PrisonPlanet Forum

Elections, Referendums and Politics => Ron Paul - The Original => 2012 GOP Confirmed Voter Fraud is only expanding the Ron Paul r-EVOL-ution => Topic started by: Jackson Holly on January 21, 2012, 10:40:51 am

Title: EXPOSED: South Carolina Massive Neutron Fraud and the Goldman Sachs Connections
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 21, 2012, 10:40:51 am
Will the 60% evangelicals in SC  GOP tip the scales away from
RP who many see as too 'liberal' on social issues ... and
the military which so many rely on for income in this
highly militarized state?

NOTE: Democrats can also vote in SC!



http://www.voanews.com/english/news/usa/Ron-Paul-Attracts-Varied-Support-in-South-Carolina-Primary-137815968.html (http://www.voanews.com/english/news/usa/Ron-Paul-Attracts-Varied-Support-in-South-Carolina-Primary-137815968.html)


Ron Paul Attracts Varied Support in South Carolina Primary



Suzanne Presto
 
(A fairly positive article) EXCERPT:
Surveys of South Carolina voters show former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich battling for first place in the state's presidential primary election Saturday. But third place is up for grabs with Representative Ron Paul of Texas mounting a surprising run against former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: jofortruth on January 21, 2012, 11:06:40 am
A good interview SC should listen to with Ron Paul yesterday morning on a local radio station:
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=227002.msg1336273#msg1336273

Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: America2 on January 21, 2012, 11:12:20 am
Will the 60% evangelicals in SC  GOP tip the scales away from
RP who many see as too 'liberal' on social issues ... and
the military which so many rely on for income in this
highly militarized state?


For the most part, the modern-day church system has gotten so corrupt - I read an article this week and they interviewed a pastor of a big Baptist church in that state. He says how it's important that everyone gets out and not only votes, but do so for the likes of Gingrich and Santorum. I mean seriously, this has got to be some kind of joke, right? Either this "pastor" never read his bible, or he just takes pleasure in following wolves blindly. He should know very well that 1) Both of these men are Catholic, and 2) Gingrich has had how many adulteries in marriages in his lifetime?

He also said that his main concern was people getting JOBS again...hmmm...sounded like he was anxious b/c his offering tabs are likely floundering...

Also, went to his church's web site, and saw that he has implemented this "small groups" in his church, which is something CFR Rick Warren and Bill Hybels(both leaders of the Emergent Church) initially implemented.

Sometimes these hypocrites make me sick.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 21, 2012, 11:12:42 am
Will the 60% evangelicals in SC  GOP tip the scales away from
RP
who many see as too 'liberal' on social issues ... and
the military which so many rely on for income in this
highly militarized state?

NOTE: Democrats can also vote in SC!



http://www.voanews.com/english/news/usa/Ron-Paul-Attracts-Varied-Support-in-South-Carolina-Primary-137815968.html (http://www.voanews.com/english/news/usa/Ron-Paul-Attracts-Varied-Support-in-South-Carolina-Primary-137815968.html)


Ron Paul Attracts Varied Support in South Carolina Primary




Surveys of South Carolina voters show former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich battling for first place in the state's presidential primary election Saturday. But third place is up for grabs with Representative Ron Paul of Texas mounting a surprising run against former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum.


  If the Evangelicals in South Carolina are truly Christian, how stupid are they?

  Ron Paul is the only Christian left in the race.  He is a Southern Baptist.

  Santorum and Newt are Catholics.  Romney is a Mormon.

  Ron Paul is the only candidate that believes in peace.  Romney, Santorum and Gingrich are puppets of the military-industrial complex.  The people of South Carolina want to save their 7 military bases and military-industrial complex jobs more than vote for peace.

     http://wearechangetv.us/2012/01/watch-out-for-the-military-industrial-complex-ron-paul-wins-another-debate-in-south-carolina/#axzz1k7IxyWzo

     “Watch Out For The Military-Industrial Complex” Ron Paul Wins Another Debate In South Carolina

     The Republican Presidential Debate in South Carolina highlights the basic general problems we face in America today. One person can always change the world, but Ron Paul cannot save the country alone. Resistance towards the Military-Industrial Complex can restore the country to its founding principles. On January 16, 2012, Ron Paul got his chance to explain his views to the nation. In my personal opinion, Ron Paul was on fire during the South Carolina debate. He is the only Republican that I believe can beat Barack Obama in January, but more importantly he is the only candidate who is talking about issues that matter to American citizens. Issues such as ending the war in Afghanistan, bringing our troops home from military bases abroad, ending the Federal Reserve System, thus ending the crazy amounts of Federal taxes I pay every year, are all at the fore-front of the national debate. These issues will remain there if Ron Paul becomes the Republican nominee to challenge Barack Obama in November.


Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.

                                               ----Matthew 5:9

  
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: URpwneddude on January 21, 2012, 11:43:35 am
"If the Evangelicals in South Carolina are truly Christian, how stupid are they?"

I know some in SC, and as you will see by tonight's results, they are quite stupid.  Stupid should hurt.  And eventually it will.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: jofortruth on January 21, 2012, 12:01:27 pm
Some idiots will vote for Newtie just because he was once living in the South (Georgia). That's how stupid and shallow some people are when it comes to voting. Others will just vote the way their so called Evangelical leader tells them (Tony dude & Others). Still others vote the same party every time even though the ones they voted for screw them. Now how stupid is that?

What these people forget is that they were given a brain to figure these things out for themselves, and not to allow some NWO TOADIE to tell them how to vote.

NONTHINKING VOTERS ARE DISGUSTING! THEY ARE AIDING THEIR OWN DESTRUCTION BECAUSE THEY PUT GUYS INTO OFFICE WHO SHOULD NEVER DARKEN THE DOORS OF POWER BECAUSE THEY ALWAYS ABUSE THE POWER THEY ARE GIVEN!


 ::)
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Stan on January 21, 2012, 05:39:37 pm
How do you get through to Google's live results page? My internet's rubbish recently and some of these news sites take ages to load.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Stan on January 21, 2012, 06:12:08 pm
Aaaah.. :P

http://www.google.com/elections/ed/us/results
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: America2 on January 21, 2012, 06:14:52 pm
Front page of Yahoo says Gingrich is projected to win.

Shame on you, Churchianity! >:(

Linky--> http://www.yahoo.com/
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 21, 2012, 06:15:35 pm
Aaaah.. :P

http://www.google.com/elections/ed/us/results

First results just appeared on HuffPost:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/21/south-carolina-primary-results_n_1220945.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/21/south-carolina-primary-results_n_1220945.html)

Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: America2 on January 21, 2012, 06:19:08 pm
First results just appeared on HuffPost:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/21/south-carolina-primary-results_n_1220945.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/21/south-carolina-primary-results_n_1220945.html)



Wow...only a couple of hundred votes are counted thus far, and they're already projecting Gingrich the winner??

Everyone, WAKE UP! The NWO-MSM is RUBBING it into your faces that these elections are rigged!
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 21, 2012, 06:22:55 pm


Paul in third at the moment with 11.4%.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: pac522 on January 21, 2012, 06:23:03 pm
Some idiots will vote for Newtie just because he was once living in the South (Georgia). That's how stupid and shallow some people are when it comes to voting. Others will just vote the way their so called Evangelical leader tells them (Tony dude & Others). Still others vote the same party every time even though the ones they voted for screw them. Now how stupid is that?

What these people forget is that they were given a brain to figure these things out for themselves, and not to allow some NWO TOADIE to tell them how to vote.

NONTHINKING VOTERS ARE DISGUSTING! THEY ARE AIDING THEIR OWN DESTRUCTION BECAUSE THEY PUT GUYS INTO OFFICE WHO SHOULD NEVER DARKEN THE DOORS OF POWER BECAUSE THEY ALWAYS ABUSE THE POWER THEY ARE GIVEN!


 ::)

All of that doesn't matter.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=227010.msg1336303#msg1336303
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: WLGarrison on January 21, 2012, 06:29:41 pm
If a couple from South Carolina gets divorced are they still first cousins?
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: WarChest on January 21, 2012, 06:33:44 pm
Live unbiased reporting here

https://revolutionpac.com/South-Carolina-Primary-Broadcast/

GODS SPEED RON PAUL IN 2012!
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 21, 2012, 06:36:37 pm
All of that doesn't matter.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=227010.msg1336303#msg1336303

  You are 100% correct.  All these elections are worse than a pile of GOP elephant crap.
  The thread above tells it all.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Stan on January 21, 2012, 06:40:14 pm
It's kinda depressing that so many people would vote for a wretched human being like Gingrich but it's the best result in terms of keeping the primary process and debates going.

I just hope Santorum gets kicked into fourth and stays there.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: jofortruth on January 21, 2012, 06:41:05 pm
  You are 100% correct.  All these elections are worse than a pile of GOP elephant crap.
  The thread above tells it all.

I agree! Nothing matters when they cheat! I was pointing to how idiotic the public is in elections!
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: jofortruth on January 21, 2012, 06:42:23 pm
It's kinda depressing that so many people would vote for a wretched human being like Gingrich but it's the best result in terms of keeping the primary process and debates going.

I just hope Santorum gets kicked into fourth and stays there.

I agree!
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: notlazy on January 21, 2012, 06:48:42 pm
4% is enugh to declare someone a winner.
Even if he is like tied with rommney
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Donovan on January 21, 2012, 06:50:07 pm
4% is enugh to declare someone a winner.



Its beyond laughable, its statistically impossible at 4%.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Stan on January 21, 2012, 06:58:28 pm
Well that's Paul done until after Florida. And I was hoping Santorum would bail after tonight. ¬_¬
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Paul-w on January 21, 2012, 07:07:31 pm
seems as though the SHEEP have spoken again...

I'm sorry, but if Romney or Gingrich win the nomination, I'd want Obama to win, otherwise the Republican party will be dead in the water and it will be 100% Democrat wins for a couple of decades...

Not as if we aren't screwed either way, but at least with 2 parties, it's better than 1....
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 21, 2012, 07:07:59 pm

  It's early and Ron Paul has 12% of the vote (according to the easily manipulatable voting machines).  I do not believe that Ron Paul only got 12% of the vote.  I do believe that 88% of the South Carolinians are BRAIN DEAD.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: notlazy on January 21, 2012, 07:10:17 pm
Bamberg County - Ron paul not listed

Hampton Country - 18 % Perry - Ron not listed
A bit later - now Ron paul 9% and Perry gone

Saluda County - Perry 4% no Ron paul

From Google Results
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 21, 2012, 07:18:15 pm


RP live here now: 

https://revolutionpac.com/South-Carolina-Primary-Broadcast/ (https://revolutionpac.com/South-Carolina-Primary-Broadcast/)

Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Waltraut on January 21, 2012, 07:29:20 pm
yeah - nobody even needs to point out that Newt Gingrich is such a hypocrite for his answer in the debate yesterday, when he was the key person bringing the impeachment of  Bill Clinton for lying about his affair in the 90s.

Mitt Romney is clearly hiding something on his tax return. He is the opposite of Perry, in that he has been able to calmly relay policy details on political topics. It is only when they bring up his taxes that he starts stammering and looking panicked
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 07:34:52 pm
South Carolina hijacked GOP "Neutron Voter Fraud" being exposed in real time...

Karl Rove may be directly involved



SC AG informs Justice Department of potentially thousands of cased of voter fraud
http://www.midlandsconnect.com/news/politics/story.aspx?id=710391
by WACH Fox News Center
Posted: 01.21.2012 at 2:51 PM

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) -- South Carolina's attorney general is asking the U.S. Justice Department for an investigation into potential voter fraud.

Attorney General Alan Wilson has sent details of an analysis by the Department of Motor Vehicles to U.S. Attorney Bill Nettles.

In a letter dated Thursday, Wilson says the analysis found 953 ballots cast by voters listed as dead. In more than 70 percent of those cases, ballots were cast between two months and 76 months after the people died.

The letter doesn't say which election the ballots were cast in, or whether multiple elections were involved.

The analysis came out of research for the state's new voter identification law. The U.S. Justice Department denied clearance of that law.

Wilson has also asked the State Law Enforcement Division to investigate.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: notlazy on January 21, 2012, 07:38:30 pm
Voter Turnout:     9.85 % -  
Voter Turnout:     14.69 %

Of the 2 County's with all precincts reporting according to
http://www.enr-scvotes.org/SC/36831/63927/en/select-county.html

Both with 50%+ Newt


Also Longest CNN air time for Ron Paul -
And now they talk how he is no candidate and cant win. "He keeps getting 5 to 10 %"

Twice above 20% is between 5% and 10%
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 07:42:28 pm

Not Newt: As Long As We're Guessing How Voters Voted in SC Instead of Counting, Ya Know, Votes...
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9080
By Brad Friedman on 1/21/2012 5:11pm 

At the precise moment the polls closed across South Carolina tonight, with zero votes tallied by the 100% unverifiable e-voting systems the state forces voters to use on Election Day, all the news nets, save for CNN (which, in a short-lived moment of being responsible, thought it inappropriate to call the race with only 2 precincts actually reporting, so they waited until 3% were in before calling it), announced that Newt Gingrich was the "winner" of the all-important "First-in-the-South" 2012 Republican Primary.

Steven J. Dorst, however, posted the following shocking statement said to be from the South Carolina Election Commission disputing the news network's reported results which are based completely on the same Exit Polls they told us could not be relied upon after the Presidential Election in 2004 and the NH Primary Election in 2008...

Dark Horse wins 2012 South Carolina Republican Primary!

Columbia, SC 21 Jan 2012 1901 EST - John H. Hudgens, III, Chairman of the South Carolina Election Commission stunned the nation when, seconds after polls closed, he announced Democrat Alvin Greene as the winner of today’s South Carolina Republican Presidential primary.

In a hastily called press conference in the lobby of the building housing the Election Commission, Hudgens reported that Greene received 57.2% of the vote. Herman Cain was a distant second with 17.2%, followed closely by Michelle Bachmann at 16.8%. All other candidates were “in the low single digits.” These numbers were, of course, reported by the 100% unverifiable ES&S iVotronic touch-screen systems used to record and tabulate votes across the entire Palmetto State in the all-important “First-in-the-South” primary.

When pressed for actual numbers, Hudgens said exact vote totals will never be released (much less tabulated), since “The environmentally friendly iVotronic machines decided to only produce percentages, thus saving paper and the wear and tear of computer printers. He added “The state of South Carolina has long maintained that we don’t think it’s all that important to know how voters actually voted, otherwise we would use a verifiable voting system. The important thing is who beat whom, and at 1 minute after polls closed in the great state of South Carolina we’re able to report as much. Anybody who says otherwise is either a liar, has sour grapes, is a conspiracy theorist or a supporter of Ron Paul’s.”

When asked how Greene, who wasn’t on the ballot, could possibly have won, Hudgens replied that he didn’t know, but that he has full faith in the tabulation contractor hired by South Carolina to gather precinct reports and tabulate the totals: “They’re good ole boys and I refuse to believe them capable of playing with the totals. It was probably through an aggressive, write-in campaign.”

Greene, best known for his upset victory in the 2010 South Carolina Democratic Senatorial primary, was reached at his home and reacted “Huh?” but quickly recovered and said he intends to compete aggressively in Nevada and Florida using the secretive and hitherto unknown campaign staff and army of volunteers he first used in 2010. Recently, a few disgruntled volunteers have leaked that his army is primarily composed of hackers, and they insisted on anonymity in fear of identity theft.

Greene’s win today in South Carolina helps the state avoid the embarrassment GOP officials had in Iowa where voters were allowed to vote on paper ballots and watch those paper ballots counted before their very eyes, allowing for an accurate result where Rick Santorum was found to have been the winner by all accounts, even after the GOP establishment there did their best to inaccurately name Mitt Romney the winner.

“There will be no such confusion in South Carolina tonight!,” Hudgens said.

Why not?

The results announced in this fake news release are based on at least as much actual evidence of voter intent expressed at the polls today as the "real results" in South Carolina will be tonight.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Valerius on January 21, 2012, 07:46:01 pm
Some guy on CNN muttered something about Ron Paul can't win keep getting 5 or 10%.... wtf? does he even look at the results?
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 21, 2012, 07:46:18 pm
South Carolina hijacked GOP "Neutron Voter Fraud" being exposed in real time...

Karl Rove may be directly involved



SC AG informs Justice Department of potentially thousands of cased of voter fraud
http://www.midlandsconnect.com/news/politics/story.aspx?id=710391
by WACH Fox News Center
Posted: 01.21.2012 at 2:51 PM

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) -- South Carolina's attorney general is asking the U.S. Justice Department for an investigation into potential voter fraud.

Attorney General Alan Wilson has sent details of an analysis by the Department of Motor Vehicles to U.S. Attorney Bill Nettles.

In a letter dated Thursday, Wilson says the analysis found 953 ballots cast by voters listed as dead. In more than 70 percent of those cases, ballots were cast between two months and 76 months after the people died.

The letter doesn't say which election the ballots were cast in, or whether multiple elections were involved.

The analysis came out of research for the state's new voter identification law. The U.S. Justice Department denied clearance of that law.

Wilson has also asked the State Law Enforcement Division to investigate.

  953 dead voters.  Sounds like Chicago 1960.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 07:47:50 pm
It's kinda depressing that so many people would vote for a wretched human being like Gingrich but it's the best result in terms of keeping the primary process and debates going.

I just hope Santorum gets kicked into fourth and stays there.

STOP BELIEVING THEIR VIRTUAL REALITY GRAPHICS AND THE VANNA WHITE SUPERMODELS ON THE BILDERBERG NEWS NETWORKS, THEY ARE NOT BASED ON REALITY, THEY ARE BASED ON A KARL ROVE/TAVISTOCK/CFR THEATRICAL SCRIPT!

THEY WANT US TO BLAME AVERAGE AMERICANS, CALL ANONE YOU KNOW IN SOUTH CAROLINA...NOT ONE OF THEM HAS VOTED FOR NEWT, HE IS THE MOST DESPISED GLOBALIST BULLSHIT ARTIST ON THE PLANET AND EVERYONE CAN SEE IT CLEAR AS DAY.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 07:52:16 pm
BOMBSHELL: Newt Gingrich accidently admits to committing 15% voter fraud in Virginia



Newt Gingrich admits to using VOTER FRAUD CONTRACTORS in 15% of his votes in Virginia
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/12/28/gingrich-campaign-workers-signature-fraud-cost-slot-on-virginia-ballot/


Algona, Iowa (CNN) - Newt Gingrich cited fraud Wednesday as the reason he didn't get on the Virginia primary ballot.

Last week his campaign acknowledged they used paid volunteers to scramble to get the required 10,000 signatures but fell short after the former House speaker and Virginia resident boasted his campaign was submitting as many as 12,000-14,000 signatures.

On a campaign stop at an Algona chocolate store, the former House speaker said the "mistake" occurred because one of their workers committed fraud.

"We hired somebody who turned in false signatures. We turned in 11,100 – we needed 10,000 – 1,500 of them were by one guy who frankly committed fraud."

The campaign called the Virginia ballot qualification process a "failed system" after they learned that former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Texas Rep. Ron Paul were the only candidates that were successful.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 21, 2012, 08:02:46 pm
STOP BELIEVING THEIR VIRTUAL REALITY GRAPHICS AND THE VANNA WHITE SUPERMODELS ON THE BILDERBERG NEWS NETWORKS, THEY ARE NOT BASED ON REALITY, THEY ARE BASED ON A KARL ROVE/TAVISTOCK/CFR THEATRICAL SCRIPT!

THEY WANT US TO BLAME AVERAGE AMERICANS, CALL ANONE YOU KNOW IN SOUTH CAROLINA...NOT ONE OF THEM HAS VOTED FOR NEWT, HE IS THE MOST DESPISED GLOBALIST BULLSHIT ARTIST ON THE PLANET AND EVERYONE CAN SEE IT CLEAR AS DAY.

  QFT.  Karl Rove is right up there with George Soros as the biggest pieces of crap on Earth.  These elections are all scams!!!!!
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 08:06:44 pm
Same voting machines that appointed Alvin Green to the Dem Nomination has appointed Newt...

The fixing of Alvin Green as a winner was the test run for this election.

The problem is that everyone knows the Neutron Voter Fraud and many people will likely be in jail just like in Ohio.

Message to the National Clandestine Services operatives...Stop cooperating with the New World Order cannibals, they eat their own and you will never be in the club.


GINGRICH/KISSINGER SECRET WEAPON IN SOUTH CAROLINA

Alvin Greene Was Here:
100% Unverifiable Statewide E-Voting in SC's 2012 GOP Primary

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9079
By Brad Friedman on 1/20/2012 12:30pm 

The voting systems in use for the nation's first three all-important electoral contests in the 2012 primary --- from Iowa to New Hampshire to Saturday's South Carolina Primary --- go from pretty great to intolerably horrible. And then comes Florida, which deserves its very own special category, thereafter.

The "First-in-the-Nation" caucuses in Iowa allowed voters to vote on hand-marked paper ballots, counted by hand in front of the public at the caucus site, with results announced to everyone right then and there before being called in to GOP headquarters and before ballots were move anywhere. The wonderfully transparent system allowed for Republican voters by the Iowa GOP (which they hypocritically fight against allowing for everybody else in other states, and even in their own during general elections) is just about as close as we general get in this country to Democracy's Gold Standard. It's also what allowed reporting errors to be discovered and confirmed by the public after an election with some 122,000 votes counted transparently within an hour or so of polls closing, leading to almost nobody charging "fraud" even though just 34 votes are said to separate first and second place in the certified results of the impossibly, and historically, close election.

As of the "First-in-the-Nation" primary in New Hampshire, however, election transparency for voters and their ability to oversee their own elections began to disappear. While a lucky 10% of voters enjoyed hand-marked, publicly hand-counted paper ballots, the rest of the state's voters were allowed to vote on hand-marked paper ballots, but forced to tolerate secret tabulation on oft-failed, easily-manipulated Diebold optical-scan systems programmed by a company (LHS) with a history of criminal behavior and convictions. The results from those 90% of Granite State voters may have been tallied accurately by the Diebold op-scanners or, as seen in the disastrous 2008 Presidential Primary, not. Since NH doesn't bother to actually check to see if their machines tallied the hand-marked paper ballots correctly, we're unlikely to ever know if they did --- barring a recount request where, by then, the secure chain of custody of the paper ballots would be uncertain (to put it mildly.)

And now we come to the "First-in-the-South" Republican primary in South Carolina, where all evidence of how voters vote disappears entirely as the voters will be forced across the entire state to vote on easily-manipulated, oft-failed, 100% unverifiable touch-screen voting systems made by the nation's largest voting machine company, ES&S. When the machine-reported results are announced tomorrow night they will either be accurate or not. Either way, there will never be a way for anybody to know one way or the other as there will be nothing to prove how voters voted and nothing to "recount", even if anybody wanted to.

Appropriately enough, perhaps, Saturday's primary in the Palmetto State will offer 100% "faith-based" voting, since it will be scientifically impossible to prove that even a single vote for any candidate on the ballot has been recorded accurately by the ES&S iVotronic touch-screens as per any voter's intent. Known what we mean, Alvin Greene?...


The machines that will be in use on Saturday in South Carolina are the very same ones that reported an unknown, unemployed, seemingly-illiterate man named Alvin Greene --- who had done no campaigning, had no campaign staff, had no campaign money and no campaign website --- had unverifiably defeated Vic Rawl, a four-term state legislator and circuit court judge who had campaigned and raised money across the entire state, for the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate in 2010.

They are the same brand and model of machines (some of them, quite literally, the very same physical machines!) that were used in Florida's contested Congressional District 13 race for the U.S. Congress in 2006 when they inexplicably lost some 18,000 votes in a race ultimately awarded to the Republican candidate Vern Buchanan over Democrat Christine Jennings by just 369 votes. After that election (the one, ironically, held to fill the seat of Republican Rep. Katherine Harris who had previously been the Sunshine State's partisan Sec. of State during the 2000 Presidential debacle Florida momentarily wised up and largely banned touch-screen voting entirely across the entire state. Many of the state's wholly-unverifiable voting machines were then sent to the landfill, but many others were sold to the state of South Carolina.

The 100% unverifiable ES&S iVotronics that are used across the entire state of South Carolina are also the same type of machines that led to impossible numbers in Monroe County Arkansas' primary election in May 2010, when, as The BRAD BLOG reported exclusively, thousands of votes seem to have simply vanished after being reported by the Secretary of State on Election Night. To this day, neither state nor county officials are able to explain what happened.

They are also the same type of machines that were used in Clay County, Kentucky in 2006 when election officials actually changed the votes of voters on the machines after the voters had left "the booth". Eight top officials from the county's Election Commission --- including the County Clerk, a Circuit Court Judge and the School Superintendent --- are all now serving a collective 156 years in the federal penitentiary for those election fraud crimes.

As well, the ES&S iVotronic system is the same one that was discovered to have been "remotely accessed" on "multiple occasions", including for 80 minutes the day before the 2010 general election, in Republican-leaning Venango County, PA, as recently revealed by a forensic audit carried out by two Carnegie Mellon computer scientists --- both of whom were threatened with lawsuits by ES&S for daring to examine their machines. The Republican-majority Board of Elections in the small, rural county had commissioned the study after problems in several recent elections, as the Chairman of the Election Board told us, resulted in inexplicable undervotes, reported touch-screen vote-flipping, and even zero votes registered for several candidates in some locations during recent elections.

They're the same machines that also registered ZERO voters for an Arkansas mayoral candidate in a 2006 run-off election, even though both he and his wife insist they had voted for him, at the very least.

And yes, they're the very same machines which resulted in a 2008 train-wreck in South Carolina itself, when they failed to even boot up across the entirety of Horry County at the beginning of the day during that year's Republican Primary election, forcing voters to scramble for pieces of paper --- even scraps of paper towels --- to try and cast a vote, since there were not enough emergency paper ballots on hand to overcome the disaster.

Other than that --- and this long and storied history of other disastrous ES&S failures --- the 100% unverifiable voting machines that will be used across the entire Palmetto State in Saturday's all-important "First-in-the-South" primary election are great! And whatever they tell you are the results from that election --- no matter how "unexpected" they might be --- will be the results of that election, whether or not they actually reflect the way voters attempted to vote or not.

It's a helluva way to run the "World's Greatest Democracy", ain't it?

But, don't worry, Florida's primary is just 10 days later, and Early Voting there starts Saturday as well. So what could possibly go wrong?
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 21, 2012, 08:07:44 pm
Can we ever again have a REAL ELECTION in
the United States of America?


Ever heard of SCYTL? It is the New World Order international vote-rigging system!

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120111005635/en/SCYTL-Acquires-SOE-Software-Leading-Election-Software (http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120111005635/en/SCYTL-Acquires-SOE-Software-Leading-Election-Software)

http://www.scytl.com/ (http://www.scytl.com/)

ABOUT SCYTL

(http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg148/evinyl/PrisonPlanetForum/Scytl_logo.jpg)

SCYTL is a technology company specializing in the development of secure electronic voting and election modernization solutions. Based in Barcelona and with offices in Baltimore, Toronto, New Delhi, Athens, Kiev and Singapore, SCYTL’s solutions have been used in public elections by governments from countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, France, Canada, Norway, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, India and Australia. SCYTL is a portfolio company of leading international VC funds Nauta Capital, Balderton Capital and Spinnaker.

~~~~~~>http://blackboxvoting.org/ (http://blackboxvoting.org/)

100% OF SOUTH CAROLINA VOTES GO THROUGH SCYTL - By Bev Harris

EXCERPT:
In South Carolina, 100% of election results will be redirected through a private Barcelona, Spain-owned company, Scytl/SOE Software, before being reported to the public.

There is only one way to immediately find out whether Scytl/SOE reported the right results*, and that is for members of the public to capture evidence of reported precinct results when polls close tonight. Think of it as a giant neighborhood watch.

Precinct results should be posted at each polling site. In addition, during poll closing the public has a right to be in the polling place watching and videotaping what goes on.



Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Geolibertarian on January 21, 2012, 08:34:03 pm
While there is undoubtedly vote fraud at play, I agree with Alex that the fraudsters can't steal an election from a candidate if that candidate has an overwhelming lead in the polls, because then it's way too obvious.

And the sad reality is that all the polls this month had Ron Paul at 20% or below in South Carolina:

     http://www.ronpaul.com/2012-ron-paul/ron-paul-polls/ (http://www.ronpaul.com/2012-ron-paul/ron-paul-polls/)

Thus, all the neocon political machine has to do to alter the outcome of the SC primary is raise one candidate a few percentage points at the expense of one or more of the other candidates.

Are Karl Rove types to blame? Of course. But as others in this thread have rightly pointed out, so too are the many thousands of bloodthirsty Christianoid types:

       http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance87.html (http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance87.html)
       http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance123.html (http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance123.html)
       http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance248.html (http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance248.html)
       http://www.antiwar.com/orig/dow.php?articleid=4127 (http://www.antiwar.com/orig/dow.php?articleid=4127)
       http://www.antiwar.com/orig/whitehurst.php?articleid=3842 (http://www.antiwar.com/orig/whitehurst.php?articleid=3842)

Why? Because they consistently make things much easier for Karl Rove and company to do their dirty work than would otherwise be the case.

(That's how I see it, anyway.)
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 21, 2012, 08:45:49 pm
While there is undoubtedly vote fraud at play, I agree with Alex that the fraudsters can't steal an election from a candidate if that candidate has an overwhelming lead in the polls, because then it's way too obvious.

And the sad reality is that all the polls this month had Ron Paul at 20% or below in South Carolina:

     http://www.ronpaul.com/2012-ron-paul/ron-paul-polls/ (http://www.ronpaul.com/2012-ron-paul/ron-paul-polls/)

Thus, all the neocon political machine has to do to alter the outcome of the SC primary is raise one candidate a few percentage points at the expense of one or more of the other candidates.

Are Karl Rove types to blame? Of course. But as others in this thread have rightly pointed out, so too are the many thousands of bloodthirsty Christianoid types:

       http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance87.html (http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance87.html)
       http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance123.html (http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance123.html)
       http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance248.html (http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance248.html)
       http://www.antiwar.com/orig/dow.php?articleid=4127 (http://www.antiwar.com/orig/dow.php?articleid=4127)
       http://www.antiwar.com/orig/whitehurst.php?articleid=3842 (http://www.antiwar.com/orig/whitehurst.php?articleid=3842)

Why? Because they consistently make things much easier for Karl Rove and company to do their dirty work than would otherwise be the case.

(That's how I see it, anyway.)

Good analysis GEO ... they will manufacture the numbers when and where necessary ...
in whatever country. If the propaganda/mind control systems are all clicking along as
programmed, they may get exactly or very close to the results they need, in actual returns.
However, I think they are probably flipping some precinct numbers to cause a fourth
place finish for RP so they can continue their "he can't win" false narrative unabated.

It looks to me like this is where the rubber meets the road ....
I wish I could hack the GOOGLE results page and find out
if that is actually straight from SCYTL.  >:(

Here is another piece from Bev Harris about SCYTL:


~~~~~> http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=28735 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=28735)


It's here - Global centralization of elections, privatized

By Bev Harris

Global Research, January 18, 2012
Planetarymovement.org

In a major step towards global centralization of election processes, the world's dominant Internet voting company has purchased the USA's dominant election results reporting company.

When you view your local or state election results on the Internet, on portals which often appear to be owned by the county elections division, in over 525 US jurisdictions you are actually redirected to a private corporate site controlled by SOE software, which operates under the name ClarityElections.com.

The good news is that this firm promptly reports precinct-level detail in downloadable spreadsheet format. As reported by BlackBoxVoting.org in 2008, the bad news is that this centralizes one middleman access point for over 525 jurisdictions in AL, AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, KY, MI, KS, IL, IN, NC, NM, MN, NY, SC, TX, UT, WA. And growing.

As local election results funnel through SOE's servers (typically before they reach the public elsewhere), those who run the computer servers for SOE essentially get "first look" at results and the ability to immediately and privately examine vote details throughout the USA.

In 2004, many Americans were justifiably concerned when, days before the presidential election, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell redirected Ohio election night results through the Tennessee-based server for several national Republican Party operations.

This is worse: This redirects results reporting to a centralized privately held server which is not just for Ohio, but national; not just USA-based, but global.

A mitigation against fraud by SOE insiders has been the separation of voting machine systems from the SOE results reports. Because most US jurisdictions require posting evidence of results from each voting machine at the precinct, public citizens can organize to examine these results to compare with SOE results. Black Box Voting spearheaded a national citizen action to videotape / photograph these poll tapes in 2008.

With the merger of SOE and SCYTL, that won't work (if SCYTL's voting system is used). When there are two truly independent sources of information, the public can perform its own "audit" by matching one number against the other.

These two independent sources, however, will now be merged into one single source: an Internet voting system controlled by SCYTL, with a results reporting system also controlled by SCYTL.

With SCYTL internet voting, there will be no ballots. No physical evidence. No chain of custody. No way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes, chain of custody, or the count.

SCYTL is moving into or already running elections in: the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Norway, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, India and Australia.

SCYTL is based in Barcelona; its funding comes from international venture capital funds including Nauta Capital, Balderton Capital and Spinnaker.



Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Trainwreck on January 21, 2012, 08:47:32 pm
Using the system to change the system isn't the answer. But Ron Paul is waking boatloads of people up. South Carolina and Florida gave up half their delegates to move their primary dates up earlier, obviously the GOP has always planned to narrate a 'close race' between newt and mittens.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: pac522 on January 21, 2012, 08:49:28 pm


Karl Rove may be directly involved





Ya Think?



Karl Rove Swept Away By Journey's 'Don't Stop Believin''

The music at the election night party of Newt Gingrich has been eclectic Saturday night, ranging from "Pump Up the Jam" by Technotronic to "Don't Stop Believin'" by Journey.

Former Bush adviser and Fox News analyst Karl Rove was particularly swept up in the latter tune. During his analysis of Saturday's results, Rove said, "That's the sign of a contest that can go on and on and on" -- while the Journey song was playing in the background.

"Well done, Karl Rove," said Fox host Megyn Kelly. "Remember that time he rapped at the White House Correspondents Dinner? He knows his music."

WATCH: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=M2SFzZ4Nx0Y
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Geolibertarian on January 21, 2012, 09:00:24 pm
"Well done, Karl Rove," said Fox host Megyn Kelly. "Remember that time he rapped at the White House Correspondents Dinner? He knows his music."

(http://0.tqn.com/d/animatedtv/1/0/z/p/lbKarlRoveMC_Pose.jpg)
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Geolibertarian on January 21, 2012, 09:09:42 pm
If someone representing the Ron Paul campaign would pursue criminal charges against Karl Rove, perhaps the following image could be made a reality:

     (http://0.tqn.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/w/d/rove_arrested.jpg)

There's no chance of that ever happening, however, if people don't get over this paralyzing fear of being called a "sore loser" by the discredited talking point (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7F9iN5zCu0) media.

In case anyone hasn't noticed, if you're not an establishment candidate, the presstitutes will call you names anyway.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 09:11:53 pm
The real winner of the South Carolina GOP primary is Dr. Ron Paul. He has solidified his spot as the top two contenders in the naionwide primaries. Gingrich's homestate is Virginia and he has admitted to voter fraud of 15% of those voting for him so he is not even on the ballot.

Santorum is still living a lie, he still refuses to see the obvious, he was given Iowa to distract the momentum building in the Ron Paul reLOVEtion.

The last debate exposed it all, it was like watching three kindergarden school kids complaining about stealing each others' finger paints while the only true statesman shined like a well needed lamp in the darkness.

The country sees it clearly and now the country is waking up to the 40+ years of voter fraud that always gives us such talentless anti-American choices like Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, McCain, Romney, Gingrich, Carter, Dole, Biden, etc. They are all CFR, all anti-American globalists, and all magicly rise to the top even though they are clearly inferior choices.   
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 09:24:06 pm
Brad Friedman - Newt: "My 'voter fraud' is just a mistake"
YouTube   9 min - 3 Jan 2012
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEL9gyRTNis
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 09:38:02 pm
OK, I just pissed my pants.

Why you may ask...I just read an article by none other than Newt Gingrich regarding the Presidential Primary Process and I have to say...

Newt makes some very good points...

Get ready for the ultimate hypocricy from the serial hypocrite...
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 09:41:24 pm
I am calling for a "Do Over"
Let's Revote in two states in the Presidential Primaries
By NEWT GINGRICH

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120303406539970055.html
FEBRUARY 15, 2008

Democrats are headed for a trainwreck in campaign '08 that threatens to produce a tainted Democratic presidential nominee and, worse, a divisive and delegitimized presidential contest.

Recall that when Michigan and Florida moved up their primaries in defiance of Democratic Party rules earlier this year, the party bosses decided to punish them by unseating their delegates. The Florida and Michigan primaries were turned into beauty contests.

At the time, it seemed like a good move since everyone assumed that the Michigan and Florida delegates wouldn't really matter in the nomination battle. The conventional wisdom was that one Democratic candidate would emerge early in the contest, and arrive at the convention with a comfortable margin of delegates for the nomination.

But the one constant in campaign '08 so far is that the conventional wisdom is wrong. Instead of a sprint, the Democratic race has turned into a slog. And it's now looking more and more likely that the Democratic presidential fight will not produce a clear and decisive winner.

So here's the run-away train careening toward the Democratic National Convention in Denver in August: If the delegate count of both campaigns is still close by the time of the convention, Florida and Michigan's combined 366 delegates will suddenly become very relevant. Instead of uniting behind a nominee, the party will be at war with itself over whether to seat the Michigan and Florida delegates. And Democrats know from hard experience that chaotic, contentious conventions and the nominees they produce (remember Chicago in 1968? San Francisco in 1972?) do not bode well for success in November.

One of the great ironies of this election season is that the very mechanism created by Democrats to avoid contentious conventions like those in Chicago and San Francisco promises to create further chaos in Denver this year.

Superdelegates are really "politician delegates." Superdelegates are technically uncommitted party insiders who can vote for whomever they choose. They were created by the party that prides itself on supposedly representing the common man to be the palace guards of the Democratic establishment. Bill Clinton is a superdelegate, as is Al Gore. They are Democratic Party insiders whose purpose is to put down insurgent campaigns and protect the interests of Democratic politics as usual.

The closeness of the delegate count has set off a furious race between Sens. Clinton and Obama for the superdelegates. But any attempt by either campaign to win with these party insiders what they couldn't win with the voting public would destroy not only the prospects of the "victorious" candidate, but the prospects of the Democratic Party itself.

So the Democrats are caught in a double-bind: Disenfranchising the voters in Michigan and Florida while allowing party insiders to pick the party's nominee has all the makings of a Democratic civil war.

You might think that as a Republican I don't have a dog in this fight, but I do. All of us do. A tainted or "stolen" Democratic nomination has the potential to delegitimize the election itself and its outcome. And tainted victories produce hobbled administrations. Much as I might have agreed with the outcome of the 2000 general election, the rancor and vitriol it produced created divisions among Americans where none naturally existed before, irreparably damaging the Bush administration.

Contrary to the political consultants' handiwork and the mainstream media's mythmaking, America is not a nation fundamentally divided between red and blue. We are surprisingly united on the core values that make us Americans and the practical solutions to the challenges we face. We need an election process with the integrity to produce a nominee who can lead this natural majority.

The question is: How?

Giving the Michigan and Florida delegates to Sen. Clinton -- particularly in light of reports that she bent the Democratic Party rules against campaigning in both states -- is a recipe for even more chaos.

On the other hand, leaving the Florida and Michigan delegates unseated runs the risk for the Democrats of alienating two big states they want and need to win in November.

The answer, for the integrity of the process, is a do-over: Hold the Michigan and Florida Democratic primaries again.

The voters -- not the party insiders -- have the moral authority to choose the nominee. Democratic voters in Michigan and Florida should get that chance. Then in November, we'll have a fair fight. And I'll be honest -- it may not help the chances for a Republican victory in the fall.

But it will help something even more important: the integrity of our political process.




W T F ?

I used to think there were limits to the sadistic hypocricy that a human being could vomit on society. Newt just proved me wrong.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: supermegaman on January 21, 2012, 09:49:32 pm
Paul needs to go third party now while he still has momentum.  time to cash in his chips.  the powers that be aren't going to allow him to get further while playing by their rules.  switch the game up on them.  He gets a massive influx of cash to bring the message home, gets put on the Presidential ticket before he seems like too much of a "loser" by the media, and can then sit back and let the remaining republican candidates tear each other apart while he watches from the nice comfy box seat. 
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: pac522 on January 21, 2012, 09:51:10 pm
There is a back up plan in place. And all I have to say is that I hope that Ron Paul supporters registered in time to be their local delegate. If they did and we have a brokered convention then Dr Paul wins. It's not the ideal way, of course we would like to win out right but the Paul campaign had 4 years to devise this strategy so lets hope it works. I got the letter a week before I needed to register and wasn't able to, so I hope someone else that was a Paul supporter in my area was able to do so.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 09:56:31 pm
Paul needs to go third party now while he still has momentum.  time to cash in his chips.  the powers that be aren't going to allow him to get further while playing by their rules.  switch the game up on them.  He gets a massive influx of cash to bring the message home, gets put on the Presidential ticket before he seems like too much of a "loser" by the media, and can then sit back and let the remaining republican candidates tear each other apart while he watches from the nice comfy box seat. 

Why would you push the overtly obvious Bilderberg Controlled Media talking points?

He is winning the GOP primary, he already retired 4 former front runners...

Rick Perry (BILDERBERG) ... Quit!

Michelle Bachmann (IRS LEAD TERRORIST) ... Quit!

Herman Cain (CHAIRMAN OF THE KANSAS CITY FEDERAL RESERVE) ... Quit!

Jon Huntsman (ROTHSCHILD BEST FRIEND MULTI BILLIONAIRE) ... Quit!



Santorum is next, then Gingrich (unless they commit over 80% vote switching.

In a two man race, Ron Paul wins easily.

Also, 300 million American citizens know who Ron Paul is thanks to his strategy.

Republican know they are going to lose with Gingrich or Rommney, it is so fricking obvious.

Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 10:01:32 pm
They know Ron Paul is winning, we know he is winning.

The whole point of their fake results is to create apathy and convince us that all is lost and there is no point in defending the constitution.

If that was true, they wouldn't fricking be writing 100,000 articles a week against ROn Paul, they would not censor any mention of him on their totally discredited media, they would not pay Powell Tate Billions to sabotage the American electoral process.

If all was really lost, they would not bother committing voter fraud!

But they did, their greatest fear is that we continue expanding the reach of the message of liberty in spite of their chicken shit operations that are exposed in real time.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: supermegaman on January 21, 2012, 10:13:27 pm
I don't see any more republican drop outs until they force Paul's hand.  stealing elections has consequences.  i.e. no delegates for Paul.  Paul has 4 delegates right now.  Next up is Florida where he probably won't get any either.  Then super tuesday is around the corner.  Look, I'm all for Paul and he gets my vote come november.  I just want him to play a winning hand and I just don't see that possible by playing their cheating system.  He's at the casino, pulling the lever and hoping 3 cherries come up and all the house is letting him get are lemons! 
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Stan on January 21, 2012, 10:17:41 pm
While there is undoubtedly vote fraud at play, I agree with Alex that the fraudsters can't steal an election from a candidate if that candidate has an overwhelming lead in the polls, because then it's way too obvious.

And the sad reality is that all the polls this month had Ron Paul at 20% or below in South Carolina:

     http://www.ronpaul.com/2012-ron-paul/ron-paul-polls/ (http://www.ronpaul.com/2012-ron-paul/ron-paul-polls/)

Thus, all the neocon political machine has to do to alter the outcome of the SC primary is raise one candidate a few percentage points at the expense of one or more of the other candidates.

Are Karl Rove types to blame? Of course. But as others in this thread have rightly pointed out, so too are the many thousands of bloodthirsty Christianoid types:

       http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance87.html (http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance87.html)
       http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance123.html (http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance123.html)
       http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance248.html (http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance248.html)
       http://www.antiwar.com/orig/dow.php?articleid=4127 (http://www.antiwar.com/orig/dow.php?articleid=4127)
       http://www.antiwar.com/orig/whitehurst.php?articleid=3842 (http://www.antiwar.com/orig/whitehurst.php?articleid=3842)

Why? Because they consistently make things much easier for Karl Rove and company to do their dirty work than would otherwise be the case.

(That's how I see it, anyway.)

Indeed. I was thinking the same thing earlier as the result became depressingly obvious. The fraud won't stop no matter how many minions go to prison, so the only answer is landslide victories. Unfortunately the general public are off being morons somewhere.

I was reading through comments on the Guardian earlier and some guy said he'll vote for Nader or Paul in the general election, assuming they run. Then he said he's voting for Stephen Colbert in the SC primary. I mean it's bad enough having the geopolitical awareness of my cat, but some of these idiots can't even get basic logic right.

But yeah, we just have to keep plugging away on either side of the pond and hope we reach a tipping point.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Jackson Holly on January 21, 2012, 10:19:46 pm
DIG:

Quote
He is winning the GOP primary, he already retired 4 former front runners...

Rick Perry (BILDERBERG) ... Quit!

Michelle Bachmann (IRS LEAD TERRORIST) ... Quit!

Herman Cain (CHAIRMAN OF THE KANSAS CITY FEDERAL RESERVE) ... Quit!

Jon Huntsman (ROTHSCHILD BEST FRIEND MULTI BILLIONAIRE) ... Quit!

YES! You have nailed it again! Neither of the ringers, Grinch nor Romulus, can win
against Bomba ... SURELY the R voters know this (??) and will not allow the
Rothschild machine to install one of them. And please God, don't let the complete
idiocy of the American electorate monkey wrench our last hope!





Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Jordan on January 21, 2012, 10:20:07 pm
Newt Gingrich has convincingly beaten Mitt Romney in South Carolina's primary election, the latest leg in the battle to be the Republican candidate in November's US presidential poll.

With 70% of the vote counted, Mr Gingrich had 40% to Mr Romney's 28%.

Mr Romney was widely seen as the frontrunner, but the latest outcome is set to turn the race into a long, hard-fought campaign, correspondents say.

The South Carolina victor has won the nomination in each election since 1980.

Other Republican hopefuls, former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum and Texas representative Ron Paul are trailing badly, with 18% and 13% respectively.
Knockout punch plea

US networks called the vote in the former House speaker's favour shortly after polls closed at 19:00 local time on Saturday (00:00 GMT Sunday), as exit polls predicted a wide margin of victory for Mr Gingrich.


BBC North America editor Mark Mardell, in South Carolina, says a Gingrich win is important, because all along the story of this race has been the search by Conservatives for an alternative to Mitt Romney.

It is just possible they have settled on Mr Gingrich, and at the very least such a result will puncture the sense that eventually Mr Romney will triumph, our correspondent adds.

Shortly after the vote, Mr Gingrich wrote on Twitter: "Thank you South Carolina! Help me deliver the knockout punch in Florida," referring to the next nominating contest on 31 January.

The contest for that state is now seen as crucial, being a major battleground state in the US general election, with a diverse electorate and where a lot of money will be spent campaigning.

Several hours later, Mr Gingrich appeared at his campaign headquarters in the state capital Columbia - to wild cheers from his supporters.

"We don't have the kind of money that at least one of the candidates has, but we do have ideas and we do have people and we have proved here in South Carolina that people power with the right ideas beats big money and with your help we are going to prove it again in Florida," he said.

Earlier, Mr Romney told his supporters they were "three contests into a long primary season" and vowed to fight for every vote in every state.

Meanwhile, Mr Santorum pledged to fight on, saying: "It's a wide open race".

Mr Gingrich has captured the headlines in recent days, batting off a potentially damaging interview from an ex-wife, in which she said he had wanted an "open marriage".

Assuming Mr Gingrich's victory is confirmed, it means that three different candidates have won the first three nominating state-by-state contests: Mr Santorum narrowly beat Mr Romney in the Iowa caucus, while Mr Romney claimed the New Hampshire primary.

All contenders agree that this will now be an endurance race, rather than the quick sprint which Team Romney had hoped for, the BBC's Steve Kingstone says.

Mr Romney must now adapt his strategy, and come up with a more decisive riposte to those who criticise his personal wealth and career record as a venture capitalist, our correspondent says.

Expect a brutal media war in Florida, he adds.

Mr Romney set the tone in his post-defeat address, accusing Newt Gingrich of aligning himself with President Obama in a "frontal assault on free enterprise". For his part, Gingrich will counter that the "Massachusetts moderate" is the real Obama clone.

Primaries and caucuses will be held in every US state over the next few months to pick a Republican nominee before the eventual winner is anointed at the party convention in August to take on Democratic President Barack Obama in November.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16669714


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16669714
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 10:32:32 pm
I don't see any more republican drop outs until they force Paul's hand.

Santorum will be gone within 2 weeks

Quote
stealing elections has consequences.  i.e. no delegates for Paul.  Paul has 4 delegates right now.  Next up is Florida where he probably won't get any either.  Then super tuesday is around the corner. 

We are playing for something bigger than this one presidential election. The message of liberty is deafening to the New World Order. THis is not about winning one of their fixed elections, this is about restoring the republic and it cannot be done by only one person, Ron Paul is the de facto spiritual leader of the constitutional republic at the moment.

By simply showing us truth in the face of their deceptions, America is restoring its morality and its confidence in the future.  Do you know how many times Ghandi was elected as Prime Minister?

Do you know how many times Martin Luther King was elected president, senator, congressman, governor, mayor?

I am not sure what kind of big picture ou are looking at, but this country is on an express train to disaster thanks to Bilderberg crimes against humanity using our armed forces to be used for their population reduction operations. The same banksters have stolen over $15 Trillion. 

These banksters have destroyed Russia, Germany, China by forcing them into hyperinflation and destablization operations, then offering them a fake revolution.

NOW THE TARGET IS ON AMERICA'S BACK!

We are learning what this country is all about so that we can expose their operations before another Rothschild fnded puppet like Mao, Stalin, Hitler gets any real following. Americans everywhere now are waking up to the true enemies to the country, and that is their greatest fear. If Ron Paul's momentum continues, then their entire fake party dystopia will be depleated of 90% of its power to keep us in perpetual darkness.

Quote
Look, I'm all for Paul and he gets my vote come november.  I just want him to play a winning hand and I just don't see that possible by playing their cheating system.

You just want to back a "winner" and not the person you feel is the most qualified?

Then vote Romney dude, he is such an awesome "winner".

And what makes  you think that the primaries are fixed but the general election is not (this argument continues to shatter the Bilderberg talking point about third party nonsense). 

Quote
He's at the casino, pulling the lever and hoping 3 cherries come up and all the house is letting him get are lemons! 

He is at the casino, he continues to see all the other players walk away as he continues to gather their money.  And every time the dealer slips his opponent an extra "ACE", there are tens of MILLIONS of Ron Paul supporters yelling: " SAW THAT! I SAW WHAT HE DID! DID YOU SEE THAT? NO WONDER FOR THE PAST 40 YEARS WE HAVE HAD OUR WEALTH STOLEN BY CASINO OPERATORS (ACTUALL THIS IS DISRESPECTFUL TO CASINO OPERATORS AS BILDERBERG HAS 100,000X LESS INTEGRITY THAN CASINO OPERATORS)"
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Jordan on January 21, 2012, 10:40:16 pm
(http://verydemotivational.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/129092786498235257.jpg)
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 10:52:35 pm
Just stop for a minute and think about this...

If ou had a choice of picking 3 bafoons to run against Ron Paul you could not find more inferior candidates than Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum.

Bilderberg is trying to convince us that these guys are winning the primary state battles.

Just stop and think about that for a minute.

Newt Gingrich regularly cancels his speeches because less than 20 people show up and they all call him an asshole.

THERE IS NO WAY GINGRICH COULD WIN AN ELECTION FOR HIGH SCHOOL PRESIDENT MUCH LESS A PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY.

BILDERBERG IS OVER-CONFIDENT AND THEY ARE SCREING UP BIG TIME.

THEY THINK HALF THE PEOPLE WILL JUST THINK IT IS TRUE AND THE OTHER HALF WILL BE SO FRUSTRATED AND FULL OF APATHY.

BE NEITHER, BE AWAKE AND CONFIDENT IN THE MESSAGE OF LIBERTY, FREEDOM, AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUUBLIC.

Nothing pisses off a Bilderberg psychopath more than an awareness to the rights of man.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 11:09:58 pm
Look what the New World Order does to the Voting Fraud operatives when they no longer need them...



Mysterious Death of Mike Connell—Karl Rove’s Election Thief
http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/12-mysterious-death-of-mike-connell%E2%80%94karl-roves-election-thief/
Top 25 of 2010

Sources:
The Raw Story, September 29, 2008
Title: “Republican IT consultant subpoenaed in case alleging tampering with 2004 election”
Authors: Larisa Alexandrovna and Muriel Kane

The Brad Blog, December 22, 2008
Title:  “OH Election Fraud Attorney Reacts to the Death of Mike Connell“
Author: Brad Friedman

Democracy Now! December 22, 2008
Title: “Republican IT Specialist Dies in Plane Crash”
Interviewee:  Mark Crispin Miller

Student Researchers: Ashleigh Hvinden, Christine Wilson and Alan Grady
Community Evaluator: Mary Ann Walker
Sonoma State University

Karl Rove’s chief IT consultant, Mike Connell—who was facing subpoena in connection with 2004 Presidential election fraud in Ohio—mysteriously died in a private plane crash in 2008.  Connell was allegedly the central figure in a longstanding plot to electronically flip votes to Republicans.

In July 2008, Connell was named as a key witness in the case known as King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association v. Blackwell, which was filed against Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth J. Blackwell on August 31, 2006 by Columbus attorneys Clifford Arnebeck and Robert Fitrakis. It initially charged Blackwell with racially discriminatory practices—including the selective purging of voters from the election rolls and the unequal allocation of voting machines to various districts—and asked for measures to be taken to prevent similar problems during the November 2006 election.

On October 9, 2006, an amended complaint added charges of various forms of ballot rigging as also having the effect of “depriving the plaintiffs of their voting rights, including the right to have their votes successfully cast without intimidation, dilution, cancellation or reversal by voting machine or ballot tampering.” A motion to dismiss the case as moot was filed following the November 2006 election, but it was instead stayed to allow for settlement discussions.

The case took on fresh momentum in July 2008 when Arnebeck announced that he was filing to “lift the stay in the case and proceed with targeted discovery in order to help protect the integrity of the 2008 election.” The new filing was inspired in part by the coming forward as a whistleblower of GOP IT security expert Stephen Spoonamore, who said he was prepared to testify to the plausibility of electronic vote-rigging having been carried out in 2004. The stay was lifted September 19, 2008 and Connell was served a subpoena on September 22.

Spoonamore, a conservative Republican who works for big banks, international governments, and the Secret Service as an expert in the detection of computer fraud, found evidence that Karl Rove, with the help of Mike Connell and his company GovTech Solutions, electronically stole the Ohio 2004 election for Bush.

Spoonamore testified that the “vote tabulation system [which Connell designed] allowed the introduction of an additional single computer between computer A and computer B.” This is called a “man in the middle” attack. According to Spoonamore, “This centralized collection of all incoming statewide tabulations would make it easy for a single operator, or a preprogrammed ‘force balancing computer’ to change the results in any way desired by the team controlling the Computer C.” Spoonamore further testified that the only purpose for such man in the middle architecture is to commit crime.
Despite Connell’s efforts to quash his subpoena to testify, he was ordered to appear for a two-hour, closed-door deposition on November 3, 2008, just eighteen hours before the 2008 national election. Though Connell had expressed willingness to testify, he was reticent after receiving threats from Rove.

Arnebeck presents evidence that Karl Rove threatened Connell, cautioning that if Connell didn’t “take the fall” for election fraud in Ohio, Connell would face prosecution for supposed lobby law violations.  After this threat, Arnebeck sent letters to the Department of Justice, as well as messages to high-ranking members of the department, seeking protection for Connell and his family from attempts to intimidate. Despite Connell’s elite status as a top-rung Republican consultant for years, whose firm New Media Communications provided IT services for the Bush-Cheney 2004 campaign, the US Chamber of Commerce, the Republican National Committee, and many Republican candidates and campaigns, witness protection requests went unheeded.

Election fraud analyst and author Mark Crispin Miller notes that the timing and circumstances of Connell’s death—between deposition and trial—are too suspicious and convenient for Rove and the Bush administration, not to merit a thorough investigation. Arnebeck and Fitrakis intended to both further depose and call Connell to testify as key witness in the federal conspiracy case. Connell was also to be questioned about his key role in the disappearance of thousands of White House-RNC email transactions. These emails are believed likely to have shed light on the White House role in the political firings of US Attorneys, as well as decisions to prosecute former Alabama Democratic Governor Don Siegelman.  Attorneys in the case said that Connell’s testimony would likely lead to the subpoenaing and under-oath questioning of Karl Rove.

Connell was an experienced pilot. His plane had been recently serviced. He had been in the nation’s capital on still-unknown business before his single engine plane crashed December 22, 2008 on the way home, just three miles short of the runway in Akron, Ohio.  The cause of the crash remains unknown.

Timing of Connell’s deposition may have saved the 2008 presidential elections from electronic theft. However, Bev Harris at Black Box Voting notes that man in the middle systems are still in place in Illinois, Colorado, Kentucky, and likely across the nation.1

Citation:
Bev Harris, “Man in the Middle Attacks to Subvert the Vote,” Black Box Voting, November 2008.

Update by Larisa Alexandrovna

The extreme vulnerability of electronic voting systems to systematic fraud has fallen out of public awareness because it did not become a major issue during the 2008 elections, but the problem has never been resolved or even seriously examined by any official body.  Questions about alleged vote count irregularities in Ohio during the 2004 election remain the strongest indication of the potential for large-scale tampering with these systems.  The lawsuit, which sought testimony from GOP information technology expert Michael Connell as to any personal knowledge he might have had of those irregularities, has represented the most determined effort to get at the truth beyond these allegations.

Michael Connell testified under subpoena in November 2008 but died the following month, when his single-engine plane crashed as he was attempting to land at an Ohio airport near his home.  At the time of his death, the only mainstream news outlet to even mention Connell’s death and the controversies surrounding his involvement in electronic voting was a single CBS/AP story.
However, there appears to have been no direct response in the mainstream press to the articles on Connell published by Raw Story. In fact, a deafening silence on his alleged relationship with the Bush White House has prevailed, even after his sudden and tragic death in December of 2008.

The case of King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association v. Blackwell is still ongoing.
Additional information on the King Lincoln case can be obtained here:
http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/klbna.php.
An organization that has taken a pro-active role in making public both the case of King Lincoln and the various articles on it is Velvet Revolution. See http://velvetrevolution.us/.

Update by Brad Friedman
Little of note has changed since the death of Mike Connell as this book goes to press.  The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is still investigating, but is likely not to release a final report until mid to late 2010. They released a preliminary report, however, indicating decreasing visibility at the Akron airport, with visibility still at 2.5 miles at the time of the crash and temperatures just above freezing.  According to the NTSB report, and confirmed via transcripts and tapes received via FOIA requests, Connell radioed to ask “whether there were any reports of icing, to which air traffic control [ATC] responded that there were no reports.”

The tapes and transcripts indicate that something suddenly happened up there, as his last words to ATC, recorded on tape, were a declaration of emergency followed quickly by “Oh, f**k,” before he was not heard from again.

Curiously, for a man as well connected to the very top echelons of the Republican Party as Connell was, no GOP officials, or George W. Bush, or John McCain, or Karl Rove, to my knowledge, ever issued a public statement upon his tragic death.

For the time being, the Ohio voting rights case has been stalled since Connell’s death. Cliff Arnebeck continues to investigate how he plans to move forward, and is considering broader subpoenas in hopes of taking depositions from, among others, Karl Rove, as he widens the scope of his conspiracy case.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 11:13:27 pm
Ohio Attorneys Seek Protection for Mike Connell and his Family against Alleged Threats from Karl Rove
http://discuss.epluribusmedia.net/content/ohio_attorneys_seek_protection_mike_connell_his_family_against_alleged_threats_karl_rove
 December 29, 2008 - 19:31 |   cho

[UPDATE2: 1/8/2009 - repaired letter formatting - luaptifer]


[UPDATE1: 12/21/2008 - added link to newer compilation of background links - luaptifer; originally posted 2008-07-24 13:18:54 -0500]]

Sources close to the Ohio Corrupt Practices Act/RICO claim sent us a copy of the following letter that asks Attorney General Mukasey for protection for Michael Connell and his family who have been allegedly threatened by Karl Rove. Rove is believed to be the strategic mastermind behind the Bush 2004 re-election campaign and the possible Ohio election improprieties. The alleged threats appear to be the result of the re-opening, through the Ohio Corrupt Practices Act/RICO claim, of the stalled investigation into the 2004 Ohio Elections.
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:50:55 EDT

Subject: Report of Rove threats against witness Michael Connell



Dear Attorney General Mukasey:

We have been confidentially informed by a source we believe to be credible that Karl Rove has threatened Michael Connell, a principal witness we have identified in our King Lincoln case in federal court in Columbus, Ohio, that if he does not agree to "take the fall" for election fraud in Ohio, his wife Heather will be prosecuted for supposed lobby law violations. This appears to be in response to our designation of Rove as the principal perpetrator in the Ohio Corrupt Practices Act/RICO claim with respect to which we issued document hold notices last Thursday to you and to the US Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform.

See: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6189 and http://www.archive.org/details/ElectionFraudInOhioCourtCase.

I have informed court chambers and am in the process of informing the Ohio Attorney General's and US Attorney's offices in Columbus for the purpose, among other things, of seeking protection for Mr. Connell and his family from this reported attempt to intimidate a witness.

Concurrently herewith, I am informing Mr. Conyers and Mr. Kucinich in connection with their Congressional oversight responsibilities related to these matters.

Because of the serious engagement in this matter that began in 2000 of the Ohio Statehouse Press Corps, 60 Minutes, the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, C-Span and Jim VandeHei, and the public's right to know of gross attempts to subvert the rule of law, I am forwarding this information to them, as well.

Cliff Arnebeck, Attorney

614-224-8771

Cell 614-361-9434

cc: Robert Fitrakis, Esq. Henry Eckhart, Esq

 

For background information, below the fold are the links GreyHawk and others have amassed or the one-page list of previous work linked directly:
CURRENT MIKE CONNELL STORIES
Jan. 18, 2009 - More than two years of reference to the late Michael Connell and his GOP network insiders is found in a single-page list to be kept current for related stories throughout ePluribusMedia:



 Mike Connell: A Trail of Questions

 At the End of the Road

Submit tips to [email protected]

 

[UPDATE: 12/23/08 - added link to previous article list.]

[UPDATE: 01/18/09 - revised reference to previous article list.]

'Comprehensive' list of Previous stories
01/18/2009 - Mike Connell: A Trail of Questions At the End of the Road

 Previous stories
Ken Blackwell Outsources Ohio Election Results to GOP Internet Operatives, Again
Ohio's election website still sent real-time results to GOP mirror server
The GOP, GeorgeWBush.com and the line that jumped the Congressional Firewall
Who is Michael L. Connell? Part I: The Atwater School of Politics
Who is Mike Connell behind the firewall: Part II
Rove -ing emails: what else could go missing?

Recent stories

 
Where the Ohio 2004 Election RICO Lawsuit is Going, Interview With Attorneys Arnebeck and Fitrakis
Our Day in Court: Research into Ohio's 2004 Election Misdeed Finally Bearing Fruit

Friends' stories

 
BradBlog: Ohio Attorney Files to Lift Stay on '04 Election Case, Cites Allegations, Evidence of Massive Fraud by a Number of GOP Operatives
RawStory: GOP cyber-security expert suggests Diebold tampered with 2002 election
VelvetRevolution.US: Several commentary and original video posts
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 11:15:37 pm
Will Karl Rove bury the record of his 2004 election theft?
http://freepress.org/departments/display/19/2011/4046
by Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
January 10, 2011


An epic legal battle now rages between Karl Rove and Ohio election rights attorneys. The question is whether the public has the right to see full transcripts of a court deposition that could shed explosive new light on the bitterly contested presidential election of 2004.

The deposition came from the late Michael Connell, Rove's IT guru. Connell died in a mysterious plan crash in December 2008, one month after he spoke under oath to election protection attorney Clifford O. Arnebeck. Connell had implanted the state-contracted software used to compute Ohio's electronic voting tabulations during the contest between Bush and John Kerry.

On December 10, 2010, attorneys in the King-Lincoln-Bronzeville Neighborhood Association case moved to release the Connell transcript in an ongoing legal struggle with Rove and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The King-Lincoln case was filed in 2006 by attorney Arnebeck alleging civil rights violations against blacks, young voters and others in Ohio's 2004 election process.

Connell's November 3, 2008 deposition in Cleveland concerned his role in the 2004 election and whether or not he was being threatened by Rove. Just over a month later on December 19, 2008, Connell died in the mysterious crash of his small plane near his Akron, Ohio, home. Suspicions of foul play surround the accident.

The Connell deposition has been sealed since his death. During the closing days of the 2010 election, King-Lincoln attorneys sought the deposition of Karl Rove in connection with his activities involving the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in all Ohio elections since 2000.

Rove and Chamber attorneys, as well as the Ohio Attorney General's office, claimed that there was no connection between Connell's deposition and more recent activities involving Rove and the Chamber.

Connell's attorney, James L. Ervin, represented Connell at the deposition and also represented Connell's estate. He filed papers with the court asking for a 30-day extension of time to file a response to the court on December 27, 2010 regarding the opening of Connell's deposition.

According to Ervin, "Mr. Connell's deposition is comprised of questions, answers, and topics that are privileged and/or confidential and are reflected as such by being designated 'sealed.'"� No part of Connell's deposition has of yet been made public.

Arnebeck told how Connell described what he did: "One, he integrated voter data files with the vote tabulation process in the Ohio Secretary of State's office in the 2004 election and two, he broadened the accessibility to this information, including facilitating its appearance on a mirror site at the SmartTech offices in Chattanooga, Tennessee."

"His testimony provided facts of a general nature. He did not, as suggested by his counsel, reveal or discuss anything that could be fairly described as a trade secret or an expert opinion,"� Arnebeck asserted.

In the spring and summer prior to Connell's deposition, contacts were made on behalf of Connell with both U.S. Representatives John Conyers and Dennis Kucinich in an attempt to have Connell testify before Congress regarding his role in the 2004 election.

Memorandum to U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich [PDF]

Ervin's motion before the court states: "During calendar year 2009, Mr. Connell's businesses, New Media Communications and GovTech Solutions, came under new ownership, and Mr. Connell's Estate was probated."�

These pleadings before the court may offer insight into who exactly owns Connell's election computer businesses. Ervin's motion states: "because the deposition transcript addresses issues that constituted privilege and/or proprietary matters, the new ownership of Connell's former businesses may have an interest in the deposition transcripts and may be the owners of the transcript."�

Ervin concludes "Decisions must be made as to who owns Mr. Connell's 2008 deposition transcript...."� This same line of argument has been used to allow private vendors to use secret proprietary source code in election software.

In a democratic society, the people should own Connell's deposition. Karl Rove should testify under oath about the electronic machinery Connell devised to link Ohio's 2004 real-time vote count to an obscure company in Chattanooga, Tennessee. That company was SmarTech, which according to public records, was hosting a website that was operating out of the White House on that election night.

Says Arnebeck: "Mr. Connell's testimony is important to the plaintiffs and the public because it reveals how those seeking to steal the 2004 Presidential election in the State of Ohio, led by Karl Rove, were better able to do so through the utilization of these integrated data files and more accessible tabulation processes. SmarTech was simultaneously serving the electronic data processes for the George W. Bush presidential campaign in that election."�

--
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman's four books on election protection are at freepress.org, where this article was first published. Disclosure: Fitrakis serves as co-counsel with Arnebeck in the King-Lincoln case and was at Connell's deposition.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: Dig on January 21, 2012, 11:18:08 pm
Treasongate: Beyond Karl Rove
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Treasongate:_Beyond_Karl_Rove
Title: SCYL's Neutron Voter Fraud test in South Carolina FAILS! No one believes results
Post by: Dig on January 22, 2012, 12:33:26 am
Is this how foreign company infiltrated D.C. elections.? Former U.S. elections officer now working private voting-system firm.
http://kleinonline.wnd.com/2012/01/20/is-this-how-foreign-company-infiltrated-d-c-elections-former-u-s-elections-officer-now-working-private-voting-system-firm/
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:06 PM EST
 

By Aaron Klein

A U.S. elections officer who served in voting districts that partnered with a controversial online voting firm recently retired from his government position to work for the firm in question, the foreign-headquartered company SCYTL.

KleinOnline reported yesterday that SCYTL has faced questions about the security of its electronic voting technologies, which are now set to be deployed in 900 U.S. jurisdictions.
 The firm already provides balloting for overseas U.S. military and civilian voting in nine states along with elections technologies in several districts.

Concerns have also been raised about SCYTL’s ties to the Spanish government and to international venture capital firms. Also, SCYTL overseas Internet balloting in foreign countries worldwide.

In October, it was announced that Paul Stenbjorn, the executive director of the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics, resigned from his position to take a job at SCYTL as director of U.S. operations.

Prior to joining SCYTL, he also served as information services manager for the Virginia State Board of Elections.

D.C.’s Board of Elections and Ethics is the independent agency of the district government responsible for the administration of elections, ballot access and voter registration.

While Stenbjorn was working for the D.C. elections and ethics board he was directly involved in testing a SCYTL system that had been deployed in the district to provide voting technologies during the November 2010 midterm elections.

Just prior to the midterms, it was Stenbjorn who opened D.C.’s Internet-based voting system for a weeklong test period, inviting computer experts from all corners to prod its vulnerabilities.

A group of University of Michigan students responded to Stenbjorn’s call and hacked into the site, commanding it to play the University of Michigan fight song upon casting a vote.

“The integrity of the system had been violated,” Stenbjorn told the Washington Post after the Michigan students infiltrated the system.

Stenbjorn said that because of the hack, a portion of the Internet voting pilot was being temporarily scrapped.

He told the Post the security hole that allowed the playing of the fight song had been identified, but it raised deeper concerns about the system’s vulnerabilities.

“We’ve closed the hole they opened, but we want to put it though more robust testing,” he said. “I don’t want there to be any doubt. … This is an abundance-of-caution sort of thing.”

After the hack, Stenjborn’s ethics board decided to relaunch the Internet program under a download-only format, allowing users to access ballots but forcing them to fax or mail them rather than cast a vote online.

Still, his D.C. elections board was hailed as “[leading] the nation in attempting to overcome the security obstacles and offer e-voting.”

While on the elections board, Stenjborn told the website Broadband and Social Justice that voting “is many, many years away, more than a decade, possibly more than a generation away.”

National security concerns

With the purchase of SOE Software, meanwhile, SCYTL has increased its involvement in the U.S. elections process. SOE Software boasts a strong U.S. presence, providing results in over 900 jurisdictions.

In 2009, SCYTL formally registered with the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (AEC) as the first Internet voting manufacturer in the U.S. under the EAC Voting System Testing and Certification Program.

Also that year, SCYTL entered into an agreement with another firm, Hart InterCivic, to jointly market a flexible and secure electronic pollbook purportedly to allow U.S. election officials and poll workers to easily manage the electoral roll on Election Day in an efficient and convenient manner.

SCYTL’s ePollBookTM already replaced the paper precinct roster in Washington, D.C.

During the midterm elections in November 2010, SCYTL successfully carried out electoral modernization projects in 14 states. The company boasted that a “great variety” of SCYTL’s technologies were involved in the projects, including an online platform for the delivery of blank ballots to overseas voters, an Internet voting platform and e-pollbook software to manage the electoral roll at the polling stations.

The states that used SCYTL’s technologies during the Midterms were New York, Texas, Washington, California, Florida, Alabama, Missouri, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, New Mexico, Nebraska, West Virginia and Washington D.C.

Just prior to the midterm’s however, the new electronic voting system in Washington, D.C., was hacked.

As a program security trial, the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics reportedly encouraged outside parties to hack and find flaws in its new online balloting system. A group of University of Michigan students then hacked into the site and commanded it to play the school’s fight song upon casting a vote.

This is not the first time SCYTL’S systems have been called into question

Voter Action, an advocacy group that seeks elections integrity in the U.S., sent a lengthy complaint to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission in April 2010 charging the integration of SCYTL systems “raises national security concerns.”

“Foreign governments may also seek to undermine the national security interests of the United States, either directly or through other organizations,” Voter Action charged.

The document notes that SCYTL was founded in 2001 as a spinoff from a research group at the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, which was partially funded by the Spanish government’s Ministry of Science and Technology.

SCYTL’s headquarters are in Barcelona with offices in Washington, D.C., Singapore, Bratislava and Athens.

Project Vote noted that in 2008, the Florida Department of State commissioned a review of SCYTL’s remote voting software and concluded, in part, that:
The system is vulnerable to attack from insiders.
In a worst case scenario, the software could lead to (1) voters being unable to cast votes; (2) an election that does not accurately reflect the will of the voters; and (3) possible disclosure of confidential information, such as the votes cast by individual voters.
The system may be subject to attacks that could compromise the integrity of the votes cast.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: South Carolina Massive Neutron Fraud and the Goldman Sachs Connections
Post by: Dig on January 22, 2012, 12:34:38 am
Bias in new vote-counting system? National security concerns also raised
http://askmarion.wordpress.com/2012/01/21/bias-in-new-vote-counting-system-national-security-concerns-also-raised/
Posted on January 21, 2012

Originally Posted on January 18, 2012 at 1:39 PM EST


by Aaron Klein

An internationally-headquartered company, SCYTL, is now taking over online U.S. voting systems.

The company has previously faced questions about the security of its electronic voting technologies, which are now set to be deployed in 900 U.S. jurisdictions.

The firm already provides balloting for overseas U.S. military and civilian voting in nine states plus elections technologies in several districts.

Concerns have also been raised about SCYTL’s ties to the Spanish government and to international venture capital firms.

The Drudge Report previously ran a feature entitled, “Foreign company buys U.S. election results reporting firm.” The article documented that SCYTL, based in Barcelona, acquired 100% of SOE Software, the leading software provider of election management solutions in the United States.

The official press release announcing the acquisition noted that SCYTL is a portfolio company of leading international venture capital funds Nauta Capital, Balderton Capital and Spinnaker.

National security concerns

With the purchase of SOE Software, meanwhile, SCYTL has increased its involvement in the U.S. elections process. SOE Software boasts a strong U.S. presence, providing results in over 900 jurisdictions.

In 2009, SCYTL formally registered with the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (AEC) as the first Internet voting manufacturer in the U.S. under the EAC Voting System Testing and Certification Program.

Also that year, SCYTL entered into an agreement with another firm, Hart InterCivic, to jointly market a flexible and secure electronic pollbook purportedly to allow U.S. election officials and poll-workers to easily manage the electoral roll on Election Day in an efficient and convenient manner.

SCYTL’s ePollBookTM already replaced the paper precinct roster in Washington, DC.

During the midterm elections in November 2010, SCYTL successfully carried out electoral modernization projects in 14 States. The company boasted that a “great variety” of SCYTL’s technologies were involved in these projects, including an online platform for the delivery of blank ballots to overseas voters, an Internet voting platform and e-pollbook software to manage the electoral roll at the polling stations.

The states that used SCYTL’s technologies during the Midterms were New York, Texas, Washington, California, Florida, Alabama, Missouri, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, New Mexico, Nebraska, West Virginia and Washington DC.

Just prior to the midterm’s however, the new electronic voting system in Washington, DC was hacked.

As a program security trial, the D.C. Board of Elections & Ethics reportedly encouraged outside parties to hack and find flaws in its new online balloting system. A group of University of Michigan students then hacked into the site and commanded it to play the University of Michigan fight song upon casting a vote.

This is not the first time SCYTL’S systems have been called into question

Voter Action, an advocacy group that seeks elections integrity in the U.S., sent a lengthy complaint to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission in April 2010 charging the integration of SCYTL systems “raises national security concerns.”

“Foreign governments may also seek to undermine the national security interests of the United States, either directly or through other organizations,” Voter Action charged.

The document notes that SCYTL was founded in 2001 as a spin-off from a research group at the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, which was partially funded by the Spanish government’s Ministry of Science and Technology.

SCYTL’s headquarters are in Barcelona with offices in Washington, D.C., Singapore, Bratislava and Athens.

The company provides voter services worldwide, including in France, Norway, Spain, India, the United Arab Emirates, Austria, Australia, Britain, Mexico, Switzerland, Philippines and Finland.

Project Vote noted that in 2008, the Florida Department of State commissioned a review of SCYTL’s remote voting software and concluded, in part, that:

. The system is vulnerable to attack from insiders.

· In a worst case scenario, the software could lead to (1) voters being unable to cast votes; (2) an election that does not accurately reflect the will of the voters; and (3) possible disclosure of confidential information, such as the votes cast by individual voters.

· The system may be subject to attacks that could compromise the integrity of the votes cast.

With research by Brenda J. Elliott – Klein Online

NOTE: An earlier edition of this article identified the venture capital firm that invested in SCYTL as the emerging markets investment management firm, Spinnaker Capital Group. The actual SCYTL investor is another company with a similar name, the Spanish venture capital firm Spinnaker SCR. Neither Spinnaker Capital Group nor its director, Bob McCarthy, are associated with SCYTL.

Related:

Dead People Receive Ballots in New Hampshire Primary

Alert: Is This How Obama Win Will Be Guaranteed? Group With Ties to President Engaged in Massive 3rd Party Drive

Will Ignorance Lead to a Second Obama Term??

Stealing Election 2012
Title: Re: EXPOSED: South Carolina Massive Neutron Fraud and the Goldman Sachs Connections
Post by: Dig on January 22, 2012, 12:51:00 am
Who owns this foreign firm?

Venture Capitalist Company Balderton

Who runs Balderton?

Goldman Sachs and McKinsey!

You cannot make this shit up!



Partners / principals.
http://www.balderton.com/team/

Roberto Bonanzinga
Prior to joining Balderton, Roberto spent 15 years working with entrepreneurs in the US and in Europe. Most recently, Roberto acted as an interim CEO for Jambaz and non-executive director/adviser to numerous companies including Jaiku (acquired by Google NASDAQ:GOOG), Mobango, Piczo, Woome and our own portfolio company Pageflakes. Roberto's past operational experience included helping to pioneer VoIP in Europe while serving as SVP of Marketing and Business Development at Viatel. He was also VP of Services and Marketing at Netscalibur, where he built the pan-European organization. Additionally, he has held senior management positions in Silicon Valley with Topica, Fabrik Communications (acquired by Critical Path) and Information Access Company (acquired by Thomson Corporation NYSE:TOC).  Education: B.A. in Business Administration from Bocconi University in Milan, Italy, and a European Commission-sponsored MSC in Electronic Information Management from Sheffield University in the UK.

Tim Bunting
Tim joined Balderton as a General Partner in 2007. He was previously a partner of Goldman Sachs where he spent 18 years. At Goldman, Tim held various roles including Global Head of Equity Capital Markets (2002 to 2005) and Vice-Chairman of Goldman Sachs International (2005 to 2006). Tim started to work with Balderton and its portfolio of companies in 2005. In 2006 Tim spent a period as non-executive chairman of Betfair. Tim is also a Governor of Wellington College and the Wellington Academy; a Trustee of the Rainbow Trust Children's Charity and the Paul Hamlyn Foundation. Education: Tim is a graduate of the University of Cambridge.

Mark Evans
Prior to becoming a General Partner at Balderton in 2002, Mark was the CEO of a US software services company and an Entrepreneur in Residence (EIR) at Benchmark Capital in Menlo Park. Before his EIR experience, Mark spent 15 years at Goldman Sachs in Europe, Asia, and the US. Education: MLitt in Economics from The University of Oxford; BA in Economics from Queen's University in Canada.

Bernard Liautaud
Bernard Liautaud founded Business Objects in 1990 and was CEO for 15 years then Chairman until January 2008. With 6,700 employees, 45,000 customers and $1.5 billion of revenue in 2007, Business Objects was the world leader in Business Intelligence and one of the 15 largest software companies in the world. Business Objects was the first European software IPO on Nasdaq in 1994. In January 2008, Business Objects was acquired by SAP for $6.8 billion, making it the third largest software acquisition at the time. Bernard is now a member of the SAP Supervisory Board and its strategy committee. He is also a member of Cap Gemini’s board and its strategy committee. He has received a number of distinctions including “Chevalier de la Légion d’Honneur” in 2007 in France, Time Magazine Europe's Digital Top 25 and BusinessWeek Stars of Europe of 2002, Top 10 CEOs in North America by Chief Executive Magazine in 2001. Education: Diplôme d'Ingénieur, Ecole Centrale de Paris, and Master of Science, Engineering Management, Stanford University. London Business School

Barry Maloney
Prior to founding Balderton Capital in 2000, Barry spent five years as CEO of Esat Digifone, Ireland's second largest GSM mobile operator. Under Barry's leadership, Esat Digifone expanded to a profitable company with 900 employees, more than one million customers and IR £400 million in revenues. Esat Digifone was acquired by British Telecom at a market value of IR £2 billion and is now part of the O2 Group. Before Esat Digifone, Barry spent two years at Xerox Corporation in Palo Alto, California, where as Vice President of first Business Development and then Channel Operations, he was instrumental in revolutionizing Xerox's approach to global marketing. Before this Barry enjoyed a pan-European career at Digital Equipment as European Pricing Manager, Director of Software Business Europe and Vice President of the Component and Peripheral Business Unit Europe. Education: Economics Degree from University College, Dublin, 1980.

Jerome Misso
Since joining Balderton in 2001, Jerome has been the firm’s Operating Partner. With almost 20 years involvement in venture capital, Jerome has a broad range of experience with both public and private companies as well as financial institutions. Prior to Balderton, Jerome was a partner at leading London law firm, Nabarro, where he was head of the Corporate Finance Technology Group. He started his career with Eversheds in 1989, helping establish a new office and becoming a partner in 1995. At both firms he received recommendations from adviser directories. Jerome obtained a law degree and prizes at the University of Hull, and first class honours in the Law Society professional exams.

Dharmash Mistry
Prior to joining Balderton Capital, Dharmash spent 15 years launching, developing and acquiring businesses globally in the media, retail and consumer goods sectors.  Most recently, he was part of the management team that successfully sold Emap’s consumer division to H. Bauer for £1.1bn. He spent eight years at Emap, where he held a range of executive roles, including Group Managing Director of Emap Consumer Media and Emap Performance.  Prior to Emap, Dharmash was at The Boston Consulting Group, where he advised clients across a range of industries in Europe, China, Japan and USA. He started his career as a Brand Manager at Procter & Gamble, running FMCG Brands in the UK and across Western Europe. Outside of Balderton, Dharmash is a non-executive director of Dixons Retail plc (DXNS.L)  and Hargreaves Lansdown PLC (Lon:HL).  Dharmash holds a MEng and BA in Engineering, Economics and Management from Oxford University.

Harry Briggs
Harry co-founded Firefly Tonics, a health drinks company, in 2002. From the initial idea – a healthy alternative to an energy drink – he grew the business into a widely-recognised luxury brand, with customers in 35 countries. He remains a shareholder and board member.  Prior to Firefly, Harry was at McKinsey & Co. in London and New York, advising businesses on branding, marketing, and portfolio improvement. He also spent a year at Hutchison 3G, developing their marketing strategy prior to the launch of “3”, the UK’s first mobile 3G network.  Harry has a first class MA in Experimental Psychology from Oxford University.

Rob Moffat
Prior to joining Balderton Capital Rob worked for Google in London, as a Manager in their global sales strategy team. Rob’s experience at Google included developing growth strategies for a number of Google’s new businesses – reviewing potential acquisition targets as well as organic growth options. He also worked on the post-merger integration of DoubleClick in Europe and on long-term strategic planning.  Before Google Rob spent five years at Bain & Company, the management consultancy. His work there included business due diligence for private equity clients, as well as operational & strategic projects across a range of industries in Europe & North America.  Rob holds an MBA with distinction from INSEAD, and an MA in Mathematics from Cambridge.

Charlotte-Anne Swerling
Prior to joining Balderton Capital Charlotte-Anne headed Operations for Massive Incorporated, the world’s first provider of dynamic advertising in video games. Charlotte-Anne joined Massive Incorporated as an early, pre-revenue start-up in New York, helping to build the business through several funding rounds and ultimately the sale of the business to Microsoft in 2006. Before Massive Charlotte-Anne spent a year as part of a task force established by Prime Minister Tony Blair to drive delivery of the government’s key objectives. Charlotte-Anne started her career at McKinsey & Co, advising businesses on a range of strategic and operational projects. Charlotte-Anne has a first class MA in History from Cambridge.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: South Carolina Massive Neutron Fraud and the Goldman Sachs Connections
Post by: Dig on January 22, 2012, 12:59:16 am
Bob Urosevich
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Urosevich

Robert J. "Bob" Urosevich[1] has been a noted member of the election systems industry since the 1970s, founding and operating numerous companies that supply voting systems to the majority of United States.
[edit] Election industry

Urosevich founded American Information Systems (now known as Election Systems & Software) in 1979 and served as president until 1992. In 1995 Urosevich started I-Mark Systems Inc. which produced touchscreen voting systems and served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing and New Business Development. In 1997 I-Mark was acquired by Global Election Systems and by 2000 was named President and Chief Operating Officer.[2] In 2002 Global Election Systems was acquired by Diebold, Inc. and the name was changed to Diebold Election Systems, Inc. with Urosevich serving as President[1]

In November 2006 Mr. Urosevich was named "Managing Director Scytl Americas" for Spanish Internet voting company Scytl.[2] Scytl was formed as a spin-off from a research group at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona which was funded by the Spanish Government's Ministry of Science and Technolog.[3]
[edit] References
^ a b THE STATE OF GEORGIA AWARDS NATION'S LARGEST VOTING CONTRACT TO DIEBOLD ELECTION SYSTEMS, Diebold Inc. press release. May 3, 2002
^ a b Profiles of the Swiss Delegation for the Workshop and Presentations on E-Voting
^ About Scytl
Title: Re: EXPOSED: South Carolina Massive Neutron Fraud and the Goldman Sachs Connections
Post by: Dig on January 22, 2012, 01:00:55 am
Recipe for Vote Fraud: Global Internet Voting Firm Buys U.S. Election Results Reporting Firm
http://www.darkpolitricks.com/2012/01/recipe-for-vote-fraud-global-internet-voting-firm-buys-u-s-election-results-reporting-firm/

By WashingtonsBlog
washingtonsblog.com


 
The Ability to Commit Vote Fraud is Becoming Push-Button

[Preface by Washington's Blog: This development comes at an interesting time, when Ron Paul supporters, progressives and the mainstream media are all discussing potential vote fraud.]

By Bev Harris, Black Box Voting

In a major step towards global centralization of election processes, the world’s dominant Internet voting company has purchased the USA’s dominant election results reporting company.

When you view your local or state election results on the Internet, on portals which often appear to be owned by the county elections division, in over 525 US jurisdictions you are actually redirected to a private corporate site controlled by SOE software, which operates under the name ClarityElections.com.

The good news is that this firm promptly reports precinct-level detail in downloadable spreadsheet format. As reported by BlackBoxVoting.org in 2008, the bad news is that this centralizes one middleman access point for over 525 jurisdictions in AL, AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, KY, MI, KS, IL, IN, NC, NM, MN, NY, SC, TX, UT, WA. And growing.

As local election results funnel through SOE’s servers (typically before they reach the public elsewhere), those who run the computer servers for SOE essentially get “first look” at results and the ability to immediately and privately examine vote details throughout the USA.

In 2004, many Americans were justifiably concerned when, days before the presidential election, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell redirected Ohio election night results through the Tennessee-based server for several national Republican Party operations.

This is worse: This redirects results reporting to a centralized privately held server which is not just for Ohio, but national; not just USA-based, but global.

A mitigation against fraud by SOE insiders has been the separation of voting machine systems from the SOE results reports. Because most US jurisdictions require posting evidence of results from each voting machine at the precinct, public citizens can organize to examine these results to compare with SOE results. Black Box Voting spearheaded a national citizen action to videotape / photograph these poll tapes in 2008.

With the merger of SOE and SCYTL, that won’t work (if SCYTL’s voting system is used). When there are two truly independent sources of information, the public can perform its own “audit” by matching one number against the other.

These two independent sources, however, will now be merged into one single source: an Internet voting system controlled by SCYTL, with a results reporting system also controlled by SCYTL.

With SCYTL internet voting, there will be no ballots. No physical evidence. No chain of custody. No way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes, chain of custody, or the count.

SCYTL is moving into or already running elections in: the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Norway, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, India and Australia.

SCYTL is based in Barcelona; its funding comes from international venture capital funds including Nauta Capital, Balderton Capital and Spinnaker.

Here is the link to the press release regarding SYCTL’s acquisition of SOE:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/scytl-acquires-soe-software-becoming-the-leading-election-software-provider-2012-01-11
Title: Re: EXPOSED: South Carolina Massive Neutron Fraud and the Goldman Sachs Connections
Post by: jerryweaver on January 22, 2012, 01:18:23 am
So we don't have to buy into all that nonsense about DEMOCRACY now ;D ;D ;D ;D
This is great news.  I'm gonna call my man Obama and let him know that he is free to go home to Kenya.
He will be relieved to hear the news. This charade is really wearing on us all, but,  especially him.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: South Carolina Massive Neutron Fraud and the Goldman Sachs Connections
Post by: notlazy on January 22, 2012, 06:49:18 am
Quote
This is a two man race between Romney and Paul. Santorum and Gingrich are not on the ballot for 500 delegates worth of states. They are not, and will not be on the ballot in other states besides just Virginia. They have no grassroots support and virtually "zero" ground game. They cannot win the nomination.
Title: Re: Massive Voter Fraud in SC:Multiple State & Fed investigations into Neutron Fraud
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 22, 2012, 07:52:07 am
Ohio Attorneys Seek Protection for Mike Connell and his Family against Alleged Threats from Karl Rove
http://discuss.epluribusmedia.net/content/ohio_attorneys_seek_protection_mike_connell_his_family_against_alleged_threats_karl_rove
 December 29, 2008 - 19:31 |   cho

[UPDATE2: 1/8/2009 - repaired letter formatting - luaptifer]


[UPDATE1: 12/21/2008 - added link to newer compilation of background links - luaptifer; originally posted 2008-07-24 13:18:54 -0500]]

Sources close to the Ohio Corrupt Practices Act/RICO claim sent us a copy of the following letter that asks Attorney General Mukasey for protection for Michael Connell and his family who have been allegedly threatened by Karl Rove. Rove is believed to be the strategic mastermind behind the Bush 2004 re-election campaign and the possible Ohio election improprieties. The alleged threats appear to be the result of the re-opening, through the Ohio Corrupt Practices Act/RICO claim, of the stalled investigation into the 2004 Ohio Elections.
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:50:55 EDT

Subject: Report of Rove threats against witness Michael Connell



Dear Attorney General Mukasey:

We have been confidentially informed by a source we believe to be credible that Karl Rove has threatened Michael Connell, a principal witness we have identified in our King Lincoln case in federal court in Columbus, Ohio, that if he does not agree to "take the fall" for election fraud in Ohio, his wife Heather will be prosecuted for supposed lobby law violations. This appears to be in response to our designation of Rove as the principal perpetrator in the Ohio Corrupt Practices Act/RICO claim with respect to which we issued document hold notices last Thursday to you and to the US Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform.

See: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6189 and http://www.archive.org/details/ElectionFraudInOhioCourtCase.

I have informed court chambers and am in the process of informing the Ohio Attorney General's and US Attorney's offices in Columbus for the purpose, among other things, of seeking protection for Mr. Connell and his family from this reported attempt to intimidate a witness.

Concurrently herewith, I am informing Mr. Conyers and Mr. Kucinich in connection with their Congressional oversight responsibilities related to these matters.

Because of the serious engagement in this matter that began in 2000 of the Ohio Statehouse Press Corps, 60 Minutes, the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, C-Span and Jim VandeHei, and the public's right to know of gross attempts to subvert the rule of law, I am forwarding this information to them, as well.

Cliff Arnebeck, Attorney

614-224-8771

Cell 614-361-9434

cc: Robert Fitrakis, Esq. Henry Eckhart, Esq

 

For background information, below the fold are the links GreyHawk and others have amassed or the one-page list of previous work linked directly:
CURRENT MIKE CONNELL STORIES
Jan. 18, 2009 - More than two years of reference to the late Michael Connell and his GOP network insiders is found in a single-page list to be kept current for related stories throughout ePluribusMedia:



 Mike Connell: A Trail of Questions

 At the End of the Road

Submit tips to [email protected]

 

[UPDATE: 12/23/08 - added link to previous article list.]

[UPDATE: 01/18/09 - revised reference to previous article list.]

'Comprehensive' list of Previous stories
01/18/2009 - Mike Connell: A Trail of Questions At the End of the Road

 Previous stories
Ken Blackwell Outsources Ohio Election Results to GOP Internet Operatives, Again
Ohio's election website still sent real-time results to GOP mirror server
The GOP, GeorgeWBush.com and the line that jumped the Congressional Firewall
Who is Michael L. Connell? Part I: The Atwater School of Politics
Who is Mike Connell behind the firewall: Part II
Rove -ing emails: what else could go missing?

Recent stories

 
Where the Ohio 2004 Election RICO Lawsuit is Going, Interview With Attorneys Arnebeck and Fitrakis
Our Day in Court: Research into Ohio's 2004 Election Misdeed Finally Bearing Fruit

Friends' stories

 
BradBlog: Ohio Attorney Files to Lift Stay on '04 Election Case, Cites Allegations, Evidence of Massive Fraud by a Number of GOP Operatives
RawStory: GOP cyber-security expert suggests Diebold tampered with 2002 election
VelvetRevolution.US: Several commentary and original video posts

  Holy Cow.  Why can't Rove be stopped?
Title: Re: EXPOSED: South Carolina Massive Neutron Fraud and the Goldman Sachs Connections
Post by: larsonstdoc on January 22, 2012, 07:55:59 am
Who owns this foreign firm?

Venture Capitalist Company Balderton

Who runs Balderton?

Goldman Sachs and McKinsey!

You cannot make this shit up!





  You knew Goldman Sachs would be involved.  If Ron Paul became president,  the Federal Reserve would quit shoveling all this money to Goldman Sachs and all of these other ZOMBIE banks.