Icann - Eu Calls 4 Full Privatization - Internet, Addresses - Contract Expires 9-30-09
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showtopic=6989
They're using this under the pretense that America has 'too much power' over ICANN and that the authority regulating the Internet should NOT give one country too much vested power.
That's a really slick con - I'm sure a lot of Eurosuckers will fall for that. In reality, it's just a cover for rolling out more IPv4-to-IPv6 transformers, getting an Agile C2 (Command & Control) system in to shut down sites whichever way they deem fit - perhaps even an international 'firewall' with specific filters for each country.
US to share Internet review amid worldwide growth
(http://por-img.cimcontent.net/api/assets/bin-200909/3e73-Internet-Names.jpg)
By ANICK JESDANUN, AP
48 minutes ago
NEW YORK — As Internet use expands worldwide, the United States said Wednesday it will give other governments and the private sector a greater oversight role in an organization whose decisions affect how computers relay traffic such as e-mail and Twitter posts.
The move comes after European regulators and other critics have said the U.S. government could wield too much influence over a system used by hundreds of millions of people worldwide. Those critics have complained, among other things, about the slow rollout of Internet addresses in languages other than English.
However, the U.S. government stopped short Wednesday of cutting its ties completely with the Internet organization, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN. The government agreed instead to establish advisory panels made up of government and private-sector representatives around the world.
The panels will review how well ICANN decisions are made openly, reflect the public interest, ensure stability and promote competition for domain names, which are the monikers ending in ".com" and other suffixes. ICANN decisions could influence what domain names are available, what languages they are in and how much they cost.
"The Internet is on a long-term arch from being 100 percent American to being 100 percent global," said Rod Beckstrom, the former U.S. cybersecurity chief who joined ICANN as chief executive in July. "This is a significant step along that arch to becoming more global."
The U.S. Commerce Department has a guaranteed seat on only one of those panels, with the remaining representatives to be picked by leaders from ICANN and its advisory committee of government officials.
But the panels' recommendations won't be binding on ICANN. And Commerce retains oversight through a separate contract for ICANN to handle the nuts-and-bolts of domain name administration. That contract runs through 2011; the new one taking effect Thursday covers ICANN's broader role in setting guidelines and policies.
ICANN also agreed to remain a nonprofit headquartered in the United States — it's based in Marina del Rey, Calif. — with offices around the world.
Beckstrom said some critics abroad might take that to mean Internet governance still isn't truly global, but the arrangement should ultimately bolster ICANN's standing internationally.
"The U.S. government is saying, `OK, you have become a multistakeholder body. Congratulations. Now on to the next set of challenges,'" Beckstrom said.
Although the United States will be sharing oversight on these review panels, Commerce officials expect to be more active than before. In the past, the U.S. rarely exercised its veto power over ICANN decisions, and it didn't conduct the formal, public reviews envisioned by the new agreement.
"In the early years we were focused on building ICANN as an institution," Lawrence E. Strickling, assistant commerce secretary for communications and information, said in an interview. "We now are about to turn our attention to focusing on ICANN's performance."
ICANN has had oversight over domain names under a series of loose agreements with the U.S. government, which funded much of the Internet's development. The latest was expiring Wednesday.
Many critics of ICANN and its U.S. oversight, including the European Union's Internet chief, Viviane Reding, saw the expiration as an opportunity to revamp Internet governance.
Under the compromise in the new agreement, the review panels are to issue reports every three or four years. Their makeup will largely fall on ICANN's chief executive, an American; its chairman, who is from New Zealand; and the chairman of the Governmental Advisory Committee, currently a Latvian.
Reding praised the new framework in a statement, and said the governments that now have more of a say in ICANN should take advantage of the opportunity.
In the coming months ICANN hopes to revamp procedures for adding domain name suffixes, which likely would spawn hundreds or thousands of new Internet addresses. A launch has been delayed because of objections over such issues as whether trademark owners could wind up having to buy thousands of new domain names simply to protect their intellectual-property rights.
ICANN also is close to allowing entire Internet addresses to be in languages other than English for the first time, potentially easing the way online for people who now must type English characters to reach Web sites in their tongues. ICANN officials say they've needed time to come up with ways to reduce fraud and fairly assign new suffixes in other languages.
Now its here and don't you just love the terms like internet governance.. ::)
Yeah, seems like they're taking the concept of a cyberworld too seriously, like it's a world which needs to be governed instead of just a network connecting computers.
Yeah, seems like they're taking the concept of a cyberworld too seriously, like it's a world which needs to be governed instead of just a network connecting computers.
You have not read into their psychopathic control freak minds enough.
What part of the NWO wants you f**king dead don't you understand? You aren't not supposed to have ANY freedom AT ALL, ZERO. That means that you are not even supposed to THINK. The Internet is a weapon to them BECAUSE WE HAVE HANDED THE NWO THEIR f**kING ASS IN THE INFOWAR MANY TIMES OVER.
I hope Alex is so empowered by the fact that "Hey, it's my show, I can do what I want", when the very delivery method for most of his material is over the Internet, when the Internet is no longer available for him to send his data.
I am so f**king pissed off that the masses are so oblivious to this shit, you ahve no idea.
Maybe you should take a look at my response to luckee in my stickied thread about this where I quote excerpts of the cybertyranny bill.
Your congressman have ZERO power to do jack shit about this takeover. Even officials who were already working for the govt. saw this writing on the wall, and that is why Rod Beckstrom got the f**k out of dodge.
Also, you had the Director of US-CERT resign.
I am going to say this again, in case any of you missed this:
THE EXACT f**kING PEOPLE WHO SCIENTIFICALLY AND MILITARILY ENGINEERED THE 9/11 FALSE FLAG, 7/7/5 ARE PART OF THE GROUP THAT IS TAKING OVER THE INTERNET. AND NO, I DON'T MEAN THE GENERALIZATION OF "THE NWO IS TAKING OVER IT", I KNOW THEIR f**kING NAMES, I HAVE POSTED THEIR NAMES MANY TIMES, THEIR OWN DOCUMENTS CONVICT THEM OF THEIR CRIMES, THEIR OWN DOCUMENTS ARE ENOUGH TO INDICT THEM FOR MASS MURDER AND TREASON, BUT I HAVE YET TO SEE MORE THAN A HANDFUL OF PEOPLE MAKE MENTION OF THE FACT THAT THEY REALIZED THAT SAID DOCUMENTS WERE IN FACT AS DAMNING AS YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD THEY WERE.
WHO IS TAKING CONTROL OF THE INTERNET? WHO ARE THESE FOREIGN GOVERNING BODIES?
THE NETWORK CENTRIC OPERATIONS INDUSTRY CONSORTIUM (NCOIC)
THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (CSIS)
GET READY FOR HELL ON EARTH.
I hear your frustration dude. Alex needs to stop the tantrums and all the little crap - it's funny and all but we're in dire straits here. And to be honest, I don't think he knows this information as well as you do or LordsSyndicate - so he feels it's out of his league or whatever. In any case, today's show and yesterday's show were all about the AFP story and while that's interesting, IMO the information you're covering is of far more importance - and it's slipping under everybody's radar.
He needs to give you a platform - perhaps let you do monthly guest appearances like an Alan Watt or Mike Rivero and then you would have the time to lay all this stuff out there. Alex's audience is pretty big - if you could get this information through and dumb it down a bit, we could have a big effect.
I've tried to do my part to bring more attention to your work. I've made a few transcripts of your radio shows with LordsSyndicate and AFAIK someone called Pilika is working on an accompanying presentation for your interview with James Corbett - he told me there are a lot of people here that get turned off by the technical stuff and don't really understand why it's so significant - so he's trying to simplify it a bit or draw up a few diagrams/flow charts so it makes sense to someone who has zero IT skills or knowledge.
But yeah - he should let you on and provide you with ample time to talk about this information, or else the Internet as we know it will be dead by next year and Alex's radio show will be reduced to local AM-FMs, shortwave - ie nowhere near it is today.
I agree, unfortunately, with the dumb it down suggestion
I've tried to explain this to people using words and phrases from AI and others, but I just watch eyes glaze over
We all know the internet free flow of information is anathema to the globalists' plans, what we don't know is how they plan to take it down in terms easy to understand.
How will that happen? What will all the large and small private internet companies do? Wont there be a huge outcry as livelihoods fold everywhere?
It doesn't seem real, or possible, though I know it is. A description of how this will work in layman's terms is really needed.
The cover story and real truth are always different these days. It's hard to believe anything read or heard anymore. It's just censorship, deception and lies. Is it just me or is everything the us govt does seem to indicate that they are planning to dissolve/destroy the USA themselves, create chaos, jail millions of political opponents and declare themselves as a new fascist military empire and get the NWO Armageddon started? "You are either with us or against us", I believe is the phrase. I realize this is the worst case scenario, but it's not like that never happened before in human history and it does have all the same coincidences. The military will take over the internet (like it has not already)here and let someone else be bothered with ICANN paperwork.Good post. They will spin their takeover differently, they are very good at labeling, exmaple, TORTURE- Enhanced Interrogation.
The US government has reportedly agreed to cede control over ICANN once its current pact with the internet oversight body expires next week.
ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers)
US Relinquishes Control of Internet Naming System Oct. 1, 2016
http://www.pcmag.com/news/347128/us-relinq...ng-system-oct-1 (http://www.pcmag.com/news/347128/us-relinquishes-control-of-internet-naming-system-oct-1)