PrisonPlanet Forum

***THE MAIN BOARDS - Welcome to the Prison Planet Educational Forum and Library*** => PhD Investigative Reports (only for the hardcore) => Topic started by: Geolibertarian on March 16, 2010, 12:28:45 pm

Title: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 16, 2010, 12:28:45 pm
I realize that most of the individuals who frequent this forum are either "conservatives" or Austrian School "libertarians" who, as such, don't have to be told that there are certain "liberals" and "progressives" who don't necessarily have their best interests in mind.

Nevertheless, I assume at least some of the many hundreds of "guests" here are left-leaning independents and relative newcomers to the world of politics. It is primarily to them that I address the following.

If Ralph Nader is a classic example of a true and sincere liberal (http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-socialism.htm) who, as such, is genuinely concerned with eliminating poverty, Barack Obama is a classic example of both (a) a smug, manipulative, insincere “limousine liberal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limousine_liberal)” and (b) a foundation-funded “poverty pimp” whose only real concern is with protecting the vested interests of the ruling-class oligarchs pulling his strings, while fooling his gullible followers with carefully crafted, euphemism (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=223151.0)-laced rhetoric into believing all the while that he’s serving their interests.

With particular regard to elite “foundations,” it seems that most people are woefully unaware of the alarming extent to which these supposedly “benevolent” institutions have shaped the horribly and increasingly dysfunctional social and political realities that have grown up around us in recent decades.

It is thus my hope that the following excerpts from Chapter 2 of Webster Tarpley’s book, Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography (http://www.lulu.com/shop/webster-g-tarpley/barack-h-obama-the-unauthorized-biography/paperback/product-3674186.html;jsessionid=33389AC23EABAD75F58D2DF60541CDC0), will help spark a dramatic reduction in this acute lack of mass awareness.

-----------------------------------

Pages 69-76:

OBAMA’S WORLD: THE FOUNDATIONS

We have already seen Obama in his role as a community organizer for the Gamaliel foundation. We must stress that Obama’s role as a foundation operative begins here, but certainly does not end when he goes off to law school. No indeed: the vocation of being a foundation operative constitutes Obama’s family business. His mother was a Ford Foundation operative, and most of the jobs Obama has ever held were with foundations. When it came time for Obama to start going to church, he unfailingly chose a congregation where Ford Foundation race theory is projected onto the plane of heaven and eternity in the form of the provocateur religion of Black liberation theology.

Before we go any further with Obama's own story, it will be useful to offer an overview of the strategic orientation of US foundation operations during this timeframe. Foundations represent an extremely important part of the social control mechanisms which prevail today in the United States.

The foundations are all the more effective in their chosen work of social control, engineering and political manipulation because many people are simply unaware of the immense scale of their operations, even though every broadcast on public television or National Public Radio is always accompanied by a litany of the foundations which have financed that program. One way to understand the pervasive influence of foundations is to say that they are as omnipresent in this country today as the CIA and the FBI were during the Cold War. This is partly because many intelligence community operations of the 1950s, 60s, and 70s have morphed into foundations under the auspices of President Reagan’s Executive Order 12333 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_12333), which privatized many of the existing spook (http://www.intelligencesearch.com/spycodes-19.html) activities. Many naïve people still think of foundations as being humanitarian or charitable institutions concerned with education, health, and the improvement of the human condition. Nothing could be further from the truth. Like Henry Ford himself, the Pew family and many other oligarchical clans whose family fortunes have been transformed into foundations harbored fascist sympathies during the 1920s and 1930s. Today, they are overwhelmingly multicultural, politically correct, Malthusian (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=117190.msg990315#msg990315), and neo-Luddite (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Luddism) in their ideology. They hate science and technology because these are seen as avenues of upward social mobility for the lower orders, and as a threat to continued financier domination. Perhaps more than any other agency, the foundations have engaged in the strangulation and perversion of the American spirit over these past four decades in particular.

The late Christopher Lasch, in his classic study The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy (New York: Norton, 1995), notes the important role of class prejudice in forming elite attitudes in this country today. He describes how well-to-do liberals, when confronted with resistance to their ideas of social engineering, “betray the venomous hatred that lies not far beneath the smiling face of upper-middle-class benevolence,” and turn on those who “just don’t get it” (Lasch, 28). The result is an academic culture which appears to be contemptuous of the human potential of vast strata of the American population. This is the kind of mentality which we can see in Obama's infamous San Francisco “Bittergate (http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/04/bittergate_pundits_doubt_obama_as_never_before.html)” rant. This is a condensed version of the elitist and left authoritarian mental world of the pro-oligarchical foundation bureaucrats. In order to understand Obama's mentality and the decisions he might make as the head of the future regime, we are therefore obliged to review some critical points about the recent historical record of the Ford Foundation and its satellites.

Most discussions of Obama's career as what he calls a “community organizer” are crippled by a total lack of historical background on the Ford Foundation and its satellites, and further by any comprehension of the goals of foundation-funded social engineering. Because Obama is so totally a product of the Ford Foundation and the foundation world of which it is the center, we will have to repeat several times in this volume that the main purpose of these foundations by the latter half of the 20th century was to exercise social control, so as to perpetuate the uncontested political domination of Wall Street financial interests over the legitimate aspirations of the various ethnic groups, economic strata, and other components of the American population.

The watchword of the Ford Foundation is Divide and Conquer. The goal of its projects is always to play one group in the population against some other group so as to create conflict, strife, and division, so that the Wall Street interests can emerge unscathed and triumph. The individual foundation grant officers involved in this process may well be motivated by some hallucination of Marxism, multiculturalism, or political correctness, but it is not these values which the foundations finally serve: their goal is to disrupt and abort the emergence of anything approaching a politically conscious united front of the American people capable of demanding radical economic reforms, and especially to ward off a revival of the New Deal, new political formations based on economic populism, a Marshall Plan for the cities, including the urban ethnic minority populations, and so forth.

POVERTY PIMPS FOR THE FOUNDATIONS

When Obama says that he was a community organizer, it would be far more accurate to say that he was a poverty pimp for the Ford Foundation network, a paid race-monger whose job it was to organize politically naïve and desperate groups on the south side of Chicago into corporatist, dead-end, fragmented, parochial projects from which they would derive little or no benefit, and the goal of which was simply to use up enough of their lives in futility until they dropped out altogether in despair. The only exception to this was the use of these community control or local control or community action advocacy groups as political pawns against certain state and local political factions, or as battering rams against other groups of working people, above all trade unions made up of municipal employees, especially teachers. This is where Obama learned to support “merit pay” as a weapon against teachers unions.

In order to understand the foundation world, it is necessary to recall that these foundations generally represent the family fortunes of industrialists and businessmen of the 19th and early 20th centuries -- the robber barons -- which have been placed into tax-free status as charitable trusts, all the while perpetuating the urge for power of their founders. The foundations represent family fortunes or fondi which have attained a kind of oligarchical immortality by transcending the mere biological existence of the individuals and families who created them, and becoming permanent institutions destined to endure indefinitely.

These foundations once upon a time had to maintain some credibility by funding hospitals, universities, libraries, scientific research, and other projects which often had genuine social utility. Shortly after the Second World War, there began a trend towards social engineering and social action on the part of the foundations. The leader in this was the Ford Foundation, which, because it was the largest and wealthiest of the US foundations, quickly became the flagship and opinion leader for the other foundations. Foundation officers represent the very essence of the financier oligarch mentality, and one result of this is that they generally all do the same thing at the same time in their respective fields of specialization. Because of this, control over the Ford Foundation represents a social control mechanism of great strength, which has been a decisive force in shaping the decline of US society and national life, especially over the last 40 years.

Dean Rusk had served Averill Harriman and Dean Acheson during the Truman administration, and then became president of the Rockefeller Foundation in the late 1950s; he ‘once described Ford’s influence on other foundations: What the “fat boy in the canoe does,” he said, “makes a difference to everybody else.” And Ford’s influence was never stronger than after it adopted the cause of social change. Waldemar Nielsen’s monumental studies of foundations, published in 1972 and 1985, only strengthened the Ford effect, for Nielsen celebrated activist philanthropy and berated those foundations that had not yet converted to the cause. “As a result,” recalls Richard Larry, president of the Sarah Scaife Foundation, “a number of foundations said: ‘If this is what the foundation world is doing and what the experts say is important, we should move in that direction, too.’” The Rockefeller Brothers Fund, for example, funded the National Welfare Rights Organization--at the same that the organization was demonstrating against Governor Nelson Rockefeller of New York. The Carnegie Corporation pumped nearly $20 million into various left-wing advocacy groups during the 1970s.’ (Heather Mac Donald, “The Billions of Dollars That Made Things Worse,” City Journal, Autumn 1996)

AGGRESSIVE FOUNDATION ACTIVISM OF THE LATE 1960s

In the second half of the 1960s, the social ferment generated by defeat in Vietnam, the student movement, the antiwar movement, the civil rights movement, and the gathering economic decline of the country spurred the foundations into action. With unerring oligarchical class instinct, they could see the grave danger that might be represented for financier domination by the possible fusion in a united front of the civil rights movement, the antiwar movement, the labor movement, and the student movement. Their answer to this was to promote and fund organization forms that were so narrow, so fragmented, and so parochial, that they prevented the necessary cooperation among these movements, thus blocking them from attaining most of their principal goals….

Right-wing commentators…are generally incapable of analyzing the real motivations for what the foundations do; they usually attribute the catastrophic results of foundation social engineering to some misguided instincts to do good. Nothing could be further from the truth: the goal of the foundations is to maintain the brutal regime of finance capital, and this presupposes that there be no national coalition capable of expressing a national interest in contradiction to the dictates of the Wall Street financiers. The rightwingers are therefore forced to make up fantastic stories of how Marxists have crept in to the temples of finance capital by the dark of the moon, so as to advance their work of revolution. In reality incendiary race baiting and pseudo-revolutionary and hyper-revolutionary rhetoric are most often the stock in trade of the foundation-funded political operative, who gets paid good money to inflame the mutual animosities and resentments of groups that ought to be uniting against Wall Street, rather than squabbling with each other for some petty and futile local concession. Barack Hussein Obama is precisely one of these foundation-funded political operatives or poverty pimps….

FORD FOUNDATION COMMUNITY ACTION AND THE 1960s GHETTO RIOTS

The beginnings of the local control-community control-poverty pimp apparatus of domestic social engineering and counterinsurgency goes back to the Ford Foundation’s Gray Areas Project of the 1960s, which was spearheaded by an obscure and highly influential Ford Foundation operative named Paul Ylvisaker. ‘The first such “action-oriented” program, the Gray Areas Project, was a turning point in foundation history--because it was a prime mover of the ill-starred War on Poverty--a turning point in American history as well. Its creator, Paul Ylvisaker, an energetic social theorist from Harvard and subsequent icon for the liberal foundation community, had concluded that the problems of newly migrated urban blacks and Puerto Ricans could not be solved by the “old and fixed ways of doing things.” Because existing private and public institutions were unresponsive, he argued, the new poverty populations needed a totally new institution--the “community action agency”--to coordinate legal, health, and welfare services and to give voice to the poor. According to Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Ford  “proposed nothing less than institutional change in the operation and control of American cities….[Ford] invented a new level of American government: the inner-city community action agency.” Ylvisaker proceeded to establish such agencies in Boston, New Haven, Philadelphia, and Oakland.’ (Heather Mac Donald)

The initial phase of Ford Foundation intervention into the black inner-city ghetto under the rubric of the Gray Areas strategy helped to fuel the Watts, Detroit, and Newark riots of 1965-1967. The community action projects that were begun in these years did not deliver what they promised, but did set the stage for the futile and self-defeating violence of “Burn, baby burn (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22burn%2C+baby%2C+burn%22+rallying+cry+of+rioters&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=),” which was considered fashionable in the radical chic salons of the day. “Unfortunately, because it was so intent on persuading the federal government to adopt the program, Ford ignored reports that the community action agencies were failures,” according to historian Alice O’Connor.

Reincarnated as federal Community Action Program (CAPs), Ford’s urban cadres soon began tearing up cities. Militancy became the mark of merit for federal funders, according to Senator Moynihan. In Newark, the director of the local CAP urged blacks to arm themselves before the 1967 riots; leaflets calling for a demonstration were run off on the CAP’s mimeograph machine. The federal government funneled community action money to Chicago gangs--posing as neighborhood organizers--who then continued to terrorize their neighbors. The Syracuse, New York CAP published a remedial reading manual that declared: “No ends are accomplished without the use of force....Squeamishness about force is the mark not of idealistic, but moonstruck morals.” Syracuse CAP employees applied $7 million of their $8 million federal grant to their own salaries’ (Heather Mac Donald)

McGeorge Bundy should have been arrested for  inciting to riot, since that is exactly what he was doing. The political benefits of the resulting backlash would of course be harvested by demagogues like Nixon and Agnew….

MCGEORGE BUNDY: FROM VIETNAM STRATEGIC HAMLETS TO COMMUNITY CONTROL

In order to fragment, divide, and frustrate the ongoing political upsurge, the organizational forms which the Ford Foundation was using its fabulous wealth to create had to be as narrow, fragmented, apolitical, exclusive, and petty as possible. “Community Action Programs were a calculated means of keeping control. To deliver a particular point of view, foot soldiers got busy. Militants and Black Power were a joke! The Ford Foundation, through its president, McGeorge Bundy, was one step ahead and positioned to penetrate the movement. In promising to help achieve full domestic equality, they played a vanguard role and become the most important organization manipulating the militant black movement.” (Pulling No Punches, October 28, 2007)

McGeorge Bundy was a Skull and Bones graduate of Yale, a protégé of Dean Acheson, and the director of the National Security Council under President Kennedy....Bundy had left government in 1966, and would stay on as boss of the Ford Foundation until 1979. For much of this time, Bundy was considered to be the informal spokesman for the US Eastern Anglophile banking establishment, otherwise known as the financier oligarchy or ruling class. Accurate accounts of Bundy’s activities are very hard to come by, because no foundation has been willing to pay for an in-depth analysis of how foundation-funded social engineering is destroying this country.

Bundy was, in short, a butcher, but he was also a sophisticated ruling-class political operative. Bundy was a slightly younger colleague of the generation of self-styled “wise men” who had reorganized the Anglo-American world empire in the wake of World War II. Bundy was a dyed-in-the-wool, hereditary, silver-spoon oligarch, who was conscious of representing one of the most powerful and aggressive centers of imperialist social engineering. ‘David Halberstam was correct to quote one of McGeorge Bundy’s colleagues as stating that Bundy “…is a very special type, an elitist, part of a certain breed of men whose continuity is to themselves, a line to each other and not the country.”’ (Vincent J. Salandria, “The Promotion of Domestic Discord, an address at the conference of the New England Branch of the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, October 23, 1971)

Bundy was determined to ram through the Ford Foundation counterinsurgency strategy, whatever the cost to New York City and its people: as one student of these events observes, “McGeorge Bundy was not a man given to self-doubt. (He once cut off discussion at a foundation meeting to a group of program officers: “Look, I’m settled about this. Let’s not talk about it any more. I may be wrong, but I’m not in doubt.”) And if he had second thoughts about the path down which he was taking the foundation, he did not express them at the time. Indeed, his speeches and writings in that period showed a confident determination to continue working with black militants.’ (“McGeorge Bundy: How the Establishment’s Man Tackled America’s Problem with Race,” Tamar Jacoby)

GONZALEZ: FORD FOUNDATION “REVERSE RACISM” AMONG LATINOS

Bundy started by revamping the grant priorities inside the Ford Foundation to focus on black oppression, as well as the parallel problems of other ethnic minorities. It is important to note that racial oppression was never defined by the Ford Foundation in broad-based economic terms, such as the need for modern housing, new urban mass transit, top-flight medical care, high-tech jobs with union wages, a quality college education for all ghetto youth, and other reforms which would have necessitated a domestic Marshall Plan costing hundreds of billions of dollars. This was something which the oligarchs had no intention of paying for. Rather, the Ford Foundation claimed that the oppression of the black community was a matter of white racist attitudes, as reflected in institutional arrangements which prevented black self-determination, community control, and self-esteem. In this case, the oligarchs could claim that white blue-collar workers were the real culprits, since they were the ones who came into the most intensive daily contact with oppressed blacks. “Bundy reallocated Ford’s resources from education to minority rights, which in 1960 had accounted for 2.5 percent of Ford’s giving but by 1970 would soar to 40 percent.” The same methods were also applied to Hispanics and Latinos in programs that were the precursors of the lunatic provocateur propaganda of groups like Atzlan, which makes the absurd demand that many American states be restored to Mexico....


Congressman Gonzalez, a real fighter who later pioneered in the effort to impeach George Bush the elder,


We will see later on that the methods of the Ford Foundation in regard to the subversion and manipulation of the American Indian movement for financier and provocation purposes are virtually identical to the approach employed towards black and Hispanic target populations.

THE FORD FOUNDATION VS. MARTIN LUTHER KING

Martin Luther King was perceived by the Ford Foundation as a very serious threat, because of the inclusive united-front methods (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poor_People%27s_Campaign) by which he proposed to merge the struggles of the black community with those of labor and the antiwar movement. The oligarchical class instinct of the Ford Foundation therefore dictated that ultra-radical racist provocateurs be thrown into the fray who would condemn Dr. King as a collaborationist Uncle Tom who was out of touch with younger firebrand radicals. The general heading for these Ford Foundation provocateurs was the Black Power movement or the pork chop cultural nationalists, who were always notoriously eager for their foundation checks.


And again, the decision to fund the most incendiary lunatic agitators was a very conscious one, since their outrageous statements could be used to fuel the backlash of the white middle class against the militants for their demands.

FORD’S MCKISSICK, ANTI-MARTIN LUTHER KING

Thanks to the sheer power of its multi-billion-dollar endowment, the Ford Foundation was able to create a new fad for shameless, race-baiting provocateurs on the national scene. H. Rap Brown became infamous for his favorite slogan that “violence is as American as cherry pie.” Rap also issued ominous threats, including his classic “If America don’t come around, we’re gonna burn it down.” This was the age of “burn, baby, burn,” while reactionary Republican strategists around Nixon and others thanked heaven for their extraordinary good fortune.

A good example of the Ford Foundation sponsorship for the most extreme black power militants as a countergang to Martin Luther King was the grant allocation in Cleveland, Ohio:


Bundy the patrician had made McKissick the minority plebeian into his mercenary as part of an incipient war on the part of the financiers against the majority of the American people in the form of the white middle class and lower middle class.

Rational spokesmen for the black community were horrified by the kinds of reckless and irresponsible agitation which the Ford Foundation was creating: ‘In Cleveland, ‘A black city councilman who opposed the program said the youths were being taught “race hatred” and that they had been heard telling younger children that “we are going to get guns and take over.” Yet Ford continued to defend the grant: “I see it,” said a foundation consultant, “as a flowering of what Black Power could be.” In August 1968, the program was renewed, with explicit instructions to include local gang leaders.’ (Tamar Jacoby) The Ford Foundation was not making mistakes; it was rather acting with diabolical effectiveness to pursue its oligarchical class agenda.


Page 85:

1980s COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONS AND COLLABORATIVES: OBAMA’S BACKGROUND

By the time Barack Hussein Obama arrived on the foundations scene in the mid-1980s, the original community action/community control/local control counterinsurgency strategy of the foundation community had somewhat evolved into community development corporations. These CDCs were first of all a reflection of the fact that economic conditions had become much more desperate as a result of rampant economic misrule under the Reagan regime. The trade union movement in its traditional form had now been largely broken. The CDCs were basically apolitical, in that they presuppose  that any attempt to change the policies of the government in Washington was hopeless, and that the most that could be attempted was to make the slide into de-industrialization and poverty a little more comfortable. The CDCs were also corporatist in the strict sense borrowed from the Mussolini fascist corporate state: as an organization form, they brought together workers, bankers, foundation bureaucrats, and government officials in an attempt to cajole corporate interests into creating a few jobs in poverty-stricken and blighted neighborhoods. Alternatively, they sought minor reform such as measures to reduce asbestos or lead poisoning in schools and public buildings.

This is precisely the strategy which Barack Hussein Obama was implementing for the Gamaliel foundation, a satellite of the Ford Foundation, in the Altgeld neighborhood on the south side of Chicago. Obama was therefore a second-generation poverty pimp carrying out an overtly corporatist political plan designed to maintain the control of bankers and financiers over the city of Chicago in just the same way that McGeorge Bundy had done this in New York.


Page 88:

”I WAS A POVERTY PIMP FOR THE FOUNDATIONS”

The role of poverty pimp within the framework of foundation-funded strategies for mass political and social manipulation, with a view to keeping the American people in a state of apathy, fragmentation, passivity, and oppression, is a very exact characterization of what Obama did during his years as a “community organizer.” To talk about poverty pimps is of course politically incorrect in the extreme, but it is the only way to convey the social reality of what we are dealing with in the case of Obama. For further background, we read in Wikipedia:


This self-serving cynicism, in feeding off the plight of a group of desperate dupes who are turned into a salable political commodity, is the essence of Obama's career.

(http://static.lulu.com/items/volume_64/3455000/3455852/3/preview/320_3455852.jpg?3455852-1223359343) (http://www.lulu.com/shop/webster-g-tarpley/barack-h-obama-the-unauthorized-biography/paperback/product-3674186.html;jsessionid=33389AC23EABAD75F58D2DF60541CDC0)

-----------------------------------

Bottom line: just as anti-war/anti-police state/anti-debt-money (http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/ponzi.php) “conservatives” must not allow themselves to become the unwitting dupes of yet another pro-war/pro-police state/pro-debt-money “neocon (http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=266&Itemid=60),” anti-war/anti-police state/anti-debt-money “progressives” must not allow themselves to become the unwitting dupes of yet another pro-war/pro-police state/pro-debt-money “liberal” or "progressive" (whether from the corporate world or foundation world).

Because to support either one is to support the same overall agenda (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13808).
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: jofortruth on March 16, 2010, 02:26:22 pm
Foundations - Reece Committee:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showtopic=2905

Various Foundations:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showforum=85
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on May 14, 2010, 11:29:25 am
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Council_of_La_Raza (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Council_of_La_Raza)

National Council of La Raza

The National Council of La Raza (NCLR) is a non-profit and non-partisan advocacy group in the United States. It is not to be confused with La Raza Unida. Its stated focus is on reducing poverty and discrimination, and improving opportunities for Hispanics. According to the organization's website, it is "the largest national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States" and "serves all Hispanic subgroups in all regions of the country". NCLR receives funding from [so-called] philanthropic organizations, such as the Ford Foundation, and corporations such as Citigroup and Wal-Mart. NCLR serves its constituency by means of its Affiliates, nearly 300 community-based organizations. The NCLR is headquartered in Washington, D.C. and maintains eight regional offices in Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Phoenix, Sacramento, San Antonio, and San Juan, Puerto Rico. The current president is Janet Murguía.

[Continued... (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Council_of_La_Raza)]
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on May 14, 2010, 03:16:00 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/pro-illegal-immigration-thugs-terrorize-santa-cruz-corporate-media-shrugs.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/pro-illegal-immigration-thugs-terrorize-santa-cruz-corporate-media-shrugs.html)

Corporate Media Plays Down Pro-Illegal Immigration Thugs Who Terrorized Santa Cruz

Imagine the national uproar if 200 Tea Partiers had gone on a rampage with burning torches

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, May 3, 2010

Imagine the uproar if 200 Tea Party members had gone on a rampage through a downtown city, smashing windows, starting fires, and spraying graffiti everywhere, the corporate media would be all over it, and yet gangs of pro-illegal immigration demonstrators do this and much worse on a regular basis, with no national news coverage whatsoever.

“A large group of protesters demonstrating at a May Day rally for worker’s and immigrant rights downtown broke off into a riot vandalizing about a dozen businesses around 10:30 p.m. Saturday, police said,” reports The Santa Cruz Sentinel (http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/localnews/ci_14998618).

An Associated Press report (http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jqDBGmaJF45-4xA1CXCFeBGQPBkQD9FF2SAO0) states that eighteen businesses were damaged as pro-immigrants rights activists engaged in violent riots, spraying graffiti, smashing windows, setting fire to shop fronts, and causing damage to a cost of up to $100,000 dollars.

“The damage that was caused was without purpose,” Capt. Steve Clark said. “It was senseless violence that victimized a community who cannot afford to be victimized in this manner. This did nothing to add credit to whatever they believed their cause was.”

The riot followed the announcement (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100501/ap_on_re_us/us_immigration_protests) that pro-amnesty demonstrators would march across the country on May 1st, which is also a date on which socialists rally worldwide to celebrate Communism, euphemistically labeled “International Workers Day” by the media.

In addition, during a pro-amnesty rally in San Francisco, 40 Golden Gate Minutemen, who were staging a peaceful counter-protest, were chased, beaten and injured by the pro-immigration thugs.

       http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/video?id=7417847 (http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/video?id=7417847)

If Tea Partiers so much as dare to carry a vaguely inflammatory sign or shout at a lawmaker, they are nationally demonized by the corporate media as dangerous racist extremists and even domestic terrorists. And yet anarchists and pro-illegal immigrant demonstrators can run riot, engage in violence and cause monumental damage to private property and it barely even makes the news.

Watch the clip below. Despite the best efforts of ABC News to characterize the culprits solely as “anarchists” and not pro-illegal demonstrators, at the end of the clip, people in the background can be heard shouting “deport illegal immigrants,” making it clear who the business owners and residents held responsible for the damage.

       http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/video?id=7418886 (http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/video?id=7418886)

As we have previously highlighted (http://www.prisonplanet.com/pro-obamacare-thugs-not-tea-party-activists-are-the-real-violent-extremists.html), despite media characterizations of anyone who opposes big government or illegal immigration as violent extremists, by far the most dangerous and violent individuals have proven to be pro-Obama goons as well as radical racist La Raza groups.

During an August 2009 demonstration in Mehville, Missouri, Obamacare opponents were locked out of a town hall meeting before Union thugs viciously attacked patriot and Tea Party activist Kenneth Gladney (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTXBOgPCh9w&feature=player_embedded), who was handing out Gadsden flags outside the stage-managed event, while hurling racist insults.

During a November 2009 immigration enforcement rally, A.N.S.W.E.R.-hired pro-illegal thugs attacked 62-year-old Dave Caulkett (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AteV2L9pc-U&feature=player_embedded) of Floridians for Immigration Enforcement, pummeling him with their signs and kicking him in the face as other A.N.S.W.E.R. goons cheered.

But you won’t see hide nor hair of Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann or Bill Maher attacking racist pro-illegal hate groups who threaten to murder Americans with axes (http://www.infowars.com/pro-illegal-demonstrator-says-illegals-will-kill-americans-with-pickaxes/), because it simply doesn’t fit into their or the federal government’s primary mission, which is to smear peaceful Americans angry at how big government and huge corporations are manipulating and siding with millions of illegal aliens to crush the middle class, as violent racist extremists who need to be silenced.

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDlutO0KK7g (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDlutO0KK7g)

Alex Jones’ Battle For The Republic exposes how the elite are using illegal immigration and pushing amnesty as a means of pulverizing the American middle class and ensuring that U.S. citizens, black, white and hispanic alike, are forced to sacrifice their freedom and sovereignty as America is sunk into a third world cesspool. Watch below.

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfJXJjdkNiw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfJXJjdkNiw) (Part 1 of 2)
       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMskIAiQDkg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMskIAiQDkg) (Part 2 of 2)
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Mr Grinch on May 14, 2010, 07:06:01 pm
Quote
I realize that most of the individuals who frequent this forum are either "conservatives" or Austrian School "libertarians" who, as such, don't have to be told that there are certain "liberals" and "progressives" who don't necessarily have their best interests in mind.

Nevertheless, I assume at least some of the many hundreds of "guests" here are left-leaning independents and relative newcomers to the world of politics. It is primarily to them that I address the following.

If Ralph Nader is a classic example of a true and sincere liberal (http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-liberalism.htm) who, as such, is genuinely concerned with eliminating poverty, Barack Obama is a classic example of both (a) a smug, manipulative, insincere “limousine liberal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limousine_liberal)” and (b) a foundation-funded “poverty pimp” whose only real concern is with protecting the vested interests of the ruling-class oligarchs pulling his strings, while fooling his gullible followers with carefully crafted, euphemism (http://propagandamatrix.com/forum/index.php/topic,5047.0.html)-laced rhetoric into believing all the while that he’s serving their interests.

With particular regard to elite “foundations,” it seems that most people are woefully unaware of the alarming extent to which these supposedly “benevolent” institutions have shaped the horribly and increasingly dysfunctional social and political realities that have grown up around us in recent decades.

It is thus my hope that the following excerpts from Chapter 2 of Webster Tarpley’s book, Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography (http://infowars-shop.stores.yahoo.net/bahobunbi.html), will help spark a dramatic reduction in this acute lack of mass awareness.

PDF Webster Tarpley’s book, Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography...
http://siob.eu/evidence/Webster%20Griffin%20Tarpley%20-%20Barack%20H%20Obama%20-%20The%20Unauthorized%20Biography.pdf
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on May 27, 2010, 05:31:36 pm
“That’s the way the ruling class operates in any society: they try to divide the rest of the people. They keep the lower and the middle classes fighting with each other, so that they, the rich, can run off with all the f**king money (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=162212.msg976261#msg976261).

"Fairly simple thing; happens to work.

"You know, anything different, that’s what they’re gonna talk about: race, religion, ethic and national backgrounds, jobs, income, education, social status, sexuality -- anything they can do [to] keep us fighting with each other, so that they can keep going to the bank."

-- George Carlin (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqW-Fv1eLCU)
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on May 28, 2010, 12:36:08 pm
In light of the information provided above, how likely is it that the so-called "New Black Panther Party" is at least partially funded by either the Ford Foundation itself or one of its "satellites"? Or is that the sort of question the race-obsessed corporate media would rather we not ask in the first place, lest the divide-and-rule tactics of the global elite (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=162212.msg967898#msg967898) be exposed for what they are?

-----------------------------------

http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-new-black-panthers-prepare-for-war-with-the-tea-party.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-new-black-panthers-prepare-for-war-with-the-tea-party.html)

The New Black Panthers “Prepare For War” With The Tea Party

Bluegrass Pundit
Friday, May 28, 2010

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_C5VMt0Sqis0/S_70CWUqHCI/AAAAAAAAEKM/D-GshSRFsUo/s320/black+panther+voter+intimidation.jpg)

It is unclear why the New Black Panthers are worried about the Tea Party. After all, they have Eric Holder on their side. He dismissed voter intimidation charges after the government had a default judgment conviction (http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODdmYjI2NTFhZGMxODQwNTI0ZGQ5ZmVmMjMxN2ExYTQ=).

Issues Wire (http://issueswire.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4040824.htm) reported:


-----------------------------------
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on June 01, 2010, 11:07:18 am
To all you self-righteous, insult-spewing, race-obsessed (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbcs-matthews-injects-phony-race-talking-point-into-his-program-again.html) “liberals” out there who shamelessly wrap in the flag of “anti-racism” virtually each and every corporate fascist economic policy, Bush-style police state policy and imperialist foreign policy the Democrat-controlled Congress and White House propose, perpetuate or expand, I have a few questions for you:

If you’re as concerned with exposing and eliminating “racism” as you would have everyone believe, why do neither you nor the General Electric (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=123056.0)-financed Thought Police at MSNBC speak a word of protest against Obama's continuation (http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/05/11/police-group-slams-obamas-drug-war-recalibration/) of the racist drug war?

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iifGYnffrBI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iifGYnffrBI)
       http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/node/64 (http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/node/64)
       http://www.drugpolicy.org/communities/race/ (http://www.drugpolicy.org/communities/race/)
       http://fff.org/explore-freedom/article/articles-on-race-and-the-drug-war/ (http://fff.org/explore-freedom/article/articles-on-race-and-the-drug-war/)
       http://www.druglibrary.org/Schaffer/hemp/history/first12000/11.htm (http://www.druglibrary.org/Schaffer/hemp/history/first12000/11.htm)

Why no word of protest against Obama's continuation (http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/05/13/iraq-the-endless-occupation/) and -- in the case of Afghanistan (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18001), Pakistan (http://www.prisonplanet.com/1-in-3-killed-by-u-s-drones-attacks-in-pakistan-are-civilians.html) and other nations -- expansion of Bush’s terroristic (http://www.counterpunch.org/chomsky01242006.html) war on “brown people (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lMDbYZ26rg)”?

Why no word of protest against Obama's plan (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12517) to impose IMF-style austerity measures (http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/fiscal_responsibility.php) on behalf of his Wall Street cronies (http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16488), particularly in view of the fact that these measures will fall harder on poor black communities than on any other sector of society?

Why no word of protest against the anti-labor (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=160421.msg992194#msg992194)/pro-land speculation (http://www.henrygeorge.org/bust.htm) tax system that also falls hardest on poor black communities?

       http://savingcommunities.org/issues/race.html (http://savingcommunities.org/issues/race.html)

Why no word of protest against how neither Obama nor Democratic Congressional “leaders” have done anything (legislatively, not rhetorically!) to reverse the NAFTA (http://www.economyincrisis.org/content/obamas-unfulfilled-nafta-campaign-promise)-induced offshoring (http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts04192005.html) of countless millions of jobs -- yet another engineered trend that, as any black person from Detroit (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18239) will readily attest, falls harder on poor, inner-city blacks than anyone else?

Why do you ignore the racist origins of your beloved victim disarmament "gun control (http://www.gunfacts.info/)" laws?

       http://www.constitution.org/cmt/cramer/racist_roots.htm (http://www.constitution.org/cmt/cramer/racist_roots.htm)
       http://www.guncite.com/journals/gun_control_wtr8512.html (http://www.guncite.com/journals/gun_control_wtr8512.html)
       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nckgyfGbdnU (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nckgyfGbdnU) (No Guns for Negroes Part One)
       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2g7TbxkJuqA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2g7TbxkJuqA) (No Guns for Negroes Part Two)

Why do you ignore the California origins of Nazi eugenics (http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html)?

Why do you ignore the eery obsession that many of today’s limousine liberals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limousine_liberal) continue to have with eugenics (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=117190.0)?

And last but certainly not least, why do you ignore the shameful, decades-old tradition among aristocrat (http://www.progress.org/archive/hgjr7a.htm)-funded “foundations” -- particularly the Ford Foundation -- of employing the divide-and-rule (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=163559.msg1026272#msg1026272)/anti-MLK (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poor_People's_Campaign) tactic of fomenting racial hatred within and between the lower and middle classes; and how this historical fact sheds a particularly unflattering light on all the racial provocateuring and hatemongering being engaged in by La Raza -- a hispanic supremecy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kv2y35OZy_Q&feature=PlayList&p=74E6D7A3A2FC6CF7&playnext_from=PL&index=0&playnext=1) group which is financed not only by the Ford Foundation, but by overprivileged corporations such as slave goods (http://walmartwatch.com/blog/archives/who_makes_the_stuff_you_buy/)-selling Wal-Mart (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jazb24Q2s94) and toxic derivatives (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=98465.msg581249#msg581249)-peddling Citigroup (http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/oops.php)?

Could it be that the real racists are you, and that your mindless accusations of racism against anyone who dares criticize God’s Obama's corporate fascist economic policies, Bush-style police state policies and terroristic foreign policies are thus nothing more than Freudian projection (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection) on your part?

Or is that yet another question you have neither the courage nor intellectual honesty to answer?
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on June 07, 2010, 10:14:27 am
Why no word of protest against Obama's plan to impose IMF-style austerity measures (http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/fiscal_responsibility.php) on behalf of his Wall Street cronies (http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16488), particularly in view of the fact that these measures will fall harder on poor black communities than on any other sector of society?

Why no word of protest against the anti-labor (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=160421.msg992194#msg992194)/pro-land speculation (http://www.henrygeorge.org/bust.htm) tax system that also falls hardest on poor black communities?

       http://savingcommunities.org/issues/race.html (http://savingcommunities.org/issues/race.html)

http://www.blackagendareport.com/?q=content/obamas-scheme-kill-public-housing-and-give-land-banks (http://www.blackagendareport.com/?q=content/obamas-scheme-kill-public-housing-and-give-land-banks)

Obama's Scheme to Kill Public Housing and Give the Land to Banks

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

June 02, 2010

For the Obama administration, every bit of public space and property is "on the table" - subject to privatization. Transfer of public wealth to private hands seems a White House obsession. Next on the auction block: the nation's public housing stock. "This is gentrification (http://www.progress.org/archive/fold149.htm) and urban displacement on a gargantuan scale."

(http://www.blackagendareport.com/images/stories/193/public_housing02.jpg)

President Obama's greatest domestic imperative is the transfer of public wealth and resources to the private sector. He moved tens of trillions of dollars to Wall Street in the guise of rescuing the economy. Hundreds of billions in public funds are scheduled for transfer to private insurance corporations over the next decade or so, masquerading as a health care plan. His support for corporate-backed charter schools and other so-called public-private partnerships has dramatically escalated the privatization of education in the United States. Obama calls it a "Race to the Top." Now, the Obama administration is serving up to corporate vultures the nation's dwindling stock of public housing, with bankers as the ultimate beneficiaries.

The plan is slick, but easy enough to see through - like the president, himself. Dubbed the Transforming Rental Assistance initiative, or TRA, the scheme would allow banks and other speculators (http://www.henrygeorge.org/bust.htm) to mortgage public housing, and then raise the rents to ten percent above market value (http://www.commondreams.org/print/56342). The federal government would make up the difference, pumping the people's money directly into Wall Street accounts. Eventually, of course, the feds will halt or cut back payments, and the properties will revert to the bankers, who will sell them to developers and kick out the tenants. This is gentrification and urban displacement on a gargantuan scale - brought to you by the First Black President.

Imagine! Obama wants to transfer to banks and developers tens of thousands of acres of public-owned urban property - home to 1.2 million families, disproportionately Black and brown - all the while subsidizing the banksters' profits with billions of taxpayer dollars. He would entrust the fates of millions of poor people to the tender mercies of the same criminal-minded class that has destroyed a generation and more of Black homeowners and displaced legions of Black renters from the gentrifying cities.

Obama wants to transform public housing into a Section 8 subsidy program. That is the kiss of death. Section 8 housing has always been underfunded. In New York City, alone, 10,000 Section 8 (http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2010-05-25/article/35433?headline=The-Far-Right-Policy-Shift-to-Privatize-1.2-Million-Public-Housing-Units) voucher holders may not be able to pay their rent because the feds won't come up with the funding.

When public housing defaults on payments to the bankers under the Obama scheme, it will be a second bonanza for Wall Street - which is how billions are made in an economy ruled by parasites who create nothing, but charge a fee for everything.

Those are Obama's kind of people. I'm not just talking about the mega-banks and hedge-funders that backed him to the hilt in his presidential campaign. Obama's closest cronies and former clients (http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/27/grim_proving_ground_for_obamas_housing_policy/) from Chicago - including senior advisor Valerie Jarret - made their fortunes milking government subsidized housing programs for the poor until the federal government had to step in and pick up the pieces.

If Obama has his way, speculators will descend on all 3,000 of the nation's public housing agencies, bribing every official in sight in a frenzy of corruption over federal land and subsidies. And the poor will start counting the days before they are put out in the street.

For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford. On the web, go to www.BlackAgendaReport.com.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 03, 2010, 09:37:12 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/clinton-obama-defend-byrds-ku-klux-klan-membership.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/clinton-obama-defend-byrds-ku-klux-klan-membership.html)

Clinton, Obama Defend Byrd’s Ku Klux Klan Membership

“He was just trying to get elected”

Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
Friday, Jul 2nd, 2010

While would be Senator Rand Paul was recently slated by the controlled left wing media for his nuanced philosophical view on one of the ten titles of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the late Sen. Robert Byrd – an actual former member of the Ku Klux Klan who filibustered the Civil Rights Act - was lauded today by a former president as well as the nation’s first black president.

(http://infowars.net/pictures/july2010/020710Byrd.jpg)

Clinton and Obama today both defended Byrd’s past association with the Klan in the 1940s.

In a key note speech at Byrd’s funeral in Charleston today, Clinton hit out at eulogies in some newspapers that had highlighted Byrd’s ties with the Klan.

“He once had a fleeting association with the Ku Klux Klan, what does that mean? I’ll tell you what it means. He was a country boy from the hills and hollows from West Virginia. He was trying to get elected,” Clinton said.

“And maybe he did something he shouldn’t have done come and he spent the rest of his life making it up. And that’s what a good person does. There are no perfect people. There are certainly no perfect politicians,” he added.

Watch the video:

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqPq4AHjzU4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqPq4AHjzU4) (Bill Clinton Explains Robert Byrd's Membership In KKK)

The late Senator signed up with the Klan in 1942, becoming head of the local chapter before claiming to lose interest in the organisation a year later. However, in 1946 Byrd stated that the KKK was “needed today as never before”, he also defended the Klan during his Senate run in 1958, voted against Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas and he filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

So much for Clinton’s description of a “fleeting” association with the KKK.

President Obama described Byrd as a “statesman”, adding that his ties to the Klan could be forgiven following his long career as a Senator.

“We know there are things he said and things he did that he came to regret,” Obama said.

In reference to a conversation Obama said he once had with Byrd the president noted: “He said, ‘There are things I regretted in my youth. You may know that.’ I said, ‘None of us are absent some regrets, senator. That’s why we enjoy and seek the grace of God.’”

“And as I reflect on the full sweep of his 92 years, it seems to me that his life bent toward justice,” Obama added. “Like the Constitution he tucked in his pocket, like the nation itself, Robert Byrd possessed that quintessential American quality, and that is the capacity to change, a capacity to learn, a capacity to listen, a capacity to be made more perfect.”
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: H0llyw00d on July 03, 2010, 09:42:57 am
Quote from: Slick Willy
“And maybe he did something he shouldn’t have done come and he spent the rest of his life making it up. And that’s what a good person does. There are no perfect people. There are certainly no perfect politicians,” he added.

(http://i102.photobucket.com/albums/m90/Hauleywood/LaughingChimp.gif)
Title: NAACP Resolution Designed to Wreck Tea Party Movement by Playing Race Card
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 13, 2010, 05:09:13 pm
http://www.infowars.com/naacp-resolution-designed-to-wreck-tea-party-movement-by-playing-race-card/ (http://www.infowars.com/naacp-resolution-designed-to-wreck-tea-party-movement-by-playing-race-card/)

NAACP Resolution Designed to Wreck Tea Party Movement by Playing Race Card

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
July 13, 2010

Before Obama was selected to be the next front man for the ruling elite, we said race would be used to shut down any opposition to government. During the NAACP convention this week, that is precisely what is happening.

(http://static.infowars.com/2010/07/i/article-images/benjealous.jpg)
NAACP president Ben Jealous accuses the Tea Party movement of
racism (see video below).


During its annual convention in St. Louis, the NAACP will consider a resolution that will “repudiate the racism of the Tea Parties” and stand against the movement’s attempt to “push our country back to the pre-civil rights era,” according to Fox News (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/13/tea-party-preempts-racist-resolution-condemns-bigoted-naacp/).

The resolution calls on “the leadership and members of the tea party to recognize the historic and present racist factions within it and to repudiate those factions,” and says the movement has opposed government programs that help working people and people of color, NAACP spokeswoman Leila McDowell told the Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/12/AR2010071204471.html).

The highly factionalized Tea Party movement uniformly opposes record deficits and a national debt designed to destroy the nation. According to the Treasury Department, the deficit stood at $94.3 billion in June. For the fiscal year to date, the budget deficit totaled $1 trillion, Bloomberg reports (http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-07-13/june-budget-deficit-in-u-s-narrowed-to-68-4-billion.html).

Spending for the entire government for June increased 3.2 percent from the same month a year earlier to $319.5 billion, according to Bloomberg. Spending by the Defense Department year to date rose to $499.1 billion from $472.8 billion in 2009. Outlays by the Social Security Administration increased to $564.2 billion for the fiscal year to date from $544.7 billion. Spending by the Department of Health and Human Services, which administers the Medicare and Medicaid programs, climbed to $631.4 billion.

On March 20, Democrats and the corporate media launched a misleading propaganda offensive claiming Tea Party protesters in Washington spat on Missouri Democrat Emanuel Cleaver and hurled racial epithets at members of the Congressional Black Caucus as they walked to the Capitol to cast a vote on Obama’s authoritarian health care bill.

In fact, as Infowars.com reported after Cleaver and others accused the Tea Party of racism, the spitting incident never occurred. The “N” word cannot be heard (see videos here (http://www.infowars.com/video-proves-tea-party-activist-did-not-spit-on-dem/)) during the confrontation in opposition to Obamacare. Democrats invented the incident and the corporate media has used it repeatedly since to denounce and discredit the popular Tea Party movement.

Democrat operatives and other miscreants have infiltrated Tea Party rallies around the country with racist and other provocative placards designed to discredit the movement. In April of 2009, in San Antonio, Texas, a man with a “Save White America” placard was outed (http://www.infowars.com/racist-provocateur-exposed-at-san-antonio-tea-party/) as a racist provocateur.

In April of this year, Jason Levin (http://www.infowars.com/crash-the-tea-party-crashes/) of Portland, Oregon, launched a website with the explicit purpose of crashing to Tea Party movement.

Levin encouraged people to “dismantle and demolish” the Tea Party movement he declared consists of “racists, homophobes, and morons.” Levin admitted his purpose was to “disrupt and derail” the movement. The FBI used similar language when it created COINTELPRO to destroy the civil rights and anti-war movements in the 1960s and 70s.

The establishment media will naturally provide the NAACP resolution with plenty of coverage and attempt to further the agenda of the ruling elite to destroy the movement with innuendo and lies at all cost. MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann wasted little time exploiting the NAACP vote (see video below) to assert the movement is chock full of racists.

The effort is likely to fail miserably. In late 2009, it was reported that the Tea Party movement boasts higher favorability ratings than either the Democratic or Republican parties, according to a Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll (http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/12/16/wsjnbc-news-poll-tea-party-tops-democrats-and-republicans/). In fact, so popular are the political ideas of the Tea Party movement — less government, lower taxes, and constitutional values — the Republican party has engaged in a concerted [and largely successful (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=170622.0)] effort to take over the movement.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZDpjRJP_Hc (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZDpjRJP_Hc) (NAACP Condemns "Racist" Tea Party: "Genetic Descendent of the 'White Citizens' Council'")

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAmmdqMpIlM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAmmdqMpIlM) (NAACP Calls Out Tea Party For Its 'Racist Element')
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: worcesteradam on July 13, 2010, 05:13:09 pm
In light of the information provided above, how likely is it that the so-called "New Black Panther Party" is at least partially funded by either the Ford Foundation itself or one of its "satellites"? Or is that the sort of question the race-obsessed corporate media would rather we not ask in the first place, lest the divide-and-rule tactics of the global elite (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=162212.msg967898#msg967898) be exposed for what they are?

-----------------------------------


Spot on. Needs checking out
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 16, 2010, 10:33:45 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/provocateurs-openly-announce-plans-to-stage-tea-party-violence.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/provocateurs-openly-announce-plans-to-stage-tea-party-violence.html)

Provocateurs Openly Announce Plans To Stage Tea Party Violence

Will establishment media take the bait as anarchists pose as racists and extremist right wingers?

(http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/april2010/120410top.jpg)

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, April 12, 2010

With the establishment desperate to engender and exploit violence which will be used to demonize the Tea Party movement as an extremist mob, so-called anarchists are now openly declaring their intentions to pose as Tea Party members and stage violence in order to discredit populist grass roots organizations.

As we warned last week, leading anarchist groups have announced that they plan to “crash” the nationwide Tea Party protests on April 15, a promise that should not be taken lightly given the proven history (http://www.prisonplanet.com/feds-prepare-to-use-anarchists-to-provoke-tea-party-violence.html) of such organizations being infiltrated and steered by authorities to provocateur pointless mayhem and violence that serves as a justification for oppressing peaceful protest groups.

Now a new website called crashtheteaparty.org has appeared to act as a forum through which such activity can be planned. The website openly states its mission is to have people infiltrate and pose as Tea Party members and then carry out shameful acts in order to “dismantle and demolish” the Tea Party. The website is registered to a man named Josh Levin.

“Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea Party in ways which exaggerate their least appealing qualities (misspelled protest signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further distance them from mainstream America and damage the public’s opinion of them. We will also use the inside information that we have gained in order to disrupt and derail their plans,” states the website.

“In other words, some on the Left in American politics are running a KGB-like 'false flag' operation to discredit the Tea Party,” writes the Washington Examiner’s Josh Tapscott (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Will-Mainstream-Media-reporters-and-editors-screen-out-Tea-Party-crashers-90572559.html). “They couldn’t sell the transparently nonsensical idea that Tea Partiers are just a bunch of racists, homophobes and morons, so the Crash the Party agents on the Left are infiltrating the Tea Party in order to pose as a bunch of racists, homophobes and morons.”

“It’s among the most illustrative expressions ever of the thirst on the Left to suppress dissent by whatever means are necessary,” he adds.

Given the virulent hatred for free speech such groups embrace, it’s unsurprising that merely staging a counter-demonstration is not good enough for them – they have to impersonate and undermine their political opposition in a completely underhanded and immature fashion.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/provocateurs-openly-announce-plans-to-stage-tea-party-violence.html)]


http://www.prisonplanet.com/think-progress-caught-using-liberal-manufactured-signs-from-%e2%80%98crash-the-tea-party%e2%80%99-as-evidence-of-tea-party-racism.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/think-progress-caught-using-liberal-manufactured-signs-from-%e2%80%98crash-the-tea-party%e2%80%99-as-evidence-of-tea-party-racism.html)

Think Progress Caught Using Liberal-Manufactured Signs From ‘Crash the Tea Party’ as Evidence of Tea Party Racism

Youtube
July 16, 2010

Liberal group Think Progress is featuring a video that supposedly “proves racism” in the ranks of the Tea Party. In fact, the video features signs that were provided by liberal groups to infiltrate the group.

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRJ2UmyHhxI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRJ2UmyHhxI) (Think Progress - Teaparty Racism video)
Title: Latino KKK: You are too white to be American!
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 20, 2010, 10:51:41 am
http://www.infowars.com/latino-kkk-you-are-too-white-to-be-american/ (http://www.infowars.com/latino-kkk-you-are-too-white-to-be-american/)

Latino KKK: You are too white to be American!

ALIPAC
July 20, 2010

Illegal immigration supporting Brown Beret protesters harass American patriots in front of Californians rallied in front of Angel Stadium (Anaheim, CA) that are trying to support Arizona’s SB 1070 law on Tuesday July 13, 2010.

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5YI2bFd5LQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5YI2bFd5LQ) (You are too white to be American! Says Latino KKK)

Nicknamed the Tan Klan or Latino KKK, the Brown Berets are a paramilitary organization founded in the 1960’s that support illegal immigration as a way to forge a racially pure homeland for Latino’s by overthrowing part or all of the United States. Many of these brown Nazis call their plans for a racist homeland ‘Aztlan’.

While this woman brazenly screams racist comments through a bull horn, she can do so because the Obama administration and most of the major news networks in America have her back.

While many in the media will conceal this incident, coverage of the NAACP’s false claim the Tea Party Movement is racist can be found on all networks.

If America knew the truth about the real violence and racism that is pervasive in the pro illegal alien and pro Comprehensive Immigration Reform AMNESTY movement, then CIR would be destroyed.

America needs to abandon the Obama, McCain, Kennedy, Bush Amnesty agenda for illegal aliens and move to enforce our existing border and immigration laws instead which will slowly push illegal aliens to return to their home.

If we fail to do that, groups like the Brown Berets will gain power and become more of a threat to law abiding Americans.

For more information or to get involved in the American struggle for our existing borders to be enforced, please visit Americans for Legal Immigration PAC aka ALIPAC at…

http://www.alipac.us (http://www.alipac.us)
Title: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Gave Millions to La Raza
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 10, 2010, 09:56:16 am
And last but certainly not least, why do you ignore the shameful, decades-old tradition among aristocrat (http://www.progress.org/archive/hgjr7a.htm)-funded “foundations” -- particularly the Ford Foundation -- of employing the divide-and-rule (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=163559.msg1026272#msg1026272)/anti-MLK (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poor_People's_Campaign) tactic of fomenting racial hatred within and between the lower and middle classes; and how this historical fact sheds a particularly unflattering light on all the racial provocateuring and hatemongering being engaged in by La Raza -- a hispanic supremecy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kv2y35OZy_Q&feature=PlayList&p=74E6D7A3A2FC6CF7&playnext_from=PL&index=0&playnext=1) group which is financed not only by the Ford Foundation, but by overprivileged corporations such as slave goods (http://walmartwatch.com/blog/archives/who_makes_the_stuff_you_buy/)-selling Wal-Mart (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3836296181471292925) and toxic derivatives (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=98465.msg581249#msg581249)-peddling Citigroup (http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/oops.php)?

http://www.infowars.com/bill-melinda-gates-foundation-gave-millions-to-la-raza/ (http://www.infowars.com/bill-melinda-gates-foundation-gave-millions-to-la-raza/)

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Gave Millions to La Raza

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
August 9, 2010

A 2002 annual report (http://www.gatesfoundation.org/nr/public/media/annualreports/annualreport02/grants.Amount.htm#) breaking down money doled out by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation reveals the foundation provided a grant to National Council of La Raza. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is arguably the largest “charitable” organization in the world.

(http://static.infowars.com/2010/08/i/article-images/billmelinda.jpg)
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation gave La Raza over $6 million in
2002.


Gates gave $6,661,364 to the racist organization for education, according to the foundation’s website. La Raza has also received financial support from the Ford Foundation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Council_of_La_Raza). For instance, in 1968, the globalist foundation gave La Raza $600,000, according to research conducted by Philip Brennan (http://www.philipbrennan.net/2010/05/15/la-raza-and-mecha-tools-of-the-new-world-order/).

La Raza’s website (http://www.theamericanresistance.com/articles/art2000fall_sc_funding_hate_3.html) admits “the organization receives two-thirds of its funding from corporations and foundations, and the rest from the government.” For the period 1992-1996, the total amount of “gifts, grants and contributions” to La Raza was more than $38 million.

The Ford Foundation has also funded the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF). According to Mario Obeldo, former head of MALDEF, “California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who does not like it should leave.” In 1998, Obledo was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Clinton.

La Raza’s motto is “For the race everything, outside the race nothing” (“Por La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada”). La Raza is associated with the radical racist group Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlán, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlán (MEChA), an organization that espouses Aztec supremacism and irredentism (specifically advocating the annexation of the American Southwest). Mestizo activists believe they have a legal and primordial right to the land and propose that a new nation be created, a Republica del Norte. The primary vehicle for creating this Aztec nation is La Reconquista, a demographic “revolution” that strives to supplant “gringos” in the Southwest with an influx of illegal Mexican immigrants.

According to La Raza (http://www.thesocialcontract.com/artman2/publish/tsc1101/article_912.shtml), border control is racist. The organization condemns the “step-up [in] immigration law enforcement significantly along the U.S./Mexico border and in the interior of the country” claiming such activities violate the civil rights of Hispanics.

A recent poll conducted by Fox News (http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/07/29/fox-news-poll-percent-say-government-enforcing-immigration-laws/) reveals that most Americans believe the federal government is failing to enforce the country’s immigration laws. In addition, voters are more likely to favor than oppose Arizona’s new immigration law that was blocked by a federal judge last week.

As Kevin Lamb (http://www.thesocialcontract.com/artman2/publish/tsc_18_4/tsc_18_4_lamb_obn.shtml) notes, the Gates and Ford foundations, along with the Soros and Rockefeller foundations, have long funded and supported “well-organized ethnic-immigrant lobbies and advocacy groups, which are actively working to transform the U.S. into a borderless society,” a cornerstone of the globalist vision and the end game of world government. La Raza, MEChA, and other so-called Hispanic civil rights organizations calling for an unrestricted flow of illegal immigrants are indispensable for this one-world agenda.

In addition to striving to eliminate borders and destroy the national sovereignty of the United States, Bill Gates has worked tirelessly as a eugenicist dedicated to reduce world population, another key objective of the elite. “First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent,” Gates said during an invitation-only conference held in Long Beach, California, earlier this year.

“In plain English, one of the most powerful men in the world states clearly that he expects vaccines to be used to reduce population growth. When Bill Gates speaks about vaccines, he speaks with authority,” writes F. William Engdahl (http://www.prisonplanet.com/bill-gates-and-neo-eugenics-vaccines-to-reduce-population.html).

La Raza and MEChA need to take note. The globalist foundations are not primarily concerned with the civil liberties of people in the third world, including Mexico, but are rather determined to exploit them in order to further their one-world and ultimately eugenics depopulation agenda (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=117190.msg726537#msg726537).
Title: MSNBC Teleprompter Reader Attempts to Ambush Ron Paul
Post by: Geolibertarian on October 14, 2010, 02:13:50 pm
http://www.infowars.com/msnbc-teleprompter-reader-attempts-to-ambush-ron-paul/ (http://www.infowars.com/msnbc-teleprompter-reader-attempts-to-ambush-ron-paul/)

MSNBC Teleprompter Reader Attempts to Ambush Ron Paul

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
October 14, 2010

It is yet another example of how the corporate media will lie and break agreements (http://www.mediaite.com/tv/angry-ron-paul-accuses-lawrence-odonnell-of-breaking-pre-show-agreement/) in order to accomplish its overarching mission — to denigrate and tear down any political candidate who will endeavor to break the stranglehold of mega-corporations and banks over the political life of the nation.

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYFTfiU11KE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYFTfiU11KE) (Ron Paul vs. Lawrence O'Donnell - pt. 1)
       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og99vvtvRlA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og99vvtvRlA) (Ron Paul vs. Lawrence O'Donnell - pt. 2)

Earlier in the week Texas Republican Ron Paul ventured into enemy territory when he agreed to appear on the Lawrence O’Donnell show on MSNBC, the same network that ambushed his son and attempted to portray him as a member of the Ku Klux Klan opposed to the Civil Rights Act. The corporate media immediately took its cue from the Maddow “interview” — actually a drive-by attempt at character assassination — and ran back-to-back segments designed to make Paul out to be a racist. The wife of former Federal Reserve mob boss Alan Greenspan, Andrea Mitchell (http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/21/dan-gainor-ron-paul-media-rachael-maddow-civil-rights-act/), declared the attempt to destroy Ran Paul was “a game changing interview.” It was nothing of the sort. Rand Paul leads the race in Kentucky.

David Gregory of “Meet the Press” called Rand’s comments “pretty far out view even for those on the right” and professional character assassin Chris Matthews went on “Leno” to bash Paul as “a philosopher and philosophers shouldn’t run for office.”

Instead of philosophers, we get a lickspittles for the establishment.

Matthews’ job is to steer people away from the fact that Obama and the Democrats are no different than Bush and the Republicans. Both work for the banksters. Both support forever war and the ongoing effort to erect pyres of dead bodies in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and soon enough Iran.

Is it any wonder Delaware’s Christine O’Donnell has refused to be interviewed by the establishment media (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/christine-odonnell-im-not-doin.html) after it dredged up and ancient video clip and attempted to make her out as a witch?

If you doubt MSNBC is a cheerleader for mass murder in far away lands, consider the fact the network dropped Jesse Ventura like a rock (http://www.mediaite.com/tv/jesse-ventura-claims-msnbc-bought-his-silence-for-opposing-iraq-war/) back in 2003 when he dared oppose the illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq. They canceled “Jesse Ventura’s America” in response to his principled opposition. Obviously, Jesse is too much of a philosopher for MSNBC, a network owned by General Electric. GE is one of the world’s top three producers of jet engines, supplying Boeing, Lockheed Martin and other military aircraft makers for the powering of airplanes and helicopters that kill brown people in “rogue states.”

Lawrence O’Donnell’s lecturing Ron Paul on “freedom” — as mandated by government at gunpoint — is hypocrisy at its worst.

The CIA infiltrated corporate media is not a purveyor of freedom and liberty. It is a slick, multi-billion dollar propaganda apparatus designed to trick people into supporting the establishment and its foreign wars. The false right-left paradigm exercised 24/7 on the corporate media networks is a distraction. It is a slight of hand devised to distract people as the ruling elite roll out their global slave and surveillance grid.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: CheneysWorstNightmare on October 14, 2010, 02:25:08 pm
These vids are making my blood boil.  And I'm only 5 minutes in. 
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: worcesteradam on October 14, 2010, 03:14:15 pm
MS-NBC

as un-corporate as

MS-DOS
Title: NAACP releases report accusing tea party groups of links to bigots
Post by: Geolibertarian on October 20, 2010, 02:28:32 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/naacp-releases-report-accusing-tea-party-groups-of-links-to-bigots.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/naacp-releases-report-accusing-tea-party-groups-of-links-to-bigots.html)

NAACP releases report accusing tea party groups of links to bigots

JUDY L. THOMAS
The Kansas City Star (http://www.kansascity.com/2010/10/19/2332666/naacp-releases-report-accusing.html)
Oct 20, 2010

Three months ago in Kansas City, the NAACP first raised charges of racism within the tea party movement. Today a report is being released accusing tea party groups of providing platforms to anti-Semites and other bigots.

“These groups and individuals are out there, and we ignore them at our own peril,” said NAACP President Benjamin Todd Jealous in a statement announcing the report. “They are speaking at tea party events, recruiting at rallies, and in some cases remain in the tea party leadership itself.”

The 94-page report is being released by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People in a teleconference today.

In July, NAACP delegates passed a resolution at their national convention in Kansas City condemning racism within the tea party movement, creating a national furor. The NAACP board of directors ratified the resolution last week.

Tea party leaders condemned the report on Tuesday.

Full article here (http://www.kansascity.com/2010/10/19/2332666/naacp-releases-report-accusing.html)
Title: Re: NAACP releases report accusing tea party groups of links to bigots
Post by: Dig on October 20, 2010, 06:28:58 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/naacp-releases-report-accusing-tea-party-groups-of-links-to-bigots.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/naacp-releases-report-accusing-tea-party-groups-of-links-to-bigots.html)

NAACP releases report accusing tea party groups of links to bigots

JUDY L. THOMAS
The Kansas City Star (http://www.kansascity.com/2010/10/19/2332666/naacp-releases-report-accusing.html)
Oct 20, 2010

Three months ago in Kansas City, the NAACP first raised charges of racism within the tea party movement. Today a report is being released accusing tea party groups of providing platforms to anti-Semites and other bigots.

“These groups and individuals are out there, and we ignore them at our own peril,” said NAACP President Benjamin Todd Jealous in a statement announcing the report. “They are speaking at tea party events, recruiting at rallies, and in some cases remain in the tea party leadership itself.”

The 94-page report is being released by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People in a teleconference today.

In July, NAACP delegates passed a resolution at their national convention in Kansas City condemning racism within the tea party movement, creating a national furor. The NAACP board of directors ratified the resolution last week.

Tea party leaders condemned the report on Tuesday.

Full article here (http://www.kansascity.com/2010/10/19/2332666/naacp-releases-report-accusing.html)

DIGNITY...a cure for NAACP's systematic rape of Civil Liberties in Black America
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=189993.0

Elite warn of more inside job white Al-Qaeda patsies if we defend Constitution
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=186534.0

Scandal Ridden NAACP Set to Release Fraudulent Report on Tea Party Racism
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=189939.0

Nanny State Liberation Front - COINTELPRO linking patriots to Big Food shills?
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=189879.0
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: citizenx on October 20, 2010, 06:44:06 pm
ALTERNATIVE MEDIA CENSORSHIP:
SPONSORED BY CIA's FORD FOUNDATION?

by bob feldman

The mass-circulation weekly TEMPO accused Ford of having once played, at the urging of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, a covert role in Indonesian political affairs by consciously supporting the work of individuals who were deemed to be sympathetic to the anti-communist aims of American foreign policy.
— Chronicle of Philanthropy, 12/13/01

The Ford Foundation's history of collaboration and interlock with the CIA in pursuit of U.S. world hegemony is now a well-documented fact...The Ford Foundation has in some ways refined their style of collaboration with Washington's attempt to produce world cultural domination, but retained the substance of that policy...The ties between the top officials of the Ford Foundation and the U.S. government are explicit and continuing.
—James Petras in "The Ford Foundation and the CIA: A documented case of philanthropic collaboration with the Secret Police" on 12/15/2001


The multi-billion dollar Ford Foundation's historic relationship to the Central Intelligence Agency [CIA] is rarely mentioned on Pacifica's DEMOCRACY NOW / Deep Dish TV show, on FAIR's COUNTERSPIN show, on the WORKING ASSETS RADIO show, on The Nation Institute's RADIO NATION show, on David Barsamian's ALTERNATIVE RADIO show or in the pages of PROGRESSIVE, MOTHER JONES and Z magazine. One reason may be because the Ford Foundation and other Establishment foundations subsidize the Establishment Left's alternative media gatekeepers / censors.

for entire page including many good links/sources:

http://www.questionsquestions.net/gatekeepers.html

Title: Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Tools of Freedom
Post by: Geolibertarian on January 17, 2011, 11:16:02 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/martin-luther-king-jr-and-the-tools-of-freedom.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/martin-luther-king-jr-and-the-tools-of-freedom.html)

Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Tools of Freedom

The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy. – Martin Luther King, Jr.

Ethan Jacobs, J.D.
Activist Post (http://www.activistpost.com/2011/01/martin-luther-king-jr-and-tools-of.html)
Jan 17, 2011

Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated April 4, 1968, shortly after he started speaking out (http://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money-masters/famous-quotations-on-banking/) against the global elite and the injustice they inflict on all of humanity though orchestrated wars and economic oppression. He believed that “a nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.”

While King may not physically be with us today, we are fortunate that he left us with powerful principles and tools for defeating tyranny. King, Gandhi and many others have set the precedent for our liberation, proving that courage, love, persistence, and some simple tools are ultimately victorious.

In fact, the tools and principles utilized by King are so powerful that they rocked the foundation of the global elite’s power structure. As Andrew Gavin Marshall writes:


Hatred for King by the elite’s agents in government intensified after he publicly identified the U.S. government as “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today.” The FBI and U.S military kept King under 24-hour surveillance, and agents had infiltrated the civil rights movement. Therefore, the elites were aware of King’s Poor People’s Campaign (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poor_People's_Campaign) for Washington D.C., where King planned to shut down the nation’s capital in the spring of 1968 through massive civil disobedience until the government agreed to combat economic inequality in the United States rather than drop bombs on Vietnam.

On December 8, 1999, in the wrongful death lawsuit filed by the King Family, a jury composed of six white and six black people deliberated less than three hours to find that Loyd Jowers (who confessed on television in 1999) and others “including governmental agencies,” were parties to the conspiracy to assassinate Martin Luther King, Jr. During closing argument, King family attorney William Pepper stated: “When Martin King opposed the war, when he rallied people to oppose the war, he was threatening the bottom lines of some of the largest defense contractors in this country. This was about money. He was threatening the weapons industry, the hardware, the armaments industries, that would all lose as a result of the end of the war.”

All Americans would be well advised to review the evidence (http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/MLKconExp.html) that was presented at the trial.

Now we shall examine Martin Luther King, Jr.’s principles and tools for restoring freedom in greater detail, committing them to memory by applying them with action each day.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/martin-luther-king-jr-and-the-tools-of-freedom.html)]
Title: Martin Luther King: Stop the Wars and Stop the Economic Raping of the Masses
Post by: Geolibertarian on January 18, 2011, 06:42:16 pm
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/01/martin-luther-king-jr-stop-wars-in-iraq.html (http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/01/martin-luther-king-jr-stop-wars-in-iraq.html)

Martin Luther King Jr.: Stop the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and Stop the Mugging of the Middle Class and Poor by the Wealthy

Washington’s Blog
Monday, January 17, 2011

The Defense Department’s general counsel said (http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=62448) that he believed Martin Luther King, Jr., might have supported the current wars:


That is easily disproven.

As King said (http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkatimetobreaksilence2.htm) in 1967:


King also proclaimed (http://www.bravenewfoundation.org/?utm_source=youtubehp) in 1967:


King lamented (http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkatimetobreaksilence2.htm) that the United States had become the “greatest purveyor of violence in the world today, said the world "is sick with war", and said that "war is not the answer." King said:


And he warned that the deep malady of the American spirit is our perverse devotion to what he called the "giant triplets" of "racism, extreme materialism, and militarism."

Indeed, if one understands King's core philosophies, the Pentagon's statement becomes even sillier.

Initially, as Pulitzer Prize-winning author Chris Hedges points out (http://www.truthdig.com/report/page2/ralph_nader_was_right_about_barack_obama_20100301/):


In other words, King believed that his Christian faith required him to fight injustice (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/03/real-christians-fight-against-injustice.html). That is why King said that we have to fight against "systems of exploitation and oppression."

Moreover, King was an adherent of two philosophical concepts (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahimsa#Modern_times) which Gandhi also followed:

[Continued... (http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/01/martin-luther-king-jr-stop-wars-in-iraq.html)]
Title: The True Meaning of War and Peace. Barack Obama versus Martin Luther King
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 24, 2011, 05:50:21 pm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-true-meaning-of-war-and-peace-barack-obama-versus-martin-luther-king/26180 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-true-meaning-of-war-and-peace-barack-obama-versus-martin-luther-king/26180)

The True Meaning of War and Peace. Barack Obama versus Martin Luther King

by David Swanson

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/126180.jpg)

Global Research, August 24, 2011
warisacrime.org  

That sounds like a crazy question, doesn't it?  Why would President Obama denounce Martin Luther King, Jr.?

Well, the reason I ask is that he's done it before.

Really?  But surely he wouldn't do it on such a solemn occasion?

Well, the time he did it before was in a Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech.

When President Barack Obama joined the ranks of Henry Kissinger and the other gentle souls who have received Nobel Peace Prizes, he did something that I don't think anyone else had previously done in a Peace Prize acceptance speech. He argued for war.  And he opposed the position of a previous Peace Prize Laureate, namely Martin Luther King, Jr.:

"There will be times when nations -- acting individually or in concert -- will find the use of force not only necessary but morally justified. I make this statement mindful of what Martin Luther King Jr. said in this same ceremony years ago: 'Violence never brings permanent peace. It solves no social problem: it merely creates new and more complicated ones.'…But as a head of state sworn to protect and defend my nation, I cannot be guided by [King's and Gandhi's] examples alone. I face the world as it is, and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to the American people. For make no mistake: Evil does exist in the world. A non-violent movement could not have halted Hitler's armies. Negotiations cannot convince al-Qaeda's leaders to lay down their arms. To say that force may sometimes be necessary is not a call to cynicism -- it is a recognition of history…. So yes, the instruments of war do have a role to play in preserving the peace."

But, you know, I've never found any opponent of war who didn't believe there was evil in the world. After all, we oppose war because it is evil.

Did Martin Luther King, Jr., not face the world as it is?  Was he delusional?  Did he stand idle in the face of threats?  This is President Obama's position.

Did King oppose protecting and defending people? Of course not.  He worked for that very goal!

Obama claims that his only choices are war or nothing. But the reason people know the names Gandhi (who was never given a Nobel Peace Prize) and King is that they suggested other options and proved that those other approaches could work. This fundamental disagreement cannot be smoothed over. Either war is the only option or it is not -- in which case we must consider the alternatives.

Couldn't we have halted Hitler's armies without a world war? To claim otherwise is ridiculous. We could have halted Hitler's armies by not concluding World War I with an effort seemingly aimed at breeding as much resentment as possible in Germany (punishing a whole people rather than individuals, requiring that Germany admit sole responsibility, taking away its territory, and demanding enormous reparations payments that it would have taken [in fact did take] Germany several decades to pay), or by putting our energies seriously into a League of Nations and International Court as opposed to the victor-justice of dividing the spoils, or by building good relations with Germany in the 1920s and 1930s, or by funding peace studies in Germany rather than eugenics, or by fearing militaristic governments more than leftist ones, or by not funding Hitler and his armies, or by helping the Jews escape, or by maintaining a ban on bombing civilians, or indeed by massive nonviolent resistance which requires greater courage and valor than we've ever seen in war.

We have seen such courage in the largely nonviolent eviction of the British rulers from India, in the nonviolent overthrow of the ruler of El Salvador in 1944, in the campaigns that ended Jim Crow in the United States and apartheid in South Africa. We've seen it in the popular removal of the ruler of the Philippines in 1986, in the largely nonviolent Iranian Revolution of 1979, in the dismantling of the Soviet Union in Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Czechoslovakia, and East Germany, as well as in the Ukraine in 2004 and 2005, and in dozens of other examples from all over the world, including Tunisia and Egypt. Why should Germany be the one place where a force more powerful than violence could not possibly have prevailed?

If you can't accept that World War II could have been avoided, there is still this crucial point to consider: Hitler's armies have been gone for 65 years but are still being used to justify the scourge of humanity that we outlawed in 1928: war. Most nations do not behave as Nazi Germany did, and one reason is that a lot of them have come to value and understand peace. Those that do make war still appeal to a horrible episode in world history that ended 65 years ago to justify what they are doing -- exactly as if nothing has changed, exactly as if King and Gandhi and billions of other people have not come and gone and contributed their bit to our knowledge of what can and should be done.

Negotiations cannot convince al-Qaeda (http://www.prisonplanet.com/us-nato-commander-admits-al-qaeda-linked-to-libyan-rebels.html) to lay down its arms? How would President Obama know that? The United States has never tried it. The solution cannot be to meet the demands of terrorists, thereby encouraging terrorism, but the grievances against the United States that attract people to anti-U.S. terrorism seem extremely reasonable:

Get out of our country. Stop bombing us. Stop threatening us. Stop blockading us. Stop raiding our homes. Stop funding the theft of our lands.  Stop taking out natural resources.  Such grievances are being aggravated rather than alleviated in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, Libya, and elsewhere.

We ought to satisfy those demands even in the absence of negotiations with anyone. We ought to stop producing and selling most of the weapons we want other people to "lay down." And if we did so, you would see about as much anti-U.S. terrorism as the Norwegians giving out the prizes see anti-Norwegian terrorism. Norway has neither negotiated with al-Qaeda nor murdered all of its members. Norway has just refrained from doing what the United States military does, although sometimes participating.

Martin Luther King, Jr., and Barack Obama disagree, and only one of them can be right. In his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, King said:

"Civilization and violence are antithetical concepts. Negroes of the United States, following the people of India, have demonstrated that nonviolence is not sterile passivity, but a powerful moral force which makes for social transformation. Sooner or later all the people of the world will have to discover a way to live together in peace, and thereby transform this pending cosmic elegy into a creative psalm of brotherhood. If this is to be achieved, man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love."

Love? I thought it was a big stick, a large Navy, a missile defense shield, and weapons in outerspace. King may in fact have been ahead of us. This portion of King's 1964 speech anticipated Obama's speech 45 years later:

"I refuse to accept the cynical notion that nation after nation must spiral down a militaristic stairway into the hell of thermonuclear destruction. I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality.…I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits. I believe that what self-centered men have torn down men other-centered can build up."

Other-centered? How odd it sounds to imagine the United States and its people becoming other-centered. It sounds as outrageous as loving one's enemies. And yet there may just be something to it.  King was a moral man who, if alive today, would be an environmentalist.  He might very well be risking arrest at the White House right now to demand clean energy rather than the opening up of enough new dirty fuel use to finish off the planet.  He would likely be committed to nonviolent actions of the aort planned for October 2011 at http://october2011.org

A year ago, on October 2, 2010, a broad coalition held a rally at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. The organizers sought to use the rally both to demand jobs, protect Social Security, and advance a hodgepodge of progressive ideas, and also to cheer for the Democratic Party, whose leadership was not on board with that program. An independent movement would back particular politicians, including Democrats, but they would have to earn it by supporting our positions.

The peace movement was included in the rally, if not given top billing, and many peace organizations took part. We found that, among all of those tens of thousands of union members and civil rights activists who showed up, virtually all of them were eager to carry anti-war posters and stickers. In fact the message "Money for Jobs, Not Wars," was immensely popular. If anyone at all disagreed, I haven't heard about it. The theme of the rally was "One Nation Working Together," a warm message but one so vague we didn't even offend anyone enough to produce a counter-rally. I suspect more people would have shown up and a stronger message would have been delivered had the headline been "Bring Our War Dollars Home!"

One speech outshone all others that day. The speaker was 83-year-old singer and activist Harry Belafonte, his voice strained, scratchy, and gripping. These were some of his words:

"Martin Luther King, Jr., in his 'I Have a Dream' speech 47 years ago, said that America would soon come to realize that the war that we were in at that time that this nation waged in Vietnam was not only unconscionable, but unwinnable. Fifty-eight thousand Americans died in that cruel adventure, and over two million Vietnamese and Cambodians perished. Now today, almost a half-a-century later, as we gather at this place where Dr. King prayed for the soul of this great nation, tens of thousands of citizens from all walks of life have come here today to rekindle his dream and once again hope that all America will soon come to the realization that the wars that we wage today in far away lands are immoral, unconscionable and unwinnable.

"The Central Intelligence Agency (http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-and-a-timeline-of-cia-crimes-and-atrocities/), in its official report, tells us that the enemy we pursue in Afghanistan and in Pakistan, the al-Qaeda (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2007/280507usesalqaeda.htm), they number less than 50 -- I say 50 -- people. Do we really think that sending 100,000 young American men and women to kill innocent civilians, women, and children, and antagonizing the tens of millions of people in the whole region somehow makes us secure?

"Does this make any sense?

"The President's decision to escalate the war in that region alone costs the nation $33 billion. That sum of money could not only create 600,000 jobs here in America, but would even leave us a few billion to start rebuilding our schools, our roads, our hospitals and affordable housing. It could also help to rebuild the lives of the thousands of our returning wounded veterans."

[Continued... (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-true-meaning-of-war-and-peace-barack-obama-versus-martin-luther-king/26180)]
Title: Black Caucus Incites Race War Against Tea Party Americans
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 31, 2011, 02:19:30 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/black-caucus-incites-race-war-against-tea-party-americans.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/black-caucus-incites-race-war-against-tea-party-americans.html)

Black Caucus Incites Race War Against Tea Party Americans

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
August 31, 2011

In the video below, Congress critters Al Green, Frederica Wilson, Maxine Waters, Cedric Richmond and Andre Carson attack the Tea Party and accuse it of racism.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tG8x6X8xn3c (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tG8x6X8xn3c)

Playing the race card against the Tea Party is the only ammo Democrats have to fight against the growing movement toward a restoration of our constitutional republic.

But it is isn’t simply Democrats who fear the Tea Party.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/black-caucus-incites-race-war-against-tea-party-americans.html)]
Title: MSNBC Yet Again Implies Criticism of Obama Is Racist
Post by: Geolibertarian on September 01, 2011, 06:10:18 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbc-yet-again-implies-criticism-of-obama-is-racist.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbc-yet-again-implies-criticism-of-obama-is-racist.html)

MSNBC Yet Again Implies Criticism of Obama Is Racist

Washington-friendly network is earning its federal bailout money

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, September 1, 2011

MSNBC has yet again implied that political criticism of Obama is racist after talking head Richard Wolffe mused that Republican opposition to Obama making a speech on a date that clashed with a presidential debate was down to “the color of his skin”.

[Embedded video clip omitted - see original article]

During an appearance on MSNBC’s The Last Word, a vehemently statist broadcast hosted by Lawrence O’Donnell, who previously attempted to portray Ron Paul as a Ku Klux Klan-supporting (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbc-teleprompter-reader-attempts-to-ambush-ron-paul/) bigot, Wolffe played the race card in explaining why people have lost respect for Obama.

“The interesting question is: What is it about this president that has stripped away the veneer of respect that normally accompanies the Office of the President? Why do Republicans think this president is unpresidential and should dare to request this kind of thing? It strikes me that it could be the economic times, it could be that he won so big in 2008 or it could be, let’s face it, the color of his skin. This is an extraordinary reaction to a normal sequence of events,” he stated.

Wolffe is an MSNBC regular, having appeared numerous times on Chris Matthews’ Hardball and previously filling in as a guest host for Keith Olbermann.

MSNBC has a history of race-baiting and attempting to characterize legitimate political criticism of Barack Obama as racist.

Back during the Obama Joker poster era, when depictions of the President as the fictional character out of Batman were deemed racist by the establishment media despite identical images being produced of Bush as the Joker for years before, MSNBC host Carlos Watson insinuated (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbc-host-calling-obama-socialist-is-code-for-n-word.html) that calling Obama a “socialist” was secret code for a racist slur.

Responding to those questioning Obama’s big government agenda by labeling him a socialist, Watson wondered whether the term was “becoming a code word, whether or not socialist is becoming the new n-word for some angry upset birthers and others.”

Of course, playing the race card is a dirty and underhanded means of silencing dissent and it always has been. Disagreeing with when Obama times his speeches or his big government agenda has nothing to do with skin color.

The federal government has done everything in its power to portray ideological adversaries of the Obama administration as dangerous extremists, most recently by characterizing white middle class people as the most likely terrorists (http://www.prisonplanet.com/big-sis-latest-terrorists-more-white-americans/), so it’s unsurprising that MSNBC is following suit.

The network is part-owned (49% to Comcast’s 51%) by one of Obama’s biggest campaign contributors, General Electric, which itself received $16 billion in federal bailout money, a story MSNBC’s hosts were keen to avoid (http://usactionnews.com/2010/12/msnbc-commentators-hide-their-corporate-ge-bosses-fed-bailout/).

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbc-yet-again-implies-criticism-of-obama-is-racist.html)]
Title: Black caucus chair: We’d ‘be marching on the White House’ if not for Obama
Post by: Geolibertarian on September 19, 2011, 11:34:04 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/black-caucus-chair-we%e2%80%99d-%e2%80%98be-marching-on-the-white-house%e2%80%99-if-not-for-obama.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/black-caucus-chair-we%e2%80%99d-%e2%80%98be-marching-on-the-white-house%e2%80%99-if-not-for-obama.html)

Black caucus chair: We’d ‘be marching on the White House’ if not for Obama

Muriel Kane
Raw Story
Sept 19, 2011

The Congressional Black Caucus is growing increasingly frustrated with a black unemployment rate of nearly 17% — almost twice the national average. Even the group’s chairman, Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO), believes they’d already be leading a march on Washington if not for a desire to avoid weakening President Obama.

“If Bill Clinton had been in the White House and had failed to address this problem, we probably would be marching on the White House,” Cleaver told McClatchy Newspapers for an article (http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/09/18/v-fullstory/2413197/black-caucus-head-treads-line.html) published on Sunday. “There is a less-volatile reaction in the CBC because nobody wants to do anything that would empower the people who hate the president.”

Tensions have recently been running high within the CBC, to the point where the group’s only Republican menber, Rep. Allen West (R-FL), threatened to quit after Rep. Andre Carson (D-IN) said that tea party members of Congress “would love to see you and me … hanging on a tree.”

Cleaver, a Methodist minister who founded a Civility Caucus some years back, is known for his non-combative style and strong party loyalty. He recently told (http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/emanuel-cleaver-obama-will-face-either-romney-or-huntsman-20110915) the National Journal, “I am convinced, irreversibly, that the lack of civility is causing most of the problems we have in our government. We’ve gotten to the point now where Republicans and Democrats have nothing in common besides being members of the ‘caustic caucus,’ and we can’t get anything done.”

Full article here (http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/09/18/black-caucus-chair-wed-be-marching-on-the-white-house-if-not-for-obama/)
Title: AP Labeled “Racist” For Accurately Transcribing Obama Speech
Post by: Geolibertarian on September 27, 2011, 03:45:13 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ap-labeled-racist-for-accurately-transcribing-obama-speech.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/ap-labeled-racist-for-accurately-transcribing-obama-speech.html)

AP Labeled “Racist” For Accurately Transcribing Obama Speech

MSNBC is obsessed with playing the race card
 
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
 
MSNBC has yet again played the race card to demonize not even criticism, but merely unsympathetic portrayal, of Barack Obama as racist after an AP writer was lambasted for accurately transcribing Obama’s Black Caucus speech.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeoOg3Fj0G0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeoOg3Fj0G0)

During his speech, Obama attempted to fool the black audience into thinking he was one of them and not a paid teleprompter reader for Wall Street by dropping the g’s at the end of his words.
 
“Take off your bedroom slippers. Put on your marching shoes,” Obama lectured the audience. “Shake it off. Stop complainin’. Stop grumblin’. Stop cryin’. We are going to press on. We have work to do.”
 
However, after the Associated Press accurately transcribed Obama’s dropped g’s, MSNBC aired a debate segment asking whether the decision not to “clean up” Obama’s words was “racist”.
 
“On MSNBC, the African-American author Karen Hunter complained the news service transcribed Obama’s speech without cleaning it up as other outlets did–specifically including the “dropped g’s,” reports Yahoo News (http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/associated-press-transcription-obama-cbc-speech-racist-173438340.html).
 
“Hunter called the AP’s version “inherently racist,” sparring with New Republic contributing editor and noted linguistics expert John McWhorter, who argued the g-less version “is actually the correct one,” noting that the president’s victory in the 2008 election was due, in part, to how effortlessly “he can switch into that  dialect.”
 
It goes without saying that Hunter’s claim is completely ridiculous. Obama’s dropping of his g’s was blatantly deliberate. If the AP had “cleaned up” his speech it would have been completely misleading and inaccurate.
 
Hunter claimed the AP transcriber didn’t “fix” Obama’s grammar because of the color of his skin, while failing to mention the fact that transcripts of George W. Bush’s speeches were routinely transcribed (accurately) by including dropped g’s and other idiosyncratic styles of speech. She then ventured further into the realms of absurdity, claiming the AP writer was using a secret “code” through which to express his racism.

“Normally, I lean toward the clean-it-up school of quote transcribing—for everyone,” AP transcriber Mark Smith told Mediaite. “But in this case, the President appeared to be making such a point of dropping Gs, and doing so in a rhythmic fashion, that for me to insert them would run clearly counter to his meaning. I believe I was respecting his intent in this. Certainly disrespect was the last thing I intended.”

It’s not the first time Hunter has used her platform at MSNBC to imply a failure to observe complete obedience to Obama is racist. Two years ago, she said (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SVZKzZUbOM) that people who “disrespected” Obama by being critical of his mandatory health care plan were racist.

As we have documented on numerous occasions, the establishment likes to play the race card in characterizing any criticism, or even any portrayal that could be considered unsympathetic, of Obama as racist. MSNBC has proven itself adept at this dirty trick.

During an appearance on MSNBC’s The Last Word (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbc-yet-again-implies-criticism-of-obama-is-racist.html) recently, talking head Richard Wolffe mused that Republican opposition to Obama making a speech on a date that clashed with a presidential debate was down to “the color of his skin”.

Back during the Obama Joker poster era, when depictions of the President as the fictional character out of Batman were deemed racist by the establishment media despite identical images being produced of Bush as the Joker for years before, MSNBC host Carlos Watson insinuated (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbc-host-calling-obama-socialist-is-code-for-n-word.html) that calling Obama a “socialist” to criticize his big government agenda was secret code for a racist slur.

Of course, the ultimate irony of all this is Obama’s attempt to come across as a working class black man by dropping letters as the end of his words. In reality, Obama’s background is about as ‘black working class’ as the Queen of England. He enjoyed a predominantly white, privileged, middle class upbringing (http://lionwar17.hubpages.com/hub/Obams-White-Enough-already-with-the-racism-nonsense) and had none of the hardships of the black working man he tries so desperately to impersonate in a bid to re-connect with black voters who are abandoning Obama (http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/black-caucus-tired-making-excuses-obama) in droves.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on October 12, 2011, 12:51:06 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/crazed-marxist-accuses-tea-partier-of-racism-violence-then-gets-racist-and-violent.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/crazed-marxist-accuses-tea-partier-of-racism-violence-then-gets-racist-and-violent.html)

Crazed Marxist Accuses Tea Partier of Racism & Violence, Then Gets Racist and Violent

YouTube
October 12, 2011
 
In Portland, Oregon on October 10th, 2011, this unknown man attempted to crash a Tea Party gathering at Pioneer Square. Near the end of the video he attacks the videographer, attempting to steal the camera in the process (language warning).

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8of8h-N1o7M (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8of8h-N1o7M) (Leftist Hurls Racist, Hateful Comments, Assaults Tea Party Member)
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: kita on October 12, 2011, 05:41:24 pm


NGO and foundations are ESSENTIAL to the Elite system of control,without them they are over!,including WWF,greenpeace,Seirra club,there are thousands of them lobbing the government on YOUR behalf.And the Government will only to happy to do what ever they say.They are the "pressure from below" element to the dialect.

Great post.

How many times have you heard on the news,such & such org wants this,on behalf of the people.9/10 times it is the Elite's OWN NGO or foundation.

Pressure from above,Pressure from below.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: TahoeBlue on October 12, 2011, 07:08:38 pm
(http://www.porhomme.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/steve-jobs-1984-macintosh.jpg) IBM look (http://www.porhomme.com/tag/steve-jobs/)
(http://www.thegeekery.biz/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/stevejobs-copy.jpg) Mao look (http://www.thegeekery.biz/?p=51)
Does Steve Jobs own other clothes? A Rant
Seriously. No, seriously. Has anyone outside of the 70’s seen this guy dressed in something other then his black mock top, jeans, and New Balances?

Title: Will False Flag Terror Discredit Occupy Protests?
Post by: notanumber on October 14, 2011, 11:05:25 am
http://www.henrymakow.com/gladio-redux_will_there_be_a_n.html

(http://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/terrorist-1.jpg)

Will False Flag Terror Discredit Protests?

October 14, 2011

A survey of state-sponsored terrorism in Europe

by Christian Soderberg
(henrymakow.com)

Although an exciting political awakening is happening in the western world, the Establishment is trying to harness it for its own ends.

And if they cannot hi-jack this awakening, they will most certainly try to make it look bad. And if things come to this, we might see a new wave of bogus political radicalism appearing in Europe and North America.
 

Fake Radicals: Police Provocateurs

Undercover police officers have been caught trying to provoke protesters to attack cops during demonstrations (2007 Quebec protests; 2009 London G20-protests).

Undercover police have even been caught on video breaking public and private property (Greece 2008). Masked undercover cops, some with clubs in their hand (Greece 2011), or dressed as a "black-bloc anarchist" (2010 Toronto G20), have been filmed crossng police safety lines.

In 2001 Genoa, Italy, the police planted petrol bombs in the facilities of student protesters during the G8-protests. They even staged a stabbing of a police officer as an excuse for use of force.

Undercover London cops tried to provoke protesters to throw things at the police during 2009 G20 protests.


..and these are just few examples of agent provocateur-cops in the western world.


"Strategy of Tension"

Staged security threats against the state are used to: Manipulate public opinion; as a smear campaign against political opposition; as a tool to restrict freedom of speech and the right to demonstrate; to establish state emergency; to start wars against another nation, and so on.

There appears to be a criminal element that has infiltrated the western security sector (police, armed forces, intelligence agencies, Pentagon, NATO ... who stage "security threads" whenever it is thought to serve the Illuminati agenda.

..and because some of these "rogue-agents" also sit at the very top of many of these security agencies, they can quite easily make it appear to be a good thing when police manipulates protesters and political groups into violence, or when they stage acts of terror themselves "..We do this to smoke out the radical element."

f you look into the Ergenekon-organization in Turkey, and the Susurluk-scandal, you will get a fairly good picture of how this criminal "shadow government" operates and how it is constructed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergenekon_(organization)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susurluk_scandal

During the "Years of Lead" in Cold War-Europe, a lot, if not most of the political terror was provoked, organized or even staged by these rogue -agents inside the western security establishment. These rogue-agents brainwashed and armed political groups to start violent street wars and to acts of terrorism against the state (..and private sector).They manipulated both ends of the political spectrum, left- and right-wing groups, to create this atmosphere of tension that lasted for decades, hence the name "Strategy of Tension".

Operation Gladio

"Operation Gladio" was a network of stay-behind armies, armed and trained by NATO-powers and their intelligence agencies. The Gladio-network had many arms caches hidden all around Europe in case of Soviet invasion ...Nothing wrong with that  ..but sadly, it appears that explosives from these arms caches were used in terror bombings at least in Italy and West Germany

Here are some examples of western intelligence agencies' involvement in political terrorism starting from 1960's

West Germany:

Peter Urbach and Red Army Faction (Baader-Meinhof Group)

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Urbach  (..use Google-translator, and check out the source articles also.)

It was Peter Urbach, apparently an agent provocateur working for West German intelligence (Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV)), who radicalized young leftist prankster-groups to leave behind their "pudding wars", and pick up the Molotov Cocktails and bombs he delivered.

Full Article--
http://www.henrymakow.com/gladio-redux_will_there_be_a_n.html
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: notanumber on October 15, 2011, 10:54:14 am
Re-post--

http://tarpley.net/2011/10/12/unchain-the-mass-strike/

Unchain the Mass Strike: Kick Out the Facilitators and Foundation Operatives,
Demand a Student Loan Amnesty Paid for by a 1% Wall Street Sales Tax


Download MP3 interview, Webster Tarpley on Press TV
http://tarpley.net/audio/getfile.php?f=20111012-WGT_on_PressTV.mp3

****************
http://edition.presstv.ir/detail/204427.html

US using thugs to silence people

The “Occupy Wall Street”(OWS) movement emerged on September 17, when a group of people began rallying in New York's financial district to protest at 'corporate greed' and top-level corruption in the country.


The campaign has now spread to nearly 70 major cities, including Seattle, Los Angeles, Dallas, and Boston, as well as more than 600 communities across the nation. It is reportedly being supported through 'Occupy' events in close to 1,600 cities across the globe.

Press TV has conducted an interview with author and historian Webster Griffin Tarpley from Washington to further talk over the issue and get an analytical view point from him.

What follows is the script of the interview:

Press TV: Webster Griffin Tarpley, I'd like to get your reaction to some of the statements that have been made, examples as it has been said of the far right trying to frighten some of these protestors and everyday Americans.

Let's look at Congressman Eric Cantor inciting fear that it's the mob that is occupying our cities and then we had Glen Beck predicting that the protestors will come for you, drag you into the street and kill you. Why are you getting such reactions in your country as the examples I just stated and what do you make of that?

Tarpley: Part of it has to do with the tremendous programmatic weakness, the programmatic void of these demonstrations, the people running these things, and we know who they are, have insisted on leaving it all as a blank slate and naturally these reactionaries and proto-fascists that you mentioned are running to fill in the blanks, loony left and whatever else you can say.

I think this is the problem. This is a mass strike upsurge, and the problem with a mass strike upsurge is that the forces of the old order attempt to extend their social control over it and typically in the United States that means the foundations, that is the domestic counterinsurgency apparatus that Wall Street ultimately uses.

The foundation I think that has played the leading role here is Adbusters of Vancouver, British, Colombia, Canada and their operative or similar to them on the scene is a woman called Alexa O'Brien and they are ones who have imposed the idea that there should not be a program and instead everything has to go through this endless General Assembly that debates and debates and debates with filibusters and days go by and nothing is done.

They talk for hours about what to order for lunch and they have no demands and as long as it is a blank slate of demands, then these are the people who will come in. Now, a couple of examples on how this is dangerous: in Atlanta, their General Assembly did something, I think, was crazy and racist really.

John Lewis, of the Civil Rights Veteran goes back to Martin Luther King, who is the local Congressman, came to the Atlanta General Assembly and said I'd like to say a few words of greeting and they told him no. Their consensus was no. Now this is fundamental stupidity.

If you have a student-based demonstration, you have got to reach out to black working people and the way to do that is obviously not to insult one of their most respected representatives when he comes in twice to offer his support.

Second example would be important in Oregon. The people there say that the facilitators who actually control this thing, foundation funded facilitators in most cases, they say the government just is not to make decisions but only to have a satisfying discussion process, in other words, pure subjectivity for the people that are there and the public be damned, working people be damned and nothing for them.

The question is what are the fighting clash-based demands that you are willing to go for? Another one, this Nurses Union has been really the bright spot. It is called 'American Nurses United' and they have been agitating for what we can call the Wall Street Sales Tax, the Tobin Tax, the Transaction Tax.

You want to break the power of Wall Street? Great, tax them, their great advantages, they pay no taxes and above all they pay no taxes on their turnover and therefore the demand would have to be tax Wall Street one percent that ties it up in the package.

One of the demands that has come forward thanks to agitation by some of us is a Student Loan Amnesty to cancel one trillion dollars of high interest illegitimate student loan debt which is crushing the younger generation and I guess to put it together: have the Student Loan Amnesty now, cancel all those debts and pay for that so to speak with a one percent Wall Street sales tax, in other words, shift the burden of the depression on to Wall Street.

Doesn't it do any good to run around invading against the rich, making news very timid process demands about ending corporate personhood? This is not the problem with the American people. The American people want to know where is my job; how can I stop a bank from foreclosing on my house and stealing it? …

Press TV: This thing about silencing John Lewis, if we have a member of the Congress there being silenced, then what does show in terms of what is going to happen to the protesters out on the streets? How would the one percent want to use any tactics to silence? What kind of tactics would they use to silence the Americans and the protesters out on the streets?

Tarpley: With what they are using. They are using a bunch of anarchists and this Adbusters comes from the Situationist International. Situationist International was cooked up by NATO and the CIA back in the 1950s and 60s to overthrow General [Charles] de Gaulle of France who was the target at that time.

This whole apparatus of the General Assembly, the facilitators, the consensus, the voting, the human microphone; the leaderless group is a brainwashing technique; the human microphone is a brainwashing technique.

So what they are trying to do is they are sending operatives on the left cover to sabotage and destroy from within and unfortunately, a lot of the people who go to these things are very na?ve and they fall into it. What is needed is some kind of an organized force and I would hope trade unions would wake up to this maybe in the way that the nurses have.

Intervene in those General Assemblies, kick out the facilitator, go back to majority rule which is the only tradition we have here; majority rule and rights of the minority have to be respected and get a program…

VG/MSK/JR

http://edition.presstv.ir/detail/204427.html
Title: Ron Paul: racist smears vs. deadly racist policies
Post by: Geolibertarian on January 06, 2012, 01:15:16 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ron-paul-racist-smears-vs-deadly-racist-policies.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/ron-paul-racist-smears-vs-deadly-racist-policies.html)

Ron Paul: racist smears vs. deadly racist policies

Travis Kelly
Grand Junction Free Press (http://www.gjfreepress.com/article/20120106/COLUMNISTS/120109978/1001&parentprofile=1059)
Friday, January 6, 2012

Now that Ron Paul has made a strong showing in Iowa, the mainstream media monopoly has geared up to smear him as a “racist” and “dangerous man,” dredging up an old newsletter that was repudiated and debunked 20 years ago.

Paul, apparently, did not exercise vigilant editorial control over this newsletter, whose publisher has stated: “Ron Paul didn’t know about those comments, or know they were written under his name until much later when they were brought to his attention. There were several issues that went out with comments that he would not ordinarily make. He was angry when he saw them.”

After this recycled smear, the Paul campaign released the video testimony of a black man, James Williams, who in 1972 could not get medical help for his ill pregnant wife “because of the difference, me being black and her being white.” The nurse in charge at the hospital even threatened to call the police as Mr. Williams became more desperately insistent. Finally, a young Dr. Ron Paul interceded to help the poor woman (she had a stillborn child), and made sure that the couple was not charged by the hospital. Mr. Williams now supports Paul’s candidacy.

I think this should settle the issue about Paul’s alleged racism, but more importantly we have a case of the kettle calling the pot black: The smears were recycled and propagated by Jamie Kirchick of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, another of the many warmongering Neo-con think tanks that hyped Saddam’s non-existent “weapons of mass destruction” and now cheerlead for yet another war against a more powerful nation — Iran. These policies have been responsible for the deaths of thousands of brown-skinned civilians over the last several decades. Where is the real racism in this debate? Michael Scheuer, former head of the CIA’s bin Laden unit, spells it out:

“Electing anyone but Ron Paul will further increase the already strong chances of widespread Islamist-conducted violence inside the United States. Any other Republican candidate or a reelected Obama will keep lying to Americans by claiming that we are being attacked because of our liberties, gender-equality laws, and elections rather than because of Washington’s constant intervention in the Islamic world. This now two-decade-old lie — which is abetted by most of the media — has hidden from Americans the fact that all of the would-be Islamist attackers who have been captured in this country were motivated by the invasion of Iraq, U.S. support for Israel, or some other U.S. government action in the Muslim world.”

Actually, this death-dealing intervention goes back more than two decades, to 1953, when a CIA-led coup overthrew the democratically elected leader of Iran, Mossadegh. For the next 25 years, we propped up the dictator Shah as he tortured and murdered thousands of dissidents seeking a democratic voice.

Next door, the CIA helped bring Saddam Hussein to power; administrations from both parties supported his brutal tyranny for years, even supplying him with the poison gas that he used on his own people, and encouraging him to attack Iran — a brutal war that killed and maimed thousands of Iranians and Iraqis.

The sanctions imposed on Saddam’s regime after the first Gulf War resulted in the deaths of some 240,000 to 500,000 Iraqi children, according to various estimates, mainly because water purification tools were prohibited as “dual use” technology. The U.N. Commissioner in charge of the sanctions, Dennis Halliday, resigned in disgust, calling the sanctions virtual genocide.

In the second Iraq War, about 110,000 civilians have been killed, and the country is now populated with innumerable widows and orphans. The slaughter continues in Afghanistan and Pakistan, with almost weekly drone attacks resulting in grisly “collateral damage.” Every now and then, our generals step down from their high horses and offer another humble apology. I recall the “mistaken” U.S. air strike in Bola Boluk, Afghanistan, in 2009; the body parts of 94 Afghani children were shoveled in graves. “So sorry,” our leaders say, again. And again. And we wonder why some people “over there” hate us?

Terrorism exists, because we continue to fuel the source with gallons of blood far exceeding the toll on 9/11. It is a vicious cycle that, after 10 years of costly battle, we can now defuse or continue to catalyze until we are both morally and financially bankrupt.

Alone in this campaign for America’s soul, Paul opposes another racist war: The War on Drugs, with its grossly disproportionate sentencing for different drug offenses, and the highest POW rate of any war in the world. America incarceration rates are the highest in our history, even as violent crimes have fallen steadily, at enormous social and fiscal costs. This war, too, is escalating — in Mexico, with disastrous results. Whole cities have been taken over by warring drug gangs, police are corrupted or murdered, and American ex-pats are fleeing, abandoning their homes as general crime skyrockets. The violence and corruption are blowing back across our borders.

The legalization of marijuana, but regulated like alcohol, would stop this hemorrhaging. Paul would also pardon all non-violent drug offenders, reducing this heavy burden on state and city budgets.

The racist mudslingers are triply hypocritical, as Paul alone has forged a bill to audit and establish congressional control over the Federal Reserve, after it supercharged the banking swindle that wiped out 53 percent of the median wealth of African-Americans and 66 percent for Latinos, according to the Pew Research Center.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/ron-paul-racist-smears-vs-deadly-racist-policies.html)]
Title: Establishment Media: Critics of Obama Are Racists And Conspiracy Theorists
Post by: Geolibertarian on February 20, 2012, 04:45:11 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/establishment-media-critics-of-obama-are-racists-and-conspiracy-theorists.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/establishment-media-critics-of-obama-are-racists-and-conspiracy-theorists.html)

Establishment Media: Critics of Obama Are Racists And Conspiracy Theorists

Saman Mohammadi
Prisonplanet.com
February 20, 2012

“The President just got in there. But in four years, will we still like him? In eight years, are we gonna still hype him? What if he says we’ve gotta go into Iran and kill a million people? Will you still be down with the man? You’d better wake up and smell the coffee.

"This is why the radio station don’t toss me. Me–and I’m on the microphone–I stand with people like Alex Jones. This is the truth I’m down with. I’ve never been about no f**kin’ government. I do for myself; speak for myself. Teach myself; reach for myself. Hip hop, you gotta do the same thing. Listen to me now, while I rap and sing. The New World Order just put on a black face.” - KRS-One (http://tobefree.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/krs-one-wake-up-they-put-a-black-face-on-the-new-world-order-%E2%80%A6-they-want-us-to-be-enraged-angered-peace-is-a-revolutionary-strategy-%E2%80%A6-stop-the-violence-in-yourself/), January 24, 2009.

Obama has a PR advantage over his Republican rivals because he is a black President. A Black President doesn’t get criticized by the left because he is black. They think that a black president can’t be an evil imperialist in the same way as a white president. I think that is one of the political codes in politically correct Washington.

In American politics, ambitious black politicians use the race card like it is a magic card. And it is. Being black in power is a good image boost, which is why Obama was handpicked to be President by the oligarchy during this time of trial and transition.

When Obama bombs Persia, Obama’s Zombies Will Say: How can Obama be evil when he’s black? Black presidents don’t start evil wars. Only white presidents do that because the white man is the devil.

When Obama bombs Persia, the Whores of the Media Will Say: You cannot call a black President evil because that makes you evil and racist. You’re only allowed to call white Presidents evil. Okay? Got that, slaves? You morons. That’s an American rule in American politics. Do not call the black man in the White House an evil scumbag, do not say he loves wars and mass death, or we’ll call you a racist.

When Obama bombs Persia, the Brainwashed Left Will Say: Bush bombed the Iraqis because he was evil and wanted oil, but Obama is bombing the Persians because he’s good and he wants to create world peace. And how do I know he’s good? Well, because he’s black. Good is written on his face. If I say he’s evil then that makes me a racist. And I may be blind supporter of a lying war criminal, but I am not a racist! I am a good liberal who loves everybody and everything. And I love my president because he is black, which means I have shed my white guilt. And those who criticize him are all racists and conspiracy theorists (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=161407.0)!

Obama is clearly exploiting his color to sell to the American people inherently evil policies. And his defenders in the press constantly use the race card to demonize Obama’s critics. Read the following articles:

Chris Matthews calls Obama critics ‘crackers’ (http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/14/chris-matthews-calls-obama-critics-crackers/)
Barack Obama critics ‘racist’, says Jimmy Carter: is he right? (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/6196591/Barack-Obama-critics-racist-says-Jimmy-Carter-Is-he-right.html)
Poet Maya Angelou Calls Obama Critics Racist (http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/02/16/poet-maya-angelou-calls-obama-critics-racist/)
Olbermann Assails Obama’s Critics As Racist (http://www.mediaite.com/tv/olbermann-assail-obamas-critics-as-racist/)
Once Again, MSNBC Dismisses Obama Criticism As Thinly Veiled Racism (http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeffrey-meyer/2012/02/01/once-again-msnbc-dismisses-obama-criticism-thinly-veiled-racism)
Every Obama Critic a Racist (http://www.prisonplanet.com/every-obama-critic-a-racist.html)
Morgan Freeman Praised for Calling Obama Critics Racist (http://dysfunctionalliteracy.com/2011/09/25/morgan-freeman-praised-for-calling-obama-critics-racist/)

The political narrative that Obama critics are racists and conspiracy theorists (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=161407.0) has been constructed and new layers of lies are constantly added. And these lies are coming from so-called liberals like Chris Matthews and the MSNBC crew.

The leadership of the Left in America and the West is filled with traitors, deceivers, and criminals. They want the American people to bomb Iran and watch World War III on television, and say that criticizing Obama’s World War is a 21st century form of racism. And brainwashed liberals feel fine about sleeping beside a mass murdering war criminal as long as he is black and he is not from Texas.

So bombing Arabs, Afghans, Pakistanis, and Iranians = fine and good. But criticizing a black president because of his criminal policies and his wars = racism. Wow, how deep the intellectual spirit of America and the West has fallen! Political correctness combined with totalitarian propaganda and mass ignorance have caused the death of America and the West.

But America and the West can be resurrected and revived. And for that to happen, we must stop allowing politicians, journalists, pundits, and newsmakers use the terms “conspiracy theorist (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=161407.0)” and “racist” as political weapons to divide and rule, and smear their democratic critics.

Defining and clarifying the words that we use is important, especially in a time of war and crisis. If the war criminals in Washington can get away with defining any political criticism of President Obama as racist hate speech and crazy/conspiratorial, then they’ll get away with anything, including carrying out false flag attacks, starting a nuclear war, and even genocide.
Title: Black-Americans come out to Defend Ron Paul against Racist attacks.
Post by: Jordan on February 24, 2012, 01:52:33 am
http://youtu.be/mYZXDSoC9GY

Title: Obama Plays Race Card, Calls on Churches to Support Campaign
Post by: Geolibertarian on February 25, 2012, 02:06:16 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-plays-race-card-calls-on-churches-to-support-campaign.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-plays-race-card-calls-on-churches-to-support-campaign.html)

Obama Plays Race Card, Calls on Churches to Support Campaign

Imagine if Paul campaign launched ‘Whites for Ron Paul’

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, February 24, 2012

Imagine if Ron Paul announced a national campaign called ‘Whites for Ron Paul’ – he’d be vilified as a racist. And yet Barack Obama has done the equivalent of precisely that with his launch of ‘African Americans for Obama’.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdjoHA5ocwU (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdjoHA5ocwU)

The program urges black Americans to volunteer their time by making calls, organizing events and going door to door in their neighborhoods encouraging other African Americans to vote for Obama.

Not only is Obama playing the race card in an attempt to pressure black Americans into voting for him, he is also violating the separation between church and state. In the video promo for the campaign, Obama urges black people to pressure churches into supporting his administration by getting his message out via “the faith community”. He also calls on voters to become “congregation captains”.

Again, imagine what the reaction would be any of the Republican candidates launched a ‘Whites for Romney’, ‘Whites for Santorum’ or ‘Whites for Gingrich’ campaign. There would be non-stop uproar. But Obama does the equivalent and gets a free pass.

“I thought race didn’t matter Mr. President?” asks Chad Hasty (http://kfyo.com/chads-morning-brief-president-obama-launches-african-americans-for-obama-more/). “I don’t think MLK would be too pleased with you at all. African-Americans for Obama? Give me a break. Under this President, more blacks are unemployed. More blacks are on food stamps. If I had to bet though, Obama will still pull 93% of the black vote. Again, just a wild guess.”

As part of his efforts to lock down the black community as a voting bloc, Obama has arrived in Florida accompanied by an invasion of rappers and NBA basketball stars – all at taxpayer expense.

“The group — which organizers said includes Magic Johnson, Alonzo Mourning and NBA Commissioner David Stern — will meet with President Obama for a $30,000-a-plate fundraiser at the (actual) home court of Dallas Mavericks guard Vince Carter in his Isleworth mansion,” reports the Orlando Sentinel (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/sns-la-pn-obama-orlando-nba-all-star-game-fundraiser-20120223,0,5932460.story).

The expensive fundraising trip is timed to coincide with Sunday’s 61st NBA All-Star Game at Orlando’s Amway Center.

An expensive new basketball shoe launched to capitalize on the event caused mayhem at a Florida mall last night (http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-florida-mall-footlocker-riot-gear-20120223,0,2886722.story). Riot police were called after crowds attempted to rush into a branch of Foot Locker to purchase the shoe before closing time.
Title: Arrest Angelina Jolie For War Crimes: Kony 2012
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 11, 2012, 03:06:05 pm
To all you self-righteous, insult-spewing, race-obsessed (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbcs-matthews-injects-phony-race-talking-point-into-his-program-again.html) “liberals” out there who shamelessly wrap in the flag of “anti-racism” virtually each and every corporate fascist economic policy, Bush-style police state policy and imperialist foreign policy the Democrat-controlled Congress and White House propose, perpetuate or expand, I have a few questions for you:

[...]

Why no word of protest against Obama's continuation (http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/05/13/iraq-the-endless-occupation/) and -- in the case of Afghanistan (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18001) and Pakistan (http://www.prisonplanet.com/1-in-3-killed-by-u-s-drones-attacks-in-pakistan-are-civilians.html) -- expansion of Bush’s terroristic (http://www.counterpunch.org/chomsky01242006.html) war on “brown people (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HMT3yewtmw)”?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/arrest-angelina-jolie-for-war-crimes-kony-2012.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/arrest-angelina-jolie-for-war-crimes-kony-2012.html)

Arrest Angelina Jolie For War Crimes: Kony 2012

Prison Planet.com
March 11, 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtGEBmSmOqI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtGEBmSmOqI) (Arrest Angelina Jolie For War Crimes: Kony 2012)

RELATED: Kony 2012 Hoax Exposed (http://www.infowars.com/kony-2012-hoax-exposed/)

RELATED: Armed Troops Burn Down Homes, Kill Children To Evict Ugandans In Name Of Global Warming (http://www.prisonplanet.com/armed-troops-burn-down-homes-kill-children-to-evict-ugandans-in-name-of-global-warming.html)

RELATED: British Corporation Mass Murdering Ugandans in UN Sanctioned Land Grab (http://www.prisonplanet.com/british-corporation-mass-murdering-ugandans-in-un-sanctioned-land-grab.html)

Angelia Jolie openly works for the UN and CFR pushing globalist wars under the cover of humanitarian intervention.

Drunk on the blood of Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan and scores of other nations Jolie is now pushing military invasion to “help” Africa. She and her masters know full well that they are carrying out destabilization operations in the 3rd world so population can be reduced and resources stolen.

We need to call a spade a spade, this is part of a new branding rollout to launch a AFRICOM take over of Africa. This constitutes a crime against humanity and Jolie is a party to it and needs to be arrested along with other globalist that are using left cover to widen globalist empire.

The problem is you can’t go to the UN because it is at the center of the corporate global government takeover, the people are asleep and wars are being launched against innocents in the name of a bleeding heat liberal agenda. THEY COME IN PEACE!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cv4UwyGFKks (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cv4UwyGFKks) (KONY 2012 Exposed: African Invasion Psyop: Infowars Nightly News)
Title: Why Angelina Jolie Needs To Go To Prison!
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 12, 2012, 12:00:48 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/why-angelina-jolie-needs-to-go-to-prison.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/why-angelina-jolie-needs-to-go-to-prison.html)

Why Angelina Jolie Needs To Go To Prison!

Prison Planet.com
March 12, 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RG_h36rrc0k (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RG_h36rrc0k) (Why Angelina Jolie Needs To Go To Prison!)

Jolie is a propagandist in the employ of the UN pushing proxy wars. She and the UN have blood all over their hands.
Title: AFRICA: The Legacy of Cecil Rhodes' Anglo-American Empire
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 12, 2012, 12:39:04 pm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/africa-the-legacy-of-cecil-rhodes-anglo-american-empire/29705 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/africa-the-legacy-of-cecil-rhodes-anglo-american-empire/29705)

AFRICA: The Legacy of Cecil Rhodes' Anglo-American Empire

by Dan Gordon

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/129705.jpg)

Global Research
March 12, 2012

"Click this Button or African children will die”: How the “Kony 2012” video drafted a Facebook army to support the militarization of Africa”

In 1877 the British Empire was at the height of its glory, the Spanish Empire would soon collapse, and a young Oxford student named Cecil Rhodes was gripped by a sudden religious vision. Rhodes scrawled out a manifesto. In it, he called for an “Anglo-American Empire” that would begin in the heart of Africa and spread out to conquer the known world.

“Africa is still lying ready for us,” he wrote. “It is our duty to take it. It is our duty to seize every opportunity of acquiring more territory and we should keep this one idea steadily before our eyes-that more territory simply means more of the Anglo-Saxon race; more of the best, the most human, most honorable race the world possesses.”

Rhodes went on to found the DeBeers diamond cartel and devote his company’s vast wealth to the colonial project in Africa. He couldn’t have known that, just over a century later, a new invention called the Internet would be tweaking his message, smoothing out his more inflammatory language, and sending his ideas around the globe through YouTube and Facebook. Nor would he ever had imagined that the first black president of the United States would be the one to carry his vision to its ultimate conclusion, under the guise of “humanitarian intervention.”

Fast-forward to March of 2012, when the non-profit “TRI” launched an online video called “Kony 2012.” Filled with lightning cuts, footage of battle-scarred African children, and tearful appeals to emotion, the movie rallies its viewers around a single goal: stopping the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) and its leader Joseph Kony. With the help of the U.S. military, of course. And Oprah Winfrey.

At first glance, that’s not such a bad idea. After all, the Lord’s Resistance Army has kidnapped perhaps thousands of Ugandan children and forced them into their militia in their bid to topple the Ugandan government. The fact that the movie ignores, however, is that Uganda’s government, and its U.S.-backed leader, Yoweri Museveni, doesn’t appear to have a much better record when it comes to human rights.

After all, Museveni was recruiting child soldiers to serve in the Ugandan military before the LRA unleashed its guerrilla war against the government. His success is probably what inspired Koney to take up the same tactics. So why does “Kony 2012” try to pin the blame squarely on the LRA for a war in neither side seems to be a friend of the Ugandan people?

It’s because Museveni is a willing tool of U.S. foreign policy. His troops are helping the Obama administration back up an impotent government in Somalia, a regime so mistrusted by its people that it has no power outside of Mogadishu. Because Museveni plays ball with the United States, he is given a free pass, just like Ethiopia’s Zenawi, to commit human rights abuses. Meanwhile, African leaders who try to pursue an independent economic policy like Sudan’s Al-Bashir and Libya’s now-dead Gadhafi are rewarded with NATO bombs and arrest warrants by the International Criminal Court.

“Kony 2012” is a crafty piece of propaganda. It happens to have been released at just the right moment in history. The movie’s narrator warns “this movie will expire at the end of 2012.” Of course, it’s just a coincidence that Obama is running for re-election this year. It’s also a coincidence that the “Kony 2012” signs the group has created to publicize their campaign are the same color as Shepard Fairey’s iconic “Hope” posters that swept Obama into office. The camera often makes shy glances towards shots of the “Kony” and “Obama” posters next to one another. The message is clear: elect one man and you will defeat the other.

Never before has subliminal programming been so blatant. If the makers of the film are truly concerned about stopping violence in Africa, they might want to question the film’s premise-that the 100 U.S. Special Forces Obama sent to Uganda in October of last year are actually there to fight the LRA. After all, according to the UN, the Ugandan military has whittled the LRA down to a mere 200 fighters. With only two guerrillas for every special ops soldier, you would think the war would have been over in a weekend.

Another fact the film neglects to mention is that Uganda’s government announced the discovery of large oil deposits in the northern part of the country last spring. Of course, this is probably a coincidence and has nothing to do with Obama’s decision to send special forces to Uganda several months later, despite the fact that the LRA has shifted their operations to the neighboring Congo.

According to the makers of the film, rather than questioning the true motive of sending troops to Africa, we should use whatever means necessary to pressure the U.S. to beef up its military presence in the region. To do this, the group has hijacked the language and imagery of the anti-globalization movement. Dropping banners, wheatpasting posters at night, holding rock concerts, and raising your fist in the air all become “subversive” ways to fight for escalating our military presence in Uganda.

Cecil Rhodes would be smiling in his grave.

(https://p.twimg.com/Anr5hHwCEAIq-B2.jpg)
Title: Forget Kony, Ugandans Are Being Slaughtered By Their Own U.S.-Backed Government
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 12, 2012, 09:02:47 pm
http://www.infowars.com/forget-kony-ugandans-are-being-slaughtered-by-their-own-western-backed-government/ (http://www.infowars.com/forget-kony-ugandans-are-being-slaughtered-by-their-own-western-backed-government/)

Forget Kony, Ugandans Are Being Slaughtered By Their Own Western-Backed Government

Kony 2012 propaganda is a crude hoax to legitimize re-colonization of Africa

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, March 12, 2012

While the political left and an army of Hollywood trendies are clamoring for a U.S. Military invasion of Uganda to capture Joseph Kony, a man who has not even been in the country for six years, Ugandan authorities, backed by the World Bank and British carbon trading companies, are slaughtering Ugandan villagers and stealing their land in a brutal new form of neo-colonialism that has gone largely unnoticed.

(http://www.thisisjanewayne.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Bildschirmfoto-2012-03-07-um-12.13.png)

Following the release of Kony 2012, a film made by a shadowy charity with links to USAID (http://www.infowars.com/kony-2012-hoax-exposed/), the Tweetosphere exploded with a deluge of leftist politicos and clueless celebrities jumping on the bandwagon to call for Barack Obama to launch yet another act of “humanitarian” bloodletting to go after Kony, leader the of Lord’s Resistance Army (LRC).

In their haste to appear trendy and in vogue with a viral trend that was all over the social networks like a bad rash within the space of 24 hours, those advocating an increased military intervention on top of the 100 US troops already sent into Uganda (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-15317684) last year, most notably habitual “humanitarian” warmonger Angelina Jolie, didn’t concern themselves with the facts.

The propaganda campaign that has put Joseph Kony on a par with Osama Bin Laden and Hitler is a crude hoax to legitimize the US military-industrial complex’s agenda (http://www.infowars.com/globalist-warlord-obama-moves-to-expand-africom-reach/) to re-colonize Africa under Africom.

“Not surprisingly, the [film] is seriously misleading, falsely implying there’s war raging in Northern Uganda when there’s not. In fact, Kony has not been in the country for six years; his group is a much-depleted rump, numbering a few hundred people at most,” writes ABC Australia’s Jeff Sparrow (http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/3883140.html).

Ugandan journalist Angelo Izama (http://thisisafrica.wordpress.com/2012/03/07/acholi-street-stop-kony2012-invisible-childrens-campaign-of-infamy/) calls Kony 2012 a “misrepresentation,” noting that the film’s “portrayal of [Kony's] alleged crimes in Northern Uganda are from a bygone era,” and that the problems facing the country in 2012 are AIDS, Hepatitis, prostitution and unemployment, none of which would be alleviated by a U.S. military invasion on the pretext of hunting a man who is not even in the country.

“At the end of the day the Kony2012 campaign will not make Joseph Kony more famous but it will make Invisible Children famous,” writes Izama. “It will also make many, including P.Diddy, feel like they have contributed some good to his capture- assuming Kony is even alive. For many in the conflict prevention community including those who worry about the militarization of it in Central Africa this campaign is just another nightmare that will end soon. Hopefully.”

While a legion of celebrity idiots and political operatives push the Kony 2012 hoax, Ugandan people are currently facing a very real threat of murder and displacement that has nothing to do with the Lord’s Resistance Army. It’s being carried out by the Ugandan government itself in alliance with the World Bank and carbon trading companies.

As we reported last year (http://www.prisonplanet.com/armed-troops-burn-down-homes-kill-children-to-evict-ugandans-in-name-of-global-warming.html), armed troops acting on behalf of New Forests Company, an outfit backed by the World Bank whose board includes HSBC Managing Director Sajjad Sabur as well as other former Goldman Sachs investment bankers, burned houses to the ground and killed children to evict Ugandans from their homes in the name of seizing land to protect against “global warming (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov0WwtPcALE).”

An Oxfam report documents how the British outfit has worked with the Ugandan government to forcibly expel over 20,000 people from their homes using terror and violence as part of a lucrative scramble for arable land that can be used to satisfy the multi-billion dollar carbon trading ponzi scheme, which is worth $1.8 million a year to the company.

Harrowing stories speak of how armed “security forces” stormed Ugandan villages and torched houses, burning children to death as they threatened to murder anyone who resisted while beating and torturing others.

But you won’t see the likes of Angelina Jolie or Bono tweeting about it in protest, because slaughtering people in cold blood and evicting families from their ancestral land in the name of saving the planet is perfectly acceptable.

Forget the manufactured hype surrounding ‘Kony 2012′ – it is nothing more than a cynical ruse designed to manipulate naive do-gooders into legitimizing another US-backed “humanitarian” assault aimed at swallowing up Africa’s resources and land.

While Joseph Kony and his army disappeared six years ago, Ugandans are being killed and evicted in their thousands by western entities right now – but nobody is making ‘viral’ films about the crisis and no celebrities are tweeting their displeasure.
Title: Invisible Government Is Hiding Behind Invisible Children To Keep Raping Africa
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 14, 2012, 12:31:30 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-invisible-government-is-hiding-behind-the-invisible-children-to-keep-raping-africa.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-invisible-government-is-hiding-behind-the-invisible-children-to-keep-raping-africa.html)

The Invisible Government Is Hiding Behind The Invisible Children To Keep Raping Africa

Saman Mohammadi
Prisonplanet.com
Wednesday, March 14, 2012

“A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” – Mark Twain.

The rotten invisible government in the United States has created a mass buzz surrounding the “Kony 2012″ (http://www.invisiblechildren.com) initiative, which is marketed towards the mindless consumers of state-managed news on Facebook and Twitter.

“KONY 2012 is less of a documentary than it is a highly efficient infomercial that is tailor-made for the Facebook generation, using state-of-the-art marketing techniques to make its point,” writes the Vigilant Citizen in his article, “KONY 2012: State Propaganda for a New Generation.” (http://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/kony-2012-state-propaganda-for-a-new-generation/)

The Kony 2012 propaganda campaign is sleek, simplistic, sexy, and has so far successfully manipulated the idealistic instincts of young people to advance sinister U.S. military and economic objectives (http://www.infowars.com/lawmakers-push-for-us-invasion-of-africa-following-kony-2012-fraud/) in Africa.

The spokespeople, popular opinion leaders, celebrities, and journalists who work for the invisible government want the young people of America and the West to demand a NATO/UN invasion of Uganda (http://youtu.be/qHpvw9Sm09o) on the pretext of ending Joseph Kony’s reign of terror in the country.

The people of Uganda are not demanding a UN/US intervention into their war-torn country because they know from historical experience that they will suffer the most at the hands of U.N. and U.S. soldiers.

The CIA, MI6, Mossad, and other Western intelligence agencies created the war-torn conditions in Uganda by practicing imperialist policies for decades. Reality and history are turned upside down when these same intelligence agencies are now being asked by “humanitarian interventionists” to intervene and save Uganda from the mess that they created in the first place.

Brendan O’Neill, editor of Spiked magazine, says (http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/12240/) that “modern Western interventionists are two times more obsessed with themselves than they are with the victims of foreign conflicts they claim to care so much about.”

He adds that the Western calls for intervention in countries such as Syria are not rooted in genuine concerns to stop human suffering and help the advance of freedom in the world, but in pathological emotions which are so pervasive because of the pathological coverage of conflicts by the Western media. “What is really motoring the demands for Western intervention in Syria,” writes O’Neill, “are the emotional needs of Western observers rather than the practical needs of Syrians. This kind of narcissism is now widespread among those who desperately want the ‘international community’ to intervene in Syria.”

Real human beings from Syria (http://youtu.be/xjrAgM9ZbbE) and Uganda (http://youtu.be/VNLeOKWfLJo) do not see UN interventions in their countries as altruistic, beneficial, and good, but as evil, dangerous, and cynical. The United Nations, NATO, and other international organizations are collectively viewed as an anti-human plague on the planet.

U.S., NATO, and U.N. soldiers are free to kill, rape, and torture innocent civilians from Africa to the Middle East. The world is their evil wonderland. And pretty soon these heartless monsters will be used in American and Western cities to shove the despotic new world order down the throats of Americans and Westerners.

But the Satanists behind the new world order will fail because Western man is waking up. The sleeping giant in America and the West is slowly rising to its feet following years of government-induced sleep. Americans and Westerners are spiritually, mentally, psychologically, and politically ready for education and instruction, as the political popularity of Ron Paul has revealed.

The mission of humanity should not be to stop mythical and mysterious evil characters like Osama Bin Laden and Joseph Kony, both of whom worked for the CIA, but to stop the very real and dangerous mass mind controllers in the U.S. and Western invisible government. They are hiding in the shadows, and literally getting away with genocide. They must be stopped and brought to justice, or humanity has no future.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: jerryweaver on March 14, 2012, 05:46:28 pm
http://tv.yahoo.com/daytime/clooney-s-close-call-with-rocket-28612318.html (http://tv.yahoo.com/daytime/clooney-s-close-call-with-rocket-28612318.html)

 Actor "Activist" George Clooney  tells us to feel an enormous responsibility at 1:14 in this vid.

This whole thing looks pretty staged.



Title: Angelina Jolie Shills for Globalist Plan in Africa at ICC Trial
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 15, 2012, 03:20:40 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/angelina-jolie-shills-for-globalist-plan-in-africa-at-icc-trial.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/angelina-jolie-shills-for-globalist-plan-in-africa-at-icc-trial.html)

Angelina Jolie Shills for Globalist Plan in Africa at ICC Trial

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
March 14, 2012

Hollywood darling Angelina Jolie (http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iA4zd3DjWYZAANtbDexXYGZWRXbw?docId=CNG.132fb791216c2b96ddd3a57979183eef.471) – “Goodwill Ambassador” for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and CFR member (http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20041839,00.html) – was on hand to witness the conviction of Thomas Lubanga at the International Criminal Court in the Hague.

(http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/media/ALeqM5hhkXM22LJln7OSilvRMjZb-Tohcg?docId=photo_1331742480220-1-0&size=l)

Judges found Lubanga guilty of kidnaping children and using them as soldiers for his Union of Congolese Patriots. He recruited the kids to fight in an ethnic conflict situated in the Ituri region of eastern Congo.

“This is their day — where these children will feel there is no impunity for what happened to them, for what they suffered,” said Jolie.

Jolie and the ICC might now turn their attention to the reasons why the Democratic Republic of Congo is one of the world’s worst hell-holes and maybe prevent a repeat of the situation.

Congo has one of the highest mortality rates in the world. It stands at 38,000 per month for a nation of 64 million people, or 1.5 per 1000 per month. As Rahul Mahajan (http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Africa/Congo's_Tragedy.html) noted in 2006, this rate dwarfed Iraq’s mortality rate of 5 per 1,000 people during the height of sanctions imposed by the United Nations and enforced by the United States. Over half the deaths in Congo are due to malnutrition, malaria, diarrhea, and easily treated respiratory infections.

“At 450,000 excess dead per year, this constitutes one of the gravest humanitarian crises in the world. Unfortunately, it gets virtually no attention,” writes Mahajan.

The globalists and their transnational corporations have benefited handsomely from the destabilization of Congo and its “First World War,” an especially brutal civil war that involved Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda, Angola, Namibia, Chad, Sudan, and Libya and ultimately claimed the lives of 3.3 million people.

Following the overthrow of the kleptocrat Mobutu Sese Seko in 1997, the globalists enriched themselves on the plunder carried out by Uganda and Rwanda in eastern Congo. They were primarily interested in coltan, an ore producing tantalum, a key element used in cell phones.

The Anglo American mining conglomerate entered into a relationship with the fanatical Nationalist and Integrationist Front, an armed group that controls much of the gold mining in the Ituri district, the same area where Thomas Lubanga operated with his children soldiers.

Prior to the rise of transnational corporate imperialism, Belgium’s King Leopold ran the Congo as a slavery and forced labor plantation and managed to kill around 10 million Africans. Following independence, the CIA had the country’s first democratically elected leader, Patrice Lumumba, abducted and killed (http://www.nytimes.com/1987/09/02/opinion/l-cia-war-against-lumumba-illustrated-errors-of-covert-policy-855987.html).

Under Mobutu, the U.S. provided lavish military and financial support to Congo, renamed Zaire by Mobutu. “From 1965 to 1991, Zaire received more than $1.5 billion in U.S. economic and military aid. In return, U.S. multinationals increased their share of the ownership of Zaire’s fabulous mineral wealth,” writes Ellen Ray (http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Africa/US_Recolonization_Congo.html) for Covert Action Quarterly.

Angelina Jolie has decided to fund the “Lubanga Chronicles,” described as a public information campaign by the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The Jolie-Pitt Foundation (http://www.aegistrust.org/Right-bar-news2/funders.html) funds the Aegis Trust, the NGO that produces the Lubanga Chronicles. Aegis Trust is also funded by the Annenberg Foundation and the European Commission.

Jolie is another celebrity added to the roster to lend legitimacy and draw attention to the supposed “humanitarian” missions of the United Nations and its affiliated and globalist sponsored NGOs. The UN has admitted it is responsible (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/714025.stm) for much of the misery in Africa, especially in regard to Rwanda where around a million Africans died. The United States was behind the effort to discourage an effective UN response (http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB53/index.html) to the genocide.

The conviction of Thomas Lubanga will be used as a propaganda centerpiece in the globalist effort to move into mineral rich Africa. Obama’s teleprompter recited concern with the brutality of the Lord’s Resistance Army and its presumed and long missing leader, Joseph Kony, is hypocrisy on steroids, as John Pilger (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27181) has explained.

The violence attributed to the CIA contracted group (http://www.infowars.com/conned-2012-joseph-kony-is-a-cia-contractor/) pales in comparison to the “multiple atrocities administered by the United States, such as the bloodbath in the 1960s following the CIA-arranged murder of Patrice Lumumba, the Congolese independence leader and first legally elected prime minister, and the CIA coup that installed Mobutu Sese Seko, regarded as Africa’s most venal tyrant,” writes Pilger.

As we noted (http://www.infowars.com/african-invasion-begins-kony-2012/) on March 13, Congress is in the process of introducing legislation designed to get the U.S. military even more involved in Africa.

“I am hopeful that we can use this momentum as a force for change. We must do all that we can to protect innocent civilians — especially children — and end LRA violence once and for all,” the bipartisan resolution’s sponsor, Rep. Jim McGovern (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/kony-2012-video-inspires-house-resolution-warlord-article-1.1038813?localLinksEnabled=false), said in a statement.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHpvw9Sm09o (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHpvw9Sm09o) (African Invasion Begins: KONY 2012)

The U.S. intervention in Africa at the behest of international bankers and transnational corporations has nothing to do with saving children. It is about stealing natural resources and extending the “grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy,” including an effort to “prevent collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming together,” as top globalist minion and Rockefeller understudy Zbigniew Brzezinski (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Zbigniew_Brzezinski) wrote in his 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard.
Title: Ugandans React Angrily To Kony 2012 Propaganda Film
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 15, 2012, 03:37:11 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ugandans-react-angrily-to-kony-2012-propaganda-film.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/ugandans-react-angrily-to-kony-2012-propaganda-film.html)

Ugandans React Angrily To Kony 2012 Propaganda Film

Transparent ploy to legitimize US military invasion of Africa

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Wednesday, March 14, 2012

The viral Kony 2012 propaganda film has stoked anger amongst those it was ostensibly designed to help – Ugandan citizens – who see through the movie as a transparent ploy to legitimize a US military invasion of Africa.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU_1jnrj5VI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU_1jnrj5VI)

During a screening of the documentary in northern Uganda, the area that was worst affected by Joseph Kony’s LRA, crowds reacted with confusion, anger and eventually violence, throwing rocks at the screen in protest against the underhanded motive behind the film.

“There are some kinds of people, some kind of NGO who are trying to mobilize funds using the atrocities committed in northern Uganda,” said one Ugandan.

Another expressed the opinion that Kony 2012 was a bunch of white Americans exploiting the suffering of black people on a different continent for their own ends.

As the rocks begin to be pelted at the screen, the Al Jazeera reporter notes that the film “clearly doesn’t resonate with many of the people it claims it’s meant to help.”

Ugandans also expressed disgust at the notion that the face of Kony was being used to adorn t-shirts, a display that they feel belittles their suffering. Of course, the fact that the Invisible Children organization behind the Kony 2012 film is a business empire posing as a charity (http://www.prisonplanet.com/kony-2012-organization-exposed-as-lucrative-business-model.html) that spends the majority of its expenses on lining the pockets of its owners explains why the merchandise is just as important as the message.

Americans of Ugandan origin have took to You Tube to express their suspicion and confusion about why a shadowy western organization is whipping up support around using US military forces to hunt down a man who has not even been in Uganda for six years, no longer holds any influence in the region, and is even presumed dead by some observers.

There has also been a massive backlash against the fact that the Invisible Children organization openly supports the 30-year dictator of Uganda Yoweri Museveni, a man who resorted to election fraud (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/21/world/africa/21uganda.html) last year to hold on to power and has been implicated in murders and acts of genocide (http://freeuganda.com/?p=438) against his own people.

“If Invisible Children was in fact a serious organization that has not been co-opted by the Museveni regime and the U.S. foreign policy agenda, the organization would inform the world that General Museveni, who has now stolen three elections in a row in Uganda is the first person who deserves to be arrested,” writes Black Star News (http://blackstarnews.com/news/135/ARTICLE/8007/2012-03-08.html).

Ugandan journalist Rosebell Kagumire (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_3bZKaPdyo), who worked directly with victims of the civil war in Uganda, has also questioned the motives behind the film, pointing out that Uganda is now a relatively stable country and that Kony has not even been present there for six years. Kagumire rejects the idea that outside forces should use Kony’s past atrocities as an excuse to interfere in Uganda.

Ugandan-American journalist Phillip Martin (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeNCCtOq0uc&feature=related) also labeled the idea of “making Kony famous,” a key facet of the rhetoric behind the Kony 2012 campaign, as “one of the most disrespectful things” the film makers could have done.

Another backlash video going viral (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=68GbzIkYdc8) uses the medium of rap to stress the point that Joseph Kony is merely the latest dark-skinned bogeyman being waved in front of a global audience to legitimize western hegemonic interests as part of the contest with China to swallow up Africa’s natural resources.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/ugandans-react-angrily-to-kony-2012-propaganda-film.html)]
Title: Re: Angelina Jolie Shills for Globalist Plan in Africa at ICC Trial
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 15, 2012, 03:39:13 am
"Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."

-- C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock (http://books.google.com/books/about/God_in_the_Dock.html?id=I6xWiVDThpEC), p. 292
Title: KONY 2012: State Propaganda for a New Generation
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 15, 2012, 11:07:52 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/kony-2012-state-propaganda-for-a-new-generation.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/kony-2012-state-propaganda-for-a-new-generation.html)

KONY 2012: State Propaganda for a New Generation

Vigilant Citizen (http://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/kony-2012-state-propaganda-for-a-new-generation/)
March 15, 2012

The overnight viral sensation KONY 2012 brought worldwide awareness to the African war criminal Joseph Kony. Beneath this commendable cause, lies however an elaborate agenda that is presented in the video in a very manipulative way. We’ll look at the agenda behind KONY 2012 and how it uses reverse psychology to not only justify a military operation in Africa, but to actually have people demand it.

(http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/leadkony.jpg)

KONY 2012 is a viral sensation that swept the entire world in less than 24 hours. Its main subject is the African rebel leader Joseph Kony, his war crimes and the clearly defined “movement” to stop him.  Countless celebrities have endorsed the movement, news sources have reported it and social media is buzzing with it. While the problem of guerrilla warfare and child soldiers has plagued Africa for decades, and several documentaries have already been produced regarding the issue, this particular 29-minute video made managed to obtain mass exposure and support.

KONY 2012 is less of a documentary than it is a highly efficient infomercial that is tailor-made for the Facebook generation, using state-of-the-art marketing techniques to make its point. Young people like “underground movements” and want to feel like they are changing the world. KONY 2012 taps into these needs to bring about something that is not “hip” or “underground” at all: A military operation in Uganda. Not only that, it urges the participants of the movement to order stuff, to wear bracelets that are associated with an online profile and to record their actions in social media. This makes KONY 2012 the first artificially created movement that is fully track-able, monitor-able and quantifiable by those who engendered it. In other words, what appears to be a movement “from the people” is actually a new way for the elite to advance its agenda.

A Propaganda Experiment

The video begins with an interesting statement: “The next 27 minutes are an experiment. But in order for it to work, you have to pay attention”. It is an experiment as it tests a new, groundbreaking way to get an agenda accepted by the Facebook generation. In the past, when the government needed to justify the invasion of a country, the President would sit in front of the camera and tell the public why war should be declared in this area of the world. In the case of KONY, the military agenda is disguised as grassroots activism, where the US army entering Uganda would be perceived as a “victory of the people”, effectively reversing the communications model.

(http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kony1-e1331578338887.jpg)

Towards the end of the video, an image is displayed explaining how decisions (and messages) start from the top of the pyramid (the elite) and are communicated to the masses through mass media and such.

Due to the advent of social media, the above diagram has become a lot less effective to get a message across to the young generation. It is not CNN reports and the President addressing the nation anymore, it is about “liking” Facebook pages and viral YouTube videos. This is where messages now come across. Always studying, analyzing and exploiting the most effective ways to persuade public opinion, KONY 2012 appears to be an attempt to test out the effectiveness of a “viral” propaganda campaign. By creating this “movement” and making young people actually DEMAND the U.S. government intervene in Africa, the masterminds behind this campaign would manage the impossible: Reversing the propaganda model in order to make it emanate from the people. By doing so, the elite’s agenda is not only accepted by the masses, it is perceived as a victory by them.

(http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kony2.jpg)

“We are living in a new world” indeed. The KONY 2012 logo aptly represents how a viral video and social media can reverse the propaganda model. Don’t be fooled however. Power is still not in the hands of the base of the pyramid … far from it. It is all about appearances.

When the war on Iraq was declared, a great portion of young Americans opposed the war. How is it they are now begging the government to send troops to Africa? A simple video, specifically conceived for the Facebook generation did the trick. As it is the case in most campaigns to justify a war, the first goal was to identify a bad guy.

Identifying the Bad Guy

(http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kony3.jpg)

By associating Kony with Bin Laden and Hitler in this poster, KONY 2012 is promoting war.

I have absolutely no intention of defending Joseph Kony or to say “he’s not that bad”. He, along with many other guerrilla factions across Africa, has committed despicable atrocities. However, the problem of child soldiers has existed for decades and there are literally hundreds of Joseph Konys across the African continent. In some cases, some of the armies are actually funded by Western countries. If we would truly go to the root of the issue, we’d discover that Africa has been plagued with the problem of warring factions and rebel guerrillas ever since Western forces “liberated” their colonies and divided the continent of Africa according to Western interests. Indeed, instead of setting the boundaries of each country according to the geographic location of the ethnic groups and tribes that live there, countries were created according to the economic needs of colonizing forces such as Great Britain, France and others. The net result is: A bunch of artificial countries that each contain several tribes, ethnic groups, languages and religions. When one group takes power, the others are repressed, which leads to violence and rebellion. Add to the mix extreme poverty due to resources being siphoned out of Africa by Western countries and you’ve got a breeding ground for merciless warlords. As long as this problem exists, Joseph Konys will continue to emerge in Africa.

But the video mentions none of this. All it says is that arresting Kony would “make the world better”. KONY 2012 is all about identifying a bad guy, “making him famous” and have people demand his death by U.S. forces. Fixing the true cause of problems in the third world has never been on the Agenda. But picking out a “bad guy” to justify military action has always been part of it. If in the case of Saddam Hussein, “facts” (that ultimately proved false) were given to justify the invasion of Iraq. A different technique is being used with Kony, one that originates from advertising.

Any marketing specialist will tell you: “Facts don’t sell, emotions do”.  The first part of KONY 2012 solely addresses emotions. It is about making the filmmaker likeable, showing gut-wrenching images of African kids in pain, in misery and in despair. Then, the turning point: Joseph Kony is the cause of all of this. Not centuries of exploitation and devastation by Western forces in Africa that lead to chaos, lawlessness and poverty. No, it’s Kony. That bastard. George Clooney is really mad at him right now. He even tweeted about it.

Another marketing strategy is to appeal to the lowest common denominator. In other words, to get a message across, one must address the audience as if it was made of kids. KONY 2012 does exactly this by ridiculously oversimplifying the problem and explaining it to an actual child – who represents the viewers.  This is not surprising though, as this is how the masses are perceived by the higher ups.

(http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kony4.jpg)

Here’s what this scene implies: “Look, dumb-ass, even this little kid gets it. So you better get it.”

Once the viewers had their emotions stirred, got infantilized and had the problem spelled out to them as if they were in kindergarten, the table is set for the true goal of the video: Defining the agenda.

Defining the Agenda

KONY 2012 is a movement backed by some of the world’s most powerful entities and has precise goals. As the movie’s intro states, it is an experiment. It is an opportunity to create a movement that can be fully trackable, quantifiable and manageable through social media whose culmination is a U.S. military intervention in Uganda. The carrying out of this mission will not only be perceived as a victory, it will restore young people’s faith in democracy. What the members of this movement might not realize is that they are helping the advancement of the elite’s agenda towards a New World Order.

(http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kony5.jpg)

This poster aptly summarizes how the Illuminati works. Political parties are irrelevant as both work towards the same Agenda.

The second part of the movie let’s go of emotions and describes to the viewers what the elite expects from them. U.S. troops are already in Uganda, but, according to the movie, Kony “changed his tactics”… Damnit Kony, you and your sneaky tactics. Apparently, high tech satellites, unmanned drones and all kinds of radars are not enough to catch this guy. Nope, in order to catch him, a complicated plan, involving the purchase of an “Action Kit” and the registering an ID bracelet on a website is required. Makes sense.

(http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kony61.jpg)

Those who want to “Stop Kony” are required to wear a bracelet bearing a unique code which needs to be registered at a website. Of course, personal information is requested.

Once the bracelet is registered, members can associate it with their Facebook account, which will keep track of all KONY-related actions. The end result is: every single member of KONY 2012 will be known, identified and easily tracked – with constantly updated information. All of this data will of course be collected, scrutinized and stored by those in charge.

Furthermore, members are asked to contribute a “few dollars a month” to TRI, an organization whose ultimate goal is American military intervention in Uganda.

(http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kony7.jpg)

TRI’s logo is an inverted “Peace” sign. In symbolism, an inverted sign means that it stands for the opposite of the regular sign. In other words, TRI is about war. Peace does not involve “equipping” and “training” government forces to fight rebel factions. As the novel 1984 states, WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, and IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.

To support the cause and to make it popular, a bunch of elite-sponsored artists and politicians have been enlisted, including Lady Gaga, Jay-Z, Rihanna, Oprah, George Clooney, Bono, etc. While some of them might be genuinely concerned about problems in Africa, most of them are pawns of the elite that are used to promote its agenda.

(http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kony8.jpg)

Am I seeing warmongering George W. Bush in here? The dude that lied to the whole country in order to attack Iraq for its oil and stuff? Hmm. Weird.

After going past the celebrities and the emotions, the end result of this campaign is simple and steeped in real politik: Since the fall of rival superpower USSR, Western forces have sought to bring down and to control regional powers around the world, mostly in third countries. Uganda is part of that plan. The same way the spectre of Bin Laden was used to invade Afghanistan, Kony is being used to enter Uganda.

(http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/kony9.jpg)

The video clearly shows what is the goal of this “movement”: U.S. troops taking charge of the Ugandan army, the same way it took charge of the Iraqi, Libyan and other armies in the past few years.

In Conclusion

KONY 2012 is a cleverly orchestrated campaign specifically aimed at today’s youth, the future citizens of the world. Using state-of-the-art techniques and new technologies, the campaign is a first attempt at “reverse propaganda”, where the agenda APPEARS to emanate from the people. By using emotions, irrational thoughts and superficial explanations, KONY 2012 attempts to trick well-meaning people, who desire to make a positive change in the world, to instead fuel a gigantic war machine that is controlled by the world’s elite.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/kony-2012-state-propaganda-for-a-new-generation.html)]
Title: Make THIS go Viral: Kony 2012 Propaganda 2.0 Explained
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 15, 2012, 12:07:38 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/make-this-go-viral-kony-2012-propaganda-2-0-explained.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/make-this-go-viral-kony-2012-propaganda-2-0-explained.html)

Make THIS go Viral: Kony 2012 Propaganda 2.0 Explained

Land Destroyer Report
Wednesday, March 14, 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68GbzIkYdc8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68GbzIkYdc8)

Editor’s Note: Seems Kony 2012 not only made Joseph Kony famous, but also the now not-so-hidden agenda of Wall Street and London’s AFRICOM. I wonder if the makers of this informative and entertaining video had to spend 9 years duping people into parting with millions of dollars to get this online like Invisible Children did? Let’s see if we can make this go viral and prove that in addition to being deceitful, Invisible Children also misappropriated millions of dollars when simply telling the truth would have sold better, and with lower overhead.

The final message is also quite powerful – showing the true potential of modern society, if the truth is known and technology mobilized against, not for the agenda of the megalomaniacal elite.
Title: Top Ten Ways to Tell Kony is Phony. The Hidden Agenda is to Invade Africa
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 15, 2012, 12:19:40 pm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/social-media-scam-alert-top-ten-ways-to-tell-kony-is-phony-the-hidden-agenda-is-to-invade-africa/29777 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/social-media-scam-alert-top-ten-ways-to-tell-kony-is-phony-the-hidden-agenda-is-to-invade-africa/29777)

Social Media Scam Alert: Top Ten Ways to Tell Kony is Phony. The Hidden Agenda is to Invade Africa

by Bruce A. Dixon

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/129777.jpg)

Global Research, March 14, 2012
blackagendareport.com

A week ago Invisible Children released a video that was immediately picked up and promoted by every corporate news and entertainment outlet till it went "viral". Kony 2012 allegedly "promote awareness" of and contributes to the end of child soldiering in Africa.  But is that really what it's about?

Is it, like the old Save Darfur war dance, another propaganda campaign to justify US intervention in Africa?


Thanks to relentless promotion by Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, Bloomberg News, ABC, CBS, Oprah, celebrities and politicians of both corporate parties, along with right wing church groups and foundations, the Kony 2012 video has “gone viral.” Viewed on YouTube more than a hundred million times by now, it paints a vivid and simple picture, clear enough, its narrator says, for a five year old.

Joseph Kony, the YouTube video tells us, is a bad guy in Uganda, a lawless warlord leading something called the Lord's Resistance Army, which kidnaps, enslaves and murders innocent children by the tens of thousands. Just why Kony does this is unclear, but we're told the Ugandan government would gladly shut him down and bring him to justice if only the US would provide the advanced weapons, sophisticated tracking gear, military training and the boots on the ground to help get it done. To make this happen, all that Kony 2012's promoters ask of us is to help spread “awareness” of Uganda's “invisible” child soldiers by facebooking, tweeting and repeating the Kony 2012 video, and by emailing influential politicians and the one-name celebrities like Oprah, Bono, Rhianna, Cosby and Lady Gaga (OK, Lady Gaga is two names) to whom they listen. The Kony 2012 video aims to bring the criminal child-enslaving Ugandan warlord to justice by enlisting tens of millions of us little people in making Kony's name an odious household word around the planet, after which Washington DC will stretch forth its military arm to bring Kony, alive if possible, before the International Criminal Court for trial and punishment.

Almost everything is wrong with this simple picture, from the missing histories and hidden motives of storytellers and players to false statements of processes and problems real and unreal on both sides of the Atlantic. In fact, Kony 2012 is not a search for justice. Kony 2012 is a corporate-style PR and military psy-ops campaign, a cynical hoax engineered to justify US and Western military intervention to control the incredibly lucrative oil, mineral, water and strategic resources of the heart of Africa.  The video tells viewers not to study history, but to make it. Kony 2012 does not promote “awareness “. It relies on and promotes ignorance and smug racism.

Black Agenda Report is far from the first or the only news source to point that Kony 2012 is a warmongering hoax, and we certainly won't be the last. As our contribution, we here offer our top ten reasons why Kony is phony.

Reason #10: Invisible Children is funded by a core of notorious right wing donors including the Discovery Institute, which Bruce Wilson fingered in a March 11 Talk 2 Action piece as the leading funder of efforts to promote the replacement of biological sciences in schools with “intelligent design,” along with the Caster Foundation and the National Christian Foundation, all prominent backers of anti-gay referenda, politicians and initiatives in the United States and around the world. The Ugandan regime of Yoweri Museveni is a favorite of theirs for having passed legislation making it a criminal offense to be gay, punishable by a life sentence. Credible African journalists like Keith Harmon Snow have also alleged that Invisible Children’s white and male  leaders have direct personal connections to US intelligence agencies.

Reason #9: Invisible Children and Kony 2012 don't tell us that the Ugandan government of Yoweri Museveni, one of the “good guys” in the Kony 2012 universe, is also accused by the same International Criminal Court before which it wants to bring Joseph Kony, of using tens of thousands of child soldiers in its genocidal depredations in neighboring Congo, where Uganda and six other African nations invaded and killed an estimated 5 to 6 million Congolese in the late 1990s and early 2000s, a larger death toll than anyplace on planet Earth since the second world war. Bruce Wilson’s excellent March 8 Talk 2 Action article "Invisible Children" Co-founder (KONY 2012) Hints It's About Jesus, and Evangelizing links to numerous sources for this and much else.

Reason #8: Invisible Children and the Kony 2012 video also don't tell us that Uganda's Museveni replaced a president and rival general from the Acholi region of northern Uganda, the same ethnic group as Kony's LRA. The Ugandan government has evicted hundreds of thousands of Acholi from their lands and confined them to desperate and squalid refugee camps for more than XYZ years.

Kony and his LRA did commit monstrous crimes in previous decades, but by now are said to number only a few hundred combatants. Kony may not even have set foot in Uganda in years, but he and the LRA are useful as convenient bogeymen to justify the continued dispossession of Uganda's Acholi, whose chief misfortunes besides the LRA itself, are having produced rivals to Museveni and living at the edge of a resource-rich region that stretches across Uganda's borders for hundreds of miles into Congo and Sudan.

Reason #7: Invisible Children and Kony 2012 are lying when they attribute the disappearance of all 30,000 missing northern Ugandan children to the LRA.

The truth is that some of the child soldiers the Ugandan government used in neighboring Congo were abducted in northern Uganda, nobody knows how many, and a large but unknown portion of that region's civilian dead, many of them Acholi, perished at the hands of Uganda's government, which always had far more firepower and resources than the LRA, and just as little regard for the property and lives of innocent civilians and their children.

Reason #6: Threats of massive foreign intervention into civil conflict do not bring adversaries to the table. Instead they make it unnecessary for those on whose side the foreigners intervene to negotiate at all, and leave nothing for the other side to negotiate over. Uganda needs an end to violence, and resources devoted to building its civil society, not more military aid.

Reason #5: The United States, the other “good guy” in Kony 2012's imaginary world basically invented the modern African child soldier in the late 1970s and early 80s, so their commitment to “ending child soldiers” is a bit suspect.

Apartheid South Africa was bordered Portuguese ruled Angola and Mozambique, with their own vicious versions of apartheid until 1974. In that year, despite massive US and NATO aid, the Portuguese army rebelled, refused to continue fighting against African independence and overthrew its own government at home. White South Africa was deeply threatened by having independent black regimes now at its borders. So, with US funding it helped create and arm “contra” guerilla forces, UNITA in Angolan and RENAMO in Mozambique to burn schools and clinics, to mine orchards and roads, commit mass rapes, mutilations and murders, terrorizing citizens in their own country.

Lacking foreign troops or popular support , but with US aid and plenty of firepower, UNITA and RENAMO hit upon the innovation of kidnapping and enslaving child soldiers to carry out their despicable mission. Both were effusively praised and lavishly funded by Barack Obama's favorite president Ronald Reagan, and their leaders welcomed at the White House.

The chaos and social demoralization spread by Western financed armies of nihilistic child soldiers made them an ideal tool for use in whatever African setting the West wished to delay or prevent the emergence of African civil societies and central governments which might succumb to popular demands to develop a country's resources for its people rather than to benefit foreign interests. Employed in Liberia, Sierra Leone, Congo, Rwanda, Uganda and elsewhere, “failed states” infested by murderous child soldiers in the 80s and 90s proved to be incredibly good business environments for (mostly) Western extraction of hundreds of billions worth of timber, gold, diamonds, coltan and other vital African resources.

Reason #4: Depending on movie stars and celebrities is the precise opposite of building the backbone and habits of a vibrant and self-aware civic movement.

This kind of so-called activism reinforcing a slavish worship of celebrity culture, acceptance of corporate marketers who tell us what to eat, wear, covet, consume or shun and convince us it was our idea, not theirs. The real deal is that FaceBook, Twitter and much of crowd-sourced culture are fundamentally the master's tools, clicktivism, not activism.

It's never easy, and may not even be possible for slaves to free themselves with the master's tools. That ain't what they were designed for. Most of those forwarding and FaceBooking the Kony 2012 video, including some of the celebrities, as Keith Harmon Snow points out, probably can't find Uganda on a map.

Reason #3: When both corporate parties, the entire corporate media universe, a constellation of celebrities and movie stars, all the right wing and much of the establishment liberal church along with the whole bag of bipartisan foreign policy experts agree on the need for decisive military action, you can bet the course of wisdom and truth is just about always in the opposite direction. Republicans and Democrats voted to send troops to Vietnam, and only a single congresswoman voted against war in Afghanistan.

Reason #2: Kony 2012 and the campaign to keep US boots on the ground in Central Africa are all about the oil.

And the diamonds.

And the gold.

And the coltan, and the water.

Uganda's northern region contains vast oil reserves, and neighboring Congo is the source of most of the planet's coltan, a highly conductive compound used in every cell phone, computer, aircraft, automobile, missile, GPS or other electronic device on earth.

Reason #1: It's all about white people, the white West and their First Black President doing their imperial and colonial thing, running the planet for their benefit at everybody else's expense and feeling good about it, saving hapless & hopeless black Africans from themselves. Such a deal. If they wanted to take Kony down, they could have done it last week, last year, five or ten years ago. If they do take him down it'll be cause their Kony tool has outlived its usefulness, and maybe they need to plant a big wet sloppy kiss on Museveni and his gang, a bigger and more important bag of fools and tools.

The good news about Kony 2012 is that unlike the similar “Save Darfur” scam, many voices have been quick to express skepticism, disbelief and flat out ridicule of the Kony 2012 hoax.

The bad news is that US corporate media, Republicans, Democrats, the Obama White House and State Department as well as rabid Tea Party senators and congress creatures all being permanent cheerleaders for war and empire, few of Kony 2012's many critics will get on the TV stations that caused Invisible Children's video to “go viral.” Mark Twain said a hundred years ago --- talking about genocidal Western exploitation of the Congo, in fact, that a lie can flash across the world in the time the truth takes to put its boots on. But the boots are on. The truth is out here, and you are responsible for helping it overtake the lie.

[Continued... (http://www.globalresearch.ca/social-media-scam-alert-top-ten-ways-to-tell-kony-is-phony-the-hidden-agenda-is-to-invade-africa/29777)]
Title: Rihanna To Be Poster Child For Kony 2012 Fraud
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 16, 2012, 06:04:20 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/rihanna-to-be-poster-child-for-kony-2012-fraud.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/rihanna-to-be-poster-child-for-kony-2012-fraud.html)

Rihanna To Be Poster Child For Kony 2012 Fraud

Pop star to become face of “humanitarian” military intervention in Africa

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, March 15, 2012

Rihanna has committed to becoming the poster child for western “humanitarian” military intervention in Africa after promising she will visit Uganda to promote the Kony 2012 fraud, despite Ugandans themselves angrily distancing themselves from the viral propaganda film.

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbYYBLPraMI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbYYBLPraMI)

Having been identified as one of the cultural icons the Kony 2012 filmmakers deliberately targeted in an attempt to make their film go viral, it was Rihanna tweeting the link out to her millions of followers that got the ball rolling (http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1680863/rihanna-kony-2012.jhtml) in the first place.

Rihanna then contacted the organization (http://www.tmz.com/2012/03/08/rihanna-joseph-kony-video/#.T2JQVRFmKDk) and plans to make a video with them that will further grease the skids for a foreign military intervention in Africa, with a resolution already introduced in Congress (http://www.prisonplanet.com/lawmakers-push-for-us-invasion-of-africa-following-kony-2012-fraud.html) toward that end.

During an interview with Access Hollywood, the Barbadian singer explained she was teaming up with Invisible Children, the shadowy foundation group behind Kony 2012, to take on “things that are not OK.”

“I want to get my hands really dirty with that project so I’m planning on going to Uganda later on this year,” she said, adding that she was working with Invisible Children on making a film to publicize the “stop Kony” campaign. Rihanna also praised Barack Obama for “dealing” with Kony by sending in 100 U.S. troops last year.

Rihanna claims she is becoming a poster child for the project to “help the victims” of Joseph Kony. However, as we documented yesterday (http://www.prisonplanet.com/ugandans-react-angrily-to-kony-2012-propaganda-film.html), the victims in Uganda are appalled that their suffering is being used to create a pretext for western military intervention in Africa that will only create more bloodshed in the long run.

During a broadcast of the Kony 2012 film in a town in northern Uganda, residents reacted with outrage (http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g-yJe3puXRVkbmts28qLTmw5MnOQ?docId=8e597afadbe84ed199f53f1905bbbbe2) and ended up throwing rocks at the screen to express their disgust at the motivation behind the movie.

In addition, Ugandans now living in America have took to You Tube in droves to savage the film (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNLeOKWfLJo) as a transparent ploy to legitimize the US military-industrial complex’s hegemonic agenda under Africom (http://www.corbettreport.com/uganda-africom-and-the-kony-boogeyman/).

An Al-Jazeera tool (http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/spotlight/ugandaspeaks/) that tracks reaction to the film from people in Uganda shows that the majority are against the Kony 2012 campaign.

The fact that Rihanna is a pop star whose career revolves around putting out mindless “music” for the consumption of an army of moronic imbeciles, most of whom probably couldn’t even point to the continent of Africa on a map, makes her mobilization of such a legion of idiots all the more dangerous.

Why is she traveling to Uganda to promote a charity now loathed by the vast majority of Ugandans?
While the likes of Rihanna, Angelina Jolie, George Clooney and a whole host of other celebrities have thrown their weight behind the Kony 2012 fraud, despite the fact that Kony and his army are virtually defunct having not even been present in Uganda for six years, real atrocities being committed right now (http://www.prisonplanet.com/forget-kony-ugandans-are-being-slaughtered-by-their-own-western-backed-government.html) against Ugandans by British carbon trading companies backed by the World Bank are completely ignored.

The Ugandan government, headed up by 30-year dictator Yoweri Museveni, is working with western interests to displace, torture and massacre Ugandan civilians in massive land grabs (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/22/world/africa/in-scramble-for-land-oxfam-says-ugandans-were-pushed-out.html?_r=3&scp=3&sq=uganda&st=cse) for the purposes of making millions of dollars in carbon credits for outfits like the New Forests Company.

There is no charity to support these victims, no viral video, and no deluge of celebrities to draw attention to their plight.

Indeed, by supporting the Stop Kony fraud, Rihanna, Clooney, Jolie and their ilk are actually propping up the dictatorial regime in Uganda that is now terrorizing Ugandans just as Joseph Kony’s LRA did previously.
Title: Exposed: Kony 2012 Scam Is a Soros/NGO Front
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 16, 2012, 06:14:54 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/exposed-kony-2012-scam-is-a-sorosngo-front.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/exposed-kony-2012-scam-is-a-sorosngo-front.html)

Exposed: Kony 2012 Scam Is a Soros/NGO Front

Alex Jones & Aaron Dykes
Prison Planet.com
March 15, 2012

Kony 2012, hyped on the backs of celebrities and do-gooders, is revealed for what it is– a propaganda salvo for a continent wide invasion of Africa. Yes, the mantra War is Peace is once again drumming U.S. soldiers into further conflict.

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNzzf76FV_c (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNzzf76FV_c) (Secrets KONY 2012 Is Desperate to Hide)

Research makes clear that KONY is a sophisticated psy-op to muster popular support for what is, in reality, nothing more than a geostrategic positioning vis-a-vis China for oil (http://tv.globalresearch.ca/2012/03/us-launches-pr-campaign-ugandan-oil-intervention) and mineral resources, as well as an effort to legitimize the U.S. military’s AFRICOM unit (http://www.infowars.com/kony-2012-invisible-childrens-pro-africom-museveni-propaganda/) in the region through newly-branded “humanitarian” interventions.

It is not only War in the name of “Peace,” but an attempt to empower the International Criminal Court (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/uganda/9137982/Joseph-Kony-2012-International-Criminal-Court-chief-prosecutor-supports-campaign.html) under the influence of NGOs and other related globalist corporate interests.

Nobel Peace Prize “winner” Barack Obama has already deployed 100 special forces troops (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/8828528/Barack-Obama-deploys-US-special-forces-to-central-Africa.html) to the central African region back in October 2011, and a resolution in Congress (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/kony-2012-video-inspires-house-resolution-warlord-article-1.1038813?localLinksEnabled=false)– on the heels of KONY 2012′s viral views of at lest 80 million– seeks to send more forces there for an all out invasion on the pretext of hunting down a shadowy warlord with less blood on his hands than an average African despot.

Top celebrities vying for greater power including CFR member and UN goodwill ambassador Angelina Jolie (http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2012/mar/12/kony-2012-angelina-jolie), actor George Clooney (http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/14/on-capitol-hill-george-clooney-testifies-on-sudan/), media baroness Oprah Winfrey (http://www.thegrio.com/news/how-oprah-helped-the-kony-documentary-go-viral.php), as well as Africa-obsessed Bill Gates and Bono (http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/3883140.html), have all come out in front of this issue.

(http://static.infowars.com/2012/02/i/rotator/Soros_ICG_Samantha_Power_Angelina_Jolie_KONY.jpg)

But behind KONY’s apparent urgency are the usual suspects, the hidden hands behind uprisings and color revolutions including the Arab Spring (http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/05/americas-arab-deception.html) and Libyan (http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/03/the-strikes-on-libya-humanitarian-intervention-not-imperial-aggression/72740/) invasion. A key World Net Daily investigation (http://kleinonline.wnd.com/2011/10/15/212-4/) makes clear that George Soros and his International Crisis Group, headed by former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, and the likes of Samantha Power (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samantha_Power), a key member of Obama’s National Security Council advancing “humanitarian” causes, have significantly framed and shaped the manufactured crisis surrounding the now-famous head of the Lord’s Resistance Army. Like Libya, the Responsibility to Protect doctrine (http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org)– created and advanced by Soros, Samantha Power and other power players– gives the impetus for intervention in the conflict. Groups like Invisible Children (http://www.invisiblechildren.com), who produced KONY 2012, are pawns in their game.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Libertarian Perspective on March 16, 2012, 07:20:37 am
Why don't they let Ugandans and people that want to help sort it out themselves? This guy seems to be doing alright.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Childers

He is the real person on who the film the Machine Gun Preacher is based and they fight against Kony and his militia with a militia of their own, I think South Sudanese and Ugandans can take care of themselves they don't need foreign forces in their country.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: jerryweaver on March 16, 2012, 12:00:24 pm
Clooney arrested in protest at Sudanese Embassy


http://movies.yahoo.com/news/clooney-arrested-protest-sudanese-embassy-150449477.html (http://movies.yahoo.com/news/clooney-arrested-protest-sudanese-embassy-150449477.html)
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: jerryweaver on March 16, 2012, 12:31:46 pm
Slam the comments section at Yahoo as this is a lead story right now.

http://movies.yahoo.com/news/clooney-arrested-protest-sudanese-embassy-150449477.html (http://movies.yahoo.com/news/clooney-arrested-protest-sudanese-embassy-150449477.html)
Title: Angelina Jolie, George Clooney & Michael Moore say: "Do NOT read this article!!"
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 18, 2012, 03:39:00 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/10-controversial-facts-in-the-obama-deception-that-are-now-self-evident.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/10-controversial-facts-in-the-obama-deception-that-are-now-self-evident.html)

10 Controversial Facts In The Obama Deception That Are Now Self-Evident

Saman Mohammadi
Prisonplanet.com
March 18, 2012


The KONY 2012 phenomenon was a fire that consumed itself. The propagandistic film went viral because of its sensationalism and commercialism, not because it was telling the truth and making a worthy difference in the discourse of international politics and the situation in Uganda.

Invisible Children, the group behind the film, has been described as cult-like and clueless by many experts such as Stephen Lewis, a Canadian diplomat and UN envoy to Africa.

We can learn three things from the globalist-run “KONY 2012″ (http://www.infowars.com/globalists-pull-plug-on-kony-2012-with-spectacular-crash-burn/) propaganda campaign that is now viewed as an epic disaster after its creator went berserk in public and smashed his fists on the pavement while naked. One, viral political films must be treated with deep skepticism and caution because their creators are not the final authority on truth and reality. Second, if discredited politicians, journalists, and organizations promote the film then it is likely that the political cause the film is pushing on viewers is not egalitarian and just. And three, the massive recognition and popularity of a political film is not an indication of its objectivity, sincerity, and authenticity.

Several other political films have went viral on the Internet in the past. The two biggest ones are Peter Joseph’s Zeitgeist, and Alex Jones’s The Obama Deception. Unlike the KONY 2012 film, those films were not funded by large foundations and did not promote militarization and state violence as solutions.

The documentary, “The Obama Deception,” (http://youtu.be/eAaQNACwaLw) released in March 2009, has been watched 30-40 million times in the last three years, whether on the Internet, or in DVD format. And that is a conservative estimate.

At the time, critics said that the film made wild and conspiratorial claims about Barack Obama’s presidency, the United States government, and Wall Street. But those critics are silent now. In 2012, the film’s controversial claims can be measured and fact-checked based on three years of hard data, evidence, and official statements by members of the Obama administration.

II. From Controversy To Consent: The Rising Political Relevance of ‘The Obama Deception’

The ten biggest claims that were made in ‘The Obama Deception,’ according to my reading of the film, are listed below, followed by a brief explanation of why they are true, when necessary.

1. President Obama is a puppet who is owned by the parasitic financial community.

This statement needs no explanation. It is self-evident (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16488).

2. President Obama is dedicated to the overthrow of America’s constitutional republic.

President Obama told Congress in May 2011 (http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/obama-administration-tells-congress-war-powers-act-doesnt-apply-to-libya-mission/) that America’s bombing of Libya was authorized by the United Nations, and that Congress had no say in the matter.

More recently, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta informed Senator Jeff Sessions (http://youtu.be/hxT5xcfCQpI) and the Senate that the U.S. military answers to the international bankers behind the new world order, United Nations, and NATO, not the U.S. congress or the American people.

3. President Obama is a proponent of the fraudulent endless war on terror because he wants to use the global chaos to finalize the covert establishment of a global fascist government.

President Obama has continued, and, in many areas, advanced the Bush administration’s illegal and undefined global war on terror. Although he has not consciously used the phrase “global war on terror,” there is no doubt President Obama is fighting this senseless, diabolical, criminal, and evil war in America’s name to accomplish hidden political aims that go against America’s interests.

The mindless global war on terror is not being fought to defend America’s security, but to drive the United States government to bankruptcy and collapse, and make way for the establishment of a new global fascist government.

The Obama administration’s foreign policy is radical, and criminal. It has funded and armed Al-Qaeda terrorists in Libya and Syria to change unfriendly regimes under the guise of supporting democracy activists against their oppressive governments. And it is also planning to bomb Iran alongside the discredited right-wing Netanyahu government in Israel despite not proving their case that Iran is a threat to Israel or America.

In his recent article called, “The 0% Doctrine: Obama Breaks New Ground When It Comes to War With Iran,” (http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175514/) Tom Engelhardt wrote:

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/10-controversial-facts-in-the-obama-deception-that-are-now-self-evident.html)]
Title: Obama Shamelessly Exploits Death of Trayvon Martin
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 23, 2012, 06:37:37 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-shamelessly-exploits-death-of-trayvon-martin.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-shamelessly-exploits-death-of-trayvon-martin.html)

Obama Shamelessly Exploits Death of Trayvon Martin

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
March 23, 2012

Obama has exploited the tragic and fatal shooting of teenager Trayvon Martin, who was shot by a neighborhood watch captain in a Florida gated community targeted in numerous burglaries.

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueWsjzbwOxQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueWsjzbwOxQ)

Obama made his comments during a press conference (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/24/business/global/dartmouth-president-is-obamas-pick-for-world-bank.html?_r=1) in the Rose Garden announcing a nominee for the World Bank, described as a “multinational development institution” by the New York Times (more accurately described as an international bankster loan shark operation).

Obama said that “if I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”

“I think every parent in America should be able to understand why it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this,” Obama said. “All of us have to do some soul searching to figure out how does something like this happen.”

“Obviously, this is a tragedy. I can only imagine what these parents are going through. When I think about this boy, I think about my own kids.”

“I think they are right to expect that all of us as Americans are going to take this with the seriousness it deserves, and we are going to get to the bottom of exactly what happened,” he said.

The New York Times tried to minimize Obama’s obvious politicalization of the case by stating that he avoided “politically charged specifics about the case.” It mentioned that Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney had also talked about the shooting.

Obama’s comments follow an effort to turn the case into a major civil rights battle and cause célèbre with opportunists like the Rev. Al Sharpton grabbing the limelight. The Chicago Tribune (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/la-na-nn-trayvon-martin-case-rev-al-sharpton-20120322,0,2164977.story) notes that the case has drawn in many politicians and celebrities, many complaining that “the wheels of justice are moving too slowly” and that the suspect in the case should be immediately arrested and locked up.

The case is shaping up into a major civil rights issue with the NAACP, Urban League, and a host of black elected officials calling for the suspect, George Zimmerman, to be arrested.

Sharpton and the civil rights careerists, however, rarely if ever mention the facts when it comes to supposedly racially motivated crime.

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rlPU6jUD6o (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rlPU6jUD6o)

According to FBI statistics (http://www.topix.com/forum/state/wv/TBN2MRV4327LH92PN), more than 1,600 whites are murdered by blacks each year, a rate that is 18 times the rate of white people killing blacks.

“Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery,” writes Ken LaRive (http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-lafayette/federal-statistics-of-black-on-white-violence-with-links-and-mathematical-extrapolation-formulas), who cites federal crime reports backed up by the FBI’s National Crime Victimization Survey (http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict.htm).

“Blacks are three times more likely to use a hand gun, and twice more likely to use a knife,” he adds. “Hispanics commit three times more violent crimes than whites, but the statistics are nebulous because sometimes they are classified as white, so it could be far higher.”

For Sharpton and the politically correct race-baiters, however, such facts are irrelevant and distract from their victimization agenda and its goal of preferential treatment and a prized place at the government’s confiscated wealth trough.

It comes as no surprise that Obama would exploit the Trayvon Martin case. He is a master at playing the race card. As journalist Walter E. Williams (http://amarillo.com/opinion/opinion-columnist/weekly-opinion-columnist/2012-01-31/obama-campaign-plays-race-card) – who happens to be black – has noted, Obama’s racially tinted speech is “usually coded and subtle” and the Martin case is no exception.

Following Obama’s presidential victory, it became obvious his administration, establishment Democrats, and so-called “progressives” would use race as a political bludgeon against their opponents.

The liberal corporate media has played this game incessantly with chattering heads like Chris Matthews (http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-accuses-newt-gingrich-of-racially-charged-pronunciation-of-the-name-juan/) leading the charge in baseless accusations that establishment Republicans are racist. Ron Paul, in particular, has been repeatedly victimized by this sort of viciousness.

It remains to be seen if Obama will drag the dead body of Trayvon Martin behind him as he works his way through the campaign season toward the election in November. It cannot be discounted, however, considering polls showing narrow margins (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/president_obama_vs_republican_candidates.html) between Obama and his hand-picked opponents.
Title: New Black Panthers Call for Vigilante Justice in Trayvon Martin Case
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 25, 2012, 05:35:23 am
In light of the information provided above, how likely is it that the so-called "New Black Panther Party" is at least partially funded by either the Ford Foundation itself or one of its "satellites"? Or is that the sort of question the race-obsessed corporate media would rather we not ask in the first place, lest the divide-and-rule tactics of the global elite (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=162212.msg967898#msg967898) be exposed for what they are?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/new-black-panthers-call-for-vigilante-justice-in-trayvon-martin-case.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/new-black-panthers-call-for-vigilante-justice-in-trayvon-martin-case.html)

New Black Panthers Call for Vigilante Justice in Trayvon Martin Case

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
March 24, 2012

Mikhail Muhammad‘s New Black Panther Party is offering a $10,000 reward for the “capture” of George Zimmerman, the Neighborhood Watch captain accused of killing teenager Trayvon Martin.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE_i9TELcfw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE_i9TELcfw)

When Muhammad was asked if he was inciting violence against Zimmerman, he said: “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.”

The Orlando Sentinel reports today that the New Black Panthers have called for the mobilization of 10,000 black men to capture Zimmerman. Muhammad said the New Black Panthers will organize what amounts to a vigilante posse to search for Zimmerman in Maitland, a suburb of Orlando, Florida.

The party, led by Dr. Malik Zulu Shabaz of Washington, D.C., is taking donations from black entertainers and athletes and hope to collect a million dollars by next week, according to the newspaper.

Sanford, Florida, authorities said any attempt “by civilians to take any person into custody may result in criminal charges or unnecessary violence.”

The shooting has set off a nationwide debate over race and justice, reports MSNBC (http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/24/10845078-trayvon-martin-death-becomes-national-rallying-cry). Rallies in support of prosecuting George Zimmerman were held on Saturday in Washington, Chicago, Dallas and Tampa, Seattle, Baltimore and Atlanta.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/new-black-panthers-call-for-vigilante-justice-in-trayvon-martin-case.html)]
Title: Re: New Black Panthers Call for Vigilante Justice in Trayvon Martin Case
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 25, 2012, 05:51:18 am
The shooting has set off a nationwide debate over race and justice, reports MSNBC (http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/24/10845078-trayvon-martin-death-becomes-national-rallying-cry).

Only it's not a real "debate," because the questions I raised nearly two years ago on page one of this thread continue to be blatantly ignored by Obama cultists:

To all you self-righteous, insult-spewing, race-obsessed (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbcs-matthews-injects-phony-race-talking-point-into-his-program-again.html) “liberals” out there who shamelessly wrap in the flag of “anti-racism” virtually each and every corporate fascist economic policy, Bush-style police state policy and imperialist foreign policy the Democrat-controlled Congress and White House propose, perpetuate or expand, I have a few questions for you:

If you’re as concerned with exposing and eliminating “racism” as you would have everyone believe, why do neither you nor the General Electric (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=123056.0)-financed Thought Police at MSNBC speak a word of protest against Obama's continuation (http://www.prisonplanet.com/pro-legalization-cops-slam-drug-war-recalibration-say-obama-%E2%80%98just-talking-about-it%E2%80%99.html) of the racist drug war?

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iifGYnffrBI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iifGYnffrBI)
       http://www.drugpolicy.org/communities/race/ (http://www.drugpolicy.org/communities/race/)
       http://www.fff.org/comment/com0303e.asp (http://www.fff.org/comment/com0303e.asp)
       http://www.druglibrary.org/Schaffer/hemp/history/first12000/11.htm (http://www.druglibrary.org/Schaffer/hemp/history/first12000/11.htm)

Why no word of protest against Obama's continuation (http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/05/13/iraq-the-endless-occupation/) and -- in the case of Afghanistan (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18001), Pakistan (http://www.prisonplanet.com/1-in-3-killed-by-u-s-drones-attacks-in-pakistan-are-civilians.html) and other nations -- expansion of Bush’s terroristic (http://www.counterpunch.org/chomsky01242006.html) war on “brown people (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HMT3yewtmw)”?

Why no word of protest against Obama's plan (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12517) to impose IMF-style austerity measures (http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/fiscal_responsibility.php) on behalf of his Wall Street cronies (http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16488), particularly in view of the fact that these measures will fall harder on poor black communities than on any other sector of society?

Why no word of protest against the anti-labor (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=160421.msg992194#msg992194)/pro-land speculation (http://www.henrygeorge.org/bust.htm) tax system that also falls hardest on poor black communities?

       http://savingcommunities.org/issues/race.html (http://savingcommunities.org/issues/race.html)

Why no word of protest against how neither Obama nor Democratic Congressional “leaders” have done anything (legislatively, not rhetorically!) to reverse the NAFTA (http://www.economyincrisis.org/content/obamas-unfulfilled-nafta-campaign-promise)-induced offshoring (http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts04192005.html) of countless millions of jobs -- yet another engineered trend that, as any black person from Detroit (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18239) will readily attest, falls harder on poor, inner-city blacks than anyone else?

Why do you ignore the racist origins of your beloved victim disarmament "gun control (http://www.gunfacts.info/)" laws?

       http://www.constitution.org/cmt/cramer/racist_roots.htm (http://www.constitution.org/cmt/cramer/racist_roots.htm)
       http://www.guncite.com/journals/gun_control_wtr8512.html (http://www.guncite.com/journals/gun_control_wtr8512.html)
       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nckgyfGbdnU (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nckgyfGbdnU) (No Guns for Negroes Part One)
       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2g7TbxkJuqA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2g7TbxkJuqA) (No Guns for Negroes Part Two)

Why do you ignore the California origins of Nazi eugenics (http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html)?

Why do you ignore the eery obsession that many of today’s limousine liberals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limousine_liberal) continue to have with eugenics (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=117190.0)?

And last but certainly not least, why do you ignore the shameful, decades-old tradition among aristocrat (http://www.progress.org/archive/hgjr7a.htm)-funded “foundations” -- particularly the Ford Foundation -- of employing the divide-and-rule (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=163559.msg1026272#msg1026272)/anti-MLK (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poor_People's_Campaign) tactic of fomenting racial hatred within and between the lower and middle classes; and how this historical fact sheds a particularly unflattering light on all the racial provocateuring and hatemongering being engaged in by La Raza -- a hispanic supremecy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kv2y35OZy_Q&feature=PlayList&p=74E6D7A3A2FC6CF7&playnext_from=PL&index=0&playnext=1) group which is financed not only by the Ford Foundation, but by overprivileged corporations such as slave goods (http://walmartwatch.com/blog/archives/who_makes_the_stuff_you_buy/)-selling Wal-Mart (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3836296181471292925) and toxic derivatives (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=98465.msg581249#msg581249)-peddling Citigroup (http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/oops.php)?

Could it be that the real racists are you, and that your mindless accusations of racism against anyone who dares criticize God’s Obama's corporate fascist economic policies, Bush-style police state policies and terroristic foreign policies are thus nothing more than Freudian projection (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection) on your part?

Or is that yet another question you have neither the courage nor intellectual honesty to answer?

Title: 100 Trayvons a day -- and NO OUTCRY from the race-mongering establishment "Left"
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 26, 2012, 10:07:14 am
http://www.naturalnews.com/035361_Trayvon_murder_blacks.html (http://www.naturalnews.com/035361_Trayvon_murder_blacks.html)

A hundred Trayvons a day - Why the real murder of blacks is carried out by pharmaceutical companies, vaccines and cancer clinics

by Mike Adams
NaturalNews.com
March 26, 2012

(NaturalNews) No matter what you think about the Trayvon Martin shooting case, the degree of emotional and cultural outpouring in this case is impressive. But it seems to be taking place in a highly selective way. A shooting like what happened with Trayvon is tragic but rare, whereas at least a hundred African-Americans are killed by drug companies, vaccine pushers and cancer clinics every single day! And most of the drug companies are led by white men, so if there's any justification for an outcry against white-on-black crime in America, it should be directed at the vaccine manufacturers, drug companies and cancer clinics, it would seem.

But no. The outcry is focused on one Hispanic man named Zimmerman who allegedly shot a young African-American man named Trayvon. Every life is precious, of course, but how is the life of one young man more precious than the lives of a hundred of other African-Americans who die each day at the hands of their doctors, oncologists and pharmacists? FDA-approved drugs kill 106,000 Americans a year according to the Journal of the American Medical Association. And cancer deaths disproportionately occur in blacks due to chronic vitamin D deficiency among those with dark skin color. If you're curious to know why, watch my video explanation about sunlight and vitamin D. This video explains why the cancer industry refuses to tell black people the truth about why they need extra vitamin D to prevent cancer:

     http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=5A62FC73922FD51A88E62E42C5A0AD5E (http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=5A62FC73922FD51A88E62E42C5A0AD5E)

Outrage is power, but such power must be focused at the right target

One thing I've always enjoyed about the black community in America is their sense of brotherhood; the sense that if you attack one of us, you attack all of us! Strength through community. We are more powerful when we act together than if we act in isolation. These are dignified philosophies for any community to follow, but they are all too easily misdirected if the people are not told the whole truth.

What am I saying, exactly? That the African-American community would be far more justified -- and potentially save far more lives if they marched on Merck, Pfizer and AstraZeneca. You want to know who's really killing your black babies? It's the vaccine companies. The drug companies. The cancer clinics. In the cancer industry alone, it is widely known that people with dark skin color have chronic vitamin D deficiencies that accelerate cancer tumor growth. That's why cancer tumors are far more aggressive in black men and women than white men and women.

The cancer industry views black people as business opportunities to be exploited for cash. It's a form of medical enslavement, and it goes on day after day, year after year, with tens of thousands of victims each year in the USA alone, and not a single highly-visible black community leader has anything to say about it.

At least not that I've heard. Where is Jesse Jackson on the issue of black babies being made autistic by vaccines? Where is the leadership outcry against the cancer industry and its exploitation of black women for profit? Where are the rallies, the basketball team photo ops, and the church gatherings for all those African-American men, women and children who are sacrificed to the machine of white corporate profit that kills a hundred Trayvons a day across America?

There is only silence in that quarter. No press conferences. No marches. No outcry.

When NaturalNews defended Maryanne Godboldo, virtually no one in the media spoke out

The closest anything came to that was the case of Maryanne Godboldo, an African-American mom in Detroit whose daughter was taken from her by the state because she refused to put her on psychiatric medication. The state staged a SWAT team raid at her house, and she was ultimately charged with multiple felony counts.

NaturalNews went to bat for Maryanne, defending her health freedom, promoting her cause, and supporting her raising of funds to fight the establishment. With the help of her support group in Detroit, they staged sidewalk protests and online social networking campaigns of protest. In the end, all charges were dropped against Maryanne Godboldo.

The mainstream media refused to cover the story. Only NaturalNews and a few other media outlets (like InfoWars.com) dared report the truth of this African-American mom who was being railroaded by the medical establishment. Read some of our reporting on this to see for yourself:

     http://www.naturalnews.com/Maryanne_Godboldo.html (http://www.naturalnews.com/Maryanne_Godboldo.html)

Real freedom requires knowing who is trying to enslave us all

You see, NaturalNews believes in righting wrongs. We believe in medical freedom, health freedom and economic freedom. We are anti-slavery in the truest sense of the term, in that we teach people how to free themselves from medical slavery and exercise their freedoms in all areas of their life: Food, free speech, political ideas and much more. We don't care if our readers are black, white, brown, yellow or chameleon colored as long as they learn how to demand justice, liberty and true freedoms for themselves and those around them.

It pains me to see the African-American community demonstrate such a passionate response in the case of Trayvon Martin and yet fail to direct that anger and resentment in the direction where a far greater number of people are being killed daily. How many black men across America are dying from prostate cancer right now? High-dose vitamin D3 could reverse those cancers in the vast majority of cases, yet the cancer industry will not tell black men this simple fact. They are denied the knowledge that would save their lives, and so they die quietly, silently, by the hundreds and thousands, all across America year after year, without a peep from the leaders of the African-American community.

You know what this proves to the globalists? That the way to murder black people is to do it with chemicals, not guns, because the black community won't protest death by chemicals. Where there is no apparent violence involved, the deaths go unnoticed. This is the dirty little secret of the eugenics movement, which actually originated in what is now the United Kingdom (yeah, Kings and Queens and all that...).

The eugenics agendas underway in the world today are insidious in their use of silent "stealth" tactics to target certain genetic groups for extermination. GMOs and vaccines are already being developed that target only selected genetic profiles. Theoretically, it would not be out of the question for the GMO seed companies to produce a variety of corn that contained a chemical designed to target those of African-American descent and selectively compromise their health or fertility. What we know from observing current events is that such deaths would simply be explained away without any real outcry whatsoever. Score one for the (evil) global eugenics movement.

Eugenics programs target blacks in Africa

Make no mistake: Eugenics programs are very real. They exist right now, and most of the populations being targeted with vaccines and AIDS drugs (which actually cause immune system failure) are, in fact, people with dark skin color. Look at where the vaccine non-profits are focusing their "good deeds" around the world -- it's almost always "black" nations in Africa. Ever notice that?

For every Trayvon death in America, perhaps a hundred thousand African children are either killed or made infertile through vaccines and other "high-tech" population control solutions offered by organizations like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which spends hundreds of millions of dollars promoting vaccines and infertility technologies.

     (http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html (http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html)) and
     (http://www.naturalnews.com/034834_Bill_Gates_sperm_infertility.html (http://www.naturalnews.com/034834_Bill_Gates_sperm_infertility.html)).

None of this justifies what happened in the Trayvon shooting, of course. I don't yet know the facts of that case, and I very much doubt anyone else does either, as there simply has not been time for the full facts to come to light. But at the same time, we do have facts about Big Pharma, vaccines, and the death of African-Americans day after day. We know, for example, that the number of people dying in America from FDA-approved pharmaceuticals is equivalent to a jumbo jet airliner nose-diving right into the ground every single day. We know that blacks are disproportionately harmed by cancers compared to whites. We also know that both type-2 diabetes and obesity disproportionately impact blacks compared to whites, even though the cures for these conditions are readily available (and dirt cheap to acquire or dispense, by the way). We also know that both blacks and whites (and everybody else) is intentionally denied access to the truth about nutritional remedies and cures that can reverse disease and free these people from medical enslavement.

Even if the facts in the Trayvon case reveal he was shot without justification, his death -- as tragic as it has been -- pales in comparison to the death of tens of thousands of other African-American men and women each and every year by the vaccine and drug industries. So while I love to see people take to the streets and express their outrage -- because that's a constitutionally-protected exercising of Free Speech -- I desperately wish those efforts would be directed at the far worse criminals operating in America today.

Zimmerman doesn't even compare to real (corporate) evil...

Believe me, this Zimmerman man who allegedly shot Trayvon is nothing compared to the evil of the corporate stiffs who run the largest GMO seed companies and vaccine manufacturers. Those people are pure evil day in and day out, and they think nothing of using little black babies for their medical experiments on a routine basis. Why do you think the Nigerian government issued arrest warrants for Pfizer executives? (http://www.naturalnews.com/023654.html (http://www.naturalnews.com/023654.html))

Why does the drug industry routinely conduct illegal medical experiments on black people like we saw with the Tuskegee experiments? (http://www.naturalnews.com/023654.html (http://www.naturalnews.com/023654.html))

The pharmaceutical and vaccine giants think absolutely nothing of rounding up a few hundred black children for their medical experiments. It's all for the "greater good," anyway, right? In reality, that translates into selling those drugs to a bunch of white people who have high-paying insurance policies that will offer full-price reimbursement to the drug companies. It's all about profit at any cost.

Why we all should be marching on Monsanto and the vaccine companies

The African-American community going after Zimmerman is, I believe, a kind of deliberate misdirection to make sure all that rage and hatred doesn't end up being pointed at the real murderers who kill little black babies for profit. Those murderers, of course, are the psychiatric drug pushers, the vaccine companies and the GMO pimps.

The day the African-American community across this country really wakes up and realizes who is murdering their children is the day that a "Million Man March" takes down Monsanto and conducts citizens' arrests of all the people who work there. That's what I want to see: A million people of all colors marching on Pfizer, marching on the corrupt CDC, marching on the FDA, and marching on the very same DEA that has put countless thousands of your people behind bars for the very same crimes that white people only get slapped on the wrist for, you know? The real injustices in America are not named Zimmerman, they are found in the grand conspiracies between evil corporations and corrupt government agencies that routinely betray the American people while they sell out to corporate interests.

Because if the death of one young black man can ignite so much righteous indignation across the African-American community, imagine what might be accomplished if everybody wakes up to the real source of what's killing their children by the tens of thousands. It's called genocide, people. It's happening right now, right in front of our eyes, and there is absolutely no outcry against it.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Valerius on March 26, 2012, 11:19:44 am
How little the outcry by the globalists or their propaganda mouthpieces to the incident involving government employees and the EMT who was choked by the side of the road or the kid who was shot in the back in the subway and countless others brutalities.


Title: Establishment operatives are EXPLOITING Trayvon Martin to foment racial tension!
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 27, 2012, 08:11:26 am
The FBI...er, beg pardon...the Ford Foundation...er, beg pardon again...the "Revolutionary Communist Party"...is engaged in a blatantly obvious PsyOp aimed at shamelessly exploiting the death of Trayvon Martin as a means of fomenting racial hatred within and between the lower and middle classes (lest people of all colors realize who their real enemy (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=216458.msg1295756#msg1295756) is and begin uniting in common purpose (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=198869.0) against that enemy).

If you need proof of this, look no further than the following propaganda piece:

       http://revcom.us/a/264/a-modern-american-lynching-trayvon-martin-en.html (http://revcom.us/a/264/a-modern-american-lynching-trayvon-martin-en.html)

I'm sure more such proof is forthcoming.

Right, Michael Moore?

Right, Chris Matthews?

Right, Jesse Jackson?

Right, Li Onesto?

::)

---------------------------

“In his People’s Party Paper, Tom Watson, the Populist congressman from Georgia, appealed to white and black farmers to meet on common ground: ‘You are kept apart that you may be fleeced separately of your earnings. You are made to hate each other because upon that hatred is rested the keystone of the arch of the financial despotism which enslaves you both. You are deceived and blinded that you may not see how this race antagonism perpetuates a monetary system (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXt1cayx0hs) which beggars both.’”  

-- Jack Beatty, Age of Betrayal (http://books.google.com/books?id=U3eG_QoBRzsC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false), p. 214


“That’s the way the ruling class operates in any society: they try to divide the rest of the people. They keep the lower and the middle classes fighting with each other, so that they, the rich, can run off with all the f**king money (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=162212.msg976261#msg976261).

"Fairly simple thing; happens to work.

"You know, anything different, that’s what they’re gonna talk about: race, religion, ethic and national backgrounds, jobs, income, education, social status, sexuality -- anything they can do [to] keep us fighting with each other, so that they can keep going to the bank."

-- George Carlin (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HMT3yewtmw)

---------------------------
Title: Do NOT watch this! That's an ORDER from Chuck Schumer, Jesse Jackson, et al.
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 27, 2012, 09:19:48 am
"Don't you DARE watch the documentary films below! That's an ORDER from Chuck Schumer, Michael Moore, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Chris Matthews and the rest of the race-mongering, ambulance-chasing, tragedy-exploiting, police state-worshiping establishment 'Left!'"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAU9AJfttls (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAU9AJfttls)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nckgyfGbdnU&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL265EE0C4E76B1E3F (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nckgyfGbdnU&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL265EE0C4E76B1E3F)
Title: Re: Do NOT watch this! That's an ORDER from Chuck Schumer, Jesse Jackson, et al.
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 27, 2012, 12:27:48 pm
(http://www.ninehundred.net/~equalccw/s_racist.jpg)

(http://myconstructedreality.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/dredscott2.jpg)

(http://doctorbulldog.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/gun_control3.jpg)

Keep the above in mind as you read the following:

------------------------

http://www.prisonplanet.com/sen-schumer-exploits-trayvon-martin-case-in-call-to-outlaw-stand-your-ground.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/sen-schumer-exploits-trayvon-martin-case-in-call-to-outlaw-stand-your-ground.html)

Sen. Schumer Exploits Trayvon Martin Case in Call to Outlaw “Stand Your Ground”

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
March 26, 2012

(http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1050600.1332697518!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_635/image.jpg)

Schumer wants to the Justice Department to expand an investigation into the controversial law. More than thirty states have some form of the Castle Doctrine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_doctrine) or the Stand Your Ground (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law) law on the books. The Castle Doctrine has its roots in English common law under the dictum that “an Englishman’s home is his castle” and the belief that deadly force may be used when a home is invaded.

“I am sending a letter to the Justice Department to ask them to expand their investigation into the general application of these ‘stand your ground’ laws, whether they actually increase, rather than decrease, violence, and whether they actually prevent law enforcement from prosecuting cases where a real crime has been committed,” Schumer said on Monday.

“Given your duty to protect the public, your unique nationwide jurisdiction to conduct an investigation, and your authority to allocate federal resources to state and local law enforcement, I believe that you are warranted and justified in conducting an investigation as to whether these ‘stand your ground laws’ are contributing to excessive uses of force and decreased prosecutions for killings throughout the United States. I therefore urge you to commence such an investigation at the earliest possible instance,” Schumer added.

Along with New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Representative Carolyn McCarthy, Charles Schumer is at the forefront of an effort to roll back the Second Amendment (http://www.ontheissues.org/domestic/Charles_Schumer_Gun_Control.htm) and deny citizens the right to defend themselves. He has attempted to enforce gun laws by linking the exercise of the Second Amendment to terrorism and has pushed consistently for outlawing “assault weapons.” Schumer has also worked to close down the so-called “Gun Show Loophole” that allows sales of firearms without asking permission from the Attorney General and the federal government.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/sen-schumer-exploits-trayvon-martin-case-in-call-to-outlaw-stand-your-ground.html)]

------------------------
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 27, 2012, 01:24:32 pm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/25/us-plan-disarm-rebels-central-africa
US reveals plan to disarm LRA fighters

Barack Obama presents strategy to combat Lord's Resistance Army rebels and their leader Joseph Kony in central Africa

Xan Rice in Nairobi
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 25 November 2010 08.12 EST

The US government yesterday revealed a plan to disarm Lord's Resistance Army fighters in central Africa and capture or kill their leader, Joseph Kony.

Barack Obama presented a strategy document to Congress designed to "mitigate and eliminate" the threat to civilians posed by one of the world's longest-running and most brutal insurgencies.

While they are unlikely to result in US troops being directly involved in combat operations, the proposed measures should strengthen local military efforts against the LRA. Several international human rights groups welcomed the move, although some relief agencies working in the affected areas warned the plan could prove counterproductive
...
The strategy document said the US had spent more than $23m (£14.5m) on support for the Ugandan military since then, but added that more money was needed
...
"You are not going to see marines on the ground fighting Kony," Cakaj said. "But you are going to see more US troops and contractors on the ground facilitating regional efforts to stop the rebels. It's not a radical move, but it is certainly a positive step."

However, Chris Bain, head of UK aid agency Cafod, said that while the US commitment to tackling the LRA problem was encouraging, the military approach is a "dangerous one if it doesn't ensure the protection of innocent civilians" - as has happened in the past.

http://www.africa-eu-partnership.org/successstories/co-operating-disarm
Co-operating to disarm

The first Pan-African action against trafficking of small arms and light weapons (SALW) was officially launched in early 2010 with support from the EU. The three-year initiative will support peace and security in the region by actively fighting against the proliferation of firearms and explosive materials in Africa.

The first Pan-African action against trafficking of small arms and light weapons (SALW) is being funded by the EU through the Instrument for Stability (IfS). It will provide some €3.3 million to the Regional Centre on Small Arms (RECSA) (www.recsasec.org/) in order to reinforce coordinated action for the elimination of SALW trafficking.
...
Civilians hold 79% of all weapons circulating in Africa,
which seriously undermines the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals, (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=227627.msg1347237#msg1347237)
helps support illegitimate nodes of power and instability, and undermines governance. It also threatens the success of development aid, the safety of development workers and raises the costs of delivering and sustaining such aid. [ HOW BLATENT CAN YOU GET? ]


 Contractors to the Congo - 01 December 2011  (http://www.isn.ethz.ch/isn/Current-Affairs/ISN-Insights/Detail?lng=en&id=134437&contextid734=134437&contextid735=134435&tabid=134435&dynrel=4888caa0-b3db-1461-98b9-e20e7b9c13d4,0c54e3b3-1e9c-be1e-2c24-a6a8c7060233)

While security and defense contracting in Africa is nothing new, the awarding of another multi-million dollar contract by the US State Department to a controversial private security operation is perhaps indicative of just how thinly stretched the US military is becoming. This does not bode well for either oversight or accountability.

 By Jody Ray Bennett for ISN Insights
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From the outsourcing of security functions to widespread mercenary activity, contracting on the African continent is nothing new. For decades the continent has been a playground for private third parties involved in everything from the training of militaries to the toppling of governments, to the legitimate and illicit arms trades. That an impressive volume of literature and documentary evidence exists on the private involvement of individuals and companies in the shaping of the African security economy speaks to this.

DynCorp’s contract

And so it follows: last June, DynCorp International - one of the “Big Three” armed security contractors that arrived in Iraq back in 2003 alongside Blackwater/Xe and Triple Canopy - announced that it had been awarded a State Department contract to provide training to the military of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. While the details of the mission remain purposely ambiguous, the contract does specify that the task order was issued by the State Department’s Bureau of African Affairs, has a base time limit of one year with two additional option years and will focus on training junior to mid-level military personnel in functional areas such as communications, logistics and engineering.

“This is consistent with the recent political history of Africa. Private security contractors have been active in the rebuilding of Liberia since the removal of Charles Taylor. They have also had a role in training AMISOM (the African Union Mission in Somalia) peacekeepers as well. Traditionally, training on this level has been offered only by those [US military personnel] currently serving on active duty. But this contract reveals just how thinly spread the US Military is around the world,” Scott A Morgan, an analyst of US policy in Africa, told ISN Insights.
...
In a recent article discussing the use of private contractors on the African continent, Johnnie Carson, the top official for African affairs in Obama’s State Department put it bluntly: “We do not want an American footprint or boot on the ground.”

The issue of oversight and accountability of private firms acting on behalf of the US Departments of State or Defense has long been the Achilles’ heel of the private military and security industry. That a private company financed by taxpayers’ money will be representing US strategic goals in a place like the DRC indicates the issue is far from resolved. While the expansion of the market has yet to be realized by the industry, time will tell if Africa provides the next boom for private military and security providers. Until then, DynCorp is leading the way into the jungle.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/11/world/africa/11somalia.html?pagewanted=all
U.S. Relies on Contractors in Somalia Conflict

By JEFFREY GETTLEMAN, MARK MAZZETTI and ERIC SCHMITT
Published: August 10, 2011
...
Now Mr. Rouget works for Bancroft Global Development, an American private security company that the State Department has indirectly financed to train African troops who have fought a pitched urban battle in the ruins of this city against the Shabab, the Somali militant group allied with Al Qaeda.

The company plays a vital part in the conflict now raging inside Somalia, a country that has been effectively ungoverned and mired in chaos for years. The fight against the Shabab, a group that United States officials fear could someday carry out strikes against the West, has mostly been outsourced to African soldiers and private companies out of reluctance to send American troops back into a country they hastily exited nearly two decades ago.

“We do not want an American footprint or boot on the ground,” said Johnnie Carson, the Obama administration’s top State Department official for Africa.
...
Still, over the past year, the United States has quietly stepped up operations inside Somalia, American officials acknowledge.

The Central Intelligence Agency, which largely finances the country’s spy agency, has covertly trained Somali intelligence operatives, helped build a large base at Mogadishu’s airport — Somalis call it “the Pink House” for the reddish hue of its buildings or “Guantánamo” for its ties to the United States — and carried out joint interrogations of suspected terrorists with their counterparts in a ramshackle Somali prison.

The Pentagon has turned to strikes by armed drone aircraft to kill Shabab militants and recently approved $45 million in arms shipments to African troops fighting in Somalia.
...

Several United Nations and African Union officials credit the work of Bancroft with improving the fighting skills of the African troops in Somalia, who this past weekend forced Shabab militants to withdraw from Mogadishu, the capital, for the first time in years.
...
Some American Congressional officials investigating the money being spent for operations in Somalia said that opaque arrangements like those for Bancroft — where money is passed through foreign governments — made it difficult to properly track how the funds were spent.
...
Mr. Stock, Bancroft’s president, said that bickering in Washington about how to contain the Shabab threat had made the American government even more dependent on companies like his.

As he put it, “We’re the only game in town.”
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: TahoeBlue on March 28, 2012, 01:33:39 pm
http://www.dyn-intl.com/news-events/press-releases.aspx
DynCorp International Awarded Contract Valued at up to $95 Million to Provide Personnel Support Services in Egypt

FALLS CHURCH, Va. - ( March 27, 2012 ) - DynCorp International (DI) today announced that it has been awarded a contract with the U.S. Air Force to provide support services for Department of Defense and contractor personnel in Egypt.


http://www.dyn-intl.com/news-events/news-archives/news-2011/news053111-di-wins-africap-training-task-order.aspx
DynCorp International Wins AFRICAP Training Task Order

FALLS CHURCH, Va. (May 31, 2011) - DynCorp International (DI) announced today that it has been awarded a task order under the Africa Peacekeeping Program (AFRICAP) to provide basic leadership training to personnel within the military of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

"We are proud to continue our work in promoting peace and stability in Africa," said DI President Steve Schorer. "DI has extensive experience and success in providing training designed to enhance the leadership and management capability of our partners in the government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo."

The task order, awarded by the U.S. Department of State's Bureau of African Affairs, has one base year and two option years. The total potential revenue is $17.1 million if both option years are exercised. The AFRICAP program supports regional stability in Africa by building the capacity of African countries and regional organizations to prevent, manage and resolve conflicts on the African continent.

Under the task order, DI will provide basic leadership and specialty training focusing on junior and mid-level military personnel in functional areas such as communications, logistics and engineering.

http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/cross-cutting_programs/transition_initiatives/pubs/Uganda_Final_Evaluation_Report_April_2011.pdf
This evaluation of the Northern Uganda Transition Initiative (NUTI)
...
NUTI was launched at a time when the aspirations of the population in northern Uganda, as well as international and national objectives, coincided: to leave the camps where people had taken refuge, and to reintegrate in their home areas. The programme took place between 2008 and 2011, alongside the return of an estimated 85% of the population.
...
NUTI is one of a number of USAID programmes operating in the region, such as SPRING, NUDEIL and NUMAT2, and as such offers a good opportunity to review the articulation of OTI within USAID. The contractor implementing the contract was Casals & Associates, Inc, which was then acquired by DynCorp International in January 2010. NUTI closed on 15 May 2011.

NUTI Database, Cleared, Completed, Closed grants, from earliest to latest, generated on 05.08.2011. The total budget over the three years is an estimated US$22 million, meaning roughly 40% of the budget is for operational costs.

http://www.casals.com/
(http://www.casals.com/wp-content/themes/Archive/lifestyle_40/images/casals_and_associates_b.gif)
(http://www.casals.com/wp-content/themes/Archive/lifestyle_40/images/dyncorp01.gif)
Title: Ex-NAACP big rips Al & Jesse for handling of Trayvon Martin shooting
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 31, 2012, 10:41:05 am
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/race_buzzards_circle_trayvon_GjszYV5diCTZezdmxbrLON (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/race_buzzards_circle_trayvon_GjszYV5diCTZezdmxbrLON)

Ex-NAACP big rips Al & Jesse for handling of Trayvon Martin shooting

Ex-NAACP big rips Al & Jesse * ‘Using child as bait,’ he says * NY pols turn out in hoodies

By FRANK ROSARIO in Sanford, Fla., ERIK KRISS in Albany and DAVID SEIFMAN in New York
New York Post
March 27, 2012

The furor over the shooting of Florida teen Trayvon Martin is being “exploited” by the likes of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton to “racially divide the country,” a civil-rights leader charged yesterday.

Martin’s “family should be outraged at the fact that they’re using this child as the bait to inflame racial passions,” the Rev. C.L. Bryant, a former NAACP leader, said of the 17-year-old hoodie-wearing black youth who was shot dead by a mixed white-Latino neighborhood-watch volunteer.

The pastor accused Jackson and Sharpton — who yesterday organized a thousands-strong protest in Sanford, Fla., where the shooting occurred last month — of “acting as though they are buzzards circling the carcass of this young boy” in an interview with The Daily Caller, a news Web site.

(http://www.nypost.com/rw/nypost/2012/03/27/news/web_photos/parents--300x150.jpg)

Bryant, the past president of the NAACP chapter in Garland, Texas, called Jackson and Sharpton “race hustlers” for inserting themselves into the drama.

His scathing criticism came as:

* New York lawmakers in Albany, wearing hoodies in solidarity with Martin, said the demonization of minorities by police “was born here in New York City.”

* Mayor Bloomberg, a gun-control advocate, said the Feb. 26 shooting was proof that loose national gun laws defy common sense.

* Thousands in Sanford rallied to demand that Zimmerman, a 28-year-old cop wannabe, be arrested and prosecuted. Other protests occurred throughout the country.

* Sanford named Capt. Darren Scott, who is black, as acting police chief. He will fill in for Police Chief Bill Lee, who is white and had temporarily stepped down amid controversy over how local cops had handled the shooting.

* Sanford Mayor Jeff Triplet called his city “a tinderbox” set to explode amid the racial tensions.

Former NAACP leader Bryant said the rallies organized by Sharpton and Jackson suggest there is an epidemic of “white men killing black young men” while ignoring much more prevalent black-on-black crime.

“The epidemic is truly black-on-black crime,” he said. “The greatest danger to the lives of young black men are young black men.”

Bryant said he wants to see protests about those problems.

“Why not be angry about the wholesale murder that goes on in the streets of Newark and Chicago?” he asked. “Why isn’t somebody angry about that 6-year-old girl who was killed on her steps last weekend in a cross fire when two gang members in Chicago start shooting at each other? Why is there no outrage about that?”

[Continued... (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/race_buzzards_circle_trayvon_GjszYV5diCTZezdmxbrLON)]
Title: Obama Is Trying To Start A Race War: Exploiting Trayvon’s Death
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 31, 2012, 05:09:36 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-is-trying-to-start-a-race-war-exploiting-trayvons-death.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-is-trying-to-start-a-race-war-exploiting-trayvons-death.html)

Obama Is Trying To Start A Race War: Exploiting Trayvon’s Death

Prison Planet.com
March 31, 2012

There can no longer be any doubt, the social engineers are trying to spark civil unrest as a distraction from the criminal looting the Banksters are carrying out. Divide and conquer is the oldest trick in the book, stir the people up against one another then pose as the savior that keeps the peace!

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMBs1NlqOf0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMBs1NlqOf0)
Title: Re: Do NOT watch this! That's an ORDER from Chuck Schumer, Jesse Jackson, et al.
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 31, 2012, 05:21:41 pm
"Don't you DARE watch the documentary films below! That's an ORDER from Chuck Schumer, Michael Moore, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Chris Matthews and the rest of the race-mongering, ambulance-chasing, tragedy-exploiting, police state-worshiping establishment 'Left!'"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAU9AJfttls (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAU9AJfttls)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nckgyfGbdnU&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL265EE0C4E76B1E3F (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nckgyfGbdnU&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL265EE0C4E76B1E3F)

http://www.prisonplanet.com/biden-hints-at-more-gun-laws-in-wake-of-trayvon-martin-case.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/biden-hints-at-more-gun-laws-in-wake-of-trayvon-martin-case.html)

Biden Hints at More Gun Laws in Wake of Trayvon Martin Case

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com
March 31, 2012

Vice president Joe Biden told CBS News Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” self-defense law will become a subject of debate following the Trayvon Martin shooting.

[Video clip omitted - see original article (http://www.prisonplanet.com/biden-hints-at-more-gun-laws-in-wake-of-trayvon-martin-case.html)]

“It’s important that people be put in a position where their Second Amendment rights are protected, but that they also don’t, as a consequence of the laws, unintendedly put themselves in harm’s way,” Biden told Bob Schieffer in an interview that will air on “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

Biden told CBS it is questionable if firearms allow people to protect themselves. “The idea that there’s this overwhelming additional security in the ownership and carrying concealed and deadly weapons… I think it’s the premise, not the constitutional right, but the premise that it makes people safer is one that I’m not so sure of,” Biden said.

According to Gun Owners of America, firearms are used 2.5 million times a year in self-defense. “Law-abiding citizens use guns to defend themselves against criminals as many as 2.5 million times every year — or about 6,850 times a day,” a GOA factsheet (http://gunowners.org/sk0802.htm) notes. “This means that each year, firearms are used more than 80 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than to take lives.” In the vast majority of cases, brandishing a firearm prevented an attack of crime, the statistics reveal.

Forty three state constitutions (http://www.saf.org/default.asp?p=gunrights_faq#25) contain specific references to the citizen right of self-defense. In addition, seven other states protect the right to self-defense statutorily.

Police cannot protect the public (http://www.firearmsandliberty.com/kasler-protection.html) against violent crime and have repeatedly stated it is not their job to do so. Police response to emergencies has actually increased (http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/data-drive/article_a12d37b4-6345-11e1-9597-001871e3ce6c.html) over the last decade.

Prior to the mid-1800s, individuals were responsible for their own protection and were legally required to pursue and attempt to apprehend criminals. “The notion of a police force in those days was abhorrent in England and America, where liberals viewed it as a form of the dreaded ‘standing army,’” writes Peter Kasler.

In making his anti-gun argument, Biden ignored Supreme Court rulings made in 2008 and 2010. In the District of Columbia v. Heller (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller) ruling made in 2008, the Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm and the Second Amendment affirms the individual right to use firearms for traditionally lawful purposes, including self-defense.

Biden favors more gun control laws (http://www.issues2000.org/2012/Joe_Biden_Gun_Control.htm), including closing the so-called “gun show loophole.” The National Rifle Association gave him an “F” for his gun control voting record when he was a Senator.
Title: Obama Administration Exploits Trayvon to Push Anti-Gun, Race-Baiting Rhetoric
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 02, 2012, 01:18:49 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-administration-exploits-trayvon-shooting-to-push-anti-gun-race-baiting-rhetoric.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-administration-exploits-trayvon-shooting-to-push-anti-gun-race-baiting-rhetoric.html)

Obama Administration Exploits Trayvon Shooting to Push Anti-Gun, Race-Baiting Rhetoric

Establishment is creating the myth of white on black violence to take everyone’s rights

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Infowars.com
Monday, April 2, 2012

The Obama administration, its supporters, and the establishment media are engaged in a transparent effort to whip up racial tension over the Trayvon Martin shooting in a bid to chill second amendment rights and polarize the American people as part of an election stunt.

     http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57407389/biden-trayvon-case-could-spur-gun-laws-debate/ (http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57407389/biden-trayvon-case-could-spur-gun-laws-debate/)

In doing so they are manufacturing a race-baiting myth that threatens to cause genuine racial unrest – the notion that white on black hate crimes are a problem of epidemic proportion when in reality federal crime statistics prove that the opposite is true.

Despite a witness telling Sanford police (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2119615/Trayvon-Martin-case-Anonymous-witness-claims-teen-attacked-killer-George-Zimmerman-fatal-shooting.html) that he saw Martin attacking George Zimmerman before the fatal shot was fired, clearly suggesting Zimmerman was acting in self-defense, along with new video showing that Zimmerman was injured during the confrontation (http://news.yahoo.com/video/us-22424932/george-zimmerman-enhanced-video-shows-injury-28804646.html), the administration has exploited the tragedy to create momentum for the right to self-defense to be abolished altogether.

During a CBS News interview which aired yesterday, Vice-President Joe Biden said the incident would re-open debate on the “Stand Your Ground” self-defense law, while also flagrantly lying about the second amendment.

“The idea that there’s this overwhelming additional security in the ownership and carrying concealed and deadly weapons… I think it’s the premise, not the constitutional right, but the premise that it makes people safer is one that I’m not so sure of,” Biden said.

In reality, as Gun Owners of America documents, firearms are used 2.5 million times a year in self-defense. “Law-abiding citizens use guns to defend themselves against criminals as many as 2.5 million times every year — or about 6,850 times a day,” a GOA factsheet notes (http://gunowners.org/sk0802.htm). “This means that each year, firearms are used more than 80 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than to take lives.” In the vast majority of cases, brandishing a firearm prevented an attack of crime, the statistics reveal.

In light of the NRA’s recent warning (http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/feb/10/nra-official-obama-wants-outlaw-guns-2nd-term/) that Obama would use his second term to ban firearms, in addition to newly uncovered footage in which Attorney General Eric Holder calls for Americans to be “brainwashed” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nM0asnCXD0) out of their support for gun rights, the administration is clearly invoking the Trayvon incident to prepare the groundwork for Obama to clamp down on the second amendment if he is re-elected.

While Obama waded into the controversy by proclaiming Trayvon to be the son he never had, his supporters have played on race to generate hysteria and a lynch mob mentality. Al Sharpton’s call for civil disobedience (http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/General%2BNews/123255/Al-Sharpton%3A-Civil-Disobedience-Will-Escalate-If-Zimmerman-Remains-Free.html) threatens to stimulate racially-fueled clashes, while Spike Lee’s decision to tweet what he believed to be Zimmerman’s home address, only for it to be the home of an elderly couple who had to go into hiding (http://news.yahoo.com/video/us-15749625/sanford-couple-in-fear-after-spike-lee-tweet-28773427.html), illustrates how far beyond the pale the entire situation has been hyped.

Meanwhile, despite a week of intense media scrutiny, Twitter has still failed to delete (http://www.prisonplanet.com/twitter-spamming-celebrities-not-ok-advocating-murder-is-fine.html) an account entitled ‘Kill Zimmerman’ (https://twitter.com/#%21/KillZimmerman) which incites readers to murder the accused shooter in cold blood. Imagine if white supremacists reacted to a white man being shot by a black man by setting up a twitter account calling for the black man to be hunted down and killed lynch-mob style. Do you think Twitter would delete the profile?

The fact that the establishment media, at the direction of race-baiting Obama supporters like Al Sharpton and Obama himself have artificially manufactured racial controversy around the Trayvon Martin shooting is manifestly provable.

NBC News had to admit (http://www.nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/04/nbc-investigating-segment-on-zimmerman-call.html?imw=Y) that they had deliberately edited a call between George Zimmerman and a 911 dispatcher prior to Martin’s death in order to make Zimmerman appear racist, by removing the part of the call where the dispatcher directly asks Zimmerman if Martin is white, hispanic or black.

Despite making up only 8 per cent of the population of the United States, black on white violence is seven times more likely to happen than the converse. Whether people like that or not, it is a fact, but you will never see the establishment media even acknowledge it, never mind start a public debate on the root causes of why it is happening.

These statistics come from a New Century Foundation analysis (http://www.nc-f.org/) of federal crime statistics.

You will also never hear a discussion about why, “blacks are 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against whites then vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit a robbery,” as Ken LaRive documents (http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-lafayette/federal-statistics-of-black-on-white-violence-with-links-and-mathematical-extrapolation-formulas).

In addition, you will never witness a national debate over a spate of incidents that have occurred over the last two years (http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/the_taboo_on_mentioning_black_mob_violence.html) in which gangs of black flash mobs go on violent rampages targeting non-blacks.

If Jesse Jackson, Spike Lee and their ilk showed half as much concern for the fact that black culture, particularly in the form of rap music, promotes and glorifies violence, which undoubtedly is one of the major causal factors behind these statistics, as they are showing in their efforts to whip up racial tension over the Trayvon shooting, America would be a much more harmonious place.

But this isn’t really about representing black people or highlighting genuine concerns over racism, it’s about firming up Obama’s support base with the election just over six months away. If the administration can exploit enough tragic incidents like the Trayvon shooting to polarize the American people and rally recalcitrant liberals into re-affirming their support for Obama, another four years in White House can still be obtained.
Title: Jesse Jackson calls on blacks to wear hoodies to polling places
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 06, 2012, 12:42:52 pm
Throughout history, race-mongers (be they black (http://www.islamfortoday.com/nationofislam.htm) or white (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke)) have always known that the only way you can lure large amounts of people into embracing a racist ideology is to seduce them with kernels of truth. In other words, first bring them to tears with a fiery, truth-filled speech about the problems they all face, then offer your snake-oil "solution" to those problems.

Ruling-class parasites (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=216458.msg1295756#msg1295756) absolutely love this, because they know it functions as a pressure-release valve. That is to say, it allows the oppressed masses to vent their anger and frustration about various symptoms without ever actually joining forces (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=198869.0) to eliminate the underlying root causes (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=160459.0).

http://www.prisonplanet.com/jesse-jackson-calls-on-blacks-to-wear-hoodies-to-polling-places.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/jesse-jackson-calls-on-blacks-to-wear-hoodies-to-polling-places.html)

Jesse Jackson calls on blacks to wear hoodies to polling places

Breitbart.com
Friday, April 6, 2012

Speaking to The Tom Joyner Morning Show on Wednesday, Jesse Jackson said:

“If a white kills a black we revolt, if a black kills a white it’s jail time, we kill each other it’s Miller time. It’s as if somebody has the right to kill us.”

Jackson then added “This right wing, we got to win the election, so wear your hoodie, put a voter registration card under your hoodie if you have a hoodie without a voter card you’ve been Hoodiewinked.”

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XddhELjbuwY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XddhELjbuwY)
Title: Racist drug war continues under Obama; Obamanoids wink and look the other way!
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 16, 2012, 08:46:35 am
To all you self-righteous, insult-spewing, race-obsessed (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbcs-matthews-injects-phony-race-talking-point-into-his-program-again.html) “liberals” out there who shamelessly wrap in the flag of “anti-racism” virtually each and every corporate fascist economic policy, Bush-style police state policy and imperialist foreign policy the Democrat-controlled Congress and White House propose, perpetuate or expand, I have a few questions for you:

If you’re as concerned with exposing and eliminating “racism” as you would have everyone believe, why do neither you nor the General Electric (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=123056.0)-financed Thought Police at MSNBC speak a word of protest against Obama's continuation (http://www.prisonplanet.com/pro-legalization-cops-slam-drug-war-recalibration-say-obama-%E2%80%98just-talking-about-it%E2%80%99.html) of the racist drug war?

       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iifGYnffrBI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iifGYnffrBI)
       http://www.drugpolicy.org/communities/race/ (http://www.drugpolicy.org/communities/race/)
       http://www.fff.org/comment/com0303e.asp (http://www.fff.org/comment/com0303e.asp)

http://www.naturalnews.com/035584_Obama_War_on_Drugs_prohibition.html (http://www.naturalnews.com/035584_Obama_War_on_Drugs_prohibition.html)

Obama betrays the left; cheers continued expansion of drug war, criminalization of plant-based medicine

by Mike Adams
NaturalNews.com
April 16, 2012

(NaturalNews) If you happen to need even more evidence that President Obama has gutted his campaign promises and betrayed not only the left but also African Americans who enthusiastically supported his election, he has just gone public with his support for the continued war on drugs. Keeping marijuana criminalized, it seems -- and keeping more African Americans in prison -- is a top priority for the Obama administration.

This means Obama supports the midnight DEA raids on our citizenry; the filling of prisons with small-time pot smokers; the disproportionately punitive sentences handed down to black men and women across America who aren't really criminals at all... they merely suffer from a chemical addiction that would more rightly be considered a medical issue.

Nearly every country in Latin America has now openly and publicize recognized that the so-called "war on drugs" is a complete and total failure. But Obama thinks it's just great! Fill the prisons! Prosecute more blacks! Buy more guns and night vision gear for the DEA! That's what Obama's America stands for, it seems.

"I personally and my administration's position is that legalization is not the answer," Obama said just hours before the meeting of Latin American leaders at the Convention Centre in Cartagena, Colombia, for the Americas Summit (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-17716926). Meanwhile, Obama's top Secret Service agents and military commanders were banging Colombian whores in the background, then refusing to pay them their $47 prostitution fee. (http://www.naturalnews.com/035580_Secret_Service_Colombia_prostitutes... (http://www.naturalnews.com/035580_Secret_Service_Colombia_prostitutes.html)) Obama had "no comment" on that particular issue.

Let's get real about all this. Marijuana prohibition simply doesn't work. At least not for reducing crime and drug addiction. Anyone who thinks prohibition works is completely delusional. But it does work for certain special interests. What are those special interests, anyway?

Who BENEFITS from the continued criminalization of marijuana?

If you really want to know why prohibition remains in place with marijuana, it's simple to find out why. Just ask yourself "Who benefits?"

• The DEA. Without a drug "problem," the DEA won't get hundreds of millions of dollars worth of increases in operating budgets from the federal purse strings. If drugs were decriminalized, the DEA would have to be sharply downsized (which would be a great thing for liberty and safety but a terrible thing for the DEA honchos).

• Private prisons. Thanks to illegal agreements between prison operators and state governments, prisons can put prisoners to work at slave labor wages -- just a few cents an hour -- manufacturing goods that the corporate prison owners sell for pure profit. If you thought the Nike sweatshops in Asia were bad, go visit a prison in the USA some time and watch the slave labor taking place right here at home.

• Local police. The "drug war" is the excuse that local police departments use to receive more grant money for weapons, assault gear and now even armored assault vehicles to be used against the citizens. Without the drug war excuse, all this grant money disappears and these cops have to go back to actually serving the community instead of bashing in doors like a bunch of cocaine cowboys.

• The government drug runners! It's now a well-known fact that the ATF, DEA and other government agencies are all heavily involved in running drugs across America. Just Google any of these terms if you want to check it out for yourself. The ATF is even engaged in money laundering through the globalist banks. This is why government crackdowns on drugs are highly selectively -- drug raids are really just a way to eliminate the competition so that the biggest drug dealer of all -- the government itself -- can continue to rake in the maximum profits. Legalizing drugs would obviously cause street prices to collapse, sucking all the profits out of the government-run drug business.

• Local District Attorneys and prosecutors. Without the drug war to give them a juicy field of easy targets to prosecute, their careers would take a huge hit. It's so much harder to arrest real criminals than to go after pot smokers and raw milk farmers, isn't it? Gee, imagine the difficulty of actually fighting REAL crime for a change?

• Big Government. The entire government benefits from the continued criminalization of drugs. For starters, it establishes the outrageous precedent that government can outlaw a native plant -- even a plant that has grown wild across North America for hundreds of years. This alone is an outrageous encroachment on fundamental human freedom. Beyond that, the government can always point to "drug violence" as another excuse to squash our freedoms and put in place a tyrannical police state. It's all "for your own good," of course. Isn't it always?

• Big Pharma and the hospital industry. Because recreational drugs are illegal, they're often cut with dangerous chemicals that cause liver damage and kidney damage. This results in yet more repeat business for hospitals and the drug industry. If street drugs were legalized, they would be standardized and regulated, and adulteration of those products would be extremely rare. They would be safer to use, in other words, which is exactly what the pharmaceutical industry is dead set against. They only make money when people are damaged or sick from using street drugs concocted in somebody's trailer.

Who LOSES from the drug war? You!

So we've covered the beneficiaries of the drug war, but who loses from it? You do, of course: Your liberties, freedoms, tax dollars and personal safety are all threatened by the existence of the war on drugs. Decriminalizing and regulating these drugs would have an enormously positive impact on you and your life.

If drugs were decriminalized, here's what would happen:

• Drug gangs would vanish as their source of revenues (illegal drugs at black market prices) dry up.

• Drug-related crime would sharply fall.

• State revenues would skyrocket from the regulated sale of legalized marijuana.

• The corrupt prison industry would collapse to perhaps only 25% of its current size.

• Your personal safety and security would be greatly enhanced due to the lack of drug violence, shootings, home invasions and more.

• Mexican drug gangs would lose their power base, resulting in a sharp drop in crime along the border.

• Former "criminal" pot smokers would once again become taxpaying members of the workforce, contributing to the financial upkeep of society rather than draining it as prisoners.

• The happiness index across society would sharply rise.

Even the Red Cross says decriminalize marijuana

It's all pure economics, my friends. Cause and effect. Legalize recreational drugs and you end the violence, the crime, the prison system overload and the entire underground market for the stuff.

It's all so obvious that even the Red Cross has called for decriminalization (http://copssaylegalize.blogspot.com/2012/03/red-cross-calls-for-drug.... (http://copssaylegalize.blogspot.com/2012/03/red-cross-calls-for-drug.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LawEnforcementAgainstProhibition+%28Law+Enforcement+Against+Prohibition%29)).

At the same time, countless members of the FBI, DEA and active-duty police organizations are also openly calling for decriminalization (http://www.leap.cc/).

The rational argument for ending prohibition is further detailed at www.Norml.org

There are no rational reasons for keeping marijuana criminalized. There are only political reasons for doing so. That's why Obama continues to support the irrational war on drugs -- because it's a political issue.

Obama, the betrayer of the political left

Obama, of course, is a teleprompter-reading puppet of the global elite. He does what they tell him to do, and right now they're telling him to keep pushing Drug War propaganda because it's a highly effective way to expand the police state and keep people living in fear while denying them access to plant-based medicine.

Obama, it turns out, has betrayed the left so many times I can hardly keep count: He supports the GMO industry, he signed the NDAA which expands secret arrests and secret Gitmo-style prisons, he's an opponent of farm and food freedom (http://www.naturalnews.com/035301_Obama_executive_orders_food_supply.... (http://www.naturalnews.com/035301_Obama_executive_orders_food_supply.html)) and he has proven himself to be nothing more than a big business operative who defends the status quo while preaching "hope and change" that he never delivers.

Obama has assaulted free speech, due process (http://www.naturalnews.com/034537_NDAA_Bill_of_Rights_Obama.html), medical freedom and parental rights. In doing so, he has betrayed many of the top priorities of the very people who once put him into office.

He wants to keep marijuana criminalized because that's what the police state fascist system of corporate control wants.

Of course, this doesn't mean the alternatives we're given are going to be any better. This is not some pitch for Romney, for God's sake. That guy is just as much of a corporate sellout as Obama (and Bush before him). Elections are created to present the illusion that the People have a choice when, in reality, all they're voting for is which color of puppet they want to see on television while we're all being imprisoned, exploited, enslaved and oppressed by a growing fascist state.

[Continued... (http://www.naturalnews.com/035584_Obama_War_on_Drugs_prohibition.html)]
Title: NATO’s Slow Genocide in Libya: Syria is Next (and NO OUTCRY from Obamanoids!)
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 20, 2012, 11:23:17 am
To all you self-righteous, insult-spewing, race-obsessed (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbcs-matthews-injects-phony-race-talking-point-into-his-program-again.html) “liberals” out there who shamelessly wrap in the flag of “anti-racism” virtually each and every corporate fascist economic policy, Bush-style police state policy and imperialist foreign policy the Democrat-controlled Congress and White House propose, perpetuate or expand, I have a few questions for you:

[...]

Why no word of protest against Obama's continuation (http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/05/13/iraq-the-endless-occupation/) and -- in the case of Afghanistan (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18001), Pakistan (http://www.prisonplanet.com/1-in-3-killed-by-u-s-drones-attacks-in-pakistan-are-civilians.html) and other nations -- expansion of Bush’s terroristic (http://www.counterpunch.org/chomsky01242006.html) war on “brown people (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaS2bRGS86c)”?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/natos-slow-genocide-in-libya-syria-is-next.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/natos-slow-genocide-in-libya-syria-is-next.html)

NATO’s Slow Genocide in Libya: Syria is Next

Tony Cartalucci
Prisonplanet.com
April 20, 2012

What the world has to look forward to if NATO and the UN gets its way in Syria.

While Qatari government propaganda outlet Al Jazeera (http://english.mofa.gov.qa/details.cfm?id=114) is busy whitewashing the NATO-led terrorist take-over of Libya with “documentaries” like “Gaddafi: The Endgame – State of Denial (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YwenAKDDHo),” depicting the evisceration of one of Africa’s most developed nation-states as a pro-democracy revolution yielding a promising tomorrow – Libya in reality has been plunged into perpetual violence, destabilization, and division. And as militants battle each other while carving the once unified Libya into a myriad of fiefdoms, genocidal death squads continue a campaign of extermination nationwide.

(http://en.cumhuriyet.com/medya.php?mn=79800)

Image: The people of Tawargha are Libyans and have been Libyan for generations, settling there from sub-Saharan Africa. They have been brutally persecuted by the NATO-armed terrorists now running Libya. In Syria, expect these to be Alawite, Christian, and secular faces.

….

One group of Libyans hit hardest are the people of Tawargha – who were either exterminated or exiled from their city of 10,000-30,000 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-15517894) during the NATO-led destruction of Libya last year. Since then, their refugee camps have been raided (http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2012/03/libyan-revolution-update-enjoying.html), and survivors who have not yet fled Libya are being systematically imprisoned, tortured, and murdered.

Now, the very network of corporate-funded and directed NGOs charged with “human rights advocacy,” who assisted the Libyan rebels in willfully lying to the world (http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/10/lies-behind-humanitarian-war-in-libya.html) over violations of “human rights” in the lead up to NATO’s military intervention, are finally reporting the widespread atrocities being carried out by the rebels themselves. In fact, organizations like Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Amnesty International, both funded by convicted criminal and Wall Street speculator, George Soros (http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2012/03/surpise-soros-is-convicted-criminal.html), began reporting such atrocities back in 2011, but only long after NATO bombs were already falling on Libya and the process of “regime change” was already irreversible. And, at critical junctures, such as the sieges of Bani Walid and Sirte (http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/09/sirte-civilians-nato-committing.html), where NATO itself was committing systematic war crimes by air in tandem with terrorist forces on the ground – organizations like HRW and Amnesty International were altogether mute.

(http://libya360.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/sirte-after-nato-bombardments.jpg)

Image: The desolate Libyan city of Sirte after NATO’s months-long siege – the tragic aftermath of a UN-sanctioned “humanitarian war.” Not a word regarding NATO’s blockade and bombardment of these cities has been mentioned by either HRW or Amnesty International in any terms resembling the rhetoric they used to justify NATO’s intervention in March of 2011.

….

Now though, with Syria next on the chopping block, many around the world are looking at the “progress” made in Libya to see if the UN and NATO’s proposal for military intervention is justified, warranted, or feasible. What they see is a patchwork of terrorist regimes butchering people systematically, infighting, making duplicitous, self-serving deals with foreign firms and otherwise running the nation into the ground.

Amnesty International, a full-year too late, has published a report titled, “Libya: NTC must investigate death of another Tawargha man under torture (http://www.amnestyusa.org/news/news-item/libya-ntc-must-investigate-death-of-another-tawargha-man-under-torture),” in regards to the latest case in the NTC’s systematic genocide of the people of Tawargha - a city now rendered a “ghost town (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8754375/Gaddafis-ghost-town-after-the-loyalists-retreat.html).” HRW had published a report last week titled, “Libya: Wake-Up Call to Misrata’s Leaders (http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/04/08/libya-wake-call-misrata-s-leaders),” also regarding the systematic genocide of the people of Tawargha. Ironically, both Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International are giving all inquiring minds a look behind the curtain as to how exactly they are distorting other conflicts – including Syria today.

From the Beginning, Libyan Rebels were Known War Criminals

Long before the first NATO bombs dropped on Libya, genuine geopolitical analysts including Dr. Webster Tarpley of Tarpley.net (http://tarpley.net), noted that the Libyan “rebels” were in fact notoriously brutal racists and led by militias belonging to a listed international terrorist organization responsible for violence not only in Libya, but in Afghanistan and Iraq. On March 1, 2011 Dr. Tarpley spoke on the Alex Jones show (http://tarpley.net/2011/03/01/imperialist-rampage-envelops-libya-in-civil-war/) warning that Libyan rebels were lynching black Libyans, hailed from Al Qaeda, and that the overall agenda of destabilizing and possibly intervening militarily across the Arab World was to implement “chaos, civil war, and the division of countries,” along with the installation of weak puppet-regimes.

Just days after NATO began its military operations against Libya in mid-March of 2011, Dr. Tarpley confirmed (http://tarpley.net/2011/03/24/the-cia%e2%80%99s-libya-rebels-the-same-terrorists-who-killed-us-nato-troops-in-iraq/) that the Libyan rebels were led by the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), claimed by West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center (CTC) to have been involved in fighting Western troops in both Afghanistan and Iraq before returning to Libya to then be armed, trained, and led by Western forces in the overthrowing of Muammar Qaddafi.

During the initial phases of NATO’s intervention, HRW and Amnesty International were complicit in covering these facts up and instead focused on lending legitimacy to the now confirmed lies (http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/03/libya-another-war-another-pack-of-lies.html) of the NTC regarding human rights abuses perpetrated against them by the Libyan government. It wasn’t until July of 2011 that HRW would admit (http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/07/libyas-not-so-noble-rebels.html) that Libyan rebels were carrying out systematic abuses of their own, and even then they were whitewashed and excused. And while Human Rights Watch now admits that what the Libyan NTC is doing to the Tawargha people amounts to “crimes against humanity,” they could have just as easily drawn such conclusions backed with ample evidence before NATO intervened militarily and rendered moot the entire “humanitarian” “responsibility to protect” doctrine the entire war was disingenuously based on.

In retrospect, we are meant to believe these organizations simply made a mistake and could not have possibly known the rebels would turn out to be worse human rights violators than those they sought to replace.

HRW & Amnesty Repeating “Mistakes” in Syria, No Mistake

That HRW and Amnesty International appear to be making the exact same mistakes in Syria, even as they finally admit the crimes of the “pro-democracy” rebels in Libya a year later and tens of thousands of lives too late, is certainly no mistake. This is exactly the purpose both organizations are meant to serve along with a myriad of other faux-NGOs – to lend legitimacy to both the Syrian terrorists and the governments of the West arming and directing them as they carry out what is essentially a campaign of foreign military conquest.

The first admissions of Syrian rebels committing atrocities have likewise come a full-year after unrest was triggered in 2011. Human Rights Watch admitted in their report, “Syria: Armed Opposition Groups Committing Abuses (http://www.hrw.org/node/105885),” that Syrian rebels are kidnapping, torturing, and executing people, many of whom have been confirmed to be civilians. Again, geopolitical analysts have stated since the unrest began in 2011 that Syria’s opposition likewise represented not genuine “pro-democratic” forces, but rather proxies for foreign interests, many linked to extremist groups including Al Qaeda, and with Libya’s LIFG commander Abdul Hakim Belhaj (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8919057/Leading-Libyan-Islamist-met-Free-Syrian-Army-opposition-group.html) literally pledging cash, weapons, and men to the Syrian rebels’ and NATO’s cause.

Indeed, Syria is destined not for a stable democratic-tomorrow, but rather the same division, destruction, chaos, and genocide now rampant across Libya, where self-serving traitors simultaneously sell their nation out from under its people while eliminating their competition through violence and terrorism. As NATO and the UN attempt to court Syria’s ruling business and government cliques, it would be wise for Syrians to look at Libya as an example of just how much worse it can get and the necessity to remain unified against what has been planned from the very beginning to be the end of Syria.

That the West’s war machine extends not only around the world in the form of vast military assets, but with an immense media infrastructure to propagate their agenda, and a gargantuan network of NGOs funded and directed to subvert every form of national institution should be a big enough clue for stake-holders within besieged nation-states that the West has neither the need nor the desire to “share” once they prevail.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/natos-slow-genocide-in-libya-syria-is-next.html)]
Title: Re: NATO’s Slow Genocide in Libya: Syria is Next (and NO OUTCRY from Obamanoids!)
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 20, 2012, 11:33:28 am
Here's the geopolitical ideology of limousine "liberals" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limousine_liberal) in a nutshell:

When a Republican puppet "president" wages a terroristic (http://www.counterpunch.org/2006/01/24/the-terrorist-in-the-mirror/) war on "brown people (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzrQSba-1k4)" overseas, it's evil and bad, but only because (a) it's a Republican doing it, and (b) it's being done in the name of "defending freedom."

But when a Democratic puppet "president" does the same exact thing in the name of "humanitarianism," it's trendy and liberal! ::)

To all you warmongering Obamanoids out there, you are without question the most blatant and despicable hypocrites on the planet. As bad as the warmongering Republicans from whom you laughingly proclaim to be so "different" are, at least they're honest about their disdain for dark-skinned peasants!
Title: Obama has Prosecuted More Whistleblowers than All Other Presidents COMBINED
Post by: Geolibertarian on April 22, 2012, 10:05:57 am
Hey Obamanoids! Are you going to wrap this in the flag of "anti-racism" too?

---------------------------

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/04/obama-has-prosecuted-more-whistleblowers-than-all-other-presidents-combined.html (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/04/obama-has-prosecuted-more-whistleblowers-than-all-other-presidents-combined.html)

Obama has Prosecuted More Whistleblowers than All Other Presidents COMBINED

Obama Aggressively Prosecutes Whistleblowers … But Refuses to Go After White Collar Criminals

Washington's Blog
April 22, 2012

Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton each prosecuted financial crime more aggressively than Barack Obama (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/obama-prosecuting-fewer-financial-crimes-than-under-either-bush-presidency.html).

But that doesn’t mean that Obama is failing to prosecute. He is just aiming at a different type of target.

The New York Times reported last year:

[Continued... (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/04/obama-has-prosecuted-more-whistleblowers-than-all-other-presidents-combined.html)]

---------------------------
Title: Congressional Democrats Introduce Amendment to Outlaw Self Defense
Post by: Geolibertarian on May 09, 2012, 01:01:11 pm
"Don't you DARE watch the documentary films below! That's an ORDER from Chuck Schumer, Michael Moore, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Chris Matthews and the rest of the race-mongering, ambulance-chasing, tragedy-exploiting, police state-worshiping establishment 'Left!'"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAU9AJfttls (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAU9AJfttls)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nckgyfGbdnU&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL265EE0C4E76B1E3F (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nckgyfGbdnU&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL265EE0C4E76B1E3F)

http://www.prisonplanet.com/congressional-democrats-introduce-amendment-to-outlaw-self-defense.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/congressional-democrats-introduce-amendment-to-outlaw-self-defense.html)

Congressional Democrats Introduce Amendment to Outlaw Self Defense

Kurt Nimmo
PrisonPlanet.com
May 9, 2012

The Congressional Progressive Caucus has announced it will introduce legislation designed to strip Americans of the right to defend themselves. Called “Stop Shoot First Laws,” the amendment to the Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations bill under consideration in the House would deny states federal funding allocated under section 505 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 if they continue to allow citizens to defend themselves.

(http://images.politico.com/global/2012/05/120508_grijalva_ellison_ap.jpg)
Democrats Raul Grijalva asnd Keith Ellison.

“Shoot first laws have already cost too many lives,” said Progressive Caucus co-chairs Keith Ellison and Raul Grijalva (http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/05/08/democrats-try-to-reverse-stand-your-ground-in-appropriations-bill/) upon introducing their amendment. “In Florida alone, deaths due to self-defense have tripled since the law was enacted. Federal money shouldn’t be spent supporting states with laws that endanger their own people. This is no different than withholding transportation funds from states that don’t enforce seatbelt laws.”

“The message here is if you have this kind of law that your federal funding is going to take a hit because they make states less safe,” Adam Sarvana, communications director for Grijalva, told Politico (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76045.html).

In other words, the Democrats will force states to choose between putting their citizens at the mercy of violent criminals or taking federal largess.

Because the House does not have an open amendment process, the amendment will likely not see a vote on the floor. Ellison and Grijalva introduced the amendment in and effort to further politicize the Trayvon Martin case and increase pressure on the Second Amendment.

Democrats are using “Shoot First” instead of “Stand Your Ground” in an effort to portray self defense as homicide.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/congressional-democrats-introduce-amendment-to-outlaw-self-defense.html)]
Title: Murder, Inc: Official Obama Policy
Post by: Geolibertarian on June 01, 2012, 12:38:57 pm
Hey Obamanoids! Are you going to wrap this in the flag of "anti-racism" too?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/murder-inc-official-obama-policy.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/murder-inc-official-obama-policy.html)

Murder, Inc: Official Obama Policy

Stephen Lendman
Global Research
June 1, 2012

Obama’s wars increase body counts daily. New ones planned will add more. Death squads operate in 120 or more countries. So do CIA agents licensed to kill.

US citizens may be targeted at home or abroad. No one anywhere is safe. Summary judgment means no arrests. No Miranda rights. No due process. No trial. Just a bullet, bomb or slit throat. It’s official Obama policy. Diktat authority affords justice to no one ordered killed.

On May 29, The New York Times upped the stakes. Its article headlined “Secret ‘Kill List’ Proves a Test of Obama’s Principles and Will,” saying:

Obama “placed himself at the helm of a top secret ‘nominations’ process to designate terrorists for kill or capture, of which the capture part has become largely theoretical.”

In other words, he appointed himself judge, jury and executioner. Despot authority is official administration policy. Diktats decide who lives or dies.

Anyone called Al Qaeda or accused of terrorist connections gets marked for death.

What “moral and legal conundrum” could he face, asked The Times. None whatever. On day one in office, he spurned rule of law principles.

He adopted George Bush’s ideology. His predecessor called “the Constitution….just a G-damn piece of paper.”

Obama feels the same. He’s comfortable with “unitary executive” authority. It puts him above the law. Chalmers Johnson called it “a ball-faced assertion of presidential supremacy….dressed up in legalistic mumbo jumbo.”

International law is quaint and out-of-date, he believes. Diktat authority replaced it. The former constitutional law professor abandoned what he taught. He campaigned against war and torture. In office, he exceeded the worst of his predecessor.

He usurped the power of life and death, including against US citizens. He’s got final “kill list” authority.

Policy prioritizes killing by drones, death squads, or other means. Only eliminating America’s enemies matter. Whether real or imagined makes no difference.

The more removed, the greater the number replacing them. According to national security adviser Thomas Donilon:

“He is determined that he will make these decisions about how far and wide these operations will go. His view is that he’s responsible for the position of the United States in the world. He’s determined to keep the tether pretty short.”

His “aggressive counterterrorism record” baffles supporters and critics alike. Secrecy obscures policies. Shadow war actions aren’t publicized. Deadly force is approved “without hand-wringing.” So is fork-tongued politics, torture and other lawless practices.

For Obama, killing Americans comes “easy.” Waging war on Islam is policy. So is take no prisoners. Counterterrorism is cover for wholesale or retail slaughter. Collateral deaths don’t matter.

US Pakistan ambassador, Cameron Munter, complained about CIA drone strikes. He told colleagues “he didn’t realize his main job was to kill people.”

Obama and counterterrorism adviser John Brennan collaborate on who lives or dies. Both match each other’s bloodthirstiness. “Just war” thinking overrides rule of law principles and moral considerations.

“Drones have replaced Guantanamo as the recruiting tool of choice for militants.” America needs enemies to justify war. Avoiding peace and stability is policy.

Former national intelligence director Dennis Blair said:

“The steady refrain in the White House was (targeted killing) is the only game in town – reminded me of body counts in Vietnam.”

Unanswered is when will killing stop? Who’ll denounce what’s unconscionable? Who in government believes right over wrong matters most? No one around Obama dares. His administration doesn’t tolerate justice, morality, and rule of law principles.

On matters of war and peace, only imperial interests matter. Ends justify means.

“A phalanx of retired generals and admirals stood behind Mr. Obama on the second day of his presidency.”

They “provid(ed) martial cover as he signed several executive orders to make good on campaign pledges. Brutal interrogation techniques were banned, he declared. And the prison at Guantánamo Bay would be closed.”

Guantanamo remains open. Other torture prisons expanded. Every major promise made was broken. Wars rage without end. New ones are planned. Killing like sport continues daily.

Unlike voters who believed in him, he “was never carried away by his own rhetoric.” Lying came easily. So did going rogue. Amoral realpolitik defines his thinking.

Morality has no place in government. Nor do human rights and other democratic values. Former White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel calls it “cold-blooded (thinking) about the self-interests of your nation.” Body counts don’t matter, just objectives.

From inception, Obama’s doctrine featured human sacrifice for unchallenged dominance. Winning alone matters. Anything goes is policy. He has final say.

In 2008, campaign national security strategists advised “pragmatism over ideology.” Urging it “reinforced the president’s instincts.”

Policy rules out nothing. Rhetoric woos supporters. Major objectives aren’t deterred. They include war, torture, rendition, military commissions, indefinite detentions, and targeted killings.

Nothing stands in his way. He’s ruthless. His public persona hides it. Those around him know better.

Openly he urges sparing innocent lives. Privately he doesn’t give a damn. Under Bush, Iraq and Afghanistan rules of engagement were kill every military aged man in sight. Obama changed nothing.

Mostly civilians die. Policies don’t distinguish militants from noncombatants. In Libya alone, NATO killed over 100,000. Killer gangs took many more lives. No one kept count or cared.

Obama’s thinking reflects it. Pragmatism alone matters. Humanity is someone else’s problem. Everyone targeted in strike zones is fair game. Being there means they’re “up to no good,” even women and children.

An unnamed official said “Al Qaeda is an insular, paranoid organization – innocent neighbors don’t hitchhike rides in the back of trucks headed for the border with guns and bombs.”

The same goes for residents where militants are targeted. Being there justifies indiscriminate killing.

Official counts distort reality. Combatants alone are killed, they claim. Independent analysts say as many as 50 civilians die for every militant. In combat theaters everywhere, ordinary people suffer most.

Former intelligence and government officials admit it. According to one:

“It bothers me when they say there were seven guys, so they must all be militants. They count the corpses” but don’t care who they are.

National security advisor Donilon says Obama “is a president who is quite comfortable with the use of force on behalf of the United States.”

Forgotten is candidate Obama’s pledge to end America’s wars. On October 27, 2007, he said:

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/murder-inc-official-obama-policy.html)]
Title: Gee, I wonder why the White House Channel (er, beg pardon, MSNBC) ignored this?
Post by: Geolibertarian on May 06, 2013, 03:36:48 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHO-Pf9pcAk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHO-Pf9pcAk) (Reverend Edward Pinkney, Dr. Randy Short and Dr. Webster Tarpley come together at an NAACP Protest)
Title: Fascist Obama to blacks: you only get upset when I tell you to? Got that slaves?
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 11, 2013, 11:24:00 am
http://www.infowars.com/time-magazine-cops-preparing-for-pro-trayvon-riots-is-racist/ (http://www.infowars.com/time-magazine-cops-preparing-for-pro-trayvon-riots-is-racist/)

It’s Racist For Cops To Prepare For Pro-Trayvon Riots, Says Time Magazine

Author fails to acknowledge deluge of Twitter threats

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
July 11, 2013

Time Magazine writer Marc W. Polite argues that despite a deluge of Twitter messages from Trayvon Martin supporters threatening to riot if George Zimmerman is acquitted, police preparations for potential unrest are based on little more than racism.

In an article entitled Preparing for Riots After Zimmerman Verdict Is Racial Fear Mongering (http://ideas.time.com/2013/07/11/preparing-for-riots-after-zimmerman-verdict-is-racial-fear-mongering/?iid=tsmodule), Polite states that the “pre-emptive call for calm (by police) runs counter to recent history, and may be akin to racial fear mongering” as part of an, “assumption of violence on the part of the black community, and of black men.”

Nowhere in his piece does Polite mention the plethora of threats made by Trayvon Martin supporters (http://www.infowars.com/trayvon-supporters-threaten-riots-looting-if-zimmerman-aquitted/), primarily made on Twitter, that brazenly promise riots, looting, attacks on white people, and murder attempts on Zimmerman if he is found not guilty.

“No one seems to be concerned about the possible violence of Zimmerman supporters if Zimmerman is convicted,” adds Polite, failing to acknowledge that unlike Trayvon supporters, thousands of Zimmerman backers have not took to social media networks to openly announce their plans to riot if they don’t like the verdict.

Even if disorder is unlikely, the sheer volume of messages from Trayvon supporters threatening to stage violence and looting means it would be remiss of authorities not to at least prepare for some kind of unrest.

The race of the people making those threats should make no difference whatsoever. If thousands of white supremacists were making threats to riot, rob and kill, would Time Magazine publish an article labeling police racist for preparing to deal with it?

Polite’s article also fails to mention the fact that Trayvon supporters already staged disorder last year in response to Zimmerman not being arrested, when gangs of teenagers ransacked a Walgreens in north Miami (http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/27/miami-teens-ransack-loot-local-walgreens-in-trayvon-martin-protest/), hardly a “sophisticated” form of protest, as Polite claims has been embraced by pro-Trayvon activists.

Polite argues that relatively recent murders where the victims were black men did not prompt nationwide riots. However, in none of these cases did the President of the United States insert himself into the controversy at the outset as Obama did when he stated, “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”

In addition, it has now come to light that many of the early pro-Trayvon Martin protests were actually encouraged by the Obama administration.

As Michael Snyder writes (http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/why-did-the-obama-administration-organize-and-manage-protests-against-george-zimmerman), “Judicial Watch has obtained documents which prove that the Community Relations Service, a division of the Department of Justice, was sent to Sanford, Florida in late March 2012 “to help organize and manage rallies and protests against George Zimmerman“. This included spending quite a bit of money, arranging meetings between the NAACP and local leaders, and providing police escorts for protesters.”

[Continued... (http://www.infowars.com/time-magazine-cops-preparing-for-pro-trayvon-riots-is-racist/)]
Title: Judge In Zimmerman Case Pressured by Obama Administration?
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 11, 2013, 11:39:19 am
http://www.infowars.com/judge-in-zimmerman-case-pressured-by-obama-administration/ (http://www.infowars.com/judge-in-zimmerman-case-pressured-by-obama-administration/)

Judge In Zimmerman Case Pressured by Obama Administration?

Bizarre outburst against Zimmerman suggests prejudice

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Infowars.com
July 11, 2013

Speculation is raging that the judge in the George Zimmerman case could have been put under pressure by the Obama administration after she staged a bizarre outburst during which she interrogated Zimmerman while repeatedly silencing his lawyers.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgDuu6i8MtE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgDuu6i8MtE) (Judge Confronts Zimmerman)

The hostile exchange began when Judge Debra Nelson asked Zimmerman if he planned to testify.

Essentially, Judge Nelson told Zimmerman he had the “absolute right to remain silent” but then proceeded to demand he answer her questions interrogation-style while silencing his lawyers.

Defense attorney Don West twice objected to Nelson’s interrogation, prompting the judge to raised her voice and exclaim, “Your objection is overruled!” in a manner more befitting of an angry parent lecturing a child than a legal professional.

Both of Zimmerman’s lawyers appeared shocked as attorney Mark O’Mara asked under his breath, “what is going on?”

Several legal experts and observers said the outburst was unprecedented.

“I have never seen that in more than 30 years of court reporting,” tweeted (https://twitter.com/KBelichWFTV/status/355023743619301376) journalist Kathi Belich.

Former Senatorial candidate Richard Rivette also expressed his shock at the judge’s behavior.

“This judge is an idiot. I spent five years investigating high profile capital cases defending people from the death penalty, and worked for the Federal judiciary as an independent investigator on other cases. No judge ever inquires as to whether a defendant will testify until the entire defense case is presented. If the defense rests and does not call the defendant then the judge knows there will be no testimony. If the defense calls the defendant then that’s when the judge finds out. They have to get through the entire case first. To see if it is valid after prosecution cross-examines their witnesses and experts as to whether a defendant SHOULD testify, which is decided in private not in public, and NOT on the record. By doing this, the judge has undermined a portion of Zimmerman’s credibility. He looks like he is waffling and this is normal judge/defendant questioning, which it is NOT,” said Rivette.

Respondents to the story at the National Review Online (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/353105/judge-confronts-zimmerman-testy-exchange-dimitrios-halikias) also expressed their view that Zimmerman was being railroaded.

“A fix is in from the administration to find Zimmerman guilty regardless of what it takes,” commented one.

“By demanding that Zimmerman respond to a question, after she has assured him that he has the right to remain silent, she is undermining his right to remain silent and making it appear as though he and his attorneys are not firm in their convictions. This judge is shameless,” added another.

Judge Nelson also ruled this week that Trayvon Martin’s text messages, which showed that Martin had been involved in fights before and was trying to buy or sell a gun, cannot be shown to the jury (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/10/trayvon-martin-texts-evidence-zimmerman), which some suggested was another indication of an anti-Zimmerman bias.

Nelson also granted a request by prosecutors to block the defense’s attempt to show the jury a computer-animated depiction of the fight between Martin and Zimmerman.

She is also likely to allow the jury to consider lesser charges (http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/11/19415120-judge-to-consider-lesser-charges-for-george-zimmerman?lite) against Zimmerman in light of the prosecution’s probable failure to prove its case for second-degree murder, another indication that the state is desperate to avoid him walking free.

Judge Nelson has been very careful at every stage of the trial to dismiss evidence or testimony that could convince the jury in favor of acquitting Zimmerman.

Now some are asking the question – did Nelson’s aggressive outburst represent an attempt to prejudice the jury against Zimmerman?

Given the likelihood that Zimmerman will be acquitted, has Judge Nelson been put under pressure by the federal government to aggressively advocate for the prosecution, just as Supreme Court Justice John Roberts was apparently pressured (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/06/18/was-justice-roberts-intimidated-into-voting-for-obamacare-senator-mike-lee-presents-the-evidence/) to vote to uphold Obamacare?

Ever since President Barack Obama personally inserted himself into the controversy by declaring Trayvon Martin to be akin to the son he never had, higher-ups have constantly meddled in the case in an effort to secure a murder charge for a scenario that Zimmerman would not normally have even been arrested for under Florida’s Stand Your Ground law.

Indeed, ex-Sanford police chief Bill Lee told CNN yesterday (http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/10/justice/sanford-bill-lee-exclusive/index.html) that “he felt pressure from city officials to arrest Zimmerman to placate the public rather than as a matter of justice,” and that his investigation “provided no probable cause to arrest Zimmerman at the scene.”

It also emerged this week that the federal government encouraged and funded last year’s protests demanding the arrest of Zimmerman via the Community Relations Service, a division of the Department of Justice. Documents obtained by Judicial Watch (http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/documents-obtained-by-judicial-watch-detail-role-of-justice-department-in-organizing-trayvon-martin-protests/) show that the CRS was “deployed to Sanford, FL, following the Trayvon Martin shooting to help organize and manage rallies and protests against George Zimmerman,” spending millions of dollars in the process.

Given the plethora of threats by Trayvon supporters (http://www.infowars.com/trayvon-supporters-threaten-riots-looting-if-zimmerman-aquitted/) to stage violent riots if Zimmerman is acquitted, could Nelson be under pressure to secure a charge of at least manslaughter in order to avoid nationwide civil disorder?

If that’s the case, her apparent effort to prejudice the jury clearly suggests that a mistrial has taken place.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: chrisalfieri on July 11, 2013, 01:05:53 pm
i think this goes the other way.i think they created the outrage, and will now use it as fodder for riots when they ultimately gain his acquittal. riots which we'll see in mass scale.
in appeals, even if his upcoming verdict returned guilty, it could be reversed based solely on this judge's outburst.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: jerryweaver on July 11, 2013, 01:30:31 pm
Confirmation By Former Police Chief: Zimmerman Arrest Was To 'Placate' Public, Not Justice (Video)

7/10/13 - Former Sanford, Florida police chief Bill Lee claimed on CNN today that he was fired last year because he didn't want to arrest George Zimmerman. He says there was a lot of pressure because city officials just wanted him arrested for killing Trayvon Martin as means of placating the public. Lee says he refused, and as a result, he was let go from his position, which was publicly explained as a lack of trust elected officials and the public had in Lee.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B42t06yFEDI

CNN's George Orwell got Lee to open up about how he was being pushed on all sides to arrest Zimmerman.

"I had one of the city commissioners come to me on two different occasions and say, 'All we want is an arrest.' And I explained to them, 'Well, you just can't do that, you have to have probable cause to arrest somebody.' And it was related to me that they just wanted an arrest, they didn't care if it got dismissed later. You don't do that."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=BXbpails_qA
Title: Obama-Backed Rebels Starve Syrians, Kill Protesters
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 11, 2013, 01:50:26 pm
Meanwhile, Obama continues to wage war on "brown people (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzrQSba-1k4)" overseas...

-----------------------------

http://www.infowars.com/obama-backed-rebels-starve-syrians-kill-protesters/ (http://www.infowars.com/obama-backed-rebels-starve-syrians-kill-protesters/)

Obama-Backed Rebels Starve Syrians, Kill Protesters

Extremists threaten one year in jail for food during Ramadan

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
July 10, 2013

Obama administration-backed FSA rebels are starving Syrians by imposing food blockades and shooting at protesters in the city of Aleppo.

Even opposition activists who normally reserve their criticism for the Assad regime have condemned the action, noting that it has caused food prices to spike to more than ten times normal levels.

“This is a crime … Some of our rebel forces, God reform them, are participating in this blockade. Prices are soaring at an unimaginable rate. There is now horrible scarcity,” one of the activists told Reuters (http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/09/us-syria-hunger-aleppo-idUSBRE9680O520130709).

Rebel fighters dubiously blamed government forces for the blockade, despite the fact that it is being imposed by FSA militants, who are blocking roads and preventing food, medical provisions and even baby milk formula from reaching the city, which is split between FSA and Syrian Army control.

In addition, Aleppo residents who attended protests against the food blockade were shot at and killed by FSA rebels. Activist Edward Dark, who works to help displaced families in Aleppo, tweeted out the following photo of two victims killed by FSA militants.

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/100713victims.jpg)

Despite allegations that the Egyptian military shot at Muslim Brotherhood protesters following last week’s coup receiving widespread media attention, reports that FSA rebels are now doing the same thing to Syrian citizens have attracted virtually no press coverage.

Reports are also emerging that 20 prisoners have already starved to death in an Aleppo prison due to the food shortages. According to residents, FSA fighters are threatening them with starvation unless they join up with the rebels, who are being led by Al-Qaeda terrorists (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/08/free-syrian-army-rebels-defect-islamist-group).

[Continued... (http://www.infowars.com/obama-backed-rebels-starve-syrians-kill-protesters/)]

-----------------------------

Yet are any of you wannabe street criminals (er, beg pardon, "Trayvon supporters") who are threatening to riot (http://www.infowars.com/trayvon-supporters-threaten-riots-looting-if-zimmerman-aquitted/) if Zimmerman actually gets a (horror of horrors!) fair trial -- and is consequently acquitted -- protesting that?

Of course not.

Why?

Because God "Obama" didn't tell you to, that's why.

Pathetic beyond words.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: jerryweaver on July 11, 2013, 02:18:38 pm
This is being openly exposed by CNN as blatant GOV race provoking.

WTF!!!

Ex-Sanford police chief: Zimmerman probe 'taken away from us'
By Eliott C. McLaughlin, CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/justice/sanford-bill-lee-exclusive

Justice Dept. 'peacekeepers' worked 'Trayvon' rallies, group claims
http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/politics/peacekeepers-zimmerman/index.html?iid=article_sidebar

I think we are being played.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 12, 2013, 10:41:46 am
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/2017_214129568741880_572453563_n.jpg)

"WRONG!" exclaim hyperventilating race-baiters (http://nycivilrights.org/our-open-letter-to-the-brass-at-msnbccomcast-regarding-the-race-baiting-of-the-networks-compensated-pundits) at MSNBC (http://cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/mrc-expose-msnbc-s-race-baiting-hate-filled-character-assassinating-misogynists), "All whites are born racist, and the only way they can cure themselves of that racism is by developing a cult-like devotion to Wall Street puppet (http://www.counterpunch.org/2008/05/05/obama-s-money-cartel/), Barack Obama, and to the banker-owned (http://www.infowars.com/top-senate-democrat-bankers-own-the-us-congress/) Democratic Party!"

::)
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 12, 2013, 02:40:54 pm
(http://t.qkme.me/3qqd56.jpg)

“In his People’s Party Paper, Tom Watson, the Populist congressman from Georgia, appealed to white and black farmers to meet on common ground: ‘You are kept apart that you may be fleeced separately of your earnings. You are made to hate each other because upon that hatred is rested the keystone of the arch of the financial despotism which enslaves you both. You are deceived and blinded that you may not see how this race antagonism perpetuates a monetary system (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=98465.0) which beggars both.’”  

-- Jack Beatty, Age of Betrayal (http://books.google.com/books?id=U3eG_QoBRzsC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false), p. 214
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 13, 2013, 09:34:35 pm
To wannabe rioters: do not allow yourselves to be the useful dupes of government-financed provocateurs.

Please don't give them the satisfaction!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCrx_u3825g (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCrx_u3825g)
Title: Defense Lawyer: If Zimmerman Were Black, He Wouldn’t Have Been Charged
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 14, 2013, 06:28:35 am
http://www.infowars.com/defense-lawyer-if-zimmerman-were-black-he-wouldnt-have-been-charged/ (http://www.infowars.com/defense-lawyer-if-zimmerman-were-black-he-wouldnt-have-been-charged/)

Defense Lawyer: If Zimmerman Were Black, He Wouldn’t Have Been Charged

Anthony Gucciardi
Infowars.com
July 14, 2013

George Zimmerman’s defense lawyer Mark O’Mara wasn’t timid with the mainstream media during the live Q&A on Miami’s WSVN (http://www.wsvn.com/video/ch1/) 7 News, calling out the media on injecting racial tensions into the case. In the Q&A, O’Mara told a reporter that Zimmerman would never have been charged if he were black.

The answer came during live Q&A session with George Zimmerman’s defense attorneys Don West and Mark O’Mara, who were surprisingly blunt with the media questioning. O’Mara even went on to call out the mainstream media for twisting the case and turning into a racial bout that may actually (http://www.freep.com/article/20130713/NEWS07/307130051/) spawn riots and flash mobs that could result in the death of innocents — a nonsensically violent response to protest the verdict of the Trayvon case.

MEDIA MAKING TRIAL A RACIAL ISSUE

The fact of the matter is that the media has turned this case into a racial conflict of white verses black that isn’t even applicable. First of all, George Zimmerman is of clear Hispanic descent, yet somehow the media is spinning it as if he is a ‘rich, white male’. This is, of course, is a tactic performed by the mainstream media to make the case an issue of race and subsequently generate mass frenzy over this perceived racial divide.

Specifically the racial divide between black and white, even though Zimmerman is Hispanic.

The truth is that Hispanics have struggled with civil liberty issues for decades, similar to the black community — and both have historically struggled against corruption. So what is going on here? Zimmerman is actually a minority whose ethnicity has been targeted for decades and at the receiving end of racist acts — so why is the media pretending that this is some type of white hate trial? And let it be known that I am the first to fight against this form of corruption and expose bought and paid for politicians who abuse the justice system, detailing such scenarios (http://www.storyleak.com/5-proven-reasons-to-stop-trusting-the-government-right-now/) in my previous work.

The fact of the matter is that the media, an arm of the corporate monopoly that controls the bought and paid for politicians within our nation, continues to fuel racial divide like never before. Just as always, the anchors continue to read their scripted news reports (for a real great example of this see how (http://www.infowars.com/crash-prank-reveals-how-corporate-media-reads-mindlessly-from-teleprompter-scripts/) anchors actually read joke names from the teleprompter that were reported to be from the Asiana plane crash like ‘Ho Lee Fuk’ and ‘Wi Tu Lo’) and twist the story as they please.

In the case of Trayvon Martin verses George Zimmerman, the media tried desperately to turn the case into a fissure between humanity. Ultimately, I believe they have failed, but we shall soon see how the world reacts to this self-defense case turned ‘racial hot button mega piece’ in the coming days.
Title: Rapper Lupe Fiasco Calls Out Race Baiting Media On Trayvon Martin Case
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 14, 2013, 06:35:43 am
Rapper Lupe Fiasco Calls Out Race Baiting Media On Trayvon Martin Case

Anthony Gucciardi
Infowars.com
July 14, 2013

While many celebrities tossed their 140 characters of nonsense into the realm of Twitter, rapper Lupe Fiasco revealed the truth regarding how the media used the Trayvon Martin case to further ‘antagonize US race relations’.

Going on to talk about (https://twitter.com/LupeFiasco/status/356264220943319042) why the case should have never been televised and turned into a media sensation that is now causing so-called ‘protesters’ to go out and destroy private property, Lupe Fiasco is right on point with this one. As a major black artist, Lupe is obviously not ‘racist’ for calling out the mainstream media on their blatant race baiting (http://www.storyleak.com/defense-lawyer-if-zimmerman-were-black-wouldnt-have-been-charged/) and spin of the Trayvon Martin case, and neither am I when I point out this same fact. It simply comes down to looking at the way the media spun the entire case, let alone the ruling, in a way that has justifiably led to concerns that public backlash could result in riots or homicides.

And after seeing the slew of (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/28/twitter-explodes-george-zimmerman-death-threats/) Twitter threats from users who said they’d hunt down and kill Zimmerman and others if he was not found guilty, it’s obvious the media has turned this case into a race-driven war.

As I’ve discussed earlier, there is a real level of corruption that threatens black individuals, Hispanic individuals, and white individuals. In fact, it’s the biggest threat we face today: corrupt government that has zero regard for our rights in any capacity. So why are we being tricked into fighting each other based on skin color under the guise of stopping the very same racism? It’s simple, and it comes down to political brainwashing 101.

HUMANITY COMING TOGETHER = REAL CIVIL LIBERTIES VICTORY

If we were all to come together, regardless of skin color, regardless of our so-called ‘political affiliations’, and stand up for our rights and the Constitution — we would assuredly achieve victory against all forms of civil liberties abuse. Against the Patriot Act which allows warrantless wiretapping of US citizens, against the NDAA which allows the indefinite detainment of US citizens, against the DHS-enacted 100 mile ‘border’ where the Constitution does not exist (http://www.storyleak.com/are-you-living-in-fourth-amendment-exclusion-zone/). Against all these real issues.

I agree with Lupe Fiasco, it’s time to reclaim our rights together — don’t let the media divide and conquer us in such a simple manner.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 14, 2013, 10:33:06 am
Have you noticed that those who obsessively wrap themselves in the flag of "anti-racism" have an embarrassing and self-discrediting tendency to direct their moral outrage only at those things which the race-baiting "news" media essentially order them to?

So have I.

Allow me to cite a few examples...

Example #1: Obama's continuation of the utterly racist drug war.

-- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iifGYnffrBI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iifGYnffrBI)
-- http://www.drugpolicy.org/race-and-drug-war (http://www.drugpolicy.org/race-and-drug-war)
-- http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/node/64#sthash.LkDcHFjm.dpbs (http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/node/64#sthash.LkDcHFjm.dpbs)
-- http://fff.org/explore-freedom/article/articles-on-race-and-the-drug-war/ (http://fff.org/explore-freedom/article/articles-on-race-and-the-drug-war/)
-- http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/05/11/police-group-slams-obamas-drug-war-recalibration/ (http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/05/11/police-group-slams-obamas-drug-war-recalibration/)
-- http://www.naturalnews.com/035584_Obama_War_on_Drugs_prohibition.html (http://www.naturalnews.com/035584_Obama_War_on_Drugs_prohibition.html)

Example #2: Obama's continuation of Bush's terroristic (http://www.counterpunch.org/2006/01/24/the-terrorist-in-the-mirror/) war on "brown people (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzrQSba-1k4)" overseas.

-- http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-obama-killing-machine-in-afghanistan/18001 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-obama-killing-machine-in-afghanistan/18001)
-- http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-forbidden-truth-the-u-s-is-channelling-chemical-weapons-to-al-qaeda-in-syria-obama-is-a-liar-and-a-terrorist/5339004 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-forbidden-truth-the-u-s-is-channelling-chemical-weapons-to-al-qaeda-in-syria-obama-is-a-liar-and-a-terrorist/5339004)
-- http://www.globalresearch.ca/fighting-al-qaeda-by-supporting-al-qaeda-in-syria-the-obama-administration-is-a-state-sponsor-of-terrorism/5339728 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/fighting-al-qaeda-by-supporting-al-qaeda-in-syria-the-obama-administration-is-a-state-sponsor-of-terrorism/5339728)

Example #3: Obama's continuation of both an anti-Georgist (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=160421.0) tax system and anti-Georgist (http://www.monetary.org/henry-georges-concept-of-money-ful/2010/12) monetary system that fall hardest (by far!) on poor black communities.

-- http://savingcommunities.org/issues/race.html (http://savingcommunities.org/issues/race.html)
-- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIPHd4Gjcck (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIPHd4Gjcck)
-- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPKKQnijnsM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPKKQnijnsM)
-- http://www.blackagendareport.com/?q=content/obamas-scheme-kill-public-housing-and-give-land-banks (http://www.blackagendareport.com/?q=content/obamas-scheme-kill-public-housing-and-give-land-banks)

Example #4: Obama's obsession with victim disarmament, despite the racist origins of that agenda.

-- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaX3EM-fsc8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaX3EM-fsc8)
-- http://www.constitution.org/cmt/cramer/racist_roots.htm (http://www.constitution.org/cmt/cramer/racist_roots.htm)
-- http://www.guncite.com/journals/gun_control_wtr8512.html (http://www.guncite.com/journals/gun_control_wtr8512.html)

Yet, compared to the hysterical outrage we're currently witnessing over Zimmerman's acquittal, there is virtually no word of protest against any of those things from the politically correct among us.

Why?

Not because they're "too busy," obviously, but simply because the ruling-class "news" media didn't TELL them it was politically correct to be upset about those things.

Such loyal and obedient little minions, aren't they? Do you suppose they fetch and roll over too?  ::)
Title: The George Zimmerman trial: life and death in the American psyop
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 15, 2013, 04:11:04 pm
The George Zimmerman trial: life and death in the American psyop

Jon Rappoport
Prison Planet.com
July 15, 2013

There were at least six extraordinary moves before the suspect, George Zimmerman, was brought up on charges.

An out-of-date photo, showing Trayvon Martin as a young innocent boy, flashed across television screens all over the world.

News stories asserted that a white man named Zimmerman killed a black child.

NBC-edited 911 audio between Zimmerman and a police dispatcher made it seem as if Zimmerman was voluntarily profiling Martin as black, when this was not the case (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/the-trayvon-martin-operation/). Several NBC employees were fired over the editing incident.

In the same 911 audio, according to CNN and other media sources, Zimmerman said, “f**king coons.” This was corrected to “f**king cold.” Finally, this became “f**king punks.”

President Obama said if he had a son, that son would have looked like Trayvon Martin.

NBC and CNN weren’t the only the major network outlets that presented false information to the public. ABC obtained footage of Zimmerman at the police station on the night of the Martin killing. The network claimed there was no visible evidence Zimmerman had sustained head wounds. But then a still from the video surfaced which showed cuts on the back of Zimmerman’s head, supporting his statement that he and Martin had been in a fight. At that point, ABC broadcast the video, stating they’d “re-digitized” it and the wounds were now apparent.

These actions, taken together, defined the case as a black-versus-white hate crime.

The door was pushed wide open, letting in millions of voices to assert their positions and feelings on the matter of race.

The whole race issue was dealt a blow when it turned out that Zimmerman wasn’t white. His father was white. His mother was Peruvian. Her grandfather was African-Peruvian.

But by then, it was too late. Media forces and politicians and hustlers and private citizens on both sides of the race issue had already shoved in their chips and rolled the dice. They couldn’t turn back.

They couldn’t say, “Oh, well, this is the murder of a black boy but a white man didn’t do it, so let’s re-frame it as another tragic killing…”

Al Sharpton couldn’t say, “We thought we had the quintessential white-on-black murder of a young boy, but we don’t. Let’s fold our tent and go home and wait for another day and a better reason…”

Likewise, it was hard to put the genie back in the bottle after the press reported that Zimmerman said, “f**king coons.” Ensuing corrections to the translation of his words didn’t affect the black- versus-white scenario.

Nor did that scenario dissolve when it turned out NBC had perniciously edited a section of Zimmerman’s 911 call, to make it seem as if he had put Trayvon Martin’s race front and center. NBC’s admission it had cooked the books was looked upon as a grievous media slanting of the truth, but the basic black-vs.-white storyline was still intact.

This is all quite astonishing when you stop and think about it.

The wave was building, it had already been put into motion, and nothing was going to stop it, not even the simple glaring fact that Zimmerman wasn’t white.

Obama weighed in. He took the wave to another level. If I had a son, he would have looked like Trayvon Martin. (Looked like Martin in which photo? The first one, or later ones?)

The race of the accused is the whole issue, and yet everyone can see, right out in the open, that his race has been wrongly identified—and it doesn’t matter.

“We’re going to go forward as if Zimmerman is white.”

None of the above is proof that Zimmerman is innocent or guilty. Taken together, it is all about establishing black-vs.-white as the context.

That context is patently false, but it functions as enduring symbolism for the issue of race.

It’s as if Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson, OJ Simpson’s purported victims in the 1994 murders, had turned out to be black, after America was already riveted by a “black-on-white” crime and refused to let go of it.

How many people have ever heard of the 2008 murder of James Shamp, a black man, by Richard Bordelon, Hispanic, in Los Angeles? Two factors prevented nationwide publicity. Bordelon was a gang member—and it was a Hispanic-vs.-black case.

Zimmerman-Martin is part-Hispanic vs. black, but it’s not playing that way.

Claims that Trayvon Martin was stalked and profiled would not be enough to turn the Zimmerman trial into a national event, unless Zimmerman were still held up, even if only in false memory, as a white man.

Many media outlets and politicians, including the president, have been instrumental in forwarding this psyop.

Inflaming racial hatreds and grabbing guns are two objectives of the op (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/01/14/what-government-fears-most-blacks-and-whites-united-with-guns/).

But Zimmerman-Martin is part of a much larger program: identifying so-called racial characteristics and cementing them in the mind. White=certain qualities. Black=certain qualities.

At bottom, this is one more way of insisting that the individual no longer matters. It’s a way of claiming that what matters is the group an individual belongs to. In this instance, skin color defines the group.

The primacy of the group over the individual is the true devastating operation in America.

Individuals have freedom. Individuals have independence. Individuals have potential power. These elements are anathema to fascists.

Groups only have agendas. They seek fulfillment of those agendas through government. That kind of partnership increases, in the long run, the dominance of government.

Underneath it all, this is what we’re talking about here: individuals must go, only groups should remain.

Black vs. white is the useful occasion and the smokescreen for the deeper aim (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/behind-the-trayvon-martin-psy-op/).
Title: The Blunt Truth about The Trayvon Martin Case
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 16, 2013, 04:23:12 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01nSGb6waE8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01nSGb6waE8) (The Blunt Truth about The Trayvon Martin Case)


(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/1016873_686026098090222_1185262504_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 17, 2013, 04:07:04 am
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/1002129_215932578561579_1258029974_n.jpg)
Title: Blacks benefit from Florida ‘Stand Your Ground’ law at disproportionate rate
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 17, 2013, 08:53:14 am
Proving once again that, the more obsessed one is with being "politically correct" (as defined, of course, by the race-baiting, tragedy-exploiting, talking point (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7F9iN5zCu0)-parroting "news" media), the more one must be either blissfully ignorant or in willful denial of even the most basic facts of the issue in question...

http://www.infowars.com/blacks-benefit-from-florida-stand-your-ground-law-at-disproportionate-rate/ (http://www.infowars.com/blacks-benefit-from-florida-stand-your-ground-law-at-disproportionate-rate/)

Blacks benefit from Florida ‘Stand Your Ground’ law at disproportionate rate

Patrick Howley
Daily Caller
July 17, 2013

African Americans benefit from Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” self-defense law at a rate far out of proportion to their presence in the state’s population, despite an assertion by Attorney General Eric Holder that repealing “Stand Your Ground” would help African Americans.

Black Floridians have made about a third of the state’s total “Stand Your Ground” claims in homicide cases, a rate nearly double the black percentage of Florida’s population. The majority of those claims have been successful, a success rate that exceeds that for Florida whites.

Nonetheless, prominent African Americans including Holder and “Ebony and Ivory” singer Stevie Wonder, who has vowed not to perform in the Sunshine State until the law is revoked, have made “Stand Your Ground” a central part of the Trayvon Martin controversy.

Holder, who was pressured by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and other progressive groups to open a civil rights case against acquitted neighborhood watchman George Zimmerman in the 2012 shooting death of 17-year-old Martin, criticized Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” self-defense law in a speech Tuesday before the NAACP.

Full article here (http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/16/blacks-benefit-from-florida-stand-your-ground-law-at-disproportionate-rate/)
Title: Obama’s Military Budget: The Largest Since World War II
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 17, 2013, 09:11:21 am
Have you noticed how the so-called "anti-war" Left -- particularly those who were waxing indignant (and rightly so) about U.S. imperialism as recently as five years ago -- are either pretending not to notice the following or, worse, making tortured excuses for it merely because "their" guy is doing it now instead of Bush?

http://www.globalresearch.ca/obamas-military-budget-the-largest-since-world-war-ii/5342906 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/obamas-military-budget-the-largest-since-world-war-ii/5342906)

Obama’s Military Budget: The Largest Since World War II

By Stop NATO (http://www.globalresearch.ca/author/stop-nato)
Global Research
July 16, 2013

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/eagle4.jpeg)

Obama’s defense budget larger than any other president’s since World War II

The vast majority of people in the USA, including Congressmen and analysts, have little idea just how large the Pentagon’s defense budget increases have been under President Obama.

Except for George W. Bush’s presidency, Obama’s military-budget request is larger than any other president’s defense budget since the death of Franklin Roosevelt in April 1945.

If one subtracted a sum of $52 billion mandated by the Budget Control Act from the $612 billion defense budget Obama requested for 2014, they would see that the Pentagon spends billions of dollars above what the US spent during the Cold War, Vietnam and Korean wars.

Every year the Pentagon publishes the Green Book or “National Defense Budget Estimates”, which many believe to be the “bible” of defense budget analysts.

The graphs of the Green book shows that the USA is now near a post-World War II low which is, according to many defense-spending boosters, is a dangerous trend that needs to be reversed. But all the data collected for the Green book, while technically accurate, are misused, as the numbers in it represent not money actually spent, but the sum of annual Pentagon spending as part of the total American economy.

[Continued... (http://www.globalresearch.ca/obamas-military-budget-the-largest-since-world-war-ii/5342906)]
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Sasha on July 17, 2013, 09:27:30 am
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/1002129_215932578561579_1258029974_n.jpg)

Morgan Freeman Calls Tea Party & Conservative Goals 'Racist'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yecco-KPDK4

Morgan Freeman: Tea Party Is Racist, They're Out To Get Obama
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/23/morgan-freeman-tea-party-racist_n_978123.html

Morgan Freeman Receives Invite to Tea Party After He Calls Movement Racist
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/09/29/morgan-freeman-receives-invite-to-tea-party-after-calls-movement-racist/
Title: Professor Who Said ‘Black People Can’t be Racist’ Spews Racism
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 17, 2013, 09:47:06 am
And the media PsyWar (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXg70qJQ6O0) campaign to foment racial division both within and between the lower and middle classes (an age-old "divide-and-conquer" tactic) just keeps on coming -- much to the giddy delight of the parasitic ruling class (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=216458.msg1295756#msg1295756):

http://www.infowars.com/msnbc-pundit-more-white-kids-need-to-die-for-americans-to-understand-racism/ (http://www.infowars.com/msnbc-pundit-more-white-kids-need-to-die-for-americans-to-understand-racism/)

Professor Who Said ‘Black People Can’t be Racist’ Spews Racism

Dyson just disproved his own ridiculous claim

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
July 17, 2013

MSNBC pundit Michael Eric Dyson, who previously argued that it is impossible for black people to be racist, illustrated why so many viewers are abandoning the beleaguered network when he said that Americans would not understand racism until white kids were being killed in the same numbers as blacks.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nRv2UVDOg0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nRv2UVDOg0)

During a segment discussing the George Zimmerman verdict, Dyson, a professor of sociology at Georgetown University, remarked, “White Americans and others will feel that this was a justifiable verdict, this is how things happen. Not until, and unless, the number of white kids die that approximate the numbers of black and other kids who die, will America see.”

Dyson also called on Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder to take unspecified “bold” and courageous” action.

Dyson’s argument is not only racist and offensive, it completely ignores the reality that black on black crime accounts for the vast majority of murders of black people in the United States.

According to the Justice Department, 94 per cent of all black murder victims in the United States are killed by other black people. More blacks are murdered in Chicago every weekend than the Ku Klux Klan killed over a period of 50 years.

Dyson’s attempt to play the race card by arguing that white Americans think the Zimmerman verdict was justifiable simply because whites are not being murdered at the same ratio as blacks makes absolutely no sense whatsoever given that the vast majority of blacks are killed by other blacks, not by whites or hispanics.

The high murder rate of young black men has virtually nothing to do with the actions of white people, so why is Dyson making such a spurious correlation? His rhetoric is the very definition of racism.

Dyson is also not so animated about the fact that 1,300 black babies are killed every day in America through abortion.

The MSNBC pundit’s convoluted logic, disguised as it is by high-brow yet ultimately nonsensical academic rhetoric, is no surprise given that he has previously argued that it is impossible for black people to be racist. Dyson just disproved his own ridiculous claim.

Is it really any wonder that MSNBC’s ratings recently plunged to a 6 year low when people like Dyson are their caliber of pundit?

During a segment discussing the George Zimmerman verdict, Dyson, a professor of sociology at Georgetown University, remarked, “White Americans and others will feel that this was a justifiable verdict, this is how things happen. Not until, and unless, the number of white kids die that approximate the numbers of black and other kids who die, will America see.”

Dyson also called on Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder to take unspecified “bold” and courageous” action.

Dyson’s argument is not only racist and offensive, it completely ignores the reality that black on black crime accounts for the vast majority of murders of black people in the United States.

According to the Justice Department, 94 per cent of all black murder victims in the United States are killed by other black people. More blacks are murdered in Chicago every weekend than the Ku Klux Klan killed over a period of 50 years.

Dyson’s attempt to play the race card by arguing that white Americans think the Zimmerman verdict was justifiable simply because whites are not being murdered at the same ratio as blacks makes absolutely no sense whatsoever given that the vast majority of blacks are killed by other blacks, not by whites or hispanics.

The high murder rate of young black men has virtually nothing to do with the actions of white people, so why is Dyson making such a spurious correlation? His rhetoric is the very definition of racism.

Dyson is also not so animated about the fact that 1,300 black babies are killed every day in America through abortion.

The MSNBC pundit’s convoluted logic, disguised as it is by high-brow yet ultimately nonsensical academic rhetoric, is no surprise given that he has previously argued that it is impossible for black people to be racist. Dyson just disproved his own ridiculous claim.

Is it really any wonder that MSNBC’s ratings recently plunged to a 6 year low when people like Dyson are their caliber of pundit?

During a segment discussing the George Zimmerman verdict, Dyson, a professor of sociology at Georgetown University, remarked, “White Americans and others will feel that this was a justifiable verdict, this is how things happen. Not until, and unless, the number of white kids die that approximate the numbers of black and other kids who die, will America see.”

Dyson also called on Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder to take unspecified “bold” and courageous” action.

Dyson’s argument is not only racist and offensive, it completely ignores the reality that black on black crime accounts for the vast majority of murders of black people in the United States.

According to the Justice Department (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304830704577496501048197464.html), 94 per cent of all black murder victims in the United States are killed by other black people. More blacks are murdered in Chicago every weekend than the Ku Klux Klan killed over a period of 50 years.

Dyson’s attempt to play the race card by arguing that white Americans think the Zimmerman verdict was justifiable simply because whites are not being murdered at the same ratio as blacks makes absolutely no sense whatsoever given that the vast majority of blacks are killed by other blacks, not by whites or hispanics.

The high murder rate of young black men has virtually nothing to do with the actions of white people, so why is Dyson making such a spurious correlation? His rhetoric is the very definition of racism.

Dyson is also not so animated about the fact that 1,300 black babies are killed every day in America through abortion.

The MSNBC pundit’s convoluted logic, disguised as it is by high-brow yet ultimately nonsensical academic rhetoric, is no surprise given that he has previously argued that it is impossible for black people to be racist. Dyson just disproved his own ridiculous claim.

Is it really any wonder that MSNBC’s ratings recently plunged to a 6 year low (http://www.businessinsider.com/msnbc-ratings-fall-fox-news-cnn-rachel-maddow-chris-hayes-2013-7) when people like Dyson are their caliber of pundit?

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZ0QfLkjujY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZ0QfLkjujY)
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 17, 2013, 09:53:16 am
Morgan Freeman Calls Tea Party & Conservative Goals 'Racist'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yecco-KPDK4

Morgan Freeman: Tea Party Is Racist, They're Out To Get Obama
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/23/morgan-freeman-tea-party-racist_n_978123.html

Morgan Freeman Receives Invite to Tea Party After He Calls Movement Racist
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/09/29/morgan-freeman-receives-invite-to-tea-party-after-calls-movement-racist/

I know, but when someone who's usually wrong on a particular issue suddenly has a rare attack of wisdom, I immediately express my approval in hopes of discouraging him from reverting out of habit back to his original, unenlightened position.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Sasha on July 17, 2013, 11:20:34 am
I know, but when someone who's usually wrong on a particular issue suddenly has a rare attack of wisdom, I immediately express my approval in hopes of discouraging him from reverting out of habit back to his original, unenlightened position.

Good policy.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 17, 2013, 04:09:22 pm
It would seem that (at least in some respects) the more things "change," the more they stay the same:

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71ZjYzBJG8o (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71ZjYzBJG8o) (The Hate that Hate Produced)

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QL18wIw7OjQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QL18wIw7OjQ) (Brother Minister: The Assassination of Malcolm X)
Title: Niece: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Would Not Wear A Hoodie
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 18, 2013, 09:12:41 am
http://www.infowars.com/niece-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-would-not-wear-a-hoodie/ (http://www.infowars.com/niece-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-would-not-wear-a-hoodie/)

Niece: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Would Not Wear A Hoodie

Niece of the slain civil rights leader says we need to stop dividing ourselves by race.

Kit Daniels
Infowars.com
July 17, 2013

(http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2013/195/9/5/mlk_hoodie___april_4th__1968__nikkolas_smith_by_nikkolas_smith-d60mzww.jpg)

Dr. Alveda King, niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., rejected the now-viral image showing the late civil rights leader wearing a hoodie just like the one Travyon Martin wore the night of his death (http://nikkolas-smith.deviantart.com/art/MLK-Hoodie-April-4th-1968-Nikkolas-Smith-363870032).

“Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. would very likely not wear a hoodie,” she said. “I can assure you he would not wear sagging pants.”

Dr. King made this statement on the Andrea Tantaros Radio Show on Tuesday after being asked what she thought of the image entitled MLK Hoodie – April 4th, 1968.

“I can almost promise you Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. would not wear a hoodie,” she further emphasized later in the interview.

Dr. King also said that people need to think with grace rather than emotions in reference to the image and the overall backlash to the George Zimmerman verdict.

“There was a reasonable doubt in that case,” she said. “So the case went the ways of the laws of this land, but now we need to go further and look at the human heart.”

Dr. King also called out the mongers in the media and elsewhere who are trying to spin the verdict into racial tensions between Caucasians and African-Americans.

“As far as trying to fit the Caucasians against African-Americans, Mr. Zimmerman is a Hispanic,” she said. “Although we are one blood, one human family, one human race, there’s a lot of deception and emotion in these things that are being spurred.”

“Mr. Zimmerman is not a Caucasian. He’s not.”

Even when her uncle was assassinated in 1968, Dr. King said that it wasn’t fair to blame it on Caucasians.

Right before her father left home in order to retrieve the body of the slain civil rights leader, she said she stood in the kitchen ranting, “I hate white people!”

“Alveda, white people did not kill your uncle,” Dr. King’s father said to her as he held her in his arms. “The devil did.”

From that experience, Dr. King learned to answer violent tragedies with love, not hate.

“We answer with reason,” she said. “We answer with sanity.”

Other people have also rejected the image, which was originally posted at Deviant Art.

“It seems over the years, people have forgotten what exactly he (Dr. MLK, Jr.) was fighting for: equality,” one commenter said.
Title: Social Engineering & Racial Division: The Trayvon Martin Tragedy
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 18, 2013, 02:42:16 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/social-engineering-racial-division-the-trayvon-martin-tragedy.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/social-engineering-racial-division-the-trayvon-martin-tragedy.html)

Social Engineering & Racial Division: The Trayvon Martin Tragedy

Contrived selective outrage prevents Americans from unifying against national security state

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet.com
July 18, 2013

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/180713jackson2.jpg)

The rights and wrongs of the confrontation between George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin will continue to be debated, but what has emerged clearly from the relentless coverage of the story is a contrived agenda by the establishment to stir up racial animosity in America in order to undermine everybody’s rights – a form of social engineering that ultimately hurts everybody, no matter what their color or creed.

One of the fundamental questions surrounding the Zimmerman trial is how the whole country was whipped up into a fervor of selective outrage over one black teenager being killed by a hispanic man, falsely labeled “white” by the media, when the problem of black on black violent crime completely dwarfs any notion that black people are being deliberately targeted by whites.

The likes of Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Eric Holder and even Barack Obama himself all inserted themselves into the Trayvon Martin controversy in order to hype the threat posed by violent hate crimes against blacks, manufacturing a kind of universal white guilt that demanded “justice for Trayvon” not based on the facts of the case, but on emotional manipulation focused around the erroneous presumption that America had declared “open season” on murdering young black men.

In reality, according to Justice Department figures (http://frontpagemag.com/2012/walter-williams/should-black-people-tolerate-this/), 94 per cent of all blacks murdered in America every year are murdered by other black people, despite the fact that black Americans make up just 13 per cent of the US population. That’s 7,000 blacks murdered every year (http://globalgrind.com/news/7000-black-people-murdered-each-year-other-blacks-details) by other black people.

This statistic alone completely demolishes the narrative that the Zimmerman case represented a bellwether illustration of the threat posed to black people by racist hate crimes.

In addition, as black radio host Larry Elder points out (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=6vK5UkZrPcc#at=106), half of the murders in America are committed by black people, meaning that when old people and minors are taken out of the equation, 3 per cent of the population, predominantly young black men, are committing nearly 50 per cent of the murders in America. This statistic seems somewhat more concerning than the nationwide hand-wringing that has taken place as a result of the actions of a hispanic neighborhood watch captain in killing one black teen.

If people like Sharpton, Jackson, Holder and Obama really cared about black people being murdered, there would be a national conversation about these statistics. Instead, we have witnessed an 18 month obsession with one isolated incident in Florida.

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/180713jackson.jpg)

The primary threat to black people clearly stems from violent gangs and other black people, but this has been completely ignored by the media in favor of ginning up a racial divide that is completely contrived. More blacks are killed by other blacks in Chicago every weekend than the Ku Klux Klan killed over a period of 50 years.

The high murder rate of young black men has virtually nothing to do with the actions of white people, so why was the Zimmerman case hijacked by establishment black leaders and the media in order to insinuate this myth?

If the media wanted to initiate a national conversation about this issue, why did it fail to mention the 1,300 black babies who are killed every day in America through abortion? The simple answer is that the establishment isn’t interested in focusing on anything that cannot be blamed on white people because this doesn’t further their agenda of manufacturing racial division.

Racial Division: Divide and Conquer

Just as the state has sought to play groups off against each other for their own benefit as part of divide and conquer throughout history, black people are also being targeted with aggressive programs of social engineering to keep them dependent on big government.

Ever since infamous social engineers Clarence Gamble and Margaret Sanger wrote (http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/childress/080315) about the need to hire black leaders in order to hoodwink blacks into voting for their own eventual “extermination,” black Americans have been the unwitting victims of a sustained program to keep them downtrodden and reliant on the system via government hand outs, cultural cannibalism, and societal manipulation.

To achieve this con trick, the government found it necessary to create a common enemy against which blacks must appear to be defended by the state – racist white people. The Democrat Party, despite being responsible for founding the KKK (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2309727/posts), then set themselves up as the representatives of black America while behind the scenes scheming to cynically exploit and manipulate them as a voting block through which to undermine constitutional rights like the second amendment.

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/180713jackson3.jpg)

The likes of Sharpton and Jackson perpetuate racial division by promulgating the myth that racist white America continues to subjugate black people, when in reality such subjugation comes directly from law enforcement, the state, and an establishment pop culture narrative that encourages black people to act like thuggish hip hop stars.

Meanwhile, true black leaders like Martin Luther King who encourage racial harmony between blacks and whites are murdered by the state (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-conspiracy-to-kill-martin-luther-king-not-a-theory-but-a-fact/5329816).

Social Engineering

It is very appropriate that Trayvon Martin’s Family Attorney told Fox News that her first role was to act as a “social engineer” (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/07/trayvon-martins-family-attorney-im-a-social-engineer-video/) given that social engineering lay at the core of the entire George Zimmerman controversy.

The Obama administration seized control of the affair from the very beginning with the Justice Department funding pro-Trayvon protests (http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/documents-obtained-by-judicial-watch-detail-role-of-justice-department-in-organizing-trayvon-martin-protests/) last year in order to create public pressure that led to Zimmerman’s arrest after local police had already satisfied themselves that Zimmerman had acted in self defense and that no charges were necessary.

The ex-Sanford police chief Bill Lee also went public (http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/10/justice/sanford-bill-lee-exclusive) to reveal that the case had been hijacked “in a number of ways” by outside forces and that “he felt pressure from city officials to arrest Zimmerman to placate the public rather than as a matter of justice.”

In one sense, the Zimmerman trial served as an extremely useful distraction from the myriad of scandals that plagued the Obama administration in the weeks before the case came to dominate US television networks. The NSA PRISM controversy, the IRS targeting conservative groups story and the AP hacking probe all virtually disappeared from the headlines as the nation obsessed over every development in a Florida courtroom.

However, once the fix was in and the Obama administration secured its show trial, it didn’t really matter whether Zimmerman was found guilty or not. The political hijacking of the case was about contriving selective outrage and then channeling that outrage into the demonization of the right to self-defense, the right to own guns and the sanctity of juries, while at the same time driving a further wedge between black and white America.

Instead of unifying around the universal liberties enshrined in the constitution and coming together to stand up to an out of control national security state that is spying on all Americans, stealing their financial future and erecting a police state, the Trayvon Martin tragedy allowed Americans to be tricked into buying into the politics of racial division while ignoring their true common enemy.
Title: Twitter Explodes With Racism Directed At Larry Elder Following CNN Interview
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 19, 2013, 01:49:28 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/twitter-explodes-with-racism-directed-at-larry-elder-following-piers-morgan-interview.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/twitter-explodes-with-racism-directed-at-larry-elder-following-piers-morgan-interview.html)

Twitter Explodes With Racism Directed At Larry Elder Following Piers Morgan Interview

Black radio host gets torrent of racist abuse from other black Americans for voicing unpopular opinion on Martin/Zimmerman case

Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
July 18, 2013

Update: Some of the Twitter accounts of those who directed the racist remarks now appear to have been suspended. The embeds below may appear as text only for this reason.

Following an appearance on CNN, during which he called out host Piers Morgan for race baiting, radio talk show host Larry Elder has been bombarded with racist remarks on Twitter from other black Americans.

Morgan admitted that he had booked Elder to appear because he had been critical of Morgan’s assertion that the key witness in the failed prosecution of George Zimmerman is a “smart cookie.”

While Morgan attempted to railroad Elder into calling Rachel Jeantel “stupid”, Elder instead focused on how he believes the media is engaging in outright race baiting over the Trayvon Martin case, stirring up division and promoting hatred.

Elder’s performance was lauded by many commentators as he slammed Morgan for treating “black people like children” and told him he should be “ashamed” of himself.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vK5UkZrPcc (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vK5UkZrPcc)

“I’m just bothered by how you are handling all this,” he said. “You think you are doing something for black people but you’re not. You’re making black people feel as if they are under siege and it’s not true, it’s an outrage!” Elder said.

Elder hit Morgan with cold hard facts, noting that there were 7,000 murders last year of black people, almost all of which were committed by other black people. Elder also highlighted the fact that there have been 480 black people murdered in Chicago alone this year, and 75 percent of the cases are yet to be solved.

“Where are the cameras, where are the shows?” Elder asked Morgan. “It’s outrageous to act as if black America should fear some non-black guy stalking some black kid at night. The likelihood of a black person being killed by a non-black person is extremely remote, which is why this became a big national issue in the first place.” he stated.

“Half of the murders in this country are committed by black people, even though black people are 12 percent of the population,” Elder urged. “This is why commonsensical people profile.”

“As if [the Zimmerman case] somehow is some sort of indictment of America and black people should look over their shoulders every night and act as if a white guy is going to jump out of a bush and get them. It’s outrageous,” he said. “Hard work wins. Get an education, don’t pay attention to negative people, stay focused and you’ll be OK in America. That’s why most of the people in the world want to come here, that’s why you want to come here, Piers.”

In response to Elder’s interview, he has received a torrent of racist abuse on social media sites from other black Americans. Below are numerous examples.

Warning: the following tweets directed at Elder contain extremely vulgar and racist language.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/twitter-explodes-with-racism-directed-at-larry-elder-following-piers-morgan-interview.html)]
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: jamesld on July 19, 2013, 05:36:13 am
@ Geolibertarian

Thank you Sir!!!

Awesome work here!!

I see things differently now
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 19, 2013, 07:26:31 am
@ Geolibertarian

Thank you Sir!!!

I live to share information and thereby contribute to, as Henry George put it, "the awakening of thought and the progress of ideas," so no need to thank me.  Thank you.

Quote
Awesome work here!!

I see things differently now

I'm genuinely pleased to hear that, although I should mention the work I do consists mostly of collating other people's work. "Connecting the dots" is what some people call it. Sort of like a jigsaw puzzle: if you put all the pieces together, one sees the big picture; if not, one sees only a confusing assortment of "disconnected facts" (to quote John Taylor Gatto).
Title: Trayvon Death Sparks Riots, Yet US Kid Killed By Obama Drone Strike Ignored
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 19, 2013, 07:37:40 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/trayvon-death-sparks-riots-yet-us-kid-killed-by-obama-drone-strike-ignored.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/trayvon-death-sparks-riots-yet-us-kid-killed-by-obama-drone-strike-ignored.html)

Trayvon Death Sparks Riots, Yet US Kid Killed By Obama Drone Strike Ignored

Anthony Gucciardi
Prison Planet.com
July 19, 2013

The death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin under circumstances deemed to be self defense by the court has ignited riots and countless death threats, yet the undisputed murder of a 16-year-old US citizen and resident of Denver via an Obama-initiated drone strike with no trial whatsoever has generated virtually zero outcry.

The result of our scripted media theater system here in the United States, it turns out that the people really do only lash out against stories that are given the most attention — especially when it comes to the death of those underage. In this case, we have a 16-year-old United States citizen that was killed without any form of a trial. Instead of actually looking at the evidence and taking the case to court, 16-year-old American Abdulrahman was killed from an Obama drone strike while eating at a restaurant.

There’s no question that Abdulrahman’s family is linked up with Al Qaeda, especially with his father being the notorious Anwar al-Awlaki, who was also (http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/07/grandfather-asks-why-teen-was-killed-by-drone.html) reportedly killed in a 2011 drone strike. But the case of this 16-year-old American Abdulrahman is a perfect example of how the media literally picks which murder story they’d like to highlight depending on what fits the agenda. When we cheer on the motif that we need to abandon all forms of trial for ‘terrorists’ and just kill them instead, we’re cheering away our rights.

CHEERING AWAY OUR RIGHTS

And that is what is essential to understand. The decision to follow the Constitution when it comes to US citizens does not come down to whether or not someone has ‘terrorist’ ties and may potentially be somewhat involved. Consider the scenario of this kid’s death and realize that the legal process was entirely bypassed on purpose by the Obama administration and swiftly ended with a drone strike targeting a public restaurant.

It was a death that took place back in October of 2011, when one of Obama’s innocent-killing drone strikes hit a restaurant in southern Yemen. Killing not only the 16-year-old US citizen but his teenage cousin and five other children (who went unnoticed because they weren’t US citizens), the Obama administration took until May of 2013 to admit that it was responsible for the death of Abdulrahman. And remember, we’re not talking about a kid who was given the opportunity of a trial or any constitutional rights, we’re not talking about a case that may or may not have been self-defense (like the Trayvon case), we’re talking about a kid who was sitting in a restaurant one second before being blown up by a drone strike.

Was he linked up with terrorists via his family line? Yes, but if you think I am supporting terrorists then you may be missing the point here: it’s not about the boogey man terrorist. When we are selective with to whom we apply the Constitution, to whom we apply basic freedoms, you can bet you will quickly lose yours next. It starts with the ‘evil terrorists’ losing their rights, then it’s your turn.

And remeber, these are also the same type of drone strikes that kill (http://www.policymic.com/articles/16949/predator-drone-strikes-50-civilians-are-killed-for-every-1-terrorist-and-the-cia-only-wants-to-up-drone-warfare) 50 innocent people for every 1 ‘terrorist’ — the loose term that virtually means nothing.

There’s a new piece in the New York Times that I believe will be majorly huge over the next few days, which involves Abdulrahman’s grandfather speaking out about his death via the Obama administration’s strike. In the report (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/18/opinion/the-drone-that-killed-my-grandson.html?src=twr), the grandfather lays down the circumstances in which his grandson was killed — by his own government and without a trial. From the story:


We will see whether or not the grandfather’s piece and the overall coverage ends up hitting the overall media. The New York Times articles has already started picking up among some news outlets, but the fact remains that the mainstream media really only chooses pieces to feature that they can slant. Yet here we have a 16-year-old killed by the Obama administration with no trial, no coverage, nothing. Just taken out and setup as a precedent to go ahead and deem US citizens fit to die without any constitutional rights.

Are you next?
Title: Charles Barkley: “A Lot of Black People are Racist Too”
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 19, 2013, 07:50:17 am
http://www.infowars.com/charles-barkley-a-lot-of-black-people-are-racist-too/ (http://www.infowars.com/charles-barkley-a-lot-of-black-people-are-racist-too/)

Charles Barkley: “A Lot of Black People are Racist Too”

Real Clear Politics (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/07/18/charles_barkley_on_zimmerman_trial_i_agree_with_the_verdict.html)
July 19, 2013

[Embedded video clip omitted - see original article (http://www.infowars.com/charles-barkley-a-lot-of-black-people-are-racist-too/)]

CHARLES BARKLEY: Well, I agreed with the verdict. I feel sorry that young kid got killed. But they didn’t have enough evidence to charge him. Something clearly went wrong that night. Clearly something went wrong. I feel bad for anybody who loses a kid, but if you looked at the case and you don’t make it — there was some racial profiling, no question about it. But something happened that changed the dynamic of that night, and I know — that’s probably not a popular opinion among most people but just looking at the evidence I agreed with the verdict.

I just feel bad because I don’t like when race gets out in the media because I don’t think the media has a pure heart, as I call it. There are very few people have a pure heart when it comes to race. Racism is wrong in any, shape, form — a lot of black people are racist too. I think sometimes when people talk about racism, they say only white people are racist. There are a lot of black people who are racist. I don’t like when it gets out there in the media because I don’t think the media has clean hands.

Full article here (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/07/18/charles_barkley_on_zimmerman_trial_i_agree_with_the_verdict.html)
Title: Obama Plays the Race Card Once Again
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 20, 2013, 10:31:11 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-takes-chance-to-play-race-card-once-again.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-takes-chance-to-play-race-card-once-again.html)

Obama Plays the Race Card Once Again

Prison Planet.com
July 19, 2013

When it looked like the Trayvon Martin hysteria was finally calming down, Obama just needlessly inserted himself into the story AGAIN, playing the race card in order to undermine self-defense and the second amendment. Doesn’t he have a country to run? Why when major cities are going bankrupt is he wasting time on the outcome of a court case in Florida?

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZXjCikJgHg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZXjCikJgHg)

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTOiaM-uQIU (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTOiaM-uQIU)
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: jofortruth on July 20, 2013, 11:32:15 am
Trayvon Race Card New Distraction from Globalist Takeover
http://youtu.be/3ncUiqVec0w


http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=248390.0


The race-baiter non leaders never pass up an opportunity to divide the American people. However, some very smart black people are waking up to how they have been manipulated by their so called black leaders who are nothing but frauds owned by the NWO mostly white globalists who are used to manipulate their own people. Many black people don't have a clue of that FACT, so they just mindlessly believe manipulators such as Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, etc!) These people are despicable!

Blacks and whites alike, deserve REAL AMERICAN LEADERS, instead of these frauds we are currently stuck with and who are destroying OUR COUNTRY! IT'S BEYOND TIME TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THESE DESPICABLE PEOPLE AND THAT BEGINS BY EXPOSING THEM, AND THEN RUNNING THEM OUT OF OFFICE WHEREVER THEY LURK! >:(

That said, the above video proves that many smart black people are indeed waking up, and that is great to see because we are in the battle of our life, for our country, and we need ALL GOOD AMERICANS TO HELP IN THAT BATTLE!


Title: How the media, Obama and the racism industry are tearing America apart...
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 21, 2013, 07:13:18 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/racism-theater-how-the-media-obama-and-the-racism-industry-are-tearing-america-apart-for-their-own-selfish-gain.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/racism-theater-how-the-media-obama-and-the-racism-industry-are-tearing-america-apart-for-their-own-selfish-gain.html)

Racism theater: How the media, Obama and the racism industry are tearing America apart for their own selfish gain

Mike Adams
Natural News
July 21, 2013

America is a nation in great need of healing. It is a nation subsisting on a food supply poisoned with GMOs, pesticides and herbicides, suffering under an epidemic of chronic disease and nearly bankrupted by the gutting of the U.S. economy by parasitic Washington bureaucrats.

Thanks to politicians like Obama, America has been driven to the brink of financial disaster, and thanks to former presidents like Bush, the “land of the free” has been turned into a dystopian surveillance police state (which Obama then multiplied and expanded). At numbers never before seen in U.S. history, everyday Americans are unemployed, living on government food aid (over 100 million Americans! (http://www.naturalnews.com/041168_food_stamps_federal_government_economic_breakdown.html)), and seeing the “American dream” slip away from them more and more rapidly as the reality of the bleak future fully sets in.

America is a nation in desperate need of healing: nutritional healing, medical healing, economic healing and racial healing.

So what does Obama do? He fans the flames of racial hatred and joins with the “racism industry” to spread hatred and mistrust for his own political gain.

Obama assaults the psyche of America

He is beyond shameless… he is destructive to the very psyche of America. Just as the nation needs to come together for the common causes that unite us all — GMOs, deadly vaccines, fluoride in the water, the Fed’s grand money theft, etc. – Obama keeps us divided along racial lines with trumped-up fear mongering and muckraking that’s intentionally designed to keep America divided.

If America were a patient, Obama and the racism industry would be a deadly cancer spreading across the body, destroying healthy tissue and causing pain and suffering. Instead of encouraging Americans to call for peace, unity and understanding, Obama takes to the airwaves and claims racism remains so bad in America that Trayvon Martin could have been him, implying that even the President could have been shot by an angry Latino who the brain-damaged media continues to somehow call “white.”

The myth of systematic oppression of blacks in America

The very premise that black people are systematically oppressed in modern-day America is a myth. America is a nation where the President is black, the Attorney General is black, most of the highest-paid athletes and sports figures are black, the highest-paid entertainers are black, and black people hold key positions as mayors, governors, senators and members of Congress. If anything, the racial composition of our nation and its political, entertainment and business leaders is absolute proof that the era of black oppression is ancient history in America. I’m not saying there aren’t isolated cases of one-on-one racism that still go on, but the idea that there is systematic oppression of blacks is absurd.

Remember: It was white people who ultimately put Obama in office, their votes proving that white people wanted a black person to hold the highest office of the land. For that very person to now fan the flames of racial division and hatred is catalyzing damaging ripple effects far beyond what most people are even considering right now. Obama has set back racial tolerance three decades or more in America, actually fomenting new distrust where none existed. All across America, white people who used to be completely non-racist are now seeing the black community go completely and irrationally insane over a wholly contrived issue that has been viciously manipulated and shaped from the very beginning to spread hatred.

MSNBC, the propaganda division of the White House (http://www.naturalnews.com/041199_msnbc_fake_media_white_house_puppet.html), continues to go out of its way spewing racism and hatred, just as directed by Obama who then joins in with his own racial division and hatred. The plan, of course, is to foment so much contrived hatred that America collapses into a massive race war (http://www.naturalnews.com/041188_Trayvon_Martin_race_war_mainstream_media.html) that distracts everybody from the monumental failures of bad government.

Racism industry is the enemy of economic abundance

Detroit, a city largely run by Obama-supporting African-Americans, has collapsed into bankruptcy. The same kind of failed thinking that brought Detroit to its knees is now being unleashed by people like Al Sharpton — the Don King of race-baiting hatred — who is behind a new call for an economic boycott of Florida (http://www.naturalnews.com/thehill.com/homenews/house/312381-cbc-members-would-support-florida-boycott).

This idea, just like most of the racism industry’s ideas, make absolutely no sense. What do all the people of Florida — many of whom are black — have to do with Trayvon Martin or George Zimmerman? Is the hatred now so intense that black America will boycott an entire state of many black-run businesses simply because they happen to be in the same geographic region where something went down that they don’t like?

The irrationality has reached the point of insanity. The mere application of logic is now called “racist.”

And why are blacks now lining up against “stand your ground” self defense laws when it is their own people who need those laws the most? The vast majority of murders in the USA are black-on-black crime, and when those murders are stopped, it’s often the case that a responsible black man with a legal gun intervenes to STOP violence and save an innocent life. Standing your ground is the essence of family security and personal liberty, yet Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and black America now seem to have been hornswaggled into believing that the right of self defense should be stripped from everyone, including themselves.

I’ve never understood why black riots often result in people burning down their own neighborhoods and smashing out the windows of their own black-run businesses. But that’s actually indicative of what we’re also seeing with the desired economic boycott of Florida and the “racism industry” idea that self defense laws are somehow racist. The racism industry is, above all, an industry of black self destruction.

Self defense is now a “selective” right depending on your skin color

There would be absolutely zero issue in all this if an armed black man shot a crazed white junkie in self-defense, or if a black man shot a young black punk in self defense. Charges never would have even been filed. No, this contrived outrage is not about the right to self defense: it’s about the selective targeting of races.

And that’s where the insanity gets even worse: These racism industry black leaders are essentially saying that it’s WRONG for an Hispanic to have self defense but it’s right for a black man to have self defense.

No Latino, Hispanic or white person is allowed to exercise any form of self defense at all in America today — but only if attacked by someone of dark skin color. When a white person is being grounded-and-pounded into the concrete by a gangster, the only politically correct response is to surrender and beg for more. Taking any action whatsoever — including throwing a punch in return — gets you immediately labeled a racist.

Racism theater

That’s the insanity that Obama and the racism industry have created in America. It’s a kind of mental sickness that has turned America into a self-destructing mental patient. And the real point of it all, of course, is to create massive contrived riots and “racism theater (http://www.naturalnews.com/racism_theater.html)” that distract people from all the failures of big government: failed health care, failed economic policies, failed crony capitalism, failed international relations, failed wars in the Middle East, failed government-run education system, failed currencies, and even a failed system of justice where the worst criminals of all are the people running the government.

The spectacle of it all is mind-blowing. Because if you’re like me, you aren’t one bit racist and you’ve never called anyone a n—-r or a c—–r. You’ve treated all people equally not by trying to do so, but because it always seemed natural to be open-minded about everyone, regardless of their physical appearance. And now people like you and I are suddenly being labeled “racists” because we legally own guns, or because we believe in the sacred right of self-defense, or because we disagree with Obamacare or some other failed White House policy.

Now, we are all racists, it seems, not because we judged somebody by their skin color — which we didn’t — but because we don’t agree with the politics of the black leaders. Now, “black” has become a dogma, not a race. It is a set of beliefs that you have to embrace, or you’ll be called a racist. And those beliefs are wholly irrational, including things like the belief that a socialist-style government based on entitlement handouts to the entire population is the answer to economic prosperity. Somehow, black America went from completely distrusting government in the 1960′s to completely worshipping government today. And if you want to see where that leads, just look at Detroit, which is a microcosm of where America is headed soon.

America needs racial healing and unity, not division

I have been called a racist for calling for racial unity in America. The “racism theater” is now so insanely stupid that if you aren’t publicly calling for the murder of George Zimmerman, then you are labeled an outright racist.

In other words, you must now call for violence against “White Hispanics” in order to be politically correct according to the new standard of black dogma.

These are the kinds of insanities that have been witnessed, historically, right before nations fell into collapse. And I believe America is on the verge of self destruction, and that it is being accelerated toward that by Obama himself.

If there’s any marching that really needs to be done in America today, it should be a march against media manipulation of racial hatred. Or perhaps and march against the President abusing his office to destroy America.

Instead, black America is marching today across 100 cities, calling for… something. They want “justice” which, in their definition, means the murder of Zimmerman, his family and all his supporters. You are witnessing the complete downfall of law and real justice in America, replaced by mob rule.

Why you will never see another black President in America

The backlash against all this will be enormous. Obama has done enormous damage to the idea that a black President can bring unity and healing to America. When white people initially put Obama in office in 2008, they were thinking, “Let’s put a black man in the White House and demonstrate how tolerant and color blind we really are as a nation.”

But now, many of those same white people are being called racists by the people closest to the President. Now, Obama is fanning the flamed of racial division and hatred, betraying the very reason why so many white people voted him into office.

The memory of this nightmare of a presidency will last for at least a generation, maybe longer. Almost no white or Hispanic person living today will ever vote for a black president again because they are seeing how their good intentions have been twisted and betrayed. Instead of racial unity, we got racial division and hatred spewed by the President himself.

Black people are 12% of the U.S. population. The other 88% are mostly Latinos and Whites, both of which have been viciously smeared and vilified throughout the TMGZ trial. Those 88% are not going to voting for a black president ever again.

And thanks to Obama, race-based paranoia is now at an all-time high in America. Distrust between those of different races has reached a frightening peak, and there are race-based beatings and shootings happening all across the country right now because of all this. (It’s mostly young black kids beating up whites and Hispanics.)

Even as more wise black cultural leaders like Bill Cosby are calling for peace and calm, it’s people like Al Sharpton — whose very power depends on continued racial hatred — who are whipping up division and paranoia. For their own political power, they will drive America to the brink of a race war, and nothing bad that happens is ever their fault. It’s always the fault of “cracker ass whiteys” who are the devil, they say.

Well, if I’m the devil, then Rachel Jeantel is Ralph Waldo Emerson.

The media that didn’t cover the March Against Monsanto is now headlining the racism industry’s contrived marches

And now the real truth finally comes out: The same media which outright refused to cover the March Against Monsanto — encompassing 450+ cities around the world — is going to spend the weekend headlining the far smaller marches that have been contrived by the racism industry.

Once again, this completely proves that the media is itself a contrived affair that’s spoon-feeding you racism and hatred while making sure you never see anything that really matters (like GMOs, fluoride, vaccine deaths, chemtrails, etc.).

Just as America is in desperate need of truth and healing, the mainstream media is censoring truth and broadcasting racism lies and hatred — all part of the agenda of “racism theater.”

If we need to be marching against anything in America, it’s a march against the media, an industry of such vicious mind control and false propaganda that it may very well bring this nation to its knees. (All while advertising erection pills and diet soda.)

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/racism-theater-how-the-media-obama-and-the-racism-industry-are-tearing-america-apart-for-their-own-selfish-gain.html)]
Title: UPenn professor calls God a ‘white racist’ following Zimmerman verdict
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 22, 2013, 08:14:12 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/university-of-pennsylvania-professor-calls-god-a-white-racist-following-zimmerman-verdict.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/university-of-pennsylvania-professor-calls-god-a-white-racist-following-zimmerman-verdict.html)

University of Pennsylvania professor calls God a ‘white racist’ following Zimmerman verdict

Jonathan Benson
Natural News
July 22, 2013

The mainstream media and the Obama administration’s active fomenting of racial tension and hatred following the George Zimmerman not-guilty verdict has led to some bizarre public outbursts, including a recent deranged blog posting published by a supposedly well-educated college professor. University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) associate professor Anthea Butler recently spewed her obvious disagreement with the verdict by ranting online that God is a “white racist” who walks around with a gun “stalking young black men.”

Butler, who teaches at the UPenn Department of Religious Studies, went off on a disturbing tangent in her blog posting when she began to vomit her irrational beliefs about how God “ain’t good all of the time,” insinuating that because the Zimmerman verdict was not what she wanted, God is somehow evil. Butler proceeded in her posting to accuse God of not being “for” black people in general because of the verdict, making sure to also blame Christians for Trayvon Martin’s murder.

“As a historian of American and African-American religion, I know that the Trayvon Martin moment is just one moment in a history of racism in America that, in large part, has its underpinnings in Christianity and its history,” gushes Butler. “When the good Christians of America are some of its biggest racists, one has to consider our moral responsibility to call out those who clearly are not for human flourishing, no matter what ethnicity a person is.”

Zimmerman case had nothing to do with white Christians; Butler the true racist

Butler goes on and on to decry white people, Christians, all Americans that are not black, and of course God in her lunatic diatribe against essentially all of non-black humanity, illustrating how completely off her rocker she truly is. Not only did the Zimmerman trial have absolutely nothing to do with white Christians — Zimmerman, after all, is actually part Hispanic, for anyone that actually cares — but the verdict itself was determined based on the evidence, or lack thereof, that was presented during the trial.

“No amount of heartbreak over the Zimmerman acquittal justifies these hateful posts,” wrote Josiah Ryan, editor-in-chief of the UPenn paper Campus Reform, in an editorial about Butler’s unhinged pontification. “Professor Butler’s remarks were clearly designed to hurt when Americans needed healing and to divide when we needed unity.”

“In tumultuous times students must be able to turn to their professors for calm and wisdom. In stoking the flames of hatred, Professor Butler has betrayed her students’ trust. UPenn administrators out not to allow her back in the classroom.”

The real irony in Butler’s rant is that it really only illustrates her own seething racism (http://www.naturalnews.com/racism.html) towards non-blacks, whom she fallaciously blames for all of the problems faced by what she presumptuously refers to as “us,” specifically African-Americans. And by somehow managing to drag God into the mix and labeling him as a racist, Butler proves that she has literally lost her grounding in reality.

According to reports, Butler has not been able to be reached for comment following her irrational blog posting, which she gleefully followed up with hateful “tweets” suggesting that God is a member of the KKK.

Not surprisingly, UPenn officials have also thus far refused to comment on the situation.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4850

http://www.foxnews.com

http://www.huffingtonpost.com
Title: Why I left the NAACP
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 22, 2013, 11:19:27 am
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/07/22/trayvon-zimmerman-naacp-column/2572955/ (http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/07/22/trayvon-zimmerman-naacp-column/2572955/)

Why I left the NAACP

The NAACP has stopped advancing colored people and started advancing colored progressives.

Rev. CL Bryant
USA Today
July 22, 2013

After a Florida jury acquitted George Zimmermanin the killing of Trayvon Martin, the NAACP pledged (http://www.naacp.org/press/entry/naacp-statement-in-the-acquittal-of-george-zimmerman-in-the-killing-of-tray) that it "will not rest until racial profiling in all its forms is outlawed." The reaction is characteristic of today's NAACP, a group that deals more in political demagoguery than in advancing the causes relevant to African Americans. The group is a shadow of what it once was.

There was a time when the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People was at the forefront of the fight for equal rights and black empowerment. As a two-term president of the NAACP branch in Garland, Texas, in the 1980s, I led our efforts to help the black community rise.

We believed that every child deserved a quality education that allowed him or her to become a leader in the community. We fought for the society that espoused the same values championed by Martin Luther King Jr., where our children would be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin.

Then I watched as progressives staged a coup to take over the Garland NAACP chapter and many others, including the national organization. Their agenda is angry, calling for every black man, woman, and child to be dependent on the government from cradle to grave – wards of the state, addicted to government handouts, living with a perpetual victim complex.

For far too long the NAACP has failed to advance anyone. Too many black youths are functionally illiterate. About 40 percent of blacks don't graduate (http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/statement-us-education-secretary-duncan-nces-report-examining-graduation-dropout) from high school. Black unemployment is almost as high as it was during the Great Depression. While the NAACP continues to champion the rhetoric of race baiters, it has nothing to show for the donations taken from those struggling to make ends meet in the black community.

The end of my lifetime membership of the NAACP began the minute I dared to speak out. I was ostracized and punished for declaring that my rights come from God, not the government and that I believed the NAACP stood for the "advancement of colored people," not the "advancement of colored progressives."

Progressives in the NAACP called me a "bad soldier" for the organization. I refuse to fight for agendas that hold my community down in poverty.

[Continued... (http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/07/22/trayvon-zimmerman-naacp-column/2572955/)]
Title: Re: Why I left the NAACP
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 22, 2013, 12:07:04 pm
The end of my lifetime membership of the NAACP began the minute I dared to speak out. I was ostracized and punished for declaring that my rights come from God, not the government, and that I believed the NAACP stood for the "advancement of colored people," not the "advancement of colored progressives."

While I applaud Rev. Bryant for calling the NAACP out for its Judas goat (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judas_goat) ways, I feel compelled to mention that, by calling the self-promoting race-baiters and poverty pimps who've hijacked that organization "progressives," he's giving them a compliment which they simply don't deserve.

A true progressive is someone like Ralph Nader. Martin Luther King was a progressive. People like Al Shaprton and Jesse Jackson, on the other hand, are authoritarian reactionaries who disguise their true ideological colors by shamelessly wrapping themselves in the flag of progressivism.

It's the same principle with conservatism. A true conservative is someone like Chuck Baldwin. People like George W. Bush and Mitt Romney, on the other hand, far from being "conservatives," are authoritarian reactionaries in their own right, except of a right-wing variety instead of a left-wing one.

Left-wing authoritarians want to collectivize tyranny and call it "democracy," whereas right-wing authoritarians want to privatize (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDMenqKCXdw) tyranny and call it "liberty."

But in either case the end result is the same: the enslavement of the masses to a handful of ruling-class parasites (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=216458.msg1295757#msg1295757).

The only difference is the public relations packaging in which that enslavement is skillfully wrapped by intellectual prostitutes and social engineers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_engineering_(political_science)).
Title: Actor James Woods Dismantles Obama’s Racist Opportunism
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 22, 2013, 03:40:54 pm
http://www.infowars.com/actor-james-woods-dismantles-obamas-racist-opportunism/ (http://www.infowars.com/actor-james-woods-dismantles-obamas-racist-opportunism/)

Actor James Woods Dismantles Obama’s Racist Opportunism

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
July 22, 2013

The chattering classes have yet to excoriate James Woods for his politically incorrect remarks about Obama and Saint Trayvon.

Following Obama’s absurd “I am Trayvon” commentary on Friday, the irascible actor took Obama to task for his political stunt. He noted there are millions of other teenage boys in America who do not elicit a peep from the president.


He also disputed the claim made by the usual political ambulance chasers led on by the likes of the Rev. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson that America is somehow mired in irremediable racism and hatred.

“Though I only have anecdotal evidence, I have personally watched diversity flourish in this country in my 66 years,” he responded to tweets on the Trayvon controversy. “For Sharpton et al, racial disharmony is in part a business. They thrive on discord, while we diverse Americans thrive on harmony.”

Government is not about righting “historical wrongs,” it is about confiscation of wealth.


Following a barrage of sharp criticism, Alexandra Le Tellier (http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-president-obama-race-trayvon-martin-20130719,0,2468167.story), who bills herself as a brain cancer survivor, took to The Los Angeles Times op-ed page to deflect “right-wing” criticism of Obama. She said those who accuse Obama of shameless race-baiting are “in the way” of the government as it bolsters victimhood for the sake of political gain.

“Some accuse Obama of race-baiting and stoking racial tensions,” Le Tellier wrote on Friday. “But that’s not fair, and it’s not what he did. What the president did was make himself relatable, and then he used his position of power to suggest a path forward for a ‘more perfect union.’”

“The people who object to Obama saying that we need to ‘bolster and reinforce our African American boys’ are just in the way.”

She didn’t say all American boys. Just American boys with the politically correct amount of melanin. The white kids, of course, according to the cultural Marxists and the multicultural crowd who are allowed space on The Los Angeles Times and The New York Times, do not rate consideration because they have something called “white privilege,” a preposterous theory produced by “whiteness studies” and the academic discipline known as “critical race theory” claiming white racism is “engrained in the fabric and system of the American society,” as UCLA describes it.

Last week, the former Capital Hill cop turned MSNBC barker, Chris Matthews (http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/18/chris-matthews-apologizes-for-all-white-people-video/), “apologized” to a couple NBC employees for the perceived racism of white people.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4gkesjQ6cA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4gkesjQ6cA)

“We’re going to continue this conversation, gentlemen, privately and on television,” Matthews told NBC creative director and vice president Val Nicholas. “I mean a lot of people out there — I’ll just tell you one thing, and I’m speaking now for all white people, but especially [those] who have tried to change the last 50 or 60 years and a lot of them have really tried to change. I’m sorry for this stuff. That’s all I’m saying.”

Matthews’ comments assume white people are inherently racist, as whiteness studies and other biased and unscientific nonsense preach to American children who unfortunately attend (and will pay for, into the indeterminate future, due to the government backed student loan scam) at institutions of higher education (or, more accurately, indoctrination).

The pushback by James Woods is welcome. Not all actors, fortunately, are drinking the cultural Marxist kool aid and trumpeting to heaven the piousness of Saint Trayvon.

Of course, the elite who run the universities, the LA Times and other propaganda tools, don’t give a whit about supposed white privilege, “historically contingent constructions,” cultural Marxism, and other postmodern nonsense. Racial politics, for them, is about control. It’s another conquer and divide strategy.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: TahoeBlue on July 22, 2013, 06:12:30 pm
just a comment that -  I don't think the baiting is working for Big O. - thank goodness.
Title: Photos: Obama-Backed Syrian Rebels Ransack Christian Village; Obamanoids silent
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 23, 2013, 10:40:33 am
Meanwhile, Obama continues to wage war on "brown people (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzrQSba-1k4)" overseas...

http://www.infowars.com/photos-obama-backed-syrian-rebels-ransack-christian-village/ (http://www.infowars.com/photos-obama-backed-syrian-rebels-ransack-christian-village/)

Photos: Obama-Backed Syrian Rebels Ransack Christian Village

Residents slaughtered, churches desecrated

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
July 23, 2013

Images obtained exclusively by Infowars show the aftermath of an alleged massacre of a Christian village in Syria during which men, women and children were slaughtered and churches desecrated by Obama-backed FSA rebels.

The photos, which were provided by a source inside the village of al-Duvair in Syria’s Western province of Homs, show ruined homes, ransacked churches as well as the burned remains of what looks like an infant.
According to the Assyrian International News Agency (http://www.aina.org/news/20130529024056.htm) (AINA) on May 29, “The armed rebels affiliated to the Free Syrian Army (FSA) raided the Christian-populated al-Duvair village in Reef (outskirts of) Homs near the border with Lebanon….and massacred all its civilian residents, including women and children.”

However, our source tells us that the Syrian Army were able to intervene before the rebels were able to slaughter the entire village.

These are some of the very same rebels that the Obama administration is set to arm following the House and Senate Intelligence Committee’s green light (http://rt.com/usa/joint-chiefs-us-options-syria-445/) for the White House to send heavy weaponry.

The decision to send arms was made despite a plethora of evidence confirming that FSA rebels have joined forces with Al-Qaeda terrorists (http://www.prisonplanet.com/detain-obama-under-ndaa-for-supporting-terrorists-in-syria.html) and are committing atrocities on a routine basis. Some fighters have even threatened to commit more war crimes (http://www.prisonplanet.com/heart-eating-cannibal-demands-obama-send-weapons.html) if heavy weaponry is not immediately sent by western powers, while others have vowed to attack the US and Europe (http://www.prisonplanet.com/fsa-rebel-suicide-bomber-vows-to-attack-us-europe.html) once they are finished in Syria.

It is important to stress that it was the Syrian Army, which is predominantly Sunni Muslim, that stepped in to help the Christians who were under siege from radical jihadist militants that now form the front line fighting force of the FSA.

This is by no means the first time that western-backed rebels have attacked Christian churches in Syria. As we reported in June last year (http://www.infowars.com/syrian-rebels-ransack-christian-churches/), images sent to us by a woman in Homs depicted a desecrated Catholic church as well as a member of the FSA posing for a photograph wearing a looted priest’s robe.

View the images below, some of which are disturbing.

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/230713image2.jpg)

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/230713image3.jpg)

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/230713image4.jpg)

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/230713image5.jpg)

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/230713image6.jpg)

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/230713image7.jpg)

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/230713image8.jpg)

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/230713image9.jpg)

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/230713image10.jpg)

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/230713image1.jpg)
Title: Leftists Caught Running Zimmerman Frame-up
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 23, 2013, 07:15:22 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/leftists-caught-running-zimmerman-frame-up.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/leftists-caught-running-zimmerman-frame-up.html)

Leftists Caught Running Zimmerman Frame-up

Authoritarian left tries to frame Zimmerman supporters

Prison Planet.com
July 23, 2013

See update below (http://www.prisonplanet.com/leftists-caught-running-zimmerman-frame-up.html#21)

At least one member of a leftist group has been caught red-handed attempting to paint supporters of George Zimmerman as “proud racists,” yet another instance of the authoritarian left pulling dirty stunts to discredit conservative protesters with legitimate concerns over the evisceration of Americans’ rights.

(http://static.infowars.com/bindnfocom/2013/07/dailymailsc.jpg)

On Sunday, a woman at a Houston pro-Zimmerman rally was photographed holding a handmade sign that read, “We’re racist & proud.”

The development was seized upon by media outlets such as the Daily Mail (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2373141/Justice-Trayvon-Martin-rallies-Racist-proud-group-stages-counter-demonstration.html) and the New York Daily News (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/pro-zimmerman-pro-trayvon-martin-groups-meet-houston-article-1.1405688) as indicative of the caliber of protesters attending pro-Zimmerman events.

The Gateway Pundit (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/07/busted-left-wing-plant-at-houston-pro-zimmerman-rally-is-far-left-activist/) probed the woman holding the racist sign and exposed her to be a member of a far left environmental group known as the Texas Campaign for the Environment (http://www.texasenvironment.org/news_story.cfm?IID=1154).

“Renee even has her photo linked to a far left environmental website (https://www.google.com/search?q=renee+vaughan+texas&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=QAvuUfSAA5DM9ATD7YDQAQ&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1920&bih=959#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=xgpNAa_IU7l2eM%3A%3BnkWMM1PNWKAYGM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.texasenvironment.org%252Fimages%252Frenee_000.JPG%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.texasenvironment.org%252Fspotlight.cfm%3B64%3B79),” reported the Pundit.

This is merely the latest in a long history of desperate liberal self-inflicted wounds geared to smear conservatives as fringe right-wing, racist lunatics who hold radical beliefs, despite their legitimate concerns over Constitutional rights and the rule of law.

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul has also been the target of a leftist smear attempt. In 2010, a democratic operative was caught “dressed up as a slack-jawed ‘Rand Paul fan (http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/weigel/archive/2010/08/09/tea-party-infiltration-done-wrong.aspx),‘ wearing a tinfoil hat and holding a sign that echoed/parodied conservative fears about illegal immigration,” in addition to posing as a racist, according to Fox Nation (http://www.thefoxnation.com/politics/2010/08/11/fake-racist-paul-plant-was-obama-volunteer). The fake racist was later discovered to be an Obama campaign worker and Democratic liberal activist.

Last year, a Central Connecticut University student (http://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2012/07/03/bias-hoax-central-connecticut) also reported she was being targeted by hate notes of a homophobic nature which were being slipped under her door, an event that spurred a campus protest and rally before hidden camera footage revealed she herself was responsible for slipping the notes under her door.

A similar event took place at George Washington University in 2007 when a Jewish college student was filmed by a security camera painting swastikas on her own dorm room door (http://www.jta.org/2007/11/06/news-opinion/jewish-student-behind-some-dorm-swastikas) and blaming it on racist elements within the student body. When questioned as to why she painted them, Sarah Marshak claimed it was an attempt to have the campus acknowledge racism.

For a more comprehensive catalog of these types of leftist false flags, read Allie Grasgreen’s article “Hate Crime Hoaxes (http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/07/31/hate-crime-hoaxes-present-burdens-lessons-college-campuses).”

Given the plethora of smear attempts aimed at painting conservatives in a negative light, the woman holding the racist sign is undeniably in good company.

UPDATE: The woman in the video was interviewed by Breitbart News (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/07/23/Racist-and-Proud-Sign-Anti-Zimmerman-Smear-Proven-False-Video-Proof) and professed she intended the sign’s message to be taken sarcastically, a detail that “would be hard to miss for any media who were actually present, or who read the [Houston] Chronicle story (http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Dueling-Trayvon-Martin-protests-collide-in-River-4678150.php#photo-4944084) carefully enough to note that the woman was with the anti-Zimmerman protest,” according to Breitbart.

Here’s a transcript of Breitbart’s interview:

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/leftists-caught-running-zimmerman-frame-up.html)]
Title: Cornel West: Obama ‘A Global George Zimmerman’
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 24, 2013, 07:54:43 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/cornel-west-obama-a-global-george-zimmerman.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/cornel-west-obama-a-global-george-zimmerman.html)

Cornel West: Obama ‘A Global George Zimmerman’

Melanie Hunter
CNS News (http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/cornel-west-obama-global-george-zimmerman)
July 24, 2013

Dr. Cornel West on Monday said President Barack Obama “has very little moral authority” to speak about the Trayvon Martin case, because the president is “a global George Zimmerman” for trying to “rationalize the killing of innocent children” in Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen.

“I think we have to acknowledge that President Obama has very little moral authority at this point, because we know anybody who tries to rationalize the killing of innocent peoples, a criminal—George Zimmerman is a criminal—but President Obama is a global George Zimmerman, because he tries to rationalize the killing of innocent children, 221 so far, in the name of self-defense, so that there’s actually parallels here,” West said.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDYfwYvCYPA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDYfwYvCYPA)

Full article here (http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/cornel-west-obama-global-george-zimmerman)
Title: McCain Wants “Stand Your Ground” Laws Reviewed, Just Like Obama and Holder
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 24, 2013, 10:14:27 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/mccain-wants-stand-your-ground-laws-reviewed-just-like-obama-and-holder.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/mccain-wants-stand-your-ground-laws-reviewed-just-like-obama-and-holder.html)

McCain Wants “Stand Your Ground” Laws Reviewed, Just Like Obama and Holder

Bob Adelmann
New American
July 24, 2013

Within days of Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama strongly suggesting that “stand your ground” laws now enacted in more than 25 states be reconsidered, Arizona Republican Senator John McCain reiterated those same suggestions almost verbatim. First, on Sunday McCain told Candy Crowley (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/21/john-mccain-stand-your-ground_n_3631171.html) on CNN’s State of the Union that while


When pressed, McCain said his own state of Arizona, which has enacted a “stand your ground” statute, also ought to look at it again (http://redalertpolitics.com/2013/07/21/sen-mccain-says-arizona-should-review-stand-your-ground-law/), because “it is a very controversial [piece of] legislation.”

On Monday McCain found himself on Newsmax TV echoing the same sentiment: “There is a great deal of controversy associated with this [stand your ground] legislation and we ought to review the results of it … I’m not making a judgment on [it], I’m just saying it has obviously created a great deal of controversy in this country and it deserves to be reviewed.”

On Tuesday, July 19, AG Eric Holder told an NAACP audience (http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/16014-holder-time-to-question-stand-your-ground-laws), “It’s time to question laws that senselessly expand the concept of self-defense and sow dangerous conflict in our neighborhoods.” This was followed by impromptu remarks from the president on Friday (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/07/19/cruz-says-obama-going-after-guns-with-stand-your-ground-remark/), in which he mentioned:


Simply put, Republican-In-Name-Only John McCain was acting as an echo chamber for radical positions against laws that have been long been established and defended and promoted successfully for decades. In fact, McCain’s own state of Arizona has a “stand your ground” law that Governor Jan Brewer signed into law and then vigorously defended when asked about it last week (http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/arizona/politics/article_580bd14a-ef25-11e2-8c29-001a4bcf887a.html): “I support ‘stand your ground.’ I think it’s important. I think it’s a constitutional right.”

So does the Supreme Court. As reviewed here (http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/16014-holder-time-to-question-stand-your-ground-laws), constitutional scholar and Second Amendment expert David Kopel published his analysis of a dozen self-defense cases that the Supreme Court ruled upon in the 1890s which laid the groundwork for the case —Beard v. United States — that “became the most important armed self-defense case in American legal history, upholding and extending the right to self-defense,” according to Kopel. In that case, decided in 1921, a man named Hermes, who had twice assaulted Brown with a knife and vowed he would kill him the next time, did in fact attack Brown a third time. Brown ran to his coat where he kept a pistol, retrieved it in time to prevent Hermes from stabbing him, shooting him dead instead. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., who wrote the opinion, said:

"The right of a man to stand his ground and defend himself when attacked with a deadly weapon, even to the extent of taking his assailant’s life, depends upon whether he reasonably believes that he is in immediate danger of death or grievous bodily harm from his assailant, and not upon the detached test whether a man of reasonable prudence, so situated, might not think it possible to fly with safety or to disable his assailant, rather than kill him.…

"Many respectable writers agree that, if a man reasonably believes that he is in immediate danger of death or grievous bodily harm from his assailant, he may stand his ground, and that, if he kills him, he has not exceeded the bounds of lawful self-defense. That has been the decision of this Court [in] Beard v. United States.

"Detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife." [Emphasis added.]

That final statement has become, according to Kopel, “a part of American folk wisdom, further influencing the tendency of the American mind against retreat.”

But Obama, Holder, and now McCain want to call into question this “controversial” law that has been settled for nearly 100 years and adopted by more than 25 states. Why would they do this? Is there an ulterior motive? If so, is it to “clarify” something that is already crystal clear? Or is there another motive behind turning this molehill into a mountain? Kopel thinks so:

Title: Trayvon Protests Organized by Communist Who Praised Stalin & Mao
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 24, 2013, 10:53:41 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/trayvon-protests-organized-by-communist-who-praised-stalin-mao.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/trayvon-protests-organized-by-communist-who-praised-stalin-mao.html)

Trayvon Protests Organized by Communist Who Praised Stalin & Mao

Revolutionary Communist Party has “coordinated Trayvon Martin protests throughout the country”

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
July 24, 2013

Many of the Trayvon Martin protests that are still taking place in major cities across the United States were organized by the Revolutionary Communist Party which is chaired by a Marxist who praised mass killers Joseph Stalin and Chairman Mao.

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/july2013/240713trayvon.jpg)

In a lengthy exposé by the politically independent SF Weekly (http://www.sfweekly.com/2013-07-24/news/revolutionary-communist-party-trayvon-martin-bob-avakian/full/), columnist Rachel Swan documents how, “Members of the Berkeley-based Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP) had, indeed, set the time and date for two consecutive Trayvon Martin rallies in Oakland, as well as the ones in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York.”

Explaining how many of the demonstrations were adorned with Communist red flags, Swan notes how the RCP sent out email blasts urging people to attend the rallies, made protest signs and also used “viral marketing” to give the message a “veneer of spontaneity”.

“It turns out that Revolutionary Communists have coordinated — or perhaps infiltrated — Trayvon Martin protests throughout the country, often with more aggressive sloganeering than in Oakland. In Florida, they didn’t shy away from connecting Martin to larger, more abstract causes,” writes Swan, noting that the group has used the marches to denounce capitalism (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=192293.msg1235289#msg1235289).

The Founder and current chairman of the Revolutionary Communist Party is Bob Avakian, “an acolyte of Mao Zedong and Joseph Stalin — he praises both of them in his 2005 autobiography,” writes Swan.

Despite the fact that between them the two dictators killed at least 50 million people, Avakian has been a consistent and vehement supporter of both Chairman Mao and Joseph Stalin.

Avakian protested the efforts of reformer Deng Xiaoping to lead China towards a market economy after Mao’s death in 1976, having backed the cultural revolution, during which historical relics and artifacts were destroyed, cultural and religious sites were ransacked and Mao’s political opponents were tortured and executed.

When the RCP was criticized by some on the left for creating a Mao-like “cult of personality” around Avakian, he responded (http://kasamaproject.org/pamphlets/9-letters/letter-8/), “I certainly hope so — we’ve been working very hard to create one.”

It is unsurprising that the Revolutionary Communist Party has backed the Obama administration’s efforts to create a furore around the Trayvon Martin case. Recall that it was the Justice Department which organized and paid for (http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/documents-obtained-by-judicial-watch-detail-role-of-justice-department-in-organizing-trayvon-martin-protests/) many of the original Trayvon Martin protests last year. Given that Barack Obama’s political career was launched in the living room of Weathermen Communist and domestic terrorist Bill Ayers (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/04/liar-in-chief-bill-ayers-confirms-obamas-explosive-career-started-in-his-living-room/), it makes perfect sense.

The RCP wasn’t similarly perturbed when Roderick Scott, a 42-year-old black man (http://www.infowars.com/say-hello-to-roderick-scott-the-anti-george-zimmerman/), shot and killed Christopher Cervini, a 17-year old white kid who broke into his car and tried to attack him, suggesting that their protests have little to do with justice for Trayvon Martin and everything to do with hijacking contrived racial tension in order to push their own warped political agenda.
Title: Re: McCain Wants “Stand Your Ground” Laws Reviewed, Just Like Obama and Holder
Post by: jofortruth on July 24, 2013, 11:22:38 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/mccain-wants-stand-your-ground-laws-reviewed-just-like-obama-and-holder.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/mccain-wants-stand-your-ground-laws-reviewed-just-like-obama-and-holder.html)

McCain Wants “Stand Your Ground” Laws Reviewed, Just Like Obama and Holder

Bob Adelmann
New American
July 24, 2013

Within days of Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama strongly suggesting that “stand your ground” laws now enacted in more than 25 states be reconsidered, Arizona Republican Senator John McCain reiterated those same suggestions almost verbatim. First, on Sunday McCain told Candy Crowley (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/21/john-mccain-stand-your-ground_n_3631171.html) on CNN’s State of the Union that while

    no one I know of has said {that the Zimmerman verdict} is flawed or corrupt, or that’s there’s anything wrong with the system of justice, I can also see that the “stand your ground” law may be something that needs to be reviewed by the Florida legislature, or any other legislature.

When pressed, McCain said his own state of Arizona, which has enacted a “stand your ground” statute, also ought to look at it again (http://redalertpolitics.com/2013/07/21/sen-mccain-says-arizona-should-review-stand-your-ground-law/), because “it is a very controversial [piece of] legislation.”



(http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x222/jo56_photos/a8dab40be103a9a43b2e30d5fc161d88.jpg)

ARIZONA, FIRE THIS GLOBALIST MINION IDIOT! FIND A REAL AMERICAN TO SEND TO WASHINGTON.

AMERICA, STOP SENDING GLOBALIST MINIONS (PRESIDENTS) WHO SIMPLY POSE AS LEADERS BUT WHO GO ON VACATION EVERY MONTH SPENDING YOUR TAXPAYER MONIES!
Title: Re: McCain Wants “Stand Your Ground” Laws Reviewed, Just Like Obama and Holder
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 24, 2013, 12:56:43 pm
ARIZONA, FIRE THIS GLOBALIST MINION IDIOT! FIND A REAL AMERICAN TO SEND TO WASHINGTON.

Unfortunately his term doesn't end until 2016.

Assuming he runs for re-election that year, it's a virtual given he'll win the GOP primary again if for no other reason than because he'll have much more "soft money" contributions at his disposal than will any potential challenger.

And once he wins the primary, all that will be necessary for him to win the general election is for the Republican Party propaganda machine to wave "gay marriage" (or some other cultural wedge issue) in everyone's face.

That's how hopelessly stupid most lesser-evil voters (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=81509.msg959150#msg959150) are.
Title: Yet another Democrat exploiting Trayvon's death to demonize self-defense rights
Post by: Geolibertarian on July 25, 2013, 07:33:29 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/democrat-sheila-jackson-lee-filing-bill-to-cut-funding-to-any-state-that-doesnt-change-stand-your-ground-laws-to-duty-to-retreat.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/democrat-sheila-jackson-lee-filing-bill-to-cut-funding-to-any-state-that-doesnt-change-stand-your-ground-laws-to-duty-to-retreat.html)

Democrat Sheila Jackson Lee Filing Bill To Cut Funding To Any State That Doesn’t Change “Stand Your Ground” Laws To “Duty To Retreat”…

Weasel Zippers (http://weaselzippers.us/2013/07/24/dem-rep-sheila-jackson-lee-filing-bill-to-cut-funding-to-any-state-that-doesnt-change-stand-your-ground-laws-to-duty-to-retreat/)
July 25, 2013

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) said Wednesday that she would soon introduce legislation that would cut federal funding to any state that doesn’t require neighborhood watch programs to register with police.

Jackson Lee said her Justice Exists for All Act is a response to the trial of George Zimmerman, who was found not guilty of murder and manslaughter charges after shooting 17-year old Trayvon Martin. Zimmerman was the neighborhood watch coordinator in the Florida neighborhood where the shooting took place.

“We will … decrease the incidence of gun violence resulting from vigilantes by reducing by 20 percent the funds that would otherwise be allocated… to any state that does not require local neighborhood watch programs to be registered with a local [law] enforcement agency,” Jackson Lee said on the House floor.

She said her bill would also use the threat of less federal money to entice states to change their “stand your ground” laws. Jackson Lee said her bill would only allow states to avoid a cut if their laws are amended to include a “duty to retreat.”

“For states that do not require a duty to retreat, we will question their federal funding and assess their Justice Department funding and reduce it by 20 percent,” she said. She was not specific about what the change might mean for state laws.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: jerryweaver on July 25, 2013, 08:49:36 am
I am seeing a lot of average folks understanding "psy op" now after the Zimmerman deal. Let us hope they don't forget.

I talked to a black woman yesterday on the street. She understood that the Martin / Zimmerman media circus was a psyop.

She wanted to hear the Quanell X Alex Jones interview.

Title: Obama Fights to Keep Black People in Jail
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 01, 2013, 06:59:28 pm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-fights-to-keep-black-people-in-jail/5344611 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-fights-to-keep-black-people-in-jail/5344611)

Obama Fights to Keep Black People in Jail

By Margaret Kimberley
Global Research, August 01, 2013
Black Agenda Report 31 July 2013

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Prison-Blacks.jpg)

The Obama administration is fighting a federal court ruling that would free the remainder of the mostly Black prison inmates convicted under now-defunct, viciously racially disparate crack cocaine laws. The First Black President and his Black attorney general are determined to keep “5,000 people in jail who have no reason to be there.”

“Thousands of inmates, mostly black, languish in prison under the old, discredited ratio. Like slavery and Jim Crow laws, the intentional maintenance of discriminatory sentences is a denial of equal protection.”
– Sixth District Court of Appeals

If Barack Obama’s ascendance to the oval office was worth a fraction of the importance which has been claimed, the president would do something to stop the human catastrophe of mass incarceration and the destruction it has wrought on black Americans. Instead he has officially given it his blessing. In a stunning decision, the Obama administration has made it quite clear where it stands. It stands with making certain that the president spends his two terms in office pleasing white people at the expense of black people.

Mass incarceration was the mechanism used to put black people back in their place after the civil rights movement. It was a perfect means of turning back the clock and diminishing or destroying the citizenship rights which were won after years of struggle. The war on drugs was the pretext for carrying out this plan and the hysteria fomented against crack cocaine created popular demand for draconian law enforcement measures. The United States then became the imprisonment capital of the world with black people paying a disproportionate price.

Under the 1986 Anti-Drug Abuse Act, the federal government officially established that one form of a drug would by statute be treated with greater severity than another form, a 100:1 degree of severity. For sentencing purposes, one gram of crack cocaine was treated like 100 grams of powdered cocaine and thereby established harsh mandatory minimum sentences in federal courts.

Those disparities were opposed from the very beginning by astute lawyers, civil libertarians and anyone savvy about the role that the criminal justice system has always played in imposing the harshest treatments on black people. Years of agitation brought relief in 2010 when Congress passed and President Obama signed the Fair Sentencing Act. The sentencing disparity didn’t end however, it was merely reduced. The ratio went from 100:1 to 18:1. The legislation should have been called the Not Quite So Unfair Sentencing Act.

The 100:1 disparity existed for some 20 years before it was addressed and didn’t undo the damage of two decades. What would happen to those who were sentenced between 1986 and 2010? According to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, those persons ought to have the opportunity for retroactive redress. This court noted that between 1988 and 1995 in seventeen states which included large cities such as Boston, Denver, Miami, Chicago, Los Angeles and Dallas, not one white person was tried under federal regulations for a crack cocaine related offense. In US v Blewett it ruled that the Fair Sentencing Act “should apply to all defendants, including those sentenced prior to its passage.” The court’s decision sounds reasonable and fair, but not to the Obama justice department, which is seeking to overturn the ruling (http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2013/06/as-expected-feds-ask-full-sixth-circuit-to-review-and-reverse-blewett-crack-retroactivity-ruling.html). In other words, the Obama administration is leaving 5,000 people in jail who have no reason to be there and they are doing it for the most cynical of motives.

The Obama apologists have ready-made excuses for any and all acts of evil-doing perpetrated by this administration. One of the favorite enabler rationales is that he isn’t just the president for black people, but for everyone. True, but he seems to never be the president for black people. We have no political victories to point to, no reason for happiness except outdated notions of race pride.

It is clear that Obama has chosen to side with white America against black America. There is no other explanation. He is a lame duck and no longer has to worry about re-election. He had a court decision which he could support and which gave him an easy out.

But there is no easy out when it comes to black people, criminal justice issues and the Obama administration. It seems that the protest slogans are true. We are all Trayvon Martin and must be prepared to face attack and even death and have no expectation of redress from the federal government. We are all Bradley Manning and must be willing to risk being hit with the sledge hammer of federal prosecution for any offense.

We are still being told that the term limited president can’t risk being identified with his most loyal supporters. White people must win, black people must lose and black people should just keep quiet about it all.

Of course the president notoriously parsimonious with pardons and commutations could change this situation with the stroke of a pen. He could commute the sentences (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/07/obama_needs_to_fix_the_crack_cocaine_sentencing_gap.html) of the 5,000 people still in federal prisons who were sentenced under the old rules. That will never happen and the unlucky people sentenced just weeks before the 2010 act was signed, are just victims of a “cosmic roll of the dice (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jul/23/us-v-blewett-obama-justice-department-shame).”

The hollowness of Obama mania has never been more clear cut than in this instance. When he first campaigned for the presidency in 2008 detractors were urged to be quiet and let him win because his feet could be held to the fire. No such flames were ever lit, and the Obamaphiles maligned anyone who didn’t go along with their cultish fixation.

The constitutional law professor president doesn’t care much about the constitution nor does the technically black man care about black people. The president is just the latest ambitious man who was able to make the right sales pitch to the right people and ended up becoming president as a result. There certainly isn’t any change for the people he could help but has chosen not to.
Title: Obama’s Housing Program: A Windfall for Wall Street
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 08, 2013, 01:03:30 pm
http://www.blackagendareport.com/?q=content/obamas-scheme-kill-public-housing-and-give-land-banks (http://www.blackagendareport.com/?q=content/obamas-scheme-kill-public-housing-and-give-land-banks)

Obama's Scheme to Kill Public Housing and Give the Land to Banks

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

June 02, 2010

http://www.globalresearch.ca/obamas-housing-program-a-windfall-for-wall-street/5345388 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/obamas-housing-program-a-windfall-for-wall-street/5345388)

Obama’s Housing Program: A Windfall for Wall Street

By Nick Barrickman and Andre Damon
Global Research
August 08, 2013

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/129511.jpg)

US President Barack Obama spoke Tuesday at a high school in Phoenix, Arizona, where he outlined a series of proposals that would lead to a windfall for mortgage lenders, in the name of a “better bargain for the middle class.” Obama called for the elimination of Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-backed mortgage lenders.

The proposal to eliminate the mortgage lenders represents yet another concession to the demands of Wall Street and the Republican right, which have for decades derided Fannie and Freddie as impinging on the “free market,” and blamed them, as a proxy for government intervention in the private economy, for the 2008 financial crash.

Obama said that his proposal would “end Fannie and Freddie as we know them,” adding that, “For too long, these companies were allowed to make big profits buying mortgages, knowing that if their bets went bad, taxpayers would be left holding the bag. It was ‘heads we win, tails you lose.’ And it was wrong.”

Obama said, “I believe that our housing system should operate where there’s a limited government role and private lending should be the backbone of the housing market,” adding “I know that sounds confusing to folks who call me a socialist.”

The call for eliminating Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is entirely of a piece with every other action taken by the Obama Administration in response to the housing crisis, which has been aimed entirely at expanding the profits of the Wall Street financial institutions responsible for the 2008 crash.

The US home ownership rate hit its lowest level in nearly eight years in 2013, according to a report released in June by the Harvard University Center for Housing Studies.

In his speech, Obama presented a fraudulent overview of his administration’s record on the housing crisis, seeking to present his policies as aiming to “foster homeownership” and protect the “middle class.” Obama said that, “less than a month after I took office, I came here to Arizona and laid out steps to stabilize the housing market and help responsible homeowners get back on their feet” through a program which “helped millions of Americans save an average of $3,000 each year by refinancing at lower rates.”

Obama was referring to the Home Affordable Modification Program, which the White House initially claimed would help up to four million families avoid foreclosure. In fact, less than half a million people received permanent modifications to their mortgages as a result of the program, half of whom were still expected to default.

Neil Barofsky, the former Special Inspector-General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP) described Obama’s mortgage modification program as a “failure,” which left home-owners in a “far worse place than they would have been had this program not existed.”

Barofsky characterized the program in his book, Bailout: An Inside Account of How Washington Abandoned Main Street While Rescuing Wall Street, as follows: “[Treasury Secretary Timothy] Geithner apparently looked at HAMP as an aid to the banks, keeping the full flush of foreclosures from hitting the financial system all at the same time.” At one point, Geithner told Barofsky that the intended function of the program was to “foam the runway” for the banks in order to avoid being hit by too many mortgage defaults all at once.

Obama likewise praised the settlement that his administration mediated last year with the five largest mortgage lenders, saying, “we worked with states to force big banks to repay more than $50 billion to more than 1.5 million families—the largest lending settlement in history.”

The terms of this mortgage agreement were entirely favorable to the banks, while doing little or nothing to aid the millions of people who have been devastated by the collapse of the US housing market. In exchange for the settlement, the banks were released from liability for their fraudulent activities, including the widespread illegal practice of “robo-signing,” in which the banks had employees sign hundreds of thousands of foreclosure documents without any knowledge of the underlying mortgages.

Wall Street officials responded positively to Obama’s speech. “Washington has suddenly come alive on housing finance reform,” David Stevens, president of the Mortgage Bankers Association, told the New York Times. “We saw nothing substantive prior to this year, but now we’re in a housing recovery and the odds have clearly improved given that both the House and Senate have weighed in.”

As with all other initiatives Obama has undertaken, from healthcare, to immigration, to education “reform,” the basic parameters of his policies have been tailored to suit the interests of Wall Street and big business, while couched in the language of helping the “middle class,” combating inequality, and creating jobs.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: TahoeBlue on August 12, 2013, 04:40:06 pm
Isn't Obama short for Abomination ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abomination_(Bible)

...
The Biblical words usually translated as "abomination" do not always convey the same sense of moral exceptionalism as the English term does today, as it often may signify that which is forbidden or unclean according to the religion (especially sheqets).

 Linguistically in this case, it may be closer in meaning to the Polynesian term taboo or tapu, signifying that which is forbidden, and should not be eaten, and or not touched, and which sometimes was a capital crime.

The word most often translated "abomination" to denote grave moral offenses is Tōʻēḇā.
Title: Black Citizens Group Files ‘Articles of Impeachment’ Against Obama
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 14, 2013, 09:24:18 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/black-citizens-group-files-articles-of-impeachment-against-obama.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/black-citizens-group-files-articles-of-impeachment-against-obama.html)

Black Citizens Group Files ‘Articles of Impeachment’ Against Obama

Calls for removal of President over NSA spying, prosecution of whistleblowers, Benghazi cover-up

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
August 14, 2013

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/august2013/140813obama.jpg)

A conservative black citizens group has filed lengthy and detailed articles of impeachment against Barack Obama, calling for the President to be removed from office over NSA spying, prosecution of whistleblowers, wiretapping of journalists, the torture program as well as the Benghazi cover-up.

Despite the fact that the Florida-based National Black Republican Association (http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com/index.cfm) (NBRA) associates itself with the GOP, a number of the articles of impeachment refer to activities undertaken by the Obama administration that have been supported by establishment Republicans, such as mass NSA surveillance, the illegal torture program and the treatment of whistleblowers like Edward Snowden.

This non-partisan broadside against Obama makes the articles of impeachment less easy to dismiss as merely a Republican group with an axe to grind.

Citing the Declaration of Independence and the need “to free ourselves and our fellow citizens from governmental tyranny,” the articles note that Obama “has intimidated whistleblowers and brought twice as many prosecutions against whistleblowers as all prior presidents combined, also pointing out that, “while refusing to prosecute anyone for actual torture, (Obama) prosecuted former Central Intelligence Agency employee John Kiriakou for disclosing the torture program.”

The articles slam Obama for his administration’s role in failing to secure the US consulate in Benghazi and then subsequently launching a cover-up to hide the true nature of the incident, including subjecting CIA agents to regular polygraph tests to ensure they don’t leak information about an arms smuggling operation based near the consulate (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/10218288/CIA-running-arms-smuggling-team-in-Benghazi-when-consulate-was-attacked.html) that saw weapons smuggled to Al-Qaeda militants in Syria.

The articles also mention the Department of Justice’s role in wiretapping over a hundred Associated Press journalists as well as Fox News reporter James Rosen.

Article 6 lambastes Obama for having authorized and permitted, “(1) the National Security Agency to conduct or continue electronic surveillance of over 300 million average Americans; (2) given access to National Security Agency surveillance data to other intelligence units within the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Secret Service, the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security in violation of the law; and (3) conducted the surveillance of average Americans unconstrained by Congress, the United Supreme Court or the US Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court which has, to this date, functioned as a rubber stamp, having approved every request made of it in 2012 and rejecting only two of the 8,591 requests submitted between 2008 and 2012.”

Other articles focus on the IRS’ harassment of Tea Party groups as well as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives trafficking guns to Mexican drug dealers under Operation Fast and Furious.

Some of the articles of impeachment listed also echo those first launched by Infowars in January (http://www.infowars.com/citizens-file-article-of-impeachment-against-obama/).

The NBRA has done an exemplary job in compiling such a well written and detailed list. Hopefully this will serve to help a lot of black people and other Obama loyalists wake up to the fact that despite his promises of “hope” and “change,” Obama has fronted one of the most unconstitutional administrations in US history.

Read the full text of the articles of impeachment below.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/black-citizens-group-files-articles-of-impeachment-against-obama.html)]
Title: The White House Channel Blames Boston Bombing on “Deeply Racist” Alex Jones
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 15, 2013, 08:14:57 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbc-blames-boston-bombing-on-deeply-racist-alex-jones.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbc-blames-boston-bombing-on-deeply-racist-alex-jones.html)

MSNBC Blames Boston Bombing on “Deeply Racist” Alex Jones

Claims Tsarnaev brothers inspired by talk show host, who is “getting paid to be racist”

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
August 14, 2013

MSNBC engaged in one of the most egregious and defamatory hit pieces in its entire history earlier today when host Alex Wagner and guests all but blamed Alex Jones for the Boston bombings, claiming with no evidence that the Tsarnaev brothers were inspired to carry out the attack by the “deeply racist” Jones and his website.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iqw4fNbJ1Yw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iqw4fNbJ1Yw) (MSNBC's Now Parodies Itself With Tortured Claim Boston Bombers Were Right Wing)

“Alex Jones may sound crazy, but he has 300 million people that have watched him on YouTube,” said Wagner, characterizing Jones as “deeply racist,” despite the fact that Jones has preached a message of peaceful, non-violent inclusiveness for the best part of two decades.

“These folks are getting paid to be racist,” remarked former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele, as MSNBC showed a screenshot of Infowars.com. Steele went on to claim that only a “small percentage” of people read Infowars despite the fact that it gets more web traffic than MSNBC.com.

Neither Steele or Wagner presented a single example of Alex Jones being “racist,” a shred of evidence that he was “getting paid to be racist,” nor was any proof offered that the Tsarnaev brothers were fans of Infowars.com.

On the contrary, Alex Jones and Infowars are renowned for communicating a message of non-violence and racial harmony, stemming back from the 90′s when Alex Jones protested against and bullhorned the Ku Klux Klan (http://www.prisonplanet.com/alex-jones-bullhorns-the-ku-klux-klan.html).

In comparison, MSNBC is part owned by General Electric, a titan of the military-industrial complex and one of the biggest arms manufacturers on the planet – not to mention a key Obama campaign contributor. Who exactly is promoting violence?

Wagner also tried to legitimize convoluted logic that terrorist atrocities are caused by distrust in the establishment, and therefore people like Alex Jones who build an audience based off that premise are somehow to blame for terrorist attacks.

In reality, distrust in mainstream media and government is shared by a huge majority of patriotic, peaceful Americans. Recent polls show that a whopping 77% of US citizens distrust television news (http://www.storyleak.com/gallup-poll-virtually-no-one-trusts-the-mainstream-media/) and 73% distrust the federal government (http://rt.com/usa/government-trust-americans-poll-172/).

Perhaps MSNBC should take a look at their own biased, defamatory, inaccurate and offensive content if they are interested in figuring out why the network’s viewing figures recently plunged to a 6 year low (http://www.businessinsider.com/msnbc-ratings-fall-fox-news-cnn-rachel-maddow-chris-hayes-2013-7).
Title: The White House Channel Attempts to Connect Hate Groups to Alex Jones
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 15, 2013, 01:58:36 pm
(http://t.qkme.me/3qqd56.jpg)

http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbc-connects-hate-groups-to-alex-jones.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbc-connects-hate-groups-to-alex-jones.html)

MSNBC Attempts to Connect Hate Groups to Alex Jones

Hate groups rise because whites are no longer “geographically dominating”

Julie Wilson
Infowars.com
August 15, 2013

Progressive talk show host and strong supporter of repealing the Second Amendment, Alex Wagner, devoted an 11-minute segment to bashing documentary filmmaker Alex Jones Wednesday afternoon on her MSNBC show Now with Alex Wagner. Wagner opens the segment reminding the public how many people were killed and wounded in the Boston marathon bombing.

She quickly leads into deceased Boston bomber suspect Tamerlane Tsarnaev’s interest in “far right-wing conspiracy theories (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=161407.0).” Despite there being no evidence whatsoever, Wagner alleges that he was a fan of Alex Jones. She even accuses Alex of “influencing” the behavior of the Boston bomb suspects Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev.

     http://video.msnbc.msn.com/now/52754909#52754909 (http://video.msnbc.msn.com/now/52754909#52754909)

Wagner says, “The bombing suspects may not have been the radical jihadists that they were initially believed to be. Older brother Tamerlane Tsarnaev was reportedly a fan of far right-wing conspiracy theories (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=161407.0).”

Wagner attempts to segue the defamatory segment by airing a clip of Alex confronting Bilderberg member Ed Balls prior to a live BBC broadcast, as means to discredit him. MSNBC then shows a clip of Balls making the “you’re crazy” gesture as the show comes to an end, hoping to set the stage for some justified Alex Jones disparagement.

Wagner starts off by acknowledging Jones’ 300 million Youtube views and Tamerlane’s interest in “white supremacist” publications, all in the same sentence.

The host proceeds to quote Salon writer Alex Seitz-Wald saying, “Tsarnaev illustrates how 21st century anti-government conspiracism (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=161407.0) melts down typical ideological barriers in a postmodern stew of various radicalisms, united by a common deep distrust of the government.”

Wagner alleges that Tamerlane may have been “influenced” and even “motivated” by domestic movements within the US in terms of “far right conservative fringe movements,” referring to it as “fairly shocking.”
Soon Southern Poverty Law Center’s Mark Potok joins the conversation to discuss the “rise of hate speech,” and its relation to tea party and militia groups.

According to Potok, the nation has seen an incredible rise in the number of patriot groups, which he believes began with Obama’s arrival on the political scene. Potok also attributes the rise in “hate groups” (also known as patriot groups, according to him) to an increase in diversity, or “less whites” as he refers to it. He asininely alleges that hate groups are growing because the United States is becoming “less white” and whites are no longer “geographically dominating.”

Potok describes Tamerlane as being far more “Americanized” than people originally thought. He follows suit with Wagner singling out the “right-wing” books Tamerlane read as a tactic to explain why he had “gone down the rabbit hole in regards to conspiracy (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=161407.0) thinking,” and believed the world was not as it seemed.

Wagner picks up where Potok left off to “dovetail,” as she puts it, the “radical-libertarian agenda” as sort of a “southern racist post neo-Confederate attitude towards governance.”

She drives her accusations home by asking Potok again if the “post neo-confederate” mentality is “recent.” Potok again connects the new racist mentality to the election of President Obama calling him a black man that represents real change.

He accuses conservative media networks of stirring racial hate by saying Obama is “fostering the genocide of white people” and specifically singles out World Net Daily alleging their reporting accuses Obama of promoting “black mobs to attack white people.”

Wagner adds, “The racial piece of this isn’t going anywhere. Alex Jones may sound crazy, but he still has 300 million YouTube viewers and that sort of fringe-arch conservative and I think racist strain, is being tapped into at crazy profit by people in the media.”

MSNBC’s political analyst and former Republican National Committee chairman, Michael Steele, joins the conversation and coincides with Wagner accusing Jones’ of being “deeply racist,” alleging that Jones’ gets paid to be “publicly ignorant and racist.”

Once again the day time political opinion show flashes proof of Alex’s popularity, but only to discredit it a second time when Steele points out that it’s really just a “small percentage” of the population that entertains these ideas.

That “small percentage” however trumps MSNBC’s viewer ratings by a landslide (http://www.infowars.com/maddows-ratings-hit-new-lows-following-attacks-on-alex-jones/).

The political pundits continue making unsubstantiated claims blatantly defaming Alex, who was just voted for the number three slot on Talkers Magazine’s “Frontier Fifty,” (http://www.infowars.com/alex-jones-selected-as-number-three-on-talkers-frontier-fifty-list/) which is described as “a selection of outstanding talk media webcasters.”

Wagner says, “While there may be only ten people that take Alex Jones seriously, there is still ten people that take Alex Jones seriously,” alluding that his followers could become like the alleged Boston bombers.

Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim joins the conversation offering nothing really except to call water fluoridation and chemtrails a “conspiracy (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=161407.0),” immediately dismissing his credibility.

Grim says if you search the internet long enough, you can find validation in whatever you’re looking for, alluding to the idea that if you believe something to be a conspiracy (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=161407.0), you can find “facts” to confirm it, regardless of whether or not it’s true.

Potok again attempts to demonize patriot groups calling them racist, claiming they hate government for offering handouts to black people, “people who are not like the rest of us.”

This certainly isn’t the first time the mainstream media has dedicated segments to bashing Alex Jones, however the segments seem to be getting longer.

This illustrates the establishment media’s growing fear that they’re losing the information war.

As Alex’s popularity continues to grow waking up millions around the world, the media establishment predictably moves to fulfill their role as the gatekeepers of the New World Order.
Title: The White House Channel Plays Race Card: Ignores Obama's Drone Killings
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 16, 2013, 09:44:50 pm
Alex is joined by Larry Pinkney, former minister of information for the original Black Panther Party, to respond to the accusations of Alex Jones and Infowars being "Racist" by MSNBC...

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmGbUdtZAx8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmGbUdtZAx8)
Title: Is the Media Covering Up the Beginnings of a Race War?
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 23, 2013, 12:37:02 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/is-the-media-covering-up-the-beginnings-of-a-race-war.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/is-the-media-covering-up-the-beginnings-of-a-race-war.html)

Is the Media Covering Up the Beginnings of a Race War?

No national debate over spate of black on white crimes

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet.com
August 23, 2013

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/august2013/230813lane.jpg)
Image: Chris Lane.

Despite engaging in a seemingly endless and racially-charged national debate about the Trayvon Martin case, the US corporate media has shown no interest in reviving this obsession despite a spate of black on white murders, at least two of which indicate a racially-charged hate crime motivation behind the killings.

George Zimmerman’s acquittal last month drew a line under nearly 18 months of hand-wringing over the threat posed to black people by racially-charged hate crimes. Black ideologues like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and others were constantly in the headlines holding up the Trayvon case as a dire warning that African-Americans could now be targeted for murder merely as a result of the color of their skin.

In light of several high profile black on white murders in recent days, the invective has been noticeably less verbose. The most anger Jesse Jackson could muster over the gang-initiation hate crime slaying (http://www.infowars.com/as-predicted-chis-lane-murder-was-gang-initiation-yet-no-calls-for-justice/) of Australian student Chris Lane was a tepid tweet (http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2013/08/22/jesse-jacksons-tepid-tweet-murder-white-australian-three-bored-teens-fro) stating that the incident should be “frowned upon.”

Lane was slaughtered by a gunshot to the back as part of a gang initiation by three juveniles, an incident which the media initially tried to downplay as “bored teens.” Two of the suspects are black. It subsequently emerged that one of the suspects had posted racist tweets on his account (http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2013/08/christopher-lane-murder-racist-tweets-from-one-teen-suspect-unco/) before the murder, stating “90% of white ppl are nasty. #HATE THEM.” Another reads, “Ayeee I knocced out 5 woods since Zimmerman court!.” “Woods” is a racist term for white people.

Barack Obama, who personally inserted himself into the Trayvon Martin case on two separate occasions, was “not familiar” with Lane’s murder, according to the White House.

Meanwhile, in Spokane Washington, 88-year-old World War Two veteran Delbert Belton, who survived being wounded during the Battle of Okinawa, did not survive a brutal beating carried out by two black teens (http://www.kxly.com/news/spokane-news/elderly-man-dies-after-being-attacked-outside-ice-arena/-/101214/21574858/-/9flm7iz/-/index.html) outside a pool hall.

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/august2013/230813murder2.jpg)
Image: Delbert Belton.

As one respondent to the story remarked, “If this had been 2 white kids beating up an old black dude, it’d be all over the national news by now.”

The story has received local attention but comparatively little national coverage, despite the Drudge Report prominently linking the story. Drudge has consistently highlighted the problem of black on white crime over the last few years and been attacked for doing so.

The national media has also largely ignored what could be the most shocking story out of all three – the apparent “Trayvon-revenge” killing of David Santucci in downtown Memphis by three African-Americans named Mario Patterson, Dondre Johnson and Jerrica Norfleet.

According to Santucci’s brother Miguel De Diago (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/22/another-senseless-murder-youre-not-hearing-about-and-some-in-the-family-wonder-if-it-could-be-a-trayvon-martin-revenge-murder/), police are covering up the fact that the murder was a racist hate crime and that Santucci was killed because he was white in revenge for George Zimmerman’s acquittal. Although authorities claim the murder was motivated by robbery, nothing was taken from Santucci, he still had his wallet, keys and cell phone on him after being shot dead.

These three murders all occurred within the last two weeks, but the press attention they have received in comparison to the Trayvon case has been virtually non-existent.

Trayvon Martin supporters have made the claim that these murders have not sparked a national debate because the culprits were arrested and charged, unlike George Zimmerman who was initially released.

However, this misses the point entirely. During Zimmerman’s trial, no racially-based motivation for the shooting was uncovered, yet a national debate about race ensued. In at least two of these cases, there are clear indications that two white men were indeed the victims of racist hate crime, yet the outrage has been comparatively muted.

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/august2013/230813murder3.jpg)
Image: Murder suspects.

As Pat Buchanan highlights (http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/dead-souls-of-a-cultural-revolution/), “interracial violence is overwhelmingly black-on-white,” yet the national debate over the Trayvon Martin case would suggest the opposite. The media is deliberately avoiding difficult questions about why black culture encourages broken homes and criminal behavior in preference of manufacturing the myth that blacks are under some kind of endemic hate crime assault from whites.

In reality, crime statistics drawn (http://www.wnd.com/2007/08/43138/) from Justice Department and FBI figures show that “Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit violent crime against a white person than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.”

Facts cannot be labeled “racist”. The deliberate policy of the national media in hyping the idea that blacks face a growing hate crimes threat from whites – when it clearly appears that the opposite is true – means the genuine problem of black violence and how to address its root causes for the benefit of all Americans no matter what their skin color is being buried.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Honor18 on August 23, 2013, 12:41:09 pm
This story has got almost 600 comments on it in the last 3 hours ....touchy subject it seems ...
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 23, 2013, 12:55:38 pm
This story has got almost 600 comments on it in the last 3 hours ....touchy subject it seems ...

If the three individuals suspected of murdering Delbert Belton had been caught on videotape raping a ten-month-old white baby, and people of all colors who weren't psychopaths actually had the nerve to complain, would that be considered a "touchy" subject as well?

For chrissake, is there no point at which we tell racists of all colors to go pound sand??   ::)

"Magua's heart is twisted. He would make himself into what twisted him." -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OceYiLo8OTM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OceYiLo8OTM)
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Honor18 on August 23, 2013, 01:01:06 pm
I was just pointing out how many comments there were on the story .... exactly where do you see something racist about that ?
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 23, 2013, 01:14:20 pm
I was just pointing out how many comments there were on the story .... exactly where do you see something racist about that ?

You misunderstand me. I wasn't directing that comment at you. I just know, without looking, that there are scores of "Trayvon supporters" who (much to the giddy delight of MSNBC) are throwing a tantrum right now over the fact that the cold-blooded murder of this World War II vet is even being compared to the death of Saint Trayvon in the first place.
Title: Re: Beware of FOUNDATION OPERATIVES in "liberal" or "progressive" clothing!
Post by: Honor18 on August 24, 2013, 07:49:42 am
Trust me I live 2 hours north of Sanford florida and am a Front desk Manager of a Hotel I am not a Trayvon fan and like most that I know from this area I would have probably done the same thing Zimmerman done ...I just would have been smart enough not to get out of the truck knowing that the cops were coming ....... but no i am not a fan at all ..... You should see how some of the "protestors" acted towards not only me but the employees that work for me as well ... Its a disgrace !!
Title: 50 Years Later – The Political Ruling Class Defiles Martin Luther King’s Memory
Post by: Geolibertarian on August 29, 2013, 08:12:37 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/50-years-later-west-defiles-martin-luther-kings-memory.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/50-years-later-west-defiles-martin-luther-kings-memory.html)

50 Years Later – West Defiles Martin Luther King’s Memory

Tony Cartalucci
Prison Planet.com
August 29, 2013

The differences between Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and current US President Barack Obama could not be greater. In fact, the only thing they have in common is that they are both black. Yet somehow, Western media outlets have managed to draw parallels between these diametrically opposed figures – presumably because they are indeed both black. AP recently published an article titled, “Obama Embodies King’s Dream and His Struggle (http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/obama-embodies-kings-dream-struggle-20089903?singlePage=true),” stated:


Why? Merely because President Obama is black? Or because President Obama embodies any of the ideals of justice, equality, and peace that Martin Luther King Jr. championed for during life, and ultimately died for?

There is no greater way to defile the memory of Martin Luther King Jr. than to compare him with US President Barack Obama – a servant of an engine for the greatest disparity, inequality, and injustice on Earth – driven by the very corporate-financier interests (http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/03/naming-names-your-real-government.html) King stood up against, was opposed by throughout his entire life, and most likely was killed by.

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Vp88vFyE3Xc/UPyXGgQVblI/AAAAAAAAGzM/jwZhIGAmGjQ/s640/ObamaNotAMarxist_1.jpg)
Image: A visual representation of the corporate-financier special interests represented by US
President Barack Obama’s cabinet, past and present.


Indeed, despite the left-leaning facade President Obama displays publicly, his entire cabinet, past and present, is a collection of corporate-financier special interests, warmongers, criminals, and elitists who merely couch a corporate-fascist, self-serving agenda behind well-meaning liberal-esque causes. A look at these characters more closely reveals just this:

- Timothy Geithner (Secretary of the Treasury): Group of 30, Council on Foreign Relations, private Federal Reserve
- Eric Holder (Attorney General): Covington & Burling lobbying for Merck and representing Chiquita International Brands in lawsuits brought by relatives of people killed by Colombian terrorists.
- Eric Shinseki (Secretary of Veteran Affairs): US Army, Council on Foreign Relations, Honeywelldirector (military contractor), Ducommun director (military contractor).
- Rahm Emanuel (former Chief of Staff): Freddie Mac
- William Daley (former Chief of Staff): JP Morgan executive committee member
- Jacob “Jack” Lew (Chief of Staff) Council on Foreign Relations, Brookings Institution (Hamilton Project)
- Susan Rice (UN Ambassador): McKinsey and Company, Brookings Institution, Council on Foreign Relations
- Peter Orszag, (former Budget Director): Citi Group, Council on Foreign Relations
- Paul Volcker: Council on Foreign Relations, private Federal Reserve, Group of 30
- Ronald Kirk (US Trade Representative): lobbyist, part of Goldman Sachs, Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts, and Texas Pacific Group partnership to buyout Energy Future Holdings.
- Lawrence Summers (National Economic Council Director): World Bank, Council on Foreign Relations, Brookings Institution (Hamilton Project)

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-qcHTrzEKmxk/UPyYQNQJOxI/AAAAAAAAGzY/bdLC2pjVigQ/s640/BrookingsSponsors_2.jpg)
Image: Brookings Institution’s corporate backers – clear very un-liberal, and clearly not the
sort of interests Martin Luther King Jr. supported.


Of course, representation of the Council on Foreign Relations (http://www.cfr.org/about/corporate/roster.html) and the Brookings Institution (page 19, .pdf) (http://www.scribd.com/doc/121406132) should give any genuine left-leaning liberal pause for thought. These are think-tanks created by and for big business. The Brookings Institution in particular is home of the very architects of “George Bush’s” myriad of wars – as well as the wars now being waged under Obama.

In reality, Obama’s policy is driven by not only the exact same corporate-financier interests that drove Bush’s, but in fact, many of the exact same individuals are writing the policy versus nations like Libya (http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/03/libya-war-for-world-government.html), Syria (http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2012/05/us-brookings-wants-to-bleed-syria-to.html), and Iran (http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/05/which-path-to-persia-redux.html) today who were behind “Bush’s” Iraq and Afghanistan wars – the consequences of which still are reverberating. This is what is called, “continuity of agenda,” with the feigned political proclivities of both Bush and Obama being nothing more than carefully orchestrated theater to divide and distract the public as a singular agenda transcends presidencies and perceived political lines.

King was also an Adamant Anti-War Activist

On the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous “I have a dream” speech, should he still walk this world today, would undoubtedly be taking the podium and speaking out against the latest war the US and its collaborators are gearing up for against Syria. He would undoubtedly have condemned the global war Obama has waged from Mali to Libya, from Syria to Afghanistan and the borders of Pakistan, from Yemen to Somalia, to Uganda and beyond.

In a speech given on April 4, 1967 in New York City titled, “Beyond Vietnam – A Time to Break Silence,” King gives what is perhaps the widest encapsulation of his philosophy and worldview, one that would undoubtedly criticize and clash with the disingenuous US presidents of today, during their hollow celebrations of King’s iconic speech.

We should carefully reread King’s enlightening speech criticizing the Vietnam War which in part states [emphasis added]:

"A true revolution of values will lay hand on the world order and say of war, 'This way of settling differences is not just.' This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation’s homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into the veins of peoples normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice, and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.

"America, the richest and most powerful nation in the world, can well lead the way in this revolution of values. There is nothing except a tragic death wish to prevent us from reordering our priorities so that the pursuit of peace will take precedence over the pursuit of war. There is nothing to keep us from molding a recalcitrant status quo with bruised hands until we have fashioned it into a brotherhood."

The US preparing to attack Syria, citing a humanitarian catastrophe it itself intentionally engineered as early as 2007 (http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/03/05/070305fa_fact_hersh?currentPage=all) to divide and destroy both Damascus and its allies in Tehran, is surely “not just.” Rushing to war with fabrications (again), is surely “not just.” Sidestepping international law to pursue a hegemonic war dressed up as a humanitarian intervention is surely “not just.”

It is safe to say that America has not mended its ways and only traveled further down the dark path King warned us of back in 1967. The man “leading” us, or at least the front-man for the corporate-financier interests that drive America’s destiny, may honor King with carefully contrived words and well orchestrated public stunts, but in deeds and actions Obama and the corporate-financier elite that hold his leash, defile and dishonor King in every way imaginable.

If you want to honor King and his life’s work, honor it by implementing the words he uttered while alive, not by playing along with a system that resisted him until his death, and has since dishonored and exploited his memory with disingenuous praise while maliciously carrying out an agenda contra to everything King ever stood for.

You can read and listen to the whole April 4, 1967 speech, “Beyond Vietnam – A Time to Break Silence” on AmericanRhetoric.com (http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkatimetobreaksilence.htm).
Title: Obamanoids: "Don't advocate bombing brown people overseas? You're a racist!"
Post by: Geolibertarian on September 11, 2013, 10:27:20 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ed-asner-hollywood-stars-fear-being-labeled-racist-if-they-oppose-obama-on-syria.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/ed-asner-hollywood-stars-fear-being-labeled-racist-if-they-oppose-obama-on-syria.html)

Ed Asner: Hollywood Stars Fear Being Labeled Racist if They Oppose Obama on Syria

“A lot of people don’t want to feel anti-black”

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
September 11, 2013

Actor Ed Asner says that Hollywood celebrities are afraid of opposing Barack Obama on military intervention in Syria because they fear being labeled racist.

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-PhH2HYUss (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-PhH2HYUss)

Asner, the Emmy Award winning star of The Mary Tyler Moore Show, told the Hollywood Reporter (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/syria-why-hollywoods-anti-war-623326), “A lot of people don’t want to feel anti-black by being opposed to Obama.”

“It will be a done deal before Hollywood is mobilized,” he added “This country will either bomb the hell out of Syria or not before Hollywood gets off its ass.”

Whereas a plethora of celebrities vehemently opposed the invasion of Iraq under the Republican administration of George W. Bush, barely a handful have voice their disapproval of Obama’s push for air strikes against Syria.

Madonna made headlines (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/06/madonna-syria_n_3882739.html?utm_hp_ref=entertainment) for posting a sign opposing the attack on her Instagram account, while actress Alyssa Milano leaked a fake sex tape (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6UfHTzxCGw) which blithely regurgitated the White House’s talking points on the necessity for military intervention.

Are Hollywood celebrities really afraid of being labeled racist if they speak out against Obama’s attack on Syria, or are they more concerned with being portrayed as hypocrites for campaigning for Obama’s election and then standing back in silence as he breaks every promise he made?
Title: Libs Attack Justice Clarence Thomas For Slamming Obsession With Race
Post by: Geolibertarian on February 14, 2014, 09:48:02 am
http://www.prisonplanet.com/libs-attack-justice-clarence-thomas-for-slamming-obsession-with-race.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/libs-attack-justice-clarence-thomas-for-slamming-obsession-with-race.html)

Libs Attack Justice Clarence Thomas For Slamming Obsession With Race

Race baiters unhappy about being called out

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
February 14, 2014

(http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/february2014/140214thomas.jpg)
Image: Justice Clarence Thomas (Wikimedia Commons).

Following U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ assertion that the nation is far too obsessed with racial differences, liberals pounced on Thomas’ remarks by hurling racist slurs while others implied that the black judge was himself being racist.

During an event at Palm Beach Atlantic University this week, Thomas stated (http://news.yahoo.com/clarence-thomas-on-race-194104252.html?soc_src=mediacontentstory), “The worst things that have been done to me, the worst things that have been said about me, by northern liberal elites, not by the people of Savannah, Georgia.”


During a completely unrelated debate on a land surveying bill, Alabama Rep. Alvin Holmes, D-Montgomery responded to Thomas’ remarks by racially insulting Thomas over his interracial marriage.

Tim Lockette @TLockette_Star
Holmes said he doesn't like Clarence Thomas because Thomas is married to a white woman. This in discussion on a bill about land surveying.
5:35 PM - 11 Feb 2014

Holmes subsequently made the false claim that Thomas was a “failed surveyor,” before attempting to walk back his comments about the Justice’s interracial marriage, while still taking the opportunity to label him an “Uncle Tom.”

Mary Sell @DD_MarySell
Alvin Holmes told @TLockette_Star that he supports interracial marriage and statement Thomas was misinterpreted. But Thomas is "Uncle Tom."
6:13 PM - 11 Feb 2014

The exchange proved Thomas’ point that he has faced more racism from liberals because of his conservative outlook.

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow blog (http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/clarence-thomas-sadness-race) responded to Thomas’ speech by attempting to argue that more race conciousness was a good thing because nobody wanted to return to 1960′s Jim Crow era. A CNN segment (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPyKdCqkZOA#t=192) also implied that Thomas himself was racist for wanting to move on from race even being an issue.

However, Thomas is clearly not making excuses for the treatment of blacks half a century ago, his point about oversensitivity towards race is obviously aimed at “northern liberal elites” like those who run MSNBC, who constantly play the race card as a cheap political tool to cynically demonize their idoelogical adversaries.

“When conservatives disagree with the nation’s first black president, they’re often labeled as racists. But when liberals disagree with the nation’s only black Supreme Court justice, all at once it’s the justice who’s the racist. I find it difficult to follow this line of reasoning,” writes Michael Dorstewitz (http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/02/13/libs-jump-all-over-justice-thomas-for-saying-race-shouldnt-matter-promptly-called-uncle-tom-100518).

Criticism of Obama’s policies has ludicrously been characterized as closet racism on numerous occasions by MNSBC and top Democrats.

Last year, the head of the Louisiana Democratic party, state senator Karen Carter Peterson (http://www.nationalreview.com/article/350041/oppose-obamacare-racist-dennis-prager), said that the sole reason so many Americans opposed Obamacare was because Obama was black.

MSNBC has also reapeatedly attempted to claim that using the word “Obamacare” is code for racism (http://hotair.com/archives/2013/12/09/msnbc-lets-face-it-obamacare-was-a-word-coined-by-wealthy-white-men-to-diminish-obamas-accomplishments/), while concurrently referring to Tea Party supporters as “teabaggers”.

MSNBC even labeled the Associated Press racist (http://www.infowars.com/ap-labeled-racist-for-accurately-transcribing-obama-speech/) for accurately transcribing Obama’s September 2011 Black Caucus speech, while MSNBC talking head Richard Wolffe mused (http://www.infowars.com/msnbc-yet-again-implies-criticism-of-obama-is-racist/) that Republican opposition to Obama making a speech on a date that clashed with a presidential debate was down to “the color of his skin”.

In 2009, MSNBC host Carlos Watson insinuated (http://www.prisonplanet.com/msnbc-host-calling-obama-socialist-is-code-for-n-word.html) that calling Obama a “socialist” was secret code for a racist slur.

The real reason why Democrats, along with MSNBC and CNN contributors, are unhappy with Thomas’ comments, is because he called them out for what they are – race baiters who are obsessed with labeling everyone else racist simply to score political points.
Title: Obama Expands Bush’s Fascist Domestic and International Infrastructure
Post by: Geolibertarian on March 28, 2014, 09:00:04 am
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-expands-bushs-fascist-domestic-and-international-infrastructure/5375351 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-expands-bushs-fascist-domestic-and-international-infrastructure/5375351)

Obama Expands Bush’s Fascist Domestic and International Infrastructure

If you want to see fascism built right, get a Black Harvard man to do it – and watch the internal resistance crumble

By Glen Ford (http://www.globalresearch.ca/author/glen-ford)
Global Research, March 26, 2014
Black Agenda Report (http://www.blackagendareport.com)

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/OBAMA_still_more_hope.jpg)

Obama: Putin-Baiter and Preventive Detainer

President Obama has thrown international law into history’s dustbin, torn up the U.S. Bill of Rights, and is mapping millions for possible future detention. “One court order + one suspect number + three hops = everybody remotely involved in anti-war activity.”

Barack Obama is one smooth operator, relentlessly expanding on the fascist domestic and international infrastructure bequeathed him by George W. Bush, the cartoon cowboy imperialist. As we described him in 2012, Obama is truly the “more effective evil (http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/why-barack-obama-more-effective-evil)” – a president who routinely commits the most brazen aggressions under the lawless doctrine of “humanitarian” intervention, and who has utterly trashed due process and the rule of law on the domestic front. If you want to see fascism built right, get a Black Harvard man to do it – and watch the internal resistance crumble.

Although Russian President Vladimir Putin has drawn a line against further NATO incursions and coups at his southern border – a move that most of Earth’s inhabitants undoubtedly applaud, given that polls have long confirmed that the U.S. is seen as the number one threat (http://news.firedoglake.com/2013/12/31/united-states-seen-as-greatest-threat-to-world-peace-in-2013/) to peace in the world – U.S. public opinion reverts effortlessly to Cold War mode. Obama will have no problem gaining near-unanimous congressional support (http://www.voanews.com/content/us-house-votes-on-ukraine-resolution/1869296.html) for the widest range of escalations against Moscow – from sanctions to natural gas wars to preparations for the shooting kind – while the ridiculous U.S. pseudo-Left, personified by Jon Stewart, of the Daily Show, snarks an historically-reversed narrative of post-1991 history in which Russia is constantly moving westward towards the English Channel.

The president lowered himself to Stewart’s level (or was it the other way around?), baiting the Russians (http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5g2AkYREUEAyKHmUn1y7Gf8Ipm1Mw?docId=3809cb85-ecfe-42ac-9644-35698a4a3d01) as less than manly. “Russia is a regional power that is threatening some of its immediate neighbors, not out of strength but out of weakness,” said the fracking PR-man-in-chief. Obama issued his juvenile insults against the world’s other paramount nuclear power at, of all places, a summit on nuclear security in The Hague, Netherlands. Tens of millions of eyes must have rolled among the U.S.’s southern neighbors when Obama said, “we generally don’t need to invade them in order to have a strong cooperative relationship with them.”

Tell that to Haiti (1994, 2004), Cuba (1961), Grenada (1983), Panama (1989), Dominican Republic (1965) – neighborly nations directly invaded by U.S. troops; and to the people of Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, and Colombia, who lost tens or hundreds of thousands at the hands of U.S. surrogates; and to the citizens of Chile and the rest of South America, virtually every country of which was taken over by militaries backed by the United States. And, we are only talking about the post-World War Two era! As we write, Obama pursues George Bush’s policy of regime change in Venezuela, while the people still suffer under the heirs to the military coup he backed in Honduras, in 2009.

The list gets much, much longer if one includes the rest of the world as “neighbors” of the U.S. Certainly, the Americans behave as if everyone else’s internal affairs are subject to Washington’s approval – a negation of international law and the real meaning of Obama’s humanitarian military intervention doctrine, or R2P, Responsibility to Protect. Under the First Black President, U.S. non-recognition of international law has effectively achieved bipartisan acceptance. Indeed, much of what pretended to be an anti-war movement under Obama’s Republican predecessor is now in thrall of “humanitarian” warfare.

If it were really true that the fate of the world rests with anti-war constituencies and other resisters inside the Belly of the Beast, as many peace activists used to claim, then the world would likely be doomed. The American polity is not effectively defending its own liberties. President Obama has pulled off what George W. Bush did not even attempt: he has established, through the Congress and the courts, preventive detention without trial as the law of the land, effectively nullifying due process. Having stripped citizens of their legal protections, he now bargains with Congress on the uses of the NSA spy machinery that is already capable of monitoring literally every American – plus unknown proportions of the rest of the world.

Obama says he wants to limit telephone monitoring (http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/25/us/obama-to-seek-nsa-curb-on-call-data.html?hp&_r=0) to two “hops” removed from the phone number targeted as suspicious, in order to “minimize” the State’s intrusion on the people’s privacy. In fact, one court order allowing two “hops” would quite easily bring ten thousand telephone numbers under NSA surveillance, as U.S. District Judge Richard Leon figured out (http://gigaom.com/2013/12/17/how-feds-use-one-seed-and-3-hops-to-spy-on-nearly-everyone/) before rendering a decision against the NSA. The judge postulated that each of the 100 phone numbers called by the suspect – or “seed” – phone (the first “hop”) had called or gotten calls from at least 100 other numbers over five years (the second “hop”), totaling 10,000. A third “hop” would ensnare a total of one million phones.

Judge Leon’s assumptions are very conservative. If the national security state targets any effective political activist, they would reap far more than 100 numbers on both the first and second “hops” – probably enough to effectively map the bulk of the political activity among, say, peace groups. A third hop would round up multiples of millions, including the barely committed and folks with no interest in politics of any kind. One court order + one suspect number + three hops = everybody remotely involved in anti-war activity.

It turns out that the NSA has for years been allowed to search up to three hops (http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/25/house-nsa-bill-end-bulk-collection-act-reform) away from the suspect phone. They have undoubtedly already mapped every potentially left-leaning or ethnically suspect (Black) U.S. human network, having assembled millions of names and numbers.

If George Bush or any Republican were president, leftists of all stripes would realize the clock is ticking – that they must radically alter the direction of the U.S. state, or be interned by it. However, the smooth fascist, Barak Obama, is in charge, and there is little sense of urgency on the Left.

Which is another reason that we say Obama is the more effective evil.
Title: Eric Garner’s Daughter: ‘This is not a Black and White Issue’
Post by: Geolibertarian on December 05, 2014, 05:14:26 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/eric-garners-daughter-this-is-not-a-black-and-white-issue.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/eric-garners-daughter-this-is-not-a-black-and-white-issue.html)

Eric Garner’s Daughter: ‘This is not a Black and White Issue’

Daughter of black man killed by police refutes notion that race had anything to do with father’s death

Adan Salazar
Prison Planet.com
December 5, 2014

The daughter of Eric Garner, the man choked to death last July in New York City for the crime of selling loose cigarettes, revealed to CNN that she did not consider race to be a factor leading to her father’s murder.

Speaking with CNN’s Don Lemon following Wednesday’s grand jury decision not to indict the officer responsible for Garner’s death, Erica Garner said she felt the issue was a microcosm of the larger problem of police brutality, which has come to affect virtually all walks of life equally.

“This is not a black and white issue,” Garner told Lemon. “This is a national crisis. Like… I believe this is a crisis.”

Garner added that she felt a sense of solidarity with people of different cultures after she saw the amount of support her family received from around the world:
Garner even stood her ground after a determined Lemon attempted to have her play to the racial narrative.

“Are you saying this is not an issue of race? I’m sure… You think this is a racial issue?” Lemon again asked.

“I really doubt it. It was about the officer’s pride. It was about my father being 6’4″ and 350 pounds and he wants to be the top cop that brings a big man down,” Garner answered.

Garner’s opinion greatly differs from protesters who are actively embracing the push to conflate the issue of police brutality with racism.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/eric-garners-daughter-this-is-not-a-black-and-white-issue.html)]
Title: Mike Brown’s Cousin: Let’s Not Make This About Race
Post by: Geolibertarian on December 05, 2014, 05:20:31 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/mike-browns-cousin-lets-not-make-this-about-race.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/mike-browns-cousin-lets-not-make-this-about-race.html)

Mike Brown’s Cousin: Let’s Not Make This About Race

Focus should be on problem of police brutality, not hating white people

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
December 5, 2014

The cousin of Michael Brown, the 18-year-old shot by Officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, contacted Infowars to express his agreement that the protests against the deaths of Brown and Eric Garner should not be focused around race, but on preventing police brutality.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B4GxWoFIQAAM3iR.jpg:large)

Ty Pruitt, who has given numerous interviews with major networks and featured in news reports over the last two weeks, said he resonated with the message that the reaction to Brown and Garner’s deaths should not be centered around hating white people, but on stopping violence at its source.

Pruitt was responding to a Facebook video rant in which I argued that social justice warriors are steering the protest movement away from true solutions by fanning the flames of racial division in America.

Fresh examples of how the demonstrations are becoming sidetracked into a kind of Occupy 2.0 malaise continue to occur.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/mike-browns-cousin-lets-not-make-this-about-race.html)]
Title: Eric Garner’s Wife: “I Don’t Feel Like It’s A Black And White Thing”
Post by: Geolibertarian on December 08, 2014, 12:27:18 pm
Is it safe to assume at this point that Obama's race-obsessed public relations officials at MSNBC (er, beg pardon, the "journalists" at MSNBC) are throwing a tantrum right about now?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/eric-garners-wife-i-dont-feel-like-its-a-black-and-white-thing.html (http://www.prisonplanet.com/eric-garners-wife-i-dont-feel-like-its-a-black-and-white-thing.html)

Eric Garner’s Wife: “I Don’t Feel Like It’s A Black And White Thing”

Agrees with other family members despite media and politicians’ race obsession

Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
December 8, 2014

The wife of Eric Garner, the New York man choked to death on video by a police officer, has spoken out to dismiss claims that the incident was racially motivated.

Appearing on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Esaw Snipes said “I don’t even feel like it’s a black-and-white thing, honestly, you know, in my opinion.”

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsQc45bZyaE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsQc45bZyaE)

Garner’s wife said she believes her husband was “murdered unjustly,” but that his skin color had nothing to do with it.

Snipes said that during routine encounters with police, officers would fixate on the fact that Garner had a history of selling loose cigarettes, saying the cops “harassed” the couple when they were out shopping.

“They said things to us: ‘Hi, Cigarette Man. Hey, Cigarette Man Wife.’ You know? Stuff like that,” she said.

“I feel like it’s just something that he continued to do and the police knew. You know, they knew.” Snipes added, after explaining that Garner often turned to selling cigarettes because he failed to hold down a job due to poor health and laziness.

“He tried working with the Parks Department. But he had asthma. You know? He had issues. You know? Heavy guy. And he was very lazy. You know? He didn’t like to do anything,” she said.

Snipes also stated that as far as she knew, Garner never resisted arrest. “I’m not going to say he was a career criminal, but I’m going to say he had a past of being arrested,” Snipes said. “And he never, not once, ever resisted arrest.”

The comments echo those of Garner’s daughter , who revealed to CNN last week that she did not consider race to be a factor leading to her father’s murder.

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUkMeJemTYU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUkMeJemTYU)

“This is not a black and white issue,” Erica Garner told Don Lemon, adding “This is a national crisis,” while appealing for unity.

“I mean for White people to come out and show how deeply they was hurt, and like Asians and, you know, different people from different nations and different parts of the world to come out and show that they felt the same way I felt on that video, I greatly appreciate it. It’s like a sense of I’m not the only one that feels this way.” the young girl urged.

Similar comments were made by a cousin of Michael Brown, the 18-year-old shot by Officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson. Ty Pruitt contacted Infowars to express his agreement that the protests against the deaths of Brown and Eric Garner should not be focused around race, but on preventing police brutality.

[Continued... (http://www.prisonplanet.com/eric-garners-wife-i-dont-feel-like-its-a-black-and-white-thing.html)]
Title: Obama to Congress: Rubber-Stamp My “Perpetual War”
Post by: Geolibertarian on February 20, 2015, 08:59:30 am
Show me an "anti-war" liberal who voted for Obama, not once, but twice, and I'll show you a used car salesman's wet dream.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-to-congress-rubber-stamp-my-perpetual-war-blank-check-to-use-us-military-force-in-perpetuity/5432253 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-to-congress-rubber-stamp-my-perpetual-war-blank-check-to-use-us-military-force-in-perpetuity/5432253)

Obama to Congress: Rubber-Stamp My “Perpetual War”. “Blank Check to Use US Military Force in Perpetuity”

By Marjorie Cohn
Global Research, February 20, 2015
Truthout

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/CONGRESS.jpg)

President Obama’s proposed AUMF seeks retroactive congressional approval for wars he has been conducting for six months. Even if Congress does not oblige him, Obama will continue to bomb Iraq and Syria, falsely claiming that the 2001 AUMF gives him that authority.

As President Barack Obama presented his proposed Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) to Congress, he declared, “I do not believe America’s interests are served by endless war, or by remaining on a perpetual war footing.” Yet Obama’s proposal asks Congress to rubber-stamp his endless war against anyone he wants, wherever he wants. Obama has launched 2,300 airstrikes in Iraq and Syria since August 8, 2014. In his six years as president, he has killed more people than died on 9/11 with drones and other forms of targeted killing in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia – countries with which the United States is not at war.

Obama’s proposed AUMF contains some purported limitations, but their vagueness amounts to a blank check to use US military force in perpetuity.

“Associated Persons or Forces”

The president’s proposal authorizes force against the Islamic State (ISIS or ISIL) and its “associated persons or forces.” They are defined as “individuals and organizations fighting for, on behalf of, or alongside ISIL or any closely-related successor entity in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners.”

This proviso contains no geographical limitation. It would authorize the use of military force anywhere in the world. “[T]he executive branch could interpret this language to authorize force against individuals far from any battlefield with only some remote connection to the group – potentially even in the United States itself,” according to the American Civil Liberties Union.

No “Enduring Offensive Operations”

Obama’s AUMF “does not authorize the use of the United States Armed Forces in enduring offensive ground combat operations.” This provision contains no definition of “enduring.” Does this mean one month? One year? Three Years? Or perhaps six months with a break, then another six months?

Under Obama’s AUMF, the United States could deploy thousands of US troops and call it a defensive operation.

This provision is riddled with exceptions. The 3,000 US military personnel currently in Iraq are exempted from the limitation. So are special operations forces, as well as those collecting intelligence, involved with “kinetic strikes, or the provision of operation planning and other forms of advice and assistance to partner forces.” These exemptions are so vague, they can justify just about any US troops.

Nor is the term “offensive” defined in the proposal. By labeling operations defensive, Obama or his successor could use increasing numbers of ground troops. What if any of the US personnel currently serving in Iraq are attacked? Under Obama’s AUMF, the United States could deploy thousands of US troops and call it a defensive operation.

[Continued... (http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-to-congress-rubber-stamp-my-perpetual-war-blank-check-to-use-us-military-force-in-perpetuity/5432253)]
Title: Obama’s Legacy: Permanent War and Liberal Accommodation?
Post by: Geolibertarian on February 20, 2015, 09:07:01 am
Show me an "anti-war" liberal who voted for Obama, not once, but twice, and I'll show you a used car salesman's wet dream.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/obamas-legacy-permanent-war-and-liberal-accommodation/5432269 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/obamas-legacy-permanent-war-and-liberal-accommodation/5432269)

Obama’s Legacy: Permanent War and Liberal Accommodation?

By Ajamu Baraka
Global Research, February 20, 2015
Counter Punch

(http://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/obamagrin-400x206.jpg)

The announcement by the Obama administration that it will seek congressional authorization to expand the war on ISIS in Syria and possibly send more heavy weapons to its client government in Ukraine did not generate the kind of muscular opposition and sense of urgency that one would expect from the anti-interventionist liberals and significant sectors of what use to be the anti-imperialist and anti-war left.

Outside of a few articles written by some of us confined to the marginalized and shrinking left, the reports that the administration was considering both of these courses of action were met with passing indifference. It is as if the capitalist oligarchy’s strategy of permanent war has been accepted as a fait-accompi by the general public and even significant numbers of the left.

The fact that the U.S. President could launch military attacks in Syria, supposedly a sovereign state and member of the United Nations, for six months without any legal justification and not face fierce criticism in the U.S. and internationally demonstrates the embrace of lawlessness that characterizes the current epoch of Western imperialist domination.

And the acquiescence of much of the left in the U.S. and Europe on the issue of Syria and the U.S. supported coup in Ukraine reveals the moderating and accommodating forces within the faux left that attempts to bully and intimidate anti-imperialist critics.

To oppose the dismemberment of Syria or criticize the dangerous collaboration between the U.S. and racist neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine was reduced to the silly and intellectually lazy arguments that one was “pro-Assad” or a dupe for Putin!

However, the current ideological environment did not evolve by accident or by the particular confluence of historical events. The disappearance of anti-imperialism among the cosmopolitan left in the U.S. and Western Europe is reflective of a monumental ideological accomplishment by the propagandists of empire. The professional propagandists of empire and Western dominance were able to adroitly “introject” into the center of the radical world-view and consciousness a liberal ideological framework that privileged “anti-authoritarianism over anti-imperialism.

The political consequence of this shift in consciousness has been disastrous for oppositional left politics throughout the West but particularly in the U.S. As the U.S. increasingly turned to lawless violence to advance its interests over the last seven years of the presidency of Barack Obama, “leftists” in the U.S. objectively aligned themselves with the U.S./EU/NATO axis of domination through their silence or outright support in the name of opposing authoritarian regimes.

The human consequence of this collaboration with U.S. and Western militarization by progressive forces in the U.S. and Europe has translated into unrestrained violent interventions from Libya to Syria and back to Iraq. Along with the escalations of direct military interventions, economic warfare and subversion directed at the state and people of Iran, Russia, Venezuela, and other progressive states in Latin America has resulted in the unnecessary suffering of millions.

[Continued... (http://www.globalresearch.ca/obamas-legacy-permanent-war-and-liberal-accommodation/5432269)]