9/11 UAL 175 Plane Identified On FAA graphic after it crashed into the WTC

Author Topic: 9/11 UAL 175 Plane Identified On FAA graphic after it crashed into the WTC  (Read 4709 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline oyashango

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,520
  • 43 Trillion and counting
    9/11 UAL 175 Plane On Radar AFTER It Has ‘Crashed’ Into The WTC

                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdXGSefI6pM&

Online Jackson Holly

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,515
  • It's the TV, stupid!
    • JACKSON HOLLY'S OLD HOME PLACE
Wow ... great find oya!!
St. Augustine: “The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself."

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Any more info on this?  I mean it is Pilots for 911 truth so, well, let's just say it ain't the best resource for interpreting data.

So the FAA gizmo shows some planes.  We need to understand how the gizmo works.  Maybe it only stops reporting a plane when it officially lands or something, who knows.  The fact that it showed it near the WTC is a more important matter IMO.

Because if this stupid FAA gizmo shows the flight and the correct coordinates, then WTF!!!!!

We were told that the "terrorists" disengaged all tracking so we could not find these planes.  But obviously there was some method to track this one.  Still it could be that the gizmo allows for custom intervention and it was after the crash, so someone at the FAA could have plotted this plane at the location of the hit for assessment of what planes were still in the air.

OBVIOUSLY THE FAA NEEDS TO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS.

But this is not a BOMBSHELL compared to WTC 7 exploding to dust in 6 seconds.

Still a good find, nonetheless.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline oyashango

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,520
  • 43 Trillion and counting
The day of 911, I was leaving for New York, Laguardia, to pick up a friend from an international flight.  Just about to leave out the door ,the phone rang and it was a friend asking me to turn on the tele. When I did, I saw the first plane hit. Instinctively, I placed a VHS in the box and let it record until it was finished. I am just now reviewing it, and did find Peter Jennings also questioning the whereabouts of flight 175. I have opened a Youtube account to start uploading segments in which I too have questions. They might have already been answered. If so, considered it part of the 911 archives.

Here are two so far:

Peter Jennings, where is flight 175?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPMMWKbBcIk

If All Planes Hit And The Rest Grounded How Did Security Know (In advance) About Another Plane?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gu1MEzf23ig

Offline ES

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,640
  • Old Iron Sides: Enemy of Tyrannical Scum
Interesting find. I wonder why flight 175 was left up on the tracker and not the other one that crashed as well?
"My heroes are people who monkey wrench the new world order". - Jello Biafra

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
The day of 911, I was leaving for New York, Laguardia, to pick up a friend from an international flight.  Just about to leave out the door ,the phone rang and it was a friend asking me to turn on the tele. When I did, I saw the first plane hit. Instinctively, I placed a VHS in the box and let it record until it was finished. I am just now reviewing it, and did find Peter Jennings also questioning the whereabouts of flight 175. I have opened a Youtube account to start uploading segments in which I too have questions. They might have already been answered. If so, considered it part of the 911 archives.

Here are two so far:

Peter Jennings, where is flight 175?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPMMWKbBcIk

If All Planes Hit And The Rest Grounded How Did Security Know (In advance) About Another Plane?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gu1MEzf23ig

you saw the first plane hit on 9/11 on the television?

are you george bush?
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Scootle

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,236
this may be disinfo ... the youtube user who posted it is a no-planer.

"Although many people do not believe an aircraft hit the Pentagon or crashed in Shanksville, they still cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC. Perhaps this may help."
- http://www.youtube.com/user/skyarcher
The truth will set you free
From global tyranny
Wake up American slobs
9/11 was an inside job
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OntBg2qwk_M&fmt=35

Century of Manipulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mujq-C1UAw0

... Here's Tom with the weather!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CCIcjIngLA

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: NEW VIDEO: 9/11 UAL 175 Plane On FAA graphic (Ptech?) system
« Reply #7 on: March 14, 2009, 04:28:20 pm »
this may be disinfo ... the youtube user who posted it is a no-planer.

"Although many people do not believe an aircraft hit the Pentagon or crashed in Shanksville, they still cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC. Perhaps this may help."
- http://www.youtube.com/user/skyarcher

Well, like I said, I am not sure it is disinfo but misinfo.  They are focusing on the digital image as if it never crashed.  I am focusing on the digital image to now go back to the FAA and ask how the system works. 

Either way, a digital image (even on TV) is not evidence of anything, but begs the question concerning how the FAA tracks planes.

I agree, the video maker tries to imply that the plane did not hit the building because of a fricking Pac Man graphic on a monitor (duh).  But accidently may have pointed to a question regarding why the FAA had actually tracked this plane when they said they could not.  Also this may be explained by manual intervention so that they could account for all birds in the air (but there would be a record of this, it could not be that easy - except for the help of Ptech!)

Also the slowing down of the voices over and over again. c'mon, we can see and hear we do not need to be led like a monkey-wtf? sure sign of manipulating the discourse.

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Unintelligable Name

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,651
you saw the first plane hit on 9/11 on the television?

are you george bush?

+1 lol.

Offline oyashango

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,520
  • 43 Trillion and counting
+1 lol.

lol!  No. I saw the building after it has just been hit.  I should have phrased that better. It had just happen. See . . . Bush was telling the truth. ;D

Offline jimd3100

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,313
Well, it's rather interesting but the problems I see are these.

1. Flight explorer gets it's data from the FAA, I think the FAA would notice flight 175 hovering over NY more than an hour after it supposedly hit the tower, why hang around the area for more than an hour? That's probably it's last known location and updates from the FAA quit coming for it..things were a bit hectic that day.

2. It could be fake because I can make out the 175 and the BOS and the LA without the closeup. Can anybody make out the flight numbers and leave/arrive cities of the other planes he puts the curser over? I can't. Why is this one clearer than the rest? I'm not saying it's fake I don't know, it probably isn't. Just wish I could make out the others as well.

3. Smells like no planer to me

No Planers will like this so they can say "see, flight 175 never hit the tower". Which means I'm supposed to believe that it just hanged around NY for a couple of hours, flying around I guess. That is very unlikely.

If you believe planes flew into the buildings, which I think is very f**King obvious, the only question is were the planes switched? If you believe the planes were switched then I would assume the "switched plane" would have to be remotely controlled. Now you have to explain what happened to the plane passengers? Where is the original plane? Why didn't the Air traffic controllers contact the pilot asking him WTF he was doing flying somewhere and landing, and why did the pilot do that, or was it remotely controlled without the pilots doing it to be landed and switched...and on and on.....but I know some will say, "we don't have to answer any of those things we don't know". Which wether it's admitted or not hurts the argument for it.

A plane flew into the tower. Either it was flight 175 or it wasn't. Finding the remains of victims of flight 175 at the wtc would seem to indicate it was flight 175.

"The 1,401 people identified include 45 of those aboard the hijacked planes - 33 from Flight 11, which struck the north tower, and 12 from Flight 175, which hit the south tower."
http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/planes/evidence/dailynews_halfvictimsidd.html

If I say flight 175 flew into the tower, I have no need to explain where it went or what happened to the passengers. Why make this complicated? If the planes were remote controlled, why not just have Mr Zakheims FTS system remote control the original planes?

So yea, it's interesting, but I don't see a need to think this proves the real flight 175 was flying over NY well over an hour after it was supposed to have hit the tower. Because it would make no sense.

Might find this interesting...
http://www.avweb.com/other/911flightexplorer.html


Offline New World Hitler

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Wow, that is interesting.  Probably easier to fake than planes though...