PrisonPlanet Forum

***THE MAIN BOARDS - Welcome to the Prison Planet Educational Forum and Library*** => Very Important Threads / Most important issues / Basic Information on the New World Order => Topic started by: Satyagraha on September 03, 2011, 07:07:29 am

Title: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Satyagraha on September 03, 2011, 07:07:29 am
You want to know who we're fighting?
Who the real enemies are?
Watch this video; lecture by Dr. John Coleman, and understand who we're up against:

(http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/tt201/Pilikia_photos/9-3-20117-34-02AM.jpg) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XV77hzXgd3U&feature=related)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XV77hzXgd3U&feature=related

These people operate on a global perspective.
They ARE the "one world government".

THEY are destroying the middle class.
The de-industrialization of western countries is happening because THEY are executing their plans. We are watching them rip countries to shreds, kill millions of people, take absolute control of resources, and give us media propaganda to engage our anger and direct it to the "enemies" they manufacture.

THEY are the people behind the manufactured "enemies" - they instigate infighting; so we focus our anger on each other: we hate the muslims, we hate the jews, we hate the christians, we hate the democrats, we hate the republicans.... we hate each other.

They remain safe and protected from scrutiny because they have created a system to shield them from view. We see the David Rockefellers, the Ben Bernankes, the Barack Obamas; we see only their minions. Puppets, all.

But to see behind those puppets; to view the real controllers is to violate their carefully constructed shield of invisibility. For this you will be called 'paranoid'. This is a psyop: you are being marginalized with stigmatizing labels because you are a threat. We are so conditioned to herd mentality; we are fearful of being labeled and ostracized. To accept that, and remain silent in the face of this threat is to surrender to their control.

These are the real enemies: the people controlling the puppets in government, industries including pharma, agri-business, defense contractors, non-profit 'humanitarian' organizations, and the media propaganda machines that serve up our daily doses of conditioning to keep us in the dark. To keep us fighting amongst ourselves.

Info: The Club of Rome (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_clubrome.htm)
Info: The Committee of 300 (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_committee300.htm)
Info: The Bilderberg Group (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_bilderberg.htm)

The next time you think to perpetuate the false enemy agenda; to post something that fear-mongers about any group of people, think about these 'clubs'. They've planted the seeds to grow hatred, and you are providing fertilizer every time you spread the hate.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: larsonstdoc on September 03, 2011, 08:05:38 am
  GREAT VIDEO THAT SUMS UP OUR FUTURE IF WE DON'T STOP THESE RAT BASTARDS!!!

 When you get men setting themselves up as greater than the Constitution of the United States, you get anarchy and eventually tyranny. --- John Coleman
                                                                                                                            

                     (i.e.  THE SUPER COMMITTEE---aka THE COMMITTEE OF 13)


  Paranoid---"Let me tell you what the the real meaning of paranoid is.  It is a man or a person who has the ability to link events that seemingly are not connected."---John Coleman
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: larsonstdoc on September 03, 2011, 08:13:28 am


  You tube video---Dr. John Coleman on the AJ Show.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XG9nAW3zLA
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Jacob Law on September 03, 2011, 08:43:16 am
nice post, good job
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: decemberfellow on September 03, 2011, 11:31:15 am
When anyone says man that was a scary movie,  I will show them this.  Nothing from hollywood can match the truth.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: attietewd on September 03, 2011, 03:15:58 pm
 
I noticed most comments beneath the video at youtube had nothing to do with the video and were quite boring.  Which could be a diversionary tactic to discourage piqued interest from casual viewers IMO.  But one removed comment caught my eye:



Quote
comment removed by Homeland Security
bd1965  7 months ago
???

Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: chris jones on September 05, 2011, 09:38:40 am
 Excellant, the truth gets me wired up, this film deserves a moment of silence and contemplation.
 The industrial revolution brought about the rise of this nation, without industry as an economic base what is to be the outcome? The collapse of the middle class, just as was the downfall of the Roman Empire.
  This was a crystal clear image of what is taking place, my hats off to these men.
A anlysis: (We are nothing but worms in their elite garden).
The barricade to these demigods was our constitution. It has been attacked, the tree of liberty has been ripped from our soil, the beacon of light has been extinguished.
 R.P has brought the truth to the citizenry, do the people want it?

   
   
 
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: decemberfellow on September 05, 2011, 10:33:44 am
Bump for later reply
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on September 05, 2011, 11:03:43 pm
Thanks for the video!

After I had my brief personal encounter with the black (or dark) nobility and their oligarchical minions I needed some help in understanding these people.  The work by Dr. Coleman really helped me embark on my own journey of research and meetings with remarkable men.  

I'm certain that his health issues were not coincidental.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Constitutionary on September 15, 2011, 04:39:00 pm
There a lot more people awake now than say in 2006 when ENDGAME came out.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Geolibertarian on September 20, 2011, 05:38:12 pm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-true-story-of-the-bilderberg-group-and-what-they-may-be-planning-now/13808 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-true-story-of-the-bilderberg-group-and-what-they-may-be-planning-now/13808)

"The True Story of the Bilderberg Group" and What They May Be Planning Now

A Review of Daniel Estulin's book

by Stephen Lendman

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/113808.jpg)

Global Research
June 1, 2009

For over 14 years, Daniel Estulin has investigated and researched the Bilderberg Group's far-reaching influence on business and finance, global politics, war and peace, and control of the world's resources and its money.

His book, "The True Story of the Bilderberg Group," was published in 2005 and is now updated in a new 2009 edition. He states that in 1954, "the most powerful men in the world met for the first time" in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, "debated the future of the world," and decided to meet annually in secret. They called themselves the Bilderberg Group with a membership representing a who's who of world power elites, mostly from America, Canada, and Western Europe with familiar names like David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Gordon Brown, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, Lloyd Blankfein, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Rupert Murdoch, other heads of state, influential senators, congressmen and parliamentarians, Pentagon and NATO brass, members of European royalty, selected media figures, and invited others - some quietly by some accounts like Barack Obama and many of his top officials.

Always well represented are top figures from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), IMF, World Bank, Trilateral Commission, EU, and powerful central bankers from the Federal Reserve, the ECB's Jean-Claude Trichet, and Bank of England's Mervyn King.

For over half a century, no agenda or discussion topics became public nor is any press coverage allowed. The few invited fourth estate attendees and their bosses are sworn to secrecy. Nonetheless, Estulin undertook "an investigative journey" that became his life's work. He states:

"Slowly, one by one, I have penetrated the layers of secrecy surrounding the Bilderberg Group, but I could not have done this withot help of 'conscientious objectors' from inside, as well as outside, the Group's membership." As a result, he keeps their names confidential.

Whatever its early mission, the Group is now "a shadow world government....threaten(ing) to take away our right to direct our own destinies (by creating) a disturbing reality" very much harming the public's welfare. In short, Bilderbergers want to supplant individual nation-state sovereignty with an all-powerful global government, corporate controlled, and check-mated by militarized enforcement.

"Imagine a private club where presidents, prime ministers, international bankers and generals rub shoulders, where gracious royal chaperones ensure everyone gets along, and where the people running the wars, markets, and Europe (and America) say what they never dare say in public."

Early in its history, Bilderbergers decided "to create an 'Aristocracy of purpose' between Europe and the United States (to reach consensus to rule the world on matters of) policy, economics, and (overall) strategy." NATO was essential for their plans - to ensure "perpetual war (and) nuclear blackmail" to be used as necessary. Then proceed to loot the planet, achieve fabulous wealth and power, and crush all challengers to keep it.

Along with military dominance, controlling the world's money is crucial for with it comes absolute control as the powerful 19th century Rothschild family understood. As the patriarch Amschel Rothschild once said: "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes its laws."

Bilderbergers comprise the world's most exclusive club. No one buys their way in. Only the Group's Steering Committee decides whom to invite, and in all cases participants are adherents to One World Order governance run by top power elites.

According to Steering Committee rules:


Membership consists of annual attendees (around 80 of the world's most powerful) and others only invited occasionally because of their knowledge or involvement in relevant topics. Those most valued are asked back, and some first-timers are chosen for their possible later usefulness.

Arkansas governor Bill Clinton, for example, who attended in 1991. "There, David Rockefeller told (him) why the North American Free Trade Agreement....was a Bilderberg priority and that the group needed him to support it. The next year, Clinton was elected president," and on January 1, 1994 NAFTA took effect. Numerous other examples are similar, including who gets chosen for powerful government, military and other key positions.

Bilderberg Objectives

The Group's grand design is for "a One World Government (World Company) with a single, global marketplace, policed by one world army, and financially regulated by one 'World (Central) Bank' using one global currency." Their "wish list" includes:

-- "one international identity (observing) one set of universal values;"

-- centralized control of world populations by "mind control;" in other words, controlling world public opinion;

-- a New World Order with no middle class, only "rulers and servants (serfs)," and, of course, no democracy;

-- "a zero-growth society" without prosperity or progress, only greater wealth and power for the rulers;

-- manufactured crises and perpetual wars;

-- absolute control of education to program the public mind and train those chosen for various roles;

-- "centralized control of all foreign and domestic policies;" one size fits all globally;

-- using the UN as a de facto world government imposing a UN tax on "world citizens;"

-- expanding NAFTA and WTO globally;

-- making NATO a world military;

-- imposing a universal legal system; and

-- a global "welfare state where obedient slaves will be rewarded and non-conformists targeted for extermination."

[Continued... (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-true-story-of-the-bilderberg-group-and-what-they-may-be-planning-now/13808)]
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Geolibertarian on September 20, 2011, 05:38:37 pm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/25080 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/25080)

The Federal Reserve Cartel: The Eight Families

by Dean Henderson

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/125080.jpg)

Global Research
June 1, 2011

(Part one of a four-part series)

The Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo) own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP Amoco and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths.  But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch.


According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation.[1]

So who then are the stockholders in these money center banks?

This information is guarded much more closely.  My queries to bank regulatory agencies regarding stock ownership in the top 25 US bank holding companies were given Freedom of Information Act status, before being denied on “national security” grounds.  This is rather ironic, since many of the bank’s stockholders reside in Europe.

One important repository for the wealth of the global oligarchy that owns these bank holding companies is US Trust Corporation - founded in 1853 and now owned by Bank of America.  A recent US Trust Corporate Director and Honorary Trustee was Walter Rothschild.  Other directors included Daniel Davison of JP Morgan Chase, Richard Tucker of Exxon Mobil, Daniel Roberts of Citigroup and Marshall Schwartz of Morgan Stanley. [2]

J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank- by far the most powerful Fed branch- by just eight families, four of which reside in the US.  They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.

CPA Thomas D. Schauf corroborates McCallister’s claims, adding that ten banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank branches.  He names N.M. Rothschild of London, Rothschild Bank of Berlin, Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Warburg Bank of Amsterdam, Lehman Brothers of New York, Lazard Brothers of Paris, Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York, Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy, Goldman Sachs of New York and JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York.  Schauf lists William Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff and James Stillman as individuals who own large shares of the Fed. [3]  The Schiffs are insiders at Kuhn Loeb.  The Stillmans are Citigroup insiders, who married into the Rockefeller clan at the turn of the century.

Eustace Mullins came to the same conclusions in his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, in which he displays charts connecting the Fed and its member banks to the families of Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller and the others. [4]

The control that these banking families exert over the global economy cannot be overstated and is quite intentionally shrouded in secrecy.  Their corporate media arm is quick to discredit any information exposing this private central banking cartel as “conspiracy theory (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=161407.0)”.  Yet the facts remain.

The House of Morgan
 
The Federal Reserve Bank was born in 1913, the same year US banking scion J. Pierpont Morgan died and the Rockefeller Foundation was formed.  The House of Morgan presided over American finance from the corner of Wall Street and Broad, acting as quasi-US central bank since 1838, when George Peabody founded it in London.

Peabody was a business associate of the Rothschilds.  In 1952 Fed researcher Eustace Mullins put forth the supposition that the Morgans were nothing more than Rothschild agents.  Mullins wrote that the Rothschilds, “…preferred to operate anonymously in the US behind the facade of J.P. Morgan & Company”. [5]

Author Gabriel Kolko stated, “Morgan’s activities in 1895-1896 in selling US gold bonds in Europe were based on an alliance with the House of Rothschild.” [6]

The Morgan financial octopus wrapped its tentacles quickly around the globe.  Morgan Grenfell operated in London.  Morgan et Ce ruled Paris.  The Rothschild's Lambert cousins set up Drexel & Company in Philadelphia.

The House of Morgan catered to the Astors, DuPonts, Guggenheims, Vanderbilts and Rockefellers.  It financed the launch of AT&T, General Motors, General Electric and DuPont.  Like the London-based Rothschild and Barings banks, Morgan became part of the power structure in many countries.

By 1890 the House of Morgan was lending to Egypt’s central bank, financing Russian railroads, floating Brazilian provincial government bonds and funding Argentine public works projects.  A recession in 1893 enhanced Morgan’s power.  That year Morgan saved the US government from a bank panic, forming a syndicate to prop up government reserves with a shipment of $62 million worth of Rothschild gold. [7]

Morgan was the driving force behind Western expansion in the US, financing and controlling West-bound railroads through voting trusts.  In 1879 Cornelius Vanderbilt’s Morgan-financed New York Central Railroad gave preferential shipping rates to John D. Rockefeller’s budding Standard Oil monopoly, cementing the Rockefeller/Morgan relationship.

The House of Morgan now fell under Rothschild and Rockefeller family control.  A New York Herald headline read, “Railroad Kings Form Gigantic Trust”.  J. Pierpont Morgan, who once stated, “Competition is a sin”, now opined gleefully, “Think of it.  All competing railroad traffic west of St. Louis placed in the control of about thirty men.”[8]

Morgan and Edward Harriman’s banker Kuhn Loeb held a monopoly over the railroads, while banking dynasties Lehman, Goldman Sachs and Lazard joined the Rockefellers in controlling the US industrial base. [9]

In 1903 Banker’s Trust was set up by the Eight Families.  Benjamin Strong of Banker’s Trust was the first Governor of the New York Federal Reserve Bank.  The 1913 creation of the Fed fused the power of the Eight Families to the military and diplomatic might of the US government.  If their overseas loans went unpaid, the oligarchs could now deploy US Marines to collect the debts.  Morgan, Chase and Citibank formed an international lending syndicate.

The House of Morgan was cozy with the British House of Windsor and the Italian House of Savoy. The Kuhn Loebs, Warburgs, Lehmans, Lazards, Israel Moses Seifs and Goldman Sachs also had close ties to European royalty. By 1895 Morgan controlled the flow of gold in and out of the US. The first American wave of mergers was in its infancy and was being promoted by the bankers. In 1897 there were sixty-nine industrial mergers. By 1899 there were twelve-hundred. In 1904 John Moody - founder of Moody’s Investor Services - said it was impossible to talk of Rockefeller and Morgan interests as separate. [10]

Public distrust of the combine spread. Many considered them traitors working for European old money. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, Andrew Carnegie’s US Steel and Edward Harriman’s railroads were all financed by banker Jacob Schiff at Kuhn Loeb, who worked closely with the European Rothschilds.

Several Western states banned the bankers. Populist preacher William Jennings Bryan was thrice the Democratic nominee for President from 1896 -1908. The central theme of his anti-imperialist campaign was that America was falling into a trap of “financial servitude to British capital”. Teddy Roosevelt defeated Bryan in 1908, but was forced by this spreading populist wildfire to enact the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. He then went after the Standard Oil Trust.

In 1912 the Pujo hearings were held, addressing concentration of power on Wall Street. That same year Mrs. Edward Harriman sold her substantial shares in New York’s Guaranty Trust Bank to J.P. Morgan, creating Morgan Guaranty Trust. Judge Louis Brandeis convinced President Woodrow Wilson to call for an end to interlocking board directorates. In 1914 the Clayton Anti-Trust Act was passed.

Jack Morgan - J. Pierpont’s son and successor - responded by calling on Morgan clients Remington and Winchester to increase arms production. He argued that the US needed to enter WWI. Goaded by the Carnegie Foundation and other oligarchy fronts, Wilson accommodated. As Charles Tansill wrote in America Goes to War, “Even before the clash of arms, the French firm of Rothschild Freres cabled to Morgan & Company in New York suggesting the flotation of a loan of $100 million, a substantial part of which was to be left in the US to pay for French purchases of American goods.”

The House of Morgan financed half the US war effort, while receiving commissions for lining up contractors like GE, Du Pont, US Steel, Kennecott and ASARCO. All were Morgan clients. Morgan also financed the British Boer War in South Africa and the Franco-Prussian War. The 1919 Paris Peace Conference was presided over by Morgan, which led both German and Allied reconstruction efforts. [11]

In the 1930’s populism resurfaced in America after Goldman Sachs, Lehman Bank and others profited from the Crash of 1929. [12] House Banking Committee Chairman Louis McFadden (D-NY) said of the Great Depression, “It was no accident. It was a carefully contrived occurrence...The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so they might emerge as rulers of us all”.

Sen. Gerald Nye (D-ND) chaired a munitions investigation in 1936. Nye concluded that the House of Morgan had plunged the US into WWI to protect loans and create a booming arms industry. Nye later produced a document titled The Next War, which cynically referred to “the old goddess of democracy trick”, through which Japan could be used to lure the US into WWII.

In 1937 Interior Secretary Harold Ickes warned of the influence of “America’s 60 Families”. Historian Ferdinand Lundberg later penned a book of the exact same title. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas decried, “Morgan influence...the most pernicious one in industry and finance today.”

Jack Morgan responded by nudging the US towards WWII. Morgan had close relations with the Iwasaki and Dan families - Japan’s two wealthiest clans - who have owned Mitsubishi and Mitsui, respectively, since the companies emerged from 17th Century shogunates. When Japan invaded Manchuria, slaughtering Chinese peasants at Nanking, Morgan downplayed the incident. Morgan also had close relations with Italian fascist Benito Mussolini, while German Nazi Dr. Hjalmer Schacht was a Morgan Bank liaison during WWII. After the war Morgan representatives met with Schacht at the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland. [13]

The House of Rockefeller

BIS is the most powerful bank in the world, a global central bank for the Eight Families who control the private central banks of almost all Western and developing nations. The first President of BIS was Rockefeller banker Gates McGarrah- an official at Chase Manhattan and the Federal Reserve. McGarrah was the grandfather of former CIA director Richard Helms. The Rockefellers- like the Morgans- had close ties to London. David Icke writes in Children of the Matrix, that the Rockefellers and Morgans were just “gofers” for the European Rothschilds. [14]

BIS is owned by the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, Bank of Italy, Bank of Canada, Swiss National Bank, Nederlandsche Bank, Bundesbank and Bank of France.

Historian Carroll Quigley wrote in his epic book Tragedy and Hope that BIS was part of a plan, “to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole...to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements.”

[Continued... (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/25080)]
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Geolibertarian on September 20, 2011, 05:39:05 pm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-freemasons-and-the-house-of-rothschild/25179 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-freemasons-and-the-house-of-rothschild/25179)

The Federal Reserve Cartel: Freemasons and The House of Rothschild

by Dean Henderson

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/125179.jpg)

Global Research
June 8, 2011

(Part two of a four-part series)

In 1789 Alexander Hamilton became the first Treasury Secretary of the United States.  Hamilton was one of many Founding Fathers who were Freemasons.  He had close relations with the Rothschild family which owns the Bank of England and leads the European Freemason movement.  George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, Ethan Allen, Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, John Brown and Roger Sherman were all Masons.

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/hamilton.gif)
Andrew Hamilton

Roger Livingston helped Sherman and Franklin write the Declaration of Independence. He gave George Washington his oaths of office while he was Grand Master of the New York Grand Lodge of Freemasons. Washington himself was Grand Master of the Virginia Lodge. Of the General Officers in the Revolutionary Army, thirty-three were Masons. This was highly symbolic since 33rd Degree Masons become Illuminated. [1]

Populist founding fathers led by John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Thomas Paine- none of whom were Masons- wanted to completely severe ties with the British Crown, but were overruled by the Masonic faction led by Washington, Hamilton and Grand Master of the St. Andrews Lodge in Boston General Joseph Warren, who wanted to “defy Parliament but remain loyal to the Crown”. St. Andrews Lodge was the hub of New World Masonry and began issuing Knights Templar Degrees in 1769. [2]

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/warren1.jpg)
General Joseph Warren

All US Masonic lodges are to this day warranted by the British Crown, whom they serve as a global intelligence and counterrevolutionary subversion network. Their most recent initiative is the Masonic Child Identification Program (CHIP). According to Wikipedia, the CHIP programs allow parents the opportunity to create a kit of identifying materials for their child, free of charge. The kit contains a fingerprint card, a physical description, a video, computer disk, or DVD of the child, a dental imprint, and a DNA sample.

The First Continental Congress convened in Philadelphia in 1774 under the Presidency of Peyton Randolph, who succeeded Washington as Grand Master of the Virginia Lodge. The Second Continental Congress convened in 1775 under the Presidency of Freemason John Hancock. Peyton’s brother William succeeded him as Virginia Lodge Grand Master and became the leading proponent of centralization and federalism at the First Constitutional Convention in 1787. The federalism at the heart of the US Constitution is identical to the federalism laid out in the Freemason’s Anderson’s Constitutions of 1723. William Randolph became the nation’s first Attorney General and Secretary of State under George Washington. His family returned to England loyal to the Crown. John Marshall, the nation’s first Supreme Court Justice, was also a Mason. [3]

When Benjamin Franklin journeyed to France to seek financial help for American revolutionaries, his meetings took place at Rothschild banks. He brokered arms sales via German Mason Baron von Steuben. His Committees of Correspondence operated through Freemason channels and paralleled a British spy network. In 1776 Franklin became de facto Ambassador to France. In 1779 he became Grand Master of the French Neuf Soeurs (Nine Sisters) Lodge, to which John Paul Jones and Voltaire belonged. Franklin was also a member of the more secretive Royal Lodge of Commanders of the Temple West of Carcasonne, whose members included Frederick Prince of Whales. While Franklin preached temperance in the US, he cavorted wildly with his Lodge brothers in Europe. Franklin served as Postmaster General from the 1750’s to 1775 - a role traditionally relegated to British spies. [4]

With Rothschild financing Alexander Hamilton founded two New York banks, including Bank of New York. [5] He died in a gun battle with Aaron Burr, who founded Bank of Manhattan with Kuhn Loeb financing. Hamilton exemplified the contempt which the Eight Families hold towards common people, once stating, “All communities divide themselves into the few and the many. The first are the rich and the well born, the others the mass of the people...The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge and determine right. Give therefore to the first class a distinct, permanent share of government. They will check the unsteadiness of the second.”[6]

Hamilton was only the first in a series of Eight Families cronies to hold the key position of Treasury Secretary. In recent times Kennedy Treasury Secretary Douglas Dillon came from Dillon Read (now part of UBS Warburg). Nixon Treasury Secretaries David Kennedy and William Simon came from Continental Illinois Bank (now part of Bank of America) and Salomon Brothers (now part of Citigroup), respectively. Carter Treasury Secretary Michael Blumenthal came from Goldman Sachs, Reagan Treasury Secretary Donald Regan came from Merrill Lynch (now part of Bank of America), Bush Sr. Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady came from Dillon Read (UBS Warburg) and both Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin and Bush Jr. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson came from Goldman Sachs. Obama Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner worked at Kissinger Associates and the New York Fed.

Thomas Jefferson argued that the United States needed a publicly-owned central bank so that European monarchs and aristocrats could not use the printing of money to control the affairs of the new nation. Jefferson extolled, “A country which expects to remain ignorant and free...expects that which has never been and that which will never be. There is scarcely a King in a hundred who would not, if he could, follow the example of Pharaoh – get first all the people’s money, then all their lands and then make them and their children servants forever...banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies. Already they have raised up a money aristocracy.” Jefferson watched as the Euro-banking conspiracy to control the United States unfolded, weighing in, “Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of the day, but a series of oppressions begun at a distinguished period, unalterable through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing us to slavery”. [7]

But the Rothschild-sponsored Hamilton’s arguments for a private US central bank carried the day. In 1791 the Bank of the United States (BUS) was founded, with the Rothschilds as main owners. The bank’s charter was to run out in 1811. Public opinion ran in favor of revoking the charter and replacing it with a Jeffersonian public central bank. The debate was postponed as the nation was plunged by the Euro-bankers into the War of 1812. Amidst a climate of fear and economic hardship, Hamilton’s bank got its charter renewed in 1816.

Old Hickory, Honest Abe & Camelot

In 1828 Andrew Jackson took a run at the US Presidency. Throughout his campaign he railed against the international bankers who controlled the BUS. Jackson ranted, “You are a den of vipers. I intend to expose you and by Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people understood the rank injustices of our money and banking system there would be a revolution before morning.”

Jackson won the election and revoked the bank’s charter stating, “The Act seems to be predicated on an erroneous idea that the present shareholders have a prescriptive right to not only the favor, but the bounty of the government...for their benefit does this Act exclude the whole American people from competition in the purchase of this monopoly. Present stockholders and those inheriting their rights as successors be established a privileged order, clothed both with great political power and enjoying immense pecuniary advantages from their connection with government. Should its influence be concentrated under the operation of such an Act as this, in the hands of a self-elected directory whose interests are identified with those of the foreign stockholders, will there not be cause to tremble for the independence of our country in war...controlling our currency, receiving our public monies and holding thousands of our citizens independence, it would be more formidable and dangerous than the naval and military power of the enemy. It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government for selfish purposes...to make the rich richer and more powerful. Many of our rich men have not been content with equal protection and equal benefits, but have besought us to make them richer by acts of Congress. I have done my duty to this country.”[8]

Populism prevailed and Jackson was re-elected. In 1835 he was the target of an assassination attempt. The gunman was Richard Lawrence, who confessed that he was, “in touch with the powers in Europe”. [9]

Still, in 1836 Jackson refused to renew the BUS charter. Under his watch the US national debt went to zero for the first and last time in our nation’s history. This angered the international bankers, whose primary income is derived from interest payments on debt. BUS President Nicholas Biddle cut off funding to the US government in 1842, plunging the US into a depression. Biddle was an agent for the Paris-based Jacob Rothschild. [10]

The Mexican War was simultaneously sprung on Jackson. A few years later the Civil War was unleashed, with London bankers backing the Union and French bankers backing the South. The Lehman family made a fortune smuggling arms to the south and cotton to the north. By 1861 the US was $100 million in debt. New President Abraham Lincoln snubbed the Euro-bankers again, issuing Lincoln Greenbacks to pay Union Army bills.

The Rothschild-controlled Times of London wrote, “If that mischievous policy, which had its origins in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.” [11]

The Euro-banker-written Hazard Circular was exposed and circulated throughout the country by angry populists. It stated, “The great debt that capitalists will see is made out of the war and must be used to control the valve of money. To accomplish this government bonds must be used as a banking basis. We are now awaiting Secretary of Treasury Salmon Chase to make that recommendation. It will not allow Greenbacks to circulate as money as we cannot control that. We control bonds and through them banking issues”.

The 1863 National Banking Act reinstated a private US central bank and Chase’s war bonds were issued. Lincoln was re-elected the next year, vowing to repeal the act after he took his January 1865 oaths of office. Before he could act, he was assassinated at the Ford Theatre by John Wilkes Booth. Booth had major connections to the international bankers. His granddaughter wrote This One Mad Act, which details Booth’s contact with “mysterious Europeans” just before the Lincoln assassination.

Following the Lincoln hit, Booth was whisked away by members of a secret society known as Knights of the Golden Circle (KGC). KGC had close ties to the French Society of Seasons, which produced Karl Marx. KGC had fomented much of the tension that caused the Civil War and President Lincoln had specifically targeted the group. Booth was a KGC member and was connected through Confederate Secretary of State Judah Benjamin to the House of Rothschild. Benjamin fled to England after the Civil War. [12]

Nearly a century after Lincoln was assassinated for issuing Greenbacks, President John F. Kennedy found himself in the Eight Families’ crosshairs. Kennedy had announced a crackdown on off-shore tax havens and proposed increases in tax rates on large oil and mining companies. He supported eliminating tax loopholes which benefit the super-rich. His economic policies were publicly attacked by Fortune magazine, the Wall Street Journal and both David and Nelson Rockefeller. Even Kennedy’s own Treasury Secretary Douglas Dillon, who came from the UBS Warburg-controlled Dillon Read investment bank, voiced opposition to the JFK proposals. [13]

Kennedy’s fate was sealed in June 1963 when he authorized the issuance of more than $4 billion in United States Notes by his Treasury Department in an attempt to circumvent the high interest rate usury of the private Federal Reserve international banker crowd. The wife of Lee Harvey Oswald, who was conveniently gunned down by Jack Ruby before Ruby himself was shot, told author A. J. Weberman in 1994, “The answer to the Kennedy assassination is with the Federal Reserve Bank. Don’t underestimate that. It’s wrong to blame it on Angleton and the CIA per se only. This is only one finger on the same hand. The people who supply the money are above the CIA”. [14]

Fueled by incoming President Lyndon Johnson’s immediate escalation of the Vietnam War, the US sank further into debt. Its citizens were terrorized into silence. If they could kill the President they could kill anyone.

The House of Rothschild

The Dutch House of Orange founded the Bank of Amsterdam in 1609 as the world’s first central bank. Prince William of Orange married into the English House of Windsor, taking King James II’s daughter Mary as his bride. The Orange Order Brotherhood, which recently fomented Northern Ireland Protestant violence, put William III on the English throne where he ruled both Holland and Britain. In 1694 William III teamed up with the UK aristocracy to launch the private Bank of England.

The Old Lady of Threadneedle Street- as the Bank of England is known- is surrounded by thirty foot walls. Three floors beneath it the third largest stock of gold bullion in the world is stored. [15]

The Rothschilds and their inbred Eight Families partners gradually came to control the Bank of England. The daily London gold “fixing” occurred at the N. M. Rothschild Bank until 2004. As Bank of England Deputy Governor George Blunden put it, “Fear is what makes the bank’s powers so acceptable. The bank is able to exert its influence when people are dependent on us and fear losing their privileges or when they are frightened.”[16]

Mayer Amschel Rothschild sold the British government German Hessian mercenaries to fight against American Revolutionaries, diverting the proceeds to his brother Nathan in London, where N.M. (Nathan and Mayer) Rothschild & Sons was established. Mayer was a serious student of Cabala and launched his fortune on money embezzled from William IX- royal administrator of the Hesse-Kassel region and a prominent Freemason.

Rothschild-controlled Barings bankrolled the Chinese opium and African slave trades. It financed the Louisiana Purchase. When several states defaulted on its loans, Barings bribed Daniel Webster to make speeches stressing the virtues of loan repayment. The states held their ground, so the House of Rothschild cut off the money spigot in 1842, plunging the US into a deep depression. It was often said that the wealth of the Rothschilds depended on the bankruptcy of nations. Mayer Amschel Rothschild once said, “I care not who controls a nation’s political affairs, so long as I control her currency”.

[Continued... (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-freemasons-and-the-house-of-rothschild/25179)]
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Geolibertarian on September 20, 2011, 05:40:19 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bi2gOhvpOHg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bi2gOhvpOHg) (The Money Masters – part 9 of 22)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pyaj30n8kZY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pyaj30n8kZY) (The Money Masters – part 10 of 22)

The following excerpts from The Money Masters (http://www.infowarsshop.com/The-Money-Masters_p_78.html) can be viewed in the two youtube clips above.

------------------------------

A truly incredible editorial in the London Times explained the central bankers' attitude towards Lincoln's Greenbacks (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=98465.msg581271#msg581271):


[...]

Allegations that international bankers were responsible for Lincoln's assassination surfaced in Canada 70 years later in 1934. Gerald G. McGeer, a popular and well-respected Canadian attorney, revealed this stunning charge in a five hour speech before the Canadian House of Commons blasting Canada's debt-based money system. Remember: it was 1934, the height of the Great Depression, which was ravaging Canada as well. McGeer had obtained evidence -- deleted from the public record -- provided to him by Secret Service agents at the trial of John Wilks Booth, after Booth's death. McGeer said it showed that Booth was a mercenary working for the international bankers. According to an article in the Vancouver Sun of May 2, 1934:


Interestingly, McGeer claimed that Lincoln was assassinated not only because international bankers wanted to reestablish a central bank in America, but because they also wanted to base America's currency on gold -- gold they controlled. In other words: put America on a gold standard (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=98465.msg1232275#msg1232275). Lincoln had done just the opposite by issuing U.S. notes -- Greenbacks -- which were based purely on the good faith and credit of the United States. The article quoted McGeer as saying:


Not since Lincoln has the U.S. issued debt-free United States notes.

[...]

With Lincoln out of the way, the money changers' next objective was to gain complete control over America's money. This was no easy task. With the opening of the American west, silver had been discovered in huge quantities. On top of that, Lincoln's Greenbacks were generally popular. Despite the European central bankers' deliberate attacks on Greenbacks, they continued to circulate in the United States -- in fact until a few years ago. According to historian W. Cleon Skousen:


It is clear that the concept of America printing her own debt-free money sent shock waves throughout the European central banking elite. They watched with horror as Americans clamored for more Greenbacks. They may have killed Lincoln, but support for his monetary ideas grew.

On April 12, 1866, nearly one year to the day of Lincoln's assassination, Congress went to work at the bidding of the European central banking interests. It passed the Contraction Act, authorizing the Secretary of the Treasury to begin to retire some of the Greenbacks in circulation, and thereby contract the money supply. Authors Theodore R. Thoren and Richard F. Warner explained the results of the money contraction in their classic book on the subject, The Truth In Money Book:


In other words, the money changers wanted two things: (1) the reinstitution of a central bank under their exclusive control, and (2) an American currency backed by gold. Their strategy was two-fold.

First of all, cause a series of panics to try to convince the American people that only centralized control of the money supply could provide economic stability.

And secondly, remove so much money from the system, that most Americans would be so desperately poor that they either wouldn't care or would be too weak to oppose the bankers.

In 1866, there was $1.8 billion in currency in circulation in the United States -- about $50.46 per capita. In 1867 alone, half a billion dollars...was removed from the U.S. money supply. Ten years later, in 1876, America's money supply was reduced to only $600 million. In other words, 2/3 of America's money had been called in by the bankers. Only $14.60 per capita remained in circulation. Ten years later [in 1886], the money supply had been reduced to only $400 million, even though the population had boomed. The result was that only $6.67 per capita remained in circulation -- a 760% loss in buying power over 20 years.

Today, economists try to sell the idea that recessions and depressions are a natural part of something they call the "business cycle." The truth is, our money supply is manipulated now just as it was before and after the Civil War.

How did this happen? How did money become so scarce? Simple. Bank loans were called in, and no new ones were given. In addition, silver coins were melted down. In 1872, a man named Ernest Seyd was given a hundred thousand pounds -- about $500 thousand -- by the Bank of England and sent to America to bribe necessary Congressmen to get silver demonetized. He was told that if that was not sufficient, to draw an additional hundred thousand pounds, or as much more as was necessary.

The next year Congress passed the Coinage Act of 1873, and the minting of silver dollars abruptly stopped. In fact, Representative Samuel Hooper, who introduced the bill in the House, acknowledged that Mr. Seyd actually drafted the legislation. But it gets even worse than that. In 1874, Seyd himself admitted who was behind the scheme:


But the contest over control of America's money was not yet over. Only three years later, in 1876, with one-third of America's workforce unemployed, the population was growing restless. People were clamoring for a return to the Greenback money system of President Lincoln, or a return to silver money -- anything that would make money more plentiful. That year, Congress created the United States Silver Commission to study the problem. Their report clearly blamed the monetary contraction on the national bankers. The report is interesting, because it compares the deliberate money contraction by the national bankers after the Civil War to the fall of the Roman Empire:


Despite this report by the Silver Commission, Congress took no action. The next year, 1877, riots broke out from Pittsburgh to Chicago. The torches of starving vandals lit up the sky. The bankers huddled to decide what to do. They decided to hang on. Now that they were back in control (to a certain extent), they were not about to give it up.

At the meeting of the American Bankers Association that year, they urged their membership to do everything in their power to put down the notion of a return to Greenbacks. The ABA secretary, James Buel, authored a letter to the members which blatantly called on the banks to subvert not only Congress but the press:


------------------------------
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Geolibertarian on September 20, 2011, 05:42:32 pm
"...the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences."

-- Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope (http://www.wanttoknow.info/articles/tragedy_hope_banking_money_history), p. 324


From http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/s_p.php (http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/s_p.php):

[...]

Daniel Estulin, noted expert on the Bilderbergers (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-true-story-of-the-bilderberg-group-and-what-they-may-be-planning-now/13808), describes that secretive globalist group as “a medium of bringing together financial institutions which are the world’s most powerful and most predatory financial interests.” Writing (http://domasjefferson.com/news/bilderberg-2011-discussions-leaked-via-moles-inside) in June 2011, he said:

"Bilderberg isn’t a secret society. . . . It’s a meeting of people who represent a certain ideology. . . . Not OWG [One World Government] or NWO [New World Order] as too many people mistakenly believe. Rather, the ideology is of a ONE WORLD COMPANY LIMITED."

It seems the Bilderbergers are less interested in governing the world than in owning (http://whoownstheworld.com) the world. The “world company” was a term first used at a Bilderberger meeting in Canada in 1968 by George Ball, U.S. Undersecretary of State for Economic Affairs and a managing director of banking giants Lehman Brothers and Kuhn Loeb. The world company was to be a new form of colonialism, in which global assets would be acquired by economic rather than military coercion. The company would extend across national boundaries, aggressively engaging in mergers and acquisitions until the assets of the world were subsumed under one privately-owned corporation, with nation-states subservient to a private international central banking system.

Estulin continues:

"The idea behind each and every Bilderberg meeting is to create what they themselves call THE ARISTOCRACY OF PURPOSE between European and North American elites on the best way to manage the planet. In other words, the creation of a global network of giant cartels, more powerful than any nation on Earth, destined to control the necessities of life of the rest of humanity.

". . . This explains what George Ball . . . said back in 1968, at a Bilderberg meeting in Canada: Where does one find a legitimate base for the power of corporate management to make decisions that can profoundly affect the economic life of nations to whose governments they have only limited responsibility?'"

That base of power was found in the private global banking system. Estulin goes on:

"The problem with today’s system is that the world is run by monetary systems, not by national credit systems. . . . [Y]ou don’t want a monetary system to run the world. You want sovereign nation-states to have their own credit systems, which is the system of their currency. . . . [T]he possibility of productive, non-inflationary credit creation by the state, which is firmly stated in the US Constitution, was excluded by Maastricht [the Treaty of the European Union] as a method of determining economic and financial policy."

The world company acquires assets by preventing governments from issuing their own currencies and credit. Money is created instead by banks as loans at interest. The debts inexorably grow, since more money is always owed back than was created in the original loans. (For more on this, see here (http://webofdebt.com).) If currencies are not allowed to expand to meet increased costs and growth, the inevitable result is a wave of bankruptcies, foreclosures, and sales of assets at firesale prices. Sales to whom? To the “world company.”

[Continued... (http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/s_p.php)]
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Geolibertarian on September 21, 2011, 01:58:17 pm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-axis-of-greed-the-nature-and-structure-of-the-economic-elite/17767 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-axis-of-greed-the-nature-and-structure-of-the-economic-elite/17767)

Part III: The Axis of Greed: The Nature and Structure of the Economic Elite

by David DeGraw

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/117767.jpg)

Global Research, February 27, 2010
Amped Status - 2010-02-19

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/degraw1.jpg)


--  Abraham Lincoln (http://www.ratical.org/corporations/Lincoln.html)


(http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/degraw2.jpg)

U.S. Elite
Institutions:

Federal Reserve
Business Council
Bilderberg Group
Conference Board
Brookings Institute
Advertising Council
Heritage Foundation
Trilateral Commission
Business Round Table
Chamber of Commerce
Federal Trade Commission
Council on Foreign Relations
American Petroleum Institute
American Enterprise Institute
American Bankers Association
Pharm Research & Manufacturers
Public Relations Society of America
American Psychological Association
Project for a New American Century
Securities and Exchange Commission
Committee for Economic Development
National Association of Manufacturers
Carnegie / Ford / Rockefeller foundations
Military / Media / Prison Industrial Complex

I don’t view the Economic Elite as a small group of men who meet in secrecy to control the world. They do feature elements of conspiracy and are clearly composed of secretive organizations like the Bilderberg Group (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13808) - this is not a conspiracy theory, this is a conspiracy fact - but as a whole the Economic Elite are primarily united by ideology. They’re made up of thousands of individuals who subscribe to an ideology of exploitation and the belief that wealth and resources need to be concentrated into the fewest hands possible (theirs), at the expense of the many.

That being said, there are some definite lead players in this group and it is important that we are not too vague and expose the individuals who publicly lead them. Focusing on the fundamental structure of the US economy, we have people like Hank Paulson, Tim Geithner, Ben Bernanke, Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, Alan Greenspan, Lloyd Blankfein, Jamie Dimon, John Mack, Vikram Pandit, John Thain, Hank Greenberg, Ken Lewis, John J. Castellani, Edward Yingling and Tom Donohue.

In total, the Economic Elite are made up of about 0.5% of the US population. At the center of this group is the Business Roundtable (http://www.businessroundtable.org/about/members), an organization representing Fortune 500 CEOs that is also interlocked with several lead elite organizations. Most Americans have never heard of the Business Roundtable. However, in my analysis, it is the most influential and powerful Economic Elite organization.


-- G. William Domhoff, Who Rules America? (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0767416376?tag=apture-20)

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/degraw3.jpg)

The Roundtable’s first year of operation was 1972, which coincided with the beginning of the CEO salary explosion, and has been the driving force behind the unprecedented concentration of wealth since their inception. Their dominance over the US economy and government is unparalleled. Their members are a Who’s Who of everything that is wrong with our economy. Here is a partial list of some of their lead members (http://www.businessroundtable.org/about/members):


The Business Roundtable is the most powerful activist organization in the United States. Their leaders regularly lobby members of Congress behind closed doors and often meet privately with the President and his administration. Any legislation that affects Roundtable members has almost zero possibility of passing without their support.

For three major examples, look at healthcare and financial reform, along with the military budget. The healthcare reform bill devolved into what amounts to an insurance industry bailout (http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/HealthCare/howard-dean-health-care-bill-bigger-bailout-insurance/story?id=9349392) and was drastically altered by Roundtable lobbyists representing interests like WellPoint, Aetna, Cigna, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson. Obama and Congress are trying to please the Roundtable with a bill that supports their interests. This led to the dropping of the public-option (http://thehill.com/homenews/house/65161-anxious-ceos-criticize-any-public-insurance-option) put forth in the House bill. However, when it came to finishing the bill, Roundtable members began to walk away from the process. That’s the real reason why the reform bill has stalled (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30502.html). Obama will be meeting with the Roundtable on February 24th, in hopes of getting healthcare reform back on track. After that meeting, he will then hold a bipartisan healthcare meeting with members of congress.

Also being addressed in Obama’s upcoming meeting with the Roundtable are issues concerning financial reform (http://rawstory.com/2010/02/obama-takes-rosier-view-obscene-shameful-ceo-bonuses/). Almost every aspect of financial reform (http://www.timesonline.com/bct_news/news_details/article/1528/2009/october/16/all-business-lobbyists-influence-financial-reform.html) has been D.O.A. thanks to Roundtable lobbyists (http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/14/lobbyists-mass-to-try-to-shape-financial-reform/) representing the interests of Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Bank of America, HSBC, Master Card and American Express. They even pushed to make sure Ben Bernanke was reconfirmed (http://www.businessroundtable.org/news/business_roundtable_statement_bernanke’s_confirmation) as the head of the Federal Reserve and they have also guided Obama into focusing on deficit reduction (http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-a-budget/79005-the-big-question-will-the-budget-deficit-be-an-issue-for-voters), now that their member companies are healthy again and making record profits after receiving trillions in government subsidies. The Roundtable played a pivotal role in the appointment of Hank Paulson (http://www.businessroundtable.org/news/business_roundtable_welcomes_hank_paulson039s_nomination_treasury_secretary), formerly the CEO of Roundtable member Goldman Sachs, who replaced Roundtable member John Snow as US Treasury Secretary. The Roundtable also strongly lobbied on behalf of current Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner (http://www.businessroundtable.org/sites/default/files/Treasury Secretary Statement 11 24 08 FINAL.pdf) [.pdf] and White House National Economic Council Director Larry Summers (http://www.businessroundtable.org/sites/default/files/Treasury Secretary Statement 11 24 08 FINAL.pdf) [.pdf]. Although there has been recent talk of Geithner being replaced at the Treasury, the lead choice to replace him is Jamie Dimon (http://www.businessroundtable.org/member_details?id=90&width=640&height=480&TB_iframe=true), Roundtable member and CEO of JP Morgan Chase.

The drastic rise in military spending is also a result of Roundtable lobbyists pushing the interests of large military companies like Boeing and Bechtel, along with the largest oil companies like ExxonMobil, Shell, Hess and Chevron.

The Roundtable tells politicians what they want done, and the politicians do it. At times, Roundtable members even write the laws themselves (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-hamsher/why-is-ellen-tauscher-hel_b_171165.html). On financial reform alone, those representing Wall Street firms gave “$42 million (http://robertreich.org/post/371113369/whos-killing-financial-reform) to lawmakers, mostly to members of the House and Senate banking committees and House and Senate leaders.” During the 2008 election cycle, they gave $155 million (http://robertreich.org/post/371113369/whos-killing-financial-reform): $88 million to Democrats and $67 million to Republicans. Keep in mind, this is the spending on just their financial reform initiative. When it came to health reform, they gave even more (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/oct/01/lobbyists-millions-obama-healthcare-reform).

When it comes to getting elected, over 90% of the time the candidate who simply spends more money on their campaign wins the election. The Roundtable and politicians recognize this fact, so the overwhelming majority of current elected officials relied heavily (http://www.opensecrets.org/bigpicture/topcontribs.php?cycle=2008) on campaign funding from Roundtable members, including President Obama (http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&cid=N00009638).

Shortly after Obama’s inauguration he held a meeting with Roundtable members (http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/03/12/obamas-remarks-to-the-business-roundtable/tab/article/) at the St. Regis Hotel. The president of the Business Roundtable is John J. Castellani. Throughout the first nine months of Obama’s presidency, Castellani met with him at the White House more than any other person, with the exception of Chamber of Commerce CEO Tom Donohue. If you look at the records of people who have spent the most time with Obama (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/25/white-house-visitor-logs_n_370921.html) in the White House, other than these two, another frequent visitor is Edward Yingling, the president of the American Bankers Association.

These organizations - the Business Roundtable, Chamber of Commerce and the American Bankers Association - along with the Federal Reserve, a secretive quasi-government private institution, form the center of the Economic Elite’s power structure. Since the bailout, the Federal Reserve has been working closely with private firm BlackRock (http://ampedstatus.com/bailout-player-blackrock-becomes-bigger-than-federal-reserve). Due to this relationship, BlackRock has emerged as the world’s largest money manager and now manages more assets than the Federal Reserve. They also “manage many of the Treasury Department’s big investments (http://ampedstatus.com/bailout-player-blackrock-becomes-bigger-than-federal-reserve).”

On a global level, you have economic institutions like the World Trade Organization (WTO), the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, and international treaties like NAFTA. These organizations already form a de facto world government that has rights beyond our constitutional rights and national sovereignty. If the WTO makes a ruling that goes against US law, the WTO ruling supersedes US law and wins out.

Here is how Global Exchange explains these global institutions (http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/wto/):


[World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) (http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/wbimf/)]


In addition to dominating our political and economic system, the Economic Elite have already created their own private military. Their private military is now more powerful (http://ampedstatus.com/af-pak-war-racket-the-obama-illusion-comes-crashing-down) than the US military. As mentioned earlier, private mercenaries now outnumber US soldiers and receive the lion’s share of military spending.

Corporations like SAIC, Blackwater, Bechtel, Raytheon and Halliburton are composed of the most elite worldwide intelligence and military officers. These are the highly profitable and powerful entities that the Economic Elite turn to when national militaries and intelligence agencies - like the CIA, FBI or other government run entities - can’t get the job done.

For instance, SAIC, a “stealth company (http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/03/spyagency200703?printable=true)” that most people have never heard of, is considered to be the brains of the entire US intelligence apparatus, more powerful than the much more popularly known CIA, NSA and FBI - all agencies that SAIC is deeply intertwined with. I urge you to research SAIC to get a crash course in how the true power structure functions. You can start by reading an excellent investigative report by Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele titled, “Washington’s $8 billion shadow (http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/03/spyagency200703?printable=true).”

The Economic Elite dominate US intelligence and military operations. Other than the obvious geo-strategic reasons, the never-ending and ever-expanding War on Terror’s objective is to drain the US population of more resources and further rob US taxpayers, while using our tax money to create a private military that is more powerful than the US military.

I think any logical person can see the ominous implications (http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_terror-industrial_complex_20100208) of having such a vast and powerful private military and intelligence complex, created for and used, in secrecy, by the Economic Elite. Outside of the blatant economic policy attacks, heavily armed and sophisticated covert powers led by small groups of Economic Elite are now a serious risk and present danger.

In conclusion, these economic and government policy forming organizations, along with their private military and intelligence corporations, form the core of the Economic Elite power structure.


-- Paul Wolfowitz


© Copyright David DeGraw, Amped Status, 2010
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Nailer on September 21, 2011, 04:29:07 pm
the enemy is anyone that works for the US Government or that gets paid by them.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: amagi on October 18, 2011, 01:27:05 am
the enemy is anyone that works for the US Government or that gets paid by them.

The question you beg is: Why?

I am not here to defend government by any stretch but that answer is  important to understanding what needs to be fixed and how to prrevent it from becoming broken again.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: filletboy on October 21, 2011, 06:03:25 pm
NOT SURE HOW TO MAKE A NEW THREAD


what is up with obama sayin he is bringing all the troop home from iran
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Freeski on October 21, 2011, 06:28:32 pm
the enemy is anyone that works for the US Government or that gets paid by them.

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it."

Ignorance is no excuse.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Dig on October 21, 2011, 10:40:15 pm
the enemy is anyone that works for the US Government or that gets paid by them.

Well that is a load of Bullshit.

The enemy to humanity has been easily exposed in this thread. Research it yourselves. It is less than 10,000 nutballs and they are enslaved by smalled and smaller groups. It is their nature to continually torture, ridicule, perster, rape, and murder each other. They are resevoir dogs. The movies Queen Margot, Richard III (Shakespeare), and Lion in the Winter should wake up the most comatose sheep into understanding how insanely degenerate these self proclaimed "owners" of the world are.

The private federal reserve corporation has been stealing tens of $trillions a year so that people become dependent on the state for work and sustenance. We need to take the noose off the necks of the American worker and entrepeneur and stop blaming each other for the dystopia we all allowed to exist contrary to the laws of the land.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: BrookeKilby on December 04, 2011, 05:09:40 pm
Excellent post.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: pac522 on December 04, 2011, 06:05:16 pm

I noticed most comments beneath the video at youtube had nothing to do with the video and were quite boring.  Which could be a diversionary tactic to discourage piqued interest from casual viewers IMO.  But one removed comment caught my eye:

Quote
comment removed by Homeland Security
bd1965  7 months ago
???




The user bd1965 actually posted that,  comment removed by Homeland Security, otherwise the removed comment would have been in italics. lol
Title: Money Power Runs America
Post by: Geolibertarian on January 04, 2012, 02:18:36 pm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/money-power-runs-america/28495 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/money-power-runs-america/28495)

Money Power Runs America

by Stephen Lendman

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/128495.jpg)

Global Research
January 4, 2012

Wall Street does it by controlling money, credit and debt, as well as manipulating markets for private enrichment. House and Senate millionaires do it their way for greater wealth, privilege, power and status.
 
New Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) (http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2011/11/congress-enjoys-robust-financial-status.html) figures show it. More on them below. New York Times writer Eric Lichtblau commented in his article headlined, "Economic Downturn Took a Detour at Capitol Hill," saying:
 
In 1991, Representative Ed Pastor (D. AR) entered Congress with around $100,000 in savings and as much debt owed banks. Now he's a millionaire, one of 250 in Congress.
 
"(A)nd the wealth gap between lawmakers and their constituents appears to be growing quickly" as austerity cuts harm most Americans needing help during harder than ever hard times.
 
Since 2008, they've lost jobs, homes, personal savings, and futures. At the same time, congressional members are richer than ever. Perhaps never "has the divide (been) so wide, or the public contrast so stark, between lawmakers and those they represent."
 
No wonder Gallop's year end poll showed Congress getting its lowest ever 11% approval rating. At the same time, growing numbers of Americans reject both parties for independent or unaffiliated status.
 
On November 14, the Atlantic Wire (http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2011/11/how-members-congress-get-rich-through-honest-graft/44928/) headlined, "How Members of Congress Get Rich Through 'Honest Graft,'" saying:

"A 60 Minutes (http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7388130n&tag=contentBody;storyMediaBox) report examined the ways members of Congress trade on inside, privileged information" to get rich. "Congresspeople are exempt from insider trading rules" so profit in ways others can't legally.
 
They do it through stock trades and privileged business deals. Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert earmarked funding for a federal highway project on land he owned. He later sold it for $2 million.
 
Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi profited from eight IPOs, including some "that had business before her House." So have other congressional members, past and present.

Former Senator Bob Dole bought shares in Automatic Data Processing four days before GHW Bush signed legislation with new military data processing rules benefitting the company handsomely.
 
Former Speaker and Republican presidential aspirant Newt Gingrich bought Boeing stock just before he helped kill amendments to cut International Space Station funding. It helped Boeing secure a lucrative contract.

Numerous others in Congress profit the same way. Some hit the jackpot. In 2004, the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (http://insidertrading.procon.org/sourcefiles/abnormalreturnsziobrowski.pdf) [.pdf] published a report showing Senate portfolios outperformed the market by about 12% annually. It didn't happen by chance.
 
A 2011 study (http://insidertrading.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001034) showed House member investments exceed market performance by 6%. Do it annually and it adds up. For example, $100 invested at 6% for 40 years grows tenfold. At 12%, it's 80-fold.
 
Washington runs on inside information. Congressional members use it to get rich. While their median net worth gained 15% from 2004 to 2010, America's 10% richest found theirs unchanged, and for Americans overall, it dropped based on inflation-adjusted dollars.
 
Of course, America's top 1% outdid them all. Why else would nationwide protests target them for social justice?

Notably, congressional wealth grew two and a half times (from $280,000 to $725,000) from 1984 to 2009 in inflation-adjusted dollars, while for average Americans it declined slightly. Moreover, for the past half century, income inequality mostly benefits congressional conservatives. Progressivism pays poorly.
 
In 1984, one in five House members had zero or negative net worth, excluding home equity and other non-income producing property. By 2009, it dropped to one in 12.
 
As a result, the gap between congressional members and their constituents perhaps never has been so wide. Moreover, it increases annually at a time Main Street's suffering harder than ever hard times, and few in Washington care.
 
Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) Report (http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2011/11/congress-enjoys-robust-financial-status.html)
 
It began saying:

"These days, being a millionaire (puts you in) the (top) one percent. But in Congress, it only makes you average."
 
Among 535 House and Senate members, 250 (or 47%) are millionaires, based on 2010 financial disclosure forms. Only America's top 1% enjoys that status. According to CRP's executive director Sheila Krumholz:
 
"The vast majority of members of Congress are quite comfortable financially, while many of their own constituents suffer from economic hardship."

It's largely from decades of destructive bipartisan policies. Since the 1980s, economic inequality grew enormously. Business and super-rich elites profited handsomely at the expense of working class people.
 
Wealth disparity is unprecedented at a time nearly 23% of Americans are unemployed. Half of US households are impoverished or bordering on it. Millions lost homes, and growing hunger and homelessness threaten millions more.
 
In contrast, congressional members never had it so good. "It's no surprise that so many people grumble about lawmakers being out-of-touch," said Krumholz. "Few Americans enjoy the same financial cushion maintained by most members of Congress - or the same access to market-altering information that could yield personal financial gains."

[Continued... (http://www.globalresearch.ca/money-power-runs-america/28495)]
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Geolibertarian on January 08, 2012, 06:45:36 pm
You want to know who we're fighting?
Who the real enemies are?
Watch this video; lecture by Dr. John Coleman, and understand who we're up against:

Although I agree with the rest of his analysis, I'm afraid Dr. Coleman is sadly misguided on the issue of free trade.

To understand why, please see the following:

       http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=187591.0 (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=187591.0)
       http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=190382.0 (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=190382.0)
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: savvvvylady on February 17, 2012, 10:17:05 pm
Has anyone read about this today

http://www.fastcompany.com/1816814/department-of-homeland-security-explains-social-media-monitoring-project-to-congress
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Constitutionary on February 18, 2012, 04:43:34 pm
The Globalists ar egetting desperate.  Most everyone is onto them and now they want to monitor social media to go after the antagonists.

Good luck tho there are millions of us and not enough of them to go after all of us.    :D

So they can just suck it !!!!!!!!       ;D
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: chris jones on February 24, 2012, 08:50:03 pm
Well that is a load of Bullshit.

The enemy to humanity has been easily exposed in this thread. Research it yourselves. It is less than 10,000 nutballs and they are enslaved by smalled and smaller groups. It is their nature to continually torture, ridicule, perster, rape, and murder each other. They are resevoir dogs. The movies Queen Margot, Richard III (Shakespeare), and Lion in the Winter should wake up the most comatose sheep into understanding how insanely degenerate these self proclaimed "owners" of the world are.

The private federal reserve corporation has been stealing tens of $trillions a year so that people become dependent on the state for work and sustenance. We need to take the noose off the necks of the American worker and entrepeneur and stop blaming each other for the dystopia we all allowed to exist contrary to the laws of the land.
Hey dig, can we say they seek supremcy over the common man, that any and all scams they have araringed are for the physical, financial,and abject survitude to those they consider the moronic masses, or have I gone overboard. 
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Satyagraha on March 04, 2012, 07:38:02 am
And who does the Club of Rome want us to believe is the enemy?


SO, WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE'S ENEMIES?
According to THEM...pg 56
"We become the "irregular" force in the protracted Global War on Extremists and move increasingly to preventative and preemptive actions. "

Now, how do THEY define 'extremists'? ... and, exactly What are THEIR actions going to be?



ALAN WATT READING A CLUB OF ROME DOCUMENT...

Alan:  Then they sum it up:

             "The real enemy…"

Alan:  --Which they have chosen, remember, to make you believe in.

             "The real enemy then is humanity itself."



MORE...

-------------------------------------

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?
(http://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/images/post_pics/auschwitz_watching.jpg)(http://images.reserve123.com/product/666-2.jpg)
(http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/02/21/us/21camera.xlarge1.jpg)(http://images.pennnet.com/articles/mae/thm/th_0704mae_sr01.jpg)




"[I ]f all of the leaders of the Third Reich had been sadistic monsters and maniacs then these events would have no more moral significance than an earthquake, or any other natural catastrophe. But this trial has shown that under a national crisis ordinary, even able and extraordinary men can delude themselves into the commission of crimes so vast and heinous that they beggar the imagination.

No one who has sat through the trial can ever forget them. Men sterilized because of political belief. A mockery made of friendship and faith. The murder of children. How easily it can happen. There are those in our own country, too who today speak of the protection of country of survival. A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way.

The answer to that is: Survival as what? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult. Before the people of the world let it now be noted that here in our decision, this is what we stand for:

Justice, truth and the value of a single human being."


Judgment At Nuremberg (Movie 1961)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3BwK51YFgQ
http://www.script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/j/judgment-at-nuremburg-script-transcript.html




From: ALAN WATT
"CRISIS CREATION BY THE CLUB OF ROME - CLUBBING US TO DEATH"

http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/Alan_Watt_Blurb_CrisisCreationClubOfRome_May302007.html
May 30, 2007 (Please read all of Alan Watt's analysis in the link above, it is amazing)

[...]
Here it is, summing it up. This is what all this is meant lead your mind to: coming to their conclusion.

             "The common enemy of humanity is man."
 
Alan:  Here's a beautiful psychopathic ability to double-think.

"The common enemy of humanity is man."


Alan:  This is the new enemy, you see, we always need enemies to come together to fight, to work, to strive towards, and to be taxed silly.

             "…in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea…"

Alan:  I'll read that again.

"…in searching…"

Alan:  “In searching,” not in finding.

             "…in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill."

Alan:  Now for the hard of thinking, I'll repeat that part.

"…in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we…"

Alan:  We--

"…we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill."

Alan:  That should be chiseled in your stone or painted on your living room walls; you could read it everyday, because if you forget this, you'll fall for everything else that just comes your way in your lifetime.

To continue:

             "In their totality and in their interactions, these phenomena do constitute a common threat which demands solidarity."

Alan:  Their goal is solidarity, like a religious movement.

"…of all peoples, but in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome."

Alan:  Behavior changes, behavior modification, you see.

Then they sum it up:
             
"The real enemy…"

Alan:  --Which they have chosen, remember, to make you believe in.

             "The real enemy then is humanity itself."


This is a summary of a religion that's been indoctrinated and has been over the years, many years, which will bring in their new idealized society; but we have to believe in it, like a religion, to make it happen. And you think that your governments are making all these decisions for you.

Since the 1960’s, massive funding went into preaching the new environmentalism, the Gaia [or Gaea] worship, the overpopulation, “the sky is falling” attitudes that we've been brought along with.  Now you do have a generation that's grown up hearing nothing but this, who believe it's all true. Their reality is induced through propaganda and indoctrination, and reinforced by further propaganda, ongoing propaganda. A term they used in circles at the top, back in the 1940’s and '30’s even, they called it "continuing education."  That was their couching term for it, which would confuse Joe Average, but it literally meant: beginning with early childhood indoctrination at school and furthered down through time with newspapers, magazines, the radio and eventually television, to reinforce their original lies, until Joe Average and Jane Average think it’s all real and they behave accordingly. 

It’s no different than the way religion was used before that, where you'd run through the forest, terrified of all the demons behind every tree; and shadows, as the sun would move and cast the shadows; and it would get dark and you'd run into that big church, where it’s full of light and God was there to dispel all the darkness. It made you feel better and safe, and you clung to the holy men because they could save you.

Any reality can be induced, given time, reinforcement and promulgated from the top down, as the ancients talked about in Greece, when they discussed this many times in the writings of various philosophers. How many generations have lived, died, fought in wars, had moments of pleasure and masses of misery, never knowing that their reality and their belief system (and everything else) was given by a small dominant minority with the history of the ages and the sciences therein? Nothing has changed.

Eventually, you will see children who will volunteer for sterilization, thinking they're doing the world a great deed (or if they're singled out), because they will be told; and this is coming. It's been discussed, written about and published that they have defective genes. They might even have an allergy, “oh, my,” and they shouldn't really put that on to another generation of inflicting misery. You'll see the first generation being "enhanced," as they call it. That's was put forth to the public, through fiction again; the Star Trek series and the eventual space station series (I don’t know what they called it).  "Genetic enhancement,” see the movie, "Gattaca," good predictive programming. 

However, they will volunteer for sterilization, and probably get some social benefits if they go ahead and do this. Ultimately, of course, they won't need humans to breed, at the low levels. They've discussed this and published it too.  Charles Galton Darwin talked about the elite not altering themselves or altering their brains, because they must retain survival capabilities and instincts, since they will be steering the ship of Earth. Whereas Koestler, by the way, for all his so called leading of the left-wing worked for MI6 (declassified now). He said "the masses of people won't need their survival capabilities because the state will be making their decisions for them."

Therefore, we're going through just one part of an ongoing process.  It was ongoing and planned for your parents, grandparents and back through time. Masses of people have lived and died, never knowing reality; and that's what we're up against—those who steal our ability to be sentient. They decide what we will be, by giving us a scripted version of reality.  They often, in their arrogance, do come out with statements, psychopathically, because they are psychopaths, you see. Psychopaths have tremendous ego. They love to say, "Well, we really told you. It's just that you didn't listen," and they do tell us, and they chuckle that we don't get it because we cannot imagine people being so evil as to do what they do. That's why they get away with it. They're helped by myriads of bureaucrats, who, once again are conditioned in their little tunnel and they can't think outside of it either.  They will rationalize what they do, no matter what it is and no matter who suffers.

Get the book. Read through it, and you certainly will learn, by their own admissions that: the reality that you've had, and the one they're going to give you, was designed by them.

From Hamish and myself, it's good night, and may your god or your gods go with you.



Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Alexandermerow on March 04, 2012, 05:48:13 pm
Good video! Down with the NWO!
Title: The Meaning of Occupy Bilderberg
Post by: Geolibertarian on May 31, 2012, 10:41:14 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-meaning-of-occupy-bilderberg-the-elevation-of-the-shadow-into-public-consciousness.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-meaning-of-occupy-bilderberg-the-elevation-of-the-shadow-into-public-consciousness.html)

The Meaning of Occupy Bilderberg: The Elevation of The Shadow Into Public Consciousness

Saman Mohammadi
Prisonplanet.com
May 31, 2012

“What a difference a year makes. Occupy Bilderberg? I love it. The Occupy movement seems finally to have realised that the problem isn’t the 1%, it’s the 0.001%. It’s the guys and gals and whatever David Rockefeller is who are meeting in Chantilly, Virginia, at the end of the week. Many hundreds of protestors have pledged to show up. And who knows, they may just manage to drag the mainstream news media with them.” – Charlie Skelton: Bilderberg 2012: the technocrats are rising at this year’s annual conference (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/30/bilderberg-2012-technocrats-are-rising); May 30, 2012.

“Do nothing secretly; for Time sees and hears all things, and discloses all.” – Sophocles.

The occupy movement is growing up and taking on the big boys at the 2012 Bilderberg conference, held in Chantilly, Virginia.

Bilderberg is the shadow G8 and G20. Its much more powerful and influential in global affairs than those public bodies. It is the invisible layer of skin under the thick public skin of national governments, global media, global banks, global charities, and global corporations.

When you peel away the public skin, you find a virus spreading underneath, and that virus is the Bilderberg plutocrats who want to keep nations impoverished and under-developed (http://www.infowars.com/bankers-want-to-keep-greece-mired-in-depression/) for their own gain. Of course, their view of the world situation is the exact opposite. They see the 99% as a virus on the planet, and they are the cure. They seek to, “micro-manage the human race, which they regard as a plague on the earth,” writes (http://www.infowars.com/agenda-21-to-be-discussed-at-bilderberg-confab/) Paul Joseph Watson.

Instituting anti-growth policies on a global basis in the name of “protecting the environment” is a matter of pride to them. Launching illegal wars to reduce the size of the human population and increase the size of their bank accounts gives them joy and a great sense of accomplishment.

According to criminal Bilderbergers and their collaborators in the media, the Earth needs “healing” and the quickest ways of removing the human virus is by starting another massive world war, and creating poverty and starvation worldwide. Their highly secret global depopulation agenda (http://disquietreservations.blogspot.ca/2012/02/global-death-cult-started-world-war-iii.html) came to life as a result of the false flag 9/11 events, which had the propaganda effect of pitting the Western world and Israel against the Islamic world.

Over the last several years, Bilderberg has come under increasing scrutiny from the global alternative press. Its plots and schemes, whether it concerns U.S. domestic politics, the global economic crisis, or the wars in the Middle East, have been discovered and exposed by a new generation of media activists and reporters.

In the field of Bilderberg coverage American journalist Jim Tucker (http://www.infowars.com/jim-tucker-bilderberg-global-mafia/) still casts a long shadow, having consistently reported on Bilderberg conferences for over three and a half decades. His persistence and determination has inspired thousands on the ground, and infuriated thousands in the sky.

The Bilderberg sky gods are especially filled with rage this year because of all the buzz that dedicated protesters and activists have created. Their minions in the state security services have erected a fortress around the Westfields Marriott Washington Dulles hotel, where Bilderbergers are set to meet to discuss sensitive global issues, and make world policy decisions that will have repercussions for the entire world.

“Given the fact that a record number of demonstrators are expected to attend,” writes (http://www.infowars.com/bilderberg-launches-unprecedented-security-crackdown/) Paul Joseph Watson, “Bilderberg has been more stringent than ever before in its efforts to get people out of the way.” They’ve engaged in threats, spread false rumours (http://www.infowars.com/source-bilderberg-planning-fake-bomb-threat/) to demonize protesters, and intensified security measures to intimidate journalists into vacating the premises.

All the security and secrecy is meant to cover up the fact that they’re deciding the political fate of the world without consulting the people of the world.

The Bilderberg oligarchy’s biggest long-term political project is the European Union, which is facing a severe legitimacy crisis in the wake of the global economic meltdown. The EU is a grandiose experiment but it is destined to fail and collapse under the current immoral, incompetent, and corrupt leadership.

Europeans don’t want to be enslaved and robbed by a parasitic and transnational financial class anymore. Iceland has provided the best example thus far of an economic recovery without the banksters (http://youtu.be/TP1J3HXOZIc).

The lesson from Iceland is simple: nations prosper without the international private banking cartel, and die with it. America has been controlled by this heartless and satanic cartel for a century, and its currency and reputation has been destroyed as a result.

One of the biggest global political goals of the Bilderbergers is the destruction of America and all nation states, and the creation of a global security state. The NATO summit in Chicago gave us a glimpse into the dark heart of the emerging global security state. But the real heart of this invisible and secretive state is the Bilderberg conference.

Without popular legitimacy and political accountability at the highest levels, however, a universal security state will crash and burn.

Washington is the military enforcer of the Bilderberg’s global political and economic policies. The tragic irony is that America is one of the biggest losers of the policy of corporate globalism. The undermining of American sovereignty by numerous White House administrations at the behest of the internationalist Bilderberg oligarchy has created a weaker and poorer America.

President Obama is the latest American presidential puppet to follow the secret policy of destroying America from within. Mitt Romney will continue on this treasonous course if he wins the election in November.

The political power that will guide the destiny of America in January 2013 will not be Mr. Obamney, but the Bilderberg oligarchy, as it has done for decades now. That is why elevating the secretive Bilderberg conference into public consciousness is so important.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-meaning-of-occupy-bilderberg-the-elevation-of-the-shadow-into-public-consciousness.html)]
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Geolibertarian on June 25, 2012, 02:41:31 am
(http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/538539_10151191192503082_1622482150_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: DireWolf on July 11, 2012, 12:02:21 pm
The enemy is anyone, club, association, cartel, or group who wishes to suppress our God given Rights for their own gain. The other enemy is apathy.
Title: Watch the Money Flow; and You Will Find the Enemy
Post by: newworldorderblog on October 17, 2012, 12:22:58 pm
I found this link amazing in terms of who the enemy really is:

http://www.newworldorderdia.wordpress.com

http://newworldorderdia.wordpress.com/2012/09/28/is-war-with-iran-imminet/
Title: Emergent News For Ohio
Post by: CHGWYN1626 on October 24, 2012, 10:41:24 am
 :o

Today in Cincinnati Ohio at Lunken Airport they are conducting drills with local Firefighters and the SWAT team for disaster drill training using real smoke and dissaray.  Expected to last until 12pm.

Chris
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: nice on October 25, 2012, 09:17:24 pm
Hey guys!
I was watching the movie pirates of the carribean|(end of the world) and right in the begining they are talking abt Us economy collapse and its consequence and martial laws....Are they giving us a hint?

same in death race by Jason stoham they are talking abt us economy... in the end...

Its coming......
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: monkeyjohn on January 05, 2013, 11:27:52 am
Did you write this? If so it's brilliant. I have sent it to all my contacts and I am hoping I can wake some up. But I'm not holding my breath. Great text and vid. Thanks
 



You want to know who we're fighting?
Who the real enemies are?
Watch this video; lecture by Dr. John Coleman, and understand who we're up against:

(http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/tt201/Pilikia_photos/9-3-20117-34-02AM.jpg) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XV77hzXgd3U&feature=related)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XV77hzXgd3U&feature=related

These people operate on a global perspective.
They ARE the "one world government".

THEY are destroying the middle class.
The de-industrialization of western countries is happening because THEY are executing their plans. We are watching them rip countries to shreds, kill millions of people, take absolute control of resources, and give us media propaganda to engage our anger and direct it to the "enemies" they manufacture.

THEY are the people behind the manufactured "enemies" - they instigate infighting; so we focus our anger on each other: we hate the muslims, we hate the jews, we hate the christians, we hate the democrats, we hate the republicans.... we hate each other.

They remain safe and protected from scrutiny because they have created a system to shield them from view. We see the David Rockefellers, the Ben Bernankes, the Barack Obamas; we see only their minions. Puppets, all.

But to see behind those puppets; to view the real controllers is to violate their carefully constructed shield of invisibility. For this you will be called 'paranoid'. This is a psyop: you are being marginalized with stigmatizing labels because you are a threat. We are so conditioned to herd mentality; we are fearful of being labeled and ostracized. To accept that, and remain silent in the face of this threat is to surrender to their control.

These are the real enemies: the people controlling the puppets in government, industries including pharma, agri-business, defense contractors, non-profit 'humanitarian' organizations, and the media propaganda machines that serve up our daily doses of conditioning to keep us in the dark. To keep us fighting amongst ourselves.

Info: The Club of Rome (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_clubrome.htm)
Info: The Committee of 300 (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_committee300.htm)
Info: The Bilderberg Group (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_bilderberg.htm)

The next time you think to perpetuate the false enemy agenda; to post something that fear-mongers about any group of people, think about these 'clubs'. They've planted the seeds to grow hatred, and you are providing fertilizer every time you spread the hate.

Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: jofortruth on January 05, 2013, 01:32:18 pm
Quote
Info: The Club of Rome
Info: The Committee of 300
Info: The Bilderberg Group

Find more on the Elite thugs here:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showforum=12
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: patrickbuchanan121 on January 13, 2013, 09:55:37 pm
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/we-people-petition-congress-abolish-executive-order-and-powers-thereof/dVD1r1WV
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Joe Public on January 17, 2013, 06:39:03 am
There is a new movie coming out in March 2013 about cloning Jesus called "The Power of Few", starring Christian Slater and Christopher Walken. 
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: steadysniper on January 20, 2013, 03:38:31 pm
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/allow-supporters-alex-jone-form-there-own-republic-its-own-laws/80xlHWCF
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Tlion714 on April 27, 2013, 04:23:52 am
Good video! Down with the NWO!

000110
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Anonymous Philanthropy on May 07, 2013, 08:06:01 am
Quote from: Satyagraha
Who is the enemy?

The question is, how far up the chain can people here see? The global elite got there because Europe spent a thousand years in the dark. They're an opportunistic infection that took root when Europe's culture and history were destroyed. And it's still in a bad way.

The global elite aren't the under-riding problem. Get rid of them and countless more will come in their place. And since you sacrificed and exhausted yourself doing it, they're going to finish you off like an animal who took the bait. If you want a solution, rebuild the noble culture that was once yours. Look further back in time and find that which made you what you are now. The history they don't want you to know.

The global elite and their many NWO attempts (there's no single NWO) only have as much power as a baboon - the ability to bluff, intimidate and scare off any animal of any size, yet has no power itself. Tell me, what power does a baboon have over those who know it's bluffing? Regain the confidence and integrity your forgotten ancestors once had, and share it with those who do their bidding. The global elite only have as much power as those they work through. Don't attack, inspire and recruit.

The real enemy is your fear of a little baboon. A baboon that has you all rounded up and herded into bandwagons like sheep.
Title: Bilderberg Agenda: Domestic Spying, Diffusing Social Protests, War on Syria/Iran
Post by: Geolibertarian on May 18, 2013, 09:15:21 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/bilderberg-2013-agenda-domestic-spying-diffusing-social-protests-war-on-syria-and-iran.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/bilderberg-2013-agenda-domestic-spying-diffusing-social-protests-war-on-syria-and-iran.html)

Bilderberg 2013 Agenda: Domestic Spying, Diffusing Social Protests, War on Syria and Iran

Stephen Lendman
Prison Planet.com
May 17, 2013

Its four-day meeting occurs annually. It’s a rite of spring. British political economist Will Hutton calls the group the “high priests of globalization.”

Powerful movers and shakers have their own agenda.They discuss key issues.

They do it year round. Once annually they meet face-to-face. They plot strategy to exploit the world’s riches. They want them for themselves.

They try to keep meeting dates, locations, and issues to be discussed secret.
Word gets out. It’s official. Britain’s five-star Grove Hotel is this year’s venue. It’s a Hertfordshire, England hotel resort. It calls itself “London’s cosmopolitan country estate.”

It’s 18 miles from London. It’s 30 minutes from Heathrow Airport. It’s ideal for secluded meetings. Great pains are taken to keep journalists, activists, and other uninvited guests away.

On May 13, Infowars (http://www.infowars.com/google-berg-global-elite-transforms-itself-for-technocratic-revolution/) reporters Paul Joseph Watson and Jon Scobie visited the Grove Hotel. They claim to have “groundbraking” information.

Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt is a regular Bilderberg attendee. Watson and Scobie said his company is “merging” with Bilderberg.

“Google’s annual Zeitgeist conference, which has been based at the Grove since 2007, immediately precedes the Bilderberg Group conference by a matter of days.”


Bilderberg’s “being recast as ‘Google-Berg’ – partly because of efforts on behalf of activists to tear away the veil of Bilderberg’s much cherished secrecy, and partly as a means of re-branding authoritarian, undemocratic secret gatherings of elites as trendy, liberal, feel-good philanthropic-style forums like Google Zeitgeist and TED.”

In May 2012, London’s Telegraph (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/eric-schmidt/9285690/Google-invites-the-best-and-brightest-into-its-Big-Tent.html) headlined “Google invites the best and brightest into its Big Tent.”

It’s Google’s annual Zeitgeist conference. The Telegraph compared it to annual Davos World Economic Forum meetings. Major global figures participate in both.

Eric Schmidt thinks “privacy is a relic of the past,” said Infowars. He “plans to turn Google into the ultimate Big Brother.”

He and Bilderberg members share a common agenda. In part, it reflects a “collectivist, permanently networked world (without) individuality and privacy.”

Bilderberg’s grand design is one-world government comprised of rulers and serfs. It wants total unchallenged global control.

Infowars said its “inside source” listed the following June issues for discussion:

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/bilderberg-2013-agenda-domestic-spying-diffusing-social-protests-war-on-syria-and-iran.html)]
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: kimmypoo808 on May 19, 2013, 09:02:16 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7_-LDjlQJk
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: No2NWO on May 19, 2013, 09:21:53 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7_-LDjlQJk

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=245827.0
Title: Exposing the Financial Core of the Transnational Capitalist Class
Post by: Geolibertarian on September 13, 2013, 10:23:57 am
"...the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences."

-- Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope (http://www.wanttoknow.info/articles/tragedy_hope_banking_money_history), p. 324

http://www.globalresearch.ca/exposing-the-financial-core-of-the-transnational-capitalist-class/5349617 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/exposing-the-financial-core-of-the-transnational-capitalist-class/5349617)

Exposing the Financial Core of the Transnational Capitalist Class

By Peter Phillips and Brady Osborne
Global Research, September 13, 2013
Project Censored

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/118541.jpg)

Introduction

In this study, we decided to identify in detail the people on the boards of directors of the top ten asset management firms and the top ten most centralized corporations in the world. Because of overlaps, there is a total of thirteen firms, which collectively have 161 directors on their boards. We think that this group of 161 individuals represents the financial core of the world’s transnational capitalist class. They collectively manage $23.91 trillion in funds and operate in nearly every country in the world. They are the center of the financial capital that powers the global economic system. Western governments and international policy bodies work in the interests of this financial core to protect the free flow of capital investment anywhere in the world.

A Brief History of Research on the American Power Elite

A long tradition of sociological research documents the existence of a dominant ruling class in the United States, whose members set policy and determine national political priorities. The American ruling class is complex and competitive, and perpetuates itself through interacting families of high social standing with similar lifestyles, corporate affiliations, and memberships in elite social clubs and private schools.[1]

The American ruling class has long been determined to be mostly self-perpetuating,[2] maintaining its influence through policy-making institutions such as the National Association of Manufacturers, the US Chamber of Commerce, the Business Council, Business Roundtable, the Conference Board, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Council on Foreign Relations, and other business-centered policy groups.[3] These associations have long dominated policy decisions within the US government.

In his 1956 book, The Power Elite, C. Wright Mills documented how World War II solidified a trinity of power in the US that comprised corporate, military, and government elites in a centralized power structure motivated by class interests and working in unison through “higher circles” of contact and agreement. Mills described how the power elite were those “who decide whatever is decided” of major consequence.[4] These higher-circle decision makers tended to be more concerned with interorganizational relationships and the functioning of the economy as a whole, rather than with advancing their particular corporate interests.[5]

The higher-circle policy elites (HCPE) are a segment of the American upper class and are the principal decision makers in society. Although these elites display some sense of “we-ness,” they also tend to have continuing disagreements on specific policies and necessary actions in various sociopolitical circumstances.[6] These disagreements can block aggressive reactionary responses to social movements and civil unrest, as in the case of the labor movement in the 1930s and the civil rights movement in the 1960s. During these two periods, the more liberal elements of HCPE tended to dominate the decision-making process and supported passing the National Labor Relations and Social Security Acts in 1935, as well as the Civil Rights and Economic Opportunities Acts in 1964. These pieces of national legislation were seen as concessions to the ongoing social movements and civil unrest, and were implemented instead of instituting more repressive policies.

However, during periods of threats from external enemies, as in World Wars I and II, more conservative/reactionary elements of the HCPE successfully pushed their agendas. During and after World War I, the United States instituted repressive responses to social movements, for example through the Palmer Raids and passage of the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. After World War II, the HCPE allowed and encouraged the McCarthy-era attacks on liberals and radicals and, in 1947, passage of the National Security Act and the anti-labor Taft-Hartley Act. In the past twenty-five years, and especially since the events of 9/11, the HCPE in the US has been united in support of an American empire of military power that maintains a repressive war against resisting groups—typically dubbed “terrorists”—around the world. This war on terror is much more about protecting transnational globalization, the free flow of financial capital, dollar hegemony, and access to oil, than it is repressing terrorism. Increasingly, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is a partner with US global dominance interests.[7]

The Transnational Capitalist Class

Capitalist power elites exist around the world. The globalization of trade and capital brings the world’s elites into increasingly interconnected relationships—to the point that sociologists have begun to theorize the development of a transnational capitalist class (TCC). In one of the pathbreaking works in this field, The Transnational Capitalist Class (2000), Leslie Sklair argued that globalization elevated transnational corporations (TNC) to more influential international roles, with the result that nation-states became less significant than international agreements developed through the World Trade Organization (WTO) and other international institutions.[8] Emerging from these multinational corporations was a transnational capitalist class, whose loyalties and interests, while still rooted in their corporations, was increasingly international in scope. Sklair wrote:

[Continued... (http://www.globalresearch.ca/exposing-the-financial-core-of-the-transnational-capitalist-class/5349617)]
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Honor18 on September 13, 2013, 11:37:31 am
Great article ! Nice post !
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Conflagration2100 on September 19, 2013, 01:07:27 pm
Since I no longer just simply accept ANY information without checking into it further,
This article may be be of interest since both John Coleman and Eustace Mullins articles are referenced in this thread.

Actually it was overwhelmingly apparent, and outright obvious the export of Americans jobs back in the mid 1970's, even in the small town I grew up in as factory and Mill, one after one closed to be shipped overseas, so any information of a "Prediction ?" happening in the late 1980's and early 1990's, is simply talking about what has "already happened" and "was currently happening" as if it's going to happen any time now.   

http://www.whale.to/c/check.html (http://www.whale.to/c/check.html)

Eustace Mullins Exposed Dr. John Coleman In 1992

According to the late, great Eustace Mullins, Dr. John Coleman (the name he goes by, anyway) not only lifted the materials he used in his books and lectures from both Mullins and Lyndon Larouche publications, but he also may have lifted material from the Anti-Defamation League…while working as a Mossad agent-agitator against America!

Check out below what Mullins had to say about Coleman back in 1992, and see if what Mullins said holds any water. Given that it’s from Mullins, I’d say it holds a glass that is over half-full.

Some Illuminating Background On The Character “John Coleman”, Agent-Agitator Finally Exposed

(Editor’s note: Regular readers will recall that much space in the 9/8/92 LIBERATOR was devoted to explaining an insipid array of attacks from one “Dr. John Coleman” aka John Clarke and likely actually one Joseph Pavlonsky, of Russian Khazarian origin. It seems that some of the excellent sources “Coleman” “borrowed” material from have seen fit to discuss this colorful character and in so doing, provide an illuminating — if sadly destructive — pattern of activity we would share with our readers. The following is an extract from an article purportedly by Eustace Mullins in Lawrence Patterson’s publication Criminal Politics for July or August of 1992.)

A specter is haunting the American conservative movement — a specter using an alias (among others) of Dr. John Coleman. Coleman bills himself as “the World’s Greatest Intelligence Expert — with secret but highly placed ties to British Intelligence.” He appeared out of the blue at a Bob White, Sound Monetary Conference meeting in Costa Rica in 1984.

With no sponsorship — other than the seminar sponsor, a Dr. Harold Brown — and no documentation, Coleman managed to convince the attendees that he was indeed one of the world’s important experts on international intelligence. He claimed to be privy to the most carefully guarded secrets of the individuals who clandestinely rule the world.

However, Coleman said he would share these secrets only if certain carefully observed guidelines were maintained. The most important of these was that he would never be asked to furnish any personal background information — any documentation or any source from which he obtained his “secret information.” Such restrictions would scream “confidence artist” to most people. But when he met James K. Warner (editor of the Christian Defense League newspaper) — in 1984, he justified his refusal to reveal background information on himself or his sources by claiming that “he was subject to assassination threats.”

He snared Jim Warner by confiding in him one of his closely guarded secrets — that his name was not Dr. John Coleman at all, but that it was, in fact, John Clark. Coleman stated that by giving Warner this private information, he was actually placing his life in his hands. As he was an accomplished confidence artist, Coleman convinced Warner that he should offer him a position. Warner responded to him by employing him as a writer for the Christian Defense League Report.

Coleman would send in material which indeed contained startling information (but was totally undocumented, [and] would soon win him an enthusiastic following among Warner’s readers. Coleman also supplied a great many audio tapes which were offered to Warner’s readers. Each of course supplying “secret information.” This began a five year relationship which proved to be filled with pitfalls for Warner, who was after all a small underfinanced businessman.

Not only did Coleman continue to refuse [to provide] any documentation, but he made frequent demands for salary increases…extra expenses for himself and his family…and advances on his salary which exceeded the projected totals of several years salary. Warner was in no position to meet these demands, but in his anxiety to retain Coleman, he dug deep into his own pocket and also issued frantic fund raising appeals for Coleman. The result was that Warner was nearly bankrupted and conservatives nearly lost an excellent source of out of print books and independent information.

It should be noted that it is a common technique for an infiltrator to attempt a financial raid on a host target — thereby rendering the host target unable to continue in business. An example of this would be the Rockefeller faction attempting to take over the National Rifle Association some 15 years ago with a grandiose plan which would have bankrupted the NRA…

Mullins Material Had To Be Discontinued… Or Else!

There were other problems which Coleman created for Warner. One of them was his continuous demands that Warner cease any articles or sell any books written by myself, Eustace Mullins. I had, in fact, been writing for Warner for more than a decade. Warner attributed this obsession to mere jealousy on Coleman’s part. In fact, it went much deeper.

Coleman’s vaunted sources of information were not secret at all, but were discovered by me in the process of reviewing his printed statements. Here are the results of my study: about 30% of his material was lifted from my own writings and about 70% was stolen from Lyndon Larouche publications. Principally, Coleman would rely on feature articles in the Executive Intelligence Review magazine. The material was simply rewritten by Coleman and crudely puffed up to five or six times its original length. Unfortunately, Warner never noticed.

Finally I became so concerned about the quantity of material lifted from the Larouche publications by Coleman that I decided to let Jim Warner know that his “new star” was lifting most of his “secrets” from Larouche publications.

Some months later, Warner received an indignant letter from the Larouche office, complaining about Coleman‘s plagiarism of the Larouche material. When Warner confronted Coleman, Warner was assured that it was simply an effort by the Larouche group to sow dissension. Coleman claimed he had only seen one copy of the Executive Intelligence Review in his life. Sometime later, when Coleman claimed to have left the country for South Africa, some of his effects were stored at the Warner warehouse. Among them, Warner found two boxes of well-thumbed issues of Larouche magazines. Sure enough, this proved to be the source of many of Coleman’s “British intelligence” connections. But Warner’s readers were trapped, and they were besieging him with requests that he bring Coleman into the public spotlight through meetings and seminars.

Coleman finally did appear at some meetings for a few months. But then, Warner was hit with still more demands for more loans and salary advances. He tried to find other employment for him, sending him off to a part-time job with a long time supporter,William Makinney, of Florida. Bill Makinney was lured by the promise that Coleman could make some extremely profitable deals for him. Later he was disappointed when Coleman arrived with his wife and son, and Coleman demanded the use of a Lincoln town car and memberships in the most exclusive Palm Beach Clubs and nightly meals in the most expensive restaurants.

Even worse he spent much of his time closeted in a room at Makinney’s home. He claimed to be making long distance phone calls to the head of the South African gov’t. Makinney was later unable to find records of any such phone calls in his billing. Soon Makinney asked him to leave and put him on a plane the sadder but wiser.

Warner was again assailed by constant demands for more money. Warner finally decided that the only way to meet the demands was to hold public meetings with Coleman as the star. Coleman, who had billed himself as the “World’s Greatest Orator” proved to be a lack luster speaker, who read in a dull monotone from his type written speech, The meetings were a failure. Meanwhile, Warner had purchased a car for Coleman’s use and a computer for Coleman’s use at a large home which Warner rented for him. Coleman rarely appeared at the Warner offices citing his fear of assassination.

What’s more, Warner discovered at the meetings, Coleman attempted to make financial deals for himself, showing no loyally to Warner whatsoever. Finally, Warner informed him that he was fired. Warner was required to obtain a warrant to cease the automobile and computer that were loaned to him. Then he realized that Coleman had obtained an illicit copy of his mailing list. Coleman began issuing appeals to Warner’s subscribers claiming that I had had him discharged in order to become an editor of another Warner publication.

Finally, Coleman showed in California where he was guest of one Dr. Arnold Geisbret, of Glendale, CA. Geisbret has an interesting background. He is an attendee at many rightwing meetings, including those of Lawrance Patterson’s National Bankruptcy Seminars. He would take copious notes and interrogate everyone that would talk to him. Geisbret, obviously, intended to collect as much information on the right-wing as possible. Coleman, meanwhile, went from one address to the other in California using Warner’s mailing list as a source of suckers.

At each resident, he would spin a spiteful tale of having been cruelly used by Jim Warner who had taken all of his money. Meanwhile, Coleman would make threatening calls to Warner informing him that he would launch a national campaign against him if he refused to make a financial settlement. Wishing to avoid legal problems, Warner settled a substantial sum of money on Coleman, all to no avail. Coleman not only launched a campaign of denunciation against Warner using his mailing list of subscribers, but he also began a surreptitious mailing campaign using pseudonyms to accuse Warner of sexual offenses and of being a double agent. These defamatory letters were also mailed to Warner’s mailing list.

Great Success… In Spreading Discord!

Coleman was achieving great success in spreading consternation and discord throughout the conservative network. I began to realize his true motives. Rather than a greedy confidence artist — with an ability to rewrite other’s materials as his own — it became obvious to me and to those that knew him, that he was more than likely a highly trained double agent, whose handlers would unleash the “attack dog” on an unprepared patriot community a step at a time. One source I have spoken with claimed that he has been trained in Israel by a Mossad unit — and had been known there as Joseph Pavlonsky.

We later discovered that he entered the United States on an English passport recorded by the INS as #A20211168 issued to “John Clarke.” Interestingly, when Warner accompanied him to get a driver’s license in Louisiana, he claimed he had applied for a social security number although none was forthcoming. Even though he had been in the United States for almost a decade, he had been driving in the Western states on a Louisiana license, and had never obtained a U.S. green card or work permit.

On To Carson City, Nevada…As “Space Commander”

Next comes Coleman’s employment with one George Green who operates a nonconformist publication titled Phoenix Journal Express which is supposedly representing the statements from a space being — (yes, we said space being) by the name of Gyorgos Ceres Hatonn!!

Hatonn is the claimed commander of a fleet of space ships from the galaxy of Pleiades. These spaceships have been deployed over the California border with Nevada for several years. This has proved to be convenient for all concerned because the people of Pleiades, interestingly enough, do not require a U.S. work permit from its employees. Coleman is now writing the material for Hatonn. Interestingly enough, he gives advice about International Banking, but amazingly, is always negative on Sterling denominated investments and, interestingly, Swiss banking as well.

Under the auspices of George Green’s Phoenix Journal Express, and America West publishers of Tehachapi, California, Coleman finally published his first and only book “The Committee of Three Hundred”. After examining this book, it has proven to be the usual amalgam of his borrowings from my various textbooks and, again, from the Larouche magazine.

The foreword to the book is very revealing. He again takes the opportunity to sow more dissension in the conservative movement. It is a vitriolic denunciation of the movement claiming it was “part of a carefully crafted and orchestrated program to discredit him (Coleman) and run by secret government agents and informers embedded in the so-called Christian right wing “identity movement”. The invective goes on at some length repeating the slanders of his previous circulated hate letters. The Committee of 300 contains nothing new and is an amalgam of others’ materials.

Material Lifted From the Anti-Defamation League!

Having reviewed the material of the anti-defamation league, I can say that Coleman’s smear attack in his foreword against the “so-called Christian right wing” is atypical material taken from the guide books of the anti-defamation league. His denunciation of the “identity movement” is also taken directly from ADL literature. For years the ADL has considered the “identity movement” its number one opponent and target in the United States.

A Potent Agitator… Working Against America!

Whatever the truth or falsity of the claims of Dr. John Coleman (alias John Clarke, alias Pavlonksy), it is clear that he is a potent agititor working among American conservative publishers. Lawrence Patterson has also had a brush with him and he has recently succeeded in taking in Colonel Arch Roberts, who ran a lengthy review of his book.

He has constantly sown seeds of discord and hate for his own devious purposes and will undoubtedly continue to pit patriot against patriot for as long as he is allowed to betray, impede and infiltrate without exposure. Hopefully, this article which has been submitted to Criminal Politics magazine of which I am a contributing editor, will help to expose John Coleman as a foreign agent.

http://thewhaler.wordpress.com/2010/06/02/eustace-mullins-exposed-dr-john-coleman-in-1992/

sourced http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mind_II/index.php?s=6ff89b072622697d415f004bbdb0a519&showtopic=4507&st=0
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Geniocrat on September 19, 2013, 03:56:12 pm
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it."

Ignorance is no excuse.

Exactly, they start marching people into FEMA Camps I'll only try to rescue the children along with other true patriots and I won't feel guilty that some arm-chair voter gets FEMA-tized by the very Globalist government he or she helped elect.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: pac522 on September 19, 2013, 06:34:17 pm
Keep the posts coming.

Yell Fire! : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnTUs0SF_Is

Testify: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JSBhI_0at0

Core of Corruption: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9O3mc-Sm6vo

Know your enemy!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LvwzanCLCo
Title: Bilderberg Attendee List Takes Shape
Post by: Geolibertarian on May 27, 2014, 02:13:21 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/bilderberg-attendee-list-takes-shape.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/bilderberg-attendee-list-takes-shape.html)

Bilderberg Attendee List Takes Shape

Update: Click here (http://www.infowars.com/official-bilderberg-2014-membership-list-released/) for the Full attendee list

Hungarian politicians who allegedly conspired to undermine elections will attend


Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
May 27, 2014

A media blackout on the weekend’s elite Bilderberg Group meeting in Copenhagen Denmark is in full force. Not one single major news article has been published about the meeting despite the fact that 140 political, financial and business leaders from from 22 countries around the world will gather in one hotel for four days.

The only glimmers of information, aside from the few sources on the ground, come in the from a smattering of foreign media pieces.

(http://hw.infowars.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/270514tile9.jpg)

A Danish Reuters (http://www.information.dk/telegram/499021) piece notes that among the attendees will be NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen and Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt. Both are regular Bilderberg attendees, with Bildt also a full time member of the RAND Corporation and the Trilateral Commission.

The piece lists several Danish representatives, president of pharmaceutical company Lundbeck, Jørgen Huno Rasmussen, Carlsberg’s CEO, Flemming Besenbacher, and the president of petrochemical giant Haldor Topsoe A / S, Henrik Topsøe, will all reportedly be in attendance. The piece claims, however, that no Danish politicians are currently believed to have been invited.

Topics up for discussion are said to include China and the global economy. The article notes that police have been communicating with protesters and are prepared for the meeting.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/bilderberg-attendee-list-takes-shape.html)]
Title: Bilderberg at 60: inside the world’s most secretive conference
Post by: Geolibertarian on May 29, 2014, 03:02:51 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/bilderberg-at-60-inside-the-worlds-most-secretive-conference.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/bilderberg-at-60-inside-the-worlds-most-secretive-conference.html)

Bilderberg at 60: inside the world’s most secretive conference

Charlie Skelton
London Guardian (http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/29/bilderberg-60-inside-worlds-most-secretive-conference)
May 29, 2014

It’s been a week of celebrations for Henry Kissinger. On Tuesday he turned 91, on Wednesday he broke his personal best in the 400m hurdles, and on Thursday in Copenhagen, he’ll be clinking champagne flutes with the secretary general of Nato and the queen of Spain, as they celebrate 60 glorious years of Bilderberg. I just hope George Osborne remembered to pack a party hat.

Thursday is the opening day of the influential three-day summit and it’s also the 60th anniversary of the Bilderberg Group’s first meeting, which took place in Holland on 29 May 1954. So this year’s event is a red-letter occasion, and the official participant list (http://bilderbergmeetings.org/participants.html) shows that the 2014 conference is a peculiarly high-powered affair.

The chancellor, at his seventh Bilderberg, is spending the next three days deep in conference with the heads of MI6, Nato, the International Monetary Fund, HSBC, Shell, BP and Goldman Sachs International, along with dozens of other chief executives, billionaires and high-ranking politicians from around Europe. This year also includes a visit from the supreme allied commander Europe, and a return of royalty – Queen Sofia of Spain and Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands, the daughter of the Bilderberg founder Prince Bernhard.

Back in the 1950s, when Bernhard sent out the invitations, it was to discuss “a number of problems facing western civilization”. These days, the Bilderberg Group prefers to call them “megatrends”. The megatrends on this year’s agenda (http://bilderbergmeetings.org/press-release.html) include: “What next for Europe?”, “Ukraine”, “Intelligence sharing” and “Does privacy exist?”

Full article here (http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/29/bilderberg-60-inside-worlds-most-secretive-conference)
Title: Leaked Secret Agenda From Bilderberg 2014 Revealed
Post by: Geolibertarian on May 30, 2014, 07:57:29 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/leaked-secret-agenda-from-bilderberg-2014-revealed.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/leaked-secret-agenda-from-bilderberg-2014-revealed.html)

Leaked Secret Agenda From Bilderberg 2014 Revealed

Kit Daniels
Prison Planet.com
May 30, 2014

Bilderberg, the annual gathering of the world’s most powerful politicians and business magnates, is clearly shaping global policies by positioning its favored politicians as world leaders, determining the timetables of military conflicts and influencing economic policies of nearly every nation on the planet, impacting the lives of billions around the globe.

Daniel Estulin, an author and expert on the Bilderberg Group, has learned from his internal sources several items on Bilderberg’s agenda for this year’s conference in Copenhagen, Denmark which began yesterday:

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/leaked-secret-agenda-from-bilderberg-2014-revealed.html)]
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Al Bundy on October 07, 2014, 11:36:36 am
Serbs are not enemy of Americans ?
Those five citizens of Serbia who went to ISIS are not Serbs. During the War in Bosnia they are called Bosnian Muslims. They went to ISIS because they hate Serbs and Christians and everything they stands for.

http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/serbia-files-charges-against-alleged-isis-funders-and-recruitershttp://
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Owais on October 21, 2014, 01:29:43 am
Look like amazing movie we should see.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: ialsop on November 15, 2014, 10:01:42 am
Excellent history of the 13 satanic bloodlines.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/bloodlines/
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: BluePhoenix729 on February 01, 2015, 03:51:01 am
Props, great video! Takes me back to the time when I first discoverd something was wrong, which was because of the illuminati cards.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: wyzandrea on June 03, 2015, 02:10:28 am
The person you don't like! ;D
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Al Bundy on June 03, 2015, 03:37:05 am
Serbs are not enemy of Americans ?
Those five citizens of Serbia who went to ISIS are not Serbs. During the War in Bosnia they are called Bosnian Muslims. They went to ISIS because they hate Serbs and Christians and everything they stands for.

http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/serbia-files-charges-against-alleged-isis-funders-and-recruitershttp://

Bad news: Vahabies from Bosnia,Montenegro,Herzegovina...come back to fight for ISIS in Iraq and Syria.
Believe me they are not Serbs ( Serbs are in Ukraine and fights for rebels and Croats for Kiev hunta ).
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Al Bundy on June 05, 2015, 08:24:39 am
Iran sends 15000 soldiers to help Assad`s Syria against ISIS  :o

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2015/Jun-04/300520-iran-sends-15000-fighters-to-syria.ashxhttp://

P.S. For "Daily Star" Islamic Republic of Iran have no soldiers. Iran have "fighters".
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: EvadingGrid on June 05, 2015, 08:31:22 am

P.S. For "Daily Star" Islamic Republic of Iran have no soldiers. Iran have "fighters".

Yes, its a propaganda tactic.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: chris jones on June 11, 2015, 09:40:12 pm
Buisness men and their elite overlords..
Cynical reasoning: Either way they stay on top, perpetual war, domestic deterioration in every sense of the word, contitutional eradication,. It's a no win foir the peons globably. The illusion of bringing so called democracy to the ME was a clustermuck, its a no win.
 To counter their so called AlQ they initiated ISIS and high profiled-haneiuos acts, continuation of deceptive propaganda at any price, innocent human life being at the forefront.
  FF's are an ancent form of moving the meat around, thats US.
I probably won't be around for the the final abomination, but the younger generation will, in fct you folks may not miss out out on their end game. Either way I pray the common man steps though the fog of deception and realizes our global wonders, including our regime among others globaly and insiders recognize, and find the truth, courage and honor to in every sector of civilians and  G. employees to band togeter and give our coming generations  the ability to rise up.
 Our congress is terrified of oit this crew on high  and their influnce over the heart , minds aND VERY SURVIVAL OF  of the young ones USA, an for that matter globlay.
  Lets face it, these nations we invaded are not fond of America,Honor in some in point in time was a RIGHTIOUS ACT,  a true example to be followed, Where is it now.
  Its business benny, not politics, not for us it will be suffering, chaso,and mayham.
   
 
 
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: decemberfellow on June 11, 2015, 10:18:43 pm
Quote
Ephesians 6:12         For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.


THE TRUE ENEMY
Title: America, The Time Has Come!
Post by: jerryweaver on June 11, 2015, 11:02:40 pm
America, The Time Has Come!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9N_2MWUAlg
Title: The Ides of Something are Upon us
Post by: jerryweaver on June 12, 2015, 12:45:18 am

The Ides of Something are Upon us

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ibl4xAF5cB4
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: EvadingGrid on June 12, 2015, 03:38:21 am
Mystery Babylon
http://www.ukginger.net/billcooper.html
Title: Re: America, The Time Has Come!
Post by: jerryweaver on June 12, 2015, 09:27:54 am
Zionism is Doomed ~ Ken O’Keefe, August 30th 2014

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgFbvQzCaMk
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: chris jones on June 18, 2015, 10:15:13 pm
Zionism. Just my take is a percent of the big picture, it's my understanding the Jewish faithfull are not Zionists in the majority, so no longs story.
  Those % who are truly in controll use this segment to further their agenda.
The enemy, we all know* its established shadow power who have infiltrated the Govs / UN/NATO & every 3 A-Z agency, to mention global manipulation is old hat.
  Congress dances for them while the MSM choir sings their songs. Mr. Obama was groomed, mentored, protected, a highly specialized Muppet playing a given role.
   DIRT, they have got it all on the pols, we know it, hell hey have dirt on every cit, but especially so for those in positions of power no matter how insignificant they may appear. Clean hand pols are terrified of this crew, or simply doing business or tit for tats to survive the elites wrath.
           Aftera all politicing is big business accompanied by the elites and their                 superpowers.$$powers, Teflon suits, just as long as they don't drop a dime.
  We are not well liked, peons that is, stumblebums know nothings, easy money for the powers.
  BUT- Not all of us.  Hows it feel to be a nothing but a mucken number?
Don't be suprised if their are more insiders on our team,does  any one think think they are going to publicize their intent , make public the truth , they wait,* we are their catylist. When cits grab on the game they are screwed.   They will when their lifelfestyle is up the creek, when their bubble breaks.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: zoodie53186 on August 03, 2015, 05:14:35 pm
I would post this information in a main board but I'm not sure how to do that, so if you guys could spread this info far and wide that would be much appreciated. The secrets of the illuminati are all in the book "The DaVinci Code". Look at all the disney movies, they all speak of a princess. The princess is Mary Magdalene. She is here in this time right now and she needs her diaries that are hidden beneath the glass pyramid in the Louvre in Paris. I would tell you who she is but her identity must be hidden for now. Jesus, Mary, and Sarah are all in this time period right now. I will tell you their first names, they are Shane, Michelle, and Christine. They went to high school together in Massachusetts. Throughout high school they had what they thought were just dreams in different time periods but never got together because of some unfortunate circumstances. In the book it says her story is everwhere, it's in tv shows , like "I Dream of Jeannie" and "Bewitched" and it's in movies like all the disney movies "Lion King" "Cinderella" "Snow White" "Aladdin" and it's in superhero movies like "Batman" and "Superman" it's in songs in bands like "Metallica" and "Black Sabbath"... The devil is the one who is going to take over as god in the new world order. It's what Hitler was trying to warn everyone about back in WWII. Why would everyone in the illuminati and freemasons be devil-worshippers? Because he promises that everyone will be god-like and have the same genius, magical powers, eternal life youth and beauty, pleasures and riches that the gods enjoy. Sounds good right? But God is going to have to die for it. He will go to hell. And I will tell you that Shane and Michelle feel the same about the new world order, they want everyone to be god-like too, so God does not have to die for it. God will go to hell forever if Mary Magdalene (Michelle) doesn't get her diaries. Again, beneath the floor in the Louvre, use a jackhammer to get them. She needs help really bad. Be good infowarriors and get this info out to whoever you can. Mary Magdalene used to be the knight Galahad which is why there is a G in the middle of the compass and square in the freemason symbol. They call Mary Magdalene the tower which is why the twin towers were attacked. The devil will lock Mary and Sarah away forever and all God's angels that weren't fallen angels will go to hell forever too. So it's important that no one is hurt. Mary and Sarah are also manchurian candidates in which they have split personalities, Lilith and Charlotte. The giant owl statue is of Lilith and when they say that Mary is possessed by 7 demons they just mean 7 means perfect, the perfect demon, Lilith. This is why it's called project monarch, because Mary is the monarch. Lilith has all the same genius and memories of Mary but split off into another soul, into someone else that works for the devil. The devil is going to marry Charlotte. Look, I would explain more but I'm running out of time. I will tell you the last name and the exact location next June 2016. The world is going to end in 2027 (27 is backwards of the 72 names of God in Kabbalah). The truth is out there all around in the media everywhere you just have to see it. Bye for now. Read "The DaVinci Code".
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: decemberfellow on August 03, 2015, 05:48:24 pm
Where did you come up with this nonsense?
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: iamc2 on August 03, 2015, 06:13:57 pm
I would post this information in a main board but I'm not sure how to do that, so if you guys could spread this info far and wide that would be much appreciated. The secrets of the illuminati are all in the book "The DaVinci Code". Look at all the disney movies, they all speak of a princess. The princess is Mary Magdalene. She is here in this time right now and she needs her diaries that are hidden beneath the glass pyramid in the Louvre in Paris. I would tell you who she is but her identity must be hidden for now. Jesus, Mary, and Sarah are all in this time period right now. I will tell you their first names, they are Shane, Michelle, and Christine. They went to high school together in Massachusetts. Throughout high school they had what they thought were just dreams in different time periods but never got together because of some unfortunate circumstances. In the book it says her story is everwhere, it's in tv shows , like "I Dream of Jeannie" and "Bewitched" and it's in movies like all the disney movies "Lion King" "Cinderella" "Snow White" "Aladdin" and it's in superhero movies like "Batman" and "Superman" it's in songs in bands like "Metallica" and "Black Sabbath"... The devil is the one who is going to take over as god in the new world order. It's what Hitler was trying to warn everyone about back in WWII. Why would everyone in the illuminati and freemasons be devil-worshippers? Because he promises that everyone will be god-like and have the same genius, magical powers, eternal life youth and beauty, pleasures and riches that the gods enjoy. Sounds good right? But God is going to have to die for it. He will go to hell. And I will tell you that Shane and Michelle feel the same about the new world order, they want everyone to be god-like too, so God does not have to die for it. God will go to hell forever if Mary Magdalene (Michelle) doesn't get her diaries. Again, beneath the floor in the Louvre, use a jackhammer to get them. She needs help really bad. Be good infowarriors and get this info out to whoever you can. Mary Magdalene used to be the knight Galahad which is why there is a G in the middle of the compass and square in the freemason symbol. They call Mary Magdalene the tower which is why the twin towers were attacked. The devil will lock Mary and Sarah away forever and all God's angels that weren't fallen angels will go to hell forever too. So it's important that no one is hurt. Mary and Sarah are also manchurian candidates in which they have split personalities, Lilith and Charlotte. The giant owl statue is of Lilith and when they say that Mary is possessed by 7 demons they just mean 7 means perfect, the perfect demon, Lilith. This is why it's called project monarch, because Mary is the monarch. Lilith has all the same genius and memories of Mary but split off into another soul, into someone else that works for the devil. The devil is going to marry Charlotte. Look, I would explain more but I'm running out of time. I will tell you the last name and the exact location next June 2016. The world is going to end in 2027 (27 is backwards of the 72 names of God in Kabbalah). The truth is out there all around in the media everywhere you just have to see it. Bye for now. Read "The DaVinci Code".
zoodie53186

It is time for your own reality check...as ya have gone to far in the Twilight Zone---which is near to La-La-land!

$60.00 to make ya look DUMB---your Cash and you lost---by--by--oh-ye-little-one!
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: twinsphinx on August 08, 2015, 01:43:21 pm
Hi all, new here. The system is the enemy, we are slaves to an economic and political system that serves the wealthy. In the current system the true enemy is very elusive, but to change the system would be to strip them of power.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: iamc2 on August 08, 2015, 06:57:46 pm
Hi all, new here. The system is the enemy, we are slaves to an economic and political system that serves the wealthy. In the current system the true enemy is very elusive, but to change the system would be to strip them of power.
Welcome mate  8)...and your analysis is Spot On!

...in the end the little morons will be Striped of their power.. ;)
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Al Bundy on July 08, 2016, 05:09:37 pm
Tonight, waiting for the series, I looked at the "News from culture". The report was from international music festival "Exit" in Serbia.
I happened to notice an item on the punk group "Anti-Flag" from Pittsburgh.
Band member Pat Tetik told Serbian TV: Earlier we protested against everything and are now rebelling against the police officers who kill blacks. "
I expected him to say that rebels against the New World Order (globalism), police brutality in general, terrorism .... It is impossible that he had not heard of the 5 policemen killed in Dallas.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Al Bundy on January 26, 2017, 07:19:30 am
AFP: After 73 years German Army again in Lithuania  >:(

https://www.thelocal.de/20170125/german-troops-march-into-lithuania-amid-russia-fearshttp://
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: AlexanderStone on October 02, 2017, 01:42:40 pm
Most companies that use the tekhelet blue to claim the authority of the high priest.

Here is isis using that blue:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=296034750747558&set=a.296030347414665.1073741834.100010231056343&type=3&theater

Here are a huge number of 'american' 'entities' using that blue:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100010231056343&sk=photos&collection_token=100010231056343%3A2305272732%3A69&set=a.296030347414665.1073741834.100010231056343&type=3
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: AlexanderStone on October 02, 2017, 01:44:24 pm
'new world' order just means 'american order'; AO; Area of Operations, Alpha & Omega, etc.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: AlexanderStone on October 22, 2017, 11:17:39 am
Zuckerberg / burg 'sugar city' / 'sugar mount(ain)'

He looks exactly like David rockfeller's son, so I'm guessing hes a clone / twin (mangle-uh perfected 'twinning' apparently).

Dulce base 'Dulce' means 'sweet' as in 'Dulce de Leche'

They apparently refer to endorphin rich blood as being 'sweet'.

This is why the aztecs would cut out peoples hearts the way they did. The endorphins from a horrible death sweeten the blood to these 'people'.

This was also one of the aims of the monarch program.

This is one reason that hollywood tries to condition people about liking vampires.
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: One Revelator on October 22, 2017, 12:14:43 pm
Who or what indeed is the enemy? The video reveals the full impact of what happened in this case.

VIDEO: Cop Suffers A Panic Attack During Standoff As Paramedic Disarms Him

Mac Slavo
SHTFplan.com
October 20, 2017

A Sevier County Sheriff’s Office deputy opened fire without warning in a mobile home park. He then suffered an apparent panic attack and four minutes later was forcibly disarmed by a paramedic, body camera footage shows.

Deputy Justin Johnson and paramedic Blake Gregg were holding down an unarmed suspect, Tina Carrie Jo Cody, when the incident occurred. The video begins with Johnson asking Cody to walk toward him with her hands up. He already seems angry and slightly agitated.

Johnson was called to the mobile home park at 794 Sharp Road by the paramedics. A “morbidly obese female” had fallen inside one of the homes and was complaining about landlord Robin Sutton, Cody’s mother, and Cody, Johnson wrote in his report.

Once Cody is on the ground after a short chase,  an obviously adrenalized Johnson suddenly turned toward the trailer park and fired four shots. He paused and fired three more rounds, the video obtained by the USA TODAY NETWORK – Tennessee showed. Johnson then ran away from Cody and Gregg toward Sharp Road.

“Shots fired,” he told dispatchers. “We need help.” Four minutes later, Johnson was kneeling over Cody, who had remained on the ground during the shooting, with his gun still in his hand when the video showed he began hyperventilating and running backward away from the mobile homes and Cody.

Paramedic Michael O’Connor ran toward Johnson.

“Pull it together,” O’Connor told Johnson. “Look at me.”

The sheriff’s deputy begins to panic around the 5:25 mark in the video. Johnson continued to hyperventilate while pointing his gun toward Cody, Gregg and the mobile homes. He appears to be suffering from a breakdown. “Give me your gun,” O’Connor repeatedly said. A still hyperventilating Johnson continued to grip the gun. O’Connor eventually wrested it from his hand. “Let go of it,” O’Connor said. Johnson continued to hyperventilate.

The paramedic does succeed in disarming Johnson. About one minute and 30 seconds after Johnson began hyperventilating, his breathing slowed. “I’m OK,” he said. “I’m OK.”

O’Connor handed Johnson his gun back. He had hyperventilated so strongly one of his contact lenses had popped out of his eye, the video showed. He tossed it away as he trained his gun toward the mobile homes. The man he has been yelling at was Brian Keith Mullinax, the boyfriend of Tina Carrie Jo Cody. The couple spent 42 days in jail on felony charges, accused of causing what was described in court statements as a “panic attack” and which a detective called “some type of cardiac event.” They remain under prosecution on misdemeanor charges, court records show.

Unarmed, Mullinax was face down on the ground with his arms extended during the duration of Johnson’s panic attack. The video showed Mullinax obeyed Johnson when – after Johnson had fired seven shots and ran away – the deputy ordered him to the ground, and he never moved from that position during or after Johnson’s panic attack.

Mullinax is set to stand trial in Sevier County Criminal Court on a charge that he assaulted Johnson. A lower court judge already dropped felony charges against both Cody and Mullinax, and a grand jury refused to indict Cody for causing the panic attack. She remains charged with resisting arrest.

https://www.prisonplanet.com/video-cop-suffers-a-panic-attack-during-standoff-as-paramedic-disarms-him.html
Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Al Bundy on February 13, 2019, 09:39:44 am
NATO

https://www.ebony.com/news/kevin-hart-issues-another-apology-lgbt-community/(http://)

p.s. One more Banana Republic joins NATO. They even must change the name of state to be member of NATO.
Republic of Macedonia-> Republic of North Macedonia :o


Title: Re: Who is the enemy?
Post by: Al Bundy on February 16, 2019, 05:32:05 pm
German PM Merkel says the current world order is under threat   :)

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/24/germany-has-difficulties-and-polarization-that-we-havent-seen-for-decades-merkel-tells-davos.htmlhttp://