The Poor British Royals are Innocent (sic)

[robertcalm]

Just as I was trying to point out it was the money changers and not the British

[Revolt426]

Just as I was trying to point out it was the money changers and not the British

You are a disinformation agent. Lord Palmerston was the Prime Minister of Britain. Stop your nonsense, i gave you loads of chances to post something rational and everytime someone debunks what you say you change your words or bring another subject up.

[robertcalm]

Cornwallis had some very well known bed fellows?

American War of Independence
After the opening skirmishes of the war took place around Boston, Cornwallis put his previous misgivings aside and sought active service. His participation in the American War of Independence began with his service as second in command to Henry Clinton. Cornwallis, along with several other senior officers, was promoted shortly before leaving for the conflict.[5] Clinton's forces arrived in North America in May 1776 at Cape Fear, North Carolina. These forces then shifted south and participated in the first siege of Charleston in June 1776. They were unable to make a breathrough and eventually withdrew.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Cornwallis,_1st_Marquess_Cornwallis

[robertcalm]

Do you not read the other posts .... Im now very confused

Disraeli and
Baron Rothschilds plan

[Revolt426]

Do you not read the other posts .... Im now very confused

Better for you to be confused then the others looking at this thread.

[Revolt426]

SO! you are saying Lord Palmerston, the Prime Minster of Britain was NOT BRITSH, is THIS WHAT YOU ARE SAYING?

[Dig]

OK, now this post is directed toward you...

The British Royal Family has been genociding hundreds of millions of people since 1200 AD at least (as mentioned earlier). Their acceptance of the Rothschild/Bauer family does mean that they are hijacked. Their acceptance of the Scottish Rite in the 1200's does not mean they are hijacked. These same royals were the main power behind the East India Trading Company since its inception (priot to 1600). Their banking system came way before the Rothschilds, although the Rothschilds control much of the system today.  The Rothschilds are British/French/Bavarian royalty just like the rest of these incestuous maniacs.

THE BRITISH ROYALTY ACCEPTED THESE GENOCIDAL INFLUENCES. 

It added to their effectiveness in genociding populations.

If you wish to blame all of the world's problems for the past thousand years on one single 300 year old royal family, that is fine.  But people may see it differently.

[robertcalm]

Man your ace ... Revolt there is room to learn on here as well .... You have this tunnel vision conspiracy that has been dispproved on many occasions but you keep protesting it ...

Like I proved to you last time Palmerston ended the slave trade in the uk

and posted the documentry that proved that Newport and the Zionists controlled this ...

I have not argued or contested his role in the Civil War but he was working for Disraeli and Rothschild as proven...

[Revolt426]

See you just swung the whole conversation in a different direction again, and i have dealt with people like you before so i see it.

We  have verified Lord Palmerston tried to cut the US in half by funding and aiding the Confederacy and causing rebellions against Russia. Then you say , it was the money changers not the British.

SO i ask you, is Lord Palmerston, PM of Britain, British?

And You give another BS answer... hence you are full of it.

[Dig]

Just as I was trying to point out it was the money changers and not the British

The money changers are british, WTF?

In the 1200's, the Knight's Templar/Scottish Rite was allowed into the British Royalty (and the British Royalty were genocidal maniacs prior to this).

The Knights Templar were money changers 500 years before the Bauer/Rothchild family ever had any influence.

The British Royals take in other genocidal maniacs into their lair so they can be more effective at genociding hundreds of millions of people.

WTF?

You are defending the British Empire? King George? East India Trading Company? How can this be any more absurd?

[robertcalm]

No my point is the Royals German Ancestry ... The Rothschilds German Jewish ancestry


They are not true Brits

Like your Biden post ... Zionist

Well should we label all of the USA Zionist...because of 1 man or 1 family

The British ppl are not Brown (or Braun Jewish/German)

Or Blair

We have been occupied and Zionist ppl have been given top jobs under the pretence of being British

Just as your Clinton admitted he was Jewish after leaving office...

Same old story

Elizibeth the 1st called England  the New Jerusalem

Makes you wonder

The Queen was coronated under Solomans Stone in Westminster Abbey

Zionist dont just control the Federal Reserve ...

[robertcalm]

What the Hell you change the title of this post for!!

No way I said the Royals are Innocent

Typical I win the debate with facts and evidence

You dont like the truth you shut ppl up

Thats fascism ....

[Revolt426]

Yea? I agree with Sane and i want you to answer my question, was Lord Palmerston British?

[robertcalm]

I told you he was but disproved you on everything you posted ... So whats your point!

[Dig]

Jewish ppl keep to there culture

Zionist have one agenda

World Domination over the gentiles

The New World Order

That is affecting the UK, USA and every other nation

So to me they have no loyality to the British PPL

Only for their own agenda

So no I dont class Zionists as British

I class them as they refer to themselves as Zionists

OMFG...The British Royalty has been hijacked by Zionists?  Even though they have been genociding people for 1,000 years.  When was Zionism created?  Finally the crap comes full circle.  All the crap about the royal family being hijacked in 1066 was BS.  They really have been hijacked in the 1700s.

So why were they genociding hundreds of millions for over 600 years before zionism was ever created?

The British Royalty used secular religious sects to help them with genocide.  They used the papacy's knights templar, zionism, naziism, muslim brotherhood.

THEY CREATED ALL OF THIS CRAP.

[Revolt426]

I told you he was but disproved you on everything you posted ... So whats your point!

You disproved nothing whatsover and you are a lying disinformation agent or a retard. Either way i do not talk to Lying disinformation agents or retards on this forum, so goodbye and god save the queen!

[robertcalm]

Hang on once again your equating me with defending the Royals which on every post except the ones you decide to alter is not right....

My point is the Royals and the Rothchilds are not British .....

Never have been

Is this what Truthers sites are about

You post good evidence ... You anwser debate with logical and proven face

But because your winning the debate its gets moved to a whinning thread

Fuksake Grow up

I gave you the honest facts if you cant see the truth then I cant help you...

Dont keep labelling me a royalist and telling lies about me which are not true to try and prove a point ..

[Dig]

I told you he was but disproved you on everything you posted ... So whats your point!

hahahaha the british royal scapegoater is now trying divide and conquer tactics on this thread.  WTF?

I do not "disapprove" of anything Rev wrote.  And I do not "disapprove" of anything you wrote.

But I will call out the bullshit and you wrote an exhorbitant amount of it, whereas Rev posted logical arguments based on evidence, sources, links, thoughtful inquiry.

You have posted stuff that fits your agenda of scapegoating the British Royal family who sits waaaaaaay up on the capstone.

You attempted to blame all masons and zionists rather than the true wizards behind the curtains.  I am surprised you have not blamed the Muslim Brotherhood yet.

[strgzr]

Wow it's like the twilight zone. I read though most of Re: Lincoln and the Lord Palmerston Connection, got tired of the infighting so I moved on. Ended up reading anouther apology from robertcalm about the Royals and was considering making a comment when all of the sudden I'm back at the civil war, Lincoln, and Lord Palmerston. Somehow they are connected and got stuck together. I don't get it. Wow my head is still spinning. I guess I'll move on and hope I don't end up back on this thread.

[Revolt426]

This thread is infested with mutated trolls, stay out.

[robertcalm]

There you go again only ppl saying Im defending the Royals is YOU... by changing the title of the thread ,,

Not one sentence I wrote proves otherwise on here

And why would I attack Muslims ... Now Im getting flak for more things I have not even mentioned

[Amd304912]

Wow it's like the twilight zone. I read though most of Re: Lincoln and the Lord Palmerston Connection, got tired of the infighting so I moved on. Ended up reading anouther apology from robertcalm about the Royals and was considering making a comment when all of the sudden I'm back at the civil war, Lincoln, and Lord Palmerston. Somehow they are connected and got stuck together. I don't get it. Wow my head is still spinning. I guess I'll move on and hope I don't end up back on this thread.

Me too, i have been searching for an article on the british mandate of palestine for over an hour and it seems it was scrubbed from the gaza board as well as changed on wikipedia.....

[robertcalm]

Further more blaming Masons and Zionists they are the core of the New World Order

The Queen/Monarchy the Core of the Old World Order


Power Switch from one to the other

Same arsehole different shift......

My point about infighting between them not us ...

[robertcalm]

See how is it other ppl get my logic ... I know British History very well...

You know your own history

My viewpoint is unbiased and well researched

But yet I get called Retard and Troll just because I have proved something wrong that someone wrote

Thats a bit OTT and very very nasty

[Dig]

Further more blaming Masons and Zionists they are the core of the New World Order

The Queen/Monarchy the Core of the Old World Order


Power Switch from one to the other

Same arsehole different shift......

My point about infighting between them not us ...

You change your arguments like the queen changes her wardrobe. You just said that the zionists hijacked the british royals.  And earlier you said the Masons hijacked the british royals. Now you are agreeing that the british royals acrtually control the masons and the zionists. I guess everyone has to wake up sometime.

[robertcalm]

When did I say the Royals control the Zionists Masons

I said there is conflict between them???

My point about infighting between them not us ...


Fom the very first post of this thread I stated

 have posted this philosphy before as to why they would freely give up power to the EEU and commit Treason by breaking the Bill of Rights which declares no Foreign Power can rule the UK other than the Queen/King....

I dont support or advocator of the Royals posting this as another angle of the Illuminati in-fighting..

Where in that does it say I support the Royal Family

[Dig]

Me too, i have been searching for an article on the british mandate of palestine for over an hour and it seems it was scrubbed from the gaza board as well as changed on wikipedia.....

I doubt that thread was scrubbed. These two threads (Lincoln and Lord Patterson/Royals Black Mailed) were merged because Robertcalm kept posting the same stuff on both of them. It now seems that he is no longer pushing the insanity of scapegoating the british royals:

"The Queen/Monarchy the Core of the Old World Order"

So I will try to split out the relevant Lincoln and the Lord Palmerston Connection posts.

[robertcalm]

Blaming me for replying to direct questions and just coz I disproved your logic

Getting accused of things I never said

Getting accused of being a troll by responding to questions only

and getting called insulting names as you have no anwser

[Revolt426]

Blaming me for replying to direct questions and just coz I disproved your logic

You provided no source or evidence to contradict the 10 or so posts about Palmerston trying to cut the US in half by funding the confederacy. All you say is " He banned slavery in the UK" blah blah... go away.

[strgzr]

See how is it other ppl get my logic ... I know British History very well...

You know your own history

My viewpoint is unbiased and well researched

But yet I get called Retard and Troll just because I have proved something wrong that someone wrote

Thats a bit OTT and very very nasty

I guess what bothers me is what I consider to be your apologist stance toward the British Royals. To me they aren't quaint, or comforting. They are parasites. They are some of the most visible parasites of humanity. Their only reason to exist is that they do exist. They add nothing real or of value to the British people. What's worse from the reaction I've seen of the common folk when speaking to or about say, the Queen, if the royals were suddenly gone Great Brittan would fall apart.

[robertcalm]

The argument never to got to Palmerston

Argument was over Lincoln and who assassinated him

I proved it was the Zionist Bankers

Go back Check

Dont blame me or rope me in for things I have not posted

[Revolt426]

In Response to me asking if Lord Palmerston was British, you responded:

I told you he was but disproved you on everything you posted ... So whats your point!

AKA you are a liar.

[Dig]

Wow it's like the twilight zone. I read though most of Re: Lincoln and the Lord Palmerston Connection, got tired of the infighting so I moved on. Ended up reading anouther apology from robertcalm about the Royals and was considering making a comment when all of the sudden I'm back at the civil war, Lincoln, and Lord Palmerston. Somehow they are connected and got stuck together. I don't get it. Wow my head is still spinning. I guess I'll move on and hope I don't end up back on this thread.

Here is the Lincoln/Lord Palmerston Thread: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=80886.0

Sorry for the inconvenience.

[robertcalm]

Palmerston

Slavery Abolition Movement

Heres the official records

Palmerston <<<

http://janus.lib.cam.ac.uk/db/node.xsp?id=EAD%2FGBR%2F0275%2FSlavery;sib0=64

Prove once and for all he stopped slavery

http://abolition.nypl.org/print/suppression/


Revolt I have never ever disputed Palmerston wasnt British -- why you asking me a question I never disputed

[Revolt426]

Palmerston

Slavery Abolition Movement

Heres the official records

Palmerston <<<

http://janus.lib.cam.ac.uk/db/node.xsp?id=EAD%2FGBR%2F0275%2FSlavery;sib0=64

Prove once and for all he stopped slavery

^^ LOL this guy is some fatass sitting back laughing his ass off trying to throw the whole forum off. You eating a bag of potato chips with HFCS and drinking some diet coke with aspartame and typing at the same time?. There was proof Lord Palmerston collaberated with slave traders.. infact funded them and you tout that he abolished slavery IN the UK, which was for the sole purpose of making the UK look innocent, as they always do. You refuse to TOUCH the fact that he collaborated with the Confederacy, you wont even MENTION it.

[Dig]

The argument never to got to Palmerston

Argument was over Lincoln and who assassinated him

I proved it was the Zionist Bankers

Go back Check

Dont blame me or rope me in for things I have not posted

You mean these zionist bankers?

Assassination of President Lincoln
http://www.reformation.org/lincoln.html

President Lincoln's views on the Jesuits

President Lincoln told Charles Chiniquy his views on the Jesuits:

"So many plots have already been made against my life, that it is a real miracle that they have all failed . . . But can we expect that God will make a perpetual miracle to save my life? I believe not. The Jesuits are so expert in those deeds of blood that Henry IV (king of France who was assassinated by the Jesuit Revaillac for giving liberty to his people), said that it was impossible to escape them, and he became their victim, thought he did all he could to protect himself. My escape from their hands, since the letter of the Pope to Jeff Davis has sharpened a million of daggers to pierce my breast, would be more that a miracle. . . . I know that Jesuits never forget nor forsake (never give up). Man must not care how and where he dies, provided he dies at the post of honor and duty."

John Surratt coordinated the assassination

Here is a quote from the History of the Great Conspiracy by T. M. Harris:

"From the description given by Sergeant Dye of the man who acted as monitor, calling the time three times in succession at short intervals, the last time calling "Ten minutes past ten," in front of the theatre, it will be remembered that the writer came to the conclusion that this was John H. Surratt. This conclusion was verified by this same witness on the trial of Surratt. Sergeant Dye had taken a seat on the platform in front of the theatre, and just before the conclusion of the second act of the play had his attention arrested by an elegantly-dressed man, who came out of the vestibule, and commenced to converse with a ruffianly-looking fellow. Then another joined them, and the three conversed together. The one who appeared to be the leader said, "I think he will come out now," referring, as the witness supposed, to the President. The President's carriage stood near the platform on which the witness was sitting, and one of the three passed out as far as the curbstone and looked into the carriage. It would seem that they had anticipated the possibility of his departure at the close of the second act, and had intended to assassinate him at the moment of his passing out of the door. Quite a crowd of people came out at the conclusion of the act, and Booth and his companions stood near the door, awaiting the opportunity which they sought. When most of the crowd had returned into the theatre, and the would be assassins saw that the President would remain to the close of the play, they began to prepare for his assassination in the theatre . . . Booth had left the side of his companion before this long enough to go into the saloon, where he drank a glass of whiskey, and then, as soon as the time had been called the third time, went at once into the theatre, and in less that ten minutes thereafter fired the fatal shot . . . The suspicions of Sergeant Dye having been aroused by the conduct of these three men, he naturally scanned them very closely, and testified that he had a good view, not only of the person, but of the face and features of the man who called the time, and had his image indelibly impressed on his memory. Upon being confronted by Surratt on his trial, he unhesitatingly and positively declared that he was the man." (Harris, History of the Great Conspiracy, p. 212).
       
John Surratt (1844-1916) was the timekeeper who coordinated the assassination of President Lincoln outside the theatre. In September, 1865, Surratt crossed the Atlantic, settling first in England, then later in Rome, where he joined the Papal Zouaves. While visiting Alexandria, Egypt in late 1866, Surratt was identified as the wanted Lincoln assassination conspirator and arrested. Surratt was brought back to the United States for trial in a civilian--not a military--court. The trial began on June 10, 1867. After listening to testimony from 170 witnesses, the trial ended on August 10 with a hung jury. The federal government eventually dropped all charges against Surratt and he was released from custody in the summer of 1868.

[robertcalm]

You Guys just cant accept the truth ... come on be honest

Im chilled here ... no way your making me quell on something Im not wrong about

Freed by the American Courts as the Bankers had acheived their aim stopping the Green back

You tell me why would a country free the men who killed the President

unless it had been beneficial to his successor

[Dig]

You Guys just cant accept the truth ... come on be honest

Im chilled here ... no way your making me quell on something Im not wrong about

Your "truth" has changed 3 times.

Which is it?  The British Royals? The Zionists? The Masons? The Germans? The Jesuits?

You are not dividing and conquering the NWO, you are trying to confuse people searching for truth by continuing to mix everything up and blame one sub-elite group, then another.

[robertcalm]

I have not changed my truth or facts in any single way in this thread

Go back check

You will see ..

I never mentioned Jesuits as your truth is flawed

I proved German/British Royal Family Lineage

dont get what I have changed

[robertcalm]

In these Posts I have been polite.. Courteous

Provided Links and evidence of all my responses

I have been called a Liar with no substance

I have been called a Troll with no reason

I have been called a retard when there no argument

If you actually read this thread I havent said a word wrong

But Im being accussed of all sorts of things that I never said in the first place...


I have not defended the Royal Family in this thread
I have never said Palmerston was not British I dont know where that came from

All the way through all I did was defend lies targeted at me ...

Prove me otherwise with a paste from this Post and I will apologise

If you read it back you will quite plainly see I have not done or said anything wrong