Pretty much hit the nail on the head and the reason I started posting referenced proven facts here. Interesting isn't it.
Hey esteemed, honoured doctor of good will...
Do you think you can answer the following questions with just a tad more content than your sock puppet?
Here are the questions again:
How come over 200 witnesses heard bombs in the buildings?
How come the witnesses heard a popcorn of explosions, "pop, pop, pop, pop, pop" for each floor exploding out?
How come there were no large flashes?
How come there were no nuke casualties?
Why would there not be an EMP if nukes were used?
Wouldn't a nuclear blast leave victims with some kind of symptoms of a nuclear blast?
Doesn't a nuclear warhead render a person somewhat injured in a distinct way?
How did the people running out from the building or trapped in the building escape the nukes?
Were the nukes only used on certain floors while other ordinances only contained more conventional technology?
How did the nukes leave steel beams completely intact with diagonal slices in them looking like shape charges?
Why was thermite found at the site?
Why was their pools of molten steel under all three exploded buildings?
Where alse have these nukes been used? Bali? 7/7? Madrid?
Which company has the most experience in using micro-nukes on buildings (or did they decide that 9/11 would be a good "test")?
Also, we all know that the goal of disinfo is to create more questions surrounding the "truthers" hypothesis than the official story. With this in mind, doesn't the nukes theory fall into the category of a goal for disinfo? Doesn't this represent motive?
I know you are a fine doctor and not a lawyer, so this may not be your area of expertise, but perhaps you can use your super powers of scientific reasoning to see if it fits.
And the "nukes are quiet" thing is awesome. Does that mean my neighbor could have been hit by a nuke, and I would never even know?
Oh man, there must be another 5,000 questions about this.
As stated earlier: Maybe that is the point of approved disinfo, to create more questions about the theorists than about the gov's official story.