More fission theories including 4th generation zionist nukes

[GoingEtheric]

...  Attacks Were An Inside/Outside Job ...

you know what's funny? You title the rense article "Inside/Outside Job" everytime, but it doesn't say "Outside" ONCE on rense's page. You ADDED "Outside."

Disinfo trolls: That's you

[so_Z]

yeah, but it is our responsibility to expose this nonsense.  I mean usually it goes on boards without much opposition ("tell a lie big enough and people will believe it" -Hitler).  People either do not want to bother or are hypnotized with some seemingly intriging information.  We have a mission to confront these assumptions with pervasive and exploratory discussion and questioning.  If it gets past the scrutiny of people who have been researching this stuff for a while (and who have an obvious commitment to truth), then fine.  But this microjukes stuff is absolute nonsense, and thanks to the relentless members asking the tough question, it seems to be beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Sure, sequester and effectively shut down the discussion. Make groundless accusations and insults about the participants. Skip reading the corroborating documents. Disrupt and enable disruption by other board members. All because you are highly informed and intensely interested in getting at the truth.  Sounds more like the slash and burn antics of a government hunting party to me.

[Dig]

Yeah I'm with you on that, it does need discussing for whatever ends may come of it and as we know, the truth stands up to scrutiny, just all of a sudden I'm a nazi moderator because I respectfully ask that all this stuff be kept in one thread.??

-----

If it comes out that the minijukes theory is credible, then it'll get moved to the WTC1&2 section, but until then, it is a case study on a controversial subject so here it will stay.

Folks can take offence all they like, can't please everyone. I'm not gonna assist in contributing to more sidelining of the 9/11 truth movement, sorry.

"If it comes out that the minijukes theory is credible..."

hell will freeze over?

cats and dogs will fall from the sky?

let's just say I ain't holding my breathe

[Dig]

Sure, sequester and effectively shut down the discussion. Make groundless accusations and insults about the participants. Skip reading the corroborating documents. Disrupt and enable disruption by other board members. All because you are highly informed and intensely interested in getting at the truth.  Sounds more like the slash and burn antics of a government hunting party to me.

Yeah this is worse than aushwitz

[TheGoodFight1984]

"If it comes out that the minijukes theory is credible..."

hell will freeze over?

cats and dogs will fall from the sky?

let's just say I ain't holding my breathe

Me neither chief.. I'm not a fan of these jukes ideas and nothing I've ever seen suggests they were used.. just trying to keep the peace and moderate as fairly as I can I guess..!

[EdWardMD]

Sure, sequester and effectively shut down the discussion. Make groundless accusations and insults about the participants. Skip reading the corroborating documents. Disrupt and enable disruption by other board members. All because you are highly informed and intensely interested in getting at the truth.  Sounds more like the slash and burn antics of a government hunting party to me.

Pretty much hit the nail on the head and the reason I started posting referenced proven facts here.  Interesting isn't it.

Ed

[Dig]

Pretty much hit the nail on the head and the reason I started posting referenced proven facts here.  Interesting isn't it.

Ed

Hey esteemed, honoured doctor of good will...

Do you think you can answer the following questions with just a tad more content than your sock puppet?

Here are the questions again:

How come over 200 witnesses heard bombs in the buildings?

How come the witnesses heard a popcorn of explosions, "pop, pop, pop, pop, pop" for each floor exploding out?

How come there were no large flashes?

How come there were no nuke casualties?

Why would there not be an EMP if nukes were used?

Wouldn't a nuclear blast leave victims with some kind of symptoms of a nuclear blast? 

Doesn't a nuclear warhead render a person somewhat injured in a distinct way? 

How did the people running out from the building or trapped in the building escape the nukes?   

Were the nukes only used on certain floors while other ordinances only contained more conventional technology?

How did the nukes leave steel beams completely intact with diagonal slices in them looking like shape charges?

Why was thermite found at the site?

Why was their pools of molten steel under all three exploded buildings?

Where alse have these nukes been used?  Bali? 7/7? Madrid?

Which company has the most experience in using micro-nukes on buildings (or did they decide that 9/11 would be a good "test")?

Also, we all know that the goal of disinfo is to create more questions surrounding the "truthers" hypothesis than the official story.  With this in mind, doesn't the nukes theory fall into the category of a goal for disinfo? Doesn't this represent motive? 

I know you are a fine doctor and not a lawyer, so this may not be your area of expertise, but perhaps you can use your super powers of scientific reasoning to see if it fits.

And the "nukes are quiet" thing is awesome.  Does that mean my neighbor could have been hit by a nuke, and I would never even know?

Oh man, there must be another 5,000 questions about this.



As stated earlier: Maybe that is the point of approved disinfo, to create more questions about the theorists than about the gov's official story.

[Unintelligable Name]

This disinfo needs to be shut down.... I wonder who is paying him....

I don't think anyone is -- it's just the thrill of discovery (I think) that pushes him forward.

Too bad it's pointless to begin with. What color bomb was that which blew up WTC again? Did it have a Hello Kitty sticker on the side? Let us debate this issue further....

[Dig]

Did it have a Hello Kitty sticker on the side? Let us debate this issue further....

lmfao rotf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[jimd3100]

here's the link to Gsponer 4th gen nukes

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0510/0510071v1.pdf  - Gsponer - 4th generation nukes

André Gsponer writes lots of stuff and is the founder of an impressive sounding  "Independent Scientific Research Institute" in Switzerland. Problem is this impressive Research institute is most likely Gsponers den in his house. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I doubt that you can show me their website or name me anyone else on their staff and/or their positions or anything else about this "Independent Scientific Research Institute".

But ok....lets say they don't want a website or just because their address is a PO box means nothing and it's all legit. After looking into this it seems to me that these exotic weapons are theoretical only at this time, but again maybe I'm wrong on that too, and even if "officially" they aren't really in production maybe they exist "secretly". OK fine. Whatever.........anyone interested in this stuff might be interested in this book.....
http://books.google.com/books?id=zZucnXnI0-QC&dq=Andre+Gsponer&source=gbs_summary_s&cad=0

Gsponer is in it....
http://books.google.com/books?id=zZucnXnI0-QC&pg=PA187&dq=Andre+Gsponer

Maybe GSponer is legit and maybe this book is BS. OK Fine. But my take on this is pretty much what this earlier post said....

They were blown up -- doesn't matter to me with what type of bomb. It was a bomb(s).

Was it a big bomb? Or a tiny bomb? Was it black colored, or neon yellow colored? Did it smell like rotten eggs? Did Bush kiss it for good luck? Did it have the sequence green, red, yellow, blue on the wiring or was it purple, black, white, red?

On the other hand I frankly don't have a problem with you trying to tell the world nukes were at the WTC. And just because some folks feel proving the towers disintegrating in less than 10 seconds is proof enough, doesn't mean everyone should feel that way, and if you think you've proven they were nuked good for you. It's just that I'm not going to tell people WTC building 7 was nuked, because I don't believe it was, and it makes me sound like a loon. As for the towers, if 7 wasn't nuked I'm leaning toward the towers weren't either, but if they were I can't prove it, and Gsponers' science and Mr Wards here sound like gobbledygook to me, but that's just because I'm not a Nuclear Scientist. I doubt Mr Ward is too, but again.....whatever, do your work, publish it, call us gatekeepers and whatever, I do have to say Ward is one of the biggest drama queens I've seen in a while, ....however when he says stuff like this.....

Yep, and the French were here with cameras too (nadir?) filming the fire dept, but also just happened to catch the plane going into the WTC - don't you just love coincidences.  I believe there was an Israeli tie to him too.
Ed

He sounds like a no planer. That is their argument you know...that the scene was staged and it's all fake. BTW it's Nadet. And the FDNY guys that were with them say it's not fake staged or anything else, and they were almost killed on 9/11 and so were the Nadet Brothers. But that quote alone tells me pretty mush all I need to know about EdWardMD.

I don't know why the towers disintegrated in 10 seconds. So I'm not going to say it wasn't nukes. But I'm not going to say it was either. I'll let EdWardMD do that, but you're not doing yourself any favors by implying AJ and Prof Jones are out to silence you, and you yourself admit you believe thermite was at the WTC.

[space86]

Nuclear Fusion bombs are nothing new.

[Unintelligable Name]

F**k you, EdWardMD.

Take your bullshit and leave -- we aren't buying it and we don't want it.

[Dig]

Nuclear Fusion bombs are nothing new.

yes, but the ziomicronukes are 4th generation reptilian future tech.