More fission theories including 4th generation zionist nukes

[EdWardMD]

Atom/LetsB,

Thanks for the links, I'll take a look at them.  But, I'm done with nukes in the WTC.  It's an overwhelming proven fact that's being denied, hidden and scammed. NOTE THAT NOT ONE SINGLE SO CALLED TRUTHER/DEBUNKER HAS EVER ADDRESSED MY INFORMATION IN A SCIENTIFIC MANNER nor has any been able to refute a single referenced fact in more than 200 links in my articles - they do the only thing they can do when faced with overwhelming proof - try to hide it.  I can't do anything about that.  The proof is out there, I've seen to that.  I check on it now and then to help more people note it.  But, I've done/doing all I can do on the subject.  No more evidence is needed - JUST EXPOSURE.

Ed

[Atomgrad]

Well I`ll keep posting your article whenever someone laughs at mini nukes and I`ll tell them to take it up with you if they have a problem with the article. I`m guessing you still won`t have many people wishing to argue the science of it with you.

 

[EdWardMD]

911 Pics you never saw on TV or the web before in a amazing kickback Slideshow!
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v393/youricarma/NineOneOne/?albumview=slideshow

Damn, could have used a few of these in the articles.  Very unusual pics of the pentagon overheads - glad I hadn't seen these I had enough difficulty dealing with just the WTCs.  Thanks for the link. I saved it.

Ed

[EdWardMD]

Well I`ll keep posting your article whenever someone laughs at mini nukes and I`ll tell them to take it up with you if they have a problem with the article. I`m guessing you still won`t have many people wishing to argue the science of it with you.

 

Unfortunately, no one wants to deal with proven facts.  Most make a BS statement, accept that as a fact then go to some scam BS questions.  It's been a pleasure.  You too LBR.

Ed

[EdWardMD]

Whoever they are, they`ve obviously seen the same report as one I saw about the possible use of a mini nuke, most of what your friend sent you just a cut n paste of it.

I was looking for the link to it the other week for another thread on here, I was going to post it and the link to the Finnish Military Explosive Experts report saying he believed it was amini nuke, but couldn`t find it on the site I thought it was on.

Not unusual, many so called truth groups have pulled it when it was posted.  Google "Ed Ward, MD" & 'still silent on proven anomalies' - to see why.

Ed

[Atomgrad]

Did.

http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/

Your first link has been disabled btw.

http://box217.bluehost.com/suspended.page/disabled.cgi/wakeupfromyourslumber.com?q=node/6033

Have you ever thought of ringing Alex on his show?

[Atomgrad]

And have you and Dr Jones agreed on objects to be tested yet?

[EdWardMD]

Did.

http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/

Your first link has been disabled btw.

http://box217.bluehost.com/suspended.page/disabled.cgi/wakeupfromyourslumber.com?q=node/6033

Have you ever thought of ringing Alex on his show?

I believe wake up slumber site is down in total or at least that what it says when I try to get to my articles.

I've sent Alex my stuff and he knows I'm available ANYTIME.  Try this link - http://www.rense.com/general80/prov.htm

LOL, yes, I agreed to test WTC debris and he can keep his briefcase, calculator and umbrella that supposedly made it through when virtually nothing else did - nor did I note anywhere in his offer where it was proven this garbage he has was actually in the WTC - something like - someone gave it to him and said it was in the WTC and came out intact.

Which leads me to Deagle - who took control of my sample after 'helping me get the correct testing' and would not return it.  Meanwhile it's been over a year and Deagle still hasn't it gotten tested nor returned it to me - 'everyone he sends it to gets death threats and he can't get it tested', but no response on why he will not return it so I can get it tested.  Interesting isn't it.

I suspect I may not be on this board much longer (edward19(at)cox.net).

Ed

[TahoeBlue]

The problem is thread started out in General Discussion with the title "I've been in touch with a survior from Tower 1. And here is what they said. "

Since then it was moved to  9/11/2001 Attacks Were An Inside Job > Faux Controversies and Case Studies , then it's been renamed to " More fission theories " (How about "FUSION Theories" )...

I often thought it would good to start a new thread  in 
" 9/11/2001 Attacks Were An Inside Job > 9/11 Material & Research "  titled something like "Evidence of Fusion explosives at WTC" and put all the best evidence and links in there.

It's taken years for the Israeli spyring to reach the conscious level, I think this is the same.

[EdWardMD]

The problem is thread started out in General Discussion with the title "I've been in touch with a survior from Tower 1. And here is what they said. "

Since then it was moved to  9/11/2001 Attacks Were An Inside Job > Faux Controversies and Case Studies , then it's been renamed to " More fission theories " (How about "FUSION Theories" )...

I often thought it would good to start a new thread  in 
" 9/11/2001 Attacks Were An Inside Job > 9/11 Material & Research "  titled something like "Evidence of Fusion explosives at WTC" and put all the best evidence and links in there.

It's taken years for the Israeli spyring to reach the conscious level, I think this is the same.

Good thinking, Proven Referenced Evidence of 4th Generation Micro Nukes in WTC1, WTC2, and WTC6
(I only have proof of existing 3rd-4th gen micros, although pure fusion nukes do exist - about a year ago India announced they would be producing them 2 to 3 years - I have no firm proof it was pure fusion, one is not needed and a semi-pure 3rd/4th will work fine.  An semi-ordinary 3rd or 4th would leave similar traces after about 3 to 5 days max.  So actually, semi-pure 3rd-4th gen is my fact, so that is what I stick to.

You are going to get me banned - they are not going to like it there is my guess.  LOL, I've been banned all over.  But, everytime, I at least expose a few truths.

Thanks,

Ed

[EdWardMD]

9/11/01 Attacks Were An Inside/Outside Job
Proven Referenced Evidence of 4th Generation Micro Nukes in WTC1, WTC2, & WTC6

Thermate, C4, Micro Nukes and 911 Was an Inside/Outside Job Is The Only Proven Theory that Complies with All of the Evidence in One Proven Theory.

To date, not one valid referenced fact has been established to refute a single proven fact in about 300 references presented in the article, let alone the primary evidence for micro nukes in the WTC.

1. Three Massive WTC Craters - See us gov LIDAR proof: http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm

2. Five Acres of WTC Land Brought to Seering Temperatures in a Few Hours by an 'Anaerobic, Chlorine Fueled "Fire" - Impossible by Basic Laws of Physics. See us gov Thermal Images proof:
http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm

3. Tritium Levels 55 Times (normal) Background Levels assessed a numerical value of 'traces' and 'of no human concern'. See us gov (DOE report) proof: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/141

4. An Impossible "Fire" (Combustion Process). See Laws of Physics for Fire/Combustion Process and Dr. Cahill's data on 'anaerobic incineration'. http://rense.com/general77/newlaws.htm

5. And More Proprietary Evidence

Ed Ward, MD - 911 Related Articles - Chronological:

Bombs in the WTC Buildings Proves Nothing to Racist-Fascist Bigots http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/08/21/ward.htm

Micro-Nukes in the WTC  http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/09/25/ward.htm General evidence for inside job and background of micro nukes

Update: Micro-Nukes at the WTC - Main micro nuke evidence presented in this article.   http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm
 
Update: Proves Micro Nukes in the WTC http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/04/16/ward.htm

Verifying the Source of WTC Tritium Levels that Are 55 Times "Background Levels" http://www.rense.com/general76/wtc.htm

Prof. Jones Denies, Ignores, Misrepresents Proven Tritium Levels 55 Times Normal Background Levels
http://www.rense.com/general77/levels.htm

Steven Jones Replies To Dr. Ed Ward
http://www.rense.com/general77/ward.htm

Prof Jones Gladly Assists Testing Unaffected WTC Items
http://www.rense. com/general77/profjh.htm

Update: Factual Evaluation of the DOE WTC Tritium Report Data - 911 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/141

Breakdown of the WTC Rain and Firehose Water - 4 Million Gallons of Dilution http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/136

Prof Jones Accepts Validity of Stable Isotopic Testing For Neutron Activation of Fusion Reactions  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/142

Note: According to Dr. Deagle, he has been unable to find anyplace in the world that will perform the needed tests on the WTC sample.

Hello!?! 48,000 Curies of Tritium Would Have to Have Burned to Leave the 3.53/2.83 nCi/L of WTC Tritium Residue - This concentration is almost equal to the highest concentrations of environmental contamination of the 1960's after Thousands of Megaton Nukes were 'tested'.  55 TIMES BACKGROUND AND ALMOST EQUAL TO THE HIGHEST RECORDED LEVELS OF THE 60'S IS CALLED TRACES - Dr. Jones ceased response.  This is not science, ignoring and denying 55 x what should have been found and that was after 4 million liters of dilution.  JONES CALLS THIS TRACES.
http://groups.yahoo. com/group/EdWard-MD/message/147

Note: This is based on evidence in which some of glass Tritium containers were not even melted by fire. All of the Tritium found was only in/on the unmelted glass. In any fire that can melt glass, ALL of tritium escapes into the atmosphere, unless water is poured over the source DURING the initial fire.)

Ed Ward, MD

[EdWardMD]

The problem
I often thought it would good to start a new thread  in 
" 9/11/2001 Attacks Were An Inside Job > 9/11 Material & Research "  titled something like "Evidence of Fusion explosives at WTC" and put all the best evidence and links in there.

Something like this?
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=90400.0

Ed

[EdWardMD]

Something like this?
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=90400.0

Ed

It was a good thought, but doesn't seem to be getting any more notice than here.  Thanks for the thought.

Ed

[Atomgrad]

I've sent Alex my stuff and he knows I'm available ANYTIME. 

The reason why I say try talking to Alex is twofold. It`s harder to dispute evidence in a realtime conversation, and it helps you get the word about. After all, he`s had David Icke on the show a few times, and your arguement for mini nukes makes far more sense than Ickes claim about Reptiles, and yet I`ve seen both ideas being unfairly bundled together, as in, "You believe in mini nukes? I bet you believe Reptiles run the planet as well".

I suspect I may not be on this board much longer

(edward19(at)cox.net).

As long as you follow the rules of the forum, you won`t get banned for having a different opinion from the majority, otherwise myself and Chris, the guy who started this thread would both have banned by now. Though you might get called a troll or a DisInfo Artist now and again.

[EdWardMD]

"You believe in mini nukes? I bet you believe Reptiles run the planet as well".

As long as you follow the rules of the forum, you won`t get banned for having a different opinion from the majority, otherwise myself and Chris, the guy who started this thread would both have banned by now. Though you might get called a troll or a DisInfo Artist now and again.

I would never disparage reptiles by lumping them with the scum that run this planet.  LOL, now and again, that's pretty much the multiple response to my facts, 'now and then' would be a vast improvement - none dare breach the actual evidence with referenced facts.  I've written Alex in the past, I've phoned in a couple times in the past - didn't get through - and his lack of address of the facts has been noted several times.  I hope/wish I am wrong, but it appears Alex is not interested in having these facts come to light.   

It appears you may be right, I'm pleasantly surprised I've lasted this long.  My posts have not been deleted - historyscammel.con, haven't been personally attacked by a moderator counterintel crew - historyscammel and abovetopsneakrat.con as well as many other BYU crew boards.  Hell, maybe I'm wrong about Alex, I'D LOVE TO BE WRONG ABOUT HIM not wanting the information noted, because then the proven facts would get more exposure.

Anyway.... I've enjoyed my time here and appreciate the assistance from all that have posted to my response.  BTW, I've got way more stuff than just micro nukes.  Pick a tyranny and google 'ed ward md' and the tyranny and you are likely to find an article from me.  I started out in equal shared parenting and kept digging until I found out who the scum are and their basic structure.

Thanks.

Ed

[Orgetorix]

One picture is worth a thousand words.

[Atomgrad]

Yeah, I read quite a bit of your priceofliberty and weblog pages last night.

I hope you intend to stick around, and keep trying to ring Alex, who knows, eventually you should get through.

Another suggestion would be to add the article you made last night to the PHD forum http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?board=378.0 . As the title says, Hardcore Research.

[EdWardMD]

One picture is worth a thousand words.

Yes, the horizontal and vertical pyroclastic flows were evidence, but not anything I could put numbers to.  There are a few formulas that can be used to figure kilotons from the flows, but so many variables with them being in falling buildings it simply was not factual enough - although they did get mentioned with a link in the article - with so much other proven referenced information, they were merely in a list of evidence.  Thanks for the assist.

Ed

[EdWardMD]

Okay so let me get this straight. Just hear me out, this is what I believe happened.

Believes are great for some individuals.  I deal in facts.  Try "rereading" the article.  Most of your questions are answered.  Now, if you have referenced proof regarding my referenced proof that disproves my references we can work it out - if any refernce is not correct, I'll gladly strike it - I don't write BS - BTW,  none has had to be stricken over 2 years.  But, I'm not interested in what-if-thens, beliefs, maybes, thinks, etc.  Get some referenced proven facts, read article enough to comprehend what it says, then we can be on the same page.

Micro-Nukes in the WTC  http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/09/25/ward.htm General evidence for inside job and background of micro nukes

Update: Micro-Nukes at the WTC - Main micro nuke evidence presented in this article.   http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm


DrEd

[EdWardMD]

Yeah, I read quite a bit of your priceofliberty and weblog pages last night.

I hope you intend to stick around, and keep trying to ring Alex, who knows, eventually you should get through.

Another suggestion would be to add the article you made last night to the PHD forum http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?board=378.0 . As the title says, Hardcore Research.

Wow, you take links AND you read some of my other stuff - you are a rarity.  Sure, I'll repost it there.  Thanks again.

Ed

[EdWardMD]

9/11/01 Attacks Were An Inside/Outside Job
Proven Referenced Evidence of 4th Generation Micro Nukes in WTC1, WTC2, & WTC6

Thermate, C4, Micro Nukes and 911 Was an Inside/Outside Job Is The Only Proven Theory that Complies with All of the Evidence in One Proven Theory.

To date, not one valid referenced fact has been established to refute a single proven fact in about 300 references presented in the article, let alone the primary evidence for micro nukes in the WTC.

1. Three Massive WTC Craters - See us gov LIDAR proof: http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm

2. Five Acres of WTC Land Brought to Seering Temperatures in a Few Hours by an 'Anaerobic, Chlorine Fueled "Fire" - Impossible by Basic Laws of Physics. See us gov Thermal Images proof:
http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm

3. Tritium Levels 55 Times (normal) Background Levels assessed a numerical value of 'traces' and 'of no human concern'. See us gov (DOE report) proof: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/141

4. An Impossible "Fire" (Combustion Process). See Laws of Physics for Fire/Combustion Process and Dr. Cahill's data on 'anaerobic incineration'. http://rense.com/general77/newlaws.htm

5. And More Proprietary Evidence

Ed Ward, MD - 911 Related Articles - Chronological:

Bombs in the WTC Buildings Proves Nothing to Racist-Fascist Bigots http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/08/21/ward.htm

Micro-Nukes in the WTC  http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/09/25/ward.htm General evidence for inside job and background of micro nukes

Update: Micro-Nukes at the WTC - Main micro nuke evidence presented in this article.   http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm
 
Update: Proves Micro Nukes in the WTC http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/04/16/ward.htm

Verifying the Source of WTC Tritium Levels that Are 55 Times "Background Levels" http://www.rense.com/general76/wtc.htm

Prof. Jones Denies, Ignores, Misrepresents Proven Tritium Levels 55 Times Normal Background Levels
http://www.rense.com/general77/levels.htm

Steven Jones Replies To Dr. Ed Ward
http://www.rense.com/general77/ward.htm

Prof Jones Gladly Assists Testing Unaffected WTC Items
http://www.rense. com/general77/profjh.htm

Update: Factual Evaluation of the DOE WTC Tritium Report Data - 911 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/141

Breakdown of the WTC Rain and Firehose Water - 4 Million Gallons of Dilution http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/136

Prof Jones Accepts Validity of Stable Isotopic Testing For Neutron Activation of Fusion Reactions  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/142

Note: According to Dr. Deagle, he has been unable to find anyplace in the world that will perform the needed tests on the WTC sample.

Hello!?! 48,000 Curies of Tritium Would Have to Have Burned to Leave the 3.53/2.83 nCi/L of WTC Tritium Residue - This concentration is almost equal to the highest concentrations of environmental contamination of the 1960's after Thousands of Megaton Nukes were 'tested'.  55 TIMES BACKGROUND AND ALMOST EQUAL TO THE HIGHEST RECORDED LEVELS OF THE 60'S = TRACES - Dr. Jones ceased response.  This is not science, ignoring and denying 55 x what should have been found and that was after 4 million liters of dilution.  JONES CALLS THIS TRACES.
http://groups.yahoo. com/group/EdWard-MD/message/147

Note: The above tritium calculation is based on evidence in which some of glass Tritium containers were not even melted by fire. All of the Tritium found was only in/on the unmelted glass. In any fire that can melt glass, ALL of tritium escapes into the atmosphere, unless water is poured over the source DURING the initial fire.)

Ed Ward, MD

[EdWardMD]

Very unusual pics of the pentagon overheads - glad I hadn't seen these I had enough difficulty dealing with just the WTCs.  Thanks for the link. I saved it.

Ed

Did anyone else notice that there are 2 TWO paths of destruction in the pentagon, one that goes exactly perpendicular to the impact point and one that goes along the angle of impact of the plane - not a commercial airliner - but a plane.  The only damage I had ever seen noted was the damage done along the angle of impact.  This damage done perpendicular to the impact strikes me as very unusual.  Has anyone ever investigated or noted it?

Ed

[Dig]

What type of radiation would a micro-nuke put out?

[Atomgrad]

Could it be the flight path talked about by these eyewitness`s including Police Officers?

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=85917.0

[EdWardMD]

Could it be the flight path talked about by these eyewitness`s including Police Officers?

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=85917.0

Nope it was damage to two adjacent hallways - I went back and stopped the slide show to look at them and there are two areas where fire extended deep into the building.  For some reason, I'm not so interested since it is two hallways instead of one?  But, thanks for checking.

Hope I wasn't too hard on the last poster.  After 2 years of people not even reading the article, but giving ifs, bogus science as fact, then making suppositions on the BS, I'm just tired of it.  Many times as in the last poster, if they had bothered to read the article, they'd have seen the referenced facts that negates their supposition - such as the blast effects for a .01 kiloton nuke - which may be classified as ANY information on less than a 1 kiloton nuke was classified (I found out later - that's my story and I'm stickin to it) by the shrub scum - but, I got it out there since it was on a public site.  The link was removed within a few days, but they had a program that did blast effects for any size nuke down to .01 kt - was a super find.  Makes one wonder why is a 1kt blast effect not classified, BUT ANYTHING LESS THAN A 1KT IS CLASSIFIED - scumbags.  I think I stuck the zip file of the program on a bitorrent site somewhere.

I put the article up in the hardcore research as you suggested - every little bit helps.  LOL, they may be able to ignore me, ban me, tin foil hat me, but they can't stop me.  I'm still waiting for my first real death threat - activists say, 'if you haven't gotten one, you are not doing enough'. - but as Jeff R says, 'it's the ones you don't hear about that you need to worry about.'

Anyway...

Ed

[EdWardMD]

What type of radiation would a micro-nuke put out?

Tritium of course - they still can't get past the tritium production, but it would also depend on the type of 4th generation nuke used, dirty or clean, - they made them both in the past and the blast effect they have selected, neutron, alpha, beta, heat, etc.  If it was pure fusion - only tritium.  If it was semi-pure the residual radiation is there, but it's so small it would be hard to distinguish from background.  Should be a link in my article for it under induced radiation 'measured in days' - 3 days min to 5 days max = clear is the general consensus.  Or you can do a search on google for '4th generation nuclear weapons', I believe Gspooner wrote the article.  Many links in my articles on the subject.

DrEd

[EdWardMD]

LOL, they moved the article from phd research so now it's double listed in the 911 discussion.  Well at least the haven't transfered it to the faux board - YET.  Interesting isn't it.

Ed

[Atomgrad]

Burlguy, believe it or not, he has actually answered your question. Not a straightforward answer admittedly, but if you read his reply about hoping he wasn`t too hard on you, then cross reference the amount in his article, the answer is actually there. I just did it and there it is, a blast radius of approx 90 meters, and if a bomb is detonated underground, you have the ability to shape the blast direction.

How small can a nuclear reaction be? Through hydrodynamic experiments for triggering fusion, extremely lows yield nuclear explosions have been generated on the magnitude of "several Pounds of TNT." As noted above, in 1961 .01 kt was unveiled in 1961. In 1956, the Tamalpais with a yield of 0.072 kt was declassified...

...This program produced (partial list) the following information for a regular 0.01 kt yields, air ignition: Fireball max light radius = 25.4 meters, Max time light pulse width = 0.011 seconds, Max fireball airburst radius = 10.6 meters, Time of max temperature = 0.0032 seconds, Area of rad. exposure = 0.12 sq. miles; Blastwave Effects: Overpressure = 5 lb/sq. inch (160 mph) radius = 0.09 km, 1 lb/sq. inch radius = 0.26 km; Underground ignition: Crater diameter = 56 feet with a Richter magnitude of 3.52.

Focused nuclear explosions were envisioned in 1959 as a possible concept for propulsion of the spacecraft Orion. The mere directing of the yield was obviously known prior to 1959. Samuel Cohen has stated that a low yield neutron bomb may be tailored to direct yield and proposed the concept more than 35 years ago. An underground detonation causes shaping of the direction of yield as well

 

[EdWardMD]

Burlguy, believe it or not, he has actually answered your question. Not a straightforward answer admittedly, but if you read his reply about hoping he wasn`t too hard on you, then cross reference the amount in his article, the answer is actually there. I just did it and there it is, a blast radius of approx 90 meters, and if a bomb is detonated underground, you have the ability to shape the blast direction.

 

Almost right Atom, just a little quibble, but then I'm the foremost expert on WTC evidence, that is 100% correct for an air blast, but these were building blasts a cross between underground and air (mostly underground) - so the real effects will be significantly LESS than an air blast and that does not count the falling building debris turned into 2 BILLION POUNDS OF INSTANT DUST that significantly decreases almost of all the effects of a nuke.  And you are 100% correct on the ground shaping a charge, but there are also links for shaped charge nukes even without ground effects - one by cohen on a china nuke and one on the orion project (70s?), both of which demonstrate focused nuke effects without ground effects - there may be some mention of shaping in 4th gen nukes too.   Thanks for the assist - you get an A, but not an A+, very good.

Notice how he has conveniently disregarded, 2 BILLION POUNDS OF INSTANT BUILDING TURNED TO DUST, Hiroshima effect cancers, massive heat in 6 acres, 55 x tritium levels, wilting spires, etc, et al, to focus on an unreferenced dust cloud TIMING - WHICH IS CLEARLY VISIBLE IN PYROCLASTIC FLOWS AFTER THE BUILDING STARTS TO COME DOWN FROM Thermate and C4.

THANKS AGAIN FOR THE ASSIST, so little patience for those that don't read or comprehend what is written - although it is a tremendous amount of information - I'm told 2 days just to go through the links - so I do understand when people miss a MINOR point or two and LIKE to clarify things for them.



Ed

[EdWardMD]

Burlguy, believe it or not, he has actually answered your question. Not a straightforward answer admittedly, but if you read his reply about hoping he wasn`t too hard on you, then cross reference the amount in his article, the answer is actually there. I just did it and there it is, a blast radius of approx 90 meters, and if a bomb is detonated underground, you have the ability to shape the blast direction.

 

Oops, didn't notice you included one of the links on Orion - Damn, A+, but not an A++ - grin.  BTW, burl has been reported for breaking the rules of the forum personal attacks as well as a likely breaking of the federal law on aliases defaming real people.  Will be interesting to see any mod response - lol, at abovetopsneakrat.con it got me banned for noting the same.

Ed

[TheGoodFight1984]

Recieved the note regarding your concerns Ed - and while I won't be reporting this to the feds as that would be OTT in my opinion, I will say;

Be nice to each other and stay objective please! and keep the personal attacks to private messages if you really must engage in them.

Cheers

[EdWardMD]

Recieved the note regarding your concerns Ed - and while I won't be reporting this to the feds as that would be OTT in my opinion, I will say;

Be nice to each other and stay objective please! and keep the personal attacks to private messages if you really must engage in them.

Cheers

LOL, nope, not really fed caliber - Agreed.  But, there is a federal law about it so people will know.  Thanks for the note.

Cheers back at ya',

Ed

[EdWardMD]

911 Pics you never saw on TV or the web before in a amazing kickback Slideshow!
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v393/youricarma/NineOneOne/?albumview=slideshow

LBR,

I'd like to get the high res pics of the WTCs - looks like massive window damage for a huge distance, if possible.  It's not really necessary, but, I'd like to get them.  So if it's a big deal for you, don't worry about it.   edward19(at)cox.net.

Excellent pics BTW.

My Best to You and Yours,

Ed

[Mr.Me]

This reminds me of the article posted years ago concerning the Bali bombing and the inconsistencies with the offical story:

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=424

Joe Vialls made a case that a (clean) fission detonator, used for setting off a larger fusion bomb, was used in Bali, and would explain why concrete was blown off of the reinforced steel bars inside the pillars, or why there was a crater. I don't know if it's true or not, he says the only way a crater can be formed is if the bomb is planted into the ground, or it's a nuke with the vaporisation power to do that. 

[EdWardMD]

This reminds me of the article posted years ago concerning the Bali bombing and the inconsistencies with the offical story:

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=424

Joe Vialls made a case that a (clean) fission detonator, used for setting off a larger fusion bomb, was used in Bali, and would explain why concrete was blown off of the reinforced steel bars inside the pillars, or why there was a crater. I don't know if it's true or not, he says the only way a crater can be formed is if the bomb is planted into the ground, or it's a nuke with the vaporisation power to do that. 

Red mercury or it's more appropriate name Lithium 6 was one of the older methods, but lasers, Z materials,  several other materials similar to lithium and several others have been linked to triggers more recently.

Vialls excellent efforts are used in my articles.  There are also several notations in the article where many more pounds of explosives than are capable to be loaded in a car or pickup that have been set off and do not create craters.  I'm not so sure Vialls said it, but, I know I did and gave referenced proof concerning that subject.  One little note of clarification - this is only for supposed car/truck bombs.  Obviously an air to ground missile not set to explode above ground will make a crater. 

""""""""""The US bomb, BLU-82 - used for clearing helicopter landing zones in the jungles of Vietnam - contains 6.3 tons of high grade military explosive with an aluminum additive for increased heat, but does not create a crater. The 1/4 inch steel encased explosive is parachuted to its target and detonated 1 to 2 feet above ground. """""""""

The LA national guard also set off 2 pickups loaded with 1,000 lbs of ammonium nitrate.  Didn't even scratch the surface.  I don't think I included that one in the article.

Ed

[Dig]

Tritium of course - they still can't get past the tritium production, but it would also depend on the type of 4th generation nuke used, dirty or clean, - they made them both in the past and the blast effect they have selected, neutron, alpha, beta, heat, etc.  If it was pure fusion - only tritium.  If it was semi-pure the residual radiation is there, but it's so small it would be hard to distinguish from background.  Should be a link in my article for it under induced radiation 'measured in days' - 3 days min to 5 days max = clear is the general consensus.  Or you can do a search on google for '4th generation nuclear weapons', I believe Gspooner wrote the article.  Many links in my articles on the subject.

DrEd

So you are saying that there are 4th generation nukes that leave no residual radiation or any footprint other than tritium after 5 days? I mean absolutely nothing else detectable after 5 days.  What is the half life of tritium?

[xTruthSeekerx]

no planers mini nukers go back to your hole

[TheGoodFight1984]

Behave XtsX

[xTruthSeekerx]

sorry, it reallly annoys me 

I mean look 2 planes hit the building and they were laced with bombs, thermite and thermate right? simple nuff said and God knows how many chemicals were released hence all the respirtory problems

*facdesk*

[EdWardMD]

So you are saying that there are 4th generation nukes that leave no residual radiation or any footprint other than tritium after 5 days? I mean absolutely nothing else detectable after 5 days.  What is the half life of tritium?

"I'm" not saying anything about induced radiaition.  "I'm" repeating what experts in the field say.  Seems my 2 year old link has been taken down.  Here's a quickie for the neutron bomb, considerably less advanced than 3rd or 4th gen nukes.  Induced radiation from neutrons is the same regardless of the neutron source.

The neutron flux can induce significant amounts of short-lived secondary radioactivity in the environment in the high flux region near the burst point. The alloys used in steel armor can develop radioactivity that is dangerous for 24-48 hours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb

here's the link to Gsponer 4th gen nukes

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0510/0510071v1.pdf  - Gsponer - 4th generation nukes

"I'm" not saying there were 6 acres of land greater than 1500 degrees, 2 Billion pounds of building turned into instant dust, hiroshima effect cancer spectrum present, tritium levels than are 55 x normal AFTER 4 million liters DILUTION, massive craters 250 wide and 35 feet deep, and 120 feet wide and 45 feet deep, impossible 'chlorine fueled, anaerobic' "fires", wilting spires, etc, et al, "I'm" merely repeating what documented referenced proven evidence shows.

Cohen the father of the neutron nuke also has similar reports.

About 13 years.  I'm not really to interested in fetching information for you that is easily available on the net.  If you have some REFERENCED PROVEN FACTS THAT COUNTER ANY OF MY REFERENCED PROVEN FACTS, I'll be glad to work on it with you - I don't knowingly write Bogus Science BS - so if anyone HAS DOCUMENTED REFERENCED FACTS THAT COUNTER MINE...  Otherwise, there is a thing called google that can fetch facts for you.  Best of luck.

DrEd