PrisonPlanet Forum

***THE MAIN BOARDS - Welcome to the Prison Planet Educational Forum and Library*** => EARTHQUAKE! ... NLE11 HAARP/STUXNET Earthquake/Nuke Attacks during NLE11 being used to create a 'Green Nazi' Patriot Act => General Discussion for the Prison Planet Educational Forum and Library => COREXIT: HG Wells 'Gas of Peace' owned by Nalco/Blackstone/Rothschild and used for depopulating the planet => Topic started by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on July 03, 2010, 11:04:26 pm

Title: COREXIT Contamination Maybe Great For Population Reduction.
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on July 03, 2010, 11:04:26 pm
Like seafood?  You may want to think twice before eating seafood caught not only in the gulf but seafood caught in the entire U.S. eastern seaboard.  Why?

BP's Oil hiding wonder chemical COREXIT is slowly working it's way up the eastern seaboard.  I find it interesting that BP had enough of this stuff made in advance for a oil blowout of this magnitude.  At any rate, I did a little research and I found that COREXIT increases uptake of crude-oil endocrine disruptors in fish, contradicting BP’s claim.  Why is this important?

Endocrine disruptors are chemicals that mimic the effect of our bodies’ natural hormones. Exposure to endocrine disruptors (EDs) has been shown to increase the risk of cancers of hormone-dependent tissues (including breast cancer), infertility and other reproductive problems, as well as developmental defects and low birth weight.  A nice little gift from the eugenicists that you can ADD to all the OTHER gifts these assholes have given us.

I would like to continue my research into this topic. I hope others will join me.
Here is the article where I got this info.

I'm sure there will be a war waged in the seafood industry between those exposing the toxicity in seafood via BP and those covering up claiming all is well and NO scientific evidence links the toxic seafood with bad health.  We all know the drill.  Besides Obama declared gulf seafood safe to eat.  So it must be safe? Right? ::)
Title: Re: COREXIT Contamination Maybe Great For Population Reduction.
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on July 05, 2010, 02:20:49 pm
Plants in Ohio already effected by gulf rain.

How will this effect food crops in the mid west and eastern US?

The UN not long ago said food prices will sore 40% by next year.
Title: Re: COREXIT Contamination Maybe Great For Population Reduction.
Post by: Dig on July 05, 2010, 03:31:33 pm
A marine biologist working with a group of environmentalists to save sea turtles claims the U.S. Coast Guard is involved in spraying a toxic chemical dispersant over the Gulf of Mexico; and he says it's already traveled inland.

"Do I think there's dispersants coming in and mixing with our everyday lives?" Dr. Chris Pincetich asked, speaking with a group of activists.

"Absolutely," he pronounced.

Pincetich, a marine biologist and toxicologist who works with the Sea Turtle Restoration Project, was speaking to a group of activists who call themselves Project Gulf Impact.

Video of the interview quickly made its way to the Internet, where it has sparked renewed concern about the kerosene-like oil dispersant substance Corexit, being sprayed over the Gulf of Mexico in the wake of the worst environmental accident in human history.
Story continues below...

BP, the oil company responsible for a broken deep-water well that has been gushing oil and gas unabated since April 22, has been dumping massive amounts of the chemical stock ever since the disaster began as a way of keeping the oil off the water's surface. Thinned by dispersant the oil mixes with the water column and forms underwater plumes that are less likely to wash ashore or be measured by satellite photography.

After initially approving Corexit, the U.S Environmental Protection Agency retracted it's allowance and ordered BP to stop dumping the mysterious chemical substance by Sunday, May 23. BP ignored the order, as it had purchased more than a third of the world's supply of Corexit and was in the process of mass producing more in Sugarland, Texas.

The EPA followed up on May 26 by ordering BP to reduce the volume of Corexit output by 75 percent. BP has not complied, according to CNN.

"Before May 26, BP used 25,689 gallons a day of the chemical dispersant Corexit," the network reported on July 2. "Since then, CNN's analysis shows, the daily average of dispersant use has dropped to 23,250 gallons a day, a 9 percent decline."

The EPA's Web site claims the agency and the Coast Guard are tightly monitoring BP's use of Corexit; it does not say that the Coast Guard is actively participating in the deployment thereof.

"The Federal Government reserves the right to discontinue the use of this dispersant method if negative impacts on the environment outweigh the benefits, and the Coast Guard’s Federal On-Scene Coordinator has the authority to make daily decisions regarding any request by BP to adjust the use of dispersant," the agency declared, even after its own orders were so obviously ignored.

"The exact makeup of [Corexit] is kept secret under competitive trade laws, but a worker safety sheet for one product, called Corexit, says it includes 2-butoxyethanol, a compound associated with headaches, vomiting and reproductive problems at high doses," Pro Publica noted.

However, Fast Company magazine added: "in a statement to the Gulf Oil Disaster Recovery Group, toxicology expert Dr. William Sawyer elaborated on the risks associated with Corexit. According to Sawyer, Corexit is also known as deodorized kerosene--a substance with health risks to humans as well as sea turtles, dolphins, breathing reptiles, birds, and any species that need to surface for air exchanges."

Breathing dispersant fumes is what's thought to have sickened and number of spill response workers. Crew members aboard three separate vessels "reported experiencing nausea, dizziness, headaches and chest pains," according to the Coast Guard. Instead of ensuring workers had adequate access to respirators, BP CEO Tony Hayward claimed workers had fallen ill from food poisoning. Fishermen who've since joined the cleanup effort have been discouraged from wearing proper breathing equipment, allegedly because BP wants to stem the tide of "hysteria" over the disaster.

The chairman of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council called Corexit "worse than oil." However, at the end of June the EPA concluded a round of testing on the substance and declared Corexit to be "slightly toxic," but actually not worse than oil.

The New York Times reported:

    Lab workers determined what concentration of dispersant was needed to kill half the fish or half the shrimp in the sample, measured in parts per million, and then classified the products in rather broad categories. Corexit, which becomes lethal to half the shrimp or fish at 130 parts per million, was labeled “practically nontoxic,” and dispersants that killed half the shrimp or fish in concentrations between 19 and 55 parts per million were labeled “slightly toxic.” The worst-ranking, Dispersit SPC 1000, killed half the aquatic life at 2.9 parts per million and was classed as “moderately toxic.’’

To the contrary, Yobie Benjamin with the San Francisco Chronicle wrote:

    Corexit 9500 is a solvent originally developed by Exxon and now manufactured by the Nalco of Naperville, Illinois (who by the way just hired some expensive lobbyists). Corexit is is four times more toxic than oil (oil is toxic at 11 ppm (parts per million), Corexit 9500 at only 2.61ppm).

    In a report written by Anita George-Ares and James R. Clark for Exxon Biomedical Sciences, Inc. titled "Acute Aquatic Toxicity of Three Corexit Products: An Overview" Corexit 9500 was found to be one of the most toxic dispersal agents ever developed.

The substance is thought to become even more toxic when mixed with salty, oily water at high temperatures, such as those found on the Gulf's surface in the middle of summer.

Likewise, Dr. Pincetich argued that his background in toxicology and testing pesticides on marine life gives him a unique perspective on the EPA's measurement process.

"People need to realize that their water, their air, the sand they're walking on, the things they're touching when they wake up in the morning -- are coated with this stuff," he said. "If you see it in a high concentration, it looks like radiator fluid. It is not a pretty sight. The stuff is toxic. The tests say 'no effect'. I can tell you from managing those tests as a professional that you need to know exactly what test gave you what effect that you tested. So, if it was no effect on the survival of seven days of the fish, what happened to that fish at 10 days? That was my doctoral thesis."

He continued: "The pesticides that killed no fish at 96 hours, which is the EPA deadline -- 90 percent of them died two weeks later. These were embryonic salmon. There are a lot of chemical effects that are not being measured by the standard EPA tests."

Pincetich specifically cautioned that no matter how carefully Corexit is sprayed, the chemicals will always drift inland, or simply evaporate and return in condensation.

"[Corexit] basically disrupts the natural ability of oil to bond with itself," he said. "Oil bilipid layers next to each other are the very basis of life. Each of us is made out of cells. Those cells are nothing more than an oil layer surrounding our proteins and RNA and all the other molecules talking to each other. You put in a chemical that disrupts that basic biological structure and you are putting yourself at risk from umpteen effects.
Title: Re: COREXIT Contamination Maybe Great For Population Reduction.
Post by: John_Back_From_The_Club_O on July 05, 2010, 03:41:21 pm
The very last paragraph of the above says it all concerning COREXIT.

Don't eat the shrimp, neo-eugenics.

Something just dawned on me.

Above, I posted video shot in Ohio.  I got to wondering if the NWO can NOW step up / accelerate / enhance chemtrail spraying now with the BP contamination operation in full swing?  The MSM is already denying or at minimum down playing the air quality problem from the gusher and the chemicals used to contain(?) it. 

More neo-eugenic warfare on America?