VACCINES: AUTISM - DEPOPULATION - BILL GATES

Author Topic: VACCINES: AUTISM - DEPOPULATION - BILL GATES  (Read 160615 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
thank you ..

"Researchers at Mayo Clinic are hacking the genetic code that controls the human response to disease vaccination"

...because GMO is working out so well.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,846
Oh now I get it GENETIC SCREENING!!!

"
These and similar studies will likely allow physicians to prescribe appropriate doses and timing of vaccines based on
routine genetic screening blood tests in the near future.

"
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Offline jerryweaver

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,430
Poisoned by a Vaccination John Berchielli
« Reply #562 on: July 05, 2015, 02:39:32 PM »
Poisoned by a Vaccination John Berchielli

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoR1uPXZ1mE

Former "Volunteer" And Proponent Of Forced Vaccines Has A Message For You -- From His Hospital Bed...

In the video, a pro SB277 'volunteer' is hospitalized after being vaccinated, and has a good debrief for those who listen:

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
Eugenics Repackaged for Modern Times (Still For The 'Greater Good')
« Reply #563 on: July 06, 2015, 06:56:42 AM »
Mapping the Genome and Modern Genetics: Eugenics Repackaged for Modern Times http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/mapping-the-genome-and-modern-genetics-eugenics-repackaged-for-modern-times/#sthash.DCPXknFc.dpuf

by John P. Thomas
Health Impact News

This is part II of a series on the relationship between the eugenics movement and modern genetics. It examines whether true health and true happiness lie in the human genome. Are we really bound to the set of genes that we received from our parents? Or can we overcome what we were given? What are the factors that activate or deactivate certain genes? How can we control the expression of our genetic make-up to promote our health and the health of our children? Can we trust everything we hear about the benefits of genetic research?

Is there a dark side to genetics? Is there reason to suspect hidden motivations of certain groups who want us to be convinced that our genes, and only our genes, control every aspect of our health and well-being? Is it wise to believe that we have no other options than to suffer while scientists look for genetic cures for all that ails us?

The previous article reviewed the history of the eugenics movement and examined how it was given a facelift and transformed into what we now think of as the modern science of genetics. It discussed the eugenics program of Adolf Hitler that terminated the lives of eleven million men, women and children.

Hitler was strongly influenced by Darwin’s theory of evolution and by Americans who were promoting eugenics. He closely followed the teachings of university professors in the United States who were teaching eugenics and using the principles of Darwin’s theory of evolution to form a “superior” race of people in America. The previous article questioned whether there remains a link between the eugenics movement of the past and modern genetic science. Do they still share common goals?


READ MORE @ LINK
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,292
* Anti-Vaccine Course Stays at Univ of Toronto, after investigating
« Reply #564 on: July 07, 2015, 02:10:58 PM »
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/nation...rticle25327336/
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/nation...015+%282%29.pdf

Quote
The University of Toronto says it stands by a health studies course in which students were required to read and watch material stating vaccines are toxic and linked to serious health problems.

---

The university’s review concluded the course content on immunization “had not been unbalanced” and that “in context, [it] would enable critical analysis and inquiry,” according to an e-mail statement from Althea Blackburn-Evans, U of T’s director of media relations.


U of T investigates instructor over anti-vaccine course materials
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health...rticle23277476/


IMO, Dr. Andrew Wakefield is credible and anyone who says he is not, is a liar. He cares about kids, which is why he has sacrificed everything to give you the truth about vaccines! READ, DON'T LET THE LYING MEDIA TELL YOU WHAT YOU WILL BELIEVE ON ANY SUBJECT. THEY LIE SO MUCH, NO ONE SHOULD BELIEVE THEM!
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...?showtopic=7004
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline lee51

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,732
Re: * Anti-Vaccine Course Stays at Univ of Toronto, after investigating
« Reply #565 on: July 07, 2015, 02:13:40 PM »
Wow--good for Canada! Dr. Wakefield needs to watch his back though.

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,292
Re: * Anti-Vaccine Course Stays at Univ of Toronto, after investigating
« Reply #566 on: July 07, 2015, 02:22:58 PM »
Wow--good for Canada! Dr. Wakefield needs to watch his back though.

Yeah, but as usual,  the professor's name is no longer on their faculty list. Big pharma ruins careers when people tell the truth about their scumbaggery, just like they did to Wakefield.

HOWEVER, THE POSITIVE PARTS OF THIS STORY ARE THAT THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO DIDN'T COW TO BIG PHARMA, AND THE PROFESSOR GOT HER MESSAGE OUT AND IT GOT IN THE NEWS, JUST LIKE WAKEFIELD!

PEOPLE NEED TO KEEP EXPOSING HOW BIG PHARMA HARMS PEOPLE! DON'T EVER STOP! AS LONG AS THEY KEEP TRYING TO BLOCK OTHER VIEWPOINTS ON THEIR DRUGS, AND REFUSE TO ALLOW A BALANCED APPROACH, YOU MUST KEEP EXPOSING THEM!

THE MEDIA, LIKE MANY DOCTORS AND OTHERS WHO SUPPORT A SINGLE VIEW ON DRUGS, ARE BRIBED BY BIG PHARMA MONIES, AND THAT IS ABSOLUTELY SHAMEFUL! LOOK AT THE ADS ON YOUR TV. WHO DO YOU THINK HELPS FUND BIG MEDIA? THEY WON'T TELL THE TRUTH BECAUSE IF THEY DID THEIR FUNDING WOULD DRY UP. SHAMEFUL THERE ARE SO MANY COWARDS AND SELLOUTS IN THESE INDUSTRIES!
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: * Anti-Vaccine Course Stays at Univ of Toronto, after investigating
« Reply #567 on: July 07, 2015, 06:06:28 PM »
Before eugenists Rockefeller / Carnegie took over the 'independent' medical system (USA) medical schools were 'there own' medical universities 'independent' of big pharma and general university influences.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
How The CDC Made 30,000 Diagnoses Of Polio Instantly Disappear
« Reply #568 on: July 07, 2015, 09:40:57 PM »
How The CDC Made 30,000 Diagnoses Of Polio Instantly Disappear
http://www.naturalblaze.com/2015/07/the-cdc-made-these-two-radical-changes.html#sthash.lT6XiX1V.XYmoLtiG.dpuf

By Shawn Siegel

The graph is from the Ratner report (1), the transcript of a 1960 panel sponsored by the Illinois Medical Society, on which sat three PhD statisticians and an MD, met to discuss the problems with the ongoing polio vaccination campaign.

The polio vaccine was licensed in the U.S. in 1954. From 1950 thru 1955, the striped and clear portions of the bars represent about 85% of the reported cases, or 30,000 per year, on average. Those cases were automatically eliminated by two radical changes the CDC made to the diagnostic parameters and labeling protocol of the disease as soon as the vaccine was licensed – 30,000 cases a year we were subsequently told were eliminated by the vaccine

That success, held aloft as a banner of the industry, is an illusion. The CDC has an awesome power of control over public perception, sculpting it from behind closed doors in Atlanta, with the point of a pen.

Over the last sixty years in the U.S., more than a million cases of what would have been diagnosed as polio pre-vaccine – same symptoms - were given different labels.

The change didn’t stop there, however. As addressed in the Ratner report, they also changed the definition of a polio epidemic, greatly reducing the likelihood that any subsequent outbreaks would be so labeled – as though the severity, or noteworthiness, of paralytic polio had halved, overnight. It’s summed up thusly in the report:

 Presently [1960], a community is considered to have an epidemic when it has 35 cases of polio per year per 100,000 population. Prior to the introduction of the Salk vaccine the National Foundation defined an epidemic as 20 or more cases of polio per year per 100,000 population. On this basis there were many epidemics throughout the United States yearly. The present higher rate has resulted in not a real, but a semantic elimination of epidemics.

And that’s precisely what happened to polio: not a real, but a semantic elimination of the disease.

In the decades following the release of the vaccine, additional changes were made to the diagnostic parameters of the disease, changes involving analysis of cerebrospinal fluid and stool and additional testing (2), each succeeding change making it less and less likely that a diagnosis of paralytic polio would result.

And, critically, before the vaccine was licensed polio diagnoses were made clinically and accepted from around the nation, duly reported to the American public annually as polio, no lab analysis required, while after it was licensed only the CDC was – and is - allowed to issue confirmations of paralytic polio – all suspected cases had to be sent to them for analysis and testing. (3)

Again, perception is key. Because of the persistent pre-vaccine news coverage of the disease, including film footage of paralytic polio victims in leg braces, or immobilized, strapped to huge, inclined boards, or housed in foreboding iron lungs, the public pictured the thousands of kids reported with polio each year as suffering terribly, when in truth the pictures involved only a fraction of a percent of the diagnosed cases.

Moreover, while for many the perception was that the iron lung was a permanent fixture, in the majority of cases the machine was needed only temporarily – generally about one to two weeks. (4)

The arbitrariness of the change in the diagnostic parameter of paralytic polio, from one day of paralysis to two months, resulting specifically in the elimination of all the cases represented by the striped portions of the bars in the graph, is remarkable. Indeed, the very idea that the length of time you’re ill determines the disease is remarkable!, and flies in the face of the science of virology.

Continued @ Link Above.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,846
Re: How The CDC Made 30,000 Diagnoses Of Polio Instantly Disappear
« Reply #569 on: July 07, 2015, 10:51:54 PM »
wow nice find , that would explain a lot , it's very similar to the IPCC and global warming "science"  phenomenon .
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Offline TARA

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 255
Re: Autism doctor who exposed vaccine damage found dead in North Carolina
« Reply #570 on: July 15, 2015, 05:14:29 AM »
Are there any news of the autopsy? Very mysterious death... ::)
Let him that would move the world first move himself.

Socrates

Offline lee51

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,732
Re: Autism doctor who exposed vaccine damage found dead in North Carolina
« Reply #571 on: July 15, 2015, 12:18:01 PM »
Seems to be lots of deaths..

http://www.healthnutnews.com/fifth-holistic-alternative-doctor-33-found-dead-in-florida-making-5-dead-and-5-more-missing-doctors/

5th holistic doctor (age 33) died in Florida making 5 dead and 5 more missing

UPDATE: TIMELINE OF ALL 10 deaths and disappearances at bottom which I highly recommend you read.

I read about Dr. Baron Holt DC not long after he died less than a month ago near me here on the East Coast of Florida. Father’s day June 21st. Dr. Holt was coincidentally found the very same day  that Dr. Bruce Hedendal (also a DC found here on the E Coast of Florida)  was found  slumped over in his car. Like Holt, Dr. Hedendal was also extremely fit. Dr Hedendal been doing an athletic event earlier in the day before he died.

These two chiropractors who tragically died the same day in the same state, come  2 days after the death of Dr. Bradstreet MD who was found in a river in North Carolina with a gunshot wound to his chest. Previously Dr. Bradstreet  had lived and practiced here on the East Coast of Florida as well.   I hesitated covering Dr. Holt’s story as I had no information and didn’t feel comfortable as there were no recent articles I could reference.

Now there is.

From the article which refers to Dr. Holt as the faithful healer:


His unexpected death last month while on a trip to Jacksonville, Fla. has been a blow to his family and the community he’d created through his work. Though he had been struggling with recent health issues, none were thought to be life threatening by loved ones. His family is awaiting the results from an autopsy report.

I had searched before for any information but saw no statement from the family. Now that I see this article states his family felt he had no health challenge that was life threatening and was a mere 33 years old.

The article goes on to say Holt’s practice, Revolution Chiropractic, had just celebrated its fifth anniversary this year. Highly fit at 33, he was deeply connected to his Christian faith, and his career as a Triangle practitioner was booming.

Holt took a holistic approach to treatment; he and his staff taught classes on nutrition, exercise, even aromatherapy.

In 2012, he traveled to London to work with the U.S. Olympic team, and could count Ultimate Fighting Championship athletes among the 500 patients his practice saw each week, said Brigitte Spurgeon, friend and Revolution Chiropractic clinical director.

When I read that he was “highly fit” well accomplished, even traveling to London to work with the Olympic team and already emerging as a prominent natural chiropractor, I feel that it’s my duty to report on his sad  untimely death whatever the cause.

Again, our hearts go out to his family, friends and loved ones and we hope they get to the bottom of this whatever the cause may be.  Just to give you a timeline I’m going to write it out as follows:

#1 June 19th– Dr Bradstreet, formerly of Florida, now practicing in Georgia was found with a gunshot wound to his chest in a river.  The small town locals ruled the death almost immediately as a suicide but many have their doubts.  This same day in Mexico- June 19th (the only case outside the US) 3 doctors were traveling to the State Capital to deliver some papers (we don’t know what they contained)  They were reported missing that day. Authorities said they found the bodies, but the family says those bodies look nothing like their family members. A sad but riveting article was written about those details here.

#2 June 21st– We have two chiropractors both in Florida, both on the East Coast both presumably  healthy and both described as very fit both found dead.  We still have no cause of death in the articles we can find on either one. A few people have contacted me about Dr. Hedendal, but admit that they were surprised by his death and still find it shocking he died. I’ve been given a few causes of death but am not certain and even the friends telling me weren’t confident this was the case.  Interestingly Dr. Holt lived in North Carolina which is the state Dr. Bradstreet’s body (see #1 story above)  was found  2 days prior. Though Dr. Bradstreet now lived in Georgia and before that neighboring state Florida.

#3 June 26th, Dr. Patrick Fitzpatrick MD goes missing. He was traveling from North Dakota to neighboring Montana (which he did often as his son lived in Montana) and his truck and trailer were found on the side of the road. Searches have expanded, but authorities say it’s like he vanished without a trace. He’s 6′ tall, described as Irish with a goatee and details can be found on the links.

#4 June 29th– The beloved holistic  Theresa Sievers MD was found murdered  in her home.  Her co worker says she was known as the “Mother Teresa of South Florida. Her husband and children were in Connecticut at a family reunion. The authorities have been investigating for two weeks “around the clock”  and now say that it was targeted, not random, not a home invasion ,and when the facts come out “books and movies will be written about it” it’s that huge of a story.  On this very same day, June 29th,  Jeffrey Whiteside MD a pulmonologist went missing , vanishing when he simply “walked away” .  Dr Whiteside, known for his successful treatment of lung cancer, disappeared in Door County Wisconsin while vacationing with family. They say he was  on foot and had no vehicle and numerous reports call it “mysterious” saying he too vanished without a trace. They’ve been searching now 2 weeks and even colleagues have joined in (along with many bloodhounds, drones search parties and helicopters) but not a shred of evidence in 2 weeks.

#5 July 1oth– Lisa Riley DO (Doctor of Osteopathic medicine) is found in her home with a gunshot wound to her head. Her husband called it in 911 and has a prior record, and actually was charged with attempted murder on his ex Ms. King, before charges were dropped. Evidence showed that there was  gun residue was found on Ms. King’s  hand and not Mr Riley’s and his story collaborated but hers allegedly didn’t and kept changing. At least that’s what evidence showed at the time.  (click link in this paragraph for their story with details)

We hope all 5 missing doctors are found alive and well. Our hearts go out to the other 5 doctors who were found dead and we hope they get to the bottom of each one and find the killer or killers soon of those who were indeed murdered.

This is Erin Elizabeth July 14, 2015. still concerned for my own better half of  years who is a prominent outspoken holistic DO.

Offline lee51

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,732

Offline wyzandrea

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Even though this is not a good idea at first sight, but trying is not so bad. Sterilization for the kangaroons makes effect on immunocontraception. While, I never try such kind of experiment in my lab http://www.creative-animodel.com/ till now.

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
Not Only Are Your Vaccines GMO But The 'Adjuvants' Are Nano-Tech To Boot.
« Reply #574 on: July 24, 2015, 12:36:03 AM »
I just want to bring this to the attention of the public. 

Not only are today's vaccines genetically altered 'Franken-viruses'...  (I'm learning with three DNA strains or a triple-helix.  They always love to do their dirty work in threes.) ... not only do they have the Franken-viruses in them, but now, they are letting the cat out of the bag (slowly) about the nanobot adjuvants to jack your immune system.  As if mercury, aluminum... was not bad enough.

This playing God directly into your veins takes GMO's to a completely different level folks.

You can guarantee this crapola is already in vaccines and big pharma does NOT have to put them in the ingredient's list because they own the patents on these lab created monsters. 

Now, the NIH (et al) will get into the 'size' issue in this article but nano tech is very capable of 'doing'.  What will it 'really' do is the greater question in all of this.

They say...
"The increasing attention on vaccine development is greatly justified based on the continuous emergence of deadly pathogens that are difficult to manage"

I would submit that this vaccine agenda is a major contributor to the "emergence of deadly pathogens that are difficult to manage."
God help us all.
---------------------------------------------
Nano-microparticles as immune adjuvants: correlating particle sizes and the resultant immune responses
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2963573/

Abstract
The development of novel immune adjuvants is emerging as a significant area of vaccine delivery based on the continued necessity to amplify immune responses to a wide array of new antigens that are poorly immunogenic. This article specifically focuses on the application of nanoparticles and microparticles as vaccine adjuvants. Many investigators are in agreement that the size of the particles is crucial to their adjuvant activities. However, reports on correlating the size of particle-based adjuvants and the resultant immune responses have been conflicting, with investigators on both sides of the fence with impressive data in support of the effectiveness of particles with small sizes (submicron) over those with larger sizes (micron) and vice versa, while other investigators reported data that showed submicron- and micron-sized particles are effective to the same degree as immune adjuvants. We have generated a list of biological, immunological and, more importantly, vaccine formulation parameters that may have contributed to the inconsistency from different studies and made recommendations on future studies attempting to correlate the size of particulate adjuvants and the immune responses induced. The information gathered could lead to strategies to optimize the performance of nano-microparticles as immune adjuvants.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
Continued

They're not in vaccines yet! Oops, it looks like they are.

Nanoparticle vaccines
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X13016319

Abstract
Nanotechnology increasingly plays a significant role in vaccine development. As vaccine development orientates toward less immunogenic “minimalist” compositions, formulations that boost antigen effectiveness are increasingly needed. The use of nanoparticles in vaccine formulations allows not only improved antigen stability and immunogenicity, but also targeted delivery and slow release. A number of nanoparticle vaccines varying in composition, size, shape, and surface properties have been approved for human use and the number of candidates is increasing. However, challenges remain due to a lack of fundamental understanding regarding the in vivo behavior of nanoparticles, which can operate as either a delivery system to enhance antigen processing and/or as an immunostimulant adjuvant to activate or enhance immunity. This review provides a broad overview of recent advances in prophylactic nanovaccinology. Types of nanoparticles used are outlined and their interaction with immune cells and the biosystem are discussed. Increased knowledge and fundamental understanding of nanoparticle mechanism of action in both immunostimulatory and delivery modes, and better understanding of in vivo biodistribution and fate, are urgently required, and will accelerate the rational design of nanoparticle-containing vaccines.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
Nano Squalene (Oh it just keeps getting better.)
http://www.invivogen.com/addavax

for research use only, not for use in humans.  (YET. So they say.)
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
I like this one.

Fabrication of nanoadjuvant with poly-e-caprolactone
http://www.dovepress.com/fabrication-of-nanoadjuvant-with-poly-e-caprolactone-pcl-for-developin-peer-reviewed-article-IJN

It's claim to fame is that it's "biodegradable".  So, after this nano junk screws you up, it "degrades" and can NOT ever be traced that it was this nano crap which harmed or killed you in the first place.  The NWO must be licking their chops over this one.

If you read these sales brochures for all this nano tech you would think vaccines will, without fail, really work this time.  Honest really!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXa5ub3b49k
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
Continued

They're not in vaccines yet! Oops, it looks like they are.

Nanoparticle vaccines
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X13016319

Abstract
Nanotechnology increasingly plays a significant role in vaccine development. As vaccine development orientates toward less immunogenic “minimalist” compositions, formulations that boost antigen effectiveness are increasingly needed. The use of nanoparticles in vaccine formulations allows not only improved antigen stability and immunogenicity, but also targeted delivery and slow release. A number of nanoparticle vaccines varying in composition, size, shape, and surface properties have been approved for human use and the number of candidates is increasing. However, challenges remain due to a lack of fundamental understanding regarding the in vivo behavior of nanoparticles, which can operate as either a delivery system to enhance antigen processing and/or as an immunostimulant adjuvant to activate or enhance immunity. This review provides a broad overview of recent advances in prophylactic nanovaccinology. Types of nanoparticles used are outlined and their interaction with immune cells and the biosystem are discussed. Increased knowledge and fundamental understanding of nanoparticle mechanism of action in both immunostimulatory and delivery modes, and better understanding of in vivo biodistribution and fate, are urgently required, and will accelerate the rational design of nanoparticle-containing vaccines.

Excuse me but this must be underscored
Why we don't trust vaccine science and all the people pushing them...  The definition of 'insanity' pure insanity...

"However, challenges remain due to a lack of fundamental understanding regarding the in vivo behavior of nanoparticles." DUH!!.


YET THE SOB's APPROVED IT'S USE FOR HUMANS!!!!! SEE ABOVE!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXa5ub3b49k
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
Nanoparticle Hazards

It seems that "engineered nanoparticles" have been used in vaccines and drugs going back to the late 1990's and, reading the hazards, that even by the mid 2000's the medical establishment had acknowledged that nano materials in drugs and vaccines has opened a Pandora's box of problems such as respiratory disease and heart problems.  The medical establishment has no explanation on how or why these 'engineered' nano particles cause the problems they do however the medical establishment is determined to forage ahead with there reckless experimentation on all of us anyway.
-----------------------------------

Toxicological hazards of nanoparticles
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2527668/


General concepts

To use the potential of Nanotechnology in Nanomedicine, full attention is needed to safety and toxicological issues. For pharmaceuticals specific drug delivery formulations may be used to increase the so called therapeutic ratio or index being the margin between the dose needed for clinical efficacy and the dose inducing adverse side effects (toxicity). However, also for these specific formulations a toxicological evaluation is needed. This is particularly true for the applications of nanoparticles for drug delivery. In these applications particles are brought intentionally into the human body and environment, and some of these new applications are envisaged an important improvement of health care (Buxton et al 2003; European Technology Platform on Nanomedicine 2005; Ferrari 2005). Opinions started to divert when toxicologists claimed that new science, methods and protocols are needed (Borm 2002; Nel et al 2006). However, the need for this is now underlined by several expert reports (Oberdörster, Maynard et al 2005; SCENIHR 2006) and more importantly by the following concepts:

Nanomaterials are developed for their unique (surface) properties in comparison to bulk materials. Since surface is the contact layer with the body tissue, and a crucial determinant of particle response, these unique properties need to be investigated from a toxicological standpoint. When nanoparticles are used for their unique reactive characteristics it may be expected that these same characteristics also have an impact on the toxicity of such particles. Although current tests and procedures in drug and device evaluation may be appropriate to detect many risks associated with the use of these nanoparticles, it cannot be assumed that these assays will detect all potential risks. So, additional assays may be needed. (SCENIHR 2006) This may differ depending on the type of particles used, ie, biological versus non-biological origin.

Nanoparticles are attributed qualitatively different physico-chemical characteristics from micron-sized particles, which may result in changed body distribution, passage of the blood brain barrier, and triggering of blood coagulation pathways. In view of these characteristics specific emphasis should be on investigations in (pharmaco)kinetics and distribution studies of nanoparticles. What is currently lacking is a basic understanding of the biological behavior of nanoparticles in terms of distribution in vivo both at the organ and cellular level.

Effects of combustion derived nanoparticles in environmentally exposed populations mainly occur in diseased individuals. Typical pre-clinical screening is almost always done in healthy animals and volunteers and risks of particles may therefore be detected at a very late stage.

It may be argued that some if not all of these specific effects will be detected during routine testing and post marketing evaluation after clinical use. All would depend on the types of assays used in the preclinical evaluation, which should be considered in the light of the use of the final products. In addition, one cannot rely on the toxicological profile of the bulk material when that material is used in a nanoformulation. What is clear is that the safety evaluation and the risk benefit analysis need to be performed on a case by case basis.

The use of nanoparticles as drug carrier may reduce the toxicity of the incorporated drug. In general the toxicity of the whole formulation is investigated while results of the nanoparticles itself are not described. So, discrimination between drug and nanoparticle toxicity cannot be made. So, there should be a specific emphasis on the toxicity of the “empty” non-drug loaded particles. This is especially important when slowly or non degradable particles are used for drug delivery which may show persistence and accumulation on the site of the drug delivery, eventually resulting in chronic inflammatory reactions.

Evidence for nanoparticle toxicity

The largest database on the toxicity of nanoparticles has originated from inhalation toxicology including the PM10 literature (particulate matter with a size below 10 mm), where the ‘NP hypothesis’ has proved to be a powerful drive for research (Donaldson et al 2002, 2004; Oberdörster, Oberdörster et al 2005; Borm et al 2006). An overview of particle terminology in relation to ambient effects is given in Table 3. Therefore it relevant to discuss this evidence in the expectation that it will shed light on the toxicity of engineered NPs. The idea that combustion-derived NPs are an important component that drives the adverse effects of environmental particulate air pollution or PM10 comes from several sources:

Table 3
Table 3
Various denominations of particles in inhalation toxicology and drug delivery in relation to their source (ambient, bulk, engineered)
Much of the mass of PM10 is considered to be non-toxic and so there has arisen the idea that there is a component(s) of PM10 that actually drives the pro-inflammatory effects and combustion-derived NP seems a likely candidate.
Nanoparticles are the dominant particle type by number suggesting that they may be important and their small size means that they have a large surface area per unit mass. Particle toxicology suggests that, for toxic particles generally, more particle surface equals to more toxicity.

Substantial toxicological data and limited data from epidemiological sources support the contention that NPs in PM10 are important drivers of adverse effects.

The adverse health effects of particulate matter (PM) are measurable as exacerbations of respiratory disease and deaths as well as hospitalizations and deaths from respiratory and cardiovascular disease (Dockery et al 1993; Brooke et al 2004; Pope et al 2004). Inflammation is the common factor that binds together these adverse effects and the ability of NPs to cause inflammation can be seen as an important property. It is not clear what effects of NPs have pulmonary inflammation as a prerequisite and what effects could potentially be driven by exposures below those causing inflammation. There is also the potential for pulmonary inflammation to result in changes in membrane permeability that in turn may impact the potential for particles to distribute beyond the lung. Some NPs may have the extra potential of affecting cardiovascular disease directly. Vascular function was impaired after inhalation of diesel exhaust particles (Mills et al 2005). However, data to date are limited and not all studies of nanoparticles have shown significant translocation from lung to the blood. In some studies translocation has been rather minimal (Kreyling et al 2002; Takenaka et al 2006). Understanding clearance kinetics of inhaled ambient air nanoparticles will also be important in understanding their potential for adverse effects.

The current paradigm in particle toxicology is that ultrafine ambient air particles have the potential of affecting cardiovascular disease both indirectly via pulmonary inflammation and directly through particle distribution. Although important, this property of redistribution has yet to be demonstrated for NPs present in real PM10. It should be noted that there are several mechanisms whereby NPs could lead to inflammatory effects, as is the case for larger particles. These mechanisms are either based on the large surface area of particle core or on soluble components released by the NPs. In addition various chemicals including those of biological origin like endotoxin may be adsorbed onto the NP and released (Carty et al 2003; Kreyling et al 2004; Schins et al 2004). Several toxicological studies support the contention that NPs in PM10 could drive inflammatory effects. There are a number of components of PM10 that contribute to the mass but have little toxicity – these include salts such as sulfates, chlorides and ammonium salts and nitrates, but also wind-blown or crustal dust. In fact within PM10 there are only few components that toxicologists would identify as likely mediators of adverse effects – ie, particle surfaces, organics, metals and endotoxin (in some PM10 samples). In fact, a large surface area, organics and metals are all characteristic of combustion–derived particles and so these have attracted considerable toxicological attention (Donaldson et al 2005). However, it is difficult to untangle, in a combustion particle sample, the relative roles of surface, organics and metals, although this has been most attempted in vitro. The aggregation of multiple chemical species including biological compounds like endotoxin limits the extrapolation of the results on the toxicological effects of such particles.

Toxicological effects of nanoparticles

As already mentioned above, NPs exert some very special properties that are very relevant in the further design of toxicity testing of engineered nanomaterials. An overview of most striking effects of (nano) particles that have been observed over the last decades is given in Table 4 along with the particle type that have been tested in this response. Several effects are just quantitatively different from fine particles. In this case nanoparticles may cause the same effects as ‘traditional’ particles (eg, inflammation, lung cancer) but they may be more potent because of their greater surface area.

Table 4
Table 4
Toxicity of engineered and combustion (nano) particles as illustrated by their most unique adverse effects in vivo and in vitro
However, nanoparticles could also cause new types of effects not previously seen with larger particles (eg, mitochondrial damage, uptake through olfactory epithelium, platelet aggregation, cardiovascular effects). These effects depicted in Table 4 clearly need a new way of handling their toxicology. In addition, epidemiological evidence suggests that these effects occur predominantly in subjects that have an impaired health. This finding should be considered in developing toxicological testing models.

Effects on blood and cardiovascular system
As we discussed earlier, ligand coated engineered nanoparticles are being explored and used as agents for molecular imaging or drug delivery tools. This has led to a considerable understanding of particle properties that can affect penetration in tissue without affecting tissue function. Cationic NPs, including gold and polystyrene have been shown to cause hemolysis and blood clotting, while usually anionic particles are quite non-toxic. This conceptual understanding maybe used to prevent potential effects of unintended NP exposure. Similarly, drug loaded nanoparticles have been used to prolong half-life or reduce side-effects and have shown which particle properties need to be modified to allow delivery, while being biocompatible (Gupta and Gupta 2005).

On the other hand, one is trying to find explanations for the increased risk of patients with cardiovascular diseases upon exposure to PM and/or traffic. Several toxicological studies have demonstrated that combustion and model NPs can gain access to the blood following inhalation or instillation and can enhance experimental thrombosis but it is not clear whether this was an effect of pulmonary inflammation or particles translocated to the blood (Nemmar et al 2002, 2003; Mills et al 2005). High exposures to DEP by inhalation caused altered heart rate in hypertensive rats (Campen et al 2003) interpreted as a direct effect of DEP on the pacemaker activity of the heart. Inflammation in distal sites has long been associated with destabilization of atheromatous plaques and both instillation and inhalation of PM cause morphological evidence of atheromatous plaque increase and destabilization in rabbits (Suwa et al 2002) and mice (Chen and Nadziejko 2005). Ultrafine carbon black instilled into the blood has been reported to induce platelet accumulation in the hepatic microvasculature of healthy mice in association with prothrombotic changes on the endothelial surface of the hepatic microvessels (Khandoga et al 2004). Recent studies with carbon derived nanomaterials showed that platelet aggregation was induced by both single and multi-wall carbon nanotubes, but not by the C60-fullerenes that are used as building blocks for these CNT (Radomski et al 2005). These data show that not all nanomaterials act similar in this test, and that surface area is not the only factor playing a role here. The data also corroborate the earlier concept developed in medicine that mainly cationic species have an effect on blood clotting. Interestingly, this is the first study that allows bridging of data, since also a real life PM10 sample (SRM1648) was included in the test-series. Actually the PM sample showed a lower effect compared to the carbon nanotubes (Radomski et al 2005).

Uptake and effects of nanoparticles in the brain
Nanoparticles can get access to the brain by two different mechanisms, ie, (1) transsynaptic transport after inhalation through the olfactory epithelium, and (2) uptake through the blood-brain barrier. The first pathway has been studied primarily with model particles such as carbon, Au and MnO2 in experimental inhalation models in rats (Oberdörster et al 2004; Oberdörster, Oberdörster et al 2005). The second pathway has been the result of extensive research and particle surface manipulation in drug delivery (Kreuter 2001; Koziara et al 2006; Tiwari and Amiji 2006). The latter studies suggest that the physiological barrier may limit the distribution of some proteins and viral particles after transvascular delivery to the brain, suggesting that the healthy BBB contains defense mechanisms protecting it from blood borne nanoparticle exposure. When nanoparticles with different surface characteristics were evaluated, neutral nanoparticles and low concentrations of anionic nanoparticles were found to have no effect on BBB integrity, whereas high concentrations of anionic nanoparticles and cationic nanoparticles were toxic for the BBB. Nanoparticles have been shown to induce the production of reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress (Nel et al 2006) and this has been confirmed in the brain after inhalation of MnO2 nanoparticles (Elder et al 2006). Oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases. Evidence for the involvement of ambient air nanoparticles in these effects is presented by studies in biopsies from city dwellers. Alzheimer’s like pathology was demonstrated in brain sections by increased markers of inflammation and AB42-accumulation in frontal cortex and hippocampus in association with the presence of nanoparticles (Calderon-Garciduenas et al 2004). Also inhalation exposure of BALB/c mice to particulate matter showed activation of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the brain (Campbell et al 2005). Whether this is due to the fraction of combustion nanoparticles remains to be investigated.

Go to:
Current data on the toxicology engineered nanoparticles
In the past few years a number of papers have described the toxicology of newly engineered nanomaterials, including fullerenes (Sayes et al 2005), carbon nanotubes (Donaldson et al 2006), quantum dots (Hardman 2006) and have illustrated that apart from size and surface area, many more parameters describing the material (surface) properties have to be included. In a recent report Costigan (2006) reviewed the evidence for toxicity of NPs used in healthcare products. Her conclusions again stressed the limited availability of toxicity data of the NPs in use.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline donnay

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,659
  • Live Free Or Die Trying!
This is designed to kill--depopulate.  The eugenicists are running things.

Nevertheless this will be my line in the sand.
Please visit my website: https://www.theherbsofthefield.com/

Offline jerryweaver

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,430
Quote
Nanoparticles are the dominant particle type by number suggesting that they may be important and their small size means that they have a large surface area per unit mass. Particle toxicology suggests that, for toxic particles generally, more particle surface equals to more toxicity.

I'm guessing it's working in the Chemtrails also.
Nano Aerosols In Chemtrails Guarantees Global Health Crisis
http://chemtrailsmuststop.com/2014/07/nano-aerosols-in-chemtrails-guarantees-global-health-crisis/

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
I'm guessing it's working in the Chemtrails also.
Nano Aerosols In Chemtrails Guarantees Global Health Crisis
http://chemtrailsmuststop.com/2014/07/nano-aerosols-in-chemtrails-guarantees-global-health-crisis/

Exactly!
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov


Offline sipsipaway

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
Re: VACCINES: AUTISM - DEPOPULATION
« Reply #584 on: July 26, 2015, 04:03:14 PM »
Nature Cure doctor in 1922 stated:

At present the trend of allopathic medical science is undoubtedly toward the serum, antitoxin and vaccine treatment. Practically all medical research tends that way. Every few days we see in the daily papers reports of new serums and antitoxins which are claimed to cure or create immunity to certain diseases.

  Suppose the research and practice of medical science continue along these lines and are generally accepted or, as the medical associations would have it, forced upon the public by law. What would be the result? Before a child reached the years of adolescence, it would have had injected into its blood the vaccines, serums, and antitoxins of smallpox, hydrophobia, tetanus (lockjaw), cerebro-spinal meningitis, typhoid fever, diphtheria, pneumonia, scarlet fever, etc.

  If allopathy were to have its way, the blood of the adult would be a mixture of dozens of filthy bacterial extracts, disease taints and destructive drug poisons. The tonsils and adenoids, the appendix vermiformis and probably a few other parts of the human anatomy would be extirpated in early youth under compulsion of the health departments.

  What is more rational and sensible: the endeavor to produce immunity to disease by making the human body the breeding ground for all sorts of antibacteria and antipoisons, or to create natural immunity by building up the blood on a normal basis, purifying the body of morbid matter and poisons, correcting mechanical lesions and by cultivating the right mental attitude? Which one of these methods is more likely to be disease-building, which health-building?

  Just imagine what human blood will be like in coming generations if this artificial contamination with all sorts of disease taints and drug poisons is to be forced upon the people!

http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020123lindlahr/020123ch17.html

Offline Geniocrat

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,874
Re: VACCINES: AUTISM - DEPOPULATION
« Reply #585 on: July 26, 2015, 04:11:25 PM »
All part of the Nefilim plot to depopulate humanity.

Globalists are nothing but human traitors to these people.

Homo Sapien slaves to the Homo Capensis species...

They need to come out with a THEY LIVE 2:  The Live at the Vatican...

World Banker Says “Second Species” Controls Earth
 
http://www.secretsofthefed.com/disclosure-world-banker-says-second-species-controls-earth/

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline Letsbereal

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,615
  • Know Thyself
Green light for world's first malaria vaccine
« Reply #587 on: July 26, 2015, 06:07:36 PM »
Green light for world's first malaria vaccine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YSdkuh4AdU

Jul 24, 2015 euronews
->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-

Offline Letsbereal

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,615
  • Know Thyself
Jim Marrs on AJS - Depopulation
« Reply #588 on: July 26, 2015, 08:58:07 PM »
Revelation Of The Beast Revealed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cb4pErynvqQ

Jul 25, 2015 The Alex Jones Channel

Journalist and author Jim Marrs joins today's show breaking down his latest book Population Control and the truth corporate owners don't want you to discover.
->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-

Offline Letsbereal

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,615
  • Know Thyself
Jeff Rense & Jim Marrs - Population Control
« Reply #589 on: July 27, 2015, 10:19:09 PM »
Jeff Rense & Jim Marrs - Population Control https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmehPV3RmBk

Jul 24, 2015 Jeff Rense
->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,166
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Green light for world's first malaria vaccine
« Reply #590 on: July 27, 2015, 11:40:24 PM »
Green light for world's first malaria vaccine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YSdkuh4AdU

Jul 24, 2015 euronews

If you do even some modest research one finds you don't need a 'vaccine' to prevent Malaria.

The villain Bill Gates has been gushing over this one.  I've noticed that Bill, with all his billions, gives very little to zero in life saving infrastructure that would eliminated diseases such as malaria.

Nice guy that Bill.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline Letsbereal

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,615
  • Know Thyself
Meningitis: WHO in plea to avoid outbreak
« Reply #591 on: July 29, 2015, 12:02:23 AM »
Meningitis: WHO in plea to avoid outbreak https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNf9RYicst0

Jul 28, 2015 euronews

The World Health Organisation is calling for vaccine production to be increased to ward off a potential outbreak of meningitis.
->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-

Offline jofortruth

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,292
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline Dreamtraveler

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: VACCINES: AUTISM - DEPOPULATION - BILL GATES
« Reply #593 on: November 24, 2017, 05:55:46 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZos8FAouVk
"you know there is no conspiracy there folks just get your damn vaccine" she is such a bad actress...




Offline Dude447

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,184
Re: VACCINES: AUTISM - DEPOPULATION - BILL GATES
« Reply #594 on: November 24, 2017, 08:41:26 PM »
Have a flu vaccine or lose your job , the flu jab is a massive BS scam .