PrisonPlanet Forum
May 22, 2013, 10:01:34 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 7/7 Controled Explosion "Certainly going to be conducting a controled explosion"  (Read 4737 times)
New World Hitler
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 102


« on: March 21, 2009, 07:31:16 PM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHlq4CXKlOE

Found this CNN report pretty interesting, I've never seen this mentioned in any 7/7 docs I've seen.  I find it funny they reported doing a controled explosion, as we all know, the number 30 bus was re-directed to Tavistock Square.  What's the chances that the bus bomb could have been the controled explosion they were talking about?  Has there ever been anything else mentioned about this?  Policing a bus to a road that it's not supposed to go down, which suddely explodes, would certainly fit the bill of "taking control" of that explosion. 
Logged
Conspirator
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 9


« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2009, 04:31:13 AM »

As the video clearly states, they are talking about a controlled explosion at Edgware Road, one of the tube stations affected, not the number 30 bus.


Seriously, if you are ignorant of the details of July 7th to the extent that you completely missed this then I suggest you take A LOT more time to do some investigation before raising any questions or opinions about what happened.  This is really, really simple stuff. 
Logged
Mike Philbin
Guest
« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2009, 06:19:44 AM »

yeah, that's right, it wouldn't be a CONTROLLED EXPLOSION to dispose of any discarded rucksacks that 'might have contained' a dud chapati flour bomb.

Smiley
Logged
Conspirator
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 9


« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2009, 06:49:54 AM »

There is no chapati flour involved on July 7th.

That's a confusion with the essentially unconnected 21/7 fake bombings, whose perpetrators were subject to a show trial and sent to prison for decades. 
Logged
Mike Philbin
Guest
« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2009, 07:25:53 AM »

you read me like a book, the only thing you forgot to do was remind us what sort of bombs were used on 7/7 and whether they were military grade or not.

Smiley
Logged
Conspirator
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 9


« Reply #5 on: August 06, 2009, 11:28:26 AM »

The explosions may have been electrical. 
Logged
Mike Philbin
Guest
« Reply #6 on: August 06, 2009, 11:32:41 AM »

the explosions that TORE OPEN THE TUBE TRAINS and the BUS 'might be electrical'?

what does that mean?   cheers.
Logged
Conspirator
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 9


« Reply #7 on: August 06, 2009, 01:22:29 PM »

Not quite.  The tube explosions may have been electrical.  It was reported all morning that the blasts on the underground were due to power surges, and it was only when the bus exploded that people started talking about Al Qaeda and terrorism. 

Some have speculated that the power surges were a huge industrial accident, blowing up electrical motors and so on, causing immense damage to underground trains.  As such, the bus bombing may have been a set up of some kind to make people think it was terrorism and stave off a massive motherf**ker lawsuit for corporate manslaughter. 
Logged
Mike Philbin
Guest
« Reply #8 on: August 06, 2009, 01:25:39 PM »

I 'know' about the power surge reports, I listened to them LIVE on the day...

Quote
huge industrial accident

Quote
massive motherf**ker lawsuit for corporate manslaughter

... but you know what?  In all my years of looking into 7/7 I've never heard any of this amazing new evidence before.

Cite your sources, please.

Smiley
Logged
Conspirator
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 9


« Reply #9 on: August 06, 2009, 01:48:46 PM »

On the July 7th Truth Campaign website they have a 'alternative hypotheses' section where they deal with some of this, and their incident analysis discusses it too.

But specifically, Bruce Lait and Crystal Main were knocked out, apparently due to electrocution, the Benton sisters have repeatedly said they were electrocuted, other witnesses also describe this (Gracia Hormingos I think one of them is called).  The reports that morning suggested many more stations were involved - as many as 6, 7 or 8.  Witness reports from e.g. Manjit Dhanjal, Will Lam, and Saira Khan suggest as many as four trains were involved in the Liverpool Street-Aldgate area, heading in different directions on different tube lines.  Similarly, there is a lot of dispute over exactly where the train was at Egdware Road, and there are several people who were injured or died who shouldn't have been where the official version says they were.  On the Picadilly line it seems two trains heading in opposite directions were affected, not just one.  I can cite relatively detailed evidence for all this but the point is that there may have been a lot more explosions on the underground that morning than could possibly be caused by three suicide bombers or three bombs strapped to the underside of tube trains. 

It was even reported as 'confirmed by the Metropolitan police' that three buses had been blown up, and it was then that people first started using the phrase 'the hallmarks of Al Qaeda'.

Of course this is nonsense, Al Qaeda have a history of hitting major symbolic targets, not civilian transport systems.  That's much more in keeping with Marxist groups like the PLO or the fascists in Italy who were part of Gladio.  Obviously these terrorism analysts are a bunch of idiots, or being fed their lines. 
Logged
Mike Philbin
Guest
« Reply #10 on: August 07, 2009, 09:21:10 AM »

may one say at this point, "Independent Commission with subpoena powers?"

Smiley

to which the answer ALWAYS is ... National Security. Well, I don't feel so f**king secure.

Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!