PrisonPlanet Forum

Elections, Referendums and Politics => Occupy Movement => Topic started by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 06:46:15 pm

Title: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 06:46:15 pm
Check it out, the exact same CSIS/Kissinger gameplan used in Egypt is now taking place in the US...



Semper Fi: Marines Coming To Protect Protesters On Wall Street
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/10/01/semper-fi-marines-coming-to-protect-protesters-on-wall-street/
October 1, 2011
By Michael Hayne

The thousands of indefatigable Wall Street protestors, risking their eyes and recording equipment against Wall Street’s personal jack-booted thugs in the NYPD, recently garnered even more support– the US Marines. That’s the type of support that may make an NYPD cop think twice before he decides to go all Tiananmen Square on a group of teenage girls, armed with chalk and cardboard signs (maybe it’s because they are spelled properly?). The Occupy Wall Street movement may have thought it broke new ground when the NYC Transit Union joined their movement, but that ground just tipped the Richter Scale with news that United States Army and Marine troops are reportedly on their way to various protest locations to support the movement and to protect the protesters. Here’s the message Ward Reilly relayed from another Marine, on his facebook page:

“I’m heading up there tonight in my dress blues. So far, 15 of my fellow marine buddies are meeting me there, also in Uniform. I want to send the following message to Wall St and Congress:I didn’t fight for Wall St. I fought for America. Now it’s Congress’ turn. My true hope, though, is that we Veterans can act as first line of defense between the police and the protester. If they want to get to some protesters so they can mace them, they will have to get through the f**king Marine Corps first. Let’s see a cop mace a bunch of decorated war vets.I apologize now for typos and errors. Typing this on iPhone whilst heading to NYC. We can organize once we’re there. That’s what we do best.If you see someone in uniform, gather together. A formation will be held tonight at 10PM. We all took an oath to uphold, protect and defend the constitution of this country. That’s what we will be doing. Hope to see you there!!”

Kudos, Mr Reilly!Thank You for having the courage and foresight to see past the transparently false and empty patriotism perpetually touted by the defense skanks and petro whores in Congress in order to keep their campaign coffers filled to the brim. Meanwhile, your brothers and sisters suffer massive cuts and are forced to live with PTSD, with little if any help from the very government and country for which you have sacrificed so much. Thank you for recognizing this movement not as a bunch of screaming white liberal kids with Henna tattoos, but as a universal and profound rejection of the unchecked and undue influence the plutocrats on Wall Street have had on the decision-making in Washington. Thank You for your service, and thank you for seeing through all the mountains of bullsh#t being shoveled around the clock by the Koch Bros. puppets in Washington via their lapdogs in the media.

It’s safe to say to if Mr. Reilly and his fellow marines lend their voices, it could be a defining moment that gives the Occupation of Wall Street movement the just right amount of fuel it needs to catch fire. After all, it would be interesting to see the media ignore  NYPD cops pepper spraying decorated war veterans, assuming the donut marchers dared to even consider the notion of trying.
--------------
Michael is a comedian/VO artist/Columnist extraordinaire, who co-wrote an award-nominated comedy, wrote for NY Times Laugh Lines, guest-blogged for Joe Biden, and writes a column for MSNBC.com affiliated Cagle. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook. Seriously, follow him or he’ll send you photos of Rush Limbaugh bending over in a thong.


Just so everyone is clear...

Bloomberg owns the NYPD

Obama is the commander in chief of the Marine Corp

Obama and Bloomberg are 100% aligned on ending US sovereignty and bringing in a NEW WORLD ORDER

How is it possible that troops which Bloomberg commands are gearing up to be violently confrontational with troops that Obama commands unless this was a live operation?

And Soros/Rothschild control the main provocateurs at the protests...

And for all the protestors, NYPD, and Marines going along with this obvious escalation to avoid the Federal Reserve issues funding all of these operations...PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT THE BANKSTERS DID TO EGYPT BEFORE IT IS TOOO LATE...

Notice how the MSM keeps comparing it to Egypt's "spontaneous and organic" revolution?

Well look at Egypt now...

More people arrested for political reasons in the last 7 months than in 30 years under Mubarak.

Public hangings of over 12,000 in the streets of Cairo

Police stations burned to the ground and the public gang-raping of police officers in the streets

Virginity tests for thousands of teenage girls and young women (they make a girl strip and they physically try to evaluate if her hyman is broken - sick shit) who are stopped at checkpoints randomly or targeted based on their looks

No food easily available

Mass looting and killing sprees with marauding gangs as Rockefeller predicted

No water readily available

Race based and religious based assassinations including burning people alive in public and burning down christian coptic churches

Increased tension with Israel who has been at peace with Egypt for 30 years

As one of the 'revolutionary' patsies described it: "Egypt has turned into a horror movie"

Egypt is 80 million people, if it can happen there it can happen here. The NWO needs this fake revolution to be exactly like Egypt because their time is running out and people are waking up.

DOCUMENTS EXPOSED HOW EGYPT WAS A TRIAL RUN FOR BILDERBERG TO STAGE FAKE REVOLUTIONS

"MENA: North Africa-Middlle East" War links update
Posted March 27th, 2011 by lizburbank

1/28 Documents Expose US behind 'pro-democracy uprisings' in New War Front http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/333

2/4/11 Egypt: US Mission Accomplished? http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/334

2/11 U.S. Declares Freedom: Egypt's 'New' Military Dictatorship http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/335

2/13 Egypt: Transparent Trappings:Creative Destruction for a ’Greater Middle East'& Beyond http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/336

2/20 Removing Room for Doubt http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/337

2/21 Behind the Offensive Across North Africa and Middle East http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/339

2/28 Libya: US Soft War Preps for Military Moves: African & Arab Surrogates Assist http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/338

3/8 Bomb Libya? Pros & Cons http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/341

3/17 All-Out War Officially Legitimized http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/343

3/19 Why US AFRICOM Commands "odyssey Dawn" War http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/344


MORE:

Notice that the mainstream media is 100% quiet about Egypt after they helped to take out their entire government through a series of deceptive tactics (documented within this forum with more info here: http://www.puppet99.com/?p=218 ) by Jacob Rothschild, David Rockefeller, Joseph Nye, Richard Haass, Henry Kissinger, Haim Saban, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Emir Al-Thani, Joseph Cohen, Mitt Romney, and other trilateral terrorists?

Do you want to know why the MSM will not touch this story? Because all of those puppet pundits who were claiming this was a victory for "Arab democracy" and a "spontaneous and organic" rise of free people over a tyrannical regime now know the truth. They were willful accomplices in a Bilderberg plot to commit genocide in North Africa using RAND Corp's SMART MOB technology, Rothschild's freezing of Mubarak's assets, propaganda from Brookings/CFR/Heritage, 24/7 media manipulation by Al-Jazeera/CNN/ABC/CBS/MSNBC/FOX, and all of the Joseph Nye mythology building bullshit.

Here is just one of thousands of reports from the front lines (which is every single home and business) in Egypt:


Egyptian Revolutionary:
We have turned the country into a horror movie

http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2011/may/17/egypt-why-are-churches-burning/
Yasmine El Rashidi

On a recent afternoon this month, in a busy downtown Cairo street, armed men exchanged gunfire, threw rocks and Molotov cocktails, and freely wielded knives in broad daylight. The two-hour fight, which began as an attempt by some shop-owners to extort the customers of others, left eighty-nine wounded and many stores destroyed. In the new Egypt, incidents like this are becoming commonplace. On many nights I go to bed to the sound of gunfire, and each morning I leaf through newspapers anticipating more stories of crime. Stopped at gun-point; car stolen; head severed; kidnapped from school, held at ransom; armed men storm police station opening fire and killing four; prison cells unlocked—91 criminals on the loose. Many people I know have already bought guns; on street corners metal bludgeons are being sold for $3; and every week I receive an email, or SMS, or Facebook message about a self-defense course, or purse-size electrocution tool, or new shipments of Mace. “These are dangerous times,” my mother told me recently as she handed me a Chinese-made YT-704 “super high voltage pulse generator.” “You have to take precautions, keep it in your bag.”

Even more worrying, it seems increasingly clear that a variety of groups have been encouraging the violence, in part by rekindling sectarian tensions that had disappeared during the Tahrir Square uprising, when Muslim and Coptic protesters protected one another against Mubarak’s thugs. Since then, there have been a series of attacks on Copts, and the perpetrators seem to include hardline Islamists (often referred to as Salafis), remnants of the former regime, and even, indirectly, some elements of the military now in charge, who have allowed these attacks to play out—all groups that in some way have an interest in disrupting a smooth transition to a freely elected civil government and democratic state.

On the weekend of May 7 and 8, in the Cairo district of Imbaba—an impoverished working-class neighborhood that has been a stronghold of militant Islamists in the past—a group of Salafis tried to force their way into Saint Mina Church, a local Coptic house of worship. They were demanding the release of a woman, Abeer, an alleged convert to Islam whom they claimed—without evidence—the church was holding against her will. (Christians here have long alleged that Islamists kidnap their girls, rape them, and force them to convert to Islam. In recent weeks, those allegations have grown. Now, some Salafis have been making similar charges about Copts.).

The day before, via Twitter, they had called on Muslims to come to the church to “free a Muslim sister,” and on Saturday night, a handful of Salafis and some thugs gathered outside the church, waving sticks and swords, chanting Allahu Akbar (Allah is the Greatest), provoking onlookers. A Christian man pulled out a gun and fired at them from a café nearby, and Christian residents from neighboring buildings followed suit, shooting from balconies. Before long, a battle had begun. The Muslim men and a growing crowd of hooligans brought out Molotov cocktails, rifles, handguns, bludgeons and knives. Eventually, the church was set on fire.

It was several hours before the police, fire department, and army showed up, and even then, witnesses told me, “they just stood by watching.” By the time they began firing tear-gas and dispersing the crowds, the Islamists and their now-large entourage of young men (many of whom were later revealed to be thugs with criminal records) had decided to move on. “They announced they were heading to another church to destroy it,” one eyewitness, a lawyer (and Muslim), told me, “and off they went.” The army just watched them march off, weapons in hand.

At the second Coptic church, also in Imbaba, two kilometers away, the mob wreaked havoc. A video shows a group of several hundred men marching towards it, breaking open its metal door, and smashing everything in sight. One man held a gun. Some were bearded; others young and clean shaven. The two attacks left fifteen people dead (including both Muslims and Copts) and 242 injured—some struck by stray bullets or broken glass, rocks, and wood; others burned in the fire. Many more were nearly comatose from inhaling large amounts of tear gas.
 
By the time I got to the second church early Sunday morning, it was a scene of devastation. The church priest, Father Metias, sat on a wooden bench in the middle of the burned building consoling sobbing Christians, who kissed his hand. “Even if it wasn’t this woman, Abeer, who they claim was held by the church, they would find another excuse. Before Abeer there was Camilia,” he told me, referring to a similar case in which Salafis claimed that a Coptic woman named Camilia had converted to Islam and was being held in another church. (Camilia eventually appeared on TV refuting the Salafi claims. Abeer, on the other hand, whose whereabouts during the attacks remain unclear, has since handed herself over to the military and is being investigated on several charges.) “These Salafis are radical, they want to eradicate the Copts from the country,” the priest said. “But I hold the army and leaders responsible. There is a security vacuum. Those who commit crimes are not being held accountable.”

By far the largest Christian minority in the Middle East, Egypt’s Copts account for some ten percent of the country’s population of 82 million. Since Mubarak’s resignation on February 11, hardline Salafis —who were kept under tight control by the former regime—have become vocal opponents of the church. Although they command only a small fraction of the followers of the mainstream Muslim Brotherhood, the Salafis’ brand of purist Islam is popular among some in conservative and working class districts, where there is growing resentment that the revolution hasn’t brought any tangible benefits. Leading up to the  March constitutional referendum, they promoted “yes” as a vote for “religion and stability,” and they are increasingly turning to the same outreach strategies long-used by the Brotherhood to win supporters. In some areas, Salafi Sheikhs have been using their Friday sermons to incite violence against Copts, whom they regard as infidels, and preach against democracy, which they say is not compatible with their goal of establishing an Islamic State.

The first major attack on the Coptic community occurred on March 4, when armed thugs bulldozed a church to its foundations on the outskirts of Cairo, allegedly over an illicit relationship between a Coptic man and a Muslim woman. The incident was followed by riots and clashes that left 13 people dead and 140 wounded. Yet rather than arresting and charging those responsible—sending them for quick military trials as it increasingly does with peaceful youth protesters—the military simply called on a Salafi Sheikh, Mohamed Hassan, to visit the area and try to reconcile Copts and Muslims.

Outraged by this response, several thousand Copts from across Cairo marched that night to the State TV and Radio Building, ten minutes from Tahrir, and set up camp nearby. They were demanding that the military bring the attackers to justice, rebuild the church, dismiss the district’s governor, and establish a law that insures equal religious protections for Muslims and Copts. Within a day the protest had grown to some 10,000 people, including Muslims who had come out in solidarity. Colored blankets and plywood covered the pavement, and Christian crosses were on display everywhere, as was the symbol of an Egypt for all: the cross within a crescent. “We don’t feel safe in our own country,” one protester told me. He and others I spoke to said they would not go home until their demands were met. “We want to be treated as equals,” Tamer Wagdy, a 25-year-old Copt who decided to act as my guardian, told me. “This is our revolution, the Coptic one.”

Soldiers from the armed forces, with their tanks, guns, and concrete and barbed-wired barricades, had entirely surrounded the hundred-square meters of street where the protesters had gathered. Unlike during the Tahrir uprising, they were doing little to search people entering the area or prevent thugs from infiltrating the crowd. One afternoon, I watched a man rush in, grab a gold chain with a cross on it from the neck of a young protester, pull it off, then push the protester over the corniche fence and into the river and try to run away. He was swiftly shoved to the ground by two teenage boys with crosses tattooed on their wrists and dragged toward a soldier. I then watched as the soldier held the thief’s arm, twisted it, playfully pulled his ear, and then laughed and let him go, back into the crowds. “It’s because we’re Copts,” Tamer had told me. “They are doing nothing to protect us.”

Despite several attempts by the army to disperse them, the Coptic protesters would not budge. Finally, on March 14—the tenth day of their sit-in—the military council promised to meet their key demands. (The army did later rebuild the church, though it has not brought charges against the March 4 attackers.) A priest subsequently urged them to leave and many went home. But ninety or so protestors remained, and the army began a brutal crackdown against them at 4:30 AM that night, sending in several hundred soldiers with wooden sticks, metal batons, and Taser guns. Tamer called me in a panic when the attack began. I couldn’t get to him until 7 AM, when the curfew was lifted. By then, many of his friends had been badly beaten; many had also been detained. Thirty-two people were hospitalized with injuries, and a twenty-two-year old man was missing.

While Christians have long played a significant part in Egypt’s economic and political life—Mubarak’s long-standing minister of finance was a Copt—they have also been subject to recurring waves of persecution. In the 1970s, President Anwar El Sadat attempted to quell the threat of leftist groups by releasing from jail the radical Islamists (or Al-Gamaa Al-Islamiya), who ultimately assassinated him in 1981, and brutal attacks on both foreigners and Copts became more frequent. In the spate of terrorist attacks they orchestrated in the 1990s, Al-Gamaa radicals killed scores of tourists, but also targeted Coptic churches, monasteries, villages, homes, and shops, particularly in Upper Egypt, leaving several hundred dead.

Mubarak, to his credit, clamped down: his security apparatus threw Al-Gamaa members in jail and the situation for Copts improved. Permits to build churches became somewhat easier to obtain, and broadcasts of church services and programs became more frequent. But it was also widely known that the regime was allowing a degree of room for Salafis and more radical Islamists to keep society somewhat fragmented and provide a counterweight to the far larger Muslim Brotherhood, whose social services and broad support made it a more direct threat to the government. Among the diplomatic cables disclosed by Wikileaks, for example, one from 2009 points to the “striking increase” in Salafism in recent years, and reports: “One of the most potent factors in facilitating the spread of Salafism has been the [Government of Egypt’s] largely passive approach to it… the GOE is happy to allow the unfettered spread of Salafi ideology, viewing it as drawing popular support away from the MB [Muslim Brotherhood].” The cable further noted: “Salafism is a bridge to extremism.”

Last year, amid growing grievances against the government and animosity towards the president’s son, Gamal Mubarak—who was being groomed to succeed his father in the 2011 presidential elections—the state security apparatus increasingly resorted to violence. Days before the parliamentary elections in November 2010, clashes broke out in a district near the Pyramids between anti-riot police and Copts, who were protesting a government moratorium on construction of a Christian community center. At least two people were killed, dozens injured, and 133 arrested. The government’s NDP spokesman Ali ElDin Hilal blamed the Copts for inciting the conflict; 156 people faced charges with possible maximum sentences of life in jail.

Then, during the November elections, the Coptic candidates were all but suppressed. The ruling National Democratic Party (NDP) fielded just 10 Copts among its 780 nominees vying for the 508 available seats. Of a total 5,725 candidates running for election, just 81—less than 2 percent—were Christian. It was widely believed that this was another one of the regime’s tactics to silence the opposition and maintain the status quo. (In the end, carefully orchestrated violence, vote rigging and corruption at the hands of the NDP gave it an unprecedented sweeping majority win—the opposition at large was eliminated.)

Weeks later, when a bomb ripped through a church in Alexandria, killing 23 and injuring 81, people were outraged by the regime’s feeble reaction and its changing story about the suspected perpetrators. The rumor fast spread that the Minster of Interior, Habib El Adly—a close Mubarak ally who is now in jail—had planned the attack in collusion with Islamists. “He wanted to keep people distracted so that Gamal could be pushed into power,” prominent politicians and retired army generals told me.

Much of this speculation was confirmed when protesters stormed the State Security headquarters on March 5, retrieving classified files and documents from the former regime—some of them directly implicating the interior minister in the Alexandria attack. Other cables and leaked documents unearthed since the uprising point to close collaboration between the State Security, or Amn Al Dawla, and particular Sheikhs, who were given public offices and positions. Among them was Mohamed Hassan, the prominent Sheikh who had been dispatched by the military to calm tensions after the March 4 attack and who, during the revolution, had called the Tahrir Square protesters “sinners.”

Now that the Mubarak regime has fallen and the military has shown clemency toward Islamists, radical Salafis have been further emboldened, sometimes to the point of taking the law into their own hands. In late March, a group of Salafis in the Upper Egyptian governorate of Qena cut off a teacher’s ear after accusing him of renting an apartment to prostitutes. They have also called for monuments and shrines to be destroyed, alcohol to be banned, and all women to cover their hair or risk being beaten and sprayed with acid. When one such threat circulated by SMS last month, many women chose to stay home the next day.

These incidents have led some in the Egyptian media to say that the Salafis have supplanted the Muslim Brotherhood as the fiend that threatens to turn Egypt into an Islamic state. This is hardly plausible—the military has promised that “Egypt will not become Iran,” and the Muslim Brotherhood, which hosted a joint conference with the Salafis last week, has denounced the violence and the radical interpretations of Islam that in part seem to be driving it. It also isn’t clear whether Salafis are principally responsible for the violence: despite perceptions to the contrary, only 23 of the more than 200 people detained for taking part in the Imbaba attack have been identified by the armed forces as Salafis (others who have been identified appear to be mainly thugs, plus some associates of the former regime).

I emailed my friend Stephane Lacroix, a scholar and expert on Wahabism and Egypt’s Salafi movements, asking for his insight on the recent Salafi resurgence. He confirmed the State Security’s support of certain Sheikhs, and said that some of the Egyptian Islamists appear to be backed by wealthy patrons in Saudi Arabia. About the threat to the Coptic community, he said: “Salafis do have a sectarian rhetoric, but at the same time they are capable of pragmatism… The biggest threat, I believe, is from mutasallifin (those influenced by certain hardline Salafi ideas) who are out of everyone’s control. It is those on the fringes of the movement who are causing the recent troubles.”

Although the news of the church attacks and clashes stunned much of the nation, the Coptic community had already anticipated such an attack. “We leave the house in the morning and are not sure we will return at night. Every day we pray for our lives,” one man told me last Friday at a Coptic rally at the Coptic Orthodox Cathedral in Cairo, the seat of the Coptic Pope, during which Copts called for equal rights and better protection from the state.

On Sunday, May 8, a few hours after a midday mass had been held at an Imbaba church for those killed in the local clashes, about two thousand Copts marched from the Supreme Court in downtown Cairo to the State TV and Radio Building. The march had already been planned before the Imbaba attacks, but now, in their aftermath, it had taken on new meaning. One of the protesters’ loudest chants accused Field Marshall Tantawi—the top army commander—of failing to hold anyone accountable for the attacks: ‘Field Marshal Tantawi why are you silent? Is it because you are a Salafi too?’

In one of Mubarak’s final speeches, he warned that in his absence, there would be “chaos.” Since his resignation, the military council, led by former Mubarak insider Tantawi, has at times appeared to be pushing things precisely in that direction. The police remain largely passive, and soldiers often just stand by, watching crimes unfold. Meanwhile, the military has released long-held Islamist prisoners and lifted restrictions on approximately 3,000 wanted radical Islamists who had been in exile and blacklisted from entering the country. Among those recently released is Abboud El Zomor, a member of the Al-Gamaa Al-Islamiya who was involved in the assassination of Sadat and is calling for an Islamic State. He said—live on Egyptian State TV—that he had no regrets about his involvement in the killing of Sadat. “If he were alive I would do it again.”

El Zomor, who was kept in jail for almost 30 years despite completing the 15-year sentence he was handed down, is one of the radical Islamists mentioned in a diplomatic cable dated November 2008. The cable (08CAIRO2187) details the counter-radicalization efforts and pressures Egyptian State Security has been applying on the Al-Gamaa [GI], saying that if pressure is lifted, “it is likely that some members of GI would return to violent extremism.” It also cited a government source saying that members of the group who have been released from prison “are prone to re-radicalization, and that left to themselves, it is likely that they would do so.”

In the end, there does not seem to be any single explanation for the church attack and the other recent incidents of violence. What is clear is that a confluence of forces—an army seeking the opportunity to consolidate power, remnants of a regime stirring havoc, a cabinet with little authority of its own, radical Islamists aspiring to an Islamic State, and deep-rooted currents of social intolerance that Egypt has long failed to confront—have created a situation in which the Copts, among other groups, have become particularly vulnerable. As the economy plummets, financial woes may lead to more instability—prices have already risen, and on the streets people are complaining they have no work. Reports indicate that many are already resorting to theft to feed their families.

As I write this, there are several hundred Copts camped outside the State TV and Radio building once again. In their tenth day of protest their encampment—which attracts several thousand in the evening hours as the workday ends and the air cools—looks much like it did back in March. Although the interim Interior Minister has said he will work with an “iron fist,” and the Prime Minister announced measures to prevent religious sloganeering, to give permits to build churches and mosques on an equal basis, and to refer those implicated in previous attacks to military courts, the protesters remain fearful.

A Coptic family is right now mourning the death of their 27-year-old son, who was shot over the weekend of May 15 on his way to work. Two other people were killed last weekend in violence at the hands of armed thugs; 60 others were injured. The army has announced it will extend the emergency law until after a President is elected, and already there is speculation that it may postpone the parliamentary elections, citing security concerns. “Whatever way things go, we’ll be under military rule for at least a few years,” a prominent businessman told me yesterday. As another friend put it, “Egypt today: horror movie, Bollywood production.”

Yasmine El Rashidi’s eyewitness account of the 2011 Egyptian revolution,
The Battle for Egypt

Egypt is 80 million people, if it can happen there it can happen here. The NWO needs this fake revolution to be exactly like Egypt because their time is running out and people are waking up.


Egypt protests: secret US document discloses the hijacking of protesters for American interests
Here is the secret document sent from the US Embassy in Cairo to Washington disclosing the extent of American support for the protesters behind the Egypt uprising.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/8289698/Egypt-protests-secret-US-document-discloses-support-for-protesters.html
10:30PM GMT 28 Jan 2011

S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 CAIRO 002572 SIPDIS FOR NEA/ELA, R, S/P AND H NSC FOR PASCUAL AND KUTCHA-HELBLING E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/30/2028 TAGS: PGOV, PHUM, KDEM, EG SUBJECT: APRIL 6 ACTIVIST ON HIS U.S. VISIT AND REGIME CHANGE IN EGYPT REF: A. CAIRO 2462 B. CAIRO 2454 C. CAIRO 2431 Classified By: ECPO A/Mincouns Catherine Hill-Herndon for reason 1.4 (d ).

1. (C) Summary and comment: On December 23, April 6 activist xxxxxxxxxxxx expressed satisfaction with his participation in the December 3-5 \"Alliance of Youth Movements Summit,\" and with his subsequent meetings with USG officials, on Capitol Hill, and with think tanks. He described how State Security (SSIS) detained him at the Cairo airport upon his return and confiscated his notes for his summit presentation calling for democratic change in Egypt, and his schedule for his Congressional meetings. xxxxxxxxxxxx contended that the GOE will never undertake significant reform, and therefore, Egyptians need to replace the current regime with a parliamentary democracy. He alleged that several opposition parties and movements have accepted an unwritten plan for democratic transition by 2011; we are doubtful of this claim.

xxxxxxxxxxxx said that although SSIS recently released two April 6 activists, it also arrested three additional group members. We have pressed the MFA for the release of these April 6 activists. April 6's stated goal of replacing the current regime with a parliamentary democracy prior to the 2011 presidential elections is highly unrealistic, and is not supported by the mainstream opposition. End summary and comment.

---------------------------- Satisfaction with the Summit ----------------------------

2. (C) xxxxxxxxxxxx expressed satisfaction with the December 3-5 \"Alliance of Youth Movements Summit\" in New York, noting that he was able to meet activists from other countries and outline his movement's goals for democratic change in Egypt. He told us that the other activists at the summit were very supportive, and that some even offered to hold public demonstrations in support of Egyptian democracy in their countries, with xxxxxxxxxxxx as an invited guest. xxxxxxxxxxxx said he discussed with the other activists how April 6 members could more effectively evade harassment and surveillance from SSIS with technical upgrades, such as consistently alternating computer \"simcards.\" However, xxxxxxxxxxxx lamented to us that because most April 6 members do not own computers, this tactic would be impossible to implement. xxxxxxxxxxxx was appreciative of the successful efforts by the Department and the summit organizers to protect his identity at the summit, and told us that his name was never mentioned publicly.

------------------- A Cold Welcome Home -------------------

3. (S) xxxxxxxxxxxx told us that SSIS detained and searched him at the Cairo Airport on December 18 upon his return from the U.S. According to xxxxxxxxxxxx, SSIS found and confiscated two documents in his luggage: notes for his presentation at the summit that described April 6's demands for democratic transition in Egypt, and a schedule of his Capitol Hill meetings. xxxxxxxxxxxx described how the SSIS officer told him that State Security is compiling a file on him, and that the officer's superiors instructed him to file a report on xxxxxxxxxxxx most recent activities.

--------------------------------------------- ----------

Washington Meetings and April 6 Ideas for Regime Change

--------------------------------------------- ----------

4. (C) xxxxxxxxxxxx described his Washington appointments as positive, saying that on the Hill he met with xxxxxxxxxxxx, a variety of House staff members, including from the offices of xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx), and with two Senate staffers. xxxxxxxxxxxx also noted that he met with several think tank members. xxxxxxxxxxxx said that xxxxxxxxxxxx's office invited him to speak at a late January Congressional hearing on House Resolution 1303 regarding religious and political freedom in Egypt. xxxxxxxxxxxx told us he is interested in attending, but conceded he is unsure whether he will have the funds to make the trip. He indicated to us that he has not been focusing on his work as a \"fixer\" for journalists, due to his preoccupation with his U.S. trip. 5. (C) xxxxxxxxxxxx described how he tried to convince his Washington interlocutors that the USG should pressure the GOE to implement significant reforms by threatening to reveal CAIRO 00002572 002 OF 002 information about GOE officials' alleged \"illegal\" off-shore bank accounts. He hoped that the U.S. and the international community would freeze these bank accounts, like the accounts of Zimbabwean President Mugabe's confidantes. xxxxxxxxxxxx said he wants to convince the USG that Mubarak is worse than Mugabe and that the GOE will never accept democratic reform. xxxxxxxxxxxx asserted that Mubarak derives his legitimacy from U.S. support, and therefore charged the U.S. with \"being responsible\" for Mubarak's \"crimes.\"

He accused NGOs working on political and economic reform of living in a \"fantasy world,\" and not recognizing that Mubarak -- \"the head of the snake\" -- must step aside to enable democracy to take root.

6. (C) xxxxxxxxxxxx claimed that several opposition forces -- including the Wafd, Nasserite, Karama and Tagammu parties, and the Muslim Brotherhood, Kifaya, and Revolutionary Socialist movements -- have agreed to support an unwritten plan for a transition to a parliamentary democracy, involving a weakened presidency and an empowered prime minister and parliament, before the scheduled 2011 presidential elections (ref C). According to xxxxxxxxxxxx, the opposition is interested in receiving support from the army and the police for a transitional government prior to the 2011 elections.

xxxxxxxxxxxx asserted that this plan is so sensitive it cannot be written down. (Comment: We have no information to corroborate that these parties and movements have agreed to the unrealistic plan xxxxxxxxxxxx has outlined. Per ref C, xxxxxxxxxxxx previously told us that this plan was publicly available on the internet. End comment.)

7. (C) xxxxxxxxxxxx said that the GOE has recently been cracking down on the April 6 movement by arresting its members. xxxxxxxxxxxx noted that although SSIS had released xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx \"in the past few days,\" it had arrested three other members. (Note: On December 14, we pressed the MFA for the release of xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx, and on December 28 we asked the MFA for the GOE to release the additional three activists. End note.) xxxxxxxxxxxx conceded that April 6 has no feasible plans for future activities.

The group would like to call for another strike on April 6, 2009, but realizes this would be \"impossible\" due to SSIS interference, xxxxxxxxxxxx said. He lamented that the GOE has driven the group's leadership underground, and that one of its leaders, xxxxxxxxxxxx, has been in hiding for the past week.

8. (C) Comment: xxxxxxxxxxxx offered no roadmap of concrete steps toward April 6's highly unrealistic goal of replacing the current regime with a parliamentary democracy prior to the 2011 presidential elections. Most opposition parties and independent NGOs work toward achieving tangible, incremental reform within the current political context, even if they may be pessimistic about their chances of success. xxxxxxxxxxxx wholesale rejection of such an approach places him outside this mainstream of opposition politicians and activists.

SCOBEY02008-12-307386PGOV,PHUM,KDEM,EGAPRIL 6 ACTIVIST ON HIS U.S. VISIT AND REGIME CHANGE IN EGYPT
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Satyagraha on October 03, 2011, 07:03:15 pm

The thousands of indefatigable Wall Street protestors, risking their eyes and recording equipment against Wall Street’s personal jack-booted thugs in the NYPD, recently garnered even more support– the US Marines. That’s the type of support that may make an NYPD cop think twice before he decides to go all Tiananmen Square on a group of teenage girls, armed with chalk and cardboard signs (maybe it’s because they are spelled properly?).


So why didn't they protect the protestors at the G20?
Protestors outside the G20 meeting were abducted, beaten, victimized by sound cannons...
That the marines are being called in to protect the protestors means the protestors are 'their own'.

Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: egypt on October 03, 2011, 07:08:25 pm
Thank you for this exposure, Dig.  I was just hoping too much that it was a good thing for military men to show up to protect demonstrators.

Thank goodness you know what is going on!

Love, e
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: ersatz protocol on October 03, 2011, 07:10:31 pm
van jones is rapidly becoming the media spokesman for occupy wall street.
van jones clearly states on his twitter that he supports obama 2012...
as much as i admire good intentions of dissent..i think this one is co-opted.

Van Jones: Marines to stand with Wall Street protesters

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/10/03/van-jones-marines-to-stand-with-wall-street-protesters/
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 07:13:27 pm
Thank you for this exposure, Dig.  I was just hoping too much that it was a good thing for military men to show up to protect demonstrators.

Thank goodness you know what is going on!

Love, e


I only know what i can see from the headlines. Please people research this shit for yourselves. Do your own investigations. Ask yourselves, why are there no more stories about Egypt? There used to be over 5,000 stories a day about Egypt, now nothing whatsoever. They have transformed a growing anti-central bank country into a scene from the movie "The Road".

They are pplanning on doing it here. And look at Libya, now UAV's control all of the skies, that is what they want in the US. They want more social conflict to justify their next generation weapons.

But please research this stuff on your own.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 07:20:53 pm
FLASHBACK: Battle in Seattle...staged escalations to deny true protests

Watch the following and decide for yourself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4Y7jrIx61k (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4Y7jrIx61k) (part 1 of 4)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpY6Sw400Q0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpY6Sw400Q0) (part 2 of 4)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5TaJcI35V8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5TaJcI35V8) (part 3 of 4)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e0ONAaHHzQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e0ONAaHHzQ) (part 4 of 4)
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 07:22:19 pm
SMART MOBS AND TEEN MOBS IN US CITIES
RAND PUSHES FOR FUNDING OF "RED CELL" SMART MOB OPERATIONS TO EVALUATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR UN TAKEOVER OF THE UNITED STATES VIA FAKE REVOLUTION
NATIONAL CLANDESTINE SERVICE BEGINS IMPLEMENTING THESE "RED CELL" OPERATIONS IN VARIOUS US CITIES LIKE PEORIA, IL

2002 (Over 9 years ago - funding authorized as part of overhaul of US Black Operations allowed by the false flag terror attacks on 9/11/2001)
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/rheingold/rheingold_print.html

The big battle coming over the future of smart mobs concerns media cartels and government agencies are seeking to reimpose the regime of the broadcast era in which the customers of technology will be deprived of the power to create and left only with the power to consume. That power struggle is what the battles over file-sharing, copy protection, regulation of the radio spectrum are about. Are the populations of tomorrow going to be users, like the PC owners and website creators who turned technology to widespread innovation? Or will they be consumers, constrained from innovation and locked into the technology and business models of the most powerful entrenched interests?

In 1999 and 2000, Howard Rheingold started noticing people using mobile media in novel ways. In Tokyo, he accompanied flocks of teenagers as they converged on public places, coordinated by text messages. In Helsinki, he joined like-minded Finns who share the same downtown physical clubhouse, virtual community, and mobile-messaging media. He learned that the demonstrators in the 1999 anti-WTO protests used dynamically updated websites, cell-phones, and "swarming" tactics in the "battle of Seattle," and that a million Filipino citizens toppled President Estrada in 2000 through public demonstrations organized by salvos of text messages. Drivers in the UK used mobile communications to spontaneously self organize demonstrations against rising petrol prices. He began to see how these events were connected. He calls these new uses of mobile media "smart mobs."

For nearly two years, Rheingold visited hotspots around the world where smart mob technologies and societies were erupting. He had some idea of how to look for early signs of momentous changes, having chronicled and forecast the PC revolution in 1985 and the Internet explosion in 1993. He is now sees a third wave of change underway in the first decade of the 21st century, as the combination of mobile communication and the Internet makes it possible for people to cooperate in ways never before possible.

HOWARD RHEINGOLD has evolved from a modest, quiet, thoughtful working writer/editor into the flamboyant Howard "always ten years ahead of his time" Rheingold. From his dazzling hand-designed shoes to his vividly colored suits and his TV ads for Kinko's, he has invented his own character-spokesman, communications expert, celebrity, lecturer, writer, thinker, wise man, one of the first people to recognize the potential of a new medium for human communication. As Kevin Kelly says: "Anywhere Rheingold goes, I'll be there behind him."

Rheingold is the author of Virtual Reality, and The Virtual Community, and was the editor of Whole Earth Review and the Millennium Whole Earth Catalog.

This RAND CORPORATION Senior Scholar's new book is
Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution.


Smart mobs use mobile media and computer networks to organize collective actions, from swarms of techo-savvy youth in urban Asia and Scandinavia to citizen revolts on the streets of Seattle, Manila, and Caracas. Wireless community networks, webloggers, buyers and sellers on eBay are early indicators of smart mobs that will emerge in the coming decade. Communication and computing technologies capable of amplifying human cooperation already appear to be both beneficial and destructive, used by some to support democracy and by others to coordinate terrorist attacks. Already, governments have fallen, subcultures have blossomed, new industries have been born and older industries have launched counterattacks.

There are both dangers and opportunities posed by this emerging phenomenon. Smart mob devices, industries, norms, and social consequences are in their earliest stages of development, but they are evolving rapidly. Current political and social conflicts over how smart mob technologies will be designed and regulated pose questions about the way we will all live for decades to come.

A number of new technologies make smart mobs possible and the pieces of the puzzle are all around us now, but haven't joined together yet. Wireless Internet nodes in cafes, hotels, and neighborhoods are part of it. The radio chips designed to replace barcodes on manufactured objects are part of it. Millions of people who lend their computers to the search for extraterrestrial intelligence are part of it. The reputation systems used on eBay and Slashdot, and the peer to peer capabilities demonstrated by Napster point to other pieces of the puzzle.

Some mobile telephones are already equipped with location-detection devices and digital cameras. Some inexpensive mobile devices already read barcodes and send and receive messages to radio-frequency identity tags. Some furnish wireless, always-on Internet connections. Large numbers of people in industrial nations will soon have a device with them most of the time that will enable them to link objects, places and people to online content and processes. Point your device at a street sign, announce where you want to go, and follow the animated map beamed to the box in your palm; or point at a book in a store and see what the Times and your neighborhood reading group have to say about it. Click on a restaurant and warn your friends that the service has deteriorated.

The big battle coming over the future of smart mobs concerns media cartels and government agencies are seeking to reimpose the regime of the broadcast era in which the customers of technology will be deprived of the power to create and left only with the power to consume. That power struggle is what the battles over file-sharing, copy protection, regulation of the radio spectrum are about. Are the populations of tomorrow going to be users, like the PC owners and website creators who turned technology to widespread innovation? Or will they be consumers, constrained from innovation and locked into the technology and business models of the most powerful entrenched interests?

Telephone companies and cable operators, with enormous investments in old technologies, are moving to control who can build enterprises on the Internet, and the kinds of enterprises they can create. The expensive auctions of radio spectrum for next-generation "3G" mobile communications are threatened by the emergence of radically more cost effective technologies in the form of grassroots wireless networks.

The entire 1920s scheme for regulating the use of the electromagnetic spectrum is thrown into question by the invention of "cognitive radios" and other wireless technologies that put power into the hands of user communities rather than central broadcasters.

Five Hollywood movie studios and the four giant companies that dominate the global recording industry say they are trying to protect intellectual property, but are backing legislation and "protection devices" that will lock down computers and the Internet into a pay-for-play model in which only the largest players will be allowed to create or distribute content or services online, permitted to create new kinds of computers, or empowered to invent things like the Web.

Although the recording industry succeeded in shutting down Napster, and the legal arguments were about the theft of copyrighted music, the technical significance of peer-to-peer resource sharing is far greater than even the future of the music industry. Seventy million people used Napster within the first months of its existence. When tens of millions of people pool their computing power, many things become possible.

[email protected] uses the idle processing power of millions of PCs to search for life in outer space and other CPU-sharing "distributed computing" networks help search for new medicines, understand the immune system, crack codes, predict the weather. Wireless networks show that communication bandwidth can be pooled. Combining the data storage, computation, and communication power of millions of PCs makes possible entirely new kinds of science, business, and social enterprise, based on the emergent power of millions of individuals.

Combine wearable computing, wireless communications, and peer-to-peer resource sharing, and all the people in a building or a crowd walking down the street can join into ad-hoc networks.

As influential as the Internet has been, it has been, for the most part, confined to computers on desktops. Mobile communication and pervasive computing technologies are permeating every part of our professional and personal lives with Internet-enabled capabilities. Just as the microprocessor and the television screen combine into an entirely new technology with its own capabilities, the personal computer, and millions of computers linked through the global telecommunication network constitute an entirely new technology with its own capabilities, the Internet, the marriage of the mobile telephone and the Internet will result in far more than email or stock quotes in your pocket - the mobile Internet in a computation-pervaded environment will constitute an entirely new medium with its own properties.

Will the architecture and regulation of the emerging wireless Internet be dictated by and empower a few large, highly centralized institutions such as corporations and governments, or will it favor the cooperative innovations of millions of citizens - the way the architecture and regulation of the wired Internet made the Web possible?

The people who make up smart mobs cooperate in ways never before possible because they carry devices that possess both communication and computing capabilities. Their mobile devices connect them with other information devices in the environment as well as with other people's telephones.

Dirt-cheap microprocessors embedded in everything from box tops to shoes are beginning to permeate furniture, buildings, neighborhoods, products with invisible intercommunicating smartifacts. When they connect the tangible objects and places of our daily lives with the Internet, handheld communication media mutate into wearable remote control devices for the physical world.

The cost, size, and performing power of computers, video displays, and wireless communications are moving from the computer industry into the fashion industry, as wearable computers embedded in clothing become cost-effective. Ultimately, with peer-to-peer methodologies, reputation systems that mediate trust between strangers, and ad-hoc broadband networks, wearable devices will be desired, purchased, and used as much for their social capabilities as for their utility as information appliances.

There are the dangers as well as opportunities concerning smart mobs. I used the word "mob" deliberately because of its dark resonances. Humans have used our talents for cooperation to organize atrocities. Technologies that enable cooperation are not inherently pathological: unlike nuclear bombs or land mines, smart mob technologies have the potential for being used for good as well as evil.

Nevertheless, years before the September 11, 2001 attacks, commentator Thomas Friedman prophetically referred to "superempowered individuals" such as Osama Ben Laden who use modern technologies and networked organizations to execute acts of terrorism. RAND corporation analysts have pointed out that the Russian mafia and Colombian narcotics trafficking enterprises use "netwar" methods combining communication networks, social networks, and networked forms of organization.

On the other hand, when cooperation breaks out, civilizations advance and the lives of citizens improve. This is the big opportunity of smart mobs. Language, the alphabet, cities, the printing press did not eliminate poverty or injustice, but they did make it possible for groups of people to create cooperative enterprises such as science and democracy that increased the health, welfare, and liberty of many.

Just as medicine only became an effective weapon against illness when science furnished useful knowledge about the nature of diseases, the most effective use of communication and computer technologies could emerge from new scientific understandings of human cooperation. The most powerful opportunities for human progress are rooted not in electronics but in understandings of social practices. Sociologists, political scientists, evolutionary biologists, even nuclear warfare strategists have contributed the first clues that an interdisciplinary science of cooperation might be emerging.

Mobile communications and pervasive computing have the potential for magnifying cooperation far more powerfully than previous technologies; coupled with new knowledge about the social dynamics of collective action, smart mob technologies could make possible improvements in the way billions of people live.
Mobile Media and Political Collective Action
RAND Corporation's Senior Social Architect: Howard Rheingold

http://www.rheingold.com/texts/PoliticalSmartMobs.pdf
New rooms:

CYBERTERRORISM - Admitted to be 100% controlled by CIA/FBI/NRO/NSA/NCS
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?board=515.0

The FBI have admitted that all cybercrime is committed by them or another agency in order to control any possible future cyberterrorists that may blossom. They continually recruit anyone who shows an interest in cyberterrorism by paying them large sums of taxpayer money and telling them to recruit their friends. The Pentagon regularly runs classes for children to teach them how to hack into neighbors' bank accounts and security systems. They then recruit the children that show promise for future covert operations. Since the 1970's, RAND Corporation has been working on these operations for total surveillance and domination over the individual by enacting progressively more catastrophic cyber terrorism. After every attack, RAND recommends more network centric systems with less humans. This of course allows for PTECH style systems to create more catastrophic attacks. The PTECH/Cyberterror that occured on 9/11/2001 as revealed by declassified FAA and MITRE documentation (along with the testimony of Indira Singh who exposed these remote command and control systems) prove that PTECH and MITRE had some of the most powerful control over the events of 9/11/2001. This includes running all of the military drills which gave cover for the events while causing cascading stand down orders throughout NORAD. But the cyberterrorism agenda by Bilderberg/Pentagon is not limited to spectacular events like 9/11/2001, they also include the building of massive data wharehouses of profiling information on all citicens and all foreigners. The Pentagon regularly steals millions of records from Sony, Target, Bank of America, Defense Contractors, all the social networks, all healthcare data, basically all of the sectors of society. William Lynn III has admitted to this full spectrum control of all data systems and the only reason they call it a 'hack' is to avoid treasonous violations of the the first, forth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eigth amendments in the US Constitution. By the Pentagon stealing the information (which is given to Bilderberg Eurocrats), they can claim it was a hack (no non-FBI/Secret Service controlled hacker targets the middle class) and that the information is now public knowledge because it was purposefully leaked. They also use this information in elaborate extortion operations to neutralize potential 'turds in the punchbowl'. In fact, IBM/RAND/CSIS brag about building predictive systems which will autonomously silence potential whistleblowers who compromise their plans for destroying the United States of America. They actually brag about it. This is how IBM/RAND are building their 'Alphaville' control grid which IBM/CISCO have written white papers about. Basically...War is a Racket and Cyberterrorism is a Racket. The most treasonous corporations involved (the top people from them, not the majority of the workers who are compartmentalized) are Kissinger's CSIS, RAND, MITRE, Booz Allen Hamilton, CACI, Kroll, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems. Just reading Brzezinski's 'Between Two Ages' gives a person a good understanding of this Trilateral Terrorist agenda.
RAND Corporation 'Smart Mob' events to destabilize the United States of America
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?board=516.0

Hey kids...want to help Rothschild and Rockefeller families turn the US and Europe into a horror movie like KISSINGER/CSIS/SAIC/MITRE/RAND did to Egypt (a country of 80 million)? Well just get yourself microchipped with a cool cybernetic tattoo and give all your personal records to Goldman Sach's owned 'Facebook.' You can also utilize Twitter which gives you direct access to the White House because Obama's new communications czar is actually the CEO of Twitter (I shit you not). And you do not have to worry about acting inappropriately when engaging in these RAND 'Smart Mobs' because Cass Sunstein (Obama's science czar) has installed behavioral modification systems for you to be nudged into acting the way Rothschild needs you to act. Also, do not worry who is giving you your orders because the $2 Million Pentagon/CIA laptops will keep all the info secure for Raytheon's William Lynn III (Undersecretary of Defense) in his Cyber Bunker Death Star that you helped pay for. And if you are wondering why you have this urge to rebel, just remember that Undersecretary of Homeland Security, Jane Holl Lute (Former director of UN's millions of exploited women and children...you know, the ones that the movie 'Whistleblower' exposed and the ones that Jane Holl Lute has continued to deny any quarter to) has demanded that all 7-9 year olds be controlled by her operations so that their 'World View and sense of Entitlement' can be formed to meet the needs of the Bilderberg Elite. Also, the offshore banksters have made it impossible for you to get jobs while they continue to raise the prices of food and shelter. Let's not forget CIA/Evergreen/Air America spraying the sky with Barium which is used to drive populations completely insane. Yes we all can join in the New World Order Red Team/Joker architected controlled opposition to scare the shit out of the middle class until they demand a complete military controlled society as Egypt is turning into. And just like all patsy revolutionaries, we will be summarily extinguished because the last thing the globalists want is a true revolution when they have been working so long at destroying the true American Revolution for so many decades. Why so serious?
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 07:27:30 pm
Paper presented at the RTO SCI Lecture Series on “Technologies for Future Precision Strike Missile Systems”, held in Tbilisi, Georgia, 18-19 June 2001; Bucharest, Romania, 21-22 June 2001; Madrid, Spain, 25-26 June 2001; Stockholm, Sweden, 28-29 June 2001, and published in RTO-EN-018.

http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public//PubFullText/RTO/EN/RTO-EN-018///EN-018-$I.pdf (http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public//PubFullText/RTO/EN/RTO-EN-018///EN-018-$I.pdf)

Pre-9/11/2001!
Read this document and wonder how this insanity was gonna get approved without the NATO Fundraiser called 9/11!



Technologies for Future Precision Strike Missile Systems -
Introduction/Overview
Eugene L. Fleeman
Aerospace Systems Design Laboratory
School of Aerospace Engineering
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0150, United States

Abstract/Executive Summary

This report documents and updates the results of NATO Research and Technology Organization (RTO) lecture series number 221, entitled “Technologies for Future Precision Strike Missile Systems.” The lecture series was conducted under the RTO Consultant and Exchange (C&E) Program as a two-day educational event. The lectures were first held March 23-24, 2000 in Atlanta Georgia USA, at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Following the lectures at Georgia Tech, the lectures were held April 3-4, 2000 in Turin, Italy and April 6-7, 2000 in Ankara, Turkey. Due to the interest in the lectures, they were reprised in 2001. Updated lectures were presented in Tbilisi, Georgia (18-19 June 2001), Bucharest, Romania (21-22 June 2001), Madrid, Spain (25-26 June 2001), and Stockholm, Sweden (28-29 June 2001).

The primary purpose of the lecture series was the disseminating of state-of-the-art scientific and technical knowledge among a wide audience. The lecture series identified significant developments in the enabling technologies and provided examples of the advancements. It also addressed the challenging requirements in areas such as adverse weather capability, time critical targets, high kill probability, no collateral damage, high survivability light-weight expeditionary warfare weapons, and affordability.

Emerging technologies for precision strike missile systems that were addressed in the lecture series included:

-Mission planning technology. Assessments included off-board sensor integration, near-real-time mission planning, flight altitude, terrain following, and missile data links for in-flight targeting.
-Missile aeromechanics technology. Assessments included hypersonic airframes, low cost/high temperature structure, and ramjet propulsion.
-Guidance & control technology. An overview of existing guidance and control was given. Assessments included precision guidance and optimal guidance laws.
-Missile GPS/INS sensor technology. Assessments included low cost inertial navigation system (INS) and
-Global Positioning System (GPS)/INS integration.
-Missile design technology. An overview of the missile design process was given. Assessments included computer programs and electronic spreadsheets for conceptual design and missile design criteria.
-Seeker technology. Assessments included active and passive imaging infrared and radar seekers.
-Missile/aircraft integration technology. Assessments included high firepower weapon concepts, reduced observables, and insensitive munitions.
-Simulation/validation technology. Assessments included hardware-in-the-loop and design validation.
-Automatic target recognition technology. Assessments included robust algorithms and hardware/algorithm optimization.

Introduction

The last decade has seen increased usage of precision strike missile systems for military strike operations. Moreover, precision strike missiles are expected to have an even larger share of military strike operations in the future. A key contributor to the increased effectiveness of precision strike missiles is the advancement in technology. Examples of system effectiveness improvements include improved missile range, firepower, maneuverability, accuracy, lethality, and adverse weather capability. This lecture series provided insight into the enabling technologies and the state-of-the-art for precision strike missile systems. A historical example of the value of guided weapons is the Thanh Hoa Bridge in Vietnam. For over six years, a total of 871 aircraft sorties dropped unguided bombs but failed to close the bridge. However, the first operational application of laser-guided bombs on 13 May 1972 resulted in direct hits on the supporting piers, dropping the center span and closing the bridge. It is noted that eleven aircraft were lost using unguided munitions in the 871 previous sorties. No aircraft were lost in the four sorties using precision guided munitions. The technical program for the lectures consisted of two days.

The first day included registration, opening ceremony, an introduction/overview, and lectures on mission planning technology, missile aeromechanics technology, guidance & control technology, missile GPS/INS technology, and missile design technology.

Day 2 continued the program with lectures on seeker technology, missile/aircraft integration, simulation/validation, and automatic target recognition technologies. Following the lectures, there was a round-table discussion to address questions and comments from the attendees. The lecture series director provided concluding remarks.

The lecture series director was Mr. Eugene Fleeman of the Georgia Institute of Technology. Other speakers were Mr. Erik Berglund of the Swedish Defence Research Agency, and Mr. William Licata of the Raytheon Company. Figure 1 summarizes the focus of this lecture series. Primary areas of emphasis were technologies in aerodynamics, propulsion, structures/materials, guidance and control, seeker, missile design, GPS/INS sensors, missile/aircraft integration, simulation/validation, automatic target recognition (ATR), and mission management. Other areas that were addressed, but with lesser emphasis, included missile data link, cost/logistics, reduced observables, and survivability.

This lecture series recognizes that precision strike missiles are different from other flight vehicles, such as combat aircraft. Precision strike missiles are a technical specialty in their own right. For example, Figure 2 compares precision strike missile characteristics and the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) with that of fighteraircraft. Examples are shown where missiles are driving technology. Also shown are other areas where the missile is not driving technology in comparison with fighter aircraft. As an example, the lateral and longitudinal acceleration SOTA of missiles exceeds that of combat aircraft. Missile lateral maneuverability of 30+ g's and longitudinal acceleration of 30+ g's have been demonstrated. Notable examples of precision strike missiles with high acceleration and maneuverability include AGM-88 HARM and AGM-114 Hellfire missiles. Missile speed is also usually greater than that of combat aircraft, an example is the AS-17/Kh 31 hypersonic ramjet missile. Another difference is dynamic pressure loading on a missile, which is usually greater than of combat aircraft. An example of a precision strike missile that operates at high dynamic pressure is the ANS ramjet missile. Another difference is the relatively small size and lighter weight of missiles in comparison to combat aircraft, notably the LOCAAS powered submunition.

Related to cost, missiles are a throw-away. As a result, they are more cost-driven than combat aircraft. Development cost is smaller for missiles and the difference in production cost is even more dramatic. An example is the GBU-31 JDAM, with cost on the order of $15,000, compared to 10's of millions of dollars for typical combat aircraft. Finally, cruise missiles such as AGM-129 are able to achieve low radar cross section without the other design limitations associated with piloted aircraft.

Areas where the combat aircraft have superior capability include range, targets killed per use, and target acquisition. Although the conventional version of the AGM 86 cruise missile (CALCM) has a flight range that can exceed 700 nautical miles, combat aircraft have much longer range. In the area of target kill capability, precision strike missiles have become more efficient in recent years, with a single target kill probability approaching one and a capability for multiple target kills. The Apache missile is an example of an efficient precision strike missile. It has high accuracy and is capable of dispensing submunitions, exhibiting high firepower. However the same missiles are load-outs on combat aircraft, and so the enhancement in missiles also enhances the combat aircraft effectiveness and firepower. Finally, although smart, powered submunitions such as LOCAAS have demonstrated a capability for automatic target recognition (ATR), combat aircraft with a human pilot continues to have superior capability for target recognition, discrimination and acquisition. Autonomous target acquisition by missiles is a relatively immature technology that will improve in the future with new technologies such as multi-mode and multi-spectral seekers.

Examples of Precision Strike Missiles

Figure 3 is an example of surface target types and the characteristics of current precision strike missiles. The missions for precision strike missiles cover a broad range of targets, including fixed targets, radar sites, ships, armor, and buried targets.

In the case of fixed targets (which usually are of large size with hardness ranging from soft to hard), a blast fragmentation warhead or dispensed cluster submunitions are usually used. The current missiles for use against fixed targets are relatively large, with wings for efficient subsonic flight. Current missiles in this category include AGM-154 JSOW, Apache, KEPD-350, BGM-109 Tomahawk, and AGM-142 Have Nap.

The second target category is radar sites. Radar sites are relatively soft, and a blast fragmentation warhead is usually used. Anti-radar missiles have an anti-radiation homing (ARH) seeker and generally fly at high supersonic Mach number, for launch aircraft survivability in a SAM engagement and to minimize threat radar shutdown before missile impact. Current missiles in this category include AGM-88 HARM, AS-11 Kilter/ Kh-58, ARMAT, AS-12 Kegler/ Kh-27, and ALARM.

A third target category is ship targets. Ships are relatively hard targets and usually require a kinetic energy penetrating warhead, followed by blast fragmentation after penetration of the hull. Anti-ship missiles are generally large size and have a large warhead. Anti-ship missiles are designed to survive ship defenses, relying on either speed or flying at low altitude in clutter to survive. Current anti-ship missiles include MM40 Exocet, AS-34 Kormoran, AS-17 Krypton/Kh-34, Sea Eagle, and SS-N-22 Sunburn/3M80.

A fourth category is armor targets. This includes tanks, armored personnel carriers, and other armored combat vehicles. Armor targets are small size, mobile, and very hard. Typical anti-armor warheads include shaped charge, explosively formed projectile (EFP), and kinetic energy penetrator. Most anti-armor missiles are small size, have hit-to-kill accuracy, and are low cost. Examples are Hellfire/Brimstone, LOCAAS, MGM-140 ATACMS with submunitions, AGM-65 Maverick, and LOSAT.

A final category is buried targets. Buried targets require a high fineness kinetic energy penetration warhead, followed by blast fragmentation. Buried targets include underground command posts and bunkers. The current missiles in this category (CALCM, GBU-28, GBU-31 JDAM) are large and heavy. A technical concern is flight control at impact to avoid breaking up the warhead. Design considerations include the shape of the nose, weight, case material, and diameter. Explosives and fuzes must survive at high deceleration.

Alternatives for Precision Strike Figure 4 is an example of alternative approaches that should be considered in establishing mission requirements. It illustrates an assessment of alternative approaches for precision strike. The assessment includes the approaches that are used today by current systems, as well as a projection of capabilities that may be used in the future for new missile systems. Three measures of merit are assumed in comparing future precision strike missiles with the current systems. These are cost per shot, number of launch platforms required, and the effectiveness against time critical targets. For the current systems, two approaches are used:

1) penetrating aircraft with relatively short range subsonic precision guided munitions or missiles and 2) standoff platforms (e.g., ships, aircraft) using subsonic cruise missiles.

The penetrating aircraft systems include the F-117 with subsonic precision guided munitions such as JDAM. As shown, penetrating aircraft/subsonic precision guided munitions have an advantage of low cost per shot, about $15,000. However, the experience in Desert Storm showed that subsonic penetrating aircraft do not have the capability to counter time critical targets such as theater ballistic missiles (TBMs).

Another current approach, using standoff platforms such as ships and large aircraft outside the threat borders requires fewer launch platforms, resulting in lower logistics costs. However, standoff platforms with subsonic cruise missiles (e.g., Tomahawk, CALCM) are also ineffective against time critical targets (TCTs) such as theater ballistic missiles.

Also shown in the figure are future missile system alternatives. Technology development work is under way in all three areas; the best approach has yet to be demonstrated.

One approach is based on a standoff platform, with an aircraft, ship, or submarine standing off outside the threat country border. Hypersonic long-range precision strike missiles would provide broad coverage, holding a large portion of the threat country at risk. This approach is attractive in the small number of launch platforms required and the effectiveness against TCTs. Based on current technology programs such as the Affordable Rapid Response Missile Demonstrator (ARRMD) Program, the cost of future hypersonic missiles is projected to be comparable to that of current cruise missiles.

Another alternative approach is to use overhead, loitering unmanned combat air vehicles (UCAVs) with hypersonic missiles. The number of UCAVs required is dependent upon the speed and range of their on- board missiles. This approach would probably provide the fastest response time against time critical targets, because of the shorter required flight range of the missile.

A third approach is overhead loitering UCAVs with light weight precision guided munitions. This approach would have the lowest cost per shot, but would also require a larger number of UCAVs. An enabling synergistic capability for precision strike is the application of near-real-time, accurate targeting from either overhead tactical satellite or overhead unmanned air vehicle (UAV) sensors. It is projected that an advanced command, control, communication, computers, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (C4ISR) network will be available in the year 2010 time frame to support near-real-time and high accuracy targeting of time critical targets. The C4ISR network could be used by all types of launch platforms (e.g., fighter aircraft, bombers, helicopters, UCAVs, ships, submarines, ground vehicles). Illustrated in Figure 5 are examples of a ground station, overhead satellite sensors and satellite relays, and the overhead UAV sensor platform elements of the assumed C4ISR architecture. The assumed C4ISR of the year 2010 is projected to have a capability for a target location error (TLE) of less than 1 meter (1 sigma) and sensor-to-shooter connectivity time of less than 2 minutes (1 sigma). ). A data link from the launch platform to the missile will allow in-flight target updates and battle damage indication/battle damage assessment (BDI/BDA). An enabling technology for a light weight/low volume missile data link is phased array antenna. A phased array antenna can be conformally mounted on the missile airframe. The improved responsiveness of hypersonic precision strike missiles must be harmonized with other measures of merit such as robustness, warhead lethality, miss distance, observables, survivability, reliability, and cost, as well as constraints such as launch platform integration and firepower requirements (Figure 6).

Missile Design Validation and Technology Development Process

Missile technology development is focused on the key enabling technologies that are driven by the requirements, but are in need of additional development and demonstration for a required level of maturity. The technology development program addresses alternative approaches and risk mitigation. It has exit criteria for each phase, and an exit plan in the event of failure. The technology development and demonstration activities lead to a level of readiness for entry into Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD). Early technology work addresses laboratory tests and demonstrations of a critical component of a subsystem in a representative environment, but not necessarily a full-scale environment. The next step of technology development is a laboratory or a flight demonstration of a subsystem in a representative, but not a full-scale environment. This is followed by either a laboratory demonstration or a flight Advanced Technology Demonstration (ATD) of a subsystem in a full-scale environment. Finally, there is a flight demonstration, based on either an Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) or a Program Definition and Risk Reduction (PDRR) of a full-scale prototype missile in a full-scale environment. This is required for a missile to enter into EMD. Figure 7 shows the design validation and technology development process for precision strike missiles. A primary integration tool for the design validation/development process is missile system simulation. The initial simulations used in conceptual and preliminary design are digital simulations. As missile guidance & control hardware becomes available, a hardware-in-loop (HWL) simulation is also developed. HWL simulation incorporates the missile guidance & control hardware (e.g., seeker, gyros, accelerometers, actuators, autopilot). It also includes a simulated target signal for the seeker to track. Hybrid computers are used in HWL simulation. Fast analog computers simulate the rapidly changing parameters, such as the flight trajectory equations of motion. Digital computers simulate the more slowly changing parameters, such as the forces and moments from aerodynamics and propulsion. HWL and digital simulations are the primary system analysis tools used during missile flight tests. For example, simulation results based on wind tunnel data are validated with flight test results. HWL and digital simulations are also used to determine the cause of flight test anomalies. New Technologies for Precision Strike Missiles Figure 8 summarizes new technologies for precision strike missiles. Most of these were covered in this lecture series, however there was insufficient time to address them in detail. Almost all subsystems in precision strike missiles are expected to have major technology improvements in the future. The following is an assessment of new technologies for precision strike missiles, following the format of Figure 8.

Dome. New seeker/sensor dome technologies include faceted/window, multi-spectral, and multi-lens domes. Faceted domes are pyramidal-shaped domes that have reduced dome error slope, resulting in improved guidance accuracy. Seeker tracking errors due to the error slope of a traditional high fineness dome are a problem for imaging infrared and radar seekers. Small changes in the curvature of a dome greatly affect the tracking accuracy. An approach that alleviates the problem, previously developed for the Mistral and SA-16 surface-to-air/air-to-air missiles, is a faceted dome. The SLAM ER precision strike missile and ballistic missile defense interceptors also use a similar approach, based on a single flat window. A faceted dome behaves in the same optical manner as a flat window dome, with an advantage of a wider field of regard available to the seeker. The error slope of a faceted/window dome is nearly negligible compared to a traditional high fineness dome. Another advantage of a flat window is reduced observables. A grid or slotted film over the window can be tuned for transmission in the wavelength or frequency of interest. This results in reduced radar scatter, providing reduced radar cross section (RCS) for the precision strike missile. Another dome technology is multi-spectral domes. Multi-spectral domes allow multi-spectral (e.g., mid-wave IR/long wave IR) and multi-mode (e.g., IR/millimeter wave) seekers. Finally, multi-lens domes are concentric high fineness domes that provide optical correction, resulting in low dome error slope. A high fineness multi-lens dome has lower drag at supersonic speed than a traditional hemispherical dome.

Seeker. New seeker technologies include multi- spectral, synthetic aperture radar (SAR), strapdown, and uncooled IR seekers. Multi-spectral/multi-mode seekers provide enhanced performance for automatic target recognition. As an example, imaging IR focal plane array (FPA) detectors have the capability to sample multiple wavelengths, providing multi-spectral target discrimination across a broad wavelength. Multi- spectral seekers also have enhanced rejection of false targets and ground clutter. SAR seekers have good effectiveness in adverse weather and ground clutter. SAR seekers have the flexibility to cover a broad area search (e.g., 5 km by 5 km) for single-cell target detection, then switch to high resolution (e.g., 0.3 meter) for target identification and targeting in ground clutter. An example of a SAR sensor is the Predator UAV TESAR. SAR seekers can also provide high-accuracy profiling of the known terrain features around the target and derive the GPS coordinates of the target. Strapdown seekers are seekers without gimbals, using electronic stabilization and tracking. The reduction in parts count by eliminating gimbals reduces the seeker cost, which may be the highest cost subsystem of a precision strike missile. Uncooled IR seekers use an uncooled detector, such as a bolometer. Elimination of a cooling system reduces seeker cost. G&C. Guidance & control technologies include GPS/INS, in-flight guidance optimization, derived angle-of- attack and angle-of-sideslip feedback for bank-to-turn missiles, and automatic target recognition. GPS/INS of the year 2010 is projected to have a precision guidance capability of less than 3 meters circular error probable (CEP). GPS/INS precision accuracy permits a low cost seeker-less missile to be used against fixed targets. INS sensors that cost about $20,000 US a decade ago are now a third of the price. The potential exists for a $2,000 to $3,000 INS, based on Micro-machined Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) technology. MEMS devices are fabricated from a single piece of silicon by semiconductor manufacturing processes, resulting in a small, low-cost package. Between 2,000 and 5,000 MEMS gyro devices can be produced on a single five- inch silicon wafer. INS sensor alternatives for precision strike missiles include those based on ring laser gyros, fiber optic gyros, digital quartz gyros, and MEMS gyros/accelerometers. Benefits of GPS/INS integration include higher precision position and velocity measurement, reduced sensor noise, reduced jamming susceptibility, and missile attitude measurement capability. A missile operating at high altitude with a modern GPS receiver will have lower susceptibility to jamming. The availability of GPS to continuously update the inertial system allows the design trades to consider a lower precision and less expensive INS, while maintaining precision navigation accuracy (3 meters CEP) and good anti-jam (A/J) performance. Modern GPS/INS receivers are based on a centralized Kalman filter that processes the raw data from all of the sensors (e.g., SAR, GPS receiver, INS). GPS/INS Kalman filters with more than 70 states have been demonstrated for precision strike missiles. In addition to enhanced accuracy, Kalman filters also provide robustness against jamming and the loss of satellites. Pseudo-range measurements can be made from three, two, or even one satellite if one or more of the satellites are lost. GPS/INS guidance is an enabling consideration for precision navigation and the fusion of target sensor data in a clutter environment. GPS accuracy in the Wide Area GPS Enhancement (WAGE), differential or relative modes has sensor hand-off error less than 3 meters. Using in- flight digital trajectory flight prediction and derived flight conditions (e.g., Mach number, angle of-attack, angle-of-sideslip, dynamic pressure) from the GPS/INS, the missile can continuously optimize the flight trajectory to maximize performance parameters such as range, off-boresight, and accuracy. Automatic targetrecognition will continue to improve as a technology, relieving the workload of the pilot. Advancements in sensor capability for C4ISR will provide new capabilities of near real-time ATR, lower false alarm rate, improved targeting accuracy, and improved data rate.

Electronics. Referring to Figure 8, a fourth area of enabling capability is electronics technology. Revolutionary advancements have been made in high performance, low cost commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) processors. This is an enabling technology for guidance & control and sensor data fusion. The capability to process multi-dimensional discrimination in a low cost, small size, and low power package is beginning to emerge. Processing capability has been doubling about every two years, expanding from 2,300 transistors on the 4004 chip in 1972 to 5.5 million transistors on the Pentium Pro chip in 1995. There is no sign that thegrowth rate will slow down. A projection to the year 2010 predicts a capability of over 1 billion transistors on a chip. Processing capability is ceasing to be a limitation for the application of sensor data fusion and near real-time trajectory optimization to precision strike missiles. Airframe. Airframe technologies are enhancing flight performance, reducing weight, permitting higher flight Mach number, reducing cost, providing higher reliability, and reducing observables. Airframe technologies for precision strike missiles include non-axisymmetric lifting bodies, neutral static margin, split canards, lattice fins, low drag inlets, single cast structures, low cost manufacturing, composites, titanium alloys, MEMS data collection, and low observables. Lifting body airframes provide enhanced maneuverability and aerodynamic efficiency (lift-to-drag ratio). Enhancements in maneuver and cruise performance are also provided by neutral static margin. Split canard control also provides enhanced maneuverability. Another airframe technology that has high payoff for subsonic and supersonic precision strike missiles is lattice fins. Lattice fins have advantages of smaller hinge moment and higher control effectiveness. Another airframe technology is low drag inlets. Low drag inlets are in development for hypersonic missiles. New airframe technology will also reduce the cost of precision strike weapons. Examples of recent precision strike weapons that include low cost technologies include JDAM and JASSM. Technologies to reduce cost are also being introduced into existing weapons, with large savings. An example is Tactical Tomahawk. It has a simple low cost airframe with extruded wings that enables the introduction of low cost commercial parts for G&C and propulsion. The current Tomahawk has 11,500 parts, 2,500 fasteners, 45 circuit cards, 160 connectors, and 610 assembly/test hours. Tactical Tomahawk will have 35% fewer parts, 68% fewer fasteners, 51% fewer circuit cards, 72% fewer connectors, and 68% fewer assembly/test hours – resulting in a 50% reduction in cost. The Tactical Tomahawk also has superior flexibility (e.g., shorter mission planning time, a capability for in-flight targeting, a capability for battle damage indication/battle damage assessment, modular payload) and higher reliability. Tactical Tomahawk demonstrates that reduced parts count is an important contributor to reducing missile cost. The traditional approach to estimating missile unit production cost has been to base the cost estimate on missile weight. However, Tactical Tomahawk is the same weight as the current Tomahawk, at 50% of the cost. Precision castings will become more prevalent in precision strike missiles. Castings reduce the parts count, with a resulting cost savings. This technology is particularly important to air breathing missiles such as ramjets, which have a more complex non-axisymmetric shape. Ramjets have traditionally been more expensive than axisymmetric rocket powered missiles. A one-piece cast airframe design integrates all of the secondary structure to minimize the structure parts count. Precision tooling minimizes subsequent machine and hand finishing of mating surfaces, by achieving a precision surface finish “as-cast.” Fuel cells can be an integral part of the structure and not require bladders. Structural attachment points (e.g., ejector attachments, payload supports, booster attachments) and self-indexing/aligning features can be integral to the structure. This minimizes or eliminates mating, alignment, and assembly tooling and test (inspection) requirements. Precision castings have been demonstrated for missile aluminum, titanium, and steel airframes, motor cases, and combustors. Ceramic tooling is an enabling technology for low cost precision castings. Other manufacturing technologies that reduce airframe cost include vacuum assisted resin transfer molding, pultrusion, extrusion, and filament wind manufacturing of the missile structure. Composite materials will find increased use in new missile airframe structure. High temperature composites particularly have benefits for hypersonic missiles, which require weight reduction. Another technology is titanium alloys. Titanium alloy technology enables lighter weight missiles for a hypersonic, high temperature flight environment. Future precision strike missiles will have low cost/small size MEMS sensors for data collection during missile development and for health monitoring after production. Localized stress, temperature, and other environmental conditions can be monitored through sensors scattered around the airframe. Finally, the airframe shaping and materials technology development for low observable cruise missiles will provide future reduction in observables.

Power. Power supply technology is also expected to benefit from the application of MEMS. The energy per weight available from a MEMS power system is much greater than that of thermal batteries. Micro turbine generator technology is based on micro-machined semiconductor manufacturing techniques. It is basically a miniature generator that is powered by a miniature jet engine. A micro turbine generator offers a greater than 15 to 20 times weight and volume advantage.

Warhead. Enhanced warhead technologies for precision strike missiles include high energy density warheads, multi-mode warheads, hard target penetrator warheads, submunition dispense, and powered submunitions. Current high explosive warheads have cross-linked double base (XLDB) explosive charges such as HMX and RDX. An example of a new high explosive charge is the US Navy China Lake CL-20. CL-20 is chemically related to current XLDB nitramine explosives. However, CL-20 is a cyclic polynitramine, with a unique caged structure that provides higher crystal density, heat of formation, and oxidizer-to-fuel ratio. CL-20 propellant has 10-20% higher performance than HMX and RDX. CL-20 also has reduced shock sensitivity (class 1.3 versus 1.1) and milder cookoff reaction than either HMX or RDX. There is emphasis to reduce unit production cost and logistics cost by producing a multipurpose missile that covers a broader range of targets. An example is the Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW). JSOW is a neck-down replacement of Walleye, Skipper, Rockeye, Maverick, and laser guided bombs. A multipurpose weapon system for precision strike is inherently flexible because it can engage a broader target set. A modular warhead provides enhanced capability to engage and defeat hardened, buried targets, and mobile surface targets. Warheads for penetrating deeply buried targets are based on a kinetic energy penetration warhead case that includes a small explosive charge. The technology for kinetic energy penetrator warhead includes penetrator shape, case material, explosive, and fuze to survive and function at high deceleration. Kinetic energy warheads may not require an explosive charge. LOSAT is an example of a hypersonic missile that does not have an explosive charge. In the area of submunitions, submunition dispense and powered autonomous submunitions such as LOCAAS have the capability to counter mobile, time critical targets such as TBMs. A powered submunition can search a relatively large area, providing the potential for locating a TBM launcher after the launch site has been vacated. This provides robustness against uncertainties in the time lines for C4I and target dwell. A technical challenge is supersonic/hypersonic dispense of submunitions. The flight environment of high dynamic pressure and shock wave-boundary layer interaction is relatively unexplored. Aft dispense of submunitions is an enabling technology for supersonic/hypersonic submunition dispense.

Insulation. Referring again to Figure 8, an eighth area of enabling capability is insulation technology. Higher density external airframe and internal insulation materials are in development for hypersonic missiles. Most precision strike missiles are volume-limited rather than weight limited. Higher density insulation materials permit more fuel/propellant, resulting in longer range.

Propulsion. Emerging propulsion technologies include liquid fuel ramjet, variable flow ducted rocket, scramjet, slurry fuel, endothermic fuel, composite motor case, rocket motor energy management, low observables, high thrust motor, and reaction jet control. Turbofan and turbojet propulsion systems are relatively mature technologies for precision strike missiles. They are most suited for subsonic cruise missiles, providing high efficiency to deliver a warhead at long range against non-time-critical targets. Turbofans/turbojets have an operating regime to about Mach 3. However, beyond Mach 2, increasingly complex inlet systems are required to match delivered inlet airflow to compressor capacity, and expensive cooling systems are required to avoid exceeding material capabilities at the turbine inlet. Liquid fuel ramjet propulsion provides high specific impulse for efficient cruise at a Mach number of about 4 and an altitude of about 80,000 feet. Above Mach 5, deceleration of the inlet airflow to subsonic velocity results in chemical dissociation of the air, which absorbs heat and reduces the useful energy output of the combustor. Also, two or more oblique shock compressions are required for efficient inlet pressure recovery at a Mach number greater than 5.0, adding to the complexity, cost, and integration risk of a ramjet missile. Variable flow ducted rocket propulsion has advantages of higher acceleration than a liquid fuel ramjet and longer range than a solid rocket. For precision strike missions, it is particularly applicable to the suppression of long range, high performance SAMs. The ducted rocket acceleration and fast response to Mach 3+ provides short response time for an anti-SAM engagement. Ducted rockets utilize a gas generator to provide fuel-rich products to the combustor. The fuel-rich products mix and burn with the air from the inlet. The specific impulse of a ducted rocket is between that of a liquid fuel ramjet and a solid rocket. Supersonic combustion ramjet (scramjet) propulsion is most efficient for cruise Mach numbers 6 or greater. The scramjet maintains supersonic flow throughout the combustor. A technical challenge for the scramjet is fuel mixing and efficient combustion. There are extremely short residence times for supersonic combustion. Another technical challenge is inlet integration for efficient pressure recovery. Like the ramjet, the scramjet is rocket boosted to a supersonic takeover speed. The takeover speed of a scramjet is about Mach 4.5, higher than a ramjet, requiring a larger booster. For a weight-limited system, a scramjet missile will have less available fuel than a ramjet missile. An efficient cruise condition for a scramjet is about Mach 6, 100K feet altitude. Fuel technologies include slurry fuels and endothermic fuels. High density slurry fuels provide high volumetric performance for volume-limited missiles. Endothermic fuels decompose at high temperature into lighter weight molecular products, providing higher specific impulse and permitting shorter combustor length. Endothermic fuels also provide cooling of the adjacent structure. Another propulsion technology is composite motor cases. Composites provide reduced weight compared to a steel motor case. Thrust-time history management technologies for rocket motors include pintle, pulsed, and gel propellant motors. In the area of low observable precision strike missiles, the emphasis on reduced observable plumes will continue in the foreseeable future. Finally, kinetic kill precision strike missiles use high thrust motors to quickly accelerate to hypersonic speed. Kinetic kill missiles also employ reaction jet control for hit-to-kill accuracy.

Data Link. New data link technologies include battle damage indication/battle damage assessment (BDI/BDA), in-flight targeting, and phased array antennas. BDI/BDA can be provided by a data link of target imagery from an imaging IR seeker. In-flight targeting is particularly useful against mobile, time critical targets such as TBMs. Phased array antennas are in development that provide high data rate and flexibility for a precision strike missile to communicate with satellites, ground stations, manned aircraft, and UAVs.

Flight Control. A final area is that of flight control technology for precision strike missiles. The requirement for internal carriage on low observable aircraft has driven new technology in compressed carriage (e.g., small-span/long-chord, folded, wraparound, switchblade) aerodynamic surfaces. This allows higher firepower load-outs for internal carriage on low observable aircraft such as the F-22.

A third approach
is overhead loitering UCAVs
with light weight precision guided munitions.


This approach would have the lowest cost per shot, but would also require a larger number of UCAVs. An enabling synergistic capability for precision strike is the application of near-real-time, accurate targeting from either overhead tactical satellite or overhead unmanned air vehicle (UAV) sensors. It is projected that an advanced command, control, communication, computers, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (C4ISR) network will be available in the year 2010 time frame to support near-real-time and high accuracy targeting of time critical targets. The C4ISR network could be used by all types of launch platforms (e.g., fighter aircraft, bombers, helicopters, UCAVs, ships, submarines, ground vehicles). Illustrated in Figure 5 are examples of a ground station, overhead satellite sensors and satellite relays, and the overhead UAV sensor platform elements of the assumed C4ISR architecture. The assumed C4ISR of the year 2010 is projected to have a capability for a target location error (TLE) of less than 1 meter (1 sigma) and sensor-to-shooter connectivity time of less than 2 minutes (1 sigma). ). A data link from the launch platform to the missile will allow in-flight target updates and battle damage indication/battle damage assessment (BDI/BDA). An enabling technology for a light weight/low volume missile data link is phased array antenna. A phased array antenna can be conformally mounted on the missile airframe. The improved responsiveness of hypersonic precision strike missiles must be harmonized with other measures of merit such as robustness, warhead lethality, miss distance, observables, survivability, reliability, and cost, as well as constraints such as launch platform integration and firepower requirements (Figure 6).


NATO is pulling out to let Al-Qaeda plan next generation false flag operations in secret. Of course, there will be full cybernetics over the airspace using the cyberneticly controlled drone air force. This will remain to make sure that only NATO approved false flag plans are conducted and anyone trying to give human rights to the Libyan people will be assassinated by NATO drones. You cannot make this shit up.

NATO Libya mission could end next week
Top U.S. commander for Africa says...
drones will remain

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/10/01/libya-nato.html
The Associated Press Posted: Oct 1, 2011 2:07 PM ET

The military mission in Libya is largely complete and NATO's involvement could begin to wrap up as soon as next week after allied leaders meet in Brussels, according to the top U.S. commander for Africa. Army Gen. Carter Ham, head of U.S. Africa Command, told The Associated Press that American military leaders are expected to give NATO ministers their assessment of the situation during meetings late next week. NATO could decide to end the mission even though ousted leader Moammar Gadhafi is still at large and his forces are still entrenched in strongholds such as Sirte and Bani Walid. Just last week, NATO's decision-making body, the North Atlantic Council, agreed to extend the mission over the oil-rich North African nation for another 90 days, but officials have said the decision would be periodically reviewed. Families have been given the weekend to flee from the fighting in Sirte. (Esam Al-Fetori/Reuters) Ham said that the National Transitional Council and its forces should be in "reasonable control" of population centres before the end of the NATO mission, dubbed Unified Protector. And he said they are close to that now. When NATO makes its decision, Ham said he believes there would be a seamless transition of control over the air and maritime operations to U.S. Africa Command. And, at least initially, some of the military surveillance coverage would remain in place. "We don't want to go from what's there now to zero overnight," Ham said. "There will be some missions that will need to be sustained for some period of time, if for no other reason than to offer assurances to the interim government for things like border security, until such time that they are ready to do all that themselves." U.S. intelligence and surveillance assets, such as drones, will likely stay in the region also to keep watch over weapons caches, to prevent the proliferation of weapons from Libya into neighbouring countries.

Battle for Sirte

Hundreds of cars carrying Sirte residents formed long lines at revolutionary forces' checkpoints leading out of the city Saturday, calmly waiting to be checked by the fighters as explosions echoed in the distance and NATO planes circled overhead. Revolutionary forces said on Friday that families inside the city have two days to leave. Many of those fleeing Sirte said conditions in the city continue to deteriorate, with food in short supply and no water or electricity. After weeks of fighting Gadhafi's loyalists inside Sirte, the fighters now hold positions about five kilometres from the city centre, said commander Mustafa al-Rubaie. Sirte's airport and military base are under the control of anti-Gadhafi forces. However, heavy battles are continuing as Gadhafi forces are in control of strategic positions inside the city, including high-rise buildings where snipers are positioned.

But Ham said airstrikes would likely end, unless specifically requested by the Libyan transitional government. NATO took over command of the mission in March, after it was initially led by the U.S. in the early days of the bombing campaign. Canada has flown numerous air missions over Libya and provided sea support as part of the NATO mission. In addition there are Canadian Forces members on the ground, though not engaged in fighting, but to provide security for diplomats. The mission was designed to enforce a UN resolution allowing the imposition of a no-fly zone and military action to protect Libyan civilians. The aggressive bombing runs that battered Gadhafi forces, weapons, air control, and other key targets, gave the revolutionary forces the time and breathing room to organize and begin to push into regime strongholds. A key turning point came about a month ago when the fighters were able to seize the capital, Tripoli, effectively ending Gadhafi's rule. Now, the National Transitional Council has taken over the leadership of the nation and is promising to set up its new interim government, even as it continues to fight forces still loyal to the fugitive leader. Ham said NATO need not wait until Gadhafi is found and forced out of the country before ending the Libyan mission. "The fact that he is still at large some place is really more a matter for the Libyans than it is for anybody else," said Ham, adding that U.S. President Barack Obama and other leaders made it clear that the object of the mission was about protecting the people, not killing Gadhafi. Ham added he doesn't see a major U.S. role in training or other military assistance, because other Arab nations are better suited for that. He said that the U.S. may be able to help re-establish Libya's Coast Guard and maritime domain.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: ersatz protocol on October 03, 2011, 07:32:44 pm
i wholeheartedly agree,dig..i was really psyched with the initial reports about occupy wall street protests,and hated hearing about the nypd brutality
..but day by day i keep hearing about new progressive/lib support
being added to the list of those touting the protests as their type of revolution..van jones,michael moore,alec baldwin,george soros,charles rangel...etc...and my skepticism grows.
there's an agenda to be had,or these f**kers wouldnt show up...i'm sorry to sound like a cynical asshole..but
i trust my gut and research thus far and these 'progressives' i'd mentioned are not exactly on the fence as far as
electing anyone other than obama.so just take all that into consideration,is all..
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 07:40:40 pm
THEHOUSEMAN exposed this shit in 2009!!!!!!!!!!

FROM 2009:

THEHOUSEMAN:
http://www.g-20meltdown.org/
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=53674491031
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7955057.stm

THEHOUSEMAN: I was just shopping in London today, and some guys were handing out flyers about a new event coming APRIL 1st... called "Spring offensive".

MANIFESTO
-Can we oust the bankers from power?
-Can we get rid of the corrupt politicians in their pay?
-Can we guarantee everyone a job, a home, a future?
-Can we establish government by the people, for the people, of the people?
-Can we abolish all borders and be patriots for our planet?
-Can we all live sustainably and stop climate chaos? Can we make capitalism history?
YES WE CAN!



THEHOUSEMAN: I don't like the sound of this at all.... it seems like controlled opposition. Making capitalism history, ABOLISHING BORDERS?? Climate chaos??

The flyer I was handed out sounds a lot better than what I'm reading on their website. It blames both David Cameron and Gordon Brown.. and talks about literally overthrowing the banks.

Their website, on the other hands, looks like a con. I would hate this to turn into violent rioting, giving an excuse for more police powers, martial law etc..


Yeah! Just look at the success from the G20:

British plan to execute protestors at G20 -- CONTROLLED OPPOSITION/FF
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=94427.0


Please understand that Tavistock and Jane Lute TARGET THE YOUTH FOR CONTROLLED OPERATIONS

Community Partnerships to Counter Violent Extremism

Speaker:    
Jane Holl Lute
Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
http://www.cfr.org/uk/community-partnerships-counter-violent-extremism/p24593
April 1, 2011, Washington, D.C. Council on Foreign Relations


QUESTIONER: Thank you for your remarks today, ma'am. I'm curious. We talked quite a bit about identifying negative trends as they occurred -- the "See Something, Say Something" -- before we get to a critical level. I'm curious what the department's role is in preventing that from even getting to bad things seem to be afoot. So what is the role in sort of the Prevent strategy, whether we call it a counter-narrative or a counter-radicalization? Is there a role for the department to play in that regard?

LUTE: Well, when I was -- when I was working on the Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict, I spent a lot of time thinking about this problem. You know, I began my career as a soldier. I wrote my doctoral dissertation on how wars end. I spent a lot of time thinking about how you might prevent the emergence of mass violence, and I spent a lot of time as a peacekeeper. I'm thinking about peace-building -- so have walked this circle of violent conflict. And a lot of people a lot smarter than me, including the guy I'm sharing the stage with right now, have much smarter answers to your question. People used to say: How do you prevent deadly conflict? What do you need to do? What's the sentence? You want the sentence? The sentence is: Educate young women, employ young men. That's the sentence. Is that the answer? I don't think so. It's not entirely the answer. Or if it is, there's a lot that goes into educating young women and employing young men.

There's a lot we know about the high-payoff interventions with adolescent girls, for example. It is the high-payoff intervention for us as a -- as a global society. There's a lot we know about getting to young men.

What's the right age?

It's between 7 and 9,

they say, when you really want to influence the choices that they're going to make later in life. It's really about then when you begin to shape their world view, their understanding; create their sense of opportunities, entitlement and hope.

Here is some information on how these operations are done...it involves thousands of people that you will never even see on the ground...


This (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-238183975496151184) is a very deep analysis of what has been occuring in Australia for years and includes all the fake sympathizers that are supposed to be our friends:

Bohemian Owl Provocateurs at Melbourne's G-20 Hyatt Police Riot: The Real Story
(http://video.google.com/ThumbnailServer2?app=vss&contentid=a3c3e180e232ad86&offsetms=5000&itag=w160&lang=en&sigh=AHivCEYYJNZdtToalubSMtSN6pU)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-238183975496151184
======================================================
"If you demonstrate against somebody that we like...
I'll slip on my wig and see if I can start a riot...

[Remember the wigged/hatted provacateurs at all the rallies]
transform you into an angry mob...
and all your leaders go to jail for my job...
 'I Am The Owl'"


- The Dead Kennedys.


======================================================
"The Dead Kennedies" Warned us decades ago about rallying people to "Storm the office!"

TOMORROW YOUR HOMELESS, TONIGHT IS A BLAST!

____________________________

COINTELPRO: A War on Radical America

By the time the Panthers came along the FBI had been conducting Counter-Intelligence Programmes (COINTELPRO) to disrupt left and Puerto Rican groups for years. Thanks to thousands of FBI documents released under the Freedom of Information Act, we know that agents were asked by their superiors to formulate "imaginative and hard-hitting counter-intelligence measures aimed at crippling the BPP". Massive surveillance via wiretaps, burglaries, live tails and mail tampering was only the beginning.

The Feds shared information and collaborated with local police units. At least 38 Panthers were murdered by various police agencies between 1968 and 1972, and at least 12 others died in 'shooting wars' fostered by the FBI. Hundreds more party members and their supporters were beaten or suffered gunshot wounds.

COINTELPRO methods that appear in released FBI memos:

Forged Mail. The FBI regularly sent forged correspondence to groups or members of groups to exacerbate differences among activists and to create snitch-jackets (see below).

Fake 'Propaganda'. The FBI fabricated and distributed publications, leaflets, broadsheets, cartoons etc. in the name of targeted organizations designed to misrepresent their positions, goals and objectives in a way to publicly discredit them and increase tensions within and between groups.

Disinformation. The FBI released false info to their media contacts. They hoped this process would condition public sentiment to accept brutal Bureau/police repression. Potential killer cops on the beat also watched the TV and thereby had their worst Panther nightmares reinforced. This had the effect of increasing trigger-finger itch during street confrontations.

Harassment Arrests. Repeated arrests of targeted individuals on spurious charges were carried out, not to obtain convictions, but to demoralize, harass and increase paranoia. Arrestees and their supporters found themselves and movement money tied up in case after case.

Informers and Agent Provocateurs. Thousands of informers were used against radical groups in this period. In the BPP and in other groups, many also functioned as agent provocateurs. They encouraged or engaged in illegal activities that could then be attributed to Party members. They disrupted internal functioning and assisted in the spread of disinformation. To exploit rifts between rival black groups, agent provocateurs were escalating the fighting, sometimes starting gun battles.

Snitch-Jacketing. Suspicion would be created, through the spreading of rumours, manufacture of evidence etc. that loyal group members, usually in key positions, were FBI informers. In the case of the BPP, agents knew the likely outcome of this tactic would be extreme violence directed at the jacketed individuals.

Political Assassinations. The FBI physically eliminated selected activists, often after other attempts at destroying their effectiveness had failed. They mostly used surrogates, but provided the intelligence and logistics.

For those feeling smug about not living in the US it might be worth pointing out that ALL the above tactics have been used domestically by the British state during its war with the Irish Republican movement.


--------------------------------

More on COINTELPRO:

3 Minute COINTELPRO Lesson
(http://img.youtube.com/vi/_9DaGXYZlK8/default.jpg)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9DaGXYZlK8

U.S. Government's Secret Echelon and COINTELPRO Spying Ops
(http://img.youtube.com/vi/rk_9-Cpgcfs/default.jpg)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rk_9-Cpgcfs

-----------------------------

CointelPro FBI's War on Black America
(http://img.youtube.com/vi/p993fs5pR4U/default.jpg)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3729458480013375211
Alternative: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7574288480731470534

Monarch: Chapter 8: Cointelpro
(http://img.youtube.com/vi/tJaDLhuNxi8/default.jpg)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJaDLhuNxi8

COINTELPRO smashes Earth First to kill Judi Bari then take over the environmental movement
Judi Bari R.I.P. 1997-Won lawsuit 5 years after she died against the government-no one went to jail

(http://img.youtube.com/vi/kbJFZSITS1I/default.jpg)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbJFZSITS1I

---------------------------------------------

Rockefeller uses agent provocatuers to squash the Anti-War movement
(http://cdn-01.liveleak.com/liveleak/thumbs/2007/Oct/20/021bf300136623_1_thumb.jpg)   
A Rockefeller funded anti-globalization march filled with agent provocateurs with masks and gloves in Washington turned violent, with shop windows smashed as crowds protested on the eve of Saturday's International Monetary Fund and World Bank meetings.  These sensationalized protests are the result of the CFR/Heinz infiltration of various protest groups to ensure that increased surveillance goes on with more control over United States Sovereignty.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=21e_1192877391
________________________________

Stop SPP Protest - Union Leader stops provocateurs
(http://img.youtube.com/vi/St1-WTc1kow/2.jpg)
5 min - Aug 21, 2007 -    (1544 ratings)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St1-WTc1kow
_________________________________

Greenwald's movie about COINTELPRO and Abbie Hoffman, steal this movie:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5858962939917432628
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 07:53:25 pm
The banksters have recently stolen the NYPD's pensions.
The banksters have cut the staff of local law enforcement everywhere.
The banksters bail out US cities (who got raped from bankster ponzi schemes) and then allow military drills on their police stations which simulate a military takeover of the whole town.
The banksters now know many in the NYPD stand up for 9/11 truth.
The anti-cops stories are popping up 1,000 per day.
There are zero anti-bankster stories anywhere...

NOW THE MILITARY IS GOING TO COME IN AND TELL LOCAL COPS TO GO F THEMSELVES?!?!?!?!

AFTER 10 YEARS IN AFGHANISTAN KNOWING IT IS AN ILLEGAL OCCUPATION, AFTER BEING SILENCED AND STOOD DOWN FOR 10 YEARS OF DU, FALSE FLAGS, PAT TILLMAN, PRIVATE LYNCH, SEAL TEAM SIX, ETC...

NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN, A FEW HUNDRED PEOPLE DEMANDING AN END TO CAPITALISM ALLOWS THE ENTIRE CHAIN OF COMMAND INCLUDING OBAMA, PANETTA, AND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE IN BETWEEN TO STAND DOWN AS MILITARY MEN BOAST ABOUT CONTROLLING LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PREVENTING LOCAL OFFICIALS FROM THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL STATES' RIGHTS.

A MILITARY INTERVENTION IN THE MOST POWERFUL CITY ON THE PLANET? EVERYONE IN THE TOP BRASS IS STANDING DOWN?

REMEMBER THAT THE NEW SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WAS THE DIRECTOR OF THE CIA!
EVERYTHING THE CIA DOES IS BASED ON DECEPTION!

HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE?

HERE IS WHAT ALL OF US WHO LOVE AMERICA ARE FIGHTING FOR...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7KfXkQdS64

WE NEED  EVERY US SOLDIER OUT OF ILLEGAL WARS ASAP, EVERY ONE OF OUR TROOPS BACK HOME ASAP!

WE NEED THE PRIVATE FEDERAL RESERVE TO STOP STEALING EVERY PENNY OF WEALTH FROM THE NEXT 10 GENERATIONS.

WE NEED THE CONSTITUTION OBEYED, DEFENDED, AND PROTECTED BY ALL IN GOVERNMENT.

THAT IS IT, MORE DEMANDS = MORE EXCUSES FOR GLOBALIST DECEPTIONS/ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL OPERATIONS USED AGAINST THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 07:59:14 pm
MY OPINION...

VAN JONES NEVER LEFT THE WHITEHOUSE...IT WAS A SCAM!

Van Jones – Communist Adviser to President Obama
http://www.alinskydefeater.com/Blog/2011/08/van-jones-communist-adviser-to-president-obama/
Originally posted September 1, 2009

The primary document for this post is an article from the left-leaning online newspaper The East Bay Express. They offer what they think is a glowing recommendation of (Anthony) Van Jones, but in the process they reveal a great deal about his radical Marxist beliefs and endeavors. [1]

On Tuesday, March 10th, 2009 at 12:37 PM Van Jones was announced on the White House Blog as the new “Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation at CEQ.” The more popular title ascribed to him today is Obama’s Green Czar. His mission is to lead the Obama Administration in creating an entirely new energy economy and in particular to create and develop so-called “Green Jobs”. The Blog then goes on to describe Van Jones in glowing terms, but never bothers to mention that he is an admitted communist who has spent most of his adult life spreading Marxist ideas.[2]

In what appears to be an attempt to introduce Van Jones on the national stage, The East Bay Express tells the story of a young African-American who grew up in poverty, and sought to effect change,and to bring fairness and fiscal equity to the poor neighborhoods of Oakland, CA. In the course of the story we are informed that Jones chose to go to Yale Law School. What they do not tell us is how a poverty stricken young man such as Jones was able to suddenly attend one of the most prestigious and most expensive places of higher learning in the nation.

Such things probably do not really bother far left online newspapers, but it is stark when in the course of painting Jones’ biography The East Bay Express says,

“Jones had planned to move to Washington, DC, and had already landed a job and an apartment there. But in jail, he said, “I met all these young radical people of color — I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ‘This is what I need to be a part of.’” Although he already had a plane ticket, he decided to stay in San Francisco. “I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary.” In the months that followed, he let go of any lingering thoughts that he might fit in with the status quo. “I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th,” he said. “By August, I was a communist.”[1]

According to the article, Jones had been swept up during mass arrests at a celebration of a not guilty verdict for some involved in the Rodney King riots in LA. But prison is the least of the things that jumps off the page. “By August, I was a communist.” To this day, there is no record that Van Jones has ever disavowed those beliefs.

To the contrary, his background indicates a deep rooting in Marist philosophy. In 1994 Jones was a part of the formation of a radical group called ‘Standing Together to Organize a Radical Movement’ (STORM). It is through the document describing this organization that we learn just how deep the roots of Marxism run in Van Jones.

Let me just give you a few quotes from the STORM summation entitled “Reclaiming Revolution”:

“And disputes – primarily among the three committed anarchists and the six committed communists – had driven many to the more politically experienced and ideologically committed revolutionary Marxists out of the study process.” (p.9)

“For many STORM members, the integrity of the investigation was proof of the usefulness of Marxist tools (e.g. Mao’s principle of “No investigation, no right to speak.”) in solving real-life problems.” (p. 13)

“We spent the next six months studying together. We tried to draw out the strengths and limitations of different forms of organizing. We contrasted Alinsky organizing models, SNCC’s grassroots model and Marxist-Leninist methods of mass work. We worked to develop a basic understanding of Marxist and Leninist histories, theories and politics.” (p. 14)

“Outside of the organization, a group of movement veterans intrigued by STORM’s interest in Marxist politics organized a series of study groups. STORM members, along with other young leftists, thus got a chance to study Marx’s critique of capitalism and revolutionary strategy together with trained communists.” (p.14)

“All Core Members had to be explicitly committed to revolutionary Marxist politics.” (p. 15)

“Later sessions covered more “contemporary” issues, including Marxist feminism, transgender liberation, and the Palestinian liberation struggle. We continued to study the Marxist tradition, including dialectical materialism and member initiated studies of Mao’s “On Practice” and “On Contradiction”. (p. 19) [3]

Make no mistake about it. STORM was the brainchild of Van Jones and this summation represents his thoughts on communism, Marxism, and Leninism. In fact, the words “Marx” or “Marxism” appear 89 times in a document that is less than 100 pages long! The American Spectator says, “He does not appear to have distanced himself from his past communist activities and is now part of the Obama administration’s push to turn Sept. 11 into a National Day of Service focused on the promotion of the radical environmentalist agenda.” [4]

Along with the American Spectator, WND online offers a link to a document advertising Jones’ anti-American Imperialism rally while the twin towers still smoldered, and thousands in New York still clung to the faint and fading hopes that their loved ones might still be alive. Worse yet, he had already organized a vigil on Sept. 12, 2001. The American Spectator says, “…self-described “communist” and “rowdy black nationalist” Van Jones, held a vigil in Oakland, California, “mourning the victims of U.S. imperialism around the world” on the night after Sept. 11, 2001.” [5]

All of this would be enough for most fair thinking Americans to believe that such a man does not belong in the highest places of our Government. In fact, how can we expect a Marxist to create private industry jobs? But there is even more to disturb the senses in this appointment.

The New Yorker offers us this window into the world of Van Jones,

“Jones, who is forty, is tall and imposing, with a shaved head and a patchy goatee. He wears rimless glasses and favors dark clothing. On this particular day, he was wearing a black turtleneck, black jeans, black boots, and a charcoal jacket. He was introduced by a community organizer and aspiring rapper, who described him as “a leader with answers,” a “genius from the hood, similar to our own,” and a youthful version of Barack Obama.” [6]

A young Barack Obama? There are more than passing similarities. The East Bay Express says of Jones,”…and in college had discovered the black liberation theology that reinterprets the Christ story as an anticolonial struggle, he had pulled away from spirituality during his communist days.” [1]

Where have we heard that phrase “black liberation theology” before? Oh yes, this was the theology embraced by the Reverend Jeremiah Wright as Barack Obama sat in the pews of Wright’s church for some twenty years listening to his hateful, anti-American sermons.

From the book that has made Barack Obama rich, “Dreams of My Father” there is this excerpt:

“To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists.” [7]

In an Op-Ed for the Boston Globe, David Alinsky, the son of ‘Rules for Radicals’ writer Saul Alinsky says,

“Barack Obama’s training in Chicago by the great community organizers is showing its effectiveness. It is an amazingly powerful format, and the method of my late father always works to get the message out and get the supporters on board. When executed meticulously and thoughtfully, it is a powerful strategy for initiating change and making it really happen. Obama learned his lesson well.” [8]

So what drew President Obama to appoint Van Jones as his new “Green Czar”? It would seem that they share some very similar and very troubling roots. Both men have shown an interest in:
-Black liberation theology [not sure what that means]
-Saul Alinsky and his ‘Rules for Radicals’
-Community organizing
-Marxism

It is time that President Obama and Van Jones answer to “We the people”. Van Jones, do you still espouse Marxism? If not, when did you quit believing in it? Mr. President, were you aware that Van Jones was/is a communist? If so, please tell us why you appointed him as your adviser.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 08:12:56 pm
Trilateral Commission Declares:
Yeah we manufactured these revolutions...Biyatches!!!


Information Revolutions:
Joseph Nye of Trilateral Commission on 'The Future of Power'

http://www.mi2g.com/cgi/mi2g/press/020211.php
London, UK - 2nd February 2011, 00:01 GMT


Dear ATCA Open & Philanthropia Friends


[Please note that the views presented by individual contributors are not necessarily representative of the views of ATCA, which is neutral. ATCA conducts collective Socratic dialogue on global opportunities and threats.]

Do the accelerating information revolutions signal the beginning of a new age? Some key questions which have emerged out of the recent Socratic dialogue:

1. Jordan's King Abdullah dismisses government, names new prime minister amid protests. What next?

2. Balance of power shifts. Game changer is that Egypt's army decided not to stand in the way of a million-strong protesters. Will other Arab armies follow that example?

3. Oil drops from two year high: Are markets expecting a reasonably smooth transition to more democratic and therefore more stable governments?

4. UN human rights chief is deeply alarmed by sharp rise in casualties recently, which may be as high as 300 in Egypt. Will bloodshed increase?

5. Egypt is significant: a real trend-setter in the Arab world. Should other Arab regimes watch out, is there a revolutionary wind headed their way?

6. Speak-to-tweet system is live. Google and Twitter have launched a new service via phone which circumvents the ban on net services in Egypt. Switch off voice too?

7. How plausible is it that the Arab revolutions in North Africa will spread to petro-regimes like Saudi Arabia and its GCC neighbours?

8. How do you feel about the revolution-in-air events in Egypt, Tunisia and now Jordan? Where is this headed not just in the Arab world but worldwide?

We look forward to your views in regard to these questions.

Information Revolutions and The Future of Power

We are grateful to Dr Joseph Nye, chairman, Trilateral Commission, North America for his submission to ATCA in response to Lord Howell, Herv de Carmoy and our original briefings on digitally driven leaderless revolutions and self-assembling dynamic networks. He writes:


As authoritarian Arab regimes struggle with Twitter, Facebook and Al-Jazeera inflamed demonstrations; Iran tries to cope with the cyber sabotage of its nuclear enrichment program; and American diplomats try to understand the impact of Wikileaks, it is clear that smart policy in an information age will need a more sophisticated understanding of power in world politics.

Power Transition and Power Diffusion

That is the argument of my new book The Future of Power. Two types of power shifts are occurring in this century -- power transition and power diffusion. Power transition from one dominant state to another is a familiar historical event, but power diffusion is a more novel process. The problem for all states in today's global information age is that more things are happening outside the control of even the most powerful states. In the words of Richard Haas, president of the Council on Foreign Relations -- and once a faculty member at the Kennedy School -- 'the proliferation of information is as much a cause of nonpolarity as is the proliferation of weaponry.'

Barbarians and Non-State Actors

Regarding power transition, much attention is lavished on a supposed American decline, and facile historical analogies to Britain and Rome. But Rome remained dominant for more than three centuries after the apogee of Roman power, and even then, it did not succumb to the rise of another state, but died a death of a thousand cuts inflicted by various barbarian tribes. Indeed for all the fashionable predictions of China, India or Brazil surpassing the United States in the next decades, the greater threats may come from modern barbarians and non-state actors. In an information based world of cyber insecurity, power diffusion may be a greater threat than power transition.

Soft Power: Best Story

At an even more basic level, what will it mean to wield power in the global information age of the 21st century? What resources will produce power? In the 16th century, control of colonies and gold bullion gave Spain the edge; 17th century Netherlands profited from trade and finance; 18th century France gained from its larger population and armies; while 19th century British power rested on its primacy in the industrial revolution and its navy. Conventional wisdom has always held that the state with the largest military prevails, but in an information age it may be the state (or non-states) with the best story that wins. Soft power becomes a more important part of the mix.

GDP Growth v Smart Strategies

Today, it is far from clear how we measure a balance of power, much less how to develop successful strategies to survive in this new world. Most current projections of a shift in the global balance of power are based primarily on one factor -- projections of growth in the gross national product of different countries. They ignore the other dimensions of power that are discussed in my book, not to mention the policy difficulties of combining them into smart strategies. For example, while Hu Jintao told the 17th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party that China needs to invest more in its soft power, polls show that China's soft power is limited by a domestic authoritarian regime that puts people like Liu Xiaobo in jail.

Combining Hard and Soft Power Resources

Nation states will remain the dominant actors on the world stage, but they will find the stage far more crowded and difficult to control. A much larger part of the population both within and among countries has access to the power that comes from information. Governments have always worried about the flow and control of information, and the current period is not the first to be strongly affected by dramatic changes in information technology. Revolutions are not new, nor is transnational contagion, nor non-state actors. What is new -- and what we see manifested in the Middle East today -- is the speed of communication and the technological empowerment of a wider range of actors. An information world will require new policies that combine hard and soft power resources into smart power strategies.

[ENDS]

Joseph S Nye, Jr is chairman, Trilateral Commission, North America. He is university distinguished service Professor at Harvard University and from 1995 to 2004 was dean of the Harvard Kennedy School. Prior to assuming the deanship he served as US assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs, in which position he won two distinguished service medals, and was chair of the National Intelligence Council. Dr Nye originally joined the Harvard faculty in 1964, serving as director of the Center for International Affairs and associate dean of arts and sciences. In a 2008 poll of international relations scholars, he was rated the sixth most influential scholar in the field over the past 20 years and the most influential on American foreign policy.

From 1977 to 1979, Dr Nye was deputy to the undersecretary of state for security assistance, science, and technology and chaired the National Security Council Group on Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Nye's most recent books are The Paradox of American Power (2002), Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (2004), The Power Game: A Washington Novel (2004), and The Powers to Lead (2008) and The Future of Power (2011) which The Economist called 'rigorous and convincing.' Nye received his bachelor's degree summa cum laude from Princeton University. He did postgraduate work at Oxford University on a Rhodes scholarship and earned a PhD in political science from Harvard. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and an honorary member of The British Academy. He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the British Academy, the American Academy of Diplomacy, and an honorary fellow of Exeter College, Oxford. He is the recipient of Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson Award, the Charles Merriam Award from the American Political Science Association, and various honorary degrees.

We welcome your thoughts, observations and views. To reflect further on this subject and others, please respond within Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn's ATCA Open and related discussion platform of HQR. Should you wish to connect directly with real time Twitter feeds, please click as appropriate:

. ATCA Open
. @G140
. mi2g Intelligence Unit
. Open HQR
. DK Matai

DK Matai, Chairman, Asymmetric Threats Contingency Alliance (ATCA) & The Philanthropia

ATCA: The Asymmetric Threats Contingency Alliance is a philanthropic expert initiative founded in 2001 to resolve complex global challenges through collective Socratic dialogue and joint executive action to build a wisdom based global economy. Adhering to the doctrine of non-violence, ATCA addresses asymmetric threats and social opportunities arising from climate chaos and the environment; radical poverty and microfinance; geo-politics and energy; organised crime & extremism; advanced technologies -- bio, info, nano, robo & AI; demographic skews and resource shortages; pandemics; financial systems and systemic risk; as well as transhumanism and ethics. Present membership of ATCA is by invitation only and has over 5,000 distinguished members from over 120 countries: including 1,000 Parliamentarians; 1,500 Chairmen and CEOs of corporations; 1,000 Heads of NGOs; 750 Directors at Academic Centres of Excellence; 500 Inventors and Original thinkers; as well as 250 Editors-in-Chief of major media.

The Philanthropia, founded in 2005, brings together over 1,000 leading individual and private philanthropists, family offices, foundations, private banks, non-governmental organisations and specialist advisors to address complex global challenges such as countering climate chaos, reducing radical poverty and developing global leadership for the younger generation through the appliance of science and technology, leveraging acumen and finance, as well as encouraging collaboration with a strong commitment to ethics. Philanthropia emphasises multi-faith spiritual values: introspection, healthy living and ecology. Philanthropia Targets: Countering climate chaos and carbon neutrality; Eliminating radical poverty -- through micro-credit schemes, empowerment of women and more responsible capitalism; Leadership for the Younger Generation; and Corporate and social responsibility.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 08:17:07 pm
Paul exposed this shit in August...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-rioting-underclass-product-of-a-diseased-culture.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-rioting-underclass-product-of-a-diseased-culture.html)

The Rioting Underclass: Product of a Diseased Culture

Pressure from above, pressure from below; It’s about eviscerating the middle class by manipulating them to demand their own enslavement

Excellent article by PJ Watson.

My favourite quote:


This is like a bad zombie movie – it’s the rise of the idiots. The plague started in Tottenham. It rapidly spread to other areas of London, and soon the hordes were rampaging around major cities nationwide. But these zombies weren’t scavenging for brains, they were in search of JD Sports chav-wear, 40 inch TVs and iPads. The police stood by and watched. The petrified public welcomed troops on the streets, curfews, more surveillance and control with open arms. Thanks a lot, idiots.

The cause of this mayhem cannot be traced to any legitimate political grievance, it is almost entirely the product of a diseased culture, fostered by multinational corporations and the celebrity-obsessed entertainment industry, that brainwashes young people to aspire to lifestyles they can never possibly attain.


The CDC has stated on record that there would be a "ZOMBIE ATTACK"

Why would they do that?
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 08:21:13 pm
FLASHBACK FROM THE UK "RIOTS":

"These flash mobs in England right now are a very big psy-op look at what they're saying on Twitter:

Quote
f**k rubber bullets, use real bullets
Totalbiscuit

BTW if you want my actual opinion on those involved in the London Riots, they should be lined up against the wall and shot. I've never claimed to be a reasonable or kind person. What started as a peaceful protest against a police shooting has been rapidly hijacked and taken over by thieves and criminals who out to steal and destroy at the expense of innocent people. Why would we want these people to continue living in our country? f**k em.

"So basically these flash mobs are what is going to let ordinary citizens put their John Hancock behind executing you on the street by riot police and cops to maintain public order."

HOW THE HELL ARE THEY GOING TO JUSTIFY THEIR FUTURE NAZI WEAPONS WITHOUT MANUFACTURED RIOTS AND RAND CORP 'SMART MOBS'?


‘London riots facial recognition’ group forms on Google
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/09/london-riots-facial-recognition-group-forms-on-google-appears/
By Andrew Jones
Tuesday, August 9th, 2011 -- 11:57 am

A new Google Group called "London Riots Facial Recognition" emerged online in the wake of the London riots in an effort to identify the perpetrators. The group's reported aim is to use tools similar to Facebook's photo recognition to identify the looters who appear on photos of the riots on the web.  The first discussion in the group was started by the user 'Syd Lawrence', and is followed up by other discussions focusing on accessing the code "Application Programming Interface" (API) for different sites to cropping specific images. However, the most important discussion in the Google Group centers on the legality and ethical challenges of doing "facial recognition", an issue that has led Facebook to receive much criticism and possible investigation from US government officials. Two of the discussions are titled "Ethical Issues" and "Keeping Things Legal." The latter  thread includes a question that asks, "Get police backing?" As of this post, the group was still in the early stages on which steps to take in order to begin 'facial recognition.'

Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 08:29:49 pm
More from the UK Riots:

"The eager and adventurous unemployed young are indeed the shock troops in the destruction of the old social order everywhere."

Author: HG wells
Book Title: The New World Order
Published: 1940
Years of liberal dogma have spawned a generation of amoral, uneducated, welfare dependent, brutalised youngsters

By Max Hastings
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2024284/UK-riots-2011-Liberal-dogma-spawned-generation-brutalised-youths.html

A few weeks after the U.S. city of Detroit was ravaged by 1967 race riots in which 43 people died, I was shown around the wrecked areas by a black  reporter named Joe Strickland.

He said: ‘Don’t you believe all that stuff people here are giving media folk about how sorry they are about what happened. When they talk to each other, they say: “It was a great fire, man!” ’

I am sure that is what many of the young rioters, black and white, who have burned and looted in England through the past few shocking nights think today.

It was fun. It made life interesting. It got people to notice them. As a girl looter told a BBC reporter, it showed ‘the rich’ and the police that ‘we can do what we like’.

If you live a normal life of absolute futility, which we can assume most of this week’s rioters do, excitement of any kind is welcome. The people who wrecked swathes of property, burned vehicles and terrorised communities have no moral compass to make them susceptible to guilt or shame.

Most have no jobs to go to or exams they might pass. They know no family role models, for most live in homes in which the father is unemployed, or from which he has decamped.

They are illiterate and innumerate, beyond maybe some dexterity with computer games and BlackBerries.

They are essentially wild beasts. I use that phrase advisedly, because it seems appropriate to young people bereft of the discipline that might make them employable; of the conscience that distinguishes between right and wrong.

They respond only to instinctive animal impulses — to eat and drink, have sex, seize or destroy the accessible property of others.

Their behaviour on the streets resembled that of the polar bear which attacked a Norwegian tourist camp last week. They were doing what came naturally and, unlike the bear, no one even shot them for it.

A former London police chief spoke a few years ago about the ‘feral children’ on his patch — another way of describing the same reality.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2024284/UK-riots-2011-Liberal-dogma-spawned-generation-brutalised-youths.html

Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Satyagraha on October 03, 2011, 08:31:28 pm
Paul exposed this shit in August...

The CDC has stated on record that there would be a "ZOMBIE ATTACK"

Why would they do that?

I couldn't believe that statement, "The CDC has stated on record that there would be a "ZOMBIE ATTACK"...
So I checked. Holy shit. W.T.F.?....

(http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/tt201/Pilikia_photos/zombie.jpg)
http://emergency.cdc.gov/socialmedia/zombies_blog.asp

There are all kinds of emergencies out there that we can prepare for. Take a zombie apocalypse for example. That’s right, I said z-o-m-b-i-e a-p-o-c-a-l-y-p-s-e. You may laugh now, but when it happens you’ll be happy you read this, and hey, maybe you’ll even learn a thing or two about how to prepare for a real emergency.

A Brief History of Zombies
We’ve all seen at least one movie about flesh-eating zombies taking over (my personal favorite is Resident EvilExternal Web Site Icon.), but where do zombies come from and why do they love eating brains so much? The word zombie comes from Haitian and New Orleans voodoo origins. Although its meaning has changed slightly over the years, it refers to a human corpse mysteriously reanimated to serve the undead. Through ancient voodoo and folk-lore traditions, shows like the Walking Dead were born.

.... (Emergency preparedness text in source article)....

If zombies did start roaming the streets, CDC would conduct an investigation much like any other disease outbreak. CDC would provide technical assistance to cities, states, or international partners dealing with a zombie infestation. This assistance might include consultation, lab testing and analysis, patient management and care, tracking of contacts, and infection control (including isolation and quarantine). It’s likely that an investigation of this scenario would seek to accomplish several goals: determine the cause of the illness, the source of the infection/virus/toxin, learn how it is transmitted and how readily it is spread, how to break the cycle of transmission and thus prevent further cases, and how patients can best be treated. Not only would scientists be working to identify the cause and cure of the zombie outbreak, but CDC and other federal agencies would send medical teams and first responders to help those in affected areas (I will be volunteering the young nameless disease detectives for the field work).

(continued) (http://emergency.cdc.gov/socialmedia/zombies_blog.asp)

Linking social media to emergency preparedness; twitter revolution awareness ad from CDC.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Freeski on October 03, 2011, 08:34:17 pm
Paul exposed this shit in August...

The CDC has stated on record that there would be a "ZOMBIE ATTACK"

Why would they do that?

Wall Street protests take zombie turn
For Monday's protest, Patrick Bruner, a spokesman for the group, said demonstrators are being urged to dress in business wear with white faces and blood, and will march while eating Monopoly money. He said financial workers should see them "reflecting the metaphor of their actions."
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2011/10/03/wall-street-protest-occupy.html?cmp=googleeditorspick
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Son on October 03, 2011, 08:36:21 pm
The banksters have recently stolen the NYPD's pensions.
The banksters have cut the staff of local law enforcement everywhere.
The banksters bail out US cities (who got raped from bankster ponzi schemes) and then allow military drills on their police stations which simulate a military takeover of the whole town.
The banksters now know many in the NYPD stand up for 9/11 truth.
The anti-cops stories are popping up 1,000 per day.
There are zero anti-bankster stories anywhere...

NOW THE MILITARY IS GOING TO COME IN AND TELL LOCAL COPS TO GO F THEMSELVES?!?!?!?!

AFTER 10 YEARS IN AFGHANISTAN KNOWING IT IS AN ILLEGAL OCCUPATION, AFTER BEING SILENCED AND STOOD DOWN FOR 10 YEARS OF DU, FALSE FLAGS, PAT TILLMAN, PRIVATE LYNCH, SEAL TEAM SIX, ETC...

NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN, A FEW HUNDRED PEOPLE DEMANDING AN END TO CAPITALISM ALLOWS THE ENTIRE CHAIN OF COMMAND INCLUDING OBAMA, PANETTA, AND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE IN BETWEEN TO STAND DOWN AS MILITARY MEN BOAST ABOUT CONTROLLING LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PREVENTING LOCAL OFFICIALS FROM THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL STATES' RIGHTS.

A MILITARY INTERVENTION IN THE MOST POWERFUL CITY ON THE PLANET? EVERYONE IN THE TOP BRASS IS STANDING DOWN?

REMEMBER THAT THE NEW SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WAS THE DIRECTOR OF THE CIA!
EVERYTHING THE CIA DOES IS BASED ON DECEPTION!

HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE?

HERE IS WHAT ALL OF US WHO LOVE AMERICA ARE FIGHTING FOR...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7KfXkQdS64

WE NEED  EVERY US SOLDIER OUT OF ILLEGAL WARS ASAP, EVERY ONE OF OUR TROOPS BACK HOME ASAP!

WE NEED THE PRIVATE FEDERAL RESERVE TO STOP STEALING EVERY PENNY OF WEALTH FROM THE NEXT 10 GENERATIONS.

WE NEED THE CONSTITUTION OBEYED, DEFENDED, AND PROTECTED BY ALL IN GOVERNMENT.

THAT IS IT, MORE DEMANDS = MORE EXCUSES FOR GLOBALIST DECEPTIONS/ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL OPERATIONS USED AGAINST THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
.............on 9/11/01 it was 19......right?
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: chris jones on October 03, 2011, 08:45:27 pm
 aLONG ALONG AJ HAS WARNED US OF THIS MOVE, WELL HERE IT COMES.
tHIS IS A TURNING POINT THAT WILL WAKE UP THE silent majority
What does it look like they think of citizens and of this nation...ZIP
  Remember Kent state, no many do. This being injected is another step in domination and they have FEMA vacation camps set up for the emergencys.  
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: JT Coyoté on October 03, 2011, 08:59:31 pm
At the very least, listen to the first hour of today's show... Alex lays it ALL out step by step, move by move, frame by frame, to where even a caveman can understand it...

JTCoyoté

"The Democrats and the Republicans are the two
wings of the same bird of prey which is feasting
upon the Constitution and the American people."

~Pat Buchanan
-- From his campaign speeches as the
Reform Party candidate for president in 2000.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Freeski on October 03, 2011, 09:07:26 pm
Maybe this is it.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: tritonman on October 03, 2011, 09:08:16 pm
At the very least, listen to the first hour of today's show... Alex lays it ALL out step by step, move by move, frame by frame, to where even a caveman can understand it...

JTCoyoté

"The Democrats and the Republicans are the two
wings of the same bird of prey which is feasting
upon the Constitution and the American people."

~Pat Buchanan
-- From his campaign speeches as the
Reform Party candidate for president in 2000.

Some cavemen seemed to have missed it.
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=218759.msg1300126#msg1300126
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Effie Trinket on October 03, 2011, 09:13:32 pm
The banksters have recently stolen the NYPD's pensions.
The banksters have cut the staff of local law enforcement everywhere.
The banksters bail out US cities (who got raped from bankster ponzi schemes) and then allow military drills on their police stations which simulate a military takeover of the whole town.
The banksters now know many in the NYPD stand up for 9/11 truth.
The anti-cops stories are popping up 1,000 per day.
There are zero anti-bankster stories anywhere...

NOW THE MILITARY IS GOING TO COME IN AND TELL LOCAL COPS TO GO F THEMSELVES?!?!?!?!

AFTER 10 YEARS IN AFGHANISTAN KNOWING IT IS AN ILLEGAL OCCUPATION, AFTER BEING SILENCED AND STOOD DOWN FOR 10 YEARS OF DU, FALSE FLAGS, PAT TILLMAN, PRIVATE LYNCH, SEAL TEAM SIX, ETC...

NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN, A FEW HUNDRED PEOPLE DEMANDING AN END TO CAPITALISM ALLOWS THE ENTIRE CHAIN OF COMMAND INCLUDING OBAMA, PANETTA, AND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE IN BETWEEN TO STAND DOWN AS MILITARY MEN BOAST ABOUT CONTROLLING LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PREVENTING LOCAL OFFICIALS FROM THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL STATES' RIGHTS.

A MILITARY INTERVENTION IN THE MOST POWERFUL CITY ON THE PLANET? EVERYONE IN THE TOP BRASS IS STANDING DOWN?

REMEMBER THAT THE NEW SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WAS THE DIRECTOR OF THE CIA!
EVERYTHING THE CIA DOES IS BASED ON DECEPTION!

HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE?

HERE IS WHAT ALL OF US WHO LOVE AMERICA ARE FIGHTING FOR...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7KfXkQdS64

WE NEED  EVERY US SOLDIER OUT OF ILLEGAL WARS ASAP, EVERY ONE OF OUR TROOPS BACK HOME ASAP!

WE NEED THE PRIVATE FEDERAL RESERVE TO STOP STEALING EVERY PENNY OF WEALTH FROM THE NEXT 10 GENERATIONS.

WE NEED THE CONSTITUTION OBEYED, DEFENDED, AND PROTECTED BY ALL IN GOVERNMENT.

THAT IS IT, MORE DEMANDS = MORE EXCUSES FOR GLOBALIST DECEPTIONS/ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL OPERATIONS USED AGAINST THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Want to see what this is about?  Take a look at this:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/20/INRG1GCFBT.DTL

U.S. not prepared for Mumbai-like terror attacks
John Arquilla
Sunday, November 21, 2010


It took the 10 terrorists just 10 minutes to overwhelm Mumbai's defenses when they struck in November 2008. They were organized in five two-man teams, and the first waded into the crowd at one of India's biggest railway stations, firing AK-47s and tossing grenades. Soon more than 50 people were dead, a hundred more wounded. While this was going on, three other teams got out of cabs in other parts of the city and walked into two luxury hotels and a swanky restaurant, letting loose with guns and grenades. A fifth team stormed a Jewish community center, killing people and taking hostages.

After the initial wave of attacks, most of the Lashkar-e-Taiba hit men moved on before the police tactical units arrived, and soon five more targets had been struck, including a hospital. Bombs left by the terrorists at other points in the city as they moved around also began going off. It would take Indian law enforcement and military elements three days to bring an end to the crisis, by which time the toll of dead and wounded had reached almost 500.

Today, the concept of attacks by small teams at several sites simultaneously - what I have called "swarm" tactics - has caught on among terrorists. This month alone, we have seen such methods employed in the simultaneous bombings in Baghdad, where over 400 were killed, and in Karachi, Pakistan, two weeks ago, where small teams waged gun battles while a truck bomb went off at a major police installation. Recent intelligence revelations have gone further, suggesting that al Qaeda is planning to swarm cities in France and Germany in the same manner. And there is another hard truth: The next Mumbai-, Baghdad- or Karachi-style attacks could happen in San Francisco. Because, for all these warning signs, there is little evidence that our nation has made effective defensive preparations against assaults of this sort.

Our military's Northern Command, responsible for dealing swiftly with major terrorist attacks on American cities, remains largely wedded to the notion of responding by being able to move a brigade-size force - about 3,000 troops - where it's needed in a day or so. This is too much, too late when it comes to trying to counter small teams attacking a city at several points simultaneously.

Instead of this big, bulky approach, planners should aim at being able to deploy many small teams within minutes. This means giving a lot of attention, training and resources to local law enforcement and other first responders. It means doing simple things like providing more small-arms practice for all police. They don't have to become SWAT-like master snipers to take down terrorists - incremental improvements in a patrolman's already strong weapons-handling skills will pay huge dividends.

I recommend the notion of building a swarming capacity of our own. Police, military and other responders should be prepared to seize control from the terrorists at or near the outset of any incident, wherever it might take place.

The military should be preparing in fresh ways to back up the local first line of defense against Mumbai-style terror strikes. A good step would be to break up the brigade-size reaction force into, say, 50 platoon-size (40 to 50 soldiers each) detachments, then disperse them across the country close to major urban centers, within less than an hour's reach of any attack site. Between these first and second responders, a dense network of counterterrorist nodes would be ready at all times, all over the country.

This is certainly the idea that has guided improvements in Indian counterterrorism over the past two years and that is starting to animate German, French and British efforts. The Israelis have long operated in this manner as well. The Saudis also have shown great skill in developing counter-swarming commando teams in their hard fight against al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

Our allies are thus becoming increasingly well prepared to cope with what's coming. Why aren't we? Certainly not for lack of understanding. In meetings with local police chiefs and state-level Department of Homeland Security officials from around the country over the past two years, I learned they clearly grasp the nature of the Mumbai-style threat and see an urgent need to prepare better for it.

But these insights have not, for the most part, bubbled up to the tops of the gargantuan Defense and Homeland Security hierarchies that oversee them. Up there, the very idea of a locally led, network-style solution to the coming terrorist swarm is seen primarily as a threat to centralized control rather than as the most appropriate response to a complex new security challenge.

So in all likelihood, the terrorists will continue preparing to mount small-scale swarming assaults along the lines of the Mumbai model. We can't count on detecting or pre-empting all of them. In the wake of such an event, it should be expected that networks of armed Americans would spring up on their own to deter or counter terrorist swarms. Indeed, many in the Tea Party are already calling for the passage of enabling "firearms freedom" acts.

Tea Party favorites would probably sympathize with this self-help view as well. For example, Sen.-elect Rand Paul stated during his campaign that he intended to "fight all attempts at gun control." Sarah Palin's protege in the Alaska Senate race, Joe Miller, had a campaign event last July in which his supporters marched behind a Hummer openly carrying assault weapons.

All of which suggests that the American people are likely to act on their own if government doesn't protect them
against the kind of threat that is so clearly looming.

If we fail to act in the face of this swarm warning, the only uncertainties remaining will be about whether the damage done by such attacks is grave or catastrophic.

Let's do something before it comes to this.

John Arquilla teaches in the special operations program at the Naval Postgraduate School, and is author of "Worst Enemy: The Reluctant Transformation of the American Military." Send your feedback to us through our online form at SFGate.com/chronicle/submissions/#1.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 09:20:34 pm
Maybe this is it.

THERE IS NEVER AN "IT". THE MORE WE LOOK FOR AN "IT" MOMENT, THE LESS LIKELY WE ARE TO SEE WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON.

this is a protracted struggle.

They will likely escalate things to a certain point and then back off for a few months and start again.

This is what the did in London and Egypt.

They may continue escalating and it is important to be vigilant, but I believe they are going to try and provoke a wedge between cops and citizens and have people look to anonymous and possibly foreign "men in uniform" as saviours.

And just so the good cops know...

YOU GUYS GOT SNAKES IN YOUR RANKS WHO ARE PROVOKING THIS COUNTRY TO A CIVIL WAR.

THEY ARE SELLING YOU OUT BY STAGING FOR THE CAMERAS PEPPER SPRAY IN THE FACE AND OTHER VIOLENT ACTS USED FOR LOOPING YOUTUBES THAT DRIVE MOBS.

YOU NEED TO EXPOSE THOSE SNAKES BEFORE THE WHOLE COUNTRY TURNS ON THE LEGITIMATE LOCAL POLICE FORCES LIKE THEY DID IN EGYPT,

IN CAIRO, EVERY POLICE STATION WAS BURNED TO THE GROUND IN LESS THAN 3 MONTHS! EVERY ONE OF THEM, PLEASE RESEARCH THIS SHIT, DO NOT LET THESE SNAKES IN YOUR RANKS SELL YOU AND YOUR FAMILY DOWN A RIVER.

JOIN OATH KEEPERS ASAP, LOOK IT UP.

THERE ARE LESS THAN 10,000 PSYCHO EUROCRAT ARCHITECTS MANUFACTURING CIVIL STRIFE, WE NEED TO STOP FIGHTING EACH OTHER AND RALLY AROUND THE CONSTITUTION THAT PROTECTS THE COPS, THE MILITARY, AND YOUTHFUL/PASSIONATE PATRIOTS LOOKING FOR ANSWERS.

ALWAYS REMEMBER THE ULTIMATE GOALS OF THE GLOBALIST CLANS AND TRILATERAL TERRORISTS...DESTRUCTION OF THE CONSTITUTION!
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: One Revelator on October 03, 2011, 09:22:53 pm
“I’m heading up there tonight in my dress blues. So far, 15 of my fellow marine buddies are meeting me there, also in Uniform. I want to send the following message to Wall St and Congress:I didn’t fight for Wall St. I fought for America. Now it’s Congress’ turn. My true hope, though, is that we Veterans can act as first line of defense between the police and the protester. If they want to get to some protesters so they can mace them, they will have to get through the f**king Marine Corps first. Let’s see a cop mace a bunch of decorated war vets. I apologize now for typos and errors. Typing this on iPhone whilst heading to NYC. We can organize once we’re there. That’s what we do best.If you see someone in uniform, gather together. A formation will be held tonight at 10PM. We all took an oath to uphold, protect and defend the constitution of this country. That’s what we will be doing. Hope to see you there!!”

It is unclear whether these are active duty marines, or they are VETERANS, prior service.

If they are active duty, then they are still under command of the POTUS. If not, then they are technically civilians, and are no longer under POTUS authority.

If active duty, then the term “veteran” would mean veteran of a war while still in service.
If relieved from active duty, the term “marine” would be used in the context of “once a marine, always a marine”.

I’m leaning toward the latter. Surprised nobody else caught this yet.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Freeski on October 03, 2011, 09:26:25 pm
THERE IS NEVER AN "IT". THE MORE WE LOOK FOR AN "IT" MOMENT, THE LESS LIKELY WE ARE TO SEE WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON.

Oh yes, there is an "it moment" coming, meaning a second American Revolution or civil war, and a Canadian one, and a British one, Australian, Irish, all of us.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 09:33:53 pm
FLASHBACK: UK FAKE RIOTS...

Ever wonder how Scotland Yard is controlling the communications to these 'Smart Mob' Patsies?
YOUR TAX MONEY AT WORK!

US creates a "Cyber Al-Qaeda" to destroy sovereign countries
Clinton cites 'historic opportunity" to manufacture a new enemy for the future

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43369742/ns/technology_and_science-the_new_york_times
By JAMES GLANZ and JOHN MARKOFF

The Obama administration is leading a global effort to deploy “shadow” Internet and mobile phone systems that dissidents can use to undermine repressive governments that seek to silence them by censoring or shutting down telecommunications networks. The effort includes secretive projects to create independent cellphone networks inside foreign countries, as well as one operation out of a spy novel in a fifth-floor shop on L Street in Washington, where a group of young entrepreneurs who look as if they could be in a garage band are fitting deceptively innocent-looking hardware into a prototype “Internet in a suitcase.” Financed with a $2 million State Department grant, the suitcase could be secreted across a border and quickly set up to allow wireless communication over a wide area with a link to the global Internet. The American effort, revealed in dozens of interviews, planning documents and classified diplomatic cables obtained by The New York Times, ranges in scale, cost and sophistication. Some projects involve technology that the United States is developing; others pull together tools that have already been created by hackers in a so-called liberation-technology movement sweeping the globe.

The State Department, for example, is financing the creation of stealth wireless networks that would enable activists to communicate outside the reach of governments in countries like Iran, Syria and Libya, according to participants in the projects. In one of the most ambitious efforts, United States officials say, the State Department and Pentagon have spent at least $50 million to create an independent cellphone network in Afghanistan using towers on protected military bases inside the country. It is intended to offset the Taliban’s ability to shut down the official Afghan services, seemingly at will. The effort has picked up momentum since the government of President Hosni Mubarak shut down the Egyptian Internet in the last days of his rule. In recent days, the Syrian government also temporarily disabled much of that country’s Internet, which had helped protesters mobilize.

The Obama administration’s initiative is in one sense a new front in a longstanding diplomatic push to defend free speech and nurture democracy. For decades, the United States has sent radio broadcasts into autocratic countries through Voice of America and other means. More recently, Washington has supported the development of software that preserves the anonymity of users in places like China, and training for citizens who want to pass information along the government-owned Internet without getting caught.  But the latest initiative depends on creating entirely separate pathways for communication. It has brought together an improbable alliance of diplomats and military engineers, young programmers and dissidents from at least a dozen countries, many of whom variously describe the new approach as more audacious and clever and, yes, cooler. Sometimes the State Department is simply taking advantage of enterprising dissidents who have found ways to get around government censorship. American diplomats are meeting with operatives who have been burying Chinese cellphones in the hills near the border with North Korea, where they can be dug up and used to make furtive calls, according to interviews and the diplomatic cables.

The new initiatives have found a champion in Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose department is spearheading the American effort. “We see more and more people around the globe using the Internet, mobile phones and other technologies to make their voices heard as they protest against injustice and seek to realize their aspirations,” Mrs. Clinton said in an e-mail response to a query on the topic. “There is a historic opportunity to effect positive change, change America supports,” she said. “So we’re focused on helping them do that, on helping them talk to each other, to their communities, to their governments and to the world.” Developers caution that independent networks come with downsides: repressive governments could use surveillance to pinpoint and arrest activists who use the technology or simply catch them bringing hardware across the border. But others believe that the risks are outweighed by the potential impact. “We’re going to build a separate infrastructure where the technology is nearly impossible to shut down, to control, to surveil,” said Sascha Meinrath, who is leading the “Internet in a suitcase” project as director of the Open Technology Initiative at the New America Foundation, a nonpartisan research group. “The implication is that this disempowers central authorities from infringing on people’s fundamental human right to communicate,” Mr. Meinrath added.

The invisible Web
In an anonymous office building on L Street in Washington, four unlikely State Department contractors sat around a table. Josh King, sporting multiple ear piercings and a studded leather wristband, taught himself programming while working as a barista. Thomas Gideon was an accomplished hacker. Dan Meredith, a bicycle polo enthusiast, helped companies protect their digital secrets. Then there was Mr. Meinrath, wearing a tie as the dean of the group at age 37. He has a master’s degree in psychology and helped set up wireless networks in underserved communities in Detroit and Philadelphia. The group’s suitcase project will rely on a version of “mesh network” technology, which can transform devices like cellphones or personal computers to create an invisible wireless web without a centralized hub. In other words, a voice, picture or e-mail message could hop directly between the modified wireless devices — each one acting as a mini cell “tower” and phone — and bypass the official network. Mr. Meinrath said that the suitcase would include small wireless antennas, which could increase the area of coverage; a laptop to administer the system; thumb drives and CDs to spread the software to more devices and encrypt the communications; and other components like Ethernet cables.

The project will also rely on the innovations of independent Internet and telecommunications developers. “The cool thing in this political context is that you cannot easily control it,” said Aaron Kaplan, an Austrian cybersecurity expert whose work will be used in the suitcase project. Mr. Kaplan has set up a functioning mesh network in Vienna and says related systems have operated in Venezuela, Indonesia and elsewhere. Mr. Meinrath said his team was focused on fitting the system into the bland-looking suitcase and making it simple to implement — by, say, using “pictograms” in the how-to manual. In addition to the Obama administration’s initiatives, there are almost a dozen independent ventures that also aim to make it possible for unskilled users to employ existing devices like laptops or smartphones to build a wireless network. One mesh network was created around Jalalabad, Afghanistan, as early as five years ago, using technology developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Creating simple lines of communication outside official ones is crucial, said Collin Anderson, a 26-year-old liberation-technology researcher from North Dakota who specializes in Iran, where the government all but shut down the Internet during protests in 2009. The slowdown made most “circumvention” technologies — the software legerdemain that helps dissidents sneak data along the state-controlled networks — nearly useless, he said. “No matter how much circumvention the protesters use, if the government slows the network down to a crawl, you can’t upload YouTube videos or Facebook postings,” Mr. Anderson said. “They need alternative ways of sharing information or alternative ways of getting it out of the country.” That need is so urgent, citizens are finding their own ways to set up rudimentary networks. Mehdi Yahyanejad, an Iranian expatriate and technology developer who co-founded a popular Persian-language Web site, estimates that nearly half the people who visit the site from inside Iran share files using Bluetooth — which is best known in the West for running wireless headsets and the like. In more closed societies, however, Bluetooth is used to discreetly beam information — a video, an electronic business card — directly from one cellphone to another. Mr. Yahyanejad said he and his research colleagues were also slated to receive State Department financing for a project that would modify Bluetooth so that a file containing, say, a video of a protester being beaten, could automatically jump from phone to phone within a “trusted network” of citizens. The system would be more limited than the suitcase but would only require the software modification on ordinary phones. By the end of 2011, the State Department will have spent some $70 million on circumvention efforts and related technologies, according to department figures. Mrs. Clinton has made Internet freedom into a signature cause. But the State Department has carefully framed its support as promoting free speech and human rights for their own sake, not as a policy aimed at destabilizing autocratic governments.  That distinction is difficult to maintain, said Clay Shirky, an assistant professor at New York University who studies the Internet and social media. “You can’t say, ‘All we want is for people to speak their minds, not bring down autocratic regimes’ — they’re the same thing,” Mr. Shirky said.  He added that the United States could expose itself to charges of hypocrisy if the State Department maintained its support, tacit or otherwise, for autocratic governments running countries like Saudi Arabia or Bahrain while deploying technology that was likely to undermine them.

Shadow cellphone system
In February 2009, Richard C. Holbrooke and Lt. Gen. John R. Allen were taking a helicopter tour over southern Afghanistan and getting a panoramic view of the cellphone towers dotting the remote countryside, according to two officials on the flight. By then, millions of Afghans were using cellphones, compared with a few thousand after the 2001 invasion. Towers built by private companies had sprung up across the country. The United States had promoted the network as a way to cultivate good will and encourage local businesses in a country that in other ways looked as if it had not changed much in centuries. There was just one problem, General Allen told Mr. Holbrooke, who only weeks before had been appointed special envoy to the region. With a combination of threats to phone company officials and attacks on the towers, the Taliban was able to shut down the main network in the countryside virtually at will. Local residents report that the networks are often out from 6 p.m. until 6 a.m., presumably to enable the Taliban to carry out operations without being reported to security forces. The Pentagon and State Department were soon collaborating on the project to build a “shadow” cellphone system in a country where repressive forces exert control over the official network. Details of the network, which the military named the Palisades project, are scarce, but current and former military and civilian officials said it relied in part on cell towers placed on protected American bases. A large tower on the Kandahar air base serves as a base station or data collection point for the network, officials said. A senior United States official said the towers were close to being up and running in the south and described the effort as a kind of 911 system that would be available to anyone with a cellphone. By shutting down cellphone service, the Taliban had found a potent strategic tool in its asymmetric battle with American and Afghan security forces. The United States is widely understood to use cellphone networks in Afghanistan, Iraq and other countries for intelligence gathering. And the ability to silence the network was also a powerful reminder to the local populace that the Taliban retained control over some of the most vital organs of the nation. When asked about the system, Lt. Col. John Dorrian, a spokesman for the American-led International Security Assistance Force, or ISAF, would only confirm the existence of a project to create what he called an “expeditionary cellular communication service” in Afghanistan. He said the project was being carried out in collaboration with the Afghan government in order to “restore 24/7 cellular access.” “As of yet the program is not fully operational, so it would be premature to go into details,” Colonel Dorrian said.  Colonel Dorrian declined to release cost figures. Estimates by United States military and civilian officials ranged widely, from $50 million to $250 million. A senior official said that Afghan officials, who anticipate taking over American bases when troops pull out, have insisted on an elaborate system. “The Afghans wanted the Cadillac plan, which is pretty expensive,” the official said.

Broad subversive effort
In May 2009, a North Korean defector named Kim met with officials at the American Consulate in Shenyang, a Chinese city about 120 miles from North Korea, according to a diplomatic cable. Officials wanted to know how Mr. Kim, who was active in smuggling others out of the country, communicated across the border. “Kim would not go into much detail,” the cable says, but did mention the burying of Chinese cellphones “on hillsides for people to dig up at night.” Mr. Kim said Dandong, China, and the surrounding Jilin Province “were natural gathering points for cross-border cellphone communication and for meeting sources.” The cellphones are able to pick up signals from towers in China, said Libby Liu, head of Radio Free Asia, the United States-financed broadcaster, who confirmed their existence and said her organization uses the calls to collect information for broadcasts as well.  The effort, in what is perhaps the world’s most closed nation, suggests just how many independent actors are involved in the subversive efforts. From the activist geeks on L Street in Washington to the military engineers in Afghanistan, the global appeal of the technology hints at the craving for open communication.  In a chat with a Times reporter via Facebook, Malik Ibrahim Sahad, the son of Libyan dissidents who largely grew up in suburban Virginia, said he was tapping into the Internet using a commercial satellite connection in Benghazi. “Internet is in dire need here. The people are cut off in that respect,” wrote Mr. Sahad, who had never been to Libya before the uprising and is now working in support of rebel authorities. Even so, he said, “I don’t think this revolution could have taken place without the existence of the World Wide Web.”
US bankrolls 'shadow Internet for dissidents' abroad

(AFP) – 3 hours ago

WASHINGTON — The US government is financing the development of "shadow" Internet systems to enable dissidents abroad to get around government censors, The New York Times reported on Sunday. The newspaper said the covert effort also includes attempts to create independent cellphone networks inside foreign countries. The operation involves a fifth-floor shop on L Street in Washington, where a group of young entrepreneurs are fitting deceptively innocent-looking hardware into a prototype "Internet in a suitcase," the report said. Financed with a $2.0 million State Department grant, the suitcase could be secreted across a border and quickly set up to allow wireless communications over a wide area with a link to the global Internet, the paper noted. Some projects involve technology being developed in the United States while others pull together tools that have already been created by hackers from the so-called liberation technology movement, The Times said. The State Department is financing the creation of stealth wireless networks that would enable activists to communicate outside the reach of governments in countries like Iran, Syria and Libya, the paper said.

Read More
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jyLorww_LugjNffiBVsCsCOOgB9A

US Underwrites Internet Detour Around Censors

CONTENTS:
Citing interviews, planning documents, and classified diplomatic cables, the paper says the plan "ranges in scale, cost and sophistication." (More...)
The State Department is also reported to be funding new stealth wireless networks for use in countries like Iran, Syria, and Libya. (More...)

Citing interviews, planning documents, and classified diplomatic cables, the paper says the plan "ranges in scale, cost and sophistication." Its aim, the paper says, is to "deploy'shadow' Internet and mobile phone systems that dissidents can use to undermine repressive governments that seek to silence them by censoring or shutting down telecommunications networks." It describes a mix of technology being developed under the auspices of the United States and independent projects that have arisen as part of the global "liberation-technology movement." "The New York Times" says the plan has picked up steam since President Hosni Mubarak's ill-fated regime shut down the Internet in Egypt in the days before he was ousted in February. It identifies one project as "Internet in a suitcase," delivering quick wireless access to a broad area in an easily transportable manner. Another entails the creation of a parallel cell-phone network in Afghanistan to counter militants' efforts to shut down official channels of communication. [1] WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - The Obama administration is leading a global effort to establish "shadow" Internet and cellphone systems to help dissidents undermine authoritarian governments, the New York Times reported on Sunday. The effort has quickened since former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's government shut down the country's Internet in the last days of his rule, said the Times report, which cited planning documents, classified diplomatic cables and sources. [2]

WASHINGTON — The U.S. government is financing the development of "shadow" Internet systems to enable dissidents abroad to get around government censors, The New York Times reported on Sunday. [3]

The State Department is also financing creation of stealth wireless networks to enable activists to communicate beyond the reach of governments in countries like Iran, Syria and Libya, the Times said, citing participants in the projects. Another project focuses on development of an "Internet in a suitcase" that could be smuggled across a border and deployed to allow wireless communication with a link to the global Internet, the Times reported. [2] Financed with a $US2 million ($1.9 million) State Department grant, the suitcase could be secreted across a border and quickly set up to allow wireless communications over a wide area with a link to the global internet. [4]

In one project, the U.S. State Department and Pentagon have spent at least $50 million to create an independent cellphone network in Afghanistan using towers on military bases in the country, the Times said, citing unnamed U.S. officials. [2] The U.S. government has also spent at least $50 million to create an independent cellphone network in Afghanistan using towers on protected military bases inside the country, The Times said. It is intended to offset the Taliban?s ability to shut down the official Afghan services, the report noted. [3]

The New York Times said today the covert effort also includes attempts to create independent cellphone networks inside foreign countries. [4]

The United States has embarked on an effort that officials say is aimed at helping dissidents around the world counter censorship by repressive governments, according to a report in "The New York Times." [1]

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is backing the U.S. effort, according to the report. "We see more and more people around the globe using the Internet, mobile phones and other technologies to make their voices heard as they protest against injustice and seek to realize their aspirations," the Times quoted Clinton as saying in an email response to a query on the subject. [2]

THE U.S. Government is reportedly financing the development of shadow internet systems to enable dissidents abroad to get around government censors. [4]

The Times said some projects involve technology being developed in the U.S. while others pull together tools that have already been created by hackers from the so-called liberation technology movement. [4] The operation is aimed at counteracting the Taliban insurgency's ability to shut down official Afghan services, the Times said. [2]

The State Department is also reported to be funding new stealth wireless networks for use in countries like Iran, Syria, and Libya. [1] The newspaper said the covert effort also includes attempts to create independent cellphone networks inside foreign countries. [3]


SOURCES
1. U.S. Said Aiming To Help Dissidents Fight High-Tech Censorship - Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty © 2011
2. Secret U.S. effort aims to help dissidents - report | Reuters
3. AFP: US bankrolls'shadow Internet for dissidents' abroad
4. US Government financing internet in a box suitcase to help dissidents avoid censors, newspaper reports
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 09:37:54 pm
Oh yes, there is an "it moment" coming, meaning a second American Revolution or civil war, and a Canadian one, and a British one, Australian, Irish, all of us.

IT MOMENTS are for mythology builders and noosphere distributors. The first American Revolution was a protracted struggle with many defeats and years of education/debates/conversations. They want us to focus on IT MOMENTS so they can shape them and if they are defeats, the pharoahs can create apathy from them. We need to look at the protracted struggle that will continue long after the next 100 generations. The following thread exposes how the New World Order uses "IT MOMENTS". It is a leaked letter to Trilateral Terrorist and Harvard Professor Joseph Nye:

Mfg Mythologies, Swarming Smart Mobs
How to create a "MIRACLE MOMENT" and then perpetuate a myth about it.
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=202213.0
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Freeski on October 03, 2011, 09:44:52 pm
IT MOMENTS are for mythology builders and noosphere distributors. The first American Revolution was a protracted struggle with many defeats and years of education/debates/conversations. They want us to focus on IT MOMENTS so they can shape them and if they are defeats, the pharoahs can create apathy from them. We need to look at the protracted struggle that will continue long after the next 100 generations. The following thread exposes how the New World Order uses "IT MOMENTS". It is a leaked letter to Trilateral Terrorist and Harvard Professor Joseph Nye:

Mfg Mythologies, Swarming Smart Mobs
How to create a "MIRACLE MOMENT" and then perpetuate a myth about it.
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=202213.0

Thanks man
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 09:53:12 pm
It is unclear whether these are active duty marines, or they are VETERANS, prior service.

If they are active duty, then they are still under command of the POTUS. If not, then they are technically civilians, and are no longer under POTUS authority.

If active duty, then the term “veteran” would mean veteran of a war while still in service.
If relieved from active duty, the term “marine” would be used in the context of “once a marine, always a marine”.

I’m leaning toward the latter. Surprised nobody else caught this yet.

Please pay very, very, very close attention to this supposed spontaneous email which a representative of Joe Biden published...

“I’m heading up there tonight in my dress blues. So far, 15 of my fellow marine buddies are meeting me there, also in Uniform.

I want to send the following message to Wall St and Congress: I didn’t fight for Wall St. I fought for America. Now it’s Congress’ turn.

My true hope, though, is that we Veterans can act as first line of defense between the police and the protester. If they want to get to some protesters so they can mace them, they will have to get through the f**king Marine Corps first. Let’s see a cop mace a bunch of decorated war vets.I apologize now for typos and errors. Typing this on iPhone whilst heading to NYC. We can organize once we’re there. That’s what we do best.If you see someone in uniform, gather together. A formation will be held tonight at 10PM. We all took an oath to uphold, protect and defend the constitution of this country. That’s what we will be doing. Hope to see you there!!”


He is threatening Wall Street - no problem

He is threatening local police - BIG PROBLEM

He is threatening Congress, yet saying that he is defending the constitution...

CONGRESS IS THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!

For the past 10 years, Bilderberg media has been having us get angry at congress because congress is the main thing that slows everything down.

THEY NEED A DICTATORSHIP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I pray I am wrong and you are right, but if you or I started spamming emails that we were returning veterans and that we were going to get 15 of our buddies to teach local cops a lesson during an international media event and were sending a message to congress, withing 2 hours there would be a SWAT TEAM readied to lock and load.

You know what else? A confirmed agent for Joe Biden, MSNBC, and the NY TIMES would not be promoting it in 1,000 news outlets!

Check out who originated the article that White House Czar Van Jones is promoting...

Check it out, the exact same CSIS/Kissinger gameplan used in Egypt is now taking place in the US...

Semper Fi: Marines Coming To Protect Protesters On Wall Street
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/10/01/semper-fi-marines-coming-to-protect-protesters-on-wall-street/
October 1, 2011
By Michael Hayne

--------------
Michael is a comedian/VO artist/Columnist extraordinaire, who co-wrote an award-nominated comedy, wrote for NY Times Laugh Lines, guest-blogged for Joe Biden, and writes a column for MSNBC.com affiliated Cagle. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook. Seriously, follow him or he’ll send you photos of Rush Limbaugh bending over in a thong.



For Pete's sake, some guy painted a picure of a bank on fire and he got his ass SWAT Teamed!

Gibson does not use Indian labor and his entire company got SWAT Teamed!

If you try to sell Raw Milk, you get your ass SWAT Teamed!

But if you promote this, you get WH Czar and Joe Biden agent to promote you to hundreds of milllions.

Yup, must be a coincidence.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 09:57:23 pm
WHAT ABOUT THE MIAC REPORT...

#1 THREAT IS RETURNING VETERANS!!!!!!!!!!

YOU CANNOT MAKE THIS SHIT UP!
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Effie Trinket on October 03, 2011, 10:05:13 pm
Here is the European counterpart to this Bilderberg/CoR operation spreading like wildfire in the U.S.

http://www.europeanrevolution.net/

There they have a facebook page:  http://www.facebook.com/european1revolution

This is a HUGE operation, global in scope--but more alarmingly--it is in a huge number of U.S. cities and states already.  Yeah like this sprung up naturally.  Big surprise that all of their chapters have facebook pages, just like how all the false flag terror patsies magically get facebook pages created for them almost in real time:

http://roarmag.org/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-bigger-spreads-us/

List of occupations:

    Occupy Together
    Occupy Atlanta
    Occupy Austin
    Occupy Baltimore
    Occupy Boston
    Occupy Charlotte
    Occupy Chicago
    Occupy Cincinnati
    Occupy Columbus
    Occupy Dallas
    Occupy Denver
    Occupy Detroit
    Occupy Houston
    Occupy Indianapolis
    Occupy Jacksonville
    Occupy Kansas City
    Occupy Las Vegas
    Occupy Los Angeles
    Occupy Memphis
    Occupy Miami
    Occupy Milwaukee
    Occupy Nashville
    Occupy New Orleans
    Occupy Omaha
    Occupy Philadelphia
    Occupy Pittsburgh
    Occupy Portland
    Occupy Sacramento
    Occupy San Antonio
    Occupy San Diego
    Occupy San Jose
    Occupy San Francisco
    Occupy Seattle
    Occupy Wall Street
    Occupy Washington, D.C. (starts on Oct. 6)
    Occupy London Stock Exchange
    Occupy Toronto Stock Exchange
    Please share the FB pages of other cities!
_________________________________
WHAT THE F_CK IS THIS?
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/316929_211852962215920_100001736525906_566860_1413438581_n.jpg)

(http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/312970_182698035142155_178047252273900_381184_256208015_n.jpg)

Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Satyagraha on October 03, 2011, 10:08:51 pm

List of occupations:

    Occupy Together
    Occupy Atlanta
    Occupy Austin
    Occupy Baltimore
    Occupy Boston
    Occupy Charlotte
    Occupy Chicago
    Occupy Cincinnati
    Occupy Columbus
    Occupy Dallas
    Occupy Denver
    Occupy Detroit
    Occupy Houston
    Occupy Indianapolis
    Occupy Jacksonville
    Occupy Kansas City
    Occupy Las Vegas
    Occupy Los Angeles
    Occupy Memphis
    Occupy Miami
    Occupy Milwaukee
    Occupy Nashville
    Occupy New Orleans
    Occupy Omaha
    Occupy Philadelphia
    Occupy Pittsburgh
    Occupy Portland
    Occupy Sacramento
    Occupy San Antonio
    Occupy San Diego
    Occupy San Jose
    Occupy San Francisco
    Occupy Seattle
    Occupy Wall Street
    Occupy Washington, D.C. (starts on Oct. 6)
    Occupy London Stock Exchange
    Occupy Toronto Stock Exchange
    Please share the FB pages of other cities!
_________________________________
WHAT THE F_CK IS THIS?
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/316929_211852962215920_100001736525906_566860_1413438581_n.jpg)


Does anyone need anymore PROOF that this is a GLOBALIST AGENDA?
Big money behind this campaign to destabilize the US; London, Toronto.. where the hell else have they planted provocateurs?
"Occupation" is exactly what they're doing.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Effie Trinket on October 03, 2011, 10:17:38 pm
Look at this insane photo from their a facebook page from Occupy Boston, they are depicting THE POLICE as being in bed with Wall Street, but active military are going to "protect the protesters".  They are flat out trying to brainwash the public into further regarding local police as the enemy:

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/314791_180723942006231_178047252273900_374352_911207876_n.jpg)

https://www.facebook.com/OccupyBoston?ref=pb
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=180723942006231&set=pu.178047252273900&type=1&theater





Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 10:20:33 pm
Here is the European counterpart to this Bilderberg/CoR operation spreading like wildfire in the U.S.

http://www.europeanrevolution.net/

There they have a facebook page:  http://www.facebook.com/european1revolution

This is a HUGE operation, global in scope--but more alarmingly--it is in a huge number of U.S. cities and states already.  Yeah like this sprung up naturally.  Big surprise that all of their chapters have facebook pages, just like how all the false flag terror patsies magically get facebook pages created for them almost in real time:

http://roarmag.org/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-bigger-spreads-us/

_________________________________
WHAT THE F_CK IS THIS?
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/316929_211852962215920_100001736525906_566860_1413438581_n.jpg)

(http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/312970_182698035142155_178047252273900_381184_256208015_n.jpg)

FLASHBACK...2 months ago...

FACEBOOK...A globalist operation from A to Z owned by Goldman Sachs...

All the protestors in UK were threatened with 20 years because of a facebook post or they could be an agent for the Queen Mum...

Goldman Sachs owned Facebook calls for US Civil War to give Goldman more power
And so it begins here in the States. :o
http://www.facebook.com/pages/US-Day-of-Rage/199185230105826

Goldman’s Facebook coup
http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/01/03/goldmans-facebook-coup/
Jan 3, 2011 00:18 EST

The NYT reports that Goldman Sachs is investing $450 million of its own money into Facebook and that it’s bringing along $50 million from Digital Sky Technologies and as much as $1 billion more from its high-net-worth clients — all at a valuation of $50 billion.

The enormous sums of money involved here clearly ratify the valuation: this isn’t a handful of shares trading in an illiquid market, it’s an investment substantially larger than most IPOs.

It’s worth remembering here that only two years ago, when Microsoft bought into Facebook at a $15 billion valuation, that sum was described in the NYT as “astronomical”. But that said, Facebook’s multiples have clearly shrunk from those heady days: in 2007, Facebook could actually use Microsoft’s $240 million to fuel its expansion. Today, it’s reportedly earning $2 billion a year, which implies to me that this is a cash-out rather than a dilutive offering. Facebook has raised, in total, about $850 million to date, and there’s no obvious need for a massive new round of funding which would dwarf that entire sum.

If Goldman is leading the buyers, then, who are the sellers? VC shop Accel Partners has been selling Facebook shares quite aggressively of late, at lower valuations than this. They could easily provide all the shares that Goldman is buying and still be left with a stake worth some $3.5 billion. And it’s entirely conceivable that some early employees might well want to diversify their holdings and have maybe a little less than 99% of their net worth in Facebook stock.

As for Goldman, it has probably bought itself the IPO mandate, which could easily generate hundreds of millions of dollars in fee income. It has also become the only investment bank which can give its rich-people clients a coveted pre-IPO stake in Facebook: the extra cachet that brings and the possible extra clients, make this investment a no-brainer. Facebook doesn’t need to stay worth $50 billion forever — Goldman just needs to engineer an IPO valuation somewhere north of that, then exit quietly in the public markets. And that is surely within its abilities.

Goldman Limits Facebook Investment to Non-US Clients Exposing Anti-American Agenda
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/01/17/goldman-limits-facebook-investment-to-foreign-clients/
Top 25% of world's hackers are under FBI control
The FBI and US secret service have used the threat of prison to create an army of cyber terrorists to control all cyber crime globally

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jun/06/us-hackers-fbi-informer
Ed Pilkington in New York
guardian.co.uk, Monday 6 June 2011 16.12 BST

A quarter of hackers in the US have been recruited by federal authorities, according to Eric Corley, publisher of the hacker quarterly, 2600. Photograph: Getty Images The underground world of computer hackers has been so thoroughly infiltrated in the US by the FBI and secret service that it is now riddled with paranoia and mistrust, with an estimated one in four hackers secretly informing on their peers, a Guardian investigation has established. Cyber policing units have had such success in forcing online criminals to co-operate with their investigations through the threat of long prison sentences that they have managed to create an army of informants deep inside the hacking community. In some cases, popular illegal forums used by cyber criminals as marketplaces for stolen identities and credit card numbers have been run by hacker turncoats acting as FBI moles. In others, undercover FBI agents posing as "carders" – hackers specialising in ID theft – have themselves taken over the management of crime forums, using the intelligence gathered to put dozens of people behind bars.

So ubiquitous has the FBI informant network become that Eric Corley, who publishes the hacker quarterly, 2600, has estimated that 25% of hackers in the US may have been recruited by the federal authorities to be their eyes and ears. "Owing to the harsh penalties involved and the relative inexperience with the law that many hackers have, they are rather susceptible to intimidation," Corley told the Guardian. "It makes for very tense relationships," said John Young, who runs Cryptome, a website depository for secret documents along the lines of WikiLeaks. "There are dozens and dozens of hackers who have been shopped by people they thought they trusted." The best-known example of the phenomenon is Adrian Lamo, a convicted hacker who turned informant on Bradley Manning, who is suspected of passing secret documents to WikiLeaks. Manning had entered into a prolonged instant messaging conversation with Lamo, whom he trusted and asked for advice. Lamo repaid that trust by promptly handing over the 23-year-old intelligence specialist to the military authorities. Manning has now been in custody for more than a year. For acting as he did, Lamo has earned himself the sobriquet of Judas and the "world's most hated hacker", though he has insisted that he acted out of concern for those he believed could be harmed or even killed by the WikiLeaks publication of thousands of US diplomatic cables. "Obviously it's been much worse for him but it's certainly been no picnic for me," Lamo has said. "He followed his conscience, and I followed mine."

The latest challenge for the FBI in terms of domestic US breaches are the anarchistic co-operatives of "hacktivists" that have launched several high-profile cyber-attacks in recent months designed to make a statement. In the most recent case a group calling itself Lulz Security launched an audacious raid on the FBI's own linked organisation InfraGard. The raid, which was a blatant two fingers up at the agency, was said to have been a response to news that the Pentagon was poised to declare foreign cyber-attacks an act of war. Lulz Security shares qualities with the hacktivist group Anonymous that has launched attacks against companies including Visa and MasterCard as a protest against their decision to block donations to WikiLeaks. While Lulz Security is so recent a phenomenon that the FBI has yet to get a handle on it, Anonymous is already under pressure from the agency. There were raids on 40 addresses in the US and five in the UK in January, and a grand jury has been hearing evidence against the group in California at the start of a possible federal prosecution. Kevin Poulsen, senior editor at Wired magazine, believes the collective is classically vulnerable to infiltration and disruption. "We have already begun to see Anonymous members attack each other and out each other's IP addresses. That's the first step towards being susceptible to the FBI." Barrett Brown, who has acted as a spokesman for the otherwise secretive Anonymous, says it is fully aware of the FBI's interest. "The FBI are always there. They are always watching, always in the chatrooms. You don't know who is an informant and who isn't, and to that extent you are vulnerable."

Wikileaks -- a Big Dangerous US Government Con Job

By F. William Engdahl, 7 December 2010

The story on the surface makes for a script for a new Oliver Stone Hollywood thriller. A 39-year old Australian hacker holds the President of the United States and his State Department hostage to a gigantic cyber “leak,” unless the President leaves Julian Assange and his Wikileaks free to release hundreds of thousands of pages of sensitive US Government memos. A closer look at the details, so far carefully leaked by the most ultra-establishment of international media such as the New York Times, reveals a clear agenda. That agenda coincidentally serves to buttress the agenda of US geopolitics around the world from Iran to Russia to North Korea. The Wikileaks is a big and dangerous US intelligence Con Job which will likely be used to police the Internet.

It is almost too perfectly-scripted to be true. A discontented 22 -year old US Army soldier on duty in Baghdad, Bradley Manning, a low-grade US Army intelligence analyst, described as a loner, a gay in the military, a disgruntled “computer geek,” sifts through classified information at Forward Operating Base Hammer. He decides to secretly download US State Department email communications from the entire world over a period of eight months for hours a day, onto his blank CDs while pretending to be listening to Lady Gaga. In addition to diplomatic cables, Manning is believed to have provided WikiLeaks with helicopter gun camera video of an errant US attack in Baghdad on unarmed journalists, and with war logs from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Manning then is supposed to have tracked down a notorious former US computer hacker to get his 250,000 pages of classified US State Department cables out in the Internet for the whole world to see. He allegedly told the US hacker that the documents he had contained "incredible, awful things that belonged in the public domain and not on some server stored in a dark room in Washington, DC." The hacker turned him in to US authorities so the story goes. Manning is now incommunicado since months in US military confinement so we cannot ask him, conveniently. The Pentagon routinely hires the best hackers to design their security systems.

Then the plot thickens. The 250,000 pages end up at the desk of Julian Assange, the 39-year-old Australian founder of a supposedly anti-establishment website with the cute name Wikileaks. Assange decides to selectively choose several of the world’s most ultra-establishment news media to exclusively handle the leaking job for him as he seems to be on the run from Interpol, not for leaking classified information, but for allegedly having consensual sex with two Swedish women who later decided it was rape.

He selects as exclusive newspapers to decide what is to be leaked the New York Times which did such service in promoting faked propaganda against Saddam that led to the Iraqi war, the London Guardian and Der Spiegel. Assange claims he had no time to sift through so many pages so handed them to the trusted editors of the establishment media for them to decide what should be released. Very “anti-establishment” that. The New York Times even assigned one of its top people, David E. Sanger, to control the release of the Wikileaks material. Sanger is no establishment outsider. He sits as a member of the elite Council on Foreign Relations as well as the Aspen Institute Strategy Group together with the likes of Condi Rice, former Defense Secretary William Perry, former CIA head John Deutch, former State Department Deputy Secretary and now World Bank head Robert Zoellick among others.

Indeed a strange choice of media for a person who claims to be anti-establishment. But then Assange also says he believes the US Government version of 9/11 and calls the Bilderberg Group a normal meeting of people, a very establishment view.

The latest sensational Wikileaks documents allegedly from the US State Department embassies around the world to Washington are definitely not as Hillary Clinton claimed "an attack on America's foreign policy interests that have endangered innocent people." And they do not amount to what the Italian foreign minister, called the "September 11 of world diplomacy." The British government calls them a threat to national security and an aide to Canada’s Prime Minister calls on the CIA to assassinate Assange, as does kooky would-be US Presidential hopeful Sarah Palin.

Most important, the 250000 cables are not "top secret" as we might have thought. Between two and three million US Government employees are cleared to see this level of "secret" document,1 and some 500,000 people around the world have access to the Secret Internet Protocol Network (SIPRnet) where the cables were stored.

Siprnet is not recommended for distribution of top-secret information. Only 6% or 15,000 pages of the documents have been classified as even secret, a level below top-secret. Another 40% were the lowest level, "confidential", while the rest were unclassified. In brief, it was not all that secret.2

Most of the revelations so far have been unspectacular. In Germany the revelations led to the removal of a prominent young FDP politician close to Guido Westerwelle who apparently liked to talk too much to his counterpart at the US Embassy. The revelations about Russian politics, that a US Embassy official refers to Putin and Medvedev as “Batman and Robin,” tells more about the cultural level of current US State Department personnel than it does about internal Russian politics.

But for anyone who has studied the craft of intelligence and of disinformation, a clear pattern emerges in the Wikileaks drama. The focus is put on select US geopolitical targets, appearing as Hillary Clinton put it “to justify US sanctions against Iran.” They claim North Korea with China’s granting of free passage to Korean ships despite US State Department pleas, send dangerous missiles to Iran. Saudi Arabia’s ailing King Abdullah reportedly called Iran’s President a Hitler.

Excuse to police the Internet?

What is emerging from all the sound and Wikileaks fury in Washington is that the entire scandal is serving to advance a long-standing Obama and Bush agenda of policing the until-now free Internet. Already the US Government has shut the Wikileaks server in the United States though no identifiable US law has been broken.

The process of policing the Web was well underway before the current leaks scandal. In 2009 Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller and Republican Olympia Snowe introduced the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S.773). It would give the President unlimited power to disconnect private-sector computers from the internet. The bill "would allow the president to 'declare a cyber-security emergency' relating to 'non-governmental' computer networks and do what's necessary to respond to the threat." We can expect that now this controversial piece of legislation will get top priority when a new Republican House and the Senate convene in January.

The US Department of Homeland Security, an agency created in the political hysteria following 9/11 2001 that has been compared to the Gestapo, has already begun policing the Internet. They are quietly seizing and shutting down internet websites (web domains ) without due process or a proper trial. DHS simply seizes web domains that it wants to and posts an ominous "Department of Justice" logo on the web site. See an example at . Over 75 websites were seized and shut in a recent week. Right now, their focus is websites that they claim "violate copyrights," yet the torrent-finder.com website that was seized by DHS contained no copyrighted content whatsoever. It was merely a search engine website that linked to destinations where people could access copyrighted content. Step by careful step freedom of speech can be taken away. Then what?

http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/Geopolitics___Eurasia/US_Con_Job/us_con_job.html
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: One Revelator on October 03, 2011, 10:27:00 pm
Please pay very, very, very close attention to this supposed spontaneous email which a representative of Joe Biden published...

“I’m heading up there tonight in my dress blues. So far, 15 of my fellow marine buddies are meeting me there, also in Uniform.

I want to send the following message to Wall St and Congress: I didn’t fight for Wall St. I fought for America. Now it’s Congress’ turn.

My true hope, though, is that we Veterans can act as first line of defense between the police and the protester. If they want to get to some protesters so they can mace them, they will have to get through the f**king Marine Corps first. Let’s see a cop mace a bunch of decorated war vets.I apologize now for typos and errors. Typing this on iPhone whilst heading to NYC. We can organize once we’re there. That’s what we do best.If you see someone in uniform, gather together. A formation will be held tonight at 10PM. We all took an oath to uphold, protect and defend the constitution of this country. That’s what we will be doing. Hope to see you there!!”


He is threatening Wall Street - no problem

He is threatening local police - BIG PROBLEM

He is threatening Congress, yet saying that he is defending the constitution...

CONGRESS IS THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!

For the past 10 years, Bilderberg media has been having us get angry at congress because congress is the main thing that slows everything down.

THEY NEED A DICTATORSHIP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I pray I am wrong and you are right, but if you or I started spamming emails that we were returning veterans and that we were going to get 15 of our buddies to teach local cops a lesson during an international media event and were sending a message to congress, withing 2 hours there would be a SWAT TEAM readied to lock and load.

You know what else? A confirmed agent for Joe Biden, MSNBC, and the NY TIMES would not be promoting it in 1,000 news outlets!

Check out who originated the article that White House Czar Van Jones is promoting...


For Pete's sake, some guy painted a picure of a bank on fire and he got his ass SWAT Teamed!

Gibson does not use Indian labor and his entire company got SWAT Teamed!

If you try to sell Raw Milk, you get your ass SWAT Teamed!

But if you promote this, you get WH Czar and Joe Biden agent to promote you to hundreds of milllions.

Yup, must be a coincidence.

OK. So because of these points, I see no evidence of a “mutiny” within the US Armed forces. The original source being hyped was…uh…facebook. That, together with the blathering MSM coverage and WH involvement makes the fishy list.

Could even actors, dressed in military uniform, show up on the scene? It would be interesting to see the official DoD PR response on that.

Or could it just be a BS story perpetrated by DC criminals to spark their beloved violence?

IDK.

I disagree, however, that the writer has threatened congress. “I want to send the following message to Wall St and Congress: I didn’t fight for Wall St. I fought for America. Now it’s Congress’ turn.(to fight for America)”

Threatening local police? Iffy. He did say first line of DEFENSE rather than offense.

The script just so happens to be playing out just like it did in Egypt. Again, fishy list.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 10:27:28 pm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From the US Declaration of Independence:

"[ S ]he has excited domestic insurrections amongst us..."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

(http://i327.photobucket.com/albums/k454/Protean7/Queen_Joker.gif)(http://lordwhatsmymotivation.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/aahd064_8x10rev-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-posters.jpg)
“You know, whenever Pharaoh wanted to prolong the period of slavery in Egypt,
he had a favorite, favorite formula for doing it.
What was that?
He kept the slaves fighting amongst themselves.
But whenever the slaves get together,
that's the beginning of getting out of slavery.”

—Martin Luther King, Jr.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




(http://polytricks.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/brzezinskisplash.jpg)
"[The G]rand imperative of imperial geostrategy [is] to keep the barbarians from coming together."

-Zbigniev Brzezinski 1997 "The Grand Chessboard"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

They cannot stand the eternal Human Being who strives for freedom, equality, and justice.

They cannot allow for this because they only want slaves and hive minds. they cannot stand the human spirit or individuality...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here is the agenda for the CoIntelPro operations of divide and conquer.
They use both the attack dogs and the controlled opposition against the eternal American Citizen or British Citizen

They want us to have various manufactured categories attack each other.

(http://i244.photobucket.com/albums/gg7/brockelever/Dere-Ewig-American6.jpg)
[Another awesome piece of artwork by Brocke]


Blast from the past...last year...

Al Gore and David de Rothschild: "It's Time For Civil Disobedience" (video clip)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lIcdpq-5-c

"The time for talk is over!"

(http://i2.ytimg.com/vi/mtudNpL30BU/default.jpg)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtudNpL30BU
Quote
Look how Soros/Beatrix and the other Nazis gladly line you up like sheep to be slaughtered, torture you with chemicals, and restraints, and illegally imprison you!

Violence erupts outside Copenhagen climate summit
http://rawstory.com/2009/12/violence-erupts-copenhagen-climate-summit/
By Raw Story
Saturday, December 12th, 2009 -- 12:10 pm


UPDATE

Police in Copenhagen say they detained 968 people during climate protests in the Danish capital Saturday. The Associated Press reports that the protests -- which attracted 40,000 to 100,000 people, depending on the source -- were "mostly peaceful."Police said they rounded up 968 people in a preventive action against a group of youth activists at the tail end of the demonstration. Officers in riot gear moved in when some of the activists, masking their faces, threw cobblestones through the windows of the former stock exchange and Foreign Ministry buildings. The mostly peaceful demonstrations in Copenhagen on Saturday provided the centerpiece of a day of global climate activism stretching from Europe to Asia. Police assigned extra officers to watch protesters marching toward the suburban conference center to demand that leaders act now to fight climate change.
Story continues below...

ORIGINAL STORY CONTINUES BELOW

Violence broke out in Copenhagen on Saturday as tens of thousands took to the streets to demand tough measures on climate change, with demonstrators around the world rallying for action instead of words. Hundreds of youths wearing black went on the rampage through the Danish capital, throwing bricks and smashing windows, as around 30,000 protesters marched through the streets to demanding world leaders declare war global warming. Many of the youngsters, whose faces were covered with scarves, were forced to the ground by riot police before being bundled into vans, an AFP reporter said. Police said some 400 people were arrested in the scuffles, although the rest of the march -- the centerpiece of protests in 130 cities across the world -- remained peaceful. The huge march to the heavily-guarded Bella Center venue capped a day of lobbying by green groups around the world, staging peaceful, colorful protests from Australia to the Arctic Circle. "We can't change the science, we have to change the politics -- and if we can't change the politics, we have to change the politicians," Kumi Naidoo, head of Greenpeace International, told the main rally. If all goes well, the 194-nation conference under the UN's Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) will wrap up on Friday with a historic deal sealed by more than 110 heads of state and government. It would commit major economies to actions that would curb emissions of heat-trapping fossil-fuel gases and generate hundreds of billions in dollars for poor countries badly exposed to climate change. Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen of host country Denmark was upbeat. "In less than a week, I believe we will achieve global agreement... an agreement that will set the course for an ambitious approach to our joint efforts in combating climate change," he told a forum on clean energy. But many delegates complained that progress had been negligible and the mood soured by finger-pointing. A draft blueprint, presented on Friday, ran into problems almost immediately among developing countries, emerging giant economies, the United States and the European Union (EU). Poorer countries lashed it for failing to spell out commitments on finance while the United States complained it failed to bind China and other high-population, fast-growing economies to tough pledges on emissions. The EU said the draft did not go nearly far enough to limit warming to two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), a goal endorsed by many countries. "We are in a situation where we can see that so far we haven't achieved enough," Andreas Carlgren, environment minister of Sweden, which currently chairs the EU, said on Saturday. The EU has unilaterally decided to cut its greenhouse-gas emissions by 20 percent over 1990 levels, and has offered to deepen this to 30 percent if it finds other major players willing to make a comparable effort.

But Carlgren ruled this out, blaming foot-dragging by the world's top two carbon emitters. "So far we haven't sufficient bids on the table," he told a press conference. "So far the bids from the United States and China are not sufficient whereby we can deliver this 30 percent." Related article: US, China face off at talks Conference chair Connie Hedegaard scheduled an informal meeting with environment ministers on Saturday, followed by a further session on Sunday. Those meetings mark the start of a gruelling game of climate poker before the arrival of heads of state and government on Wednesday and Thursday, many of whom will speak in the conference's plenary session. Those slated to attend include US President Barack Obama, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, Premier Wen Jiabao of China, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama of Japan and the heads of the European Union (EU). Failure on December 18 would deal a heavy blow to the nation-state system, the head of the Nobel-winning UN panel of climate scientists warned on Saturday. "I think if we are able to get a good agreement, this would clearly create an enormous amount of confidence in the ability of human society to be able to act on a multilateral basis," said Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). "If we fail, I don't think everything is lost, but certainly it will be a major setback." This video was published to YouTube by the Associated Press on Saturday, Dec. 12, 2009.



Did you greenies understand that?

David de Rothschild told you to engage in violent disobedience after it became public that the copenhagen deal was a scam.

He told you to cause a diverson so that the media would focus on the disruption.

Then his cousin by incestuous inter-ritual orgies, Queen Beatrix, had her Nazi police ARREST YOU!

Lord Rothschild and the Queen Bitch drank tea and ate crumpets while you got processed as enemies of the state!

WAKE UP!

The new world order wants to end humanity itself!



You need more proof this is a scam?

Here is the president of the IPCC.

(http://www.wholetruthcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/rajendra_pachauri_wideweb__470x3170.jpg)
(http://www.treehugger.com/20090923-rajendra-pachauri.jpg)
(http://iefconf2009.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/pachauri1.jpg)
(http://www.globalclimatescam.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/jerry-lewis.jpg)
(http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1211/csmimg/OGORESPEECH_P3.jpg)



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajendra_K._Pachauri

Biography

Pachauri was on the Board of Directors of the Indian Oil Corporation (January 1999 to September 2003); Board of Directors of GAIL (India) Ltd. (April 2003 to October 2004); National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd (August 2002 to August 2005)

http://www.biographybase.com/biography/Pachauri_RK.html

Any questions?
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 10:31:34 pm
OK. So because of these points, I see no evidence of a “mutiny” within the US Armed forces. The original source being hyped was…uh…facebook. That, together with the blathering MSM coverage and WH involvement makes the fishy list.

Could even actors, dressed in military uniform, show up on the scene? It would be interesting to see the official DoD PR response on that.

Or could it just be a BS story perpetrated by DC criminals to spark their beloved violence?

IDK.

I disagree, however, that the writer has threatened congress. “I want to send the following message to Wall St and Congress: I didn’t fight for Wall St. I fought for America. Now it’s Congress’ turn.(to fight for America)”

Threatening local police? Iffy. He did say first line of DEFENSE rather than offense.

The script just so happens to be playing out just like it did in Egypt. Again, fishy list.

Good points, thanks for the feedback. Please keep following up, they are revving shit up and the more thoughtful people looking into this the better.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 10:33:29 pm


THEY NEED PERSISTING SOCIAL CRISIS TO JUSTIFY THE USE OF CIVILIAN TRAUMA AND SERVITUDE WEAPONS AS BRAGGED ABOUT BY ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI IN 1970!!
(http://wideshut.co.uk/images/host/images/89592617859362083240.jpg)

Read this article:
HAARP, Haiti, Brzezinski and the NWO
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/printer_5495.shtml
By Jerry Mazza Online Journal Associate Editor


Comment:

What is important to note is Jerry Mazza's evaluation and comparison of the two moments in historical context:

He actually wrote a chapter called “How to Wreck the Environment” in his book, Unless Peace Comes. Of course, this came at the height of the Vietnam brutality. Given the aura of violence similar to today’s, Gordon described in his chapter, among other things, “polar ice cap melting or destabilization, ozone depletion techniques, earthquake engineering, ocean wave control and brain wave manipulation using the planet’s energy fields.”

Also important to note is Brzezinski's invisible hand in all of these narratives pervasive among the elite controllers of society:

As of 1970, Brzezinski predicted HAARP could be used for “a more controlled and directed society” linked to technology. This society would be dominated by an elite group which impresses voters by allegedly superior scientific know-how.” Furthermore, Dr. Strangelove states, “Unhindered by the restrains of traditional liberal values, this elite [the New World Order of today] would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control. Technical and scientific momentum would then feed on the situation it exploits.”

And thus spake Brzezinski, who also predicted that it would take an inciting incident like Pearl Harbor (i.e., 9/11) to engage the normally peaceful American population to go to war on a march for world hegemony (i.e., The War on Terror). And he was spot on.

Zbig is not afraid, in fact, is lauded for thinking down avenues that would make most of us shiver with disgust. Regrettably, his forecasts tend to prove accurate, because they inspire the worst people to do the worst things. And so, these “tools for the elite” and their temptation to use them increases incredibly. The policies to use them are in place. As to the “stepping stones” that could be used to reach this highly controlled techno-society, Brezinski expected them to be “persisting social crisis” and the use of mass media to gain the public’s confidence. Again, he’s spot on.



As to the “stepping stones” that could be used to reach this highly controlled techno-society, Brezinski expected them to be “persisting social crisis” and the use of mass media to gain the public’s confidence. Again, he’s spot on.

RockefellerFoundation predicts for 2012
PERSISTING SOCIAL CRISIS
caused by pandemic, economic collapse, marauding gangs

So, I was reading this article (I think it has already been linked to by other people on here - since Alan Watt linked to it a couple of days ago - but as far as I know, this is the original article and contains some more stuff that the link Alan Watt put up did not have ) - and it made mention of this consortium called Global Business Network.


The English Ideology and WIRED Magazine

Part Three Of Three

Techno-Utopianism: The Final Imperial Solution
by Mark Stahlman November 22nd, 1996

http://web.archive.org/web/20011226171744/www.rewired.com/96/Fall/1122.html


This snippet in particular piqued my curiosity
Quote
No less chilling is the scenarios planning exercise that WIRED's wizards-behind-the-curtain perform on their multi-national clients. From General Motors to AT&T, the Global Business Network (GBN) charges hefty sums to show the yellow-brick-road towards "ByteCity" to strategic planners and top corporate brass. In one recent and rare public discussion of the results, GM's top planning team defined the three "alternative futures" which emerged after years of GBN counseling. The first is just like our world and, so by definition, is not very interesting. The second is an eco-fascist regime in which car designs are completely "Green" and the companies can only follow orders. The third is the fun one, however. This is the world in which armed gangs roam the streets and surface travel is a series of car chases. This scenario has already been anticipated with a Cadillac that includes armored protection and a "panic" button installed in the middle of the dashboard. The car has a satellite tracking system built in and it can call the local authorities (presumably your multi-national's private swat-team) and get help when you get trapped by the natives.

So naturally, I looked into Global Business Network. This consortium is kind of like Wells 'The Samurai' corporate overlord board - every bigwig company you can imagine that is into some type of big industry is among its members.

Global Business Network

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Global_Business_Network
Funding / Members - Corporations
I don't have time to list all of the companies, so let's just list for the sake of interest some of the key companies that consider themselves to be members - these companies also provide for the organization's funding:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Global_Business_Network#Funding
  • AT&T
  • Bechtel
  • Booz Allen & Hamilton
  • Coca-Cola Company
  • Dow Chemical
  • DuPont
  • EDS (Electronic Data Systems)
  • Fannie Mae
  • Freddie Mac
  • ExxonMobil
  • General Electric
  • Heineken (My note: The Dutch beer-brewer)
  • Hewlett Packard/HP
  • IBM (My note: Big surprise, huh?)
  • Intel
  • L'Oreal
  • Lucent Corporation
  • Microsoft
  • Monsanto
  • Procter & Gamble
  • Reuters
  • Sandia National Laboratories
  • Shell Oil/Dutch Royal Shell
  • Toyota
  • Sun Microsystems (My note: See, I don't want to hear anymore crap from some techies that Sun Microsystems was 'once' good prior to being taken over by the evil 'Oracle' - to hell with that - they were ALWAYS part of the hive mind - stop sucking up to controlled opposition is my message to these people - forget about the SPARC processors and all that shit and realize these guys didn't give a rip about you, the individual, or any semblance of human dignity - same as all the other corporate technocrats)
  • Xerox
[...]
http://www.gbn.com/articles/pdfs/GBN&Rockefeller%20scenarios.technology&development.pdf
Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
This report was produced by

The Rockefeller Foundation
and Global Business Network.
May 2010

(http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/526/33182154.jpg)
Let's see what Peter Schwartz, President of Global Business Network, has to say about these 'scenarios' firsthand:
Quote

Scenario planning is a powerful tool precisely because the future is unpredictable and shaped by many interacting variables. Scenarios enable us to think creatively and rigorously about the different ways these forces may interact, while forcing us to challenge our own assumptions about what we believe or hope the future will be. Scenarios embrace and weave together multiple perspectives and provide an ongoing framework for spotting and making sense of important changes as they emerge. Perhaps most importantly, scenarios give us a new, shared language that deepens our conversations about the future and how we can help to shape it.

The Rockefeller Foundation has already used this project as an opportunity to clarify and advance the relationship between technology and development. Through interviews and the scenario workshops, they have engaged a diverse set of people - from different geographies, disciplines, and sectors - to identify the key forces driving change, to explore the most critical uncertainties, and to develop challenging yet plausible scenarios and implications.  

Zbigniew Brzezinski pushes Rockefeller agenda of
PERSISTING SOCIAL CRISIS
to justify more weapons against the American people on LIVE TV!

Zbigniew Brzezinski: Obama The New Mr. 'Malaise'
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2010/07/16/m-word-zbigniew-brzezinski-says-obama-presiding-over-age-malaise
By Mark Finkelstein
Fri, 07/16/2010 - 08:35 ET [/center]

Can you hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth emanating from 1600 Pennslyvania Avenue?  It's Pres. Obama & Co. reacting to Zbigniew Brzezinki pinning on Barack Obama the word that doomed Jimmy Carter: "malaise."

On Morning Joe, Carter's former national security adviser said there "is a sense of pervasive malaise" in America. What's worse, suggested Zbig, Pres. Obama hasn't been able to figure out how to deal with the malaise. Ruh-roh!
 


ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: I think we're now going through a phase in which there is a sense of pervasive malaise, which affects different groups in society in different ways.

So people are dissatisfied; they're slightly worried; they don't see a good certain future for themselves or for the country, but in their own narrow sphere.


There's no grand mobilizing idea. And I have a sense that Obama, who started so well, and who really captivated people—he captivated me!—has not been able yet to generate some sort of organizing idea for an age which combines a malaise that's pervasive and percolating, and complexity.. . .  


PAT BUCHANAN: We need a new paradigm!

BREZINSKI: And the President hasn't articulated it.

BUCHANAN: No he hasn't.

BREZINSKI: There goes any further invitation to the White House!



Brzezinski clearly understood the personal implications of his downer of a diagnosis: "there goes any further invitation to the White House!"  The panel all enjoyed a good chuckle, but could anything be much worse for PBO than to be seen as the reincarnation of Jimmy Carter?

Historical Note:  Here's more on the Malaise Speech itself.  Interestingly, although Carter adviser Pat Caddell used "malaise" in his notes for the speech, Carter himself never actually employed the word, speaking instead of a "crisis of the spirit in our country."

No Goneril, She: Good daughter that she is, Mika tried to put the best face on father's words.  As Zbig lamented the end of his White House invitations, Mika twice pointed out that he had said "yet."  In other words, it's not that pops had painted the president an irredeemable failure.  It's just that PBO hasn't come up with a solution to the malaise "yet."

The entire point of persisting social turmoil is to justify their insane weapons against humanity.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: SUPREMEMASTER on October 03, 2011, 10:34:32 pm
I believe they are going to try and provoke a wedge between cops and citizens

Step #1: Go here: http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=nXTjlVfjH6Y (http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=nXTjlVfjH6Y)

Step #2: Scroll down until you see this:
(http://i51.tinypic.com/1zv8kg0.png) (Screenshot of YouTube comments)
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 10:47:25 pm
WATCH THE MOVIE BY MICHAEL MOORE CALLED "CAPITALISM" ASAP!

All of the players in the movie are being used to support this idea that CAPITALISM and not banksters or people acting against the US constitution is the problem! He made a movie saying that all of the problems of the world are due to CAPITALISM. The movie was managed by Ari Emanuel who is brother to Rham Emanuel. Michael Moore interviewed various airline pilots (who are getting screwed...not by capitalism, but because of corporate welfare, regulations on the people, austerity, PTECH controlling them...all of which is anti-capitalism). Now The airline pilots union is joining the protests. Just like his movie about healthcare bragging about France/UK, his movies (not him) are used to forward the elites' agendas by recruiting genuine patriots to serve as poster children for banksters' goals. Banksters hate capitalism more than anyone, it is their kryptonite. The illegitimate banksters would be broke if we did not socialize their bailouts!

Also, look at the corporate sponsors promoting this stuff (they never promoted 9/11 truth which had much more demonstrations)...

Washington Post:
http://drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/10/03/regarding_occupy_wall_street

CNN/AOL: http://edition.cnn.com/2011/10/03/politics/occupy-wall-street/

FORBES: http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/10/03/why-occupy-wall-street-is-more-than-just-a-protest/

There are thousands of articles, this is 100% corporate controlled. In India, there were millions on the streets protesting corruption...not one article about it. They were successful because it was real. This is Goldman Sachs/Bilderberg operation all the way.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Satyagraha on October 03, 2011, 10:50:16 pm
WATCH THE MOVIE BY MICHAEL MOORE CALLED "CAPITALISM" ASAP!

All of the players in the movie are being used to support this idea that CAPITALISM and not banksters or people acting against the US constitution is the problem! He made a movie saying that all of the problems of the world are due to CAPITALISM. The movie was managed by Ari Emanuel who is brother to Rham Emanuel. Michael Moore interviewed various airline pilots (who are getting screwed...not by capitalism, but because of corporate welfare, regulations on the people, austerity, PTECH controlling them...all of which is anti-capitalism). Now The airline pilots union is joining the protests. Just like his movie about healthcare bragging about France/UK, his movies (not him) are used to forward the elites' agendas by recruiting genuine patriots to serve as poster children for banksters' goals. Banksters hate capitalism more than anyone, it is their kryptonite. The illegitimate banksters would be broke if we did not socialize their bailouts!

Also, look at the corporate sponsors promoting this stuff (they never promoted 9/11 truth which had much more demonstrations)...

Washington Post:
http://drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/10/03/regarding_occupy_wall_street

CNN/AOL: http://edition.cnn.com/2011/10/03/politics/occupy-wall-street/

FORBES: http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/10/03/why-occupy-wall-street-is-more-than-just-a-protest/

There are thousands of articles, this is 100% corporate controlled. In India, there were millions on the streets protesting corruption...not one article about it. They were successful because it was real. This is Goldman Sachs/Bilderberg operation all the way.

Did that idiot mention what he thinks is BETTER than capitalism? Is he into Mao? Stalin? Did he have a suggestion? I haven't seen that movie, but will watch it; clearly Michael Moore is anti-capitalism; but wondering (fearing) if he thinks socialism is the answer. If so, then he's totally clueless. Let him read about the "Great Leap Forward" when Mao genocided 80+ million chinese... Jesus what an ass.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Optimus on October 03, 2011, 11:07:08 pm
Paul exposed this shit in August...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-rioting-underclass-product-of-a-diseased-culture.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-rioting-underclass-product-of-a-diseased-culture.html)

The Rioting Underclass: Product of a Diseased Culture

Pressure from above, pressure from below; It’s about eviscerating the middle class by manipulating them to demand their own enslavement

Excellent article by PJ Watson.

My favourite quote:


This is like a bad zombie movie – it’s the rise of the idiots. The plague started in Tottenham. It rapidly spread to other areas of London, and soon the hordes were rampaging around major cities nationwide. But these zombies weren’t scavenging for brains, they were in search of JD Sports chav-wear, 40 inch TVs and iPads. The police stood by and watched. The petrified public welcomed troops on the streets, curfews, more surveillance and control with open arms. Thanks a lot, idiots.

The cause of this mayhem cannot be traced to any legitimate political grievance, it is almost entirely the product of a diseased culture, fostered by multinational corporations and the celebrity-obsessed entertainment industry, that brainwashes young people to aspire to lifestyles they can never possibly attain.


The CDC has stated on record that there would be a "ZOMBIE ATTACK"

Why would they do that?

Why indeed?

Wall Street protesters dress as zombies in NYC

    AP foreign, Monday October 3 2011

VERENA DOBNIK

Associated Press= NEW YORK (AP) — Protesters speaking out against corporate greed and other issues in New York City are dressing as corporate zombies and greeting Wall Street workers as they head into the office.

Patrick Bruner, a spokesman for the group, says Occupy Wall Street demonstrators are being urged to dress in business wear with white faces and blood, and will march while eating monopoly money. He says financial workers should see them "reflecting the metaphor of their actions."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/9876309
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 11:34:29 pm
End the Fed, not Capitalism
http://www.infowars.com/end-the-fed-not-capitalism/
Andrew Steele America 20xy October 3, 2011

Organizers of the “Occupy Wall Street” protests have now urged the people gathered there to dress up as “corporate zombies” and pretend to eat monopoly money.  Indeed, if the protests were aimed at the real source of the problem– the Federal Reserve– the use of monopoly money in the demonstration might be the most striking symbol, however since many of the protestors  have aimed their anger at the free market, demanding we give the government that’s robbed us even more power to feed its cronies, the more fitting symbol of the protests in this particular demonstration are the zombies.

For a short period as the protests began many complained that the media wasn’t paying attention to them.   Suddenly women protesters were sprayed in the face with mace by a rogue cop and all eyes were on New York.  People who couldn’t occupy Wall Street started occupying places in other cities, and the corporate media began covering every aspect of it.

Now the protests are picking up momentum.  The media is grabbing control of it.  Something big indeed is happening, but it’s not good.

From Boston.com, writing about the protests in Boston:

“Accompanied by Boston Police officers who stopped traffic at key intersections, the protesters first gathered in the city’s Financial District this morning and then marched to the State House where they stood on the steps, chanting slogans and holding signs.

Some of the signs included “capitalism is organized crime” and “where’s my golden parachute?”

A Daily Monitor headline proclaims that there’s an “Anti-capitalism rebellion in progress in US”

The media has the power to pick and choose what it wants to give attention to.  Though past protest marches involving thousands of people as well as a nationwide series of demonstrations at every Federal Reserve bank in the country years ago were flagrantly ignored by the cackling skulls on TV and newspaper hacks being told what to write, those which reinforce the positions coming out of the foolish left/right distraction and which ultimately benefit those who have created our current situation get full coverage.

While every faction of modern activism has made an appearance at the protests, the loudest and most featured voices now are the ones who claim that the free market drove us off this cliff, when in reality the free market hasn’t existed for years and that it’s too much government power that has led us to this point.  It is not a free market when government has the power to pick winners and losers and thus control the cogs of the economy for the benefit of its buddies.  It’s not a free market when a banking cartel has the ability to artificially lower interest rates and print money, devaluing the savings and purchasing power of people who actually work for a living to give to the firms that should have been allowed to crumble as a result of their own bad business practices.  Yes, big government advocates will complain that the free market leads to winners and losers too, but let’s look at who the losers would be if we had real capitalism and the government kept its hands off– AIG, JP Morgan, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, ect…all the accounting firms who got bailouts with our money and who are being protested now.     Anyone who believes that human nature will suddenly change and that government officials will suddenly become more benevolent if they just get more of the power they’re grabbing for is either being deceptive or foolish.  “Too big to fail” will not go away simply because we turned the poor masses against the middle class and allowed the super rich stealing trillions in bailouts to eliminate their weaker competition by having the government tax the few remaining small business job creators into oblivion.

Common Sense was the title of a pamphlet that once helped inspire a revolution in a America, and it’s now it’s a concept that needs to be reawakened in America today.

The “Occupy Wall Street” protests have turned into a vanity bazar for hypocritical, leftist opportunists like millionaire Michael Moore who has done well for himself through capitalism and by marketing his movies through corporate companies that promote them within the corporate media.  When recently questioned about the Federal Reserve– which has enabled the corporate socialism that created our problems–he nervously dismissed the idea of any protest against it and tried to reinforce the simplistic and misguided message that the corporate media hopes useful idiots will latch onto– capitalism has to go!

Sometimes reality is more ironic than fiction.  While Michael Moore rails against capitalism, you have to pay to watch his movie on YouTube, while other well-known voices defending the free market allow their entire, expensively produced movies to be put on YouTube for free and encourage people to copy and distribute them.
-------------------------
Andrew Steele | “Occupy Wall Street” protests have turned into a vanity bazaar for hypocritical, leftist opportunists like millionaire Michael Moore."
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 03, 2011, 11:52:47 pm
Hey look...Obama is pushing more ANTI-CAPITALIST legislation via treasonous trade deals.

Guess what else...he wants them passed before the unions find out that they just got f-d, Bilderberg style!



Obama quietly sends three trade deals to Congress and orders them to be passed "WITHOUT DELAY"
The secret move by Obama is meant to avoid a confrontation with Labor Unions who oppose them

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/10/03/obama-sends-three-trade-deals-to-congress/
By Agence France-Presse
Monday, October 3, 2011

WASHINGTON — US President Barack Obama on Monday sent long-stalled free trade deals with Colombia, Panama and South Korea to the congress and pressed lawmakers there to approve them “without delay.” “These agreements will support tens of thousands of jobs across the country for workers making products stamped with three proud words: Made in America,” Obama said in a statement. The move, instantly applauded by his Republican foes and the US business community, came after a nearly three-year feud fed by market-access and labor worries and a fight over aid to US workers displaced by overseas competition. The Republican-held House of Representatives, expected to act first on the accords before the Senate acts, will likely approve them next week, according to Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s office. “They will be a top priority for the House,” Republican House Speaker John Boehner said in a statement that charged Obama’s years-long delay in submitting them to the congress “was unacceptably long and likely cost jobs.” Boehner said the accords would pass “in tandem” with Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), a program that provides financial help to workers hurt by overseas competition, in accordance with a Democratic demand. That compromise — Republicans had opposed TAA — was likely to grease the legislative wheels and allow for quick approval of all three accords despite concerns among powerful US labor unions, historically strong Democratic allies.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 04, 2011, 12:12:32 am
Look how the queen rewards her operatives...

FACEBOOK...ITS A KILLER!

Two Facebook users who urged people to join in riots online are jailed for FOUR years

By Jack Doyle, James Tozer and Jaya Narain
Last updated at 8:03 AM on 17th August 2011
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2026755/Manchester-Facebook-riot-inciters-Perry-Sutcliffe-Jordan-Blackshaw-jailed-4-years.html


Two Facebook users who tried to kickstart mob violence during last week’s riots were each jailed for four years yesterday.

Perry Sutcliffe, 22, and Jordan Blackshaw, 20, were locked up even though their ‘chilling’ plans to go on the rampage came to nothing.

In a separate development a judge in Manchester tore up normal sentencing rules and said any adults involved in rioting should expect to go lose their liberty for a ‘significant period’.

(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/08/16/article-2026755-0D74409800000578-755_224x423.jpg)

Judge Andrew Gilbart, QC, unveiled a sliding scale of tariffs under which riot leaders will be jailed for at least eight years, burglars who broke into shops to steal for between four and seven years, and arsonists between three and seven years.

Even those who claimed they found stolen goods abandoned on the street should be jailed for up to four years, he said.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2026755/Manchester-Facebook-riot-inciters-Perry-Sutcliffe-Jordan-Blackshaw-jailed-4-years.html

Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 04, 2011, 12:17:01 am
Thankfully DARPA has all the tools necessary to manufacture, manipulate, and disintegrate riots.
So, if any violence erupts, it is only a DARPA operation and not the reponsibility of the protestors.
What a relief, thanks DARPA!

Pentagon Forecast: Cloudy, 80% Chance of Riots
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/11/lockheed-peers/
By Noah Shachtman  November 9, 2007  |  6:02 am

The Pentagon is paying Lockheed Martin to try to predict insurgencies and civil unrest like the weather.  It’s part of a larger military effort to blend forecasting software with social science that has some counterinsurgency experts cringing.

Lockheed recently won a $1.3 million, 15-month contract from the Defense Department to help develop the "Integrated Crises Early Warning System, or ICEWS.  The program will "let military commanders anticipate and respond to worldwide political crises and predict events of interest and stability of countries of interest with greater than 80 percent accuracy," the company claims.  "Rebellions, insurgencies, ethnic/religious violence, civil war, and major economic crises" will all be predictable.  So will "combinations of strategies, tactics, and resources to mitigate [against those] instabilities."

DARPA, the Pentagon’s bleeding-edge research arm, laid out the case for ICEWS this summer at its conference, held outside of Disneyworld.  "Commanders will always need to have an accurate picture of enemy positions, as well as friendly units and allies," David Honey, who heads the agency’s Strategic Technology Office, told confab-goers in Anaheim, California.
"But increasingly it’s social, cultural, political and economic information, foreign language capabilities and other clues – that are proving essential."

Figuring out how to find those clues won’t be easy, his colleague, Sean O’Brien, warned.
He has a three-part plan for how ICEWS might get it done, however.  It tracks, roughly, to how meteorologists piece together long-range weather forecasts.  

Step one: dump everything we know about a country like Iraq, and “create [software] agents that mirror the actual communities.”  



Not only does that mean identifying "government leaders[']
propensity to defuse or exacerbate potentially volatile situations,"
O’Brien explained in a call for proposals.
It also requires a determination of "how a country’s macro-structural conditions (social, demographic, economic) affect the way in which the country’s citizens interact with its government."  

What’s more, according to an
article in the Military & Aerospace Electronics trade journal, the ICEWS system should be designed to "capture and process vast quantities of data from digitized news media, Websites, blogs, and other sources of information that reflect the dynamic and rapidly changing character and intensity of interactions between people and governments."

Step two in the ICEWS plan: make these agents even more realistic, by “leverag[ing] the hundreds of social, cultural, and behavioral theories” about why people act the way they do.  Step three: let commanders run mock battle plans against these modeled Iraqis, to see how they might react.

Experts on counterinsurgency are, to say the least, skeptical.  

“Wait a minute, you can’t tell me who’s going to a win a football game. And now you’re going to replicate free will?” Lieutenant Colonel
John Nagl, who helped write the Army’s manual on defusing insurgencies, tells DANGER ROOM.

“They are smoking something they shouldn’t be," retired Lieutenant General Paul Van Riper recently quipped to Science Magazine.


The military has been trying, for decades, to use social science data to forecast what might happen next on the battlefield — or around the world.  In 1976, for example, Pentagon-funded researchers put together a "integrated crisis warning system… comprised of (1) quantitative military, political, and economic crisis indicators; (2) quantitative indicators of U.S. military, political, and economic interests abroad;
(3) a unified multi-method forecasting capability; and (4) a computer base."  

More recently, DARPA has funded efforts to "anticipate the societal/regional indicators that precipitate instability."

For these projects, the agency turned to Carnegie Mellon University professor Kathleen Carley and  Massachusetts research firm Aptima, Inc.  VISualization of Threats and Attacks in Urban Environments, or "VISTA," was their company’s attempt to "utiliz[e] cultural models and other social network analysis techniques to assess and forecast nation state instability and conflict."  The "Anticipatory Culture-Based Modeling Environment," or ACUMEN, toolkit created a "simulation engine" based on "theories from psychology, social psychology, sociology, organization science, political science, and economics."

ACUMEN modeled political, military, social, religious, and insurgent groups as agents, along with their relationships regarding hostility, support, membership, and more. ACUMEN modeled the profiles of agents and geographic regions (at the state and province levels)
within specific test states using a set of social, political, economic, health, and demographic indicators. In all there were 150 indicators for the state, 60 indicators for each province, and 30 indicators for each agent.

But that was all in the lab.  The goal of ICEWS is to eventually bring the tool to war. As Military & Aerospace Electronics notes, "The third phase will involve a live, in-theater test of the system."

ALSO:

* Army Association Blasts Army’s "Human Terrain"
* Mapping Human Terrain "Enables the Kill Chain"?
* Pentagon Science & Technology: The Human Problem
* When Anthropologists Go to War
* When Anthropologists Go to War (Against the Military)
* When Anthropology Gets Ugly
* Report: Military Should Double Social Science Cash
* Can Social Science Win the War on Terror?
DARPA kicks off program to develop advanced computer system to forecast global wars and other political instability
http://www.militaryaerospace.com/index/display/article-display/281403/articles/military-aerospace-electronics/online-news/darpa-kicks-off-program-to-develop-advanced-computer-system-to-forecast-global-wars-and-other-political-instability.html
By John Keller

ARLINGTON, Va., 5 Jan. 2006. Scientists at the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in Arlington, Va., are asking industry for ideas on how to develop an advanced computer system called the Integrated Crisis Early Warning System (ICEWS) that is able to predict global wars and other political instability.

The goal is to develop a system to monitor, assess, and forecast crises throughout the world to support decisions on how to allocate resources to mitigate them, officials say. The ICEWS will provide military commanders with a powerful capability to anticipate and respond to worldwide political crises and track their success in near-real time.

Officials of the DARPA Information Processing Technology Office (IPTO) released a broad agency announcement for the ICEWS program Jan. 5 (BAA07-10). Companies interested in participating have more than a year -- until Jan. 18, 2008 -- to respond.

Companies who respond to the solicitation should propose end-to-end solutions for the development of state-of-the-art computational modeling capabilities that can monitor, assess, and forecast -- in near-real time -- a variety of phenomena associated with country instability, such as riots and rebellions, regime changes, major economic collapses, violent anti-state insurgencies, major acts of government repression, civil wars, and conflicts between two or more countries

The 2005 National Security Strategy outlined two priorities for the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), DARPA officials explain. First, military leaders should have early warning of international crises so they can mitigate them before they become more threatening. Second, the military needs a way to assess the risks of responding to international crises. The ICEWS program is DARPA's response.

This new system should yield technology that enables military commanders to identify the countries that are likely to become more or less unstable in the near-, mid-, and long-term; the factors driving instability; and the strategies, tactics, and resources likely to have the greatest influence.

DARPA leaders will pursue the ICEWS program in three phases, and now only are working on the first phase, which is to build and test computational social science models for forecasting various forms of country instability with an ability to forecast several kinds of events that can produce political instability.

The second phase will develop the decision support analytical and technical foundation for ICEWS, with a key goal of developing the capability to generate strategies and tactics for any set of circumstances that are driving the instability.

In the second phase, DARPA and its contractors will explore ways to map diplomatic, informational, military, and economic actions to various political stability challenges, and update model parameters resulting from worldwide changes. The third phase will involve a live, in-theater test of the system.

The ICEWS should use the latest information-processing technologies that can capture and process vast quantities of data from digitized news media, Websites, blogs, and other sources of information that reflect the dynamic and rapidly changing character and intensity of interactions between people and governments.

The system is to receive database information that will flow through the integrated model, and produce results users can visualize through a user interface. Once data goes to the system, the ICEWS should process it, run the models, generate the output, and alert the user that forecasts are ready.

Through the user interface, the user should be able to review forecasts at national and regional levels. The ICEWS also should automatically generate explanations for each forecast as step-by-step descriptions of the computations performed to generate the forecast.

Finally, ICEWS should provide a simple "what-if" capability that enables the user to change the values of original input data and rerun the models to determine whether the forecast will change based on altering input data.

To ask questions, or for more information, contact the DARPA Information Processing Technology Office by post at DARPA/ITO BAA Coordinator, Attn: BAA07-10, 3701 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Va. 22203-1714.
Third International Conference on Computational Cultural Dynamics
http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/conferences/icccd2009/program.html
2009


Reasoning About Diverse Cultures Using Multi-Disciplinary Teams and Computer Technology in the Human Social Culture Behavior (HSCB) Modeling Program by Cmdr. Dylan Schmorrow

The Human Social Culture Behavior (HSCB) Modeling program vision includes developing unbiased, objective, valid science-based approaches to enable DoD Operations Planning, Information Operations, Analysis, Intelligence, Experimentation, and Training. Specifically, quantitative models and shaping tools that provide assessments, forecasts, options for courses of action, and decision support for understanding and reasoning about the human terrain of battlespaces. Multi-disciplinary research is necessary in developing computational models for cultural dynamics. HSCB performers have addressed this need by forming multi-disciplinary teams in the same organization, subcontracting to organizations with the necessary skills, or hiring consultants. In addition, the HSCB Modeling program is taking advantage of advances in computer technologies to support data gathering, tool/model/training environment development, system integration, and results visualization and interpretation. An illustrative mission thread will be used to highlight how multi-disciplinary teams and advances in computer technology are supporting the collection of data-to use of that data in tools/models-through visualizing and interpreting results. Finally, HSCB success stories of computational models for cultural dynamics that enhanced cultural sensitivity will be shared.

Biography
Commander Schmorrow is a U.S. Naval Officer in the Navy’s Medical Service Corps and serves as the Specialty Leader of the Aerospace Experimental Psychologist community. He is also an Acquisition Professional in the Naval Acquisition Corps and is currently serving in the Office of the Director, Defense Research and Engineering as Biosystems Associate Director, Human Systems. He is responsible for S&T programs in the Human Systems (HS) Technology area, which includes DoD programs in personnel selection, training and leadership, cognitive sciences, interface design, personnel protection, combat feeding, human systems integration and human performance. He monitors S&T planning and programming to facilitate applicable insertion into military acquisition programs supporting U.S. warfighters. He also serves as the Program Director for the OSD Human, Social, Culture and Behavioral Modeling research and development program that is focused on providing DoD and the US Government with the ability to understand and effectively operate in human/social/culture terrains inherent to non-conventional warfare missions. His interests include advancing information technology, neuroscience, human-factors, training, autonomy, and decision upport technologies to maximize human performance. He frequently collaborates with the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Homeland Security, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the DoD Services to improve warfighting capabilities and to support academic and industry performers in advancing science and building new technologies.

Trends and Challenges in Political Event Data Analysis by Philp Schrodt

Political event data -- brief records recording when who did what to whom in a political system -- were originally developed in the 1960s under DARPA and NSF funding, and are one of the most common formal methodologies used for forecasting political developments. In recent years, the field has experienced a resurgence due to the availability of near-real-time data produced using automated methods working with news stories available on the Web and from commercial sources such as Factiva and Lexis-Nexis, as well as a substantial expansion in the types of forecasting methods that are used. This talk will survey the current state of the art in event data production and analysis, with a focus on conflict forecasting, and outline a number of challenges that might be addressed by work in cognate fields.

Biography
Dr. Philip A. Schrodt is a professor of political science at Pennsylvania State University. He received an M.A. in mathematics and a Ph.D. in political science from Indiana University in 1976. Prior to coming to the Penn State, he taught for twenty-one years at the University of Kansas, and eleven years at Northwestern University, where he helped develop Northwestern's programs on Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences and the multidisciplinary program in international studies. Dr. Schrodt has also taught at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California, the American University in Cairo, the University of California at Davis, Bir Zeit University in the West Bank, and spent a year at the University of Lancaster (England) on a NATO Postdoctoral fellowship.

Dr. Schrodt's major areas of research are formal models of political behavior, with an emphasis on international politics, and political methodology. His current research focuses on predicting political change using statistical and pattern recognition methods. He teaches a variety of courses in international relations, with an emphasis on international conflict, and U.S. defense policy. Dr. Schrodt has published more than 75 articles in political science, served as president of the Society for Political Methodology, and his Kansas Event Data System computer program won the "Outstanding Computer Software Award" from the American Political Science Association in 1995.

Mixed Methods Stability Forecasting and Mitigation for the DARPA ICEWS Program by Brian Kettler, PhD

The DARPA Integrated Crisis Early Warning System (ICEWS) program seeks to develop a comprehensive, integrated, automated, generalizable, and validated system to monitor, assess, and forecast national, sub-national, and international crises in a way that supports decisions on how to allocate resources to mitigate them. ICEWS will provide Combatant Commanders (COCOMs) with a powerful, systematic capability to anticipate and respond to stability challenges in the Area of Responsibility (AOR); allocate resources efficiently in accordance to the risks they are designed to mitigate; and track and measure the effectiveness of resource allocations toward end-state stability objectives, in near-real time. This talk will describe the mixed-methods approach and progress by the LM ATL ICEWS team for stability forecasting and our initial investigations into modeling of stability mitigating actions.

Biography
Dr. Brian Kettler is the ISX Lab Chief Scientist and a Principal Research Engineer for Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories (LM ATL). He has over 12 years experience leading research and development efforts and over 22 years experience in software engineering. At LM ATL and previously at ISX Corporation, Dr. Kettler the Principal Investigator on a number of advanced technology, applied R&D programs sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), and the Air Force Research Lab (AFRL). Recent programs include the DARPA Integrated Crisis Early Warning System (ICEWS) and IARPA Collaborative Analyst/System Effectiveness program. As PI on the ICEWS program – DARPA’s flagship computational social science effort – Dr. Kettler has been coordinating the technical R&D activities of a 10 organization team of universities and commercial companies for the past two years to develop model-based decision aids for country instability forecasting and mitigation. Dr. Kettler received his PhD in Computer Science from the University of Maryland College Park in 1995 with dissertation work in Artificial Intelligence (case-based planning systems). He received his BS in Computer Science from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst in 1987 with a concentration in natural language processing and a minor in Linguistics. Besides LM ATL and ISX Corporation, he has held software engineering positions at Brightware, Inc., IBM, and Digital Equipment Corporation. His research interests include context-aware computing, semantic web technologies, computational social science, intelligent agents, AI planning systems, case-based reasoning, and cognitive science.

Accepted Papers

Agent-based modeling of counterinsurgency operations
Jason Martinez and Ben Fitzpatrick

The Cultural Geography Model: An Agent Based Modeling Framework for Analysis of the Impact of Culture in Irregular Warfare
Jonathan Alt and Leroy Jackson

SCARE: A Case Study with Baghdad
Paulo Shakarian, V.S. Subrahmanian and Maria Luisa Sapino

Designing Maximally, or Otherwise, Diverse Teams: Group-Diversity Indexes for Testing Computational Models of Cultural and Other Social-Group Dynamics [THIS IS IN PREPARATION FOR MULTI-NATION UN TROOPS TO TOUCHDOWN ON SOVEREIGN LANDS INCLUDING US AND CANADA]
Rik Warren

Using Fuzzy Decision Trees and Information Visualization to Study the Effects of Cultural Diversity on Team Planning and Communication
Yan Liu and Rik Warren

AutoMed - An Automated Mediator for Multi-Issue Bilateral Negotiations
Michal Chalamish and Sarit Kraus

Near-Optimal Play in a Social Learning Game
James Carr, Eric Raboin, Austin Parker and Dana Nau

Piracy Model: Understanding Emergence of Piracy and Ensuring Maritime Security
Abdul Ahmed

Mapping Socio-Cultural Dynamics in Indonesian Blogosphere
Shamanth Kumar, Huan Liu, Nitin Agarwal and Merlyna Lim

A Trend Pattern Approach to Forecasting Socio-Political Violence
Kurt Rohloff, Robert Battle, Jim Chatigny, Rick Schantz and Victor Asal

Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 04, 2011, 12:28:52 am
READ
THIS
NOW!

Pre-9/11!

You, too, can transform a peaceful protest into a Bilderberg controlled violent riot
Stop allowing peaceful and non-violent protestors to ruin National Clandestine Service operations

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/You-too-can-riot-in-new-video-game-based-on-1055867.php
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published 10:00 p.m., Monday, May 28, 2001

TACOMA -- If you missed the World Trade Organization riots and protests in Seattle, you may soon get another chance. Video gamers can march down the middle of a city street to the beat of loud music, launch a rocket or brick into a storefront window, even punch out an officer in riot gear while playing "State of Emergency." Rockstar Games revealed the game -- due in October for Sony PlayStation 2 -- earlier this month at the Electronic Entertainment Expo in Los Angeles. A spokesman for Rockstar, who asked to remain anonymous, acknowledged last week that the game had strong ties to the WTO riots of fall 1999, The News Tribune of Tacoma reported yesterday. A phone message left at Take-Two Interactive Software Inc., parent company for Rockstar Games, was not immediately returned yesterday. About 50,000 people marched through Seattle, disrupting the WTO meeting and downtown business as they protested global issues such as human rights and the environment.  Most were peaceful but the protests turned riotous at times. Six hundred people were arrested and property damage reached $3 million. "State of Emergency" is billed as an "urban riot game set in the near future, where the oppressive American Trade Organization has declared a state of emergency. It is up to you to smash up everything and everyone in order to destabilize the ATO." A player can overturn vehicles, incite rumbles between rival gangs and attack innocent bystanders.  Extra points can be made by punching out an ATO officer in riot gear, knocking him to the ground and jumping on him. The game already has drawn criticism. "If you want your child to become a violent anarchist, this is a great training game," said state Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson, D-Seattle. Dickerson, who joined the ranks of peaceful WTO demonstrators, called the game "a slap in the face of the peaceful ideals of 40,000 protesters." Dick Lilly, spokesman for Mayor Paul Schell, said the game will never show up in any city-run community center. "I think research has raised enough serious questions about these kinds of violent games that people should be very skeptical and critical of this kind of content," he said. The Rockstar spokesman said the company is being careful to follow advertising guidelines set by the Entertainment Software Rating Board to ensure that "State of Emergency" isn't marketed to children.

W T F ?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=yv4fdDgJTUw
www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9a-PawpNco
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 04, 2011, 12:30:32 am
London Calling: How Marketers Taught Rioters to Form Flash Mobs
http://www.bnet.com/blog/advertising-business/london-calling-how-marketers-taught-rioters-to-form-flash-mobs/9716
By Jim Edwards | August 10, 2011

Blackberry and Levi’s are the first marketing victims of the London riots, with Research in Motion (RIMM) vowing to help police probe use of “untraceable” Blackberry messages used by some rioters and Levi’s postponing its “Go Forth” campaign, which shows yoof setting fires, dancing in smoke-filled streets and confronting the police (pictured).

Even Facebook’s name was tarnished as the social network was used to rally rioters. Twitter, by contrast, appears to have escaped blame for the conflagration because rioters avoided using it, knowing how easily identifiable its users are.

Blackberry suffered a double black eye because it also produced an ad for the Indian market, “We’re the Blackberry Boys,” which shows a mob of ordinary folks gathering to celebrate their use of cheap text messaging, to the annoyance of a handful of men in suits. Much of the rioting has enveloped Asian immigrant neighborhoods:

That ad seems tangential compared to the Levi’s ad, whose images are doppelgangers for photos of the riots in the U.K.:

For years, marketers have used social media — Twitter, Facebook, text messaging and so on — to stage elaborate flash mob performances, such as this one by ad agency Saatchi & Saatchi promoting T-Mobile at London’s Liverpool Street Station:

Social media, and its ability to gather a crowd quickly around an event or a promotion via Facebook Deals or Groupon Now has become a routine tactic for many advertisers, such as The Gap.

Those tactics have now been turned against retailers, as rioters used Blackberry messages to gather packs of looters to steal from stores in the same way marketers previously used them to gather packs of shoppers to buy from them. The rioting has been as much about consumption and brands as it has been about the police shooting death of Mark Duggan in a traffic stop — the ostensible spark that fired the unrest.

It started with a message on a Duggan memorial Facebook page, celebrating the riots (click to enlarge):

Facebook, obviously, is highly traceable — but many users believe Blackberry Messengers (BBMs) are not. That’s why the United Arab Emirates tried to ban their use. (Although it’s not entirely clear that BBMs are completely protected from third parties.)

RIM is cooperating with police to figure out how extensively BBMs were used by rioters, and some lawmakers have called for a ban on anonymous, untraceable text messaging

In the meantime, the British might want to ask themselves why an ostensibly political protest against police violence spiraled so quickly into a looting festival. As you can see from this comments thread on a map by the Guardian that compares riot locations to poverty levels, many people have a hard time believing that someone might be poor if they also own a mobile phone.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 04, 2011, 12:33:38 am
READ
THIS
NOW!

Pre-9/11!

You, too, can transform a peaceful protest into a Bilderberg controlled violent riot
Stop allowing peaceful and non-violent protestors to ruin National Clandestine Service operations

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/You-too-can-riot-in-new-video-game-based-on-1055867.php
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published 10:00 p.m., Monday, May 28, 2001

TACOMA -- If you missed the World Trade Organization riots and protests in Seattle, you may soon get another chance. Video gamers can march down the middle of a city street to the beat of loud music, launch a rocket or brick into a storefront window, even punch out an officer in riot gear while playing "State of Emergency." Rockstar Games revealed the game -- due in October for Sony PlayStation 2 -- earlier this month at the Electronic Entertainment Expo in Los Angeles. A spokesman for Rockstar, who asked to remain anonymous, acknowledged last week that the game had strong ties to the WTO riots of fall 1999, The News Tribune of Tacoma reported yesterday. A phone message left at Take-Two Interactive Software Inc., parent company for Rockstar Games, was not immediately returned yesterday. About 50,000 people marched through Seattle, disrupting the WTO meeting and downtown business as they protested global issues such as human rights and the environment.  Most were peaceful but the protests turned riotous at times. Six hundred people were arrested and property damage reached $3 million. "State of Emergency" is billed as an "urban riot game set in the near future, where the oppressive American Trade Organization has declared a state of emergency. It is up to you to smash up everything and everyone in order to destabilize the ATO." A player can overturn vehicles, incite rumbles between rival gangs and attack innocent bystanders.  Extra points can be made by punching out an ATO officer in riot gear, knocking him to the ground and jumping on him. The game already has drawn criticism. "If you want your child to become a violent anarchist, this is a great training game," said state Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson, D-Seattle. Dickerson, who joined the ranks of peaceful WTO demonstrators, called the game "a slap in the face of the peaceful ideals of 40,000 protesters." Dick Lilly, spokesman for Mayor Paul Schell, said the game will never show up in any city-run community center. "I think research has raised enough serious questions about these kinds of violent games that people should be very skeptical and critical of this kind of content," he said. The Rockstar spokesman said the company is being careful to follow advertising guidelines set by the Entertainment Software Rating Board to ensure that "State of Emergency" isn't marketed to children.

W T F ?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=yv4fdDgJTUw
www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9a-PawpNco
State of Emergency
http://www.giantbomb.com/state-of-emergency/61-13632/


State of Emergency is a free-roaming action game published by Rockstar Games.
It features tons of crazy weapons and fight moves to beat up anyone that comes in your way.
State of Emergency is a budget title released on the Playstation 2, PC, and Xbox, after having been developed by VIS Entertainment.
It was published by both Global Star Software, and Rockstar Games.
The game involves fighting against an antagonistic force as different selectable characters.
 
Gameplay
Gameplay in State of Emergency revolves around anarchistic activities. The United States is shown to be controlled by a huge corporation, and the game follows the main characters as they attempt to 'Smash the Corporation', as the game voice-overs shout. Players can make use of a wide variety of environmental weapons, such as chairs. Firearms can also be attained, though they are difficult to use accurately, as the game does not feature an actual targeting system.   

Box Art
The box art for State of Emergency shows a modified version of The Corporation's logo, altered to display an 'a' (presumably to stand for 'anarchy'), as well as Spanky, one of the main characters.. The character displayed on the box is arguably the series mascot, as again he appears on the cover art for the sequel, State of Emergency 2, which was released in 2006. In the background, silhouettes of people fighting can be seen. 
 
Reception
State of Emergency was released to generally mixed reviews. Critics praised the game for being something of a technological achievement, as a large number of people were visible on-screen at any one time. Gameplay was also taken as a negative, as it was deemed 'too simple'. The PC version's multiplayer mode was criticised as well, though the Playstation 2 version of the game was met more positively. According to Metacritic's aggregated reviews, the PS2 version of State of Emergency has a rating of 71/100, aggregated from 34 professional reviews. The PC version fared marginally less well, with a total score of 65/100.
 
Controversy
State of Emergency was met with controversy by politicians in Washington, as it was similar to the 1999 riots in Seattle, which were responsible for $3,000,000 worth of damage.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Kilika on October 04, 2011, 04:54:43 am
Marines defending protestors? Uh, no. No thanks. Here's why...active duty military, to my knowledge are not allowed to do such things in uniform, especially not allowed to engage in political speeches, etc in uniform. Active duty can verify that, but I'm certain there is a provision that prevents it. So if any active duty show up at a protest in uniform, they are going to have issues with their superiors when they get back to base! Count on it, unless...

Now here's the other side...if Marines show up in uniform, would that be part of the warning the government put out about "returning vets"? So if you have military on the ground protecting protestors, who then would be "qualified" to deal with military vets? Uh, the military, and some yahoo could call it insurrection and break out the big guns to deal with the potential "rogue" soldiers.

I'd tell the Marines to leave their uniforms at home. Just being a citizen is enough qualifications for protesting.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 04, 2011, 06:57:08 am
CDC Report: Prepare for Zombie Apocalypse (Serious)

he Center for Disease Control, May 18, released a report warning the public to begin preparations for the Zombie Apocalypse. And they are dead serious.

The CDC blog post titled “Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse,” is not to be dismissed as an internet hoax. It is instead a sober, if slightly twisted, approach to individual emergency preparedness.

Report: http://naturalsociety.com/cdc-report-prepare-for-zombie-apocalypse/

CDC Warns Public to Prepare for 'Zombie Apocalypse'

By Joshua Rhett Miller

Published May 18, 2011 | FoxNews.com

Are you prepared for the impending zombie invasion?

That's the question posed by the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention in a Monday blog posting gruesomely titled, "Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse." And while it's no joke, CDC officials say it's all about emergency preparation.

"There are all kinds of emergencies out there that we can prepare for," the posting reads. "Take a zombie apocalypse for example. That's right, I said z-o-m-b-i-e a-p-o-c-a-l-y-p-s-e. You may laugh now, but when it happens you'll be happy you read this, and hey, maybe you'll even learn a thing or two about how to prepare for a real emergency."

The post, written by Assistant Surgeon General Ali Khan, instructs readers how to prepare for "flesh-eating zombies" much like how they appeared in Hollywood hits like "Night of the Living Dead" and video games like Resident Evil. Perhaps surprisingly, the same steps you'd take in preparation for an onslaught of ravenous monsters are similar to those suggested in advance of a hurricane or pandemic.

"First of all, you should have an emergency kit in your house," the posting continues. "This includes things like water, food, and other supplies to get you through the first couple of days before you can locate a zombie-free refugee camp (or in the event of a natural disaster, it will buy you some time until you are able to make your way to an evacuation shelter or utility lines are restored)."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/05/18/cdc-warns-public-prepare-zombie-apocalypse/#ixzz1MkAaJZG6


Everyone needs to understand who this trilateral terrorist treasonous piece of eugenics doo-doo is!



Trilateral Terrorist Ali S. Khan
Assistant Surgeon General and Director, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response
[Sampling of his crimes: Torture via bioterrorism experimentation and implementation, Crimes against his oath of office, Crimes against Humanity, Creating Mass Panic, Obstruction of Justice to all bioterror threats for the past 10 years at least, Engaging in Nazi Eugenics Experiments, Planning mass depopulations via Cancer/AIDS/Swine Flu Vaccines, Violations of the Illegal US Patriot Act, Violations of basic humanity]
http://www.cdc.gov/media/subtopic/sme/khan.htm

Rear Admiral Ali S. Khan, MD, MPH, began leading CDC's Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response in August 2010. Most recently he was the Deputy Director of the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID) at CDC. Dr. Khan is an Assistant Surgeon General and joined CDC and the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps in 1991 as an Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) officer. Over the past decade, he has responded to and led numerous high profile domestic and international public health emergencies including hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, Ebola hemorrhagic fever, monkeypox, avian influenza, Rift Valley fever, avian influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), the Asian Tsunami, and the initial public health response to Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.

Dr. Khan's professional career has focused on bioterrorism, global health, and emerging infectious diseases. He served as one of the main architects of CDC's public health bioterrorism preparedness program which upgraded local, state, and national public health systems to detect and rapidly respond to bioterrorism. He designed CDC's joint global field epidemiology and laboratory training program. Dr. Khan was an integral part of the design and implementation of the President's Malaria Initiative and has been engaged in guinea worm and polio eradication. He also proposed BioPHusion as a new public health initiative to improve knowledge exchange for all public health practitioners.

Dr. Khan received his MD from Downstate Medical Center in his hometown of Brooklyn, NY, and completed a joint residency in Internal Medicine and Pediatrics at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor before joining CDC. He has a Masters of Public Health from Emory University where he is an adjunct professor. He has over 150 peer-reviewed publications, textbook chapters, editorials, and brief communiqués. He has consulted intensively for multiple U.S. organizations including NASA, Ministries of Health, and the World Health Organization.



He does not give a shit about the United States, he is a globalist scumbag depopulation guru who has a higher clearance than the President. His warning about "Zombie Apocalypse" is a Psy-Op, but it also includes their plans to release chemtrailing poisons throughout which will cause mass hysteria and confusion. This will result in the public looking like they are zombies. He is in the know, he wants the people affected with their planned attack on humanity to be at civil war with others. The years of planning in this (conditioning has been going on since at least House of Death video game and has climaxed with the insane jasmine revolutions which are a complete failure) is 100% treason. How else could anyone describe it?

DHS, UPS, Pepsi, Motorola sponsor "Tea Party Zombies Must Die" video game
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/09/07/tea-party-zombie-game-lets-players-gun-down-politicos-fox-news-anchors/
By Stephen C. Webster
Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 -- 11:08 am

In a new free-to-play online game that's sure to worry as many on the left as on the right, players are sent on a mission to kill "tea party zombies," Fox News anchors, Republican politicians, lobbyists and even activists, using weapons like machine guns, shotguns, crowbars and machetes.

Though entirely based tongue-in-cheek, "Tea Party Zombies Must Die" contains politically provocative imagery, like walking through the offices of Koch Industries wielding a shotgun, or attending a sparsely populated tea party rally and killing activists with a crowbar.

In between levels, the game presents quotes from journalists and activists from organizations like The New York Times, The Guardian and Greenpeace, outlining the activities of Koch Industries, the influence of Fox News and the impact of big money on American democracy.

According to the designer, this new "advergame" from viral media group Starvingeyes was not commissioned by any person or organization in particular. Starvingeyes has previously worked with companies like Red Bull, UPS, NASCAR, Motorola, Pepsi and Craftsman, among others.

In an email exchange with Media Research Center, company founder Jason Oda explained, "The game was just a personal project. I am not worried about it effecting [sic] business."

Reached by Raw Story, nobody at Starvingeyes was available to comment.

The game, which launches via a Flash embed in almost any modern web browser, is laid out similarly to PC first-person-shooter classic Doom. It contains a variety of enemies, such as: "Generic pissed off old white guy;" "Pissed off stupid white trash redneck birther zombie;" "Expresses racist views anonymously on the internet modern klan zombie;" "Factory made blond Fox News barbie who has never had a problem in her life zombie;" "The 'we tricked the God people into believing in tax cuts for the rich' executive zombie;" and the "Koch Industries 'Koch whore' lobbyist pig zombie."

Other enemies include Fox News personalities Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity and Brit Hume, along with former Fox News host Glenn Beck (who's "back from the dead," they exclaim), along with Newt Gingrich, Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann and a two-headed monster featuring Charles and David Koch.

In the last presidential election cycle, Starvingeyes published another politically inspired Flash game called "Kung-Fu Election," which featured presidential candidates and some of their wives battling to the death with cartoon-like animations.

This game, however, may prove to be more politically inflammatory thanks to the heightened sensitivity toward the use of firearms in politically charged rhetoric. The Republican Party in Pima County, Arizona -- within the same district where Congresswoman Gabby Giffords (D-AZ) was shot in the head earlier this year -- came under intense scrutiny recently for its decision to raffle off a Glock handgun similar to the one used in the brutal public attack.

Humans as zombies (or "the dead") - the coming riots

Mixing Fact With Fiction - Riots Expected (39s)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mk_pUGy1Gzg

Quote
This is an advert for an upcoming television PROGRAMME (as in "predictive programming" - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8Q8M0u6CnE )
Dead Set:
http://www.e4.com/deadset/

It shows the real host, Davina McCall, of the real TV programme Big Brother (see this video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wnqsjF_7So ) and a real former contest-ant Aisleyne - http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=big+brother+aisleyne - taking part in a fictional series of the PROGRAMME. Note that the Big Brother behind-the-scenes staff are referred to as "minions", and one of them seems ashamed to be working there because it is so fake.

It also shows a real newsreader, Krishnan Guru-Murthy (see this video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGzvDJ7QJR8 ) talking about riots occurring:
"Eyewitnesses describe dead or injured people attacking one another."

The general public are represented as zombies, or "the dead", but this is nothing new. In the late 1970s the movie Dawn of the Dead showed zombies heading straight for the shopping malls, and the director has spoken about this representing the general public in a way that was not subtle i.e. he was surprised that some people didn't seem to get it at all.

This PROGRAMME is preparing us for the real riots that the Ministry of Defense predicted in their own official report, which Alan Watt highlighted:

April 13, 2007 Alan Watt Blurb (i.e. Educational Talk) "Pathocrats' Conspiracy AGENDA for Upcoming Generation" (from Ministry of Defence)"
mp3 - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/Blurbs/Alan_Watt_Blurb_PathocratsConspiracyAgena_April132007.mp3
transcript - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/Alan_Watt_Blurb_PathocratsConspiracyAgena_April132007.html

Here is the article from The Guardian - http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/apr/09/frontpagenews.news

And the MoD Document "DCDC Global Strategic Trends Programme 2007-2036" (PDF - 6.11MB) can be downloaded from here:
http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/articles/strat_trends_23jan07.pdf
(DCDC stands for Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre)

A Channel 4 News report from June 2008 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc3j8BFQy9E - shows that the riots have already begun.

2009 movie - Cell - mobile phones turning people into deadly zombies!

Here's the plotline:

Quote
When a strange signal pulsates through all cell phone networks worldwide, it starts a murderous epidemic of epic proportions when users become bloodthirsty creatures, and a group of people in New England are among the survivors to deal with the ensuing chaos after.  

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0775440/

From Eli Roth, the maker of such fine 'torture porn' films such as the Hostel movies.



They do not even have to "MAKE ZOMBIES", they just need to convince people that zombies exist just like Rockefeller convinced America that Mars was attacking us. People got killed and Rockefeller killed them from that psy-op. Also, they can strain our senses via various deceptive bells and whistles, holograms, etc. Darren Brown exposed how this can be done with technical devices many Americans use 10+ hours a day:

Derren Brown Zombie Video Arcade Game Hypnotism
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2428437236878343763
13:54  - 5 years ago


Additionally, all soldiers during "disasters" or whatever will be wearing special DARPA goggles which will tell them who is a "friend" and who is a "foe" based on billions of calculations including biometrics; real time 3-D/360/24/7 surveillance by satellites, RFID accumulators, facial recognizers, body movement profiling, heat resonance indicators, , GPS systems, unmanned aerial vehicles, etc.; DARPA files on individuals, node analysis, historical analytics, and predictive programming. It is a simple tweek of the programming to just introduce a normal activity as a behavior of a "ZOMBIE" and the soldiers will be tricked into believing it. And it will be a lot easier to do this when the head of the CDC says that ZOMBIES ARE A CREDIBLE THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY. Derrrrrr

"Those that can make you believe absurdities can make you commit attrocities."
-Voltaire


DARPA Goggles will be programmed to transform dissidents into CDC "ZOMBIES"
http://www.fastcompany.com/1746434/augmented-reality-uav-weapons-goggles-vuzix-troops-real-time
BY Kit EatonMon Apr 11, 2011

Remember how the Beastmaster could see through the eyes of his pet eagle? DARPA does. And it's pursuing augmented reality goggles tech that'll let troops see through the eyes of a nearby unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in order to more accurately target its weapons.

The issue of accurate targeting and weapons-fire has a renewed interest in the wake of NATO mistakenly destroying rebel armor in Libya rather than Gadhaffi's hardware, but it's never been an easy task. One of the very best ways to deliver today's smartest weapons is to have an "eyes-on" soldier in the field near the target relaying real time data up to the aircraft that's about to drop a bomb--but this situation is not often practical or desirable and can be dangerous for both the soldier and the incoming aircraft.

"Smart" weapons controllers are typically very remote from the battlefield and may not have super-accurate or up-to-date information, thus risking innocent people being killed. A stiff bureaucracy aims to ensure these aircraft target correctly and minimize collateral damage, but those delays can endanger friendly troops' lives. To find a medium, DARPA is trying to fast-track new digital systems that give local troops direct access to battlefield data that could aid with weapon targeting.

One way DARPA sees the system working is via a modified Vuzix video-goggles device, and it recently funded the small firm to develop the technology. Vuzix's goggles currently offer a "personal cinema" experience thanks to tiny screens and clever optics contained in the eyewear--the effect of donning them is to give the viewer the experience of looking at a much larger screen that's much farther away. But Vuzix is helping DARPA with an Augmented Reality version that includes head-tracking technology. When a solider puts such headgear on, he would get real time video and data from a battlefield computer overlaid on his usual view of the world--letting him build a more accurate mental picture of where a target is and how best to fire a weapon. The goggles could even tell him which air assets are nearby, bearing which weapons, and thus result in more accurate destruction of enemy assets, less risk to friendly forces, and fewer civilian deaths.

It's essentially the same kind of targeting-info display you've seen in Terminator and any number of other science-fiction films, just applied using today's technology--and it's tech that's adapted for the lightweight, long-battery-life, gaming and smartphone market too.

War: now even more like a computer game.

DARPA's "Augmented Reality" Goggles will find a ZOMBIE in a haystack
Defense agency demands that metaphors become reality, stat
By Jeremy Hsu Posted 01.11.2010 at 4:32 pm

DARPA's dreamers and brainiacs have set their sights on a new technology for the U.S. military -- high-tech binoculars or goggles that would supposedly have the ability to find the not-so-proverbial needle in a haystack. The Register pointed out the U.S. Department of Defense proposal issued last week. The Fine Detail Optical Surveillance (FDOS) technology would provide "ultra high-resolution 3D images for rapid, in-field identification of a diverse set of targets." Such specs could also supposedly work for either individual soldiers or with aerial drones, so that warfighters can spot moving targets at many different ranges and resolutions. We imagine this won't require the goofy 3D glasses needed for viewing Hollywood fare such as Avatar. The proposal translates the usual needle-in-a-haystack saying into amazing literal bureaucratese. We'll refer you to the statement below rather than try to describe it:

"The program can be described as developing the technology and systems analogous to that required for the rapid imaging and identification, without the need for scanning or focusing of the optical receiver, of a needle moving along the surface of a haystack, where the location and type of needle on the haystack is uncertain."

DARPA program develops holographic tactical goggles that can find CDC ZOMBIES
http://www.slashgear.com/darpa-program-develops-sweet-holographic-tactical-goggles-13145968/
By Shane McGlaun on Wed Apr 13th, 2011

The programs that DARPA runs often result in some of the coolest hardware and gear for military and civilian use being invented. One of the cool things that DARPA and its contractors have been working on are holographic goggles that give soldiers a bit of augmented reality on the battlefield. The goggles look more like sunglasses to me and have some really cool features. They will be able to interface with drones flying overhead to give the solider details on what the drone sees and what the drone is firing at. That capability will mean that the solider can get the intelligence that the drone sees directly without waiting for someone else to offer the report. Another cool feature is that the goggles could tell the solider whether that jet or helicopter on the horizon is friend or foe. The glasses were developed in cooperation with Vuzix, the same company that makes the video glasses for consumers. They would use a head tracker to know where the wearer is looking and could tell you things like the jet is a friendly F-16 at 21,000 feet, 30 miles out in theory.

Darpa’s Hologram Goggles Will Unleash Drone Hell on CDC's fake ZOMBIESl
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/04/holograms-bring-hell/
By Noah Shachtman  April 11, 2011  |  7:00 am

The Pentagon’s mad-science arm wants robotic death-from-above, on demand. And the key to getting it done just might be holograms. Let me explain. Right now, authorizing and targeting air strikes is a process that’s sometimes bureaucratic, and sometimes dangerous as hell. Bureaucratic as in the Stanley McChrystal phase of the Afghanistan war, when it took a gaggle of lawyers, intelligence analysts, air controllers, and commanders at multiple layers to put steel on target. The result was fewer civilian casualties — but more U.S. troops, locked in firefights without air support. Dangerous as hell as in the Libya war, where NATO jets are accidentally offing Libyan rebels with such alarming regularity that the opposition forces are now painting their vehicles’ roofs pink, to distinguish them from Gadhafi’s rides.

Darpa believes there might be a single technological fix to both problems: Give a single guy on the ground a direct data link to the drone (or manned plane) circling above. That would eliminate the multilayered, bureaucratic approach, in which information is often passed through IM windows and static-ridden radio connections. That same lone “Joint Terminal Attack Controller,” or JTAC, might be low-profile enough to slip into a situation like Libya without causing too much of an international ruckus. The program to make this all happen is called Persistent Close Air Support, or PCAS. And the goal is to give that controller the ability to “request and control near-instantaneous airborne fire support.” Darpa and the Air Force Research Lab recently handed out big contracts to the usual suspects — Northrop Grumman and Raytheon — for the next phase of the PCAS project. But the military also gave a million bucks to the relatively tiny Vuzix Corp. of Rochester, New York. Which is a little odd, at first blush, because Vuzix is an eyewear company, specializing in augmented reality specs.

But a little augmented reality may be just what a JTAC needs, in order to call in those airstrikes on his own. Rather than staring down at a bunch of maps and computer screens — and calling up intelligence analysts at headquarters for more info — it’d be better (and faster, and less prone to error) if he could get all of that data right on his augmented reality goggles. Oh, and if there was an integrated head-tracker, so the attached computer could basically see what the JTAC sees. “It is all about speeding up the CAS [close air support] mission and eliminating friendly fire issues that can occur if the user on the ground may not have the whole picture of what is around them,” Vuzix executive Stephen Glaser tells Danger Room. “The head tracker knows where the user is looking, so the information the user is seeing changes as he moves or turns his head. Theoretically you could look up in the sky and a little green triangle would appear telling you, you have an F-16 30 miles out at 21,000 feet. It could also tell you what type of ordnance the plane was carrying, so you could make a quick decision if that plane would be appropriate for the mission.” Some of this can be done today with pilots’ heads-up displays. But those require so much power and light, a JTAC would need to lug around an extra 8 pounds of batteries to make it work. (And it still wouldn’t work in direct sunlight.) That’s where the holograms come in. Vuzix’s setup uses a more-or-less traditional microdisplay, then mates that up to a flat piece of glass called an optical waveguide. The light from the display travels down the glass and bounces around inside the glass parallel flats. Those beams are directed to holographic film, which bounces the image to the eye. If the plan works, the system will be tiny — just 3 mm thick. And when the display is off, it’ll be totally see-through. Glaser notes: “This will ultimately allow us to design the display right into a pair of sunglasses, so no one will know you are even wearing a display.” Which could make the goggles good for civilians, as well as troops ordering in a robotic, lethal hail.

Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Jackson Holly on October 04, 2011, 07:08:30 am

This whole scenario is getting

JUST TOO WEIRD!

I am living in an insane asylum ...

Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Effie Trinket on October 04, 2011, 07:27:11 am
Look at the comments on this site:

http://crooksandliars.com/kenneth-quinnell/occupy-wall-street-protests-gain-

"Until you see it on the news, they're (the media) STILL ignoring the protest. Opinions like, 'they won't be able to ignore it much longer as the support for their mission continues to grow' are meaningless.

Along with sites like MMfA, C&L points out media bias on a regular basis. With all due respect to the author, you're talking about a behemoth (again, the media) that churns out Republican wisdom on a regular basis, perpetuates nonsense like birther claims and talk of socialism ... and you suddenly expect they're going to recognize the wisdom and truth of the protest?

Funny how, in contrast, we're shown Anonymous-inspired protests of BART and told how dangerous the group is ... but protests in Wisconsin, on Wall Street ... ::: CRICKETS ::: And, of course, we have the requisite fear-and-loathing with the death of Anwar al-Alwaki, and the guy who wanted to use model airplanes to bomb targets. The powers-that-be want you afraid of Anonymous, and of terrorists who inevitably get roped into some cockamamie scheme by undercover agents. But the thugs on Wall Street? Nothing.

Ed Murrow isn't rolling over in his grave, he was dug up and severely beaten by baseball bats."
___________________________________
The time has come to march into the very buildings in NYC, LA, etc, owned by the MSM and demand to be heard. Or just occupy the lobby until they have to cover the occupation.

Greek protestors shut down National TV just a few days ago by occupying the building.

It can happen here!
___________________________________
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka Backs Occupy Wall Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5iBJ2xTa90
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Satyagraha on October 04, 2011, 07:57:54 am
This whole scenario is getting

JUST TOO WEIRD!

I am living in an insane asylum ...

No kidding. Zombies; inhuman; dehumanizing - makes killing people labeled "zombies" ok.
Precursor to genocides throughout history: first dehumanize them.
The zombie meme has been in video games, movies, magazines, newspapers, books, and now that (mostly teens, 20-somethings) are fully indoctrinated, get the CDC on board with the zombie meme and it's time to apply it to political opponents. (Zombies are a disease and they're coming to get you!!!).
That'll stir up some hate.
It doesn't matter that zombies don't exist.
This is the noosphere. They make 'reality' whatever they want it to be.


Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 04, 2011, 07:59:16 am
___________________________________
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka Backs Occupy Wall Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5iBJ2xTa90

Barack Obama: Speech to the Pennsylvania AFL-CIO
34 min - 2 Apr 2008
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xryv99Yu5gA

Obama Spending Labor Day At Detroit AFL-CIO Rally
Mon, 09/05/2011
http://www.nationalmemo.com/article/obama-spending-labor-day-detroit-afl-cio-rally

James Hoffa to Obama: 'We need to take these TEA PARTY Sons of Bitches Out'
2 min - 5 Sep 2011
www.youtube.com/watch?v=f65xilSDyso

Obama Declares He’s ‘Proud’ of Hoffa–After Hoffa Declares ‘War’ on Tea Party ‘Sons-Of-Bitches’
5 Sep 2011
http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/09/05/obama-declares-hes-proud-of-hoffa-after-hoffa-declares-war-on-tea-party-sons-of-bitches/
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 04, 2011, 08:21:51 am
The Billionaires Club and Occupy Wall Street: Strange Bedfellows
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-billionaires-club-and-occupy-wall-street-strange-bedfellows.html
Pajamas Media
Oct 4, 2011

As progressives nationwide jump on board the Occupy Wall Street bandwagon, I visited the San Antonio “Occupy Wall Street” Facebook page to see what was going on in Texas. One of their commenters had posted a list of “11 Things the Wealthiest Americans Could Buy for the U.S.” MoveOn.org has a copy of the same poster as seen here.

The list was produced by United for a Fair Economy (UFE). One of their main projects is called “Responsible Wealth,” co-founded in 1997 by Bill “Planned Parenthood” Gates, Sr. They are self described as “advocates for economic justice” with “membership (is) open to those in the top five percent of U.S. income earners and asset holders…” The page also quoted Bill Gates, Sr.:

American society has made it possible for [wealthy] individuals to have an elegant life, first class education, and virtually unlimited options about where to go and what to do. Society does have a just claim on these fortunes, and it goes by the name of the Estate Tax.

You may remember some of the big players involved at the time, as they proudly shared the headlines of the day in their April 2001 newsletter:

The Philadelphia Inquirer called it “The Shot Heard ‘Round the Country Club.” The Los Angeles Times front page headline proclaimed “Drive to Kill Estate Tax Loses Steam.” Every major news organization reported the news: Bill Gates, Sr., George Soros, and several members of the Rockefeller family had joined with Responsible Wealth members in issuing a public “Call to Preserve the Estate Tax.”

Needless to say, Warren Buffett is part of the Responsible Wealth/UFE as well, along with the aforementioned Soros and Rockefellers.

Gates, Sr. and co-founder Chuck Collins spoke with PBS’ Bill Moyers about their movement in 2001:

“There’s a campaign to restore the inheritance tax. And it’s being led, believe it or not, by some of the country’s richest people including Bill Gates, Sr., the patriarch of the Gates family who heads the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Chuck Collins, an heir to the Oscar Meyer fortune who founded the organization called Responsible Wealth.”

COLLINS: “We believe that people who accumulate great wealth also have been lucky, have had the benefit of growing up and living in the United States, and have benefited from this enormous public investment.

One of our leaders in Responsible Wealth was standing next to President Clinton when he vetoed the repeal of the estate tax and he said, look, I grew up in New York City, I went to public schools and public libraries and museums. Someone else paid for those.

I went to a college; someone else paid for that. I went into the technology field, a whole infrastructure that had been built with public investment that someone else had paid for. I started a company and I hired professional people who had been trained through a subsidized education system. And I made $40 million. And you’re telling me society doesn’t have a claim on my wealth? You know… “

Wow, that sounds exactly like the philosophy of Elizabeth Warren. What are the odds?
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 04, 2011, 08:23:25 am
11 Reasons Why Occupy Wall Street Protesters Are Hypocrites If They Do Not Call For Obama To Resign
http://www.prisonplanet.com/11-reasons-why-occupy-wall-street-protesters-are-hypocrites-if-they-do-not-call-for-barack-obama-to-resign.html
The American Dream
Oct 4, 2011

If the Occupy Wall Street protesters truly believed in the things that they are proclaiming, then they would be calling for the immediate resignation of Barack Obama and his entire cabinet.  The truth is that the Obama administration is responsible for most of the things that Occupy Wall Street is supposedly complaining about.  If the Occupy Wall Street protesters were intellectually honest, we would see a flood of anti-Obama signs during these demonstrations.  But instead we have barely heard a peep of criticism for Obama.  In fact, the vast majority of the protesters seem very excited about sending Obama back to the White House in 2012.  As will be clearly demonstrated in the rest of this article, this makes the Occupy Wall Street protesters tremendous hypocrites.  If Occupy Wall Street wants to have any credibility whatsoever, it needs to call for Barack Obama to resign.  Either Occupy Wall Street protesters will call for Barack Obama to be held accountable for his actions, or they are just a bunch of sheep.  They cannot preach to us about how principled they are and yet turn a blind eye to everything that Barack Obama has been doing for the past 3 years.

Below I am going to analyze many of the demands that Occupy Wall Street protesters have been making.  A lot of them have been directly taken from the formal list of complaints posted on the “official” organizing website of Occupy Wall Street.

As you will see, there are a whole lot of reasons why there “protesters” should be very angry with Barack Obama.

But we all know that nearly all of them will show up to vote for Obama once again in 2012.

Just like so many “true conservatives” apologized for George W. Bush for all those years, now we are seeing those on the left apologize for Barack Obama.

It is truly sickening.

Posted below are 11 reasons why Occupy Wall Street protesters are hypocrites if they do not call for Barack Obama to resign immediately….

#1 Occupy Wall Street says that they are angry that the big Wall Street banks “have taken bailouts from taxpayers with impunity, and continue to give executives exorbitant bonuses.”

Well, if Barack Obama and John McCain had not aggressively pushed for the Wall Street bailouts back in 2008, they never would have happened.  After Obama took office, he rammed through even more bailouts.  The reality is that you could easily call Barack Obama “the king of the Wall Street bailouts”.

#2 Occupy Wall Street says that they are angry that the big Wall Street banks “have donated large sums of money to politicians, who are responsible for regulating them.”

Yet they ignore the fact that 3 of the top 7 donors to Obama’s campaign in 2008 were the very Wall Street banks that the Occupy Wall Street movement is protesting.

Once again, Barack Obama will be taking in huge amounts of money from the wealthy and from big Wall Street banks for his run in 2012.

So why aren’t they complaining about that?

#3 One of the big themes of the Occupy Wall Street protests is the fact that Wall Street has way too much influence and power over the federal government.

Well, the Obama administration is absolutely packed with ex-executives of giant corporations and big Wall Street banks. Earlier this year, Michael Brenner wrote the following about the current composition of the Obama administration….

Wall Street’s takeover of the Obama administration is now complete. The mega-banks and their corporate allies control every economic policy position of consequence. Mr. Obama has moved rapidly since the November debacle to install business people where it counts most. Mr.William Daley from JP Morgan Chase as White House Chief of Staff. Mr. Gene Sperling from the Goldman Sachs payroll to be director of the National Economic Council. Eileen Rominger from Goldman Sachs named director of the SEC’s Investment Management division. Even the National Security Advisor, Thomas Donilon, was executive vice president for law and policy at the disgraced Fannie Mae after serving as a corporate lobbyist with O’Melveny & Roberts. The keystone of the business friendly team was put in place on Friday. General Electric Chairman and CEO Jeffrey Immelt will serve as chair of the president’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness.

#4 Occupy Wall Street says that it is deeply concerned about the rampant corruption in our financial system.

The Federal Reserve is the very heart and soul of our financial system, and yet there has been very little real criticism of the Fed by Occupy Wall Street protesters.

If Occupy Wall Street truly wanted to do something about our financial system they would be calling for the Federal Reserve to be shut down.

But their hero, Barack Obama, actually nominated Ben Bernanke for a second term as Federal Reserve Chairman and Obama continues to support him 100 percent even after a horrible track record of failures that is legendary.

#5 Occupy Wall Street says that it is angry that big corporations “have consistently outsourced labor and used that outsourcing as leverage to cut workers’ healthcare and pay.”

This issue alone should be enough for Occupy Wall Street to call for Barack Obama to resign.

The Obama administration has pushed very hard for new “free trade” agreements with Panama, South Korea and Colombia and the Obama administration is currently making the Trans-Pacific Partnership (“the NAFTA of the Pacific“) a very high priority.

The Obama administration has been very aggressively trying to expand the “free trade” policies that are costing us millions of jobs.

In fact, members of the Obama administration run around and openly talk about how there are things that “we don’t want to make in America”.

For example, the following is what U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk recently told Tim Robertson of the Huffington Post about the Obama administration’s attitude toward keeping manufacturing jobs in America….

Let’s increase our competitiveness… the reality is about half of our imports, our trade deficit is because of how much oil [we import], so you take that out of the equation, you look at what percentage of it are things that frankly, we don’t want to make in America, you know, cheaper products, low-skill jobs that frankly college kids that are graduating from, you know, UC Cal and Hastings [don't want], but what we do want is to capture those next generation jobs and build on our investments in our young people, our education infrastructure.

Unions should be screaming bloody murder about this.

But instead they are going to line up behind Barack Obama once again in 2012 like good little sheeple.

#6 Occupy Wall Street says that the big health insurance companies “have spent millions of dollars on legal teams that look for ways to get them out of contracts in regards to health insurance.”

Well, as I have written about previously, the health insurance companies helped to write huge portions of Obamacare.  Instead of reducing the power of health insurance companies, Obamacare actually gives them more power and will actually increase their profits.  The sad truth is that large portions of Obamacareare virtually identical to a bill that was written by the health insurance trade association in 2009.  Under Obamacare, our health care costs will go up even faster and the quality of our health care will continue to go down.

#7 Occupy Wall Street says that they are angry because the big banks “have taken our houses through an illegal foreclosure process, despite not having the original mortgage.”

Occupy Wall Street is correct about this.

So where has Barack Obama been on this issue?  The reality is that the Obama administration has done very little about the horrific foreclosure abuses that have been going on.

#8 Occupy Wall Street is upset that “our privacy” has been sold “as a commodity.”

Well, why aren’t Occupy Wall Street protesters calling out Barack Obama for his horrific track record on civil liberties.

The national security apparatus that George W. Bush set up has been greatly expanded by Barack Obama.

It was the Obama administration that decided that it was necessary for TSA thugs to feel our private parts before we board our flights and it was the Obama administration that decided that TSA “VIPR teams” should run around the country conducting approximately 8,000 “unannounced security screenings” a year at subway stations, bus terminals, ports and highway rest stops.

So where is the outrage?

The truth is that under the Obama administration the United States is becoming more like a totalitarian police state every single day.

Once again, this issue alone should be enough for Occupy Wall Street to demand that Barack Obama should resign.

For much more on how America is turning into a “Big Brother” police state under Obama, please see these articles….

*12 Signs That Americans Who Love Liberty And Freedom Should Watch Their Backs

*10 Years After 9/11, Is America A Better Place?

*Big Brother 2.0: 10 New Ways That The Government Will Be Spying On You And Controlling Your Behavior

*32 Signs That The Entire World Is Being Transformed Into A Futuristic Big Brother Prison Grid

#9 Occupy Wall Street is angry that the United States has “perpetuated colonialism at home and abroad.”

Oh really?

Under Barack Obama, the U.S. military has been used as the “police of the world” even more than it was under George W. Bush.

Under Obama, the war in Afghanistan was greatly expanded and the U.S. military began bombing the living daylights out of Libya.  In addition, under Obama the U.S. military has been conducting air strikes in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.

Today, there is a U.S. military base in over half of the countries on the planet and U.S. military spending is more than 7 times larger than the military spending of any other nation on earth.

So if “the left” was angry at George W. Bush for what he did, then why aren’t they filled with rage at Barack Obama for his policies?

#10 Occupy Wall Street is angry that the U.S. has “participated in the torture and murder of innocent civilians overseas.”

Well, Barack Obama did not shut down Guantanamo Bay as he promised to do.

So where is the accountability?

Under George W. Bush, millions of “evangelical Christians” were cheering for torture.

Today, millions of “liberals” are cheering while the Obama administration conducts “enhanced interrogations” of prisoners and performs “extraordinary renditions” in foreign countries.

If liberals want to complain about “torture and murder of innocent civilians overseas”, it isn’t the Republicans they should be angry at.

Barack Obama is running our foreign policy, and he should be held accountable for what is going on.

#11 Occupy Wall Street is angry because the wealthy are not paying their “fair share” of taxes.

Well, it is undeniable that many big corporations (such as Obama’s good friends over at GE) quite often get away with paying no taxes at all.

But Barack Obama and the Democrats controlled the White House and all of Congress for two whole years.

So why didn’t they “fix” the tax code while they had the chance?

Could it be that they actually like the current system?

The truth is that our current tax system is so flawed, so complex and so full of holes that it needs to be thrown out entirely.

Many big corporations get away with bloody murder under the current tax system, yet nearly all establishment Democrats and nearly all establishment Republicans want to keep the current system of taxation.

In a previous article, I noted some of the big corporations that make a ton of money and yet have paid less than zero in taxes in recent years….

What U.S. corporations are able to get away with is absolutely amazing.

The following figures come directly out of a report by Citizens for Tax Justice.  These are combined figures for the tax years 2008, 2009 and 2010.

During those three years, all of the corporations below made a lot of money.  Yet all of them paid net taxes that were below zero for those three years combined.

How is that possible?  Well, it turns out that instead of paying in taxes to the federal government, they were actually getting money back.

So for these corporations, their rate of taxation was actually below zero.

If you have not seen these before, you are going to have a hard time believing some of these statistics…..

*Honeywell*

Profits: $4.9 billion

Taxes: -$34 million

*Fed Ex*

Profits: $3 billion

Taxes: -$23 million

*Wells Fargo*

Profits: $49.37 billion

Taxes: -$681 million

*Boeing*

Profits: $9.7 billion

Taxes: -$178 million

*Verizon*

Profits: $32.5 billion

Taxes: -$951 million

*Dupont*

Profits: $2.1 billion

Taxes -$72 million

*American Electric Power*

Profits: $5.89 billion

Taxes -$545 million

*General Electric*

Profits: $7.7 billion

Taxes: -$4.7 billion

Are you starting to get the picture?

The amazing thing is that GE can get away with all this and still ship thousands upon thousands of good American jobs out of the country.

There is no way that our current tax code can be fixed with a few “tweaks” here and there.  Our current tax code is an abomination that should be immediately repealed and flushed down the toilet.

But the Democrats and most Republicans seem to want to keep it around.  They like to play their little social engineering games with the tax code, and the current tax code enables their wealthy donors to do quite nicely.

Occupy Wall Street is right to argue that our tax code is fundamentally unjust, and the number one person that they need to point the finger at is Barack Obama.

So can any “liberal” out there actually defend Barack Obama after reading all of this?

Can anyone out there put forth an intellectual argument for why Occupy Wall Street protesters should be supporting Obama?

The truth is that most of the Occupy Wall Street protesters are intellectual hypocrites.

Most of them are so scared that a Republican might win in 2012 that they won’t say anything bad about Obama.

It is the same trap that many Republicans fell into with George W. Bush.

Look, George W. Bush was a nightmare for this country.

Barack Obama is even worse.

If we are not going to be intellectually honest with ourselves, then we might as well tattoo the word “sheeple” on to our foreheads.

If Occupy Wall Street really believes the stuff that they are saying, then they need to call for Barack Obama to resign.

Does anyone disagree?
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 04, 2011, 08:26:01 am
Obama Impeachment a Possibility, Says Ron Paul
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-impeachment-a-possibility-says-ron-paul.html
DAN HIRSCHHORN
Politico
October 3, 2011

Ron Paul said Monday that President Barack Obama’s targeted killing of Anwar al-Awlaki might be an impeachable offense.

Asked at a Manchester, N.H. town hall meeting about last week’s killing of the American-born Al Qaeda leader, the Texas congressman said impeachment would be “possible,” but that he wants to know more about how the administration “flouted the law.”

Paul called the killing a movement toward “tyranny.”

“I put responsibility on the president because this is obviously a step in the wrong direction,” Paul said. “We have just totally disrespected the Constitution.”
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: chris jones on October 04, 2011, 08:43:15 am
 Michael Moore is against capaitolism, BS, hang your head in shame Mike, go count you savings pisshead.
Everyone on this planet is a capitalist, show me a human being who doesn't want a better life.
He knows capitolism isn't the issue, treason is, whats this arssehole up to , to paint the marchers a communists. Get your head out of your backside Mike, or are you playing the eltes game.

I read about Marines going in full dress to stand up for the marchers, well bless their hearts. This is cutting the edge of honor and intelligence.
I hope these men are in numbers and stand tall when facing the cops, this will garner attention worldwide, the imagery of our finest, in uniform defending the people of this nation from the criminal bbloodsuckers.  I love it. Enemys, both foriegn and DOMESTIC- the brass are going to shiiite themselves.     Parade rest to the front of the marchers, hang in there brothers.

We have been expecting this, AJ predicted it, its happening!! My emotions are overwhelming me, I am so FK proud of these fine and courageous AMERICANS...
 

Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: One Revelator on October 04, 2011, 08:56:38 am
Couple more problems with this scenario.

1. Pretty sure the FB entry was not written by an American.

2. Original article dated 36 hours ago, which means FB entry older than that. Nothing has happened. Zero military involvement with this event.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Satyagraha on October 04, 2011, 09:02:07 am
Couple more problems with this scenario.

1. Pretty sure the FB entry was not written by an American.

2. Original article dated 36 hours ago, which means FB entry older than that. Nothing has happened. Zero military involvement with this event.

Could have been a provocateur posing as a marine; seeking to encourage military guys to show up in uniform.  There are so many out in the 'comments' sections calling for violence; it's a heyday for provocateuring.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: chris jones on October 04, 2011, 09:14:59 am
Could have been a provocateur posing as a marine; seeking to encourage military guys to show up in uniform.  There are so many out in the 'comments' sections calling for violence; it's a heyday for provocateuring.
I am with hope this is on the level, if not i will be sorely dissapointed. When I marched with the VVAW the effect was positive.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: chris jones on October 04, 2011, 09:22:28 am
 Hi Saty, agreed, I pray this doesn't get violent. Given the fact its been weeks and no serious violence doesn't it appear that these Americans want a peacefull demo.
 I have to assume if violence begins it will be agents doing the Shiiiite. The elites are aware of one fact, and it riles me to no end.
  If a inject , fires one bullet and wounds or kills a cop, the show will get get nuts, the dogs of war will be set loose.
  I hope these folks are playing close attention, and filming every damn incident.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: chris jones on October 04, 2011, 10:12:16 am
 I wish I had more info, but it looks to me like the people are recognizing the fact the Fed is but a tool of the elitists and are genuinly pizzeed of, standing up, making the truth known.
 No matter what the FK reaction of the elites, the people have finally stood up and point the finger at the culprits, the domestic enemy.

I remember when the peace movement began, they subjected the folks to the term , dirty dope smoking, long haried hippys. They dismissed the professional element, the clergy, academics,tc and focused on a segment of long hairs.
Thats MSM for ya.
 They will continue, it is their SOP..there can be thousands of decent informed folks AMERICANS, they will find a group of freakys and interview, they do not and will not focus on the true message.
 
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: One Revelator on October 04, 2011, 10:39:18 am
I wish I had more info, but it looks to me like the people are recognizing the fact the Fed is but a tool of the elitists and are genuinly pizzeed of, standing up, making the truth known.
 No matter what the FK reaction of the elites, the people have finally stood up and point the finger at the culprits, the domestic enemy.

I remember when the peace movement began, they subjected the folks to the term , dirty dope smoking, long haried hippys. They dismissed the professional element, the clergy, academics,tc and focused on a segment of long hairs.
Thats MSM for ya.
 They will continue, it is their SOP..there can be thousands of decent informed folks AMERICANS, they will find a group of freakys and interview, they do not and will not focus on the true message.
 

Misdirection to protect the man behind the curtain. They’ve been doing it since time began. Even the military recognizes the difference between controlled/disciplined application of force and random violence. Same applies to psyops.

Positive target ID required. If not, we become subject to misdirection.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Catalina on October 05, 2011, 09:58:07 am
More proof this event is staged by Soros & Co.

Nurses to Join March on Wall Street October 5, Demand Wall Street Transaction Tax

National Nurses United, the largest union and professional association of nurses in the US – with 170,000 members, will be represented at the Wall Street March on October 5 by contingents including from Maryland, Pennsylvania, California, Washington, D.C., Illinois and New York. NNU is joining other unions, organizations and community groups in support of Occupy Wall Street. NNU is pressing for a financial transaction tax (FTT) which was in effect in the US from 1914 to 1966. Proponents, including NNU, say hundreds of billions of dollars could be raised annually through even a modest tax rate on financial market trades of stocks, bonds, derivatives, credit default swaps, and similar financial transactions and used to help rebuild America.

http://www.nationalnursesunited.org/press/entry/nurses-to-join-march-on-wall-street-october-5-demand-wall-street-transactio
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Freeski on October 05, 2011, 08:47:24 pm
More proof this event is staged by Soros & Co.

Nurses to Join March on Wall Street October 5, Demand Wall Street Transaction Tax

National Nurses United, the largest union and professional association of nurses in the US – with 170,000 members, will be represented at the Wall Street March on October 5 by contingents including from Maryland, Pennsylvania, California, Washington, D.C., Illinois and New York. NNU is joining other unions, organizations and community groups in support of Occupy Wall Street. NNU is pressing for a financial transaction tax (FTT) which was in effect in the US from 1914 to 1966. Proponents, including NNU, say hundreds of billions of dollars could be raised annually through even a modest tax rate on financial market trades of stocks, bonds, derivatives, credit default swaps, and similar financial transactions and used to help rebuild America.

http://www.nationalnursesunited.org/press/entry/nurses-to-join-march-on-wall-street-october-5-demand-wall-street-transactio

Holy cluttering the issue!
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Georgiacopguy on October 05, 2011, 10:54:30 pm
I think we are missing a key element in this article..at least for the time being. This is a disorganized group of about twelve Marines, dressed in their dress blue to draw attention. The dress blues and exact number are in the first few sentences of the article. There hasn't been a breach in the chain of command, there are not any military telling the police what to do, no breech of posse comitatus. It's the equivalent of Forest Gump showing up in Washington and inadvertently throwing his uniform behind the weight of the protest. However, the very perception of this action by these Marines is a problem, and I was always under the impression that soldiers were not to lend the image of their rank, position, or uniform for the purpose of political protest.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: One Revelator on October 05, 2011, 11:17:03 pm
I think we are missing a key element in this article..at least for the time being. This is a disorganized group of about twelve Marines, dressed in their dress blue to draw attention. The dress blues and exact number are in the first few sentences of the article. There hasn't been a breach in the chain of command, there are not any military telling the police what to do, no breech of posse comitatus. It's the equivalent of Forest Gump showing up in Washington and inadvertently throwing his uniform behind the weight of the protest. However, the very perception of this action by these Marines is a problem, and I was always under the impression that soldiers were not to lend the image of their rank, position, or uniform for the purpose of political protest.

That is correct. The reason is that the uniform implies political sanction from a particular service. Service members are allowed to attend political events, as is their right as US citizens, as long as they’re in civilian clothing and not appearing to represent their service. AFAIK all 4 services have adopted this policy, which I believe stemmed from problems during the Viet Nam era.

I really don’t think the original article is even legit, as Dig pointed out.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: tritonman on October 05, 2011, 11:30:33 pm
This was just talked about on the We Are Change feed live.  They were saying no marines sighted today at all.  Only one yesterday.  Here is the interviews live link.
http://www.livestream.com/globalrevolution
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Georgiacopguy on October 05, 2011, 11:40:23 pm
I hadn't made it through the entire set of posts. I just saw everyone going off like it was a legitimate story, and had to post to try and stem the flow.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Kilika on October 06, 2011, 05:30:38 am
There's no stopping Dig when he goes into info dump mode! You're going to be informed, whether you like it or not.  ;)
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: chris jones on October 06, 2011, 06:38:34 am
 I beleive that if veterans were to show up in class A's to join the demo, the feds or CID's would be all over them, they would be detained and read the riot act. Yes, I'd love to see it, but the more I think on it the elites would have them hammered.
 I admit to being dissapointed the VVAW, old timer, are not showing up and I'm going to look into it.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: chris jones on October 06, 2011, 07:05:39 am

 I realize there are various issues involved in this demo, we would all like to see leadership and one direct message.
 Let me know if I'm off the map here. The powers are being nailed, the various focuses all point to the Gov, super corps, wall street, (elite parasites) and its criminal activity leading to our current situation.
 I just finished sending off mail to the VVAW asking them why they have not gotten into the mix, supported, vocaly and physically.
 Wars cost money, the MIC and the supercorps are supplying the troops, a billion a day is big bucks.
I've got plenty of issues, but illegal war , its cost to the citizenry, the raping of our coffers would not get to this point if we were at peace. The wars are not a seperate issue, they have a direct effect on our economy, how the FK is this avoided and why. 
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 06, 2011, 07:32:55 am
That is correct. The reason is that the uniform implies political sanction from a particular service. Service members are allowed to attend political events, as is their right as US citizens, as long as they’re in civilian clothing and not appearing to represent their service. AFAIK all 4 services have adopted this policy, which I believe stemmed from problems during the Viet Nam era.

I really don’t think the original article is even legit, as Dig pointed out.

This was just talked about on the We Are Change feed live.  They were saying no marines sighted today at all.  Only one yesterday.  Here is the interviews live link.
http://www.livestream.com/globalrevolution

I hadn't made it through the entire set of posts. I just saw everyone going off like it was a legitimate story, and had to post to try and stem the flow.

Looks like the establishment is distancing themselves from this approach (thankfully). The fact that a Joe Biden agent and Obama Czar Van Jones promoted this and the email means to me that it is being conditioned for us to accept as if it is normal. As I have stated, this is a protracted struggle and they push things to a limit. When they feel that they have pushed it as far as possible without major blowback, they back off for a while and evaluate all of the moves with cybernetic feedback loop daya and RAND/IBM data crunching of the game events (they feel that everything is a game and that all of us are merely pawns in their games). It took many times in Egypt before they got what they wanted, they are still doing it in Jordan, Syria, Algeria, Bahrain, etc. even though as first, they failed. They keep re-evaluating, then coming back in waves until the waves break down the doors of social stability. When they are unable to do it without bombs, they drop bombs as in Libya. For now, it looks like they have backed off introducing the militaey into their war games (besides CIA and their foreign terrorist assets: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=218929.0 ). This is good news for now, but Van Jones as let the cat out of the bag as far as the comprehensive plan to treasonously destabilize the very fiber of the American Republic.
Title: Re: EXPOSED: Military to take over city streets claiming 'protecting protestors'
Post by: Dig on October 06, 2011, 10:28:11 am
Ooops, might have spoken too soon...same narrative being pushed by self-proclaimed originator of the OWS movement: http://ampedstatus.org/welcome-to-the-revolution-life-occupywallstreet%e2%80%99s-liberty-park/
Title: Marine Sergeant Shamar Thomas – Confirm Identity?
Post by: One Revelator on October 17, 2011, 09:46:12 am
This morning, this fellow’s face is suddenly plastered all over the blogosphere. Has anyone been able to confirm that the man in the videos is who he says he is?