PrisonPlanet Forum

***THE MAIN BOARDS - Welcome to the Prison Planet Educational Forum and Library*** => PhD Investigative Reports (only for the hardcore) => Topic started by: IridiumKEPfactor on March 01, 2012, 08:52:01 am

Title: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: IridiumKEPfactor on March 01, 2012, 08:52:01 am
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ (http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/)

Wow. did not expect that. All I can say is I wonder if her was investigating something? Could be just a heart attack or something else. I did not like him that much cause was pushing the party line but was not as bad as your average Fox fake conservative.

(http://biggovernment.com/files/2012/03/840_102926845194_686155194_5053359_1686_n.jpg)

Life on earth is truly to short.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: NYBasher23 on March 01, 2012, 08:58:47 am
 ??? Story in The Atlantic Journal has some weirdness to it:

http://news.yahoo.com/andrew-breitbarts-death-reported-142117001.html

The story is on Yahoo!News, but it's linked to The Atlantic Journal.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Satyagraha on March 01, 2012, 09:02:06 am
In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/
by Larry Solov

With a terrible feeling of pain and loss we announce the passing of Andrew Breitbart.

Andrew passed away unexpectedly from natural causes shortly after midnight this morning in Los Angeles.

We have lost a husband, a father, a son, a brother, a dear friend, a patriot and a happy warrior.

Andrew lived boldly, so that we more timid souls would dare to live freely and fully, and fight for the fragile liberty he showed us how to love.

Andrew recently wrote a new conclusion to his book, Righteous Indignation:

    I love my job. I love fighting for what I believe in. I love having fun while doing it. I love reporting stories that the Complex refuses to report. I love fighting back, I love finding allies, and—famously—I enjoy making enemies.

    Three years ago, I was mostly a behind-the-scenes guy who linked to stuff on a very popular website. I always wondered what it would be like to enter the public realm to fight for what I believe in. I’ve lost friends, perhaps dozens. But I’ve gained hundreds, thousands—who knows?—of allies. At the end of the day, I can look at myself in the mirror, and I sleep very well at night.


Andrew is at rest, yet the happy warrior lives on, in each of us.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: URpwneddude on March 01, 2012, 09:05:00 am
And just earlier last week he spoke of having videos of 0bama in college that no one has seen.  Hmm.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Valerius on March 01, 2012, 09:07:40 am
What natural causes? At 43?
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: louisvillefreedomfighter on March 01, 2012, 09:09:17 am
http://www.breitbart.tv/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/ (http://www.breitbart.tv/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/)
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Satyagraha on March 01, 2012, 09:14:38 am
Andrew Breitbart exposed the "narrative" behind "Occupy Wall Street" (among other exposures) on his website: www.biggovernment.com

Clueless Socialists Protest MacIver Institute
http://biggovernment.com/category/occupy-wall-street/

Occupy and Foreign Terror: The American Left's Glorification of Greek Tragedy
http://biggovernment.com/bdarby/2012/02/24/occupy-and-foreign-terror-the-american-lefts-glorification-of-greek-tragedy/
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: IridiumKEPfactor on March 01, 2012, 09:15:12 am
He should have released the videos or given out copies for safety as an insurance plan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fRQ2lIQ3Lg&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fRQ2lIQ3Lg&feature=related)
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Bilderberg CEO on March 01, 2012, 09:17:07 am
43 is the new 85.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: NYBasher23 on March 01, 2012, 09:23:05 am
 ??? ??? ??? I was trying to edit my previous post, because I cited the wrong publication (it's the Atlantic Wire, NOT Atlantic Journal), anyhow, when I went back to Yahoo!News, the link for the story was an entirely different source. Here's an original quote from The Atlantic Wire story, which is making me question the "natural causes death".

Joel Pollak, editor-in-chief of Breitbart.com, told The Atlantic Wire by email, "I can't tell you more than I have already, unfortunately. We'll know more later." Ben Howe, a Breitbart colleague, tweets that he has "personal confirmation" the news is legitimate and not a hoax as some on Twitter had initially suspected. "We have lost a husband, a father, a son, a brother, a dear friend, a patriot and a happy warrior," wrote Larry Solov in the announcement on Breitbart's sites.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dok on March 01, 2012, 09:25:10 am
Quote
Andrew passed away unexpectedly from natural causes

at 43?
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: shipgeek on March 01, 2012, 09:28:43 am
Read about his death some minutes ago on another forum.

My first question... what natural cause?

RIP Andrew Breitbart.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: donnay on March 01, 2012, 09:54:09 am
My very first thought was, "I wondered whom he pissed off?"
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: donnay on March 01, 2012, 11:01:00 am
"The CIA has many secret weapons including a gun that shoots an ice bullet into you that causes you to have what looks like a heart attack. How many famous or important people have died of sudden heart attacks in the last 20 years? Some could be the victims of the CIA and the secret ice bullet they use to silence dissenters."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KctL8HQc8TE
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: hammelstein on March 01, 2012, 11:21:11 am
"The CIA has many secret weapons including a gun that shoots an ice bullet into you that causes you to have what looks like a heart attack. How many famous or important people have died of sudden heart attacks in the last 20 years? Some could be the victims of the CIA and the secret ice bullet they use to silence dissenters."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KctL8HQc8TE

An ice bullet would still cause a bullet hole and thus wouldn't look at all like a heart attack.  Come on.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: donnay on March 01, 2012, 11:51:33 am
An ice bullet would still cause a bullet hole and thus wouldn't look at all like a heart attack.  Come on.

If you watched the video, it causes a red mark, not a bullet hole, it is the size of a pin hole--hard to detect.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzIw44w00ow
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Leftovers on March 01, 2012, 11:55:50 am
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ (http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/)

Wow. did not expect that. All I can say is I wonder if her was investigating something? Could be just a heart attack or something else. I did not like him that much cause was pushing the party line but was not as bad as your average Fox fake conservative.

(http://biggovernment.com/files/2012/03/840_102926845194_686155194_5053359_1686_n.jpg)

Life on earth is truly to short.

On David Ickes site they are saying he had the goods on Obama for something?..
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Optimus on March 01, 2012, 12:02:31 pm
On David Ickes site they are saying he had the goods on Obama for something?..


He was assassinated to hopefully prevent damaging video about Barry Soetoro from being released.

Will Damning Obama Footage Still Be Released After Breitbart’s Death?
http://www.infowars.com/media-trailblazer-andrew-breitbart-dies-aged-43/
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: SUPREMEMASTER on March 01, 2012, 12:04:06 pm

He was assassinated to hopefully prevent damaging video about Barry Soetoro from being released.

Will Damning Obama Footage Still Be Released After Breitbart’s Death?
http://www.infowars.com/media-trailblazer-andrew-breitbart-dies-aged-43/

Anyone with COMMON SENSE KNOWS that this was a 100% guaranteed assassination to cover up what he knows and to keep that video from being publically released.

And we're not civilians.

This country operates by the constitution.

The globalists will never take this country.


You [military black ops] bastards think you can run around killing ANYONE YOU WANT as if the constitution doesn't apply.

You just f**ked up.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Optimus on March 01, 2012, 12:30:36 pm
Blast from the past! Check out this little tid-bit from Reuters...

Secret panel can put Americans on "kill list'
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/06/us-cia-killlist-idUSTRE79475C20111006

Quote
"A former official said one of the reasons for making senior officials principally responsible for nominating Americans for the target list was to "protect" the president."

Barry must have felt threatened by what Breitbart had on him and Breitbart must have been nominated to be on the "target list". The chances that he died of "natural causes" are becoming very slim.

And here are a few topics to refresh our memories:

The Secret Memo That Explains Why Obama Can Kill Americans
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=218734.0

Henry Kissinger is in charge of the WH "Assassinate Americans" program
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=165896.0

"License to Kill? Intelligence Chief Says U.S. Can Take Out American Terrorists"
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=158167.0

***White House "kill list" for extra-judicial murders: Impeachable/Criminal
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=218945.0
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 01, 2012, 12:39:00 pm
He was assassinated to hopefully prevent damaging video about Barry Soetoro from being released.

If that is indeed the case, then that certainly proves Alex's point that if you have explosive information which, if released, would likely destroy the reputation and career of someone powerful, then the longer you sit on that information, the more you needlessly put yourself at risk of being permanently "silenced."

Perhaps someone should have asked Breitbart: "Which is more important -- that lucrative book deal you're holding out for, or your life?"

(Note: I'm not saying that's why he sat on the information, just that I can easily see that being a motivating factor -- particularly for someone in the media.)
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: shipgeek on March 01, 2012, 12:44:42 pm
I wonder if they did an "iranian scientist" on him?

Natural causes my mutt.

 ::)
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: blackbeagle on March 01, 2012, 12:55:20 pm
I'm starting to agree more and more with the ice bullet theory. These guys are ruthless.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: chris jones on March 01, 2012, 02:33:12 pm

I go along with Geo:If that is indeed the case, then that certainly proves Alex's point that if you have explosive information which, if released, would likely destroy the reputation and career of someone powerful, then the longer you sit on that information, the more you needlessly put yourself at risk of being permanently "silenced."
Word travels fast in the Intell community, they will not be put in harms way (exposed)by anyone, be it a whistle blower or a big dog finding a conscience.
 There is a long list of scenarios to wack out folks and have it appear to be natural, the 3 K's were different, they were a message to the high powered, don't step out of line or get what JFK got.
 The peons, lackeys get mugged, suicide, fall off buildings, and surely die of natural causes. These teams of hitters are  BACKED professionals.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: SUPREMEMASTER on March 01, 2012, 03:00:31 pm
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: jofortruth on March 01, 2012, 03:48:27 pm
Andrew Breitbart at CPAC 2012 02102012 - FULL SPEECH
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbycMtTUDfE


Last speech Feb 10, 2012 where he said some interesting things about Obama. Now he's dead and the LA Times and others immediately say "of natural causes"? You have to be kidding me! This is HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS being what he has been exposing of late about Obama!

He was on Piers Morgan recently also and was everywhere speaking out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POteICT_gRg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9-WS1FNRIs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFrL3s0f1YY&feature=related
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: chris jones on March 01, 2012, 04:43:47 pm
this man was not an advocate of the regime, he was a face and therfor recieved attention, the report is sketchy -natural causes (what natural causes) this rings bells for folks seeking truth.
 Many folks have been erased, wacked out, especialy so those who spoke out against the regime, or those who had inside information and were considered a risk factor to the big dogs.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: hardrain77 on March 01, 2012, 04:56:50 pm
Normally when someone passes away in this nature, they wait to report the cause of death. Supposedly, he collapsed in front of some people. May be heart attack, but usually an autopsy in performed before making that printed conclusion.

Even Whitney Houston was found face down and blue, passed out in a tub and they waited for the autopsy to come to the ultimate conclusion.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: jofortruth on March 01, 2012, 05:26:29 pm
http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/container/420/421/?layout=&content_type=content_item&playlist_cid=&media_type=video&content=8BDCZB1PNR124C2L&read_more=1&widget_type_cid=svp&referrer=http://www.mediaite.com/tv/watch-andrew-breitbarts-fiery-cpac-speech-i-have-college-days-obama-videos/#

Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 01, 2012, 08:11:17 pm
RIP

I've used his site for many links....

example:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203605.msg1219226#msg1219226
Rockefella's & Gates ,whole family's go to india! and Buffett Too!

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.59c9179dd6dee0a41928bcf240caa589.431&show_article=1
Buffett says Japan quake a 'buying opportunity'
Mar 21 2011  02:13 AM US/Eastern
...
Buffett, the chairman of investment firm Berkshire Hathaway, was visiting South Korea to attend a ground-breaking ceremony for a local unit of Israel's Iscar Metalworking Companies, 80 percent owned by Berkshire Hathaway.

Buffett was scheduled to meet with South Korean President Lee Myung-Bak later Monday
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on March 01, 2012, 08:45:08 pm
(http://commonamericanjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/840_102926845194_686155194_5053359_1686_n.jpg)

Just to let you people in on how things work 'downtown'.  'RECOVERY' - ASSASSINATiON / HIT's are nothing new for the NWO assassin teams.  These are typical operations.  They happen more often than not internally, but occasionally, they are needed to be done OUTSIDE the inner circle.


(http://images.wikia.com/callofduty/images/1/12/Delta_icon.png)

A special unit from the ABOVE are typically put on the assignment.   The reason why I say this was a 'recovery' op is because UNTIL, and ONLY UNTIL ALL 'concerned' materials are without a shadow of a doubt 'recovered' does the operation get the 'go-ahead', using symbol below, for target termination.


(http://www.hiddenmeanings.com/whatar2.gif)

The point is in the DOWN position meaning, all materials recovered, terminate 'WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE'.

Therefore the REAL footage of Obama has been recovered (as far as they know) and (most likely) IF ANY footage does come out CLAIMING to be that of Andrew Breitbart's it will most likely by a PROVABLE fake to discredit ANY real evidence Andrew Breitbart may have had.

 
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 01, 2012, 11:03:46 pm
Soros releases new narrative to silence anyone questioning the LIKELY murder of Andrew Breitbart by "THE SECRET TEAM"...


SOROS/ROTHSCHILD APPROVED HEADLINES

25 people who think Obama murdered Breitbart -AMERICAblog

Andrew Breitbart Killed By Obama? 11 Hilarious Conspiracy Theories -International Business Times

Did Obama Kill Andrew Breitbart? Some Idiots Think So -Opposing Views

Conservative Tweeters Think Obama Killed Breitbart -Lez Get Real

ATTENTION MORONIC ALTERNATIVE MEDIA...HOW STUPID ARE YOU? BREITBART WAS IN YOUR PROFESSION WHETHER YOU AGREED WITH HIM OR NOT. YOU ARE COVERING FOR A LIKELY ''STAR CHAMBER' SYSTEM THAT REGARDS YOU AS 'PLAUSIBLE TARGETS'. WHY THE HELL AREN'T YOU TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WTF HAPPENED INSTEAD OF ASSISTING THE NWO IN BUILDING A TREASONOUS JOURNO-ASSASSINATION GRID? THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT RON PAUL WARNED YOU ABOUT YOU MORONS!

ATTENTION SOROS/ROTHSCHILD...

NO ONE WITH CREDIBILITY BELIEVES OBAMA KILLED BRIETBART, BUT WE DO KNOW THAT THERE IS A HIGH LIKELIHOOD THAT "THE SECRET TEAM" IS BEING IGNORED WHILE YOU RUN YOUR OBVIOUS NARRATIVE TO ATTEMPT TO SILENCE ANY INVESTIGATION WHATSOEVER.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 01, 2012, 11:05:59 pm

New Phoenix Program:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4361536536898115029

CIA and Operation Phoenix in Vietnam
http://www.serendipity.li/cia/operation_phoenix.htm
by Ralph McGehee, 1996-02-19

Chapter 1      The "Secret Team" -- The Real Power Structure
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ST/STchp1.html

Cheney secret team involved saboteurs as well as assassins
By Wayne Madsen
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4942.shtml
http://granddelusion.wordpress.com/

http://www.american-buddha.com/phoenixprogtoc.htm
http://www.serendipity.li/cia/death_squads1.htm
http://rawstory.com/2010/01/ron-paul-cia/

Ron Paul: After ‘CIA coup,’ agency ‘runs military’
US House Rep. Ron Paul says the CIA has in effect carried out a "coup" against the US government, and the intelligence agency needs to be "taken out." Speaking to an audience of like-minded libertarians at a Campaign for Liberty regional conference in Atlanta this past weekend, the Texas Republican said:

There's been a coup, have you heard? It's the CIA coup. The CIA runs everything, they run the military. They're the ones who are over there lobbing missiles and bombs on countries. ... And of course the CIA is every bit as secretive as the Federal Reserve. ... And yet think of the harm they have done since they were established [after] World War II. They are a government unto themselves. They're in businesses, in drug businesses, they take out dictators ... We need to take out the CIA.

Paul's comments, made last weekend, were met with a loud round of applause, but they didn't gather attention until bloggers noticed a clip of the event at YouTube. Paul appeared to be referring to news reports that the CIA is deeply involved in air strikes against Al Qaeda targets in Afghanistan and Pakistan. A suicide bombing late last year against Forward Operating Base Chapman in Afghanistan took the lives of seven of CIA operatives, including two contracted from Blackwater. The event highlighted the CIA's deep involvement in the war effort. Paul's reference to the CIA being "in the drug business" refers to long-running allegations that the CIA has funded some of its covert operations with proceeds from drug-running. That claim was most famously made in a 1996 investigative report from the San Jose Mercury-News, which alleged that cocaine from the Contra-Sandinista civil war in Nicaragua was making its way to the streets of L.A. via the CIA. The following video was uploaded to the Web by user TNSONSOFLIBERTY, Jan, 15, 2010.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dECSYm5bSM&feature=player_embedded

http://btjunkie.org/torrent/Black-Operations-DVD-ROM-The-Induction-Series-Fa/

(http://www.nysut.org/images/content/rfk_hands_480_02.jpg)(http://www.gardenofpraise.com/images/jfk2.jpg)(http://www.utsa.edu/today/images/events/mlk2.jpg)(http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/files/RFK.jpg)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Evidence of Revision (1 of 6) : The Assassinations of Kennedy
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=666048701355447870

Evidence of Revision (2 of 6) : The "Why" of it
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5335724479269105967

Evidence of Revision (3 of 6) : LBJ, Hoover and others
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2334637168204169083

Evidence of Revision (4 of 5) : The RFK assassination as never seen
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=679700833693499618

Evidence of Revision (5 of 6) : RFK assassination, MK ULTRA
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8273110340777778333

Evidence of Revision (6 of 6) : MLK assassination
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4920540616782600949


Propaganda Analysis Home Page
http://carmen.artsci.washington.edu/propaganda/home.htm
(Nicely done site. Also information on The Institute for Propaganda Analysis)

Propaganda and Psychological Warfare - Research Resource
http://www.lafayette.edu/mcglonem/prop.html
(Lots of links.)

Army Field Manual 33-1, Psychological Operations, August 1979
http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm33-1/
(only part of this manual.)

PROPAGANDA PLANNING PROCESS
http://www.mcad.edu/classrooms/POLITPROP/palace/library/propplan.html
(Another bit of FM 33-1, this time chapter 12.)

PSYOPs LESSONS LEARNED
http://call.army.mil/call/trngqtr/tq4-96/psyops.htm

PSYOP, MILITARY
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/1012/links.html
(Links, interesting pages.)

Psychological Operations and the Verbiage of War
http://www1.monumental.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum/war/page/w_da.html
(A study on how propaganda and psyops were used against David Koresh, the Waco children and church.)
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 01, 2012, 11:07:03 pm
THE SECRET TEAM

The CIA
and Its Allies
in Control of the United
States and the World

   L. FLETCHER PROUTY
Col., U.S. Air Force (Ret.)


  The "Secret Team" -- the Real Power Structure

         The most remarkable development in the management of America's relations with other countries during the quarter-century since the end of World War II has been the assumption of more and more control over military, financial and diplomatic operations at home and abroad by men whose activities are secret, whose budget is secret, whose very identities as often as not are secret -- in short, by a Secret Team whose actions only those implicated in them are in a position to monitor and to understand.

          For the purposes of this historical study, the choice of the word "Team" is most significant. It is well known that the members of a team, as in baseball or football, are skilled professionals under the direct control of someone higher up. They do not create their own game plan. They work for their coach and their owner. There is always some group that manages them and "calls the plays". Team members are like lawyers and agents, they work for someone. They generally do not plan their work. They do what their client tells them to do. For example: this is true of agents in the Central Intelligence Agency. It is an "Agency" and not a "Department" and its employees are highly skilled professionals who perform the functions their craft demands of them. Thus, the members of the highest level "Secret Team" work for their masters despite the fact that their own high office may make it appear to others that they, themselves are not only the Team but the Power Elite. This recalls a story related by the Rt. Hon. Lord Denning, Master of the Rolls, of Great Britain, during WW II.

          Winston Churchill had left the Admiralty to become Prime Minister. Frequently he would come down to the Admiralty basement on his way from #10 Downing Street, to his underground, bomb-proof bedroom. He made it his practice to visit the Officer in Charge for up-to-date Intelligence and then stroll into the Duty Captain's room where there was a small bar from which he sometimes indulged in a night-cap, along with his ever-present cigar.

          On this particular night there had been a heavy raid on Rotterdam. He sat there, meditating, and then, as if to himself, he said, "Unrestricted submarine warfare, unrestricted air bombing -- this is total war." He continued sitting there, gazing at a large map, and then said, "Time and the Ocean and some guiding star and High Cabal have made us what we are."

          This was a most memorable scene and a revelation of reality that is infrequent, at best. If for the great Winston Churchill, there is a "High Cabal" that has made us what we are, our definition is complete. Who could know better than Churchill himself during the darkest days of World War II, that there exists, beyond doubt, an international High Cabal? This was true then. It is true today, especially in these times of the One World Order. This all-powerful group has remained superior because it had learned the value of anonymity. For them, the Secret Team and its professionals operate.

          We may wish to note that in a book "Gentleman Spy, the Life of Allen Dulles" the author, Peter Grose cites Allen Dulles response to an invitation to the luncheon table from Hoover's Secretary of State, Henry L. Stimson. Allen Dulles assured his partners in the Sullivan & Cromwell law firm, "Let it be known quietly that I am a lawyer and not a diplomat." He could not have made a more characteristic and truthful statement about himself. He always made it clear that he did not "plan" his work, he was always the "lawyer" who carried out the orders of his client whether the President of the United States, or the President of the local bank.

          The Secret Team (ST) being described herein consists of security-cleared individuals in and out of government who receive secret intelligence data gathered by the CIA and the National Security Agency (NSA) and who react to those data, when it seems appropriate to them, with paramilitary plans and activities, e.g. training and "advising" -- a not exactly impenetrable euphemism for such things as leading into battle and actual combat -- Laotian tribal troops, Tibetan rebel horsemen, or Jordanian elite Palace Guards.

          Membership on the Team, granted on a "need-to-know" basis, varies with the nature and location of the problems that come to its attention, and its origins derive from that sometimes elite band of men who served with the World War II Office of Strategic Services (OSS) under the father of them all, General "Wild Bill" William J. Donovan, and in the old CIA.

          The power of the Team derives from its vast intragovernmental undercover infrastructure and its direct relationship with great private industries, mutual funds and investment houses, universities, and the news media, including foreign and domestic publishing houses. The Secret Team has very close affiliations with elements of power in more than three-score foreign countries and is able when it chooses to topple governments, to create governments, and to influence governments almost anywhere in the world.

          Whether or not the Secret Team had anything whatsoever to do with the deaths of Rafael Trujillo, Ngo Dinh Diem, Ngo Dinh Nhu, Dag Hammerskjold, John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and others may never be revealed, but what is known is that the power of the Team is enhanced by the "cult of the gun" and by its sometimes brutal and always arbitrary anti-Communist flag waving, even when real Communism had nothing to do with the matter at hand.

          The Secret Team does not like criticism, investigation, or history and is always prone to see the world as divided into but two camps -- "Them" and "Us". Sometimes the distinction may be as little as one dot, as in "So. Viets" and "Soviets," the So. Viets being our friends in Indochina, and the Soviets being the enemy of that period. To be a member, you don't question, you don't ask; it's "Get on the Team" or else. One of its most powerful weapons in the most political and powerful capitals of the world is that of exclusion. To be denied the "need to know" status, like being a member of the Team, even though one may have all the necessary clearances, is to be totally blackballed and eliminated from further participation. Politically, if you are cut from the Team and from its insider's knowledge, you are dead. In many ways and by many criteria the Secret Team is the inner sanctum of a new religious order.

          At the heart of the Team, of course, are a handful of top executives of the CIA and of the National Security Council (NSC), most notably the chief White House adviser to the President on foreign policy affairs. Around them revolves a sort of inner ring of Presidential officials, civilians, and military men from the Pentagon, and career professionals of the intelligence community. It is often quite difficult to tell exactly who many of these men really are, because some may wear a uniform and the rank of general and really be with the CIA and others may be as inconspicuous as the executive assistant to some Cabinet officer's chief deputy. Out beyond this ring is an extensive and intricate network of government officials with responsibility for, or expertise in, some specific field that touches on national security or foreign affairs: "Think Tank" analysts, businessmen who travel a lot or whose businesses (e.g. import-export or cargo airline operations) are useful, academic experts in this or that technical subject or geographic region, and quite importantly, alumni of the intelligence community -- a service from which there are no unconditional resignations. All true members of the Team remain in the power center whether in office with the incumbent administration or out of office with the hard-core set. They simply rotate to and from official jobs and the business world or the pleasant haven of academe.

          Thus, the Secret Team is not a clandestine super-planning-board or super-general-staff. But even more damaging to the coherent conduct of foreign and military affairs, it is a bewildering collection of semi-permanent or temporarily assembled action committees and networks that respond pretty much ad hoc to specific troubles and to flash-intelligence data inputs from various parts of the world, sometimes in ways that duplicate the activities of regular American missions, sometimes in ways that undermine those activities, and very often in ways that interfere with and muddle them. At no time did the powerful and deft hand of the Secret Team evidence more catalytic influence than in the events of those final ninety days of 1963, which the "Pentagon Papers" were supposed to have exposed.

          The New York Times shocked the world on Sunday, June 13, 1971, with the publication of the first elements of the Pentagon Papers.[1] The first document the Times selected to print was a trip report on the situation in Saigon, credited to the Secretary of Defense, Robert S. McNamara, and dated December 21, 1963. This was the first such report on the situation in Indochina to be submitted to President Lyndon B. Johnson. It came less than thirty days after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and less than sixty days after the assassinations of President Ngo Dinh Diem of South Vietnam and his brother and counselor Ngo Dinh Nhu.

          Whether from some inner wisdom or real prescience or merely simple random selection, the Times chose to publish first from among the three thousand pages of analysis and four thousand pages of official documents that had come into its hands that report which may stand out in history as one of the key documents affecting national policy in the past quarter-century -- not so much for what it said as for what it signified. This report is a prime example of how the Secret Team, which has gained so much control over the vital foreign and political activities of this government, functions.

          Most observers might have expected that the inner group of men who had worked so closely with President Kennedy for three years would have lost heart in those days following his tragic death. On the contrary, they burst forth, as though from strong bonds and fetters and created this entirely new report, thus shaping the future of the Indochina conflict. Their energy and their new sense of direction seemed almost to rise from the flame of Kennedy's tomb in Arlington.


ENTIRE TEXT OF "THE SECRET TEAM":
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=140555.0
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 01, 2012, 11:10:14 pm
The Secret Government
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sstDwKTCpM
Uploaded by Wrayer on Sep 30, 2006

It aired on PBS in 1987 and is as good as anything on the tape (must see). Moyers is a very respected TV journalist who also worked for Lyndon B. Johnson and has a very professional approach. He interviews many different people involved with the CIA and other government agencies. His documentary gives quite an overview of what has actually happened in the last 50 years regarding the CIA and the cold war (including Iran, Guatamala, Cuba, Viet Nam and Chile). He features such people as Ralph McGeehee and Phil Retinger (both former CIA agents), Rear Admiral Gene La Rocque (Ret. U.S.N.), Theodore Bissell (active in the CIA at the time), Sen. Frank Church and many others. Moyers is so very credible. The full video "The Secret Government" is 90 minutes - this segment is edited by Frank Dorrel to 20 minutes.

Coverup - behind the iran-contra affair (1988)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8476042566108039966
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXZRRRU2VRI
1:12:27  - 4 years ago

CIA Covert Operations and U.S. Interventions Since World War II – Full documentary
http://wearechangetv.us/2012/02/cia-covert-operations-and-u-s-interventions-since-world-war-ii-full-documentary/

The CFR is Financing SAIS Nitze's "Not-See" Spy School
The CFR controls THE SECRET TEAM
CFR's Treasonous Operations are above the CIA

http://www.bilderberg.org/roundtable/foundation.html

In 1944 a group of statesmen founded The Paul H. Nitze School. of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). At least one, Paul H. Nitze, was a Council on Foreign Relations(CFR) member. The resident SAIS faculty includes 36 professors. At least 20 are CFR members, two are CFR fellows.

Council on Foreign Relations members in an ad hoc committee called the "Special Group" and through a vast intragovernmental undercover infrastructure called the "Secret Team" plan and coordinate massive psychological operations scripted using "Tactics of Deception." American citizens and citizens of foreign nations are manipulated to accept the particular climate of opinion the groups are seeking to achieve in the world. Is SAIS a cover for Council on Foreign Relations "Special Group" and "Secret Team" members and covert operator training school?1

CFR member Nitze, Graduated cum laude from Harvard in 1928. He joined Dillon, Read and Co., a New York investment banking firm. In 1944 he went to Washington to join the war effort. He became Financial Director of the Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs. Born in Amherst, Massachusetts, Nitze was married to the late Phyllis Pratt. They had four children. He is now married to Elisabeth Scott Porter. CFR member Nitze's legal residence is in Washington, D.C. He has a second residence in Bel Alton, Maryland. Council on Foreign Relations headquarters is The Harold Pratt House 58th E. 68th Street, New York, NY.2

CFR Member Nitze's vita reads:
1953-61 President Foreign Service Educational Foundation, Washington D.C.
1947-53 Various positions with the Department of State,
1947 Deputy Director of the Office of International Trade Policy.
1948 Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Economic Affairs.
1949 Deputy Director of the State Department's Policy Planning Staff,
1950 Director State Department's Policy Planning Staff
1961-63 Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs.
1963-67 57th Secretary of the Navy
1967-69 Deputy Secretary of Defense.
1969-74 US Delegation to the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks with the Soviet Union.
1981-84 Headed Arms Control Talk Negotiating Team
1984-89 Special Advisor Arms Control to Sec. of State and President.

President Reagan appointed him Ambassador-at-Large, the position in which he served until his retirement. Nitze has been diplomat-in-residence at SAIS since retiring from the State Department on April 30, 1989.3

When a CFR member tries to make a difference it is a difference designed to create tension between two or more target groups. In 1993 Nitze published a book titled TENSION BETWEEN OPPOSITES: REFLECTIONS ON THE PRACTICES AND THEORY OF POLITICS. Is Nitze really retired, or has he assumed another cover for his role in the "Special Group" that co-ordinates State Department Psychological Operations focused at Americans and citizens of other nations?4

CFR member Zbigniew Brzezinski is SAIS Robert E. Osgood Professor of American Foreign Policy. CFR members: Brzezinski (Public Law and Government Professor, Columbia ); Frederick C. Barghoorn (Political Science Professor, Yale ); and George A. Kelly (Politics Professor, Brandeis ); contributed to THE ART AND SCIENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS. The book contains a series of case studies sponsored by the US Department of the Army.

CFR member Paul Wolfowitz, Ph.D. is SAIS Chairman and Dean. Prior to joining SAIS as dean in 1994, Wolfowitz taught at the National Defense University as a visiting distinguished fellow.5

Other Council on Foreign Relations SAIS faculty members are: Fouad Ajami (Majid Khadduri Professor and Director of Middle East Studies), A. Doak Barnett (Professor emeritus of Chinese Studies), Frederick Brown (Fellow, Foreign Policy Institute and Adjunct Professor Southeast Asian Studies Program), Charles Doran (Andrew W. Mellon Professor of International Relations and Director of Canadian Studies), Isaiah Frank (William L. Clayton Professor of International Economics), Francis Fukuyama (Director of the SAIS Telecommunications Project and Fellow, Foreign Policy Institute), Charles Gati (Fellow, Foreign Policy Institute), Christian Herter (Professorial Lecturer in International Relations), David M. Lampton, Ph.D.(George and Sadie Hyman Professor of China Studies and Director of China Studies), Michael Mandelbaum (Christian A. Herter Professor and Director of American Foreign Policy), Steven Muller (Fellow, Foreign Policy Institute), Donald Oberdorfer (Journalist-in-Residence, Foreign Policy Institute), George Packard (Edwin O. Reischauer Professor and Director of the Reischauer Center for East Asian Studies), Riordan Roett (The Sarita and Don Johnston Professor and Director of Latin American Studies), Hederick Smith (Editor-in-Residence, Foreign Policy Institute), S. Frederick Starr (Chairman, Central Asia Institute), I. William Zartman (Jacob Blaustein Professor of International Organizations and Conflict Resolution and Director of African Studies). The two Council on Foreign Relations Fellows on the SAIS faculty are Andrew J. Bacevich and Wilford L. Kohl.

When SAIS opened 15 students were enrolled. SAIS became a division of Johns Hopkins University in 1950. By 1963, SAIS outgrew its first quarters on Florida Avenue, Washington, DC, and moved to one of its two present buildings on Massachusetts Avenue. By 1995, more than 8,600 men and women had graduated from SAIS. They are now working in 143 countries. Are these graduates covert operators?

SAIS Alumni are employed by the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Education, and State, and Office of the U.S. Trade Representative [see NAFTA PSYOP].6 President William J. Clinton, Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Secretary of Health Education and Welfare Donna E. Shalala and Director of the CIA John Deutch are all Council on Foreign Relations members.

SAIS maintains centers in Bologna, Italy, and Nanjing, China. The Bologna center was founded in 1955. "The student body is composed of some 150 to 170 university graduates. About 45 percent of the students come from the United States, 45 percent from Europe, and the remaining 10 percent from Canada and countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. The Bologna Center presently has 4,221 alumni representing 88 nationalities. They hold positions of importance in the public and private sectors of their respective countries--in foreign ministries and other government agencies, international and regional organizations, multinational corporations, banks and other financial institutions, non-profit organizations, journalism, and research centers and universities around the world."7

Is SAIS a school for Intelligence Agents and Covert Operators? Do SAIS graduates work for American and foreign intelligence agencies? Are alumni of the Hopkins Bologna Center and Hopkins-Nanjing Center Foreign intelligence agents? Do these intelligence agents participate in psycho-political operations and covert operations that further the aims of the United States Council on Foreign Relations and its branch organizations in other nations?

The Hopkins-Nanjing Center was established in 1968. It is located in the Peoples Republic of China "in Nanjing City, the capital of Jiangsu Province in the Yangtze River delta. The Center facility is adjacent to the campus of Nanjing University. The Chinese students live with graduate students from the United States and other countries who take courses from Nanjing University faculty in Mandarin Chinese. The Hopkins-Nanjing Center is the only American educational institution with a permanent physical presence in China."8

The Center's American students who held jobs before their time in Nanjing have worked for such employers as the Beijing Trade Exchange in Washington, D.C., the CBS News Bureau in Beijing, The Los Angeles Times, The Dow Chemical Company, General Electric Company, the Voice of America, the U.S. Army, U.S. Peace Corps, The Asia Society, Citibank, and the American Enterprise Institute.9

The American Enterprise Association was founded in 1943. It latter changed its name to the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. In 1979 the American Enterprise Institute began publishing a magazine called Public Opinion. 10 The American Enterprise Institute advertises itself to be a nonpartisan, nonprofit, research and educational organization based in Washington D. C. "The institute conducts seminars and conferences, and publishes books and periodicals. The AEI's research is carried out under three major programs: Economic Policy Studies; Foreign Policy and National Security Studies; and Social and Political Studies. " The American Enterprise Institute has a network of resident scholars and fellows. The network includes over ninety adjunct scholars at leading universities throughout the United States of America and in several foreign countries. Do these AEI scholars monitor the effectiveness of CFR psyops on University Students and report this information to the AEI as part of the Institutes Public Policy Research program?11

The last issue of Public Opinion was the May/June issue published in 1989. Nine people were on the Public Opinion Editorial Board. Five were Council on Foreign Relations members (David R. Gergen, Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, Irving Kristol, William Schneider, and Richard J. Whalen). 12 The Board of Trustees of the American Enterprise Institute had twenty-six members. Six were Council on Foreign Relations members: Willard C. Butcher (Chairman. and CEO Chase Manhattan Bank), Robert Anderson (Chairman. of the Executive Committee Rockwell International Corp. ), Paul W. McCracken (Edmund Ezra Day University Professor Emeritus University of Michigan), Edmund T. Pratt, Jr. (Chairman CEO Pfizer, Inc. ), Richard D. Wood (Chairman of the Board Eli Lilly and Co. ), and Walter B. Wriston (Former Chairman of Citicorp).13

The Chinese Institute of Pacific Relations is the CFR's branch in china. It runs Chinese government and industry. In April of 1989 the Chinese Government demonstrated the great lengths it would go to to retain its workers. Students camped out in Beijing's Tiananamon Square protesting economic and political corruption in Chinese Government. Over 100,000 students and workers marched. Twenty other cities in China saw similar protests. Martial law was imposed. Army troops crushed protests in Tiananamon Square. Death toll estimates were between 500-7000. Ten thousand people were injured. Ten Thousand dissidents were arrested. Thirty-one dissidents were tried and executed.

Did the Hopkins-Nanjing Center help plan, develop, and carry out a psycho-political operation that resulted in Tiananamon Square? Was Tiananamon Square engineered to get rid of well educated, intelligent students, who might interfere with Council on Foreign Relations plans for taking control of the People's Republic of China?

A group called the The Hopkins-Nanjing Council includes CFR members President George Bush (Honorary Chairman), Ambassador Arthur Hummel (Co-Chairman), and Morris W. Offit (CEO OFFITBANK). The Chairman of the Development committee is Russell S. Passarella, Senior Vice President, of The Chase Manhattan Private Bank. The Chase Manhattan Bank, is run by the Rockefeller Family. David Rockefeller Jr., David Rockefeller Sr., John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV, Rodman Clark Rockefeller, and Nelson Rockefeller (deceased) all belong to the Council on Foreign Relations. Council on Foreign Relations member Lynn Etheridge Davis, CFR member President Clinton's, International Security Advisor, is a Chase Manhattan bank Vice President..14

The Hopkins-Nanjing Partnership are a group of individuals and Foundations who gave money to the SAIS The Hopkins-Nanjing Center. Gifts range from $10,000 to over one million. Council on Foreign Relations member David Rockefeller is listed as a Hopkins-Nanjing "Supporter" for supplying a gift of $10,000 or more. The Council on Foreign Relations directed Ford Foundation is listed as a "Benefactor" who donated between $250,000 and $1,000,000.15

In the 1950s a the Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie foundations gave the Council on Foreign Relations $2.5 million grant.[12]16

After World War II covert foreign policy became State Department standard operating procedure. The Ford Foundation became a major player in funding covert activities. In 1948 the Air Force set up Rand Corporation to perform classified research. The Council on Foreign Relations medcine, munitons, food, and media industries had access to the research through their Intelligence Connections. Taxpayer funded research could be easily turned into Council on Foreign Relations member and insider profits.17

The interlocks between the trustees at Rand, and the Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie foundations were so numerous that the Reece Committee, a congressional committee tasked with investigating the foundations, listed them in its report (two each for Carnegie and Rockefeller, and three for Ford). In 1952 alone, when the chairman of Rand was also the Ford Foundation president, Ford gave one million dollars to Rand. 18

Conspicuously absent from The Reece Committee report were the links between the Foundations to the Council on Foreign Relations. In his book "A THOUSAND DAYS"(1965), CFR member Arthur Schlesinger, Jr, provides the link. Schlesinger writes "the American Establishment," whose "household deities were Henry L. Stimson and Elihu Root; its present leaders [1965], Robert A. Lovett and John J. McCloy; its front organizations, the Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie Foundations and the Council on Foreign Relations; its organs, the New York Times and Foreign Affairs...."[11]19

Schlesinger's account leaves out the link between CFR foundation directors and officers and US Intelligence agencies. In his book Carroll Quigley, is guilty of the same oversight. In his book TRAGEDY AND HOPE , Quigley writes about the establishment of an American branch of the British Royal Institute of International Affairs. The American branch, is the Council on Foreign Relations. Missing from Quigley's history is that the founding members were also members of the first US intelligence organization, known as the INQUIRY.[a]20

Quigley's first book, The ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT was written in 1949. No one would publish it until 32 years after Quigley died. Quigley writes, "The [Royal] Institute [of International Affairs] was organized at a joint conference of British and American experts at the Hotel Majestic on 30 May 1919. At the suggestion of Lord Robert Cecil, the chair was given to General Tasker Bliss of the American delegation. We have already indicated that the experts of the British delegation at the Peace Conference were almost exclusively from the Milner Group and Cecil Block. The American group of experts, "the INQUIRY," was manned almost completely by persons from institutions including universities dominated by J.P. Morgan and company."

This is disinformation -- a "tactic of deception" used to shift the readers focus away from more important information. While many of the INQUIRY members were connected to the J.P. Morgan company, they were also the first US Intelligence agents and covert operators. Missing from Quigley's history, is that the INQUIRY was the first American Intelligence organization. The INQUIRY was organized and run by Edward Mandel House, Woodrow Wilson's close political advisor. Missing from Quigley's history is that the INQUIRY drafted most of Wilson's 14 points. The only group that can profit from keeping this information secret is the Council on Foreign Relations. If Council on Foreign Relations members have participated in psycho-political operations focused a American Citizens and weakened America economically so that the CFR controlled international empire could profit they have committed treason. A staggering 5.5 Trillion Dollar Debt is evidence of this betrayal of trust. Shouldn't traitors be tried and executed?21

Since its inception, almost every important figure in American foreign policy, both covert and overt, has been closely involved with the Council on Foreign Relations. The Ford Foundation was deeply involved in covert actions in Europe during the early years of the Cold War, working closely with Marshall Plan (a PSYOP run by CFR members Dean Achenson, Walter Lippmann, and George Kennan) and CIA officials on specific projects. CFR member Richard Bissell was a Ford Foundation staff member in 1953, when he left suddenly to became a special assistant to the director of the CIA.[b ]22 When the Congress for Cultural Freedom was exposed as CIA-funded in 1967, Ford took over its funding.[c]23 In the early 1960s, Ford was involved in training Council on Foreign Relations members in Indonesia.[d]24

One such member was McGeorge Bundy. Bundy was not unusual in Council on Foreign Relations circles: Yale degree in 1940, army intelligence during World War II, policy analyst for the Council on Foreign Relations from 1948-49, Harvard dean from 1953-61, special assistant to the President for national security from 1961-66 (during the buildup in Vietnam), president of the Ford Foundation from 1966-79, and with Carnegie from 1990 until his death in 1996.[e]25 His brother William P. Bundy was at the CIA from 1951-61, and edited the CFR journal Foreign Affairs from 1972-84.[f]26

The covert side of Rockefeller Foundation receded after CFR member Nelson Rockefeller's death in 1979. Nelson, with the help of Hoover's FBI, was in charge of all U.S. intelligence in Latin America during World War II. After the war he artfully meshed his spook connections with his far-flung monopoly interests. His associate in Brazil, Col. J. C. King, became CIA chief of clandestine activities in the Western Hemisphere. When Nelson Rockefeller was appointed by CFR member Eisenhower to the National Security Council in 1954, his job was to approve various covert operations. This is when Nelson began his long association with CFR member Henry Kissinger.

During the 1950s, Rockefeller Foundation helped the CIA fund their MK-ULTRA mind control research, and supported early efforts to legitimize Ngo Dinh Diem as the leader of South Vietnam. Cold War heavies CFR member John J. McCloy and Robert A. Lovett were Rockefeller trustees. In 1950, OSS veteran Charles B. Fahs became head of the Foundation's division of humanities. His assistant there, another OSS veteran named Chadbourne Gilpatric, came to Rockefeller Foundation directly from the CIA. [g] 27

Up to 1961 every Secretary of State except Cordell Hull, and James Byrnes, were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. The undersecretaries, almost to a man, were also Council on Foreign Relations members. Secretaries of state have frequently been foundation officers. CFR member Dean Rusk went from the State Department after the war, to the presidency of the Rockefeller Foundation from 1952-60, and then back to State for eight years as secretary. [h] 28 CFR member John Foster Dulles was a trustee at Rockefeller while chairman at Carnegie.29 [i ] Other secretaries of state from the foundations included Edward R. Stettinius, Jr., Henry L. Stimson, Frank B. Kellogg, and Charles Evans Hughes.30 [j]

In the 1950's Psychological operations, were coordinated by a Governmental agency called the Psychological Strategy Board. The architect of the Psychological Strategy Board was Gordon Gray. Gray had a consultant named Henry Kissinger. Kissinger was the paid political consultant to the Rockefeller family. Gordon Gray, Henry Kissinger, and many members of the Rockefeller family belonged the Council on Foreign Relations. On Thursday 26 July 1951, President Truman would tell the press that the Psychological Strategy board was a part of the Central Intelligence Agency. 31

In the book 1984 Big Brother controlled the people by invading their privacy and using psychological manipulation to control and change reality through conscious deception, deliberate lying, and an official ideology that abounded in contradictions. Council on Foreign Relations and Royal Institute of International Affairs members employ the same techniques to control people -- including their fellow countrymen.

Hadley Cantril and Lloyd Free were Princeton University Social Psychologists; researchers; and members of the intelligence community. Council on Foreign Relations Member Nelson Rockefeller funded them to develop psycho-political policy strategies and techniques. Council on Foreign Relations Member Edward R. Murrow, would, with Rockefeller Foundation Funding conduct a research project to perform a systematic analysis of Nazi radio propaganda techniques and the political use of radio. This study would result in a world wide monitoring and broadcasting Government agency called the Foreign Broadcast Intelligence Service (FBIS).

The FBIS would become the United States Information Agency (USIA). The USIA was established to achieve US foreign policy by influencing public attitude at home and abroad using psycho-political policy strategies. The USIA Office of Research and reference service prepares data on psychological factors and propaganda problems considered by the Policy Planning Board in formulating psycho-political information policies for the National Security Council.

The Psychological Strategy Board became the renamed super-powered Operations Coordinating Board (OCB). The OCB had a vague ambiguous name that didn't provoke curiosity. It had more members than the Psychological Strategy board. It had the same mission, to use psychological strategy, propaganda, and mass media, to manipulate huge groups of individuals. It had a psychological warfare machine -- the United States Information Agency at its disposal. The USIA would be responsible for foreign policy propaganda for the NSC.

The National Security Council is responsible for recommending national security policy. The President for having the policy approved. The Operations Coordinating Board for coordinating interdepartmental aspects of operational policy plans to insure their timely and coordinated execution.

The National Security Council's recommended national security policy is the de facto foreign policy of the United States.The Department of State's Policy Planning Board scripted the policy for the NSC. The USIA Office of Research and Reference service prepared data on psychological factors and propaganda problems. The Policy Planning Board used the data in formulating psycho-political information policies for the NSC. In 1955 the Director of the USIA became a voting member of the Operations Coordinating board; USIA representatives were invited to attend meetings of the NSC Planning Board; and the USIA Director was invited to Cabinet meetings. 32

From 1950-1953 CFR member Nitze directed the Department of State Policy Planning Board. Nitze and crew scripted psycho-political operations for the National Security Council.33 SAIS Chairman and Dean Paul Wolfowitz, . also directed the Department of State Policy Planning Board. Wolfowitz was undersecretary of defense during CFR member George Bush's administration and served as assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs. He authored PRESERVING PEACE IN THE NUCLEAR AGE (1983) and numerous articles on political science, economics and defense issues. Are the books, documentaries, and articles produced by SAIS faculty and alumni Department of State propaganda meant to trick, manipulate, and brainwash Americans into accepting Council on Foreign Relations doctrine?

The latest warnings from the Council on Foreign Relations members who planed and directed a PSYOP called Mutually ASSured Destruction (MAD) include warnings of some rogue nation terrorizing the United States with a thermonuclear device. In 1994 CFR member William Clinton's administration began using this threat as an excuse to return America to a state of perpetual National Security. Such a state is necessary for the Federal Reserve board to legally control interest rates. If a nuclear tragedy ever happens it will be due to a Council on Foreign Relations run covert operation.34

On 19 February 1961, President John F. Kennedy issued a Statement abolishing the Operations Coordinating Board:

"I am today issuing an Executive Order abolishing the Operations Coordinating Board. This Board was used in the last Administration for work which we now plan to do in other ways. This action is part of our program for strengthening the responsibility of the individual departments. First, we will center responsibility for much of the Board's work in the Secretary of State. He expects to rely particularly on the Assistant Secretaries in charge of regional bureaus, and they in turn will consult closely with other departments and agencies. This will be our ordinary rule of continuing coordination of our work in relation to a country or area."

Second, insofar as the Operations Coordinating Board - as a descendent of the old Psychological Strategy Board - was concerned with the impact of our actions on foreign opinion - our "image" abroad - we expect its work to be done in a number of ways; in my own office, in the State Department, under Mr. Murrow of USIA, and by all who are concerned with the spirit and meaning of our actions in foreign policy. We believe that appropriate coordination can be assured here without extensive formal machinery.

Third, insofar as the Operations Coordinating Board served as an instrument for ensuring action at the President's direction, we plan to continue its work by maintaining direct communication with the responsible agencies, so that everyone will know what I have decided, while I in turn keep fully informed of the actions taken to carry out decisions. We of course expect that the policy of the White House will be the policy of the Executive Branch as a whole, and we shall take such steps as are needed to ensure this result.

I expect the senior officials who served as formal members of the Operations Coordinating Board will still keep in close and informal touch with each other on problems of common interest. Mr. Bromley Smith, who has been the Executive Officer of the Operations Coordinating Board, will continue to work with my Special Assistant, Mr. McGeorge Bundy [Bundy was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations ], in following up on White House decisions in the area of national security. In these varied ways we intend that the net result shall be a strengthening of the process by which our policies are effectively coordinated and carried out, throughout the Executive Branch.""

Kennedy's executive order didn't dissolve the Operations Coordinating Board, it made it invisible. The OCB became an ad hoc committee called the "Special Group." In The CIA File, author David Wise writes, "In The Invisible Government, published in 1964, Thomas B. Ross and I disclosed for the first time the existence of the "Special Group," the interagency government committee customarily cited by intelligence officials as the principal mechanism for control of covert operations. The special Group was also known during the Eisenhower years as the 54/12 Group and has been periodically renamed as the 303 committee - after a room number in the Executive Office Buildings - and during the Nixon administration, it acquired the name "Forty Committee. "... It was this committee to which Allen Dulles was referring when he wrote in a now famous statement, 'The facts are that the CIA has never carried out any action of a political nature, given any support of any nature to any persons, potentates or movements, political or otherwise, without appropriate approval at high political level in our government outside the CIA. '" 35

In 1975, Philip Agee, in the CIA DIARY, links the "Special Group" to the Operations Coordinating Board. A box on an organization chart writes, "Operations Co-ordination Board (OCB) (later renamed the 54-12 Group, The Special Group, the 303 group and the 40 Committee) Director of Central Intelligence, Under Secretary of State, Deputy Secretary of Defense are ad hoc members. "36

Air Force Intelligence Officer L. Fletcher Prouty writes, "During the Eisenhower years the NSC, which at times was a large and unwieldy body, was reduced for special functions and responsibilities to smaller staffs. For purposes of administering the CIA among others, the NSC Planning Board was established. The men who actually sat as working members of this smaller group were not the Secretaries themselves. These men are heads of vast organizations and have many demands upon their time. This means that even if they could attend most meetings, the essential criteria for leadership and continuity of the decision making-process simply could not be guaranteed. Thus the sub-committee or special group idea was born, and these groups were made up of men especially designated for the task. In the case of the Special Group, called by many codes during the years, such as "Special Group 5412/2," it consists of a designated representative of the President, of the Secretary of State, of the Secretary of Defense, and the Director of The Central Intelligence Agency in person. This dilution of the level of responsibility made it possible for the CIA to assume more and more power as the years went by, as new administrations established their own operating procedures, and the control intended by the law became changed."37 Prouty is understating what "this dilution did" -- it made it impossible to dissolve the Special Group.

Senator, isn't it time to dissolve the "Special Group?" Isn't it time to investigate the Council on Foreign Relations?


[1] Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) 1740 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA, http://www.sais-jhu.edu/
[2] Who's Who 1994, pg. 3076; Biographical notes courtesy of the City of Vancouver, Washington, which presented the 1995 George C. Marshall Lecture by Paul H. Nitze. EDF Membership 1-800-684-3322 Environmental Defense Fund (www.edf.org) 257 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10010
[3] Ibid
[4] Ibid
[5] Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) 1740 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA, http://www.sais-jhu.edu/
[6] Ibid, http://www.jhu.edu:80/~nanjing/currstu.html
[7] Ibid, http://www.jhubc.it/overview-print.shtml
[8] Ibid, http://www.jhu.edu:80/~nanjing/whatis.html
[9] Ibid, http://www.jhu.edu:80/~nanjing/currstu.html
[10] Hadley Cantril, The Human Dimension: Experiences in Policy Research, Rutgers The State University, 1967 pg 165-166
[11] The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Public Opinion, May/June 1989, pg 61
[12] Ibid, Contents pg 61
[13] Ibid, pg 61
[14] Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) 1740 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA, http://www.jhu.edu:80/~nanjing/hnccoun.html, http://www.jhu.edu:80/~nanjing/individ.html
[15] Ibid
[16] G. William Domhoff, The Higher Circles: The Governing Class in America (New York: Vintage Books, 1971), p. 115. See also Leonard Silk and Mark Silk, The American Establishment (New York: Avon Books- Discus, 1981), notably pp. 104-52 about the Ford Foundation and pp. 183-225 about the Council on Foreign Relations.
[17] Rene Wormser, Foundations: Their Power and Influence (Sevierville TN: Covenant House Books, 1993), 412 pages. First published in 1958 by Devin-Adair in New York, and reprinted in 1977 by Angriff Press., pp. 65-66.
[18] Ibid
[19] Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., A Thousand Days (Boston, 1965), p. 127, as quoted in Laurence H. Shoup and William Minter, Imperial Brain Trust: The Council on Foreign Relations and United States Foreign Policy (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1977), p. 63.
[20] Quigley, Tragedy and Hope p. 952; Footnotes [a]-[j] From NameBase NewsLine, No. 15, October-December 1996 Philanthropists at War
[21] Quigley, Carroll, The Anglo American Establishment, 1981, Books in Focus, NY, NY pg 182-183
[22] Sallie Pisani, The CIA and the Marshall Plan (Lawrence KS: University Press of Kansas, 1991), 188 pages; Eric Thomas Chester, Covert Network: Progressives, the International Rescue Committee, and the CIA (Armonk NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1995), 265 pages.
[23] Peter Coleman, The Liberal Conspiracy: The Congress for Cultural Freedom and the Struggle for the Mind of Postwar Europe (New York: The Free Press, 1989), pp. 224-27
[24] David Ransom, "Ford Country: Building an Elite for Indonesia." In Steve Weissman, ed., The Trojan Horse: A Radical Look at Foreign Aid (Palo Alto CA: Ramparts Press, 1975), pp. 93-116.
[25] Associated Press, "JFK aide Bundy dies at 77," as published in Washington Times, 17 September 1996, p. A3; Who's Who in America, 47th edition, 1992-93.
[26] Who's Who in America, 43rd edition, 1984-85.
[27] Gerard Colby with Charlotte Dennett, Thy Will Be Done -- The Conquest of the Amazon: Nelson Rockefeller and Evangelism in the Age of Oil (New York: Harper Collins, 1995), p. 221, 265-69.
[28] Who's Who in America, 43rd edition, 1984-85.
[29] Who's Who in America, 26th edition, 1950-51.
[30] Ferdinand Lundberg, The Rich and the Super-Rich (New York: Bantam Books, 1969). Chapter 10, titled "Philanthropic Vistas: The Tax-Exempt Foundations" (pp. 465-530), describes the Patman investigations pg. 482-483
[31] Harry S. Truman, Public Papers of Harry S. Truman, US Government Printing Office 1963, 1951 July 27 [172] pg. 427.
[32] Henderson, John W.,The United States Information Agency, 1966, pg. 52-53 Frederick A. Praeger, Publishers, New York, Washington, London, Book 14 in the Praeger Library of US Government Departments and Agencies series, consulting editors Ernest S. Griffith, former Dean and Professor Emeritus, School Of International Service, American University. Hugh Langdon Elsbree, former Chairmen, Department of Political Science, Dartmouth College. Both editors are formed directors, Legislative Reference Service, Library of Congress.
[33] Who's Who 1994, pg 3076
[34] Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) 1740 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA, http://www.sais-jhu.edu/
[35] Robert L. Borosage and John Marks, The CIA File, Grossman Publishers A Division of Viking Press, 1976 pgs. 12-13
[36] Philip Agee, Inside the Company CIA Diary, Stonehill Publishing Co., 38 East 57 Street, New York, NY, 1975 pg 632
[37] Prouty, L. Fletcher Col., US Air Force Retired, The Secret Team, The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States and the World, copyright 1973 by L. Fletcher Prouty, Ballantine Books, Inc., 201 East 50th Street, New York, NY, First Printing 1974 pg 3-5
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 01, 2012, 11:13:02 pm
ROUND TABLE GROUP
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=11208.0
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 01, 2012, 11:16:02 pm
Pentagon Manhunters: America’s New Murder, Inc.?
http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/pentagon-manhunters-americas-new-murder-inc/
by Tom Burghardt / November 23rd, 2009

When CIA Director Leon Panetta revealed (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124736381913627661.html) that for eight years the Agency ran a secret program to hunt down and kill top leaders of the Afghan-Arab database of disposable Western intelligence assets known as al-Qaeda, it set off a political firestorm.

While congressional Democrats and Republicans diverted the public’s attention with claims and counterclaims whether or not the Company had “misled” Congress by not disclosing the program’s existence, investigative journalist Seymour Hersh reported months earlier that former Vice President Richard Cheney had stood up an “executive assassination ring.”

According to Hersh, that fully-operational program was run, not by the CIA, but by the Pentagon’s secretive Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), a subunit attached to United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM (http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/default.aspx)). During a “Great Conversations” event last March at the University of Minnesota, Hersh told the audience:

    “Congress has no oversight of it. It’s an executive assassination ring essentially, and it’s been going on and on and on. Just today in the Times there was a story that its leaders, a three star admiral named [William H.] McRaven, ordered a stop to it because there were so many collateral deaths.

    “Under President Bush’s authority, they’ve been going into countries, not talking to the ambassador or the CIA station chief, and finding people on a list and executing them and leaving. That’s been going on, in the name of all of us.” (Eric Black, “Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh describes ‘executive assassination ring’,” MinnPost.com, March 11, 2009)


Old news right? Well, not entirely.

Wired investigative reporter Noah Shachtman revealed (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/11/us-needs-hit-squads-manhunting-agency-spec-ops-report/) November 3, that a report published by the Pentagon’s Joint Special Operations University (JSOU), the “educational component” of USSOCOM based at MacDill Air Force Base in Florida, proposed creating a specialized “manhunting” unit with a global reach.

Shachtman writes that its author argues that the CIA “didn’t go far enough. Instead, it suggests the American government should set up something like a ‘National Manhunting Agency’ to go after jihadists, drug dealers, pirates and other enemies of the state.”

While not an “official” report, the fact that the monograph (https://jsoupublic.socom.mil/publications/jsou/JSOU09-7crawfordManhunting_final.pdf), Manhunting: Counter-Network Organization for Irregular Warfare, was written by retired Air Force Lt. Colonel George A. Crawford and published by JSOU, lends added weight to arguments by critics that the United States Government has “gone rogue” and is preparing a planet-wide Operation Condor (http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB239d/index.htm) network to capture or kill imperialism’s enemies.

Currently a senior director for Archimedes Global, Inc. (http://www.archimedesglobal.com/), Crawford boasts a résumé that includes “operational assignments with special operations and special activities, intelligence collection and analysis, information operations and psychological operations.”

The shadowy firm, while short on information describing what it actually does, like many newly-minted intelligence and security outfits in Washington, is chock-a-block with retired spooks and special forces operators cashing-in on the tsunami of public funds fueling the “War on Terror.”

According to their web site the company offer services such as “Operations and Research” from “experienced, highly trained people” who possess “unmatched expertise across a number of industries and focus areas.”

In the realm of Technology, Archimedes specializes in “Cryptanalysis and Applied Cryptography.” Hint, hint, this is what the National Security Agency does when it isn’t spying on the American people and building an exploitable database (http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/07/23/new_churchcomm/) on dissidents destined for “special handling” should the need arise.

The firm’s “Information and Risk” brief claims they will solve “the most difficult communication and risk problems by seeing over the horizon with a blend of art and science.” And with focus areas that include “strategic communications, media analysis and support, crisis communications, and risk and vulnerability assessment and mitigation,” it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to infer that those well-schooled in the dark art of psychological operations (PSYOPS) would find a friendly home at Archimedes!

With some 25-years experience “as a foreign area officer specializing in Eastern Europe and Central Asia,” including a stint “as acting Air and Defense Attaché to Kyrgyzstan,” Crawford brings an interesting skill-set to the table.

A trained interrogator “selected by the commander of United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) as an inspector for the Secretary of Defense Interrogation Special Focus Team,” one shudders to contemplate what his duties entailed in that capacity.

As the Congressional Research Service (CRS) reported (http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/crs/rs21048-3.pdf) in 2004 in the wake of the Abu Ghraib scandal, with Special Operations Forces (SOF) tasked with “greater responsibility for planning and conducting worldwide counterterrorism operations,” systematic human rights violations in Afghanistan and Iraq was just another day at the office.

Intimate with the narcotrafficking, al-Qaeda-linked Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA (http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2000/01/heroin-heroes)), JSOU avers that Crawford “personally authored the intelligence plan for military operations in Kosovo and was the lead strategist for developing USSOCOM’s advanced intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities for counterterrorism operations.”

A rather ironic claim considering that right-up to the moment of the 9/11 attacks, as former FBI translator and whistleblower Sibel Edmonds revealed, the United States employed Afghan-Arab veterans of the anti-Soviet jihad for destabilization operations in innumerable global hot spots.

Manhunting: The Return of Operation Condor?

This isn’t the first time that America’s engagement with “dark actors” involved in “manhunting” as a state-sponsored blood sport led to a devil’s pact with torturers, drug dealers and sociopathic fascist killers.

During the 1970s, in the wake of the overthrow of Chile’s democratically-elected socialist president, Salvador Allende, the intelligence and security services of several Latin American states, notably Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay launched a secretive program, Operation Condor–with a major assist from the CIA and the Pentagon (http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010306/)–that tracked down and murdered leftist opponents.

Operating under the radar, Condor operatives included military personnel, European neofascists, CIA-trained Cuban terrorists and international narcotraffickers who did the “wet work” for their political masters, Latin American oligarchs and their North American allies. Thousands were killed and thousands more “disappeared” into clandestine prisons.

Long Island University political science professor, J. Patrice McSherry, revealed (http://www.logosjournal.com/issue_4.2/mcsherry.htm), “U.S. military and intelligence forces were well informed of Condor operations, and the United States played a key covert role in modernizing and extending the Condor apparatus. An Argentine military source told a U.S. Embassy contact in 1976 that the CIA had been deeply involved in setting up computerized links among the intelligence and operations units of the six Condor states.”

Indeed, so extensive were these links that “U.S. forces also gave the Condor organization access to the U.S. continental communications system based in the Panama Canal Zone.” A declassified 1978 cable (http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010306/condor.pdf) from U.S. Ambassador to Paraguay Robert White to the Secretary of State, “revealed that Condor operatives made use of a U.S. facility in the Canal Zone for secret communications and intelligence coordination.”

The Pentagon, according to White’s declassified cable, provided the narco-linked death squad (http://www.consortiumnews.com/1990s/consor24.html) with the sophisticated electronic means to coordinate global operations.

General Alejandro Fretes Dávalos, commander of Paraguay’s armed forces told the ambassador, “that intelligence chiefs from Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Uruguay used ‘an encrypted system within the U.S. telecommunications net[work],’ which covered all of Latin America, to ‘coordinate intelligence information’.”

“Essentially,” McSherry wrote, “U.S. military and/or intelligence forces put the official U.S. communications channel at the disposal of Operation Condor. It was a collaboration reflecting high-level executive approval of Condor.”

This “high-level executive approval” of an international death squad reflected past–and current–Pentagon thinking that when it comes to killing capitalism’s opponents, everything is permitted.

The parallels to contemporary American covert intelligence and military operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan, with their documented linkages to the flourishing international drug trade are striking.

That these moves by Washington to seize the geostrategic high ground vis-à-vis their imperialist rivals, as in Latin America decades earlier, have spawned an unholy alliance with far-right political forces, warlords, religious extremists and drug traffickers, exposes the lie that U.S. military intervention has anything to do with democracy and human rights. Thirty years ago Danish journalist Henrik Krüger observed:

    International Fascista was a crucial first step toward fulfilling the dream not only of [SS Col. Otto] Skorzeny, but also of his close friends in Madrid exile, José Lopez Rega, Juan Peron’s grey eminence, and Prince Justo Valerio Borghese, the Italian Fascist money man who had been rescued from execution at the hands of the World War II Italian resistance by future CIA counterintelligence whiz James J. Angleton. They, and other Nazi and Fascist powers throughout Europe and Latin America, envisioned a new world order built on a Fascist Iron Circle linking Buenos Aires, Santiago, Lima, La Paz, Brasilia and Montevideo. (Henrik Krüger, The Great Heroin Coup: Drugs, Intelligence, & International Fascism, Boston: South End Press, 1980, p. 210)

Shaped by French unconventional warfare doctrines, U.S. counterinsurgency tactics employed in Southeast Asia, and their own on the ground expertise crushing dissent, the “new professionalism of internal security” deployed by Condor operatives–code for massive repression and unrestrained violence–was directed against the people of Latin America with predictable results.

Eerily prefiguring America’s “War on Terror,” counterinsurgency “specialist” Roger Trinquier, the author of Modern Warfare and an architect of France’s bloody repression during the Algerian anticolonial struggle (1954-1962), averred that counterguerrillas must employ the full range of psychological warfare techniques against the civilian population if victory is to be achieved. This is a thesis to which Crawford returns time and again, particularly as it relates to the covert decapitation of resistance networks by American manhunters.

Fast forward and it becomes all-too-clear that Krüger’s “Fascist Iron Circle” didn’t disappear with Pinochet’s fall from grace; instead, it has morphed into a high-tech killing machine whose tentacles have fanned-out from the Washington Beltway to encircle the globe. Peter Dale Scott, writing (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=SCO20080906&articleId=10095) on America’s descent into a lawless state presciently remarked:

    Mafias and empires have certain elements in common. Both can be seen as the systematic violent imposition of governance in areas of undergovernance. Both use atrocities to achieve their ends; but both tend to be tolerated to the extent that the result of their controlled violence is a diminution of uncontrolled violence. I would tentatively suggest an important difference between mafias and empires: that, with the passage of time, mafias tend to become more and more part of the civil society whose rules they once broke, while empires tend to become more and more irreconcilably at odds with the societies they once controlled. (”Deep Events and the CIA’s Global Drug Connection,” Global Research, September 6, 2008)

Indeed, the “controlled violence” implicit in Crawford’s thesis, provides stark confirmation of Scott’s analysis that as the imperialist empire unravels it tends “to become more and more irreconcilably at odds” with popular control in a democratic republic.

The Mechanics of Standing Up a Death Squad

In “Unconventional Warfare in the 21st Century,” Antifascist Calling revealed (http://antifascist-calling.blogspot.com/2008/12/unconventional-warfare-in-21st-century.html) last December that USSOCOM had published (http://www.wikileaks.org/leak/us-fm3-05-130.pdf) its definitive doctrine on the subject. Titled Unconventional Warfare, the 248-page document asserted that Unconventional Warfare or UW establishes a “litmus test,” namely warfare conducted “by, with or through surrogates” and that their preferred assets are irregular forces:

    Irregulars, or irregular forces, are individuals or groups of individuals who are not members of a regular armed force, police, or other internal security force. They are usually nonstate-sponsored and unconstrained by sovereign nation legalities and boundaries. These forces may include, but are not limited to, specific paramilitary forces, contractors, individuals, businesses, foreign political organizations, resistance or insurgent organizations, expatriates, transnational terrorism adversaries, disillusioned transnational terrorism members, black marketers, and other social or political “undesirables.” (Army Special Operations Forces, Unconventional Warfare, Field Manual No. 3-05.130, Headquarters, Department of the Army, Washington, DC, 30 September 2008, p. 1-3)

And with an explicitly stated goal to “gain or maintain control or influence over the population and to support that population through political, psychological, and economic methods,” the organization that Crawford proposes in Manhunting clearly exists along this UW warfighting continuum.

    Manhunting–the deliberate concentration of national power to find, influence, capture, or when necessary kill an individual to disrupt a human network–has emerged as a key component of operations to counter irregular warfare adversaries in lieu of traditional state-on-state conflict measures. It has arguably become a primary area of emphasis in countering terrorist and insurgent opponents. (George A. Crawford, Manhunting: Counter-Network Organization for Irregular Warfare, JSOU Report 09-7, The JSOU Press, Hurlburt Field, Florida, September 2009, p. 1)

In the author’s view, a national manhunting agency of necessity, will be a hybrid organization, combining features of a Special Forces small tactical team with those of the FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team (HRT), the U.S. Marshals Services’ Special Operations Group (USMSSOG) at the federal level, “down to Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams and fugitive or criminal task forces in most U.S. cities.”

In addition to American examples, the author cites New Scotland Yard’s Antiterrorist Branch (SO13), Germany’s Grenzschutzgruppe (GSG-9), and the French Groupe de Sécurité et d’Intervention de la Gendarmerie Nationale (GIGN) as examples of a combined task force built on the “elite unit concept.” Moving on, Crawford recommends Israel’s Sayaret Mat’kal, “a special reconnaissance unit within Israel’s General Headquarters Intelligence Corps.

Lest readers forget, New Scotland Yard’s Antiterrorist Branch, SO13, was the “crack” unit that murdered Jean Claude de Menezes in cold blood on a London subway in 2005.

After an investigation that was little more than a cover-up, it was revealed that de Menezes was entirely innocent and had been mistakenly targeted by SO13’s armed wing, SO19, as part of “Operation Kratos,” the Met’s controversial “shoot-to-kill” program meant to take down suspected terrorists and would-be suicide bombers.

De Menezes was neither, but that didn’t stop police from pumping seven bullets into his head.

Tellingly, SO13 was stood up after consultations with Israeli “experts,” well-known for their fidelity to human rights, the rule of law and the sanctity of life, as Israel’s murderous assault last year on Gaza amply demonstrated.

Acknowledged manhunting masters in their own right, the Israeli settler-colonial security apparat have perfected the art of the “targeted killing,” when they aren’t dropping banned munitions such as white phosphorus on unarmed and defenseless civilian populations.

Like their Israeli counterparts who come highly recommended as models of restraint, an American manhunting agency will employ similarly subtle, though no less lethal, tactics. Crawford writes:

    When compared with conventional force-on-force warfare, manhunting fundamentally alters the ratio between warfare’s respective firepower, maneuver, and psychological elements. Firepower becomes less significant in terms of mass, while the precision and discretion with which firepower is employed takes on tremendous significance, especially during influence operations. Why drop a bomb when effects operations or a knife might do? (Crawford, op. cit., p. 11, emphasis added)

Where “influence” and “effects” operations are concerned, secrecy and deceit are the norm and discretion in choosing a “target” is transformed into a morality play with a unique demonstration effect:

    If internal security forces arrest a terrorist, it is an act of law enforcement, most often viewed favorably by both the international and domestic communities. If a terrorist is killed in an alley by an unknown assailant, it is an unsolved crime, a crime which may not be deeply investigated if the terrorist has a lengthy rap sheet. Thus it may be preferable to consign terrorist manhunting to intelligence and law enforcement organs and to avoid entanglements caused by crossing manhunting with military or diplomatic functions. Where manhunting is concerned, there may be legal and moral advantage in ambiguity and plausible denial. (Crawford, op. cit., p. 16)

Harken back to Seymour Hersh’s description of how Dick Cheney’s “executive assassination ring” actually performed in the real world: “they’ve been going into countries, not talking to the ambassador or the CIA station chief, and finding people on a list and executing them and leaving.”

This too, was the precise mechanism employed by Operation Condor assassins across Latin America, Europe and the United States during the 1970s. Small teams of highly-trained, plausibly deniable intelligence officers and assets, including NATO-trained Italian neofascists, Turkish narcotraffickers and CIA-sponsored Cuban exiles carried out a reign of terror against their Southern Cone leftist opponents.

While the 1976 car-bombing in Washington, D.C. that murdered former Chilean Foreign Minister Orlando Letelier and his secretary, Ronni Moffitt, may be the most notorious Condor operation to come to light, dozens if not hundreds of other “catch and snatch” operations were carried out, with a wink-and-a-nod from Washington. Those “disappeared” into Argentine or Chilean dungeons were never to be seen again.

The highly-specialized and compartmented nature of Crawford’s manhunting agency would become a permanent feature of America’s oxymoronic “War on Terror.”

    They would be trained in physical, intelligence, and virtual-tracking techniques. The team will also include “shooters,” supported by on-call logistics and administrative support. Rather than an ad-hoc task force in the nature of the current law enforcement, Intelligence Community, or DoD operations, manhunting teams would be standing formations, trained to pursue their designated quarry relentlessly for as long as required to accomplish the mission. In cases where action must take place in uncooperative countries, it may be necessary for teams to act unilaterally, with no support or coordination with local authorities, in a manner similar to that employed by Israel’s Avner team in response to the Munich Olympics massacre. (Crawford, op. cit., p. 19)

Or I might add, by Pinochet’s murderous Dirección de Inteligencia Nacional (National Intelligence Directorate) or DINA. Since intelligence will be central to the proposed national manhunting agency, “sensitive site exploitation (SSE) teams are the second tactical formation needed for manhunting.”

As with the actual shooters, SSE teams will be assembled and able to respond on-call “in the event of a raid on a suspect site or to conduct independent ‘break-in and search’ operations without leaving evidence of their intrusion.” Such teams must possess “individual skills” such as “physical forensics, computer or electronic exploitation, document exploitation, investigative techniques, biometric collection, interrogation/debriefing and related skills.”

Additionally, “Technical surveillance elements (TSE) or mobile surveillance teams (MST) will be stood up. According to Crawford, “Manhunting will require personnel who are experts at conducting surveillance of particular facilities, personnel, or activities without arousing suspicion or being detected.”

    They will be taught to blend in unobtrusively into an urban or remote background, often “hiding in plain sight.” Some may be skilled at employing technical surveillance devices–wiretaps, video surveillance equipment, or more intrusive devices and methods. They will also be skilled at multiple forms of transportation across international boundaries. Their goal is to maintain surveillance on suspected activity, either confirming or denying hostile intent. Picture in your mind a typical city street scene, with a little old lady walking her dog, the phone repair crew descending into a manhole, two little old men playing an innocent game of checkers, or the homeless person sleeping on the park bench, and you are on the right track. (Crawford, op. cit., p. 21)

As if to drive home the point that the target of these sinister operations are the American people and world public opinion, Crawford, ever the consummate PSYOPS warrior, views “strategic information operations” as key to this murderous enterprise. Indeed, they “must be delicately woven into planned kinetic operations to increase the probability that a given operation or campaign will achieve its intended effect.”

    Personnel skilled at conducting strategic information operations–to include psychological operations, public information, deception, media and computer network operations, and related activities–are important for victory. Despite robust DoD and Intelligence Community capabilities in this area, efforts to establish organizations that focus information operations have not been viewed as a positive development by the public or the media, who perceive government-sponsored information efforts with suspicion. Consequently, these efforts must take place away from public eyes. Strategic information operations may also require the establishment of regional or local offices to ensure dissemination of influence packages and assess their impact. Thus manhunting influence may call for parallel or independent structures at all levels…” (Crawford, op. cit., pp. 27-28, emphasis added)

This too, follows the Condor model where independently organized “task forces” drawn from a pool of technical specialists operating under deep cover, carried out intense psychological operations that targeted public opinion on the home front, the better to silence anyone who might oppose the “shooters” who did the dirty work.

While “government-sponsored information efforts,” i.e. illegal propaganda campaigns aimed at the American people by the secret state are viewed with “suspicion,” perhaps Crawford’s current employer, Archimedes Global, or dozens of other firms just like it would be better suited to for the “dissemination of influence packages”?

Unlike thirty years ago when Latin American oligarchs relied on CIA-financed publications such as El Mercurio in Chile or La Prensa in Argentina to fan the flames of anti-leftist discord and sow chaos, thus seeding the ground for the horrors that followed the military takeover, Pentagon media operations today still conform to principles enunciated decades earlier.

Indeed, Crawford’s “information operations” mirror precisely the chilling discourse of Argentine V Army Corps Commander General Acdel Vilas: “In reality, the only total, integral warfare is cultural warfare. … What we create in the individual is his mind. … The fight isn’t one to conquer terrain, physically, but to conquer minds. Not to take advantageous physical positions but to mold mental structures in his favor.”

As with his forerunners in decades’ past, Crawford’s manhunting weltanschauung is not conducive to a democratic model of society but rather, to the darkness of a technocratic and immutable fascism servicing America’s ruling oligarchy.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: SUPREMEMASTER on March 01, 2012, 11:16:32 pm
Soros releases new narrative to silence anyone questioning the LIKELY murder of Andrew Breitbart by "THE SECRET TEAM"...


SOROS/ROTHSCHILD APPROVED HEADLINES

25 people who think Obama murdered Breitbart -AMERICAblog

Andrew Breitbart Killed By Obama? 11 Hilarious Conspiracy Theories -International Business Times

Did Obama Kill Andrew Breitbart? Some Idiots Think So -Opposing Views

Conservative Tweeters Think Obama Killed Breitbart -Lez Get Real

ATTENTION MORONIC ALTERNATIVE MEDIA...HOW STUPID ARE YOU? BREITBART WAS IN YOUR PROFESSION WHETHER YOU AGREED WITH HIM OR NOT. YOU ARE COVERING FOR A LIKELY ''STAR CHAMBER' SYSTEM THAT REGARDS YOU AS 'PLAUSIBLE TARGETS'. WHY THE HELL AREN'T YOU TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WTF HAPPENED INSTEAD OF ASSISTING THE NWO IN BUILDING A TREASONOUS JOURNO-ASSASSINATION GRID? THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT RON PAUL WARNED YOU ABOUT YOU MORONS!

ATTENTION SOROS/ROTHSCHILD...

NO ONE WITH CREDIBILITY BELIEVES OBAMA KILLED BRIETBART, BUT WE DO KNOW THAT THERE IS A HIGH LIKELIHOOD THAT "THE SECRET TEAM" IS BEING IGNORED WHILE YOU RUN YOUR OBVIOUS NARRATIVE TO ATTEMPT TO SILENCE ANY INVESTIGATION WHATSOEVER.

Because, if all of this isn't true and if Breitbart really WASN'T murdered, then why is the establishment trying so damn hard to counter what we are saying by using logical fallacies and disingenuous, selective, slanderous reporting?

No way in hell is any of this a coincidence.

A-G-E-N-D-A.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on March 01, 2012, 11:25:13 pm

ATTENTION MORONIC ALTERNATIVE MEDIA...HOW STUPID ARE YOU? BREITBART WAS IN YOUR PROFESSION WHETHER YOU AGREED WITH HIM OR NOT. YOU ARE COVERING FOR A LIKELY ''STAR CHAMBER' SYSTEM THAT REGARDS YOU AS 'PLAUSIBLE TARGETS'. WHY THE HELL AREN'T YOU TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WTF HAPPENED INSTEAD OF ASSISTING THE NWO IN BUILDING A TREASONOUS JOURNO-ASSASSINATION GRID? THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT RON PAUL WARNED YOU ABOUT YOU MORONS!

There was all kinds of info a couple years back on pentagon (military) / government  / corporations targeting bloggers.  Tons of info on this and NOW, I can NOT find hardly any of it by Yahoo , google, bing, start paging it via search engines.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 01, 2012, 11:26:56 pm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NWO Whistleblower Extermination Program
FULLY OPERATIONAL
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?board=316.0

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 01, 2012, 11:49:25 pm
An ice bullet would still cause a bullet hole and thus wouldn't look at all like a heart attack.  Come on.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzIw44w00ow&feature=related

CIA whistleblower talks about a gun that shoots a frozen dart of poison that mimicks a heart attack in the unfortunate victim.

The Iceman: Confessions of a New World Order Hitman
Contract Killer for the New World Order exposes the use of HEART ATTACK ASSASSINATIONS for high profile targets
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-iceman-confessions-of-a-mafia-hitman/


The Iceman Confessions Of A New World Order Hitman Richard Kuklinski
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tv4c3flhSaU

CIA Whistleblower talks about Heart Attack gun

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=11169

Assassinations by induced heart attack and cancer

(http://presscore.ca/2011/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/CIA-dart.jpg)

In 1975, during the Church Committee hearings, the existence of a secret assassination weapon came to light. The CIA had developed a poison that caused the victim to have an immediate heart attack. This poison could be frozen into the shape of a dart and then fired at high speed from a pistol. The gun was capable of shooting the icy projectile with enough speed that the dart would go right through the clothes of the target and leave just a tiny red mark. Once in the body the poison would melt and be absorbed into the blood and cause a heart attack! The poison was developed to be undetectable by modern autopsy procedures.


Can you give a person cancer? If cancer in animals can be caused by injecting them with cancer viruses and bacteria, it would certainly be possible to do the same with human beings! In 1931, Cornelius Rhoads, a pathologist from the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, purposely infects human test subjects in Puerto Rico with cancer cells; 13 of them died. Though a Puerto Rican doctor later discovers that Rhoads purposely covered up some of the details of his experiment and Rhoads himself gives a written testimony stating he believes that all Puerto Ricans should be killed, he later goes on to establish the U.S. Army Biological Warfare facilities in Fort Detrick Maryland (origin of the HIV/AIDS virus, the Avian Flu virus and the Swine Flu / A-H1N1 virus), Utah and Panama, and is named to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, where he begins a series of radiation exposure experiments on American soldiers and civilian hospital patients.

The answer to the question – Can you give a person cancer – is yes. After nearly 80 years of research and development there is now a way to simulate a real heart attack and to give a healthy person cancer. Both have been used as a means of assassination. Only a very skilled pathologist, who knew exactly what to look for at an autopsy, could distinguish an assassination induced heart attack or cancer from the real thing.

Is death by heart attack, burst aneurysm, of cerebral hemorrhage a “natural cause”? Not if government agencies have found a way to influence your heart rate, blood pressure, or vascular dilatation. Neurological research has found that the brain has specific frequencies for each voluntary movement called preparatory sets. By firing at your chest with a microwave beam containing the ELF signals given off by the heart, this organ can be put into a chaotic state, the so-called heart attack. In this way, high profile leaders of political parties who are prone to heart attacks can be killed off before they cause any trouble. Jack Ruby died of cancer a few weeks after his conviction for murder had been overruled in appeals court and he was ordered to stand trial outside of Dallas — thus allowing him to speak freely if he so desired. There was little hesitancy in Jack Ruby killing Lee Harvey Oswald in order to prevent him from talking, so there is no reason to suspect that any more consideration would have been shown Jack Ruby if he had posed a threat to people in the US government who had conspired to murder the president of the United States – John F Kennedy.

Matt Simmons, an oil industry expert, was assassinated for turning whistleblower over the Obama administration coverup of the BP Gulf Oil Spill. Investment banker Matt Simmons, who died suddenly, was an energy industry insider and presidential adviser whose profile soared when he wrote that Saudi Arabia is running out of oil and world production is peaking. Simmons, 67, died at his vacation home in Maine. An autopsy by the state medical examiner’s office concluded Monday that he died from accidental drowning “with heart disease as a contributing factor.”

His 2005 best-selling book, Twilight in the Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy, brought him a wider audience. The book argued that Saudi Arabia vastly overstated the size of its oil reserves and that the world was on the verge of a severe oil shortage as the largest oil fields become depleted. This revelation is backed up by Iran. Iran knows the Middle East oil supply is quickly drying up and for that reason it is now focusing on building nuclear reactors. Once the oil runs out Iran will be the only country in the Middle East that will be energy self-sufficient. All of the other Middle Eastern countries, including Saudi Arabia will become Third World impoverished states.

Former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic was also assassinated. He was found dead in the detention centre at The Hague tribunal. Mr Milosevic faced charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity for his alleged central role in the wars in Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo during the 1990s. He also faced genocide charges over the 1992-95 Bosnia war, in which 100,000 people died.

Milosevic wrote a letter one day before his death claiming he was being poisoned to death in jail. An autopsy verified his claim as it showed that Milosevic’s body contained a drug that rendered his usual medication for high blood pressure and his heart condition ineffective, causing the heart attack that led to his death.

Former MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson told reporters that he saw documents in 1992 that discussed assassinating Milosevic by means of a staged car accident, where the driver would be blinded by a flash of light and remote controlled brake failure enacted to cause the crash. This exact same technique was utilized for real in the murder of Princess Diana.

If Milosevic was murdered, who would ultimately be responsible? NATO. Why NATO? Because, though the ICTY (or ‘Hague Tribunal’) presents itself to the world as a UN body, NATO officials have themselves made clear, in public, that it really belongs to NATO. NATO appointed the prosecutors, and the judges who ruled out investigating any war crimes accusations against NATO. It follows that Slobodan Milosevic, who was a prisoner of the Hague Tribunal’s Scheveningen prison when he died, was a prisoner of NATO. NATO had both motive and opportunity to kill him.

In March 2002, Milosevic presented the NATO controlled Hague tribunal with FBI documents proving that both the United States government and NATO provided financial and military support for Al-Qaeda to aid the Kosovo Liberation Army in its war against Serbia. This didn’t go down too well at the Pentagon and the White House, who at the time were trying to sell a war on terror and gearing up to justify invading Iraq.

During Milosevic’s trial for war crimes NATO alleged that the Serbs had committed a massacre of Albanian civilians in the Kosovo town of Racak. Evidence presented in the court showed that NATO’s claim was a hoax. This is especially embarrassing because the allegation of a massacre at Racak was the excuse that NATO used to begin bombing the Serbs on 24 March 1999 (the carpet bombing were done by the United States Air Force -authorized by then president Bill and Hillary Clinton). Then NATO claimed that the Serbs had supposedly been murdering 100,000 Albanian civilians. However, NATO’s own forensics reported that they could not find even one body of an Albanian civilian murdered by Milosevic’s forces. The failure to find any bodies eventually led to NATO’s absurd claim that the Serbs had supposedly covered up the genocide by moving the many thousands of bodies in freezer trucks deep into Serbia (while Bill Clinton was carpet bombing the place) without leaving a single trace of evidence. But the Hague tribunal showed these accusations to be entirely fraudulent as well.

Milosevic made several speeches in which he discussed how a group of shadowy internationalists had caused the chaos in the Balkans because it was the next step on the road to a “new world order.”

During a February 2000 Serbian Congressional speech, Milosevic stated, “Small Serbia and people in it have demonstrated that resistance is possible. Applied at a broader level, it was organized primarily as a moral and political rebellion against tyranny, hegemony, monopolism, generating hatred, fear and new forms of violence and revenge against champions of freedom among nations and people, such a resistance would stop the escalation of modern time inquisition. Uranium bombs, computer manipulations, drug-addicted young assassins and bribed of blackmailed domestic thugs, promoted to the allies of the new world order, these are the instruments of inquisition which have surpassed, in their cruelty and cynicism, all previous forms of revengeful violence committed against the mankind in the past.”

Evidence linking Milosevic to genocides like Srebrenica, in which 7,000 Muslims died, was proven to be fraudulent. In fact, Srebrenica was a ‘UN safe zone’, yet just like Rwanda, UN peacekeepers deliberately withdrew and allowed the massacre to unfold, then blamed Milosevic. Milosevic’s exposure of UN involvement in the Srebrenica massacre was another reason why tribunal transcripts were heavily edited and censored by NATO, and another contributing factor for NATO to murder him while he was in their custody.

NATO’s Hague Tribunal was clearly a kangaroo court whose sole purpose was to convince ordinary people all over the world that NATO’s destruction of Yugoslavia was justified. Since NATO failed to show this in its own court (a total absence of evidence did make this difficult), there is indeed a powerful NATO motive to murder Milosevic – to prevent his acquittal. In this way, NATO can continue to claim that Milosevic was guilty, and nobody would begin to look into the mountain of evidence that showed that it was NATO leaders (particularly US president Bill Clinton) who committed war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in Yugoslavia.

So many people have been done in by cancer at a convenient time in history that it is now time to ask the question “who is assassinating people by giving their target cancer or inducing a massive heart attack”? Who ordered the hits and why?

Mr. Charles Senseney, a CIA weapon developer at Fort Detrick, Maryland, testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee in September 1975 where he described an umbrella poison dart gun he had made. He said it was always used in crowds with the umbrella open, firing through the webing so it would not attract attention. Since it was silent, no one in the crowd could hear it and the assassin merely would fold up the umbrella and saunter away with the crowd. Video footage of the assassination of John F Kennedy shows this umbrella gun being used in Dealey Plaza. Video evidence of the events of November 22, 1963 shows that the first shot fired on the fateful day had always seemed to have had a paralytic effect on Kennedy. His fists were clenched and his head, shoulders and arms seemed to stiffen. An autopsy revealed that there was a small entrance wound in his neck but no evidence of a bullet path through his neck and no bullet was ever recovered that matched that small size.

Charles Senseney testified that his Special Operations Division at Fort Detrick had received assignments from the CIA to develop exotic weaponry. One of the weapons was a hand-held dart gun that could shoot a poison dart into a guard dog to put it out of action for several hours. The dart and the poison left no trace so that examination would not reveal that the dogs had been put out of action. The CIA ordered about 50 of these weapons and used them operationally. Senseney said that the darts could have been used to kill human beings and he could not rule out the possibility that this had been done by the CIA.

A special type of poison developed for the CIA induces a heart attack and leaves no trace of any external influence unless an autopsy is conducted to check for this particular poison. The CIA revealed this poison in various accounts in the early 1970s. The CIA even revealed the weapon that fired those darts that induces a heart attack at a congressional hearing. The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target. The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. A former CIA agent disclosed that the darts were made of a frozen form of the liquid poison. She disclosed that the dart would melt within the target and would only leave a very tiny red dot at the entry point – the same type of small entrance wound that was found during the autopsy of John F Kennedy.

For over 50 years assassinations have been carried out so skillfully as to leave the impression that the victims died from natural causes. Details of some of the techniques used to achieve this were brought to light in 1961 when professional KGB assassin Bogdan Stashinskiy defected to the West and revealed that he had successfully performed two such missions. In 1957 he killed Ukrainian emigré writer Lev Rebet in Munich with a poison vapor gun which left the victim dead of an apparent heart attack. In 1959, the same type of weapon was used on Ukrainian emigré leader Stepan Bandera, although Bandera’s death was never fully accepted as having been from natural causes.

Continued... (http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=9)

Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 01, 2012, 11:55:03 pm
WTF? Everyone knows that any whistleblower suddenly dying of a "heart attack" is likely the victim of a PRESCISION STRIKE assassination operation.

The opening scene of the movie "THE INTERNATIONAL" shows this gun being used to murder a whistleblower and make it look like a heart attack.

In the movie Michael Clayton, another whistleblower is murdered by a "HEART ATTACK" injection like the ones used by THE ICEMAN (documentary link above)
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: DesertEagle602 on March 02, 2012, 12:00:20 am
(http://media.adamdodson.org/var/albums/Illuminati-Card-Game/cia.png)  :o
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on March 02, 2012, 12:20:23 am
The question that has to go viral...

Was Andrew Breitbart murdered under the NDAA?

The question going viral EXPOSES the SORO's funded 'skeptics' for the fraudsters they are AND NDAA itself.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 12:22:43 am
FROM 2008, OVER 4 YEARS AGO...

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=24826.0

Journalists, bloggers are threats in terror drill
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Journalists_bloggers_are_threats_in_terror_0131.html
Associated Press Published: Thursday January 31, 2008


It's the government's idea of a really bad day: Washington's Metro trains shut down. Seaport computers in New York go dark. Bloggers reveal locations of railcars with hazardous materials. Airport control towers are disrupted in Philadelphia and Chicago. Overseas, a mysterious liquid is found on London's subway.

And that's just for starters.

Those incidents were among dozens of detailed, mock disasters confronting officials rapid-fire in the U.S. government's biggest-ever "Cyber Storm" war game, according to hundreds of pages of heavily censored files obtained by The Associated Press. The Homeland Security Department ran the exercise to test the nation's hacker defenses, with help from the State Department, Pentagon, Justice Department, CIA, National Security Agency and others.

The laundry list of fictional catastrophes which include hundreds of people on "No Fly" lists suddenly arriving at airport ticket counters is significant because it suggests what kind of real-world trouble keeps people in the White House awake at night.

Imagined villains include hackers, bloggers and even reporters. After mock electronic attacks overwhelmed computers at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, an unspecified "major news network" airing reports about the attackers refused to reveal its sources to the government. Other simulated reporters were duped into spreading "believable but misleading" information that worsened fallout by confusing the public and financial markets, according to the government's files. The $3 million, invitation-only war game simulated what the U.S. described as plausible attacks over five days in February 2006 against the technology industry, transportation lines and energy utilities by anti-globalization hackers. The government is organizing another multimillion-dollar war game, Cyber Storm 2, to take place in early March. "They point out where your expectations of your capabilities may be overstated," Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff told the AP. "They may reveal to you things you haven't thought about. It's a good way of testing that you're going to do the job the way you think you were. It's the difference between doing drills and doing a scrimmage." The AP obtained the Cyber Storm internal records nearly two years after it requested them under the Freedom of Information Act. The government censored most of the 328 pages it turned over, marked "For Official Use Only," citing rules preventing the disclosure of sensitive information. "Definitely a challenging scenario," said Scott C. Algeier, who runs a cyber-defense group for leading technology companies, the Information Technology Information Sharing and Analysis Center. For the participants including government officials from the United States, England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand and executives from leading technology and transportation companies the mock disasters came fast and furious: Hacker break-ins at an airline; stolen commercial software blueprints; problems with satellite navigation systems; trouble with police radios in Montana; school closures in Washington, Miami and New York; computer failures at border checkpoints.

The incidents were divided among categories: computer attacks, physical attacks or psychological operations.

"We want to stress these players," said Jeffrey Wright, the former Cyber Storm director for the Homeland Security Department. "None of the players took 100 percent of the correct, right actions. If they had, we wouldn't have done our job as planners." How did they do? Reviews were mixed. Companies and governments worked successfully in some cases. But key players didn't understand the role of the premier U.S. organization responsible for fending off major cyber attacks, called the National Cyber Response Coordination Group, and it didn't have enough technical experts.

Also, the sheer number of mock attacks complicated defensive efforts. The little-known Cyber Response group, headed by the departments of Justice and Homeland Security, represents the largest U.S. government departments including law enforcement and intelligence agencies and is the principal organization for responding to cyber attacks and recovering from them. The exercise had no impact on the real Internet. Officials said they were careful to simulate attacks only using isolated computers, working from basement offices at the Secret Service's headquarters in downtown Washington.

However, the government's files hint at a tantalizing mystery:

In the middle of the war game, someone quietly attacked the very computers used to conduct the exercise.

Perplexed organizers traced the incident to overzealous players and sent everyone an urgent e-mail marked "IMPORTANT!" reminding them not to probe or attack the game computers.

"Any time you get a group of (information technology) experts together, there's always a desire, 'Let's show them what we can do,'" said George Foresman, a former senior Homeland Security official who oversaw Cyber Storm. "Whether its intent was embarrassment or a prank, we had to temper the enthusiasm of the players."

This video is from The Associated Press, broadcast January 31, 2008.[/size]

(http://www.rawprint.com/media/2008/0802/ap_bloggers_cyberstorm_threat_080131a.jpg)
http://www.rawprint.com/media/2008/0802/ap_bloggers_cyberstorm_threat_080131a.flv

Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on March 02, 2012, 12:28:18 am
FROM 2008, OVER 4 YEARS AGO...


Thanks this article is JUST the tip of the blogger 'HYSTERIA' iceberg that was being generated by the NWO's Lame Stream Corporate Presstitutes.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 12:28:25 am
50 Year old message to the Press from a Dead President
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.


The President and the Press:
Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association
President John F. Kennedy

Waldorf-Astoria Hotel - New York City, April 27, 1961
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1710662559138481080

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that...

no war ever posed a greater threat to our security.

If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that

the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper.

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.

It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

     Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.

[...]

It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation--an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people--to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well--the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

    No President should fear public scrutiny of his program.

For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition.

And both are necessary.

I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people.

For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.


     I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers--I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

    Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed--

and no republic can survive.

That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy.

And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution- -not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.


    This means greater coverage and analysis of international news--for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security--and we intend to do it.

It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world's efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure.

And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of man's deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news--that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be:

free and independent.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 12:35:58 am
June 11, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/12/us/politics/12leak.html?hp

NY TIMES: White House Takes a Hard Line Against Leaks to Press

By SCOTT SHANE

(http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/06/12/us/JP-LEAK-1/JP-LEAK-1-popup.jpg)
National Security Agency headquarters.

WASHINGTON — Hired in 2001 by the National Security Agency to help it catch up with the e-mail and cellphone revolution, Thomas A. Drake became convinced that the government’s eavesdroppers were squandering hundreds of millions of dollars on failed programs while ignoring a promising alternative.

He took his concerns everywhere inside the secret world: to his bosses, to the agency’s inspector general, to the Defense Department’s inspector general and to the Congressional intelligence committees. But he felt his message was not getting through.

So he contacted a reporter for The Baltimore Sun.

Today, because of that decision, Mr. Drake, 53, a veteran intelligence bureaucrat who collected early computers, faces years in prison on 10 felony charges involving the mishandling of classified information and obstruction of justice.

The indictment of Mr. Drake was the latest evidence that the Obama administration is proving more aggressive than the Bush administration in seeking to punish unauthorized leaks.

In 17 months in office, President Obama has already outdone every previous president in pursuing leak prosecutions. His administration has taken actions that might have provoked sharp political criticism for his predecessor, George W. Bush, who was often in public fights with the press.

Mr. Drake was charged in April; in May, an F.B.I. translator was sentenced to 20 months in prison for providing classified documents to a blogger; this week, the Pentagon confirmed the arrest of a 22-year-old Army intelligence analyst suspected of passing a classified video of an American military helicopter shooting Baghdad civilians to the Web site Wikileaks.org.

Meanwhile, the Justice Department has renewed a subpoena in a case involving an alleged leak of classified information on a bungled attempt to disrupt Iran’s nuclear program that was described in “State of War,” a 2006 book by James Risen. The author is a reporter for The New York Times. And several press disclosures since Mr. Obama took office have been referred to the Justice Department for investigation, officials said, though it is uncertain whether they will result in criminal cases.

As secret programs proliferated after the 2001 terrorist attacks, Bush administration officials, led by Vice President Dick Cheney, were outspoken in denouncing press disclosures about the C.I.A.’s secret prisons and brutal interrogation techniques, and the security agency’s eavesdropping inside the United States without warrants.

In fact, Mr. Drake initially drew the attention of investigators because the government believed he might have been a source for the December 2005 article in The Times that revealed the wiretapping program.

Describing for the first time the scale of the Bush administration’s hunt for the sources of The Times article, former officials say 5 prosecutors and 25 F.B.I. agents were assigned to the case. The homes of three other security agency employees and a Congressional aide were searched before investigators raided Mr. Drake’s suburban house in November 2007. By then, a series of articles by Siobhan Gorman in The Baltimore Sun had quoted N.S.A. insiders about the agency’s billion-dollar struggles to remake its lagging technology, and panicky intelligence bosses spoke of a “culture of leaking.”

Though the inquiries began under President Bush, it has fallen to Mr. Obama and his attorney general, Eric H. Holder Jr., to decide whether to prosecute. They have shown no hesitation, even though Mr. Drake is not accused of disclosing the N.S.A.’s most contentious program, that of eavesdropping without warrants.

The Drake case epitomizes the politically charged debate over secrecy and democracy in a capital where the watchdog press is an institution even older than the spy bureaucracy, and where every White House makes its own calculated disclosures of classified information to reporters.

Steven Aftergood, head of the project on government secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, who has long tracked the uneasy commerce in secrets between government officials and the press, said Mr. Drake might have fallen afoul of a bipartisan sense in recent years that leaks have gotten out of hand and need to be deterred. By several accounts, Mr. Obama has been outraged by some leaks, too.

“I think this administration, like every other administration, is driven to distraction by leaking,” Mr. Aftergood said. “And Congress wants a few scalps, too. On a bipartisan basis, they want these prosecutions to proceed.”

Though he is charged under the Espionage Act, Mr. Drake appears to be a classic whistle-blower whose goal was to strengthen the N.S.A.’s ability to catch terrorists, not undermine it. His alleged revelations to Ms. Gorman focused not on the highly secret intelligence the security agency gathers but on what he viewed as its mistaken decisions on costly technology programs called Trailblazer, Turbulence and ThinThread.

“The Baltimore Sun stories simply confirmed that the agency was ineptly managed in some respects,” said Matthew M. Aid, an intelligence historian and author of “The Secret Sentry,” a history of the N.S.A. Such revelations hardly damaged national security, Mr. Aid said.

Jesselyn Radack of the Government Accountability Project, a nonprofit group that defends whistle-blowers, said the Espionage Act, written in 1917 for the pursuit of spies, should not be used to punish those who expose government missteps. “What gets lost in the calculus is that there’s a huge public interest in the disclosure of waste, fraud and abuse,” Ms. Radack said. “Hiding it behind alleged classification is not acceptable.”

Yet the government asserts that Mr. Drake was brazen in mishandling and sharing the classified information he had sworn to protect. He is accused of taking secret N.S.A. reports home, setting up an encrypted e-mail account to send tips to Ms. Gorman, collecting more data for her from unwitting agency colleagues, and then obstructing justice by deleting and shredding documents.

Gabriel Schoenfeld, author of “Necessary Secrets,” a book proposing criminal penalties not just for leakers but for journalists who print classified material, said that whatever his intentions, Mr. Drake must be punished.

“The system is plagued by leaks,” said Mr. Schoenfeld, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, a conservative research organization. “When you catch someone, you should make an example of them.”

A spokesman for the Justice Department, Matthew A. Miller, said the Drake case was not intended to deter government employees from reporting problems. “Whistle-blowers are the key to many, many department investigations — we don’t retaliate against them, we encourage them,” Mr. Miller said. “This indictment was brought on the merits, and nothing else.”

Though Mr. Obama began his presidency with a pledge of transparency, his aides have warned of a crackdown on leakers. In a November speech, the top lawyer for the intelligence agencies, Robert S. Litt, decried “leaks of classified information that have caused specific and identifiable losses of intelligence capabilities.” He promised action “in the coming months.”

Prosecutions like those of Mr. Drake; the F.B.I. translator, Shamai Leibowitz; and potentially Specialist Bradley Manning, the Army intelligence analyst, who has not yet been charged, have only a handful of precedents in American history. Among them are the cases of Daniel Ellsberg, a Defense Department consultant who gave the Pentagon Papers to The Times in 1971, and Samuel L. Morison, a Navy analyst who passed satellite photographs to Jane’s Defense Weekly in 1984.

Under President Bush, no one was convicted for disclosing secrets directly to the press. But Lawrence A. Franklin, a Defense Department official, served 10 months of home detention for sharing classified information with officials of a pro-Israel lobbying group, and I. Lewis Libby Jr., a top aide to Mr. Cheney, was convicted of perjury for lying about his statements to journalists about an undercover C.I.A. officer, Valerie Plame Wilson.

The F.B.I. has opened about a dozen investigations a year in recent years of unauthorized disclosures of classified information, according to a bureau accounting to Congress in 2007.

But most such inquiries are swiftly dropped, usually because hundreds of government employees had access to the leaked information and identifying the source seems impossible. Often even a determined hunt fails to find the source, and agencies sometimes oppose prosecution for fear that even more secrets will be disclosed at a trial.

By Justice Department rules, investigators may seek to question a journalist about his sources only after exhausting other options and with the approval of the attorney general. Subpoenas have been issued for reporters roughly once a year over the last two decades, according to Justice Department statistics, but such actions are invariably fought by news organizations and spark political debate over the First Amendment.

The reporter in the Drake case, Ms. Gorman, who now works at The Wall Street Journal, was never contacted by the Justice Department, according to two people briefed on the investigation. With Mr. Drake’s own statements to the F.B.I. in five initial months of cooperation, along with his confiscated computers and documents, investigators believed they could prove their case without her. Prosecutors further simplified their task by choosing to charge Mr. Drake not with transferring classified material to Ms. Gorman but with a different part of the espionage statute: illegal “retention” of classified information.

An Air Force veteran who drove an electric car, Mr. Drake has long worked on the boundary between technology and management. After years as an N.S.A. contractor, he was hired as an employee and turned up for his first day of work on Sept. 11, 2001. His title at the time hints at the baffling layers of N.S.A. bureaucracy, with more than 30,000 employees at the Fort Meade, Md., headquarters alone: “Senior Change Leader/Chief, Change Leadership & Communications Office, Signals Intelligence Directorate.”

Chris Frappier, a close friend since high school in Vermont, described Mr. Drake then as fascinated by technology and international affairs, socially awkward, with “an incredible sense of duty and honor.”

When he read the indictment, said Mr. Frappier, now a legal investigator in Vermont, he recognized his old friend.

“It’s just so Tom,” Mr. Frappier said. “He saw something he thought was wrong, and he thought it had to be stopped.”

According to two former intelligence officials, Mr. Drake became a champion of ThinThread, a pilot technology program designed to filter the flood of telephone, e-mail and Web traffic that the N.S.A. collects. He believed it offered effective privacy protections for Americans, too.

But agency leaders rejected ThinThread and chose instead a rival program called Trailblazer, which was later judged an expensive failure and abandoned. Mr. Drake and some allies kept pressing the case for ThinThread but were rebuffed, according to former agency officials.

“It was a pretty sharp battle within the agency,” said a former senior intelligence official. “The ThinThread guys were a very vocal minority.”

One former N.S.A. consultant recalled “alarmist memos and e-mails” from Mr. Drake, including one that declared of the agency: “The place is almost completely corrupted.”

Mr. Drake, whom friends describe as a dogged, sometimes obsessive man, took his complaints about ThinThread and other matters to a series of internal watchdogs. He developed a close relationship with intelligence committee staff members, including Diane S. Roark, who tracked the security agency for the House Intelligence Committee. She discussed with Mr. Drake the possibility of contacting Ms. Gorman, according to people who know Ms. Roark.

The subsequent investigation, which included a search of Ms. Roark’s house, devastated Mr. Drake, his wife — herself an N.S.A. contractor — and their teenage son.

“For Tom Drake, a man who loves his country and has devoted most of his life to serving it, this is particularly painful,” said his lawyer, James Wyda, the federal public defender for Maryland. “We feel that the government is wrong on both the facts alleged and the principles at stake in such a prosecution.”

Forced in 2008 out of his job at the National Defense University, where the security agency had assigned him, Mr. Drake took a teaching job at Strayer University. He lost that job after the indictment and now works at an Apple computer store. He spends his evenings, friends say, preparing his defense and pondering the problems of N.S.A., which still preoccupy him.


Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 12:37:03 am
Peter King is the latest terrorist in the congress demanding that the United States nuke every Wikileaks server and burn the eyes out of every American who reads the publicly owned information.

Way to go King...YOU ARE EXPOSED AS A BONA FIDE TERRORIST

Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

"I am Peter King, and I hate America, Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr"



GOP Rep. asks Clinton to declare WikiLeaks a ‘foreign terrorist organization’
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/gop-rep-wikileaks-deemed-foreign-terrorist-organization/
[NOTE: Peter King is saying that now confirmed terrorist Hilary Clinton has the power to declare anyone a 'foreign terrorist organization'? Perhaps Peter needs to review the CONSTITUTION which he took an oath to protect against enemies foreign and domestic!]
By Stephen C. Webster
Sunday, November 28th, 2010 -- 7:20 pm

A Republican Congressman from New York has invented a new definition for the word "terrorism" that doesn't require guns, bombs, vast underground networks of sleeper cells, a criminal conspiracy or even violence. All that's needed to be a terrorist, according to Rep. Peter King, is a website and some inconvenient information.  That's why King sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder on Sunday, demanding that whistleblower website WikiLeaks be deemed a "foreign terrorist organization" and it's founder declared a terror ringleader. "To me they are a clear and present enemy to the United States of America," he told a CBS radio reporter on Sunday. King said the website's release of sensitive -- but not "top secret" -- US diplomatic cables was "worse than a military attack." Declaring the site a "terrorist" group, King suggested, would allow the US "to seize their funds and go after anyone who provides them with any help or contributions or assistance whatsoever." He also called for site founder Julian Assange to be prosecuted under the Espionage Act. That may prove difficult, however, given that WikiLeaks did not steal any of the documents it released to the media -- they was given to them by a whistleblower, allegedly a young soldier named Bradley Manning. That sequence of events, of a whistleblower contacting a high profile news venue with explosive information that needs to be made public, happens in newsrooms all across the country every week. Though inconvenient for officials, the revelation of information contained in any of the WikiLeaks files, much like the Pentagon Papers amid the Vietnam war, is crucial to maintaining an enlightened public -- a point the US Supreme Court made abundantly clear in New York Times Co. v. United States in 1971. "In seeking injunctions against these newspapers and in its presentation to the Court, the Executive Branch seems to have forgotten the essential purpose and history of the First Amendment," Justices Hugo Black and William Douglas wrote, taking the side of the Times, which had recently published what was then considered the largest cache of secret military information in US history. "In the First Amendment the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy," they continued. "The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government." After the release of the Pentagon Papers, Justices Black and Douglas opined that "newspapers nobly did precisely that which the Founders hoped and trusted they would do." According to Daniel Ellsberg, the man responsible for leaking the Pentagon Papers, WikiLeaks has done just the same. Concurring with the court's majority, Justice Potter Stewart added: "In the absence of the governmental checks and balances present in other areas of our national life, the only effective restraint upon executive policy and power in the areas of national defense and international affairs may lie in an enlightened citizenry - in an informed and critical public opinion which alone can here protect the values of democratic government. For this reason, it is perhaps here that a press that is alert, aware, and free most vitally serves the basic purpose of the First Amendment. For without an informed and free press there cannot be an enlightened people." “[The WikiLeaks] documents serve an important public interest, illuminating the goals, successes, compromises and frustrations of American diplomacy in a way that other accounts cannot match," the Times added. “The Attorney General and I don’t always agree on different issues, but I believe on this one, he and I strongly agree that there should be a criminal prosecution [of WikiLeaks],” Rep. King told CBS radio. Attorney General Holder has not made any announcement regarding a criminal prosecution of the site or it's founder. The White House strongly condemned the site's actions on Sunday, calling the publication of State Dept. documents a continuation of a violation of law. King's call for prosecution was echoed Sunday by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-GA), Clair McCaskill (D-MO) and former State Department official Liz Cheney.  Julian Assange is currently wanted for questioning by Swedish authorities who are investigating a claim of rape and molestation. Assange has maintained that the charges are baseless and part of a campaign to discredit him.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: pac522 on March 02, 2012, 01:59:21 am
WTF? Everyone knows that any whistleblower suddenly dying of a "heart attack" is likely the victim of a PRESCISION STRIKE assassination operation.

The opening scene of the movie "THE INTERNATIONAL" shows this gun being used to murder a whistleblower and make it look like a heart attack.

In the movie Michael Clayton, another whistleblower is murdered by a "HEART ATTACK" injection like the ones used by THE ICEMAN (documentary link above)

From my YouTube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvcyZXSiFFQ&feature=channel_video_title
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 02:52:04 am
NATO's Libyan model in America?
FROM AUGUST!

CIA Order: Kill non-mainstream reporters
~~~~~~~~~~
What U.S. is hiding: Targeted Killings of non-mainstream reporters in Libya ordered: Attempts to bury truth


http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/kill-non-mainstream-reporters-libya-ordered-trapped-hiding-shot
Human Rights | August 22, 2011

The Examiner learned in communications from human rights defenders and independent journalists throughout Monday that they were shaken with news of 1300 Libyans killed and 5000 wounded Saturday, plus, the U.S. allegedly ordered Targeted Killings of Voltaire Network reporters, Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya and Thierry Meyssan, non-mainstream reporters in Libya covering the NATO war, while other independent reporters there are being fired upon and, according to ABC, journalist Mohammed Nabbous was killed Saturday.  In a KPFA radio interview with journalist Don DeBar, he reported most mainstream "news" about Libya has been untrue, as alternative news sites' reporters heavily report, but are increasingly persecuted according to their recent reports.

The reporter who may have known too much, slain and what the U.S. is hiding

"The conflict in Libya has claimed the life of another journalist. A sniper shot Mohammed Nabbous, 28-year old resident of Benghazi and founder of its first independent TV news channel Libya Alhurra, on Saturday night," reported ABC's Mark Colvin on Monday.

As Naboous was filming attacks in Benghazi, he was shot, soon after the regime said it was honouring a ceasefire, according to ABC.

"You may have heard Mohammed Nabbous on this program on Friday when he reported an attack on a power station outside Benghazi," Colvin wrote.

Within days of NATO bombings on Libya, Nabbous reportedly had a team of "citizen reporters," shooting video reports all around Benghazi that he was posting on his channel Libya Alhurra.

"He was also an important source for foreign networks like Al Jazeera, CNN and NPR who regularly interviewed him and rebroadcast his videos. We also relied on his video updates to confirm stories coming out of Benghazi," stated Colvin for ABC.

The sense of despair expressed by Human Rights advocates and independent journalists from various points around the globe in communications to the Examiner on Monday as word spread about the recent NATO massacres on Libyans, unreported by mainstream news, and the targeting of independent reporters.

Monday, cheers reported in some corners were not heard from human rights workers when mainstream reported Tripoli had falling under what independent reporters say, has been falsely reported on mainstream news.

"What is needed right now is not despair on our part, but the dissemination of information, which NATO has decided is the most important battleground," stated independent journalist, WBAIX  radio announcer Don DeBar, formerly with NPR's WBAI.

DeBar told Dupré in communications early Tuesday that Nabbous, unlike painted by ABC, was  "clearly a U.S. agent."

"He founded Libya's version of al-Hurra," said DeBar.

According to Wikipedia "Alhurra (or al-Hurra) (Arabic: الحرّة‎, al-Ḥurrah [alˈħurra],[note] 'The free') is a United States-based satellite TV channel, sponsored by the U.S. government..."

"The station is forbidden from broadcasting itself within the U.S. under the 1948 Smith-Mundt Act concerning the broadcast of propaganda." (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammed_Nabbous and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alhurra)

DeBar elaborated on U.S. media propaganda when interviewed by Press TV on Monday, showing documented photographic samples:

"Now the Russians, who conduct satellite surveillance of planet Earth, because they have been prepared for 50 years for a nuclear strike from the United States, said that, on the specific dates that [Gadaffi] charges were delineated that [he] had attacked his people from the air, here are the photographs: there are no planes in the air, there were no aeral activities conducted whatsoever. (Watch: 'US liable for civilian deaths in Libya', Press TV, August 22, 2011)

"This has not made the media in the west at all - including on programs like Democracy Now! and Al Jazeera which is carried on progressive radio networks, if you can believe that, in the United States," he told Press TV.

DeBar wrote Tuesday, "Coverage of the situation in Libya over the past three days, while useless to anyone trying to understand what is actually happening in Libya, nevertheless provides an interesting peek into the modus operandi of the global media that has broad application for the decoding of its coverage of all of the issues that touch our lives." (See: "Media Wars - Many Mouths, One Voice: Libya Coverage Provides a Peek Behind the Curtain," Don DeBar, August 23, 2011)

Targeted Individual reporters for Targeted Killings

The Réseau Voltaire, (Voltaire Network), an international non-profit organisation independent news group, based in Paris, released a brief statement late on Monday about its two journalists in Libya targeted for killings. (Also see: "Obama targeted killings lawsuit spotlights American civilians," Dupré, D. Examiner, September 2, 2010)

"From the Rixos [Hotel], the order was given by so-called "journalists" from the U.S. to bring down Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya and Thierry Meyssan."

The statement was released in an short newsletter by Voltaire news group saying that the individuals who gave the orders "have been identified and their names will be released in due course."

Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya is a Research Associate with the Centre for Research on Globalization, and Thierry Meyssan, is president and founder of Voltaire Network and the Axis for Peace Conference.

Both Nazemroaya and Meyssan are entrenched in Hotel Rixos, the Voltaire news group reported in a written statement.

The targeted killing threats of the independent journalists highlight President Obama's signed Executive Order that the Center for Constitutional Rights defined as "an extrajudicial killing policy under which names are added to CIA and military 'kill lists' through a secret executive process and stay there for months at a time.

This policy 'is plainly not limited to imminent threats" the Center for Constitutional Rights had said in September 2010.

"After the attacks of September 11, the Pentagon began a shift away from its late Cold War–era 'two-war strategy,' premised on maintaining the ability to conduct two major military operations simultaneously, and began to focus instead on irregular warfare against individuals and groups." (Emphasis added; Sharon Weinberger, Black Ops: Secret Military Technology in the Age of Terrorism, August 3, 2010)

Weinberger furthers, "The head of U.S. Special Operations Command talks about 'high-tech manhunting,' while Air Force officials describe plans to compress the 'kill chain.'" (Dupré, September 2, 2010)

An interview conducted early Monday morning with Voltaire's Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya showed him in hiding, and trapped in Tripoli. (See embedded Youtube.)

"I'm confined in a place where I can't move," cleary unnerved and appearing to be in a very small space as he spoke, Nazemroaya said.

He described, partially in graphic details, some of the traumatizing events he has seen including massacres by NATO and the children.

"There have been massive, -- atrocious, -- criminal bombings" against the Libyan people he emphatically reported.

"I didn't sleep the other night because the bombings would not stop."

He asked how mainstream reporters can be reporting on what is happening out on the streets when they are in the hotel with him.

The Réseau, (Voltaire Network), according to Wkipedia:

"... systematically attacked the Bush and Sharon administrations. According to the Réseau, the United States are a "hyperpower", a term forged by former minister Hubert Védrine, and all international relations are strongly dependent on the attitude of the concerned nations toward the USA. Thus, any analysis quickly comes back to the USA which they accuse of trying to establish a "new world order", which was the exact formulation that George H.W. Bush used on September 11, 1990 in front of Congress on the 49th anniversary of the Pentagon´s groundbreaking.

In an email, WBAIX radio's Don DeBar, who has remained in regular communications with several independent reporters in Libya, covered Libya there on the ground in 2009, and then, the covered the war on Libyans since its onset, concurred with Nazemroaya about mainstream journalists there.

"Most reporting is being done from inside or near the journalists' hotels," DeBar stated.

"Outside the primary location, snipers have fired at - and in one case, shot - non-mainstream journalists."

According to DeBar, only reporters "embedded with the invaders" have been permitted to shoot footage outdoors.

Libya's media has had its power cut off, so is off the air he said.

In his August 23 report, DeBar wrote:
"The manufacture of events in Libya has been underway since the lead-up to the US-led invasion, including the narrative that enabled the UN resolutions 1970 and 1973 - prominent among these were the claim that the Libyan government was conducting an aerial war against protestors, countered by satellite evidence from the Russian military showing no such attacks took place, and the claim that African mercenaries were firing on protestors, which was both untrue and provoked racist killings of Libyans with African features and skin by rebel gangs."
On Press TV, DeBar stated about NATO's war on Libyans, "This is the second stop for AFRICOM [Africa Command], the first direct stop for AFRICOM under Obama's regime.
 
"AFRICOM came online about two months before he was elected but after Cote D'Ivoire - where they carried the elected president out of the country at gunpoint, the French did, the former colonial power - this episode began.
 
"And Libya has played - if you want to believe Nelson Mandela - Libya played a major role in ending apartheid in South Africa, and Muammar Gaddafi in particular played a major role in doing that. He has been active in building a communications infrastructure and a financial infrastructure owned by Africa in Africa."
 
Peddling Libya War as popular uprising when Libya had human rights obsrerved, unlike Americans having rights violated

Press TV asked DeBar, "If the Gaddafi regime has totally fallen, or will fall, how likely is it that the Libyan people will actually go further towards independence and be freer people as a lot of them who have been in the streets, and they have been showing some of them today, are saying? What's the likely scenario in your perspective?
 
DeBar answered, "The likely scenario is colonialism, and the reason for the invasion of Libya is that Libya was one of the places organizing against colonialism of the continent of Africa."

Early Monday morning, when KPFA's Davey D interviewed DeBar about the real on-the-ground situation in Tripoli, DeBar said the war on Libya was peddled as a popular uprising, but Libyans, unlike Americans, have no reason to rebel against their government. (See: Don DeBar, "LIBYA: The Real Deal" Youtube.)

"Unlike Americans," he said, "everyone in Libya owns their own home, a human right -- as well as free education, free health care comparable to the U.S. hospitals, affordable and widely available food - unlike Americans have," he said.

DeBar said on Press TV:

"The people of Libya, by the way, went from being the poorest people on the planet in 1969, by every objective measure, to having the highest standard of living in Africa, and one of the highest standards of living in the Muslim world - housing is owned by the people, free of any mortgages, everyone. It is a human right there under the law - and the entire education system and free healthcare." (Press TV Transcript)

In Tripoli, "relentless NATO bombings resumed around 10:20 Monday morning against certain objectives that independent reporters say is a massacre," according to Voltaire.

The fighting also resumed around the Rixos Hotel where some Libyan leaders along with the foreign journalists are entrenched.

DeBar said he has been told by some journalists stuck in the hotel, who have been able to call around the city to the many residents they know personally:

 "The invaders have been largely turned back. They arrived under severe aerial attacks across the city, including strafing of civilians intended to clear the streets for the invasion.

"They were supplemented with troop landings from NATO naval vessels in the port. This was apparently the source of many of the Qatari personnel."
Three states have offered diplomatic protection to the Voltaire Network team of reporters in Libya the news group stated.
 
"However, trapped in the city, they have no way of reaching the respective embassies."
 
Turn of media events late Monday evening
 
On Monday, DeBar urged people to visit his Facebook page, http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/don.debar where he keeps a long string of information needing to be shared, "especially those in, or in contact with people in, Libya," he stated late Monday.
 
In a dramatic turn of events late Monday night, The Washington Post published an article about the reporting contradictions.
 
"Forces loyal to the fugitive Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi struck back Monday against the rebel fighters who had swept euphorically into the capital the night before, forcing them to retreat from several strategic locations and tempering hopes that the battle for Tripoli was all but over."
 
"The dramatic appearance Monday night of Gaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam at the Rixos hotel, where the Tripoli-based press corps remains trapped, contradicted the rebels’ assertion the day before that they had captured him and cast into doubt their claim of controlling 80 percent of the capital."
 
DeBar told Dupré in a private email that his Press TV interview was recorded at 2:30 pm New York time on Monday, Auguest 22, 2011.
 
"At that time, I questioned the veracity of the claimed capture of Gadaffi's sons and of rebel control of the city of Tripoli. It turns out I was right."
 
"No, I don't have a crystal ball - just good contacts on the ground who don't lie or hold their tongues when they see horrible wrong being done. NATO - that's Obama to the apologists - has done everything to keep this information from you, but the truth will out!"
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 02:55:51 am
FROM OCTOBER, A WARNING FROM PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE DR. RON PAUL...

Ron Paul: WH Secret Assassination Team Could Target U.S. Journalists
http://www.thestatecolumn.com/articles/2011/10/06/ron-paul-president-obama-could-target-u-s-journalists/
The State Column | Thursday, October 06, 2011


Texas congressman and Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul said Wednesday that a program put in place to combat U.S. citizens engaged in terrorism may be expanded to include journalists.

Speaking before the National Press Club, the Republican presidential candidate again criticized President Barack Obama for approving last week’s drone strikes in Yemen against Anwar al-Awlaki who was tracked and executed based on secret intelligence that linked him to two failed terrorist attacks against the U.S.

Mr. Paul said the latest drone strike represented an expansion of presidential power that could theoretically be expanded to include journalists and other U.S. citizens.   

“Can you imagine being put on a list because you’re a threat? What’s going to happen when they come to the media? What if the media becomes a threat? … This is the way this works. It’s incrementalism,” Mr. Paul said. “It’s slipping and sliding, let me tell you.”

The comment is the latest from the Texas Republican concerning the killing of al-Awlaki. Speaking earlier this week, Mr. Paul condemned the killing, saying he would consider impeaching President Obama.

“He can now assassinate people without due process–American citizens–and people cheer him. What is going on with this country?” Mr. Paul said.

Mr. Paul, who is currently trailing former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney and Texas Republican governor Rick Perry in recent polls, announced Wednesday that his campaign had raised $8 million in the third quarter of 2011.

Could the WH Secret Team Assassinate Journalists?      
http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/9276-could-the-president-assassinate-journalists
Written by Thomas R. Eddlem    
Thursday, 06 October 2011 11:18


Representative Ron Paul suggested before the National Press Club October 5 that President Obama's assassination program of alleged terrorists could grow into an assassination program for journalists who disagree with the federal government.

"Can you imagine being put on a list because you're a threat?" the GOP presidential contender asked. "What's going to happen when they come to the media? What if the media becomes a threat? Or a professor becomes a threat? Someday that could well happen. This is the way it works. It's incrementalism.... It's slipping and sliding, let me tell you." Paul's remarks were a reaction to a September 30 drone strike in Yemen authorized by President Obama which targeted and killed two American citizens, one of whom — Anwar al-Awlaki — had been on a presidential assassination list for more than a year.

Indeed, both Awlaki — a New Mexico native — and his fellow U.S. citizen killed in the drone strike, Samir Khan, were journalists. Awlaki served as the primary video propagandist for al Qaeda on the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), an organization which did not exist on September 11, 2001. The South Carolina-born Khan served as editor of Inspire magazine, the English language propaganda magazine of AQAP launched in 2010 from Yemen.

Awlaki openly used his videos to justify terrorist attacks against the United States, but he denied participating in the actual planning of terrorist events. President Obama claimed the opposite in a statement September 30, alleging that "He directed the failed attempt to blow up an airplane on Christmas Day in 2009. He directed the failed attempt to blow up U.S. cargo planes in 2010." However, President Obama and his staff have steadfastly refused to release any evidence of the President's allegations.

Paul stressed that he didn't invent the word "assassination" policy for Obama's program, noting that the term was coined by Obama's Director of National Intelligence, Dennis Blair. "A lot of people are having second thoughts about this policy," noted Paul. "This was an announced policy in February of 2010 by Dennis Blair. And he used the word 'assassination.' Sometimes on the media they'll say, 'Oh, Ron Paul says he was assassinated. Where did he come up with that word?' From Dennis Blair, who said that that is now our policy." The word "assassination" has been attributed to Blair's testimony before the House Select Committee on Intelligence February 3, 2010, and indeed that was the substance of Blair's remarks, though the word does not appear to be on the official publicly released transcript.

Paul noted that the American system of law has traditionally been based upon trials, rather than gangland-style Mafia hits. He recalled that this happened even with the worst war criminals during World War II. “All the Nazi criminals were tried. They were taken to court and then executed,” Paul said. “The reason we do this is because we want to protect the rule of law.”

Over at the Ron Paul 2012 campaign website, official blogger Jack Hunter found that Paul has some high-powered conservative legal support for trials rather than a presidential license to kill — in Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia. Scalia wrote in a 2004 decision, "Where the Government accuses a citizen of waging war against it, our constitutional tradition has been to prosecute him in federal court for treason or some other crime…" Scalia, favorably quoting British legal scholar William Blackstone, also claimed, “To bereave a man of life, or by violence to confiscate his estate, without accusation or trial, would be so gross and notorious an act of despotism, as must at once convey the alarm of tyranny throughout the whole kingdom…”

Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England (1753), from which Scalia quoted, was widely read by America's Founding Fathers, and he was among the most quoted men at the U.S. Constitutional Convention of 1787.

Hunter's quote of Scalia was from a 2004 dissent in the case of Louisiana native Yaser el-Hamdi, who had been detained indefinitely by the Bush administration at a military brig in South Carolina. Hunter's citation was perhaps a biased selection, in that Scalia heavily weighed the fact that Hamdi's physical location was within the continental United States: "A view of the Constitution that gives the Executive authority to use military force rather than the force of law against citizens on American soil flies in the face of the mistrust that engendered these provisions," Scalia wrote.

But Scalia also added that American citizens are different from foreign combatants in war, stressing that "the tradition with respect to American citizens, however, has been quite different. Citizens aiding the enemy have been treated as traitors subject to the criminal process." In other words, Scalia's basic argument was that alleged traitors have traditionally been given a trial and not been imprisoned or killed without any due process guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and its Fifth and Sixth Amendments.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 03:07:50 am
Secret Panel Can Put Americans On 'Kill List'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/06/secret-panel-can-put-americans-on-kill-list_n_998883.html
First Posted: 10/06/11 05:31 PM ET Updated: 12/06/11 05:12 AM ET

American militants like Anwar al-Awlaki are placed on a kill or capture list by a secretive panel of senior government officials, which then informs the president of its decisions, according to officials.
Murder Inc.

Execution By Secret WH Committee
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article29316.htm
By Glenn Greenwald


October 06, 2011 "Salon" - -  Here is what the Democratic President has created and implemented, and what many party loyalists explicitly endorse (when there’s a Democrat in the White House) — from Reuters:

American militants like Anwar al-Awlaki are placed on a kill or capture list by a secretive panel of senior government officials, which then informs the president of its decisions . . . .

There is no public record of the operations or decisions of the panel, which is a subset of the White House’s National Security Council . . . . Neither is there any law establishing its existence or setting out the rules by which it is supposed to operate. . . . The role of the president in ordering or ratifying a decision to target a citizen is fuzzy. White House spokesman Tommy Vietor declined to discuss anything about the process. . . .

Representative Dutch Ruppersberger, was asked by reporters about the killing.  The process involves “going through the National Security Council, then it eventually goes to the president” . . . .Other officials said the role of the president in the process was murkier than what Ruppersberger described. They said targeting recommendations are drawn up by a committee of mid-level National Security Council and agency officials. Their recommendations are then sent to the panel of NSC “principals,” meaning Cabinet secretaries and intelligence unit chiefs, for approval . . .  But one official said Obama would be notified of the principals’ decision. If he objected, the decision would be nullified, the official said.

So a panel operating out of the White House — that meets in total secrecy, with no known law or rules governing what it can do or how it operates — is empowered to place American citizens on a list to be killed by the CIA, which (by some process nobody knows) eventually makes its way to the President, who is the final Decider.  It is difficult to describe the level of warped authoritarianism necessary to cause someone to lend their support to a twisted Star Chamber like that; I genuinely wonder whether the Good Democrats doing so actually first convince themselves that if this were the Bush White House’s hit list, or if it becomes Rick Perry’s, they would be supportive just the same.  Seriously: if you’re willing to endorse having White House functionaries meet in secret — with no known guidelines, no oversight, no transparency — and compile lists of American citizens to be killed by the CIA without due process, what aren’t you willing to support?

Of all the things I’ve seen over the past several years, easily one of the most repellent has been the number of people — especially journalists — who are running around definitively asserting that Awlaki had an “operational role” in Terrorist plots and had “taken up arms” against the U.S. even though they have no idea whether that’s actually true (Politico‘s Roger Simon: “U.S. citizen living overseas and plotting the death of American citizens from, let’s say, Yemen, you can say hello to our little friends, the 100-lb. Hellfires”; Josh Marshall: Awlaki was “a key leader of an international terrorist group, organizing and inspiring terrorist attacks within the US” ).  Just consider how even the anonymous government officials who spoke to Reuters in order to defend the Awlaki killing characterize the “evidence” they have to support that claim:

The Obama administration has not made public an accounting of the classified evidence that Awlaki was operationally involved in planning terrorist attacks.

But officials acknowledged that some of the intelligence purporting to show Awlaki’s hands-on role in plotting attacks was patchy.

For instance, one plot in which authorities have said Awlaki was involved Nigerian-born Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, accused of trying to blow up a Detroit-bound U.S. airliner on Christmas Day 2009 with a bomb hidden in his underpants.

There is no doubt Abdulmutallab was an admirer or follower of Awlaki, since he admitted that to U.S. investigators. . . . But at the time the White House was considering putting Awlaki on the U.S. target list, intelligence connecting Awlaki specifically to Abdulmutallab and his alleged bomb plot was partial. Officials said at the time the United States had voice intercepts involving a phone known to have been used by Awlaki and someone who they believed, but were not positive, was Abdulmutallab.

Someone spoke to someone on “a phone known to have been used by Awlaki”: maybe it was Abdulmutallab, maybe it wasn’t.  Maybe it was Awlaki, maybe it wasn’t.  Who knows?  Who cares?  Some officials “believed” it may have involved those two, so it’s time to kill Awlaki.  Remember, Good Democrats hate the death penalty because they think it’s so terribly barbaric to execute people whose guilt is in doubt (even if, unlike Awlaki, they’ve enjoyed an indictment and full jury trial, lawyers, the right to examine evidence and to confront witnesses, multiple appeals, and habeas petitions).  There’s also this:

Awlaki was also implicated in a case in which a British Airways employee was imprisoned for plotting to blow up a U.S.-bound plane. E-mails retrieved by authorities from the employee’s computer showed what an investigator described as ” operational contact” between Britain and Yemen.

Authorities believe the contacts were mainly between the U.K.-based suspect and his brother. But there was a strong suspicion Awlaki was at the brother’s side when the messages were dispatched.

There was a “strong suspicion” — not that Awlaki participated in this email plotting, but that he was “at the side” of someone who did.  Who needs “beyond a reasonable doubt’?  That is so pre-9/11.  ”A strong suspicion” that he may have been next to someone plotting an attack: that’s the McCarthyite standard Democratic Party loyalists are holding up to justify the due-process-free execution of their fellow citizen by a secret, lawless White House “panel.”

What’s crucial to keep in mind is that nobody can see this “evidence” which these anonymous government officials are claiming exists.  It’s in their exclusive possession.  As a result, they’re able to characterize it however they want, to present it in the best possible light to support their pro-assassination position, and to prevent any detection of its flaws.  As any lawyer will tell you, anyone can make a case for anything when they’re in exclusive possession of all the relevant evidence and are the only side from whom one is hearing; all evidence becomes less compelling when it’s subjected to adversarial scrutiny.  Yet even given all those highly favorable pro-government conditions here, it’s obvious — even these officials admit — that the evidence is “partial,” “patchy,” based on “suspicions” rather than knowledge.

But no matter.  Officials in the Obama White House and then the President decreed in secret that Awlaki should die.  So the U.S. Government killed him.  Republicans who always cheer acts of violence against Muslims are joined by Democrats who reflexively cheer what this Democratic President does, and now this death panel for U.S. citizens — operating with no known rules, transparency, or oversight — is entrenched as bipartisan consensus and a permanent fixture of American political life.  I’m sure this will never be abused: unrestrained power exercised in secret has a very noble history in the U.S. (Reuters says that the only American they could confirm on the hit list is Awlaki, though Dana Priest reported last year that either three or four Americans were on a  hit list).

Anyway, look over there: wasn’t it outrageous how George Bush imprisoned people without any due process and tried to seize unrestrained power, and isn’t it horrifying what a barbaric death cult Republicans are for favoring executions even when there’s doubt about guilt?  Even for those deeply cynical about American political culture: wouldn’t you have thought a few years ago that having the President create a White House panel to place Americans on a CIA hit list — in secret, without a shred of due process — would be a bridge too far?

UPDATE: I don’t think it’s dispositive of the question here — because the U.S. Government isn’t permitted to murder fugitives who aren’t violently resisting apprehension and, in any event, Awlaki was never a fugitive since he was never indicted by the U.S. for anything — but Robert Farley persuasively highlights the baselessness of the excuse that Awlaki could not have been apprehended (and he also documents how dubious, uncertain and filled with doubt is the case against Awlaki generally).
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 03:16:17 am
FLASHBACK: Pat Tillman was assassinated by the New World Order because he was going against the "official narrative" of the illegal war in Afghanistan.



This  is the article which first exposed me to the technique the NWO uses called 'narrative building':


After Pat’s Birthday
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y250/CSUMB84/kevin_pat_350.jpg)
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/200601019_after_pats_birthday/
Posted on Oct 19, 2006 By Kevin Tillman

Editor’s note: Kevin Tillman joined the Army with his brother Pat in 2002, and they served together in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Pat was killed in Afghanistan on April 22, 2004. Kevin, who was discharged in 2005, has written a powerful, must-read document.

It is Pat’s birthday on November 6, and elections are the day after.  It gets me thinking about a conversation I had with Pat before we joined the military.  He spoke about the risks with signing the papers.  How once we committed, we were at the mercy of the American leadership and the American people.  How we could be thrown in a direction not of our volition.  How fighting as a soldier would leave us without a voice… until we got out.  

Much has happened since we handed over our voice:

Somehow we were sent to invade a nation because it was a direct threat to the American people, or to the world, or harbored terrorists, or was involved in the September 11 attacks, or received weapons-grade uranium from Niger, or had mobile weapons labs, or WMD, or had a need to be liberated, or we needed to establish a democracy, or stop an insurgency, or stop a civil war we created that can’t be called a civil war even though it is.  Something like that.

Somehow our elected leaders were subverting international law and humanity by setting up secret prisons around the world, secretly kidnapping people, secretly holding them indefinitely, secretly not charging them with anything, secretly torturing them.  Somehow that overt policy of torture became the fault of a few “bad apples” in the military.

Somehow back at home, support for the soldiers meant having a five-year-old kindergartener scribble a picture with crayons and send it overseas, or slapping stickers on cars, or lobbying Congress for an extra pad in a helmet.  It’s interesting that a soldier on his third or fourth tour should care about a drawing from a five-year-old; or a faded sticker on a car as his friends die around him; or an extra pad in a helmet, as if it will protect him when an IED throws his vehicle 50 feet into the air as his body comes apart and his skin melts to the seat.

-Somehow the more soldiers that die, the more legitimate the illegal invasion becomes.  

-Somehow American leadership, whose only credit is lying to its people and illegally invading a nation, has been allowed to steal the courage, virtue and honor of its soldiers on the ground.  

-Somehow those afraid to fight an illegal invasion decades ago are allowed to send soldiers to die for an illegal invasion they started.

-Somehow faking character, virtue and strength is tolerated.

-Somehow profiting from tragedy and horror is tolerated.

-Somehow the death of tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of people is tolerated.

-Somehow subversion of the Bill of Rights and The Constitution is tolerated.

-Somehow suspension of Habeas Corpus is supposed to keep this country safe.

-Somehow torture is tolerated.

-Somehow lying is tolerated.  

-Somehow reason is being discarded for faith, dogma, and nonsense.  

-Somehow American leadership managed to create a more dangerous world.

-Somehow a narrative is more important than reality.

-Somehow America has become a country that projects everything that it is not and condemns everything that it is.

-Somehow the most reasonable, trusted and respected country in the world has become one of the most irrational, belligerent, feared, and distrusted countries in the world.

-Somehow being politically informed, diligent, and skeptical has been replaced by apathy through active ignorance.

-Somehow the same incompetent, narcissistic, virtueless, vacuous, malicious criminals are still in charge of this country.

-Somehow this is tolerated.

-Somehow nobody is accountable for this.


In a democracy, the policy of the leaders is the policy of the people.  So don’t be shocked when our grandkids bury much of this generation as traitors to the nation, to the world and to humanity.  Most likely, they will come to know that “somehow” was nurtured by fear, insecurity and indifference, leaving the country vulnerable to unchecked, unchallenged parasites.  

Luckily this country is still a democracy.  People still have a voice.  People still can take action.  It can start after Pat’s birthday.  


Brother and Friend of Pat Tillman,

Kevin Tillman

Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 03:36:46 am
Who Else is on WH's Secret Kill List?
by Ron Paul
Tuesday, October 11, 2011


http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-who-else-is-on-obamas-secret-kill-list/



According to the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution, Americans are never to be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The Constitution is not some aspirational statement of values, allowing exceptions when convenient, but rather, it is the law of the land.  It is the basis of our Republic and our principal bulwark against tyranny.

Last week’s assassination of two American citizens, Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan, is an outrage and a criminal act carried out by the President and his administration.  If the law protecting us against government-sanctioned assassination can be voided when there is a “really bad American”, is there any meaning left to the rule of law in the United States?  If, as we learned last week, a secret government committee, not subject to congressional oversight or judicial review, can now target certain Americans for assassination, under what moral authority do we presume to lecture the rest of the world about protecting human rights?  Didn’t we just bomb Libya into oblivion under the auspices of protecting the civilians from being targeted by their government? Timothy McVeigh was certainly a threat, as were Nidal Hassan and Jared Lee Loughner.  They killed people in front of many witnesses.  They took up arms against their government in a literal way, yet were still afforded trials.  These constitutional protections are in place because our Founders realized it is a very serious matter to deprive any individual of life or liberty.  Our outrage against even the obviously guilty is not worth the sacrifice of the rule of law.  Al-Awlaki has been outspoken against the United States and we are told he encouraged violence against Americans.  We do not know that he actually committed any acts of violence.  Ironically, he was once invited to the Pentagon as part of an outreach to moderate Muslims after 9/11.  As the US attacks against Muslims in the Middle East and Central Asia expanded, it is said that he became more fervent and radical in his opposition to US foreign policy.

Many cheer this killing because they believe that in a time of war, due process is not necessary – not even for citizens, and especially not for those overseas.  However, there has been no formal declaration of war and certainly not one against Yemen. The post-9/11 authorization for force would not have covered these two Americans because no one is claiming they had any connection to that attack. Al-Awlaki was on a kill list compiled by a secret panel within President Obama’s National Security Council and Justice Department.  

How many more Americans citizens are on that list?  

They won’t tell us.

What are the criteria?

They won’t tell us.

Where is the evidence?

They won’t tell us.


Al-Awlaki’s father tried desperately to get the administration to at least allow his son to have legal representation to challenge the “kill” order. He was denied. Rather than give him his day in court, the administration, behind closed doors, served as prosecutor, judge, jury, and executioner.The most worrisome aspect of this is that any new powers this administration accrues will serve as precedents for future administrations.  Even those who completely trust this administration must understand that if this usurpation of power and denial of due process is allowed to stand, these powers will remain to be expanded on by the next administration and then the next.  Will you trust them?  History shows that once a population gives up its rights, they are not easily won back.  Beware.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 04:06:27 am
Plausible Scenario:
Neocons to Obama: We will stop Breitbart meme if you approve Iran nuke FF

Was the assassination of Breitbart a false flag to allow neocons to pressure Obama into approving a false flag or approve the mas murdering of millions of Iranians?

Will the assassination of Breitbart be used this way even if it was not a false flag.

Look how much Bilderberg will allow only the neocons to talk about the assassination of Breitbart, once they stop you will know that a deal has been cut.

Every journalist in the world should be exposing this assassination, the fake left is playing right into the 'bomb iran' plans by trying to cover up the murder.

Neocons also probably agreed to backstap Sheriff Arpaio as well.

The New World Order eats its own, if an IBM computer calculates that the benefit of killing one of their own will assist in protecting public myths then chances are that person will be added to the WH kill list.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Scootle on March 02, 2012, 07:46:43 am
Breitbart: “Wait ‘Til They See What Happens March 1st”
http://www.prisonplanet.com/breitbart-wait-til-they-see-what-happens-march-1st.html
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Satyagraha on March 02, 2012, 08:51:15 am
The Mysterious Death of Andrew Breitbart: Infowars Nightly News
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-mysterious-death-of-andrew-breitbart-infowars-nightly-news.html

Prisonplanet.com
Friday, March 2, 2012

Breitbart claimed to have footage damaging to Obama prior to his death.

(http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/tt201/Pilikia_photos/PPNews.jpg) (http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-mysterious-death-of-andrew-breitbart-infowars-nightly-news.html)
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 08:53:00 am
Shocking Video: Andrew Breitbart’s Last Interview Was With Sheriff Joe Arpaio About Obama Eligibility
http://www.westernjournalism.com/andrew-breitbarts-last-interview-was-with-sheriff-joe-arpaio-about-obama-eligibility/
March 1, 2012 By Floyd Brown


The news conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate yielded one fascinating back story. This is a story which has received no media coverage, but it deserves to get out.

We are all still dealing with the shock of our friend and Patriot Andrew Breitbart’s sudden death. Andrew was, as Rush Limbaugh say, a bulldog for the truth.

This back story is about Andrew’s last hours. In those last hours he was working with Sheriff Arpaio to get the truth about Obama’s fraudulent birth certificate out to a wider audience.

We filmed this amazing clip of Dr Jerome Corsi talking about Andrew’s last interview before his tragic death. It show’s he was in the fight until his last breath. We admire this man more than we can express.
Reader Cheryl: "Breitbart Connection Revelation.."
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=232165
Posted By: Jordon [Send E-Mail]
Date: Thursday, 1-Mar-2012 17:36:50

In Response To: Was Andrew Breitbart Murdered by the Obama Regime? (Jordon)

Re: Was Andrew Breitbart Murdered by the Obama....

4:16pm EST, March 1, 2012

Breitbart Connection Revelation:

The livestream press conference broadcast by World Net Daily (wnd.com) from Arizona with Sheriff Joe Arpaio, his lead investigator (didn't get his name), and Jerome Corsi has just concluded, presenting the documented evidence that both the Obama birth certificate released online by the White House, and the Selective Service Registration Card, with a date stamp from the United States Postal Service, reveal undisputable evidence of forgery and fraud. There are also signed affidavits in Sheriff Arpaio's files. The first 15 minutes of the livestream video could not be understood, because of audio and visual buffering problems. These problems were completely resolved by the 16-minute mark, and the broadcast then continued without interruption for the following hour.

The Breitbart Connection: Mr. Jerome Corsi reported live on the video that Sheriff Arpaio gave an interview to Andrew Brietbart hours before Mr. Breitbart's death on Wednesday, February 29th, and Mr. Corsi described this as "the last interview" Mr. Breitbart ever conducted.

Other key points were revealed. There is "a person of interest" known to the Arpaio investigators whose name has not yet been released, regarding the fraudulent manufacturing of the birth certificate. The manufacturer of the computer which was used has been identified, but that specific information has not yet been released either.

Signed,

Cheryl, A Reader
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Satyagraha on March 02, 2012, 08:57:27 am
Link posted to Drudge Report this morning:

Andrew Breitbart Talked Politics in L.A. Bar an Hour Before Dying (Exclusive)
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/andrew-breitbart-dead-la-bar-politics-296386
2:33 PM PST 3/1/2012 by Matthew Belloni

Marketing executive Arthur Sando tells THR about his lengthy debate with the conservative activist at The Brentwood; they said goodbye around 11:30 p.m., 50 minutes before Breitbart was pronounced dead.

Andrew Breitbart spent his final hours much like he lived most of his life: passionately talking politics.

Breibart, the 43-year-old conservative pundit and provocateur who died suddenly early Thursday while walking near his Los Angeles home, had stopped into The Brentwood, a nearby bar and restaurant. There, he struck up a conversation with Arthur Sando, a marketing executive who didn't know Breitbart but likely was the last person to talk extensively with him before he died.

In an interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Sando says he arrived at the bar in the tony Brentwood section of L.A. around 10 p.m. and soon the empty seat next to his was filled by a man with a familiar face. 

"I tried to figure out how I knew him," says Sando, a veteran publicity and marketing executive who works for dietary supplement company MonaVie and has worked at CBS, King World Prods and Turner Broadcasting. "He was on his BlackBerry. And I said 'Andrew?' I told him I had seen his work."

Sando says the duo quickly struck up a conversation that would last a little less than two hours.

"He was friendly and engaging," Sando recalls. "I said, 'You can't be very happy with the slate of Republican candidates' and he said, 'Why would you say that?' I said, 'Well, they're talking about contraception,' and he said, 'The conversation is being framed by the liberal media.' I said, 'Well, the media isn't writing Rick Santorum’s speeches for him.' We had a back-and-forth for awhile until we said we weren’t going to agree on some things."

The friendly debate continued in the bar as Breitbart sipped red wine, says Sando. "We just hit it off, he was delightful. There were other people who sat down and joined the conversation."

Sando also mentioned that he hadn't seen Breitbart as a guest on HBO's Real Time With Bill Maher recently; Breitbart told Sando he enjoyed going on Maher's show because it taught him how to deal with a hostile audience and how to react when getting booed.

Breitbart had stopped in for a drink but wasn't there to meet anyone in particular, Sando says. Nor were there any signs of health or other problems.

"He wasn’t drinking excessively," Sando recalls. "He was on his BlackBerry a lot."

After the two hours, Breitbart said he was leaving. "We exchanged contact information," Sando says. "We were going to get together."

Sando says he was "shocked" to read Thursday morning that Breitbart, who had a history of heart problems, had collapsed while on a walk near his home in the same neighborhood as the bar. Breitbart was rushed to a hospital and pronounced dead at 12:19 a.m., according to Reuters, less than an hour after leaving The Brentwood.

The exact cause of death has not been revealed but initial reports said it was natural causes.

"There were no signs that anything was wrong," says Sando. "It's very sad."
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Satyagraha on March 02, 2012, 09:04:58 am
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20120302/D9T8ANI80.html

...
Breitbart, 43, died after collapsing shortly after midnight during a walk near his home. He was rushed to the emergency room at Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center.

He suffered heart problems a year earlier, but his father-in-law, actor Orson Bean, said he could not pinpoint what happened. Larry Dietz, watch commander at the Los Angeles County coroner's office, said an autopsy was likely....
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Satyagraha on March 02, 2012, 09:09:31 am
WND EXCLUSIVE
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/michael-savage-was-breitbart-assassinated/

Michael Savage: Was Breitbart assassinated?
Media activist recently promised to publish revealing Obama videos
Published: 14 hours ago

Noting that the cause of Andrew Breitbart’s unexpected death yesterday was being examined by the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office, talk-radio host Michael Savage raised the question of whether the conservative media powerhouse – who recently announced he had videos that could politically damage President Obama – was murdered.

On his top-rated show today, Savage played an audio clip of Breitbart telling an audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last month that he had obtained videos that shed light on Obama’s ties to radicals in the early 1980s who helped propel him to the presidency.

“Maybe my overly active imagination kicked into overdrive,” Savage told his listeners of his decision to raise the question. “But you heard what Breitbart said – he has videos … we’re going to vet the president.”

Breitbart reportedly was walking near his home in Brentwood, Calif., just after midnight this morning when he collapsed. A neighbor saw him fall and called 911. Emergency crews tried to revive him and rushed him to the emergency room at the UCLA Medical Center.

It’s entirely plausible, Savage acknowledged, that Breitbart simply collapsed of a heart attack because of overwork and a reported history of health problems.

“I’m asking a crazy question,” Savage said, “but so what? We the people want an answer. This was not an ordinary man. If I don’t ask this question, I would be remiss.”

Breitbart told the CPAC crowd last month that the videos would reveal Obama during a time when he was meeting a “bunch of silver ponytails” – referring to Weather Underground terror group members Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

Ayers and Dohrn reportedly launched Obama’s political career with a fundraiser in their Chicago home.

Savage noted that Breitbart had dinner with Ayers and Dorhn three weeks ago at the couple’s Hyde Park residence on Chicago’s South Side, which is near Obama’s home. Breitbart was invited by Daily Caller Editor-in-Chief Tucker Carlson, who won an Internet auction for a dinner party with the couple.

“I’ve got videos – this election we’re going to vet him,” Breitbart said at CPAC, promising they would show how “racial division and class warfare are central” to the “hope and change” that Obama”sold in 2008.”

“He threatened the president at CPAC with video that could derail the president’s campaign,” Savage said.

“I pray it was natural causes, but we’ll never know the truth.”

Savage said that if Breitbart’s colleagues have the videos, they should post them as soon as possible and make them viral “or they’ll never see the light of day.”

Savage said he hadn’t spoken with Breitbart for the past two years, but he recalled the media mogul’s visited to his home in the Bay Area.

“He spoke for three straight hours,” Savage said. “I was unable to say a word.”

Savage also attended a party at Breitbart’s Los Angeles home.

“I told him two years ago to get a body guard. Never be alone in the street,” Savage said.

Savage, the author of the bestselling novel “Abuse of Power,” put on his novelist hat and speculated about ways a murderer could remain undetected by inducing a heart attack that didn’t leave any traces.

A caller from Savage’s native New York City said there’s a simple way to find out what happened.

“If the tapes come out, he died of a heart attack,” the caller said. “If the tapes don’t come out, they whacked him.”
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Satyagraha on March 02, 2012, 09:12:59 am
Andrew Breitbart's death to be reviewed by L.A. County coroner
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/03/andrew-breitbart-death-review-coroner.html
March 1, 2012 |  9:18 am

The Los Angeles County coroner's office will review the death of conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart, who collapsed and died Thursday while taking a nighttime walk near his Westwood home.

Given his young age -- he was 43 -- and the unexpected manner in which he died, authorities will conduct an autopsy to help determine a specific cause of death.

Breitbart's father-in-law, actor Orson Bean, said in an interview with The Times that Breitbart was found collapsed near his home about 12:30 a.m. Paramedics took him to Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, but doctors were unable to revive him.

"We're devastated. I loved him like a son," Bean said. "It looks like a heart attack, but no one knows until" an autopsy is done.

Breitbart, a star of the tea party movement, was a Hollywood-hating, mainstream-media-loathing conservative, according to a Times profile.
After 10 years as editor of the Drudge Report and helping to launch the Huffington Post, Breitbart launched in 2005 his news aggregation site Breitbart.com, which was designed to counter what he described as the "bully media cabal" that he said ignored stories at odds with prevailing liberal orthodoxy.

His goal, he often said, was to "destroy the institutional left."

His big splash came in 2009, when he posted an undercover video in which a pair of conservative activists posing as a prostitute and her boyfriend asked employees of the community group ACORN for help with a brothel that would house underage Salvadorans.

ACORN was embarrassed when some of its workers seemed too helpful; Congress responded by defunding the organization.

In 2010, Breitbart posted a 2 1/2-minute video of Shirley Sherrod, a black employee of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, in which she appeared to make racially charged comments.

It left viewers with the inaccurate impression Sherrod had deliberately not helped a white man save his family farm in 1986 when she worked for a Georgia nonprofit organization.

The furor from the video caused Sherrod to be fired; when it was later revealed her comments had been taken out of context, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack called Sherrod to apologize and ask whether she would return to the department.

Breitbart's conservative news websites broke the story about the sexually charged tweets by Rep. Anthony Weiner, a Democrat from New York, in a scandal that led to his resignation.

The Times' Robin Abcarian visited his office in West Los Angeles in 2010: "The command center of Andrew Breitbart's growing media empire is a suite of offices on Sawtelle Boulevard in West Los Angeles with the temporary feel of a campaign office. Only the computers seem firmly anchored."

Breitbart lived in Westwood with his wife, Susie, and their four young children, Samson, 12; Mia, 10; Charlie, 6; and William, 4.. He was adopted by moderately conservative Jewish parents and attended two of L.A.'s most exclusive private schools  —Carlthorp and Brentwood.

His father, Gerald, owned Fox and Hounds, a landmark Tudor-style Santa Monica restaurant that later became the punk rock club Madame Wong's West. His mother, Arlene, was an executive at Bank of America in Beverly Hills and downtown L.A.

Breitbart is also survived by his sister, Tracy.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: JT Coyoté on March 02, 2012, 10:26:44 am
Andrew was #3 on the white house hit list... Alex Jones is #24....

Oldyoti

"The reason for the Second Amendment
may not be fully understood until
such time as it is needed."

~Thomas Jefferson
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: donnay on March 02, 2012, 11:10:24 am
Andrew was #3 on the white house hit list... Alex Jones is #24....

Oldyoti

"The reason for the Second Amendment
may not be fully understood until
such time as it is needed."

~Thomas Jefferson



JT,

Where can a find that list?
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: JT Coyoté on March 02, 2012, 11:38:07 am

JT,

Where can a find that list?

The boys at the bunker have it... Alex mentioned these numbers from it in the last 15 minutes of yesterday's show... about 49 minutes into the 3rd hour.

He is talking about it again now as related to the NDAA...

Oldyoti

"Error of opinion may be
tolerated where reason is
left free to combat it."

 ~Thomas Jefferson, 3/4/1801
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Effie Trinket on March 02, 2012, 11:52:44 am
They're already eradicating whistle blowers.

   http://areyoutargeted.com/2010/04/28/what-is-it-about-whistle-blowing-that-drives-people-crazy/

What they really want is to identify the whistle blowers before they blow the whistle.

Of course, there is no possible blowback to a whistleblower-suppression policy.  None whatsoever.

   http://areyoutargeted.com/2010/04/18/is-the-coverup-bringing-system-down/
Notice the above website no longer exists--and there is not even an archive of it, which is not the norm.

THIS COULD ERADICATE WHISTLE BLOWERS

(http://www.whistleblowingethics.info/Customers/DialogicalEthics/website.nsf/webPages/B804A742686461FFCA25736B001F69EE/$FILE/whistleblower.jpg)

Darpa Is Looking to SMITE Internet Interlopers

http://gizmodo.com/5544002/darpa-is-looking-to-smite-internet-interlopers

Darpa is going at securing cyberspace again, and this time they've got an open call to everyone to help them devise a program that will flag threats through irregular activity.

The new program called "Suspected Malicious Insider Threat Elimination"—painstakingly abbreviated to SMITE—was started to point out threats in the massive amounts of data on the internet. The new idea behind the program is to track the the activity of individuals or groups, rather than look for hints of threats in the entire sea of information. Theoretically it will be easier to notice malicious intentions by looking for small differences in the constantly updated activities of single users rather than the whole mess of us.

All this cyber-sleuthing sounds questionable, as some future activity could be mistakenly flagged as hostile. To prevent this, Darpa is calling for submissions to build a massive database that will prevent any accidental interpretations. The call for participants is going on now and there's workshop set later this June. Start covering your tracks now.

*******************************************************************************

DARPA plans to SMITE insider enemies

http://gcn.com/articles/2010/05/20/darpa-smite-rfi.aspx

RFI seeks technology to address attacks from within

    * By Kathleen Hickey
    * May 20, 2010

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is looking for technology to address insider threats. DARPA will use the technology, called Suspected Malicious Insider Threat Elimination (SMITE), to predict insider attacks, determine when one is underway and to detect one that has already taken place, according to the request for information issued May 10.

DARPA defines an insider threat as "malevolent (or possibly inadvertent) actions by an already trusted person with access to sensitive information and information systems and sources,” according to the RFI.

The agency plans to use forensics to find clues, gather and evaluate evidence and assess inferred actions and predict future behavior of the individual.

“In both the real and virtual world, it is very difficult to do anything without leaving some evidence behind. Attempts to conceal or remove evidence generally create new evidence that, if detected, could be a strong indication of the perpetrator’s intent,” the RFI stated.

The technology, which has not yet been specified, will be used to find individuals operating on U.S. networks. Specific topics of interest outlined in the RFI include:

    * Techniques to derive information about the relationship between deductions, the likely intent of inferred actions, and suggestions about what evidence might mean.
    * Methods to dynamically forecast context-dependent behaviors – both malicious and non-malicious.
    * Online and offline algorithms for feature extraction and detection in enormous graphs (as in billions of nodes).
    * Hybrid engines where deduction and feature detection mutually inform one another.

Particular technologies of interest include traditional insider threat detection, deception detection, pattern recognition, automated reasoning, analysis and algorithms for massive graphs and computational psychology and sociology.

*******************************************************************************

Request for Information (RFI)
DARPA-SN-10-46
Suspected Malicious Insider Threat Elimination (SMITE)
http://www.darpa.mil/ipto/solicit/baa/RFI-SN-10-46_PIP.pdf

*******************************************************************************

Danger Room What’s Next in National Security
Darpa Wants Code to Spot ‘Anomalous Behavior’ on the Job

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/05/darpa-wants-code-to-spot-anomalous-behavior-on-the-job/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+%28Wired%3A+Index+3+%28Top+Stories+2%29%29

Can software catch a cyberspy’s tricky intentions, before he’s started to help the other side? The way-out researchers at Darpa think so. They’re planning a new program, “Suspected Malicious Insider Threat Elimination” or SMITE, that’s supposed to “dynamically forecast” when a mole is about to strike. Also, the code is meant to flag “inadvertent” disclosures “by an already trusted person with access to sensitive information.”

“Looking for clues” that suggest a turncoat or accidental leaker is about to spill (.pdf) “could potentially be easier than recognizing explicit attacks,” Darpa notes in a request for information. But even that simpler search won’t be easy. “Many attacks are combinations of directly observable and inferred events.” Which is why SMITE’s program managers are interested in techniques to figure out “the likely intent of inferred actions, and suggestions about what [that] evidence might mean.” That goes for “behaviors both malicious and non-malicious.”

Step one in starting that process: Build a ginormous database to store all kinds of information on would-be threats. “The next step is to determine whether an individual or group of individuals is exhibiting anomalous behavior that is also malicious.” That’s a toughie — something anomalous in one context might be perfectly normal in another. One possible solution, the SMITE paper adds, could be detecting “deceptive” activities, which are a sign of cyberspying. Or cheating on your taxes. Or carrying on an office affair. Or playing World of Warcraft on the job. Depending on the situation.

Over at The Register, Lew Page quips: “It will no doubt be a comfort for anyone in a position of trust within the U.S. information infrastructure to know that mighty military algorithms and hybrid engines will soon sniff your every move so as to forecast any context-dependent malice on your part — and then in some unspecified way (remember what the E in SMITE stands for) eliminate you as a threat.”

More likely, the program is just a way to do some basic research into algorithms’ ability to understand human intent. But since every Darpa program has to have some sort of military application — no matter how far-fetched — the agency has cooked up this cyberspy-fighting scenario.

Anyway, our spies tell us that Darpa is planning a  SMITE workshop for mid-June in northern Virginia.
Title: Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. auto-assassination grid
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 12:20:20 pm
Notice the above website no longer exists--and there is not even an archive of it, which is not the norm.


DARPA witchfinder-ware to SMITE America's IT traitors
If we're lucky, we'll only have to be lucky once. Erm...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/19/darpa_smite/
By Lewis Page • Get more from this author
Posted in Security, 19th May 2010 12:03 GMT

Free whitepaper – Assuring application service quality

Our old friends at DARPA - the US military research bureau - have broached another intriguing and mildy upsetting scheme this week. This time the Pentagon boffins want nothing less than some kind of automated witch-finder technology able to finger "increasingly sophisticated malicious insider behavior" in the USA.

According to the US National Counterintelligence Strategy, “Trusted insiders ... are targeting the US information infrastructure for exploitation, disruption, and potential destruction”.


DARPA aren't having any of that, hence their new and sinisterly named Suspected Malicious Insider Threat Elimination (SMITE) project. The warboffins state:
We define insider threat as malevolent (or possibly inadvertent) actions by an already trusted person with access to sensitive information and information systems and sources.

Unspecified "technology" is to be developed to root out the traitors and incompetents menacing the US information infrastructure from within. The DARPA IT directors don't offer any details on how this is to be done, but they do give some general ideas:
Security is often difficult because the defenses must be perfect, while the attacker needs to find only one flaw. An emphasis on forensics could reverse the burden by requiring the attacker and his tools to be perfect, while the defender needs only a few clues to recognize an intrusion is underway.

Topics of interest include ... suggestions about what evidence might mean and [ways to] forecast context-dependent behaviors both malicious and non-malicious.

Also of interest are on-line and off-line algorithms for feature extraction and detection in enormous graphs (as in billions of nodes) as well as hybrid engines where deduction and feature detection mutually inform one another.

It will no doubt be a comfort for anyone in a position of trust within the US information infrastructure to know that mighty military algorithms and hybrid engines will soon sniff your every move so as to forecast any context-dependent malice on your part - and then in some unspecified way (remember what the E in SMITE stands for) eliminate you as a threat.

But this is DARPA, so there's every chance that SMITE will never happen - or that if it does it will mutate into something completely different from what its creators intended.

Full details in pdf here.
DARPA plans to SMITE insider enemies
RFI seeks technology to address attacks from within

http://gcn.com/articles/2010/05/20/darpa-smite-rfi.aspx
By Kathleen Hickey
May 20, 2010

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is looking for technology to address insider threats. DARPA will use the technology, called Suspected Malicious Insider Threat Elimination (SMITE), to predict insider attacks, determine when one is underway and to detect one that has already taken place, according to the request for information issued May 10.

DARPA defines an insider threat as "malevolent (or possibly inadvertent) actions by an already trusted person with access to sensitive information and information systems and sources,” according to the RFI.

The agency plans to use forensics to find clues, gather and evaluate evidence and assess inferred actions and predict future behavior of the individual.

“In both the real and virtual world, it is very difficult to do anything without leaving some evidence behind. Attempts to conceal or remove evidence generally create new evidence that, if detected, could be a strong indication of the perpetrator’s intent,” the RFI stated.

The technology, which has not yet been specified, will be used to find individuals operating on U.S. networks. Specific topics of interest outlined in the RFI include:
Techniques to derive information about the relationship between deductions, the likely intent of inferred actions, and suggestions about what evidence might mean.
Methods to dynamically forecast context-dependent behaviors – both malicious and non-malicious.
Online and offline algorithms for feature extraction and detection in enormous graphs (as in billions of nodes).
Hybrid engines where deduction and feature detection mutually inform one another.

Particular technologies of interest include traditional insider threat detection, deception detection, pattern recognition, automated reasoning, analysis and algorithms for massive graphs and computational psychology and sociology.

Responses are due May 26. To see the full RFI, click here.
DARPA SMITEs Insider Threats
http://whatsbrewin.nextgov.com/2010/05/darpa_smites_insider_threats.php
By Bob Brewin   05/18/10 03:38 pm ET

How bad is the threat of an insider attack against military information systems?

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency answers that question in stark terms in its request for industry help to counter insider electronic moles:
Trusted insiders ... are targeting the U.S. information infrastructure for exploitation, disruption, and potential destruction. [Emphasis included.]

National Counterintelligence Strategy of the United States of America (2008).

DARPA says protecting information systems against bad insider actors is often difficult
because the defenses must be perfect and comprehensive, while the attacker needs to find only one flaw.

That's why the agency said it has kicked off a project called Suspected Malicious Insider Threat Elimination, which we all know stands for SMITE, a lovely play on words for fighting back against an enemy.

Detecting insider threats, DARPA said, remains a challenge because it requires unearthing subtle indicators of malicious behavior buried in enormous observational data of no immediate relevance, or zeroing in on one key signal out of a lot of background noise.

One way to detect insider threats is to focus on deceptive behavior, which is characteristic of malicious intent - which, by the way, leads to the problem of assigning intent to observed behaviors.

But DARPA added that in both the real and virtual world, it is very difficult to do anything without leaving some evidence behind. Attempts to conceal or remove evidence generally create new evidence that, if detected, could be a strong indication of the perpetrator's intent.

Forensic-like techniques can be used to find clues, gather and evaluate evidence and combine them deductively, and DARPA says it needs industry help in developing these techniques.

The agency wants vendors to provide it with white papers that include, but are not limited to, techniques to derive information about the relationship between deductions, the likely intent of inferred actions and suggestions about what evidence might mean and then dynamically forecast context-dependent behaviors.

The agency also would like ideas on how to use information sensors and algorithms to help it determine the scale and complexity of current and projected insider threats and novel approaches based on social behavioral science.

Anyone interested in tackling this challenge needs to respond to DARPA by May 26.
Darpa Want Autonomous Assassination Grid to Eliminate Whistleblowers Exposed through ‘Anomalous Behavior’
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/05/darpa-wants-code-to-spot-anomalous-behavior-on-the-job/
By Noah Shachtman Email Author May 20, 2010 |  10:22 am |  Categories: DarpaWatch

Can software catch a cyberspy’s tricky intentions, before he’s started to help the other side? The way-out researchers at Darpa think so. They’re planning a new program, “Suspected Malicious Insider Threat Elimination” or SMITE, that’s supposed to “dynamically forecast” when a mole is about to strike. Also, the code is meant to flag “inadvertent” disclosures “by an already trusted person with access to sensitive information.”

“Looking for clues” that suggest a turncoat or accidental leaker is about to spill (.pdf) “could potentially be easier than recognizing explicit attacks,” Darpa notes in a request for information. But even that simpler search won’t be easy. “Many attacks are combinations of directly observable and inferred events.” Which is why SMITE’s program managers are interested in techniques to figure out “the likely intent of inferred actions, and suggestions about what [that] evidence might mean.” That goes for “behaviors both malicious and non-malicious.”

Step one in starting that process: Build a ginormous database to store all kinds of information on would-be threats. “The next step is to determine whether an individual or group of individuals is exhibiting anomalous behavior that is also malicious.” That’s a toughie — something anomalous in one context might be perfectly normal in another. One possible solution, the SMITE paper adds, could be detecting “deceptive” activities, which are a sign of cyberspying. Or cheating on your taxes. Or carrying on an office affair. Or playing World of Warcraft on the job. Depending on the situation.


Over at The Register, Lew Page quips: “It will no doubt be a comfort for anyone in a position of trust within the U.S. information infrastructure to know that mighty military algorithms and hybrid engines will soon sniff your every move so as to forecast any context-dependent malice on your part — and then in some unspecified way (remember what the E in SMITE stands for) eliminate you as a threat.”

More likely, the program is just a way to do some basic research into algorithms’ ability to understand human intent. But since every Darpa program has to have some sort of military application — no matter how far-fetched — the agency has cooked up this cyberspy-fighting scenario.

Anyway, our spies tell us that Darpa is planning a  SMITE workshop for mid-June in northern Virginia.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 12:42:36 pm
WND EXCLUSIVE
Michael Savage: Was Breitbart assassinated?
Media activist recently promised to publish revealing Obama videos

http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/michael-savage-was-breitbart-assassinated/
Published: 17 hours ago

Noting that the cause of Andrew Breitbart’s unexpected death yesterday was being examined by the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office, talk-radio host Michael Savage raised the question of whether the conservative media powerhouse – who recently announced he had videos that could politically damage President Obama – was murdered.

On his top-rated show today, Savage played an audio clip of Breitbart telling an audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last month that he had obtained videos that shed light on Obama’s ties to radicals in the early 1980s who helped propel him to the presidency.

“Maybe my overly active imagination kicked into overdrive,” Savage told his listeners of his decision to raise the question. “But you heard what Breitbart said – he has videos … we’re going to vet the president.”

Breitbart reportedly was walking near his home in Brentwood, Calif., just after midnight this morning when he collapsed. A neighbor saw him fall and called 911. Emergency crews tried to revive him and rushed him to the emergency room at the UCLA Medical Center.

It’s entirely plausible, Savage acknowledged, that Breitbart simply collapsed of a heart attack because of overwork and a reported history of health problems.

“I’m asking a crazy question,” Savage said, “but so what? We the people want an answer. This was not an ordinary man. If I don’t ask this question, I would be remiss.”

Breitbart told the CPAC crowd last month that the videos would reveal Obama during a time when he was meeting a “bunch of silver ponytails” – referring to Weather Underground terror group members Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

Ayers and Dohrn reportedly launched Obama’s political career with a fundraiser in their Chicago home.

Savage noted that Breitbart had dinner with Ayers and Dorhn three weeks ago at the couple’s Hyde Park residence on Chicago’s South Side, which is near Obama’s home. Breitbart was invited by Daily Caller Editor-in-Chief Tucker Carlson, who won an Internet auction for a dinner party with the couple.

“I’ve got videos – this election we’re going to vet him,” Breitbart said at CPAC, promising they would show how “racial division and class warfare are central” to the “hope and change” that Obama”sold in 2008.”

“He threatened the president at CPAC with video that could derail the president’s campaign,” Savage said.

“I pray it was natural causes, but we’ll never know the truth.”

Savage said that if Breitbart’s colleagues have the videos, they should post them as soon as possible and make them viral “or they’ll never see the light of day.”

Savage said he hadn’t spoken with Breitbart for the past two years, but he recalled the media mogul’s visited to his home in the Bay Area.

“He spoke for three straight hours,” Savage said. “I was unable to say a word.”

Savage also attended a party at Breitbart’s Los Angeles home.

“I told him two years ago to get a body guard. Never be alone in the street,” Savage said.

Savage, the author of the bestselling novel “Abuse of Power,” put on his novelist hat and speculated about ways a murderer could remain undetected by inducing a heart attack that didn’t leave any traces.

A caller from Savage’s native New York City said there’s a simple way to find out what happened.

“If the tapes come out, he died of a heart attack,” the caller said. “If the tapes don’t come out, they whacked him.”
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: jofortruth on March 02, 2012, 12:58:12 pm

JT,

Where can a find that list?


One list - Southern Poverty Law Center Publishes Patriot Hit List
http://www.infowars.com/southern-poverty-law-center-publishes-patriot-hit-list/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdqEp-jYL7E&feature=youtube_gdata_player
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/publications/the-patriots?page=0,0

Quote
Here are the 40 names that are targeted in the SPLC report (and guess who is listed at the very top? Yours truly):

1. Chuck Baldwin, Pastor, Radio Broadcaster, Syndicated Columnist, 2008 Constitution Party Presidential nominee.
2. Joe Banister, former IRS special agent, tax protester.
3. Martin “Red” Beckman, tax protester
4. Catherine Bleish, head of the Liberty Restoration Project.
5. Chris Broughton, Second Amendment advocate, member of “We The People” group.
6. Bob Campbell, head of American Grand Jury.
7. Robert Crooks, Army veteran, retired commercial fisherman, anti-illegal immigration proponent.
8. Joseph Farah, CEO of World Net Daily
9. Gary Franchi, producer of “Camp FEMA: American Lockdown,” national director of RestoreTheRepublic.com.
10. Al Garza, head of the Patriot’s Coalition, an anti-illegal immigration group.
11. Ted Gunderson, retired FBI agent.
12. John Hassey, “The public face of Alabama’s militia movement in the late 1990s,” says SPLC.
13. Alex Jones, Radio Talk Show host.
14. Devvy Kidd, “prolific columnist, blogger, and public speaker.”
15. Larry Kilgore, telecommunications consultant, former US Senate candidate from Texas, pro-secession advocate.
16. Cliff Kincaid, syndicated columnist and author, editor of AIM Report (Accuracy in Media’s publication), founder and president of America’s Survival, Inc., a UN watchdog group.
17. Mark Koernke, associated with the now-defunct Michigan Militia.
18. Richard Mack, former Graham County, Arizona, Sheriff, author, and public speaker.
19. Jack McLamb, former Phoenix, Arizona, police officer, author, and public speaker.
20. John McManus, former member of the US Marine Corps, president of the John Birch Society.
21. Daniel New, father of Michael New (the Army medic who refused to wear a UN uniform), author, public speaker.
22. Norm Olson, founder of the now-defunct Michigan Militia.
23. Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America.
24. Stewart Rhodes, Army veteran and Yale Law School graduate, founder of Oath Keepers.
25. Jon Roland, computer specialist, founder of the Constitution Society.
26. Luke Rudkowski, founder We Are Change.
27. Robert “Bob” Schultz, founder of We The People.
28. Joel Skousen, editor, World Affairs Brief.
29. Jim Stachowiak, Radio Talk Show host, “Longtime militia organizer,” claims SPLC.
30. John Stadtmiller, founder, Republic Broadcasting Network.
31. Orly Taitz, California attorney, a leader in the push to make President Obama disclose his US birth certificate.
32. Amanda Teegarden, executive director of Oklahomans for Sovereignty and Free Enterprise.
33. Mike Vanderboegh, anti-Obama health care activist.
34. Paul Venable, former candidate for the Idaho House of Representatives.
35. Edwin Vieira, Jr., attorney, author, proponent of constitutional State militias, lecturer.
36. Michele Bachmann, US Representative from Minnesota.
37. Glenn Beck, Fox News Channel TV host.
38. Paul Broun, medical doctor, US Representative from Georgia.
39. Andrew Napolitano, attorney, former State judge in New Jersey, Fox News Channel legal analyist, lecturer.
40. Ron Paul, former member of the US Air Force, medical doctor, US Representative from Texas, 2008 Republican candidate for President.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 01:09:03 pm
'Tea Party Zombies Must Die' Video Game Lets Players Kill Off Conservatives
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/07/tea-party-zombies-must-die-video-game_n_951896.html
The Huffington Post   Paige Lavender   First Posted: 09/07/11

A new video game is giving players a chance to explore a post-apocalyptic Fox News studio and kill off zombies that resemble famous conservatives including Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck.

The game, called "Tea Party Zombies Must Die," is project by StarvingEyes Advergaming, a website that provides games for online viral campaigns.

Other characters in the first-person shooter include the "Generic Pissed Off Old White Guy Zombie," the "Pissed Off Stupid White Trash Redneck Birther Zombie" and the "Express Racist Views Anonymously On The Internet Modern Klan Zombie," who dons the remains of a KKK robe as he wanders around with a sign that describes President Barack Obama as a Muslim
You can see some of the characters in the game in this video from MRC TV:

According to National Review Online, players get "informative tidbits" between levels about how Obama's health care plan lowers the deficit, and "how most Republicans think the president is a Muslim."

Jason Oda, the head of StarvingEyes, told MRC TV the game was a personal project and downplayed the criticism coming from conservative circles.

"I am not worried about it affecting business," Oda said.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: jofortruth on March 02, 2012, 01:09:17 pm
Another hit list! I'm sure there are many, since real Americans are sick of the crap and are standing up:
http://www.rense.com/general87/globe.htm
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: jofortruth on March 02, 2012, 01:17:42 pm
http://tinyurl.com/6vdgt4v

Quote
Rick Santorum: "What a huge loss, in my opinion, to our country and certainly to the conservative movement."

Newt Gingrich: "Andrew Breitbart was the most innovative pioneer in conservative activist social media in America. He had great courage and creativity."

And Mitt Romney called Breitbart a "brilliant entrepreneur, fearless conservative, loving husband and father."
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: nirosive on March 02, 2012, 01:20:00 pm
YAHOO: Andrew Breitbart death sparks conspiracy theories galore


Quote
The news quickly sent conservative bloggers--still shocked by Breitbart's sudden death--into a frenzy.

"In a stunning coincidence," Paul Joseph Watson wrote on InfoWars.com, "it appears Andrew Breitbart suffered his untimely death just hours before he was set to release damning video footage that could have sunk Barack Obama's 2012 re-election campaign."


Quote
But it wasn't just Sinclair News that housed conspiracy theorists. Conservative site InfoWars.com had plenty of speculations too.

"I'm going to reiterate what I said before," a commenter wrote on InfoWars.com. "In my opinion THIS GUY GOT ELIMINATED. Plain and simple." And another wrote: "Anybody who gets too close to the truth will be killed."

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/andrew-breitbart-death-sparks-conspiracy-theories-galore-175523779.html

Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 02, 2012, 01:40:51 pm
http://commieblaster.com/bill_ayers/

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/11/must-see-terrorist-bill-ayers-brags-to-education-activists-about-hosting-obama-fundraiser-video/

Terrorist Bill Ayers recently bragged about hosting a fundraiser for Barack Obama in his home back in the 1990′s. Ayers told the audience, “I thought he wanted to be mayor of Chicago – that’s the limit of my imagination.”
 The audience loved it.
 
From the video: In this clips obtained exclusively by Education Action Group at a recent “Rethinking Schools” event, Ayers recalls his fundraising for Barack Obama and fellow radical Bob Peterson.
 
Of course, the one time the liberal media asked Obama about his association with Bill Ayers in 2008, he said Ayers was “just another guy in the neighborhood.”This was despite the fact that they were well aquainted and shared an office in Chicago.

plus...
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/03/steve-bannon-we-are-going-to-release-the-breitbart-obama-harvard-tapes-in-one-week-to-10-days-video/
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: donnay on March 02, 2012, 02:05:53 pm

One list - Southern Poverty Law Center Publishes Patriot Hit List
http://www.infowars.com/southern-poverty-law-center-publishes-patriot-hit-list/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdqEp-jYL7E&feature=youtube_gdata_player
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/publications/the-patriots?page=0,0


Thanks Jo.  I don't see Andrew Breitbart on the SPLC list.  Hmm...
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 02, 2012, 02:28:14 pm
We could complain all day about how evil and corrupt the banker-owned political establishment is, it still wouldn't bring Andrew Breitbart or any other assassination victim back to life.

So the question is: can anything positive be derived from Breitbart's death?

If there's only one thing that can, it's this: Breitbart's assassination can be made to convince whistleblowers everywhere that the price for sitting on -- rather than immediately releasing -- explosive information about a high-level minion (http://www.whitehouse.gov) of the NWO (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5E) is death.

If there are any whistleblowers out there reading this, to you I say: if you value your own life, then the best way to protect yourself is to release whatever information you have sooner rather than later, and to the widest possible audience -- preferably on the Alex Jones Show (http://www.infowars.com/listen-on-the-internet/) -- that way millions of people know about it, not just you.

Nothing sends political cockroaches scurrying faster than the public spotlight.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 04:17:42 pm
DARPA Taps Raytheon for Cybersecurity Research Program
http://www.thenewnewinternet.com/2011/08/05/darpa-taps-raytheon-for-cybersecurity-research-program-steve-hawkins-comments/

Raytheon announced today it has been selected by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to support its Anomaly Detection at Multiple Scales program, a cybersecurity initiative that will use algorithms to better detect anomalous behaviors and insider threats. Raytheon will create, adapt and apply technology to the problem of anomaly characterization and detection in large data sets.

According to Raytheon,  the ADAMS project will use data collected by Raytheon‘s endpoint audit and investigation solution known as SureView. The specific goal of ADAMS researchers is to detect anomalous behaviors shortly after a trusted insider “turns” and begins committing malicious acts.

“This project will provide unprecedented understanding of the insider threat at a time when the U.S. government is mandating that agencies implement automated insider threat detection capabilities to protect their classified information systems,” said Steve Hawkins, vice president of Raytheon’s Intelligence and Information Systems’ Information Security Solutions business. “The ADAMS program will ensure that operationally proven tools such as SureView can be further enhanced to keep pace with the ever-evolving nature of the insider threat and allow analysts to better identify precursor behaviors before damaging incidents occur.”

Raytheon’s SureView is an appliance-based solution that detects threats by auditing end-user behavior on computer endpoints for policy violations and high-risk activity, such as accessing classified or proprietary data and trying to send it outside the firewall.

ADAMS will leverage massive data sets from large computer end-user populations observed in live, operational environments. According to the company, DARPA has stated it wants the technology developed by ADAMS researchers to bolster the capabilities of existing sensor suites currently employed by cybersecurity analysts and operators.


Related posts:
Raytheon Launches New Cybersecurity Product
Raytheon Taps Kevin Brown to Lead Cybersecurity Ops at Fort Meade Offices
Bids Open for New Cyber-Insider Threat Program
DARPA Looks to SMITE Traitors
NGA Awards $30 Million Extension to Raytheon
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 05:04:33 pm
http://rpgoldman.real-time.com/

Robert P. Goldman    New Stuff

New plan recognition paper from AAAI-2011 with Chris Geib.
Computer Science Research
SMITE (Computer Security, Intrusion Detection)

I am currently working on the SMITE project, as part of DARPA's Scalable Network Monitoring program. SMITE aims at performing intrusion detection on ultra high speed network traffic (up to 100 Gbps).

My particular role in the project is to work on what is called intrusion detection system (IDS) "correlation" (correlation is actually a misleading term, what is really meant here is "fusion.")

Even more specifically, my work is in the component that is called the "evidence assessor." This component uses qualitative Bayesian reasoning to weigh competing hypotheses for clusters of IDS resports. Often these competing explanations weigh malign (malware sweeping the network in order to spread) against benign (print daemons looking for networked printers) explanations; the evidence assessor helps us address the problem of false positives that has plagued IDSes.

This project continues work on techniques that were first developed in the ARGUS/Scyllarus project.

Papers from SMITE:
"Model-based Intrusion Assessment in Common Lisp ," with Steven A. Harp, in working notes of the ICAPS 2009 Workshop on Computer Security and Artificial Intelligence (SecArt), Thessaloniki, Greece, September, 2009. This paper is a mild revision and reformatting of the ILC paper, listed below, which is the authoritative (archival) version.
"Model-based Intrusion Assessment in Common Lisp," with Steven A. Harp Proceedings of the International Lisp Conference, Cambridge, MA, 2009.
Integrated learning (Planning, Knowledge Representation, Semantic Web)

My most recently concluded activity was working on the BBN-led POIROT team for DARPA's Integrated Learning program, which aimed at integrating together a large number of intelligent systems to learn workflows from observing humans using web services.

Papers from Integrated Learning:
2010
"Shopper: a system for executing and simulating expressive plans," Proceedings of ICAPS 2010, Toronto, Canada, 2010. short paper with John Maraist. There was also be a demonstration of this system at ICAPS 2010.
2009
"A Semantics for HTN Methods," in the Proceedings of ICAPS 2009, Thessaloniki, Greece, September, 2009.
"Partial Observability, Quantification, and Iteration for Planning: Work in Progress," in working notes of the ICAPS 2009 Workshop on Generalized Planning, Thessaloniki, Greece, September, 2009.
"SHOPPER: Interpreter for a high-level web services language," with John Maraist, in the Proceedings of the International Lisp Conference, Cambridge, MA, March 2009.
"LTML -- a language for representing semantic web service workflow procedures," with Mark Burstein, et al., To appear in the working notes of the "Semantics for the Rest of Us" workshop at the 8th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2009).
2008
"Using Classical Planners to Solve Nondeterministic Planning Problems," with Ugur Kuter, Dana Nau and Elnatan Reisner, in the Proceedings of ICAPS 2008, Sydney, Australia, September 2008.
2007
"HOTRiDE: Hierarchical Ordered Task Replanning in Dynamic Environments," with N. Fazil Ayan, Ugur Kuter, and Fusun Yaman, on replanning and execution monitoring of HTNs.
"Conditionalization: Adapting forward-chaining planners to partially observable environments," with Ugur Kuter, Dana Nau, Elnatan Reisner, Proceedings of ICAPS-2007.
Planning for Uninhabited Air Vehicles (UAVs)

I've been doing a lot of work on planning for UAVs in the past years. This is closely related to my interest in Planning for Intelligent UIs, since we're trying to use AI planners to make it easier to command complex behaviors of autonomous systems. Unfortunately, the pace of this work has been such that I have not had time to write much about it. Here are some snippets:
With Mark Boddy, I taught a tutorial on planner domain modeling at ICAPS05 (June 2005).
Most of this work has been funded under two U.S. government SBIR contracts: PVACS and TUSC.
At the ICAPS 2004 workshop on Connecting Planning Theory with Practice, I presented a paper with some lessons learned about using the SHOP2 planner in a UAV control interface.
I've been contributing to the maintenance of the SHOP2 HTN planning system.
Planning and Controller Synthesis

My work in automatic controller synthesis has mostly been done in collaboration with my colleague, David Musliner. He introduced me to the CIRCA architecture he developed (while at the University of Michigan). CIRCA is a novel architecture for doing intelligent control in hard real-time. I have since done work on incorporating model-checking into the architecture, doing abstraction-based controller synthesis, and extending the modeling capabilities for hierarchical control.

In 2001 I participated in the NASA New Millennium Program planning process, and to be on the program committee of the AAAI Symposium on Model-Based Validation of Intelligence, to be held at Stanford in March, 2001.

In 2002, I presented results from this work at the 2002 Workshop on Hybrid Control: Control and Computation (HSCC-2002).

In 2005, Musliner, Pelican, and I wrote a paper about incremental verification in controller synthesis at the Third Workshop on Model Checking and Artificial Intelligence (MoChArt05).

February 2006: Our paper on incremental verification in controller synthesis has been published in Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science. You may find the paper through Elsevier's ScienceDirect website.

For recent papers in this area, click here.

My work on planning and controller synthesis grew out of earlier work on planning in conditions of incomplete information.
Information Fusion

I am interested in the use of Bayesian networks (belief networks, causal probabilistic networks) to do information fusion. I have worked on this in the context of troubleshooting abnormal situations in oil refineries (in the context of Honeywell's project on Abnormal Situation Management), and am now exploring the use of belief networks for information fusion in computer network intrusion detection (see the Argus project).
Planning with Incomplete Information

I became interested in work on planning under uncertainty as an outgrowth of my interest in general aspects of reasoning under uncertainy. Some of my early work in this area was concerned with developing a better understanding of algorithms for conditional planning, such as CNLP and Cassandra. This led me to work on formalizing the problem of conditional planning, and the development of algorithms for conditional linear planning and epsilon-safe planning. Some relevant papers include:
Representing Uncertainy in Simple Planners (from KR-94): Postscript only;
Conditional Linear Planning (from AIPS-94): Postscript and pdf;
Epsilon-Safe Planning (from UAI-94): Postscript and pdf;
Expressive Planning and Explicit Knowledge (from AIPS-96): Postscript and pdf;

These papers were all written with Mark S. Boddy at Honeywell Laboratories.
Planning for Intelligent User Interfaces

Through work with colleagues in user-centered design, notably Chris Miller, I have become interested in exploring the ways that planning systems, particularly constraint-based planning systems, can provide a user-interface to advanced control systems. One of the systems my group at Honeywell built was a multi-agent constraint-based planner (see below). Much of that work was done in conjunction with my colleague Karen Haigh.
In the course of this work, I have become interested in using optimization as a way to manage user interaction for intelligent systems. With some colleagues, I have written this work up in a paper that appeard in the 2005 proceedings of the American Helicopter Society's International Specialists' Meeting on Unmanned Rotorcraft: "Optimizing to Satisfice."

In 2006, a paper entitled "Delegation Interfaces for a Dynamic and Unpredictable Task: A Mobile Target Tracking Example," with my colleagues Chris Miller and Harry Funk, was presented at the NATO RTO Human Factors and Medicine Panel (HFM) Symposium which was held in Biarritz, France, 9-11 October 2006. I will make that paper available here if that's legal.

A paper about the general approach, but written for a human factors audience, rather than an AI audience appeared at the HFES conference: "The Playbook Approach to Adaptive Automation," Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, 2005.
Miscellaneous

From 2005 through 2007 I worked on the DARPA Coordinators program. This was a research program investigating coordination across multiple agents that execute complex, hierarchical tasks, in a dynamic environment. See multi-agent coordination.

My earliest work at Honeywell Technology Center was done on planning under uncertainty, and on constraint-based scheduling, specifically for batch manufacturing (a kind of manufacturing that is a hybrid between continuous and discrete manufacturing. For information on this work, and an off-print of an article from IEEE Intelligent Systems, send me some email.

Another offshoot of my work on controller synthesis has been an interest in verification. Here is a paper I co-authored, appearing in the proceedings of the 2001 Spin Workshop, describing work on verification at Honeywell Laboratories.
This web page is currently very much under construction.

Curriculum Vitae

My CV is available as HTML for easier browsing.

I have removed the MS Word version because keeping it up-to-date was difficult, especially in the face of revisions to the software and file formats. If you must have it in MS Word, please try to import the HTML and contact me if you have any problems.

I will also make publications available through this web site.
Recent papers
Here are some of my recent papers in various interest areas:
Planning: There are a number of papers that should be added here. See also CIRCA papers and Constraint-based planning, and Integrated Learning.
"Durative Planning in HTNs," short paper in Proceedings of ICAPS 2006, June 2006.
Multi-agent coordination
Coordinating Highly Contingent Plans: Biasing Distributed MDPs Towards Cooperative Behavior, with David J. Musliner, Ed Durfee and Mark Boddy, paper for the ICAPS 2008 Multiagent Planning Workshop.
"Flexibly Integrating Deliberation and Execution in Decision-Theoretic Agents," with David Musliner, Jim Carciofini, Ed Durfee, Jianhui Wu, and Mark Boddy. Paper for the ICAPS-2007 workshop on Planning and Plan Execution for Real-World Systems: Principles and Practices for Planning in Execution.
"Unrolling" Complex Task Models into MDPs, paper for the working notes of the AAAI 2007 Spring Symposium on Game Theory and Decision Theory. Describes work on compiling complex hierarchical task models (specifically in the TAEMS language) into Markov Decision Processes. Joint work with Dave Musliner, Mark Boddy, Ed Durfee, and Jianhui Wu.
AAAI Spring Symposium 2006 paper, Coordinated Plan Management Using Multiagent MDPs, describes work I'm doing with researchers from Honeywell, Adventium Labs, and the University of Michigan on the DARPA Coordinators program.
"CTAEMS Language Specification," with Mark Boddy, Bryan Horling, John Phelps, Regis Vincent, A. Chris Long, Bob Kohout, and Rajiv Maheswaran. This was the specification for a dialect of the TAEMS multi-agent HTN notation, developed for the DARPA Coordinators program that clarified a number of issues in the original TAEMS language design.
Planning and AI Planning: I had a paper, with Jeff Abbott and John R. Surdu, on a simulation-based paradigm for military operations planning in the September 2008, SIW workshop: "Task-based Approach to Planning".
Plan recognition:
"Recognizing Plans with Loops Represented in a Lexicalized Grammar," with Christopher W. Geib, in the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference, San Francisco, CA, August 2011.
I was one of the chairs of a Dagstuhl workshop on plan recognition, held in April, 2011. The final report, which I edited with the other chairs (Chris Geib, Henry Kautz and Tamim Asfour) is available here.
"Handling Looping and Optional Actions in YAPPR," with Christopher W. Geib, in the AAAI Workshop on Plan, Activity and Intent Recognition (PAIR), Atlanta, GA, 2010.
"Plan Libraries for Plan Recognition: Do We Really Know What They Model?", with Froduald Kabanza and Philipe Bellefeuille, in the AAAI Workshop on Plan, Activity and Intent Recognition (PAIR), Atlanta, GA, 2010.
"A Probabilistic plan recognition algorithm based on plan tree grammars," with Christopher W. Geib, Artificial Intelligence, volume 117, number 11, 2009.
"A New Probabilistic Plan Recognition Algorithm Based on String Rewriting," joint work with Chris Geib and John Maraist, in the Proceedings of ICAPS-2008, Sydney, Australia, 2008.
A somewhat more updated, and more conjectural version of the above paper, for presentation at the Plan, Activity and Intent Recognition Workshop at IJCAI-2009 is here.
"Partial Observability and Probabilistic Plan/Goal Recognition," joint work with Chris Geib, in the proceedings of the 2005 Workshop on Modeling Others from Observations.
A New Theory of Plan Recognition, published in the Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, joint work with Chris Geib and Chris Miller. Available in pdf or postscript. (For some reason, at least on my screen, the pdf looks horrible, and my version of gnu ghostview can't open the postscript, although kghostview can. Not sure why. Sorry.)
Reactive Planning/Controller Synthesis: I have been working, in the context of the CIRCA intelligent control architecture, on the problem of automatically synthesizing hard real-time controllers. Some recent papers in this area are:
The Evolution of CIRCA, a Theory-Based AI Architecture with Real-Time Performance Guarantees , a AAAI Spring Symposium paper from 2008 giving an overview of the CIRCA architecture and its history.
Incremental Verification for On-the-Fly Controller Synthesis, with David Musliner and Michael Pelican, at MoChart05.
For the AAAI 2000 Symposium on Hybrid Control; you can find it here.
For the 2002 Workshop on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control. Click here for my paper.
A similar paper, with a couple of improvements, and written more for an AI audience, will be presented at the 2002 AIPS workshop on Planning via Model Checking.
"Modifying HyTech to automatically synthesize hybrid controllers," with R. Deshpande, D.J. Musliner, Jorge Tierno and Steve Pratt, Proceedings of the Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 1223-1228, Orlando, FL, 2001
Deliberation Scheduling/Metareasoning: The CIRCA architecture relies on having a real-time subsystem that provides hard real-time reactions, while its AI subsystem has the freedom to use planning algorithms that may be intractable. Recently, we have been working to get the inference of the AI subsystem under timing discipline, as well. To do this, we have been pursuing methods of deliberation scheduling, specially tailored to the CIRCA framework. Our earliest experiments in this line of work have been written-up in a paper entitled Managing Online Self-Adaptation in Real-Time Environments, available in postscript or pdf. I presented this paper at the International Workshop on Self-Adaptive Software, in mid-May 2001.
Constraint-based planning:
"MACBeth: A Multi-Agent Constraint-Based Planner" --- This paper was presented at the AAAI-2000 workshop on Constraints and AI Planning. Postscript or Adobe Acrobat.
More recently, I was co-author on a survey of Constraint-based planning that grew out of the AAAI-2000 workshop.  A preprint is available in postscript.  The paper will appear in AI magazine.
Computer security and information fusion:
In 2010, I was co-chair (with Mark S. Boddy and Stefan Edelkamp) of the SecArt workshop on Security and Artificial Intelligence, at AAAI in Atlanta, Georgia.
"Model-based Intrusion Assessment in Common Lisp," with Steven A. Harp, presented at the International Lisp Conference, March 2009.
Information Modeling for Intrusion Report Aggregation, Postscript and Adobe Acrobat.
Plan Recognition in Intrusion Detection Systems, Postscript and Adobe Acrobat.
A Stochastic Model for Intrusions, Adobe Acrobat presented at the 2002 Symposium on Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (RAID-2002).
Common Lisp Build System: I have recently spent some time helping Faré (François-René Rideau) develop the new version of ASDF (Another System Definition Facility), the de facto standard build system for Common Lisp. I am proud to say that our ASDF 2 is now distributed with all major CL implementations. The project raised a number of interesting issues arising from Lisp's rich notion of a run-time environment (meaning that simply aping make is a non-starter); the way this rich environment requires us to ``hot patch'' an existing ASDF in a CL environment; the fact that there are multiple CL implementations, not just a single reference implementation; etc. We describe this work in a paper published at the 2010 International Lisp Conference:
"Evolving ASDF: More cooperation, less coordination," François-René Rideau and Robert P. Goldman, Proceedings of the International Lisp Conference, Reno, NV, 2010.
The ARGUS project

One of my last research projects at Honeywell, and one of those of which I was most proud was the ARGUS project. The ARGUS project was work in the area of computer security, specifically intrusion detection. The objective of the ARGUS project was to provide a framework for fusing the reports of multiple intrusion detection systems into a single unified view of a computer installation's security situation. This work builds on my interest in qualitative probability and Bayesian approaches to information fusion.

A couple of papers on the Argus project, were published at the DISCEX-2001 conference. Drafts are available:
Information Modeling for Intrusion Report Aggregation, Postscript and Adobe Acrobat.
Plan Recognition in Intrusion Detection Systems, Postscript and Adobe Acrobat.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 06:11:22 pm
Just an FYI regarding false narratives about Breitbart. He has been accused of being the cause of the Shirley Sherrod firing which is bullcrap. Jon Stewart exposed the truth about this when it happened:



Jon Stewart: ‘Andrew Breitbart May Be The Most Honest Person In The Entire Story’
http://www.mediaite.com/online/jon-stewart-on-sherrod-scandal-breitbart-may-be-the-most-honest-person-in-the-entire-story/
by Colby Hall | 8:44 am, July 27th, 2010


After railing against Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack for saying that Sherrod’s dismissal “should have been done in a more personal way, with far more thought and far less haste,” he then mocked the NAACP for claiming to have been “snookered” and the White House’s unique non-apology apology. Shockingly, however, Stewart appeared to give Andrew Breitbart a pass – not for his actions, per se, but rather his candor in admitting his agenda five months back:

Stewart: First of all, Fox News is too busy with their black panther hard-on to bother much with this. And Andrew Breitbart, the guy who leaked the edited tape, may be the most honest person in this entire story. This is what he said five months ago:

Bretibart (from file footage): I want to be in the history books saying I took down the institutional left.

Stewart: See he didn’t say “I want to be in the history books a aparagon of honesty,” he didn’t say “I would like to be in the Museum of Broadacsting, and to be known by children around the wold as Arnold B. Truthington of Accuracy Lane.”

No ,he said out loud “I want to bring down the institutional left.” So if you are on the institutional left, and you see the package from him, watch the whole (bleep) tape. How is that snookering?

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-july-26-2010/lost-in-race



Breitbart actually exposed who was the real culprit...Glenn Beckster.

Breitbart was trying to expose the NAACP and not Shirley Sherrod, GLenn shifted the narrative to SHirley and blammed Breirtbart...



Andrew Breitbart blames Glenn Beck for Shirley Sherrod scandal
http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/05/andrew-breitbart-blames-glenn-beck-for-shirley-sherrod-scandal/
Posted on 05.26.11
By Eric W. Dolan

Echoing claims he made on MSNBC in April, conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart blamed Fox News host Glenn Beck for a clip that portrayed U.S. Department of Agriculture state director Shirley Sherrod as racist.

Breitbart accused Beck of taking the video of Sherrod and cutting it up into 15 second pieces on his radio program, ignoring Breitbart’s original focus on the NAACP and instead making it solely about Sherrod.

“He found out between the time he did the radio show and the TV show that he had screwed the pooch,” Breitbart said. “So he goes on the TV show and does a 180 degree turn and changes the entire narrative. Who suffered from that? Me because it made it look like I had gone after Sherrod. He had gone after Sherrod and then he turned her into a victim.”

Mediaite reported that Breitbart attacked Beck on Tuesday night in a series of postings on Twitter, claiming Beck had “thrown [him] under the bus” and taken content from his websites without attribution.

Watch video, courtesy of The Tolbert Report, below:
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on March 02, 2012, 06:39:16 pm
(http://commonamericanjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/840_102926845194_686155194_5053359_1686_n.jpg)

Just to let you people in on how things work 'downtown'.  'RECOVERY' - ASSASSINATiON / HIT's are nothing new for the NWO assassin teams.  These are typical operations.  They happen more often than not internally, but occasionally, they are needed to be done OUTSIDE the inner circle.


(http://images.wikia.com/callofduty/images/1/12/Delta_icon.png)

A special unit from the ABOVE are typically put on the assignment.   The reason why I say this was a 'recovery' op is because UNTIL, and ONLY UNTIL ALL 'concerned' materials are without a shadow of a doubt 'recovered' does the operation get the 'go-ahead', using symbol below, for target termination.


(http://www.hiddenmeanings.com/whatar2.gif)

The point is in the DOWN position meaning, all materials recovered, terminate 'WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE'.

Therefore the REAL footage of Obama has been recovered (as far as they know) and (most likely) IF ANY footage does come out CLAIMING to be that of Andrew Breitbart's it will most likely by a PROVABLE fake to discredit ANY real evidence Andrew Breitbart may have had.

 

Alex Jones made this a point. Breitbart's handlers are stalling and NOT releasing the damning video.

Will they be shocked to find that their hiding places were found BEFORE Breitbart's death?
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Dig on March 02, 2012, 06:58:40 pm
Alex Jones made this a point. Breitbart's handlers are stalling and NOT releasing the damning video.

Will they be shocked to find that their hiding places were found BEFORE Breitbart's death?

At this point, the assassination of a non-mainstream journo is 1,000x more damaging to the Obama Deception Mythology than any fricking college video even if they have him f**king squirrels while shitting on an American flag.

I mean really, WTF? The New World Order just totally f-d themselves!


[Disclaimer: I am not saying that there exists hours of videos of the president f**king varmints nor videos of him defecating on 'ol glory, or doing both at the same time. I highly doubt that any squirrel f**king videos exist and i also doubt that our president engages in such activities to begin with. The satire was meant to expose the fact that sometimes a downtrodden group of incestous control freaks like the committee of 300 will cut off their nose to spite their face, or in this case, S.M.I.T.E. an American journo without realizing the just exposed themselves as the only true National Security threat to the United States of America.]
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on March 02, 2012, 07:28:40 pm
At this point, the assassination of a non-mainstream journo is 1,000x more damaging to the Obama Deception Mythology than any fricking college video even if they have him f**king squirrels while shitting on an American flag.

I mean really, WTF? The New World Order just totally f-d themselves!



In some ways yes.

The problem however, is that you are assuming most people have two brain cells to rub together.

A video MAY have even woke up those individuals with that 'empty minded stare'.

You know. I wonder how many 'associates' of Obama have died of 'natural' causes who we don't even know about?
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: chris jones on March 02, 2012, 07:56:09 pm
The pheonix program, get out of jail free cards. Above the law of he miliary regulars and any and all civilian auhoriy.
  Mr. Colby-CIA and Westmoreland, quite a pair, their Icon was Colonell Patton of the 11th. Armored cavalry.. Pyshotics.
  TDY, CIA & Mill combo, an excuse to stick hard core irregulars, on duty assigments or strictly hand picked CIA.
  Nothing has changed in fact it has imploded to a degree that is far beyond the average mans comprehension, a controlled cladestine "inside" organization that makes Murder Inc appear to be miniscule. Inside yes, golobal, YES.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: L2Design on March 02, 2012, 09:46:10 pm
WHYYYY do they say.. 'I'm going to show my proof'..

 JUST SHOW IT!

DONT TELL THEM YOU'RE GONNA..

omggggg
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: JT Coyoté on March 03, 2012, 12:49:34 pm

One list - Southern Poverty Law Center Publishes Patriot Hit List
http://www.infowars.com/southern-poverty-law-center-publishes-patriot-hit-list/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdqEp-jYL7E&feature=youtube_gdata_player
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/publications/the-patriots?page=0,0


Well you are in good company there in the top 3, Jo...

The list from 2009 where Alex is #24 is from the Globe and glimpsed in this article... I don't see Andrew Breitbart anywhere however... Alex may have been mistaken or quoting from another list...

Oldyoti

"Whenever the people are well
informed, they can be trusted with
their own government; that whenever
things get so far wrong as to attract
their notice, they may be relied on to
set them to rights."
~Thomas Jefferson,
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 03, 2012, 01:58:42 pm
At this point, the assassination of a non-mainstream journo is 1,000x more damaging to the Obama Deception Mythology than any fricking college video even if they have him f**king squirrels while shitting on an American flag.

I mean really, WTF? The New World Order just totally f-d themselves!


[Disclaimer: I am not saying that there exists hours of videos of the president f**king varmints nor videos of him defecating on 'ol glory, or doing both at the same time. I highly doubt that any squirrel f**king videos exist and i also doubt that our president engages in such activities to begin with. The satire was meant to expose the fact that sometimes a downtrodden group of incestous control freaks like the committee of 300 will cut off their nose to spite their face, or in this case, S.M.I.T.E. an American journo without realizing the just exposed themselves as the only true National Security threat to the United States of America.]

Exactly - Anybody who wants to can find the Bernadine Dorn /Bill Aires / "Communist"/CIA connection to Obama. We don't need a video.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 03, 2012, 02:13:53 pm
Exactly - Anybody who wants to can find the Bernadine Dorn /Bill Aires / "Communist"/CIA connection to Obama. We don't need a video.

Agreed.

Webster Tarpley was sounding the alarm bells about this long before anyone else was:

http://tarpley.net/2008/05/20/barack-obama-ventriloquist%E2%80%99s-dummy-zbigniew-brzezinski-ventriloquist/ (http://tarpley.net/2008/05/20/barack-obama-ventriloquist%E2%80%99s-dummy-zbigniew-brzezinski-ventriloquist/)

http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/barack-h-obama-the-unauthorized-biography/3674186 (http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/barack-h-obama-the-unauthorized-biography/3674186)

Yet to hear some people talk, it's as though Tarpley's two books on Obama were never published.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: JT Coyoté on March 03, 2012, 04:49:11 pm
Agreed.

Webster Tarpley was sounding the alarm bells about this long before anyone else was:

http://tarpley.net/2008/05/20/barack-obama-ventriloquist%E2%80%99s-dummy-zbigniew-brzezinski-ventriloquist/ (http://tarpley.net/2008/05/20/barack-obama-ventriloquist%E2%80%99s-dummy-zbigniew-brzezinski-ventriloquist/)

http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/barack-h-obama-the-unauthorized-biography/3674186 (http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/barack-h-obama-the-unauthorized-biography/3674186)

Yet to hear some people talk, it's as though Tarpley's two books on Obama were never published.

...or Corsi's "Obama-Nation"... But my gut tells me that what Breitbart found, or was more likely given, though related, is much more damning.

JTCoyoté

"What has been the effect of coercion?
To make one-half the world fools and
the other half hypocrites. To support
roguery and error all over the earth."

~Thomas Jefferson
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on March 03, 2012, 04:51:52 pm
Sheriff Joe Spoke To Brietbart 4-5 hrs Before He Died? (video)
http://video.godlikeproductions.com/video/322012_sheriff_joe_on_alan_stock_radio?id=b1b72b7e3bbe33b4672
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 03, 2012, 06:04:12 pm
...or Corsi's "Obama-Nation"... But my gut tells me that what Breitbart found, or was more likely given, though related, is much more damning.

You're probably right. Heck, even if the video in question merely confirms what Tarpley and Corsi have been writing about for years, I think it's still safe to assume that -- if released unedited to the public -- it would damage Obama politically far more than any of the books that have been written about him.

Because for one thing, save for sports articles and celebrity gossip stories, most Americans simply don't read. And for another, there's a world of difference in the eyes of most people between merely "telling" them something in a book or essay and actually showing it to them on video.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: pac522 on March 03, 2012, 06:17:36 pm
...or Corsi's "Obama-Nation"... But my gut tells me that what Breitbart found, or was more likely given, though related, is much more damning.

JTCoyoté



Information that could actually trigger the NDAA to be used against Obama?
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on March 03, 2012, 07:31:24 pm
I have to agree that the video it's only abstract to the larger issue of the question of his death being a NDAA hit.

Which means had we lived in such a country in the 1970's the journalists that broke the Watergate deal instead would have been terminated by the Nixon circles.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 03, 2012, 08:10:20 pm
John Pilger: The two sides of Barack Obama
EXPOSED: Barack Obama's CIA and Agent Provocateur Connections

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/191292-John-Pilger-s-Speech-The-two-sides-of-Barrack-Obama
John Pilger Youtube Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:19 UTC


The new boss, just like the old boss... Don't expect 'Change' anytime soon. Who is it that Obama serves?

Thought-provoking speech by Australian Journalist and documentary maker John Pilger:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXL998q7skI


Comment: As Pilger relates above, Obama's first employer was Business International Corporation, about which William Blum relates as follows:
In his autobiography, "Dreams From My Fathers", Barack Obama writes of taking a job at some point after graduating from Columbia University in 1983. He describes his employer as "a consulting house to multinational corporations" in New York City, and his functions as a "research assistant" and "financial writer".

The odd part of Obama's story is that he doesn't mention the name of his employer. However, a New York Times story of 2007 identifies the company as Business International Corporation.10 Equally odd is that the Times did not remind its readers that the newspaper itself had disclosed in 1977 that Business International had provided cover for four CIA employees in various countries between 1955 and 1960.

The British journal, Lobster Magazine - which, despite its incongruous name, is a venerable international publication on intelligence matters - has reported that Business International was active in the 1980s promoting the candidacy of Washington-favored candidates in Australia and Fiji. In 1987, the CIA overthrew the Fiji government after but one month in office because of its policy of maintaining the island as a nuclear-free zone, meaning that American nuclear-powered or nuclear-weapons-carrying ships could not make port calls. After the Fiji coup, the candidate supported by Business International, who was much more amenable to Washington's nuclear desires, was reinstated to power - R.S.K. Mara was Prime Minister or President of Fiji from 1970 to 2000, except for the one-month break in 1987.

In his book, not only doesn't Obama mention his employer's name; he fails to say when he worked there, or why he left the job. There may well be no significance to these omissions, but inasmuch as Business International has a long association with the world of intelligence, covert actions, and attempts to penetrate the radical left - including Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) - it's valid to wonder if the inscrutable Mr. Obama is concealing something about his own association with this world.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"The name's Obama -- BARACK Obama."
(http://cinie.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/obamabond.jpg)
Joseph Cannon, Cannonfire
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m57169&hd=&size=1&l=e
August 21, 2009

Of all the outside-the mainstream notions I've posited on this blog, the one that annoys the most people is my suggestion that the CIA recruited young Barack Obama during his days at Occidental College. I would further suggest that the Agency link runs in the family. I believe that, at an earlier time, the Agency (or some other branch of the intelligence community) may have recruited his mother, Ann Dunham.

~~~~~~~~~~~~
For earlier posts in ths series -- may I call it a series? -- see


here:
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-passport-scandal-and-murder.html

here :
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2008/10/money.html

here :
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2008/11/spies-lies-barry-and-his-mom.html

and here:
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2009/02/tim-geithners-dad-barack-obamas-mom-and.html

And now we have this intriguing shard of additional data:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

JOHN PILGER:
OBAMA IS A CORPORATE MARKETING CREATION

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C62KAmMzu0E

The eye-opener here concerns Obama's first job out of college. He was recruited by Business International Corporation, accused of functioning as a CIA front company. You don't have to take the word of John Pilger, the man in the video. Here's Wikipedia:

The company has been identified as cover organization for the Central Intelligence Agency, e.g. see Lobster Magazine, issue 14 in 1987. According to a lengthy article in the New York Times in 1977, the co-founder of the company told the newspaper that "Eldridge Haynes [the other founder] had provided cover for four CIA employees in various countries between 1955 and 1960".

I see no reason to presume that the CIA/BIC relationship ended in 1960. Lobster is a quirky but reliable publication.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

William Blum, a left-wing CIA expert, made the same catch:
http://killinghope.org/bblum6/aer65.html

In his autobiography, "Dreams From My Fathers", Barack Obama writes of taking a job at some point after graduating from Columbia University in 1983. He describes his employer as "a consulting house to multinational corporations" in New York City, and his functions as a "research assistant" and "financial writer".

The odd part of Obama's story is that he doesn't mention the name of his employer. However, a New York Times story of 2007 identifies the company as Business International Corporation.

In his book, not only doesn't Obama mention his employer's name; he fails to say when he worked there, or why he left the job.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Obama's bios are as important for what they leave out as for what they reveal. I first became suspicious of his now-infamous trip to Pakistan (which he took in the summer between Occidental and Columbia) because he refused to mention this adventure in his books.

Think of it: We are talking about a man who compiled not one but two autobiographical works before the age of 46. We are talking about an ambitious politician intent on establishing his foreign policy cred. Yet he refused to mention a dangerous trip to Pakistan which he made at a time when travel to that country was discouraged by the State Department. That country was then the focus of the CIA's largest covert operation, the supplying of the Afghan mujahadeen. While there, this callow college kid met with one of the most powerful men in Pakistan -- a meeting arranged by an unnamed personage with the American Embassy. (Spook-watchers know what that means.)

If the trip was a pleasure jaunt, why did Obama keep it a secret? And how did he pay for the journey?

This site encapsulates a series of points which I had earlier made at greater length:
Adding to the mix is the fact that Ann Dunham, Obama's mother, had visited at least 13 countries in her lifetime, and had worked for companies that required travel to Pakistan. Her employers appear to have included the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Ford Foundation, Women's World Bank, and the Asian Development Bank. Note that USAID and the Ford Foundation have (allegedly) been used as covers for CIA agents. . . .
Like mother, like son. Ann worked for at least two organizations notorious for providing CIA cover. Barack went straight from college to an organization known to provide CIA cover. Coincidence?

Let's put it this way: How often do such things happen in your family?

Supposedly, Ann was a leftist. Yet she married Lolo Sotero, a key intermediary between the American oil companies and Indonesian strongman Suharto, installed by the CIA in an extremely bloody coup. (Obama admits the CIA connection in his book.) No genuine lefty would have had anything to do with Suharto or his cronies.

I do not claim to have conclusive evidence. Then again, one must ask: When we try to sort of occurrences in the clandestine world, what constitutes hard evidence? If you are emotionally invested in Obama, then no amount of proof will ever suffice -- except, perhaps, for a signed note by CIA director Panetta, saying "Yes, he worked for us."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Added notes on "The name's Obama -- Barack Obama"
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m57266&hd=&size=1&l=e
by Joseph Cannon, Cannonfire August 23, 2009
(http://regmedia.co.uk/2009/04/07/samurai_bond_obama.jpg)

A few posts down, I once again discussed my pet theory that young Barack Obama had been recruited by the CIA, a theory which annoys some and intrigues others. (See, for example, the strange blog here.) One piece of evidence favoring this idea concerns Obama's post-college gig at Business International Corporation, a New York firm never named or accurately described in his book, Dreams From My Father. A number of sources have pegged BIC as a company which has provided cover for CIA operatives.

This New York Times story on Obama's New York period offers further insights. The story refers to a blog called Analyze This, maintained by one Dan Armstrong. Unfortunately, that blog has slipped the surly bonds of the internets. When blogs die, the corpse usually lingers online for a good long time -- but Analyze This, alas, has vanished entirely. A pity, that: I've heard that it contained some interesting comments by other BIC alumni.

As does this NPR story.

Armstrong said Obama's book exaggerates just how respectable Business International was, with its description of suits and ties and meetings with German bond traders. There was no dress code, Armstrong said. And there was nothing corporate about it.

"It was a company full of low-paid, hard-working, fun-loving young people," Armstrong said. "It wasn't part of a high-powered consulting or finance world. It was a little sweatshop."
The relevant section of Obama's book, and a counter-piece by Armstrong, can be found here. Obama portrayed the place as as a high-powered consulting house. Armstrong (who worked down the hall) replied:

First, it wasn’t a consulting house; it was a small company that published newsletters on international business. Like most newsletter publishers, it was a bit of a sweatshop. I’m sure we all wished that we were high-priced consultants to multinational corporations. But we also enjoyed coming in at ten, wearing jeans to work, flirting with our co-workers, partying when we stayed late, and bonding over the low salaries and heavy workload.

Barack worked on one of the company’s reference publications. Each month customers got a new set of pages on business conditions in a particular country, punched to fit into a three-ring binder. Barack’s job was to get copy from the country correspondents and edit it so that it fit into a standard outline. There was probably some research involved as well, since correspondents usually don’t send exactly what you ask for, and you can’t always decipher their copy. But essentially the job was copyediting.


I must confess: That does sound like a humdrum gig. Still, I wonder what life was like for the "country correspondents." I can easily see a CIA agent using that job title as cover.

Here's how Armstrong describes Obama's somewhat misleading account of his days at BIC:
All of Barack’s embellishment serves a larger narrative purpose: to retell the story of the Christ’s temptation. The young, idealistic, would-be community organizer gets a nice suit, joins a consulting house, starts hanging out with investment bankers, and barely escapes moving into the big mansion with the white folks. Luckily, an angel calls, awakens his conscience, and helps him choose instead to fight for the people.
Obama left the job without having any other source of income lined up, and his reason for leaving -- guilt over not being true to himself -- strikes me as unconvincing.

If my pet theory has merit, then we may posit that Obama, having done a service for the Agency in Pakistan, was granted a temporary gig at a firm with which the Agency had good relations. In other words, someone was looking out for him.

And just who was the someone? Possibly Zbigniew Brzezinski: Obama was one of only seven students to study sovietology under Brzezinski at Columbia, or so it says here.

The previous post also noted that Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, traveled the world while working for the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Ford Foundation, Women's World Bank, and the Asian Development Bank. USAID is notorious for working with the CIA, as is the Ford Foundation. (For further background, see "The Ford Foundation and the CIA.") But what of the other two groups?

The Asian Development Bank, headquartered in the Philippines, is a financial institution ostensibly devoted to raising Asia's poor out of poverty. A laudable goal. Frankly, though, after reading this Wikipedia entry (which reads like ad copy), I'm still not sure how this organization does what it says it does.

Even the most laudable and respectable organization may still provide cover for CIA-linked individuals, and the Asian Development Bank may have done just that. So, at least, claims the venerable German "spook-watching" publication Geheim!. They published an Agee-like list of CIA personnel serving under various guises throughout the world, a list compiled, it seems, from previous issues of the magazine.

One alleged Agency-linked personage is "Cinnamon N. Dornsife" of the "Asian Development Bank - Manila." Her name is actually N. Cinnamon Dornsife, and she was the "U.S. Ambassdor" to the bank, or so it says here. (I didn't know that countries sent ambassadors to banks. One learns something new every day.) Her resume is here. She was graduated from SAIS, a CIA-linked institution, and then went on to work for six years in Indonesia.

I wonder if she knew Ann?

Women's World Banking provides microcredit financing to woman-owned businesses internationally -- a very commendable goal, to be sure. I've found nothing linking this group to spookery.

So what does it all mean? Perhaps nothing -- after all, many people have worked for BIC, USAID, the Ford Foundation and Asian Development Bank without having any connection to the intelligence community. There's a difference between providing cover for CIA personnel and functioning as a CIA front.

Still, both Barry and his mom have interesting employment histories. Once again, I have to ask: How often does this sort of thing happen in your family?

An added note to the added note: A rather full account of Ann's foreign adventures can be found in a Google machine translation of a piece originally published in an Indonesian blog. The title of the post googles into English as "During the Rose of Heaven All her life Doing Good So Much Amazing That Called Stanley Ann Dunham." I get the impression that the author may have a bias. At any rate, it turns out that her work for the Asian Development bank took her to Pakistan in 1986-87.

Visit page for many many links !
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m57266&hd=&size=1&l=e




John Pilger "The Invisible Government"
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-uq7O1RqQQ
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3WnYrvBO3I
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtpU2ORFyeo&feature=related
Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqff-glEqkE&feature=related




Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 03, 2012, 08:11:12 pm
From 15 months ago...Please read all of it very carefully to understand what is going on...


Who are the true terrorists engaging in anti-government, violent, radical acts?
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=187085.0

WHO ARE THE TERRORISTS?
WHO ARE IN THE PROCESS OF A COUP D'ETAT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT?
WHO IS FOLLOWING HITLER'S TECHNIQUES OF TERRORISM?
WHO ARE THE FANATICS WHO HAVE STATED THEY WANT TO KILL 25 MILLION AMERICANS?
WHO ARE THE SLEEPER CELLS AND HOW ARE THEY TRIGGERED?
WHO CREATES TERRORISTS BY INDOCTRINATING PEOPLE INTO FAUX RELIGIOUS CAUSES INCLUDING GAIA?
WHO CREATES TERRORISTS BY INDOCTRINATING PEOPLE INTO FAUX POLITICAL CAUSES INCLUDING ANTI-CAPITALISM?
WHO FUNDS THE TERRORISTS?
FOLLOW THE MONEY AND THE EVIDENCE...

(http://d.yimg.com/kq/groups/19193405/hr/151649610/name/ThePyramid.jpg)

Just so we are all clear who the enemy is and how they operate...

"Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting." -Sun Tzu

"To keep people everywhere from deciding their own destinies by means of one created crisis after another and then “managing” such crises. This will confuse and demoralize the population to the extent where faced with too many choices, apathy on a massive scale will result. In the case of the United States, an agency for crisis management is already in place. It is called the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), whose existence I first disclosed in 1980. There will be more on FEMA as we proceed." -John Coleman Committee of 300 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_committee300_02.htm

Levin was the author of a work entitled “Time Perspective and Morale” which is a Club of Rome publication concerning how to break down the morale of nations and individual leaders.

Here is an extract of the document:

“One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a strategy of terror consists in exactly this tactic: keep the person hazy as to where he stands and just what he may expect. In addition, if frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and promise of good treatment together with the spreading of contradictory news make the structure of the situation unclear, then the individual may cease to know whether a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal.

Under these conditions, even those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks are paralyzed by the severe inner conflict in regard to what to do.”

This Club of Rome blueprint applies to COUNTRIES as well as to individuals, particularly the government leaders of those countries. We in the U.S. need not think that “Oh well, this is America, and those kinds of things just do not happen here.” Let me assure you that they ARE happening in the U.S., and perhaps more so than in any other country.

The Levin-Club of Rome plan is designed to demoralize us all so that in the end we feel we should follow whatever it is that is planned for us. We WILL follow Club of Rome orders like sheep. Any seemingly strong leader who SUDDENLY APPEARS to “rescue” the nation must be regarded with the utmost suspicion. Remember that Khomeini was groomed for years by British intelligence, especially during his time in Paris, before he suddenly appeared as the savior of Iran. Boris Yeltsin is from the same M16-SIS stable.

The Club of Rome feels confident that it has carried out it Committee of 300 mandate to “soften up” the United States. After 45 years of waging war on the people of this nation, who will doubt that it has indeed accomplished its task? Look around and see how we have been demoralized.

[...]

With the U.S. spiritually, morally bankrupted, with our industrial base destroyed throwing 30 million people out of work with our big cities ghastly cesspools of every imaginable crime with a murder rate almost three times higher than any other country, with 4 million homeless, with corruption in government reaching endemic proportions, who will gainsay that the United States is ready to collapse from within, into the waiting arms of the New Dark Age One World Government?

[...]

We as a nation are ready to accept the demise of the United States of America and the American way of life, once the envy of the entire world.
 
Do not think this has happened on its own— the old “times are changing” syndrome. Time does not change anything, PEOPLE do.


Hey Tavistock...I got your apathy right here you pieces of psychopathic crapola!  




Just so we are clear on WTF is going on...

Banksters have bet on Barry Soetoro, Bill Ayers, John Holdren, John Holdren, Rahm Emanuel, Elena Kagan, etc. to further the continued destruction of the middle class in America. This is the softening up period. Previously, the banksters got 8 good years of destroying America from George W. Bush.

If anyone thinks that Bill Ayers, John Holdren, Cass Sunstein, Rahm Emanuel, Elena Kagan, and other globalist revolutionary idealists give a flying crap about the American people, they are insane. Their entire philosophy is based on their "higher knowledge" of society and that they need to force a revolution to get their way. They also believe they need to do it in secrecy using deception, false flag terrorist acts, lying to the public, and any other machievellian protocol available.

The banksters still control the strings and are using these idealogues to further the NWO goal which is to remove borders, remove sovereignty, remove useless eaters, and re-educate the zombies that make it through their violent and genocidal depopulation plans. They are using the Soetoro deception to destroy all American industries. They took out the auto industry, the banking industry, the healthcare industry, and are now going after the energy industry.

IMO, this group of psychos most probably were part of various Kissinger/Rockefeller study groups [MK Ultra sub-programs] where the purpose is to manipulate the minds of America's youth into anti-American revolutionary agendas. It is not like there is no evidence of this, Ted Kazcinski was at Harvard and because of his intellect and because of how much he loved America, the family, etc. he was put into one of these programs. He was trained to be a sophisticated revolutionary. He was being trained to hate America, hate the Family, hate Capitalism, hate Monotheism. He was trained to be a violent terrorist against capitalism, against American ideals. This is on record, proven, documented, incontrovertible.


[Side note: The ivy league schools are used for this recruiting, they are completely owned by Bilderberg/Committee of 300 and regularly set seeds for various controlled movements to take shape. That is why you always see the same people from the same schools hand picked to be the highest level puppets in this country. Yale was founded to protect the East India Trading Company's control over the international drug and slavery trade. So the NWO uses a different controlled agenda every 4-12 years using conditioned puppets.]

[Disclaimer: This site detests any provocation of violence in any way whatsoever. The insane actions taught to Kaczynski in the unconsented MK Ultra studies forced upon him without his knowledge at Harvard University are deplorable. Here is the Forum's stand on activism as explained in the subheading of the activism room: This forum is to promote non-violent non-cooperation as MLK, Jr. and Gandhi did. Do not ever, even as innuendo, promote violence on this forum. Report others who do. Anyone promoting violence will be banned and posts removed (at the least). The promoting of violence is a CoIntelPro tactic to stop lawful discourse against corrupt government tyranny. Research the Church Commission report and you will find that 25% of the KKK during the 1960's were FBI and FBI assets. They were the ones in the cars and engaged in the conversations promoting the horrendous violence that occured throught this great land. They also were promoting violence within the constitutional black nationalist movements in order to shut that down (see CoIntelPro: War on Black America). Do not let the new CoIntelPro do the same thing with the truth movement. More here: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=60394.0 Additionally, this site condemns the insane actions by elite chess players like Kissinger and others who exterminate millions via false flag terrorism and mockingbird psyops.]


Here are some links into the minds of these violent revolutionary terrorist lunatics:

Bill Ayers' manifesto calling for a false flag terrorist act to start a "Prarie Fire" that will genocide millions
http://zombietime.com/prairie_fire/
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1166148/prairie_fire_william_ayers_revolutionary.html
http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Prairie-fire.pdf
Here is CounterPunch's Ron Jacobs praising the insanity: http://www.counterpunch.org/jacobs07242004.html

John Holdren's psychopathic lunacy and depopulation agenda
http://www.rense.com/general87/holdren.htm
http://healthcaretodiefor.com/?p=108
http://nationalexpositor.com/News/1666.html
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread566544/pg1

Cass Sunstein's insatiable and obsessive desire to exterminate any free thought, to deprive humanity of self determination:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-information-czar-calls-for-banning-free-speech.html
http://21stcenturywire.com/2010/05/23/obama-internet-chief-dr-cass-sunstein-wants-to-turn-off-the-lights-on-free-speech/

Rham Emanuel was brought up to believe in using terrorism to get his way:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article5337807.ece
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_5870.shtml
http://gawker.com/5078472/obama-already-palling-around-with-terrorists
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/us-election/rahm-emanuels-father-an-israeli-terrorist-14043727.html
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/05/is-rahm-emanuel-an-american-kapo/

Elena Kagan is an elitist nut who wants to take away all individual rights and give them to corporations
http://www.examiner.com/x-27672-Portland-Political-Buzz-Examiner~y2010m5d19-Elena-Kagan-Obama-SCOTUS-nominee-avowed-socialist-shill-for-Shariah-antiUS-military
http://www.frcblog.com/2010/05/change-watch-elena-kagan-supreme-court-nominee/
http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/elen-kagan-believes-global-law-trumps-constitutional-law/
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/elena-kagan-some-free-speech-should-be-disappeared/

Van Jones is not a fan of free market capitalism and the idea of financial freedom (only resigned because he still had a conscience when it came to 9/11 truth)
http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/loudon-obama-appoints-former-communist-to-white-house-green-job/
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2110435/van_jones_obamas_communist_green_jobs.html
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-722-Conservative-Politics-Examiner~y2009m7d17-Van-Jones-Green-Jobs-Czar-a-selfdescribed-communist-arrested-during-Rodney-King-riots

John O. Brennan believes that the Banksters should have American citizens exterminated/assassinated if they get in the way of the CFR/Bilderberg plan to end US sovereignty.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Homegrown-Terrorists-Growing-Threat/2010/06/25/id/363052
http://www.infowars.com/how-many-americans-are-targeted-for-assassination/

Hillary Clinton is a War Criminal who also uses false flag terrorism to achieve the destruction of America
http://www.clintonmemoriallibrary.com/clintcrimefamily.html
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/crime2.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/965761/posts
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8438833120507357139
http://www.antiwar.com/pilger/?articleid=13303
http://www.heraldscotland.com/death-squad-leader-was-top-cia-agent-1.829131
There is just too much, much is in this board: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?board=305.0


Larry Grathwohl on Ayers' plan for American:
Re-education camps and the need to kill millions

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWMIwziGrAQ


Eyewitness to the Ayers Revolution
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/eyewitness-to-the-ayers-revolution/
Posted By Bob Owens On October 28, 2008

When Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn led the domestic terrorist group Weather Underground in 1969, a chance meeting led Army veteran Larry Grathwohl into joining the group. Grathwohl served as a courier, running messages between the group’s leadership (called the “Weather Bureau”) and individual cells that were to carry out attacks. Grathwohl was also an informant for the FBI. In an interview from the 1982 documentary No Place To Hide that recently surfaced, Grathwohl discussed what the Weathermen intended to do after overthrowing the U.S. government, including what they would do with those Americans who refused to embrace communism [1]. I asked, “Well what is going to happen to those people we can’t reeducate, that are diehard capitalists?” And the reply was that they’d have to be eliminated. And when I pursued this further, they estimated they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these reeducation centers. And when I say “eliminate,” I mean “kill.” Twenty-five million people. I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees, from Columbia and other well-known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people. And they were dead serious.



These are the front men. Some are just greedy psychos who got caught up in a slavery system where the more they sell out their souls, the more material trinkets they get. Some are like what Ted Kaczinski was supposed to be:

Harvard Reveals Ted Kaczynski is an MK-Ultra  Mind Control Victim. In June of 2000, Harvard University Invoices also linked Kaczynski to the CIA  [LA Times] as a subject in the CIA Mind Control Program MK-Ultra. The brilliant awkward 16 year old Kaczynski met with Henry A Murray (of Mk-Ultra LSD Scandal fame) in 1959 on his third day at Harvard and every week thereafter. [Atlantic Monthly][Net] Interestingly, Ted Kaczynski's Mk-Ultra Codename was "Lawful"...mind control slang for "Eureka here's our guy" ! The public has never heard Ted Kaczynski's voice to date, nor seen him speak. The murder of MK-Ultra scientist Frank Olson was later covered up by Donald Rumsfeld and Cheney [Rumsfeld]. http://www.unabombers.com/

The controllers of Harvard/Yale and all the other schools who groom supposed "leaders of America" conduct behavioral modification sessions to blow apart the pro-American mentality of our most gifted youths in order to fill them with New World Order concepts. This type of behavior modification is also done in the military as we have seen with Tim McVeigh who felt he was doing something for the greater good above the sovereign rights of "We the People".

And who controls these top social systems? Behind the scenes are the same old players...

Brzezinski, Harriman, Rockefeller and our overseas wizards: Houses of Rothschild, Windsor, and Orange-Nassau







Prince Philip
(http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/05/30/prince_phillip_narrowweb__300x498,0.jpg)(http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/may2008/120508princenazi.jpg)

40 years ago, Prince Philip gave the following instructions...

A new criterion has been added, the conservation of the environment so that in the long run life, including human life, can continue. This new consideration must be taken into account at all levels and in all departments of government and in the boardrooms of every industrial enterprise. It is no longer sufficient simply to quantify the elements of existence as in old-fashioned material economics; conservation means taking notice of the quality of existence as well...

The problem is of course to give some value to that quality and perhaps the only way to do this is to try and work out the cost in terms of loss of amenities, loss of holiday and recreation facilities, loss of property values, loss of contact with nature, loss of health standards and loss of food resources, if proper conservation methods are not used.

Looked at in that light it may well turn out that money spent on proper pollution control, urban and rural planning and the control of exploitation of wild stocks of plants or animals on land and in the sea, is the less expensive alternative in the long run...The conservation of nature, the proper care for the human environment and a general concern for the long-term future of the whole of our planet are absolutely vital if future generations are to have a chance to enjoy their existence on this earth.


-The Australian Conservation Foundation, Canberra (April 1970)



It is clear in the past 40 years that over 99.9% of the industrialized world has been put into this control system that Prince Philip said was necessary. Less wages, less amenities, loss of holiday, loss of property value, lossed contact with UN controlled nature preserves, loss of health standards, loss of control of food resources. What sacrifices have Prince Philip and his Bilderberg buddies made for the past 40 years?



THEY NEED PERSISTING SOCIAL CRISIS TO JUSTIFY THE USE OF CIVILIAN TRAUMA AND SERVITUDE WEAPONS AS BRAGGED ABOUT BY ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI IN 1970!!


(http://wideshut.co.uk/images/host/images/89592617859362083240.jpg)

AJ's show with with Dr. Blaylock was right on the money:

Today Alex welcomes back Dr. Russell Blaylock, board certified neurosurgeon, author and lecturer, to discuss lithium and fluoride being added to local water supplies.


Comment from MarkCentury on another thread:

In the 2008 movie "The Happening" mankind is assaulted by biochemical weapons that destroys their natural survival instincts leading victims to fearlessly commit suicide by walking into a lion's den or throwing themselves under a lawn mower.

In the final frames of this movie we see a school bus and on that bus a large number is visible:  

2010

Now 2010 has arrived and we read bizzare stories of shrimp drugged on prozac committing suicide as they fearlessly throw themselves into danger.

http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/shrimp-on-prozac-commit-suicide

Today Alex Jones released an impassioned video "The Media pushes brain eating vaccines" where he warns us that the same attack is being carried out against mankind.  

http://www.infowars.com/establishment-media-pushes-brain-eating-vaccines/

Vaccines are being used to deliver live virus bioweapons that re-engineer our brains by destroying our natural survival instincts.  This at the same time a sudden chorus of academics are pushing sedating the masses by adding toxic lithium to the water supply.  As Alex explains, this combined biochemcal assault will render the masses unable to resist the globalists as they carry out the next phases of their incremental plan of global enslavement and extermination.

Those seeking the destruction of mankind operate under a code requiring them to give advance notice.  Could the prominent but fleeting date of "2010" in the movie "The Happening" have been a warning that this is the year we would all be thrown under the biochemical bus?

Mark




Read this article:

HAARP, Haiti, Brzezinski and the NWO
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/printer_5495.shtml
By Jerry Mazza Online Journal Associate Editor


My comment:

What is important to note is Jerry Mazza's evaluation and comparison of the two moments in historical context:

He actually wrote a chapter called “How to Wreck the Environment” in his book, Unless Peace Comes. Of course, this came at the height of the Vietnam brutality. Given the aura of violence similar to today’s, Gordon described in his chapter, among other things, “polar ice cap melting or destabilization, ozone depletion techniques, earthquake engineering, ocean wave control and brain wave manipulation using the planet’s energy fields.”



Also important to note is Brzezinski's invisible hand in all of these narratives pervasive among the elite controllers of society:

As of 1970, Brzezinski predicted HAARP could be used for “a more controlled and directed society” linked to technology. This society would be dominated by an elite group which impresses voters by allegedly superior scientific know-how.” Furthermore, Dr. Strangelove states, “Unhindered by the restrains of traditional liberal values, this elite [the New World Order of today] would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control. Technical and scientific momentum would then feed on the situation it exploits.”

And thus spake Brzezinski, who also predicted that it would take an inciting incident like Pearl Harbor (i.e., 9/11) to engage the normally peaceful American population to go to war on a march for world hegemony (i.e., The War on Terror). And he was spot on.

Zbig is not afraid, in fact, is lauded for thinking down avenues that would make most of us shiver with disgust. Regrettably, his forecasts tend to prove accurate, because they inspire the worst people to do the worst things. And so, these “tools for the elite” and their temptation to use them increases incredibly. The policies to use them are in place. As to the “stepping stones” that could be used to reach this highly controlled techno-society, Brezinski expected them to be “persisting social crisis” and the use of mass media to gain the public’s confidence. Again, he’s spot on.






As to the “stepping stones” that could be used to reach this highly controlled techno-society, Brezinski expected them to be “persisting social crisis” and the use of mass media to gain the public’s confidence. Again, he’s spot on.




RockefellerFoundation predicts for 2012

PERSISTING SOCIAL CRISIS

caused by pandemic, economic collapse, marauding gangs

So, I was reading this article (I think it has already been linked to by other people on here - since Alan Watt linked to it a couple of days ago - but as far as I know, this is the original article and contains some more stuff that the link Alan Watt put up did not have ) - and it made mention of this consortium called Global Business Network.


The English Ideology and WIRED Magazine

Part Three Of Three

Techno-Utopianism: The Final Imperial Solution
by Mark Stahlman November 22nd, 1996

http://web.archive.org/web/20011226171744/www.rewired.com/96/Fall/1122.html


This snippet in particular piqued my curiosity
Quote
No less chilling is the scenarios planning exercise that WIRED's wizards-behind-the-curtain perform on their multi-national clients. From General Motors to AT&T, the Global Business Network (GBN) charges hefty sums to show the yellow-brick-road towards "ByteCity" to strategic planners and top corporate brass. In one recent and rare public discussion of the results, GM's top planning team defined the three "alternative futures" which emerged after years of GBN counseling. The first is just like our world and, so by definition, is not very interesting. The second is an eco-fascist regime in which car designs are completely "Green" and the companies can only follow orders. The third is the fun one, however. This is the world in which armed gangs roam the streets and surface travel is a series of car chases. This scenario has already been anticipated with a Cadillac that includes armored protection and a "panic" button installed in the middle of the dashboard. The car has a satellite tracking system built in and it can call the local authorities (presumably your multi-national's private swat-team) and get help when you get trapped by the natives.


So naturally, I looked into Global Business Network. This consortium is kind of like Wells 'The Samurai' corporate overlord board - every bigwig company you can imagine that is into some type of big industry is among its members.

Global Business Network

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Global_Business_Network

Funding / Members - Corporations

I don't have time to list all of the companies, so let's just list for the sake of interest some of the key companies that consider themselves to be members - these companies also provide for the organization's funding:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Global_Business_Network#Funding

  • AT&T
  • Bechtel
  • Booz Allen & Hamilton
  • Coca-Cola Company
  • Dow Chemical
  • DuPont
  • EDS (Electronic Data Systems)
  • Fannie Mae
  • Freddie Mac
  • ExxonMobil
  • General Electric
  • Heineken (My note: The Dutch beer-brewer)
  • Hewlett Packard/HP
  • IBM (My note: Big surprise, huh?)
  • Intel
  • L'Oreal
  • Lucent Corporation
  • Microsoft
  • Monsanto
  • Procter & Gamble
  • Reuters
  • Sandia National Laboratories
  • Shell Oil/Dutch Royal Shell
  • Toyota
  • Sun Microsystems (My note: See, I don't want to hear anymore crap from some techies that Sun Microsystems was 'once' good prior to being taken over by the evil 'Oracle' - to hell with that - they were ALWAYS part of the hive mind - stop sucking up to controlled opposition is my message to these people - forget about the SPARC processors and all that shit and realize these guys didn't give a rip about you, the individual, or any semblance of human dignity - same as all the other corporate technocrats)
  • Xerox

The list is far longer than this, but you get the drill - any corporation worth its salt is a member and/or provides funding for it.

Stewart Brand, Whole Earth Catalog, Wired Magazine, Global Business Network

This ties back into Stewart Brand - the guy behind the Whole Earth Catalog, the founding of Wired Magazine, and the main progenitor of this entire techno-utopia 'scientific dictatorship' that the Unabomber railed against. Coincidentally, he was also a co-founder of Global Business Network.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Stewart_Brand

Quote
Brand is a co-founder of the Global Business Network (GBN) (1988) [4]; the The Long Now Foundation (1995) [5], "whose core project is the construction of a 10,000 year clock called The Clock of the Long Now"; the ALL Species Foundation (2001) [6], "to find and document every life form on Earth" [7]; and the Long Bets Foundation (2001), "an arena for competitive, accountable predictions" and "to foster better long-term thinking." [8][9]



Anyway, here comes the big one - this is a report produced by the Rockefeller Foundation in cooperation with Global Business Network in May 2010 - and it shows four possible future scenarios that the world might be headed into. Let's discuss this, shall we.

http://www.gbn.com/consulting/article_details.php?id=101&breadcrumb=consulting

http://www.gbn.com/articles/pdfs/GBN&Rockefeller%20scenarios.technology&development.pdf

Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
This report was produced by

The Rockefeller Foundation
and Global Business Network.
May 2010


(http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/526/33182154.jpg)

Let's see what Peter Schwartz, President of Global Business Network, has to say about these 'scenarios' firsthand:

Quote

Scenario planning is a powerful tool precisely because the future is unpredictable and shaped by many interacting variables. Scenarios enable us to think creatively and rigorously about the different ways these forces may interact, while forcing us to challenge our own assumptions about what we believe or hope the future will be. Scenarios embrace and weave together multiple perspectives and provide an ongoing framework for spotting and making sense of important changes as they emerge. Perhaps most importantly, scenarios give us a new, shared language that deepens our conversations about the future and how we can help to shape it.

The Rockefeller Foundation has already used this project as an opportunity to clarify and advance the relationship between technology and development. Through interviews and the scenario workshops, they have engaged a diverse set of people - from different geographies, disciplines, and sectors - to identify the key forces driving change, to explore the most critical uncertainties, and to develop challenging yet plausible scenarios and implications.  









Zbigniew Brzezinski pushes Rockefeller agenda of

PERSISTING SOCIAL CRISIS

to justify more weapons against the American people on LIVE TV!


Zbigniew Brzezinski pushes Rockefeller agenda of civil war on LIVE TV!



Zbigniew Brzezinski: Obama The New Mr. 'Malaise'
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2010/07/16/m-word-zbigniew-brzezinski-says-obama-presiding-over-age-malaise
By Mark Finkelstein
Fri, 07/16/2010 - 08:35 ET
 

Can you hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth emanating from 1600 Pennslyvania Avenue?  It's Pres. Obama & Co. reacting to Zbigniew Brzezinki pinning on Barack Obama the word that doomed Jimmy Carter: "malaise."

On Morning Joe, Carter's former national security adviser said there "is a sense of pervasive malaise" in America. What's worse, suggested Zbig, Pres. Obama hasn't been able to figure out how to deal with the malaise. Ruh-roh!
 


ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: I think we're now going through a phase in which there is a sense of pervasive malaise, which affects different groups in society in different ways.

So people are dissatisfied; they're slightly worried; they don't see a good certain future for themselves or for the country, but in their own narrow sphere.


There's no grand mobilizing idea. And I have a sense that Obama, who started so well, and who really captivated people—he captivated me!—has not been able yet to generate some sort of organizing idea for an age which combines a malaise that's pervasive and percolating, and complexity.. . .  


PAT BUCHANAN: We need a new paradigm!

BREZINSKI: And the President hasn't articulated it.

BUCHANAN: No he hasn't.

BREZINSKI: There goes any further invitation to the White House!



Brzezinski clearly understood the personal implications of his downer of a diagnosis: "there goes any further invitation to the White House!"  The panel all enjoyed a good chuckle, but could anything be much worse for PBO than to be seen as the reincarnation of Jimmy Carter?

Historical Note:  Here's more on the Malaise Speech itself.  Interestingly, although Carter adviser Pat Caddell used "malaise" in his notes for the speech, Carter himself never actually employed the word, speaking instead of a "crisis of the spirit in our country."

No Goneril, She: Good daughter that she is, Mika tried to put the best face on father's words.  As Zbig lamented the end of his White House invitations, Mika twice pointed out that he had said "yet."  In other words, it's not that pops had painted the president an irredeemable failure.  It's just that PBO hasn't come up with a solution to the malaise "yet."
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 04, 2012, 11:37:08 pm
NDAA is just an extension of the Libyan model. The only reason they did NDAA is because they are planning a Libya style takedown of America and they need to exterminate anyone exposing that the US 'rebels' (OWS) are controlled (whether they know it or not) by CIA operatives who are connected to the Weather Underground

Indie Journalists in Libya Targeted for Killing by NATO to control false narratives
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=94&contentid=8880
by DEBORAH DUPRE

(August 23, 2011) The Examiner learned in communications from human rights defenders and independent journalists throughout Monday that they were shaken with news of 1300 Libyans killed and 5000 wounded Saturday, plus, the U.S. allegedly ordered Targeted Killings of Voltaire Network reporters, Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya and Thierry Meyssan, non-mainstream reporters in Libya covering the NATO war, while other independent reporters there are being fired upon and one, Mohammed Nabbous was killed Saturday according to ABC News.

In an interview with journalist Don DeBar on KPFA radio, he reported most mainstream "news" about Libya has been untrue, as alternative news sites heavily report but are increasingly persecuted according to their recent reports.

The reporter who may have known too much, slain and what the U.S. is hiding

"The conflict in Libya has claimed the life of another journalist. A sniper shot Mohammed Nabbous, 28-year old resident of Benghazi and founder of its first independent TV news channel Libya Alhurra, on Saturday night," reported ABC's Mark Colvin on Monday.

And look how DoD uses 'anonymous' to selectively 'leak' information which justifies targeted assassinations (even by Nazi drones).



"Secret" Drone Killings of Civilians & the Selective Leaks Defending Drones
http://whistleblower.org/blog/42-2012/1732-qsecretq-drone-killings-of-civilians-a-the-selective-leaks-defending-drones
by Jesselyn Radack on February 08, 2012 ( The Whistleblogger / 2012 )

I wrote last week about the absurdity of the Obama administration's position on the supposedly-secret Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) drone strikes that Obama defended publicly at a town hall meeting. Despite Obama's claims that the drone strikes are "very precise, precision strikes against al-Qaeda and their affiliates," the Washington Post reports today on a recent strike:

U.S. drone-fired missiles hit a house in Pakistan’s northwest tribal region near the Afghan border Wednesday, killing nine people, Pakistani intelligence officials said. . . .

This strike follows one in November:

Pakistan kicked the U.S. out of a base used by American drones last year in retaliation for American airstrikes that accidentally killed 24 Pakistani troops at two Afghan border posts on Nov. 26.

We also know that drones have killed at least three Americans – Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, his companion Samir Khan, and al-Awlaki's 16 year-old son.

If the most recent strike had killed only suspected terrorists, certainly the Obama administration would be publicizing it the way it did when Obama touted the al-Awlaki assassination as a "tribute to our intelligence community."

Even though, officially,

The U.S. does not publicly discuss details of the covert CIA-run drone program in Pakistan,

President Obama, anonymous Obama administration officials, and anonymous Pakistani officials, have all told the public about the drone program.

Why then does the Justice Department persist that it can "neither confirm nor deny" the existence of the program? The fake secrecy serves a purpose: forcing the public to get information about Obama's expanding drone program from anonymous leaks of pro-drone talking points from the Obama administration, thus obscuring an informed public debate on whether the U.S. should be in the business of sending automated drones overseas to target and kill people or, worse, its own citizens.

Today's reports follow reports Sunday that not only are civilians killed in drone strikes, but that the U.S.

. . . repeatedly targeted rescuers who responded to the scene of a strike, as well as mourners at subsequent funerals. The report, by the London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism, found that at least 50 civilians had been killed in follow-up strikes after they rushed to help those hit by a drone-fired missile. The bureau counted more than 20 other civilians killed in strikes on funerals.

Killing rescuers sounds awfully similar to the attacks shown in the deeply disturbing "Collateral Murder" video of WikiLeaks fame in which a U.S. military helicopter gunned down journalists, and then children who were riding in a van aiding civilians injured in the attack.

Moreover, the London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism found:

that 282 to 535 civilians had been “credibly reported” killed in those attacks, including more than 60 children.

This is a damning statistic considering Obama was just last week publicly bragging about the miniscule number of civilian deaths. To deal with the blatant inconsistency, it is yet again ANONYMOUS ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS to the public-relations rescue:

American officials said that the number was much too high, though they acknowledged that at least several dozen civilians had been killed inadvertently in strikes aimed at militant suspects. . . . A senior American counterterrorism official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, questioned the report’s findings, saying “targeting decisions are the product of intensive intelligence collection and observation.”

Don't dare to dig any deeper, though. And, don't ask the administration about the Justice Department memo rationalizing the targeting and assassination of an American citizen, because, in that case – when the information would open the administration up to well-deserved criticism - the Justice Department can "neither confirm nor deny the existence or nonexistence" of the records. All the public has to go on is what "anonymous administration officials" feed to the press.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 04, 2012, 11:46:29 pm
AP source: AG Holder to address targeted killings in the aftermath of the Breitbart murder
http://www.wsoctv.com/news/ap/us/ap-source-ag-holder-to-address-targeted-killings/nLLKj/
By PETE YOST The Associated Press
Updated: 10:36 p.m. Sunday, March 4, 2012 | Posted: 9:44 p.m. Sunday, March 4, 2012

WASHINGTON — Attorney General Eric Holder is expected to outline the legal framework for the use of lethal force in targeted killings of Americans overseas in a major speech at Northwestern University law school, an Obama administration official said Sunday night.

Holder's speech Monday comes five months after the killing of U.S.-born al-Qaida cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen in a drone attack.

The official said the attorney general plans to say that lethal force is legal under a Sept. 18, 2001, joint congressional resolution.  [NOTE: This is 100% horseshit and everybody knows it!]The Authorization for Use of Military Force enacted a week after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks authorizes the use of all necessary force in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States.

The official said Holder also will address how the Obama administration reformed military commissions and how both the Obama and the George W. Bush administrations have successfully used civilian courts to convict and sentence terrorists. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the contents of the speech haven't been released.

In recent months, the Obama administration has engaged in an internal debate about how much to reveal about the legal justification for the al-Awlaki killing.

At least three recently filed lawsuits have sought to force the Obama administration to publicly release its legal justification for the drone strike that killed al-Awlaki. The justification is contained in a secret Justice Department memo.

The administration has provided some details about what al-Awlaki was doing that made him so dangerous to the United States. In that vein, the Justice Department disclosed that a Nigerian man who tried to blow up an international flight on Christmas 2009 told FBI agents that his mission was approved after a three-day visit with al-Awlaki.

The man, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was sentenced last month to life in prison after admitting he attempted to blow up the plane with a bomb in his underwear as the plane approached Detroit.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 05, 2012, 02:48:25 pm
related?:

Two Fired For Looking At Obama's Passport File    
...
Quote from: Freebird100 on March 14, 2010, 06:55:16 PM
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/spingola/100314
March 14, 2010 By Deanna Spingola
The State Department passport records were scrubbed to erase any mention of Obama's CIA activities and his personal information.
...
The State Department employee, Lt. Quarle Harris, Jr. who had access and apparently scrubbed the records, was killed. [9] Harris decided to cooperate with the FBI who was investigating the break-in. His body was discovered in his parked car; he had been shot in the head, execution style.

[10] The Indonesian passport, issued in the name of Barry Soetoro, was used to travel to Pakistan to assist the Afghan Mujahideen during the U.S. buildup.

(http://obamarecords.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/lieutenant-quarles-harris-j.gif)Shot dead because he knew to much? (http://obamarecords.com/?p=10)

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/19/key-witness-in-passport-fraud-case-fatally-shot/
Key witness in passport fraud case fatally shot - Saturday, April 19, 2008

A key witness in a federal probe into passport information stolen from the State Department was fatally shot in front of a District church, the Metropolitan Police Department said yesterday.

Lt. Quarles Harris Jr., 24, who had been cooperating with a federal investigators, was found late Thursday night slumped dead inside a car, in front of the Judah House Praise Baptist Church in Northeast, said Cmdr. Michael Anzallo, head of the department’s Criminal Investigations Division.

Cmdr. Anzallo said a police officer was patrolling the neighborhood when gunshots were heard, then Lt. Harris was found dead inside the vehicle, which investigators would describe only as a blue car.

Emergency medics pronounced him dead at the scene.

City police said they do not know whether his death was a direct result of his cooperation with federal investigators.

“We don’t have any information right now that connects his murder to that case,” Cmdr. Anzallo said.

Police say a “shot spotter” device helped an officer locate Lt. Harris.

A State Department spokeswoman yesterday declined to comment, saying the investigation into the passport fraud is ongoing.
...
One agency employee, who was not identified in documents filed in U.S. District Court, was implicated in a credit-card fraud scheme after Lt. Harris told federal authorities he obtained “passport information from a co-conspirator who works for the U.S. Department of State.”
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 05, 2012, 07:34:42 pm
WATCH THIS!

The International - 'Opening scene'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls05PsIEaMI
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 05, 2012, 08:06:02 pm
CIA Manual on Clandestine Assassinations published in 1953 (the same year that CIA Scientist Frank Olson was murdered by Georgetown Set and Averell Harriman owned treasonous cowards Richard Bissell and Sidney Gottlieb on orders by MI6/Queen Bitch)...


CIA Publishes Its Own "Assassin's Manual"
Proof That CIA Controllers (Bilderberg) Actively Order
The Clandestine Killings Of American Citizens Who Oppose Anti-Constitutional Policies
The CIA Manual Published In 1953 And Declassified in 1998 Outlines
Methods To Make Sure The Public Narrative Covers-Up The CIA-Murder
By Making It Appear As "A Death By Natural Causes"


http://www.arcticbeacon.citymaker.com/articles/article/1518131/33076.htm
By Greg Szymanski 8 Sep 2005

The CIA 'Killer's Manual' was kept out of the public eye for years, but now we know it teaches the 'fine art' of assassination as if it was a mandatory college course.

If there are any lingering doubts about whether the U.S. government acts like a bunch of mafia hit men, the following documents, classified for years, should clear things up.

And as the “CIA’s Killer’s Instruction Manual” points out remember that possibly the only thing separating the mafia from the U.S. government is that the thugs in the underworld are much, much smarter.

Never in a month of Sundays would mafia thugs ever think of leaving behind a paper trail, like the following CIA documents indicate, on how exactly to pull off the perfect assassination attempt.

But that’s exactly what the U.S. government did when the CIA distributed a training manual for would-be killers called “A Study of Assassination,” distributed to agents and operatives taking part in the agency’s 1953 covert coup in Guatemala, which ousted the country’s democratically elected President.

The killer’s training manual. hidden and classified until 1997, until  the National Security Archive, a Washington D.C. public-interest group, obtained a copy among roughly 1,400 pages found by the group concerning the Guatemala coup, in light of CIA statements that  it has destroyed all other secret files about the coup.

Since the release of the documents, however, their contents have remained virtually hidden from the public eye, the messy details of how to pull off the perfect assassination never making it into the mainstream press and only viewed by a select few elsewhere.

Presented by the CIA almost like a college course for future killers, the Department of Defense and CIA spokesmen this week denied knowing anything about the manual, adding they were not aware of any such teaching tool being distributed to agents or operatives.

As the manual verifies purely by its publication, the U.S. government is involved up to its neck in the killing business, the involvement going back to the early 1950’s  and most likely much farther back.

And it’s safe to say nothing has changed today, since reports by John Perkins in his latest book, “The Economic Hit Man” and other reports surfacing, seem to indicate the killing business is booming for the government.

Take, for example, the recent story told by former Army wife Kay Griggs of Virginia, who recounts how her husband for more than 10 years told her about his involvement with training and participating in government hit squads, knowledge of which leads to the doorstep of some of the most powerful leaders in our country, including the Oval Office.

Also, consider the recent stories coming out of Venezuela where democratically elected President Hugo Chavez is running for his life from the CIA after he publicly on numerous occasions has announced to the world that the Bush administration wants him dead for not cooperating with policies that would leave his country bankrupt and his people starving.

And in a sick, twisted manner, working on a theory that the end justifies the means, the CIA published it s killer’s manual, breaking down the art of committing the perfect assassination into eight major categories, including definition, employment, justification, classification, the assassin, planning, techniques and examples.

Here are the portions of the manual, the words taken directly from the CIA writers illustrating just how sick, twisted and distorted they really are:

DEFINITION

According to the CIA, assassination is a term thought to be derived from "Hashish", a drug similar to marijuana, said to have been used by Hassan al-Sabbah to induce motivation in his followers, who were assigned to carry out political and other murders, usually at the cost of their lives.

It is here used to describe the planned killing of a person who is not under the legal jurisdiction of the killer, who is not physically in the hands of the killer, who has been selected by a resistance organization for death, and whose death provides positive advantages to that organization.

EMPLOYMENT

Assassination is an extreme measure not normally used in clandestine operations. It should be assumed that it will never be ordered or authorized by any U.S. Headquarters, though the latter may in rare instances agree to its execution by members of an associated foreign service.

This reticence is partly due to the necessity for committing communications to paper. No assassination instructions should ever be written or recorded. Consequently, the decision to employ this technique must nearly always be reached in the field, at the area where the act will take place. Decision and instructions should be confined to an absolute minimum of persons. Ideally, only one person will be involved. No report may be made, but usually the act will be properly covered by normal news services, whose output is available to all concerned.

JUSTIFICATION

Murder is not morally justifiable. Self-defense may be argued if the victim has knowledge which may destroy the resistance organization if divulged. Assassination of persons responsible for atrocities or reprisals may be regarded as just punishment. Killing a political leader whose burgeoning career is a clear and present danger to the cause of freedom may be held necessary.

But assassination can seldom be employed with a clear conscience. Persons who are morally squeamish should not attempt it.

CLASSIFICATIONS

The techniques employed will vary according to whether the subject is unaware of his danger, aware but unguarded, or guarded. They will also be affected by whether or not the assassin is to be killed with the subject hereafter, assassinations in which the subject is unaware will be termed "simple"; those where the subject is aware but unguarded will be termed "chase"; those where the victim is guarded will be termed "guarded."

If the assassin is to die with the subject, the act will be called "lost." If the assassin is to escape, the adjective will be "safe." It should be noted that no compromises should exist here. The assassin must not fall alive into enemy hands.

A further type division is caused by the need to conceal the fact that the subject was actually the victim of assassination, rather than an accident or natural causes. If such concealment is desirable the operation will be called "secret"; if concealment is immaterial, the act will be called "open"; while if the assassination requires publicity to be effective it will be termed "terroristic."

Following these definitions, the assassination of Julius Caesar was safe, simple, and terroristic, while that of Huey Long was lost, guarded and open. Obviously, successful secret assassinations are not recorded as assassination at all. [Illeg] of Thailand and Augustus Caesar may have been the victims of safe, guarded and secret assassination.

THE ASSASSIN

In safe assassinations, the assassin needs the usual qualities of a clandestine agent. He should be determined, courageous, intelligent, resourceful, and physically active. If special equipment is to be used, such as firearms or drugs, it is clear that he must have outstanding skill with such equipment.

Except in terroristic assassinations, it is desirable that the assassin be transient in the area. He should have an absolute minimum of contact with the rest of the organization and his instructions should be given orally by one person only. His safe evacuation after the act is absolutely essential, but here again contact should be as limited as possible. It is preferable that the person issuing instructions also conduct any withdrawal or covering action which may be necessary.

In lost assassination, the assassin must be a fanatic of some sort. Politics, religion, and revenge are about the only feasible motives. Since a fanatic is unstable psychologically, he must be handled with extreme care. He must not know the identities of the other members of the organization, for although it is intended that he die in the act, something may go wrong. While the Assassin of Trotsky has never revealed any significant information, it was unsound to depend on this when the act was planned.

PLANNING

When the decision to assassinate has been reached, the tactics of the operation must be planned, based upon an estimate of the situation similar to that used in military operations. The preliminary estimate will reveal gaps in information and possibly indicate a need for special equipment which must be procured or constructed. When all necessary data has been collected, an effective tactical plan can be prepared. All planning must be mental; no papers should ever contain evidence of the operation.

In resistance situations, assassination may be used as a counter-reprisal. Since this requires advertising to be effective, the resistance organization must be in a position to warn high officials publicly that their lives will be the price of reprisal action against innocent people. Such a threat is of no value unless it can be carried out, so it may be necessary to plan the assassination of various responsible officers of the oppressive regime and hold such plans in readiness to be used only i f provoked by excessive brutality. Such plans must be modified frequently to meet changes in the tactical situation.

TECHNIQUES

The essential point of assassination is the death of the subject. A human being may be killed in many ways but sureness is often overlooked by those who may be emotionally unstrung by the seriousness of this act they intend to commit. The specific technique employed will depend upon a large number of variables, but should be constant in one point: Death must be absolutely certain. The attempt on Hitler's life failed because the conspiracy did not give this matter proper attention.

The techniques portion of the manual then went on to provide details about the particular effectiveness and use of an assortment of weapons, including all types of firearms, explosives as well as blunt and sharp-edged weapons. However, the most interesting assassination techniques recommended by the CIA were:

1. Manual

It is possible to kill a man with the bare hands, but very few are skillful enough to do it well. Even a highly trained Judo expert will hesitate to risk killing by hand unless he has absolutely no alternative. However, the simplest local tools are often much the most efficient means of assassination. A hammer, axe, wrench, screw driver, fire poker, kitchen knife, lamp stand, or anything hard, heavy and handy will suffice. A length of rope or wire or a belt will do if the assassin is strong and agile. All such improvised weapons have the important advantage of availability and apparent innocence. The obviously lethal machine gun failed to kill Trotsky where an item of sporting goods succeeded.

In all safe cases where the assassin may be subject to search, either before or after the act, specialized weapons should not be used. Even in the lost case, the assassin may accidentally be searched before the act and should not carry an incrimin ating device if any sort of lethal weapon can be improvised at or near the site. If the assassin normally carries weapons because of the nature of his job, it may still be desirable to improvise and implement at the scene to avoid disclosure of his ident ity.

2. Accidents

For secret assassination, either simple or chase, the contrived accident is the most effective technique. When successfully executed, it causes little excitement and is only casually investigated.

The most efficient accident, in simple assassination, is a fall of 75 feet or more onto a hard surface. Elevator shafts, stair wells, unscreened windows and bridges will serve. Bridge falls into water are not reliable. In simple cases a private meeting with the subject may be arranged at a properly-cased location. The act may be executed by sudden, vigorous [excised] of the ankles, tipping the subject over the edge. If the assassin immediately sets up an outcry, playing the "horrified wit ness", no alibi or surreptitious withdrawal is necessary. In chase cases it will usually be necessary to stun or drug the subject before dropping him. Care is required to insure that no wound or condition not attributable to the fall is discernible after death.

Falls into the sea or swiftly flowing rivers may suffice if the subject cannot swim. It will be more reliable if the assassin can arrange to attempt rescue, as he can thus be sure of the subject's death and at the same time establish a workable al ibi.

If the subject's personal habits make it feasible, alcohol may be used [2 words excised] to prepare him for a contrived accident of any kind.

Falls before trains or subway cars are usually effective, but require exact timing and can seldom be free from unexpected observation.

Automobile accidents are a less satisfactory means of assassination. If the subject is deliberately run down, very exact timing is necessary and investigation is likely to be thorough. If the subject's car is tampered with, reliability is very low. The subject may be stunned or drugged and then placed in the car, but this is only reliable when the car can be run off a high cliff or into deep water without observation.

Arson can cause accidental death if the subject is drugged and left in a burning building. Reliability is not satisfactory unless the building is isolated and highly combustible.

3. Drugs

In all types of assassination except terroristic, drugs can be very effective. If the assassin is trained as a doctor or nurse and the subject is under medical care, this is an easy and rare method. An overdose of morphine administered as a sedative will cause death without disturbance and is difficult to detect. The size of the dose will depend upon whether the subject has been using narcotics regularly. If not, two grains will suffice.

If the subject drinks heavily, morphine or a similar narcotic can be injected at the passing out stage, and the cause of death will often be held to be acute alcoholism.

Specific poisons, such as arsenic or strychine, are effective but their possession or procurement is incriminating, and accurate dosage is problematical. Poison was used unsuccessfully in the assassination of Rasputin and Kolohan, though the latte r case is more accurately described as a murder.

EXAMPLES

Agents may be presented brief outlines, with critical evaluations of the following assassinations and attempts:

Marat, Hedrich, Lincoln, Hitler, Harding, Roosevelt, Grand Duke Sergei, Truman, Pirhivie, Mussolini, Archduke Francis Ferdinand, Benes, Rasputin, Aung Sang, Madero, Kirov ,Abdullah, Huey Long, Gandhi, Alexander of Yugoslvia, Trotsky.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 05, 2012, 08:09:26 pm
CIA Manual on Clandestine Assassinations published in 1953 (the same year that CIA Scientist Frank Olson was murdered by Georgetown Set and Averell Harriman owned treasonous cowards Richard Bissell and Sidney Gottlieb on orders by MI6/Queen Bitch)...


CIA Publishes Its Own "Assassin's Manual"
Proof That CIA Controllers (Bilderberg) Actively Order
The Clandestine Killings Of American Citizens Who Oppose Anti-Constitutional Policies
The CIA Manual Published In 1953 And Declassified in 1998 Outlines
Methods To Make Sure The Public Narrative Covers-Up The CIA-Murder
By Making It Appear As "A Death By Natural Causes"


http://www.arcticbeacon.citymaker.com/articles/article/1518131/33076.htm
By Greg Szymanski 8 Sep 2005

MORE:

http://www.frankolsonproject.org/Documents/Assassination%20Manual.html

http://www.whale.to/b/szy12.html

http://www.whale.to/b/ciaass.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Averill_Harriman

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_M._Bissell,_Jr.

http://www.serendipity.li/cia/olson2.htm
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 05, 2012, 09:06:41 pm
Holder to Speechify on “Existent or Non-Existent” Assassination Memo
Public Speech Can Be Compared to Himmler's in "Triumph of the Will"* where he stated:
"Anyone who does harm to the SA is our enemy," just three months after the Night of the Long Knives**

http://www.whistleblower.org/blog/42-2012/1788-holder-to-speechify-on-existent-or-non-existent-assassination-memo
by Jesselyn Radack on March 05, 2012 ( The Whistleblogger / 2012 )


The Washington Post reports:

Quote
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Monday plans to provide the most detailed account to date of the Obama administration’s legal rationale for killing U.S. citizens abroad, as it did in last year’s airstrike against an alleged al-Qaeda operative in Yemen, officials said. . . . his speech Monday will mark a new and higher-profile phase of the administration’s campaign to justify lethal action in those rare instances in which U.S. citizens, such as New Mexico-born Anwar al-Awlaki, join terrorist causes devoted to harming their homeland.

But when GAP (and other civil liberties groups) request the legal memo justifying the killing of al-Awlaki from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), OLC maintains that the "existence or non-existence" of the memo is classified.

To review the Justice Department's completely ridiculous and indefensible position on the assassination memo:

Quote
Days after the Obama administration engages in the targeted killing of an American citizen without due process, anonymous "administration officials" leak the existence of the legal memo rationalizing the assassination to the Washington Post.  

When the "don't worry, we've got a legal memo" excuse fails to satisfy civil libertarians questioning the expansion of Executive power to killing American citizens without affording a bunch of fundamental Constitutional rights (due process, jury trials, right to confront accusers, etc.), details of the memo appeared on the New York Times front page, including when the memo was written, who authored the memo, the memo's legal reasoning, and even the memo's number of pages in the memo.

Now, the Attorney General is going to give a public speech at Northwestern University Law School important enough to warrant more anonymous leaks to WaPo further detailing the "logic" of assassinating Americans.

Nonetheless, the Obama administration expects the public to believe that even revealing the "existence or non-existence" of the memo will harm national security.

So, the memo might not exist, but we know it is about 50 pages long, as if it is supposed to provide some comfort that the Justice Department will at least type out a few thousand words before sending a drone to kill Americans.

The absolute absurdity of Holder speaking publicly about a classified - possibly non-existent (as if any of us are naive enough to buy that response) - memo while the Justice Department claims it will harm national security to release the memo fits nicely with the rest of the Obama administration's schizophrenic policy on government transparency. Josh Gerstein ofPolitico reported on "President Obama's muddy transparency record:"
Quote
Administration lawyers are aggressively fighting FOIA requests at the agency level and in court — sometimes on Obama’s direct orders. They’ve also wielded anti-transparency arguments even bolder than those asserted by the Bush administration.

The administration has embarked on an unprecedented wave of prosecutions of whistleblowers and alleged leakers — an effort many journalists believe is aimed at blocking national security-related stories. “There just seems to be a disconnect here. You want aggressive journalism abroad; you just don’t want it in the United States,” ABC News correspondent Jake Tapper told White House press secretary Jay Carney at a recent briefing for reporters.

In one of those cases, the Justice Department is trying to force a New York Times reporter to identify his confidential sources and is arguing that he has no legal protection from doing so.

Compliance with agencies’ open-government plans has been spotty, with confusing and inaccurate metrics sometimes used to assess progress. Some federal agencies are also throwing up new hurdles, such as more fees, in the path of those seeking records.

The Office of Management and Budget has stalled for more than a year the proposals of the chief FOIA ombudsman’s office to improve government wide FOIA operations.

Not exactly what is expected from an administration claiming to be "the most open and transparent in history."

The Obama administration has revealed what it wants to reveal and concealed the rest, too often under the specter of harm to "national security." This brand of cafeteria government openness is more than just frustrating to FOIA requesters. It endangers a democratic society - which relies on an informed public - by reducing the public's information to pro-government talking points and Attorney General stump speeches at law schools.

 
--------------------------
Jesselyn Radack is National Security & Human Rights Director for the Government Accountability Project, the nation's leading whistleblower protection and advocacy organization.

* http://www.naderlibrary.com/LM.triumphofwillscreen.htm
** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Long_Knives
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Sasha on March 06, 2012, 12:41:44 am
Perhaps, Breitbart's Weather Underground/(New) Black Panther/Occupy/Obama connections from college were about to be shown as part of a live op aimed at the RNC this year.  Plus, Breitbart was about to blow the whistle on it knowing that he was in the crosshairs.  

Breitbart knew about a false flag op that went unfinished at CPAC, one that corresponds with an Infowars callers info from Tampa with connections to the Sheriffs's office several weeks ago who warned that the RNC will be a nearly identical op to the one described in the CPAC op, with the minor addition of an Annon super-back-hack to blame what ever hack they do on themselves on the Ron Paul/truther/inforwars communities.

Andrew Breitbart prepares for his Pierce Morgan interview at midnight
http://minx.cc/?post=326530 (http://minx.cc/?post=326530)

from the text Breitbart is pointing at comments for:
http://minx.cc/?post=326511 (http://minx.cc/?post=326511)

Quote
"As Peaceful As Possible:" Occupy Groups, Labor, and New Black Panthers Plan Disruptions of CPAC

Occupy DC has advised people to remain "as peaceful as possible." Why the caveat there?

But some may have a different definition of "possible."

The [planning] meetings began last Thursday and lasted until Saturday. During these meetings, protesters began throwing around ideas for confusion and chaos that include dressing like Ron Paul supporters since they “generally look like hippies”, pulling fire alarms, screaming ‘fire’ during activities, “glitter-bombing” participants, blocking entrances to the hotel, and cutting electrical power- as first reported by Lachlan Markay at the Heritage Foundation.
The person who obtained all the information said, “Speakers will be physically assaulted, not just verbally confronted.” Two Occupiers, who the informant also identified as members of the New Black Panther Party, “said they would be disappointed if they didn’t get arrested and planned to ‘make it count.’”

“Mitt [Romney] has Secret Service now, but [Newt] Gingrich and [Andrew] Breitbart don’t”, said another planner.

And this is enabled by the leftwing media, which has given them the greenlight -- no matter what these people do, they know that the media will cover for them.

Posted by: Ace at 03:25 PM"
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Satyagraha on March 06, 2012, 09:39:08 am
WATCH THIS!

The International - 'Opening scene'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls05PsIEaMI

When you watch this clip, look for this guy approaching the 'target':

(http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/tt201/Pilikia_photos/scene_shot_a.jpg)

You'll hear the metallic sound of the 'heart attack' bullet being shot...

Then you see the hit man walking away as the targeted guy continues unaware.

(http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/tt201/Pilikia_photos/scene_shot.jpg)

A few seconds later, he has a heart attack.
Title: Andrew Breitbart Snuffed Out By The Illuminati To Prevent Obama Information Leak
Post by: Femacamper on March 07, 2012, 08:22:28 am
He was pronounced dead 12:19 am, Thursday March 1st.
12 (1+2) + 19 (1+9) Thursday (5) March (3) 1
3+10 5+3+1

13 9 (3x3)
13 33!

Signs of the Illuminati? You tell me.

He was planning to release stunning videos about a young Barack Obama that would politically damn his presidency by exposing his Marxist ties. Guess what day? March 1st. But he died.

Beware the Ides of March.

More on his death and the suspicious circumstances surrounding the time up till his death, the murder, the ER coverup, and the political whitewash:

Topic: Rick Wiles discusses Andrew Breitbart's suspicious death, the videos of Obama he planned to release, and the communist revolution in America

http://www.breitbart.com

Download free Mp3 Audio Podcast of the Radio Show HERE:
http://www.trunews.com/Audio/3_02_12_friday_trunews2.mp3


GET THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW, FOR THE SAKE OF ANDREW BREITBART AND AMERICA!

Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart Snuffed Out By The Illuminati To Prevent Obama Information Leak
Post by: Femacamper on March 07, 2012, 08:36:29 am
Is Obama Eliminating His Enemies? The Ides of March!
http://www.conunderground.com/is-obama-eliminating-his-enemies-the-ides-of-march/

Is Husein Obama eliminating his enemies?

(http://www.conunderground.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/angry-Obama.jpg)
Step aside Castro and Chavez, there's a new comrade in town ready to sell out America.

Breitbart, Anonymous and the Koch brothers, prima fascia the three could not possible have anything in common but a closer look might just change all that.

I remember the first time I learned of Andrew Breitbart, he was sitting in for a radio host I think it might have been Michael Savage.  He introduced himself by saying that he mostly spends his time  starring at a computer, following  the news and trying to understand , connect the dots and deduce how the left is working to bamboozle and enslave us. In keeping with the late great Breitbart’s tradition let’s analyze  the three apparently disparate topics we mentioned above and see if we can find any connection.

Anonymous

On march 1st the Interpol executed 25 arrest warrants on two continents against alleged Anonymous members.

I don’t know much about this group except what I read in the MSM and it’s very possible that there were some valid reasons why Interpol went after them but as events unfolded in the days following these arrests the timing of these raids is at the very least questionable.

Again I am not sure what the Anonymous agenda is but I do know that they can, being hackers, gain access to information that the powers that be, i.e. Obama might not really want made public – it wouldn’t be the first time!

Andrew Breitbart

Also on march 1st Andrew Breitbart, only 43 years old died of “natural causes” after reportedly “going for a walk.”

Andrew Breitbart previously declared that on March 1st  he would reveal video tapes that will expose Obama as the Manchurian candidate out to destroy our country and our freedom. Like Anonymous Andrew Breitbart had access to the kind of information that Obama certainly does not want to be made public – it also wouldn’t be the first time.

The Koch brothers

On February 29, just one day before the Anonymous arrests and the highly suspicious death of Andrew Breitbart the Obama administration took the unprecedented step of attacking a private organization because Obama disagrees with their position. The White House is accusing the The Koch brothers of  “jacking up prices at the pump” and committing as much as $200 million to defeating Obama’s reelection.”

Like Andrew Breitbart, and Anonymous, the Koch brothers too can mobilize the masses and bring to the forefront information that Obama would do anything to destroy – again that too would not be the first time.

These three incidents are very public, very high profile and very serious – what can  be more serous than assassination, arrests and threatening to confiscate one’s property? The very fact that they are so public is what is so worrisome.
 
THIS ADMINISTRATION IS DESPERATE AND THEY WILL STOP AT NOTHING.

Are these incidents related?

Are they meant to terrorize us into cowing before the Obama dictatorship?
What will come in the next couple of weeks?  What do you think?
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart Snuffed Out By The Illuminati To Prevent Obama Information Leak
Post by: Femacamper on March 07, 2012, 08:47:21 am
More information, Rush Limbaugh, who lives where Breitbart once lived, was sent an apparent death threat by mail in the form of a circuit board with wires protruding from a box with a message about presidential assassinations. The info is covered later in the podcast. A must listen!

I also read about Rush Limbaugh being criticized by Obama in today's news. Must be related.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart Snuffed Out By The Illuminati To Prevent Obama Information Leak
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 07, 2012, 08:54:20 am
He was pronounced dead 12:19 am, Thursday March 1st.
12 (1+2) + 19 (1+9) Thursday (5) March (3) 1
3+10 5+3+1

13 9 (3x3)
13 33!

Signs of the Illuminati? You tell me.

He was planning to release stunning videos about a young Barack Obama that would politically damn his presidency by exposing his Marxist ties. Guess what day? March 1st. But he died.

Beware the Ides of March.

More on his death and the suspicious circumstances surrounding the time up till his death, the murder, the ER coverup, and the political whitewash:

Topic: Rick Wiles discusses Andrew Breitbart's suspicious death, the videos of Obama he planned to release, and the communist revolution in America

http://www.breitbart.com

Download free Mp3 Audio Podcast of the Radio Show HERE:
http://www.trunews.com/Audio/3_02_12_friday_trunews2.mp3


GET THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW, FOR THE SAKE OF ANDREW BREITBART AND AMERICA!



  So Femacamper,  what's the chance of these videos surfacing in the next few months anyway?  Surely he had a staff a people working for him that knew about the videos or have the videos.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart Snuffed Out By The Illuminati To Prevent Obama Information Leak
Post by: Femacamper on March 07, 2012, 09:26:42 am
 So Femacamper,  what's the chance of these videos surfacing in the next few months anyway?  Surely he had a staff a people working for him that knew about the videos or have the videos.

His staff said they would be released in a couple weeks. I expect that they will likely be disappeared, doctored, or somehow otherwise tampered with. Perhaps they had a friendly visit from Obama's assassination squad already.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA rules to stop explosive Obama videos?
Post by: Femacamper on March 07, 2012, 09:36:52 am
At this point, the assassination of a non-mainstream journo is 1,000x more damaging to the Obama Deception Mythology than any fricking college video even if they have him f**king squirrels while shitting on an American flag.

I mean really, WTF? The New World Order just totally f-d themselves!


[Disclaimer: I am not saying that there exists hours of videos of the president f**king varmints nor videos of him defecating on 'ol glory, or doing both at the same time. I highly doubt that any squirrel f**king videos exist and i also doubt that our president engages in such activities to begin with. The satire was meant to expose the fact that sometimes a downtrodden group of incestous control freaks like the committee of 300 will cut off their nose to spite their face, or in this case, S.M.I.T.E. an American journo without realizing the just exposed themselves as the only true National Security threat to the United States of America.]

That was good. You should write professionally in a journalistic op-ed outfit, Sane! Your quips are classic!!
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart Snuffed Out By The Illuminati To Prevent Obama Information Leak
Post by: larsonstdoc on March 07, 2012, 09:53:22 am
His staff said they would be released in a couple weeks. I expect that they will likely be disappeared, doctored, or somehow otherwise tampered with. Perhaps they had a friendly visit from Obama's assassination squad already.

  It saddens me to think that we live in a country run by thugs.


  2 Timothy 3

 1This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.

 2For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,

 3Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,

 4Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;

 5Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

 6For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,

 7Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.

 13But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Sasha on March 07, 2012, 01:21:04 pm
"The house of cards is about to fall, that is the house of Obama is done."

"Saudi connections?  Is Obama the Saudi Candidate?"  Mankow asks Breitbart.

"Bigger.  Much bigger",  answers Breitbart.

_____________________

Breitbart did not disagree with a Saudi connection, just that its bigger than Saudi Arabia alone.

Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Sasha on March 07, 2012, 01:32:51 pm
THIS IS WHAT MANKOW IS TALKING ABOUT!!!
...watch out Newt.


Perhaps, Breitbart's Weather Underground/(New) Black Panther/Occupy/Obama connections from college were about to be shown as part of a live op aimed at the RNC this year.  Plus, Breitbart was about to blow the whistle on it knowing that he was in the crosshairs. 

Breitbart knew about a false flag op that went unfinished at CPAC, one that corresponds with an Infowars callers info from Tampa with connections to the Sheriffs's office several weeks ago who warned that the RNC will be a nearly identical op to the one described in the CPAC op, with the minor addition of an Annon super-back-hack to blame what ever hack they do on themselves on the Ron Paul/truther/inforwars communities.

Andrew Breitbart prepares for his Pierce Morgan interview at midnight
http://minx.cc/?post=326530

from the text Breitbart is pointing at comments for:
http://minx.cc/?post=326511


Quote
"As Peaceful As Possible:" Occupy Groups, Labor, and New Black Panthers Plan Disruptions of CPAC

Occupy DC has advised people to remain "as peaceful as possible." Why the caveat there?

But some may have a different definition of "possible."

The [planning] meetings began last Thursday and lasted until Saturday. During these meetings, protesters began throwing around ideas for confusion and chaos that include dressing like Ron Paul supporters since they “generally look like hippies”, pulling fire alarms, screaming ‘fire’ during activities, “glitter-bombing” participants, blocking entrances to the hotel, and cutting electrical power- as first reported by Lachlan Markay at the Heritage Foundation.
The person who obtained all the information said, “Speakers will be physically assaulted, not just verbally confronted.” Two Occupiers, who the informant also identified as members of the New Black Panther Party, “said they would be disappointed if they didn’t get arrested and planned to ‘make it count.’”

“Mitt [Romney] has Secret Service now, but [Newt] Gingrich and [Andrew] Breitbart don’t”, said another planner.

And this is enabled by the leftwing media, which has given them the greenlight -- no matter what these people do, they know that the media will cover for them.

Posted by: Ace at 03:25 PM"
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Trainwreck on March 07, 2012, 02:12:24 pm
The video that is going to air doesn't seem like what Brietbart was talking about..leading a rally is not in a meeting with WU. Must've took them this whole week to dig up a different video of Obama from college....watch this video won't be a big deal...no way would Fox show the real video with all the heat they're under from the left.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Sasha on March 07, 2012, 02:22:47 pm
The video that is going to air doesn't seem like what Brietbart was talking about..leading a rally is not in a meeting with WU.

Nope, it doesn't, the 1:17 that's already public @ http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/03/07/Buzzfeeds%20Selectively%20Edited (http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/03/07/Buzzfeeds%20Selectively%20Edited) is as hard hitting a bag of kittens.  Obama's house of cards will be safe from this video assault.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: tritonman on March 07, 2012, 02:49:07 pm
That is part of the video,  the whole thing is on tonight on that jerk Hannities show, but perhaps more over the coming days.  I still think Obama is not to worried given the situation has been more than likely "taken care of".
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Trainwreck on March 07, 2012, 03:25:43 pm
I'm sure we'll see a lot of Brietbarts staff get nice cozy positions at News Corp in exchange.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: chris jones on March 07, 2012, 05:36:22 pm
Mr. Obama doesn't call the shots.
  Recruited, mentored, protected. This man doesn't have to give the order for a hit that issue is dealt with by others, he is playing only his role and most certainly is enjoying it.
  Sociopaths are without conscience and what could said are normal human emotions. Skillfull socio's have adapted the practice of acting, Obama is one of these, intelligent, determined, and a professional elite con.  As Mr. Bush invaded Afghanistan, (in my opinion), ABM was well aware he was to be the forthcoming president.
  So many folks I have spoken with in general are focusing  on Oby, they are missing the forrest for the trees, this is not a one man show, this is a global conglomerate, we are the nucleus of their target.
  Any public figure who any pose a threat to this meatgrinder is in harms way, to emphasize this fact we have only to look back and remember the 3K's, this was their message as to their ability to remove anyone who may stand in their way.
 
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Femacamper on March 07, 2012, 06:32:47 pm
Skillfull socio's have adapted the practice of acting, Obama is one of these, intelligent, determined, and a professional elite con.  As Mr. Bush invaded Afghanistan, (in my opinion), ABM was well aware he was to be the forthcoming president.
  

ABM?
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 07, 2012, 07:34:21 pm
Not the Video Breitbart Died For: Leaked Obama Vid Already Aired on PBS in 2008
http://www.infowars.com/not-the-video-breitbart-died-for-leaked-obama-vid-already-aired-on-pbs-in-2008/
Infowars
March 7, 2012

Will damning footage Andrew Breitbart intended to release March 1 ever surface unedited?

Media outlets are frothing at the release of video that shows now President Obama a ‘radical’ Harvard rally supposedly demonstrative of racial division tactics he took part in. Indeed, Breitbart.com reports:

Earlier today, Buzzfeed’s Ben Smith announced on Twitter that video researcher Andrew Kaczynski had released “the mysterious Harvard/Obama/race video that the Breitbart folks have been talking about.”

This is surely not the video that Andrew Breitbart was dying to release at the 2012 CPAC conference weeks before his untimely death. As predicted by Alex Jones, Mancow Mueller and others, the public will be distracted with less than bombshell issue while the real revelations Andrew Breitbart said he held likely ‘go with him to the grave,’ as Mancow put it earlier today.

Instead, this ‘newly leaked’ footage of Barack Obama speaking at a Harvard rally was ALREADY released in a 2008 piece produced by PBS’s Frontline program. It shows Obama speaking in support of the controversial Professor Derrick Bell. The footage is reportedly ‘selectively edited’ and was admittedly licensed from Boston TV station WGBH, who produce Frontline.

As Paul Joseph Watson reported:

“The footage shows Obama from his Harvard days fraternizing with Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, leading members of the Weather Underground terrorist group which carried out a wave of bombings against government targets in the 70′s.”

Whether that footage, or other admittedly withheld footage of Obama speaking at a panel after a Saul Alinksky play, will ever reach the public remains to be seen.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 07, 2012, 08:04:52 pm
Breitbart and the CIA’s Heart Attack Gun
http://www.infowars.com/breitbart-and-the-cias-heart-attack-gun/
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 7, 2012

Andrew Breitbart’s media empire undoubtedly posed a threat to the establishment. From the takedown of New York Rep. Anthony Weiner to the outing of the USDA’s Shirley Sherrod and very public revelations about the seamy underside of ACORN, Breitbart was considered a thorn in the side of the liberal establishment.

Senators Frank Church and John Tower examine a CIA poison dart gun that causes cancer and heart attacks.

But it was his promise to release information that would critically damage Barack Obama prior to an election that really grabbed the attention of the establishment and possibly led to his assassination.

As firebrand talk show host Michael Savage said following Breitbart’s collapse on a Brentwood, California, street and his subsequent death from an apparent heart attack, he would be remiss if he didn’t suggest that the liberal gadfly was assassinated. “I’m asking a crazy question,” Savage said on his nationally syndicated radio show, “but so what? We the people want an answer. This was not an ordinary man. If I don’t ask this question, I would be remiss.”

Others insist Breitbart had a history of health issues and simply collapsed and died from a heart attack as thousands of Americans do every day. They say Savage, Alex Jones and many others who posit a Breitbart assassination are engaging in baseless conspiracy theories.

However, we do know that government engages in assassination of political enemies and has the means to do so without leaving a trace.

During Senate testimony in 1975 into illegal activities by the CIA, it was revealed that the agency had developed a dart gun capable of causing a heart attack. “At the first televised hearing, staged in the Senate Caucus Room, Chairman Church dramatically displayed a CIA poison dart gun to highlight the committee’s discovery that the CIA directly violated a presidential order by maintaining stocks of shellfish toxin sufficient to kill thousands,” a Senate web page explains.

“The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesn’t it? Yet this is all verifiable in Congressional testimony,” writes Fred Burks.

“The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target.”

Burks suggests that Mark Pittman, a reporter who predicted the financial crisis and exposed Federal Reserve misdoings which led to a Bloomberg lawsuit against the bankster cartel, may have been assassinated with the CIA weapon.

Of course, Breitbart’s untimely death prior to the release of information that would damage the presidential campaign of Obama may be purely coincidental. If he was, however, assassinated with a frozen dart that denatures and leaves no trace, chances are we will never know what really happened to him.
Share this article:
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Trainwreck on March 07, 2012, 08:07:41 pm
Well the footage Hannity showed it trash...No different from Obama and his racist minister...the only people who will care about this are people who already hate Obama.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Trainwreck on March 07, 2012, 08:36:07 pm
Wow Hannity being real easy on Obama 'this is far far from a smoking gun'
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 07, 2012, 08:57:50 pm
Wow Hannity being real easy on Obama 'this is far far from a smoking gun'

More proof that Hannity is a fake conservative and a REAL NWO puppet.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 07, 2012, 11:06:18 pm
Hey NWO...read this...

[NOTE: I ain't one for hijacking threads into bible thunping insanity, but this verse is just too perfectly aligned with the defining differences between NWO crimes against humanity and humanity itself. It should be a very important calling to those on the fence as to how you are supposed to blow the whistle]
Fear them not therefore:
for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed;
and hid, that shall not be known.
What I tell you in darkness, that speak ye in light:
and what ye hear in the ear, that...
preach ye upon the housetops.

Matthew 10:26-27 (King James Version)

In other words, yell your f-ing heads off when you got critical, constitutionally-reinforcing, republic-defending info.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: chris jones on March 08, 2012, 04:35:17 pm
ABM?
Sorry, mispelled, was meant to be Oby..  reasoning-Old eyes..
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 09, 2012, 11:38:15 am
More proof that Hannity is a fake conservative and a REAL NWO puppet.  

I thought it was interesting that "Breitbart" was not mentioned , so this was intended to muddy the waters.

Notice also that while the reps. burn each other for months they rarely attack BO's policies or actions.

So they can't burn BO because they're campaigns are being funded by the same people as BO? (just in case people don't get it)

The Reps. want to win the senate and have already conceded the presidential race.

I like Ron Paul but he is there to make it look like a "fair and balanced"  "selection"
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: PTTurboe on March 09, 2012, 09:46:40 pm
His death was a message. Timed it with his claim of "March 1st". Their humor. Nothing else will be revealed. Let the whole affair blow away in the air...
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 10, 2012, 03:36:23 am
Holder: Targeted Assassinations Of US Citizens ‘Not Assassination’
http://dprogram.net/2012/03/06/holder-targeted-killings-of-us-citizens-not-assassination/
March 6th, 2012

(HigginsBlog) – Attorney General Eric Holder defends targeted killings of U.S. citizens saying its perfectly legal as long as ambiguous conditions are met.

In a round of Orwellian doublespeak, the US Attorney General Eric Holder has come up to defend publicly for the first time, the governments program of extra-judicial assassinations of US citizens which are conduction based merely on allegations with no evidence to support the claims.

Holder lashed out against those who call the assassinations for what they are assassination, saying the government is totally justified in killing US citizens when the are suspected of planning to kill US citizens.

Let’s review the statements he makes to according to CNN, which would surely make Hitler proud if he were still alive today.

Holder: Not ‘assassination’ to target Americans in terror hunt

Attorney General Eric Holder Monday strongly defended the targeted killing of U.S. citizens abroad when they are suspected of planning to kill Americans, and he rejected the claims of critics who call them “assassinations”.


Yes, there is a big problem with those statements Mr. Holder. No one should be punished for being suspected of anything with out a fair and impartial  convicted by judge. Hell, the USS NAZI regime suspects everyone as being a terrorist, as evidenced by repeated think tank reports and even FBI literature that outlines a whole long line of innocent activities that people perform on a daily basis qualifies as the “suspected terrorist activity” that should be reported.

Next get out your damn dictionary and look up the definition of assassination: to murder or kill someone by a  premeditated sudden or secret attack, often a politically prominent person or for religious reasons. Now, is the “targeted killing” program done in secret or a premeditated manner? Yes, for both. The definition fits the bill, so sorry Mr. Holder they are assassinations.

Are the targets politically prominent? They certainly are and if they weren’t the US government would never have known about them to put them on the secret kill list in the first place. Is it done for religious reasons? You can argue the merits of that, but a lot of US conservatives will say it is and even more importantly those being assassinated sure in the hell feel like it is.

While not referring directly to the government’s drone attack on U.S.-born Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen last year, the Attorney General was unflinching in providing publicly for the first time the Justice Department’s legal justification for using lethal force.

RECOMMENDED on GPS blog: Evaluating Holder’s speech on targeted killings

“Let me be clear-an operation using lethal force in a foreign country, targeted against a U.S. citizen who is a senior operational leader of al Qaeda or associated force, and who is actively engaged in planning to kill Americans would be lawful” Holder said.

Security Clearance: covering terrorism, military, intelligence and diplomacy

There you go CNN, let’s pretend like Anwar is the only US citizen that the has been assassination. Let’s not forget the editor of a magazine was also a victim of one of these targeted killings as was Awlaki’s 16 year son, also a US citizen, who was targeted in an entirely separate attack.

Sorry Holder, there is no evidence Awalki ever did anything besides give speeches against the attrocities that the US government commits against Muslims. No evidence that he was a member of al-Qaeda, none the less a “senior operational leader”, or that he “actively engaged in planning to kill Americans”. The only evidence is the SPECULATION of  intelligence officers that was leaked to CIA partnered newspapers like the Washington Post and the New York Times.

The Attorney General’s speech to an audience at the Northwestern University Law School in Chicago marked his most expansive comments on the subject of deadly attacks against Americans since his lawyers in the Office of Legal Counsel had written a still-secret opinion declaring such lethal attacks are legal and justifiable.

Yes, the same “secret opinion” on the “secret program” that the government continues to stonewall the ACLU on saying they can not confirm nor deny the program exists. Ironically, the have no problem discussing with the New York Times, The Washington Post, and of course, you CNN, as well as giving a speech about it at Northwestern University Law School.

Okay, now here comes the double speak that would have made Hitler proud.

Holder stressed three conditions must exist. First, the U.S. government must have determined that the individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against America. Second, capture of the suspect is not feasible, and third, the operation would be conducted within the principles of the law of war.

But Holder argued that because of al Qaeda’s ability to spring surprise attacks and is considered to be continuously planning against to attack on America, the law allows for striking even before the “precise time, place, and manner of an attack becomes clear.”

What the f**k did I just read? The first condition is “the government must have determined the individual poses an “imminent threat of a violent attack against America” but due to the nature of Al-Qaeda’s ability to surprise attack and  IS CONSIDERED to be continuously planning…. the law allows for assassinating such individuals before the before the “precise time, place, and manner of an attack becomes clear.”

So to translate that… if the government “CONSIDERS” or “ALLEGES”, the government can assassinate a US citizens anytime they wish, even if they have absolutely no evidence. Furthermore, if you are a member of, or somehow have relations to an organization that government spooks have a hunch are “continuously planning attacks” they can assassinate you.

“Such a requirement would create an unacceptably high risk that our efforts would fail, and that Americans would be killed,” Holder said.

So the logic is, if you suspect there high risk that Americans would be killed, you will first kill Americans to prevent them from killing…  Americans? Using that logic, you may as will just kill all Americans to make sure, once and for all they don’t kill any more Americans.

Holder, I suspect that you are going to kill Americans, I mean you are sitting here admitting you are going to kill Americans and that you are continuously planning to kill Americans to prevent them from killing Americans. May you should need to call in a drone to prevent yourself from killing more Americans.

Holder rejected the charge that the deadly operations violate the government’s ban on assassinations and dismissed the notion the strikes fit the definition of assassinations at all.

“Some have called such operations ‘assassinations’. They are not, and the use of that loaded term is misplaced. Assassination are unlawful killings,” Holder said, contrasting that with lawful killings in government operations under the conditions he outlined.

Well we already went over the definition of assassination and your “secret targeted killings” sure in the hell qualify as assassinations. I am glad that you do admit that Assassination are unlawful killings and as I already pointed out the conditions you outline aren’t conditions at all, and even if they were it wouldn’t change the fact that you are conducting assassinations.

Here is a hypothetical for you Mr. Holder,  If someone were to rig my son’s remote-controlled helicopter up to drop a pipe bomb on the President to prevent his continual planning to kill American citizens would that a lawful targeted killing? Surely, that person would be convicted of assassinating the president so you can have as many corrupt judges agree with you all you want but the court of public opinion convicts you of conducting assassinations.

Holder also took issue with those who have charged the government agencies must get permission from a federal court before taking action against an Al Qaeda target.

“This is simply not accurate,” Holder declared. “Due process” and “judicial process” are not one and the same, particularly when it comes to national security. The Constitution guarantees due process, not judicial process.”

Great, anadmission that the assassination program is conducting “extra-judicial killings” because up until this point the White House has asserted that the assassinations were conducted only after a secret judicial review.

Now, I am not an expert on constitutional law, and we all know damn well that most of our rights have been ripped out of the damned constitution, but I am pretty damn sure that constitution does guarantee a Judicial Process in several amendments. Call it due process all you want, and argue this is a time of war or public danger all you want, but there is a reason that the founding fathers made so judges – not legislators or slimy White House lawyers maker their own “secret interpretation” of things – define and guarantee fundamental fairness, justice, and liberty which are INALEINABLE RIGHTS owed to all.

Al Awlaki and another American, Samir Khan were killed last September when a drone operated jointly by the C.I.A. and a military Joint Operations unit destroyed a vehicle in which the men were riding in Yemen. Awlaki, who U.S. intelligence officials have said was an operational planner for attacks, was the target of that strike. Khan was traveling with Awlaki and killed, though he was not specifically targeted.

It is nice that CNN finally mentions that Khan was killed. Why don’t you add that Khan was a journalist and that the US carried out another drone strike 2 weeks later that killed Awlaki’s 16 year son, a US citizen born in Colorada. Yes, most Americans don’t know that the US is assassinating children and you wouldn’t want to let the cat out of the bad now would you.

Court documents show that the so-called “Underwear Bomber” Umar Farouk AbdulMutallab, told U.S. authorities al-Awlaki had played a major role in the plot to blow up a commercial airline flight near Detroit on Christmas Day 2009. President Obama later said al-Awlaki had “directed the failed attempt”.

This is supposed to be evidence, a man who was undoubtedly beaten and tortured and would say anything under distress. This is inadmissible hearsay, where is the evidence? Why does CNN use such hearsay as supporting evidence? Surely that is not is not objective and impartial reporting.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which filed an unsuccesful lawsuit challenging the administration’s drone program on behalf of the Awlaki’s father, said the speech was “a gesture towards additioanl transparency,” but continued to object to the legal rationale.

“Few things are as dangerous to American liberty as the proposition that the government should be able to kill citizens anywhere in the world on the basis of legal standards and evidence that are never submitted to a court, either before or after the fact. Anyone willing to trust President Obama with the power to secretly declare an American citizen an enemy of the state and order his extrajudicial killing should ask whether they would be willing to trust the next president with that dangerous power,” said Hina Shamsi, the director of ACLU’s National Security Project, in an emailed statement.

Nice how CNN references an old ACLU lawsuit while not even mention that in that case Alwaki was even denied the right to get a lawyer and try to defend against the allegations. You see, no one is allowed to do business with alleged terrorists, not even lawyers. CNN further fails to mention the ACLU’s current lawsuit against the government, in which they fail to even acknowledge that the assassination program exists. And as I pointed out before, the White House had previously asserted the assassinations were conducted after a secret judicial review.

Holder also used the speech to defend the use of civilian courts to try terrorists, noting numerous succesful prosecutions.

“The calls that I’ve heard to ban the use of civilian courts in prosecutions of terrorism-related activity are so baffling, and ultimately are so dangerous. These calls ignore reality,” Holder said. “If heeded, they would significantly weaken – in fact, they would cripple – our ability to incapacitate and punish those who attempt do us harm.”

So is the assassination of US citizens without judicial oversight.

Monday Holder indicated it was possible there would be more targeted killings.

“When such (U.S). individuals take up arms against this country, and join al Qaeda in plotting attacks designed to kill their fellow Americans, there may be only one realistic and appropriate response,” Holder said. “ We must take steps to stop them in full accordance with the Constitution. In this hour of danger, we simply cannot afford to wait until deadly plans are carried out, and we will not.”

Holder then concluded, “This is an indicator of our times, not a departure from our laws and values”.

Source: CNN

Yes please do handle then in accordance with the Constitution and not some secret shadow government processes created in the evil mind of Dick Cheney and the likes. Yes, this is an indicator of our times and the statement that this is not a departure from our laws and values is mere rhetoric as on can successfully argue that there are no laws or moral values among this nation’s elite. There is a two-tiered judicial system that operates as an over-bearing police state for the masses and an all out system of lawlessness amount the elite.

Source: Higgins Blog

Related posts:
Holder To Justify Killing Americans On Foreign Soil
Lawsuit Filed Against Government Over Assassination Of U.S. Citizens
Documents Show AG Holder Knew About ‘Fast & Furious’; Contradict Testimony
Ending impunity in South Asian media killings
Holder heading to House hot seat, Fast and Furious grilling on the way
Congress to Holder: Quit
Extrajudicial Killings. Assassinating Awlaki: Obama Can Kill Anyone He Wants To
McCain Justifies Indefinite Detention of American Citizens with Debunked Statistics
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Dig on March 10, 2012, 03:39:02 am
LA County examiners office will do the autopsy?

The same office that controlled autopsy information for the assassination of RFK?

Move along, nothing to see...

Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Trainwreck on March 10, 2012, 03:53:47 am
LA County examiners office will do the autopsy?

The same office that controlled autopsy information for the assassination of RFK?

Move along, nothing to see...



They would never in a million years let a coroner be the one to ruin their operation. Brietbart couldn't have been too smart if he thought he was somehow immune to something like this. Disgusting that there isn't ONE person on his staff who will do the right thing and leak the video so his death isn't totally in vain.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Bilderberg CEO on April 14, 2012, 03:53:25 am
LA County examiners office will do the autopsy?

The same office that controlled autopsy information for the assassination of RFK?

Move along, nothing to see...



I just checked in to ask the same question.  I thought they said they were going to do a thorough investigation.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: Femacamper on April 14, 2012, 10:39:37 pm
I just checked in to ask the same question.  I thought they said they were going to do a thorough investigation.

BWAAHAHAHAHA!

They would have to arrest their bosses.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: TahoeBlue on December 26, 2013, 02:28:42 pm
Why is Breitbart NOT a martyr today? The Heart Attack was not murder?

Was Breitbart removed for his knowledge of the Occupy Movement and to destroy support for the Tea Party?

Notice how the "occupy movement" provided cover for the financial institutions and  a path for Obama's re-selection
Not a single financial reform has been made - not a single financial principle has gone to jail.
 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlsUMidNaco
Andrew Breitbart's Assigned Coroner Dead? Poison Suspected

Michael Cormier, a respected forensic technician for the Los Angeles County Coroner died under suspicious circumstances at his North Hollywood home April 20, the same day Breitbart's cause of death was finally made public.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUQPtt_svf8
Was Breitbart Obama's First Victim Under NDAA? (License to Murder) 1/3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NR2xQPdF9zc
BOMBSHELL: Ex-CIA Agent Claims Obama Had Breitbart and Clancy Killed

Dr. Garrow claims that up to a week ago he was covert CIA. To top it off he states he knows that President Obama ordered the murders of Tom Clancy and Andrew Breitbart!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7r0qZ3EMRMk
THIS IS WHY ANDREW BREITBART WAS KILLED

Published on Aug 30, 2012  
Dr Manning explains why Andrew Breitbart was assassinated

CIA whistleblower talks about a gun that shoots a frozen dart of poison that mimics a heart attack in the unfortunate victim
This is probably how Andrew Breitbart was taken out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzIw44w00ow

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tafZTlhtoQA
'Mancow' Muller: Breitbart Was Murdered!! 1/2
Published on Mar 7, 2012  
Chicago radio host says Breitbart's death was a warning shot and that others are in danger

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WczZMSbB2DY
'Mancow' Muller: Breitbart Was Murdered!! 2/2

Hastings - Rolling Stones reporter who was critical of administration dead at 33

"who was critical of administration"

Michael Hastings, cause of death, car bomb

Andrew Breitbart, cause of death, heart attack
Steve Bridges, cause of death, heart attack

George Carlin, cause of death, heart attack


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jv-1MnuToqA
Andrew Breitbart why the left hated him

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G8iLGdMfdc
HATING BREITBART Official Theatrical Trailer

Official theatrical trailer for the feature length motion picture Hating Breitbart, due out in theaters October 12th, 2012!

(http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/saving-breitbart.jpg)

(http://rightnetworknews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/main-box-occupy.jpg)

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/08/30/exclusive-trailer-late-andrew-breitbart-uncovered-dark-side-occupy-movement-in/
Exclusive Trailer: The late Andrew Breitbart uncovered dark side of Occupy Movement in new documentary 'Occupy Unmasked'
By Hollie McKay
• Published August 30, 2012

LOS ANGELES –  While the media attempted to dive deep into the social implications and issues surrounding the recent “Occupy Wall Street” movement, which spread in the U.S. and worldwide, relatively little was reported on the alleged violent rapes, robberies and assaults that took place in Occupy's swarms of tents and sleeping bags.

But audiences will soon be exposed to a darker view of the activist movement, seen through the lens of award-winning documentary filmmakers Citizen United Productions. Directed by Stephen K. Bannon and produced by David N. Bossie,

"Occupy Unmasked” takes cameras into the Occupy camps in New York, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., Portland, Denver and Oakland, documenting instances of brutality and profanity that took place.

The film features the late Andrew Breitbart, who worked tirelessly on the project prior to his unexpected death in March.


http://www.occupyunmasked.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=iHcr_8Qgdos
Occupy Unmasked - Official Movie Trailer - Citizens United Productions

http://www.occupyunmasked.com The trailer for the new film produced by Citizens United and directed by Stephen K. Bannon.

"Occupy Unmasked" goes deep into the "Occupy" movement and exposes its origins as well as the radical ideas behind "income inequality" that has become the centerpiece of the Obama re-election effort. The film is due to be released Spring 2012.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Breitbart

Andrew Breitbart (/ˈbraɪtbɑrt/; February 1, 1969 – March 1, 2012) was a conservative American publisher,[1] commentator for The Washington Times, author,[2] and occasional guest commentator[3][4][5] on various news programs, who served as an editor for the Drudge Report website.[6] He was a researcher for Arianna Huffington, during which time he played a central role in launching her web publication The Huffington Post.[7]

He owned the news aggregation site, Breitbart.com, as well as five other websites: Breitbart.tv, Big Hollywood, Big Government, Big Journalism, and Big Peace. He played central roles in the Anthony Weiner sexting scandal, the resignation of Shirley Sherrod, and the ACORN 2009 undercover videos controversy.


http://www.fastcompany.com/1788397/real-role-anonymous-occupy-wall-street

The Real Role Of Anonymous In Occupy Wall Street

So far, the hacker collective known as Anonymous--or those claiming the name--has failed to live up to threats made via YouTube and social media. But they have brought a lot of buzz to the Occupy Wall Street movement.
 
Anonymous has caught the attention of the media--and even Homeland Security--with its biggest contribution to Occupy Wall Street: hype. But, so far, the amorphous, leaderless hacktivist movement has disappointed anyone expecting full-on revolution from a Guy Fawkes-masked army or a massive cyber attack.

Anonymous does, however, have prominent members and often unites a large number of sympathizers. The gap between expectations and reality when it comes to Occupy Wall Street results from the disconnect between those dominant members and fringe elements who hit up the costume shop and start posting YouTube videos.

The story of how Anonymous and Occupy Wall Street intertwine dates back to February 2010, to the birth of "The 99 Percent Movement."
/...

"who was critical of administration"

Michael Hastings, cause of death, car bomb

Andrew Breitbart, cause of death, heart attack

Steve Bridges, cause of death, heart attack

George Carlin, cause of death, heart attack

Tom Clancy, cause of Death, UnKnown

http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2013/10/who-killed-tom-clancy-obama-administration-the-whistleblowers-2455398.html

Who Killed Tom Clancy…Obama Administration…The Whistleblowers
Friday, October 18, 2013 16:48

Tom was working on a novel very “Manchurian Candidate-ish”.

But it was replete with fact and exposed the Saudi Muslim plant in the White House and the direct funding that went into it. Birth Certificate? Want the real one? Tom had it.    Search Tom Clancy:  http://www.westernjournalism.com/

Clancy was killed because he was getting too close to a secret they don’t want the world to know. Dr. Garrow,  executive director of The Bethune Institute, states Obama had Tom Clancy killed, noting that it takes 5 days for plant toxins and most poisons to break down and leave no traces in the human body. Strangely (or not), doctors did not perform an autopsy on Clancy’s body for 5 days.

...
Tom Clancy, master detective writer, died mysteriously on October 1st, at the age of 66

The reason he was taken before his time is as mysterious as his books.  Clancy’s publicists are still not telling.   John Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore has not released a statement either.  The Baltimore Sun announced, most discretely, that the cause of death was, “a brief illness”.  No source was provided.  His family has added to the intrigue by saying they were not expecting to lose him.
...

http://www.westernjournalism.com/bombshell-ex-cia-agent-claims-obama-breitbart-clancy-killed/
BOMBSHELL: Ex-CIA Agent Claims Obama Had Breitbart and Clancy Killed
October 12, 2013 by NewsEditor

Brandon Walker interviews Dr. Jim Garrow, philanthropist and worker for one of the largest non-profit organizations on the planet to save female children from slaughter in China. He has been featured on several media outlets throughout the world. As a guest of Now the End Begins radio program he drops a bombshell on the world here. Dr. Garrow claims that up to a week ago, he was covert CIA. To top it off, he states he knows that Obama ordered the murders of Tom Clancy and Andrew Breitbart!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=NR2xQPdF9zc
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 28, 2014, 11:43:49 am
Bump - Andrew Breitbart RIP - February 1, 1969 - March 1, 2012

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Breitbart
...
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/20/Andrew_Breitbart_by_Gage_Skidmore_2.jpg/869px-Andrew_Breitbart_by_Gage_Skidmore_2.jpg)

The Lost Andrew Breitbart Interview HD  (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnhn19fz7qg)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuEYfemno3M
The Lost Andrew Breitbart Interview

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/02/01/February-1st-Andrew-s-Birthday
February 1st: Andrew’s Birthday

Andrew was born February 1, 1969. He was adopted shortly thereafter, and when his late parents, Arlene and Gerry, looked at him, they must have thought, as all parents must, what kind of boy, son, brother, father, husband, friend, person would he become?
,,,
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 01, 2014, 12:21:17 pm
http://republicmodernmedia.com/rememberbreitbart_shirt.png

(http://www.blogbash.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/hannitybreitbartshirt.png)
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 28, 2015, 08:54:47 pm
bump for 2015

Bump - Andrew Breitbart RIP - February 1, 1969 - March 1, 2012

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Breitbart
...
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/20/Andrew_Breitbart_by_Gage_Skidmore_2.jpg/869px-Andrew_Breitbart_by_Gage_Skidmore_2.jpg)

The Lost Andrew Breitbart Interview HD  (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnhn19fz7qg)

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/02/01/February-1st-Andrew-s-Birthday
February 1st: Andrew’s Birthday

Andrew was born February 1, 1969. He was adopted shortly thereafter, and when his late parents, Arlene and Gerry, looked at him, they must have thought, as all parents must, what kind of boy, son, brother, father, husband, friend, person would he become?
,,,
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart murdered under NDAA via DARPA's S.M.I.T.E. covert ops
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 01, 2015, 10:51:17 am
http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/duck-dynasty-star-blasts-nazis-stds-cpac
‘Duck Dynasty’ star Phil Robertson blasts Nazis, STDs at CPAC
Nick Ramsey
02/28/15 11:36 AM—Updated 02/28/15 03:28 PM

Phil Robertson, the man infamous for his role on the A&E reality series “Duck Dynasty” and for his controversial comments on gay sex, gave a speech on Friday at the Conservative Political Action Conference that was long, bizarre, and at times even a little incoherent.

As Robertson was introduced at CPAC, it was noted that he was the recipient of the 2015 Andrew Breitbart Defender of the First Amendment Award. He then used his First Amendment freedom to speak for nearly half an hour, touching on off-brand topics like sexually transmitted diseases, Nazis, communism, and Jesus ...

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/02/20/quack-attack-phil-robertson-to-receive-andrew-breitbart-award/
...
Andrew’s lifelong friend and Breitbart News Network CEO Larry Solov put it perfectly, “As both Andrew’s business partner and lifelong friend, I can definitively say that he would have been thrilled to give this award, that bears his name, to Phil Robertson for his unflinching conviction in the face of an adversarial media. In fact, I’m fairly certain Andrew would have grown a beard for the award presentation.”

Having Phil Robertson and his family as a part of American culture has changed this nation for the better. Week after week, millions of Americans see a family living out their faith and their values boldly and without reservation. Despite the best attempts of the mainstream media and Hollywood liberals, the Robertson patriarch and his family are still on television and they are as popular as ever.

If you are attending CPAC 2015, please stop by the main ballroom on Friday, February 27th at 12:40 p.m. and join Breitbart News Network and Citizens United as we present Phil Robertson with this special award. It is our honor to present this award in Andrew’s name along with Breitbart News to a great conservative who, like Andrew, refuses to bow to liberal pressure no matter what the cost.

Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Anny
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 01, 2016, 04:02:19 pm
Interesting - four years ago Andrew hit with a Heart Attack - now Scalia hit with a "heart Attack" ....

His death was a message. Timed it with his claim of "March 1st". Their humor. Nothing else will be revealed. Let the whole affair blow away in the air...

4 - Years:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/03/01/4-years/
Breitbart News 1 Mar 2016
Andrew Breitbart, 1969 – 2012

(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/02/breitbart-tux-640x480.jpg)
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 22, 2017, 06:30:22 pm
bump for  Andrew Breitbart  March 1 is coming ...
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered - March 1 2012 Anny observed
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 24, 2017, 11:07:41 am
I miss Andrew ... he was great ... A lot of people don't know he was adopted .
He motivated  and inspired many in the tea party effort ...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wl7fZH4fX1k
The Best of Andrew Breitbart
Published on Jun 22, 2016

The man who inspired so many people to take action, rest in peace


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlsqj8aQ1Po
Andrew Breitbart talking about his book Righteous Indignation
Published on Dec 21, 2013

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63TMawHivXQ
Andrew Breitbart's epic interview on MSNBC
Uploaded on Apr 20, 2011

Martin Bashir tries to pin Andrew Breitbart into a corner but Andrew takes him down with a dose a reality.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jv-1MnuToqA
Andrew Breitbart why the left hated him
Published on Jan 12, 2013

Compilation of some of the best Andrew Brietbart's moments R.I.P Andrew.
Thanks to shellymicAB

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbycMtTUDfE
Andrew Breitbart at CPAC 2012 02102012 - FULL SPEECH
Uploaded on Feb 10, 2012
Courtesy of Mediaite via the Right Scoo
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered - March 1 2012 Anny observed
Post by: Satyagraha on February 24, 2017, 02:41:37 pm
I miss Andrew ... he was great ... A lot of people don't know he was adopted .
He motivated  and inspired many in the tea party effort ...


Me too ...
Thanks for the links.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 24, 2017, 03:55:47 pm
so many more ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Szod8e6_w7Y
Andrew Breitbart Tells All on His Take Down of Anthony Weiner... Pure Gold!!
Published on Jan 23, 2017

Andrew Breitbart tells his amazing story of how he helped take down Congressman Anthony Weiner at Mike Munzing's Conservative Happy Hour. This was a huge week for Andrew and just 3 days after his take-over of Weiner's press conference, Andrew tells his amazing story.

Nearly 5 years after Andrew Breitbart's passing, it's clear that he was truly one of a kind and though many have tried, no one will every take his place.
Thank you for always being fearless my friend, we still miss you every day.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: Satyagraha on February 24, 2017, 04:24:17 pm
so many more ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Szod8e6_w7Y
Andrew Breitbart Tells All on His Take Down of Anthony Weiner... Pure Gold!!
Published on Jan 23, 2017


This one, where he talks about putting in windows on his house - windows that look out at the cemetery with the bodies of the soldiers who died in Iraq, brought tears to my eyes. Instead of hiding that scene; he made it the 'view' from his house. That is a special person - who kept these guys in mind ... that tells you a lot about what kind of person Andrew Breitbart was.

He was devoted to the truth.
It's really hard to find reporters that I trust to tell the truth. Everything is so skewed (left/right paradigm), I read both sides, and try to find the truth in there somewhere. Today apparently Trump has now decided to disinvite the NYTimes, Buzzfeed, Politico, and CNN from the press briefings.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered - March 1 2012 Anny observed
Post by: Satyagraha on February 24, 2017, 06:37:25 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlsqj8aQ1Po
Andrew Breitbart talking about his book Righteous Indignation
Published on Dec 21, 2013


This is excellent.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 25, 2017, 08:03:14 pm
This is interesting in that it ties the sex rings of podesta and weiner and shows the possible heart attacks were caused by arsenic poison.

Breitbart and the doctor that autopsied him and Gunderson were poisoned with arsenic (breitbart unconfirmed) . Also Breitbart was just starting Big Hollywood and he wanted bring back conservatives to Hollywood and allow them to come out of the shadows ...

see the weiner youtube:

Quote
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Szod8e6_w7Y
Andrew Breitbart Tells All on His Take Down of Anthony Weiner... Pure Gold!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1A5Tvq6--o
The Mysterious Demise of Andrew Breitbart & Ted Gunderson 
End Times News Report   
Published on Dec 9, 2016

How much did conservative journalist Andrew Breitbart know? Plus, claims by FBI Chief Gunderson's physician that he was killed by the Illuminati.

| - - - -


reference:

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/11/04/remembering-andrew-breitbart-fck-john-podesta/
Remembering Andrew Breitbart: ‘F*ck You, John Podesta!’

In 2010, Andrew Breitbart recognized Clinton campaign chair John Podesta as one of the biggest, most corrupt figures in Washington, D.C. 
“F--k you, John Podesta,” he told journalist Dave Weigel, who then wrote for Slate. “What’s in your closet, John Podesta? Big Podesta? Big Soros? Do you want us to play these games? Because we’re playing to win.”


....

Andrew Breitbart understood that the biggest threats to America were those who pulled the strings behind the scenes to gain enormous personal power, money, and influence.


Podesta is a creature of Washington, D.C., driving the leftist agenda for decades with his fingers in every pot, since serving in the Bill Clinton White House.


He served as the president’s chief of staff during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, working tirelessly to thwart investigations around the scandal-plagued administration. The tumultuous events reportedly spawned an alter-ego for Podesta that aides called “Skippy” — the nasty side of the normally mild-mannered operative.

Podesta also co-founded a massive lobbying firm with his brother, Tony Podesta, but later went on to launch the liberal think tank Center for American Progress and its multi-armed political subsidiaries.

The Center for American Progress has received more than $5.5 million from liberal billionaire George Soros and millions from top American corporations.

The leftist operative has remained close to power for decades and has been the subject of many fawning media profiles over the years.

His lobbyist brother, Tony, has repeatedly reaped the financial rewards of Podesta’s proximity to power, as the pair enjoys unprecedented access to the most powerful people in the world, including questionable ties with Saudi Arabia and Russia.

Podesta expertly leverages his longstanding relationships with government officials to serve his interests and that of his employers.


|- - - -


http://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/publichealth/41805
Arsenic Tied to Heart Disease

Chronic exposure to arsenic, even at low levels, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and death, researchers reported.

In a prospective cohort study, over almost 20 years of follow-up, low levels of arsenic in drinking water and food were associated with increases in incident cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and stroke, according to Ana Navas-Acien, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and colleagues.
...
Exposure to high levels of the element -- the equivalent of at least 100 micrograms per liter of water -- has long been known to be linked to increased rates of cardiovascular disease and mortality, the researchers noted.


http://www.counselheal.com/articles/6839/20130924/exposure-moderate-arsenic-increases-heart-attack-stroke-risks.htm
Exposure to Moderate Arsenic Increases Heart Attack and Stroke Risks
...
The researchers also found that one fourth of the patients with the highest levels of arsenic had a 50 percent increased risk of death from heart attack or stroke
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJAcu5TqbRQ
witness describes Andrew Breitbart's final moments
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 01, 2017, 11:13:09 am
Bump - RIP - Fly the flag today
I hurts that AJ never mentions Andrew  - where would he be today if Andrew hadn't come along ?
Does he Honor the dead? 


http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2013/03/01/original-song--tribute-to-andrew-breitbart-i-cant-stand-to-say-goodbye/

https://youtu.be/SddPP-N_Xhw
"I Can't Stand to Say Goodbye" - John Ondrasik for Andrew Breitbart
Published on Feb 23, 2013

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-OLpYcFmws
Remembering Andrew Breitbart ( Song "American Pride" by Kirsten Haglund)
Published on Apr 8, 2014

Nautilus Records, LLC
www.nautilusrecords.com
On October 27, 2010 we announced the release of Kirsten's debut "American Pride",song that delivers a message of modern patriotism.
Video dedicated to Andrew Breitbart, an American conservative publisher who passed away on March 1, 2012

Song Produced by: David Cochrane
Song Written by: Kathleen Lantos & David Cochrane
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: jofortruth on March 01, 2017, 12:06:58 pm
5Years
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/01/5-years/


Quote
Andrew Breitbart, 1969 – 2012

10 years ago, when my lifelong friend, Andrew Breitbart, approached me to partner up with him on a new media venture, his pitch was very simple: Let’s change the world.

Well, my friends….
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 01, 2017, 12:15:42 pm
5Years
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/01/5-years/

JOHN OB zmrcleanz • 3 hours ago

"The left, to me, in essence, is the media." .."Christian turn-the-cheek tactics do not work agianst this crowd,”.. “These people don’t fight fair,”...“The left does not fight fair, and so I’m basically saying to conservatives, you don’t have to fight fair.”

Andrew Breitbart--kindred spirit to the President of the United States--antithesis to political correctness, and arch-enemy to Marxism in all it's forms and machinations.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 01, 2017, 02:36:18 pm
http://barbwire.com/2017/03/01/andrew-breitbart-controversial-ever-five-years-death/
Controversial as Ever Five Years After his Death
Roger Aronoff
1 March, 2017 at 06:40


Wednesday, March 1 marks the fifth anniversary of the death of conservative icon Andrew Breitbart.

We think it is important to remember his legacy, as his name is heard often these days, and his influence looms large. For those not familiar with him, Andrew was a larger than life character who figured in the establishment of several prominent media institutions that play significant roles in today’s journalistic landscape. He was first associated with the Drudge Report, famous for scooping Newsweek on its Monica Lewinsky story; The Huffington Post, the very popular leftwing blog; and Breitbart News, from which came the left’s chief bogeyman, and Donald Trump’s chief strategist, Stephen K. Bannon.

Five years after his untimely death, we at Accuracy in Media want to remind people who Breitbart was, and why he is so influential in an age of so much fake news by the mainstream media. AIM presented Andrew with the Reed Irvine Award for Excellence in Journalism in 2010, and he gave an historic speech before a packed room that called out the media for its dishonesty.
...
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: TahoeBlue on November 05, 2017, 01:25:55 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuEYfemno3M
The Lost Andrew Breitbart Interview
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: Jacob Law on November 05, 2017, 05:41:49 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuEYfemno3M
The Lost Andrew Breitbart Interview

Great video; wow if he was here today.
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: TahoeBlue on October 03, 2018, 01:57:21 pm
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/10/02/kirk-clarence-thomass-high-tech-lynching-awakened-andrew-breitbart-what-will-the-kavanaugh-witch-trial-produce/
Kirk: Clarence Thomas?s ?High Tech Lynching? Awakened Andrew Breitbart; What will the Kavanaugh Witch Trial Produce?
2 Oct 2018

How is a warrior like Andrew Breitbart created? Little did the leftists know as they tried to destroy Clarence Thomas they were creating the most effective grassroots warrior against the left of our generation. And this last week with Kavanaugh, I can?t imagine how many more thousands of Andrew Breitbarts were born.
...

Andrew was raised in California and was a product of that reflexively liberal climate. He admits to taking being a liberal for granted until, in his early 20?s, he witnessed a horrific national event:

The confirmation hearings of Clarence Thomas and the random insertion of Anita Hill into the process.

Andrew watched and wondered what was going on. He couldn?t understand how the NAACP would stand by and let a black man be accused of something like this and not stand up to protect his rights. He couldn?t understand why the National Organization for Women would blindly support someone coming forth so late with accusations.

Andrew thought those groups were supposed to be about fairness and protecting the rights of the underdogs.

Silly Andrew.

Once awakened, Andrew Breitbart became curious, he became informed, and he became active.  Boy did he become active! Today, Breitbart News stands virtually alone in presenting an uncompromising exposure of Team Left tactics and giving a large platform to the works of James O?Keefe, John Nolte, and others.
...
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: TahoeBlue on January 02, 2019, 01:55:40 pm
bump AJ mentioned him today
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: TahoeBlue on February 25, 2019, 11:45:27 pm
bump March 1st is coming ....

Andrew James Breitbart (/ˈbraɪtbɑːrt/; February 1, 1969 ? March 1, 2012) was an American conservative publisher,[1] writer and commentator.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/25/alex-marlow-goes-long-form-on-america-first-radio-with-sebastian-gorka-on-andrew-breitbarts-legacy/
Alex Marlow Goes Long-Form on ?America First? Radio with Sebastian Gorka on Andrew Breitbart?s Legacy
25 Feb 2019

(https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/04/Screaming-Andrew-640x480.png)

Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow reflected on Andrew Breitbart?s legacy in an interview on the America First radio show hosted by former Deputy Assistant to the President and Breitbart News alumnus Sebastian Gorka.

Marlow?s talk with Gorka aired on February 11?s edition of America First.

?Actually, as we?re recording this, this would?ve been his 50th birthday,? said Marlow. ?It?s kind of amazing, because he?s been gone almost seven years, but his legacy is indelible.?

https://youtu.be/AaJn3sAtsyM

Marlow said Breitbart identified how ?culture [is] upstream from politics,? and how conservatives must ?take back the media,? including the ?entertainment world and academia.?

Marlow recalled a lesson learned from Breitbart: ?You?re not supposed to have cocktails with the folks in the establishment media. You?re not supposed to share a milkshake with two straws with them. You?re supposed to be at war with them.?
...
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 01, 2019, 11:06:47 am
https://spectator.org/andrew-breitbart-was-right-about-the-media/
Andrew Breitbart Was Right About the Media
by Melissa Mackenzie
January 23, 2019, 12:00 AM

I am at war with the mainstream media because they portray themselves as objective observers of reality, when they?re no such thing. They?re partisan critical theory hacks?  They have nothing but contempt for the American people. ? Andrew Breitbart

Andrew Breitbart loathed the mainstream media. If you have any doubt about this fact, watch the following videos. He was disgusted by them and wasn?t shy about saying it.


https://youtu.be/b8CpON8VrRU

https://youtu.be/b8CpON8VrRU

https://youtu.be/lbycMtTUDfE


He knew, to his core, the mendacity pointed at ideological enemies of Leftist dogma. He ran flank for Tea Party leaders who were being investigated by every government department including the IRS, FBI, EPA, and more. He loved these people who the elites in both parties hated. He defended them.

He protected those who were willing to be apostates to the leftist cause including guys like Brandon Darby who thwarted a Lefty terrorist group who planned a bombing at the Republican National Convention, and Milo Yiannopoulos, a flamboyant anti-feminist gay man.

He promoted the brave and gave them platforms including Dana Loesch, Ben Shapiro, James O?Keefe, and Hannah Giles. He was famous for finding talented and fair-minded people and developing their gifts. [Full disclosure: He promoted my work and helped build my consulting business before I came to The American Spectator.]


....
My goal is to destroy the New York Times and CNN. ? Andrew Breitbart

It might be a losing battle, but fighting this tsunami of disinformation and totalitarian group-think is one worth fighting to the death, because death is the end game no matter. These kids in MAGA hats had the right to wear them. They had the right to smile, for heaven?s sake. They have the right to be pro-life. They have a right to exist without having their lives torn apart. The same is true for Karen Pence, the Duke Lacrosse players, and Brett Kavanaugh.

The solution is to not cede ground. The solution is to stand up for truth. The solution is to defend civil liberties for all people. The solution is to be a happy warrior, but be a warrior nonetheless. Conservatives cannot fight, though, if they don?t believe they?re in a war. It?s time to wake up. Truth is at stake.

Andrew Breitbart was right: WAR.

https://youtu.be/QbgOP7SPGnA

....


| - -- -


https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/28/andrew-breitbart-tweet-before-death-adds-fuel-to-o/
Andrew Breitbart tweet before death adds fuel to online speculation of D.C. sex-trafficking ring

Newspapers, pundits blast charges from 'dark crevices of the Web'

 By Douglas Ernst - The Washington Times - Monday, November 28, 2016

Andrew Breitbart is making news even in death.

Social media speculation of a sex-trafficking ring in the nation?s capital has burned up social media sites for weeks
. Complicating matters is Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta?s decision not to comment on anything WikiLeaks-related for months.

Explosive claims by Internet sleuths, which were prompted after reading stolen documents belonging to Mr. Podesta, have been derided as ?viciously phony? by Fox News? Howard Kurtz. A tweet by Mr. Breitbart shortly before his March 1, 2012, death is now being cited by online researchers as proof that they are onto something big.

?How prog-guru John Podesta isn?t household name as world class underage sex slave op cover-upperer defending unspeakable dregs escapes me,? Mr. Breitbart wrote Feb. 4, 2011.


The conservative icon?s death at age 43 was attributed to ?heart failure.?..
....

Mr. Seaman and others claim Mr. Podesta and his associates spoke in code in numerous documents released by WikiLeaks. One example includes a Feb. 9, 2014, email with the subject line ?Did you leave a handkerchief.?

?Hi John, The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yorus [sic]?? a woman identified as Susaner asked. ?They can send it if you want.?


Such wording led online sleuths to investigate Mr. Podesta?s connections with D.C. power-player James Alefantis, owner of Comet Ping Pong. The Democrat fundraiser and pizza place owner, who is mentioned in 16 different WikiLeaks documents, had a public Instagram account that featured sexual innuendo and bizarre images of children.

Accounts for Comet Ping Pong employees, which are now set to private, featured nudity involving men with slices of pizza strategically placed over their genitals.
...
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 01, 2019, 01:01:38 pm
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/01/7-years/
7 Years
1 Mar 2019
(https://media.breitbart.com/media/2019/02/breitbart-tux-640x480-640x480.jpg)

I'm fighting back against years and years and years of the cultural and the political left telling people to sit down and shut up, and I'm finally telling a bunch of people, whether it be a conservative or a libertarian on a college campus, whether it be an actor or a director in Hollywood who wants to make movies that represent his world view, I'm sayin' I'm gonna lead the charge. And you want to follow me? Fine. And there are people who are followin' me. I want to make things equal. I want people to have a free and open voice."

Andrew Breitbart, 1969 - 2012
Title: Re: Andrew Breitbart - RIP - Murdered
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 02, 2019, 12:04:37 pm
I miss this guy SO much ... What a great loss ... He delivered ..  He was a FORCE
Where is his replacement ? Is there a replacement ?  We NEED our Andrew  He was a force of nature.
He Stomped the Tundra


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbycMtTUDfE&feature=youtu.be
Andrew Breitbart at CPAC 2012 02102012 - FULL SPEECH

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Where_the_Buffalo_Roam
Where the Buffalo Roam

Well I guess if I had to swear one way or another, I'd say Lazlo wasn't insane. He just had very strange rhythms. But he stomped on the terra.

Lord Buckley said that. It's hard to say he got what he deserved, because he never really got anything, at least not in this story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63TMawHivXQ
Andrew Breitbart's epic interview on MSNBC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mTxpFIw-3g
The Politics of Hollywood with Andrew Breitbart

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/01/watch-michelle-malkin-pays-tribute-to-disrupter-andrew-breitbart/#
Conservative icon and best-selling author Michelle Malkin spoke at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on Thursday where she paid tribute to Breitbart News founder Andrew Breitbart, who passed away seven years ago.
1 Mar 2019

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPeNkqa0_DE
Michelle Malkin speaks at CPAC 2019: full speech