent woman; the Democratic sisterhood is vested in the former secretary of state.

It’s impossible to envision an Obama-like outsider in this cycle; then again, few envisioned candidate Obama eight years ago.

It’s silly to even speculate about a general election. One lesson from Clinton’s previous run is that you can’t corner a nomination, you have to capture it.

That may not be possible without a first-class infrastructure; that alone won’t do it. Also, at some stage, as one senator put it, she has to be today’s news.

Political resumes, even those as impressive as Clinton’s, don’t win presidential elections. The last three elected presidents had limited national and almost no international experience.

There are challenges to trying to be today’s news. Like George H.W. Bush in 1988, she has to differentiate herself from a sitting president who is popular within his own party.

When there isn’t an incumbent, the race is about capturing the mantle of change. Clinton and her campaign never got that last time.

She has time to think about these matters. And there’s no shortage of advice, a cacophony of conflicting voices. That’s a problem.

She and her husband are different people. She is more disciplined. He is more freewheeling. He seems to have a million confidantes. She has a tight core of loyalists.

In 2007, she picked the wrong people to run her campaign, and it cost her. This time, she can ill afford to repeat that mistake or have a campaign run by committee.

She needs to select someone like Stephanie Schriock, the president of Emily’s List, a high powered group that supports pro-abortion-rights Democratic women candidates, or Robby Mook, a young Clinton operative who successfully directed Terry McAuliffe’s gubernatorial run in Virginia.

There are several other possibilities; it needs to be someone versed in modern politics, who can take control and prepare for a bitter campaign.

This necessity is a lesson of the late spring of 1992 when a presidential candidate named Clinton was struggling toward the nomination; all his associates seemed to have a piece of the action, requiring a high-level conference call with more than a score of participants.

An intervention ensued. James Carville was put in charge. Bill Clinton was elected president. The person who ordered that change was Hillary Clinton.

(Albert R. Hunt is a Bloomberg View columnist.)


I expect WOIII round 2020. Hitlary will be scammed into office in 2016 because just they can and nobodies voting anyways at that time, in time to provoke WOIII.

First the firts black President and now the first female FED chairman and maybe later the first female president with Hitlary Clinton who will be the first woman to unleash a world war.

The were all set up to fail enormously or in the bizarro skull and bones Satanist mind, succeed.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Geniocrat on January 12, 2014, 03:00:46 pm
Either vote for Ventura in 2016 or kiss everything America goodbye.

It is just that simple folks.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: iamc2 on January 12, 2014, 03:50:41 pm
I think Robert Gates' Book will kick little Hillary under the rug!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Effie Trinket on January 13, 2014, 09:11:53 am
"Before Obama Kill Drone List, there was the Clinton Body Count

1 – James McDougal – Clinton’s convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.

2 – Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown. The murder happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.

3 – Vince Foster – Former white House councilor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.

4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors.

5 – C. Victor Raiser II and Montgomery Raiser, Major players in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.

6 – Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock, September 1992… Described by Clinton as a “Dear friend and trusted advisor.”

7- Ed Willey – Clinton fund raiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.

8 – Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock. Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton. He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.

9 – James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a “Black Book” of people which contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas.

10 – James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater.

11- Kathy Ferguson, ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit. Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.

12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancee.

13 – Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor.

14 – Florence Martin – Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry Seal Mena Airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot wounds.

15 – Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.

16 – Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident.

17 – Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter. Investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparently, in the middle of his investigation.

18 – Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993 in his Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno three weeks before his death

19 – Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington, Virginia apartment balcony August15, 1993. He was investigating the Morgan Guarantee scandal.

20 – Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised, nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.

21- Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.

22 – Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee, died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton’s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.

23 – Barry Seal – Drug running pilot out of Mena, Arkansas, death was no accident.

24 – Johnny Lawhorn Jr. – Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car left at his repair shop. He was found dead after his car had hit a utility pole.

25 – Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guarantee. His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released.

26- Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fund raiser died March 1, 1994 when his plane exploded.

27 – Kevin Ives and Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track” case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks. Later reports claim the two boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.

THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES/HENRY CASE:

28 – Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, July 1988.

29 – Keith McMaskle – Died stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988

30 – Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.

31 – Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.

33 – James Milan – Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to “natural causes.”

34 – Jordan Kettleson – Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.

35 – Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives / Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.

THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD: 36 – Major William S. Barkley Jr. 37 – Captain Scott J. Reynolds 38 – Sgt. Brian Hanley 39 – Sgt. Tim Sabel 40 – Major General William Robertson 41 – Col. William Densberger 42 – Col. Robert Kelly 43 – Spec. Gary Rhodes 44 – Steve Willis 45 – Robert Williams 46 – Conway LeBleu 47 – Todd McKeehan"
Title: Planet Hillary? More Like the Death Star
Post by: Geolibertarian on January 23, 2014, 04:15:01 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/planet-hillary-more-like-the-death-star.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/planet-hillary-more-like-the-death-star.html)

Planet Hillary? More Like the Death Star

Wealthy liberals will spend millions to get the Iron Maiden in the White House.

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
January 23, 2014

(http://static.infowars.com/bindnfocom/2014/01/phillary.jpg)

The twittersphere is burbling with the New York Times’ latest shameless effort to get the Iron Maiden elected come 2016. The bizarre cover, strangely reminiscent of George Méliès’s Le Voyage dans la lune (http://wattsatthemovies.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/le_voyage_dans_la_lune_poster.jpg), posits a “possible” presidential bid by the former Secretary of State.

The New York Times Magazine cover just so happens to coincide with the announcement that the largest liberal super PAC in the country is now raking in cash to front Clinton.

Earlier this month, we reported (http://www.infowars.com/obama-super-pac-morphs-into-hillary-super-pac/) on Priorities USA, the Obama PAC repurposed by the Clintonites to collect money from wealthy Democrats like movie mogul Jeffrey Katzenberg, the foul loudmouth “comedian” Bill Maher, and other supporters of the liberal side of the globalist agenda.

“The move marks perhaps the earliest-ever start to big-dollar fund-raising in support of a non-incumbent presidential candidate, providing a fund-raising portal for wealthy Clinton supporters eager to help her White House prospects — and to the legions of others eager to ingratiate themselves with Mrs. Clinton and her inner circle,” the Times reports (http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/24/us/politics/biggest-liberal-super-pac-to-fund-possible-clinton-bid.html) today.

Clinton’s mega-PAC (http://www.bustle.com/articles/13476-largest-liberal-super-pac-to-fund-hillary-clinton-2016-presidential-run) is “expected to pull in checks of six, seven, or eight figures.”

In October, it was reported that billionaire globalist, George Soros (http://freebeacon.com/george-soros-joins-ready-for-hillary-super-pac-finance-board/), had joined the finance council of Ready for Hillary, a secondary super PAC waiting in the wings. He also financially backs Priorities USA (http://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/contrib.php?cycle=2012&cmte=C00495861) along with a number of corporate unions and other groups that stand to come out on top if Clinton is elected.

Democrats are worried they will lose the both the Senate and the House to Republicans. In order to reverse this possible outcome, they have created a number of PACs (http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/08/01/liberal-super-pacs-outraise-republican-groups/2607941/) and have managed to raise nearly three items as much money as Republicans. The biggest fundraiser for Republicans is the tea party influenced super PAC Tea Party Patriots Citizen Fund. It took in a scant $2 million, mostly from small donors.

If the Times was interested in truth, it would superimpose Clinton’s face on the Death Star. Her tenure at the State Department reflected that of her predecessors, from Condoleezza Rice to Madeline Albright, James Baker, George Schultz, and, of course, Henry Kissinger.

The Iron Maiden was responsible for a continuation of war and misery around the world, from the slaughter of more than 40,000 Libyans to exacerbating the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Syria as the U.S. backs al-Qaeda and other bloody psychopaths tasked with unseating yet another disapproved government and installing yet another globalist puppet.
Title: Re: Planet Hillary? More Like the Death Star
Post by: iamc2 on January 23, 2014, 05:42:56 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/planet-hillary-more-like-the-death-star.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/planet-hillary-more-like-the-death-star.html)

Planet Hillary? More Like the Death Star

Wealthy liberals will spend millions to get the Iron Maiden in the White House.

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
January 23, 2014

(http://static.infowars.com/bindnfocom/2014/01/phillary.jpg)

The twittersphere is burbling with the New York Times’ latest shameless effort to get the Iron Maiden elected come 2016. The bizarre cover, strangely reminiscent of George Méliès’s Le Voyage dans la lune (http://wattsatthemovies.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/le_voyage_dans_la_lune_poster.jpg), posits a “possible” presidential bid by the former Secretary of State.

The New York Times Magazine cover just so happens to coincide with the announcement that the largest liberal super PAC in the country is now raking in cash to front Clinton.

Earlier this month, we reported (http://www.infowars.com/obama-super-pac-morphs-into-hillary-super-pac/) on Priorities USA, the Obama PAC repurposed by the Clintonites to collect money from wealthy Democrats like movie mogul Jeffrey Katzenberg, the foul loudmouth “comedian” Bill Maher, and other supporters of the liberal side of the globalist agenda.

“The move marks perhaps the earliest-ever start to big-dollar fund-raising in support of a non-incumbent presidential candidate, providing a fund-raising portal for wealthy Clinton supporters eager to help her White House prospects — and to the legions of others eager to ingratiate themselves with Mrs. Clinton and her inner circle,” the Times reports (http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/24/us/politics/biggest-liberal-super-pac-to-fund-possible-clinton-bid.html) today.

Clinton’s mega-PAC (http://www.bustle.com/articles/13476-largest-liberal-super-pac-to-fund-hillary-clinton-2016-presidential-run) is “expected to pull in checks of six, seven, or eight figures.”

In October, it was reported that billionaire globalist, George Soros (http://freebeacon.com/george-soros-joins-ready-for-hillary-super-pac-finance-board/), had joined the finance council of Ready for Hillary, a secondary super PAC waiting in the wings. He also financially backs Priorities USA (http://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/contrib.php?cycle=2012&cmte=C00495861) along with a number of corporate unions and other groups that stand to come out on top if Clinton is elected.

Democrats are worried they will lose the both the Senate and the House to Republicans. In order to reverse this possible outcome, they have created a number of PACs (http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/08/01/liberal-super-pacs-outraise-republican-groups/2607941/) and have managed to raise nearly three items as much money as Republicans. The biggest fundraiser for Republicans is the tea party influenced super PAC Tea Party Patriots Citizen Fund. It took in a scant $2 million, mostly from small donors.

If the Times was interested in truth, it would superimpose Clinton’s face on the Death Star. Her tenure at the State Department reflected that of her predecessors, from Condoleezza Rice to Madeline Albright, James Baker, George Schultz, and, of course, Henry Kissinger.

The Iron Maiden was responsible for a continuation of war and misery around the world, from the slaughter of more than 40,000 Libyans to exacerbating the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Syria as the U.S. backs al-Qaeda and other bloody psychopaths tasked with unseating yet another disapproved government and installing yet another globalist puppet.
how Long, can this Freak of Space-Time, Continue to bring ugliness to the Universe  ???

if aliens are here : Then she is one ugly alien!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on January 30, 2014, 01:06:35 pm
Is the MSM attempting to convince us that Hillary is to run for president.
God have mercy on the USA should this creature so much as being seriously considered.
 The queen of- "what difference does it make"..Lets be clear on this shiite.
She is definetly an egomaniac,  remember that song,............. "Shes not here"...


Benghazi in my opinion was murder, a planned assassination. Sevens was not an ambassador, he was CIA/NWO and ran guns and funds, he had to go and anyone involved before the cover was blown......Soldiers who wanted to save this crew were told to stand down, the troopers and security who were wounded defending the command post  -we will never hear another word about them or from them..          Just an opinion...

READ ON..

MSM PROPAGANDA.....................BRACE YOURSELF FOR THIS.........
Hillary Clinton is the biggest frontrunner ever for the Democratic presidential nomination.
That's according to a new Washington Post/ABC News poll, which finds former Secretary of State Clinton with a 73-12 lead over Vice President Joe Biden in a hypothetical 2016 Democratic primary race. U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) gets 8% of the vote.
As the WaPo points out, Clinton's 61-point lead is nearly three times as large as it was in 2006, when the conventional wisdom held that she would be the 2008 Democratic nominee. In 2006, she took 39% of the theoretical vote, compared to then-Sens. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and John Edwards (D-N.C.). But this time, her support is well over 50%.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on January 30, 2014, 01:19:48 pm
http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/2013/10/readying-world-for-hillary-red.html
Readying the World For Hillary-the-Red
(http://images.sodahead.com/polls/003476149/4612606269_Socialist_Hillary_Clinton_33763_answer_2_xlarge.png)

“George Soros signs on to co-chair the national finance committee of the PAC that is laying the groundwork for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential run.”

Established in January 2013, Ready For Hillary (RFH) is an independent political action committee registered with the Federal Election Commission. Its founding mission was to lead a nationwide grassroots movement encouraging former U.S. Senator and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to run for President in 2016. By its ninth month as an active organization, RFH boasted “over one million supporters and over 20,000 grassroots donors.”

Ready For Hillary was co-founded by Allida Black and Adam Parkhomenko. Black, who earned a Ph.D. from George Washington University in 1993, is currently a Research Professor of History and International Affairs at GWU. She was also the founding editor of The Eleanor Roosevelt Papers, a project designed to “preserve, teach and apply Eleanor Roosevelt's writings and discussions of human rights and democratic politics.” Moreover, Black is a lesbian activist who lauds Mrs. Clinton for her “support for LGBT rights and marriage equality.”
,,,

https://www.readyforhillary.com/

(https://d1qodaktuuv1h7.cloudfront.net/sites/readyforhillary/files/field/image/bilde.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on January 31, 2014, 11:24:14 am
"Before Obama Kill Drone List, there was the Clinton Body Count


              Neither one of the Clinton's had to lift a finger, any and all possible threats were taken care of w/ extreme prejudice. Sure they knew, but didn't so much as have to push a button.
              Billy didn't get in office by chance, he was recruited and set on the throne, the boys in the field took care of any leaks. It's a syndicate,  the hitters doing the dirt to keep the Clinton's  appearances in good shape.
              Daddy Bush is always in the shadows, he was not the one and only behind this, but he was neck deep in it.
             
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 03, 2014, 01:30:25 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnMLU_s0GAM
Peoples Limozine .... Elvis Costello ....
...
She looked like someone's girlfriend, she looked like a dream
 She looked as unlikely as the people's limousine



http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/shortcuts/2014/jan/28/hillary-clinton-cant-drive-deskilling
Why Hillary Clinton can't drive any more and other tales of deskilling

The former First Lady admits she hasn't driven a car for 18 years. But she's far from being the only privileged person to have forgotten how to do things the rest of us take for granted
...
"One of the regrets I have about my public life is that I can't drive any more," Hillary Clinton told a car dealers' conference on Monday. Among her most painful memories, you suspect this doesn't rank all that high. Yet the remark is a reminder of how wealth and power tend to separate people from normal life, and how they don't always like it. Clinton has not driven a car since 1996, on the instructions of the secret service, and it is something that her husband pines for too. "Whenever I'm on the golf course I always make them let me drive the golf cart," Bill Clinton has said.
...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on February 03, 2014, 01:42:38 pm
Every 2016 presidential election poll I've seen continues to show Hilldog with a two-digit lead over both Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.

I know how to reverse this trend, but virtually no one will listen. And the primary reason for this is the sadistic and ideologically-fueled obsession most tea-partiers seem to have with imposing IMF shock therapy on the poor and the unemployed in the midst of a banker-engineered depression.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on February 03, 2014, 06:38:42 pm
 Hi T.. I watched the clip of Lil Hillary explaining she hasn't driven a car, the secret service wouldn't let her (don't blame them).
 Point: She stuck her chest out  & paraded this fact as if she is a  god , her ego and position have driven this gal insane.. If she is not on some form of pharma meds or narcotics she is certifiable, off her nut for the long stretch.
 Sociopaths and psychotics have a few things in common, she has both traits.

 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on February 07, 2014, 04:57:54 am
Every 2016 presidential election poll I've seen continues to show Hilldog with a two-digit lead over both Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.

I know how to reverse this trend, but virtually no one will listen. And the primary reason for this is the sadistic and ideologically-fueled obsession most tea-partiers seem to have with imposing IMF shock therapy on the poor and the unemployed in the midst of a banker-engineered depression.

She will be the next president, and during her term the Tea Party Taliban will scream that the answer is more extreme shock therapy and IMF riots . . . .

Elections are won and lost nit by appeals to the hardcore party faithful, but by appealing to the undecided middle ground. Moving to the Neo Nazi Extreme Right Wing, just leaves Clinton the opportunity to move slightly to the Right and dominate that Middle Ground which will decide the election.

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 07, 2014, 10:47:57 am
Hillary is very similar to Feinstein, Pelosi, Boxer, zoe Lofgren in the Feminista Bay Area .  Most women are democrats now and will vote for any demoncat woman that shows up with a heart beat.   They also get the SEIU union vote even when they eat babies.   

So that's what the country is up against - it's very similar to the Soviet Bolsheviks - Mensheviks and  Socialist Revolutionaries'  are the useful idiots.
 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensheviks
...
This split in the party crippled the Mensheviks' popularity, and they received 3.2% of the vote during the Russian Constituent Assembly election in November 1917 compared to the Bolsheviks' 25 percent and the Socialist Revolutionaries' 57 percent

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Revolutionaries

In the election to the Russian Constituent Assembly held two weeks after the Bolsheviks took power, the party still proved to be by far the most popular party across the country, gaining 58% of the popular vote as opposed to the Bolsheviks' 25%. However, in January 1918 the Bolsheviks disbanded the Assembly and thereafter the SRs became of less political significance


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_SR_uprising
The Left SR uprising or Left SR revolt was an uprising against the Bolsheviks by the Left Socialist Revolutionary Party in July 1918. The uprising started on 6 July 1918 and was claimed to be intended to restart the war with Germany.[1] It was one of a number of left-wing uprisings against the Bolsheviks that took place during the Russian Civil War.
...
At the same time, the Bolsheviks began purging local Soviets and Soviet institutions of Left SRs. Many SRs who did not participate in the uprising were afterwards integrated into the Bolshevik Party. In 1921, there was another SR-led revolt called the Kronstadt Rebellion. The Left SRs collapsed as a party by 1922 and only existed as small cells through 1925. Mirbach assassins, Blumkin and Andreev, managed to evade capture. In early 1919, Blumkin was pardoned by Bolsheviks and rejoined Cheka. During the Moscow Trials in 1937, it was claimed that Trotsky, Kamenev, and Zinoviev were involved in this plot

http://www.johndclare.net/ER3.htm
Why Did The Bolsheviks Win The Civil War?
...

The first reason was that the Whites were disunited.   They were a coalition of different enemies of the Bolsheviks (Social Revolutionaries, Mensheviks, Tsarists, army officers angry at Brest Litovsk, and nobles whose land had been given to the peasants).   In fact, all these different groups hated each other!
...
Whereas the whites were disunited, the Bolsheviks maintained absolute unity through Terror.   The Tsar and his family were put to death, which removed a focal point for the whites.   The Cheka murdered any Whites they found – more than 7000 people were executed, and Red Army generals were kept loyal by taking their families hostage – so the Bolsheviks were united and disciplined towards a single end – winning the war.

http://faustasblog.com/2012/02/29345/
(http://www.nationalenquirer.com/sites/nationalenquirer.com/files/imagecache/node_page_image/article_images/hillary__story.jpg)
What’s with the insignia on her shoulder?

(http://anguishedrepose.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/dr-evil-hillary-clinton.jpg)

http://theweek.com/article/index/255974/its-over-jeb-bush-will-be-the-gop-nominee-in-2016
It's over: Jeb Bush will be the GOP nominee in 2016
And that would be horrible for American democracy
Damon Linker | February 5, 2014   
...
But maybe it won't come to this. Maybe the GOP will nominate someone besides Jeb Bush. Hell, maybe the Democrats will nominate someone besides Hillary Clinton!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on February 07, 2014, 12:16:31 pm
Hey T.

http://theweek.com/article/index/255974/its-over-jeb-bush-will-be-the-gop-nominee-in-2016
It's over: Jeb Bush will be the GOP nominee in 2016
And that would be horrible for American democracy
Damon Linker | February 5, 2014   
...
But maybe it won't come to this. Maybe the GOP will nominate someone besides Jeb Bush. Hell, maybe the Democrats will nominate someone besides Hillary Clinton!

   
God help America.
                        The Hall of Shame nomination for these two.
Hillary, Benghazi-"What difference does it make".                                             MEMORY HOLE?.
Jeby Bush......... "Silverado" rip off, S & L , largest fraud in past American history. MEMORY HOLE?
                        (How did this mobster become Governor, simple-"he's connected").
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 10, 2014, 01:19:21 pm
http://freebeacon.com/the-hillary-papers/
The Hillary Papers
Archive of 'closest friend' paints portrait of ruthless First Lady
February 9, 2014 9:58 pm
BY:  Alana Goodman   
   
On May 12, 1992, Stan Greenberg and Celinda Lake, top pollsters for Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign, issued a confidential memo. The memo’s subject was “Research on Hillary Clinton.”

Voters admired the strength of the Arkansas first couple, the pollsters wrote. However, “they also fear that only someone too politically ambitious, too strong, and too ruthless could survive such controversy so well.”

Their conclusion: “What voters find slick in Bill Clinton, they find ruthless in Hillary.”
....

READ THE HILLARY PAPERS HERE
...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on February 12, 2014, 12:15:07 pm
So who does not expect Hilary to be the next president ?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on February 12, 2014, 01:06:54 pm
So who does not expect Hilary to be the next president ?

I think a better question is: Why do so many austerity (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=196128.120)-promoting Republicans (both establishment and Tea Party alike) insist on giving Hilldog's public relations experts political fodder with which to portray her as the "lesser evil" in the eyes of the bottom "47 percent (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/mitt-romney-47-percent)"?

Didn't they learn anything at all from the previous two presidential elections?

Apparently not.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZdHEkm7DoY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZdHEkm7DoY)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 12, 2014, 02:01:29 pm
the Dem's and Rep's are now just racketeering thugs in suits fighting to stay in power and collecting cash ,,,

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd626.htm

...

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq said it quite well in a recent piece: Amnesty: Politicians Put Their Mouth Where Their Money Is

"For the most part, the US government is a racket, a service that is fraudulently offered to solve a problem that may not exist, would not be affected if it did exist, or only exists due to the actions of government itself. American politicians exploit the racket to run a swindle, taking money or property from someone by using lies or tricks.

"One could successfully argue that many of those operating within our present political environment are in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968) enacted into law on October 15, 1970. In general, Republicans and Democrats con voters into giving them the power to use the voters' own money (taxes) for the purpose of rewarding themselves and the wealthy donors, who fund their political campaigns and provide them with post-government employment....

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/amnesty-politicians-put-their-mouth-where-their-money-is
Amnesty: Politicians Put Their Mouth Where Their Money Is
by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD February 7, 2014
...
The objective of both the Republican and Democratic establishments is the same; to preserve the political status quo, racketeering masquerading as government.

Their business models depend on exclusivity to power, spawned by money, sustained by political expediency and crony capitalism and maintained by crushing any spontaneous outbreaks of democracy among U.S. citizens.

Both parties have forgotten that the efficiency and effectiveness of government are dependent upon the trustworthiness of elected officials as representatives and executors of the views and desires of the American people.

For that reason, the Republican and Democratic Parties are on the path to political extinction. We should hasten their journey.
...

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of "Restoring the Republic: Arguments for a Second American Revolution ". He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com.


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/26/us/politics/it-only-seems-that-political-corruption-is-rampant.html
It Only Seems That Political Corruption Is RampantBy MICHAEL WINESJAN. 25, 2014
,,,


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/22/opinion/politicians-extortion-racket.html?adxnnl=1&ref=todayspaper&adxnnlx=1382437313-NOfzrgGtIdwX0X4BpmbztA
Op-Ed Contributor
Politicians’ Extortion Racket
By PETER SCHWEIZER
Published: October 21, 2013

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — WE have long assumed that the infestation of special interest money in Washington is at the root of so much that ails our politics. But what if we’ve had it wrong? What if instead of being bribed by wealthy interests, politicians are engaged in a form of legal extortion designed to extract campaign contributions?

Consider this: of the thousands of bills introduced in Congress each year, only roughly 5 percent become law. Why do legislators bother proposing so many bills? What if many of those bills are written not to be passed but to pressure people into forking over cash?

This is exactly what is happening. Politicians have developed a dizzying array of legislative tactics to bring in money.

Take the maneuver known inside the Beltway as the “tollbooth.” Here the speaker of the House or a powerful committee chairperson will create a procedural obstruction or postponement on the eve of an important vote. Campaign contributions are then implicitly solicited. If the tribute offered by those in favor of the bill’s passage is too small (or if the money from opponents is sufficiently high), the bill is delayed and does not proceed down the legislative highway.

House Speaker John A. Boehner appears to be a master of the tollbooth. In 2011, he collected a total of over $200,000 in donations from executives and companies in the days before holding votes on just three bills. He delayed scheduling a vote for months on the widely supported Wireless Tax Fairness Act, and after he finally announced a vote, 37 checks from wireless-industry executives totaling nearly $40,000 rolled in. He also delayed votes on the Access to Capital for Job Creators Act and the Small Company Capital Formation Act, scoring $91,000 from investment banks and private equity firms, $32,450 from bank holding companies and $46,500 from self-described investors — all in the 48 hours between scheduling the vote and the vote’s actually being held on the House floor.

Another tactic that politicians use is something beltway insiders call “milker bills.” These are bills designed to “milk” donations from threatened individuals or businesses. The real trick is to pit two industries against each other and pump both for donations, thereby creating a “double milker” bill.

President Obama and Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. seemed to score big in 2011 using the milker tactic in connection with two bills: the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act. By pitting their supporters in Silicon Valley who opposed the bills against their allies in Hollywood who supported the measures, Mr. Obama and Mr. Biden were able to create a sort of fund-raising arms race.

...

The reason these fund-raising extortion tactics succeed is that politicians deploy them while bills are making their way through Congress, when lawmakers possess maximum leverage. That’s why at least 27 state legislatures have put restrictions on allowing state politicians to receive contributions while their legislatures are in session.

Why not do the same in Washington? It would reduce politicians’ penchant for cashing in on manufactured crises. Perhaps it would even compel Congress to be more efficient while in session.

We have focused for too long on protecting politicians from special interests. It’s time we stop pitying the poor politicians and start being wary of them — for they play the shakedown game as well as anyone.
 

Peter Schweizer, a fellow at the Hoover Institution, is the author of “Extortion: How Politicians Extract Your Money, Buy Votes and Line Their Own Pockets
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on February 12, 2014, 05:35:48 pm
Hi T.
       That one was right to the point......*Hammer and nail scenario*.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on February 14, 2014, 04:34:40 pm
Hilary Clinton is only liked by Old Ladies; Feminists, and Metrosexual men.

In 2016 she stands NO CHANCE: the youth in America will see to her demise!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on February 14, 2014, 05:18:59 pm
Hilary Clinton is only liked by Old Ladies; Feminists, and Metrosexual men.

In 2016 she stands NO CHANCE: the youth in America will see to her demise!
                   iamc2
                                Yes, I too am with hope the younger generation are wide awake and see this creature for what she is.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on February 14, 2014, 05:41:34 pm
                   iamc2
                                Yes, I too am with hope the younger generation are wide awake and see this creature for what she is.

Brother; I believe the youth can see the future, and they are a bunch of good people... ;)

 AMEN my brother: we teach the youth and they put it into action!

 Peace Mate!  8)
Title: Say NO to Witch Hiliary in 2016!
Post by: dustypatriot85 on February 19, 2014, 09:08:43 pm
I can't believe that brainwashed people will actually vote for her in 2016 but they will in droves  ::) ::)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxpDmmVOp2E



Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters - Full



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOy6ZagodUE
Title: Re: Say NO to Witch Hiliary in 2016!
Post by: EvadingGrid on February 21, 2014, 11:36:39 am
I can't believe that brainwashed people will actually vote for her in 2016 but they will in droves  ::) ::)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxpDmmVOp2E



Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters - Full



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOy6ZagodUE

http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/4048578/Hillary_Clinton_Exposed__The_Movie_She_had_Banned_From_Theaters_
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Honor18 on February 21, 2014, 11:40:25 am
Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters - Full



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOy6ZagodUE

BUMP ... Watched this video last night ... great video !
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on February 21, 2014, 11:51:37 am
Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters - Full



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOy6ZagodUE

BUMP ... Watched this video last night ... great video !

Speaking of Banned Films

Unlawful Killing Trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnzmk1E6QmE

Pirate Bay Torrent
http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/7933487/Unlawful_Killing_-_The_Death_of_Princess_Diana_-_Keith_Allen
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 21, 2014, 04:22:24 pm
Babushka Cat sezs Hillary would win!
(http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0tq6uW4kl1qd834x.jpg) (http://02varvara.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/00-00a-cat-in-a-babushka.jpg)

http://swampland.time.com/2014/02/21/mccain-hillary-clinton-would-be-president-if-election-were-tomorrow/
McCain: Hillary Would Be President If Election Were Tomorrow

The former Presidential candidate disagrees with fellow Republican Michele Bachmann who said that the country wasn't ready for a female President ...

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on February 21, 2014, 06:04:44 pm
Hilary as prez ?OMG never mind god help America ,more like god help everyone mind you having seen the list of lunatics both in office and want to be on both sides (its the same in the UK ) I think I will keep voting outside the 2 party system in the hope that one day sanity is going to prevail .
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on February 21, 2014, 06:30:07 pm
On aside note to that my personal opinion is it matter's not if it's a man or a woman in charge or what race ,but integrity agenda etc etc
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: BlackRoses on February 21, 2014, 07:38:21 pm
On aside note to that my personal opinion is it matter's not if it's a man or a woman in charge or what race ,but integrity agenda etc etc

This has been a couple of years back but I remember somebody (want to say it was Jimmy Carter) saying it was time for a gay President. Again, I know the system we have now is puppets to puppet masters. But isn't it wrong to have somebody just for the sake of having a woman, gay person or any other category you can think of? I'm a woman and I'd love to see a woman President in my lifetime. But I'd much rather have people in our system that aren't psychos or puppets on a string. I want people that will truly bring the people and country up. They will truly represent us and the country instead of every other criminal elite or organization possible.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on February 21, 2014, 07:49:26 pm
 Psychopaths, the clever, ones are hard to catch.
 She is not on our planet!
 I remember Billy and her being interviewed before he ran for president, a reporter asked Bill his reason for running, they both replied in unison," Why the power of course". I tried to dig this up but with no success.
 Psychos, clever ones must practice acting with human traits, feeling, emotions, humanity...
This creatures act is transparent.  She is a true nutter..
 These types of subhuman organisms would eat raw human fetus if it was prerequisite to obtain power, to enter the inner circle. They have no conscience or true human feelings.
 When the elites sniffed em out and sent an invitation, they grabbed the ole suk straw.

 
  
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: BlackRoses on February 21, 2014, 08:13:38 pm
Psychopaths, the clever, ones are hard to catch.
 She is not on our planet!
 I remember Billy and her being interviewed before he ran for president, a reporter asked Bill his reason for running, they both replied in unison," Why the power of course". I tried to dig this up but with no success.
 Psychos, clever ones must practice acting with human traits, feeling, emotions, humanity...
This creatures act is transparent.  She is a true nutter..
 These types of subhuman organisms would eat raw human fetus if it was prerequisite to obtain power, to enter the inner circle. They have no conscience or true human feelings.
 When the elites sniffed em out and sent an invitation, they grabbed the ole suk straw.

 
  
 



And I think this is something that trips people up. I get the feeling most people think psychopaths are stupid people...oh, they'll get caught and they'll either end up in jail, in an insane asylum, or dead. They never stop to think of the people smart enough to climb the ladder and get into power positions.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on February 22, 2014, 08:51:11 am

And I think this is something that trips people up. I get the feeling most people think psychopaths are stupid people...oh, they'll get caught and they'll either end up in jail, in an insane asylum, or dead. They never stop to think of the people smart enough to climb the ladder and get into power positions.
            Yup, most folks have the idea psychos are simply the nutters on a kill spree or hiding in dark alleys,deformed humans babbling to themselves.
            In evidence, Hitler, Mao, Genghis Khan, Stalin," genocide artists" Positions of power over others is irresistible to these clever LIL nutters.
  Hillarys hall of fame quote         " WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE"..            BENGHAZI.
       
           
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on February 22, 2014, 10:27:15 am




Looks to me like smart money is going to
Susana Martinez, the Govenor of my State
of New Mexico. She may be new to you, but
she is pretty strong … and likable … and younger
than Hilldog … and the first Hispanic woman ever
elected governor of a State. I don't agree with
her on everything … however, it was a strong
stance on securing our borders that helped get
her elected.


(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/t1largsusana-martinez-newt1larg-1.jpg)

WIKIPEDIA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susana_Martinez (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susana_Martinez)

Polling and opinion

Martinez has one of the highest approval rating of current governors in the United States. Her approval ratings have not dropped below 60% in her tenure as governor. In an April 2012 edition of the Washington Post, Martinez was named 8th most popular governor in the United States.

As of May 2013, Martinez had an approval rating of 66%, with over 44% of Democrats in New Mexico stating they approve of her.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Susana Martinez: U.S. Overdue for Female President
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/11/04/susana_martinez_us_overdue_for_female_president_120566.html (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/11/04/susana_martinez_us_overdue_for_female_president_120566.html)

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on February 23, 2014, 03:45:54 am
Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters - Full



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOy6ZagodUE

BUMP ... Watched this video last night ... great video !

I went and watched it, and I was very disappointed. It came across to me as a Mainstream GOP hit piece.

What I thought it would do, was to detail MENA, Little Rock, Barry Seal, CIA Cocaine operation. At the very least it could have discussed the Rose Law Firm and the "Development" fund that was used to give "loans" as bribes.

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Honor18 on February 23, 2014, 07:45:26 am
I liked it because it was a reminder of past issues ..... her and her hubby have had so many you tend to forget them ... kind of like Ovimit and his crew ... think it should be pushed for the next year or two so when she runs and she will people will remember at least those of us that are paying attention ...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on February 23, 2014, 09:19:43 am
I liked it because it was a reminder of past issues ..... her and her hubby have had so many you tend to forget them ... kind of like Ovimit and his crew ... think it should be pushed for the next year or two so when she runs and she will people will remember at least those of us that are paying attention ...

Have you seen "The Clinton Chronicles"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLnZwwYlYP0
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Honor18 on February 23, 2014, 09:44:21 am
No I have not seen it but I will watch this afternoon after I get off of work ... Thanks !
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on February 23, 2014, 09:50:44 am
No I have not seen it but I will watch this afternoon after I get off of work ... Thanks !

The other one worth having a glance is "The Mena Connection"
Clinton oversaw the smuggling of TONS of Cocaine into Mena, Arkansas !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJibpRgRaUg

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on February 23, 2014, 10:35:24 am
What really amazes me is how the Bush clan and the Clinton BS circus manage to fool so many people so much of the time
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Honor18 on February 23, 2014, 10:38:38 am

The other one worth having a glance is "The Mena Connection"
Clinton oversaw the smuggling of TONS of Cocaine into Mena, Arkansas !

Ill watch it as well .... I have read alot about this subject but have not seen this ... Thanks again !
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on February 23, 2014, 10:42:53 am
The Bush Death List
http://www.rense.com/general31/scont.htm

The Clinton Body Count
http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html

To lose one lawyer or intern may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness.



Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on February 23, 2014, 11:09:39 am
The point that continues to get lost is the fact that most if not all of this damning information about the Clintons has been circulating for nearly two decades, and yet, in practically every 2016 presidential election poll, Hilldog still continues to maintain a two-digit lead over our heroes -- our lords and saviours -- Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.

And the more I and others point out this fact, the more the response seems to be: "Well, I guess we better get even more reactionary on economics. Let's really start making those subhuman poor pay for the crimes of the super-rich!"   ::)

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Either tell the deflation (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojCqYcGMzps)-worshiping/IMF shock therapy (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=196128.120)-promoting/Rockefeller (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=192293.msg1433260#msg1433260)-financed Austrian School  (http://recoveringaustrians.wordpress.com/top-ten-austrian-economic-lies-and-mistakes/)to go Cheney (http://whitehouse.georgewbush.org/news/2004/062504.asp) itself, or get used to saying "President Hilldog."
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Wise_Old_Man on February 23, 2014, 12:13:12 pm
The point that continues to get lost is the fact that most if not all of this damning information about the Clintons has been circulating for nearly two decades, and yet, in practically every 2016 presidential election poll, Hilldog still continues to maintain a two-digit lead over our heroes -- our lords and saviours -- Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.

And the more I and others point out this fact, the more the response seems to be: "Well, I guess we better get even more reactionary on economics. Let's really start making those subhuman poor pay for the crimes of the super-rich!"   ::)

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Either tell the deflation (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojCqYcGMzps)-worshiping/IMF shock therapy (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=196128.120)-promoting/Rockefeller (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=192293.msg1433260#msg1433260)-financed Austrian School  (http://recoveringaustrians.wordpress.com/top-ten-austrian-economic-lies-and-mistakes/)to go Cheney (http://whitehouse.georgewbush.org/news/2004/062504.asp) itself, or get used to saying "President Hilldog."

Well said Geo - and very true that it is pretty evident that Hilldog will be the next President of the U.S. unless she pisses off her illuminati overlords for some reason.  The fact that she was leading in presidential "polls" months before even announcing that she would be running shows that the agenda has been set.  If the Bohemian Grove yearbook pictures prove anything, it's that the leadership for the next 20-50 years is already set in stone.  Just sit back, watch the show, and mind your own garden.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on February 23, 2014, 01:44:21 pm
Changing channels, many folks are tuned into " it can't happen here programing " , if a different reasoning should appear it is unacceptable they hit shutdown switch . The telly or ( one eyed monster) is the sole info a good portion of folks take in, that's it..          In short they don't want to know.
 It's safe to say they may secretly admire the folks that know the deal, but its in their best interests to ignore them.
 They may chat behind closed doors, OMG some of our citizens actually  know what's going on, thenlaughingly say they know and can't do anything about it,....Har,Har,Har....... belly laugh follows.
  SHilly is a power mongering psycho, that much is obvious to anyone who's head is not up their backside.
    Publicly stating Benghazi-"What difference does it make"..kinda sums up her mental state.
           
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on February 23, 2014, 01:57:09 pm
Chris as an outsider looking in .I would not trust Hilary as far as I could throw her as to what is a good candidate  against her apart from the usual 2 party BS  good luck with that
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 28, 2014, 01:49:53 pm
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/01/us/politics/bill-clinton-white-house-papers.html?hpw&rref=us&_r=0
Thousands of Clinton White House Papers Released
By PETER BAKER and AMY CHOZICKFEB. 28, 2014

WASHINGTON — The National Archives made public on Friday afternoon a trove of secret documents detailing the inner workings of Bill Clinton’s White House, a disclosure of acute interest not just to the history of one presidency but to the prospects of another.

Thirteen years after Mr. Clinton left office, the release of 3,000 to 4,000 pages of internal memos and other papers may shed light on decisions he made during a tumultuous time and, just as significantly if not more so, possibly the role his wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton, may have played in shaping them.

The documents are the first batch of a larger set of papers withheld until now under exceptions to public disclosure requirements in federal law, exceptions that expired a year ago. As Mrs. Clinton prepares for a possible second campaign for the presidency in 2016, friends and foes alike will pore over the documents for information that elaborates on her actions as first lady before she became a senator and then secretary of state.

Whether the papers will be especially revealing remains unclear.
...

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/01/us/politics/bill-clinton-white-house-papers.html?hpw&rref=us
...
The new papers, posted online by the William J. Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock, are part of a broader set of 33,000 pages that could be made public over the next two weeks. The announcement that the first installment would be released came after Politico reported this week on the delay in putting them out.
...

| - - - -

http://www.clintonlibrary.gov/formerlywithhelddocuments.html

Formerly Withheld Documents

Please find below documents that were previously withheld under the Presidential Records Act for restrictions P2 (appointment to federal office) and/or P5 (confidential advice between the President and/or his advisors and between those advisors). For more information concerning these collections please see the collection finding aids index. The finding aids detail the scope, content, and provide a box and folder title list for each collection



http://www.politico.com/story/2014/02/clinton-white-house-library-records-103959.html
The Clinton library's secret files
By JOSH GERSTEIN | 2/25/14

(http://images.politico.com/global/2013/08/15/130815-hillary-bill-clinton-ap-605.jpg)

A trove of Clinton White House records long processed for release remains hidden from public view at the Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock — even though the legal basis initially used to withhold them expired more than a year ago.

The papers contain confidential advice given to or sought by President Bill Clinton, including communications with then-first lady Hillary Clinton, and records about people considered for appointments to federal office.

...

Under the Presidential Records Act, such records can be withheld for up to 12 years after a president leaves office. However, at the 12-year mark, those broad restrictions fall away and the once-secret presidential papers are generally subject to disclosure. For the Clinton files, that milestone came and went in January 2013.

The long-sealed records pose a delicate series of choices for the Clintons, and even President Barack Obama. They could allow disclosure of the papers, fueling new stories about old controversies like Whitewater and pardons granted as the 42nd president left office in 2001. Or they could fight to keep some or all of the files secret, likely triggering a court battle and stoking concerns that the former president and his wife are unduly secretive.

Either way, it’s a potentially messy situation unfolding just as Hillary Clinton — widely considered a clear front-runner for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination — mulls over whether to make a second bid to return to the White House.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/02/clinton-white-house-library-records-103959.html#ixzz2ueEIg4h0


http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/28/rumors-persist-that-hillary-wont-run-because-health-is-worse-than-disclosed/
Whispers persist that Hillary won’t run: Health may be worse than disclosed

...
But in private, rumors persist that the former Secretary of State may not even be capable of making it to Iowa and New Hampshire. Clinton, these skeptics often say, will not run for president again because of health concerns.

...

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/02/hillary-clinton-papers-diane-blair-103367.html
‘Hillary papers’ reporter surprised

By NATALIE VILLACORTA | 2/11/14

The reporter who uncovered the archived documents belonging to Hillary Clinton’s friend Diane Blair said Tuesday that she was surprised to find what she did.

“I honestly didn’t expect to find too much in these archives,” Alana Goodman, staff writer for the Washington Free Beacon said on “Fox & Friends.” “Because they have been opened in 2010 and had not been written about so I assumed that, you know, maybe people went down and they hadn’t seen anything there. So I was actually pretty surprised to find what we did find.”
...

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/02/hillary-clinton-papers-diane-blair-103367.html#ixzz2ueFfwup7

| - - - - -

http://freebeacon.com/restricted-access/
Restricted Access

Clinton Foundation keeps tight leash on papers from Bill Clinton’s tenure as governor
February 17, 2014 5:00 am
BY:  Alana Goodman   

An extensive collection of papers related to Bill and Hillary Clinton’s years in the Arkansas governor’s mansion remains under tight control at a public library in Little Rock, with access restricted by the Clinton Foundation.

President Bill Clinton donated his papers from his tenure as Arkansas governor to the Central Arkansas Library System (CALS) in 2003, and they are housed at the Butler Center for Arkansas Studies in Little Rock.

The documents could provide new insight into the early chapter of the Clintons’ political careers, as reporters take a second look at Hillary Clinton’s past in light of the information contained in the public materials of the Diane Blair collection.
...

A CALS official told the Washington Free Beacon last month that any request to view the documents would have to be approved by Clinton Foundation board chairman Bruce Lindsey, a long-time adviser to Bill Clinton.

“Bruce [Lindsey] is going to want to know specifically what you want access to and why,” said CALS director Bobby Roberts. “Then he is going to contact us to see if we have anything. Only then will he consider giving you access.”

Roberts added, “The material is housed in hundreds of archival boxes which are closed to the public without the permission of the [Clinton] foundation.”
...
There are no personal Clinton family files in this collection, and, because she was not a member of his staff, my colleague tells me, there are no files related to Hillary Clinton’s work.”

However, CALS director Roberts told CBS in 2007 that there were at least 34 files related to Hillary Clinton in the collection.

During Bill Clinton’s tenure as governor, Hillary Clinton spearheaded his education reform initiative and led committees on rural health care and public education
...
The difficulty of accessing the papers has frustrated historians.

Professor Alan Marcus, head of the history department at Mississippi State University, said he spent four or five years trying to get access to a small collection of papers related to a retreat that Bill and Hillary Clinton attended annually in Hilton Head, S.C.

Marcus said he was told a team of lawyers from the Clinton Foundation would have to vet the documents before they would grant him access. However, the attorneys never showed up at the archive, and Marcus was forced to abandon the project after years of waiting.
...
Sabato said both the issues raised by the Blair papers and also the opaqueness of Clinton’s gubernatorial records “point to one of the downsides of the Clintons’ 40 year public office trek.”

“The written record is voluminous, and the public record is already full of controversies. All of this comes back in another presidential campaign,” he said
Title: Clinton’s Top Career Negative Seen as Benghazi, Pew Poll Shows
Post by: Letsbereal on March 05, 2014, 02:22:35 am
Clinton’s Top Career Negative Seen as Benghazi, Pew Poll Shows
5 March 2014
, by Julie Bykowicz (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2014-03-04/benghazi-seen-as-clinton-s-top-career-negative-pew-poll-shows.html

Americans cited “Benghazi” as the most glaring negative on former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s political resume, while more than two-thirds approved of her performance as America’s top diplomat, a poll shows.

15% of those surveyed identified the Sept. 11, 2012, killing of four Americans at a U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya, when asked to name the worst thing about the career of Clinton, a possible 2016 Democratic presidential candidate, according to the Pew Research Center/USA Today poll released yesterday.

“Bill Clinton/husband’s affair” came in at No. 2, with 9% of respondents choosing that as her top negative. 18% answered “nothing.”

Republicans have criticized the Obama administration’s reaction to Benghazi -- at first erroneously saying it was a spontaneous assault rather than a planned terrorist attack -- in a series of congressional hearings.

They’ve also found fault with Clinton’s response at one of those hearings: “What difference at this point does it make?” she asked about whether the attack was planned or spontaneous.

The poll found that fewer people view Clinton’s gender as a negative than in 2008, when she lost the Democratic presidential nomination to Barack Obama.

In January 2008, 35% of those polled said being a woman hurt her, while 20% now say it would harm her presidential aspirations.

More than half of respondents said they’d like her to run for president in 2016, including 76% of Democrats and 26% of Republicans.

Among independents, 45% said they’d like her to run and 48% said they wouldn’t.

Clinton, who retired last year as secretary of state, has said she will make her decision on 2016 later this year.

Democrats and Republicans alike view her as “tough,” according to the poll.

In all, 67% of Americans approve of the job she did in that position.

The poll of 1,002 adults ages 18 and older and living in the U.S. was conducted Feb. 27-March 2 in telephone interviews.

It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 13, 2014, 12:50:34 pm
They drank the roundup glyphosate

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/03/hillary-clinton-iowa-gop-2016-election-poll-104621.html
Poll: Hillary Clinton trounces GOP in Iowa
By NATALIE VILLACORTA | 3/13/14 7:44 AM EDT

Hillary Clinton leads New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and other Republican presidential contenders in Iowa by double digits, according to a new poll.

Forty-eight percent of Iowan voters support Clinton compared to 35 percent for Christie, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Thursday. That’s a reversal of December’s poll in which Christie topped Clinton 45 percent to 40 percent.

The former secretary of state also leads Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul 49 percent to 39 percent, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz 51 percent to 35 percent and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush 51 percent to 37 percent.
...
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/03/hillary-clinton-iowa-gop-2016-election-poll-104621.html#ixzz2vrljIBy8

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glyphosate
Glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine) is a broad-spectrum systemic herbicide used to kill weeds, especially annual broadleaf weeds and grasses known to compete with commercial crops grown around the globe. It was discovered to be a herbicide by Monsanto chemist John E. Franz in 1970.[3] Monsanto brought it to market in the 1970s under the trade name "Roundup", and Monsanto's last commercially relevant United States patent expired in 2000.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Letsbereal on April 09, 2014, 08:14:50 am
Hillary Clinton Considering Future Plans https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TMrsk-3mzM

23 March 2014, AssociatedPress
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Letsbereal on April 09, 2014, 08:18:05 am
Clinton Says She’s ‘Thinking About’ Presidential Run
9 April 2014
, by Alison Vekshin (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2014-04-08/clinton-says-she-s-thinking-about-presidential-run.html

Hillary Clinton, an early front-runner in the 2016 U.S. presidential race, said that though she’s contemplating seeking the White House, she won’t make a decision soon.

“I am thinking about it,” Clinton, a Democrat and former U.S. secretary of state, said yesterday in a question-and-answer session following a speech at a conference in San Francisco.

“I’m not going to make a decision for a while because I’m actually enjoying my life.”

Clinton, drawing upon her stint as America’s top diplomat, also told her audience that Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin is “a tough guy with a thin skin” who is trying to rebuild his country’s empire.

She called his annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea region “illegal” and a violation of international law.

“I have had my personal experiences with him,” said Clinton, who retired early last year as secretary of state.

“He is very difficult to read personally, and he is always looking for advantage.

So he will try to put you ill-at-ease. He will even throw an insult your way. He will look bored and dismissive.”

The global economic market is doing its part to rein in Putin, she said at the event hosted by Marketo Inc. (MKTO), a San Mateo, California-based provider of digital marketing software.

“The flood of money out of Russia in the last several months has been astonishing, and I hope it continues,” said Clinton, a former U.S. senator representing New York whose husband served as president from 1993 to 2001.

“That is the best way to undermine the oligarchs who support him, undermine his own economic interests.”

Social Media

Clinton called social media “an important, essential catalyst for organization and action,” citing its use by activists during the January 2011 rebellion that ousted former President Hosni Mubarak in Egypt and in other uprisings in the Middle East known as the Arab Spring.

Still, recalling a meeting with the social-media drivers of that effort soon after the revolt, she said they didn’t have a vision for what to do next.

“There is no doubt that social media, in and of itself, has an enormous transformative effect, but that can’t be the end of the story,” she said.

“Or you leave that to people who can care less about Twitter; they care about power and they intend to exercise it and take advantage of everybody else.”

At the State Department, Clinton encouraged embassies to use websites run by Twitter Inc. (TWTR) and Facebook Inc. (FB)

Immigration Debate

Clinton said she was sorry that a push led by President Barack Obama’s administration to revise immigration policy has failed to advance in Congress.

The technology industry has been advocating for more visas for skilled immigrant workers.

Facebook Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg last year announced the formation of an advocacy group, Fwd.us, and has met with lawmakers on Capitol Hill to press the effort.

“I’m disappointed that it’s still a contentious issue,” Clinton said of the overall immigration debate.

“It’s essential to keep focused on the visa issue because that’s a discreet problem that, even though I’d like to see it be part of an overall comprehensive reform, you have to keep pushing to open the aperture.”

Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, a Republican who is also considering a run for president, this week urged lawmakers to avoid “harsh political rhetoric” in discussing immigration, saying many undocumented workers who enter the U.S. are seeking to provide for their families in an “act of love.”

‘Hard Questions’

Clinton has said previously she will make her decision on a 2016 run later this year.

She lost the Democratic presidential nomination to Obama in 2008.

“The hard questions are not: ‘Do you want to be president?

Can you win?,’” she said at yesterday’s conference.

“The hard questions are: ‘Why would you want to do this and what can you offer that could make a difference?’”

In an average of polls taken in March complied by the RealClearPolitics website, Clinton was the runaway preference for the Democratic presidential nomination, with 65% backing.

Vice President Joe Biden was a distant second, with 12% support.

“I’m actually having fun doing ordinary things like seeing my friends and going on long walks and playing with our dogs,” said Clinton, 66.


Hitlary Clinton will be elected, the elections will be rigged and she will unleash WOIII.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Letsbereal on April 09, 2014, 09:52:07 am
Clinton Machine

Ready for Hillary had raised more than $4 million by the end of 2013, including a check from billionaire financier George Soros, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission.

Another big-money group, Priorities USA Action, is packing its board and staff with former Clinton hands such as Hollywood liaison Andy Spahn.

Clinton also has a traditional donor network, having raised $230 million for her 2008 Democratic primary race against President Barack Obama.

FROM: Donors Idle as Jeb Bush Mulls 2016 Risking ‘7 Dwarfs’ http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2014-04-09/donors-idle-as-jeb-bush-mulls-2016-risking-7-dwarfs-.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 09, 2014, 10:44:21 am
This was from last year - but isn't it interesting ...

http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/jeb-bush-helps-honor-hillary-clinton-but-keeps-a-safe-distance/2141103

Tuesday, September 10, 2013 8:52pm

(http://www.tampabay.com/resources/images/blogs-photo/rendered/2013/09/bushclinton_8col.jpg)
Jeb Bush speaking at National Constitution Center Liberty Medal ceremony honoring Hillary Clinton

WASHINGTON — Jeb Bush tried to seem bemused Tuesday evening as he helped present a public service award to Hillary Clinton. “I’m not sure what people expect will happen here tonight,” he said.

...
Hillary and I come from different political parties, and we disagree about lots of things, but we agree on the wisdom of the American people — especially those in Iowa and New Hampshire and South Carolina,” the former Florida Republican governor joked, referring to the states he and Clinton would compete in if they enter the 2016 presidential race.

Clinton was honored with the National Constitution Center’s Liberty Medal for her public service and ongoing advocacy efforts on behalf of women. “We are drawn here today by a common purpose,” Bush said, going on to extoll the values of the Constitution.

...

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/jeb-bush-keeps-distance-in-awarding-hillary-clinton-the-liberty-medal/2141102

Hillary Clinton the Liberty Medal

...
Bush, already under fire for his advocacy of the Common Core education standards, was cordial toward Clinton, but his speech avoided talking about her career
...
Even as Bush seemed to brush off criticism, he never got too close to Clinton, denying a photo of them side-by-side that would surely be used against him in a future campaign.
...
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: jofortruth on April 09, 2014, 02:04:00 pm
HAVE YOU EVER ASKED YOURSELF WHY ONLY BUSH AND CLINTON FAMILY MEMBERS GET TO RUN THE WHITE HOUSE AND OTHER TOP GOVT JOBS FOR DECADES? THEY FRONT FOR THE GLOBALISTS WHO ARE TAKING YOUR COUNTRY AWAY FROM YOU. IDIOTS!

THAT SHOULD TELL YOU SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG. THESE FAMILIES THINK THEY ARE KINGS AND QUEENS AND OWN THE WHITE HOUSE. THEY DO NOT REPRESENT YOU! THEY WORK FOR AND ARE FUNDED BY THE GLOBALISTS INVOKING THEIR AGENDAS! IS THAT NOT OBVIOUS YET?

ANYONE WHO EVER VOTES FOR ANYONE FROM EITHER THE BUSH FAMILY OR THE CLINTON FAMILY (HAVE YOU NOTICED THAT JEB BUSH AND HILLARY CLINTON ARE RUNNING FOR OFFICE? YEP MORE BUSHES AND CLINTONS THINK THEY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO RUN FOR OFFICE AGAIN) IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT WHO LOVES TO BE THEIR SLAVE!

IT IS ON THE WATCH OF BUSH, CLINTONS (AND THEIR OTHER GLOBALIST MINION BUDDIES IN BOTH PARTIES WHO HAVE REIGNED FOR DECADES) THAT AMERICA IS AT THE PRECIPICE OF DESTRUCTION.  WOULD YOU BE SO FOOLISH AS TO VOTE FOR ANY OF THEM EVER AGAIN WHEN UNDER THEIR WATCH THIS HAS HAPPENED?

AMERICA HAS 300+ MILLION PEOPLE AND ONLY TWO FAMILIES GET TO RULE CONTINUALLY? THAT IS A DICTATORSHIP, MONARCHY, WHATEVER. IT IS NOT A FREE COUNTRY. CERTAINLY THERE IS SOMEONE ELSE ACTUALLY QUALIFIED FOR OFFICE WHO ISN'T A LAME ASS MINION OF THE GLOBALISTS. TIME TO PUT SOMEONE INTO OFFICE WITH SOME REAL AMERICAN BLOOD WHO HAS INTELLIGENCE AND INTEGRITY. ENOUGH WITH THESE GLOBALIST MINION LOSERS WHO LIE AND DECEIVE INCESSANTLY!



 ::)

DO NOT EVER AGAIN VOTE FOR A BUSH OR CLINTON (THANK GOD OBAMA HAS YOUNG CHILDREN WHO CAN'T RUN FOR OFFICE) FAMILY MEMBER! AMERICA IS A REPUBLIC, IT IS NOT A DICTATORSHIP OR MONARCHY! DO NOT EVER AGAIN VOTE FOR ANY OF THEIR OTHER FRIENDS WHO ALWAYS GET ON THE BALLOTS BECAUSE THEY ARE OWNED ALSO. TIME TO RAISE UP REAL AMERICANS FOR OFFICE AND KICK THESE JACKASSES OUT OF CONTROL OF WASHINGTON. ENOUGH!
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Letsbereal on April 09, 2014, 03:15:50 pm
Inequality may encourage vote for Democrats - Republican districts show less divergence in incomes
9 April 2014
, by Darrell Delamaide - Washington (MarketWatch)
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/inequality-may-encourage-vote-for-democrats-2014-04-09

A new analysis of congressional district demographics lets the “Gini” out of the bottle, so to speak, and attempts to explain why Democrats are harping on income inequality.

Also read these MarketWatch stories:

Is Hillary Clinton liberal enough? http://www.marketwatch.com/story/is-hillary-clinton-liberal-enough-2014-03-26

Governors buck red state, blue state labels http://www.marketwatch.com/story/governors-buck-red-state-blue-state-labels-2014-02-26


Hitlary Clinton will be elected, the elections will be rigged and she will unleash WOIII.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: chris jones on April 09, 2014, 07:07:27 pm
 LIL Hillary has been barnstorming- making speaching engagements, earned about a million $$$$$$$$ so far.
 Testing the waters Hillary?
                                     God have mercy on humanity.
 
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Catalina on April 09, 2014, 07:13:38 pm
The fix is in on another rigged election coming 2016!  >:(
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Highland on April 10, 2014, 09:22:17 am
This is why people should move to third party such as the constitution party. Republicans are going to be sure losers for various reasons. Republicans have been promising small government and less tax for 50 years. Not gonna happen.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: JohnBFTOR on April 10, 2014, 10:47:31 am
Americans should hit the street in mass if another Clibton / Bush becomes president OR even vice-president.

Builderberg in 2008 (a totally foreign group of gangsters) promised Hillary that they would pull out ALL the stops in 2016 if she would be a good little minion and wait for O'bummer to wreck the country.

The majority of people in the is country do NOT want to see Hillary or another Bush in charge.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: chris jones on April 10, 2014, 03:37:00 pm
Hillary...............Hitler in drag.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: iamc2 on April 10, 2014, 06:31:07 pm
Hillary...............Hitler in drag.
Hitler looked better in a Drag--than Hilary/or/Mike O'Bumbles--- ???
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: jofortruth on April 10, 2014, 07:41:50 pm
Shoe Thrown at Hillary during speech:
http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2014/04/10/object-thrown-at-hillary-woman-apprehended/


You see it's a crime to throw a shoe at a deceitful politician, but not a crime for a deceitful politician to screw the American people and commit treason!  ::)


Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Letsbereal on April 10, 2014, 08:27:00 pm
Shoe Thrown at Hillary during speech:
http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2014/04/10/object-thrown-at-hillary-woman-apprehended/


You see it's a crime to throw a shoe at a deceitful politician, but not a crime for a deceitful politician to screw the American people and commit treason!  ::)

Shoe thrown at Hillary Clinton during Las Vegas speech
10 April 2014
, Las Vegas (Associated Press - Guardian)   
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/10/hillary-clinton-las-vegas-shoe-thrown

Woman taken into custody after throwing what she described as a shoe moments after Clinton took the stage

A woman was taken into custody after throwing what she described as a shoe at HillaryClinton during a Las Vegas speech.

The incident happened moments after Clinton took the stage Thursday at an Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries meeting at the Mandalay Bay hotel-casino.

Clinton ducked but did not appear to be hit by the object, and then joked about the incident.

Security ushered out a woman who said she threw a shoe but didn't identify herself to reporters or explain the action.

Authorities said the woman would be arrested.

The former US secretary of state and Democratic senator from New York has been traveling the country giving paid speeches to industry organizations and appearing before key Democratic Party constituents.
Title: Shoe thrown at Hillary Clinton during Las Vegas speech (VIDEO)
Post by: Optimus on April 11, 2014, 07:53:48 am
Shoe thrown at Hillary Clinton during Las Vegas speech (VIDEO)

http://rt.com/usa/hillary-shoe-thrown-speech-764/

Published time: April 10, 2014 23:41
Edited time: April 11, 2014 11:17

Former US Secretary of State was nearly hit by a shoe during a speech in Las Vegas Thursday, dodging the object at the last second as an usher escorted a young woman from the audience.

Clinton had only been on the stage at an Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries meeting near the Mandalay Bay hotel and casino for moments when an object flew toward her from the crowd. Clinton, also a former New York State senator and First Lady, stepped out of its path and joked, “good thing she didn’t play softball like I did,” as quoted by the Associated Press.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QPhtJcn_mR4

The young woman was not identified, although security personnel at Mandalay Bay told reporters the police had been called and she would likely be arrested.

Considered likely to run as the Democratic candidate for president in 2016, Clinton is touring the country and delivering a series of speeches while at work on a book about her time in the State Department, a term that stretched across the first four years of the Obama administration. She appeared at the Las Vegas conference alongside Steve Wozniak, an Apple co-founder.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on April 11, 2014, 08:23:13 am
Tragically we have lost a great politically motivated cobbler and all we have to show for it is the TSA.   :D

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Richard_reid_1.jpg/230px-Richard_reid_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jofortruth on April 11, 2014, 11:21:48 am
Hill Dog Cancels Appearance where Benghazi Victims Mom Protesters Present (See how these people are,  who call themselves our leaders? They can't face the music. Will not engage with REAL AMERICANS because they are cowards! They prefer the ignorant fawning public at their speechs so they feel like rockstars! America needs REAL LEADERS IN WASHINGTON. These high and mighty lying cowards need to go and never be allowed to serve the public ever again because they don't know what SERVE means unless it's serving the Globalists scumbags.)
http://cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/barbara-boland/hillary-clinton-cancels-appearance-where-benghazi-victims-mom-protestors#sthash.w1b9htak.dpuf

 ::)
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Letsbereal on April 11, 2014, 04:44:50 pm
Strange things happening in DC. lately according to the hysterical reporters.

Hillary Clinton Dodges Shoe Pitch Protest: Watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDm7lDMmucs

They hysterical try to laugh it off. And then this metrosexual with his little homoprop, coughing it up like a little baby “It could have hurt her, It could have hurt her”.

Come on let’s be real! Hurt - Mr.Chow https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDxQTpRVmxM
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Due_Process_NonNegotiable on April 11, 2014, 05:00:25 pm
All these stories about "this politician is a front runner, that politician is a front runner" is nothing more than fluff to give the sheep the idea that they have choice.  The next puppet president has already been chosen. 
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: BlackRoses on April 11, 2014, 07:00:56 pm
Strange things happening in DC. lately according to the hysterical reporters.

Hillary Clinton Dodges Shoe Pitch Protest: Watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDm7lDMmucs

They hysterical try to laugh it off. And then this metrosexual with his little homoprop, coughing it up like a little baby “It could have hurt her, It could have hurt her”.

Come on let’s be real! Hurt - Mr.Chow https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDxQTpRVmxM

Let's see what the differences are. Okay, I think the Repubs and Dems are all scum so don't think I'm defending anybody. I seem to recall Bush had shoes thrown at him. Were the ones concerned about Hilary, wanting the thrower to have her hands chopped off* thinking the same about the thrower in Bush's situation? Did we have concern or was it a huge 'lmfao, somebody just threw shoes at Bush! What a shame they missed.' I think I know my answer. People need to break away from thinking the *hit coming out of their side doesn't stink. Let's not act like groupies.

*I was on another website and saw somebody make that comment.

All these stories about "this politician is a front runner, that politician is a front runner" is nothing more than fluff to give the sheep the idea that they have choice.  The next puppet president has already been chosen. 

Of course. You nailed it.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: chris jones on April 11, 2014, 07:36:27 pm
 We have been run by a criminal element for decades, the military has been used like attack dogs for the elite and the supercorps, one nation infiltrated after another.
  OK, Hillary' and Billy's past if exposed  would put them in the clink or lynched.
  Our gov has turned into a offensive machine we being the pawns in their game.
Your guys are right, the rhetoric is definetly their ploy to convince the public, she is the one.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Al Bundy on April 12, 2014, 10:59:29 am
And future US president get a shoe  ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npR2WujY-Bchttp://
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: Geniocrat on April 12, 2014, 03:31:34 pm
Hillary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
2 October 2013
, by Roger Runningen (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2013-10-02/hillary-clinton-tops-in-2016-race-would-topple-top-republicans.html

Hillary Clinton has the most support of any potential Democratic candidate for the 2016 presidential sweepstakes and would defeat any of three Republican candidates tested in a poll released today.

The former secretary of state, 65, has the support of 61 percent of Democrats, according to the Quinnipiac University national poll.

In the Democratic field, Clinton tops Vice President Joseph Biden 61% to 11%, with 7% favoring U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and 2% supporting New York Governor Andrew Cuomo.

“As she watches the hand-to-hand political combat in Washington, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton remains above the fray and the queen of the 2016 mountain,” said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.

Asked about the Republican field, 17% of those polled said they’d support Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, 13% were for New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, 12% backed Senator Marco Rubio of Florida and 11% said they’d support former Florida Governor Jeb Bush.

Senator Ted Cruz of Texas and Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin each had 10%.

In a head-to-head contest against Republicans, Clinton would defeat Christie 49% to 36%, Paul 53% to 36%, and Cruz 54% to 31%.

The survey conducted among 1,497 registered voters between Sept. 23-29 has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5%.


LOlz


Ha ha funny....

Now let's elect a real patriot like Jesse Ventura and get the Globalists out of government.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: chris jones on April 12, 2014, 06:17:19 pm
 JV is an horable man and true American. I can't think of a better guy to take on the elites, the deal is he will need a lot of backup, it will not be an easy quest.   
Title: It's Not Hitlary, It's Boeing 2016
Post by: Letsbereal on April 17, 2014, 12:03:54 am
It's Not Hillary, It's Boeing 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDfsugMELu8

15 April 2014, RT America

This week the Washington Post reports on the close ties between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the world's second largest defense contractor, Boeing.

With allies already in Congress and the White House, Boeing has stretched its influence to the State Department as well.

With Hillary Clinton preparing for a possible presidential run in 2016, it might be Boeing that benefits the most. RT's Sam Sacks reports.
Title: “Hitlary For President” Fundraiser Busted For Illegal Campaign Contributions
Post by: Letsbereal on April 18, 2014, 03:08:34 pm
“Hillary For President” Fundraiser Busted For Illegal Campaign Contributions
17 April 2014
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-04-17/hillary-president-fundraiser-busted-illegal-campaign-contributions
Title: Hitlary Clinton’s Memoir Will Be Called ‘Hard Choices’
Post by: Letsbereal on April 20, 2014, 02:48:00 am
Hillary Clinton’s Memoir Will Be Called ‘Hard Choices’
18 April 2014
, by Jonathan Allen (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2014-04-18/hillary-clinton-s-memoir-will-be-called-hard-choices-.html
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton’s Memoir Will Be Called ‘Hard Choices’
Post by: chris jones on April 20, 2014, 03:39:31 pm
Hillary Clinton’s Memoir Will Be Called ‘Hard Choices’
18 April 2014
, by Jonathan Allen (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2014-04-18/hillary-clinton-s-memoir-will-be-called-hard-choices-.html

LIL Hillary, choices OK " What difference does it make" hall of fame.
Title: An Open Letter to the Tea Party
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 22, 2014, 10:40:46 am
An Open Letter to the Tea Party

["Open Letter" because it seems self-labeled "tea partiers" can't even agree on what the "real" Tea Party is, and because we, consequently, don't even know what mailing address to send it to.]

The Democratic Party
April 22, 2014

We are pleased to see that, despite a six-year low in approval ratings (http://www.politico.com/story/2014/04/hillary-clinton-favorability-fox-poll-105816.html), Hillary Clinton continues to lead both Rand Paul and Ted Cruz in -- not some, not most -- but all presidential election polls (see this (http://www.pollingreport.com/wh16gen.htm) and this (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/)).

Half a decade ago Webster Tarpley -- author of those two blasphemous books, Obama: The Postmodern Coup and Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography -- tried to warn conservatives and libertarians against giving pro-war/pro-police state/pro-Wall Street Democrats "left cover":

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZdHEkm7DoY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZdHEkm7DoY)

Since Dr. Tarpley did so shortly after The Obama Deception (in which he was featured) had gone viral on the Internet, we must confess we were a bit nervous at the time that many of you might actually take his advice to heart and change your policy agenda and election strategies accordingly.

Fortunately, and thanks in large part to the Rockefeller (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=192293.msg1433260#msg1433260)-financed Austrian School (http://recoveringaustrians.wordpress.com/top-ten-austrian-economic-lies-and-mistakes/), our fears went completely unrealized.

And for that we sincerely thank all of you.

Now to the future.

The 2014 mid-term election (http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/t7dgqe/daily-show-rock----mid-term-elections) is only 28 weeks away.  And since many of our candidates have become so unpopular, we are counting on you to continue providing us convenient foil against which to define ourselves in the eyes of the bottom "47 percent (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/mitt-romney-47-percent/)."

And here is how we respectfully request -- no, order you -- to do so.

First and foremost, since we (establishment Democrats) are all puppets of Wall Street mega-banks, you will not embarrass us politically by promoting the NEED Act:

--  http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.2990.IH: (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.2990.IH:)

--  http://www.monetary.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/HR-2990.pdf (http://www.monetary.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/HR-2990.pdf)

--  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-zarlenga/sequesters-shutdowns-and-_b_4086071.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-zarlenga/sequesters-shutdowns-and-_b_4086071.html)

Since our lord and savior, Barack Obama, has not only perpetuated all of George Bush's police state expansion measures, but implemented new ones of his own, you will not embarrass us by promoting either of the following two bills...

The American Freedom Agenda Act

-- http://antiwar.com/paul/?articleid=11790 (http://antiwar.com/paul/?articleid=11790)

-- http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20071026194436401 (http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20071026194436401)

-- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/finally-action-ron-paul-i_b_69042.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/finally-action-ron-paul-i_b_69042.html)

The Surveillance State Repeal Act

-- https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr2818/text (https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr2818/text)

-- http://news.antiwar.com/2013/07/25/rep-holt-introduces-surveillance-state-repeal-act/ (http://news.antiwar.com/2013/07/25/rep-holt-introduces-surveillance-state-repeal-act/)

Since we support "freedom of speech" only when we happen to agree with whatever is being spoken or written, you will not embarrass us by promoting the Internet Freedom Preservation Act:

-- http://www.freepress.net/release/336 (http://www.freepress.net/release/336)

-- http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.5353: (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.5353:)

Since our lord and savior, Barack Obama, put a Monsanto lobbyist in charge of "food safety," (http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-puts-monsanto-lobbyist-in-charge-of-food-safety.html) you will not embarrass us by promoting the Genetically Engineered Food Right to Know Act:

-- https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr3553 (https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr3553)

-- http://www.progress.org/tpr/genetically-engineered-food-right-to-know-act-2/ (http://www.progress.org/tpr/genetically-engineered-food-right-to-know-act-2/)

-- http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis-rand-pauls-response-to-gmo-labeling-and-the-proper-role-of-limited-government.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis-rand-pauls-response-to-gmo-labeling-and-the-proper-role-of-limited-government.html)

Since liberal or left-leaning opponents of the drug war and prison-industrial complex have gotten precisely the opposite of what they naively assumed they were voting for when they voted for our lord and savior, Barack Obama, you will not embarrass us by promoting the Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act:

-- http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.2306: (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.2306:)

-- http://norml.org/component/zoo/category/end-federal-marijuana-prohibition (http://norml.org/component/zoo/category/end-federal-marijuana-prohibition)

And last but not least, since we have historically relied (http://www.powells.com/biblio/1-9780786718436-5) upon rigged elections as much as Republicans have, you will not embarrass us by promoting any of the following three bills...

The Paper Ballot Act

-- http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.6200: (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.6200:)

-- http://www.petitiononline.com/hndcount/petition.html (http://www.petitiononline.com/hndcount/petition.html)

-- http://www.votersunite.org/takeaction/handcounted.asp (http://www.votersunite.org/takeaction/handcounted.asp)

-- http://hackingdemocracy.com (http://hackingdemocracy.com)

The Voter Freedom Act

-- http://archive.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul194.html (http://archive.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul194.html)

-- http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hr3600ih/pdf/BILLS-110hr3600ih.pdf (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hr3600ih/pdf/BILLS-110hr3600ih.pdf)

The Freedom Debate Act

-- http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:H.R.2478.IH: (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:H.R.2478.IH:)


Now get out there and give us some left cover, slaves!

We know you're way too ideologically brainwashed not to.


Your loving and affection masters, the banker-owned (http://www.infowars.com/top-senate-democrat-bankers-own-the-us-congress/) Democratic Party
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: attietewd on April 22, 2014, 12:27:05 pm
The only people who are actively picking sides and supporting either side with zeal, whether it be "tea partiers" or change.gov ARE SO ASLEEP THEY WOULDN'T KNOW THE TRUTH IF IT HIT THEM IN THE FACE!  Why do you fill up the boards with this left-right crap.  Who cares about the tea party?  Who cares about the Change we got coming from the left?  Our government has been hi-jacked....if it ever really was our government.  Both sides right now are hell bent on destroying life the way we knew it.  When the SHTF will anyone be loyal to either side if they are starving, homeless and a slave?
Title: Hillary Clinton Wipes Boogers on Child
Post by: Letsbereal on April 22, 2014, 03:31:31 pm
Hillary Clinton Wipes Boogers on Child https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcKfmW7qVHg
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 23, 2014, 08:02:03 am
Why do you fill up the boards with this left-right crap.

Because you can't expose false paradigms for the intellectual prisons they really are unless you talk about them.

That's why.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=256369.0 (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=256369.0)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: BlackRoses on April 23, 2014, 07:48:45 pm
The only people who are actively picking sides and supporting either side with zeal, whether it be "tea partiers" or change.gov ARE SO ASLEEP THEY WOULDN'T KNOW THE TRUTH IF IT HIT THEM IN THE FACE!  Why do you fill up the boards with this left-right crap.  Who cares about the tea party?  Who cares about the Change we got coming from the left?  Our government has been hi-jacked....if it ever really was our government.  Both sides right now are hell bent on destroying life the way we knew it.  When the SHTF will anyone be loyal to either side if they are starving, homeless and a slave?

I think everybody on this forum knows they're all scum. But imagine the people that might be lurking  or have never visited this site that fall into this crack of "It's all Obama and the Dems fault!" or "It's still Bush and the Republicans fault." This is a prison that needs to be broken out of. Talking this stuff out is a way to maybe end the "sports team mentality". That's the way I look at it. A lot of people look at this stuff being played out, they never take a look at all the players involved. They boo at the away team, root for the home team. No matter what the home team does.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: attietewd on April 23, 2014, 08:31:47 pm
Ok, I can agree with you, but I prefer this method: George Carlin, The Big Club

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5dBZDSSky0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5dBZDSSky0)

To each his own, as long as the message gets out there!
Title: Getting Ready for Hitlary Clinton in 2016 Costly Deal
Post by: Letsbereal on April 24, 2014, 01:51:30 am
Getting Ready for Hillary Clinton in 2016 Costly Deal
24 April 2014
, by John McCormick (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2014-04-24/getting-ready-for-hillary-clinton-in-2016-costly-deal.html

Excerpt:

Getting Ready for Hillary isn’t cheap.

The super political action committee by that name is averaging roughly $500,000 a month in expenses -- nearly as much as it’s bringing in -- as it builds a database of supporters and donors ahead of a possible 2016 presidential bid by the former U.S. secretary of state, senator from New York and first lady, disclosure records show.

Fundraising costs -- from online advertising to printing, from postage to airline flights and town car rentals -- are the group’s biggest expenses, generating revenue for selected vendors.

“We’re doing something different that has never been done before,” said Seth Bringman, the super-PAC’s spokesman. “We are looking to reinvest every dollar that comes in.”

Since Ready for Hillary has no plans to run television advertising like most super-PACs, Bringman says the group’s goal is to spend its money on a continuous basis as it creates the list of Clinton supporters ready for a potential White House run by her.

“We are not building up a bankroll,” he said. “There’s no need, unlike other super-PACs, to pile up resources.”

Without lifting a finger, Clinton already has the backing of an experienced fundraising team, veteran voter-turnout specialists from President Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign and endorsements by some of the biggest Democratic names.

Ready for Hillary, based in a Virginia suburb outside Washington, also has raised $5.7 million from about 55,000 donors since it was set up last year.

Those encouraging a Clinton presidential bid have created what amounts to the most robust campaign infrastructure so far among any of the Democrats who might run in 2016.


Getting Hitler to power also was costly but he gave us WOII which was priceless. Hitlary is going to give us WOIII.
Title: Re: Hillary Clinton Wipes Boogers on Child
Post by: iamc2 on April 24, 2014, 06:59:30 pm
Hillary Clinton Wipes Boogers on Child https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcKfmW7qVHg
The woman is a booger; and just watching her subtle move is like watching a snake strike: and to do this childish act on a child should show folks the depravity of her character.

 The woman is an evil loser.
Title: Hitlary Clinton Says Snowden "Helped Terrorists"
Post by: Letsbereal on April 25, 2014, 06:28:14 pm
Hillary Clinton Says Snowden "Helped Terrorists"
25 April 2014
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-04-25/hillary-clinton-says-snowden-helped-terrorists


IRS REVOKES TAX EXEMPT STATUS FOR CRITICIZING HILLARY & JOHN KERRY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNH6mhY23Rc

22 April 2014, KafkaWinstonWorld
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: jofortruth on April 25, 2014, 06:38:43 pm
Well, Hillary aided and abetted terrorists in Benghazi, and then lied about it, as did Obama! the same goes for all of the contrived and fomented wars! Washington is funding, aiding and abetting terrorists daily, on behalf of their globalist agendas! SO, FOR HILLARY TO BLAME SNOWDEN FOR ANYTHING IS OUTRAGEOUS AND HYPOCRITICAL!

So who are the real terrorists? Look no further than DC!

Anyone who backs a Clinton or another Bush for the presidency, needs their heads examined! ON THESE IDIOTS WATCH OVER DECADES, THE COUNTRY HAS FALLEN INTO TOTAL CHAOS AND THEY HAVE CREATED IT! IF YOU VOTE THESE TRAITORS BACK INTO OFFICE THEY WILL OVERSEE THE GRAND FINALE OF DESTROYING AMERICA FOR THEIR GLOBALIST AGENDA!

 >:(
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: decemberfellow on April 25, 2014, 07:52:23 pm
What the thread title says  I don't doubt one bit, unless someone comes along more suited for what the puppet masters need. (repub, demo, or 3rd)  If that happens  ol hillary will go down in flame and shame.
Title: Re: Hitlary Clinton Tops in 2016 Race, Would Topple Top Republicans
Post by: decemberfellow on April 25, 2014, 08:03:15 pm
Well, Hillary aided and abetted terrorists in Benghazi, and then lied about it, as did Obama! the same goes for all of the contrived and fomented wars! Washington is funding, aiding and abetting terrorists daily, on behalf of their globalist agendas! SO, FOR HILLARY TO BLAME SNOWDEN FOR ANYTHING IS OUTRAGEOUS AND HYPOCRITICAL!

So who are the real terrorists? Look no further than DC!

Anyone who backs a Clinton or another Bush for the presidency, needs their heads examined! ON THESE IDIOTS WATCH OVER DECADES, THE COUNTRY HAS FALLEN INTO TOTAL CHAOS AND THEY HAVE CREATED IT! IF YOU VOTE THESE TRAITORS BACK INTO OFFICE THEY WILL OVERSEE THE GRAND FINALE OF DESTROYING AMERICA FOR THEIR GLOBALIST AGENDA!

 >:(

Anyone who backs a Clinton or another Bush for the presidency, needs their heads examined! ON THESE IDIOTS WATCH OVER DECADES, THE COUNTRY HAS FALLEN INTO TOTAL CHAOS AND THEY HAVE CREATED IT! IF YOU VOTE THESE TRAITORS BACK INTO OFFICE THEY WILL OVERSEE THE GRAND FINALE OF DESTROYING AMERICA FOR THEIR GLOBALIST AGENDA!

I agree there, except that america won't be won back in the voting box,  ammo box maybe. 
Title: Bush Alumni Test Whether Family Name Is Liability in 2016
Post by: Letsbereal on April 28, 2014, 05:27:15 am
Bush Alumni Test Whether Family Name Is Liability in 2016
28 April 2014
, by Michael C. Bender (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2014-04-28/bush-alumni-test-whether-family-name-is-liability-in-2016.html

Excerpt:

As a key player in George W. Bush’s administration, Ed Gillespie was a vocal supporter of Bush’s unsuccessful plan to revamp U.S. immigration law.

Gillespie is taking a different stance this year when it comes to an immigration plan backed by the former president’s brother, Jeb Bush.

In campaigning for the U.S. Senate in Virginia, Gillespie has distanced himself from Bush’s plans for undocumented immigrants and for new education standards.

Gillespie, 52, is one of more than two dozen former Bush administration officials seeking state or federal offices this year in races from New York to Nebraska.

How they embrace the Bush brand -- running on it, or running away from it -- could be an early market test for Jeb Bush, now considering his own presidential campaign.

“That’s obviously the number one thing: Whether or not there is still Bush fatigue,” said Julian Zelizer, a Princeton University history professor and author of “The Presidency of George W. Bush: A First Historical Assessment.”

The family brand is one of Jeb Bush’s biggest assets and biggest liabilities, as the younger brother of George W. Bush and son of ex-President George H.W. Bush.

How voters react, following a Bush presidency marked by wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and growing federal budget deficits, may show how difficult the path to the Republican presidential nomination will be.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on May 03, 2014, 03:32:11 pm
Sucklings are lining up:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia on Saturday endorsed Hillary Clinton for president, even though the former secretary of state has not announced whether she will seek the White House in 2016.

Related Stories

Va. senator backs not-yet-2016 candidate Clinton Associated Press
Elizabeth Warren Hopes Hillary Clinton Makes 2016 Run But Declines to Endorse Her ABC News
Elizabeth Warren: Almost an endorsement of Hillary Clinton 2016 Christian Science Monitor

"Today I encouraged Hillary Clinton to run for president & pledged my support for her candidacy if she does," Kaine said in a tweet that linked to his remarks on www.readyforhillary.com, website of one of the most prominent pro-Clinton organizations.

"She understands the challenges facing Americans from all walks of life and has the compassion and skill necessary to help improve our everyday lives," Kaine, former governor of Virginia,

said in remarks prepared for the breakfast meeting, according to the website.
Title: Hitlary: 'Stay Tuned' on 2016 Run
Post by: Letsbereal on May 06, 2014, 12:38:12 pm
Hillary: 'Stay Tuned' on 2016 Run https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLkonjBhkpg

6 May 2014, AssociatedPress

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says she's still trying to decide if she's "ready" for a 2016 presidential run during a keynote speech at the National Council for Behavioral Health Conference on Monday.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on May 07, 2014, 11:42:54 am
Clinton felt the need to get the old cobwebs out of the way before the campaign ...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/05/06/_lynne_cheney_hillary_approved_monica_lewinsky_piece_to_get_the_story_out_of_the_way.html
Lynne Cheney: Hillary Approved Monica Lewinsky Piece To "Get The Story Out Of The Way"

LYNNE CHENEY: It's astonishing to me how this whole idea becomes distorted when it's about the Clintons. You're doing a section on Monica Lewinsky, I noticed, at the top of the show. I really wonder if this isn't an effort on the Clintons' part to get that story out of the way.

Would Vanity Fair publish anything about Monica Lewinsky that Hillary Clinton didn't want in Vanity Fair?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on May 10, 2014, 06:56:07 pm
Hi T.
         I agree with ya. They will also attempt to make Hillary appear to be a victim of the Benghazi deal (OMG she didn't know, faulty intell) and blame CIA in the entirety.
The agency could give a twit less, they are in the smoke, if they let a few heads roll, which I doubt, they will be guys on the shitttlist or will receive a golden parachute on the way out.
        Does the feild agent  on the inside use strictly bonifide CIA, no, a guy they refer to as controll can pick and choose contractors, handymen, Yup-expendable and the difference is they know it.
        Hillary/Billy/ friends & uppers are working hard ( the appearence) to put her on top, it won't work despite all their efforts, BUT not to worry they have other muppets on standby.
            " What difference does it make"        Quoted..
       
Title: Hitlary and Me - The 2008 campaign was a nightmare
Post by: Letsbereal on May 12, 2014, 01:33:38 pm
Hillary and Me - The 2008 campaign was a nightmare. Will 2016 be as bad?
May 2014
, by Glenn Thrush (Politico)
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/05/hillary-clinton-and-me-2008-campaign-106568.html
Title: Glenn Greenwald: "They'll Probably Have A Gay Person After Hitlary"
Post by: Letsbereal on May 13, 2014, 08:23:12 am
Glenn Greenwald On The 2016 Elections – "They'll Probably Have A Gay Person After Hillary"
12 May 2014
, by Mike Krieger (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-12/glenn-greenwald-2016-elections-%E2%80%93-theyll-probably-have-gay-person-after-hillary
Title: Boko Haram Worked for Hitlary Clinton
Post by: Letsbereal on May 13, 2014, 08:36:13 am
Boko Haram Worked for Hillary Clinton https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiwQCGk6qh8

13 May 2014, TheAlexJonesChannel
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on May 13, 2014, 08:48:08 am
Glenn Greenwald On The 2016 Elections – "They'll Probably Have A Gay Person After Hillary"
12 May 2014
, by Mike Krieger (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-12/glenn-greenwald-2016-elections-%E2%80%93-theyll-probably-have-gay-person-after-hillary


… let's give a couple quotes from that GREENWALD interview from GQ:

Quote
Now for my favorite part of the entire interview, where he just skewers the sham that is the American political process…

How do you feel about the early presidential jockeying?


Hillary is banal, corrupted, drained of vibrancy and passion. I mean, she’s been around forever, the Clinton circle. She’s a f**king hawk and like a neocon, practically. She’s surrounded by all these sleazy money types who are just corrupting everything everywhere. But she’s going to be the first female president, and women in America are going to be completely invested in her candidacy. Opposition to her is going to be depicted as misogynistic, like opposition to Obama has been depicted as racist. It’s going to be this completely symbolic messaging that’s going to overshadow the fact that she’ll do nothing but continue everything in pursuit of her own power. They’ll probably have a gay person after Hillary who’s just going to do the same thing.


The best part of the above statement is that, because he himself is openly gay, he can make such commentary without being labeled “homophobic.”

I hope this happens so badly, because I think it’ll be so instructive in that regard. It’ll prove the point. Americans love to mock the idea of monarchy, and yet we have our own de facto monarchy. I think what these leaks did is, they demonstrated that there really is this government that just is the kind of permanent government that doesn’t get affected by election choices and that isn’t in any way accountable to any sort of democratic transparency and just creates its own world off on its own.
As I and many others have pointed out before, there is a good chance 2016 will see Jeb Bush vs. Hilary Clinton. Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush, Obama, Obama and then…well yep, Bush
or Clinton.

American Feudalism.

ZERO HEDGE:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-12/glenn-greenwald-2016-elections-–-theyll-probably-have-gay-person-after-hillary (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-12/glenn-greenwald-2016-elections-–-theyll-probably-have-gay-person-after-hillary)

INTERVIEW AT GQ:
http://www.gq.com/news-politics/newsmakers/201406/glenn-greenwald-edward-snowden-no-place-to-hide?currentPage=1 (http://www.gq.com/news-politics/newsmakers/201406/glenn-greenwald-edward-snowden-no-place-to-hide?currentPage=1)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on May 13, 2014, 08:57:41 am
Quote
American Feudalism.

 … over across the water the feudalism is more
out-in-the-open. Can some of our Brit members
let us know how many of this line of succession
are of the same family line? All of them?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

THE BRITISH MONARCHY

The order of succession is the sequence of members of the
Royal Family in the order in which they stand in line to the throne.


THE LINE OF SUCCESSION
Line of Succession as at July 2013


SOVEREIGN
1. The Prince of Wales
2. The Duke of Cambridge
3. Prince George of Cambridge
4. Prince Henry of Wales
5. The Duke of York
6. Princess Beatrice of York
7. Princess Eugenie of York
8. The Earl of Wessex
9. Viscount Severn
10. The Lady Louise Mountbatten-Windsor
11. The Princess Royal
12. Mr. Peter Phillips
13. Miss Savannah Phillips
14. Miss Isla Phillips
15. Mrs. Michael Tindall
16. Miss Mia Tindall
17. Viscount Linley
18. The Hon. Charles Armstrong-Jones
19. The Hon. Margarita Armstrong-Jones
20. The Lady Sarah Chatto
21. Mr. Samuel Chatto
22. Mr. Arthur Chatto
23. The Duke of Gloucester
24. Earl of Ulster
25. Lord Culloden
26. The Lady Cosima Windsor
27. The Lady Davina Lewis
28. Master Tane Lewis
29. Miss Senna Lewis
30. The Lady Rose Gilman
31. Master Rufus Gilman
32. Miss Lyla Gilman
33. The Duke of Kent
34. The Lady Amelia Windsor
35. The Lady Helen Taylor
36. Mr. Columbus Taylor
37. Mr. Cassius Taylor
38. Miss Eloise Taylor
39. Miss Estella Taylor
40. Master Albert Windsor
41. Master Leopold Windsor
42. The Lord Frederick Windsor
43. Miss Maud Windsor
44. The Lady Gabriella Windsor
45. Princess Alexandra, the Hon. Lady Ogilvy
46. Mr. James Ogilvy
47. Mr. Alexander Ogilvy
48. Miss Flora Ogilvy
49. Miss Marina Ogilvy
50. Mr. Christian Mowatt
51. Miss Zenouska Mowatt

https://www.royal.gov.uk/ThecurrentRoyalFamily/Successionandprecedence/Succession/Overview.aspx (https://www.royal.gov.uk/ThecurrentRoyalFamily/Successionandprecedence/Succession/Overview.aspx)


Title: KARL ROVE: Hitlary Clinton May Have Brain Damage...
Post by: Letsbereal on May 13, 2014, 09:20:33 am
KARL ROVE: Hillary Clinton May Have Brain Damage... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlxxoAeZg1k

13 May 2014, AMTV
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on May 13, 2014, 10:24:35 am
Quote
KARL ROVE: Hillary Clinton May Have Brain Damage

Now that's rich.

What "Turd Blossom" isn't telling anyone is that lesser-evil voters -- the ones who elected Bush twice, and then Obama twice -- DO have brain damage.

http://voices.yahoo.com/the-evils-lesser-evil-voting-385201.html (http://voices.yahoo.com/the-evils-lesser-evil-voting-385201.html)

The Evils of Lesser Evil Voting

Joel S. Hirschhorn
Yahoo Voices
June 02, 2007

Condemn progressives for voting enthusiastically for Democrats and the inevitable response is something like “just imagine how much worse voting for Republicans would be.” Similarly, many true conservatives and Libertarians see voting for Republicans as a necessary evil. With many progressives regretting giving Democrats a majority in Congress and many conservatives regretting putting George W. Bush in the White House, it is timely to refute lesser evil logic.

Inevitably, lesser evil voters face personal disappointment and some shame. Politicians that receive lesser evil votes do not perform according to the values and principles that the lesser evil voter holds dear. These voters must accept responsibility for putting ineffective, dishonest and corrupt politicians in office. Though they may be lesser evils, they remain evils.

All too often lesser evil voters avoid shame and regret and prevent painful cognitive dissonance by deluding themselves that the politician they helped put in office is really not so bad after all. Corrosive lesser evil voting erodes one’s principles as pragmatism replaces idealism. This makes the next cycle of lesser evil voting easier.

Lesser evil voting helps stabilize America’s two-party duopoly (http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=231&Itemid=60) that greatly restricts true political competition. Third party and independent candidates – and minor Democratic and Republican candidates in primaries – are defeated by massive numbers of lesser evil voters. Despite authentically having the political goals that mesh with many voters on the left or right, these minor “best” candidates fall victim to lesser evil voting. Lesser evil voters are addicted to a self-fulfilling prophesy. They think “If I vote for a minor candidate they will lose anyway.” They ensure this outcome though their lesser evil voting. The truly wasted vote is the unprincipled lesser evil vote.

Effective representative democracy requires politically engaged citizens that vote. Lesser-evil voters support the current two-party system with its terribly low voter turnout and chronic dishonesty and corruption. Lesser evil voters help put into office disappointing politicians, not the best people that would restore American democracy and show more citizens that voting is valuable. Lesser evil voters demonstrate the validity of turned-off citizens’ view that it really does not matter which major party wins office.

Politicians knowingly market themselves to lesser evil voters by constructing phony sales pitches, especially to certain audiences outside of their more certain base constituents. Democrats make themselves look more progressive than they really are, and Republicans make themselves look more conservative than they really are. Lesser evil voters are phony, and they produce a phony political system. Lesser evil voters contribute mightily to the travesty of our political system that no sane person respects and has confidence in.

Lesser evil voting demonstrates the worst aspects of political compromise. This is the common cause of terrible laws. When citizens surrender so much of what they truly believe in, they enable compromise politicians to create bad public policy that, in the end, satisfies very few people and puts band-aids on severe problems. Lesser evil voters concede victory to the other side – the side they view as the worse alternative because the people they vote for will not stand up for what is right and necessary. Think Iraq war. Even when their lesser evil side wins, they do not have the principled positions that would prevent awful compromises, often in the name of bipartisanship that is a clever way to justify our corrupt two-party mafia.

Lesser evil voters deride the alternatives of not voting or voting for minor candidates. The outcome should the “other” side win is deemed unacceptable. There is worse and there is worst. The core problem with lesser evil voters is that they are short term thinkers. They fail to see the repeated long term consequence of their style of voting – a system over many election cycles that persists in delivering suboptimal results. The “good” outcome in the current election (from their perspective) is the enemy of the “better” solution in the longer term (from an objective perspective). The better solution is major reform that will never happen as long as lesser evil voting persists.

Understand this: Lesser evil voting is not courageous. It is cowardly surrender to the disappointing two-party status quo. Lesser evil voters should trade regret for pride by voting for candidates they really think are the best. Voters in this presidential primary season have some remarkable opportunities to transform fine minor candidates into competitive major candidates – more honest and trustworthy people like Ron Paul, Mike Gravel and Dennis Kucinich, for example.

Finally, the deadly decline of American democracy results in large measure from lesser evil voters electing lesser evil politicians. When virtually no elected public official is there because most voters have embraced his clear principled, trustworthy positions we get a government that is easily corrupted by corporate (http://www.gangsofamerica.com) and other moneyed interests. We get what we have now. And if you are dissatisfied with that, then reconsider the wisdom of lesser evil voting. We will only get the best government by voting for the best candidates. Otherwise, we get what we deserve and what the power elites prefer.


http://www.nolanchart.com/article8066-lesserevil-voting-perpetuates-evil.html (http://www.nolanchart.com/article8066-lesserevil-voting-perpetuates-evil.html)

Lesser-Evil Voting Perpetuates Evil

The root explanation of why the nation is in terrible shape and speeding down the wrong track is the dominant practice of lesser-evil voting.

by Joel S. Hirschhorn
Nolan Chart
October 13, 2010

For many years Americans have justified voting for candidates they were not especially thrilled with by convincing themselves that the lesser evil deserved to win office. The fraction of people totally committed to one of the two major parties is small. Most Americans see themselves as independents, liberals, conservatives, progressives or libertarians, but not as loyal Democrats or Republicans. Most Americans are fed up with both major parties, not just incumbents.

But this year's midterm elections will once again result in only Democratic or Republican candidates winning. Other than staying home and not voting, nearly all voters will employ the lesser-evil justification. Just one problem: That lesser-evil strategy has resulted in the dismal state of the nation that angers most Americans.

The only logical conclusion is that lesser-evil voting perpetuates all the cancerous evil plaguing the political system. This should not surprise anyone. Regardless of party affiliation, major party candidates convincingly lie to voters and the tons of money poured into politics create a mass propaganda machine from both parties that deceives voters.

Lesser-evil voting sometimes works in favor of Democrats and sometimes favors Republicans. Negative advertising creates fear of some candidates and media pundits and celebrities use their considerable power to give voters reasons to vote for or against candidates. The thirst for true reforms of government persists, as evidenced by the Tea Party movement and even the election of President Obama. It is the force that moves the pendulum from one party to the other.

When will Americans wake up and realize that lesser evil still means evil? Least bad still means bad. Least corrupt still means corrupt. Least dishonest still means dishonest. Least stupid still means stupid.

But many people despairingly see no other option if they want to fulfill their civic responsibility and participate in elections. That is because the two major parties have given Americans no real options. They like the lesser-evil system that sustains the two-party plutocracy. Only voters in Nevada can choose the "none of the above" option. The rest of us can stay home or vote for third party candidates that stand no real chance of winning. What to do?

Stop deluding yourself that any Democrat or Republican in Congress or the White House will actually do absolutely everything, even if it means not winning reelection, to reform the corrupt, dysfunctional, wasteful government system being controlled by wealthy people and corporate interests, and devastating ordinary Americans.

Your lesser-evil vote perpetuates evil. Do you want to live with that?

[Continued... (http://www.nolanchart.com/article8066-lesserevil-voting-perpetuates-evil.html)]


http://www.nolanchart.com/article8864-voting-for-the-lesser-of-two-evils-html (http://www.nolanchart.com/article8864-voting-for-the-lesser-of-two-evils-html)

Voting for the lesser of two evils

by R. Lee Wrights
Nolan Chart
August 3, 2011

BURNET, Texas (Aug. 3) – It never ceases to amaze me how many citizens can vote for a candidate who doesn’t represent their views merely because he’s not as bad as the other guy, and then complain about the results. This phenomenon reminds me of a joke that circulated after the 1964 presidential election. That campaign was particularly vicious and decisive, especially the debate over the increasing American involvement in a far-off country called Vietnam and the fight against the “Communist Menace.” While President Lyndon Johnson pledged, “We are not going to send American boys nine or 10 thousand miles away from home to do what Asian boys ought to be doing for themselves,” Sen. Barry Goldwater countered by saying he’d make “a damned swamp out of North Vietnam” if they didn’t quit their aggression.

The joke goes like this: “You know, they told me that if I voted for Goldwater, there would be riots in our big cities and a massive war in Vietnam. Well, I voted for Goldwater, and, by golly, they were right.”

However you want to justify or rationalize it, when you vote for the “lesser of two evils” you’re not just betraying your principles but also abandoning all hope of ever having a government that respects and defends liberty and freedom. When you vote for a candidate who doesn’t represent your views in order to stop another candidate who doesn’t represent your views, you end up with a government that not only doesn’t represent you views, but is run by people who have no incentive or motivation to even consider what you might think. If you maintain you’re choosing to support one evil in order to avoid a greater evil, you’re basically admitting there is no evil you would not support in the interest of a “greater” good.

Consider any other aspect of your life. If there were only two plumbers, electricians or car repair shops in your city, and both overcharged you, provided shoddy service, used substandard parts, and didn’t guarantee their work, would you still hire the one that was least bad? Or would you find a serviceman in a nearby town to hire, even if you had to wait several days for service? Some of you probably would do what I’ve done and learn to do the work yourselves.

In either case, you reject the idea of choosing from the “lesser of two evils” and find or make your own, third choice. Why then do we tolerate lousy performance, broken promises, and shoddy service from the two parties whose only reason for existence is to expand the power of government and reduce the rights of individuals? As Pat Buchanan observed, “The Democrats and Republicans are two wings on the same bird of prey.”

The men who framed the Constitution did so with a profound understanding that government was “a necessary evil.” They knew that just by the very act of drafting a document to establish a federal government they were actually choosing the “lesser of two evils.” Therefore, they took great care in what they wrote and the government they established, setting it on the firm foundation of natural and unalienable individual rights, while granting it only limited, specific and enumerated powers. The writing of the document was a compromise and the document itself was full of compromises. Nevertheless, the framers believed that the “blessings of self-government” could be secured for posterity through this “lesser evil.”

It’s easy to claim that voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil, but that’s not the worst outcome. It’s not always possible to vote for someone you agree with on every issue. There is no such thing as a perfect candidate – even a Libertarian candidate. It may be pragmatic to vote for a candidate you agree with on most issues, some issues, or at least on key issues.

The key word here is “for;” you want to vote for a candidate, not against a candidate. This doesn’t mean voting for someone who has no principles you agree with, or who is unquestionably willing to compromise any of their principles at the drop of a hat in order to get elected. This is the underlying misconception about voting for the “lesser evil.”

To begin with, it’s habit-forming. The winning “less evil” candidate you voted for could turn out to be just as bad, or worse, than the candidate you voted “against.” Remember that once in office, a politician has to “get along” in order to “get things done.” Your vote contributes to his false sense that he’s won a “mandate from the people.” He has no reason to pay any attention to any views that don’t match his own. So we shrug our shoulders, say “Oh well,” and in the next election do it all again in the hope things will turn out differently. After a while, you become desensitized to the constant disappointment of the lesser evil we choose being no better than the greater evil we feared.

The most pernicious consequence of voting for the “lesser of two evils” is that it adds credence to the dishonest assertion by establishment party apparatchiks that the Libertarian Party is not “viable.” The reality is that if all the people who reluctantly voted for the “lesser of two evils” voted for their principles instead, not only would several third parties be viable, the cumulative effect would build like a tsunami that would eventually sweep away the calcified political establishment.

In summary, here are The Top Ten Reasons Not to Vote for the Lesser of Two Evils:

[Continued... (http://www.nolanchart.com/article8864-voting-for-the-lesser-of-two-evils-html)]

-------------------------------------

(http://i626.photobucket.com/albums/tt349/terryldj/2Wings1BirdNew.gif)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on May 13, 2014, 12:30:21 pm
 Great picture, says it all.
 Lesser evil voting..Do they give us much of a choice, Obama, Hillary, Romney, Jeb Bush etc.
                          Hillary's quote " What difference does it make"
           Only a third party president would be the kicker.. JV has my vote if he runs..
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on May 14, 2014, 05:47:45 pm
Just in. Hillary suks up to Israel & World Bank.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Hillary Clinton, a likely U.S. presidential candidate in 2016, on Wednesday defended her time as secretary of state as Republican criticism of her time in government mounts.

Clinton told a forum of the American Jewish Committee advocacy group that she played a key role in securing U.N. sanctions on Iran in 2010 to try to halt its nuclear ambitions.

"I worked for months to round up the votes," she said in the first of three speeches she is giving in Washington this week.

Scrutiny of her time as America's top diplomat has grown after Republicans in the House of Representatives announced a select committee to look into the 2012 assault in Benghazi, Libya that killed the U.S. ambassador and three others.

And Clinton has been attacked because the State Department on her watch did not designate Nigeria's Boko Haram group - which recently kidnapped hundreds of girls - as terrorists.

Clinton, who is generally considered the Democratic frontrunner if she again chooses to pursue the presidency, did not mention Benghazi or Boko Haram in her speech.

She focused on the provisional deal reached with Iran last year to limit its nuclear program. "No deal is better than a bad deal," she said, detailing her role in imposing sanctions on Iran and looking ahead to upcoming negotiations.

Clinton also stressed to the American Jewish Committee audience her commitment to Israel, just weeks after the breakdown of peace talks between Israelis and Palestinians.

She is scheduled to speak at the World Bank later on Wednesday. On Friday, she will headline a conference hosted by the New America Foundation, a liberal think tank led by one of her former State Department colleagues.

(Reporting by Gabriel Debenedetti; Editing by Bernard Orr)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Honor18 on May 15, 2014, 10:10:52 am
Well if she sucking up to Israel then we know she running in 2016 ....... God help Us !
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on May 15, 2014, 02:29:14 pm
Well if she sucking up to Israel then we know she running in 2016 ....... God help Us !
              This creature is souless, her and Billy were interviewed before he ran for president,  the reporter asked Billy why he wanted to become president, the both answered  simultaneously, "For the power of course".. ( They seemed amazed why anyone would ask them such a question).. They looked a tad  high and caught off guard.
             Powermongering skinsacks..
               
Title: Hitlary Clinton Bears Responsibility Over Benghazi, Cheney Says
Post by: Letsbereal on May 19, 2014, 07:59:42 am
Clinton Bears Responsibility Over Benghazi, Cheney Says
18 May 2014
, by Alan Bjerga and Greg Giroux (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2014-05-18/clinton-bears-responsibility-over-benghazi-cheney-says.html

Excerpt:

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton bears responsibility for the attacks on a U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya, and will be held accountable should she run for president in 2016, former Vice President Dick Cheney said.

“It’s a major issue,” Cheney, who served under President George W. Bush, said in an interview on the “Fox News Sunday” TV program.

“I don’t think we’ve heard the last of it yet.”

The Republican-controlled House voted this month to create a select committee to continue investigating the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks, which killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

The panel will probe whether President Barack Obama’s administration intentionally misled the public when officials initially asserted the violence didn’t stem from planned terrorism.

The officials later said it did.

Democrats say the attack and the administration’s comments on it have been thoroughly vetted.

“It’s a hunting mission for a lynch mob,” Senator Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who is chairman of the chamber’s intelligence committee, said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

She said questions about the attacks have been “answered to the satisfaction” of her committee, citing past hearings and four reports.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on May 19, 2014, 06:32:15 pm
 Cheney of all mucken people.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on May 19, 2014, 06:52:31 pm
 Hilary is a old hag, just trying to hang on as her life slips into history!

 And history will portray this woman as: the evil thing she is...

 The woman is a liar and _______ you fill in the blank ________
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on June 09, 2014, 11:08:07 am
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/hillary-we-struggled-buy-houses-after-white-house_794517.html
Hillary: We 'Struggled' to Buy 'Houses' After White House
9:14 AM, Jun 9, 2014 • By DANIEL HALPER

Hillary Clinton explains to Diane Sawyer that after leaving the White House she and her family "struggled to, you know, piece together the resources for mortgages, for houses, for Chelsea's education." That's why Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill Clinton have made over $100 million since leaving the White House:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyLhDz_ZvA4&feature=player_embedded

"We came out of the White House not only dead broke, but in debt," Clinton tells ABC's Diane Sawyer. "We had no money when we got there, and we struggled to, you know, piece together the resources for mortgages, for houses, for Chelsea's education. You know, it was not easy."

Hillary further explains, "Bill has worked really hard -- and it's been amazing to me -- he's worked very hard. First of all, we had to pay off all our debts, which was, you know, he had to make double the money because of obviously taxes and then pay off the debts and get us houses and take care of family members."

Daniel Halper is online editor at The Weekly Standard and author of Clinton, Inc.: The Audacious Rebuilding of a Political Machine (forthcoming).

| - -- -
Prince Charles and Lady de Rothschild Team Up to Talk About Inclusive Capitalism

wow

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/article-2464672/The-multimillion-dollar-question--really-Self-magnate-Lynn-Forester-De-Rothschild-working-mothers-dilemma.html
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/10/17/article-0-0068545B00000258-171_634x403.jpg)
Lynn with her husband Sir Evelyn de Rothschild and Bill and Hillary Clinton in 2003 at the de Rothschilds¿ party to mark the launch of Hillary's memoirs

(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/09/17/article-1057093-0068547600000258-333_468x483.jpg)
...

The participants at the conference came from the same rarefied air as the speakers. It leaked out that the 250 corporate execs and financial bigwigs who attended the event control $30 trillion in assets. Deutsche Welle wrote: “Time will tell whether the ‘Inclusive Capitalism Initiative’ bears any fruits other than more of the sort of conferences at which extremely wealthy people arrive in private jets to spend a pleasant few hours together and reassure each other that they’re doing their best for society.”
...

| - - - -

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121856
Clintons Return White House Furniture
Feb. 8 2002

Former President Clinton and his wife, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, have sent $28,000 worth of household goods back to Washington after questions arose over whether the items were intended as personal gifts or donations to the White House.

“We have been informed that it is being shipped back, and the National Park Service is ready to receive it, take possession of it and take custody of it,” Jim McDaniel, the National Park Service’s liaison to the White House, said Wednesday.

The property is being returned to government custody until such time that the issues can be resolved. It may well turn out that that property is rightly the personal property of the Clintons.”

Giving Back

After they were criticized for taking $190,000 worth of china, flatware, rugs, televisions, sofas and other gifts with them when they left, the Clintons announced last week that they would pay for $86,000 worth of gifts, or nearly half the amount.

Their latest decision to send back $28,000 in gifts brings to $114,000 the value of items the Clintons have either decided to pay for or return.
....

The gifts in question were: A kitchen table and four chairs valued at $3,650 from Lee Ficks of Cincinnati, Ohio; a $1,000 needlepoint rug from David Martinous of Little Rock, Ark.; two sofas, an easy chair and an ottoman worth $19,900 from Steve Mittman of New York; lamps valued at $1,170 from Stuart Shiller of Hialeah, Fla.; and a $2,843 sofa from Brad Noe, a businessman from California.

The gifts were just one of several flaps that followed the Clintons out of the White House:

Lawmakers are questioning Clinton’s desire to rent expensive office space in New York City at government expense. Because of the contention, the former president’s foundation has offered to pay at least $300,000 of an estimated $790,000 annual rent for the office Clinton favors.

Mrs. Clinton, the new senator from New York, has faced questions about the propriety of accepting the gifts in the period between her election and her swearing-in. Senate rules would have limited what she could accept had she been a senator.

Members of both parties also have criticized Clinton for granting scores of eleventh-hour clemency requests, including the pardon of Marc Rich, a fugitive in Switzerland from 51 counts in the United States of tax evasion and fraud.

comments:

Mindy Page  • 3 months ago   
It's only taken since 1993, and the Freedom of information Act, to get these items returned. They already knew this when they moved out of the White House.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on June 09, 2014, 03:36:51 pm
 I wish someone could dig up the interveiw Bill & Hillary had when he was running for president.
The reporter  asked them WHY do you want the presidency, BOTH answered in unison, "For the power of course" as if the question was stupid.
            I have a feeling they had a few drinks or whatever and mucked up stating the truth.
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on June 10, 2014, 06:11:50 pm
I wish someone could dig up the interveiw Bill & Hillary had when he was running for president.
The reporter  asked them WHY do you want the presidency, BOTH answered in unison, "For the power of course" as if the question was stupid.
            I have a feeling they had a few drinks or whatever and mucked up stating the truth.
 
Mr. Jones; I remember that day: but I can not find the quote [as the Nazis' hide it], but your are correct my friend, as they did say it was all about "POWER"

I concur that both are Scum Bags!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on June 10, 2014, 06:25:40 pm
We are all going to be in deep shit if Hilldog gets elected as prez
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: kidA on June 11, 2014, 06:02:04 am
I just hate the fact that a lot of my generation (I'm 26) will vote for no matter what her and husband have done in the past. We grew up in the 90s with her as our 1st Lady. Kids looked up to her, she has done no wrong . Most people my age don't really know (hell, I'm not fully informed about all the cocaine/murders the Clinton's were aiding) about the Clinton presidency except for the drama. I just want to be able to have a bullet point presentation with facts so we can start downplaying her campaign.

It really makes me sad that we can't shake these families out of office for the past 20 years.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on June 11, 2014, 08:47:29 am
I just hate the fact that a lot of my generation (I'm 26) will vote for no matter what her and husband have done in the past.

It isn't just your generation.

Lesser evil voting is an intellectual disease that infects the vast majority of the electorate, irrespective of age and other demographics.

That's why Chuck Baldwin and Ralph Nader combined got less than 1% of the vote in 2008.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmZpSCMBy4k (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmZpSCMBy4k)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jofortruth on June 11, 2014, 09:02:53 am
http://variety.com/2014/tv/ratings/abcs-hillary-clinton-interview-draws-minimal-interest-among-younger-viewers-1201217282/

Quote
Diane Sawyer’s hourlong primetime interview with Hillary Clinton drew a decent crowd of a little over 6 million viewers for ABC on Monday, but it ranked last among the major networks in its timeslot in key demos. Monday’s top honors in young adults on the broadcast nets went to NBC’s “American Ninja Warrior” and Fox’s “24: Live Another Day,” while CW’s “Whose Line Is It Anyway” looked strong kicking off the night.


Hilllary Clinton and Jeb Bush (and any other globalist minions who would dare to run for office) need to lose big in their run for the Presidency! The people need to shun them now, and not support them. LOOK AT WHAT THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS HAVE DONE TO THE NATION FOR THE PAST 3 DECADES!

AMERICA, ARE YOU STUPID ENOUGH TO REWARD FAILURES WHO DON'T EVEN WORK FOR YOU, BUT FOR GLOBALIST AGENDAS? AMERICA HAS 300+ MILLION PEOPLE AND YOU KEEP PUTTING THE MEMBERS OF 2 FAMILIES, WHO HAVE FAILED AMERICA, INTO OFFICE? I HOPE YOU ARE SMARTER THAN THAT THIS TIME AROUND!

THE FUTURE OF AMERICA DEPENDS ON EVERY AMERICAN WAKING UP AND NOW! YOU MUST STOP SUPPORTING THESE 2 FAMILIES (BUSH, CLINTON) AND ANYONE ELSE WHO WORKS WITH THEM AGAINST YOU!


 ::)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: dkdono on June 11, 2014, 10:36:30 am
Do you really think voting makes a difference?....everything in politics is controlled....along with all of us.....
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on June 11, 2014, 01:12:40 pm
We are all going to be in deep shit if Hilldog gets elected as prez

And I did not mean just  you guys in USA
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: BlackRoses on June 11, 2014, 07:55:22 pm
http://variety.com/2014/tv/ratings/abcs-hillary-clinton-interview-draws-minimal-interest-among-younger-viewers-1201217282/


Hilllary Clinton and Jeb Bush (and any other globalist minions who would dare to run for office) need to lose big in their run for the Presidency! The people need to shun them now, and not support them. LOOK AT WHAT THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS HAVE DONE TO THE NATION FOR THE PAST 3 DECADES!

AMERICA, ARE YOU STUPID ENOUGH TO REWARD FAILURES WHO DON'T EVEN WORK FOR YOU, BUT FOR GLOBALIST AGENDAS? AMERICA HAS 300+ MILLION PEOPLE AND YOU KEEP PUTTING THE MEMBERS OF 2 FAMILIES, WHO HAVE FAILED AMERICA, INTO OFFICE? I HOPE YOU ARE SMARTER THAN THAT THIS TIME AROUND!

THE FUTURE OF AMERICA DEPENDS ON EVERY AMERICAN WAKING UP AND NOW! YOU MUST STOP SUPPORTING THESE 2 FAMILIES (BUSH, CLINTON) AND ANYONE ELSE WHO WORKS WITH THEM AGAINST YOU!


 ::)

Was posting on another site and got into a discussion about the *hitty lesser evil theory. I was ragging on Repubs and Dems again, somebody comes back and asks me who to vote for. I plainly told them I'm not telling names or parties. People need to get off their *sses and research who they want to vote for. How many do this? And how many vote for lesser evil? How many come up with some *ssbackwards way to cast a vote? "Gee, I support gay rights and this person does too! You have my vote." "Oh, this person looks to be such a nice family person. I bet this person would do an amazing job." I watched the debates or negative tv ads and that made up my mind for me. People have to get a clue, stop running back for the knife to go into your back.  Lesser evil is part of why we're in the messes we're in to begin with. That along with not holding all these people accountable to start with. I see people that only seem to grow a pair and a strong backbone as long as it concerns criticizing the other side. They go as quiet as little church mice when it's their side screwing up.
Title: Hitlary's Popularity Plunges As Obama 'Contagion' Spreads
Post by: Letsbereal on June 13, 2014, 09:57:58 am
Clinton's Popularity Plunges As Obama 'Contagion' Spreads
13 June 2014
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-06-13/clintons-popularity-plunges-obama-contagion-spreads

In December 2012, 70% of those polled viewed Hillary Clinton favorably; in March 2014 it was down to 56%; and now, as President Obama's approval rating hits record lows, only 52% view Hillary Clinton favorably.

"She is down across the board," notes the poll, "even with groups that have been her most ardent supporters."

As Bloomberg reports, among likely 2016 voters, Clinton remains ahead with 47% support compared to 38% for each of her potential opponents.

As Bloomberg reports,

Fifty-two percent of Americans view the former secretary of state favorably, down from 56 percent in March and 70% in December 2012, according to the Bloomberg National Poll.

The decline means Clinton wouldn’t enter a possible 2016 race as a prohibitive favorite over key Republican rivals.

While she still bests them in head-to-head matchups, she doesn’t have majority support against any of them.

Among likely 2016 voters, Clinton beats New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, 45% to 38%, the poll shows.

When matched against Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Clinton pulls 47% support compared with 38% for each of her opponents.

Senator Marco Rubio of Florida registers only slightly weaker, drawing 36% backing to Clinton’s 47%.

...

“Hillary Clinton may be suffering from contagion from President Barack Obama’s sinking scores.

She is down across the board, even with groups that have been her most ardent supporters,”


Sex matters...

Women lopsidedly view her favorably, 61% to 31%; men see her unfavorably, by 49% to 43%.

Among likely voters, all four of the Republican candidates gain about a 6-point edge with men and Clinton scores a roughly two-to-one margin with women.


So when does Hillary start to distance herself from every Obama policy?


"Drug Bless America" http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-06-12/drug-bless-america

Wolf of Wall Street Wild Man Broker https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTHlXb0PXh4

Yeah, fugezi, fugazi it's a whazy, it's a whozy it's a ... ;)
Title: NBC Paid Hitlary's Daughter $600,000 Annual Salary For Occasional Work
Post by: Letsbereal on June 13, 2014, 11:02:40 am
NBC Paid Chelsea Clinton $600,000 Annual Salary For Occasional Work
13 June 2014
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-06-13/nbc-paid-chelsea-clinton-600000-annual-salary-occasional-work
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jofortruth on June 13, 2014, 12:12:55 pm
Was posting on another site and got into a discussion about the *hitty lesser evil theory. I was ragging on Repubs and Dems again, somebody comes back and asks me who to vote for. I plainly told them I'm not telling names or parties. People need to get off their *sses and research who they want to vote for. How many do this? And how many vote for lesser evil? How many come up with some *ssbackwards way to cast a vote? "Gee, I support gay rights and this person does too! You have my vote." "Oh, this person looks to be such a nice family person. I bet this person would do an amazing job." I watched the debates or negative tv ads and that made up my mind for me. People have to get a clue, stop running back for the knife to go into your back.  Lesser evil is part of why we're in the messes we're in to begin with. That along with not holding all these people accountable to start with. I see people that only seem to grow a pair and a strong backbone as long as it concerns criticizing the other side. They go as quiet as little church mice when it's their side screwing up.


I say VOTE OUT INCUMBENTS if they have one infraction that shows they are not representing the American people OR ARE NOT TRUSTWORTHY.

DO NOT VOTE FOR ANYONE WHO HAS BEEN IN OFFICE BEFORE OR WHOSE FAMILY HAS BEEN IN OFFICE BEFORE (aka Bush, Clinton in particular, or any of their mindless buddies who keep running for office)!

CLEAN HOUSE IN THIS ELECTION! VET ANYONE NEW YOU VOTE FOR AND IF POSSIBLE GET A WRITTEN COMMITMENT FROM THEM THAT THEY WILL WORK FOR YOU! THEN HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE. NO MORE FREE RIDE POLITICIANS! YOUR DAYS OF BEING STUPID, SELFISH, SPINELESS AND BOUGHT OFF ARE OVER!

 >:(
Title: HILLARY CLINTON WARNS US NOT TO FIGHT FOR MALIKI
Post by: jerryweaver on June 15, 2014, 11:08:43 pm


HILLARY CLINTON WARNS US NOT TO FIGHT FOR MALIKI

http://www.dailysabah.com/nation/2014/06/15/hillary-clinton-warns-us-not-to-fight-for-maliki


WASHINGTON D.C – The US former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has said the United States should not intervene in Iraq as PM Nouri al-Maliki's administration was unable to function for all Iraqis despite US support.

Referring to the Iraqi government, Clinton said on Friday: "You'd be fighting for a dysfunctional, unrepresentative, authoritarian government."

"There's no reason on earth that I know of that we would ever sacrifice a single American life for that."

'Presidential run'

Her book describes her four years - from 2008 to 2012 - as Secretary of State under Obama.

The former Secretary of State writes about her tours around the world and shares her perspectives on key policies and key political figures from different countries.

Asked what she would like her legacy to be, Clinton said she wanted to continue building her legacy through her work at the Clinton Foundation "and other things", which led to an eruption of applause as it was a veiled reference to the possibility of a presidential run.

Outside the Lisner Auditorium at George Washington University, a group of youths delivered banners asking for support for Clinton in the next US presidential race.

Title: Wealthy Clintons Use Trusts to Limit Estate Tax They Back
Post by: Letsbereal on June 17, 2014, 10:18:01 am
Wealthy Clintons Use Trusts to Limit Estate Tax They Back
17 June 2014
, by Richard Rubin (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2014-06-17/wealthy-clintons-use-trusts-to-limit-estate-tax-they-back.html

Excerpt:

Bill and Hillary Clinton have long supported an estate tax to prevent the U.S. from being dominated by inherited wealth. That doesn’t mean they want to pay it.

To reduce the tax pinch, the Clintons are using financial planning strategies befitting the top 1% of U.S. households in wealth.

These moves, common among multimillionaires, will help shield some of their estate from the tax that now tops out at 40% of assets upon death.

The Clintons created residence trusts in 2010 and shifted ownership of their New York house into them in 2011, according to federal financial disclosures and local property records.

Among the tax advantages of such trusts is that any appreciation in the house’s value can happen outside their taxable estate.

The move could save the Clintons hundreds of thousands of dollars in estate taxes, said David Scott Sloan, a partner at Holland & Knight LLP in Boston.

“The goal is really be thoughtful and try to build up the nontaxable estate, and that’s really what this is,” Sloan said.

“You’re creating things that are going to be on the nontaxable side of the balance sheet when they die.”

The Clintons’ finances are receiving attention as Hillary Clinton tours the country promoting her book, “Hard Choices.”

She said in an interview on ABC television that the couple was “dead broke” and in debt when they left the White House in early 2001.

After being criticized for her comments, she told ABC’s “Good Morning America” that she understood the financial struggles of Americans.
Title: BREAKING: Hillary Clinton Calls Gun Rights Advocates Terrorists, Calls for AWB
Post by: One Revelator on June 18, 2014, 08:39:50 am
BREAKING: Hillary Clinton Calls Gun Rights Advocates Terrorists, Calls for “Assault Weapons” Ban

By Robert Farago on June 17, 2014

Speaking at CNN’s town hall meeting tonight, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton lambasted American gun right advocates. “We cannot let a minority of people — and that’s what it is, it is a minority of people — hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people.” While she was at it, Ms. Clinton called for an “assault weapons ban,” conflating semi-automatic weapons with fully-automatic weapons as she went . . .

We’re going to have to do a better job protecting the vast majority of our citizens, including our children, from that very, very, very small group that is unfortunately prone to violence and now with automatic weapons can wreak so much more violence than they ever could have before.

I don’t think it needs saying but if Hillary is our next President gun rights will be under threat like never before. And this is coming from a guy who publicly declared that President Obama considering gun control the third rail in American politics. I was wrong before. I hope I’m wrong now.

www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/06/robert-farago/breaking-hillary-clinton-calls-gun-rights-advocates-terrorists/

_______________________________________________________________________________

Hillary: We Can’t Let Gun Control Opponents Hold an Opinion That “Terrorizes” America

Clinton goes on extraordinary anti-second amendment rant

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
June 18, 2014

Hillary Clinton all but called for the introduction of thought crime during a CNN town hall event last night when she asserted that gun control opponents should not be allowed to hold an opinion that “terrorizes” America.

After a school teacher in the audience asked Clinton about high capacity magazines and assault weapons, the presumptive 2016 presidential candidate took the opportunity to go on an extraordinary anti-gun rant.

“I’m well aware that this is a hot political subject. And again, I will speak out no matter what role I find myself in But I believe that we need a more thoughtful conversation. We cannot let a minority of people – and it’s, that’s what it is, it is a minority of people – hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people,” said Clinton.

Clinton’s claim that only a “minority” of Americans oppose gun control is contradicted by a recent Rasmussen poll which found that 53% of Americans oppose stricter gun control laws and only 40% of likely voters back tighter firearms restrictions.

“Expect this quote to be featured prominently in campaign ads in the event of Hillary’s eventual run for the highest office in the nation. A nation where, despite such grotesque characterizations, the Second Amendment is still the law of the land,” writes Caleb Howe.

Clinton’s rhetoric is even more audacious than similar sentiments expressed by her ideological adversaries on the subject of the second amendment.

Last year video emerged of Eric Holder announcing a 1995 public relations campaign based around the attempt to “really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.”

In the same year, Democrat Dianne Feinstein admitted she pushed to ban all firearms, exclaiming, “Mr and Mrs America, turn ‘em all in!”

http://www.prisonplanet.com/hillary-we-cant-let-gun-control-opponents-hold-an-opinion-that-terrorizes-america.html

________________________________________________________________________________

(http://i.cdn.turner.com/trutv/trutv.com/graphics/photos/notorious_murders/celebrity/vincent_foster/sorry-vince.jpg)
Title: Re: BREAKING: Hillary Clinton Calls Gun Rights Advocates Terrorists, Calls for AWB
Post by: BlackRoses on June 18, 2014, 07:42:59 pm
BREAKING: Hillary Clinton Calls Gun Rights Advocates Terrorists, Calls for “Assault Weapons” Ban

By Robert Farago on June 17, 2014

Speaking at CNN’s town hall meeting tonight, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton lambasted American gun right advocates. “We cannot let a minority of people — and that’s what it is, it is a minority of people — hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people.” While she was at it, Ms. Clinton called for an “assault weapons ban,” conflating semi-automatic weapons with fully-automatic weapons as she went . . .

We’re going to have to do a better job protecting the vast majority of our citizens, including our children, from that very, very, very small group that is unfortunately prone to violence and now with automatic weapons can wreak so much more violence than they ever could have before.

I don’t think it needs saying but if Hillary is our next President gun rights will be under threat like never before. And this is coming from a guy who publicly declared that President Obama considering gun control the third rail in American politics. I was wrong before. I hope I’m wrong now.

www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/06/robert-farago/breaking-hillary-clinton-calls-gun-rights-advocates-terrorists/

_______________________________________________________________________________

Hillary: We Can’t Let Gun Control Opponents Hold an Opinion That “Terrorizes” America

Clinton goes on extraordinary anti-second amendment rant

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
June 18, 2014

Hillary Clinton all but called for the introduction of thought crime during a CNN town hall event last night when she asserted that gun control opponents should not be allowed to hold an opinion that “terrorizes” America.

After a school teacher in the audience asked Clinton about high capacity magazines and assault weapons, the presumptive 2016 presidential candidate took the opportunity to go on an extraordinary anti-gun rant.

“I’m well aware that this is a hot political subject. And again, I will speak out no matter what role I find myself in But I believe that we need a more thoughtful conversation. We cannot let a minority of people – and it’s, that’s what it is, it is a minority of people – hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people,” said Clinton.

Clinton’s claim that only a “minority” of Americans oppose gun control is contradicted by a recent Rasmussen poll which found that 53% of Americans oppose stricter gun control laws and only 40% of likely voters back tighter firearms restrictions.

“Expect this quote to be featured prominently in campaign ads in the event of Hillary’s eventual run for the highest office in the nation. A nation where, despite such grotesque characterizations, the Second Amendment is still the law of the land,” writes Caleb Howe.

Clinton’s rhetoric is even more audacious than similar sentiments expressed by her ideological adversaries on the subject of the second amendment.

Last year video emerged of Eric Holder announcing a 1995 public relations campaign based around the attempt to “really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.”

In the same year, Democrat Dianne Feinstein admitted she pushed to ban all firearms, exclaiming, “Mr and Mrs America, turn ‘em all in!”

http://www.prisonplanet.com/hillary-we-cant-let-gun-control-opponents-hold-an-opinion-that-terrorizes-america.html

________________________________________________________________________________

(http://i.cdn.turner.com/trutv/trutv.com/graphics/photos/notorious_murders/celebrity/vincent_foster/sorry-vince.jpg)

Sickening.

What about those drones again?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on June 18, 2014, 08:32:33 pm
 No rant, this creature is criminally insane.
 I have often wondered if there is more to these freaks than powermongering, are some of them into mind altering substances.
 I'm serious, their actions are inhuman, I'd truly like to see a blood spectrum exam done on this gal.
 Removal of gun rights would create a path of less resistance-   for the neocon takeover.
 Throughout history sacrifices of animals and humans have been committed, times haven't changed much have they?
 Don't let you and yours be sacrificed for these bags of sh**te.
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: One Revelator on June 18, 2014, 09:21:48 pm
No rant, this creature is criminally insane.
 I have often wondered if there is more to these freaks than powermongering, are some of them into mind altering substances.
 I'm serious, their actions are inhuman, I'd truly like to see a blood spectrum exam done on this gal.
 Removal of gun rights would create a path of less resistance-   for the neocon takeover.
 Throughout history sacrifices of animals and humans have been committed, times haven't changed much have they?
 Don't let you and yours be sacrificed for these bags of sh**te.
 

She’s a witch and, if Kathy O’Brien has anything to say about it, a sadistic monarch sex slave handler. People into the black arts normally don’t live very long. But she’s owned and knows that if she does not do the will of her master, she will die. There is no “leaving” the mafia. A side effect of her practice is mild to moderate insanity. It shows in the many faces of Hillary. Not sure if there’s any humanity left in that empty shell.

Bill mentioned something when he was prez. Remember the stories of him sneaking out of the white house in the middle of the night? He said that she scared him.

Do the majority of people still really think that she should be POTUS? “Just cuz she’s a woman?” I don’t believe that.

Come 2016, she’ll be dependent on a special blend of Hollywood/media illusory magic. That is if we’re not under the control of a UN high commissioner by then.

In that case, she’ll just be appointed.
Title: Hillary’s Clear DISTAIN For America And Its Constitution
Post by: One Revelator on June 19, 2014, 02:35:16 pm
Comment: Good info on the buzzphrases. "Common sense" and "sensible" have been around for a long time. "Hard choices" is more recent. She also intentionally misuses "automatic weapon" to make it seem like machine guns are everywhere. The author addresses this in point #3. She's been stumping for citizen disarmament since at least the 90's.

Hillary Clinton: Platitudes, Never Principles, With One Exception

By Mike McDaniel on June 19, 2014

(http://truthaboutguns-zippykid.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/hillary26n-1-web.jpg)

In Hillary Clinton’s 2016 putative run for the White House, one rhetorical trend is already clear: speak only in platitudes, virtually never articulate principles. She wants everyone to think hard, and think carefully, and make hard choices. About which specific policies and the principles that inform those choices, well, that’s hard to say–with a single, notable exception. During a June 17th interview with Brett Baier and Greta Van Susteren, Van Susteren questioned Clinton about the 4th Amendment implications of domestic NSA spying, repeatedly and obviously inviting Clinton to express support for the Fourth Amendment and its warrant requirement . . .

Clinton expressed vague concern, but refused to do anything as incendiary as support any portion of the Bill of Rights. She followed the same pattern in discussing Benghazi and every other question posed by Baier and Van Susteren in a 30-minute interview.
She spoke much, but said little.

But this has not been the case where the Second Amendment is at issue. When that part of the Bill of Rights is the topic, Clinton is not shy about outlining specific polices. In another interview on the same day, in a “town hall” format meeting organized by CNN, long appropriately known as the “Clinton News Network,” Hill made her anti-liberty desires plain.

Via Brietbart’s Big Government:

“…a Maryland school teacher asked Hillary if she thought banning ‘assault weapons’ or ‘high capacity’ magazines ‘would do any good.’ Hillary said, ‘Yes,’ then expounded:

‘First of all, I think as a teacher or really any parent, what’s been happening with these school shootings should cause everybody to just think hard. We make hard choices and we balance competing values all the time. And I was disappointed that the Congress did not pass universal background checks after the horrors of the shootings at Sandy Hook, and now we’ve had more in the time since. And I don’t think any parent–any person–should have to fear about their child going to school or going to college because someone, for whatever reason–psychological, emotional, political, [ideological], whatever it means–could possibly enter that school property with an automatic weapon and murder innocent children, students, teachers.’

Clinton went on to say, ‘We cannot let a minority of people… hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people.’


She concluded:

‘My view is, yes we need to thrash this out in the political realm. But the vast majority of Americans–even law-abiding gun owners–want background checks that work, information that is shared immediately, and an awareness that we’re going to have to do a better job protecting the vast majority of our citizens–including our children–from that very, very small group that is unfortunately prone to violence, and now with automatic weapons, can wreak so much more violence.’”

So many fundamental errors, lies and misrepresentations, so little time:

(1) The only way to lawfully “thrash this out in the political realm” is to amend or repeal the Second Amendment. Even Clinton knows that’s impossible, so she advocates passing and implementing unconstitutional laws that will destroy the lives of the law abiding until they are struck down.

(2) There is no such thing in accurate firearm nomenclature as an “assault weapon.” While the term has been written into some anti-gun legislation as a catch-all phrase that essentially means “any scary-looking gun we don’t like,” its use is always misleading and inaccurate.

(3) No actual automatic weapon has ever been used in a school attack, and while such weapons are technically legal, they are among the most highly regulated firearms available in America. One does not walk into a gun store and walk out with one ten minutes later, and one does not own one without the kinds of intensive and intrusive background checks, registration and express federal permissions gun banners want for everyone and every firearm transaction.

(4) None of the policies Cllnton advocates would in any way have deterred, hampered or stopped any school killer. Even many of the legislators writing bills with those features have admitted it. Magazine size limitations, so-called “universal background checks,” “assault weapon” bans, and more are nothing more than feel good measures that will do nothing but harass and persecute the law-abiding.

(5) School killers do indeed represent a “very, very small group…prone to violence.” This particular group of criminals is very difficult to identify and stop. Criminals don’t obey the law. So politicians like Clinton wish to turn law-abiding Americans that pose no threat to school children or anyone else into criminals.

(6) And what is this “viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people?” The Second Amendment. Clinton is directly advocating ignoring or abrogating one of American’s most fundamental unalienable rights on what she represents as a majority/minority consensus. Presumably, not even a vote is required. And who are these terrorists? The Founders? Every gun-owning American? Every American who may not own a firearm but standing on principle, supports the entire Constitution, not just the portions useful to their political party?

One of fundamental principles of American democracy is that there can be no tyranny of the majority. Fifty-one percent or more of the population may not do away with the rights of the minority. This is, in large part, why the Bill of Rights exists, to protect not what everyone loves and thinks grand, but to protect ideas, practices, beliefs and speech that enjoy less than universal support. It also exists to make permanent single-party rule difficult to attain and maintain.

Hearing any politician argue for the tyranny of the majority in any context should not only send a chill up the spine of any honorable American, but should absolutely disqualify that politician from political office in our constitutional republic. To so much as think of such a thing is to imagine the destruction of liberty and the triumph of despotism.

Unfortunately for Clinton, she has a very long rhetorical trail of anti-gun statements and beliefs. In fact, even before her latest gun control gaffes (Gaffe: noun. when a politician accidently says what they really believe), Clinton’s strident anti-liberty views left even Clinton News Network’s John King and Peter Hamby unable to adequately protect her from herself.

From Brietbart.com:

“On May 7th CNN’s John King played a video of Hillary Clinton saying, ‘We have to rein in what has become [an] almost article of faith, that anybody can have a gun anywhere, [at] any time.’

King quickly added, ‘She’s talking in the context of mental health,’ but then he expressed obvious concern that this soundbite is going to make a great anti-Hillary commercial…

…Hillary was not talking about mental health issues at this point but about ‘fully licensed’ and ‘fully validated’ gun owners. She       said so herself.”


CNN’s Peter Hamby did his best to help Clinton but she was so obvious, so Hillary, he had no choice but to observe that Clinton’s anti-gun record was “going to be something of an issue for her I think.” If any media outlet bothers to review its own coverage of Clinton, Hamby’s parsing will shine as an extraordinary self-parody. As much as she will try to present herself as a moderate, seeking only “sensible,” “common sense” gun control measures, her record speaks loudly otherwise.

Clinton’s 2008 presidential run is a blueprint for her 2016 tactics. McClatchy’s David Lightman explained in a March, 2008 article:

“When Supreme Court justices debate the legality of the District of Columbia’s ban on handguns in coming weeks, their file will include a legal brief from Vice President Dick Cheney, Arizona Sen. John McCain and 54 other senators asking that the law be overturned.

But they won’t find anything from Democratic Sens. Hillary Clinton of New York or Barack Obama of Illinois. They didn’t sign the rival brief from other members of Congress who back the tough handgun restrictions.

The Democratic presidential candidates’ silence is part of a pattern. For years, the national party has downplayed its historic sympathy for gun control for fear that emphasizing it would be politically costly.”


Fortunately for the cause of liberty, the Supreme Court didn’t listen to Clinton and affirmed the right to keep and bear arms as a fundamental, individual right in the landmark Heller decision.  As much as Clinton and most other democrats avoid strident, public anti-gun advocacy, their true colors bleed through. Lightman again:

“A rival brief, signed by 18 Democratic members of Congress, counters that lawmakers long have had the right to regulate — and ban — ‘the use and possession of certain weapons.’

Clinton has a long history as an outspoken supporter of tough gun-control measures, but she, too, has moderated in recent months…

At a January debate, she called herself a ‘political realist, and I understand that the political winds are very powerful against doing enough to try to get guns off the street.”


“Political realist?” No. Clinton is a political opportunist willing to say whatever is necessary to any audience to advance her political fortunes. In this, Clinton is a common leftist politician. Like Barack Obama, she rhetorically supports the Second Amendment–sometimes–but she has never seen a restriction of the Second Amendment she does not support, and is of a kind with President Obama, the most effective inadvertent gun salesman in history.

Why is Clinton fit to be president? She was First Lady; she was a carpet bagging senator from New York; she ran for President once before.  Her ghost writers wrote two books about her, and she was a Secretary of State without a single accomplishment that can be identified by anyone, not the State Department, not her supporters, and not even Clinton. However, if elected, she would do no less than Barack Obama to make life difficult for the law-abiding gun owner, just as she would make life easier for criminals, including school shooters who, plotting mass murder and usually, suicide, tend not to care overmuch about obeying gun laws.

Even though her views and preferred policies on many other topics are as ephemeral as integrity at the IRS, a brief summary of her clear beliefs on guns—by no means exhaustive, is easily available through nothing more taxing than a brief Google search.

From On The Issues:

On making self defense in the home essentially impossible (Good morning America, 06-04-1999):

“If you own a gun… make sure it’s locked up and stored without the ammunition. In fact, make it stored where the ammunition is stored separately. We’ve made some progress in the last several years with the Brady Bill and some of the bans on assault  weapons, but we have a lot of work to do.”

Mrs. Clinton, speaking to children at the South Side Middle School in Nassau County, 07-15-1999):

“We will not make progress on a sensible gun control agenda unless the entire American public gets behind it. It is really important for each of you [kids] to make sure you stay away from guns. If you have guns in your home, tell your parents to keep them away from you and your friends and your little brothers and sisters.

On gun registration and licensing (CNN.com 06-02-2000):

Hillary Rodham Clinton offered her support for a legislative proposal to license handguns. The legislation, sponsored by Sen. Charles Schumer [one of the most staunch gun grabbers in history], would require anyone who wants to purchase a gun to obtain a state-issued photo gun license. ‘I stand in support of this common sense legislation to license everyone who wishes to purchase a gun.’ ‘I also believe that every new          handgun sale or transfer should be registered in a national registry, such as Chuck is proposing.”

Clinton twice voted against the “Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (03-02-2004 and 07-29-2005) which prohibited lawsuits against manufacturers, distributors, dealers and importers of guns and ammunition for so-called “gun violence” and the misuse of their products by third parties about whom they had no knowledge or control.

On how to deal with “gun violence” affecting African-American men (NAACP Presidential Primary Forum, 07-12-2007):

“I think it’s important to remember that the crime rate was driven down, & gun violence was driven down in the 1990s because of a combination of policies, like 100,000 police on the street and getting assault weapons off the street…Assault weapons are back on the street. We’ve got to go and do what works again. In addition to having policies that will get guns off the street…”

On the DC handgun ban that gave rise to the Heller decision, one of the few times a progressive has given lip service to anything resembling federalism (Philadelphia primary debate, 04-16-2008):

“I want to give local communities the authority over determining how to keep their citizens safe. This case you’re referring to is before the Supreme Court. [skip]

“I support sensible regulation that is consistent with the constitutional right to own and bear arms.”


The New York Times (05-09-1999) featured Clinton’s emotional appeal for gun control:

“Stepping up the Clinton Administration’s campaign against gun violence, Hillary Rodham Clinton used an emotional White House ceremony today to call on Americans to press Congress to ‘’buck   the gun lobby’’ and pass several gun control measures. [skip]

“The Senate is to begin debate next week on a number of gun control measures, some of which mirror proposals offered recently by President Clinton. ‘The senators need to hear from all of us,’ Mrs. Clinton said. She urged voters ‘’to give them the encouragement to do what they know is right and to remind them that there are many, many millions of American voters and citizens who will stand behind political leaders who are brave enough to buck the gun lobby, wherever that may take us, so that they will vote for the measures that we know will save lives.”


The NYT also noted that Hillary:

“….has also been more forceful than the President in directly taking on the powerful gun lobby in the aftermath of the Littleton killings.”

In a 06-07-2011 opinion piece, Forbes.com noted:

“Although professing to support the Second Amendment during her presidential election bid, Hillary Clinton is not generally known as a gun rights enthusiast. She has been a long-time activist for federal firearms licensing and registration, and a vigorous opponent of state Right-to-Carry laws. As a New York senator she ranked among the National Rifle Association’s worst ‘F’-rated gun banners who voted to support the sort of gunpoint disarmament that marked New Orleans‘ rogue police actions against law-abiding gun owners in the anarchistic aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.”

In a 07-10-2012 op-ed, former Clinton advisor Dick Morris noted that as Secretary of State, Clinton had gun control goals that transcended the borders of the United States:

“Without much fanfare and with as little publicity as possible, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will go to New York City to sign the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), now in the final stages of negotiation at the U.N. The treaty marks the beginning of an international crusade to impose gun controls on the United States and repeal our Second Amendment rights.

The ATT is nominally geared toward the purpose of stopping international arms sales to gangs, criminals and violent groups. But, as is so often the case with U.N. treaties, this is merely a convenient facade behind which to conceal the ATT’s true intent: to force gun control on the United States.”


Can there be any doubt that had Clinton been successful at the UN, she would be citing that treaty destructive to American sovereignty and liberty as her single greatest accomplishment? From 1999 to the present these few but entirely representative examples of Clinton’s own words and actions mark her as a dedicated and predictable progressive gun grabber.

Too many Americans make the mistake of thinking the Second Amendment is secured, but progressive politicians waited and schemed patiently for a century to impose Obamacare. They never took their eyes off the prize. They will do no less to obliterate the Second Amendment. If elected president, Hillary Clinton will be, if nothing else, a leader in attempts to diminish liberty and to increase the power of the state.

No politician willing to impose the tyranny of the majority in any way should ever be allowed anywhere near the White House.

Mike’s Home blog is Stately McDaniel Manor.

www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/06/mike-mcdaniel/hillary-clinton-platitudes-never-principles-one-exception/
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on June 19, 2014, 03:40:08 pm
Hi Hillary, "What difference does it make".
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on June 22, 2014, 10:38:35 pm
back in the 70's Hillary defended and got off a child rapist... typical ... interesting that working for the cia  infiltrating the black panthers doesn't qualify for anything ... oh well  this story died but now the audio interview has surfaced ...  How DO you end a witches ambition?  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2f13f2awK4
The Hillary Clinton Tapes
...


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/380880/hillarys-child-rapist-defense-matthew-continetti
June 21, 2014 12:00 AM
Hillary’s Child-Rapist Defense 
 It’s most definitely a newsworthy story, so why does the Arkansas library want to silence it? 

By Matthew Continetti

The facts are these. In 1975, before she married Bill Clinton, Hillary Rodham defended a child rapist in Arkansas court. She was not a public defender. No one ordered her to take the case. An ambitious young lawyer, she was asked by a friend if she would represent the accused, and she agreed. And her defense was successful. Attacking the credibility of the twelve-year-old victim on the one hand, and questioning the chain of evidence on another, Clinton got a plea bargain for her client. He served ten months in prison, and died in 1992. The victim, now 52, has had her life irrevocably altered — for the worse.

Sometime in the mid 1980s, for an Esquire profile of rising political stars, Hillary Clinton and her husband agreed to a series of interviews with the Arkansas journalist Roy Reed. Reed and Hillary Clinton discussed at some length her defense of the child rapist, and in the course of that discussion she bragged and laughed about the case, implied she had known her client was guilty, and said her “faith in polygraphs” was forever destroyed when she saw that her client had taken one and passed.

Reed’s article was never published. His tapes of the interviews were later donated to the University of Arkansas. Where they remained, gathering dust.

...


The occasion for Thrush’s tweet was “The Hillary Tapes” by the Washington Free Beacon’s Alana Goodman, who obtained the Reed interview and made it public for the first time.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jofortruth on June 23, 2014, 06:49:31 am
Hillary Clinton Calls for Harsh Restrictions On Alternative Media:
http://www.infowars.com/hillary-clinton-ca...ernative-media/ (http://www.infowars.com/hillary-clinton-calls-for-harsh-restrictions-on-alternative-media/)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zx0nrYdPCas (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zx0nrYdPCas)

Quote
Clinton declared it is the responsibility of the establishment media to counter "bad information" put out by the alternative media

No, Hillary, it is the media's job to act like professionals and real journalists and tell the American people the truth. Their job is not to GATEKEEP for you and your deceptive buddies who are nothing but globalist front men who are put there to lie to and manipulate the public!

The reason the alternative media arose is because the MSM was not doing its job and is nothing but a gatekeeper organization that lies to the public! That is why their ratings are suffering and nobody believes them anymore! The people know, Hillary! You are done as a politician and unless the MSM totally changes and becomes truly professional, they are done! THERE IS NO HONOR IN THE CURRENT MSM!

As shown by your actions, YOU DO NOT WORK FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, AND WE ARE SICK OF THE LIES AND DECEIT. YOUR FAMILY HAS NO RIGHT TO RULE OVER AMERICANS AND CONTINUE TO DO SO FOR DECADES. THE SAME GOES FOR THE BUSH FAMILY (NOW JEB WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT). AMERICA IS NOT A DICTATORSHIP OR A MONARCHY, BUT YOU PEOPLE THINK IT IS AND THAT YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO RULE FOREVER. YOU ARE DONE AS POLITICIANS BECAUSE THE PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP! AMERICA NEEDS REAL LEADERS WITH INTEGRITY, NOT FRONT MEN FOR THE GLOBALISTS WHO ARE NOTHING BUT FOLLOWERS WHO GET PAID WELL TO INVOKE AGENDAS! ENOUGH!


Hillary Clinton Confronted on Gun Control By Infowars
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB3fK_kUmO0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB3fK_kUmO0)
Title: Hilldog Has Got To Be Joking – This Is What ‘Dead Broke’ Actually Looks Like...
Post by: Geolibertarian on June 24, 2014, 06:50:00 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/hillary-clinton-has-got-to-be-joking-this-is-what-dead-broke-actually-looks-like.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/hillary-clinton-has-got-to-be-joking-this-is-what-dead-broke-actually-looks-like.html)

Hillary Clinton Has Got To Be Joking – This Is What ‘Dead Broke’ Actually Looks Like…

Michael Snyder
Economic Collapse
June 24, 2014

During a recent interview with Diane Sawyer, Hillary Clinton claimed that Bill and her were “dead broke” when they left the White House.  And then on Sunday, Hillary told the Guardian that they are not “truly well off” despite having earned about a hundred million dollars since leaving the White House and owning a couple of luxury homes.  This is yet another shocking example of how disconnected our political elite have become to the rest of the American people.  Perhaps Hillary Clinton is not “truly well off” when compared to some of the ultra-wealthy individuals that she rubs shoulders with at Democratic fundraisers, but according to numbers provided by the Social Security Administration, the Clintons would easily be in the top 0.01% of all income earners in America since leaving the White House.  So was Hillary Clinton joking, or is she really this out of touch with ordinary Americans?

Perhaps she thought that she could just tell a little white lie about how wealthy Bill and her truly are.  After all, 66 percent of Americans believe that when it says “natural” on a food label that it actually means something.  It seems like people will fall for almost anything these days.

Unfortunately for Clinton, people are not letting this one go.  In fact, CNN anchor Alison Kosik recently burst out laughing on air in response to Clinton’s claim that she is not “truly well off”…

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/hillary-clinton-has-got-to-be-joking-this-is-what-dead-broke-actually-looks-like.html)]
Title: FLOTUS: US Needs To Elect Female President ASAP
Post by: One Revelator on June 24, 2014, 12:03:23 pm
Comment: I guess any gun grabbing power monger will do “as long as it’s a woman”. Personally, I think the US presidency, congress, and supreme court has been turned into a pathetic joke. So, yeah. Put Joe the plumber in there or Mary Cary the porn star. “What difference does it make?”

FLOTUS: US Needs To Elect Female President ASAP
Larry O’Connor
Truth Revolt
June 14, 2014

First Lady Michelle Obama says the US is ready for a female president and should elect one “as soon as possible.”

Obama made the comments in a softball interview at the White House with ABC News’ Robin Roberts. The interview was not for ABC News but was staged event for the administration’s day-long “Working Families Summit.”

Roberts pivoted from her line of questioning (probably pre-approved, if not written by the White House) and asked FLOTUS when it would be time for the United States to have a woman in the Oval Office. As Mediaite reports, her response was not only a crowd pleaser for the feminists in attendance, but also had a back-handed, not-so-subtle endorsement for Hillary Clinton:

“That should happen as soon as possible,” Obama said, to cheers from the audience. “I think this country is ready. This country is ready for anyone who can do the job,” she said, adding that the election of her husband proved that you don’t need a “particular race or gender or background or socioeconomic status.”

“The person who should do the job is the person who’s the most qualified,” Obama continued, before giving Hillary Clinton a not-so-subtle nod. “And I think we have some options, don’t we?”

The “Working Families Summit” featured various “war on women” agenda points and, apparently, ABC News has no problem with their journalist being used as part of the propaganda machine emanating from Valerie Jarret’s office.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/flotus-us-needs-to-elect-female-president-asap.html
Title: Re: FLOTUS: US Needs To Elect Female President ASAP
Post by: BlackRoses on June 24, 2014, 07:45:59 pm
Comment: I guess any gun grabbing power monger will do “as long as it’s a woman”. Personally, I think the US presidency, congress, and supreme court has been turned into a pathetic joke. So, yeah. Put Joe the plumber in there or Mary Cary the porn star. “What difference does it make?”

FLOTUS: US Needs To Elect Female President ASAP
Larry O’Connor
Truth Revolt
June 14, 2014

First Lady Michelle Obama says the US is ready for a female president and should elect one “as soon as possible.”

Obama made the comments in a softball interview at the White House with ABC News’ Robin Roberts. The interview was not for ABC News but was staged event for the administration’s day-long “Working Families Summit.”

Roberts pivoted from her line of questioning (probably pre-approved, if not written by the White House) and asked FLOTUS when it would be time for the United States to have a woman in the Oval Office. As Mediaite reports, her response was not only a crowd pleaser for the feminists in attendance, but also had a back-handed, not-so-subtle endorsement for Hillary Clinton:

“That should happen as soon as possible,” Obama said, to cheers from the audience. “I think this country is ready. This country is ready for anyone who can do the job,” she said, adding that the election of her husband proved that you don’t need a “particular race or gender or background or socioeconomic status.”

“The person who should do the job is the person who’s the most qualified,” Obama continued, before giving Hillary Clinton a not-so-subtle nod. “And I think we have some options, don’t we?”

The “Working Families Summit” featured various “war on women” agenda points and, apparently, ABC News has no problem with their journalist being used as part of the propaganda machine emanating from Valerie Jarret’s office.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/flotus-us-needs-to-elect-female-president-asap.html

People will fall for this, just like they fell for Obama. I would love to see a woman President in my lifetime. But I don't want a woman for the sake of having a woman. And I wish people would realize that. It's more important to get people (whether man, woman, black, white, etc) that will actually represent the people and country, not follow orders to stomp all of us/do whatever they're told by the puppet masters. That's what I care about most.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on June 25, 2014, 08:34:29 pm
Hi S. Yes, a true human being, we haven't had one in office for some time.
Title: Hitlary's Book Sales Crash After 1st Week; Reviews Disastrous
Post by: Letsbereal on June 26, 2014, 03:15:50 pm
Hillary's Book Sales Crash After 1st Week; Reviews Disastrous
26 June 2014
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-06-26/hillarys-book-sales-crash-after-1st-week-reviews-disastrous
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on June 26, 2014, 04:17:37 pm


… interesting stuff from CNN (pro-Hilldog) polling:



10 things our poll tells us about Hillary Clinton

CNN Political Editor Paul Steinhauser

EXCERPTS:

Washington (CNN) - Do you have a positive impression of Hillary Clinton?
Do you think the former secretary of state will win the White House if she runs for president? And how excited would you be if she does run, and wins?

A CNN/ORC International (Ed: International?) poll gives us some answers to those questions, and whether a President Hillary Clinton would do a good job in the White House.

Here are 10 things our survey tells us about the most polled person in politics today:

1. We liked her as secretary of state, but as a candidate..?: Clinton's favorable ratings have steadily dropped since she left the State Department, from 67% in March 2013 to 59% last fall to 57% in March and now 55%.

The drop was expected as Clinton transitioned from America's top diplomat to potential Democratic presidential candidate

2. She gets trumped by her own family:
Two-thirds of those questioned in our poll said they have a favorable impression of former President Bill Clinton. And he’s not the only Clinton who has a higher favorable rating than his wife. Daughter Chelsea Clinton's favorable rating stands at 59%, four points higher than her mother.

3. She would do a good job as president: Our poll indicates that if Clinton is elected, most Americans say they think she will do a good job handling crucial domestic and international issues.

4. Clinton tops Obama on every issue: According to our survey, the former secretary of state scores much higher than President Barack Obama on every issue the were asked about.

5. Benghazi still hurts: … Republicans say there are still questions left unanswered. And the GOP-controlled House is launching another investigation.

6. She’s still the overwhelming frontrunner: … 63% of Democrats and independents who lean toward the party said they'd most likely support Clinton as the nominee.

7. Biggest intra-party threat comes from moderates: ...Twenty-percent of Democrats and independents who lean towards the party said they'd support a more conservative Democrat for the nomination, with 11% saying they'd back a more liberal candidate.

8. Clinton wins 2016 showdown: Clinton has, and remains, the frontrunner in hypothetical 2016 general election matchups against possible Republican contenders.

9. Is a Clinton 2016 victory a sure thing?: More than three-quarters of all Americans say it's very or somewhat likely Clinton will win the Democratic nomination if she runs for the White House, and two-thirds say she is likely to be the next president ….

10. Where's the excitement?:
…  only four out of 10 Democrats say they'd be excited to have Clinton as their party's presidential nominee.

Read article w/videos: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/06/17/10-things-our-poll-tells-us-about-hillary-clinton/ (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/06/17/10-things-our-poll-tells-us-about-hillary-clinton/)

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on June 27, 2014, 09:36:14 pm
 That's CNN for ya.. BELOW SOME OF HILLY'S QUOTES, BOTTOM LINES TREATMENT OF THE PEONS.
         LIL Hillary has been blowing up peons for years, oooooh that POWER.
    Human sacrifice gets em high. The bloodying of hands is a entry ritual for the overlords .

Bill and Hilly were interviewed when he was a candidate after leaving a gathering, (Why do your want to be president)?
 They both replied in unison " For the power of course".
They must have had a few drinks or lines, either way they were aghast that the reporter would ask such a dumb question.
 I tried looking this up, no luck.
                                           Simple known quotes of Hilly, below some salty remarks-treatment of underlings
But. some quotes:10. "I have to confess that it's crossed my mind that you could not be a Republican and a Christian."

9. "God bless the America we are trying to create."

8. "We have a lot of kids who don't know what works means. They think work is a four-letter word."

7. “He ran a gas station down in St. Louis... No, Mahatma Gandhi was a great leader of the 20th century.” –introducing a quote by Mahatma Gandhi

6. “Who is going to find out? These women are trash. Nobody’s going to believe them.” –on Bill Clinton’s bimbo eruptions

5. “If I didn’t kick his ass every day, he wouldn’t be worth anything.” –on Bill Clinton

4. "I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas, but what I decided to do was to fulfill my profession which I entered before my husband was in public life."

3. "We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

2. "I have said that I'm not running and I'm having a great time being pres — being a first-term senator." —on her presidential ambitions

1. "I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We are the president."

TREATMENT OF THE PEONS.

“Where is the G*damn f**king flag! I want the G*damn f**king flag up every morning at f**king sunrise.”
Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/2013/08/top-8-hillary-clinton-blue-quotes/#qgX6b84S95lFtvEY.99

*F**k off! It’s enough I have to see you shit-kickers every day, I’m not going to talk to you too!! Just do your G*damn job and keep your mouth shut.”
AmericanEvita America Evita by Christopher Anderson, p.90-Hillary to her State Trooper body guards after one of them greeted her with “Good Morning.”
Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/2013/08/top-8-hillary-clinton-blue-quotes/2/#WoIsdK2PVbQbwIeU.99

“If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass over here and grab those bags!”
FirstPartner The First Partner p.259- Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident.

 “Stay the f**k back, stay the f**k back away from me! Don’t come within ten yards of me, or else!  Just  f**king do as I say, Okay!!?”
UnlimitedAccessUnlimited Access by Clinton FBI Agent in Charge, Gary Aldrige, p.139- Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail. 
Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/2013/08/top-8-hillary-clinton-blue-quotes/4/#J7DxEyBvgrekUYqY.99

“Where’s the miserable c**k sucker!”
TruthAboutHillaryThe Truth About Hillary by Edward Klein, p.5- Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer.
Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/2013/08/top-8-hillary-clinton-blue-quotes/5/#SmBoJo5MwD5oEcFk.99

“Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo.  I need those sunglasses.  We need to go back!”
DerelectionOfDutyDereliction of Duty p.71-72– Hillary to Marine One helicopter pilot to turn back while en route to Air Force One.

“Come on Bill, put your d**k up!  You can’t f**k her here!!”
InsideTheWH2“Inside the White House” by Ronald Kessler, p.243-Hillary to Gov. Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive female.
Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/2013/08/top-8-hillary-clinton-blue-quotes/8/#CoJAE8eHzGLPVhrF.99

 





Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on June 29, 2014, 03:47:09 pm
It's not that I am sure Hillary will be president but the NWO is pushing for her and since in the U.S. it matters 'who counts the votes' so they can pull that off and maybe they will.
 
But Hillary and scandals seems to become a synonym so that poses a bit of a problem like it did before because plan A was Hillary not Obama as President but they pulled her back temporarily, because of a scandal, to bring her back later like they are doing now.
 
But now you have Hillary connected to Benghazi which indeed doesn't improve Hillary's approval ratings but maybe they just don't care and they always can pull out a their wild card like they did with Obama.

Nobody knew the guy back than. Now maybe some other woman to produce the first woman president after the first black president.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on June 29, 2014, 05:08:08 pm


… this bit of information has been around since …
well, since the Clintons have been around … but
now that Clinton 2.0 is set to become El Pesidente
it just may blow up in Hilldog's face.
Not to mention Bill's … uh … indiscretions:





The Clintons’ Greatest Shame:
Chelsea Clinton is the biological daughter of Webb Hubbell and not Bill Clinton

By Robert Morrow

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/SCARY.jpg)

EXCERPTS:
 In 2007 I had a conversation with then TIME reporter Karen Tumulty. I was calling her and asking why TIME was not covering all the dirty tactics and criminal private detective terror campaigns that the Clintons had long used to frighten Bill’s sex victims and former girlfriends into silence.

            Tumulty astoundingly told me “We are not going to re-litigate the 1990’s.”

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/Chelsea1995.jpg)

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/hubbell.jpg)

   I then said to Tumulty, well you do know that Chelsea is the biological daughter of Webb Hubbell and not Bill Clinton? Tumulty’s response was interesting - she did not deny or challenge this blockbuster assertion but rather just seemed to confirm it by her awkward silence and accepting non denial. Years later I asked a longtime high level Republican operative “How long have you known that Chelsea was the biological daughter of Webb Hubbell?” He said since 1992. Then I asked “Why didn’t you use it in the 1992 presidential campaign?” His answer: “Because I was not running the 1992 campaign.” I then asked “Would you say that most high level Republican and Democratic political operatives know that Chelsea is the biological daughter of Webb Hubbell?”

            This long time GOP operative said: “Yes.”

Quote
Both Gennifer Flowers (privately to someone I know) and Larry Nichols (publicly) have both stated that Chelsea is the biological daughter of Webb Hubbell. Both Flowers (14 year affair) and Nichols were very close to Bill Clinton.

Quote
In order to cover up all this uber dysfunction, the Clintons have used a variety of tactics ranging from terror campaigns, run by nasty so-called “private detectives” (aka goons Jack Palladino, Anthony Pellicano) to public relations and coordinated smear campaigns to terrify Bill’s sex victims and former mistresses into silence.

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/clinton.jpg)

   Chelsea has had plastic surgery to minimize the “gumminess” of her lower lips, which is one of the key tells that big lipped Webb Hubbell is her father.

CONTINUE READING ~~~~>http://1984arkansasmotheroftheyear.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-clintons-greatest-shame-chelsea-is.html (http://1984arkansasmotheroftheyear.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-clintons-greatest-shame-chelsea-is.html)
Title: "Clinton Inc." Raises Almost $3 Billion, And The Biggest 'Donor' Is...
Post by: Letsbereal on July 02, 2014, 09:00:15 pm
"Clinton Inc." Raises Almost $3 Billion, And The Biggest 'Donor' Is...
2 July 2014
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-02/clinton-inc-raises-almost-3-billion-and-biggest-donor
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on July 03, 2014, 04:36:01 pm


In the good ole USA name recognition alone,
and the fact that she is NOT a straight white
male, is worth at least 50% of the sheeple vote.

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: One Revelator on July 05, 2014, 01:56:53 am
For more information on Hillary’s completely deranged behavior and non-existant empathy for anyone but herself see this thread.

Hillary's treatment of her UNDERLINGS.
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=259870.0

Yet, somehow that’s all A-OK when propping this corpse up as presidential material simply because she’s a woman. Technically.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on July 05, 2014, 03:36:13 pm
It's not that I am sure Hillary will be president but the NWO is pushing for her and since in the U.S. it matters 'who counts the votes' so they can pull that off and maybe they will.
 
But Hillary and scandals seems to become a synonym so that poses a bit of a problem like it did before because plan A was Hillary not Obama as President but they pulled her back temporarily, because of a scandal, to bring her back later like they are doing now.
 
But now you have Hillary connected to Benghazi which indeed doesn't improve Hillary's approval ratings but maybe they just don't care and they always can pull out a their wild card like they did with Obama.

Nobody knew the guy back than. Now maybe some other woman to produce the first woman president after the first black president.
            Hillary was the driving force behind Billy boy. As for Oby & Hillary, they are in the same ol club, attached at the hip.
                         We all know what's coming if Lil Hillary gets the throne, the same OLE sh**te brought to another level.
           The overlords may be a tad worried about Hillary's quest, I feel certain they have allready  lined up potential muppets.
Just to repeat one quote as to how she treats her underling. OR                           " What difference does it make" Hall of fame.
         HILLARY   *F**k off! It’s enough I have to see you shit-kickers every day, I’m not going to talk to you too!! Just do your G*damn job and keep your mouth shut.”
AmericanEvita America Evita by Christopher Anderson, p.90-Hillary to her State Trooper body guards after one of them greeted her with “Good Morning.”
Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/2013/08/top-8-hillary-clinton-blue-quotes/2/#WoIsdK2PVbQbwIeU.99
Title: Hitlary: I've run for president but not been a granny
Post by: Letsbereal on July 07, 2014, 05:53:14 pm
Hillary: I've run for president but not been a granny https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgt-V_hDvbI

7 July 2014, Channel 4 News
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on July 07, 2014, 06:54:20 pm
 Hillary (What difference does it make) is to be a granny.
  I feel sorry Chelsea, can't help it.
Quote: “Marc and I are very excited that we have our first child arriving later this year, and I certainly feel all the better whether it’s a girl or a boy that she or he will grow up in a world full of so many strong young female leaders,” she said. “So thank you for inspiring me and inspiring future generations including the one that we’ll be lucky enough to welcome into our family later this year.”
                Why do I get the feeling this was more of a political statement?
 
Title: Hillary Clinton Rebuffs Comic’s Question on Candidacy
Post by: Letsbereal on July 16, 2014, 08:42:39 pm
Hillary Clinton Rebuffs Comic’s Question on Candidacy
16 July 2014
, by Lisa Lerer (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2014-07-16/clinton-says-younger-americans-doubt-economic-opportunities.html

Hillary Clinton rebuffed a late-night comedian’s repeated attempts to get her to say whether she would run for U.S. president -- though she allowed that she’d prefer working in a place with “fewer corners,” a reference to the White House’s Oval Office.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: kidA on July 17, 2014, 04:17:55 am
I finally posted something on Facebook in order to spread awareness about the  monarchy and 20+ years of Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama-Clinton (maybe Bush?) presidency and I got a surprising turn out. Likes from women, Latinos, gay men, white, and black people that I expected to think otherwise and no hate fueled comments directed towards me.

It's nice to see that some of my peers are agreeing with me! Proves my concern earlier about whether or not my generation is aware of this dog and pony show.
Title: Wall Street backlash will shake up 2016 election
Post by: Letsbereal on July 22, 2014, 05:38:44 pm
I finally posted something on Facebook in order to spread awareness about the  monarchy and 20+ years of Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama-Clinton (maybe Bush?) presidency and I got a surprising turn out. Likes from women, Latinos, gay men, white, and black people that I expected to think otherwise and no hate fueled comments directed towards me.

It's nice to see that some of my peers are agreeing with me! Proves my concern earlier about whether or not my generation is aware of this dog and pony show.

Wall Street backlash will shake up 2016 election - Americans say settlements aren’t enough punishment for bad deeds
22 July 2014
, by David Weidner - San Francisco (MarketWatch)
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-backlash-will-shake-up-2016-election-2014-07-22

Excerpt:

Americans fed up with the financial industry’s sway in Washington, its predatory practices and lack of executive accountability represent a much bigger swath of citizens than those who camped at Zuccotti Park in Lower Manhattan.

Nearly four out of five voters surveyed (78%) said financial rules and enforcement need to be strengthened, and that Wall Street’s bad practices have not changed enough, according to a poll results released Monday by Lake Research Partners on behalf of Americans for Financial Reform and the Center for Responsible Lending.

The poll found 61% of respondents agreed that Wall Street and the financial industry are still too powerful and engage in reckless practices that pose a continuing danger to the economy.

And the furor overrides the political divide we’ve been hearing so much about.

The poll found 84% of Democrats, 82% of Independents and 74% of Republicans say they are concerned about the influence of Wall Street financial companies on elected officials.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: JohnBFTOR on July 22, 2014, 09:56:04 pm
http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/2013/10/readying-world-for-hillary-red.html
Readying the World For Hillary-the-Red
(http://images.sodahead.com/polls/003476149/4612606269_Socialist_Hillary_Clinton_33763_answer_2_xlarge.png)



It takes a corporate fascist whore to blaze a nation.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on July 23, 2014, 09:22:13 pm
 When a guy was  detached from reality some folks would ssy: "He's dead but just doesn't know it yet".
 The lights are on but nobody's home.

    She has the capacity to demand air time, MSM, and she uses it, leverage on a elite scale.

Mrs Clinton past record is in evidence for those of us who care, though the number of enlightened folks are growing.
 
In fact Any citizen who watched her hysterical, pyschotic reaction when under congressional scrutiny concerning the Benghazi murders..
                     "What difference does it make"
            Either they get the point, she could give a twit or they are in need of a soul check.

 
 
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on August 20, 2014, 01:43:00 am
Texas Gov. Perry: Indictment ‘a Political Act’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aB1JTkAVmsg

19 August 2014, Associated Press


First election victim. Election Season has already begun, Hitlary will win.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on August 20, 2014, 02:37:24 am
One last thought about the OLD HAG...FALL Off Earth; and NO ONE WILL MISS YA  ::)---Ya OLD HAG!

This useless person is just that: USELESS!!!

to be honest I do ask GOD to take the old hag to The WOOD SHED for a Good Spanking by The Hand of GOD of Course! ;)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog - Code Red!~ Hitlary Parade
Post by: Letsbereal on August 28, 2014, 04:45:48 pm
Code Red!~ Hitlary Parade

Clinton: Frayed Trust Led to Ferguson Violence https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I20NsAO-6r8

28 August 2014, Associated Press
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on September 13, 2014, 11:56:32 am
George Galloway's Sputnik: Stacy Herbert on USA news (13Sept14) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDgHiPBgj-Y
Title: Hitlary Clinton in Iowa Stirs 2016 Speculation, How Dems Can Win in the South
Post by: Letsbereal on September 14, 2014, 10:27:34 pm
Hillary Clinton in Iowa Stirs 2016 Speculation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6a0CwQ9Y3NU

14 September 2014, Associated Press


Bill Clinton: How Dems Can Win in the South https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKBCZCFmz_M

14 September 2014, Associated Press
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on September 23, 2014, 06:40:34 pm
Hillary Clinton highlights gender as 2016 looms
Hillary Rodham Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign emphasized her experience, competence and preparation to become president. As Clinton considers a second White House bid in 2016, she is making a pronounced case for female empowerment and the role .I have to wonder if she has testicles hidden away,   not funny?    Hillary was Billy's motivator.
                                     She wants the woman votes and her office with no corners.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: BlackRoses on September 23, 2014, 08:17:35 pm
Hillary Clinton highlights gender as 2016 looms
Hillary Rodham Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign emphasized her experience, competence and preparation to become president. As Clinton considers a second White House bid in 2016, she is making a pronounced case for female empowerment and the role .I have to wonder if she has testicles hidden away,   not funny?    Hillary was Billy's motivator.
                                     She wants the woman votes and her office with no corners.

Well, it's the new/old standard. "You just hate Hillary because she's a woman!" Just like we're racists if we don't support/don't like Obama. I really wish people would stop falling for this horse*hit.

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on September 23, 2014, 09:11:22 pm
BlackRoses. I might have mentioned this before if so sorry.
Bill & Hill were interviewed after leaving a nightly gathering, Bill was the prez candidate, they appered a tad high.
No matter, the reporter asked them why he wanted to be president, "they both replied in unison, "Why the power of course"
 Their response was like, whats wrong with this shi**thead, why else would we want the WH.
 
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: BlackRoses on September 23, 2014, 10:51:03 pm
BlackRoses. I might have mentioned this before if so sorry.
Bill & Hill were interviewed after leaving a nightly gathering, Bill was the prez candidate, they appered a tad high.
No matter, the reporter asked them why he wanted to be president, "they both replied in unison, "Why the power of course"
 Their response was like, whats wrong with this shi**thead, why else would we want the WH.

No need to apologize. :) And it's no wonder why that clip has slipped into a black hole. I remember you said you tried to find it on other sites and couldn't find it.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Outer Haven on October 09, 2014, 03:41:28 am
Is she's (s)elected, it will break the tradition of Democrats and Republicans being switched every 8 years.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on October 17, 2014, 11:58:48 am
classic...
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/hillary-clinton-flying-monkey-signs-741631
Hillary Clinton Flying Monkey Signs Deface Brentwood Ahead of Fundraiser
(http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/news_portrait/2014/10/hillary_flying_monkeys_a_p.jpg)

.....
Guerrilla street artist SABO, who made headlines with his Gwyneth Paltrow "Obama Drone" poster, has struck again -- this time ahead of Hillary Clinton's upcoming Democratic fundraiser at Tavern restaurant in Brentwood, Calif.

(http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver/Breitbart/Breitbart-California/2014/10/08/Paltrow3JPG.JPG)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on October 17, 2014, 02:43:56 pm
classic...
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/hillary-clinton-flying-monkey-signs-741631
Hillary Clinton Flying Monkey Signs Deface Brentwood Ahead of Fundraiser
(http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/news_portrait/2014/10/hillary_flying_monkeys_a_p.jpg)



  I gotta admit that these pictures are not as scary as the real pictures of HILLDOG!!!!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on October 25, 2014, 08:27:49 pm
[ fact is sometimes better than fiction ]
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/10/24/Hillary-Dont-Let-Anybody-Tell-You-That-Businesses-Create-Jobs\
Hillary: 'Don't Let Anybody Tell You' That 'Businesses Create Jobs'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyUoCiWsTfI
Title: Hillary: "Business Does Not Create Jobs", Washington Does
Post by: Letsbereal on October 25, 2014, 11:56:10 pm
Hillary: "Business Does Not Create Jobs", Washington Does
25 October 2014
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-10-25/hillary-business-does-not-create-jobs-washington-does


Hitlary will come just in time to declare WWIII.
Title: Did Hitlary Really Say That? Mike Maloney
Post by: Letsbereal on October 28, 2014, 02:08:00 pm
Did Hillary Really Say That? Mike Maloney https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCgUaWGYWXQ

Oct 28, 2014 Mike Maloney
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on October 29, 2014, 02:51:55 am
 The only place Hillary should Run to; is, the nearest Loony Bin! and have herself committed for being a 'Pathological Loser!"
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on November 10, 2014, 11:18:56 am
This thread is inexplicitly linked to Jebby Bush

George W. Bush likes idea of Jeb Bush vs Hillary Clinton in 2016
By Steve Holland


 (Reuters) - Never mind the potential for name fatigue. Former U.S. President George W. Bush likes the idea of a 2016 presidential matchup between his Republican brother Jeb Bush and Democrat Hillary Clinton.

In an interview as part of the rollout of a book he has written about his father, former President George H.W. Bush, Bush said he is urging Jeb to try to make it three Bush presidents
...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on November 10, 2014, 07:32:30 pm
Hi T.
            GW Bush/master is attempting to push for his bro Jebby.
Silverado went down the memory hole, Daddy Bush made sure of it, Precot B. dealt with the Nazis, that too fell down the hole.
  Pappa Bush to a WH reporter after leaving office.... " if Americans knew what I had done they would lynch me"
  He hasn't stoped, the dynasty seems to be going on..
  Hillary and Bill stuck their noses up the Bush's backside.  Sh***t floats.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on November 12, 2014, 07:54:57 am


… amazing to watch this tag-team match play out:




The tricky Obama-Clinton handoff begins

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/81744919.jpg)
Then-Sen. Barack Obama, D-IL, and then-Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-NY, at an event in Unity, New Hampshire during the 2008 presidential campaign. (Mario Tama/GETTY IMAGES)

By Juliet Eilperin and Anne Gearan November 11 at 6:03 PM

As the presumptive Democratic front-runner in 2016, Hillary Rodham Clinton has many of the same goals as President Obama, starting with reassembling and reenergizing the coalition responsible for Obama’s victories in 2008 and 2012.

But if she becomes the nominee, Clinton will have to unlink herself from Obama while positioning herself to inherit the bloc of young people and minorities that helped put Obama in the White House.

“Young people want to be inspired by someone and something,” said Stephanie Cutter, a partner at the Democratic consulting firm Precision Strategies and Obama’s deputy campaign manager in 2012. “The president can and will help energize them over the next two years, but he’s not on the ballot in 2016. The next nominee must also reach and inspire them.”

The poor showing by Democrats in last week’s midterm elections has forced Obama to reboot his second-term agenda and try to restore the Democrats to political health — as his star as party leader begins to fade and Clinton’s is on the rise.

Quote
“President Obama’s legacy is now entirely dependent on the election of a Democratic successor as president who will protect and extend it, not demolish it,” said David Brock, a Clinton ally and chairman of the pro-Democratic super PAC American Bridge. “Should she run, they both now have a common enemy in a Republican Congress that will define politics through 2016.”

CLICK OVER to WASHPO to CONTINUE~~~>http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-tricky-obama-clinton-handoff-begins/2014/11/11/0f650828-6605-11e4-9fdc-d43b053ecb4d_story.html (http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-tricky-obama-clinton-handoff-begins/2014/11/11/0f650828-6605-11e4-9fdc-d43b053ecb4d_story.html)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on November 12, 2014, 06:04:44 pm
Mark: You Wouldn't Like Clinton When He's Angry... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGh9LIeSHfY

Nov 12, 2014, Bloomberg News


Clinton's are indeed coke dealing murderers, everybody knows https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lin-a2lTelg
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on November 12, 2014, 06:30:26 pm
 Billy is a practiced player, he doesn't hit head on, he sicks his backstabber.
 Why bark when ya got dogys .
     Hey L, listened to the song, first time I heard it,,NICE.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on November 12, 2014, 06:58:21 pm
Billy is a practiced player, he doesn't hit head on, he sicks his backstabber.
 Why bark when ya got dogys .
     Hey L, listened to the song, first time I heard it,,NICE.

You know what they say, you need an official denial to know it's true. So he practically admits it.

Why would he go into this allegation anyways? I wouldn't if I know it's total BS. Well he just did. LOlz
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on November 12, 2014, 08:45:25 pm
MENA Airport
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on November 14, 2014, 07:26:31 am
MENA Airport

  Since you brought up MENA, we should bring up the Arkancides.

              whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html

              THE CLINTON BODY-COUNT
Title: Hillary Clinton: "Soulless, Principle-Free, Power Hungry..."
Post by: Letsbereal on November 14, 2014, 08:35:17 pm
Glenn Greenwald On Hillary Clinton: "Soulless, Principle-Free, Power Hungry..."
14 November 2014
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-11-14/glenn-greenwald-hillary-clinton-soulless-principle-free-power-hungry


Problem is red/head, you lose, blue/tail, you lose. So even making a bet flipping a coin doesn't help you and me for that matter.

The outcome is pretty, pretty predictable. An other President, an other 911, an other war.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on November 14, 2014, 09:05:18 pm
Hi L....The coin toss  lands on the edge, no heads or tails, same coin.

Presidents..Since JFK
**** John F. Kennedy (1961-1963) Murdered   V.P  Lyndon B. Johnson (1961-1963)
36. Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-1969)   None (1963-1965) Imploded Vietnam(g> of Tonkin) ( & beleived he knew about JFK's assasination)
                         VP....Hubert Humphrey (1965-1969) Ignored, put the cat out attitude.
37. Richard Nixon (1969-1974)War raged, scandal/resigned   V.P..Spiro Agnew (1969-1973) Sprio tossed out/crime.
None (1973)
Gerald Ford (1973-1974)       Filled the gap.
38. Gerald Ford (1974-1977)   None/scared       (1974)...........Nelson Rockefeller (1974-1977) planner
39. Jimmy Carter (1977-1981) appearence of sanity restored......   Walter Mondale (1977-1981)Wally wonker
40. Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) run by VP Bush                                        George Bush (1981-1989).NWO
41. George Bush (1989-1993) If Americans knew**they would lynch me..   Dan Quayle (1989-1993) riding the train.
42. Bill Clinton (1993-2001) NWO syndicate   ......                                        Al Gore (1993-2001) suckbag.
43. George W. Bush (2001-2009)   NWO Syndicate...                                     .Dick Cheney (2001-2009) Henchman.
44. Barack Obama (2009-present)   Joe Biden (2009-present)                    No descripton required , simply sold out muppets
         Yup, I know I'm cynical, can't help it!
Hillary, the Clinton records reveal criminal organized crime at the highest level, and much more.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: One Revelator on November 19, 2014, 09:18:51 am
Infographic.

(https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-J01Rxjrmros/U6HjXiWIzBI/AAAAAAAAA0c/w27kxuF-qYg/s1600/HillaryFired.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on November 19, 2014, 11:57:39 am
Infographic.

(https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-J01Rxjrmros/U6HjXiWIzBI/AAAAAAAAA0c/w27kxuF-qYg/s1600/HillaryFired.jpg)

  Why, this is perfect.  She has all the qualifications to be president---LIAR, UNETHICAL, DISHONEST, VIOLATES THE CONSTITUTION AND ALL RULES.

  She'll have to work on her weight though.  I think the maximum a president can weigh is 300 lbs.  LOL
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on November 20, 2014, 06:13:17 am
Hi Larson, I'm glad you brought that up, it had gone down the Ole memory hole.

You may not like the latest...................SUPER PAC & Clinton.

Hillary.
the super-PAC that launched in late 2012 to urge Hillary Clinton to run for president in 2016, is coming to an end, Politico reports.

Related Stories

Secret Emails of the Men Who May Run Hillary Clinton's Campaign ABC News
Democrats got absolutely clobbered in the midterms. The exception was Hillary Clinton. The Week (RSS)
What the head of "Ready for Warren" thinks about Elizabeth Warren's new Senate promotion Vox.com
Clinton's Time Is Now Huffington Post
Rand Paul brands key Democratic losses as #HillarysLosers The Week (RSS)
Founded by former Hillary Clinton staffer Adam Parkhomenko, the grass-roots group will wind down when the former secretary of state announces her decision — which most expect to be a declaration of her candidacy — early next year.

The super-PAC has been described by some as a "shadow operation" for Clinton's would-be campaign — a characterization its creators dismiss.

“The goal of this organization has always been clear — Ready for Hillary has an explicit mission and a stated path to accomplish it,” Tracy Sefl, a senior adviser to the group, told Politico. “Now, there are several million people who can take pride in — and rightly claim credit for — the progress made. Ready for Hillary isn’t done, but we’re still very grateful for the opportunity to reflect on where we are and what all of these supporters have helped build.”
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on November 20, 2014, 08:43:03 am
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  Chris,  I'm just praying that Obummer screws up so bad that even some of the Kool-Aid drinkers may not vote for her.

  Make no mistake about this immigration crap---IT'S ALL FOR HILLARY TO PICK UP MORE VOTES.  It's part of the secret Obummer-Hillary political relationship.

  Liberals hate truth and following any rules.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on November 20, 2014, 10:18:38 am
Memory lane: Oby and the shill in the same beanbag.


Quote from: GoingEtheric on May 24, 2008, 10:05:12 am ... Sure we could talk about how bad a candidate Obama is, but that kinda implies ... Hillary Clinton inspired by Lyndon Johnson's Assassination of JFK ..... Obama has allready agreed with shillery about 2 year involuntary service for American citizens.
5 Years Ago, as War Neared, Hillary Clinton Was Silent, 'NYT'
forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=32028.0

20/03/2008 -
(March 16, 2008) -- Wherever you stand on the Obama/Clinton race, one .... can inforce the 2 year involuntary service act thats been mentioned.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on November 20, 2014, 10:25:19 am
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  Chris,  I'm just praying that Obummer screws up so bad that even some of the Kool-Aid drinkers may not vote for her.

  Make no mistake about this immigration crap---IT'S ALL FOR HILLARY TO PICK UP MORE VOTES.  It's part of the secret Obummer-Hillary political relationship.

  Liberals hate truth and following any rules.

They are all ready handing out drivers licenses in California (with motor voter) to illegal aliens with MULTIPLE ALIASES ( so I guess they have multiple Drivers licences and voter registrations in various counties and sanctuary states ,,,,

http://www.scpr.org/blogs/multiamerican/2014/09/19/17325/feds-approve-design-for-immigrant-drivers-licenses/
California DMV to 'move forward' with immigrant driver's licenses

The California Department of Motor Vehicles has finalized the look of its immigrant driver's licenses after some tweaks to the design were met with federal approval

The DMV plans to start taking license applications from immigrants in the country illegally next January.

The Department of Homeland Security had said an earlier version of immigrant driver's licenses did not have enough markings to distinguish it from 'compliant' licenses.  The proposed design included “DP” as in “driving privilege" on the front of the card instead of the typical "DL" for "driver's license."

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-California/2014/11/08/1-4M-Illegal-Aliens-Offered-New-Year-Gift-CA-Driver-Licenses

See the power of "Provisional Ballots":  

http://www.kcra.com/politics/vote-updates-expected-for-ose-bera-race/29817794
Doug Ose concedes, Rep. Bera wins re-election in D7
 
...
Bera's Republican challenger, former Congressman Doug Ose, congratulated the incumbent in a written statement Thursday evening.


"Let me begin by saying that I celebrate the fact that our institutions and our laws provide us a system whereby elections can be peacefully resolved," Ose said. "I congratulate Congressman Bera on his victory."
...

The Associated Press called the race for Bera after determining that Ose could not make up the difference with the 4,300 provisional ballots that remained to be counted
Incumbent Bera first won the seat 2 years ago


| - - -

https://www.electionintegrityproject.com/2013/09/california-suspends-a-critical-method-to-prevent-voter-fraud/
California suspends a critical method to prevent voter fraud!
By EIP on September 26, 2013 in Press Room

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

SANTA CLARITA, CA. September 26, 2013 – EIP and its supporters nationwide have been reeling from Governor Brown’s recent signing of a bill that allows non-citizens to serve as elections workers, despite our best efforts to kill this unconstitutional bill. Now, EIP has learned that further assaults on fair and honest elections in our state are hidden in the Governor’s latest budget, which he signed June 27.

The main budget bill, AB 110, suspends nine elections-related mandates for through 2014, a critical election year. Most concerning is the suspension of the requirement that signatures on provisional ballot envelopes be compared against the voters’ registration signatures to determine voter eligibility before the enclosed ballot is counted.
...
California is the land of provisional ballots, which are now an open invitation for fraud!

Provisional voting is increasing in California, partly due to the indiscriminate and illegal issuance of these ballots to “anyone” who wants to vote. According to the PEW Charitable Trusts research, Californians cast 1,065,156 provisional ballots on November 6, 2012. This was 7.4% of all California votes cast, making it the #2 provisional-voting state in the union. In that election, California alone accounted for almost 40% of the entire nation’s reported provisional votes! Yet Governor Brown enables fraudsters by removing the critical validation step that ensures these 1+ million votes are lawfully cast and counted.
...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on November 20, 2014, 11:05:52 am
Why does the Andreas fault line come to mind.......?
      Off the wall I guess.  Yes Tahoe, they are laying out the red carpet, GWB stated this, Oby is determined to finish it afterall he has to answer to the crew.
      Some guy said, its not the voters who decide, it's the vote counters.
                                       Gov.  Brown is brown nosing it.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on November 20, 2014, 11:24:47 am
Why does the Andreas fault line come to mind.......?
      Off the wall I guess.  Yes Tahoe, they are laying out the red carpet, GWB stated this, Oby is determined to finish it afterall he has to answer to the crew.
      Some guy said, its not the voters who decide, it's the vote counters.
                                       Gov.  Brown is brown nosing it.

  What a coincidence---Gov Brown governing the most populated Brown state.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on November 20, 2014, 11:28:44 am
They are all ready handing out drivers licenses in California (with motor voter) to illegal aliens with MULTIPLE ALIASES ( so I guess they have multiple Drivers licences and voter registrations in various counties and sanctuary states ,,,,




  It will be interesting in the next election when Caleeefornia will have 80 million people voting in a state with only 34 million people living there. 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on November 23, 2014, 08:29:39 am
 2 situations that could definitely bring down the house, last nail in the coffin.
 A dirty bomb, with a foreign made signature. FF
 Or a assassination attempt, be it unsuccessful or not, pulled off by dupes set up by the crew. FF
 
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on November 23, 2014, 08:53:05 am
Hilldog continues to lead all potential GOP presidential candidates (yes, including Rand Paul) in the polls.

-- http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/ (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/)

-- http://www.pollingreport.com/wh16gen.htm (http://www.pollingreport.com/wh16gen.htm)

I know how to reverse this trend, but no one will listen to me.

Indeed, to hear some people talk, Twitt Romney failed in 2012 because he wasn't enough of a reactionary on economics.

http://www.theonion.com/articles/romney-apologizes-to-nations-150-million-starving,29603/?ref=auto (http://www.theonion.com/articles/romney-apologizes-to-nations-150-million-starving,29603/?ref=auto)

Romney Apologizes To Nation's 150 Million 'Starving, Filthy Beggars'

The Onion
Sep 18, 2012

(http://o.onionstatic.com/images/18/18102/original/700.jpg?9066)

SALT LAKE CITY—Seeking to limit the fallout from a videotaped speech in which he asserts 47 percent of Americans “pay no taxes” and do not take “personal responsibility and care for their lives,” Mitt Romney hastily called a press conference today to apologize personally to the “150 million starving, filthy beggars [he] might have offended.”

Saying that he deeply regretted his choice of words at a private $50,000-a-plate fundraising function in May—during which he argued “[his] job is not to worry” about the lower-earning half of the nation’s populace—Romney personally appealed to the country’s “dirt-caked garbage pickers and toothless street urchins” for forgiveness.

“First and foremost, I would like to offer a heartfelt apology to all the whores, junkies, bums, and grime-covered derelicts out there who make up nearly half our nation,” a visibly contrite and solemn Romney said outside a campaign stop at a local high school. “Let me assure you that I in no way meant to offend any of the putrid-smelling, barefoot masses out there. My campaign is not about dividing this nation, but about bringing all sides together—the rich, elegant members of the upper class, as well as the 47 percent who are covered in flies and eat directly from back-alley dumpsters.”

“I am fully committed to building a better future for every American,” Romney continued, “and that means ensuring all 150 million grease-and-urine-soaked members of our society get a fair shake.”

The Romney campaign reportedly scrambled into damage-control mode after the video leaked Monday, issuing a statement late last night stating that the intended target of Romney’s remarks was ingrained big-government largesse, not the “hordes of uneducated, loathsome scum who unfortunately populate this country.”

However, with Romney’s comments continuing to dominate the news cycle today, the campaign opted to convene a press event to allow Romney to speak directly to the nation’s “grimy panhandlers and coke-addled whores” so that he could issue an apology and explain his familiarity with their struggles.

“I know just how hard it must be to get through a miserable, destitute life that is rife with crying babies whose shrieks consistently disrupt the affluent members of society who actually contribute something to this world,” said the GOP candidate, adding that he wanted to make amends for his recent statements and reach out to what he called the country’s “snaggle-toothed street people” and “hell-spawned savages.” “I know it can be challenging to wake each morning, covered in your own feces and refuse, and get back out there on the streets to beg for spare change and food scraps, always one step from dying right there in an alley.”

“I know your challenges, and I am ready to fight for you,” he added

Romney also said he recognized that the hardships of the nation’s low-earners are made more difficult by the fact that so “very, very many of them are drug-addicted, high-school-dropout single mothers and fathers who sleep in gutters while sewer rats nibble at their necrotic flesh.”

In an effort to right his campaign and rebuild his image, Romney promised to bring his message of compassion and economic opportunity to the “ramshackle, mud-floored huts” in which half of all U.S. residents live.

“Let me make this absolutely clear: I have the utmost respect for all of the filth-encrusted, lesion-covered degenerates of this nation,” Romney said. “In the coming weeks, I look forward to meeting real Americans in their squalid, roach-infested hellholes in every corner of this country. I promise to stand up for every one of you, even the 47 percent of you huddled together for warmth, fighting your own family members for moldy crusts of bread as you wallow in your own excrement.”

[Continued... (http://www.theonion.com/articles/romney-apologizes-to-nations-150-million-starving,29603/?ref=auto)]
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on November 23, 2014, 09:07:43 am


^^^^    ;D … funny Onion.

"In an effort to right his campaign and rebuild his image, Romney promised to bring his message of compassion and economic opportunity to the “ramshackle, mud-floored huts” in which half of all U.S. residents live."
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on December 04, 2014, 12:05:24 pm
… country music HILLDOG theme song?
They KNOW they have LOST the middle-of-the-road,
mostly white electorate … so get a deep SOUTHERN
accent down-home good-ole-boy to jump off his tractor
and "SANG A SONG FOR GOOD OLE HILLARY!


YEEE-HAAAAh! You Go Girl!

STAND WITH HILLARY

You Tube Video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfU3hI8ML30)


Edited URL code to get it to work by EG
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on December 04, 2014, 01:06:20 pm
^ ^ ^

Let's try that HILLARY THEME song URL one more time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfU3hI8ML30 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfU3hI8ML30)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on December 04, 2014, 03:00:27 pm

  10 cinnamon rolls, 9 Christmas cookies, 8 fruit cakes, 7 pumpkin pies....

(http://ts1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=HN.608050383173059662&w=300&h=300&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0)
Title: Mark Halperin: Hillary Needs to Be 'Loosey Goosey'
Post by: Letsbereal on December 04, 2014, 05:32:46 pm
Mark Halperin: Hillary Needs to Be 'Loosey Goosey' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdcuSPmlAQM

Dec 4, 2014 Bloomberg News
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Tokiem on December 04, 2014, 06:14:18 pm
^ ^ ^

Let's try that HILLARY THEME song URL one more time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfU3hI8ML30 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfU3hI8ML30)

LOL
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on December 04, 2014, 09:30:00 pm
^ ^ ^
Let's try that HILLARY THEME song URL one more time:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfU3hI8ML30 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfU3hI8ML30)

I still think its a joke wow ...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on December 04, 2014, 10:02:02 pm
^ ^ ^

Let's try that HILLARY THEME song URL one more time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfU3hI8ML30 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfU3hI8ML30)

I put in an complaint, A dangerous act leading to WWIII.

Report this video
Thank you for submitting your report. Here is the information we received from you:
Issue reported:

Harmful dangerous acts > Other dangerous acts
Timestamp selected:

0:00
Additional details:

Leading to WOIII
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on December 04, 2014, 10:06:25 pm


…  :P  this one is even WORSE! They should hire Jackson Holly!


Hillary4U&Me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FvyGydc8no (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FvyGydc8no)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on December 05, 2014, 11:18:45 am
http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/05/politics/george-w-bush-hillary-clinton-jeb-bush/
George Bush picks Jeb over 'sister-in-law' Hillary in 2016
By Eric Bradner, CNN
updated 6:37 AM EST, Fri December 5, 2014
Washington (CNN) -- George W. Bush might have developed a brotherly relationship with Bill Clinton -- but he's still picking his actual brother, Jeb, over Clinton's wife, Hillary, in a potential 2016 presidential match-up.

The two former presidents have developed a close friendship, with Bush sometimes calling Clinton his "brother from another mother." In an interview, CNN's Candy Crowley asked Bush what that makes Hillary Clinton.

"My sister-in-law," he said

But when asked whether his brother, former Florida Republican Gov. Jeb Bush, could run against his sister-in-law, the 43rd president said: "Yeah, and I think he'd beat her."
...

http://wonkette.com/440765/heres-your-weird-portrait-of-jeb-bush-with-four-mini-candy-crowleys
Here’s Your Weird Portrait of Jeb Bush With Four ‘Mini Candy Crowleys’
(http://wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/jeb-bush-cand-crowley.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on December 05, 2014, 11:55:59 am


  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    Man,  Jeb towers over Candy "Too Much Candy" Crowley.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on December 05, 2014, 08:11:23 pm

  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    Man,  Jeb towers over Candy "Too Much Candy" Crowley.

  Surreal, Lil Jebby  Savings and Loan scandal down the memory hole.  ( Silverado).
  The Bush Dynasty won't quit...
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on December 08, 2014, 11:47:31 am
(http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/17553/slide_17553_243600_large.jpg)

This was the Clintons fake makeup honeymoon session on camera ...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on December 08, 2014, 01:24:43 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1mYW5nmS9ps




Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She banned
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on December 13, 2014, 03:45:37 pm
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/12/12/shocking-new-reveals-from-sony-hack-j-law-pitt-clooney-and-comparing-fincher-to-hitler.html
Shocking New Reveals From Sony Hack: J. Law, Pitt, Clooney, and Star Wars

...
In late November, an anonymous hacking group that calls themselves “Guardians of Peace” breached Sony’s servers, leaking a massive trove of documents ranging from social security numbers of stars and employees to copies of upcoming Sony films like Annie, Mr. Turner, Still Alice, and To Write Love on Her Arms.


The Daily Beast has combed through much of the hundreds of thousands of emails that have made their way online, revealing Sony's anxiety over The Interview, Jennifer's Lawrence's amazing email moniker, the studio's feud with Judd Apatow, and more.

...

Steven Spielberg For Hillary Clinton 2016?

In case you haven’t heard, Hillary Clinton may (probably) be running for president in 2016. In the Sony emails, there are numerous correspondences of Sony execs complaining about being constantly harassed by movie moguls Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg for high-priced donations to back various democratic candidates, from Alison Lundergan Grimes to, yes, Hillary Clinton. In one, dated October 3, 2014, Tom Rothman, President of TriStar Productions, angrily emails Keith Weaver, EVP of Worldwide Government Affairs for Sony, about an email Spielberg sent him requesting his presence at a fundraiser.”


“This is from steven spielberg, who has hit me for 32 f-cking k for some Hilary event for the senate Can you pls check and see if, please god, I have already given to that so that I can't give that much now. These guys are killing me...”
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on December 13, 2014, 04:24:35 pm
Why do corporations spend so much money "lobbying" (i.e. pressuring) Congress to pass this law or that law? Because it works.

Hence what I've been saying for years in this forum: the only hope of solving this socioeconomic mess is for a critical mass of "We the People" to unite across both party and ideological lines behind an agreed-upon policy agenda for the purpose of exerting non-stop, year-round pressure on Congress to implement that agenda (even if it means overriding a Presidential veto).

Anything short of that -- while it may make for entertaining theater -- is doomed to fail.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=198869.0 (Points of agreement = massive grassroots coalition)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on December 13, 2014, 04:33:27 pm
bumped
Title: Bush v. Clinton In 2016? New World Order Dream Matchup Being Touted As ‘Inevitab
Post by: Geolibertarian on December 17, 2014, 12:20:58 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/bush-v-clinton-in-2016-new-world-order-dream-matchup-being-touted-as-inevitable.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/bush-v-clinton-in-2016-new-world-order-dream-matchup-being-touted-as-inevitable.html)

Bush v. Clinton In 2016? New World Order Dream Matchup Being Touted As ‘Inevitable’

Michael Snyder
End Of The American Dream
December 17, 2014

The next presidential election is still nearly two years away, and yet the mainstream media is already telling Americans who they are supposed to vote for.  Now that Jeb Bush has all but officially declared that he is running for president, a “dream matchup” between Bush and Hillary Clinton is being touted as “inevitable”.  But is this what the American people actually want?  Most liberals seem to truly dislike Clinton, and most conservatives can’t stand Bush at this point.  And yet when the time comes, the big money donors will line up behind them and they will get far more media coverage than the other candidates.  Yes, there is still a chance that another establishment candidate such as Mitt Romney could jump ahead of Bush on the Republican side, and there is also a chance that Hillary Clinton may decide not to run at all (more on that below).  But when it is all said and done, it is virtually certain that Americans will have a choice between establishment candidate #1 and establishment candidate #2 on election day 2016, and that is absolutely sickening.

We have already had 20 years of Bush/Clinton, and if it is Jeb Bush vs. Hillary Clinton in 2016 we will be guaranteed another four years.

The Bushes and Clintons are portrayed as “enemies” by the mainstream media, but that is not even close to the truth.  The two families have a long, friendly relationship, they have taken vacations together, and they even publicly joke with each other over social media.  The following is just one example that was recently highlighted in Time Magazine…

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/bush-v-clinton-in-2016-new-world-order-dream-matchup-being-touted-as-inevitable.html)]
Title: Jeb Bush Exploring White House Bid
Post by: Geolibertarian on December 18, 2014, 12:38:46 pm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/jeb-bush-exploring-white-house-bid/5420443 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/jeb-bush-exploring-white-house-bid/5420443)

Jeb Bush Exploring White House Bid

By Stephen Lendman
Global Research
December 18, 2014

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/jeb-bush.jpg)

Another possible Bush presidency should rile freedom-lovers everywhere. He’s forming a leadership political action committee.

On Facebook, he said he’s doing so to “discuss the most critical challenges facing our exceptional nation.”

With “support leaders…” Exploring “ideas and policies that will expand opportunity and prosperity for all Americans.” More on his bid below.

The Bush family dynasty reflects a legacy of crime. Deceit. Serial lying. Public betrayal. Neocon extremism. Serving wealth, power and privilege exclusively. At the expense of social justice.

Disdain for human and civil rights. Mindless of rule of law principles. Imperial wars called liberating ones. Mass murder and destruction.

Anti-democratic color revolutions. Torture as official US policy. Operating the world’s largest gulag. At home and abroad. Waging war on humanity. For unchallenged world dominance.

Behind every Bush there’s a crime!

Ninety-year-old George Herbert Walker Bush was a former congressman. Ambassador. CIA chief. Vice president and president. Connected some believe to JFK’s assassination.

His September 11, 1990 joint session of Congress address became known as his “Toward a New World Order” speech.

Signifying a turning point in world affairs. After the Berlin Wall’s demolition. A year before Soviet Russia’s dissolution.

America embarking on a quest for unchallenged global dominance. Using overwhelming military might.

Especially in resource rich areas. Unconstrained by rule of law principles.

Bush I claimed since America won the Cold War, it was empowered to establish international order governing principles. Based on might makes right.

The 1991 National Security Strategy of the United States followed. So did the 1992 Defense Planning Guidance.

Claiming America entitled to bring “security and stability” to various world regions.

Its unilateral right to intervene in internal affairs of other nations. Despite internationald law prohibiting it. Except in self-defense if attacked.

In November 1991, a NATO summit convened in Rome. Washington proposed a so-called “New Strategic Concept.”

Involving US-led NATO taking a “more expansive and less defensive strategic military role.”

A self-declared right to conduct so-called “humanitarian interventions.” Supported by Britain. Code language for naked aggression.

Bush I’s 1989 war on Panama reflected this notion. Deposing Manuel Noreiga. Not convenient stooge enough. Replaced to maintain US control.

Gulf War aggression followed. In January 1991. Then 1990s Balkan wars. NATO’s rape of Yugoslavia. Bush II’s post-9/11 “war on terror.”

His preventive war doctrine. Ludicrously called just war. Justifying the unjustifiable. Advancing America’s imperium.

On the pretext of preventing regimes Washington opposes from acquiring WMDs. Combatting “terrorists.” Advancing nation-building notions.

In 1992, Defense Department officials Paul Wolfowitz and Lewis Libby proposed new US strategy. Saying containment and deterrence were obsolete.

America must remain the world’s only superpower, they maintained. Unchallenged.

Advocating preemptive force. Unilaterally if necessary to confront alleged US security threats. Eliminate them.

Policies Bush II adopted. Implemented by neocons Dick Cheney, Lewis Libby, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and others.

Waging so-called “war on terror.” On “militant Islam.” On invented enemies. Advancing America’s imperium.

Taking full advantage of 9/11. US state-sponsored terrorism. The mother of all Big Lies. Multiple wars of aggression continue. Direct and indirect.

Bush II’s National Security Strategy of the United States endorsed preventive wars. America’s so-called right to intervene anywhere.

Using military force. Against any nation. Alleged terrorist or national security threats. Regardless of international, constitutional or US statute law prohibitions.

American interests come first. Obama a Bush clone and then some. Claiming moral justification for preemptive force. “Just war(s).” “Preventive” ones.

Saying “instruments of war have a role to play in preserving the peace.” Benjamin Franklin said “(t)here was never a good war or a bad peace.”

John Ellis (Jeb) Bush’s presidency assures more of the same. Wars without end. Preemptive aggression. The supreme crime against peace.

Continuing against invented enemies. New ones. Permanent war. Official US policy.

Media reports followed his announcement. Omitting what readers most need to know.

The New York Times headlined “Jeb Bush Takes a Step Toward a Presidential Run.”

Saying he’ll “actively explore” it. “(T)ying up donors whom other candidates are courting and forcing contenders to accelerate their own considerations for 2016.”

According to lobbyist Brian Ballard:

“If he runs, Jeb assumes the mantle of the center-right, establishment candidate, which, along with his family network, means he will have an incredible finance operation.”

Lobbyist/bundler Dirk Van Dongen added:

[Continued... (http://www.globalresearch.ca/jeb-bush-exploring-white-house-bid/5420443)]
Title: Re: Jeb Bush Exploring White House Bid
Post by: Geolibertarian on December 18, 2014, 12:40:38 pm
Twenty-two months from now, tens of millions of Jeb Bush supporters will (like mindless parrots) be saying:

     "Yeah, ok, so Jeb isn't 'perfect.' Would you rather have Hilldog as president?"

And tens of millions of Hilldog supporters will be saying:

     "Yeah, ok, so Hillary isn't 'perfect.' Would you rather have Jeb as president?"

And if (hypothetically) someone points out that God himself is running as a third party candidate, both Hilldog and Jeb supporters will say in unison:

     "Huh? God? 3rd party? Oh, please, that's just throwing your vote away. [blah blah blah]"

Remember where you heard it first.


https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/10/05/the-fallacy-of-voting-for-the-lesser-of-two-evils/ (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/10/05/the-fallacy-of-voting-for-the-lesser-of-two-evils/)

https://www.nolanchart.com/article8864-voting-for-the-lesser-of-two-evils-html (https://www.nolanchart.com/article8864-voting-for-the-lesser-of-two-evils-html)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 05, 2015, 11:42:20 am


… uh oh. Prince Andrew & Prince Bubba,
both caught with their hands in the cookie jar.
Hey Hilldog! Gonna STAND BY YOUR MAN?
   :)

Don't forget!

Bill Clinton identified in lawsuit against his former friend and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein who had 'regular' orgies at his Caribbean compound that the former president visited multiple times

   * The former president was friends with Jeffrey Epstein, a financier who was arrested in 2008 for soliciting underage prostitutes
   * A new lawsuit has revealed how Clinton took multiple trips to Epstein's private island where he 'kept young women as sex slaves'
   * Clinton was also apparently friends with a woman who collected naked pictures of underage girls for Epstein to choose from
   * He hasn't cut ties with that woman, however, and invited her to Chelsea's wedding
   * Comes as friends now fear that if Hillary Clinton runs for president in 2016, all of their family's old scandals will be brought to the forefront
   * Epstein has a host of famous friends including Prince Andrew who stayed at his New York mansion AFTER his arrest

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584309/Bill-Clinton-identified-lawsuit-against-former-friend-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-regular-orgies-Caribbean-compound-former-president-visited-multiple-times.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584309/Bill-Clinton-identified-lawsuit-against-former-friend-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-regular-orgies-Caribbean-compound-former-president-visited-multiple-times.html)


Billionaire Sex Offender's Phone Book Contained E-Mail Addresses, 21 Phone Numbers For Bill Clinton
~~~~>http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/bill-clinton/bill-clinton-and-jeffrey-epstein-908671 (http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/bill-clinton/bill-clinton-and-jeffrey-epstein-908671)
Title: Bill Clinton's Ties To Pedophile Friend Will Ruin Hillary’s 2016 Run
Post by: Letsbereal on January 08, 2015, 08:51:59 am
Bill Clinton's Ties To Pedophile Friend Will Ruin Hillary’s 2016 Run https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHNynJrCo2U

Jan 8, 2015 TheAlexJonesChannel
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 13, 2015, 05:36:08 pm


… one of Hilldog's main competitors
is out of the game:



Elizabeth Warren: I'm not running for president

http://fortune.com/2015/01/13/elizabeth-warren-sheila-bair/ (http://fortune.com/2015/01/13/elizabeth-warren-sheila-bair/)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iROBOTi on January 15, 2015, 08:37:54 pm
(http://api.ning.com/files/1zruj0PgXfg*csERRFHG8kK4CMEws*OgRDQuLSMh071OOSTrYfRmkbgiAxDl0VfY66k2NsKfOTMI95XnZDVtA8m9v1iORxfW/HillaryLikes.jpg?width=490&height=490)(http://api.ning.com/files/7C-F8e0yGIb5AjXZVYSJTxfSb5pj43Si3YxoBhCLt1i3hn1jKinnGT9stvYCNTpP-S4tUCF2R*R*6mXoFeB93hNFv2f*J-zW/hitlerhillary.jpg?width=490&height=490)http://12160.info/photo/photo/search?q=Hillary
.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Stan on January 16, 2015, 12:39:59 am

… one of Hilldog's main competitors
is out of the game:



Elizabeth Warren: I'm not running for president

http://fortune.com/2015/01/13/elizabeth-warren-sheila-bair/ (http://fortune.com/2015/01/13/elizabeth-warren-sheila-bair/)

That's a shame. With her being seen as an independent maverick type, her guaranteed betrayal would've woken up more lefties than that of a Hillary Clinton. Plus I would now assume it leaves Hillary free and clear to play the vagina card. It can only be helpful.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 16, 2015, 11:41:57 am


"

She’s stiff and wooden as a public speaker, as if trying to prove
Dr. Johnson’s famous aphorism that a woman preaching is like a dog
trying to walk on its hind legs.


Why Hillary Clinton won’t run for president

By Wesley Pruden - - Thursday, January 15, 2015

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_534.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_534.jpg.html)
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. (Associated Press)

Hillary can’t win, and that’s why she won’t run. She may not know that yet herself, but a lot of Democrats want her because she’s all they’ve got. The Republicans are counting on her to run because they think she’s the candidate they can beat in what looks from here like it could be a Republican year.

Lady Macbeth has the resume that makes her plausible, which a lot of pundits and normal other people confuse with “inevitable.” Everybody recognizes her name. She doesn’t hear the music but she recognizes the words and knows policy, and likes to talk about it. She’s a woman, and that should help with the ladies. (It might hurt, too).

Quote
Instinct and ambition — the “fire in the belly” — is a lethal combination, and Hillary has a version only of ambition, but it only occasionally flashes as the hard blue flame that drives winners. Mike McCurry, Bubba’s press secretary, asks the pertinent question about Hillary: At 67, does she really want to spend her golden years working 16 hours a day, eating bad food, sleeping in a strange and uncomfortable bed every night, shaking the hands of strangers in a drafty gym in Iowa, and rubbing elbows with indifferent diners in New Hampshire? She could live the luxurious life at her own pace, delivering the same canned speech written for her, enjoying a new granddaughter, making speeches for $200,000 a pop and watching the millions accumulate at the Clinton Global Foundation.

CONTINUE~~~>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/15/wesley-pruden-why-hillary-clinton-wont-run-for-pre/ (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/15/wesley-pruden-why-hillary-clinton-wont-run-for-pre/)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 16, 2015, 12:03:23 pm


Hillary can’t win, and that’s why she won’t run.

  Well, let's hope she understands this.  Of course she's one of these people that care about their legacy.

  For anybody in their right mind, it's a no-brainer.  The Clintons have millions AND THEY ARE RUNNING OUT OF TIME.  They are not spring chickens anymore---definitely early winter chickens.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on January 16, 2015, 12:44:00 pm
"Hillary can’t win." -- Wesley Pruden

That sounds more like a partisan statement than an objective one, because it completely contradicts every single presidential poll that's been conducted over the past six months:

     http://www.pollingreport.com/wh16gen.htm (http://www.pollingreport.com/wh16gen.htm)

     http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/ (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 16, 2015, 12:52:24 pm
"Hillary can’t win." -- Wesley Pruden

That sounds more like a partisan statement than an objective one, because it completely contradicts every single presidential poll that's been conducted over the past six months:

     http://www.pollingreport.com/wh16gen.htm (http://www.pollingreport.com/wh16gen.htm)

     http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/ (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/)

  You know.  That's what I thought.  I still think she'll run.  She wants it for her gravestone--THE 1ST "FEMALE" PRESIDENT.  She's got more testosterone than Bill.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 16, 2015, 03:33:56 pm
"Hillary can’t win." -- Wesley Pruden

That sounds more like a partisan statement than an objective one, because it completely contradicts every single presidential poll that's been conducted over the past six months:

     http://www.pollingreport.com/wh16gen.htm (http://www.pollingreport.com/wh16gen.htm)

     http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/ (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/)

… very true GEO … but a lot of this may be simply NAME RECOGNITION
from the libtards who don't know the Earth goes around the Sun … and
the fact (?) that she's a woman. Anyway, here is some historic polling
info from 2007 when she was about to go head-to-head w/O & John
Edwards. HOWEVER … seems to me, the DEM field is very weak …
especially if WARREN bows out.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_presidential_primary_campaign,_2008 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_presidential_primary_campaign,_2008)

Polling trends

All opinion polls in April 2007 showed Clinton as the Democratic frontrunner, however with different margins: Obama was listed in third place nationwide with 17% and John Edwards in second place with 19% behind Clinton with 41% according to an Angus-Reid poll, whereas Clinton was listed in first place with 34% and Obama in second place with 29%, ahead of Edwards with only 15% in a Rasmussen-Reports poll. By May 2007, polls were showing the race even tighter, with Rasmussen Reports showing Obama pulling ahead of Clinton 32% to 30%. But on May 24, 2007, a CBS News/NY Times poll showed Clinton, with 46%, 22 points ahead of Obama, with 24%, and 32 points ahead of Edwards, with 14%. Clinton held her lead over the summer; in September a CNN poll showed her leading Obama 46% to 23%, and in October the same poll showed her commanding majority Democratic support, with 51% compared to Obama's 21% and Edwards' 15%.

On May 4, 2007, a Gallup Poll report showed that since the beginning of the year, her favorable-unfavorable ratio had declined from 58% favorable, 40% unfavorable to 45% favorable, 52% unfavorable.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on January 16, 2015, 06:31:53 pm
  I can't stomach thinking about this creature.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 22, 2015, 07:38:28 am


Report: 65 Secret Service Agents on Hand
for Hillary Clinton's Paid Speech … in Canada


"
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a couple paid speeches in Canada yesterday. She was reportedly accompanied by United States Secret Service of 65 agents to at least one of the events.

The agents were presumably on hand to help keep the former first lady safe.


Quote
It's unclear what part, if any, of the security tab was picked up by Clinton -- and what part was paid for by U.S. taxpayers.

READ ARTICLE~~~>http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/report-65-secret-service-agents-hand-hillary-clintons-paid-speech-canada_824237.html][url]http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/report-65-secret-service-agents-hand-hillary-clintons-paid-speech-canada_824237.html (http://[url)[/url]
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 22, 2015, 07:51:08 am
^ ^ ^ ^ ^

… let's try that URL one more time.   >:(

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/report-65-secret-service-agents-hand-hillary-clintons-paid-speech-canada_824237.html (http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/report-65-secret-service-agents-hand-hillary-clintons-paid-speech-canada_824237.html)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 22, 2015, 09:40:24 am
^^^^^^^^

  I wonder how many Canadian hookers the American people had to pay for for entertaining those 65 Secret Service agents.  LOL
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on January 22, 2015, 01:28:56 pm
CNN just repoted Mrs. Clinton has been polled, and she is in the lead.
 What polls are they faces taking, I can't stand it anymore.
 " What difference does it make"!!
Title: Blood on Her Hands: Hilldog's Lies Kill 30,000
Post by: Geolibertarian on January 31, 2015, 07:39:17 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/blood-on-her-hands-hillarys-lies-kill-30000.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/blood-on-her-hands-hillarys-lies-kill-30000.html)

Blood on Her Hands: Hillary’s Lies Kill 30,000

Prison Planet.com
January 30, 2015

Just like the lies that led to the war against Iraq, Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, created false pretenses for the invasion of Libya. At least 30,000 people died as a result of this manufactured war.

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9hHe9KSGW8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9hHe9KSGW8)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 31, 2015, 07:55:43 am


... is Ben Carson Hilldog's worst nightmare?
I read somewhere that if he should only win
17% of the black vote in the swing States
he could beat Hillary ... or another Dem ...
easily, hands down.

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/1799e959-18cb-4742-b4a0-28e0e6f688a8.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/1799e959-18cb-4742-b4a0-28e0e6f688a8.jpg.html)

Ben Carson PAC Outraises 2016 GOP Hopefuls and Hillary

If money is any indication, a prominent Baltimore doctor with no political experience is an early front-runner in the 2016 U.S. presidential race.

A group encouraging retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson to run for president raised $2.4 million in the first three months of this year, more than the group backing Hillary Clinton or those affiliated with Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and other potential candidates, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission.

Carson, 62, has emerged as a prominent African-American conservative commentator. He appears regularly on Fox News and writes a weekly column for the conservative Washington Times newspaper.

Carson's spokesman says he is not interested in running for president and he is not affiliated with the National Draft Ben Carson for President Committee.

The money is a sign that conservative voters are looking beyond the usual political suspects for a presidential candidate, the head of the Ben Carson committee said.

"

My gut tells me that the American people are looking for a citizen statesman, for a non-politician."

HERE~~~>http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/ben-carson-president-committee/2014/04/18/id/566313/ (http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/ben-carson-president-committee/2014/04/18/id/566313/)

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on January 31, 2015, 08:12:57 am
I'm going to wait for Bilderberg 2015 (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=263901.msg1500828#msg1500828) in Austria to see whom they appoint to manage the franchise.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 31, 2015, 10:23:23 am
I'm going to wait for Bilderberg 2015 (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=263901.msg1500828#msg1500828) in Austria to see whom they appoint to manage the franchise.

  So true.  And if you believe that Obama is a cousin to the Bushes, the current franchise will (if Hillary or Jeb gets in) have been in power from 1989 to potentially to 2024.  And if Hillary takes the next 8 years and Jeb takes the following 8 years then this franchise/dynasty could last to 2032.
http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/obama-and-bush-are-cousins/?_r=0


  So from 1989 to 2032 would be 44 years.

  That's if you believe they are all related----Bush41, Clinton, Bush43, Obama, Hillary, Jeb

  THE DYNASTY MUST END NOW FOR AMERICA TO EVEN HAVE A CHANCE. 

  I don't think we will last until 2044 because the BIG ONE is coming soon--maybe before 2016---the total economic collapse of the USA and the world.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on February 03, 2015, 08:02:16 am

... Go Hilldog! Ratchet up the Abortion Machine ...
the ISIS head-choppers are pulling a-head in
the murder bonanza!


"
EMILY's List, which works to elect Democratic women who support abortion rights, said Tuesday that Clinton would appear at its 30th anniversary awards gala in Washington on March 3



EMILY's List to honor Hillary Clinton


KEN THOMAS Feb 3rd 2015

WASHINGTON (AP) - Hillary Rodham Clinton will be honored next month by EMILY's List, a Democratic fundraising powerhouse, as she considers a potential 2016 presidential campaign that could make her the first woman to win the White House.

EMILY's List, which works to elect Democratic women who support abortion rights, said Tuesday that Clinton would appear at its 30th anniversary awards gala in Washington on March 3. The former secretary of state will receive the group's We Are EMILY Award to honor her leadership "as a fighter for women and families," said Stephanie Schriock, the group's president.

(Ed: Blah, blah, blah.)

ARTICLE HERE~~~>http://www.aol.com/article/2015/02/03/emilys-list-to-honor-hillary-clinton/21138302/ (http://www.aol.com/article/2015/02/03/emilys-list-to-honor-hillary-clinton/21138302/)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on February 03, 2015, 12:41:37 pm
^^^^^

  I can't think of an awfuller thing THAN ABORTION.  Killing God's creations.

  Take your award Hillary and then hand it to Satan when you enter into HELL for eternity.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 03, 2015, 12:49:05 pm
^^^^^
 I can't think of an awfuller thing THAN ABORTION.  Killing God's creations.
  Take your award Hillary and then hand it to Satan when you enter into HELL for eternity.

Notice there is NO interview of Hilldog's views on abortion --- Chelsea was NOT aborted ....

EMILY's List, which works to elect Democratic women who support abortion rights,
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on February 03, 2015, 01:02:46 pm
Notice there is NO interview of Hilldog's views on abortion --- Chelsea was NOT aborted ....

EMILY's List, which works to elect Democratic women who support abortion rights,

  Kinda of off subject but you see lesbian "couples" fighting for abortion rights and at the same time trying to have babies between them (via sperm cells from a male).  WHAT HYPOCRITES!!!!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 03, 2015, 01:29:00 pm
  Kinda of off subject but you see lesbian "couples" fighting for abortion rights and at the same time trying to have babies between them (via sperm cells from a male).  WHAT HYPOCRITES!!!!

JIT - It's a Brave New World in the UK ... soon the NWO world ...

http://www.bbc.com/news/health-31069173
MPs say yes to three-person babies
3 February 2015
MPs have voted in favour of the creation of babies with DNA from two women and one man, in an historic move.

The UK is now set to become the first country to introduce laws to allow the creation of babies from three people.

In a free vote in the Commons, 382 MPs were in favour and 128 against the technique that stops genetic diseases being passed from mother to child.
...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on February 03, 2015, 01:37:05 pm
^^^^
  This won't be good.

(http://ts1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=HN.607987449092900807&w=300&h=300&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on February 03, 2015, 10:04:51 pm


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3g_6zKfbUyU

Are you SERIOUSLY 'Ready for Hillary'?!

Melissa Melton Video from TRURHSTREAM …
whew … she pulls no punches here …
no quarter for Hilldog.

 :)

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on February 05, 2015, 11:47:17 am
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2015/02/05/sharyl-attkisson-brian-williams-not-alone-hillary-clinton-lied-about-being-shot-at-in-bosnia/

Sharyl Attkisson: Brian Williams Not Alone; Hillary Clinton Lied About Being Shot At In Bosnia

February 5, 2015 11:28 AM
Title: Michael Savage: Romney Forced Out to Ensure Hillary 2016 Election Victory
Post by: Geolibertarian on February 05, 2015, 02:29:48 pm
And the controlled-opposition debate between the banker-owned establishment Left and banker-owned establishment Right continues.  *yawn!*

http://www.prisonplanet.com/michael-savage-romney-forced-out-to-ensure-hillary-2016-election-victory.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/michael-savage-romney-forced-out-to-ensure-hillary-2016-election-victory.html)

Michael Savage: Romney Forced Out to Ensure Hillary 2016 Election Victory

Elite made decision during globalist confab in Davos

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
February 5, 2015

Radio talk show host Michael Savage believes Massachusetts Republican and failed presidential candidate Mitt Romney was told by the global elite to step down as the Republican presidential candidate in order to allow Democrat Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election.

“It’s very sad, but the Republican Party purged Mitt Romney for one reason. He’s announced he’s not going to run for president,” Savage writes (http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/2015/02/romney-was-forced-to-quit-the-race-so-hillary-can-win/).

According to the popular radio talk show host and author, the decision was made during the Davos meeting.

“The Bilderbergs met in Davos, and the decision was made that Hillary Clinton will be the next president,” Savage writes. “Romney was doing too well in the polls, so they threw him out. They want to make sure that another Bush – or an incompetent moron like Rubio – will be chosen to lead the Republicans, to ensure that Hillary becomes president.”

Savage believes elections are arranged by the elite and, like a rigged horse race, the outcome is predetermined.

“There are no elections in America anymore, because this selection process determines the elections,” he writes.

“Hillary will be the third administration of Obama, who was the second administration of Jimmy Carter. Otherwise Romney might have won this time. During the first debate in 2012, he wiped the floor with Obama. But they called Romney into the back room and the boys who run the world said, ‘Listen: we’re sorry but you’ve got to take a fall.’”

Hillary Clinton is shaping up to be the preferred choice of the neocon war faction of the ruling elite.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/michael-savage-romney-forced-out-to-ensure-hillary-2016-election-victory.html)]
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: CheneysWorstNightmare on February 05, 2015, 02:38:29 pm
OR to ensure that Jeb Bush becomes president!

However, Savage needs to cater to the neocon ideology that his supports believe.

Hiliary OR Jeb OR Romney OR Obama again.....

.....it doesn't really matter.   
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on February 07, 2015, 11:15:27 pm


… uh oh. Prince Andrew & Prince Bubba,
both caught with their hands in the cookie jar.
Hey Hilldog! Gonna STAND BY YOUR MAN?
   :)

Don't forget!

Bill Clinton identified in lawsuit against his former friend and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein who had 'regular' orgies at his Caribbean compound that the former president visited multiple times

   * The former president was friends with Jeffrey Epstein, a financier who was arrested in 2008 for soliciting underage prostitutes
   * A new lawsuit has revealed how Clinton took multiple trips to Epstein's private island where he 'kept young women as sex slaves'
   * Clinton was also apparently friends with a woman who collected naked pictures of underage girls for Epstein to choose from
   * He hasn't cut ties with that woman, however, and invited her to Chelsea's wedding
   * Comes as friends now fear that if Hillary Clinton runs for president in 2016, all of their family's old scandals will be brought to the forefront
   * Epstein has a host of famous friends including Prince Andrew who stayed at his New York mansion AFTER his arrest

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584309/Bill-Clinton-identified-lawsuit-against-former-friend-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-regular-orgies-Caribbean-compound-former-president-visited-multiple-times.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584309/Bill-Clinton-identified-lawsuit-against-former-friend-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-regular-orgies-Caribbean-compound-former-president-visited-multiple-times.html)


Billionaire Sex Offender's Phone Book Contained E-Mail Addresses, 21 Phone Numbers For Bill Clinton
~~~~>http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/bill-clinton/bill-clinton-and-jeffrey-epstein-908671 (http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/bill-clinton/bill-clinton-and-jeffrey-epstein-908671)

… Thom Hartmann, of course, is as Libtard as they come …
the stupidest SMART GUY on radio. Here, though, he interviews
Mike Papantonio, the super lawyer and fellow Libtard,
about Epstein, Prince Andrew, Dershowitz and Slick Willy … even they are
aghast at this rotten-at-the-core bunch of child rapists. Surely
they realize this is about to blow up in Hilldog's face.


Pap calls this the "Bill Cosby Story on Steroids"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6JmkAlrZic (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6JmkAlrZic)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on February 08, 2015, 08:54:05 am
… Thom Hartmann, of course, is as Libtard as they come …
the stupidest SMART GUY on radio. Here, though, he interviews
Mike Papantonio, the super lawyer and fellow Libtard,
about Epstein, Prince Andrew, Dershowitz and Slick Willy … even they are
aghast at this rotten-at-the-core bunch of child rapists. Surely
they realize this is about to blow up in Hilldog's face.


Pap calls this the "Bill Cosby Story on Steroids"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6JmkAlrZic (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6JmkAlrZic)

  Nothing to see here but innocent children sex slaves, crooked dirty old men child rapists, more crooked lawyers, crooked judges, etc etc etc.

  The child rapists have gotten away with it so far but some decent people are trying to reopen the case.

  They will not get away with it forever---GOD IS WATCHING THE WHOLE SORDID MESS.

 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 08, 2015, 11:51:34 am
but she likes brain damaging children, Nazi's,  the CIA  and torture rendition planes...

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/02/grandmother-in-chief/385238/
Hillary Clinton: Grandmother in Chief

The presidential candidate insists that she is both a trailblazer and a traditionalist, a case her new role as a grandmother helps her make more convincingly.
Peter Beinart
Feb 6 2015, 10:29 AM ET


On Monday, when Hillary Clinton issued a pro-vaccination tweet with the hashtag #GrandmothersKnowBest,” journalists quickly spotted a potential theme for her presidential run. For Hillary’s sake, I hope they’re right. Because in 2016, grandmotherhood may help her convey the quality that she so disastrously failed to convey for much of 2007 and 2008: authenticity.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/hillary-clinton-tries-to-shut-down-vaccine-debate-with-one-tweet/
Hillary Clinton Tries to Shut Down Vaccine Debate with One Tweet
by Matt Wilstein | 11:04 am, February 3rd, 2015

While the crowded GOP presidential field rushed to weigh in on the increasingly loud debate over vaccinations in this country, Hillary Clinton waited until late Monday night to issue her thoughts on the matter, in less than 140 characters:

Hillary Clinton          @HillaryClinton 
The science is clear: The earth is round, the sky is blue, and #vaccineswork. Let's protect all our kids. #GrandmothersKnowBest 7:45 PM - 2 Feb 2015
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on February 08, 2015, 11:55:50 am
^ ^ ^ ^

… Granny Hilldog knows best?

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/granny.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/granny.jpg.html)

I don't think so!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on February 15, 2015, 12:13:21 pm


… whoa! The Sunday NYT blasts HILLDOG … Big Time!


"
… what Republicans say about government is true
 of the Clintons: They really do believe that
your money belongs to them.


(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/15DOWD-WEB-articleLarge.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/15DOWD-WEB-articleLarge.jpg.html)
David Brock Credit Stephen B. Thornton for The New York Times



Call Off the Dogs


(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/dowd-circular-thumbLarge-v3.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/dowd-circular-thumbLarge-v3.jpg.html)
Maureen Dowd

WASHINGTON — I’LL pay for this column.

The Rottweilers will be unleashed.

Once the Clintons had a War Room. Now they have a Slime Room.

Once they had the sly James Carville, fondly known as “serpenthead.” Now they have the slippery David Brock, accurately known as a snake.

Brock fits into the Clinton tradition of opportunistic knife-fighters like Dick Morris and Mark Penn.

The silver-haired 52-year-old, who sports colorful designer suits and once wore a monocle, brawled his way into a Times article about the uneasy marriage between Hillary Clinton’s veteran attack dogs and the group of advisers who are moving over from Obamaland.

Hillary hasn’t announced a 2016 campaign yet. She’s busy polling more than 200 policy experts on how to show that she really cares about the poor while courting the banks. Yet her shadow campaign is already in a déjà-vu-all-over-again shark fight over control of the candidate and her money. It’s the same old story: The killer organization that, even with all its ruthless hired guns, can’t quite shoot straight.

A MUST READ @NYT~~~>http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/opinion/sunday/maureen-dowd-call-off-the-dogs.html (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/opinion/sunday/maureen-dowd-call-off-the-dogs.html)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on February 15, 2015, 12:44:20 pm


Hillary hasn’t announced a 2016 campaign yet. She’s busy polling more than 200 policy experts on how to show that she really cares about the poor while courting the banks. Yet her shadow campaign is already in a déjà-vu-all-over-again shark fight over control of the candidate and her money. It’s the same old story: The killer organization that, even with all its ruthless hired guns, can’t quite shoot straight.



Hillaryious
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on February 18, 2015, 11:39:25 am
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/hillary-clinton-too-old-be-president

Is Hillary Clinton too old to be president?

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_slrv79_M_ig/R4Bx6Q1mnYI/AAAAAAAAAJU/2shTroMjU6E/s320/Hillary+Clinton+Looking+Old.jpg#hillary%20under%20the%20bus%20253x320)


Is Hillary Clinton too old to be president?

He won’t say it outright, but that’s the question Sen. Rand Paul is getting at. “It’s a very taxing undertaking to go through. It’s a rigorous physical ordeal, I think, to be able to campaign for the presidency,” the likely Republican presidential candidate told Politico Monday.

And he’s hardly alone among Republicans in wielding Clinton’s 67 years against her. Rick Santorum called the former secretary of state “old,” Sen. Mitch McConnell compared her to a cast member from “The Golden Girls,” and Bobby Jindal called her an “old, tired candidate.” Meanwhile, longtime Clinton foe Matt Drudge accused Clinton of using a walker during a magazine cover photoshoot, and the conservative Free Beacon has had plenty of laughs at the expense of Clinton’s age.


It’s obvious why a relatively young field of Republican presidential hopefuls see benefit in painting Clinton as old, but it’s unfamiliar territory for Republicans, who are used to defending their own nominees’ advanced ages.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 18, 2015, 11:42:44 am
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/hillary-clinton-too-old-be-president
Is Hillary Clinton too old to be president?

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_slrv79_M_ig/R4Bx6Q1mnYI/AAAAAAAAAJU/2shTroMjU6E/s320/Hillary+Clinton+Looking+Old.jpg#hillary%20under%20the%20bus%20253x320)
Is Hillary Clinton too old to be president?

No she's perfect ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griselda_Blanco

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a4/Griselda_Blanco.jpg/640px-Griselda_Blanco.jpg)  (http://ll-media.tmz.com/2012/09/04/0904-griselda-blanco-mug-1.jpg)

Griselda Blanco (February 15, 1943 – September 3, 2012), known as La Madrina, the Black Widow, the Cocaine Godmother and the Queen of Narco-Trafficking, was a drug lord of the Medellín Cartel and a pioneer in the Miami-based cocaine drug trade and underworld during the 1970s and early 1980s. She was an important member of the Medellin Cartel but developed a bad rapport with the Cartel when she had the niece of the Ochoa family of the Medellin Cartel, Marta Saldarriaga Ochoa, murdered in order to not pay for a shipment of cocaine delivered by Marta. Her plan was to say she never received the shipment and that the young lady disappeared with it. After the young woman's body was found on a rural south Florida road, it became open season on Griselda and she was subsequently "on the run".
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on February 18, 2015, 12:46:25 pm
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/02/18/increase-in-foreign-donations-to-clinton-foundation-raises-ethical-questions/

  Read more at the Wall Street Journal.

  Hard to put the words Clinton and ethics in the same sentence.

  So the Keystone pipeline is going in sometime.

  HILLARY---PUPPET TO FOREIGN NATIONS.

 


Increase in foreign donations to Clinton Foundation raises ethical questions for possible Hillary 2016 bid



The Clinton Foundation reportedly is seeing an increase in contributions from foreign governments after ending a self-imposed ban on such donations, raising new ethical questions as Hillary Clinton prepares for a possible 2016 presidential campaign.

According to The Wall Street Journal, which cited the foundation's online database, recent donors to the foundation include the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia, Oman, Australia, Germany, and a Canadian government agency promoting construction of the Keystone XL pipeline.

The foundation instituted a foreign gifts ban in 2009 after Hilllary Clinton was named Secretary of State by President Barack Obama. The Journal reports that the ban was not a total one, and some donations were permitted after receiving the approval of State Department ethics officials. Hillary Clinton re-joined the foundation after leaving the State Department in 2013 and has fronted a $250 million endowment campaign.

Ethics experts have told the Journal that the Foundation should re-imposed its ban while Hillary Clinton considers a possible White House bid.

"Now that she is gearing up to run for president, the same potential exists for foreign governments to curry favor with her as a potential president of the United States," said Kirk Hanson, director of the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University in California.

"She can't recuse herself [if she becomes president]," said James Thurber, director of American University’s Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies. "Whether it influences her decision making is questionable, but it is a legitimate thing to focus on by her political opposition."

The donation tied to the Keystone XL pipeline of a reported $480,000 came from Canada's Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Development, whose website described promoting the Keystone XL pipeline "as a stable and secure source of energy and energy technology" as one of its goals for the 2014-15 fiscal year on its website. The Foundation told the Journal that the donation came from a separate agency office from the one advocating for the pipeline's construction.

Construction of the Keystone XL pipeline has been a hot political topic under the new GOP-led Congress, and Hillary Clinton has repeatedly declined to comment on the issue.

Another donation that could raise eyebrows comes from the Qatari government committee preparing to host the 2022 soccer World Cup, which gave between $250,000 and $500,000 last year. Human rights groups have claimed that over 1,000 migrant workers have died in the process of constructing the infrastructure to host the tournament.

In all, a tally by the Journal has found that the number of foreign donors doubled in 2014 from the previous year. The UAE donated between $1 million and $5 million last year, while the German government gave between $100,000 and $250,000. Repeat donors include Saudi Arabia, which has contributed at least $10 million since the foundation's founding in 1999, and Australia, which has given at least $5 million.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on February 18, 2015, 12:58:14 pm
^ ^ ^ ^

$5M here, $10M there … pretty soon we're talking real money!   8)

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on February 19, 2015, 10:16:40 am
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/newsmax-pledged-1-million-clinton-foundation_858504.html

  What's with this?

Newsmax Pledged $1 Million to Clinton Foundation

Conservative website Newsmax has pledged a very large donation to the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, a new report in the Wall Street Journal states.

"Newsmax, a conservative news organization, last year pledged $1 million to the Clinton Foundation over a five-year period, according to a spokesman for Chris Ruddy, the organization’s CEO. Mr. Ruddy has been friends with the Clintons since 2007," reports the Journal.

"Through a spokesman, he said the donation wasn't tantamount to an endorsement of Mrs. Clinton’s potential campaign, though he thinks she would 'make a great presidential candidate.'"

Ruddy himself has even written a blog post for the Clinton Foundation w
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 20, 2015, 10:36:33 am
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/02/20/hillary-clinton-ties-to-corporate-donors-lobbyists-while-secretary-state/
...
The Wall Street Journal reports  [  http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clintons-complex-corporate-ties-1424403002 ]  that the 60 companies who lobbied Clinton's State Department between 2009 and 2013 donated over $26 million to the Clinton Foundation in that period. The donors include instantly recognizable names like General Electric, Exxon Mobil, and Boeing.

The Journal also reports that at least 44 of the 60 companies participated in philanthropy projects valued at $3.2 billion set up by the Clinton Global Initiative, which is a wing of the foundation. At least 25 of the companies also contributed to 15 public-private partnerships created by Clinton and coordinated by the State Department.
...
... there is no evidence that any laws were broken ...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on February 21, 2015, 10:07:00 pm


The making of Hillary 5.0:
Marketing wizards help
reimagine Clinton brand


By Philip Rucker and Anne Gearan February 21 at 6:18 PM   
Is Hillary Rodham Clinton a McDonald’s Big Mac or a Chipotle burrito bowl? A can of Bud or a bottle of Blue Moon? JCPenney or J. Crew?

As she readies her second presidential campaign, Clinton has recruited consumer marketing specialists onto her team of trusted political advisers. Their job is to help imagine Hillary 5.0 — the rebranding of a first lady turned senator turned failed presidential candidate turned secretary of state turned likely 2016 Democratic presidential nominee.

Quote
Now, Clinton will try to refresh her image once more so that voters see her as a champion for the middle class amid deep concerns about income inequality. Rohit Deshpande, a marketing professor at Harvard Business School, offered a fast-food giant as a case study.

“Refresh with the times is the issue McDonald’s is facing right now,” he said. “It’s considered tired, and the marketplace has moved on. ”

Fabian Geyrhalter, a corporate branding consultant, also drew a parallel between McDonald’s and Clinton: “There has been a brand value proposition over so many years, and suddenly she needs to shift that legacy into Clinton 2016: ‘This is what I stand for now.’ ”

INTERESTING - @WashPo~~~>http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-making-of-hillary-50-marketing-wizards-help-reimagine-clinton-brand/2015/02/21/bfb01120-b919-11e4-aa05-1ce812b3fdd2_story.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on February 22, 2015, 09:32:37 am

The making of Hillary 5.0:
Marketing wizards help
reimagine Clinton brand


By Philip Rucker and Anne Gearan February 21 at 6:18 PM   
Is Hillary Rodham Clinton a McDonald’s Big Mac or a Chipotle burrito bowl? A can of Bud or a bottle of Blue Moon? JCPenney or J. Crew?

As she readies her second presidential campaign, Clinton has recruited consumer marketing specialists onto her team of trusted political advisers. Their job is to help imagine Hillary 5.0 — the rebranding of a first lady turned senator turned failed presidential candidate turned secretary of state turned likely 2016 Democratic presidential nominee.

INTERESTING - @WashPo~~~>http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-making-of-hillary-50-marketing-wizards-help-reimagine-clinton-brand/2015/02/21/bfb01120-b919-11e4-aa05-1ce812b3fdd2_story.html

  Hillary seems so paranoid.  If the Republicans throw Bush against her, she will walk into the White House.

  I still don't get it.  Multi-millionaires in the last quarter of their lives meddling with world affairs.  I guess SATAN has such a grip on their minds that they think that they can change the world.  Such fools.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on February 24, 2015, 11:19:33 am

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/yellinghillarybillfront.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/yellinghillarybillfront.jpg.html)

Hillary Express Hits a Wall

KINDA SATIRE
http://batr.org/reactionary/022415.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on February 26, 2015, 10:17:36 am

... is Ben Carson Hilldog's worst nightmare?
I read somewhere that if he should only win
17% of the black vote in the swing States
he could beat Hillary ... or another Dem ...
easily, hands down.

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/1799e959-18cb-4742-b4a0-28e0e6f688a8.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/1799e959-18cb-4742-b4a0-28e0e6f688a8.jpg.html)

Ben Carson PAC Outraises 2016 GOP Hopefuls and Hillary

If money is any indication, a prominent Baltimore doctor with no political experience is an early front-runner in the 2016 U.S. presidential race.

A group encouraging retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson to run for president raised $2.4 million in the first three months of this year, more than the group backing Hillary Clinton or those affiliated with Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and other potential candidates, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission.

Carson, 62, has emerged as a prominent African-American conservative commentator. He appears regularly on Fox News and writes a weekly column for the conservative Washington Times newspaper.

Carson's spokesman says he is not interested in running for president and he is not affiliated with the National Draft Ben Carson for President Committee.

The money is a sign that conservative voters are looking beyond the usual political suspects for a presidential candidate, the head of the Ben Carson committee said.

"

My gut tells me that the American people are looking for a citizen statesman, for a non-politician."

HERE~~~>http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/ben-carson-president-committee/2014/04/18/id/566313/ (http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/ben-carson-president-committee/2014/04/18/id/566313/)

MUST WATCH:


February 26, 2015 9:30 AM EST - Conservative commentator Ben Carson, speaking at the first day of the 2015 Conservative Political Action Conference, threw punches at Democrats, the Affordable Care Act and radical Islam. (AP)

VIDEO:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/posttv/politics/ben-carson-stop-sitting-silently-by/2015/02/26/22c832d4-bdc4-11e4-9dfb-03366e719af8_video.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on February 26, 2015, 10:45:45 am
is Ben Carson Hilldog's worst nightmare?

I would suggest that Hilldog's worst nightmare is being challenged by Cynthia McKinney in the presidential primary.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/10/02/cynthia-mckinney-on-leadership/ (http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/10/02/cynthia-mckinney-on-leadership/)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2eaZpqzQ3E (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2eaZpqzQ3E) (Cynthia McKinney: How I Became Pro 2nd Amendment)

Imagine how buffoonish, hypocritical and non-politically correct Hilldog supporters would look demonizing someone who's not only female, but more "black" -- and more "liberal (http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-socialism.htm)" -- than Obama.

Imagine how Bush-like Hilldog would look after being forced by McKinney to arrogantly defend one imperialist war policy after another.

Imagine how Bush-like Hilldog would look after being forced by McKinney to arrogantly defend one police state policy after another.

Imagine how Bush-like Hilldog would look after being forced by McKinney to desperately defend her all-too-cozy relationship (http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/06/hillary-clintons-goldman-sachs-problem) with the financial terrorists (http://www.globalresearch.ca/financial-terrorists-are-destroying-the-us-economy/18746) at Goldman Sachs.

I could go on, but I'm sure everyone gets the idea.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on February 26, 2015, 11:01:17 am
I would suggest that Hilldog's worst nightmare is being challenged by Cynthia McKinney in the presidential primary.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/10/02/cynthia-mckinney-on-leadership/ (http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/10/02/cynthia-mckinney-on-leadership/)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2eaZpqzQ3E (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2eaZpqzQ3E) (Cynthia McKinney: How I Became Pro 2nd Amendment)

Imagine how buffoonish, hypocritical and non-politically correct Hilldog supporters would look demonizing someone who's not only female, but more "black" -- and more "liberal (http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-socialism.htm)" -- than Obama.

Imagine how Bush-like Hilldog would look after being forced by McKinney to arrogantly defend one imperialist war policy after another.

Imagine how Bush-like Hilldog would look after being forced by McKinney to arrogantly defend one police state policy after another.

Imagine how Bush-like Hilldog would look after being forced by McKinney to desperately defend her all-too-cozy relationship (http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/06/hillary-clintons-goldman-sachs-problem) with the financial terrorists (http://www.globalresearch.ca/financial-terrorists-are-destroying-the-us-economy/18746) at Goldman Sachs.

I could go on, but I'm sure everyone gets the idea.

ROFL

Yea, that would be funny.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 02, 2015, 11:09:43 am
http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-seen-launching-presidential-bid-in-april-1425254392
Hillary Clinton Seen Launching Presidential Bid in April

Move would ease uncertainties in the Democratic Party and rev up front-runner’s fundraising

By Peter Nicholas and Carol E. Lee
 
March 1, 2015 6:59 p.m. ET
 
Hillary Clinton and her close advisers are telling Democratic donors that she will enter the presidential race sooner than expected, likely in April, a move that would allay uncertainties within her party and allow her to rev up fundraising.
...
Mrs. Clinton, according to some close associates, doesn’t relish the campaign trail and is in no particular hurry to announce, especially given the scant competition for her party’s nomination

Most polls show Mrs. Clinton running far ahead of her nearest potential challenger, Vice President [Creepy] Joe Biden .

“She’s obviously biding her time before she gets out there,” said Delaware Gov. Jack Markell, a Democrat.

Mrs. Clinton, 67 years old, made known her feelings about grueling campaigns in a private meeting last month with London Mayor Boris Johnson. Mr. Johnson later said she had bemoaned the lengthy U.S. presidential campaigns.

During her 2008 bid, she teared up at a campaign event in New Hampshire when describing the rigors of campaign life: lack of sleep, an overreliance on pizza and limited ability to exercise.
...
A later entrance into the race comes with certain perils. She hopes to raise more than $1 billion for the campaign, people familiar with her plans said, and some Democratic donors are concerned that if she waits until the summer, she would be hard-pressed to meet that goal.
...
Republicans and even some Democrats have questioned the foreign contributions collected by her family’s charitable foundation, as recounted in a spate of recent news stories.
...
Close [lover and ] adviser Huma Abedin has been holding private meetings with supporters the campaign would call on for help after it is officially under way. Several donors described Ms. Abedin’s meetings as outreach to various constituencies who would prove helpful in winning the election.
...

| - - - -

Anthony Weiner to resign Thursday

All very strange..... And isn't the story that the Muslim Brotherhood is a Brit run institution more valid NOW??? and isn't it interesting that both Bill and Hill have been CIA/British/Rhodes/Milner/Rothschild assets forever?

(http://www.mygen.com/images/hillary.jpg)

So Weiner's wife Huma Abedin is/was Hillary's "Handler" in more ways then one and why he  was looking for action outside the home....

http://barracknow.blogspot.com/2011/06/bombshell-weiners-in-laws-and-muslim.html
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
BOMBSHELL: Weiner's In-Laws and the Muslim Brotherhood

I teased this story a bit on my June 12th program. For those of you who listened, you know what this is about. For the rest, former PLO member and ex-Muslim Brotherhood activist Walid Shoebat has unearthed some shocking discoveries. Among them is that Anthony Weiner's mother-in-law is a card-carrying member of the Muslim Brotherhood. What makes this a national security issue is the fact that Weiner's wife is also Hillary Clinton's closest adviser.

Weiner's In-Laws and the Muslim Brotherhood Connected
Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack

According to translated Arab sources, it has been learned that the mother of Huma Abedin – Huma is Anthony Weiner's wife and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's Deputy Chief of Staff – is an official member of the Muslim Brotherhood;


Saleha Abedin belongs to the women's division known as the Muslim Sisterhood.

What has not been validated by western media – which has been confirmed by Arab sources – is that Huma has a brother named Hassan Abedin who is a fellow with the Oxford Centre For Islamic Studies (OCIS). This adds to strong evidence that an extremely reputable British institution has been infiltrated....

(http://secretaryclinton.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/226683681.jpg)

Hillary Clinton’s lesbian scandal comes into public eye again
23.11.2007 Source: Pravda.Ru URL: http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/101539-hillary_clinton-0
...
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton was said to have a lesbian relationship with her aide, Huma Abedin. Someone else vilified Clinton’s central Republican opponent, former mayor of New York Rudy Giuliani: an anonymous individual wrote on his or her blog that Giuliani’s wife was involved in a program to kill innocent puppies to test medical products.
...
The rumor of Hillary Clinton’s lesbian love affairs started in August of 2007 by Village Voice editors Michael Musto. Hillary and her aide, Huma Abedin, do live together at home and on the road, but the only way to nail Clinton would be to catch them together in a lesbian action. ...

http://dbkp.wordpress.com/category/huma-abedin/
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iKcZ3qcCmyo/RyogHrRiI-I/AAAAAAAACF0/LCS9hy9Ud7c/s400/hillary-love-ltrs2.jpg)

Hillary’s possible lesbianism: Only whispered about til now? Hillary Clinton a lesbian? With her “personal” aide who’s been described as “mysterious” and “glamorous”?

“I am close enough to Hillary and [her personal aide]Huma [Abedin] to tell you that this ‘rumor’ is true,” the official says. “It is well known inside her campaign that Hillary and Huma are an item.


http://coverthistory.blogspot.com/2008/04/huma-abedin-in-globe-yes-respected.html
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_sVfYYHr3cdo/SBEbXMnavXI/AAAAAAAAAmM/9cu2d188qD8/s400/globecover.jpg)

Huma Abedin in the Globe

Yes, respected supermarket tabloid Globe has an article on Huma Abedin. Hillary Gay Love Scandal Revealed! The sultry beauty who's with her DAY and NIGHT
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 02, 2015, 10:10:49 pm


… and more BAD NEWS for the HILLDOG.
From NYT ...
  :P



I can recall no instance in my time at the National Archives
 when a high-ranking official at an executive branch agency
 solely used a personal email account for the transaction
of government business… ”


Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email at State
Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules


By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT

WASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business as secretary of state, State Department officials said, and may have violated federal requirements that officials’ correspondence be retained as part of the agency’s record.

Mrs. Clinton did not have a government email address during her four-year tenure at the State Department. Her aides took no actions to have her personal emails preserved on department servers at the time, as required by the Federal Records Act.

It was only two months ago, in response to a new State Department effort to comply with federal record-keeping practices, that Mrs. Clinton’s advisers reviewed tens of thousands of pages of her personal emails and decided which ones to turn over to the State Department. All told, 55,000 pages of emails were given to the department. Mrs. Clinton stepped down from the secretary’s post in early 2013.

Her expansive use of the private account was alarming to current and former National Archives and Records Administration officials and government watchdogs, who called it a serious breach.

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle & Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

Quote
The revelation about the private email account echoes longstanding criticisms directed at both the former secretary and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, for a lack of transparency and inclination toward secrecy.

CONTINUE @NYT~~~>http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html?module=Notification&version=BreakingNews&region=FixedTop&action=Click&contentCollection=BreakingNews&contentID=30563571&pgtype=Homepa
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 03, 2015, 11:43:30 am
Yes this was what was so problematic for the Benghazi thing was that there was no official emails to look at ... oh now we know why ...  so now they turn over her emails TWO WEEKS AGO !!!

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/02/nyt-shock-report-hillary-clinton-sent-every-official-email-as-secretary-of-state-from-a-private-account/
(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/03/hillary-clinton-winking-AP.jpg)

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/03/03/media-fail-hillarys-secret-email-discovered-by-benghazi-committee-not-msm/
Media Fail: Hillary’s Secret Email Discovered By Benghazi Committee
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/investigation/hillary-clinton-private-e-mail-account-897531
Hillary Clinton's Private E-Mail Draws Scrutiny
Hacker "Guccifer" first discovered backchannel receipt of intel info
...

When “Guccifer” (who was later identified as Marcel Lazar Lehel) breached Blumenthal’s account, he discovered an assortment of correspondence sent to Hillary Clinton at the e-mail address hdr22@clintonemail.com. The “clintonemail.com” domain was registered in 2009, shortly after her nomination to become Secretary of State.
...

http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/02/hillary-clintons-email-habits-raise-questions/
Hillary Clinton’s Email Habits Raise Questions

/....

The New York Times reported Clinton’s secretive email activity on Monday, noting that the account was uncovered by a House committee investigating the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.

According to The Times, Clinton’s aides turned over approximately 300 Benghazi-related emails from her personal account to the House committee two weeks ago.

Clinton did not have an official email account during her entire stint as head of the State Department, which stretched from Jan. 2009 until Feb. 2013.
...

see: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html?smid=tw-bna&_r=1
Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules
By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDTMARCH 2, 2015
...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 04, 2015, 10:41:37 am
Hillary's Benghazi e-mail server was at HER HOME .... Hillary's an IT specialist .... CIA asset

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clintons-email-server-traced-to-home-based-service-ap/
Hillary Clinton's email server traced to home-based service: AP
CBS/AP/March 4, 2015, 6:18 AM

WASHINGTON -- The computer server that transmitted and received Hillary Clinton's emails - on a private account she used exclusively for official business when she was secretary of state - traced back to an Internet service registered to her family's home in Chappaqua, New York, according to Internet records reviewed by The Associated Press.

If the details in the AP report are true, they add a new level of secrecy and sophistication surrounding her e-mail use while she was at the State Department, observes CBS News correspondent Margaret Brennan.

The highly unusual practice of a Cabinet-level official physically running her own email would have given Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate, impressive control over limiting access to her message archives. It also would distinguish Clinton's secretive email practices as far more sophisticated than some politicians, including Mitt Romney and Sarah Palin, who were caught conducting official business using free email services operated by Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc.
...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on March 04, 2015, 03:58:22 pm
 This evil woman will Lie and Sneak about: Until the day she leaves earth for good: she is a Pathological Liar & Professional Thief!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 04, 2015, 05:01:46 pm

… and more BAD NEWS for the HILLDOG.
From NYT ...
  :P



I can recall no instance in my time at the National Archives
 when a high-ranking official at an executive branch agency
 solely used a personal email account for the transaction
of government business… ”




Possibly breaking rules?  They told me I would lose my job if I used regular email for government business. And I was just a surgeon. Nothing going over the internet but patient info.

I love this. This is huge. Even for Hillarydoggydog.  Can you imagine what foreign hackers learned about US government secrets?

The idea of using government internet is that it is virtually unhackable.
Title: Associated Press Threatens Legal Action Over Request for Hillary Clinton Info
Post by: Sasha on March 04, 2015, 05:48:47 pm
'Self server' and now this, a one-two-combo that might be why MSNBC is seemingly jumping off of the USS Clinton.

Associated Press Threatens Legal Action Over Request for Hillary Clinton Information
RAVI SOMAIYAMARCH 4, 2015

The Associated Press said Wednesday that it was considering legal action over unfulfilled Freedom of Information Act requests for government documents covering Hillary Rodham Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state.

In its requests, the AP asked for her full schedules and calendars and for details on the State Department’s decision to grant a special position to a longtime Clinton aide, Huma Abedin, among other documents. The oldest request, the news organization said, was made in March 2010.

“We believe it’s critically important that government officials and agencies be held accountable to the voters,” said AP’s general counsel, Karen Kaiser. “In this instance, we’ve exhausted our administrative remedies in pursuit of important documents and are considering legal action.”

The statement comes after the revelation this week that Mrs. Clinton used a personal email account for her government business, an unusual practice that some have suggested insulated her correspondence from the eyes of investigators and the public.

continues:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/05/business/media/associated-press-threatens-legal-action-over-request-for-hillary-clinton-information.html?_r=0
Title: CNN: Experts say Hillary Clinton broke the law
Post by: Sasha on March 04, 2015, 05:52:45 pm
CNN: Experts say Hillary Clinton broke the law
http://www.wnd.com/wnd_video/cnn-experts-say-hillary-clinton-broke-the-law/
Title: Revealed: Clinton’s office was warned over private email use
Post by: Sasha on March 04, 2015, 06:08:27 pm
Revealed: Clinton’s office was warned over private email use
March 3, 2015 - Steve Friess

State Department technology experts expressed security concerns that then–Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was using a private email service rather than the government’s fortified and monitored system, but those fears fell on deaf ears, a current employee on the department’s cybersecurity team told Al Jazeera America on Tuesday.

The employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of losing his job, said it was well known that Clinton’s emails were at greater risk of being hacked, intercepted or monitored, but the warnings were ignored.

“We tried,” the employee said. “We told people in her office that it wasn’t a good idea. They were so uninterested that I doubt the secretary was ever informed.”

continues:
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/3/3/govt-cybersecurity-source-clintons-office-warned-private-email-use.html
Title: Democrats Aren’t Rushing To Defend Hillary Clinton
Post by: Sasha on March 04, 2015, 06:53:35 pm
Democrats Aren’t Rushing To Defend Hillary Clinton
http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/democrats-aren-t-rushing-to-defend-hillary-clinton-20150304
Rachel Roubein and Lauren Fox - March 4, 2015 - excerpted

March 4, 2015 Everyone in Washington is talking about Hillary Clinton's use of a personal e-mail account during her four years as secretary of State and her homebrew computer server. Everyone, that is, except for many Senate Democrats.

As operatives, strategists and opposition research groups rush to her defense, some Washington Senate Democrats are remaining silent for the moment, saying they've been too busy with the week's packed schedule to be fully briefed on the crisis du jour.

Democrats have a difficult line to walk. They don't want to be seen hitting their strongest contender to keep the White House, but that does not mean they are rushing to shield her from criticism either. For more than a dozen senators, the easiest thing to do was to shrug off questions about Clinton's private e-mail or the fact she was running them through her own server.

"[I've] been busy with other things around here, like Prime Minister Netanyahu and ISIL and things like that," Sen. Ben Cardin of Maryland said on the way to a midday floor vote. "So I haven't looked at it yet."

Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts—who has built a reputation of rarely taking press questions in the hallway—kept her head down as she bristled through corridors of the Capitol basement with a crowd of reporters moving briskly to keep up.
___

Potential 2016 Republican challenger Sen. Rand Paul said that the emails fit a pattern of behavior.

"I think we need to be very careful about elected officials obeying the law," Paul said. "The thing that concerns me more than the emails is the fact that she has been receiving money from foreign countries ... the Constitution specifically prohibits people from taking gifts while in office."
Title: Hillary had homebrew email server set up amid a no-questions asked atmosphere
Post by: Sasha on March 04, 2015, 07:04:14 pm
EXCLUSIVE: 'What Hillary wants Hillary gets': How former Secretary of State had homebrew email server set up amid a no-questions asked atmosphere
Daniel Bates - 4 March 2015

-Former senior IT official in the Department of State said the existence of the server would have been known to only  a close circle of friends
-He said that under her watch the mantra was: ‘This is what the Secretary wants, this is what the secretary gets’

Hillary Clinton arranged for a ‘homebrew’ email server to be set up whilst Secretary of State amid an atmosphere of ‘what Hillary wants, Hillary gets’.

A former senior IT official in the Department of State told Dailymail.com that Mrs Clinton was ‘demanding’ and that staff had to get things done without asking too many questions.

The existence of the server at her private home in Chappaqua, upstate New York, would have been known to just a close circle of friends as ‘these are things that are not discussed’, he said.

The former official also spoke of his frustration that Mrs Clinton’s actions had deprived the public of vital historical records.

He said: ‘I don’t agree with it. This is history that you are throwing away here’.

Mrs Clinton, who is expected to run for President in 2016, has yet to comment on the row over her private email server, which she set up in 2009 when she came to office.

Federal law requires all letters and emails written by government officials to be retained for Congressional committees, historians and so the media can access them.

However Mrs Clinton did not even have a government email address whilst serving as America’s top diplomat for four years until 2013.

continues:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2980005/What-Hillary-wants-Hillary-gets-former-Secretary-State-homebrew-email-server-set-amid-no-questions-asked-atmosphere.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 04, 2015, 07:18:01 pm


… it's difficult to fathom how she got
away with it … how she thought it
would NOT be found out and she
would NOT be brought to task.
Gotta admit … that woman has SOME cahones!


Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 04, 2015, 07:32:21 pm
She is boldly criminal.

The worst part might be that anything that could potentially have been incriminating is probably already scrubbed.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 04, 2015, 07:46:53 pm
Hillary Clinton's Long History of Hiding Emails
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/04/hillary-clintons-long-history-of-hiding-documents/

GOP Benghazi chairman: Clinton email account 'troubling'
http://thehill.com/policy/defense/234495-gop-benghazi-chairman-clinton-e-mail-account-troubling

Judicial Watch case filed in U.S. District Court seeks access to Clinton's contacts with Morsi's wife, Nagla Mahmoud
http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2015/03/state-department-sued-for-hillary-clinton-emails-with-203524.html

Will Emailgate derail the Democratic Party’s inevitable candidate?
http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-bill-clinton-monica-lewinsky-vince-foster-whitewater-benghazi-311436
Title: Did Hillary Commit a Felony?
Post by: Sasha on March 04, 2015, 08:10:07 pm
Judge Nap just corroborated this article's assertion.  He basically went on to say that even if she's just violated the same statute that Petraeus did, it still comes to some serious potential penalties.

Did Hillary Commit a Felony?
Shannen Coffin - March 4, 2015 - excerpt

...a federal criminal law makes it a felony when any custodian of official government records “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same.” The crime is punishable by up to three years in prison. And interestingly, Congress felt strongly enough about the crime that it included the unusual provision that the perpetrator shall “forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 04, 2015, 08:39:54 pm
An interesting thing that might result from Hillary being reigned in is that the Republican Primary likely becomes the race for the Presidency.

The recent mid-term elections featured terrible Dem turn-out and a vigorous GOP with increasingly libertarian tendencies.  CPAC simply reinforced awareness of that trend.  CPAC, that was dismissed by so many in the GOP, resulted in multitudinous calls for an end to Boehner's Speakership only days after CPAC ended.

The establishment is not so stable. 
Title: Napolitano: 'Hillary Clinton Is in a Lot of Trouble Legally'
Post by: Sasha on March 04, 2015, 08:44:20 pm
Napolitano: 'Hillary Clinton Is in a Lot of Trouble Legally'
http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/03/04/napolitano-hillary-clinton-lot-trouble-legally
March 4, 2015 - as seen on air - video in the link above

Judge Andrew Napolitano tonight weighed in on the revelation that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton conducted all government business on her personal email account.

“She’s in a lot of trouble legally,” he said.

If Clinton retained classified emails on her personal account and server, Napolitano said she arguably violated a statute which prohibits retaining classified information in a non-governmental, non-secure way – a misdemeanor charge.

Clinton also faces a potential felony if she knowingly and willfully destroyed or concealed government records, Napolitano said. The felony is punishable by up to three years in jail and disqualification from holding public office in the future.

The State Department claims that Clinton did not send or receive classified information on her personal account. Megyn Kelly asked Napolitano: what are the odds of that?

“In my view, it would be inconceivable,” Napolitano said. “I don’t know how she could do her job because she had the highest security clearance there is.”
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: JT Coyoté on March 04, 2015, 09:01:08 pm
She is boldly criminal.

The worst part might be that anything that could potentially have been incriminating is probably already scrubbed.

When a criminal gets this bold... the subconscious enters and trips them up... Jeffery Dohmer is a case in point...

Hillary is toast... the 'dog eat dog' system the globalists have set up insures it...

Oldyoti

"Having federal officials, whether judges,
bureaucrats, or congressmen, impose a
new definition of marriage on the people
is an act of social engineering profoundly
hostile to liberty." ~Ron Paul
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 04, 2015, 09:24:12 pm
When a criminal gets this bold... the subconscious enters and trips them up... Jeffery Dohmer is a case in point...

Hillary is toast... the 'dog eat dog' system the globalists have set up insures it...

Oldyoti

"Having federal officials, whether judges,
bureaucrats, or congressmen, impose a
new definition of marriage on the people
is an act of social engineering profoundly
hostile to liberty." ~Ron Paul


She might be toast, and if MSNBC is any indicator she's got real trouble.

Lawrence O'Donnell, the misandrist network's otherwise unnotable attempt an a Ken doll, just railed on Hillary and rebuked his guest, Dem darling Gov Jennifer Granholm, for defending Hillary's lawlessness.

The dogs are eating the dogs and the toast.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: decemberfellow on March 04, 2015, 10:08:49 pm
and she will be retired to a nice remote spot where she can live on us for her great injustices to her country a icon for woman the world over. ::)
Title: Clinton Exposed Her Emails To Foreign Spies... To Hide Them From Americans
Post by: Sasha on March 04, 2015, 10:56:13 pm
And a huge portion of her current supporters will cry, "Sexist!" at anyone who doesn't offer appropriately prostrate lamentation at her humiliated departure.  Maybe some of the foreign folks she's been selling favors to will put her up for awhile.

And while were in the neighborhood, did the Clinton Foundation sell secrets to foreign powers too?


How Hillary Clinton Exposed Her Emails To Foreign Spies... In Order To Hide Them From The American Public
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150304/11464230210/how-hillary-clinton-exposed-her-emails-to-foreign-spies-order-to-hide-them-american-public.shtml
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: semper sersum on March 04, 2015, 11:34:44 pm
Well I pray that Justice prevail and that this self propelled vile walking diseased Satanic witch be burned at the stake. Go back to haites where you belong demon. Bye bye Hitlary.;-)
Title: Hillary Responds to Email Controversy: I want the public to see my email
Post by: Sasha on March 04, 2015, 11:45:07 pm
Hillary Clinton Responds to Email Controversy
Dan Good - Mar 5, 2015

Hillary Clinton addressed concerns Wednesday about her use of a personal email account during her term as secretary of state, expressing a desire to release her emails.

“I want the public to see my email. I asked State to release them. They said they will review them for release as soon as possible,” Clinton wrote on Twitter.

continues:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/hillary-clinton-responds-email-controversy/story?id=29401518
Title: WaPo Reporter: Hillary Decided She was above the Law
Post by: Sasha on March 05, 2015, 12:03:25 am
Chris Matthews: Republican Critics partly to Blame for Hillary Email Mess

Washington Post Reporter Carol Leonnig: the Secretary of State decided on her own power that she was going to behave in a way that other government employees would not have been allowed."
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2015/03/04/shorter-chris-matthews-republican-critics-partly-blame-hillary-email
Title: Re: WaPo Reporter: Hillary Decided She was above the Law
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 05, 2015, 01:23:41 am
Chris Matthews: Republican Critics partly to Blame for Hillary Email Mess

Washington Post Reporter Carol Leonnig: the Secretary of State decided on her own power that she was going to behave in a way that other government employees would not have been allowed."
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2015/03/04/shorter-chris-matthews-republican-critics-partly-blame-hillary-email

  Matthews is such a douchebag.  Blaming the Republicans for Hillary's blatant breaking the rules of federal government employment.  What 100 percent crap.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on March 05, 2015, 04:17:54 am
Übermensch
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on March 05, 2015, 04:34:37 am
This woman is the Proverbial Biblical Pig with Lipstick... :-*  :P ::)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: semper sersum on March 05, 2015, 06:07:46 am
It's time to get in all the tyrants faces, and aim the truth cannon at them and watch them squirm burn like a vampire in the sun at high noon.;-)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 05, 2015, 07:33:07 am
I would sincerly be estacic if she were to answer for her crimes, this being a drop in the water in comaprrison to all of them.
 Problem........She sits at the elite table, the protection is she is provided runs deep. On a par with Oby,Bush, Billy, etc. Plus she has the goods on the crew though her loyalty to the powers has been rpoven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Reminds me of the            mafias..Omerta.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 05, 2015, 08:21:23 am


… WARNING! SATIRE!   ;D


Top secret no more: a satirical look
at Hillary Clinton’s email inbox


The former US secretary of state may have broken
federal law by using a private email account instead
of the government system. But what would her
inbox look like?


Stuart Heritage
Tuesday 3 March 2015 13.23 EST

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/shortcuts/2015/mar/03/top-secret-no-more-hillary-clinton-email-inbox

EXCERPT:

• John Kerry, me (7) / [No subject] - You’ll love being SoS.

• Facebook / John McCain added photos to the album After Dark At The Lincoln Memorial

• Bill / Answer your phone - I can explain everything, I swear.

• Sergey Lavrov / Mr Putin is displeased - This is of utmost importance.

• Pantsuits Direct / Your order is now ready for collection - The economy multipack pantsuit bundle

• me / Note to self - Clear schedules for 2015 and 2016.

• Secretary of Defense / Drone strike invitation - It’s either a munitions factory or a school

• Barack Obama, me (12) / Plan - Re transforming America into a communist wonderland

• Simon & Schuster (3) / Potential titles - Difficult Decisions? Terminal Velocity? Fatal Attraction?
Title: NYT Published Hillary's Tweet to Email Scandal… BEFORE Tweet Was Tweeted
Post by: Sasha on March 05, 2015, 09:22:18 am
OOPS! NYT Writes About Hillary Clinton’s Tweet Response to Email Scandal… BEFORE The Tweet Was Actually Published
http://www.libertynews.com/2015/03/oops-nyt-writes-about-hillary-clintons-tweet-response-to-email-scandal-before-the-tweet-was-actually-published/?utm_source=co2hog

Hillary Clinton has been caught flatfooted, completely rocked by a NYT story that exposed her likely illegal use of private email for official sensitive State Department communications. The story came out Monday, yet Clinton didn’t respond until today (Thursday). Clinton’s only response so far has come via a tweet calling for the State Department to release the emails it knows about.

Quote
I want the public to see my email. I asked State to release them. They said they will review them for release as soon as possible.


The story surrounding the tweet gets a little sketchy, though, when you take into account that the NYT published a story about Clinton’s tweet. The problem? The NYT published their story about Clinton’s tweet about an hour BEFORE Clinton actually sent out the tweet.

via twitter: Amy Otto @AmyOtto8 - 9:08 PM - 4 Mar 2015
This story went out https://twitter.com/hunterschwarz/status/573339169461813248 … 8:28 pm. It references a tweet from 8:35pm https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/573340998287413248 … jeez h/t @RBPundit

It’s pretty clear Clinton’s team was coordinating with the NYT in an attempt to have a positive call to action included in the story. It’s also pretty clear the NYT was in no mood to wait until Clinton actually published the tweet.

Additionally, why is Clinton calling for the State Department to release her emails? Due to her use of a private server, she is the one who owns the email records. The State Department will only have email they know about. Clinton is the one who should be releasing her emails, not the State Department.
Title: Re: WaPo Reporter: Hillary Decided She was above the Law
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 05, 2015, 09:47:56 am
Chris Matthews: Republican Critics partly to Blame for Hillary Email Mess

Washington Post Reporter Carol Leonnig: the Secretary of State decided on her own power that she was going to behave in a way that other government employees would not have been allowed."
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2015/03/04/shorter-chris-matthews-republican-critics-partly-blame-hillary-email

  Matthews is such a douchebag.  Blaming the Republicans for Hillary's blatant breaking the rules of federal government employment.  What 100 percent crap.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 05, 2015, 10:20:13 am


  There is no doubt that she broke federal law.

  You cannot use personal email accounts to do government business. I know because that was part of our orientation. 

  But she is like Obama. They are above the law. Having Americans die around the globe for no good reason is their specialty.

  Maybe the best thing that will come out of this is that she won't run for president.

  Can't you hear her say---They're just emails. What does it matter? 

  NWO Scum.
Title: Re: WaPo Reporter: Hillary Decided She was above the Law
Post by: Sasha on March 05, 2015, 10:25:37 am
And she will blow this off.  "Meh!  It was just a little criminal."

I'm hoping that even if this scandal doesn't end her political hopes formally, that it will sandbag her with so much of her base that she'll be politically finished either way.

  Matthews is such a douchebag.  Blaming the Republicans for Hillary's blatant breaking the rules of federal government employment.  What 100 percent crap.

No doubt!  But hey, what's wrong with using the vast right-wing conspiracy to hide behind when your own conspiracies come to light?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 05, 2015, 10:31:31 am
She said they--the State Department--will review them for release.

Translation--the public will see less than 5 percent of them.

  Is there anyone that doesn't believe that Hillary will be in on it--I mean help with the screening? 

  Where are the hackers? They will give us the true story.
Title: Re: WaPo Reporter: Hillary Decided She was above the Law
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 05, 2015, 10:38:16 am
And she will blow this off.  "Meh!  It was just a little criminal."

No Hillary. You are one of the biggest non-jailed criminals the world has ever seen.  And you would be much worse as president than Obama.

Our country can't take too much more of this 21st Century Communism.
Title: Saving Private Emails
Post by: Letsbereal on March 05, 2015, 10:54:52 am
(https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8593/16526709430_fb307f9dc3_z.jpg)

William Banzai7 (http://www.maxkeiser.com/2015/03/saving-private-emails/)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 05, 2015, 11:01:13 am
^^^^^
  Love it.

  Thanks Letsbereal.

  Yes she will be saving any criminal private emails.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 05, 2015, 11:02:48 am
Larson.

I remember a reporter asking them during Billy's campaign, why do you want to be president...
 They both answered in unison (aghast at the question), " the power of course".
  Hillary was in my opinion the fuel/push to Billy's climb,as if she had  2 X4  stuck up Bills backside.
  They were meant for each other.......Water seeks its own level, so does sh**t.
Have you ever seen a worm smile?   No?            then Take a look at Hillary, not meant to insult worms.
 
 
Title: Hillary Clinton leaked intel to hurt Israeli war plans, says watchdog attorney
Post by: Sasha on March 05, 2015, 11:03:34 am
FOIA documents show that those leaks were coordinated with the Obama White House's national security team

Hillary Clinton leaked intel to hurt Israeli war plans, says watchdog attorney
March 4, 2015

The media feeding frenzy over the alleged unlawful use by Hillary Clinton of a non-government email system is having an impact on other allegations against the presidential wannabe. On Tuesday, a former Department of Justice prosecuting attorney said that he believes then-Secretary of State Clinton -- probably using her unofficial and illegal email system -- was complicit in the leaking of classified intelligence regarding military operation plans formulated by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) to destroy Iran's nuclear weapons program.

In a Washington Post front page news story on March 2, 2015, reporter Anne Gearan intimated that the likely reason for the release of Israel's plans to a New York Times reporter was intended to hurt the Israeli's war plans, since President Barack Obama and his staff -- including his top advisor Valerie Jarrett, herself born in Iran -- believed Israel was willing and had the technical and strategic expertise to launch a preemptive sneak attack on Iran in order to eliminate their nuclear threat.

Ms. Gearan wrote: "Hillary Rodham Clinton used a private e-mail account for her official government business when she was secretary of state and did not routinely preserve and turn over those e-mails for government records collection, the State Department said Monday." She also wrote: "It was not clear why Clinton, a potential 2016 presidential candidate, created the private account. But the practice appears to bolster long-standing criticism that Clinton and her husband, former president Bill Clinton, have not been transparent."

According to documents obtained by Larry Klayman, the top executive at the nonpartisan Freedom Watch, as a result of his Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Secretary Clinton and her closest staff members were the likely sources of the leaks to New York Times reporter David Sanger. Klayman also said the FOIA documents show that those leaks were coordinated with the Obama White House's national security team, which included Susan "Benghazi" Rice and Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett.

continues:
http://www.examiner.com/article/hillary-clinton-leaked-intel-to-hurt-israeli-war-plans-says-watchdog-attorney
Title: Hillary’s State Dept. Forced Resignation Of Ambassador For Using Private Email
Post by: Sasha on March 05, 2015, 11:05:47 am
Hillary’s State Dept. Forced The Resignation Of An Ambassador For Using Private E-Mail
March 5, 2015 By Sean Davis

Although Hillary Clinton and her allies may be claiming that her private e-mail system is no big deal, Hillary’s State Department actually forced the 2012 resignation of the U.S. ambassador to Kenya in part for setting up an unsanctioned private e-mail system. According to a 2012 report from the State Department’s inspector general, former U.S. ambassador to Kenya Scott Gration set up a private e-mail system for his office in 2011.

continues:
http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/05/hillarys-state-dept-forced-the-resignation-of-an-ambassador-for-using-private-e-mail/
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 05, 2015, 11:09:20 am
Hi Sasha.

Good find.. THANKS...it explains who has the power/backing and who doesn't.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 05, 2015, 11:35:26 am
Larson.

I remember a reporter asking them during Billy's campaign, why do you want to be president...
 They both answered in unison (aghast at the question), " the power of course".
  Hillary was in my opinion the fuel/push to Billy's climb,as if she had  2 X4  stuck up Bills backside.
  They were meant for each other.......Water seeks its own level, so does sh**t.
Have you ever seen a worm smile?   No?            then Take a look at Hillary, not meant to insult worms.
 
 

  A country of 300 million people and the best the Rothschilds/NWO can do is Bushes and Clintons?

  Thank God for Larry Klayman--- always after these rats. Pour on the rat poison Larry.

  Chris, have you ever noticed how Hitlery and Merkel look like twins? There are tons of stories out there saying that Merkel is Hitler's daughter.  Hitler did prefer blondes. Just search-- is Merkel Hitler's daughter?  One thing is for sure--Hitlery and Merkel are both Communists.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on March 05, 2015, 11:38:05 am
Let me make a prediction here. It won’t be Hillary Clinton nor Jeb Bush who will be elected as next President.

They will pull an other rabbit out of the hat like they did before with Obama, probably a woman.

Nobody knew Obama when he went for the Presidential election so will it be next time.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 05, 2015, 11:45:59 am
Let me make a prediction here. It won’t be Hillary Clinton nor Jeb Bush who will be elected as next President.

They will pull an other rabbit out of the hat like they did before with Obama, probably a woman.

Nobody knew Obama when he went for the Presidential election so will it be next time.

that's not true - they introduced BO at the 2004 DNC convention:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWynt87PaJ0
C-SPAN: Barack Obama Speech at 2004 DNC Convention

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Democratic_National_Convention_keynote_address
The keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention (DNC) was given by then Illinois State Senator, United States Senate candidate, and future President Barack Obama on the night of Tuesday, July 27, 2004. His unexpected landslide victory in the March 2004 Illinois U.S. Senate Democratic primary made him a rising star within the national Democratic Party overnight, started speculation about a presidential future, and led to the reissue of his memoir, Dreams from My Father.[1] His convention keynote address was well received, which further elevated his status within the Democratic Party and led to his reissued memoir becoming a bestseller.[2]
Title: Re: Hillary Clinton leaked intel to hurt Israeli war plans, says watchdog attorney
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 05, 2015, 11:47:08 am
FOIA documents show that those leaks were coordinated with the Obama White House's national security team



According to documents obtained by Larry Klayman, the top executive at the nonpartisan Freedom Watch, as a result of his Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Secretary Clinton and her closest staff members were the likely sources of the leaks to New York Times reporter David Sanger. Klayman also said the FOIA documents show that those leaks were coordinated with the Obama White House's national security team, which included Susan "Benghazi" Rice and Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett.

continues:
http://www.examiner.com/article/hillary-clinton-leaked-intel-to-hurt-israeli-war-plans-says-watchdog-attorney

  Jarrett and Rice are 2 evil women.  We should be hiring Americans to run America.  Jarrett was born in Iran.  Of course Obama was born either in Kenya or some other place that isn't one of the 50 states.

  POUR ON THE RAT POISON MR. LARRY KLAYMAN.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 05, 2015, 11:51:11 am
Let me make a prediction here. It won’t be Hillary Clinton nor Jeb Bush who will be elected as next President.

They will pull an other rabbit out of the hat like they did before with Obama, probably a woman.

Nobody knew Obama when he went for the Presidential election so will it be next time.

  I heard Joel Skousen predict--on Rense Radio--that the next president will be a CONTROLLED REPUBLICAN. 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on March 05, 2015, 12:15:59 pm
  I heard Joel Skousen predict--on Rense Radio--that the next president will be a CONTROLLED REPUBLICAN.

Maybe he's right about this one, we'll see but in general I have a problem with Joel Skousen.

According to him everybody is attacking America while I see it just the other way around.

(http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2014/11/20141110_war_0.jpg)

And Joel Skousen makes a lot of money of his fear mongering which makes his judgement highly suspicious.
Title: More from Hillary's Hacked emails: Saudi money financed Benghazi attack
Post by: Sasha on March 05, 2015, 01:00:47 pm
Hacked emails: Saudi money financed Benghazi attack
2 days ago - Aaron Klein

TEL AVIV – An email reportedly sent to Hillary Clinton by former Clinton White House staffer Sidney Blumenthal quotes an intelligence source providing information that “wealthy Sunni Islamists in Saudi Arabia” funded the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. special mission in Benghazi.

The leaked emails were published by Russia Today, which says it was forwarded the emails from Blumenthal’s AOL account by the hacker using the alias “Guccifer.”

continues:
http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/hacked-emails-saudi-money-financed-benghazi-attack/
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 05, 2015, 01:01:53 pm
Maybe he's right about this one, we'll see but in general I have a problem with Joel Skousen.

According to him everybody is attacking America while I see it just the other way around.

(http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2014/11/20141110_war_0.jpg)

And Joel Skousen makes a lot of money of his fear mongering which makes his judgement highly suspicious.
                    Ron Paul says US has military personnel in 130 nations and ...
www.politifact.com/.../ron-paul-says-us-has-military...
Title: Judicial Watch Sues For Clinton's Emails With Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood
Post by: Sasha on March 05, 2015, 01:23:51 pm
Judicial Watch Sues For Clinton's Emails With Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood
Katie Pavlich | Mar 05, 2015

After ignoring a Freedom of Information Act request submitted in August 2014, government watchdog Judicial Watch has issued a lawsuit against the State Department for all emails between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, her top aide Huma Abedin and wife of Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohammed Morsi, Nagla Mahmoud, from January 2009 to January 2013. It was discovered earlier this week that both Clinton and Abedine used personal email accounts to conduct government business, potentially violating federal records laws.

continues:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/03/05/judicial-watch-sues-for-clintons-emails-with-egypts-muslim-brotherhood-n1966085
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 05, 2015, 01:27:21 pm
Maybe he's right about this one, we'll see but in general I have a problem with Joel Skousen.

According to him everybody is attacking America while I see it just the other way around.

(http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2014/11/20141110_war_0.jpg)

And Joel Skousen makes a lot of money of his fear mongering which makes his judgement highly suspicious.

  You are right.  I have called the US military the military of the NWO for a long time. Yes, we attacking everybody else. Especially if you believe ISIS is a neocon operation. I would give you links but I'm just using a tablet today.
Title: Re: Judicial Watch Sues For Clinton's Emails With Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 05, 2015, 01:31:10 pm
Judicial Watch Sues For Clinton's Emails With Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood
Katie Pavlich | Mar 05, 2015

After ignoring a Freedom of Information Act request submitted in August 2014, government watchdog Judicial Watch has issued a lawsuit against the State Department for all emails between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, her top aide Huma Abedin and wife of Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohammed Morsi, Nagla Mahmoud, from January 2009 to January 2013. It was discovered earlier this week that both Clinton and Abedine used personal email accounts to conduct government business, potentially violating federal records laws.

continues:v
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/03/05/judicial-watch-sues-for-clintons-emails-with-egypts-muslim-brotherhood-n1966085


  Keep pouring it on Mr Klayman.
Title: Re: Judicial Watch Sues For Clinton's Emails With Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood
Post by: jofortruth on March 05, 2015, 01:44:24 pm
Judicial Watch Sues For Clinton's Emails With Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood
Katie Pavlich | Mar 05, 2015

After ignoring a Freedom of Information Act request submitted in August 2014, government watchdog Judicial Watch has issued a lawsuit against the State Department for all emails between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, her top aide Huma Abedin and wife of Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohammed Morsi, Nagla Mahmoud, from January 2009 to January 2013. It was discovered earlier this week that both Clinton and Abedine used personal email accounts to conduct government business, potentially violating federal records laws.

continues:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/03/05/judicial-watch-sues-for-clintons-emails-with-egypts-muslim-brotherhood-n1966085


Copy of the Judicial Watch lawsuit available for download:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/clinton-egypt-emails-2/
Title: Re: Judicial Watch Sues For Clinton's Emails With Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood
Post by: JT Coyoté on March 05, 2015, 03:23:07 pm

Copy of the Judicial Watch lawsuit available for download:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/clinton-egypt-emails-2/

You can bet that Hilliary's alias email addresses and posts to multi individuals in nom de gare, are numerous. There are many that are doubtless addressed to other shadow email  addresses belonging the power elite as well.

To compare this to Petreaus' "crime" is to under play it greatly... Hillary was acting as the most powerful official of the US government on the world stage save the president. This story is a big deal!

Oldyoti

"A nation can survive it's fools
and even it's ambitious, but it cannot
survive it's traitors from within."

~Marcus Tullius Cicero
Title: Even Chris Matthews Couldn’t Believe a Hillary Supporter’s Answer on the Emails
Post by: Sasha on March 05, 2015, 04:44:29 pm
Even Chris Matthews Couldn’t Believe a Hillary Clinton Supporter’s Answer on the Email Question
Mar. 5, 2015 - Mike Opelka   

The story of Hillary Clinton’s private email account used during her tenure as secretary of state dominated conservative media on Wednesday. It also appeared on liberal outlets, and in many cases, was dismissed by them as a distraction or a non-story.

However, on Wednesday night’s edition of MSNBC’s “Hardball,” host Chris Matthews took on the topic with a balance uncharacteristic for the unabashedly left leaning network.

continues:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/05/even-chris-matthews-couldnt-believe-a-hillary-clinton-supporters-answer-on-the-email-question/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=ShareButtons
Title: Re: Saving Private Emails
Post by: chris jones on March 05, 2015, 04:51:04 pm
(https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8593/16526709430_fb307f9dc3_z.jpg)

William Banzai7 (http://www.maxkeiser.com/2015/03/saving-private-emails/)
Hi L............Class post..
Title: Hillary Clinton won't take questions at event honoring journalism
Post by: Sasha on March 05, 2015, 06:09:18 pm
Hillary Clinton won't take questions at event honoring journalism
Colin Campbell - Mar. 5, 2015

Hillary Clinton reportedly will not be taking any questions at an event honoring excellence in journalism.

Organizers of the March 23 Toner Prize Celebration, which is named after the late New York Times reporter Robin Toner, told the Center for Public Integrity the event would be open to reporters. However, the keynote speaker, Clinton, does not plan to take their inquiries.

continues:
http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-wont-take-questions-at-event-honoring-journalism-2015-3
Title: Re: Hillary’s State Dept. Forced Resignation Of Ambassador For Using Private Email
Post by: chris jones on March 05, 2015, 06:21:41 pm
Hillary’s State Dept. Forced The Resignation Of An Ambassador For Using Private E-Mail
March 5, 2015 By Sean Davis

Although Hillary Clinton and her allies may be claiming that her private e-mail system is no big deal, Hillary’s State Department actually forced the 2012 resignation of the U.S. ambassador to Kenya in part for setting up an unsanctioned private e-mail system. According to a 2012 report from the State Department’s inspector general, former U.S. ambassador to Kenya Scott Gration set up a private e-mail system for his office in 2011.

continues:
http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/05/hillarys-state-dept-forced-the-resignation-of-an-ambassador-for-using-private-e-mail/
            She is playing the game, word sanitation, explanations scripted, and the ole memory hole, themore time passes- the interest fades with the multiple chaotic ongoing- scenarios day after day.
 I hope they keep up the heat.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 05, 2015, 08:01:18 pm
It might fall off of the front pages for a bit, now and then, but this one has legs.  The longer she does the Clintonian-two-step and denies a things that will eventually be writ large on Drudge's top lines, the more she risks being forced into even more absurd defenses than trying to redefine common vowels.

Emailgate couples the White House, illicit foreign access, and conspiracies with a potential legal bearing on her ability to ever hold office in the US again.  She's gonna have to dance to the tune she cued up.   
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on March 05, 2015, 08:28:17 pm
Hillary will NOT be President. and in my opinion neither will Rand Paul be President!

Many think she has a chance---but she is only a distraction.

 The new Puppet will be a ReDumbLaCuM!  >:(

...as for myself: I believe Both Parties are USELESS!  8)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 06, 2015, 09:57:26 am
It might fall off of the front pages for a bit, now and then, but this one has legs.  The longer she does the Clintonian-two-step and denies a things that will eventually be writ large on Drudge's top lines, the more she risks being forced into even more absurd defenses than trying to redefine common vowels.

Emailgate couples the White House, illicit foreign access, and conspiracies with a potential legal bearing on her ability to ever hold office in the US again.  She's gonna have to dance to the tune she cued up.   
There is mentally ill people and cruel ones. She fits both. Sociopathic twisted, powermonger, EGO.
Yuh Saha, this one will definelty grab attention depsite her crew.
                   
Title: Now Angelina sets her sights on White House
Post by: Letsbereal on March 06, 2015, 10:41:40 am
Now Angelina sets her sights on White House
23 June 2009
, (Express)
http://www.express.co.uk/dayandnight/109280/Now-Angelina-sets-her-sights-on-White-House

(http://o.aolcdn.com/hss/storage/midas/525f3d804249c0c9ec755f5c5c96b8c4/200992994/angelina-jolie-maleficent.jpg)

ANGELINA Jolie is thinking of turning her attention to politics with a view to ending up in the White House, it has been revealed.

The actress, a UN goodwill ambassador for the past eight years, has become increasingly focused on humanitarian work and is said to be keen to make the leap into politics.

Her recent 34th birthday has caused her to take stock and Angelina has been telling friends she wants to get even more involved in making a difference in the world.

She is considering following fellow actors Arnold Schwarz­enegger into politics and Ronald Reagan into the White House.

Although an admirer of new US President Barack Obama she has never officially come out as a Republican or Democrat.

A friend said: “Ange has admitted she’s getting bored with Hollywood. She said she’s now got her sights set on Washington.

“She is passionate about people’s rights, war and justice and thinks she can get more hands-on and make even more of a difference by getting into politics.

She admires Obama and thinks she could make a big difference too if she were in his position.”

Angelina, who just recently dethroned Oprah Winfrey as the world’s most powerful celebrity in a list compiled by Forbes magazine, has six adopted and biological children with partner Brad Pitt.

She has been filming new action movie Salt for the past couple of months but finds herself ever more drawn to the political arena.

She recently wrote an article for Time magazine expressing outrage over the conflict in Darfur and gave an emotional address for World Refugee Day last week.

Her duties as a UN goodwill ambassador have seen her travel the world highlighting the plight of refugees and victims of war and poverty.

The friend continues: “I would place a huge wager on her becoming the first female president in the next 20 years. When Ange sets her mind on something, she goes all out to do it.

“She’s very determined and gets very stirred by her UN work.

“She is well respected for her humanitarian work and I’m sure she would make as many waves if she moved fully into the political world.”
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 06, 2015, 10:46:36 am
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/03/what-if-hillary-clinton-drops-out-115715.html#.VPnZUbnTmHs
What if Hillary Bows Out?
Here’s how it would play out in the Democratic Party—after the initial panic.
By BILL SCHER
March 03, 2015

Until now, Hillary Clinton’s run for the presidency has been viewed as pretty much a sure thing. But lately the road to near-certain nomination has taken a couple of rough turns, especially with the revelation that Clinton may have broken federal rules as secretary of state by communicating only on her private email account. Which makes us wonder: What if The Unthinkable did happen and she actually dropped out? What would be the Democrats’ response?
 
“Panic,” says Democratic consultant Chris Lapetina. Indeed, the biggest problem is that the Democratic establishment is apparently so terrified of the idea of a Hillary-less race—and the vicious primary that might result—it’s not even considering contingency plans. Political professionals, like military generals and crisis management experts, know that the way to avoid being blindsided is to prepare for every scenario. But while the Democratic National Committee has to officially remain neutral, much of the extraparty infrastructure has been moving ahead on the presumption of a Hillary campaign.

...
This Hillary-or-bust attitude bespeaks a certain complacency: Democrats have been getting a little too used to “being the organized party” for once and rallying around a single candidate, while Republicans struggle with an unwieldy double-digit field. So it makes sense for someone to entertain what would happen if disaster struck. It might as well be me.
...
Title: Hillary Clinton's Campaign Trail
Post by: Letsbereal on March 06, 2015, 07:29:06 pm
(http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2015/03/20150306_hillary_0.jpg)

Source: Townhall (http://townhall.com/political-cartoons/2015/03/04/128360)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 06, 2015, 07:54:34 pm
 Whats that they say about one picture worth a thousand words........
Hey L.. BUMPED
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 07, 2015, 10:26:17 am
Whats that they say about one picture worth a thousand words........
Hey L.. BUMPED

  The paper at the far end of the trail of slime is the BILL AND HILLARY ARKANCIDES.  (A.S.D.S.--Arkansas Sudden Death Syndrome)  WE MUST NEVER LET THE PUBLIC FORGET THIS HISTORY OF BILL AND HILL.
http://www.arkancide.com/
more at the link......

                                                                                               Arkancide

Arkancide is the unfortunate habit of potential witnesses to the Clintons' dirty dealings in Arkansas suddenly deciding to shoot themselves twice in the back of the head. Police and Coroners in Arkansas, notably Fahmy Malak who answered to Governor Bill Clinton, automatically described these shootings as "suicides."

After Bill Clinton became President the phenomenon spilled over to Washington D.C. when Hillary Clinton's ex-lover Vincent Foster was "Arkancided."

The Arkancide website consists of a history of the Clintons and their misdeeds in Arkansas and the White House, a list of books about the Clintons, a section on Hillary Clinton, which is rapidly growing and becoming increasingly relevant to all of us, and a section on the press and their view of Hillary as "she who can do no wrong."
If you're in a hurry and can't spare the week or two that it would take to follow all these links, at least read the three-part history of Hillary Clinton by Cockburn and St. Clair and the 29 episodes of The Real Hillary Clinton
Arkancide.com is run by someone who doesn't believe in UFO's or that the Moon landings were faked or that JFK was shot by a guy on the grassy knoll or that Elvis is alive (sorry!) or that Princess Diana was liquidated by MI6 or... well any of that type of nonsense.
Conspiracy theorists are idiots and I'm pleased not to be one of them. There was nothing "theoretical" about the Mena/ADFA conspiracy or the Whitewater conspiracy or the Cattle Futures conspiracy or Filegate or Travelgate or Bloodgate or... I'll finish the list when I get a moment!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 07, 2015, 01:55:44 pm


Check out this YOUTUBE:   8)


Exposed: Hillary Clinton's Sex Scandals
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvxUuAl85ho

… the Hilldog part starts about 2:45

Published on Jan 3, 2014
Video produced by http://www.westernjournalism.com
Produced, written, and edited by Kris Zane. Narrated by Tom Hinchey
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 07, 2015, 02:16:33 pm

Check out this YOUTUBE:   8)


Exposed: Hillary Clinton's Sex Scandals
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvxUuAl85ho

… the Hilldog part starts about 2:45

Published on Jan 3, 2014
Video produced by http://www.westernjournalism.com
Produced, written, and edited by Kris Zane. Narrated by Tom Hinchey

  Texx Marrs wrote this book years ago.  It talks about Hillary's lesbianism.

(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/511C3R2TAAL.jpg)

Big Sister Is Watching You: Hillary Clinton and the White House Feminists Who Now Control America--And Tell the President What to Do

Author: Texe Marrs
Title: Hillary Clinton Scandals - Cartoons
Post by: iROBOTi on March 07, 2015, 04:50:01 pm
Hillary Clinton Scandals - Cartoons
(http://api.ning.com/files/7F975s5rOKhU668yak7Q081ZtEiZLDAZIkg-1cjlnGYk1mEgh7fuH6hvGuZoJwZ0jWOlSkfCgCywGT0UxASPJqcVlfOOlRDT/12160.info.jpg?width=600&height=437)

"Cartoonists SLAM Hillary For Email Scandal; Here Are Some OF The Best
http://12160.info/photo/hillary-clinton-scandals-cartoon
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on March 07, 2015, 06:25:03 pm
I dont think Hilldogs email server in the basement is going to be enough to stop the Clinton mafia clan .Im not whistling  the wicked witch (political life is over ) is dead. wizard of oz just yet
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 08, 2015, 07:38:39 pm
Emails May Be a Key to Addressing 'Pay-to-Play' Whispers at Clinton Foundation
http://www.nationaljournal.com/twenty-sixteen/emails-may-be-a-key-to-addressing-pay-to-play-whispers-at-clinton-foundation-20150308
There are not two Clinton controversies. There is one big, hairy deal.
By Ron Fournier

March 8, 2015 "Follow the money." That apocryphal phrase, attributed to Watergate whistle-blower "Deep Throat," explains why the biggest threat to Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential dreams is not her emails. It's her family foundation. That's where the money is: corporate money, foreign money, gobs of money sloshing around a vanity charity that could be renamed "Clinton Conflicts of Interest Foundation."

What about the emails? Hillary Clinton's secret communications cache is a bombshell deserving of full disclosure because of her assault on government transparency and electronic security. But its greatest relevancy is what the emails might reveal about any nexus between Clinton's work at State and donations to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation from U.S. corporations and foreign nations.

continues:
http://www.nationaljournal.com/twenty-sixteen/emails-may-be-a-key-to-addressing-pay-to-play-whispers-at-clinton-foundation-20150308
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on March 08, 2015, 08:11:23 pm
Clinton pay for play..
Who can forget?
Clinton/Loral/Missile Tech transfer
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 08, 2015, 08:38:42 pm
Clinton pay for play..
Who can forget?
Clinton/Loral/Missile Tech transfer

That's a great one.

Quote
...Republicans have alleged that Clinton cavalierly compromised "the national interest" as a favor to Loral and its chairman, Bernard L. Schwartz, in exchange for large campaign contributions since 1994. Both the White House and Loral have denied this.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/loral053198.htm
Title: 'Huge gaps' in Clinton email record, Benghazi probe chief says
Post by: Sasha on March 08, 2015, 09:09:00 pm
'Huge gaps' in Clinton email record, Benghazi probe chief says
Lisa Lambert and Timothy Gardner | Reuters – 6 hours ago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Huge gaps exist in the emails former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has provided to a congressional committee investigating the 2012 attack on a U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, the panel's chairman said on Sunday.

Republican Representative Trey Gowdy said his committee lacked documentation from Clinton's trip to Libya after the attack despite a popular photo image of her using a handheld device during a flight to that country.

"We have no emails from that day. In fact we have no emails from that trip," said Gowdy, who heads the committee in the U.S. House of Representatives. "There are huge gaps."

continues:
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/huge-gaps-clinton-email-record-benghazi-probe-chief-192615720.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on March 08, 2015, 09:52:27 pm
Billions spent for cybersecurity by the various alphabet agencies .

 The POTUS does not care that his lies are so transparent. 

"Obama said on Saturday he only recently learned of Clinton's private email account."
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 08, 2015, 10:19:40 pm
Billions spent for cybersecurity by the various alphabet agencies .

 The POTUS does not care that his lies are so transparent. 

"Obama said on Saturday he only recently learned of Clinton's private email account."

  If Obama wasn't a liar and a micro-manager we could believe him.  The Dictator knows about everything that is going on in his Regime. 

  Obama and Hillary are both pathological liars and narcocists.  That's why the Bilderbergs, et al  LIKE THEM AS PUPPETS.

  Nothing you already didn't know Jerry.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on March 08, 2015, 11:45:57 pm
Larry Nichols goes on record about the Clintons. Listen for a minute.

THE CLINTON CONSPIRACY - MUST WATCH

http://youtu.be/C8B43JOshC4?t=3m53s

(http://0.tqn.com/d/politicalhumor/1/S/3/d/1/hillary_drivingmiisshillary.jpg)

Arkancide is the unfortunate habit of potential witnesses to the Clintons' dirty dealings in Arkansas suddenly deciding to shoot themselves twice in the back of the head. Police and Coroners in Arkansas, notably Fahmy Malak who answered to Governor Bill Clinton, automatically described these shootings as "suicides."

http://www.arkancide.com/

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 09, 2015, 10:34:18 am
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/09/us/politics/hillary-clinton-faces-test-of-record-aiding-women.html?_r=0

Hilldoggydog Faces Test of Record as Women’s Advocate

MIAMI — It was supposed to be a carefully planned anniversary to mark one of the most important and widely praised moments in Hillary Rodham Clinton’s political career — and to remind the country, ahead of a likely 2016 presidential campaign, about her long record as a champion for the rights of women and girls.

Instead, as Mrs. Clinton commemorates her 1995 women’s rights speech in Beijing in back-to-back events in New York, she finds herself under attack for her family foundation’s acceptance of millions of dollars in donations from Middle Eastern countries known for violence against women and for denying them many basic freedoms.

This was not how she intended to reintroduce herself to American voters.

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 09, 2015, 08:02:20 pm
O'Reilly just said in his monologue that talk of Hillary's email problem has been 'swirling around Washington since August'.  He didn't give any sources, but of course sourcing swirling rumors is inherently difficult.

None the less, it makes the assertion that Obama made that he'd found out about Hill's mail mess (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/03/09/president-obama-says-he-found-out-about-hillary-clintons-private-email-usethrough-news-reports-n1967746) from the news even less likely.  The assertion that White House intel is based on news programing was and is inherently ridiculous.

Perhaps a more important aspect of O'Reilly's rumor is that it meant that the Clintons likely knew this controversy was coming and they are still unprepared to get in front of the story.  Waiting instead for the GOPhers to bite deep into this red meat issue when, in classic Clintonian style, she'll undoubtedly attempt a strong semantic reformation of the English language and blame us all for our errors.
Title: White House: Obama traded email with private Clinton account
Post by: Sasha on March 09, 2015, 09:09:43 pm
White House: Obama traded email with private Clinton account
JOSH LEDERMAN - 6 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama knew that Hillary Rodham Clinton conducted business on a nongovernment email account while secretary of state, but only recently learned the details of the privately run system she was operating, the White House said Monday.

The White House has drawn scrutiny over Clinton's exclusive use of private email and whether Obama or his aides should have done more to ensure her correspondence was secure and properly preserved. In a weekend interview, Obama told CBS News that it was only recently "through news reports" that he'd learned that Clinton was using a nongovernment email system.

continues:
http://news.yahoo.com/white-house-obama-traded-email-private-clinton-account-180116859--politics.html
Title: A history of the federal government’s ‘lost’ e-mails
Post by: Sasha on March 09, 2015, 09:35:50 pm
A history of the federal government’s ‘lost’ e-mails
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2014/06/18/a-history-of-the-federal-governments-lost-emails/
Josh Hicks - June 18, 2014

IRS tea party controversy
The “torture memos”
Madoff investigation
Dismissal of U.S. attorneys (2007)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 09, 2015, 09:37:15 pm
 So OBby will lay blame on Hillarys underlings.  Stafers are to blame...Yuh, 3 bags Oby.
 Peons , dupes for the royalists.
 So was Stevens and a few hundred others along the  Hillbags journey.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 09, 2015, 10:12:35 pm
Sacrificial scape goats? Possibly.  But blaming them wouldn't mitigate Hillary's individual responsibility to follow federal records laws.  The facts are bearing down on her.  She's unquestionably done deeply unethical things between the Clinton Foundation and Benghazi.

Hillary's supposed to do a presser in the next two days.  It'll be both interesting to see what kind of smoke screen she throws down and if she takes questions from journalists.
Title: Napolitano: Clinton 'Retained & Concealed 100% of the Documents'
Post by: Sasha on March 10, 2015, 08:56:08 am
Napolitano: Clinton 'Retained & Concealed 100% of the Documents'
March 9, 2015 - as seen on FOX's Kelly File

Judge Andrew Napolitano tonight sounded off on President Barack Obama’s remarks about Hillary Clinton’s email controversy.

“I’m glad that Hillary’s instructed that those emails that had to do with official business need to be disclosed,” Obama told CBS News’ Bill Plante this weekend.

“Apparently the president has the same misunderstanding of federal law that his former secretary of state does,” Napolitano remarked on “The Kelly File.”

Napolitano explained that a federal statute says documents and records by high-ranking officials belong to the government. A former official can ask the government for personal documents back, but Clinton did the opposite, Napolitano said.

“She retained and concealed 100 percent of the documents with which she dealt while she was secretary of state in 48 months. She decided what was governmental and kept what she didn’t want to reveal,” Napolitano said.

continues:
http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/03/09/napolitano-clinton-retained-and-concealed-100-percent-documents
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 10, 2015, 09:25:21 am
Sacrificial scape goats? Possibly.  But blaming them wouldn't mitigate Hillary's individual responsibility to follow federal records laws.  The facts are bearing down on her.  She's unquestionably done deeply unethical things between the Clinton Foundation and Benghazi.

Hillary's supposed to do a presser in the next two days.  It'll be both interesting to see what kind of smoke screen she throws down and if she takes questions from journalists.
    Sasha.          Her crew, the heavy's that is either want her out of the way or will protect her till the end. Obama allready took a stand indicating her staffers should have been on this, the blame game, DUPE syndrome.  She gets away with her button pushing murders, fraud, extortion, abuse of power, ya know, there is no end to her sociopathic behavior.  She being but one of the elites chosen.
 The good news, many people are waking up to her game, I am with hope this issue doesn't go down the memory hole as did Benghazi among many others. The RICO act will never be initiated, Eric H. or his fill in would never allow it, that is along with other A to Z's depts that are scared sh**tless to stand up , are on the sukstraw or blackmailed.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 10, 2015, 09:47:47 am
    Sasha.          Her crew, the heavy's that is either want her out of the way or will protect her till the end. Obama allready took a stand indicating her staffers should have been on this, the blame game, DUPE syndrome.  She gets away with her button pushing murders, fraud, extortion, abuse of power, ya know, there is no end to her sociopathic behavior.  She being but one of the elites chosen.
 The good news, many people are waking up to her game, I am with hope this issue doesn't go down the memory hole as did Benghazi among many others. The RICO act will never be initiated, Eric H. or his fill in would never allow it, that is along with other A to Z's depts that are scared sh**tless to stand up , are on the sukstraw or blackmailed.

I agree, the record of the either establishment party actually investigating each other is poor at best.  The difference between so many of those and this one might be a matter of several forms of simultaneous fatigue in the voting public:  Hillary fatigue, Clinton fatigue, corruption fatigue, imperialism fatigue, oligarchy fatigue.  I'm not saying that this's definitely the straw that will break ye ole' camel's back, but the hay bail is surely nearly big enough now to buckle the poor beast's legs.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on March 10, 2015, 10:53:27 am
 WOW! in light of recent events; and to mention the past, of this woman?

 WOW! she is Delusional: and I can not believe she is still trampin' about!!!  :o

America is Nosey and Dumb...and this is WHY/ this Delusional OLD Hag is still in the spot light!

Give it a thought anyways ;)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on March 10, 2015, 11:44:47 am
Ya iamc2, just the idea that the Clinton's or Bush's get to be considered for potus tells me of the complete moral bankrupt sy of this us gov. It's shocking when I think about it. Our vetting process is broken .
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 10, 2015, 12:16:47 pm
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-03-10/e-mail-fiasco-will-cost-hillary-and-taxpayers

  IT WILL COST MILLIONS TO LEARN NOTHING.  THIS IS JUST A SORTING PROCESS.  THEY WILL THROW OUT THE CONDEMNING EMAILS.
  THAT'S THE WAY THE CLINTON/BUSH/OBAMA MAFIA WORKS.


Hillary's E-Mails May Cost Taxpayers Millions

The State Department is beginning to sort through more than 55,000 pages of e-mails from Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary that she handed over late last year, sticking taxpayers with additional costs that could reach into the millions. It’s an additional burden for her former department and another aspect of an e-mail fiasco her political opponents plan to highlight.

Clinton's office sent the e-mails to the State Department last December, a portion of the total in her possession, after printing them out and stacking them in boxes. The department largely sat on them until last week, when news broke that she had used a "homebrew" server rather than her government account to conduct her official business. Clinton tweeted last week that she wanted the State Department to release her e-mails, but she hasn't acknowledged what a huge job it will be for her former employees.


Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 10, 2015, 12:25:46 pm
http://www.buzzfeed.com/katherinemiller/facebook-conversation-on-hillary-clinton-is-getting-more-and#.ss5zoYengG

  Some good news.....The Facebookers are turning on the Godgrandmother of American politics.  If we could only get them away from their cell phones to vote against her.

Facebook Conversation On Hillary Clinton Is Getting More And More Negative

Data shared by Facebook exclusively with BuzzFeed News shows more people talking about Hillary Clinton after the email scandal hit. But even before the news broke, the tone had changed.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 10, 2015, 02:17:02 pm
she only takes questions from dmc-fmale reporters ...

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2015/03/10/clinton-i-opted-for-convenience-only-having-private-email-account/
Clinton: I ‘Opted For Convenience’ Only Having Private Email Account

March 10, 2015 3:09 PM
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on March 10, 2015, 02:24:22 pm
Ya iamc2, just the idea that the Clinton's or Bush's get to be considered for potus tells me of the complete moral bankrupt sy of this us gov. It's shocking when I think about it. Our vetting process is broken .
Spot On Mate...the mind of modern mankind is not only Broken...it is lost...and that is sad!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on March 10, 2015, 02:27:54 pm
she only takes questions from dmc-fmale reporters ...

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2015/03/10/clinton-i-opted-for-convenience-only-having-private-email-account/
Clinton: I ‘Opted For Convenience’ Only Having Private Email Account

March 10, 2015 3:09 PM
OH! is the woman in LUV with women?

She says; 'YES!' and the DC Crowd has a PARTY...called...'Ladies Night?'  :o :-X :-*
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 10, 2015, 02:56:14 pm
New Clintonisms to add to the relative definition of 'is':

Cake & wedding  = Libya & Benghazi
Yoga = Stand down
'Looking back' = 'at this point,...'
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: PeaceAndFreedom on March 10, 2015, 03:44:28 pm
I agree, the record of the either establishment party actually investigating each other is poor at best.  The difference between so many of those and this one might be a matter of several forms of simultaneous fatigue in the voting public:  Hillary fatigue, Clinton fatigue, corruption fatigue, imperialism fatigue, oligarchy fatigue.  I'm not saying that this's definitely the straw that will break ye ole' camel's back, but the hay bail is surely nearly big enough now to buckle the poor beast's legs.

The key is whether the Republican controlled Congressional committees with oversight over the State Department simply subpoena her private server. It's a no-brainer that is the appropriate action, given Hillary's resistance to "permitting" them to see everything. There is NOTHING preventing them from doing so immediately, other than their being entirely unserious.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 10, 2015, 03:45:32 pm
The list.

 What is her next move, perhaps it doesn't matter, she has been exposed. This is but one, Benghazi another, especially so ther pizzy fit "what difference does it make" statement.
 She had a fainting spell, just an opinion, she's taking drugs to stay pumped up when she should be on Thorazine in a strait jacket.
  One story that grabbed my attention was how she treated her underlings,..
                                        Looked up a few reports in regards to her treament of the lesser ones.
SC: fellowshipoftheminds.
Hillary quotes.
“Where is the G*damn f**king flag!  I want the G*damn f**king flag up every morning at f**king sunrise.”
-From the book Inside the White House, by Ronald Kessler, p.244 – Hillary to staff at the Arkansas Governor’s mansion on Labor Day 1991.

****************************************************************************
F**k off!  It’s enough I have to see you shit-kickers every day, I’m not going to talk to you too!!  Just do your G*damn job and keep your mouth shut.”
-From the book American Evita, by Christopher Anderson, p.90 – Hillary to her State Trooper body guards after one of them greeted her with “Good Morning”

Here’s the screenshot I took of the passage, using Amazon.com‘s “Look Inside” feature (high-lighted words are the words I used to search for the quotation):

AmericanEvita
****************************************************************************
“If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass over here and grab those bags!”
From the book The First Partner: Hillary Rodham Clinton, by Joyce Milton p.259 – Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident.

I found the passage as described on page 259 of The First Partner, on Amazon.com:

The First Partner****************************************************************************
“Stay the f**k back, stay the f**k back away from me!  Don’t come within ten yards of me, or else!  Just f**king do as I say, Okay!!?”
-From the book Unlimited Access: An FBI Agent Inside the Clinton White House, by Clinton FBI Agent in Charge, Gary Aldrich, p.139- Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail.

****************************************************************************
“Where’s the miserable c**k sucker!”
-From the book The Truth About Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She’ll Go to Become President, by Edward Klein, p. 15- Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer.

Screenshot of the passage from p. 15 of The Truth About Hillary on Amazon.com:

Truth about Hillary****************************************************************************
“You f**king idiot”
From the book Crossfire, p.84 – Hillary to a State Trooper who was driving her to an event.

****************************************************************************
“Put this on the ground!  I left my sunglasses in the limo.  I need those sunglasses.  We need to go back!”
From the book Dereliction of Duty, by Robert Patterson, p.71-72 – Hillary to Marine One helicopter pilot to turn back while en route to Air Force One.
****************************************************************************

“Come on Bill, put your d**k up!  You can’t f**k her here!!”
From the book Inside the White House, by Ronald Kessler, p.243 – Hillary to Gov.  Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive female.

****************************************************************************
This ill-tempered, violent, loud mouth, hateful and abusive woman wants to be your next president and have total control as commander and chief of our Military , the very Military for which she has shown incredible disdain throughout her public life.  Surely the people of the United States can easily do better than this.

– Ed Schriber Col.  USMC (Ret.)
“Semper Fidelis”
~Eowyn
RATE THIS: 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: decemberfellow on March 10, 2015, 03:50:46 pm
^^^^^^^^^^^Real Presidential stuff  ::)  if a in hundred years I was reading this my thought , how in the world  did this country survive.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 10, 2015, 04:17:51 pm
http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/eric-scheiner/sen-schumer-hillary-e-mails-stuff-isn-t-gonna-matter

Sen. Schumer on Hillary E-Mails: ‘That Stuff Isn’t Gonna Matter’

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8INIH0JfNA8

HILLARY--WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 10, 2015, 04:46:10 pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2988099/Hillary-Clinton-finally-address-email-controversy-today-reports-say-DAYS-silence.html

 Clinton to annouce for presidency on Apri 1st---April Fools Day in the USA---perfect for anyone who would vote for her.


I’ve deleted all my personal emails and the server will remain private: Hillary Clinton reveals HALF her inbox - 31,830 messages - has not been handed over and says she used one account for convenience
Asked why she had deleted what she admitted was ‘half of her inbox’ she replied: ‘I fully complied with every government rule’

She added: ‘They were personal and private, about matters....I did not see a reason to keep them'

Clinton said they included messages about ‘planning Chelsea’s wedding, my mother’s funeral’, ‘yoga routines’ and ‘family vacations’

Clinton attempted to make peace with the public - and Republicans who believe she withhed pertinent emails - after a speech to the U.N.

Only acknowledgement of the email controversy prior to Tuesday had been through a spokesman and a single tweet

Even after the presser questions lingered about Clinton's use of a private server, which she said would remain out of the government's grasp

Clinton is reportedly looking to launch her presidential campaign on April 1
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 10, 2015, 05:34:51 pm


quote chris jones:
Quote
she's taking drugs to stay pumped up when she should be on Thorazine in a strait jacket.

 ;D

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/images-1_1.jpeg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/images-1_1.jpeg.html)

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/hillary_clinton_insane.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/hillary_clinton_insane.jpg.html)

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/images.jpeg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/images.jpeg.html)

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/Unknown_4.jpeg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/Unknown_4.jpeg.html)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 10, 2015, 05:43:03 pm
Obi-Wan: "That Bitxch is our last hope."
Yoda: "No...there is another..." ...


(http://liftingpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Chelsea-Clinton-Before-And-After-Plastic-Surgery-Photos-2.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 10, 2015, 05:47:36 pm
  Hillary just told the world what she thinks of Americans, our congress and supreme court.
 
 
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on March 10, 2015, 05:54:11 pm
  Hillary just told the world what she thinks of Americans, our congress and supreme court.
 
 

The most delusional woman in the World!
...next to Madam Blavatsky!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 10, 2015, 06:11:07 pm
The key is whether the Republican controlled Congressional committees with oversight over the State Department simply subpoena her private server. It's a no-brainer that is the appropriate action, given Hillary's resistance to "permitting" them to see everything. There is NOTHING preventing them from doing so immediately, other than their being entirely unserious.

That's my thought too.  Gowdy said he's going to have a couple of hearings.  Without more information, what's the point of the new hearings?  Lawyer games?

If Gowdy doesn't go after the physical server and any records her IT professionals (since she can't set up and email, who's running this fancy server rig?) we should all have serious doubt in his sincerity.

The question I'm left asking though is, aren't her email records kept by the NSA-GCHQ dragnet that's grabbing everything out here? metadata and/or normal data?

Gowdy was just on FOX and seems fairly serious.  We'll see. 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 10, 2015, 06:26:37 pm
Yahoo:SC

After she spoke of womans rights (votes) she mentioned her E-Mails.

                       Hillary Clinton broke her silence Tuesday on the scandal surrounding her use of a private, nongovernmental email address while she served as secretary of state, saying that it was "a matter of convenience," that she "thought it would be easier to carry just one device" and that it was allowed under the rules of the State Department.

"Looking back, it would have been better if I had simply used a second email account and carried a second phone," Clinton said in a brief press conference at the United Nations after delivering a speech on women’s rights. "I thought using one device would be simpler, and obviously it hasn't worked out that way."
  What difference does it make?           EH Hillary..
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 10, 2015, 06:39:57 pm


Rush was talking about this today, of course. He said Petraeus and
his girlfriend used the 'Draft Folder' trick … both had the password
for the bogus-named account and just opened the 'draft folder' to
read all the lovey-dovey updates … never actually sending/receiving
anything. Rush said this was the common way of doing things, keeping
the in & out boxes empty. So, it may be that her lawyers are telling
her to say "no confidential eMails were ever sent on that server" and
to still be "truthful" … in the Orwellian sense. They will have to tear
into her devices to unravel this thing.

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on March 10, 2015, 07:13:08 pm
E-Mail?
come on?
This is a JOKE in the highest magnitude!

ALL INFO. is in the CLOUD!

...is it NOT?

Every thing I have typed is in the CLOUD!

..and everything this OLD HAG [Hillary] has put in the Cloud is in the OPEN for us to READ!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 10, 2015, 10:20:16 pm
Was Hillary important enough for the NSA to keep an eye on her somewhat unsecured server?  If for nothing else but counter-spying.  Gotta wonder if Guccifer wasn't the only snoop in her inbox?

NSA Whistleblower: NSA Spying On – and Blackmailing – Top Government Officials and Military Officers
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/06/nsa-whistleblower-nsa-spying-on-and-blackmailing-high-level-government-officials-and-military-officers.html

The NSA refuses to deny spying on members of Congress
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/01/04/the-nsa-refuses-to-deny-spying-on-members-of-congress/

NSA Spies on World Bank, IMF, UN, Pope, World Leaders, American Politicians and Military Officers
http://www.globalresearch.ca/nsa-spies-on-world-bank-imf-un-pope-world-leaders-and-american-politicians-and-military-officers/5356455

NSA monitored calls of 35 world leaders after US official handed over contacts
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/24/nsa-surveillance-world-leaders-calls

Glenn Greenwald: The NSA Can "Literally Watch Every Keystroke You Make"
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/12/30/glenn_greenwald_the_nsa_can_literally
...malware is essentially a program that allows the NSA, in the terminology that hackers use, to own the machine. So, no matter how much encryption you use, no matter how much you safeguard your communication with passwords and other things, this malware allows the NSA to literally watch every keystroke that you make, to get screen captures of what it is that you’re doing, to circumvent all forms of encryption and other barriers to your communications.

New Snowden leak: NSA program taps all you do online
http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/31/tech/web/snowden-leak-xkeyscore/
The National Security Agency's top-secret program essentially makes available everything you've ever done on the Internet — browsing history, searches, content of your emails, online chats, even your metadata — all at the tap of the keyboard....

...The program gives analysts the ability to search through the entire database of your information without any prior authorization — no warrant, no court clearance, no signature on a dotted line. An analyst must simply complete a simple onscreen form, and seconds later, your online history is no longer private. The agency claims that XKeyscore covers "nearly everything a typical user does on the Internet."

"I, sitting at my desk," said Snowden, could "wiretap anyone, from you or your accountant, to a federal judge or even the president, if I had a personal email."

NSA scandal: what data is being monitored and how does it work?
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/07/nsa-prism-records-surveillance-questions
What data is being monitored?

Potentially, everything. The PowerPoint slide about Prism says it can collect "email, chat (video, voice), videos, photos, stored data, VoIP [internet phone calls], file transfers, video conferencing, notifications of target activity – logins etc, online social networking details" and another category called "special requests".
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 11, 2015, 10:53:42 am
  Hi Sasha.
                J.Edgar Hoover had the Goods on the pols, his battlions of agents spent years digging up dirt on our elected wonders..The NSA is much more powerfull.
                Blackmail is rampant, you can bet your bippy ever pol has been far more scrutinized than we the citizens. What human being is perfect,has never made mistakes in short our elected few are human and at some point in their life have made erros. Those few  who are squecky clean can be set up, fiancial records relationships, etc..
                If a high profile pol is dedicated to this nation, people and constitution there is allways the risk he is taking the path of the 3K's. The current regime of neocons have committed criminal  & anti constitutional acts as long as they remain loyal to their masters they are protected.
           
               
               
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 11, 2015, 11:48:41 am


… Associated Press (AP) is suing Hilldog:


AP sues State Department,
seeking access to Clinton records


BY STEVE PEOPLES
MAR. 11, 2015 11:37 AM EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Associated Press filed a lawsuit Wednesday against the State Department to force the release of email correspondence and government documents from Hillary Rodham Clinton's tenure as secretary of state.

The legal action comes after repeated requests filed under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act have gone unfulfilled. They include one request AP made five years ago and others pending since the summer of 2013.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, comes a day after Clinton broke her silence about her use of a private email account while secretary of state. The FOIA requests and lawsuit seek materials related to her public and private calendars, correspondence involving longtime aides likely to play key roles in her expected campaign for president, and Clinton-related emails about the Osama bin Laden raid and National Security Agency surveillance practices.

"After careful deliberation and exhausting our other options, The Associated Press is taking the necessary legal steps to gain access to these important documents, which will shed light on actions by the State Department and former Secretary Clinton, a presumptive 2016 presidential candidate, during some of the most significant issues of our time," said Karen Kaiser, AP's general counsel.

CONTINUE~~~>http://bigstory.ap.org/article/5f35e25c77194546822769b2f9672fe3/ap-sues-state-department-seeking-access-clinton-records
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 11, 2015, 11:56:57 am


… if elected and she takes office in Jan. 2017 she will
be the 2nd oldest US Pres in history … Reagan will have
beat her out of the top spot by only a few months:


From fresh-faced student to political wife... and even
President? Time-lapse shows the changing faces of
Hillary Clinton as poll shows most Americans think
she's younger than her 67 years

* Video produced by nonprofit fundraiser and two friends shows
former secretary of state's changing looks through the years

*Hillary Clinton would be 69 if she were to become president in
January 2017, making her the second oldest to be inaugurated
and less than a year younger than Ronald Reagan when he took office

* Americans generally think she's younger than her actual age,
especially voters under age 30 – most of whom say she's in her 50s or 40s

* 'Calculating Clinton' project promises more videos if the former senator
and first lady runs for the White House


By DAVID MARTOSKO, US POLITICAL EDITOR FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

PUBLISHED: 00:50 EST, 11 March 2015 | UPDATED: 10:01 EST, 11 March 2015

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_623.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_623.jpg.html)

WATCH VIDEO~~~>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2989213/50-years-Hillary-60-seconds-Time-lapse-shows-former-secretary-state-aging-teenager-67-poll-shows-Americans-think-s-younger.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on March 11, 2015, 01:56:40 pm
Hillery in 2016!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK15mq8TlKs


http://www.activistpost.com/2015/03/while-clinton-hid-emails-6-billion-went.html?m=1
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 11, 2015, 02:31:14 pm
  Hi Sasha.
                J.Edgar Hoover had the Goods on the pols, his battlions of agents spent years digging up dirt on our elected wonders..The NSA is much more powerfull.
                Blackmail is rampant, you can bet your bippy ever pol has been far more scrutinized than we the citizens. What human being is perfect,has never made mistakes in short our elected few are human and at some point in their life have made erros. Those few  who are squecky clean can be set up, fiancial records relationships, etc..
                If a high profile pol is dedicated to this nation, people and constitution there is allways the risk he is taking the path of the 3K's. The current regime of neocons have committed criminal  & anti constitutional acts as long as they remain loyal to their masters they are protected.

Agreed.  Many follow strict choreography on stages filled with 'strings attached' that become political nooses when one of the puppets starts moving to a different tune.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 11, 2015, 05:51:44 pm
If hillary was wearing a hood she would be a double for the Sith ( whater they called him)  in star wars..
 
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 11, 2015, 06:22:47 pm
If hillary was wearing a hood she would be a double for the Sith ( whater they called him)  in star wars..
 
 

  YES BUT THE SITH IS NOT AS UGLY AND NOT AS OLD AS HILLDOG.
(http://ts1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=HN.608006742130494129&w=300&h=300&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 11, 2015, 06:28:59 pm

… if elected and she takes office in Jan. 2017 she will
be the 2nd oldest US Pres in history … Reagan will have
beat her out of the top spot by only a few months:


\

  OF THE 3 DOGS--Kerry, Biden and Hilldog---Hildoggydog is the youngest.

  Only good thing is that these rat bastards are getting too old.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 11, 2015, 06:42:49 pm
 Hey Larson, makes me wonder how these muckers keep on going.          Like the photo!
 
 Heny K ,,,comes to mind as well. Soul mates....
Henry Kissinger - Biography - Diplomat, Political Scientist ...
www.biography.com/.../henry-kissinger-9366016
Birth Date: May 27, 1923 (age 91) ... Diplomat Henry Kissinger was U.S. secretary of state under Richard Nixon, winning the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize ??? for the ...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 11, 2015, 06:51:09 pm
Hey Larson, makes me wonder how these muckers keep on going.          Like the photo!
 
 Heny K ,,,comes to mind as well. Soul mates....
Henry Kissinger - Biography - Diplomat, Political Scientist ...
www.biography.com/.../henry-kissinger-9366016
Birth Date: May 27, 1923 (age 91) ... Diplomat Henry Kissinger was U.S. secretary of state under Richard Nixon, winning the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize ??? for the ...

  Only the good die young. 


(https://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=HN.608024536178101819&w=300&h=300&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0)
Title: 2016: HILLARY PAC begins merchandising
Post by: iROBOTi on March 11, 2015, 07:02:56 pm


(http://api.ning.com/files/i8FopxWhfBFqriAIN3q*IXA04T*afEMYfxqme1devLR4CnmLewe2AgCH0QLsVPL3yw62sCxZAaHuihRPwUGVyQP9l*V5JJXa/canklesNOTforpresidentTshirt.jpg?width=321)
http://12160.info/forum/topics/2016-hillary-pac-begins-merchandising?

2016: HILLARY PAC begins merchandising
few pages of LOL Pics
.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: decemberfellow on March 11, 2015, 10:12:00 pm
Hillary Clinton to America: Bite me!

Quote
First, when I got to work as secretary of state, I opted for convenience to use my personal email account, which was allowed by the State Department, because I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two.
 
Looking back, it would’ve been better if I’d simply used a second email account and carried a second phone, but at the time, this didn’t seem like an issue.
 
This is an obvious lie. In fact, we know this is a lie because Hillary told us so. Last month at an event in Silicon Valley she said:
 “There are reasons when you start out in Washington on a Blackberry you stay on it in many instances. But it’s also — I don’t know, I don’t throw anything away. I’m like two steps short of a hoarder. So I have an iPad, a mini iPad, an iPhone and a Blackberry.”

in 2011 she had this to say
Quote
Well, I have a quite large purse, because when you travel as much as I do, you never know what you’re going to need. So in addition to makeup and all that goes with that, usually my Blackberry and papers of all kinds, because I can’t get away with a small purse because I’m in and out of meetings all the time. So it’s kind of a purse/briefcase sort of operation going on here. But when I go overseas, like on this trip, there are many more bags that come with me than just my purse in case something else is needed. And my iPod, just the usual wonderful musical “interluding” diversions that we all need, a wide variety. And on my iPad, I have to confess, mostly news sites, because I do a lot of looking to see what’s going on around the world.
http://www.redstate.com/2015/03/11/hillary-clinton-america-bite/ (http://www.redstate.com/2015/03/11/hillary-clinton-america-bite/)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 12, 2015, 12:37:56 am

… if elected and she takes office in Jan. 2017 she will
be the 2nd oldest US Pres in history … Reagan will have
beat her out of the top spot by only a few months:




  One cannot compare Reagan to Hillary.  Reagan had charisma and he was charming and had a sense of humor.  Hillary has none of these qualities.  Humor, charisma and a sense of humor can get you through a lot of things--even being the president of the USA.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 12, 2015, 08:19:32 am



There is no doubt that the scheme she established
was a blatant circumvention of the Freedom of
Information Act, atop the Federal Records Act… ”


Freedom of Information Act expert:
Clinton's email system 'laughable'


By NICK GASS 3/12/15 7:28 AM EDT

A top freedom-of-information expert isn’t buying Hillary Clinton’s explanation of why she set up her own email system to conduct official State Department business, calling it “laughable.”

Daniel Metcalfe, who advised White House administrations on interpreting the Freedom of Information Act from 1981 to 2007, told The Canadian Press that the former secretary of state acted “contrary to both the letter and the spirit of the law.”

“There is no doubt that the scheme she established was a blatant circumvention of the Freedom of Information Act, atop the Federal Records Act,” he said, reviewing a transcript of Clinton’s remarks during her Tuesday news conference. Clinton told reporters she deleted approximately 30,000 personal emails from her private account that she also used as secretary of state.

Quote
“Her suggestion that government employees can unilaterally determine which of their records are personal and which are official, even in the face of a FOIA request, is laughable,” he said.


ARTICLE~~~>http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/foia-hillary-clinton-email-daniel-metcalfe-116011.html?ml=ri
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 12, 2015, 11:47:42 am
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/12/did-hillary-clinton-destroy-subpoenaed-documents/
Did Hillary Clinton Destroy Subpoenaed Documents?
by John Hayward
12 Mar 2015
...
So: how is it possible that Hillary Clinton routed 100 percent of her email through an off-the-books server for four years without handling a single piece of classified information, or concealing a single document from legal discovery? It really isn’t possible, and as Byron York reports at the Washington Examiner, congressional Republicans are wisely disinclined to take Clinton’s word about the fullness and timeliness of her disclosure:


Here’s what Republican lawmakers are thinking after news that Hillary Clinton deleted 30,000-plus emails she deemed beyond the range of congressional inquiries:

1) During Clinton’s four years as secretary of state and after, Congress sent dozens, perhaps hundreds, of document requests, subpoenas and other inquiries to the State Department.
2) Many of those requests, probably the majority of them, covered the secretary of state’s office.
3) Congress never received Clinton’s emails as part of the Department’s response to those requests.
4) Clinton destroyed at least half of her total emails at a time when those requests from Congress — including subpoenas — were fully in effect.
5) Congress wants to know what was withheld.

“It’s not just Benghazi,” says Utah Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. “Part of what we need to do is take an inventory of congressional requests, including subpoenas. It appears on the surface that none of the State Department’s responses was complete. We’re going to go back and ask them again.”

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., head of the Select Committee on Benghazi, will continue to lead the investigation into the attack that killed four Americans in Libya in September 2012. But Congress’ oversight of the State Department extends far beyond Benghazi, and as part of the effort to undo the damage done by Clinton’s secrecy, Chaffetz says he is going to ask every member of Congress to come up with an inventory of what they have requested from the State Department. Those requests will then be re-sent to State in light of the revelation about Clinton’s emails.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 12, 2015, 12:09:02 pm


  The Clintinistas have always been liars and scammers.  Don't you ever think that they will change.  Once a crook, always a crook.  Hilldoggydog would be worse than Obama.  THESE COMMUNISTS ARE HERE TO TAKE THE REPUBLIC DOWN.

  Can't you hear her say "30,000 emails.  What difference does it make?"

  Don't ever let the Communist Obama get away from hiding from this video-----


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXWTdTnhebs

Obama-We're the Most Transparent and Ethical Administration in U.S. History!

 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on March 12, 2015, 12:20:18 pm
The politics that make these candidates seem remotely viable are a bigger problem than Jeb or Hillary.

Kill your television!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 12, 2015, 01:38:14 pm
The politics that make these candidates seem remotely viable are a bigger problem than Jeb or Hillary.

Kill your television!

  I did that a long time ago.  We watch Netflix for $8.99 a month.  I refuse to pay $100 to $150 a month for cable so that some NFL/NBA star can make millions or some worthless people like the Kardashians can make $21 million a year for a worthless show.

  You are correct.  The politics is crap and THIS IS ALL A DIVERSION FROM THE REAL ISSUES---the ones done on Fridays in Washington DC.

 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 12, 2015, 02:48:47 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/hillary-clinton-could-face-jail-time-as-email-scandal-sparks-legal-challenges.html

  This is a real stretch.  She will never be behind bars.  She's a Clintonista.  BUT MAYBE SHE WON'T BE EL PRESIDENTE.


Hillary Clinton could face jail time as email scandal sparks legal challenges

Stephen Dinan
The Washington Times
March 12, 2015

The Obama administration will soon find itself in court having to explain to federal judges why it never told anyone former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton used a secret email address, potentially spoiling dozens of open records requests, experts said Wednesday.
And Mrs. Clinton could face up to three years in prison per message if she is found to have broken her word and handled classified information on the secret account, one open records expert told The Washington Times.
The legal challenges have already begun, with The Associated Press filing a federal lawsuit saying the State Department has foiled five years’ worth of requests for Mrs. Clinton’s emails, but never told them or the court that she kept her own server — meaning that her emails weren’t being searched.
Meanwhile, the White House tried to keep Mrs. Clinton at arm’s length, insisting she alone can answer questions about what she did, and saying that none of Mr. Obama’s aides were involved in helping her decide which emails to turn over to the State Department and which to delete.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 12, 2015, 06:24:36 pm




… hhmmm. Hackers have located
the STILL ACTIVE Clinton eMail server:


"
This is a big deal and just the thing real-world hackers look
for in a target and will exploit to the max,” the source said.



"
Fox News has previously reported that, with the aid of software named Maltego, experts had established that the server is up and running, receiving connectivity to the Internet through an Atlanta-based firm called Internap Network Services Corporation. Clinton’s stern insistence at her news conference that her server “will remain private” would appear to rest, then, at least in part, on the inviolability of Internap. 

Now, working with publicly available tools that map network connectivity, experts have established that the last “hop” before the mail server’s Internet Protocol, or IP, address (listed as 64.94.172.146) is Internap’s aggregator in Manhattan (listed as 216.52.95.10).

“This is a very strong indication that the clintonemail.com server is in Manhattan,” the source told Fox News. 

By entering the IP address for the Internap aggregator into existing databases, the experts obtained the exact geolocation coordinates for the aggregator – revealed to be on lower Broadway, at the intersection with Chambers Street, some two blocks north of City Hall. This in turn suggests that the Clinton server itself lies within close proximity – most likely former President Clinton’s Harlem office, and not as far away as the Clintons’ home in Chappaqua, N.Y.


READ ARTICLE~~~>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03/12/hackers-probing-clinton-server-cite-security-lapses/
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 12, 2015, 07:50:11 pm
http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/hillary-insider-email-scandal-inside-job-by-obama/#8a2PZ1GvIbP9BMu5.99

  Snakes fighting snakes....

HILLARY INSIDER: EMAIL SCANDAL 'INSIDE JOB' BY OBAMA

Clinton insider Ed Klein believes Hillary Clinton’s email scandal may have been prompted by President Obama and ordered by top adviser Valerie Jarrett.



In an interview Wednesday with the Fox News Channel’s “Fox and Friends,” Klein said he’s not the only one who thinks that.

“Bill Clinton thinks this as well. He has said, according to my sources, that the White House is leaking to their … friends in the mainstream media stories about the Clintons; not only Hillary, but him, what she did while in the State Department.”

Klein said his sources in the White House have disclosed that the Clintons “know that Hillary is under not one but six different investigations prompted by the White House.”

At a news conference yesterday at the U.N., Hillary Clinton directly addressed media about the revelation that she conducted her business as secretary of state using a private email account instead of the secure and archived government system.
Title: Re: Gee , I can't decide
Post by: jerryweaver on March 13, 2015, 10:01:48 am
Gee , I can't decide who will the first woman president my niece says to me this morning. She lives in LA LA LA California.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/12/msnbc-guest-michelle-obama-should-challenge-hillary-she-would-make-a-great-president-video/


Anyone out there clamoring for a third Obama term?

If you were curious, one talking head has indeed stepped forward — but not for a third Barack Obama term.

In an appearance on “Now With Alex Wagner,” guest Dorian Warren suggested that First Lady Michelle Obama, instead of Elizabeth Warren and a cadre of others, should challenge former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination in 2016.

“I want to start a whisper campaign on your show right now,” Warren, a professor at Columbia University, started. “I think we should draft Michelle Obama to run.”

“Forget running for the Senate like Hillary did, let’s draft the first lady right now,” Warren continued. “She is equally as talented and smart as her husband. I think she would make a great president.”

However, needless to say, the odds of this happening are lower than low, which was confirmed by The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/12/msnbc-guest-michelle-obama-should-challenge-hillary-she-would-make-a-great-president-video/#ixzz3UHKxbQPV
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 13, 2015, 01:10:20 pm
^^^^^^

  God help us.

  Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse it does---PMS-NBC  promoting Mr Mike Obama for president.

  A 3rd world lawyer with a Kenyan husband. 

  Put a tent over that circus.

www.wnd.com/2009/08/105998/


WHAT HAPPENED TO MICHELLE OBAMA'S LAW LICENSE?



Why did Michelle Obama give up her license to practice law in 1993?

Records at the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois list her status as “voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law.”

It further states that Michelle license is “on court ordered inactive status.”

The statement has many bloggers wondering why a court would issue an order to stop Michelle Obama from practicing law, and some have even suggested the first lady may have been facing allegations of misconduct.


Michelle Obama’sIllinois registration status listed as “court ordered inactive”
Michelle Obama, known as Michelle Robinson at the time, attended Princeton University and earned her juris doctor degree from Harvard Law School in 1988. She took the bar exam in Illinois, passing it on her second try and receiving her license from the state of Illinois.


Michelle Robinson as a Harvard student before she becomes Michelle Obama (photo: Harvard University)
In 1988, Michelle became an associate at Sidley & Austin, a corporate law firm in her home town of Chicago. She was assigned to mentor summer associate and future husband, Barack Obama.

She remained at the law firm for three years, leaving the lucrative practice and corporate law behind in 1991 upon her father’s death. According to the Washington Post, Sidley & Austin offered Barack Obama a job upon his graduation from Harvard, but the future president declined – even though he planned on returning to Chicago. He explained that he wanted to go into politics and that Michelle would be leaving the firm to go with him.

According to the New York Times, Michelle was unfulfilled by her law career. She told the newspaper, “I wanted to have a career motivated by passion and not just money.”

She elaborated in an interview with Newsweek: “I didn’t see a whole lot of people who were just thrilled to be there,” she said. “I met people who thought this was a good life. But were people waking up just bounding out of bed to get to work? No.”



In 1991, Michelle wrote to Valerie Jarrett, then-deputy chief of staff for Chicago Mayor Richard Daley. Jarrett offered her a job as an assistant to the mayor, a position that offered $60,000 a year. When Jarrett was promoted to head the Department of Planning and Development, Michelle became an “economic development coordinator,” responsible for “developing strategies and negotiating business agreements to promote and stimulate economic growth within the City of Chicago.”

Michelle and Obama married in 1992 at Trinity United Church of Christ, in a ceremony officiated by Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

In 1993, Michelle left the mayor’s office and became executive director for the Chicago office of Public Allies, a taxpayer-funded organization that encourages young activists and places them in positions for nonprofit groups and government agencies. Barack Obama was a member of the group’s founding advisory board.

Public Allies promises to help adults, ages 18 to 30, find “community leadership” positions and attend weekly training workshops and retreats. Recruits receive a monthly stipend of up to $1,800, plus paid health and child care and an additional award of $4,725 to pay for student loans or college tuition.

According to Investor’s Business Daily, the program promotes “diversity and inclusion” and boasts that more than 70 percent of its recruits are “people of color.”

“When they’re not protesting, they’re staffing AIDS clinics, handing out condoms, bailing criminals out of jail and helping illegal aliens and the homeless obtain food stamps and other welfare,” Investor’s Business Daily states.

One member of the 2005 Los Angeles class told IBD, “It was too touchy-feely. It’s a lot of talk about race, a lot of talk about sexism, a lot of talk about homophobia, talk about -isms and phobias.”

According to the report, one of those -isms is “heterosexism.” The Chicago-based Public Allies training seminar describes it as a negative result of “capitalism, white supremacy, patriarchy and male-dominated privilege.”

The IBD report calls it “a boot camp for radicals who hate the military.”

Michelle Obama worked at Public Allies from spring 1993 until fall 1996 and served on its national board of directors from 1997 until 2001. She said, “The happiest time of my life was working to build Public Allies.”

On the campaign trail with her husband last year, Michelle touted her choice to give up a lucrative legal career for community service.

“We left corporate America, which is a lot of what we’re asking young people to do,” she said. “Don’t go into corporate America. You know, become teachers. Work for the community. Be social workers. Be a nurse. Those are the careers that we need, and we’re encouraging our young people to do that.”


Michelle Obama campaigns for her husband

In 1993, the same year she began working for Public Allies, she applied to change her Illinois registration status for practicing law – only four years after she received her license. It is now listed as “inactive.”

James Grogan, deputy administrator and chief counsel for the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, or ARDC, has been with the commission for 30 years. He told WND that on July 1, 1994, the Illinois Supreme Court entered an order allowing Michelle to be transferred to inactive status pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court rule 770.

The ARDC website explains, “Prior to November 1, 1999, former Supreme Court Rule 770 provided for a proceeding in the Court for any voluntary transfer to inactive status, whether because of some incapacitating condition or solely as a matter of the lawyer’s preference because the lawyer would not be practicing law.”

Grogan explained, “At the time, the only way to go on inactive status was to do what she did – which was to file a petition in the Illinois Supreme Court.”

He said attorneys often filed a petition for 770 when they wanted to pursue other careers, retire or begin raising a family.

“At the time, this happened all the time,” he said. “Our office would have to file what’s known as a consent.”

Grogan said his office would have immediately alerted the court in a public filing if there had been reason to believe she should face disciplinary action.

“We filed a consent in Michelle Obama’s case in which we had no objection to her transferring to inactive status,” he said. “In the event that she did go on inactive status and she engaged in any disbarrable offenses, there would be a disciplinary case of public record.”

He continued, “Just because someone goes on inactive it doesn’t deprive us of the jurisdiction to prosecute.”

Inundated by numerous 770 filings that each required a separate court ruling, the Illinois Supreme Court later simplified the inactivation process. In 2005, after Barack Obama was elected to the U.S. Senate, he changed his status to inactive as well.

“By 2005, which is several years later than his wife, the rule had changed such that you no longer had to file a petition that was such a pain for the court,” Grogan explained. “Instead, the court had changed it to two types of status: inactive or retired. Either situation involves merely sending a letter to us basically saying, ‘I want to transfer to inactive status.’”

Active lawyers are required to pay $289 each year and take 30 hours of Continuing Legal Education, or CLE, every two years. Under inactive status, attorneys are not required to take the courses, but they must pay $105 each year. “Inactive” registrants are not authorized to practice law. Lawyers who retire do not have to pay fees or take courses.

“A lot of people who aren’t practicing say, ‘Why bother?’” Grogan said.

Barack Obama remained listed as inactive until he retired this year.


Barack Obama listed as “retired”
“If you are currently inactive and want to get back in, all you have to do is send us a letter and pay the current balance of your registration,” Grogan said. “However, if you’re retired and want to come back in, you have to pay the full registration fee for the years you were out. I don’t think Obama’s going to come back to Chicago to practice, you know what I mean?”

In the case of Michelle Obama, Grogan said she would need to obtain another court order to reactivate her status because her file still falls under old rules that required her to go through the court for all status changes. He called her 1993 petition “unremarkable,” saying there is no reason to believe her standing was in question.

“There’s absolutely no indication of any disciplinary proceeding ever lodged against Michelle Obama,” he said.

In June 1996, she was named associate dean of student services at the University of Chicago. In 2002, she began working for the University of Chicago Hospitals, eventually earning $317,000 a year after her husband became a senator. She scaled back her responsibilities to support Barack Obama’s presidential campaign

The White House declined to respond to questions about the status of her license. Michelle Obama has not revealed exactly what prompted her to change her status to inactive or whether she plans to ever practice law again.

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 13, 2015, 07:58:11 pm
 Don't worry Larson, it'll never happen...
   As for Hillary, her explantion that it was to hard for her to carry 2 cellphones, one GOV, 1 Private..
   Sh**tsandwiches, Why didn't she backtrack and say " What difference does it make"
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on March 14, 2015, 09:34:58 am
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/03/13/269B998600000578-2993531-image-a-18_1426261198725.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 14, 2015, 10:09:21 am
^^^^


…. TIME say the horns on her head from the "M"
is accidental … that it has happened before with
the Pope, etc.

 :o
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 14, 2015, 05:25:18 pm


… NYT Maureen Dowd slams Hilldog AGAIN! It is
tainted with a certain LibTard ickyness … but … let 'er rip!


"
It depends upon what the meaning of @ is.



An Open Letter to hdr22@clintonemail.com

MARCH 14, 2015

WASHINGTON — SINCE open letters to secretive and duplicitous regimes are in fashion, we would like to post an Open Letter to the Leaders of the Clinton Republic of Chappaqua:

It has come to our attention while observing your machinations during your attempted restoration that you may not fully understand our constitutional system. Thus, we are writing to bring to your attention two features of our democracy: The importance of preserving historical records and the ill-advised gluttony of an American feminist icon wallowing in regressive Middle Eastern states’ payola.

You should seriously consider these characteristics of our nation as the Campaign-That-Must-Not-Be-Named progresses.

If you, Hillary Rodham Clinton, are willing to cite your mother’s funeral to get sympathy for ill-advisedly deleting 30,000 emails, it just makes us want to sigh: O.K., just take it. If you want it that bad, go ahead and be president and leave us in peace. (Or war, if you have your hawkish way.) You’re still idling on the runway, but we’re already jet-lagged. It’s all so drearily familiar that I know we’re only moments away from James Carville writing a column in David Brock’s Media Matters, headlined, “In Private, Hillary’s Really a Hoot.”

Quote
Ronald Reagan seemed like an ancient king, as one aide put it, gliding across the landscape. You seem like an annoyed queen, radiating irritation at anyone who tries to hold you accountable.

PLEASE CONTINUE~~~>http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/15/opinion/sunday/maureen-dowd-an-open-letter-to-hdr22clintonemailcom.html?_r=0
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on March 14, 2015, 07:39:24 pm
  One cannot compare Reagan to Hillary.  Reagan had charisma and he was charming and had a sense of humor.  Hillary has none of these qualities.  Humor, charisma and a sense of humor can get you through a lot of things--even being the president of the USA.

I agree larsonstdoc . And as an outsider If I had to vote for a USA prez between Hillary or Ronald ,Ron would win everytime
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on March 14, 2015, 08:09:35 pm
On aside note  .The Thatcher Reagan Gorby years did have a positive effect on the whole cold war era . And I will is always respect Gorby for his part in it .
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on March 14, 2015, 09:00:43 pm
http://www.history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/How5Investigations/How5InvestigationsGotItWrong_3.htm

Reagan did some good, but, a lot bad went down on his watch. His VP pick was told to him and established the Bush death dynasty's place in US public politics. CIA Bush Papa was a character in the JFK military coup. Reagan didn't know this?  The California investigative panel on political assignation put it on his desk in 1978.


Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 15, 2015, 08:56:15 am
http://www.history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/How5Investigations/How5InvestigationsGotItWrong_3.htm

Reagan did some good, but, a lot bad went down on his watch. His VP pick was told to him and established the Bush death dynasty's place in US public politics. CIA Bush Papa was a character in the JFK military coup. Reagan didn't know this?  The California investigative panel on political assignation put it on his desk in 1978.

  No question about the JFK assassination.  The big dog in that plot was LBJ.  Jim Marrs wrote the best book on the JFK assassination IMO---a book called CROSSFIRE.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 15, 2015, 08:58:31 am
On aside note  .The Thatcher Reagan Gorby years did have a positive effect on the whole cold war era . And I will is always respect Gorby for his part in it .

  Yes, Dude447.  Reagan ACTED presidential.  I''m sure you know he started out as a Hollywood actor.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 15, 2015, 11:21:04 am
  Yes, Dude447. Reagan ACTED presidential.  I''m sure you know he started out as a Hollywood actor.

1960s Boraxo HAND CLEANER COMMERCIAL RONALD REAGAN (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9IcbVDTVls)

1959 ads- Reagan for GE - Carson for Jello pudding  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9McapjKyFnk)

Ronald Reagan " Live Better Electrically" comercial de "GE Theatre"  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5Lz1C53RwI)

Ronald Reagan Versus The Hippies
This video is from the campaign trail, 1966. Reagan addresses the variety of radical student and the "Free Speech Movement" protests on the campus of the University of California--Berkeley  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCr3nL78qWs)


Reagan and Nixon at Bohemian Club | Grove

http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/bohemian_grove.html
Social Cohesion & the Bohemian Grove
The Power Elite at Summer Camp
by G. William Domhoff, U.C. Santa Cruz
(http://www.mygen.com/images/reagan_nixon_1967.jpg)
Reagan Nixon Bohemian Grove (The Summer of Love) 1967

(http://media.bakersfieldnow.com/images/110204_Ronald-Reagan.jpg)
In this Jan. 2, 1967, file photo, Ronald Reagan is sworn in as governor of California as he takes the oath of office from California State Justice Marshall F. McCombs in Sacramento, Calif. (AP Photo/File)

...
Nixon next refers to Lakeside Talks in the context of his second run at the presidency in 1967. He was now suspect goods after failing to win in 1960, so he had to prove himself all over again. A Lakeside Talk was a key setting, the start of his comeback, he says:
...
"If I were to choose the speech that gave me the most pleasure and satisfaction in my political career, it would be my Lakeside Speech at the Bohemian Grove in July 1967. Because this speech traditionally was off the record it received no publicity at the time. But in many important ways it marked the first milestone on my road to the presidency."
...
But rehabilitation through a Lakeside Talk was not all Nixon accomplished at the Bohemian Grove that summer. He also had a "candid discussion" with Ronald Reagan "as we sat outdoors on a bench under one of the giant redwoods." Nixon told Reagan of his plans to enter the primaries. He assured Reagan he would not campaign against any "fellow Republicans." Reagan allegedly professed surprise that there was speculation about his possible candidacy, and claimed he did not want to be a favorite son. According to Nixon, Reagan said "that he would not be a candidate in the primaries." In other words, they came to a deal at the Grove, with Reagan saying he would only enter the primaries if Nixon faltered.

Nixon was so full of himself over the Bohemian Grove, and so pleased to be a member, that he actually wanted to give a Lakeside Talk in 1971 even though he was now the president of the United States.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 15, 2015, 02:23:12 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZfHInw-Eto
HILLARY & BILL CLINTON-THEIR EVIL CORRUPTION EXPOSED! 2015
Title: Gowdy was Stalled by Clinton for 6+ Months; NYT Broke Stonewall
Post by: Sasha on March 15, 2015, 04:15:20 pm
Meet the Press Transcript - March 15, 2015 - excerpted
http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/meet-press-transcript-march-15-2015-n323871

CHUCK TODD:

Let me ask you to respond to something the National Review wrote this week. "Just as Mrs. Clinton did not turn over any of her private emails until the State Department finally asked for them, Gowdy, by his own account, did not issue a subpoena to address a scandal he has long known about until the scandal became public. That, in itself, is a scandal." Essentially, the question is, if you knew about this private email issue back in August of last year, why did you take so long to subpoena and get more information now?

REP. TREY GOWDY:

Well, Chuck, the power of subpoena is only as good as the power to compel compliance. And in my previous job as a prosecutor, and I think the author of that article is a former prosecutor also, you had great tools to compel compliance. In the legislative branch, you do not. So we have been working since August to secure access to all of her relevant documents and emails.

Subpoena is kind of a final thing that you do when all else fails. The State Department told us they wanted a different kind of relationship with us and we took them at their word. Well, what we later found is it was kind of a one-sided relationship. The State Department was not very cooperative. And when we realized that, and I give credit to the New York Times reporter. It wasn't our committee that uncovered that, it was a reporter. Then we issued a subpoena.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 15, 2015, 04:30:22 pm
Sasha.
    Truthfull, backed up, solid facts.. First time I've seen this..Thanks.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 15, 2015, 04:35:25 pm
Sasha.
    Truthfull, backed up, solid facts.. First time I've seen this..Thanks.

My pleasure, Chris.

O'Reilly mentioned something like this a few nights ago - that rumors about Email Gate had been swirling around DC since August.  Guess the rumors were right.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 15, 2015, 05:34:31 pm
My dear Aunt( an activist) passed over 18 years ago. She had a talent, ability to profile, make personall judgments on politicals and those involved.  A true activist.
  She told me Hillary was the driving force behind Billy, sure he wanted the power and Bennys, unscrupulous at minimum, but Hilldog was the true driving force.
  I admired her wisdom.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 15, 2015, 06:03:14 pm
Your aunt might'a been right. 
Title: Carville: "I Suspect" Clinton Didn't Want Congress Viewing Her Emails
Post by: Sasha on March 15, 2015, 10:23:20 pm
‘Not helping his cause': James Carville’s admission about the reason for Hillary’s home server is ‘stunning’ [video]
http://twitchy.com/2015/03/15/not-helping-his-cause-james-carvilles-admission-about-the-reason-for-hillarys-home-server-is-stunning-video/?utm_source=autotweet&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=twitter
March 15, 2015

This morning on ABC’s “This Week,” James Carville admitted that he “suspects” Hillary used her own server in order to avoid Congressional oversight of its contents.
Title: Re: Carville: "I Suspect" Clinton Didn't Want Congress Viewing Her Emails
Post by: iamc2 on March 15, 2015, 11:07:36 pm
‘Not helping his cause': James Carville’s admission about the reason for Hillary’s home server is ‘stunning’ [video]
http://twitchy.com/2015/03/15/not-helping-his-cause-james-carvilles-admission-about-the-reason-for-hillarys-home-server-is-stunning-video/?utm_source=autotweet&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=twitter
March 15, 2015

This morning on ABC’s “This Week,” James Carville admitted that he “suspects” Hillary used her own server in order to avoid Congressional oversight of its contents.

Well I think Carville has put the Noose around the Old Hags Neck!

Nice info mate  ;)
Title: Re: Carville: "I Suspect" Clinton Didn't Want Congress Viewing Her Emails
Post by: Sasha on March 16, 2015, 12:06:21 am

Well I think Carville has put the Noose around the Old Hags Neck!

Nice info mate  ;)

Sure thing.

If Carville, the hardest of the Clinton hardliners, can't keep a defense together, the Clintons have to be wondering who can.
Title: Obama adviser behind leak of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal
Post by: Sasha on March 16, 2015, 09:59:12 am
Obama adviser behind leak of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal
Edward Klein - March 14, 2015

It’s the vast left-wing conspiracy.

President Obama’s senior adviser Valerie Jarrett leaked to the press details of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email address during her time as secretary of state, sources tell me.

But she did so through people outside the ­administration, so the story couldn’t be traced to her or the White House.

In addition, at Jarrett’s behest, the State Department was ordered to launch a series of investigations into Hillary’s conduct at Foggy Bottom, including the use of her expense account, the disbursement of funds, her contact with foreign leaders and her possible collusion with the Clinton Foundation.

Six separate probes into Hillary’s performance have been ­going on at the State Department. I’m told that the email scandal was timed to come out just as Hillary was on the verge of formally announcing that she was running for president — and that there’s more to come.

Members of Bill Clinton’s camp say the former president suspects the White House is the source of the leak and is furious.

“My contacts and friends in newspapers and TV tell me that they’ve been contacted by the White House and offered all kinds of negative stories about us,” one of Bill’s friends quotes him as saying. “The Obamas are behind the email story, and they’re spreading rumors that I’ve been with women, that Hillary promoted people at the State Department who’d done favors for our foundation, that John Kerry had to clean up diplomatic messes Hillary left behind.”

Then, according to this source, Bill added: “The Obamas are out to get us any way they can.”

continues:
http://nypost.com/2015/03/14/obama-adviser-behind-leak-of-hillary-clintons-e-mail-scandal/
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 16, 2015, 10:14:01 am
^^^^

… sounds about right.

I wonder if the LibTard "minority" run DEMS
REALLY would nominate Mike Obama?

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 16, 2015, 10:49:32 am


  I think Jarrett runs the entire show---I mean she gets phone calls from obama's handlers and she tells the PUPPET what to do.

  Just a wild shot.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 16, 2015, 11:43:46 am
(https://thecampofthesaints.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/hrc-stalin-02s.jpg)
Hillary - Stalin ... tell the people what they want

(http://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/56231387.jpg)


http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/16/report-conglomerate-with-close-ties-to-chinese-govt-donated-millions-to-clinton-foundation/
Report: Conglomerate with Close Ties to Chinese Gov’t Donated Millions to Clinton Foundation
by Breitbart News16 Mar 2015424

A Chinese conglomerate owned by a delegate to the Chinese parliament reportedly pledged millions to the Clinton Foundation, raising questions about whether the Chinese are once again trying to influence U.S. politics with donations to entities associated with the Clintons.
...

http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB500/
Key Diplomat's Personal Notebook Sheds Light on Inner Workings of US Government Response to Genocide Unfolding in Rwanda in 1994

Washington, DC, January 30, 2015 – Former Ambassador Prudence Bushnell's notebooks provide a never-before-seen view into the inner workings of US diplomacy during one of the international community's darkest hours in recent decades. Her personal notebooks, published here for the first time by the National Security Archive, shed light on the Ambassador's own personal ethical struggles, not only with US foreign policy regarding non-intervention during the humanitarian crisis, but also the moral dilemmas that the international community faced from its unwillingness to intervene while genocide ravaged Rwanda.

(http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB500/IMAGE%20-%20Rwanda%20Task%20Force%20room%20at%20State%20Dept%20-%20With%20Clintons.jpg)

President Bill Clinton and First Lady Hillary Clinton meet with State Department Staff in the room where the Rwanda Monitoring Group met 24 hours a day from April 7th through April 15th in Washington, DC, 1994. Photo from the personal collection of Prudence Bushnell.

(http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB500/IMAGE%20-%20Bushnell%20speaking%20to%20Hilary%20Clinton%20in%20Rwanda%20Task%20Force%20room%20at%20DOS.jpg)
Prudence Bushnell speaking with First Lady Hillary Clinton at the State Department in Washington, DC in 1994. Photo from the personal collection of Prudence Bushnell
...


US foreign policy regarding non-intervention during the humanitarian crisis, but also the moral dilemmas that the international community faced from its unwillingness to intervene while genocide ravaged Rwanda.
Title: CBS: Chinese Firm Pledged $2M To Clinton Foundation In 2013 - TPP Related?
Post by: Sasha on March 16, 2015, 07:32:12 pm
CBS News: Chinese Firm Pledged $2M To Clinton Foundation In 2013
March 16, 2015

WASHINGTON (CBSDC/AP) — A CBS News investigation reveals that a Chinese company pledged millions to the Clinton Foundation in 2013.

Rilin Enterprises, a privately-held Chinese construction company run by billionaire Wang Wenliang, pledged $2 million to the foundation two years ago. CBS News reports that the firm run by Wenliang, a delegate to the Chinese parliament,  spent $1.4 million since 2012 to lobby Congress and the State Department. The firm also was one of the contractors that built the Chinese embassy in Washington.

Jim Mann, author of several books on China-U.S. relationships, told CBS News that the contract is a direct tie to the Chinese government.

With “embassy construction, one of the most important tasks is making sure there are no bugs there,” Mann told CBS News. “So you want to have the closest connection with the person or approval with the company.”

Mann continued, “If the point is you are not going to take money from foreign governments, then his construction company is as close to not just the Chinese government and as close to the Ministry of State Security as they could possibly be.”

A Rilin spokesperson says that Wang is very generous with his money.

“Mr. Wang has a long history of generous philanthropic giving to institutions of higher education and organizations that work on and promote global relations,” the spokesperson told CBS News. “The Clinton Foundation is one of many organizations Mr. Wang has donated to.”

The billionaire has also donated to New York University.

An analysis from CBS News shows the Clinton Foundation has raised at least $42 million from foreign governments and at least $170 million from foreign entities and individuals.

continues:
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2015/03/16/cbs-news-chinese-firm-pledged-2m-to-clinton-foundation-in-2013/

related:
Hillary Clinton on China and the Rest of the World - January 24, 2013
http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2013-01-24/hillary-clinton-on-china-and-the-rest-of-the-world
On China's economy: ...when you have state-owned enterprises, you end up propping them up and making political decisions that are not in their best interest. So it’s a question of time. But we’re in an economically challenging period right now, so I can’t wait 10 or 20 years (laughs) until those kinds of changes evolve inside the Chinese economic system.

Trans-Pacific Partnership To Facilitate U.S.-China Merger - 11 December 2014
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/19697-trans-pacific-partnership-to-facilitate-u-s-china-merger
...the Diplomat further reported that "In May 2013, China's Commerce Ministry indicated that it was looking more seriously at the possibility of China joining the TPP."
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 18, 2015, 04:32:40 pm
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/17/state-dept-finally-admits-no-record-hillary-clinton-signed-standard-exit-form/
State Dept. Finally Admits: No Record Hillary Clinton Signed Standard Exit Form
by John Hayward 17 Mar 2015 1357


Another piece of the puzzle fell into place in Hillary Clinton’s ever-deepening email scandal, as the State Department – following days of absolutely absurd foot-dragging – finally admitted it can’t seem to find any record of her signed Form OF-109.

This is a crucial document signed by departing State Department employees, testifying that all official records have been turned over, including – but not limited to – classified materials and emails. Since it is manifestly obvious that Hillary Clinton didn’t turn over all such materials, her signature on the OF-109 would have constituted perjury.

Ever since lawyers familiar with this document began describing it, the State Department has been asked to produce the exit paperwork for Clinton (and her top aides Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, and Philippe Reines, who also had accounts on Clinton’s secret email server.) The Republican National Committee filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the documents. Even Clinton-friendly reporters have been asking about it.

...
She never voluntarily surrendered anything to the State Department – it came looking for the material long after she left office. The Secretary of State was allowed to work entirely on her word of honor and a few pinky swears, national security be damned. I’ve worked at fast-food restaurants with tighter security procedures and better record-keeping than Hillary Clinton’s State Department.
,,,
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 19, 2015, 07:31:10 pm
Exclusive: Despite Hillary Clinton promise, charity did not disclose donors
By Jonathan Allen NEW YORK (Reuters) - In 2008, Hillary Clinton promised Barack Obama, the president-elect, there would be no mystery about who was giving money to her family's globe-circling charities. She made a pledge to publish all the donors on an annual basis to ease concerns that as…
Reuters
             Is the GP getting on to Hillary's skulldugery.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on March 20, 2015, 06:08:17 am
Ulsterman presents information on the Hillary scandals which suggest the email scandal and the Clinton Foundation donor scandal are part of a larger whole which could involve the Obama administration as well, and that the email irregularities were brought forward by one or more disillusioned House Democrats.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
D.C. WHISPERS: Clinton Machine Bracing For Pay To Play Scandal
by Ulsterman - March 18, 2015

Is the private server/missing email scandal actually a distraction from a much larger and far more damaging legal issue that would not only topple Hillary Clinton’s 2016 run but also link the Clinton Foundation swamp to the Organizing for Action political monstrosity, and thus, the Obama White House?
Apparently some in the know think just that…

Here’s a brief outline of several D.C. whispers received on what could be a particularly damaging and far-reaching scandal implicating both the Clinton and Obama political machines:

~~~~~ CONTINUE AT: ~~~~~

http://ulstermanbooks.com/d-c-whispers-clinton-machine-bracing-for-pay-to-play-scandal/
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 20, 2015, 11:47:37 am
(http://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/56231387.jpg)

http://www.infowars.com/hillary-we-need-fun-camps-for-adults/
Hillary: ‘We Need Fun Camps For Adults’
No emailing allowed
by  Paul Joseph Watson  | March 20, 2015

During a speech in Atlantic City, Hillary Clinton called for “camps for adults” at which people would be forced to talk to each other about politics.
...

http://gulaghistory.org/nps/onlineexhibit/stalin/work.php
(http://gulaghistory.org/nps/onlineexhibit/stalin/work-src/images/belbaltlag_detail.jpg)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reeducation_camp

Reeducation camp (Vietnamese: trại học tập cải tạo) is the official title given to the prison camps operated by the government of Vietnam following the end of the Vietnam War.
...
The term 'reeducation camp' is also used to refer to prison camps operated by the People's Republic of China during the Cultural Revolution, or to the laogai and laojiao camps currently operated by the Chinese government. The theory underlying such camps is the Maoist theory of reforming counter-revolutionaries into socialist citizens by re-education through labor.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/7887359/China-ponders-closing-outdated-re-education-labour-camps.html
China ponders closing 'outdated' re-education labour camps

China is considering closing its vast network of labour camps, allowing an unprecedented public debate over the controversial "re-education" programme.
(http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01678/Labour_Camp_1678487c.jpg)
By Malcolm Moore in Shanghai
7:00PM BST 13 Jul 2010
Since the 1950s, China has used "re-education through labour" to imprison people without trial.
,,,
Inmates interviewed by China Human Rights Defenders, a Hong Kong NGO, said they had been shackled upside down, electrocuted and forced to work when sick.

"We worked between 14 and 15 hours every day and aside from time for eating, we did not stop until after 9pm," said one prisoner to CHRD.
(http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/images/item/foxnation-20100513-hillary-commie.jpg) (http://libertyunyield.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/mao_suit-hillary.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on March 20, 2015, 12:11:30 pm
^^^Nice post.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on March 20, 2015, 12:30:23 pm
I worked  on the shipping crates that were used to decommission the titan II missiles.
Then China has hundreds of them within a year. I think Clinton sold them the actual missiles. Traitorous.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/green-stimulus-money-funds-chinese-tech-advancement/

Sadly, selling advanced technology to the Chinese is not without precedent. Back in 1998, the company Loral Space gave the Chinese a 200-page report on how to improve their missile guidance systems without telling the government, precipitating a Department of Justice investigation. President Bill Clinton undermined that investigation by granting Loral a waiver to complete the deal. This was Clinton’s second waiver regarding Loral’s business initiatives involving the Chinese. Years earlier, the president also waived State Department disapproval of such business as well. Yet Loral CEO Bernard Schwartz had built a six-year friendship with the president, no doubt enhanced by $1.3 million in donations to Clinton and Democrats. The years long DOJ investigation concluded in 2002, with Loral paying a $14 million civil fine, the Pentagon issuing a report concluding that sensitive technology involving missiles was transferred to the Chinese and the Chinese getting a better missile guidance system that makes them a greater danger to the United States.
Giving them additional advanced technology with military applications–again–makes no sense whatsoever. President Obama acknowledged that reality during his inauguration speech. “We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries, we must claim its promise,” he said. Dean Popps concurred. “This highly sensitive technology should not be handed over to China,” he warned. “American taxpayers own this technology; we paid for it and, like the president said, we should claim its promise.”
Joseph Stalin once said, “When we hang the capitalists they will sell us the rope we use.” Anyone who believes the Chinese Communist government, which as recently as last September hacked into a White House computer system used for nuclear commands, isn’t every bit the threat the Soviet Union was, is delusional.
The American appetite for cheap consumer goods is one thing. Aiding and abetting the military ambitions of a potential adversary is quite another.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 20, 2015, 12:50:57 pm
I worked  on the shipping crates that were used to decommission the titan II missiles.
Then China has hundreds of them within a year. I think Clinton sold them the actual missiles. Traitorous.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/green-stimulus-money-funds-chinese-tech-advancement/

Sadly, selling advanced technology to the Chinese is not without precedent. Back in 1998, the company Loral Space gave the Chinese a 200-page report on how to improve their missile guidance systems without telling the government, precipitating a Department of Justice investigation. President Bill Clinton undermined that investigation by granting Loral a waiver to complete the deal. This was Clinton’s second waiver regarding Loral’s business initiatives involving the Chinese. Years earlier, the president also waived State Department disapproval of such business as well. Yet Loral CEO Bernard Schwartz had built a six-year friendship with the president, no doubt enhanced by $1.3 million in donations to Clinton and Democrats. The years long DOJ investigation concluded in 2002, with Loral paying a $14 million civil fine, the Pentagon issuing a report concluding that sensitive technology involving missiles was transferred to the Chinese and the Chinese getting a better missile guidance system that makes them a greater danger to the United States.
...

related:

http://www.nytimes.com/1993/12/14/business/ibm-to-sell-its-military-unit-to-loral.html
I.B.M. to Sell Its Military Unit to Loral
By JOSHUA MILLS 
Published: December 14, 1993

The Loral Corporation, a weapons contractor that has prospered even as the Government has cut military spending, said yesterday that it would pay $1.58 billion for I.B.M.'s Federal Systems Company, whose products include software for radar-warning systems, antisubmarine warfare, satellites and air-traffic control.

...
Loral, based in New York, has been on a buying spree in recent years. Last year it paid $261 million for the missile unit of the LTV Corporation and in 1990 it paid $715 million for the satellite and space electronics company Ford Aerospace. But the I.B.M. purchase is its largest by far.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 20, 2015, 01:01:57 pm
Hillary would be proud of Vietnam for re- opening the "Fun Camps"

http://www.wellsphere.com/health-education-article/vietnam-reopens-re-education-camps-for-patriots-and-activists-ms-bui-hang-is-a-new-student/1567744

Vietnam reopens re-education camps for patriots and activists: Ms. Bui Hang is a new student!

Posted Dec 10 2011 2:02pm
Ms. Hang Bui by the Vietnamese police on November 27, 2011 for supporting the Vietnamese Primer Minister, Nguyen Tan Dung’s proposal of a bill on “demonstration law

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVQF-2PYbo8

http://thevietnamwar.info/vietnamese-re-education-camps/
Vietnamese Re-education Camps kubia April 17, 2014

Following the fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975, Vietnamese Communist government began to open hundreds of “re-education”camps throughout the country. Those camps, as Hanoi officially claimed, were places where individuals could “learn about the ways of the new government” through education and socially constructive labor. In 1975, it was estimated that around 1 to 2.5 million people1, including former officers, religious leaders, intellectuals, merchants, employees of the old regime, and even some Communists, entered the camps in the hope that they could quickly reconcile with the new government and continued their peaceful life. However, their time in those camps did not last for ten days or two weeks as the government had claimed. -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8FQa0rB6Pw

(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-8FQa0rB6Pw/hqdefault.jpg)
13 avril 1977
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 20, 2015, 07:15:38 pm
related:

http://www.nytimes.com/1993/12/14/business/ibm-to-sell-its-military-unit-to-loral.html
I.B.M. to Sell Its Military Unit to Loral
By JOSHUA MILLS 
Published: December 14, 1993

The Loral Corporation, a weapons contractor that has prospered even as the Government has cut military spending, said yesterday that it would pay $1.58 billion for I.B.M.'s Federal Systems Company, whose products include software for radar-warning systems, antisubmarine warfare, satellites and air-traffic control.

...
Loral, based in New York, has been on a buying spree in recent years. Last year it paid $261 million for the missile unit of the LTV Corporation and in 1990 it paid $715 million for the satellite and space electronics company Ford Aerospace. But the I.B.M. purchase is its largest by far.
                 Henry & Nixon set the deal in motion with Mao, just saying negotiations began long ago.
The crew on high had dealings with a genocidal maniac decades past, the origin's.
Title: Google "Bill Clinton rape"
Post by: Letsbereal on March 21, 2015, 09:33:29 am
Google "Bill Clinton rape" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kw5AAYnEA8w

Mar 21, 2015 corbettreport
Title: Hillary's trade dilemma
Post by: Sasha on March 21, 2015, 05:45:29 pm
In light of what might have been a pay for play arrangement with China to get them into the TPP (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=249159.msg1508211#msg1508211)...

Hillary's trade dilemma
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/hillarys-trade-dilemma-116278.html
Doug Palmer | 3/20/15 - excerpt

“There is no doubt that the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the fight over fast track is going to be part of the presidential election,” given the expectation that Clinton and others could declare their candidacy in April, the same month fast track could hit the Senate floor, Sroka said.

“It very well might be some of the first questions she is asked as a presidential candidate could be about TPP and fast track,” Sroka added. “There’s lots of reasons that people are excited about getting Elizabeth Warren into the presidential race, but her outspokenness in the battle against TPP … is something that speaks to the progressive base’s concerns and is attracting people to this campaign.”
___

Clinton, as Obama’s secretary of state, is closely associated with the agreement, which could grow to cover 21 economies in the region, including China. “Our hope is that a TPP agreement with high standards can serve as a benchmark for future agreements — and grow to serve as a platform for broader regional interaction and eventually a free trade area of the Asia-Pacific,” she wrote in October 2011.

The issue is front and center as Obama pushes for approval of trade promotion authority, a bill that would allow him to submit trade agreements, like the proposed TPP, to Congress for a straight up-or-down vote without any amendments. The next president, whoever it is, could also use the authority to negotiate a deal bringing China into the pact.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on March 21, 2015, 10:17:24 pm
Clinton Foundation’s Deep Financial Ties to Ukrainian Oligarch Revealed
21 March 2015
, by Mike Krieger (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-21/clinton-foundation%E2%80%99s-deep-financial-ties-ukrainian-oligarch-who-pushed-closer-ties-e

(http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2015/03/clinton%20foundation%20donations_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 22, 2015, 12:15:22 pm
Democracy - Clinton Hahaha ,,,

http://dangcongsan.vn/cpv/Modules/News_English/News_Detail_E.aspx?CN_ID=532103&CO_ID=30438
Hillary Clinton’s visits to Vietnam 
  15:33 | 11/07/2012   
 Excluding this visit, Hillary Clinton has had three visits to Vietnam since 2000 in both the roles of First Lady and Secretary of State.

(http://cpv.org.vn/cpv/Upload/News/2012/7/BTA-BL10072012%20clinton2.jpg)

http://coloradoboulevard.net/surviving-a-vietcong-reeducation-camp/
The following is an excerpt from an interview between Teresa Mei Chuc and her father Jack Chuc about his experience surviving nine years in a Vietcong Reeducation Camp. The interview was conducted on February 1, 2015.
Title: Ukraine oligarchs ‘top cash contributors’ to Clinton Foundation
Post by: jerryweaver on March 23, 2015, 11:57:48 am
Ukraine oligarch ‘top cash contributor’ to Clinton Foundation prior to Kiev crisis

From 2009 up to 2013, the year the Ukrainian crisis erupted, the Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, which is headquartered in the Ukrainian capital of Kiev, a new report claims.

In 2008, Viktor Pinchuk, who made a fortune in the pipe-building business, pledged a five-year, $29-million commitment to the Clinton Global Initiative, a program that works to train future Ukrainian leaders “to modernize Ukraine.” The Wall Street Journal revealed the donations the fund received from foreigners abroad between 2009-2014 in their report published earlier this week .

Several alumni of the program have already graduated into the ranks of Ukraine’s parliament, while a former Clinton pollster went to work as a lobbyist for Pinchuk at the same time Clinton was working in government.

Between 2009 and 2013, the very period when Hillary Clinton was serving as US secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation appears to have received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation.

That places Ukraine as the leading contributor among foreign donors to the Clinton Foundation.

The Pinchuk foundation said its donations to the Clinton-family organization were designed to make Ukraine “a successful, free, modern country based on European values.” It went on to remark that if Pinchuk was hoping to lobby the US State Department about Ukraine, “this cannot be seen as anything but a good thing,” WSJ quoted it as saying.

However, critics have pointed to some disturbing aspects regarding the donations, including the coincidence of the Ukrainian crisis, which began in November 2013, and the heavy amount of cash donations being made to the Clinton Foundation on behalf of wealthy Ukrainian businessmen. In any case, given that Hillary Clinton appears to be considering a possible run in the next presidential elections, more scrutiny will be devoted to her past work with the charity that bears the Clinton name.


Foreign Donors to Clinton Foundation by Ranking
Ukraine: $10.0 million
England: $8.4
Saudi Arabia: $7.3 million
Germany: $6.7 million
Ireland: $6.5 million
India: $5.0 million
Canada: $4.5 million
Argentina: $2.0 million
United Arab Emirates: $1.4 million
China: $1.3million
Source: Wall Street analysis of Clinton Foundation disclosures
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on March 23, 2015, 02:29:36 pm
Strikes me as "rather odd" that this is "legal" and Dinesh D'Souza gets a jail sentence.

Dinesh D'Souza - Election campaign finance conviction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinesh_D%27Souza#Election_campaign_finance_conviction




Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 24, 2015, 08:24:01 am


(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_648.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_648.jpg.html)

Hillary Can’t Type: Look To
Huma’s And Cheryl’s Emails

By Dick Morris

Don’t expect a gold mine of emails on Hillary’s private account. Why not? Because she doesn’t know how to type. That’s right. She writes everything out in longhand. Really. Anyone who has spent time in meetings with her knows about her endless yellow pads.


So her emails will most likely turn out to be very short and quick. She wouldn’t spend a lot of time pecking out long letters. No way. That’s why the Benghazi Committee needs to also look very closely at the emails on private accounts that Hillary’s closest aides, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, maintained. Anything more than a few lines were most likely written by someone else on her behalf. There’s a reason why Hillary set up and used private emails with them for official business: all the important emails were likely written by her staff. Without access to them, we won’t know what was going on.

The Clintons never used the White House computer for their own work. Hillary even wrote (or copied) her book manuscripts in long hand. Although ghost writer Barbara Fineman was paid $120,000 for writing It Takes A Village, she proudly waved hundreds of hand-written pages on yellow legal pads to pretend she wrote it all herself. She never acknowledged Fineman’s work.

Bill can’t type either. When I wrote his 1995 State of the Union Speech, I typed it on an IBM Selectric that the White House dug up from the basement. He told me that he didn’t want me to put it in the official computer system, because then his staff would see it.

So, he carefully copied every word in his distinctive left hand penmanship. I still have a copy of it. Then he pretended that he had written it himself.

The Clintons have figured out every which way to avoid disclosure of what they want to keep private. So don’t expect a smoking gun in Hillary’s emails.

Look, instead, to Huma, Cheryl, Jake Sullivan, and Philippe Reines — if they still exist.

http://thehillarydaily.com/hillary-cant-type-look-to-humas-and-cheryls-emails/
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 25, 2015, 12:04:03 pm
California's Communist Fascist Super Majority

When the selected next dictator in chief gets in trouble ... you need to find another despotic dictator to fill the gap ...

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/25/jerry-brown-starting-to-look-good-to-democrats/
Jerry Brown ‘Starting to Look Good to Democrats’

Jerry Brown is “starting to look good to Democrats,” according to MarketWatch, citing the fourth-term California governor as a potential presidential alternative to Hillary Clinton in 2016. “The 76-year-old governor of California wowed the politicos with his appearance on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ on Sunday. He was passionate, sharp and didn’t speak in code.”

Democrats continue to search for an alternative to Clinton, who is trapped in a series of scandals surrounding her tenure at the State Department in the first term of Barack Obama’s administration. On Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal noted–in the news section–that the State Department had no inspector general, “the lead watchdog charged with uncovering misconduct and waste,” either in office or nominated during Clinton’s entire stint at Foggy Bottom.
...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3270758/posts?page=94
California Governor Jerry Brown: Ted Cruz 'Unfit to Be Running' for President

A long-time environmentalist, Brown is dealing with a severe drought in California. He recently announced a $1 billion aid package to help affected residents and prepare for flooding

(http://www.thomaspeep.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Jerry-Brown-with-his-buddy-Jim-Jones.jpg)
Nope - Moonbeam Jerry could never be wrong in his opinion about anyone even Jimbo Jim Jones ...  just wish he had drunk the cyanide laced koolaid ..

(http://imagizer.imageshack.us/a/img809/4735/9509.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 25, 2015, 12:49:38 pm

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_648.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_648.jpg.html)

Hillary Can’t Type: Look To
Huma’s And Cheryl’s Emails

By Dick Morris

Don’t expect a gold mine of emails on Hillary’s private account. Why not? Because she doesn’t know how to type. That’s right. She writes everything out in longhand. Really. Anyone who has spent time in meetings with her knows about her endless yellow pads.


So her emails will most likely turn out to be very short and quick. She wouldn’t spend a lot of time pecking out long letters. No way. That’s why the Benghazi Committee needs to also look very closely at the emails on private accounts that Hillary’s closest aides, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, maintained. Anything more than a few lines were most likely written by someone else on her behalf. There’s a reason why Hillary set up and used private emails with them for official business: all the important emails were likely written by her staff. Without access to them, we won’t know what was going on.

The Clintons never used the White House computer for their own work. Hillary even wrote (or copied) her book manuscripts in long hand. Although ghost writer Barbara Fineman was paid $120,000 for writing It Takes A Village, she proudly waved hundreds of hand-written pages on yellow legal pads to pretend she wrote it all herself. She never acknowledged Fineman’s work.

Bill can’t type either. When I wrote his 1995 State of the Union Speech, I typed it on an IBM Selectric that the White House dug up from the basement. He told me that he didn’t want me to put it in the official computer system, because then his staff would see it.

So, he carefully copied every word in his distinctive left hand penmanship. I still have a copy of it. Then he pretended that he had written it himself.

The Clintons have figured out every which way to avoid disclosure of what they want to keep private. So don’t expect a smoking gun in Hillary’s emails.

Look, instead, to Huma, Cheryl, Jake Sullivan, and Philippe Reines — if they still exist.

http://thehillarydaily.com/hillary-cant-type-look-to-humas-and-cheryls-emails/

HOW MUCH BS CAN THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA TAKE FROM HILLARY?

(http://ts1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=HN.608050168553213502&w=300&h=300&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0)

  My son is a student here in Montana and he types 20 to 30 pages a day.

  When I was going through school we had to type a bunch of stuff and when you made an error, YOU GENERALLY HAD TO START THE PAGE OVER BECAUSE THERE WAS NO WHITE-OUT.  YOU HAD TO RELY ON ERASERS THAT USUALLY PUT A HOLE IN THE PAPER.

  Hillary, being a lawyer, had to type a lot of stuff.  Much more than doctors.

  Of course, when Hillary was young, she probably did HER BEST WORK ON HER BACK.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 25, 2015, 02:17:43 pm
Lawsuit Claims Prince Andrew Had Sex with Underage Sex Slave
Oh the Hillary - Billy connection .... POTUS .... or Caligula ...

(http://nostalgiacentral.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/caligular_014.jpg)
Caligula Caesar and Sister Drusilla ..

http://observer.com/2015/03/the-jeffrey-epstein-affair-imperils-hillary-clintons-presidential-prospects/
The Jeffrey Epstein Affair Imperils Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Prospects

The case of the high-flying (alleged) pedophile reveals a broken American political process
By Ken Silverstein | 03/25/15 10:15am   


...
What hardball PR and legal tactics will Hillary Clinton’s campaign use to try to make this potential problem—which could potentially derail her planned presidential bid—disappear? Will those tactics work, or is Ms. Clinton’s campaign already dead, even if the exact time of the funeral is not yet known?

Why is the Left-Wing Media Machine pretending that anyone who asks questions about the Epstein-Clinton connection is a paid stooge of the Right-Wing Media Machine?
And why is the Right-Wing Media Machine, which would normally be gleefully talking about this or any sordid affair involving the Clintons, being unusually reserved in hyping the case? (Hint: Because some notable conservatives and prominent supporters of Israel — a constituency that used to reside solidly in the Democratic camp but which the GOP in recent years has been wooing, with some notable success— have been implicated in the Epstein scandal too.)

How did our political and media elites ever become so hopelessly corrupt?

For those of you who haven’t heard much about the Jeffrey Epstein, he is a 62-year-old billionaire and major donor to the Democratic Party. The story erupted after Virginia Roberts gave a sworn statement in a federal court filing that claimed (as reported here by Radar) that that under Mr. Epstein’s tutelage she “was a teen sex slave forced to have sex with Prince Andrew” and that she also saw Bill Clinton on Mr. Epstein’s “orgy island.”
...
But Bill Clinton’s conduct, in and out of office, suggests he is a sexual predator without a conscience and has used his power—even the power of the Oval Office—to win sex from many women. That doesn’t mean Bill Clinton has no appeal to women and every woman who ever had sex with him was a “victim.” But some of them were.
...
Bill Clinton is not running for president now but Hillary Clinton is. She must love him at some level but it seems clear she stayed in the marriage at least in part because she believed it would further her own political ambitions. And in the end, her marriage may kill her political ambitions because her husband may be subpoenaed to testify about Jeffrey Epstein. And that probably won’t help Ms. Clinton’s poll numbers (in swing states or anywhere) because most Americans understand that a potential first gentleman should probably not be consorting with pedophiles.
,,,

 more at http://observer.com/2015/03/the-jeffrey-epstein-affair-imperils-hillary-clintons-presidential-prospects/#ixzz3VQUtUPzI
Follow us: @newyorkobserver on Twitter | newyorkobserver on Facebook
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 25, 2015, 10:01:23 pm


… with video.

Hillary Clinton hit with racketeering lawsuit over emails

March 25, 2015  By Jesse Byrnes

The conservative group Freedom Watch has filed a racketeering lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that accuses her of failing to produce documents under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

The civil suit, filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, argues that Clinton used her private emails to sell access to other officials in return for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

It alleges that, during her tenure, Clinton withheld documents requested under FOIA regarding State Department waivers given to businesses or individuals doing business with Iran, possibly undermining U.S.-imposed sanctions.
The complaint, which lists Bill and Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation as defendants, alleges the Clintons sold access to other U.S. government officials in return for donations to their organization, which they concealed, allegedly, by using a private computer server for her emails operated from their home in Chappaqua, New York.
 
Quote
“What Hillary Clinton, her husband, and their foundation have done is nothing new. It is simply part of a criminal enterprise which dates back at least 10 years, all designed to enrich themselves personally at the expense of the American people and our nation. It's time, however, that they finally be held legally accountable,” Klayman said.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/236893-clinton-hit-with-racketeering-lawsuit-over-emails
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 25, 2015, 10:49:05 pm
^^^^

  What would we do without Larry Klayman?  God bless him.
Title: How Hillary Clinton Is Responsible For Civil War In Ukraine and The Possible War
Post by: Letsbereal on March 26, 2015, 12:29:02 am
How Hillary Clinton Is Responsible For Civil War In Ukraine and The Possible War With Russia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6N3K5VFcUs

Mar 25, 2015 WeAreChange
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on March 27, 2015, 05:09:56 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1AZsN-NM5w


Meet The Clintons (Corbett Report)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 27, 2015, 11:52:07 am
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/hillary-gets-special-protection-wikipedia
Hillary Gets Special Protection On Wikipedia
(http://www.examiner.com/images/blog/replicate/EXID23359/images/caligulamoviecoin(1).gif)
...

Despite the steady wave of scandals that have begun to erode even the New York Times’ portrayal of Hillary Clinton, her image remains unblemished on Wikipedia. Since he first started editing her page in June 2005, Hillary’s “Wikipedia watchdog" has been guarding against slanders, accusations, unfair assumptions, and distortions on the high-traffic, heavily footnoted, highly policed Hillary Rodham Clinton Wikipedia page.   

Unlike most Wikipedia editors, who prefer to remain anonymous, "Wasted Time R" has no problem giving his real name: Jonathan Schilling. Leading up to Hillary’s failed bid for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, Schilling’s significant role in the shaping of the image of the former first lady was the subject of several interviews and articles, including pieces by NPR, BBC, Canadian Radio, and New Republic.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 27, 2015, 06:18:39 pm


… found this on DRUDGE:

"
Gowdy added that Clinton’s response to the
subpoena means he and Speaker John Boehner
(R-Ohio) will now contemplate new legal
actions against Clinton.


Trey Gowdy: Hillary Clinton wiped her server clean

By LAUREN FRENCH 3/27/15 6:23 PM EDT
Hillary Clinton wiped “clean” the private server housing emails from her tenure as secretary of state, the chairman of the House committee investigating the 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi said Friday.

Clinton was under a subpoena order from the Select Committee on Benghazi for all documents related to the 2012 attacks on the American compound there. But David Kendall, an attorney for Clinton, said the 900 pages of emails previously provided to the panel cover its request.

Kendall also informed the committee that Clinton’s emails from her time at the State Department have been permanently erased.

“While it is not clear precisely when Secretary Clinton decided to permanently delete all emails from her server, it appears she made the decision after October 28, 2014, when the Department of State for the first time asked the Secretary to return her public record to the Department,” Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), chairman of the committee, said in a statement.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/gowdy-clinton-wiped-her-server-clean-116472.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 27, 2015, 07:48:03 pm
 Hillary is flipping the one finger salute .
   
 
Title: RS Scandal Deja Vu: Hillary Clinton's Email Server "Wiped Clean"
Post by: Letsbereal on March 29, 2015, 05:49:54 pm
RS Scandal Deja Vu: Hillary Clinton's Email Server "Wiped Clean"
28 March 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-28/irs-scandal-deja-vu-hillary-clintons-email-server-wiped-clean
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on March 29, 2015, 05:55:10 pm
Hillary is flipping the one finger salute .
 
Hilary has flipped more than one finger.Back in the basement
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 30, 2015, 08:11:01 am


Big Wall Street banks are so upset with Elizabeth
Warren’s call for them to be broken up that some
have discussed withholding campaign donations to
Senate Democrats in symbolic protest ...


Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign Is Now
Effectively Over. Wall Street Warns Democrats
Not to Choose Senator Elizabeth Warren

By Eric Zuesse
Global Research, March 29, 2015

Hillary Clinton’s unannounced campaign for the U.S. Presidency has already failed. Her arrogance (or else stupidity) in having wiped clean the hard drive of the private server she had used for her emails while she was the U.S. Secretary of State adds insult to the injury already done to her incipient campaign by the earlier revelation that she had evaded the State Department’s record-keeping system and had used her private server for all of her State Department emails and not only for her personal emails. (The NYT had headlined March 2nd: “Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules.”)

CNN, early Saturday morning, March 28th, bannered the big follow-up, “Hillary Clinton deleted all email from personal server,” and reported that, “Hillary Clinton permanently deleted all the emails on the private server she used to do official business as secretary of state.” Ms. Clinton immediately responded to reporters’ questions by saying that nothing of importance to, or concerning, her State Department business, was on that server, and that she had recently sent to the investigator who is looking into this matter “roughly 30,000 emails” that related to State Department business. However, the public, and prosecutors, will now not be able to see the other emails (which she says were approximately 32,000), because she then had that server wiped clean. She says she had had this done because “no one wants their personal emails made public.”

Quote
Wall Street has banked on Hillary’s becoming President. Her husband gave them what they wanted (the end of the Glass-Steagall Act); and during the past year she has been collecting millions of dollars in ‘speaking fees’ for meeting with them in private.

In other words: the public would just have to trust her assertion that nothing related to government business was in those “personal emails.”

Private letters from Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and other American leaders, are published in books; but Hillary Clinton does not think that the American public should ever have access to hers. Today’s emails are like paper-and-ink letters in that bygone era; but she has, in effect, burned them. Historians won’t get to see them; neither will the public.

Even the earlier revelation had caused her ratio of unfavorable-to-favorable ratings in polls to soar.

On March 19th, Reuters headlined, “Many Democrats want independent Clinton email probe: Reuters/Ipsos poll,” and reported: “Support for Clinton’s candidacy has dropped about 15 percentage points since mid-February among Democrats, with as few as 45 percent saying they would support her in the last week.”

The only Democrats who will be voting for Hillary Clinton
are the ones who are satisfied for Wall Street to own Main Street.


http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clintons-presidential-campaign-is-now-effectively-over-wall-street-warns-democrats-not-to-choose-senator-elizabeth-warren/5439320
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: EvadingGrid on March 30, 2015, 02:03:41 pm
Got to speculate what those 32,ooo emails might have contained !

911 .?

Any guesses ?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 30, 2015, 02:46:36 pm
Got to speculate what those 32,ooo emails might have contained !

911 .?

Any guesses ?
              Hey E.. To many to list.........
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on March 30, 2015, 09:36:19 pm



… Bill Whittle's Firewall:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lDN5b6ET0I#t=379

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_658.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_658.jpg.html)

Published on Mar 18, 2015
30,000 deleted emails... Bill Whittle looks at the lawlessness,
the arrogance, and the unmasked contempt that Hillary Clinton
and Barack Obama have for the American people.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 31, 2015, 08:34:30 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mYW5nmS9ps

  Hour and a half video about HiLIARy.

  I don't know if I stand to see it all.

  I have lived all this crap in my lifetime.

  Hopefully the DIMocrats can get someone else to defeat her.

  But they are generally stupid people.

  Anybody but HiLIARy.  She would out Communist the Communists.



Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters Full Movie
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 31, 2015, 10:47:09 am
Amen, they consider us to be brainless, spoiled, imbeciles with a  society of a moronic base mentality.
Promise them anything & give em a sh**t sandwich without the bread.
Their arrogance exceeds their ego, elite  philosophy" how very simple to stick it to these Americans.
Hillary & Oby discussed involuntary service when still candidates. Same Gang, same masters.



Memory lane.
******(252 DOCUMENTED EXAMPLES OF BARACK OBAMA’S LYING, LAWBREAKING, CORRUPTION, CRONYISM, ETC. aj. infowwar.com)


Huffington SC. Hundreds of promises, only a few listed, how easily he captured our society and continues to.
#1 “If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. Period. If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan. Period. No one will take it away. No matter what.”

#2 “My administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in government.”

#3 “We agree on reforms that will finally reduce the costs of health care. Families will save on their premiums…”

#4 “I don’t want to pit Red America against Blue America. I want to be the president
 of the United States of America.”

#5 “We’ve got shovel-ready projects all across the country that governors and mayors are pleading to fund. And the minute we can get those investments to the state level, jobs are going to be created.”

#6 “And we will pursue the housing plan I’m outlining today. And through this plan, we will help between 7 and 9 million families restructure or refinance their mortgages so they can afford—avoid foreclosure.”

#7 “I will sign a universal health-care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family’s premium by up to $2,500 a year.”

#8 “We reject the use of national security letters to spy on citizens who are not suspected of a crime.”

#9 “For people with insurance, the only impact of the health-care law is that their insurance is stronger, better, and more secure than it was before. Full stop. That’s it. They don’t have to worry about anything else.”

#10 “We will close the detention camp in Guantanamo Bay, the location of so many of the worst constitutional abuses in recent years.”

#11 “Allow Americans to buy their medicines from other developed countries if the drugs are safe and prices are lower outside the U.S.”

#12 “We will revisit the Patriot Act and overturn unconstitutional executive decisions issued during the past eight years.”

#13 “Will ensure that federal contracts over $25,000 are competitively bid.”

#14 “We reject sweeping claims of ‘inherent’ presidential power.”

#15 “Will eliminate all income taxation of seniors making less than $50,000 per year. This will eliminate taxes for 7 million seniors — saving them an average of $1,400 a year– and will also mean that 27 million seniors will not need to file an income tax return at all.”

#16 “We support constitutional protections and judicial oversight on any surveillance program involving Americans.”

#17 “If we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do.  I will get our troops home, we will end this war.  You can take that to the bank.”

#18 “Will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days.”

#19 “The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”

#20 “We have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division and conflict and cynicism…. That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, ‘Not this time….’”

#21 “We’ve got to spend some money now to pull us out of this recession. But as soon as we’re out of this recession, we’ve got to get serious about starting to live within our means, instead of leaving debt for our children and our grandchildren and our great-grandchildren.”

#22 “[T]oday I’m pledging to cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office. This will not be easy. It will require us to make difficult decisions and face challenges we’ve long neglected. But I refuse to leave our children with a debt that they cannot repay – and that means taking responsibility right now, in this administration, for getting our spending under control.”

#23 “I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear that I will execute the office of president of the United States faithfully, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the constitution of the United States.”

About the author: Michael T. Snyder is a former Washington D.C. attorney who now publishes The Truth. His new thriller entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.

3dnew3 240x300 A List Of 23 Famous Obama Quotes That Turned Out To Be Broken Promises Or Cold Hearted Lies
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 31, 2015, 10:53:15 am
They will keep her young with the blood of Virgins if necessary - she will be potus...
The peasants summon the Countess to answer the question , where have the young girls gone?


(http://www.troll.me/images2/hillary-wink/hillary-wink.jpg)(https://countesselisabethbathory.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/virgin-blood.jpg)
Elisabeth Báthory

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2562301
Benghazi panel summons Clinton

A House panel Tuesday formally requested Hillary Clinton to testify about the private server and email account she used while serving as secretary of state. ...
 By Susan Ferrechio  | March 31, 2015 | 11:13 am
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 31, 2015, 11:35:42 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/judge-hillary-could-teach-nixon-a-lesson-about-destroying-evidence.html

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Hillary Could Teach Nixon A ‘Lesson’ About Destroying Evidence

Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
March 31, 2015
Libertarian pundit and and former New Jersey Superior Court Judge Andrew Napolitano blasted Hillary Clinton over the complete wipe of her private email server, as it also emerged that Clinton lied about using one device for all emails.

“She could have taught Richard Nixon a lesson,” Napolitano said, referring to the Watergate scandal.
“She utterly, totally, and completely frustrated [Congress'] lawful ability to get their hands on her records which they have a right and a duty and an obligation to examine.” Napolitano said, appearing on Fox News Monday.
Napolitano also noted that Clinton’s emails should have been handed over to a State Department official to make a call on which are personal and which are public.
“She disabled the record keeper from doing it because she was the record keeper,” the former judge said.
Napolitano added that Clinton’s actions should lead to prosecution, declaring that what Hillary did is “10 times worse” than Gen. David Petraeus, providing classified information to his mistress biographer.
In further appearances throughout the day, Napolitano said that Hillary could be in serious trouble should any federal prosecutor have “enough courage” to pursue a case.
“She now has admitted to destroying subpoenaed evidence after she was on notice of the existence of the subpoena. That’s known as obstruction of justice, as well as destruction of the documents,” Napolitano told Bill Hemmer.

“If Republicans pound away at the now 20-year-long perception that the Clintons believe they’re above the law, this will be a serious problem for her.” Napolitano added.
“It’ll also be a problem for President Obama. Why aren’t you having your prosecutors prosecute her?” he added, noting “You went after General Petraeus for having some documents in a desk drawer. She destroyed evidence after it was subpoenaed! There are different weights of crimes. His is down here, hers are up here,” he urged.

It also emerged Monday that Clinton’s excuse of wanting to only use one device for all her emails is bogus. The Associated Press obtained State Department documents that show Clinton emailed her staff on an iPad as well as a BlackBerry.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 31, 2015, 12:51:02 pm
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2562301

  What a joke.
  HiLIARy under oath.
  Has she ever told the truth?


  HOUSE WANTS HILLDOGGYDOG UNDER OATH


A House panel Tuesday formally requested Hillary Clinton to testify about the private server and email account she used while serving as secretary of state.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi, sent a request to Clinton's personal attorney, David E. Kendall, requesting that Clinton appear before the committee no later than May 1 for a transcribed interview about the server and email.

RELATED: The long, complicated story of Hillary Clinton's Benghazi subpoena

The request comes after Kendall told Gowdy that the server had been wiped clean and that it would be impossible to recover the 30,000 emails Clinton deleted last year.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 31, 2015, 01:08:11 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoPKajvq3gE
Dune (9/9) Movie CLIP - I Will Kill Him! (1984) HD
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 31, 2015, 02:58:19 pm
 Is insanity contagious?
 Folks continue to cheer for Hillary, many continue to hail GWB in his public appearences?
 Am I getting to a point, you guys will have to help me out?
 Is there a dividing line between being raised,DIPPED in a super right wing family or is in inherit insanity.
   I look back at my upbringing, painfully. It was a boot camp environment, in fact military boot camp was a peice of cake in comparison.
  I had been dipped, 100%, whatever the ole gov said had to be right on, no worries this is America, real simple. We are the right and the might, democracy, freedoms, equality, integrity, etc.
 Any challenge, nation, Gov, who didn't agree with our (democratic) system was evil, a threat to be exterminated, our enemy, Godless, and so on...  Insanity Inc./ or dipped.
  I rant at times and regret it, it's just that this has subject matter has bothered me for some time.

  I had a explosive wake up, though I do understand what it is to be dipped, indocrinated.
I am convinced the elite powers have covered about every angle possible to maintain control of the population. MSM,political rhetoric, childhood, society, etc.
 
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: PeaceAndFreedom on March 31, 2015, 03:52:56 pm

In further appearances throughout the day, Napolitano said that Hillary could be in serious trouble should any federal prosecutor have “enough courage” to pursue a case.
“She now has admitted to destroying subpoenaed evidence after she was on notice of the existence of the subpoena. That’s known as obstruction of justice, as well as destruction of the documents,” Napolitano told Bill Hemmer.

“If Republicans pound away at the now 20-year-long perception that the Clintons believe they’re above the law, this will be a serious problem for her.” Napolitano added.

The Clinton problem as always been two pronged---the criminals commit crime after crime, and the Republicans don't do the obvious. Here the issue is cut and dried, and already admitted. She destroyed evidence that she knew was subpoenaed. This utterly trumps the legalese debate over whether Hillary was authorized under federal regs to store the emails on her server or not.

So will the GOP pull the trigger? Obstruction indictments should follow for her, and any assistants who helped her trash the emails, count per count per each one destroyed. I'm ready for the headline, "Hillary indicted on 32,000 counts of obstruction of justice," how about you?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on March 31, 2015, 05:49:50 pm
 Lets see if they keep the heat up:
   Is this SOP:Rep. Trey Gowdy, chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi, sent a request to Clinton's personal attorney.
   So they request her to attend, why not send in the dept of justice? 3 bags.
Lil Hillary is in for a sh**t fight......She will defintely call in all her crony's on this, will it help her?
 Amazing, they request an audience with her highness.
   
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 01, 2015, 01:57:20 pm
DNC Frontrunner for POTUS - Hillary 2016
(http://www.mygen.com/images/StitchWitchDoll.jpg)
Title: Martin Armstrong: "Hillary Commits A Crime And They Defend Her"
Post by: Letsbereal on April 03, 2015, 07:52:46 am
Martin Armstrong: "Hillary Commits A Crime And They Defend Her"
2 April 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-02/martin-armstrong-hillary-commits-crime-and-they-defend-her
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on April 03, 2015, 08:37:53 am
seems LIKE SOME FACES ARE DEFENDING HILLY,ya know, the poor ole dear lady is getting on in years hype.. SOME ARE NOT.  What dirt does she have on these agency's, ALLMOST anyone else would be be cuffed. Imagine Hilly being treated as if she were one of us, just a American citizen criminally charged. kkkkkkkkk not likely, that would nessesitate the congress, JD, DOD etc. would abide by the law of the land. Could it be they may have been included in her Lil cell calls and covering their backsides as well?

SC: Marin Armstrons economics. TO THE POINT.

You cannot get around the fact that what she did was criminal for when all those emails were subpoenaed by Congress, she failed to produce them or inform Congress she had a secret personal email. That is outright OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE and anyone else would go to prison for 5 years. Then when they are discovered, she erases the files. Come on! Why are there three sets of laws – (1) for Democrats, (2) for Republicans, and (3) for the rest of us?

Then her supporter Ed Randel, Former Pennsylvania governor whose wife is a Federal Judge on the Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, argued with a straight face that Edward Snowden hacked the NSA so Hillary was entitled to keep a private server. Hilary's security would be even less impressive on a computer at her home.  ( yuk ,OK, she could run off to Iraq and get asylum??)

Come on. Rendell is a lawyer and he KNOWS the law. What Hillary did is an absolute criminal act – there is no exception if there is honestly one rule of law for everyone. Can you image what what have happened if Nixon just said sorry, I erased all the tapes. Tough shit!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 06, 2015, 11:07:55 am
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-players-abc-news/new-book--being-assigned-to-hillary-clinton-s-secret-service-detail-%E2%80%9Ca-form-of-punishment%E2%80%9D-213322171.html
New book: Being assigned to Hillary Clinton’s Secret Service detail “a form of punishment”
By ABC News
August 14, 2014 8:01 AM
 
DNC Frontrunner for POTUS - Hillary 2016
(http://www.mygen.com/images/StitchWitchDoll.jpg)

There’s no worse assignment for a Secret Service agent than protecting Hillary Clinton, if claims in a controversial new book are to be believed.

Ronald Kessler’s book, “First Family Detail,” is filled with salacious revelations about the secret personal lives of the nation’s most high-profile political leaders. But the authenticity of those revelations has been called into question over factual inaccuracies in the book, as well as its reliance on anonymous Secret Service agents.

She is so nasty to agents that being assigned to her detail is considered a form of punishment,” Kessler told “Top Line” of Clinton, who continues to receive Secret Service protection as a former first lady.

“It shines a light on her character,” Kessler said. “She claims to be a champion of the little people, and she's going to help the middle class. And, in fact, she treats these people around her, [who] would lay down their lives for her like sub-humans; and I think voters need to consider that.”

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 06, 2015, 11:11:33 am
^^^^^
  Just terrible.  How can people worship her?  How can people vote for her?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 06, 2015, 11:22:19 am
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/01/27/hillary-clinton-last-time-i-drove-was-1996/
Hillary Clinton: Last time I drove was 1996

(http://www.not2grand.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/christine-1983-movie-poster-john-carpenter.jpg)

https://youtu.be/fF5VFaCti44

Hillary Clinton disclosed Monday that she hasn't driven a car since the year 1996.

"The last time I actually drove a car myself was 1996," Clinton said at the National Automobile Dealers Association meeting in New Orleans. She then joked: "I remember it very well. Unfortunately, so does the Secret Service, which is why I haven't driven since then."

Clinton's lack of experience behind the wheel isn't all that unusual for a person who has been in public life as long as she has. Before stepping down as U.S. secretary of state almost a year ago, Clinton served as first lady, then senator and then secretary of state, with no time away from public office.

"I have to confess: One of the regrets I have about public life is that I can't drive anymore," Clinton said, before joking: "My husband thinks that's a blessing, but he's the one who should talk."

Former presidents and first ladies have Secret Service protection for life after leaving office, which means they have very limited opportunities to drive.

Bill Clinton said in 2012 that driving was the one thing he missed most about everyday life. He said he always drives the golf cart during golf outings to get his fill.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 07, 2015, 06:43:46 am


NOT A JOKE! GET OVER THERE
RIGHT NOW WHILE SUPPLIES LAST!


Ready for Hillary Fire Sale:
50% Off Champagne Glasses … Whiskey
Glasses and Mason Jars


5:55 PM, APR 6, 2015 • BY DANIEL HALPER

The pro-Hillary Clinton super PAC, Ready for Hillary, is getting set for the
Democratic presidential candidate to officially enter the presidential race.
This afternoon, the group sent out an email to supporters announcing a
50 percent sale on whiskey glasses, mason jars, and Champagne glasses.

A set of four champagne glasses costs $25, as does a set of four whiskey glasses.
The mason jars are only $10.08 for a set of four.


(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_693.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_693.jpg.html)

The subject line for the email announcing the sale is, "Ready to party?"
And though it makes no direct reference to Hillary Clinton entering the
presidential race, it's widely expected the Democratic candidate will
make an announcement about her future plans in the next week or two.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ready-hillary-fire-sale-50-champagne-glasses_911074.html
Title: Top Spy: Hillary's Emails 'Likely' Hacked by China, Russia, Iran
Post by: Sasha on April 07, 2015, 05:06:00 pm
Top Spy: Hillary's Emails 'Likely' Hacked by China, Russia, Iran
And 'potentially the North Koreans'
Apr 7, 2015 • By DANIEL HALPER

A top intelligence official under President Obama, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn,  says that the chances Hillary Clinton's private emails were hacked is "very high." Flynn, who ran the Defense Intelligence Agency but is now retired, called it hackings "likely."

Flynn made the comments to Megyn Kelly last night on Fox News: video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5_-w62RZ2M)

continues:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/top-spy-hillarys-emails-likely-hacked-china-russia-iran_911707.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on April 08, 2015, 11:16:43 am
 YES, a personell cell phone used to run the the machine, sure they know.
 That Hilly wiped the tpaes clean proves it.
PROBLEM...The Agency's, Gov depts. don't want these tapes exposed as well, consider this , they are involved too not just hilldog.
 Hilly needs to fullfill her days in a padded cell, as well as her comrades that would be exposed on her cell messages.
  Hillary did what she had to do, exposing the depth of the neocon traitors would be her end , heart attack, brain tuma, hit by a drone, whatever..As too would be far to many of the accomplices in this  Gov..mafia.
Title: Hillary Clinton's Interactive Web Of Money
Post by: Letsbereal on April 08, 2015, 10:28:32 pm
Hillary Clinton's Interactive Web Of Money
8 April 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-08/hillary-clintons-interactive-web-money
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 09, 2015, 11:04:34 am

Mom Jones:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/04/robby-mook-hillary-clinton-campaign-manager-profile

35 year old ROBBY MOOK to
run Hilldog's campaign …
:o


(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/mook.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/mook.jpg.html)


Quote
Mook is widely known as Robby, not Robert, and at 35, he's still boyish—handsome and clean-shaven with close-cropped brown hair. His usual uniform consists of chinos and bland dress shirts rolled up to the elbows. He couldn't be more different from, say, James Carville, the loudmouth Ragin' Cajun who advised Bill Clinton's first presidential bid and now makes a living as a consultant and TV commentator. Mook rarely appears in news stories or on TV. He did not respond to repeated interview requests. He has no Facebook page. He has a Twitter account but never tweets and has forgotten the password.

Mook, who will be the first openly gay manager of a major presidential campaign, is largely unknown beyond the insular world of Democratic staffers but well liked within it. In addition to the email listserv, his loyal following—the Mook Mafia—plans yearly reunions, during which they return to a state where they once operated for a weekend of bar-hopping mixed with volunteering for a local campaign.

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 09, 2015, 03:11:21 pm
Is Hillary's campaign dead yet?

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/09/liberal-politico-reporter-clinton-campaign-collapsing-completely/
Liberal Politico Reporter: Clinton Campaign ‘Collapsing Completely’
http://www.atlasobscura.com/places/york-witch-grave
(http://assets.atlasobscura.com/media/BAhbCVsHOgZmSSJGdXBsb2Fkcy9wbGFjZV9pbWFnZXMvZTJiODIxMGQwODgyYjM5NjcyMjk4ZTNmY2RmMDEwZGU2YzAxNTQ2My5qcGcGOgZFVFsIOgZwOgp0aHVtYkkiCng0MDA+BjsGVFsHOwc6CnN0cmlwWwk7BzoMY29udmVydEkiEC1xdWFsaXR5IDkxBjsGVDA/image.jpg)
York Witch Grave - The grave of Mary Nasson leaves no question about her witchy ways
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 10, 2015, 11:33:37 am
60 million menopausal women in USA by 2020...

http://time.com/3763552/hillary-clinton-age-president/
Hillary Clinton Is the Perfect Bit_H to Be President
...
(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51SwPIb880L._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg)


In my new book, Moody Bitches, I look at how women are taught from an early age that moodiness is a problem to be fixed. That is simply wrongheaded. Women’s moods are our body’s intelligent feedback system. If we learn to manage them properly, they are a great resource and a tremendous source of power. They show us when we are primed for certain challenges and opportunities.

And the postmenopausal emergence, if you will, coincides with the point at which most women will have a fair amount of experience under their belts. (Perhaps they’ve already served as a U.S. Senator and Secretary of State, for instance.) This is often the right time to make a push, to take more of a leadership position, enter a new arena or strike out on one’s own. My mother was a great role model in her perimenopause, taking her symptoms in stride and referring to her hot flashes as “power surges.” She got another degree and switched careers; that appealed to me as a teenage girl. Now I see this rise in power as a way to channel new energy and even new anger. It’s a chance to make changes that should’ve been made decades ago. This may also be the time when children — adolescents in particular — are ready to take on more responsibility, so perhaps there is a benefit for everyone in changing that family dynamic.
...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on April 10, 2015, 08:15:09 pm
Hillary is to release a video announcing her run for the throne.
From what I could get , she is being well mentored, playing the game as if she is one of us, with a small group of folks sitting around chit chating about the future of the nation...
Stradegy, she is not about to go head on, she is going to play lil miss public, she cares about us and our nation... Is it strange the MSM doesn't mention Benghazi, the cell phone being erased, NOPE.
 I just sat through about 10 minutes of CNN anouncing she would release her cartoon on Sunday, her game is over..She simply refuses to go home with Billy and play being a wife and granny.
 Yuh I know just to much to get into, no rant.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 11, 2015, 02:24:46 pm
Obi-Wan: "That Bitxch is our last hope."
Yoda: "No...there is another..." ...


(http://liftingpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Chelsea-Clinton-Before-And-After-Plastic-Surgery-Photos-2.jpg)

(http://ell.h-cdn.co/assets/15/15/980x1375/gallery-1428507406-elle-may-15-cover.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 11, 2015, 03:51:56 pm


… so as not to forget.   ???

BACK ON PAGE 6 OF THIS THREAD~~~>http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=249159.msg1477978#msg1477978

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/SCARY.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/SCARY.jpg.html)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 12, 2015, 11:10:10 am



… Sunday, April 12 … news from HILLDOG'S HEADQUARTERS'
neighborhood in BROOKLYN … on the day she is scheduled
to "announce" for the OVAL Orifice:


Brooklyn Hit With Anti-Hillary Street Art


8:49 AM, APR 12, 2015 • BY DANIEL HALPER
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/brooklyn-hit-anti-hillary-street-art_917019.html


A source sends along these photos from Brooklyn today of anti-Hillary Clinton signs everywhere. Clinton is expected to announce her presidential campaign later today. The campaign's headquarters are located in Brooklyn.

The signs appear to be a riff on a group of supporters calling certain words often used to describe Clinton as sexist. Words such as 'secretive,' 'ambitious,' and 'entitled.'

The signs are posted near Hillary's campaign headquarters:

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/1_1.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/1_1.jpg.html)

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/3_1.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/3_1.jpg.html)

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/2.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/2.jpg.html)

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 12, 2015, 11:32:03 am
Please tell me these polls are rigged .... These people MUST be drugged  on ssri's ...

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/poll-democrats-want-challenge-to-hillary-clinton-116875.html
Bloomberg poll: Democrats want primary challenge to Hillary Clinton
By Kendall Breitman
4/10/15 6:35 PM EDT

In a Bloomberg Politics national poll published Friday, 72 percent of Democrats and Independents said it would be good for the Democratic Party if Hillary Clinton faced off in a primary against a “serious” challenger.
...

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/03/16/gop-email-scandal-backfires-popularity-potential-hillary-clinton-presidency-grows.html
GOP Email Scandal Backfires As Popularity Of Potential Hillary Clinton Presidency Grows
By: Jason Easley more from Jason Easley
Monday, March, 16th, 2015, 7:02 pm
(http://www.therushburypig.co.uk/linked/2012-09-04%2017.00.01.jpg) (https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/53/b4/ce/53b4ce2bf8be3a6ce9229e615a5681ea.jpg)
...
A new CNN/ORC poll found that the number of Americans who say that they would be proud to have Hillary Clinton as president has increased in the wake of the media/Republican created email scandal.

The CNN poll found some bad news for Republicans. The number of respondents who agreed with the statement that Hillary Clinton is a president that they could be proud of has increased since the email scandal was first reported. The number of Americans who said that Clinton is someone that they would be proud to have as president has increased from 50% in March 2014 to 57% in March 2015. The number of respondents who agreed that Clinton says what she believes not what voters want to hear has increased from 54% in 2007 to 58% today
...


http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/04/12/poll-hillary-clinton-is-still-tops-in-popularity
Poll: Hillary Clinton Is Still Tops in Popularity

Hillary Clinton is still the most popular political figure, a new poll finds.
By Rebekah Metzler
April 12, 2013 | 1:33 p.m. EDT

Hillary Clinton remains one of the most positively viewed political figures, according to a new poll that tested the popularity of several potential 2016 presidential candidates. About 56 percent of adults surveyed said they had a positive opinion of Clinton versus 29 percent who view her negatively, according to a NBC/Wall Street Journal poll released Thursday.

| - - - -
http://www.westernfreepress.com/2015/02/21/lipstick-on-a-pig-the-rebranding-of-hillary-clinton/
Lipstick on a pig, the rebranding of Hillary Clinton
Robert Rowe |  February 21 2015

The very idea that she is even being considered by some as a candidate for the office of President of the United States after her deplorable job as US Secretary of State is so repugnant to me I barely have words for it.

I don’t care how much you dress her up, she’s unqualified for the office, and damaging to the reputation of the United States, and the office of President. They can re-brand the lies all they wish too, those who will vote for her will doubtless vote for her, the rest of us would never even remotely consider it. Her record on Benghazi and the rebellion in Libya is still not known, every effort to discover the truth in these matters has been stymied.


https://youtu.be/J_x04Gn3-2g
Gloating over the death of Muammar Gaddafi

https://youtu.be/xvhBoF_pCHo
Hillary Clinton laughs about possible war against Iran

https://youtu.be/TC0AKNQBV80
Who could forget this statement …

...

Regardless, the re-branding effort is on, in full force as this piece in The Washington Post details.


Is Hillary Rodham Clinton a McDonald’s Big Mac or a Chipotle burrito bowl? A can of Bud or a bottle of Blue Moon? JCPenney or J. Crew?

As she readies her second presidential campaign, Clinton has recruited consumer marketing specialists onto her team of trusted political advisers. Their job is to help imagine Hillary 5.0 — the rebranding of a first lady turned senator turned failed presidential candidate turned secretary of state turned likely 2016 Democratic presidential nominee.

Clinton and her image-makers are sketching ways to refresh the well-established brand for tomorrow’s marketplace. In their mission to present voters with a winning picture of the likely candidate, no detail is too big or too small — from her economic opportunity agenda to the design of the “H” in her future campaign logo
...
Let’s face it, Hillary is probably a shoo-in with the progressive socialist crowd, except of course for those select few who don’t think Hillary is progressive enough they love Fauxahontis, AKA Senator Warren. She doesn’t need rebranding for these voters, their minds are made up already, she’s the greatest thing since sliced bread.

Or have I been eating paint chips again?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 12, 2015, 11:40:41 am
^^^
… probably at LEAST 500 are loopy on the SSRIs.   ;D

"
The poll surveyed 1,000 adults from April 5 to April 8
and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percent.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 12, 2015, 03:32:21 pm


… Oh, Brother.  :o  Transparent suckin' up to all
the HILLDOG lovers … the first 1:35 of this
announcement video features a lineup of every
strain of DEM constituency you can think of …
several lovey-dovey gays/lesbian/trannys(?) …
Spanish speakers (duh), middle-class libtard
white women, lotsa black folks, mixed-racers …
students … WAIT! Did I see a white man? WOW!


Getting Started
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uY7gLZDmn4&feature=player_detailpage
Title: Hillary Clinton (Finally) Announces She Is Running For President (Again)
Post by: Letsbereal on April 12, 2015, 03:38:54 pm
Hillary Clinton (Finally) Announces She Is Running For President (Again)
12 April 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-12/hillary-clinton-finally-announces-she-running-president-again
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 12, 2015, 05:37:13 pm
^^^^

… too funny!   ;D

"
From her mother’s own childhood – in which
she was abandoned by her parents – to her
work going door-to-door for the Children’s
Defense Fund to her battling to create the
Children’s Health Insurance Program,
she’s fought children and families all her career.



Clinton's press office left an embarrassing
typo in its press announcement, saying that she had

'fought children and families all her career'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3035748/Everyday-Americans-need-champion-Wealthy-Hillary-Clinton-enters-race-president.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on April 12, 2015, 06:02:56 pm
 Hi D.. Maby it wasn't a mistake? 
           
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 12, 2015, 07:03:32 pm
Buffett for Hillary - put 25 G's on Hillary in 2014  - Big support from the common LBGT ./...

http://www.star-telegram.com/news/business/biz-columns-blogs/baker-ahles-kaskovich/article18220025.html
Buffett sings Texas tunes, endorses homebuying and Hillary Clinton
 04/10/2015 5:09 PM
  | Updated: 04/12/2015 4:23 PM

Asked if he would ever run for president, Buffett responded, “I am for Hillary Clinton,” and then joked “You have to be 35 to run for president and I’m not old enough.” The billionaire investor and CEO is 84.

http://fortune.com/2014/10/07/warren-buffett-on-clinton-2016-hillary-is-going-to-win/
Warren Buffett on Clinton 2016: 'Hillary is going to win'

by   Benjamin Snyder 
  @WriterSnyder
  October 7, 2014, 1:04 PM EDT

At Fortune’s Most Powerful Women Summit, Warren Buffett made a big claim about Hillary Clinton’s presidential chances in 2016.
...


http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-12-04/warren-buffett-bets-big-on-hillary-clinton
Presidential Markers
Warren Buffett, Reluctant PAC Man, Is Ready for Hillary

Dec 4, 2014 12:45 PM PST
“Hillary is going to win, yeah.”

The world's third richest man makes his first-ever donation to an independent political group aligned with a candidate.
..
The Oracle of Omaha gave the maximum donation allowed to Ready for Hillary last quarter, his first-ever check to the sort of independent political groups that he's scorned in the past. Buffett, who is the third richest man in the world, gave $25,000, the most any individual can donate under the committee's self-imposed cap, according to a person familiar with Ready for Hillary's post-election financial disclosure report. The group has raised more than $11 million to finance its efforts to lay the groundwork for a Clinton presidential campaign. Their latest report is due to be filed with the Federal Election Commission by midnight Thursday.
...
Ready for Hillary has no official ties to Clinton.

http://fortune.com/2014/12/04/warren-buffett-hillary-clinton/
The Berkshire Hathaway CEO also backed Clinton’s 2008 election campaign and held fundraisers in her honor.

| - - - -

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3035748/Everyday-Americans-need-champion-Wealthy-Hillary-Clinton-enters-race-president.html
'Everyday Americans need a champion': Wealthy Hillary Clinton finally enters formal race to be president with video telling middle class voters 'the deck is still stacked in favor of those at the top' of the economy
'Americans have fought their way back from tough economic times,' says the multimillionaire politician in a launch video
Her chief of staff stepped on her big moment with an email to donors saying, 'I wanted to make sure you heard it first from me'
Clinton's press office left an embarrassing typo in its press announcement, saying that she had 'fought children and families all her career'
Official campaign website is full of biographical material but includes no policy statements or issue platforms
Republican Party fires its opening salvo: 'Americans need a president they can trust and voters do not trust Hillary Clinton'
Hillary will start her 'listening tour' in Iowa and New Hampshire without huge fanfare, and then have a more formal launch event in May
Wunderkind campaign manager, 35, was a child when she was first lady and didn't live through her defining White House scandals

By David Martosko, Us Political Editor For Dailymail.com In Des Moines
Published: 08:52 EST, 12 April 2015 | Updated: 21:08 EST, 12 April 2015


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3035748/Everyday-Americans-need-champion-Wealthy-Hillary-Clinton-enters-race-president.html#ixzz3X9Swq6nY
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jerryweaver on April 12, 2015, 07:25:01 pm
It’s official – Hillary Clinton is running for president. Clinton announced her bid for the 2016 U.S. presidential race on Twitter this afternoon, ending years of conjecture over what many assumed was a sure thing.

The tweet was sent after an email from Clinton aide John Podesta went out to supporters of Clinton from the 2008 campaign, “spoiling” what political reporters had been expecting since Thursday:
 

http://techcrunch.com/2015/04/12/hillary-clinton-tweets-her-2016-presidential-bid-after-aides-email-ruined-the-surprise/

(https://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/screen-shot-2015-04-12-at-3-43-40-pm.png?w=680&h=541)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on April 12, 2015, 07:33:53 pm
 Unreal.. CNN mentioned, Benghazi & cell phone erased...........
 BUT, they said it was the Republicans slinging sh**t on the wall.

 Soon enough she will be on a vid cooking a meal for her family, washing dishes,hugging her daughter, holding her grandchild.. Y a  know, she is one of us type of hype.
 Sociopaths must study human behavior, master mimicking human emotions. The act.
  "What diference does it make".....slipped... she showed her real face.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on April 12, 2015, 07:59:18 pm
Buffett for Hillary - put 25 G's on Hillary in 2014  - Big support from the common LBGT ./...

                    Its been said billions are spent on presidential campaigns, that leaves out the common man.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 12, 2015, 09:35:48 pm

… so as not to forget.   ???

BACK ON PAGE 6 OF THIS THREAD~~~>http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=249159.msg1477978#msg1477978

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/SCARY.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/SCARY.jpg.html)


(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/11632.gif.pagespeed.ce.IuHi15ibmLkagnOzqbg9.gif) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/11632.gif.pagespeed.ce.IuHi15ibmLkagnOzqbg9.gif.html)

"
Webb says that he and Vince were “mesmerized”
by Hillary and that “Bill wasn’t much of a
presence in our lives.”


When Bill was elected president in 1992, Hillary tried to make Bill promise to appoint Hubbell to the U.S. Supreme Court if a vacancy occurred. Hillary had ordered Bill to give Webb an interim appointment as the chief justice of the Arkansas Supreme Court: “Well goddam it Bill he’s my friend, you can appoint him by law, so do it!” – said Hillary according to L.D. Brown. Webb got the Arkansas Supreme Court appointment.

http://www.mofopolitics.com/2013/08/23/the-clintons-greatest-shame-chelsea-clinton-is-the-biological-daughter-of-webb-hubbell/
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 13, 2015, 12:48:42 pm
Vote for the female Hitler !!!   'She's awesome'  ( ya think the Guardian supports Hitlery? ) 

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2015/apr/13/hillary-clinton-run-white-house-optimism-new-york-video
New Yorkers on Hillary Clinton's White House run: 'She's awesome' – video

Residents of New York share their views on Hillary Clinton's decision to run for president. Clinton announced her decision to pursue the Democratic nomination through
social media on Sunday to a largely positive response. So far Clinton has cast herself as a champion of everyday Americans although she has not offered any specific policy prescriptions yet


http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2015/apr/12/hillary-clinton-supporters-new-york-video
Hillary Clinton supporters gather in New York - video

Hillary Clinton supporters hold a small rally in New York City on Saturday ahead of her expected presidential campaign launch. The gathering was organised by the grassroots organisation 'Ready for Hillary', which has over 3.8 million supporters, that was founded two years ago to urge Clinton to run for the White House in the 2016 elections
Title: Not the Lesser of Two Evils: Why Hillary Clinton Is Unfit for the Presidency
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 13, 2015, 03:13:03 pm
Contrary to what many who claim to be intellectually free from "false paradigms" so often imply, one can be staunchly opposed to Hilldog without being a supporter of either Jeb Bush or Rand Paul.

http://tarpley.net/not-the-lesser-of-two-evils-why-hillary-clinton-is-unfit-for-the-presidency/ (http://tarpley.net/not-the-lesser-of-two-evils-why-hillary-clinton-is-unfit-for-the-presidency/)

Not the Lesser of Two Evils: Why Hillary Clinton Is Unfit for the Presidency

Webster G. Tarpley, Ph.D.
TARPLEY.net
April 12, 2015

Hillary Clinton — The International Neocon Warmonger

As the National Journal reported in 2014, even the pathetically weak anti-war left is not ready to reconcile with Hillary given her warmongering as Secretary of State. And with good reason. Scratching just lightly beneath the surface of Hillary Clinton’s career reveals the empirical evidence of her historic support for aggressive interventions around the globe.

Beginning with Africa, Hillary defended the 1998 cruise missile strike on the El Shifa pharmaceutical plant in the Sudanese capital of Khartoum, destroying the largest producer of cheap medications for treating malaria and tuberculosis and provided over 60% of available medicine in Sudan. In 2006 she supported sending United Nations troops to Darfur with logistical and technical support provided by NATO forces. Libyan leader Moammar Qaddafi was outspoken in his condemnation of this intervention, claiming it was not committed out of concern for Sudanese people but “…for oil and for the return of colonialism to the African continent.”

This is the same leader who was murdered in the aftermath of the 2011 NATO bombing of Libya; an attack promoted and facilitated with the eager support of Mrs. Clinton. In an infamous CBS news interview, said regarding this international crime: “We came, we saw, he died.” As Time magazine pointed out in 2011, the administration understood removing Qaddafi from power would allow the terrorist cells active in Libya to run rampant in the vacuum left behind. Just last month the New York Times reported that Libya has indeed become a terrorist safe haven and failed state— conducive for exporting radicals through “ratlines” to the conflict against Assad in Syria.

Hillary made prompt use of the ratlines for conflicts in the Middle East. In the summer of 2012, Clinton privately worked with then CIA director and subversive bonapartist David Petraeus on a proposal for providing arms and training to death squads to be used to topple Syria just as in Libya. This proposal was ultimately struck down by Obama, reported the New York Times in 2013, but constituted one of the earliest attempts at open military support for the Syrian death squads.

Her voting record on intervening in Afghanistan and Iraq is well known and she also has consistently called for attacking Iran. She even told Fareed Zakaria the State Department was involved “behind the scenes” in Iran’s failed 2009 Green Revolution. More recently in Foreign Policy magazine David Rothkopf wrote on the subject of the Lausanne nuclear accord, predicting a “snap-back” in policy by the winner of the 2016 election to the foreign policy in place since the 1980s. The title of this article? “Hillary Clinton is the Real Iran Snap-Back.” This makes Hillary the prime suspect for a return to the madcap Iranian policies that routinely threaten the world with a World War 3 scenario.

[Continued... (http://tarpley.net/not-the-lesser-of-two-evils-why-hillary-clinton-is-unfit-for-the-presidency/)]
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 14, 2015, 09:39:04 am
http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-surprises-early-attack-ceo-pay-190527044--finance.html

  Right Hillary.  Spill this red meat out to your brain donor followers.  Only they would think you are one of them.  You, who command $300,000 for a one hour speech.  The average doctor/dentist does not even come close to $300,000 a year---especially after they pay more than half of their income IN TAXES.


Hillary Clinton surprises with early attack on CEO pay

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK/DES MOINES, Iowa (Reuters) - Hillary Clinton, under pressure from the left wing of her Democratic Party to aggressively campaign against income inequality, voiced concern about the hefty paychecks of some corporate executives in an email to supporters.

Striking a populist note, Clinton, who announced on Sunday she was running for president in 2016, said American families were still facing financial hardship at a time "when the average CEO makes about 300 times what the average worker makes."
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 14, 2015, 10:27:49 am


… Hilldog to spend

$38 per voter?


"
Hillary Rodham Clinton and her support groups are opening a massive
fundraising effort to collect an historically-high $2.5 billion to win
the White House, according to reports.

That amounts to $37.92 per vote in the general election for the Democrat,
more than ever spent in a national campaign. The math is based on the votes
received by President Obama in his reelection, 65,915,796.


http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-to-spend-37.92-for-every-vote-in-2.5b-campaign/article/2563004
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 14, 2015, 10:33:13 am


  I still can't believe that she has no real challengers.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 14, 2015, 11:28:40 am
I still can't believe that she has no real challengers.

Perhaps her would-be challengers are afraid of something.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html (http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 14, 2015, 11:29:26 am
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3038621/More-2-MILLION-Hillary-Clinton-s-Twitter-followers-fake-never-tweet.html


  The corruption from Hillary never ends.....How much corruption can America take from the HiLIEry?  Spending $630,000 to bulk up her image on Facebook while SEC of STATE.  THE MADNESS CONTINUES.

More than 2 MILLION of Hillary Clinton's Twitter followers are fake or never tweet – and she's already under fire for 'buying' fake Facebook fans

Two different online audit tools say no more than 44 per cent of Hillary's 3.6 million Twitter fans are real people who participate in the platform

The newly minted presidential candidate is fending off accusations that her Facebook page is full of fake 'likes'

Her Facebook fan base includes more people from Baghdad, Iraq than any US city

When she was secretary of state, her agency paid $630,000 to bulk up its Facebook likes, but pledged to stop after she left
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 14, 2015, 11:31:30 am
Perhaps her would-be challengers are afraid of something.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html (http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html)

  Yes, how can we forget the ARKANCIDES.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 14, 2015, 01:07:29 pm
#WhyI'mnotvotingforHillary

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/hillary-clinton-presidential-announcement-whyimnotvotingforhillary-hashtag-tops-twitter-10173201.html
Hillary Clinton presidential announcement: #WhyI'mnotvotingforHillary tops Twitter
 Andrew Buncombe   Author Biography
 New York
Monday 13 April 2015

...

Social media erupted with mocking, and sometimes derogatory posts, and before long the hashtag #WhyI'mnotvotingforHillary was trending on Twitter.

The hashtag was reportedly the creation of Markeece Young, a young Republican from North Carolina, who said the fact that it had been Twitter's top trender, "makes my day".

Before long, everyone was at - declaring their reasons why they will not vote for Mrs Clinton. Some were serious, others were humorous. Many were creative.
...

#WhyImNotVotingForHillary was the #1 trending hashtag in America because of us. It was removed mysteriously replaced by #Hillary2016
 
...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CCcpHrgUEAAOL6I.jpg)
Dr. Gene Lingerfelt   @GeneLingerfelt 
Follow
#Hillary contemplating the plight of the poor from her humble home. #WhyImNotVotingForHillary
10:12 PM - 12 Apr 2015

|- - - -
(http://www.mygen.com/images/scooby_bus.png) (http://www.mygen.com/images/Screen-Shot-2015-04-13-at-10_33_28-PM.png) (https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/79/17/be/7917be078fc97c2d2d7a19618e1e80ac.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 15, 2015, 07:29:43 am

NEW CAMPAIGN LITERATURE FROM THE SCOOBY VAN!

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/get.jpeg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/get.jpeg.html)

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/original.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/original.jpg.html)



Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 15, 2015, 03:04:15 pm


… I swear … this woman not only has NO MORAL COMPASS, she
is also as dumb as a rock. Who in their right mind would try to pull
this off, after all the BS about connecting with 'real' people?


EXCLUSIVE: Campaign staff recruited
and DROVE 'everyday' Iowans to Hillary's
first campaign stop – including health care
'lobbyist in training' who was an Obama
campaign intern and Biden chauffeur

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/2791754900000578-3040482-image-a-3_1429126130035.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/2791754900000578-3040482-image-a-3_1429126130035.jpg.html)

*  Austin Bird sat for coffee on Tuesday morning in the town of
LeClaire, Iowa, chatting with Hillary Clinton as
photographers snapped pictures
*  News reports called him a 'student' and her campaign called
it an unscripted event
*  But Clinton's Iowa political director Troy Price drove Bird and
two other people to the coffee house
*  Bird is a hospital government relations official who interned with
Barack Obama's 2012 presidential campaign
*  The Iowa Democratic Party, which Price ran until a week ago,
tasked him to be Joe Biden's driver during an October Senate
campaign trip in Davenport

By DAVID MARTOSKO, US POLITICS EDITOR FOR DAILYMAIL.COM IN DES MOINES, IOWA

ARTICLE~~~>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3040482/Campaign-staff-DROVE-ordinary-Iowans-Hillary-s-campaign-stop-including-health-care-lobbyist-training-Obama-campaign-intern-Biden-chauffeur.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on April 15, 2015, 05:33:36 pm

  I still can't believe that she has no real challengers.
Hi Larsonstdoc as a non american I think your current prez noble peace prize boy sucks ,but the idea of another bush or clinton rampaging around the world is probably worse . O hang on its just the left and right wing of the same insane turkey.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 15, 2015, 05:59:17 pm
Hi Larsonstdoc as a non american I think your current prez noble peace prize boy sucks ,but the idea of another bush or clinton rampaging around the world is probably worse . O hang on its just the left and right wing of the same insane turkey.

  I hear you Dude 447.  Those pictures of Hillary are really taking a toll---with all those wrinkles and such. If they gave her a face-lift they would have to scrape her belly button off her chin.

  I think the younger people---less than 45---see that SHE LOOKS LIKE THEIR GRANDMOTHER.  If only they would vote.  If they would vote, they could defeat her by choosing a younger candidate. 

  The number one google search this week---HOW OLD IS HILLARY?


 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on April 15, 2015, 06:26:58 pm
I want to encourage people to vote outside of this left right BS .Dont get put off by people saying your wasting your vote. And to everyone who says I cant be botherd voting because they are all the same if you dont vote for something different it WILL always be the same.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 15, 2015, 06:32:28 pm
I want to encourage people to vote outside of this left right BS .Dont get put off by people saying your wasting your vote. And to everyone who says I cant be botherd voting because they are all the same if you dont vote for something different it WILL always be the same.

  Well I have voted for Ron Paul 3 times---in 1988, 2008 and 2012. 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on April 15, 2015, 06:52:51 pm
Keep voting  .Here in the UK I have voted outside the box since the 80s , I use to vote left or right then I realised they are the same thing .Now in the UK people who vote outside the old boy network are getting taken serious
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jofortruth on April 15, 2015, 09:48:45 pm
Campaign staff DROVE 'ordinary' Iowans to Hillary's first campaign stop - including health care 'lobbyist in training' who was an Obama campaign intern and Biden chauffeur
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-30...-chauffeur.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3040482/Campaign-staff-DROVE-ordinary-Iowans-Hillary-s-campaign-stop-including-health-care-lobbyist-training-Obama-campaign-intern-Biden-chauffeur.html)


 ::)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 16, 2015, 05:24:49 pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3042625/Hillary-ditches-Scooby-flies-New-Jersey-wrapping-three-day-Iowa-campaign-tour-totes-luggage.htm


Only her Zombie followers can't see through this crap---sitting in coach and pulling her own suitcase.  TRYING TO BE LIKE A SOCCER MOM.  WHAT BS.   SHE DID HAVE SOMEONE PICK HER UP IN A TOWN CAR ON THE TARMAC.

Hillary ditches Scooby and flies to New Jersey on plane with no First Class after three-day Iowa campaign tour – and she totes her own luggage!

United flight 3954 carried Clinton from Omaha, Nebraska to Newark, New Jersey on Thursday

Met by a Town Car and a police escort – on the tarmac – for what's likely a short trip back to her Chappaqua, New York estate

Follows Iowa campaign swing full of controlled interactions, staged conversations and little interaction with real people

Clinton was, however, photographed pulling her own suitcase down an airport concourse
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on April 16, 2015, 05:54:22 pm
In an ideal world people would be voting on how much jail time Hitlary and trouser snake Bill need to do along with the Bush clan
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on April 16, 2015, 08:54:48 pm
 Hillary is dead in the political waters and I am glad---she will NEVER be President!

The 'HillDog' is being put to sleep...by-by- Miss American LIAR!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on April 16, 2015, 09:05:30 pm
The wicked witch is not dead and jeb bush is a complete asshole
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on April 16, 2015, 09:29:01 pm
The wicked witch is not dead and jeb bush is a complete asshole
I agree and the whole game of Republican and Democrat is nothing but a big joke, and all American's whole field of Morons is just that---a Bunch of morons---and Rand Paul is one of them--with Hillary!

I am hoping Dr. Ben Carson & Donald Trump run for the TOP Office!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on April 16, 2015, 10:11:24 pm
Trump and his fake wig job is almost as bad as the clinton bush mafia
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on April 17, 2015, 12:18:59 am
Trump and his fake wig job is almost as bad as the clinton bush mafia
Trump is an arrogate individual: but he is the guy that can put a pull against the flow: and he has the money to stop the flow from DC!

 MIX it Up and the political game, will run---put in Dr. Ben Carson and the Game is over!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on April 17, 2015, 12:22:51 am
OH! Hilary will NEVER be President...

1] She is a LIAR!

2] Everyone Knows This!

#] She is done  ;D :o :P
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 17, 2015, 10:55:44 am
Hulet - He describes the setup ...:

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/pages/trailer-old-earth
Thursday - April 16, 2015
In the first half, analyst Craig Hulet offered commentary on current events, terrorism, and world conflicts. "It looks to me unbelievably clear that money is going to buy the presidency, and Jeb Bush will be the next president," he declared.

http://www.craigbhulet.com/
To Listen to Radio Appearances of Craig B Hulet? Click Here!
Latest shows:
George Noory 04.17.15
http://www.eliasound.biz/hulet/mp3s/2015/04.17.15.mp3

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on April 18, 2015, 05:12:52 pm
 Lil Jeb, only if the fix is in!
  Hiildog, Geb etc:    There are some things money can't buy, honor, integrity, morality, etc.
 They may have convinced themselves Americans are all spoiled brainless mungs, meatsacks to be bled out, I have a feeling they are in for a suprise.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 18, 2015, 05:17:52 pm

… add Nevada whores to the list of HILLARY supporters!   8)

HOOKERS FOR HILLARY!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbD3jVIWoY0#t=59

‘HOOKERS FOR HILLARY': BUNNY RANCH
EMPLOYEES ENDORSE HILLARY CLINTON

by KELLI SERIO  18 Apr 2015

Prostitutes from Dennis Hof’s Moonlite Bunny Ranch in Mound, Nevada have officially endorsed Hillary Clinton for president.

With a new campaign called “Hookers for Hillary,” Hof says his girls will do anything they can to support Hillary.

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_717.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_717.jpg.html)

“I’m reaching out to the Democrats in northern Nevada and saying ‘what can we do to help?'” Hof told The Daily Caller. “Air Force Amy has announced that she’s going to give another half-hour to any donor who donates to Hillary. An extra half-hour of time in the bedroom. That’s her way of supporting. All the girls are coming up with different things they can do.”

“Hookers vote too,” he added.

Hillary’s stance on foreign policy is apparently one reason the “Bunnies” have endorsed her, video below, citing her ability to negotiate with foreign leaders similar to how they communicate with foreign men through a “language barrier.”

Quote
Another reason the prostitutes want Hillary in the White House is because of health insurance, which they have never had access to, according to Hof.

“They classify them in the same category as illegal prostitutes, who have sexually transmitted diseases. Legal prostitutes don’t. So the girls are thrilled with Obamacare, that they finally have proper healthcare,” he explained.

~~>http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/18/hookers-for-hillary-bunny-ranch-employees-endorse-hillary-clinton/[/b]
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 18, 2015, 07:06:00 pm
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/04/why_hillary_cant_be_in_the_moment.html

  This woman really digs into Hillary.  She has trouble talking to the average American.


Why Hillary Can't Be in the Moment

Watching Hillary Clinton reach out and touch ordinary Americans is excruciating. In working a crowd of regular folks, Hillary is fingernails on the blackboard in a pantsuit. It is difficult to imagine anyone more out of touch with her own affect, movement, and connection to the people around her. She is unable to talk, touch, listen or smile in a natural manner. She doesn't seem to know what to do with her hands, where to direct her eyes, her scope of awareness is restricted. A blind person with a stick would be better than Hillary Clinton at reading people around her.

In the staged and rigidly controlled glimpses of her, we see people positioned a handshake away wishing to be noticed by this woman who may be the next president, growing discouraged and becoming commensurately uncomfortable because Hillary can't see them. Everyone is down on Hillary. The right hates her for moral, patriotic, and ideological reasons, the left wing has a worsening case of Hillaphobia. Those on the left who are not too drug-addled to be aware of politics don't like her because they are driven by narcissistic emotional needs which she does not meet. She cannot reach the anti-traditionalist places where the left likes to be massaged, nor can she humor them with hipness.

It's too late for Hillary to blow the smoke of radical transformation, on someone else's dime, up the left-wing's collective keister. Hillary can trot out plausible transgenders when necessary, but fundamentally she chose to stand by her man and political expedience at every point in her career. Just being around her makes people feel uncomfortable and she clearly returns the unhappy condition.


Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on April 18, 2015, 08:04:54 pm
One man's last wish, 'Don't vote for Hillary Clinton.' Will it matter?

Larry Darrell Upright died this week. "In lieu of flowers, memorials may be sent to Shriners Hospital for Children .... Also, the family respectfully asks that you do not vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016. We promised not to vote for Hillary," one mourner wrote. A CNN poll released Monday shows that…
Christian Science Monitor
Title: More Hillary Cronyism Revealed
Post by: Letsbereal on April 18, 2015, 09:30:10 pm
More Hillary Cronyism Revealed: Cisco Used Clinton Foundation To Cover-up Human Rights Abuse In China
18 April 2015
, by Mike Krieger (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-18/more-hillary-cronyism-revealed-cisco-used-clinton-foundation-cover-human-rights-abus
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 18, 2015, 11:25:42 pm
(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/im-sooooo-tired-i-havent-slept.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/im-sooooo-tired-i-havent-slept.jpg.html)

Why Are the Democrats So Old and Tired?
2016 field so far looks like an AARP convention, minus the Viagra
Matt Welch|Apr. 17, 2015

At the Washington Examiner, the shrewd political columnist Byron York points out that the Democratic field for the 2016 presidential race is more than a little gray around the gills:

      There are five Democrats who have either declared or are thinking about
      running for president. Three — Joe Biden, Bernard Sanders, and Jim Webb
      — will be over 70 years old on Inauguration Day 2017. Frontrunner Hillary
      Clinton will be nine months short of 70. Only Martin O'Malley, who will turn
      54 a couple of days before the 2017 swearing-in, has not reached retirement
      age already.


What explains this last wheeze of the Boomers? York lets an anonymouse do the talking:

"It's the snuffing out of young talent by the strength and size and sheer velocity of the inevitable nominee," says a well-connected Democratic strategist. "The Clintons took all the air out of the collective Democratic room. There are a lot of people who would be running who are much younger, but they've got their future in front of them, and they don't want the Clintons to ruin it, in this campaign or after this campaign. So they're waiting for a moment when there is enough oxygen to run."

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/youd-say-youre-putting-me-on.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/youd-say-youre-putting-me-on.jpg.html)
Bernie Sanders

"If Hillary Clinton weren't running, we'd have a field that looks like the Republican field — young and vibrant and diverse."


That first paragraph rings true (it certaintly seems hazardous to a Democrat's future to stand in the way of the Clinton juggernaut), but the second sounds like wishful thinking. One key reason why there aren't any attractive young Democratic candidates running is that there aren’t many attractive young Democrats to choose from.

Don't believe me? Consider the ballyhooed young talent the party trotted out at the 2012 Democratic National Convention: Laughably dishonest campaign hack Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Shultz (D-Florida). Failed ex-Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. Banal San Antonio mayor-turned Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julian Castro, whose keynote speech at the convention contained such calorie-free bromides as "We have to come together and invest in opportunity today for prosperity tomorrow."

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_718.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_718.jpg.html)
Joe Biden

"
I know it's fashionable among some to bemoan the "clown show"
of the 2016 Republican presidential field, but at least there's an
actual contest there, and a detectable pulse.


CONTINUE~~~>http://reason.com/blog/2015/04/17/why-are-the-democrats-so-old-and-tired#.qfxstp:l431
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 19, 2015, 07:02:30 am
^^^^^^^
  What a trio!  Combined age of almost 300.

  Each one of them probably has their own diaper changer on the campaign trail.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 19, 2015, 07:46:29 am



… hilarious!

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_720.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_720.jpg.html)


Hillary Clinton & her campaign team strategize her Chipotle order
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjWXRyZqRps#t=132

~~> from the funny folks @ http://aboveaverage.com
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 19, 2015, 08:28:09 am
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  Can't you hear Hillary say---LESS TONGUE?  HOW AM I GOING TO WASH THIS AVERAGE AMERICAN FOOD DOWN WITHOUT MY $400 BOTTLE OF WINE?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 19, 2015, 03:55:42 pm
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/11130117_979093525436549_5277785770056998466_n.jpg?oh=8f645f18a6330dfad2dbf983b1e83079&oe=55E45F83&__gda__=1440645255_f50ff775aacc67b00e34342ecb07e4c3)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 19, 2015, 10:31:38 pm

ONE WORD …. $$$$$

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/clinton-cash-cover-420x636.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/clinton-cash-cover-420x636.jpg.html)

HITS on MAY 5 … Read all about it!

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/04/19/new-york-times-clinton-cash-most-anticipated-and-feared-book-of-a-presidential-cycle/

@NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/20/us/politics/book-questions-clinton-donations.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 20, 2015, 08:27:11 am
http://atlanta.cbslocal.com/2015/04/19/nc-mans-obituary-urges-friends-and-family-not-to-vote-for-clinton-in-2016/

  FROM THE GRAVE----

  NC Man’s Obituary Urges Friends And Family Not To Vote For Clinton In 2016
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 20, 2015, 01:04:53 pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3047219/Hillarys-vans-ready-second-campaign-trip-spends-personal-time-Bill.html
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/04/20/15/27C826C900000578-3047219-image-a-21_1429539404707.jpg)

Time for a Scooby service! Hillary’s vans get ready for second campaign trip as she spends personal time with Bill (just as it’s revealed she’s paid more than the top CEOs)
Mrs. Clinton enjoyed some downtime in Chappaqua, New York, with husband ahead of her two-day swing through New Hampshire this week
The aspiring leader of the free world and the former leader of the free world were spotted strolling hand-in-hand as they soaked up the sun
Meanwhile, her two 'Scooby' campaign vans got some TLC of their own at a local body shop, where they were also hand washed
Clinton starts second leg of her endeavor to win the vote of 'everyday' Americans
But report shows she makes more money for an hour's worth of work than the country's top CEOs
By Francesca Chambers For Dailymail.com 
Published: 09:35 EST, 20 April 2015  | Updated: 12:40 EST, 20 April 2015


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3047219/Hillarys-vans-ready-second-campaign-trip-spends-personal-time-Bill.html#ixzz3XsFrJmiR
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/04/20/15/27C8E22000000578-3047219-image-a-6_1429541660126.jpg)
Title: Hillary Clinton Made Millions From Foreign Donors In Exchange For "Favors"
Post by: Letsbereal on April 20, 2015, 08:25:50 pm
Secretary Of State For Hire: Hillary Clinton Made Millions From Foreign Donors In Exchange For "Favors"
20 April 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-20/secretary-state-hire-hillary-clinton-made-millions-foreign-donors-exchange-favors
Title: Hillary Clinton crushes Republican rivals in new poll
Post by: Letsbereal on April 21, 2015, 06:30:53 am
Hillary Clinton crushes Republican rivals in new poll
20 April 2015
, by Robert Schroeder - Washington (MarketWatch)
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/hillary-clinton-crushes-republican-rivals-in-new-poll-2015-04-20

If the presidential election were held today, it wouldn’t even be close.

Hillary Clinton is crushing her potential Republican rivals by double digits in a new CNN/ORC International poll:

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/04/20/politics/2016-elections-republican-field-poll/index.html

The Republicans’ best showing is by Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who trails the former senator and secretary of state by 14 points.

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who hasn’t declared his candidacy yet, lags Clinton by 17 points.

Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie are each 19 points behind Clinton.

Rubio and Paul have declared their candidacies, but Christie hasn’t said he’ll run.

Clinton is also the overwhelming favorite for the Democratic nomination, with nearly seven in 10 Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents supporting her.

Even including the poll’s margin of error, Clinton would still have a double-digit lead on Rubio and the others.

The poll was taken April 16-19 and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points. It was released Monday.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 21, 2015, 07:33:11 am
^^^^^^^^
  It just shows you how brain dead the people are.

  The  early bird most corrupt person gets the worm.

  The Republicans could do themselves a favor and self-weed themselves out.  There are too many candidates and there are more in the shadows---Palin, Huckabee, Trump, Carson.  Put a tent over that circus.

  And now there are rumors that some big dog from Christie's camp is leaving to join the Bush camp.  Don't you get it?  No more Bushes.  That dog don't hunt.

  The poll was CNN poll---CNN---the Clinton News Network.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 21, 2015, 09:15:03 am
Hilldog has been leading all the GOP presidential hopefuls in every national poll I've seen this year.

-- http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/ (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/)

-- http://www.pollingreport.com/wh16gen.htm (http://www.pollingreport.com/wh16gen.htm)

If all of those polls are going to be rejected out of hand, then so too must those polls which show embarrassingly low "approval ratings" for federal politicians.

One cannot have it both ways (one way when it's convenient, the opposite way when it's inconvenient).

What needs to be seriously considered (but probably won't be) is the possibility that many if not most of those choosing Hilldog in these polls are doing so not because they agree with her policy agenda, but merely because they regard her as the slightly lesser of so many evils.

In other words, perhaps -- just perhaps -- it's not "liberty" they're afraid of or hostile to, but the idea that brutal austerity measures must be imposed on those least able to defend themselves in the midst of a banker-engineered depression, all while the parasites in the top .0001% continue laughing all the way to the bank.

-- http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/yes-republicans-want-big-time-cuts-in-social-security (http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/yes-republicans-want-big-time-cuts-in-social-security)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 21, 2015, 09:43:26 am
^^^^

… you know, Hillary likes Chipotle … and I like Chipotle …
so I'm gonna vote for her!

This is exactly how deep these voters thinking goes.

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 21, 2015, 09:44:46 am
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3047591/Clinton-aide-defends-pre-vetting-campaign-event-participants-everyday-Americans-ordinary-people-New-Hampshire-bakery-employees-refuse-shake-hand.html#ixzz3XvbBzyt1

Clinton aide admits they SCREEN 'everyday Americans' for Hillary's campaign events as some ordinary people in a New Hampshire bakery – the employees! – refuse to shake her hand

Clinton was at Kristin's Bakery in Keene, NH in advance of a small-business roundtable event

She sat with a handful of customers and made her way to the back to greet employees

But a cashier told Daily Mail Online that some of the kitchen staff 'didn't want to come out to meet Hillary' because 'they just don't like her'
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 21, 2015, 09:53:44 am
… you know, Hillary likes Chipotle … and I like Chipotle …
so I'm gonna vote for her!

This is exactly how deep these voters thinking goes.

That's certainly true in many if not most cases.

On other hand, how is that any different than saying: "Candidate so-and-so says he likes 'liberty.' I like 'liberty' too. Therefore I'm going to vote for him."

That's precisely why the Patriot Act has the word "Patriot" in it.

And why Operation Iraqi Freedom had the word "freedom" in it.

And so on and so forth.

Liberals and conservatives alike are equally guilty of falling hook, line and sinker for this Bernaysian (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHRrqLSLTVQ) technique over and over again.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 21, 2015, 09:58:11 am
That's certainly true in many if not most cases.

On other hand, how is that any different than saying: "Candidate so-and-so says he likes 'liberty.' I like 'liberty' too. Therefore I'm going to vote for him."

That's precisely why the Patriot Act has the word "Patriot" in it.

And why Operation Iraqi Freedom had the word "freedom" in it.

And so on and so forth.

Liberals and conservatives alike are equally guilty of falling hook, line and sinker for this Bernaysian (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHRrqLSLTVQ) technique over and over again.

  Hey Geo, Check this out.  My notes from the X22 report.  Nothing like the word freedom to lull the people to sleep.  NOTE--LSD IS ME.
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=251808.msg1512629#new

THE PATRIOT ACT---WILL EXPIRE AUTOMATICALLY W/O RE-AUTHORIZATION OF CONGRESS.  THIS IS CAUSING PANIC ATTACK WITHIN THE HEART OF THE FBi/NSA AND THE LACKEY CONGRESSMEN.  US GOV/CENTRAL BANKERS NOW TRYING TO SNEAK IT INTO ANOTHER PIECE OF LEGISLATION WITHOUT ANYONE NOTICING.  THEY ARE GOING TO TRY TO SNEAK IT INTO THE US FREEDOM ACT.  THIS ACT IS BACK AND APPEARS TO BE THE VEHICLE TO REAUTHORIZE SEC 215 OF THE PATRIOT ACT.  THIS WOULD ALLOW THEM TO CONTINUE TO SPY ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.   LSD---LIKE THEY EVEN NEED THE LEGISLATION.   WHY THE SPYING?  TO TRACK EVERYONE.  TO BLACKMAIL JUDGES AND GOV OFFICIALS.  THE REVIVED US FREEDOM ACT WOULD EXTEND THE PROVISIONS OF THE PATRIOT ACT.  THEY HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS FOR 2 MONTHS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 21, 2015, 10:22:52 am

…. Uh uh!


Mrs. Clinton nodded and said “Un-huh” 88 times during
this stop on the New Hampshire stop on her “listening tour.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7Ut7OCttsc
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 21, 2015, 11:01:09 am
"I don't feel no ways tired." -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-H9BOIYhgc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-H9BOIYhgc)

That evil witch is shameless, no doubt about it.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 21, 2015, 11:32:59 am
"I don't feel no ways tired." -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-H9BOIYhgc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-H9BOIYhgc) That evil witch is shameless, no doubt about it.

The vampire campaign that cannot be stopped ...
(http://i888.photobucket.com/albums/ac82/funnyfoximages2/Hillary-Clinton-Vampire.jpg)

Reminds me of the picture that could not be stopped ..

(http://www.mygen.com/users/outlaw/images/The_Outlaw_poster.a.jpg) The Outlaw
Although the movie was completed in 1941, it was only released to a limited showing two years later (1943). It didn't see a general release until 1946
Title: Book says Hillary Clinton’s State Department did favors for foreign donors
Post by: Letsbereal on April 21, 2015, 12:04:44 pm
Book says Hillary Clinton’s State Department did favors for foreign donors
21 April 2015
, by Robert Schroeder - Washington (MarketWatch)
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/book-says-hillary-clintons-state-department-did-favors-for-foreign-donors-2015-04-20

The New York Times reports that a forthcoming book by author Peter Schweizer asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation, and to former President Bill Clinton through speaking fees, received favors from the State Department when Hillary Clinton was serving as secretary of state.
Title: Hookers for Hillary - Pimp says his girls will do anything they can to support H
Post by: Letsbereal on April 21, 2015, 12:07:50 pm
Hookers for Hillary - Pimp says his girls will do anything they can to support H.
20 April 2015
, by Kelli Serio (Infowars)
http://www.infowars.com/hookers-for-hillary/

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v393/youricarma/Miscellaneous/fotomontagefahndungsfoto17.jpg)
Title: Mainstream Media Presidential Campaign Coverage
Post by: Letsbereal on April 21, 2015, 04:35:17 pm
(http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2015/04/20150421_middle_0.jpg)

Source: Investors (http://www.investors.com/editorial-cartoons/michael-ramirez/748668-champion)
Title: Populist Drivel From Clinton H. - "Will Topple The Wealthiest 1%"
Post by: Letsbereal on April 21, 2015, 05:29:09 pm
"The Deck Is Stacked," Warns Populist Clinton, Will "Topple The Wealthiest 1%"
21 April 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-21/deck-stacked-warns-populist-clinton-will-topple-wealthiest-1

TOP CONTRIBUTORS:

(http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2015/04/clinton%20donors_0.jpg)

(http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2015/04/clinton%20donors%20geography_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jofortruth on April 21, 2015, 05:46:55 pm
Who needs to be toppled are the .000001 % of the top globalists and their shameful minions like Hillary, who do their bidding in exchange for wealth and power!

 ::)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 23, 2015, 01:12:59 pm


… ~~> CLINTON CA$H

I know, the book is not out yet … but a lot of details are being
leaked in advance. I find the story very convoluted thus far
and my fear is the Hillarysheep could care less. Anyway, NYT
and a few other rags are already hitting the story pretty hard …
truth is, they can't avoid it!

Let's let RUSHBO break it down a little bit:


RUSH: I GUESS THE NYT HAS ‘JOINED THE VAST, RIGHT-WING CONSPIRACY’
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/04/23/rush-i-guess-the-nyt-has-joined-the-vast-right-wing-conspiracy/
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on April 23, 2015, 01:37:33 pm
Hillary's Charities Suffer A "Geithner Moment", Will Refile 5 Years Of Taxes
23 April 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-23/hillarys-charities-suffer-geithner-moment-will-refile-5-years-taxes
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 23, 2015, 05:05:00 pm


  Nothing brings Hilldog down--Benghazi and the rest of this crap.  The Clintons have no remorse or shame for the things that they have done starting with the Arkancides.  They are 2 aging narcissists.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 23, 2015, 05:13:09 pm
Hillary's Charities Suffer A "Geithner Moment", Will Refile 5 Years Of Taxes
23 April 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-23/hillarys-charities-suffer-geithner-moment-will-refile-5-years-taxes

  I would bet BIG MONEY that the Clintons have a team of lawyers and accountants on this and they are not going to pay their FAIR SHARE BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY ARE NOT SCUM LIKE US.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on April 23, 2015, 10:16:53 pm
More Clinton Cronyism: Selling Uranium Interests To Russia While Hillary Was SecState
23 April 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-23/more-clinton-cronyism-selling-uranium-interests-russia-while-hillary-was-secstate


How Putin’s Russia Gained Control of a U.S. Uranium Mine
23 April 2015
, by William Kennedy and Andy Hoffman (Bloomberg)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-04-23/how-putin-s-russia-gained-control-of-a-u-s-uranium-mine
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 24, 2015, 10:36:42 am
Mecha-Hillary  Clinton clobbers ALL potential GOP foes ( like Mecha-Streisand )   
(http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2014/314/c/8/mecha_streisand_1997__warning__large_file__broh__by_lolwutburger-d85xi06.png)

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/22/politics/clinton-beats-republicans-wapo-abc-poll/
Poll: Clinton clobbers potential GOP foes
Jeremy Diamond, CNN
Updated 4:03 PM ET, Thu January 22, 2015

Washington (CNN)—Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton isn't just the prospective Democratic frontrunner -- she's favored over every top potential Republican candidate, according to a Washington Post/ABC News poll released Thursday.
...
(http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/mechahillary.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on April 24, 2015, 12:34:33 pm
 A sad fact is that many folks in America think Hillary is OK: when in reality she is a demon running rampant on earth!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 24, 2015, 02:42:31 pm
http://article.wn.com/view/2015/04/23/How_Putin_s_Russia_Gained_Control_of_a_US_Uranium_Mine/
(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/C7Tb--ISR_E/0.jpg) (http://www.mygen.com/images/Hillary_hammer_and_sickle.jpg) [ oh notice that in this photo .- we have the hammer and sickle PLUS the Fascia ( So cOMMIE plus fASCISM !!! ]

Since 2013, the nuclear energy arm of the Russian state has controlled 20 percent of America’s uranium production capacity. Rosatom’s acquisition of Toronto-based miner Uranium One Inc. made the Russian agency, which also builds nuclear...

"when it was never contemplated that at some point in the future the Russian government would become a major shareholder of Uranium One."

http://patriotsbillboard.org/exposing-hillary-clintons-ties-to-saul-alinsky-communist-doctrine/hillary-clinton-rules-for-radicals-600x349/
(http://www.mygen.com/images/hillary-clinton-rules-for-radicals-600x349.jpg)
hillary-clinton-rules-for-radicals

| - - -

back in 2009 :

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/12/giustra-clinton-kazakhstan-pf-ii-in_rl_0912croesus_inl.html

1/12/2009 @ 4:45PM 
Clinton Commits No Foul In Kazakhstan Uranium Deal

An article in The New York Times on Jan. 31, 2008, though carefully worded, seemingly implied that former President Bill Clinton used political influence in Kazakhstan to allow Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra, 51, to invest in what turned out to be a very profitable uranium venture in return for Giustra’s major donations to Clinton’s foundation. Other media outlets parroting the story in the wake of Hillary Clinton’s nomination as secretary of state have been less subtle, suggesting there was an outright quid pro quo.

The Times story is premised on the coincidence that Giustra and Clinton were both in Almaty, Kazakhstan, on Sept. 6, 2005, exactly the time when Giustra was pressing his case to invest in several uranium properties there. Clinton was in Kazakhstan to announce a Clinton Foundation agreement enabling the government to buy low-cost HIV drugs. The Times seems to suggest that Clinton’s appearance with Giustra, together with his public praise of the president of Kazakhstan, somehow helped Giustra with his uranium deals.
...

Indeed, Giustra’s contributions to Clinton’s charitable efforts have continued unabated. In 2007 Giustra, Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim Helú and Swedish mining magnate Lucas Lundin each pledged $100 million to the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative to promote social welfare projects in Latin America and Africa, where mining is an important industry. Giustra has also pledged 50% of his annual mining profits to that same program.
...
Both parties continue to insist Clinton had no role in helping Giustra seal the uranium mining deals–and Giustra blames the Times for the misleading talk of a quid pro quo that its story helped foster. Giustra says this could have been avoided, if not for some blunders in the Times story. Here are the ones that seem to have the most merit.

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/Secretary_Clinton_Accepts_the_Dostyk_from_Kazakhstan_Foreign_Minister_Saudabayev_(5388522395).jpg)

http://www.businessinsider.com/nyt-reporter-clinton-lied-about-meeting-2015-4
New York Times story claimed Bill Clinton tried to deny meeting linked to 'Clinton Cash' scandals

Colin Campbell and Hunter Walker
Apr. 23, 2015, 5:30 PM

A Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times reporter claims that former President Bill Clinton falsely denied hosting a meeting with Kazakh officials when she tried to write a story that involved his foundation several years ago.

Jo Becker, who works on the newspaper's investigative desk, said Clinton only confirmed the meeting took place after she informed him there were photographs.

Clinton's role in a deal that involved Kazakhstan, the Russian government, and a man who donated millions to the president's charitable foundation were detailed in a story Becker published on Thursday.
...
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/nyt-reporter-clinton-lied-about-meeting-2015-4#ixzz3YGBPSUil
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on April 25, 2015, 04:48:00 pm
Trump is an arrogate individual: but he is the guy that can put a pull against the flow: and he has the money to stop the flow from DC!

 MIX it Up and the political game, will run---put in Dr. Ben Carson and the Game is over!
Quote myself:

The political is OVER: all the Shills are nothing but pawns in the chess game!

Trump is an arrogant snot: but so are the rest of these DOPE heads in the race!

...TRUMP and DR. CARSON could win and turn the Nation back towards the TRUTH!

...America will never be brought back to the Truth by Politics!

...I do not VOTE anymore, because the system is a JOKE!

...But I would VOTE for Trump and Dr. Carson!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 26, 2015, 02:46:26 pm
Should there be a "Clinton Cash" Thread? Or rename this thread  Clinton Cash?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/04/26/stephanopoulos-floored-as-gingrich-bloomberg-editors-detail-seriousness-of-clinton-cash/
Stephanopoulos Floored as Gingrich, Bloomberg Editors Detail Seriousness of ‘Clinton Cash’
by Matthew Boyle26 Apr 2015Washington, DC
...

Gingrich dropped bombs on Stephanopoulos in his response, suggesting he thinks criminal charges—at least an investigation—could be on the way.

“Look, this isn’t a political problem—this is a historical problem,” Gingrich said.

“The Constitution of the United States says you cannot take money from foreign governments without explicit permission of the Congress. They wrote that in there because they knew the danger of corrupting our system by foreign money is enormous.

...

Commingling the family foundation, donations from foreign governments, increased speech fees and government actions,” Halperin said.

...

Gingrich piped up again.

“I think there’s a very simple case here—the Constitution says you can’t take this stuff, we have federal laws that say you can’t take this stuff,” Gingrich said. “If this was any person but Hillary Clinton, they’d be under indictment right now for a clearly straightforward problem.”
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 26, 2015, 05:07:41 pm
^^^^^^^^

  Maybe a new thread with a title something like---
           THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF THE CLINTONS THAT WOULD PUT ORDINARY AMERICANS IN PRISON

  THIS THREAD IS PRETTY LENGTHY----OVER 600 POSTS
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on April 26, 2015, 05:47:50 pm
I agree another thread ,it would make reading an objected view of the clintons easier
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on April 26, 2015, 05:50:54 pm
Lordy you could have 3 or 4 threads running on this mafia clan  ::)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 26, 2015, 05:54:16 pm


HILLDOG 2.0?   ;D
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on April 26, 2015, 06:11:10 pm
^^^^^^^^

  Maybe a new thread with a title something like---
           THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF THE CLINTONS THAT WOULD PUT ORDINARY AMERICANS IN PRISON

  THIS THREAD IS PRETTY LENGTHY----OVER 600 POSTS


Holy Moly laronstdoc that thread would have more posts than this one  ?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: decemberfellow on April 26, 2015, 11:29:34 pm
Quote myself:

The political is OVER: all the Shills are nothing but pawns in the chess game!

Trump is an arrogant snot: but so are the rest of these DOPE heads in the race!

...TRUMP and DR. CARSON could win and turn the Nation back towards the TRUTH!

...America will never be brought back to the Truth by Politics!

...I do not VOTE anymore, because the system is a JOKE!

...But I would VOTE for Trump and Dr. Carson!

I also would vote for Trump, but Dr. Carson NO WAY  main reason he supports forced vaccinations  ...
 
Quote
Ben Carson, a retired neurosurgeon and outspoken conservative, is the chairman of the board of a company called Vaccinogen, which is working to make a vaccine for colon cancer.

“I believe that Vaccinogen has developed the first truly personalized -- and potentially commercializable -- approach to combat cancer and that is why I’m joining the Board and accepting the role of Chairman,” Carson said in a 2013 statement.

He affirmed his belief in "safe" vaccinations on Monday night.

“Certain communicable diseases have been largely eradicated by immunization policies in this country and we should not allow those diseases to return by foregoing safe immunization programs, for philosophical, religious or other reasons when we have the means to eradicate them,”

How does Trump stand on the vaccines?   
Quote
Donald Trump, the perennial not-really-a-candidate, would like everyone to remember that "tiny children are not horses."


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/02/2016-candidates-child-vaccinations_n_6598186.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/02/2016-candidates-child-vaccinations_n_6598186.html)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on April 27, 2015, 06:51:59 am
Off topic abit  but seems we are talkimg about deluded women, is hockey mom moron sarah palin about to throw her bra in the ring anytime soon ?
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 27, 2015, 07:28:29 am



… trouble in the Hilldog Fund-raiser Department:

"
Mr. Cooper said he was writing a fundraising email to
 the roughly 10,000 people in his network when he realized
that his heart wasn’t in it. I was sitting there trying to draft
the email, and I just couldn’t do it,” he told The Washington Times.


Fleeing Hillary: Top Dem money man departs
because Clinton hasn’t answered ethics questions

N.Y. businessman Jon Cooper, enlisted for ‘HillStarters,’
decides against tapping donor network

By S.A. Miller - The Washington Times - Sunday, April 26, 2015

A top Democratic moneyman recruited by Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential campaign has put fundraising activities on hold, saying he can’t do it with a clear conscience because the former secretary of state has too many unanswered questions swirling around her.

New York businessman Jon Cooper, who Team Clinton enlisted for its elite corps of early fundraisers known as “HillStarters,” said that he decided not to tap his donor network for Mrs. Clinton because she hasn’t provided enough answers about foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation while she ran the State Department, her exclusive use of private email for official business as America’s top diplomat and her commitment to liberal priorities.

“I’m officially on the fence,” said Mr. Cooper, a bundler for President Obama’s campaigns who is active in Democratic politics in New York, which Mrs. Clinton represented in the U.S. Senate and where she has set up her campaign headquarters.

Quote
“I would have hoped there would have been a strong and forceful and complete and detailed response to the questions that were raised,” he said. “That’s a sign that they still need to do a bit of a better job in the top organizational structure of the campaign. They don’t really have complete answers to these questions.”

~> CONTINUE: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/26/hillary-clinton-foreign-donations-email-agenda-que/
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on April 27, 2015, 05:52:33 pm
This is a well documented video of the Clinton scandalls, this is on u tube if a monitor can bring it up..
I am at a loss, a mutt with computers and appreciate your help, the vid hits on about every angle.

Hillary the Scandals
 Hillary Scandals
21.471 visualizações
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on April 27, 2015, 06:14:05 pm
Hi chris to post a link ie you tube etc etc left click to highlight the page you are on (its at the top of your browser normaly left side) then right click and choose copy and then right click again and choose paste to add the link to your post. Hope that makes scense
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 27, 2015, 06:35:33 pm


Holy Moly laronstdoc that thread would have more posts than this one  ?

  Yes, in a few months it will be longer with 2 or 3 scandals a day.

  Yet morons will vote for her.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on April 27, 2015, 07:07:57 pm
Hi chris
Links to your post are I think
 
1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYKAzJcU-DA

2 Is the same as above in a differnt context

3 21.471 visualizações ? no idea
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on April 27, 2015, 10:00:38 pm
Hilldog claims it was just another simple mistake. Ya know, no big deal ..Cell phones Bengahiz, scandals, etc,  Hillary didit , so it has to be Ok  sh***t.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The acting chief executive of the Clinton Foundation says the global philanthropy is working quickly to remedy mistakes it made in how it disclosed donors, saying that its policies on transparency and contributions from foreign governments are "stronger than ever."
Title: Charting American Oligarchy: How The 0.01% Contributes 42% Of All Campaign Cash
Post by: Letsbereal on April 28, 2015, 02:22:09 am
Charting American Oligarchy: How The 0.01% Contributes 42% Of All Campaign Cash
27 April 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-27/charting-american-oligarchy-how-001-contributes-42-all-campaign-cash
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: decemberfellow on April 28, 2015, 07:54:46 am
With the country falling apart and the people still asleep ........ Obama in 16 ?   High possibility.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 28, 2015, 10:51:30 am
yes with the Nepal / Everest disaster and Baltimore blowing up ,,, no more questions about Billery ...

http://thefederalist.com/2015/04/27/in-2013-the-clinton-foundation-only-spent-10-percent-of-its-budget-on-charitable-grants/
In 2013, The Clinton Foundation Only Spent 10 Percent Of Its Budget On Charitable Grants
 
Hillary Clinton's non-profit spent more on office supplies and rent than it did on charitable grants
April 27, 2015 By Sean Davis

After a week of being attacked for shady bookkeeping and questionable expenditures, the Clinton Foundation is fighting back. In a tweet posted last week, the Clinton Foundation claimed that 88 percent of its expenditures went “directly to [the foundation’s] life-changing work.”

There’s only one problem: that claim is demonstrably false. And it is false not according to some partisan spin on the numbers, but because the organization’s own tax filings contradict the claim.
...
While some may claim that the Clinton Foundation does its charity by itself, rather than outsourcing to other organizations in the form of grants, there appears to be little evidence of that activity in 2013. In 2008, for example, the Clinton Foundation spent nearly $100 million purchasing and distributing medicine and working with its care partners. In 2009, the organization spent $126 million on pharmaceutical and care partner expenses. By 2011, those activities were virtually non-existent. The group spent nothing on pharmaceutical expenses and only $1.2 million on care partner expenses. In 2012 and 2013, the Clinton Foundation spent $0. In just a few short years, the Clinton’s primary philanthropic project transitioned from a massive player in global pharmaceutical distribution to a bloated travel agency and conference organizing business that just happened to be tax-exempt.

The Clinton Foundation announced last week that it would be refiling its tax returns for the last five years because it had improperly failed to disclose millions of dollars in donations from foreign sources while Hillary Clinton was serving as Secretary of State.
...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on April 28, 2015, 12:47:42 pm
http://www.vox.com/2015/4/28/8501643/Clinton-foundation-donors-State

  Think the corporations don't control the government?

181 Clinton Foundation donors who lobbied Hillary's State Department



Clinton Foundation donor   Gave between this much*   And this much*

Microsoft/Gates Foundation   $26,000,000   No limit reported
Walmart/Walton Foundation   $2,250,000   $10,500,000
Coca-Cola   $5,000,000   $10,000,000
State of Qatar and related entities   $1,375,000   $5,800,000
Goldman Sachs   $1,250,000   $5,500,000
Dow Chemical   $1,025,000   $5,050,000
Pfizer   $1,010,000   $5,025,000
Duke Energy Corporation   $1,002,000   $5,010,000
ExxonMobil   $1,001,000   $5,005,000
Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa   $1,000,000   $5,000,000
Hewlett-Packard   $1,000,000   $5,000,000
Nima Taghavi   $1,000,000   $5,000,000
NRG Energy   $1,000,000   $5,000,000
Open Society Institute   $1,000,000   $5,000,000
Procter & Gamble   $1,000,000   $5,000,000
Boeing   $1,000,000   $5,000,000
OCP   $1,000,000   $5,000,000
Nike   $512,000   $1,035,000
Google   $511,000   $1,030,000
Daimler   $510,000   $1,025,000
Monsanto   $501,250   $1,006,000
Arizona State University   $500,000   $1,000,000
Chevron   $500,000   $1,000,000
General Electric   $500,000   $1,000,000
Morgan Stanley   $360,000   $775,000
Intel   $252,000   $510,000
Noble Energy   $250,000   $500,000
Sony   $175,000   $400,000
AstraZeneca   $150,000   $350,000
Bloomberg and Bloomberg Philanthropies   $150,000   $350,000
Salesforce.com   $125,000   $300,000
Verizon   $118,000   $300,000
Yahoo   $125,000   $300,000
Lockheed Martin   $111,000   $280,000
Qualcomm   $103,000   $265,000
TIAA-CREF   $103,000   $265,000
JP Morgan   $102,000   $260,000
Accenture   $100,000   $250,000
American Cancer Society   $100,000   $250,000
Applied Materials   $100,000   $250,000
CH2M Hill   $100,000   $250,000
Corning   $100,000   $250,000
FedEx   $100,000   $250,000
Gap   $100,000   $250,000
Gilead   $100,000   $250,000
Hess Corporation   $100,000   $250,000
Humanity United   $100,000   $250,000
Hyundai   $100,000   $250,000
Int'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers   $100,000   $250,000
Johnson Controls   $100,000   $250,000
Lions Clubs International   $100,000   $250,000
Mylan   $100,000   $250,000
Pepsi   $100,000   $250,000
Sanofi-Aventis   $100,000   $250,000
Starwood Hotels   $100,000   $250,000
United States Pharmacopeial Convention   $100,000   $250,000
UPS   $100,000   $250,000
Washington University, St. Louis   $100,000   $250,000
Time Warner   $75,000   $150,000
Hunt Alternatives   $60,000   $125,000
Ericsson   $51,000   $105,000
Abbott Laboratories   $50,000   $100,000
Anadarko   $50,000   $100,000
BT Group   $50,000   $100,000
Discovery Communications   $50,000   $100,000
Earth Networks   $50,000   $100,000
Feed the Children   $50,000   $100,000
General Motors   $50,000   $100,000
Hilton   $50,000   $100,000
Marriott   $50,000   $100,000
NextEra Energy   $50,000   $100,000
NOUR USA   $50,000   $100,000
Novozymes   $50,000   $100,000
Oceana   $50,000   $100,000
Starbucks   $50,000   $100,000
Teck Resources   $50,000   $100,000
The American Institute of Architects   $50,000   $100,000
Nature Conservancy   $50,000   $100,000
Trilogy International Partners   $50,000   $100,000
Unilever   $50,000   $100,000
World Vision   $50,000   $100,000
S.C. Johnson & Son   $50,000   $100,000
Motorola   $35,000   $75,000
Enel   $35,000   $75,000
JCPenney   $27,000   $60,000
Target   $27,000   $60,000
Novartis   $26,000   $55,000
Prudential   $26,000   $55,000
3M   $25,000   $50,000
AAR   $25,000   $50,000
AFL-CIO   $25,000   $50,000
APCO Worldwide   $25,000   $50,000
AREVA   $25,000   $50,000
Bayer   $20,000   $50,000
Capstone Turbine   $25,000   $50,000
Cemex   $25,000   $50,000
CHF International   $25,000   $50,000
Eli Lilly   $25,000   $50,000
Georgetown University   $25,000   $50,000
HBO   $25,000   $50,000
Honeywell   $25,000   $50,000
Mars, Inc.   $25,000   $50,000
McGraw-Hill Financial   $25,000   $50,000
MWH Global   $25,000   $50,000
New Venture Fund   $25,000   $50,000
Partners HealthCare   $25,000   $50,000
Rotary Foundation   $25,000   $50,000
Shell   $25,000   $50,000
Special Olympics   $25,000   $50,000
Brink's   $25,000   $50,000
United Technologies Corporation   $25,000   $50,000
Viacom   $25,000   $50,000
Wildlife Conservation Society   $25,000   $50,000
Ze-gen   $25,000   $50,000
AT&T   $11,000   $30,000
BP   $11,000   $30,000
SAP America   $10,250   $26,000
Actavis   $10,000   $25,000
ALFA   $10,000   $25,000
American Iron and Steel Institute   $10,000   $25,000
Amgen   $10,000   $25,000
Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.   $10,000   $25,000
BHP Billiton Limited   $10,000   $25,000
Chesapeake Energy Corporation   $10,000   $25,000
ConocoPhillips   $10,000   $25,000
Danfoss   $10,000   $25,000
Delphi Financial Group   $10,000   $25,000
Digital Globe   $10,000   $25,000
Dow Corning   $10,000   $25,000
EMD Serono   $10,000   $25,000
Entertainment Software Association   $10,000   $25,000
Herbalife   $10,000   $25,000
Hermitage Capital Management   $10,000   $25,000
InnoVida Holdings   $10,000   $25,000
Levi Strauss & Co.   $10,000   $25,000
Life Technologies   $10,000   $25,000
Motion Picture Association of America   $10,000   $25,000
Nokia   $10,000   $25,000
Occidental Petroleum   $10,000   $25,000
Sesame Workshop   $10,000   $25,000
Siemens   $10,000   $25,000
SNCF   $10,000   $25,000
Symantec   $10,000   $25,000
Tamares Management   $10,000   $25,000
Telefonica International   $10,000   $25,000
Hershey   $10,000   $25,000
NASDAQ OMX Group   $10,000   $25,000
The Pew Charitable Trusts   $10,000   $25,000
TV Azteca, S.A. DE C.V.   $10,000   $25,000
US Chamber of Commerce   $10,000   $25,000
Whirlpool   $10,000   $25,000
Oneida Indian Nation   $10,000   $25,000
American Public Health Association   $5,000   $10,000
EOS Foundation   $5,000   $10,000
Florida International University   $5,000   $10,000
Girl Scouts of the USA   $5,000   $10,000
Gonzalo Tirado   $5,000   $10,000
NBC Universal   $5,000   $10,000
Santa Monica College   $5,000   $10,000
Sensis   $5,000   $10,000
Adobe Systems   $1,000   $5,000
Boston Scientific Corporation   $1,000   $5,000
Bristol-Myers Squibb   $1,000   $5,000
Cablevision Systems Corporation   $1,000   $5,000
Caterpillar   $1,000   $5,000
Chicanos Por La Causa   $1,000   $5,000
Deere & Company   $1,000   $5,000
Dell   $1,000   $5,000
Edison Electric Institute   $1,000   $5,000
Eligio Cedeno   $1,000   $5,000
Festo Corporation   $1,000   $5,000
George Mason University   $1,000   $5,000
Laborers Int'l Union of North America   $1,000   $5,000
Nestle   $1,000   $5,000
Northrop Grumman Corporation   $1,000   $5,000
American Legion   $1,000   $5,000
Association for Manufacturing Technology   $1,000   $5,000
Tohono O'odham Nation   $1,000   $5,000
Hara Software   $1,000   $5,000
Oracle (matching grant program)   $250   $1,000
Nova Southeastern University   $250   $1,000
* The Clinton Foundation reports contributions in ranges.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 28, 2015, 02:29:27 pm
Of the countless interviews Alex has done over the years, the one that would perhaps be most applicable to this thread is precisely the one that I cannot, for the life of me, find on youtube: his interview of Larry Nichols on February 7, 2008.

The first infowarrior to upload that interview to youtube and post a link to it here gets -- not one, not two -- but three cookies!

(http://ronikugler.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/cookie-monster-eating-cookies-874837460.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 28, 2015, 02:42:39 pm
Of the countless interviews Alex has done over the years, the one that would perhaps be most applicable to this thread is precisely the one that I cannot, for the life of me, find on youtube: his interview of Larry Nichols on February 7, 2008.

The first infowarrior to upload that interview to youtube and post a link to it here gets -- not one, not two -- but three cookies!


http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=19f_1202735740



Former CIA Lary Nichols: Exposes the Clintons 1 of 7



This is a MUST Listen! Listen to ALL parts. Remaining SIX parts available in the group, "Ring of Power" (see below for details).

 Alex Jones Larry Nichols 02/07/2008 1.7

 It's no secret that Larry Nichols has been credited with releasing the majority of the scandals about Bill Clinton during his terms as President. It was Larry and his role in the "Clinton Circle of Power" and "Clinton Chronicles" videos, in his book, "The Genie is out of the Bottle" and this website that kept the Clinton Administration off balance and prevented many of their socialist agendas from being enacted and destroying our Great Nation.

 As a Freedom Fighter for America, Larry through his unceasing dedication, hard hitting videos and never-ending appearances on talk radio shows throughout the nation, sometimes 24 hrs a day, even to this day, he is fighting to prevent the Clintons from achieving their ultimate goal of "Global Power." He is the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" Hillary Clinton whines about.

 Larry has been quoted as saying; "It is time for all Americans to renew their commitment to protect our country and the future of our children from the enemies of freedom and to preserve the American Way of Life. It is time once and for all to put God, country and family first in our lives and resist those that put political careers and personal agendas above the interests of the people and the Nation."

 LARRY IS BACK and his web site is ready to help you help Larry in his quest to keep America Free. This will be the most ambitious mission in his life. Fighting Bill Clinton, the mob and the political machine that protects the Clintons was tough. But getting between Hillary Clinton and her chance to be the President of the United States, a position that would make her the most powerful person in the world, more than ever before puts Larry in the eye of the storm. If you think it won't be dangerous just take a look at the list of people that have died mysterious deaths.

 Larry refuses to let us make any statements directly connecting these deaths to the Clintons without being able to prove them in a court of law, so you look at the list and come to your own conclusions. But ask yourself if you would do what Larry is doing? With his proven personal knowledge of Bill and Hillary and the information he has on them and his ability to get information out to the people in spite of the main stream media, Larry has earned the right of be called a Freedom Fighter for America. As history has proven Larry will fight, with or without our help, to stand against those that choose to destroy this Great Nation.

 Larry is the only person that has been saying that Hillary is actually running for the Presidency in 2004. He has been warning the country for months that she's running and "Nichols Notes" will show how you can understand the truth about her secret plans, as only Larry does. Remember, Larry was the one that told us that if Hillary ran for United States Senator in New York, that she would win. Conservative pundits told you that she didn't have a chance, especially since she wasn't even from New York. We believed the pundits and not Larry and she's now the junior Senator from New York and the third most powerful person in the country, if not the world. Even though Larry has proven time and time again that he knows the Clintons better than anyone else, many of us thought that he just couldn't be right. He was and we have learned another valuable lesson when it comes to the Clintons. don't bet against Larry.

 LarryNichols.com is dedicated in their attempt to help Larry fight for America and to let him know that he is not alone in his efforts as a Freedom Fighter and True Patriot of America. After all, his battle is for all of us and the future of our children and grandchildren. It should be considered an honor to join in the fight to save America and become a Freedom Fighter alongside Larry. Join the battle and become a Freedom Fighter for America and while you're at it sign up for "Nichols Notes" to stay informed with up to the minute intel and the latest battle plans for the last battle for America.

 Larry said "Hillary is running for President in 2004" and reading "Nichols Notes" is your best way to understand why and how it is happening. Get "Nichols Notes" so that you can hear from Larry every week, even if you can't hear him on the radio or miss his appearances on television.

 LarryNichols.com, dedicated to keeping you updated in the battle to save our Nation.

 The Remaining SIX parts will be available in the Group, "Ring of Power"., Join it!

http://www.liveleak.com/group/Ring_of_Power

Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=19f_1202735740#bMZQCxMU6hvhOocP.99
Title: Government Watchdog Calls The Clinton Foundation "A Slush Fund"
Post by: Letsbereal on April 29, 2015, 01:05:51 am
Government Watchdog Calls The Clinton Foundation "A Slush Fund"
28 April 2015
, by Mike Krieger (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-28/government-watchdog-calls-clinton-foundation-slush-fund
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on April 30, 2015, 12:38:50 pm
Hillary Clinton Foundation Contributers
(http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/130902143959-saudi-arabia-domestic-violence-story-top.jpg)

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-state-department-documents-reveal-concern-about-bill-clintons-activities-with-saudi-entities/
Judicial Watch: State Department Documents Reveal Concern about Bill Clinton’s Activities with ‘Saudi Entities’
APRIL 23, 2015

Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced that it has received 126 pages of documents from the State Department related to Hillary Clinton’s possible conflicts of interest regarding her position as Secretary of State. The initial Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request was placed on May 2, 2011. These documents are being released as a result of a federal court order in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the State Department on May 28, 2013 (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-00772)).

Judicial Watch also disclosed that the State Department turned over nearly 1,000 records to the Clinton Foundation, beginning in January 2014, for review prior to public release.

The lawsuit is ongoing and had previously forced the disclosure of documents that provided a road map for over 200 conflict-of-interest rulings that led to $48 million for the Clinton Foundation and other Clinton-connected entities during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state. Previously disclosed documents in this lawsuit, for example, raise questions about funds Clinton accepted from entities linked to Saudi Arabia, China and Iran, among others.

The latest group of documents shows that State Department officials had concerns in January 2011 about Bill Clinton’s activities related to Saudi Arabia. An email chain, begun on January 25, 2011, includes several members of the State Department’s Legal Advisor Office, and the subject line “Clinton Foundation Request – Saudi entities.” The discussion is almost entirely redacted in the three-page email chain.

Other documents previously forced out through this lawsuit show that Bill Clinton worked with Tanmiah Commercial Group, a Saudi group based in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, that paid Clinton $300,000. The Clinton Foundation told the State Department he would participate in the 2011 Global Competiveness Forum, a five-day event in Riyadh. The event was co-sponsored by the Dabbagh Group Holding Co., which “comprises 28 autonomous companies, operating in diversified businesses in 30 countries. Mohammed Husnee Jazeel currently serves as Dabbagh Group’s CFO.” The Clinton Foundation described the event as:

[A]n annual meeting of global business leaders, international political leaders and selected academics and journalists. It was founded in 2006 by the Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority (SAGIA) and is held under the patronage of King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz.

Established in 2000, the SAGIA encourages investment in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and provides licensing and support services to investors.

The “ticketed event” targeted “the Saudi Arabian business community.”

...

(http://www.africametro.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/king-abdullah.jpg)
King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz.


Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on April 30, 2015, 06:29:39 pm
Clinton Foundation admits mistakes in tax forms

Dylan Stableford   
Dylan Stableford
Senior editor
April 26, 2015

Clinton Foundation admits mistakes in tax forms ____(Were forced to admit mistakes)..
Bill and Hillary Clinton embrace at the 2014 Clinton Global Initiative in New York. (Photo: Shannon Stapleton/Reuters)

The Clinton Foundation admitted Sunday it made some “mistakes” in its tax forms and is “acting quickly to remedy them.”

In a lengthy statement posted to the foundation’s website, Maura Pally, the foundation’s acting CEO, sought to address questions that arose late last week after the organization said it would refile its taxes.
                     " Cover em up"
“We have said that after a voluntary external review is completed, we will likely refile forms for some years,” Pally wrote. “While some have suggested that this indicates a failure to accurately report our total revenue, that is not the case. Our total revenue was accurately reported on each year’s form — our error was that government grants were mistakenly combined with other donations.”

Those grants, Pally wrote, “have always been properly listed and broken out and available for anyone to see on our audited financial statements, posted on our website.”
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on April 30, 2015, 07:56:11 pm


(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/pr_b7110.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/pr_b7110.jpg.html)
Hillary & Yulia

The Ukraine NAZIs, as we know, are big contributors to
the Clinton Foundation (Shake-down). Here we have
Her Holinesses enjoying each other's company.


Speaking to a colleague on a monitored phone call, former Ukrainian
puppet-Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko screamed:


"

It’s about time we grab our guns and go kill those damn Russians
together with their leader, (Putin) I'm ready to grab a machine gun
and shoot that motherf----r in the head!"


… sounds like Clinton's kind of woman!

http://tomatobubble.com/id636.html
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on May 01, 2015, 11:42:40 am
  I have never been to a freak show, I allways considered folks with physical deformaties their humanity rather than their appearence..
  These 2 true freaks make my hair stand on end, they speak of war and killing as if its zits killing zits, strictly a passtime for those in control.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on May 02, 2015, 09:48:42 am

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/pr_b7110.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/pr_b7110.jpg.html)
Hillary & Yulia

The Ukraine NAZIs, as we know, are big contributors to
the Clinton Foundation (Shake-down). Here we have
Her Holinesses enjoying each other's company.


Speaking to a colleague on a monitored phone call, former Ukrainian
puppet-Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko screamed:


"

It’s about time we grab our guns and go kill those damn Russians
together with their leader, (Putin) I'm ready to grab a machine gun
and shoot that motherf----r in the head!"


… sounds like Clinton's kind of woman!

http://tomatobubble.com/id636.html

  Yes, the State Dept---Hillary being the former DEAR LEADER OF THE STATE DEPT---gives money to Ukraine and then they give money back to Hillary.  What a country!!!!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Dude447 on May 02, 2015, 06:43:42 pm
Just looking at that photo sends a cold chill down my spine  >:(
Title: Bernie Sanders signals aggressive challenge to Hillary Clinton
Post by: Sasha on May 03, 2015, 11:22:21 am
^^^Hillary's blue-Mao-suit is so apropos.

Bernie Sanders signals aggressive challenge to Hillary Clinton
Greg Sargent - May 1

This afternoon, I got a chance to interview Senator Bernie Sanders, the self-avowed socialist from Vermont, who has announced he is entering the Democratic presidential primary.

Sanders confirmed to me that his campaign has raised $1.5 million in the 24 hours since yesterday’s launch, with an average donation of $43.

Sanders also laid down a hard marker against Hillary Clinton, saying flatly that her ties to Wall Street should raise concerns about whether she is willing to stand up to Wall Street’s “incredible wealth and power.”

Sanders also said the eventual Democratic candidate should embrace a robust climate change agenda that goes considerably farther than the policies President Obama has embraced. A lightly edited and condensed transcript of our conversation follows.

continues... (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/05/01/bernie-sanders-signals-aggressive-challenge-to-hillary-clinton/)

related:
Bernie Sanders Has Already Taken More Press Questions Than Hillary Clinton
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/04/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-democrat-2016-press-questions

Hillary Clinton Expected to Treat Bernie Sanders Gingerly
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/04/30/hillary-clinton-expected-to-treat-bernie-sanders-gingerly/?_r=0

Why Hillary’s Alinsky Letters Matter
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/388560/why-hillarys-alinsky-letters-matter-stanley-kurtz
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on May 05, 2015, 03:17:27 pm
The Clintons have "bills to pay" to the NWO ... Yes WE KNOW

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bill-clinton-defends-speaking-fees-i-gotta-pay-our-bills-2015-05-04
Bill Clinton defends speaking fees: ‘I gotta pay our bills’
Published: May 4, 2015 11:27 a.m.
...
Former President Bill Clinton says his charity has never done anything “knowingly inappropriate” and that he won’t stop giving high-priced speeches because “I gotta pay our bills.”
...

(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/05/Stench-of-Corruption-420x315.jpg)
Title: Hillary Clinton to back a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants
Post by: Letsbereal on May 06, 2015, 09:39:52 am
Hillary Clinton to back a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants
5 May 2015
, by Robert Schroeder - Washington (MarketWatch)
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/hillary-clinton-to-back-a-path-to-citizenship-for-undocumented-immigrants-2015-05-05

Hillary Clinton will back a “full and equal path to citizenship” for undocumented immigrants now in the U.S. during a campaign stop in Nevada on Tuesday.
Title: Reporter Grills State Department Why Hillary's Breaches Won't Be Investigated
Post by: Letsbereal on May 09, 2015, 08:47:40 am
Caught On Tape: Stunned Reporter Grills State Department Why Hillary's Breaches Won't Be Investigated
8 May 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-08/caught-tape-stunned-reporter-grills-state-department-why-hillarys-breaches-wont-be-i
Title: Nomi Prins: The Clintons & Their Banker Friends
Post by: Letsbereal on May 09, 2015, 08:52:12 am
Nomi Prins: The Clintons & Their Banker Friends
8 May 2015
, by Nomi Prins (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-08/nomi-prins-clintons-their-banker-friends
Title: Hillary 2016 Cartoon
Post by: Letsbereal on May 09, 2015, 04:47:30 pm
(http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2015/05/20150509_hill_0.jpg)

Source (http://www.investors.com/editorial-cartoons/michael-ramirez/751890)
Title: Re: Reporter Grills State Department Why Hillary's Breaches Won't Be Investigated
Post by: chris jones on May 09, 2015, 07:25:50 pm
Caught On Tape: Stunned Reporter Grills State Department Why Hillary's Breaches Won't Be Investigated
8 May 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-08/caught-tape-stunned-reporter-grills-state-department-why-hillarys-breaches-wont-be-i
   The State Dept is scared Sh**tless to take on the Clintons, this guy was absolutely terrified being grilled by Matt about Hillys charitable foundation. They (clintons)must have a long list of suklings within the system with too much to loose. Ya know, if we come down so do hundreds of others have the sins exposed if they rat out the criminal cabral.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on May 10, 2015, 08:07:01 am


… uh oh! A high profile woman
spills the beans … catfight on the horizon?


YOKO ONO: “I HAD AN AFFAIR WITH
HILLARY CLINTON IN THE ’70S”

May 8th, 2015 | by Bob Flanagan

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/yoko-ono.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/yoko-ono.jpg.html)

Los Angeles | Yoko Ono shocked reporters yesterday when she responded
to a question concerning the presidential run of Hillary Clinton and the
possibility that she could become the first woman President of the
United States in American history.



We had a brief romantic fling when I lived with John in Manhattan
and Hillary was studying at Yale, but eventually we lost touch.
I am amazed how things are going well for her and wish her
the best for her campaign.”


~> CONTIMUE: http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/yoko-ono-i-had-an-affair-with-hillary-clinton-in-the-70s/
Title: Re: Reporter Grills State Department Why Hillary's Breaches Won't Be Investigated
Post by: TahoeBlue on May 10, 2015, 10:10:38 am
   The State Dept is scared Sh**tless to take on the Clintons, this guy was absolutely terrified being grilled by Matt about Hillys charitable foundation. They (clintons)must have a long list of suklings within the system with too much to loose. Ya know, if we come down so do hundreds of others have the sins exposed if they rat out the criminal cabral.


wow ---- even if you catch the fish, you still don't catch the fish ... maybe that fish stinks too bad ...

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-FdKgNLDIk&feature=youtu.be

(http://img.thesun.co.uk/aidemitlum/archive/00927/whopper-fish_682_927359a.jpg)
Title: Re: Nomi Prins: The Clintons & Their Banker Friends
Post by: larsonstdoc on May 10, 2015, 10:40:05 am
Nomi Prins: The Clintons & Their Banker Friends
8 May 2015
, by Nomi Prins (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-08/nomi-prins-clintons-their-banker-friends

  from the article...THE BIG SIX WOULD WELCOME HILLDOG

To grasp the dangers that the Big Six banks (JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley) presently pose to the financial stability of our nation and the world, you need to understand their history in Washington, starting with the Clinton years of the 1990s. Alliances established then (not exclusively with Democrats, since bankers are bipartisan by nature) enabled these firms to become as politically powerful as they are today and to exert that power over an unprecedented amount of capital. Rest assured of one thing: their past and present CEOs will prove as critical in backing a Hillary Clinton presidency as they were in enabling her husband’s years in office.

In return, today’s titans of finance and their hordes of lobbyists, more than half of whom held prior positions in the government, exact certain requirements from Washington. They need to know that a safety net or bailout will always be available in times of emergency and that the regulatory road will be open to whatever practices they deem most profitable.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on May 11, 2015, 06:01:56 pm
If Clinton is elected, family foundation could face changes
Associated Press By JULIE PACE
5 hours ago

 FILE - In this Dec. 3, 2014, file photo former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks in Gaston Hall at Georgetown University in Washington as part of the launch of the inaugural National Action Plan Academy, a joint initiative of the Georgetown Institute for Women, Peace and Security, The Institute for Inclusive Security and the No Ceilings initiative of the Clinton Foundation. The charitable foundation run by Clinton’s family faces an uncertain future if she is elected president, with unresolved questions about who would be authorized to fundraise for the organization and whether new foreign and domestic projects could be started during that period.  (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File)
.
View gallery
 
.
 
.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Hillary Rodham Clinton's family foundation, already the subject of intense scrutiny in the early days of her White House campaign, faces an uncertain future if she is elected president.

Related Stories

Bill Clinton: Foundation has done nothing wrong Associated Press
Clinton Foundation Admits Mistakes On Tax Filings Huffington Post
Bill Clinton defends charity, says won't give up paid speeches Reuters
Clinton fundraisers show scope of family network Associated Press
Chelsea Clinton Defends Family’s Foundation Against 'Clinton Cash' Book Allegations ABC News
Among the unresolved questions: Who would be able to raise money for the Clinton Foundation? Could it begin new projects, both at home and overseas? Is there any way it could operate unburdened by conflicts of interest, real or perceived, while one of its founders sits in the Oval Office?

"I'm not sure the rules have been invented to apply to this situation," said Diana Aviv, president of Independent Sector, a network of nonprofits, foundations and corporate giving programs.

While Clinton stepped down from the foundation's board after launching her 2016 campaign, husband Bill and daughter Chelsea still hold leadership roles. They currently have no plans to stop their fundraising and management activities, nor is there a blueprint for their involvement if Hillary Clinton wins the election, people close to the foundation said.

Options being considered include Chelsea Clinton taking the helm, with her father playing a more behind-the-scenes role; fully banning the acceptance of donations from abroad; and implementing a more rigorous vetting process for domestic donors.

Neither the foundation nor Clinton's campaign will pledge publicly to give voters answers about the organization's future before the November 2016 election, but some people close to the Clintons want decisions made before then.

View galleryFILE - In this May 6, 2015, photo, former U.S President …
FILE - In this May 6, 2015, photo, former U.S President Bill Clinton speaks during a plenary session …
The people close to the Clintons and the foundation spoke on condition of anonymity, because they were not authorized to speak publicly about internal planning.

Campaign officials are also pushing the Clinton Foundation to be more aggressive in answering the criticism of its high-dollar fundraising. The organization has raised more than $2 billion since former President Bill Clinton left office, money it uses to run 11 initiatives focused on global health, climate change, economic development, wellness and opportunities for women and girls.

That aggressive fundraising is currently the subject of intense scrutiny, as Republicans and others look for potential conflicts of interests and signs that donors to the foundation sought to influence the Obama administration during Hillary Clinton's four years as secretary of state.

The Clintons deny any improprieties. But the former president has started to hint that if his wife wins the White House, he may have to step down from the organization to avoid blurring the lines between U.S. government policy and the interests of donors.

"I might if I were asked to do something in the public interest that I had an obligation to do. Or I might take less of an executive role," Clinton said in a recent interview with NBC News. "But we'll cross that bridge when we come to it."

View galleryFILE - In this Oct. 28, 2006 file photo, then-Sen. …
FILE - In this Oct. 28, 2006 file photo, then-Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., speaks at a benef …
Some people close to the Clintons and the foundation say it's unlikely the former president could continue directly raising money if his wife wins election. But they say that could be a difficult realization for him to come to, given how much of his post-White House legacy is linked to the foundation's work.

"The challenge isn't necessarily the organization surviving the founders — it's the founders letting go of the organization," said Steven Lawrence, the research director at the Foundation Center, which collects data on philanthropic organizations.

There is far less certainty about the role Chelsea Clinton might play in the foundation's future. The 35-year-old has taken on a more direct role in recent years and is an obvious choice to take over. But despite being well-liked by donors, some question whether she would be able to raise the same level of money as her popular father.

Clinton Foundation officials have discussed how to sustain the organization financially if the former president can no longer directly raise money. The conversations with donors and others have focused not just on the prospect of Hillary Clinton becoming president, but also the possibility that Bill Clinton's health leaves him unable to keep up his role as chief fundraiser.

A drive launched in 2013 has endowed a $250 million fund to help keep programs running under those circumstances.

Donna Shalala, the former Health and Human Services secretary and University of Miami president who takes over as the foundation's chief executive next month, is expected to do her own accounting of its activities. Her appointment is seen as a signal to donors that there would be continuity in leadership if the Clinton family becomes less involved.

The foundation is also weighing whether new projects, both in the U.S. and abroad, could start during a Clinton presidency, or whether worry about potential conflicts of interest would limit it to its existing work. While the foundation says there were no conflicts during Clinton's years as the nation's chief diplomat, the potential for such conflicts is far greater should she become president.

The foundation has already agreed to stop taking money from most foreign governments during her campaign, with exceptions for six Western nations.

Campaign officials suggested additional changes are not imminent. Spokesman Brian Fallon said that for now, Clinton is "proud of the foundation's work and glad that her husband and daughter continue to lead its day-to-day mission."

___

Follow Julie Pace on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/jpaceDC
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Sasha on May 14, 2015, 10:11:34 am
Stephanopoulos Apologizes for Not Disclosing $50K Donation to Clinton Foundation (http://www.mediaite.com/tv/stephanopoulos-apologizes-for-not-disclosing-50k-donation-to-clinton-foundation/)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CE-aXjEUIAI0Ftq.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on May 15, 2015, 08:41:07 pm
 If The Old Hag Hillary became President?

I believe GOD would END The Universe  ;D

Cold chance in Hell that either comes true  ;)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on May 17, 2015, 05:16:30 pm
Clintons received more than $25 million from speeches since January 2014
16 May 2015
, by Peter Nicholas and Rebecca Ballhaus - Washington (MarketWatch)
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/clintons-received-more-than-25-million-from-speeches-since-january-2014-2015-05-16

Hillary and Bill Clinton earned more than $30 million in the past 16 months, with $25 million coming from the delivery of 104 paid speeches and more than $5 million coming from Mrs. Clinton’s book, “Hard Choices.”
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on May 17, 2015, 05:22:04 pm


… the makers of this button / bumper sticker
were forced to cease & desist by the Hilldog
camp … but it IS pretty cool.   ::)

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/hillary_pop_button-285x283.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/hillary_pop_button-285x283.jpg.html)

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on May 18, 2015, 06:07:27 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/paul-benghazi-should-forever-preclude-hillary-from-presidency.html

Rand Paul: Benghazi should ‘forever preclude’ Hillary from presidency

Elliot Smilowitz
The Hill
May 17, 2015

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) charged hard after Hillary Clinton on Saturday, saying her responsibility for the 2012 Benghazi, Libya, attacks shows she should never be president.
“I think that Hillary Clinton’s failure to defend our ambassador should forever preclude her from that office,” Paul said at the Iowa Republican Party’s Lincoln Dinner on Saturday.
He accused Clinton, at the time the secretary of State, of failing to adequately protect U.S. Embassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other Americans who died in the 2012 attacks.
“The one thing you have to do as Commander in Chief is defend America and its interest,” Paul said.
He further said Clinton was to blame for Libya becoming what he called a “failed state.”
“Gadhafi is gone, but what’s left?”

Both Paul and Clinton are running for their respective parties’ nominations for the White House in 2016.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on May 18, 2015, 07:38:07 pm
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/05/18/newly-released-documents-indicate-key-hillary-clinton-claim-on-emails-was-not-true/

  More lies from the Hilldog....

Newly Released Documents Indicate Key Hillary Clinton Claim on Emails Was Not True



Emails published by the New York Times Monday indicate that Hillary Clinton used more than one private email address during her time as secretary of state, contradicting previous claims from the Democratic presidential contender’s office.

Multiple emails show Clinton used account “hrod17@clintonemail.com” while serving in the Obama administration as secretary of state.

Clinton’s attorney, David Kendall, had previously told Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) that that particular address had not “existed during Secretary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State.”

Another statement from Clinton’s office said she only used one address during her time as secretary of state.

“Secretary Clinton used one email account during her tenure at State (with the exception of her first weeks in office while transitioning from an email account she had previously used),” it said. “In March 2013, Gawker published the email address she used while Secretary, and so she had to change the address on her account.”

Clinton served as secretary of state from Jan. 2009 to Feb. 2013. The emails she sent with the “hrod17@clintonemail.com” were sent in 2011 and 2012, according to the documents released by the Times.


Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on May 19, 2015, 11:30:22 am
drudgereport.com:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/05/18/newly-released-documents-indicate-key-hillary-clinton-claim-on-emails-was-not-true/
HROD17@CLINTONEMAIL.COM
Newly Released Documents Indicate Key Hillary Clinton Claim on Emails Was Not True
 May. 18, 2015 6:57pm     Oliver Darcy   


Clinton hides from reporters...
 Security forces race across Iowa at 95 MPH to dodge pursuing journalists...
Worst Day of Campaign...
'3-5 business days': Response time for media requests...
VIDEO: Clinton Shuts Down Reporter Trying to Ask Question...
NYT: Hillary circulated Sid Blumenthal 'intelligence' memos...
 Paid by Foundation, MEDIA MATTERS...
Role Blurs Lines of Politics and Business...
House committee may subpoena...
VIDEO: VOTERS LOVE HER, NO MATTER WHAT...
UPDATE: Judge orders 'rolling' release of Clinton State Dept emails...
PRUDEN: Dems panic...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on May 19, 2015, 12:16:45 pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3087141/Hillary-hides-reporters-SECOND-secret-Iowa-party-day-security-forces-race-Hawkeye-State-95-MPH-dodge-pursuing-journalists.html

  HILLARY BETTER HOPE SHE'S NOT RIDING ON CHINESE TIRES.


EXCLUSIVE: Hillary hides from reporters with SECOND secret party of the day as her security forces race across Iowa at 95 MPH to dodge pursuing journalists

Afternoon campaign event in Mason City, Iowa was closed to the press but published on media schedules

The very existence of a second private soiree on Monday, a dinnertime party 85 miles away in Waterloo, Iowa, was kept from reporters

Not even the press 'pool' assigned to share coverage on a rotating basis knew the 6:30 pm house party was going on

Daily Mail Online found the location after following Hillary's new maroon 'Scooby' van at a distance while it raced at speeds up to 95 mph

Asked for comment, Clinton campaign responded with automated form letter warning that it could take '3-5 business days for a response'
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on May 20, 2015, 08:44:08 am
http://www.naturalnews.com/049755_Bride_of_Frankenfood_Hillary_Clinton_Monsanto.html#ixzz3agCglVvO

Bride of Frankenfood: Hillary Clinton pushes GMO agenda... hires Monsanto lobbyist... takes huge dollars from Monsanto

(NaturalNews) Democrats who had been programmed to blindly vote for Hillary Clinton are picking their jaws up off the floor after learning the truth about Hillary's ties to Monsanto. The ties run so deep that she's now being dubbed the "Bride of Frankenfood."

Shockingly, Hillary Clinton's ties to Monsanto are new information to her liberal support base. It drives home the important point that nearly everyone supporting Hillary Clinton has no idea who she really is, as evidenced by this stunning new video from Mark Dice and Luke Rudkowski.

"Hillary Rodham Clinton's ties to agribusiness giant Monsanto, and her advocacy for the industry's genetically modified crops, have environmentalists in Iowa calling her 'Bride of Frankenfood'" reports the Washington Times. "A large faction of women voiced strong support for Mrs. Clinton's candidacy until the GMO issue came up, prompting them to switch allegiances to Sen. Bernard Sanders of Vermont, a liberal stalwart challenging her for the Democratic nomination."

(http://www.naturalnews.com/images/Hillary-Clinton-Bride-of-Frankenfoods.jpg)
(http://www.naturalnews.com/images/Hillary-Clinton-Monsanto-2016.jpg)
(http://www.naturalnews.com/images/Clinton-Monstanto-2016-Button-400.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on May 20, 2015, 08:53:30 am
^^^^^^^^

  MORE HEADLINES AND EXCEPTS FROM THE SAME ARTICLE....

Monsanto and Bill Gates are top donors to the Clinton Family Foundation

Hillary Clinton hires former Monsanto lobbyist to run her campaign

Hillary Clinton's law firm used to have Monsanto as a client

Hillary Clinton pushes toxic pesticides, herbicides and other agricultural chemicals

Hillary Clinton hands nuclear fuel resource deal to Russia

Hillary Clinton parrots Monsanto's talking points as speaker for the Biotechnology Industry Organization

What you can expect from a Clinton / Monsanto presidency

There are so many ties between Clinton and Monsanto that the evil biotech corporation is practically Hillary's running mate.

Clinton / Monsanto for President, 2016!

And if Clinton becomes president, you can expect the full Monsanto agenda to be aggressively pushed as national policy:

• A nationwide federal ban on GMO labeling.

• Immediate USDA approval of all experimental GMO crops.

• Extreme, politically motivated attacks against all anti-GMO activists, scientists and journalists.

• Huge increases in taxpayer-funded subsidies for farmers who grow GMO crops.

• Aggressive corporate imperialism push to overturn bans on glyphosate and GMOs by other nations.

• Possibly even attempts by the FDA to outlaw non-GMO Project Verified labels in the same way they attacked hormone-free labels for cow's milk.

Make no mistake: A vote for Hillary is a vote for Monsanto.

Will anybody stand up and challenge the Bride of Frankenfood?

What you can expect from a Clinton / Monsanto presidency
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on May 20, 2015, 08:57:49 am
 Monsanto should have been disbanded and criminally charged after agent orange was proven to be life threatening and long lasting results- Vietnam -along with the DOD & pols who opted for it.  They made a bundle $$ and continue to. A tentacle for the elites.
  I have AO, just enough to deteriorate my inards, slow kill. Many have it far werse.
MONSANTO- death, killing us softly.
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on May 20, 2015, 12:51:58 pm
waybackmachine is rolling ....

(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NsdOVxevnBg/0.jpg)

http://www.catholicvote.org/hillary-clinton-to-receive-margaret-sanger-award-from-planned-parenthood/

Hillary Clinton to receive Margaret Sanger Award from Planned Parenthood

By CatholicVote

Honestly, I can think of few things more offensive than a “Margaret Sanger Award”.
...
The 2009 Planned Parenthood Federation of America (Prison Planet ForumA) Margaret Sanger Award, the organization?s highest honor, will be presented to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has been a champion of women's health and rights throughout her public service career,” according to the release.
...

| - - - -

http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/04/sec_clinton_stands_by_her_prai.asp
Sec. Clinton Stands By Her Praise of Eugenicist Margaret Sanger
1:25 PM, Apr 15, 2009 • By KEVIN VANCE

Last month, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton accepted Planned Parenthood's Margaret Sanger Award,
named after the founder of the American Birth Control League, which changed its name to Planned Parenthood in the 1940s.

In her remarks, Clinton singled out the namesake of the award for praise:

Now, I have to tell you that it was a great privilege when I was told that I would receive this award. I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision ... And when I think about what she did all those years ago in Brooklyn, taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all directions, I am really in awe of her.

Clinton lamented that "Margaret Sanger's work here in the United States and certainly across our globe is not done."

...

| - - - -

[ gee Hillary:  I love having blood on my hands .... baby blood ... }
http://www.lifenews.com/2014/09/23/hillary-clinton-i-admire-planned-parenthood-founder-margaret-sanger/
Hillary Clinton: I Admire Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger
Steven Ertelt   Sep 23, 2014   |   6:02PM    Washington, DC

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, an abortion advocate, is expected to seriously consider her own presidential bid in 2016. For most Democrats, according to polls that have been taken throughout the year, Hillary is the number one choice to replace pro-abortion President Barack Obama.

Obama has a laundry list of actions he’s taken as president to promote abortion on demand paid for at taxpayer expense.

Clinton would continue that pro-abortion legacy and the abortion advocacy of her husband, pro-abortion ex-President Bill Clinton
...
https://youtu.be/0u47dmqiblI
Fortenberry Dialogues with Secretary Clinton
...
https://youtu.be/r4o4WizW2mQ
Hillary Clinton Honors Margaret Sanger at the 2009 Planned Parenthood Honors Gala
...

In her role as Secretary of State Clinton pressed for abortion on an international scale. As recently as June 2012, she was upset the document the United Nations adopted at its Rio+20 conference did not promote abortion by inserting terms like “reproductive rights” into he language of the text.

| - - -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IvPhKuDPGM
PJTV -- Forgotten Newsreel History: Margaret Sanger Declaring 'No More Babies'
Margaret Sanger arguing for a moratorium on human births

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsrOPDdbTzM
VERY REVEALING Margaret Sanger Interview MUST SEE ! PLANNED PARENTHOOD
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Stan on May 20, 2015, 07:11:53 pm
I noticed a friend post this attack piece, likely in an attempt to clear their conscience when they eventually vote for Hillary. The whole purpose of this article, it seems. The Rand Paul stuff was out of date even before it became out of date again recently, and Alex apparently came up with the whole reptoid stuff. The rest is the usual blah. Part self inflicted in a way but mostly things not shown in a wider context or properly researched.

The basic message though is that Hillary is great and wholesome because 'look at those Republicans'. Tribalists are such easy fodder.

Alex Jones Is Actually Dangerous: Why We Have to Start Taking his Paranoid Worldview Seriously
http://www.alternet.org/media/alex-jones-actually-dangerous-why-we-have-start-taking-his-paranoid-worldview-seriously

Quote
The salient question is this: how far will it go? How deeply into the mainstream will Jones’ popularity bleed? It’s difficult to know, but considering how Hillary Clinton is widely favored to win in 2016 and given how the Clintons tend to attract conspiracy theories like moths to a flame, it’s a easy to foresee a further entrenching of Jones’ theories within an opposition Republican Party, carrying with it all of that terrible baggage. And then it’ll be unavoidable.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on May 22, 2015, 06:50:41 am
http://therightscoop.com/feminists-brains-are-imploding-all-over-the-internet-at-this-epic-gavin-mcinness-performance/

  Feminists don't know what to say when they learn that Hillary pays her women help 72% of what she pays man help.
  VIDEO AT THE LINK....

 

FEMINISTS’ BRAINS ARE IMPLODING ALL OVER THE INTERNET AT THIS EPIC GAVIN MCINNES PERFORMANCE
So truth-telling beard-wearer Gavin McInnes went on Sean Hannity’s show last night and slapped down feminism with some seriously uncomfortable truths about the wage gap, and what actually makes most women happy. The whole thing is worth watching, especially the end.



Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: jofortruth on May 22, 2015, 07:29:36 am
Clinton campaigning in a bubble, largely isolated from real people (If she truly worked for the people, she would be mingling with the people. This should tell you something. When a candidate for the Presidency is afraid of the people, that person does not deserve to be in office. THAT PROVES THEY DON'T WORK FOR YOU. GET A CLUE, AMERICA!)
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2015/05/21/2674...n-a-bubble.html (http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2015/05/21/267463/clinton-campaigning-in-a-bubble.html)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on May 22, 2015, 10:09:55 am
 This Old Hag is more Unreal than American Reality Shows  ::)

 I have a new name for Ms. Clinton:

"Old Haggerry"  Queen of Ugliness and Lies!
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on May 22, 2015, 10:57:17 pm


… Hilldog seems to be nailin' down
da rap vote … know what I'm talkin' bout?


(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/Waka-Flocka-Flame-for-Clinton-jpg.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/Waka-Flocka-Flame-for-Clinton-jpg.jpg.html)
Theo Wargo/Getty Images

Hillary Clinton racks up rapper endorsements
Support from Waka Flocka Flame, Ja Rule, Snoop Dogg, 50 Cent, A$AP Rocky, others

Author: By Deena Zaru
Published On: May 21 2015

A growing number of rappers are queuing up plans to make beautiful music with the front-runner Democratic presidential candidate: Hillary Clinton.

An early high-profile endorsement came from Atlanta rapper Waka Flocka Flame, who announced his own candidacy for the 2016 presidential race on 4/20 last month in a video posted by Rolling Stone, promising to legalize marijuana if he became president.

Waka later endorsed Clinton in an interview with MTV News, proclaiming that "A woman could do it. I've seen my momma raise five boys -- that's super hard, so women can do the same s--- that men could do," adding that he might even help Clinton with her campaign if she helps him promote his newest album, "Flockaveli 2."

Quote
But almost ten years later, the "In Da Club" rapper has left no room for ambiguity, proclaiming that "It's Hillary time" during an interview with the Daily Beast.

The hip-hop star said that having been the first lady during Bill Clinton's presidency, makes it so that "Hillary was the president already once."

~> MORE: http://www.clickorlando.com/news/politics/hillary-clinton-racks-up-rapper-endorsements/33149266
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on May 23, 2015, 01:03:26 pm
Whoever is into rappers like- these guys...

Mayby their music is cool, their prolitics (reality)isn't.. What the hell, she is promoting these guys.$$, fame etc..
 
 well, Barack is a educated rapper , just lower key, suit and tie, podium, title...
Title: Hitlary Approved $165 Billion In Arms Deals To Clinton Foundation Donors
Post by: Letsbereal on May 26, 2015, 10:05:35 pm
Hillary Clinton's State Department Approved $165 Billion In Arms Deals To Clinton Foundation Donors
26 May 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-26/hillary-clintons-state-department-approved-165-billion-arms-deals-clinton-foundation
Title: The Farce Is Complete: FIFA, Qatar Donated To The Clinton Foundation
Post by: Letsbereal on May 27, 2015, 02:26:29 pm
The Farce Is Complete: FIFA, Qatar Donated To The Clinton Foundation
27 May 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-27/farce-complete-fifa-qatar-donated-clinton-foundation

FIFA "Rampant" Corruption Exposed Following DOJ Indictment, 14 Arrested In Swiss Hotel - FBI/DoJ Press Conference Live Feed
27 May 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-27/fifa-rampant-corruption-exposed-following-doj-indictment-14-arrested-swiss-hotel
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on May 27, 2015, 08:13:31 pm


  AUDIT THE CLINTON FOUNDATION!

  Think that will happen?  I don't think so.  Maybe after they audit the FED.

  And it would be just like the Fed---100% inaccurate.

  I would bet the CLINTON MAFIA pays very little in taxes.

  Remember that they bought Chelsea an $11 million dollar apartment in NYC?  They probably don't even pay property taxes.

  It is an outright lie for Hilldog to say she wants to help the working stiffs.  She wants to tax us until we are stiff in a coffin.

  DEATH TO THE NWO.


Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on May 27, 2015, 09:13:39 pm
http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/declassified-docs-hillary-aided-rise-of-isis/#lbu3ts2vsUsDpzZb.99

  HILLDOG---ASED---A SCANDAL EVERY DAY.

DECLASSIFIED DOCS: HILLARY AIDED RISE OF ISIS


NEW YORK – More than 100 pages of previously classified Department of Defense and Department of State documents implicate the Obama administration in a cover-up to obscure the role Hillary Clinton and the State Department played in the rise of ISIS.

The documents were obtained in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the Washington watchdog Judicial Watch.

They confirm WND reporting over the past three years of evidence that U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens was involved in shipping weapons from Benghazi to support the al-Qaida-affiliated militias fighting the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria, effectively arming the Sunni jihadists who morphed into ISIS.

The documents further confirm WND reporting that the goal of the terrorists behind the Benghazi attack that killed Stevens was to force the release of Omar Abdul Rahman, the “blind sheik” in U.S. prison serving a life sentence for his involvement in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, and to avenge death of a prominent Libyan al-Qaida leader killed by a U.S. drone strike in Pakistan.

“These documents are jaw-dropping,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “No wonder we had to file more FOIA lawsuits and wait over two years for them.”
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on May 27, 2015, 10:34:18 pm


Hi Doc.
Finally, Stevens was rock star gun runner, Agency affiliated big wig, but expendable if the sh**t hit the fan and it did. Th balls on these freaks to say it was a video that caused this, now they giving it other flip flops.             AMEN this has been exposed.
  The power they have over the people minds is insanity, if the GP is proud of our last few regimes atrocity's I have to wonder WTF happened to HONOR , free individual thought and basic humanity.
 Nam was bad enough, this debauchery will no end overnight until crimes will be admitted too and those WHO perpetrated these traitorous acts face justice.
 Takes guts and  honor to admit mistakes, but in the end they are not to be made again. Remember Nam, and go forward same road being travelled, but with more far reaching consequences, as if nam wans't bad enough.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on May 27, 2015, 11:45:29 pm

Hi Doc.
Finally, Stevens was rock star gun runner, Agency affiliated big wig, but expendable if the sh**t hit the fan and it did. Th balls on these freaks to say it was a video that caused this, now they giving it other flip flops.             AMEN this has been exposed.
  The power they have over the people minds is insanity, if the GP is proud of our last few regimes atrocity's I have to wonder WTF happened to HONOR , free individual thought and basic humanity.
 Nam was bad enough, this debauchery will no end overnight until crimes will be admitted too and those WHO perpetrated these traitorous acts face justice.
 Takes guts and  honor to admit mistakes, but in the end they are not to be made again. Remember Nam, and go forward same road being travelled, but with more far reaching consequences, as if nam wans't bad enough.

  Chris, we have to remember that ISIS is the proxy Army of the US government.  The US is about to TURN on ISIS and they have the perfect reason why----ISIS now controls over 50% of Syria.  So the next step is US ground troops in Syria.  A think tank is going to show Congress that air strikes are no longer doing the job.  The US government wants Assad gone and they will replace him with a puppet.  Even the MSM is saying that iSIS is a creation of the US.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Stan on May 28, 2015, 04:24:49 am

… Hilldog seems to be nailin' down
da rap vote … know what I'm talkin' bout?

#sell #out #uncle #tom #judas #goat #trash
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on May 28, 2015, 04:53:29 pm

… Hillerian doublespeak.    >:(


(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_787.jpg) (http://s247.photobucket.com/user/evinyl/media/PrisonPlanetForum/screenshot_787.jpg.html)

Hillary Clinton: 'You're Not Going to See Me Turn White in the White House'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xA4NirnEJiM
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on May 28, 2015, 07:40:23 pm
The Clinton Foundation Received Millions From State-Brokered Defense Contracts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu0AxZUH6LQ

May 28, 2015 TheRealNews
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on May 28, 2015, 09:01:17 pm
   
  Chris, we have to remember that ISIS is the proxy Army of the US government.  The US is about to TURN on ISIS and they have the perfect reason why----ISIS now controls over 50% of Syria.  So the next step is US ground troops in Syria.  A think tank is going to show Congress that air strikes are no longer doing the job.  The US government wants Assad gone and they will replace him with a puppet.  Even the MSM is saying that iSIS is a creation of the US.
  Larson..Yes, this has been a calculated manipulation of US citizenry. It's ironic, more to the point it is as if the people refuse to think for themselves those who are beginning to ponder on the obvious spin are immediately intimated as though they may be labeled a discenter, conspiracy fan,an outcast from mainstream society. You served during Nam, you know what the deal is, in fact I believe most folks do. It's a tough call for flag wigglers to admit they allowed the slaughter of innocents to perpetrate the elites goal. Ya just can't correct a mistake until you admit one has been made.
  Redemption is not on the table as long as the people remain silent, the insiders use the GP's willfull ignorance, fear tactics , pseudo patriotic brain dipped..As long as the greater % population ignore the facts and wiggle the ole flag the E mafia running this nation will keep on exterminating.
 When this all comes back to home turf , when the lifestyles are drenched in suffering, it will be crystal clear to the dipped we tried to give them a heads up. Their safe Lil bubble will burst.
 Human nature bro,  the key to their control factor. It amazed me to see Americans cheering as they watched Iraq being invaded, grid bombed, innocents killed in the thousands. I'm convinced the think tankers have a center devoted strictly to the peoples reaction( the number % ),  dictate the extremes they can go to, in the majority they have been given a green light.
  Your a devoted Christian, what would the Christ have to say about this abomination.
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Letsbereal on May 29, 2015, 12:00:34 am
The Clinton Foundation Paid Sidney Blumenthal $10K/Month As He Gave Horrible Libya Advice To State Dept
28 May 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-28/clinton-foundation-paid-sidney-blumenthal-10kmonth-he-gave-horrible-libya-advice-sta
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on May 29, 2015, 06:43:03 am
^ ^ ^ ^

… read the above link …. whoa!
VERY DAMNING!


Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on May 29, 2015, 08:56:28 am
^^^^^^^^

  These people were trying to "asset strip" Libya.  It happens all the time with these crooks on Wall Street.  Remember Max Keiser mentioning seeing Steve Forbes in Greece as the asset strippers were buying up Greece several years ago?  THESE BANKERS/INVESTORS ARE LEECHES--They suck the blood (money) out of any economy in trouble.  That's what these NWO scum are doing in Yemen, Syria, Ukraine, Iraq, Afghanistan, and soon Iran.  It's rarely in the news but it is happening. 


FROM THE ARTICLE......
But an examination by The Times suggests that Mr. Blumenthal’s involvement was more wide-ranging and more complicated than previously known, embodying the blurry lines between business, politics and philanthropy that have enriched and vexed the Clintons and their inner circle for years.
 

 
Much of the Libya intelligence that Mr. Blumenthal passed on to Mrs. Clinton appears to have come from a group of business associates he was advising as they sought to win contracts from the Libyan transitional government. The venture, which was ultimately unsuccessful, involved other Clinton friends, a private military contractor and one former C.I.A. spy seeking to get in on the ground floor of the new Libyan economy.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on May 29, 2015, 11:14:22 am
Multi-Thread ...
(http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Money/Pix/pictures/2013/11/14/1384434812854/Milla-Jovovich-with-her-M-008.jpg)


Need to document this foia : 

http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/declassified-docs-hillary-aided-rise-of-isis/
Declassified docs: Hillary aided rise of ISIS
Confirm reports of U.S. arming Middle East jihadists
Jerome Corsi

Published: 17 hours ago

NEW YORK – More than 100 pages of previously classified Department of Defense and Department of State documents implicate the Obama administration in a cover-up to obscure the role Hillary Clinton and the State Department played in the rise of ISIS.

The documents were obtained in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the Washington watchdog Judicial Watch.

They confirm WND reporting over the past three years of evidence that U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens was involved in shipping weapons from Benghazi to support the al-Qaida-affiliated militias fighting the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria, effectively arming the Sunni jihadists who morphed into ISIS.

The documents further confirm WND reporting that the goal of the terrorists behind the Benghazi attack that killed Stevens was to force the release of Omar Abdul Rahman, the “blind sheik” in U.S. prison serving a life sentence for his involvement in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, and to avenge death of a prominent Libyan al-Qaida leader killed by a U.S. drone strike in Pakistan.

“These documents are jaw-dropping,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “No wonder we had to file more FOIA lawsuits and wait over two years for them.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/declassified-docs-hillary-aided-rise-of-isis/#s6ucj7GX1YiQBzvM.99


http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-defense-state-department-documents-reveal-obama-administration-knew-that-al-qaeda-terrorists-had-planned-benghazi-attack-10-days-in-advance/
Judicial Watch: Defense, State Department Documents Reveal Obama Administration Knew that al Qaeda Terrorists Had Planned Benghazi Attack 10 Days in Advance
MAY 18, 2015

Administration knew three months before the November 2012 presidential election of ISIS plans to establish a caliphate in Iraq

Administration knew of arms being shipped from Benghazi to Syria

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it obtained more than 100 pages of previously classified “Secret” documents from the Department of Defense (DOD)and the Department of State revealing that DOD almost immediately reported that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was committed by the al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked “Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman” (BCOAR), and had been planned at least 10 days in advance.

Rahman is known as the Blind Sheikh, and is serving life in prison for his involvement in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and other terrorist acts.  The new documents also provide the first official confirmation that shows the U.S. government was aware of arms shipments from Benghazi to Syria.  The documents also include an August 2012 analysis warning of the rise of ISIS and the predicted failure of the Obama policy of regime change in Syria.
...

The DOD documents also contain the first official documentation that the Obama administration knew that weapons were being shipped from the Port of Benghazi to rebel troops in Syria. An October 2012 report confirms:


Weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the Port of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The weapons shipped during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG’s, and 125 mm and 155mm howitzers missiles.

During the immediate aftermath of, and following the uncertainty caused by, the downfall of the ((Qaddafi)) regime in October 2011 and up until early September of 2012, weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles located in Benghazi, Libya were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the ports of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The Syrian ports were chosen due to the small amount of cargo traffic transiting these two ports. The ships used to transport the weapons were medium-sized and able to hold 10 or less shipping containers of cargo.

The DIA document further details:

The weapons shipped from Syria during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG’s and 125mm and 155mm howitzers missiles.  The numbers for each weapon were estimated to be: 500 Sniper rifles, 100 RPG launchers with 300 total rounds, and approximately 400 howitzers missiles [200 ea – 125mm and 200ea – 155 mm.]
...

The State Department has yet to turn over any documents from the secret email accounts of Hillary Clinton and other top State Department officials.

“These documents are jaw-dropping. No wonder we had to file more FOIA lawsuits and wait over two years for them. 

If the American people had known the truth – that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other top administration officials knew that the Benghazi attack was an al-Qaeda terrorist attack from the get-go – and yet lied and covered this fact up – Mitt Romney might very well be president.


And why would the Obama administration continue to support the Muslim Brotherhood even after it knew it was tied to the Benghazi terrorist attack and to al Qaeda? These documents also point to connection between the collapse in Libya and the ISIS war – and confirm that the U.S. knew remarkable details about the transfer of arms from Benghazi to Syrian jihadists,” stated Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch president.  “These documents show that the Benghazi cover-up has continued for years and is only unraveling through our independent lawsuits. The Benghazi scandal just got a whole lot worse for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.”
Title: January 20, 2016 Racketeering Case Against Bill and Hillary Clinton
Post by: Letsbereal on May 30, 2015, 07:29:54 pm
MM108 - Clinton Trial Set https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbZ95zruQ38

May 30, 2015 Bill Still

January 20, 2016 is the date set by a Florida Federal Judge to try a racketeering case against Bill and Hillary Clinton and their Clinton Foundation.

Title: Re: January 20, 2016 Racketeering Case Against Bill and Hillary Clinton
Post by: decemberfellow on May 30, 2015, 11:10:59 pm
MM108 - Clinton Trial Set https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbZ95zruQ38

May 30, 2015 Bill Still

January 20, 2016 is the date set by a Florida Federal Judge to try a racketeering case against Bill and Hillary Clinton and their Clinton Foundation.

Bet money that judge will be dead/missing by December.
Title: Clinton 2016? Conspiracy Shocker! Must See Documentary!
Post by: Letsbereal on May 31, 2015, 02:07:23 pm
Clinton 2016? Conspiracy Shocker! Must See Documentary! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arjXlpz5T8g
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on May 31, 2015, 09:30:16 pm
letsbereal..
   Thanks , watched the whole vid...Evil has various synonyms, Hillary  among a crew of others.
I have to say it, I am convinced a decent percent of those in the know are simply terrified of blowing the whistle, a death sentence, exposure of misdeeds (blackmail), or maby just on the sukstraw.
  The 2=" party system has to wake up and get American or at the very least grow a spine.
They have lumped the citizens into one catagory, moronic zits, those who maintain a degree of lucidity,  & integrity ,who  are aware of this abomination will one day be code red.
Title: Hillary Clinton Wins Favor With Iowa Democrats
Post by: Letsbereal on June 02, 2015, 04:00:52 am
Hillary Clinton Wins Favor With Iowa Democrats https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z15_syPJky4

Jun 1, 2015 Bloomberg Business
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on June 02, 2015, 08:50:05 am
http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/02/politics/hillary-clinton-2016-poll-gop-field-close/index.html


   excerpt from the article below....

Poll: New speed bumps for Clinton


Washington (CNN)More people have an unfavorable view of Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton now than at any time since 2001, according to a new CNN/ORC poll on the 2016 race.

While Clinton remains strikingly dominant in the Democratic field, the poll shows that her numbers have dropped significantly across several key indicators since she launched her campaign in April.

A growing number of people say she is not honest and trustworthy (57%, up from 49% in March), less than half feel she cares about people like them (47%, down from 53% last July) and more now feel she does not inspire confidence (50%, up from 42% last March).




Title: Caught On Tape: Hillary Puts "Everyday American" In Her Proper Place
Post by: Letsbereal on June 02, 2015, 01:51:23 pm
Caught On Tape: Hillary Puts "Everyday American" In Her Proper Place
2 June 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-02/caught-tape-hillary-puts-everyday-american-her-proper-place
Title: Hillary’s Poll Drop: What Worries Her Campaign the Most?
Post by: Letsbereal on June 02, 2015, 06:17:24 pm
Hillary’s Poll Drop: What Worries Her Campaign the Most? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR_V1s5MVwo

Jun 2, 2015 Bloomberg Business
Title: Re: Hillary’s Poll Drop: What Worries Her Campaign the Most?
Post by: iamc2 on June 02, 2015, 09:58:15 pm
Hillary’s Poll Drop: What Worries Her Campaign the Most? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR_V1s5MVwo

Jun 2, 2015 Bloomberg Business
WELL! Old Haggery is falling faster than Rome!

This is good for our Nation!  8)
Title: More find Hillary Clinton untrustworthy in new poll
Post by: Letsbereal on June 03, 2015, 11:47:18 am
More find Hillary Clinton untrustworthy in new poll
2 June 2015
, by Robert Schroeder - Washington (MarketWatch)
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/more-find-hillary-clinton-untrustworthy-in-new-poll-2015-06-02

A growing number of people say Hillary Clinton isn’t honest and trustworthy in a new poll.
Title: Under Hillary, US Sold $66 Million In Chemical Arms To Clinton Foundation Donors
Post by: Letsbereal on June 03, 2015, 12:31:39 pm
Under Hillary, US Sold $66 Million In Chemical Arms To Clinton Foundation Donors Gassing Their Citizens
3 June 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-03/under-hillary-us-sold-66-million-chemical-arms-clinton-foundation-donors-gassing-the
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: iamc2 on June 03, 2015, 05:46:19 pm
 The whole Nation Hates Old Haggery!   except the foolish ;)

She will never be President---just a foolish dream from a foolish person!
Title: Cartoons Mocking “Goldman Rats” And Hillary Clinton Appear All Over NYC
Post by: Letsbereal on June 04, 2015, 06:58:49 am
Cartoons Mocking “Goldman Rats” And Hillary Clinton Appear All Over NYC
4 June 2015
, by Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-03/cartoons-mocking-%E2%80%9Cgoldman-rats%E2%80%9D-and-hillary-clinton-appear-all-over-nyc

(http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user92183/imageroot/2015/06/GoldmanRats.jpg)

The American Nightmare

(http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2015/06/20150603_clintongesit_0.jpg)

Source: Investors.com (http://www.investors.com/editorial-cartoons/michael-ramirez/755471)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v393/youricarma/Miscellaneous/GOLDMANSACHSTEAM-NOMERCY.jpg)

Hillary Clinton's Poll Numbers Plunge To The Worst Since 2001
3 June 2015
, by Mike Krieger (Zero Hedge)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-03/hillary-clintons-poll-numbers-plunge-worst-2001
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on June 07, 2015, 02:32:27 pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3114030/Chelsea-Clinton-takes-break-running-Clinton-Foundation-stroll-husband-daughter.html
Chelsea Clinton takes a break from her new job running family's charity for a New York City stroll with husband and daughter
Chelsea Clinton was seen on Saturday strolling through New York with her husband, Marc Mezvinsky, and daughter Charlotte
The couple were seen smiling, dressed casually, both in jeans and jackets
This spotting comes just weeks after staff at the Foundation claimed that Vice Chair Chelsea Clinton was 'difficult' to work with
By Kelly Mclaughlin For Dailymail.com
Published: 21:12 EST, 6 June 2015  | Updated: 07:39 EST, 7 June 2015

(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/06/07/03/article-3114030-29693C6800000578-791_308x443.jpg)

Chelsea Clinton was seen on Saturday strolling through New York with her husband, Marc Mezvinsky, who was pushing their daughter Charlotte in a stroller. This spotting comes just weeks after staff at the Clinton Foundation claimed that Vice Chair Chelsea Clinton is so 'difficult' and unpleasant to staff that there has been an unusually high turnover at the charity.
...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: chris jones on June 07, 2015, 08:18:46 pm
Chelsea, the apple didn't fall far from the tree.
 
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Jackson Holly on June 08, 2015, 07:52:32 am
YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkJ3IjJDWcw

"
This is the problem of women trying to overcompensate
in becoming more aggressive and macho so they are not
accused of being soft on the need to kill and war, right?


Nader: Hillary Tried to ‘Overcompensate’
for Gender with ‘Shocking’ Militarism

“I think Hillary is not the Hillary of when she was 30 years old.
She made peace with the power structure."


Quote
Nader cited the war in Libya during President Obama’s first term to support his position on Clinton.

“She almost singlehandedly did the Libyan war. The Defense Department was against it, [Secretary Robert] Gates, and she persuaded the White House that it was an easy topple without knowing that in a tribal society with nothing to replace it you would have a civil war, sectarian killings spilling into Africa, weapons everywhere, Mali, central Africa and she’s being accused of Benghazi – the big thing is the huge amount of geography that has been destabilized because of the Libyan overthrow,” he added.

~>CONTINUE: http://pjmedia.com/blog/nader-hillary-tried-to-overcompensate-for-gender-with-shocking-militarism/
Title: Bilderberg Backs Hillary For 2016 Presidency
Post by: Letsbereal on June 08, 2015, 03:41:44 pm
Bilderberg Backs Hillary For 2016 Presidency - Chief Hillary advisor to attend secret confab
8 June 2015
, by Steve Watson (InfoWars)
http://www.infowars.com/bilderberg-backs-hillary-for-2016-presidency/
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: windyacres on June 08, 2015, 06:22:16 pm
yeah it was hard hearing  the bilderbergs backing
Hitlery when Alex was talking about it on his
radio show today.  DH has been saying for years
she's going to be the next POTUS and I begged him
to stop saying that, but now it looks like it could
become very real.  Oh please don't let her be the
next POTUS.....!!!!!!!!!
Title: Why Is Hillary Clinton Falling in the Polls? Michael Rivero
Post by: Letsbereal on June 09, 2015, 06:08:52 am
Why Is Hillary Clinton Falling in the Polls? Michael Rivero - June 8, 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9V7pg1Bo9Q

Jun 8, 2015 Talk Digital Network
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: windyacres on June 09, 2015, 04:10:26 pm
If Hitlery / Killery  wins, then TPTB totally rigged it in her favor.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: windyacres on June 09, 2015, 06:32:42 pm
Hillary’s plans to stuff the ballot box

They include felons and non-citizens

 by Phyllis Schlafly | WND.com | June 9, 2015

Hillary Clinton has laid out her game plan for winning back the White House for herself and her husband next year. Let’s hope Republicans were paying attention.

She apparently decided it won’t be enough to rely on the 66 million people who voted twice for Barack Obama, many of whom are disillusioned by the failure of “hope and change.” Obama promised an end to wars in the Middle East, a more prosperous economy for the average American and more harmonious race relations, but all three problems have only gotten worse.

Since Hillary won’t have the youthful exuberance that propelled Obama to his unlikely double victory, she plans to build a whole new electorate out of people who didn’t vote for Obama. That’s the gist of her speech in Houston last week, which her friends at MSNBC called a “far-reaching vision for expanding access to the ballot box.”

Who are the new voters to whom Hillary wants to give “access to the ballot box”? They include felons and non-citizens, along with anyone who can’t prove identity, citizenship, or residence within the voting precinct.

Read more -

http://www.infowars.com/hillarys-plans-to-stuff-the-ballot-box/

Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: Geniocrat on June 09, 2015, 07:05:01 pm
She has health issues that will keep her from the Presidency.

The good thing is that their offspring see them for what they are and are too libertarian minded to follow in their tracks.

In 20 years no one will be a Globalist....
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on June 09, 2015, 11:24:18 pm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/disappointment-in-obama-leads-some-blacks-to-ask-is-voting-even-worth-it/2015/06/09/5922363c-052b-11e5-bc72-f3e16bf50bb6_story.html

  Trouble for Hilldog if she can't get the Black people out to vote.

Disappointment in Obama leads some African Americans to ask: Is voting even worth it?

Jacksonville, Fla. — During those two electric Novembers, the chance to elect a black president, and then keep him in office, seized Regenia Motley’s neighborhood.

Nightclubs were registering voters. Churches held fish fries after loading buses that ferried parishioners to the polls. A truck hoisted a big sign that said “Obama.” And residents waited in long lines at precincts across the community.

But as Motley and some friends sought shade recently under a mulberry tree and looked across the landscape of empty lots and abandoned houses that has persisted here, they wondered whether they would ever bother voting again.

“What was the point?” asked Motley, 23, a grocery store clerk. “We made history, but I don’t see change.”
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on June 11, 2015, 01:09:19 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Murdoch
James Rupert Jacob Murdoch /ˈmɜrdɒk/[1] (born 13 December 1972) is the younger son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch and the chief executive officer of 21st Century Fox. He is the former chairman and chief executive of News Corp., Europe and Asia, where he oversaw assets such as News International (British newspapers), publisher of The News of the World newspaper, SKY Italia (satellite television in Italy), Sky Deutschland, and STAR TV (satellite television in Asia).
,...
Murdoch was married in 2000[29] and has three children, Anne (born 2003), Walter (born 2006), and Emerson (born 2008) with his American wife Kathryn Murdoch Hufschmid. Kathryn Murdoch works for the Clinton Climate Initiative, a charitable foundation set up by the former U.S. president, Bill Clinton in 2006.[7] In 2013 they launched Quadrivium Foundation [30]
...'

http://www.takeourworldback.com/bollynhufschmidmurdoch.htm
Eric Hufschmid:
•is  the half-brother of  Kathryn Murdoch née Hufschmid, a public relations executive and  Director of Strategy & Communications at the Clinton Foundation's Clinton Climate Initiative, who married James Murdoch in June 2000,
Rupert Murdoch's son and  heir apparent who joined News Corporation in 1996 and was placed in charge of its  internet operations

ERIC HUFSCHMID

Eric Hufschmid, the supposed anti-Zionist truth teller and former 9/11 researcher in the internet-based alternative media, is the brother-in-law of James Murdoch, who started at News Corporation in 1996 when he took charge of its internet operations. James is the son and  heir apparent of  billionaire  Zionist media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who was propelled to power with the financial backing of the Rothschilds of Europe, the Bronfmans of Canada and the Oppenheimers of South Africa as a conservative 'opposition' to the liberal media. Rupert Murdoch is a  long-time friend of twice-serving Israeli premier Benjamin Netanyahu. Eric Hufschmid's half-sister Kathryn  Murdoch née Hufschmid married James Murdoch in June 2000, after they had known each other for several years and had announced their engagement in the first week of June, 1999. Kathryn is a public relations executive (i.e. a spin doctor) who works for Zionist interests such as the Clinton Foundation's Clinton Climate Initiative that attempts to peddle  so-called "global warming", rebranded as "climate change".



(http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc56/poseidon888/HufschmidOnKathrynGlobalWarming.png)

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/12/business/media/rupert-murdoch-ceo-21st-century-fox-james-murdoch.html?_r=0
Rupert Murdoch Expected to Hand Reins of 21st Century Fox to Son James
By EMILY STEEL and RAVI SOMAIYAJUNE 11, 2015

Rupert Murdoch, the 84-year-old chief executive of 21st Century Fox, is planning to hand over the reins of the media conglomerate to his son James, two people briefed on the plans said on Thursday.

James Murdoch is expected to take over as chief executive, and the elder Mr. Murdoch will remain at the company as executive chairman. Another son, Lachlan, is moving from Australia to Los Angeles to become co-executive chairman, the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said.
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on June 13, 2015, 10:25:03 am
Hillary Launch rally - On c-span !!!

http://www.c-span.org/
http://www.c-span.org/video/?326471-1/hillary-clinton-presidential-campaign-announcement&live
June 13, 2015

Hillary Clinton Presidential Campaign Announcement

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton held the first major event in her campaign for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination at a rally at the Four Freedoms Monument on Roosevelt Island in New York City. She was joined by her husband and daughter as she spoke about the struggles of the middle class

| - - - -

http://ny.curbed.com/archives/2012/12/06/exploring_roosevelt_islands_new_four_freedoms_park.php
...
Though it is called a park, Four Freedoms is essentially a large sculpture where park-like activities are not allowed. "To preserve the sanctity of this site," the rules ask that you "quietly stroll" but do not engage in biking, skating, fishing, climbing, and eating or drinking anything other than water. ...

| - - -

http://www.fdrfourfreedomspark.org/

What to Expect


JUNE 13, 2015, 9:30AM—1:00PM EDT
HILLARY FOR AMERICA OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN LAUNCH
FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT FOUR FREEDOMS PARK



Franklin D. Roosevelt Four Freedoms Park is located on the southern tip of Roosevelt Island in New York City. It is the first memorial dedicated to the former President in his home state and a New York State Park. The Park is free to the public.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt_Four_Freedoms_Park

Roosevelt Island was named in honor of the former president in 1973, and the planners announced their intention to build a memorial to Roosevelt at the island's southern tip.[1] In 2005, William J. vanden Heuvel, a former U.N. ambassador and a founder of the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute, launched the effort to get the four-acre park built to Kahn's specifications, gathering more than $50 million in private and public funds.[2] The Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute subsequently kept the project going over time
...
The park was dedicated in a ceremony on October 17, 2012. Tom Brokaw served as master of ceremonies. Participants included former President Bill Clinton, Governor Andrew Cuomo, former Mayor Michael Bloomberg, and relatives of Roosevelt. Cuomo said that "New York became the laboratory of progressive democracy, and F.D.R. was the scientist creating formulas for a broad range of national problems and social ills." He praised vanden Heuvel as a "juggernaut of determination". Clinton noted the memorial's location: "As we look out on this bright new day, we are close to the U.N., which he, more than any other soul, created."[11][12] Four Freedoms Park became a New York State Park when it opened to the public on October 24, 2012.[11]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Freedoms
The Four Freedoms were goals articulated by United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt on January 6, 1941. In an address known as the Four Freedoms speech (technically the 1941 State of the Union address), he proposed four fundamental freedoms that people "everywhere in the world" ought to enjoy:
1.Freedom of speech
2.Freedom of worship
3.Freedom from want
4.Freedom from fear

| - - - -

http://www.c-span.org/video/?26443-1/clinton-campaign-rally
May 23, 1992
Clinton Campaign Rally

Democratic presidential candidate Bill Clinton, accompanied by his wife Hillary and his daughter Chelsea, took part in a homecoming rally in his hometown of Little Rock, Arkansas. At the rally, Gov. Clinton shook hands with voters and strolled down the street with his daughter in front of a large parade. After the parade, Gov. Clinton spoke to a supportive audience while standing on a stage in front of a large flag. Preceded by a country band singing a song about Arkansas, a rendition of the national anthem, and several introductions, Gov. Clinton urged his supporters to vote for him the following Tuesday in the Arkansas Democratic primary, and thanked his supporters for making his vision for America available to the citizens of the U.S. After his speech, cameras again followed Gov. Clinton as he made his way through the assembled crowd
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on June 13, 2015, 12:46:35 pm
Man she made me want to throw up ... eight years under the Obama Regime leaves a lot of work to be done .... ... early "Kinder kare" Kommie training for all the kiddies ... She plans on getting all the female vote:

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Julius_Caesar_(play)
Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;
 I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him
.
 The evil that men do lives after them;
 The good is oft interred with their bones;
 So let it be with Caesar.

The noble Brutus  Hath told you Caesar was ambitious:
 If it were so, it was a grievous fault;
 And grievously hath Caesar answer'd it.
 Here, under leave of Brutus and the rest, —
For Brutus is an honorable man;
 So are they all, all honorable men, —
Come I to speak in Caesar's funeral.
 He was my friend, faithful and just to me:
 But Brutus says he was ambitious;
 And Brutus is an honorable man.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/13/hillary-2-0-clinton-announcement-long-on-promises-short-on-specifics/
Hillary 2.0 — Clinton Announcement Long on Promises, Short on Specifics

https://twitter.com/danmericaCNN/status/609740462715310081/photo/1
Clinton's campaign set aside this area for overflow w jumbotron. Here it is 20 min to speech:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CHY7tq6WcAIgDCC.jpg)
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: TahoeBlue on June 14, 2015, 09:38:15 am
On the way to a Billary Potus Rally:
(http://www.mygen.com/images/serveimage21HTXR7W.jpg)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPQq2Caei5Y
President Hillary -- Time For A Woman

http://mrconservative.com/2013/05/18027-hillary-clinton-to-admit-to-being-lesbian-in-new-tell-all-book/
Hillary Clinton To Admit To Being Lesbian In New Tell-All Book
...
Yes, we’re talking about Hillary Clinton. It appears that, in a shock-filled, soon-to-be published autobiography, she’ll finally acknowledge the truth of all those rumors about her being a not-so-closeted bisexual.
...
e all know that, if Hillary admits her sexuality, the mainstream media and the usual talking heads will celebrate her “courage” and her “openness.” None of them will comment on the fact that she blatantly lied to the American people for thirty years or that her secret behavior consistently compromised America’s national security. Bill Clinton’s secret behavior jeopardized it too, but at least he was a hetero hound dog. Hillary’s behavior both in the White House and at the State Department left her and, by extension, the entire American government, much more open to blackmail by America’s enemies.

| - - -

http://www.bustle.com/articles/75632-5-reasons-why-right-now-is-the-time-for-a-woman-to-be-americas-president
5 Reasons Why Right Now Is The Time For A Woman To Be America's President

Now that Hillary Clinton has finally announced her campaign for president, the clock starts ticking on what could be a landmark moment in American history: If elected, Clinton would become the first American woman to serve as Commander in Chief. It’s more than a little surprising that in 2015, the U.S. still has not had a female president ...
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on June 14, 2015, 10:23:01 am
^^^^^^^^

  Every president since Bush41 ihas been worse than the one before.  Could Hillary be worse than Obama?  I think so.  If she gets in she will give the LGTB everything they want because she is one of them.  Sex changes for all.
  We are going down hill towards full-blown Communism and Fascism.  Welcome to the New Weird Order.

Bush41
B Clinton
Bush43
Obama
????
Title: Re: Ready for Hilldog
Post by: larsonstdoc on June 16, 2015, 07:05:51 am
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/hillary-clinton-libya-emails-withheld-benghazi-committee-119037.html

  Oh yeah.  She knows how to be a good NWO president because she knows how to hide evidence from WE THE PEOPLE!!!!

Some of Clinton's Libya emails said to be withh