Electric Grid BS conditioning for Booz Allen/MITRE/Ptec's Cyberterror False Flag

[Dig]

Nicholas Rockefeller
http://www.nicholasrockefeller.org/wikipedia/
His securities practice includes litigation before the United States Supreme Court and a number of his transactions have been featured in leading periodicals. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the International Insitutute of Strategic Studies, the Advisory Board of RAND, the Pacific Council on International Policy, the Committee on Foreign Relations in Los Angeles, the Western Justice Center, and has served as a participant in the World Economic Forum and the Aspen Institute. He is a member of the Board of Visitors of the Law Schools of the University of Oregon and Pepperdine University and is active in the affairs of his alma mater, Yale University. He recently chaired a panel at the United Nations on E-Commerce and is a co-author of "Economic Strategy and National Security".

Nicholas' China practice includes transactions with China’s largest banks, energy companies, communications entities and real estate enterprises as well as with China's principal cities and leading provinces. He was chosen as a board member of the Central China Construction and Development Commission and as a director of the Xiwai International School of Shanghai International University. He has appeared numerous times on CCTV and other China media.

Nicholas is a graduate of Yale University and of Yale Law School.

Related Links:

Nicholas Rockefeller - University of Oregon Law School

Bill Gates, Rockefeller Charities Join

Nicholas Rockefeller visits Xiwai International School

Rockefeller Family Fund

Rockefeller Family Charity Tradition

David Rockefeller

Senator Jay Rockefeller

John D Rockefeller

Nelson Rockefeller

Nicholas Rockefeller

[Dig]

Peter Snowden (left) celebrates with GlobalAgora CEO Nicholas Matzorkis on the day GlobalAgora-China successfully launched the first functioning WAP transactional platform hosted on the China Telecom Internet backbone. China-U.S. cooperation flags were given as gifts from the managment of Wuhan Plaza. GlobalAgora came about as a partnership between Mr. Matzorkis, Nicholas Rockefeller, and the Chinese Central Government controlled, Wuhan Department Store Group, the most profitable publicly traded shopping mall chain in the People's Republic of China.
http://www.globalagora.com/matzorkis-snowden/

[Dig]

YouTube - Nicholas Rockefeller & Nick Matzorkis on TV News in China
GlobalAgora launches the first operational WAP wireless transactional platform in the People's Republic of China.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=6moHq9aP6Ow

[Dig]

Nick Matzorkis and Nicholas Rockefeller
GlobalAgora Press Conference
People's Republic of China 2001
About Nick Matzorkis   Matzorkis-Rockefeller, China
http://www.nickmatzorkis.com/nicholas_rockefeller/
Global Agora China Inc. ("GAC"), a Hong Kong corporation, has developed and deployed (Opening Ceremonies July 28, 2001) a proprietary "wireless shopping" technology platform ("Platform"). This platform currently enables China for wireless shopping, which allows consumers to use wireless Internet (WAP) phones to browse, pay, and take delivery of virtually everything available to Chinese retail consumers.

The company's fulfillment partner, Wuhan Department Store Group, is the most profitable publicly-traded retail chain in China. It is under the aegis of the National Trade Union of China (the"NTU"), a retail industry group of 20 state-controlled department store chains with revenues in excess of RMB 40 billion ($5 billion US). Users can presently order from over 40,000 items of merchandise using Internet (WAP) enabled phones.

[Dig]

Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal Of Microchipped Population
www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/290107rockefellergoal.htm

Nick Rockefeller Revealed Elite Agenda to Aaron Russo
www.jonesreport.com/articles/210207_rockefeller_friendship.html

YouTube - Rockefeller Reveals 9/11 FRAUD to Aaron Russo
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA

YouTube - Aaron Russo And Nick Rockefeller
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKlq9e8zlPE

Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal Of Microchipped Population
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1263677258215075609

America: Freedom to Fascism
Video Interviews: See Director Aaron Russo talk about 9/11 Truth and Nick Rockefeller: Interview with Aaron Russo, Fighting Cancer and the New World Order
www.freedomtofascism.com/interviews/interviews.html

[Orgetorix]

What is PROMIS?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecutor%27s_Management_Information_System

What is Promis?

    ...Designed as a case-management system for prosecutors, PROMIS has the ability to track people. "Every use of PROMIS in the court system is tracking people," said Inslaw President Hamilton. "You can rotate the file by case, defendant, arresting officer, judge, defense lawyer, and it's tracking all the names of all the people in all the cases."

    What this means is that PROMIS can provide a complete rundown of all federal cases in which a lawyer has been involved, or all the cases in which a lawyer has represented defendant A, or all the cases in which a lawyer has represented white-collar criminals, at which stage in each of the cases the lawyer agreed to a plea bargain, and so on. Based on this information, PROMIS can help a prosecutor determine when a plea will be taken in a particular type of case.

    But the real power of PROMIS, according to Hamilton, is that with a staggering 570,000 lines of computer code, PROMIS can integrate innumerable databases without requiring any reprogramming. In essence, PROMIS can turn blind data into information. And anyone in government will tell you that information, when wielded with finesse, begets power. Converted to use by intelligence agencies, as has been alleged in interviews by ex-CIA and Israeli Mossad agents, PROMIS can be a powerful tracking device capable of monitoring intelligence operations, agents and targets, instead of legal cases.
    —Richard L. Fricker, Wired magazine, 1993, "The INSLAW Octopus".[1]

More from the same article --

    PROMIS has the ability to combine disparate databases, and to track people by their involvement with the legal system.

    Imagine you are in charge of the legal arm of the most powerful government on the face of the globe, but your internal information systems are mired in the archaic technology of the 1960s. There's a Department of Justice database, a CIA database, an Attorney's General database, an IRS database, and so on, but none of them can share information. That makes tracking multiple offenders pretty darn difficult, and building cases against them a long and bureaucratic task.

    Along comes a computer program that can integrate all these databases
    —Fricker, Wired

A different author --

    Working from either huge mainframe computer systems or smaller networks powered by the progenitors of today's PCs, PROMIS, from its first "test drive" a quarter century ago, was able to do one thing that no other program had ever been able to do. It was able to simultaneously read and integrate any number of different computer programs or data bases simultaneously, regardless of the language in which the original programs had been written or the operating system or platforms on which that data base was then currently installed.
    —Michael Ruppert, FTW.[2]

Read the inside scoop here http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=96687.0

[Dig]

What is PROMIS?

much of this is explained within this forum.  You can use the search feature.  But here is some info:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=82990.0
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=79403.0
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=96687.0
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=33319.0
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=79470.0
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=84650.0

[Anti_Illuminati]

What the f**k?  Did the NWO write up a blueprint follow up to the Report From Iron Mountain?:

Excerpt:  http://ringtone-juke-box.fpri.org/footnotes/111.200603.kuehner.teaching911.html

Technology and Terrorism

FPRI senior fellow Lawrence Husick discussed technology, the defining characteristic of modern terrorists. By the late 20th century, technology had leveled the playing field between individuals and small groups and the worlds most powerful nations. It’s not just the technology of WMD but of everyday things: as 9/11 proved, it permitted 19 young men to turn airplanes into cruise missiles. Terrorism is about leverage, being able to exert an out-scale force through the use of a long enough lever arm and strong enough fulcrum. It’s a tool of the smart.

The military calls terrorism warfare between unmatched adversaries. Aymmetric warfare tactics are used by more than just Al Qaeda: the recent book, Unrestricted Warfare: China’s Master Plan to Destroy America (Pan American, 2002), by two colonels in China’s PLA, is the best outline of it yet.

As 9/11 demonstrated, the old-style mutual assured destruction doesn’t work. This war involves what could be called MUD: Multilateral, Unconstrained Disruption. The adversary’s goal is to sufficiently disrupt the U.S. so that it will withdraw from the world. Toward this end, bin Laden has urged more attacks on the joints of the economy: things that are important in a way the Liberty Bell, the value of which is symbolic, is not.

Today’s societal commons include the Internet, the electric power grid, rail systems, and air-traffic control systems, which no one is responsible to protect. In The World is Flat (2005), Friedman notes that in the globalized world there is no way to disentangle ourselves from the rest of the world. Even were we to reduce our reliance on Middle Eastern oil, our trading partners in the Far East such as Japan could never do so. Therefore, we need to protect things outside our own borders and alliances. We can’t return to 9/10, and we were vulnerable even then. Our goal can only be security, not immunity.

In and of itself, technology is use-neutral. But students can think about how a given technology can be used, offensively and defensively, and the vulnerabilities it creates. Video has long been used as tool for communication; Mr. Husick offered the example of the Civil Defense Administration’s 1951 Bert the Turtle film (see www.conelrad.com), which taught children how to duck and cover to survive nuclear attack. But video can also be exploited as it was by Leni Riefenstahl’s films for Adolf Hitler. The Internet is essential to students, but can also be used for stegonography, hidden writing in Internet graphics. The Internet was designed by our military as network that could sustain damage from nuclear attack by Russians and still keep working; today, shutting down one Islamist website has no effect, when the world-wide web represents less than 1 percent of the material flowing through the Internet.

In the U.S., cell phones represent convenience and safety. Elsewhere, with landlines lacking, the hard-to-trace cell phone is the norm. Meanwhile, prepaid cards and disposable numbers permit anonymity and can even be used as remote trigger devices for bombs.

Enterprise software programs now run huge swaths of economy: more than 85 percent of Fortune 2000 companies run SAP R3, designed by a German company. The program runs everything in the company: personnel, ordering, manufacturing, accounts receivable and payable, and as such leaves us highly vulnerable. Mr. Husick urged having students look at any technology this way to recognize the risks it poses.
_____________________________________________________________
JHUAPL = Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

http://www.jhuapl.edu/colloquium/topics/rickards.html

Theory and Practice of the New Science of Market Intelligence

Market prices are more than single data points. They are the Σ of n intentions, preferences and decisions of innumerable market participants. Markets efficiently aggregate this data, however, recent advances in computing power and analytical techniques have allowed market prices to be disaggregated in order to draw reasonable inferences about the presence and actions of market participants including those initially unknown to the observer. These techniques include comparison of apparent price anomalies (based on e.g., share and trade quantity, volatility, relative and absolute value, momentum) with news and other explanatory variables.

The absence of surface explanations implies informed trading and begins an inferential process applied to such connate information based on behavioral models. These techniques are of particular interest in the area of national security and may be used to detect the conduct of strategic rivals and transnational actors in areas such as price manipulation, supply disruption, terrorism, expropriation and portfolio diversification in advance of confrontation.

Importantly, markets are a strategic part of the national economic infrastructure and, like the power grid, may be understood as existing in a self-organized, scale-invariant critical state. As such, they are vulnerable to catastrophic disruption with little warning and no ascertainable cause. This makes markets vulnerable both to orchestrated "swarm" tactics under a doctrine of unrestricted warfare and to periodic collapse. A robust watch function with well-rehearsed "stop loss" methodologies should be as much a part of national security policy as financial regulation. The collection and interpretation of market intelligence (or "MARKINT") is indispensable to these tasks.

Insert:  That's why "Securing Cyberspace for the 44th Presidency (Lt. Gen Raduege)" was drafted up.  Because you criminals at JHUAPL, NCOIC, The Cohen Group (Marc Grossman, Lt. Gen Raduege), Northcom, Booz Allen, et.al., have preemptively developed YOUR totally tyrannical solution to the CRISIS that YOU have yet to create.

[wvoutlaw2002]

That's what they get for running on windows platforms..

And that's why they want to force us to use Windows and only Windows. They've basically conditioned the sheeple into thinking Windows is the only operating system out there for non-Apple computers, and the sheeple most likely think "Apples are too expensive, so I'm just gonna buy a cheap PC with Windows". The amount of people who don't even know of Linux is frightening. To me, being a Linux advocate is like being a 9/11 Truth activist...most of the sheeple have been pre-programmed to think you're a weirdo if you use anything other than Windows on a non-Apple machine.

[moxiez]

So, besides a firewall, how can we shield our Windoze system from intrusion if they can gain access thru backdoor or security holes and can crack any password?

Unplug it. And that's for all computers... ignorant people will tell you Linux & Mac's are more secure that Windows boxes... but the fact of the matter is the NSA has backdoors in every piece of computer equipment in the US (and probably abroad). Linux has had the SELinux patches (created by the NSA) built into it since at least the 2.6 kernel (probably to a lesser ability before that too) and Mac's since the mid 90's.

SELinux = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selinux

[moxiez]

And before someone rips me a new arse for suggesting Windows is secure, I don't mean that at all. Windows is just as insecure as every other OS (worse actually)... but the reason so many exploits/viruses/malware/spyware applications exist for Windows is not necessarily because it's so chopped full of holes, it's because they have 95% of the market, making them the target for malicious activity. If Mac's had 95% of the market I guarantee they'd have just as many problems; you see, the viruses makers and hackers would be spending all their time looking for problems on those OS's instead of focusing on Windows. Got it? OK, good.

[lordssyndicate]

Man ,Anti Illumninati you have a way with research .


That said let us  put the following points to paper:

A. Windows, Linux, Mac, and UNIX are ALL Susceptible to the Agile framework. Agile IS NOT "Script Kiddie" code. IT IS AN AI Framework that has been improved and been under constant evolution and development for well over 60 years now. Get it?

B. Every device with an FCC compliance sticker on it is susceptible - because FCC regulations require this... Go read the docs b ehind what that sticker means. Then go google "tempest timeline". Hopefully then you'll begin to have an inkling.

C. You must either convert all your AC power to DC using special power conditioning hardware (which will blow when they blow the grid and costs a lot of money....) or You must not be on the GRID AT ALL.

That simple.

Now, in addition to that let me say that the grid itself was built from the ground up to b e a weapon and historhy tells us this., Think about it every time they raid some one they ALWAYS cut the POWER First ..... Why? Because nothing is more disorienting than loosing something you take for granted.
This will go beyond that because many people will be unable to fend for themselves without electrical power.  Think about what you would do if all electricity went out for the next year or 2. 

Enough said.

However we must realize that this attack on the power grid most likely will not occur until after they have forced every one on to internet 2 and pushed them into their homes under quarantine.  After all they can't have people out being able to grow food  in a crisis like that now can they?

Realize their goal is to kill as many people with this attack as possible. If every one is already in a situation that fo9rces them  into their homes -unable to go outside. Then millions more people will be affected by this attack and they will achieve it's maximum killing potential .

[Orgetorix]

Man ,Anti Illumninati you have a way with research .


That said let us  put the following points to paper:

A. Windows, Linux, Mac, and UNIX are ALL Susceptible to the Agile framework. Agile IS NOT "Script Kiddie" code. IT IS AN AI Framework that has been improved and been under constant evolution and development for well over 60 years now. Get it?

B. Every device with an FCC compliance sticker on it is susceptible - because FCC regulations require this... Go read the docs b ehind what that sticker means. Then go google "tempest timeline". Hopefully then you'll begin to have an inkling.

C. You must either convert all your AC power to DC using special power conditioning hardware (which will blow when they blow the grid and costs a lot of money....) or You must not be on the GRID AT ALL.

That simple.

Now, in addition to that let me say that the grid itself was built from the ground up to b e a weapon and historhy tells us this., Think about it every time they raid some one they ALWAYS cut the POWER First ..... Why? Because nothing is more disorienting than loosing something you take for granted.
This will go beyond that because many people will be unable to fend for themselves without electrical power.  Think about what you would do if all electricity went out for the next year or 2. 

Enough said.

However we must realize that this attack on the power grid most likely will not occur until after they have forced every one on to internet 2 and pushed them into their homes under quarantine.  After all they can't have people out being able to grow food  in a crisis like that now can they?

Realize their goal is to kill as many people with this attack as possible. If every one is already in a situation that fo9rces them  into their homes -unable to go outside. Then millions more people will be affected by this attack and they will achieve it's maximum killing potential .

The way I see it this attack is their ace in the hole, so to speak. They'll use it as a last ditch but only coupled with a bio attack. That increases the effectiveness by a factor of ten, Dark Winter/Topoff/Strong Angel shows that.

[Anti_Illuminati]

Bill O'RLY just had some shill bitch on that said (semi-paraphrasing):

"Russia and China have infiltrated the electric power grid network, they haven't done anything yet, but they know they're there."

Well yeah, except what she means is the govt. Knows that the black ops team is standing by.  But even to the mind of a sheep, they should at least ask themselves:  "hey if they know they are there why don't they catch them and stop them from carrying out the attack instead of just being prepared to deal with it AFTER IT HAPPENS? 

If we had  true security oriented individuals in this country we would actually be interested in preventing anything from even happening to begin with, not engaging in "mop up" operations.  But anyone who would actually be interested in dealing with any threats that might actually be real, well they get fired, or if they know too much, they get suicided--like John O'Neil.

So on the past few hours this disinfo vicious Psy-ops has come from:

Larry the Fascist Kudlow
Bill the pervert O'RLY

But I am sure the talking point has hit everyone today.

Stop using Ptech and fight like your not a bunch of cowards, NWO.

[Anti_Illuminati]

http://www.defensetech.org/archives/004789.html#comments

"We're following the story that AP released today on a recent cyber attack on U.S. power grids by Russian and Chinese cyber attackers. Several months ago, acts of cyber aggression against the United States morphed and took on strange new characteristics when looked at from a high level.

More and more the investigation and analysis of these aggressive cyber attacks are becoming laser focused on the "how they did it" and less and less on an equally important examination segment that I refer to as Strategic Intent (SI). Strategic Intent is the process of understanding a derivative of Digital DNA components. The objective of SI is to gain insight into the motivations and strategic intentions of those behind the acts of cyber aggression. This must be done at a level that places each individual act in context with all the other acts launched by a single cyber adversary.

Back in 1989, an article by Gary Hamel and C.K. Prahalad called "Strategic Intent" was published in the Harvard Business Review. Hamel and Prahalad argued that in order to achieve success, an organization must align its end result to its means through the process of Strategic Intent. We have taken this fundamental construct and modified it for direct application to the analysis of acts of cyber aggression. This approach was designed to provide insight and foresight into an adversary's strategic architecture (a high-level blueprint for the deployment of new cyber warfare capabilities), the acquisition of new cyber warfare competencies and the migration of existing competencies to the cyber warfare domain.

The following represent the top three attributes of strategic intent:

   1.

      Direction
   2.

      Discovery
   3.

      Destiny

Applying strategic intent to acts of cyber aggression results in a particular point of view about the long-term intent that a cyber adversary hopes to build over the near term. It is a view of the future that conveys the unified sense of direction. In addition, it implies what a cyber adversary perceives as inherently worthwhile. Our approach and methodology reverse engineers the intent thru scenario based intelligence analysis (SBIA) and trans-disciplinary intelligence engineering (TIE). Using these two techniques we create a plan that an adversary might establish to realize their strategic objectives.

Using this approach we examined a microcosm of cyber events that has taken place in the past twenty-four months. Going down this path we came face to face with a very concerning scenario that seems to be supported by several disparate acts of cyber aggression and general events. Could China and Russia be collaborating on acts of cyber aggression against the United States?

A more troubling version around the same theme was Russia and China teaming up to create a systematic action plan of cyber reconnaissance, cyber intelligence collection and ultimately acts of cyber aggression. If this is indeed reality, the resulting risks would be severe.

As far back as 2005, China and Russia embarked on an unprecedented military collaboration. Nothing creates a bond between two organizations than a common adversary. In fact, a joint military exercise took place that had analysts sounding an alarm. It appeared that the exercises were directed toward a specific third party, the United States.

So tell us what you think. Are Russia and China working together and launching or supporting acts of cyber aggression against the United States? Are the cyber infiltrations on the power grid a real time example of a collaborative effort between China and Russia?"

-- Kevin Coleman
April 8, 2009 01:49 PM
__________________________________________________________________
Someone there apparently seems to be awake, look at this response in the comments section:

"Your article failed to cover the facts properly. The one overwhelming fact that you missed is that the power companies themselves are giving China and Russia direct access by putting these systems on the internet. Despite warnings to the people in charge of how corporate assets are managed, (yeah this is political type speech to cover up the specifics) they are with full knowledge making the system so that Russia and China will be able to attack it. The idiots are handing the cyber attackers cart blanche abilities when they can easily make it physically impossible to access equipment. They are trusting their firewall abilities to keep the Cyber attackers out."

What he may or may not realize what he himself is actually referring to is the ARCHITECTURES that the power grid is run on/managed through.  Deliberately built in INSECURITY.
__________________________________________________________________
"Yes & they can infect other systems since utilities have manual overide controls.
But can effect Finances.
Major threat alone.

Id say cyber attacks can hit:
Finance companies
IT services
Internet
Records
Traffic control
Payroll?
(major hit here alone).
Communications"

Live Free or Die Hard was a warning that the NWO knew only few would ever understand.

[Anti_Illuminati]

Ptech is in the NCS, National Communications System (NCS.gov) (Proof)

http://www.ncs.gov/about.html

General Enterprise Management (GEM) Model Driven Enterprise Management - MDEM (EM Support) Via Model Driven Architecture (MDA)-M3/M2/M1/M0)

"M2 Enterprise Architecture Business, Data, Application, & Technical Schema
(BEAM, FEA, DoDAF, TOGAF, etc.)
Ontology EA Tools/Repositories (M3/M2/M1/M0)
Agilense WebModeler
Adaptive
CASE EA Tools (M1/M0)
Popkin SA
PTech
Computas Metis
Other"

Power Point Presentation Link

http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/2005-09-14/IAC-EA-SIG_Aug5.ppt (Open the document, and type Ptech in the search field and hit next, to see for yourself.)



Over 45 years ago, an impending national crisis highlighted the critical need for reliable and interoperable telecommunications for the Federal Government. President John F. Kennedy recognized the threat during the Cuban Missile Crisis and, as a result, established the National Communications System.  [INSERT Yeah, but if President John F. Kennedy were alive, & President today, he would have you fired, and arrested for high treason against the Constitution and Bill of Rights for deliberately jeopardizing and providing permanent hijacking capability into United States Communication infrastructure.

Background and History of the NCS

The genesis of the National Communications System (NCS) began in 1962 after the Cuban missile crisis when communications problems among the United States, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and foreign heads of state threatened to complicate the crisis further. After the crisis, President John F. Kennedy ordered an investigation of national security communications, and the National Security Council (NSC) formed an interdepartmental committee to examine the communications networks and institute changes.


This interdepartmental committee recommended the formation of a single unified communications system to serve the President, Department of Defense, diplomatic and intelligence activities, and civilian leaders. Consequently, in order to provide better communications support to critical Government functions during emergencies, President Kennedy established the National Communications System by a Presidential Memorandum on August 21, 1963. The NCS mandate included linking, improving, and extending the communications facilities and components of various Federal agencies, focusing on interconnectivity and survivability.


On April 3, 1984, President Ronald Reagan signed Executive Order (E.O.) 12472 which broadened the NCS' national security and emergency preparedness (NS/EP) capabilities and superseded President Kennedy's original 1963 memorandum. The NCS expanded from its original six members to an interagency group of 23 Federal departments and agencies, and began coordinating and planning NS/EP telecommunications to support crises and disasters.


With the addition of the Office of the Director, National Intelligence in September 2007, the NCS membership currently stands at 24 members


Each NCS member organization is represented on the NCS through the Committee of Principals (COP) -- and its subordinate Council of Representatives (COR). The COP --formed as a result of Executive Order 12472, provides advice and recommendations to the NCS and the National Security Council through the President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board on NS/EP telecommunications and its ties to other critical infrastructures. The NCS also participates in joint industry-Government planning through its work with the President's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC), with the NCS's National Coordinating Center for Telecommunications (NCC) and the NCC's subordinate Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC).

After nearly 40 years with the Secretary of Defense serving as its Executive Agent, President George W. Bush transferred the National Communications System to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The NCS was one of 22 Federal agencies transferred to the Department on March 1, 2003, in accordance with Executive Order 13286. A revised Executive Order 12472 reflects the changes of E.O. 13286. On November 15, 2005, the NCS became part of the Department's Directorate for Preparedness after nearly two years under the Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection Directorate. Currently, the DHS Under Secretary for National Protection and Programs serves as the NCS Manager.

[lordssyndicate]

Ptech is in the NCS, National Communications System (NCS.gov) (Proof)

Game over for the NWO thank you for playing... Yet again Anti Illuminati produces the hard evidence  via their own documents

[Initiated]

Thanks for the time and research you have put in.

[Wacaday]

I checked the first few pages and never seen this posted, apologies if it already has been. Not from a news site but source is quoted as BBC, I have not checked that out.

The US government has admitted the nation’s power grid is vulnerable to cyber attack, following reports it has been infiltrated by foreign spies. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) newspaper reported that Chinese and Russian spies were behind this “pervasive” breach. It said software had been left behind that could shut down the electric grid. “The vulnerability is something [we] have known about for years,” said US Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. “We acknowledge that… in this world, in an increasingly cyber world, these are increasing risks,” Ms Napolitano added. The WSJ reported that the intruders had not sought to damage the power grid or any other key infrastructure so far, but suggested they could change their approach in the event of a crisis or war.

Security watchers said that, if true, the involvement of the Chinese and Russians in such a scenario would show they were strategically thinking about how either to constrain the US or to inflict more damage if they felt a need to do so. “I think that China recognises if in a very strategic sense you want to ensure you have the ability to exploit another country’s potential weakness or vulnerability, but do it in a way that isn’t confrontational or cause an international crisis, then this is a very good way of doing that,” Eric Rosenbach, of Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government’s Belfer Center, told Reuters news agency. The motives behind these potential attacks are undoubtedly military or political in nature, said Tim Mather, chief security strategist for the RSA Conference, the world’s biggest security event.

Source: BBC

http://www.rlslog.net/chinese-and-russian-spies-infiltrated-us-power-grid/

[Overcast]

Then take the power plants off the internet you idiots.

Pretty simple I would think?

[lordssyndicate]

Then take the power plants off the internet you idiots.

Pretty simple I would think?

Ahh you see -- but then they'd have no viable  cover story when they carry out their false flag.

:/

[Dig]

If you ever want to interview the corporate executives, you must first ask the the administrative assistants very nicely.  I am sure that Booz Allen is very interested in clearing their name of any wrongdoing:

http://www.iaap-boozallenhamilton.org/Default.aspx?pid=5250

Marlene Wilson, President

Marlene Wilson is administrative professional to Rich Wilhelm, Lead Partner and Client Service Officer (CSO) for the United States Government Classified (USGC) account. She also provides additional support in his capacity as the Chair of the Principal Development Committee. Marlene is the lead AP for the USGC Account administrative team, which is comprised of seven administrative professionals. She also serves as Co-Chair for the Flex Work Forum and previously served as Chair for Professional Development within the Administrative Professionals Forum (TAP). Other positions held within the Booz Allen IAAP Chapter included Treasurer and Webmaster.

Marlene joined Booz Allen in January 2001 after 18 years as manager of the Treasurer’s Office Operations with George Washington University. She is currently pursuing a BS in Computer Information Systems at Strayer University.

_________________________________________________________________


Tina Lustre, Vice President

Tina Lustre is administrative professional to Judy Merkel, Booz Allen’s Senior Director of Recruiting. She also provides additional support to 14 Recruiting managers, and a team of approximately 180 staff. Tina is the lead AP within Recruiting, which is comprised of a six-member AP team. She currently serves as the Administrative Professionals Forum (TAP) Networking Committee chair. She led the planning efforts for this year’s TAP annual meeting

Tina joined Booz Allen in March of 2000 after four years as a Loan Processor/Junior Underwriter with Republic Mortgage Insurance Company. In 1995, she received a BA in Behavioral Science from the University of Maine in Fort Kent.

_________________________________________________________________


Renee Way, Recording Secretary

Renee Way is administrative professional to Partner, Bill Wansley, Officer In Charge (OIC) for the United States Government Classified (USGC) account, which includes the NCS (National Clandestine Services) and ODNI (Office of Director Nat’l Intelligence). She provides additional support in his role as the lead partner for the USGC Home

Team Market account. Renee is a member of the Booz Allen Hamilton IAAP Chapter. She is also a member of the Administrative Professional Forum Networking Committee.

Renee joined Booz Allen in May, 2005 after 28 years as a Program specialist with Verizon. During her tenure with Verizon, she supported the Vice President of Customer Care and Vice President of Strategic Planning. She also established the administrative functions for a start-up division of Verizon in Richmond, VA. Renee obtained an Associate Certificate in Project Management through ESI/George Washington University.

_________________________________________________________________


Valerie Charter, Treasurer

Valerie joined Booz Allen in 1997 with 20 years of administrative experience. She began working with the GO Team providing administrative support to the Accounts Payable/Employees Payable manager. Her next assignment provided the opportunity to support principals and partners within the International Team, which is currently known as the Global Resilience Team. Valerie currently supports the Client Development Lead (CDL) of the Organization and Change Team, having served in this role for the past six years. Valerie has been a member of the TAP Leadership Team for two years, and is currently the Membership Chair for the BAH IAAP Chapter. Valerie holds a Certified Professional Secretary (CPS) and a Certified Professional Administrative (CAP) rating, as well as a Bachelor in Science Degree in Management from National Louis University.


 

[Anti_Illuminati]

Hahahahahaha, wtf.  This reads in such an effed up way now.  You can tell they couldn't wait for their black op to be able to carry this out the way they wanted.  No mention of DHS because it didn't "officially" exist.  This is just mind bowing to see this from back then, wow it is so obvious.

http://www.securityfocus.com/news/194

A Cyber National Guard
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2001-04-18

“The National Guard is the perfect conduit between the Defense Department and the state.”

James Christy, Defense Department

The Defense Department supports a controversial Arizona cyber security plan.

Pentagon cyber security wonks are looking to the Grand Canyon State for the future of information warfare defense, thanks to a bill in the Arizona legislature that would create the country's first State Infrastructure Protection Center (SIPC).

Like its national namesake -- the FBI-housed NIPC -- the Arizona SIPC would be poised to respond to physical and cyber attacks on seven critical infrastructures: telecommunications, energy, banking, finance, transportation, water and emergency services. But it would be overseen by the state's emergency management department, and be comprised primarily of state agencies.

It would also maintain close ties to the Pentagon, which has endorsed the proposal. Under the plan, the Department of Defense would provide the SIPC with up-to-date, sanitized information on network vulnerabilities and ongoing attacks through a new Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) established within the Arizona National Guard.

"The National Guard is the perfect conduit between the [Defense Department] and the state," says James Christy, law enforcement and counterintelligence coordinator for the Pentagon's Defense-wide Information Assurance Program, who helped draft the proposal. "The National Guard works for the state governor most of the time, but they can be federalized in times of crisis."

The Guard's quasi-federal status is key to the plan, which Christy wants to see spread to all fifty states. He argues that state-level involvement is needed to protect critical infrastructures from terrorists and foreign info-warriors. "If we were ever to see a strategic attack on the nation, what you need is somebody on the local level, and then upstream it to the national level," says Christy.

"If something happens here in the state, it could disrupt Luke Air Force Base, for example, which is here in the Arizona," agrees Representative Wes Marsh, the bill's sponsor. "The cyber impacts the physical, and that's what's so unique about the bill."

But the SIPC bill is not without critics, and an earlier version passed Arizona's House of Representatives only to be shot down in the Senate. At issue: The legislation foresees crafting the SIPC out of existing hardware and personnel, at no cost to taxpayers -- a proposition Arizona governor Jane Hull says is unrealistic.

Moreover, the bill would require the state's technology managers to promulgate a series of cyber security plans -- including use of intrusion detection systems in every government agency -- but doesn't offer any money for that effort.

"The governor has concerns because it's not funded, and it calls for the creation of fifteen different plans with no implementation strategy or funding," says Susan Patrick, strategic communications manager with Arizona's Government Information Technology Agency, the group that would be responsible for pushing the reforms. "It also calls for us to use existing resources, and we have no statewide information security specialists in our agency."

Marsh counters that the state should already be using IDS systems, and other security measures, across the board, and argues that availability of freeware programs like Snort and PGP should alleviate cost concerns. "Current statutes require them to have disaster recover and reconstitution plans," says Marsh. "Information assurance is a critical component of that."

[luckee1]

WTF!?!?!?   THIS IS THE FIRST THREAD I HAVE COME TO THAT HAD POP UPS ATTEMPTED!!!!

WTF!

[Orgetorix]

WTF!?!?!?   THIS IS THE FIRST THREAD I HAVE COME TO THAT HAD POP UPS ATTEMPTED!!!!

WTF!

Did you get a Personal Message?

[luckee1]

INTER SECURITY POP UP SAYING DISPLAY CONTENT, CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO.  I CANNOT COPY IT TO HERE

THIS DOES NOT EVER HAPPEN ON PRISON PLANET OR INFO WAR SITES,  EVER.

[Anti_Illuminati]

Bump

[rustygunn]

Then take the power plants off the internet you idiots.

Pretty simple I would think?

SCADA systems used to be completely separate from the internet cloud.  I see no reason why they cannot go back to the "old way", especially when national security is at risk. 
This tells me one thing:
Universal control is paramount over all else.   

[Anti_Illuminati]

Ahh you see -- but then they'd have no viable  cover story when they carry out their false flag.

:/

Exactly, and please come back, we need you more than ever.  I need you to work with me, you are a genius!!!