OMG!! Final Obama Born In Kenya Proof?

[GlobalCordon]

Divorce Papers Found-Obama Sr./ Ann Dunham says Obama Jr. born in Kenya


Plains Radio Network has posted that they have found, and are going to post it online, Obama Sr. VS Ann Dunham divorce papers, which lists Barack Obama Jr. as thier son, and as being born in Kenya..
I believe it's going to be posted online this Friday..
READ:www.investigatingobama.blogspot.com...
www.plainsradio.com

Forum:
http://pub29.bravenet.com/forum/2442810129/show/953026

[GlobalCordon]

Is this it peeps?

DA DA DAAAH!!!!!!!!!

[Amd304912]

hahahahaha thats nuts

[chris jones]

It will probaly be denied, they have a staff, the CIA, NSA and any other outfit to play with the papers. They are terrific at denial, its religously political.

Biden is not gem either. or pulling in Mcain, geez, when I think about it they are all in the same boat. Different faces, same agenda.

Its likened to two nations inside of one,( the gov. elitists or g7 )and the (commoners nation the Constitutionalists, of Americans).

Waht chice is better than the other, RP is out of the game, he was the hope and cure.

[Capt. Obvious]

this would totally be the bomb if it pans out. They guys aren;t like Hal Turner are they?

[nofakenews]

It will probaly be denied, they have a staff, the CIA, NSA and any other outfit to play with the papers. They are terrific at denial, its religously political.

Biden is not gem either. or pulling in Mcain, geez, when I think about it they are all in the same boat. Different faces, same agenda.

Its likened to two nations inside of one,( the gov. elitists or g7 )and the (commoners nation the Constitutionalists, of Americans).

What choice is better than the other, RP is out of the game, he was the hope and cure.

I bet they will be like that was typo or they were not thinking straight from the pressure of divorce.  

[Raincheck]

THE WHOLE WORLD'S WATCHING

THE WHOLE WORLD'S WATCHING

[GlobalCordon]

@Mr Jones..... If they can fool a planet over 911 then messing with a document should be easy....... Time will tell!

@ Capt Obv..... Yea baby da bomb.... But then what? Like Chris said... What or should i say who next?

[GlobalCordon]

In roles Billary Clinton!

All Hail AmeriKa's first female President!!!!

[TheHouseMan]

It doesn't look like Obama's going to make it to the White House at this point.

[Triadtropz]

It doesn't look like Obama's going to make it to the White House at this point.

the NSA will figure out a way to brush this under the rug...that inaugurations gonna happen.

[Nailer]

Get ready for the riots and civil unrest if it is all true and gets media attention. The fact is if the info is on a certified court document then it will be damn hard to say its fake .

Why wait till Friday to expose the  Obamafraud , do it now today and get the ball rolling and let all those who were involved in the cover up be exposed publicly.

[Nailer]

this lawyer tells how and where you can find the info that makes Obama NOT a natural born citizen.  She says Obama is NOT a natural born citizen and tells what laws prove this. BYE BYE Obama  LOL..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xexm-LzZdRA&eurl=http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message695804/pg1

URGENT message from Orly Taitz part 1: Obama Citizenship

[grapecrusher1]

In the very slim possibility he is sidelined one advantage would be the reduced chance of race battles when the riots kickoff.  I readily see the dumb white poor rednecks blaming the complete collapse on Obama and acting in a predictable moronic manner.  Instead of seeing through the facade that he is a puppet with anglo banking masters.  I can picture them rubbing their hands together with glee revelling in the serfs shredding one another.
What a cunning plan.

[independentWV]

Plains Radio hired investigator that went to Kenya and located the divorce documents. 

The slim possiblity that Obama will be taken out any riots will be work of government provacators. Economy is in shambles and bank bailouts woke lots of people up don't think they are trusting of government. Consider cost of sending investigator to Kenya paid for by citizens.

Our attention should be directed toward Congress in the event this happens.

[chris jones]

Plains Radio hired investigator that went to Kenya and located the divorce documents. 

The slim possiblity that Obama will be taken out any riots will be work of government provacators. Economy is in shambles and bank bailouts woke lots of people up don't think they are trusting of government. Consider cost of sending investigator to Kenya paid for by citizens.

Our attention should be directed toward Congress in the event this happens.

I'd like to agree, but my faith in our congress has been shattered.
Do they truly speak for the people, well folks I do not see it, do you?

When Bushy Invaded Iraq, his message and his cabinets were WMD's, threats to our National security, protection of our people. All a FN lie and we all know it, so does our Congress, Pelosi at the head.
Trust them, UH, UH. They are a bunch of scheming barstards.
Gutless traitors to their people and our constitution they swore to uphold. ( With the exception of a very few who have maintained their honor).
This will not get rid of Oby, even if proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, they will not stop this guy. Don't underestimate the power of deception , lies , and the power of this criminal gang in power. If they want Oby he will be, if they have a second on line, he or she will be.
 It is no longer up to us, the citizens of the nation, this is obvious and proven, our voting does not mean squat. It is a ploy, a memory of better days. We are controled, thats it. Its fric or frac, they are given a agenda and they had better carry it out or end up like Kennedy. They suked up to the power, there is not out but feet first.

[OldSchool]

Without a massive and major outcry from the citizens, the inauguration will still resume. In the remote chance that our representatives get a clue and grow a set, the probability of Bush cancelling the election is prominent, and is 1 of the 2 bad choices we have. Fair election was tossed out the window decades ago.

[independentWV]

http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2008/dec/judicial-watch-announces-list-washingtons-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-2008

Judicial Watch Announces List of Washington's "Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians" for 2008
Contact:
Press Office 202-646-5188

Washington, DC -- December 31, 2008
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released its 2008 list of Washington’s "Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians." The list, in alphabetical order, includes:

Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY): Let's start with the fact that Hillary Clinton is constitutionally ineligible to serve as Secretary of State in the Obama administration. According to the Ineligibility Clause of the United States Constitution, no member of Congress can be appointed to an office that has benefited from a salary increase during the time that Senator or Representative served in Congress. A January 2008 Executive Order signed by President Bush during Hillary Clinton's current Senate term increased the salary for Secretary of State, thereby rendering Senator Clinton ineligible for the position. (Congressional "fixes" do not address the constitutional issue. Her appointment would be in violation of the U.S. Constitution.) And then, of course, there is the long history of corrupt behavior that follows Hillary wherever she goes, including Chinagate, Filegate, pardons for terrorists, pardons for cash (for her brothers), White House fundraising coffees, Whitewater, Travelgate lies, doing business with the State of Arkansas while her husband was governor, Web Hubbell, smear campaigns, false financial disclosure forms, John Huang, Chinese generals, the Lippo Group, paid sleepovers in the Lincoln Bedroom, cattle futures fraud, and stealing White House furniture. (This corruption is still going strong. In 2008, Hillary also received an illegal foreign campaign contribution in the form of a fundraising concert by music icon Elton John.)

Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT): Question: Which member of the U.S. Senate took the most campaign money from corrupt institutions Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? Answer: Chris Dodd, Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. Given this fact there is little reason to wonder why Senator Dodd blocked reform proposals for Fannie and Freddie, calling them "ill advised." Dodd's willingness to protect Fannie and Freddie would alone merit a spot on the "ten most corrupt list," but there is much more. Dodd was also nabbed for accepting preferential treatment and loan terms from Countrywide Financial. The Connecticut Senator admitted earlier this year that he was told in 2003 when he refinanced two properties that he was being placed in Countrywide's "VIP Program," but said he believed this was simply a courtesy that had nothing to do with his position in the U.S. Senate. This is either a blatant lie or horribly naïve for a man who has served in the Senate for more than 25 years and currently chairs the Senate Banking Committee that regulates the mortgage industry. We're not buying it.

Obama Advisor Valerie Jarrett (D-IL): CBS News once called Chicago politician Valerie Jarrett "the other side of Barack Obama's brain." Residents of a housing project in Chicago simply know her as "slumlord." Jarrett is the former manager of Grove Parc Plaza, a controversial low-income housing project located in Obama's former state senate district. According to the Boston Globe, the housing complex was considered "uninhabitable by unfixed problems, such as collapsed roofs and fire damage... In 2006, federal inspectors graded the condition of the complex an 11 on a 100-point scale - a score so bad the buildings now face demolition." According to documents uncovered by Judicial Watch, Jarrett is also linked to a series of other shady real estate scandals involving convicted felon and former Obama fundraiser Antoin "Tony" Rezko. Jarrett has also been caught up in the Blagojevich scandal as Obama's Candidate #1 for his senate seat. Most of Blagojevich's corrupt negotiations with the Obama team centered on the possible Jarrett appointment. She remains mum on the scandal.

Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA): Rep. Lewis may share a name with a world-renowned comedian, but there's nothing funny about his addiction to influence peddling and earmarking. Lewis, the senior Republican on the House Appropriations Committee, is under investigation for approving hundreds of millions of dollars in federal projects to benefit clients of one of his best friends, lobbyist and former Congressman Bill Lowery. According to press reports, Lowery, partners in his company and their clients donated approximately 37% of the funds collected by Lewis' campaign PAC over a six-year period (an estimated $480,000) in return. Lowery has benefited handsomely from his relationship to Lewis. His company more than tripled its income between 1998 and 2004 with help from Lewis, while increasing its client base from 21 clients to 101 over that same time period. Despite these allegations, Lewis maintains his high-ranking position on the House Appropriations Committee.

President-Elect Barack Obama (D-IL): As Barack Obama assumes the presidency he already brings to the White House a large amount of ethical baggage. Obama's presidential campaign had some of the ethical trimmings of a Chicago ward election. It was marked with enormous corruption issues, ranging from its alliance with the sleazy ACORN operation's "voter registration" and "get out the vote" efforts to its acceptance of untraceable, and in too many cases, illegal online contributions. There are also Obama's corrupt dealings with convicted felon Tony Rezko and unrepentant terrorist William Ayers, his below-market rate mortgage loans, his stock dealings and related "earmark" votes in the U.S. Senate, and his missing or non-existent official papers from his years in the Illinois State Senate. His ongoing cover up of his and his team's role in the Blagojevich "pay-to-play" scandal is ruining his presidency even before he takes the oath of office.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA): Last year House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made the "most corrupt" list for sneaking a $25 million earmark for her husband into a $15 billion Water Resources Development Act passed by Congress. This year, Pelosi ran afoul of federal election law by participating in an illegal advertising campaign funded by Al Gore's non-profit Alliance for Climate protection. The advertisement featuring Pelosi ran at least 300 times nationally, including in the House speaker's district, during campaign season, representing an illegal in-kind contribution to her campaign. Perhaps more disturbing than this incident, however, is the fact that Speaker Pelosi has allowed corruption to run rampant in Congress and has ignored serious incidents of crooked behavior within her own party. Pelosi promised a new era of ethics enforcement during the 2006 campaign and she has failed to deliver. Instead, she continues to protect the worst of the worst of political corruption in the House of Representatives.

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY): Rep. Charles Rangel, Chairman of the powerful Ways and Means Committee, took the unusual step of filing an ethics complaint against himself in 2008 related to scandals involving unpaid taxes and rent-controlled apartments. This act was clearly a publicity stunt, but regardless, the House Ethics Committee took the New York congressman up on his request, and even took things a step further by expanding the scope of its investigation. The initial transgressions that led to the ethics panel probe involve: Rangel's failure to pay taxes on $75,000 in rental income he earned from his off-shore rental property; his efforts to use his influence to keep hold of highly coveted rent-controlled apartments in Harlem; and misusing his congressional office to fundraise for his private Rangel Center. Now Congress is looking into whether or not Rangel preserved a tax loophole for an oil drilling company in exchange for funding for the Rangel Center as well.

Former Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ): Three-term Republican congressman Rick Renzi was indicted by a federal grand jury in 2008 for conspiracy, extortion, money laundering and wire fraud. He allegedly used his influence on a House Natural Resources Committee to orchestrate a land swap with the federal government that financially benefited himself and his associates. The 49-year-old lawmaker, who owns an insurance business, is also charged with embezzling more than $400,000 from insurance clients to fund his congressional campaign. A 26-page federal indictment lays out how the legislator and his business associates conspired to obtain federal government land by swapping land they owned together because the coveted public land sits above underground copper deposits. The indictment says that the congressman concealed nearly $1 million that he made for using his influence to seal the land deals. No wonder Renzi decided to retire this year.

Former Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK): "Uncle Ted" Stevens, the face of Alaska politics for 40 years and formerly the longest serving Republican in the U.S. Senate, was narrowly defeated in his campaign for re-election in November. But that's the least of his problems. Just days before the November election, Stevens was convicted on seven felony counts for accepting illegal gifts and then lying about it. The establishment of both political parties came to Stevens' defense, including former Secretary of State Colin Powell and Democratic Senator Daniel Inouye, but to no avail. The jury found Stevens guilty on all counts. And now Stevens faces the possibility of a 35-year prison sentence.

Rep. Don Young (R-AK): Carrying on Alaska's legacy of corruption, Rep. Don Young is also the subject of an influence peddling investigation. (You may recall it was Young who attempted to push through the $200 million "Bridge to Nowhere" boondoggle.) Well the Justice Department is also investigating the 18-term congressman for his corrupt ties to an oil services company, VECO, ironically the same company that furnished illegal gifts to Senator Ted Stevens. VECO allegedly used golf tournaments and pig roasts to illegally funnel cash to Young, which the 18-term congressman then failed to report on his financial disclosure forms. VECO Vice President Rick Smith has already pleaded guilty to bribing lawmakers to support oil-friendly legislation. The Alaska Republican also added a $10 million earmark for the construction of short stretch of road in Florida that benefited a wealthy campaign contributor. Real estate developer, Daniel Aronoff, had raised $40,000 for Young shortly before the earmark was inserted.

DISHONORABLE MENTIONS

Former Senator John Edwards (D-NC): By day, former North Carolina Senator and Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards repeatedly professed his love for his cancer-stricken wife during media interviews and campaign speeches. By night, Edwards was carrying on an illicit sexual affair with a former campaign consultant, Rielle Hunter. Of course, Edwards denied the affair (calling it "tabloid trash") even after he was trapped in the basement of the Beverly Hilton hotel by reporters from the National Enquirer during one of his late-night liaisons with Ms. Hunter. While Edwards did finally admit to violating his marriage vows, questions remain as to whether or not he broke any laws. Edwards' former National Finance Chairman (who just passed away) paid large sums of money to Ms. Hunter, as much as $15,000 per month, in addition to covering Hunter's moving expenses. Were these "hush funds" paid out of Edwards' campaign coffers?

Former Rep. William "Dollar Bill" Jefferson (D-LA): William "Dollar Bill" Jefferson was nabbed in a sting operation accepting a $100,000 bribe from an FBI informant to broker business deals in Africa. During his conversation with the informant, who was wired, Jefferson famously remarked, "All these notes we're writing to each other, as if the FBI is watching." Well, the FBI was watching (and listening) and during a subsequent search of Jefferson's home, investigators found $90,000 in cash stuffed in the congressman's freezer. (The marked bills were later recovered by federal authorities.) Jefferson allegedly intended to use the money to bribe a Nigerian official over a business deal that would have enriched himself and his family. Jefferson was widely expected to return to Congress despite these serious allegations. However, in a December 2008 special election surprise, voters decided instead to send "Dollar Bill" into retirement.

Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Judicial Watch neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office.

[Nailer]

Ok—Now I see the big picture! Part 1
written by Tom Waite, December 24, 2008

In my previous analysis of the Berg v. Obama Supreme Court case, I said that the Supreme Court Justices were very sly by scheduling a January 9th conference date in order to discuss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari. Because just one day earlier, congress is to open up the Electoral College’s sealed votes from each state, count the votes and declare a presidential winner. But now there is a new development, which seems very perplexing at first but I believe I can shed light on this news and reinterpret it as a sign of political chess.

The new development is that on December 18, 2008 Berg filed an injunction (to stay the congressional electoral vote count on January 8, 2009 until Barack Obama proves his qualifications, i.e. that he was born in U.S.A.) and he submitted it to Justice Antonin Scalia. Now the very perplexing news is that this injunction has been granted a conference date of January 16, 2009! I know—you’re all rubbing your eyes in disbelief and also when you put into context that the inauguration is on the 20th of January, I have no doubt that you’re saying, what the f**k?

Whenever I try to type a website on my comments, I never get posted on this blog, so I’ll creatively refer you to the following website, type in three ‘W’s’ and then a dot and then type ‘americasright’ then a dot and finally type ‘com’. Read the story ‘Berg’s Application for Injunction Curiously Moves On at Supreme Court’ under Tuesday, December 23, 2008. Jeff Schreiber (the person running this blog), is a law student and he can’t fathom the reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s decision to set a date to discuss Berg’s injunction that is well after the time congress will have counted the Electoral College’s votes. In doing so, Jeff feels this conference on January 16, 2009 to discuss Berg’s injunction will be a moot issue.

However, I see it differently, the Justices of the Supreme Court aren’t sequestered in some castle. The Justices know exactly what the issues are and are constantly being bombarded with similar legal applications to be considered regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility for president. As I’ve mentioned in a previous post, if the Justices wanted to dismiss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari they could have but they deliberately chose to discuss it 24 hours after congress officially counts the Electoral College’s votes; reason being Berg’s issue of standing will now be valid! Once Obama official wins the national vote (via the counting of Electoral College’s votes), Berg’s issue of harm being done to him by Obama now becomes legally valid it is no longer theoretical; thus Berg does have legal standing!

Now in a political game of chess, the Supreme Court’s manoeuvring of the January 9th date to discuss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari can be seen as a move of check against Obama. Obama is now in a corner but still can move his king chess piece and similarly with the Writ of Certiorari, Obama still could refuse to deliver evidence proving he was born in United States. I understand why the Justices set a date one week later (January 16) to discuss Berg’s injunction to stop congress from counting the Electoral College’s votes, this move can be seen as check and mate! Meaning Obama’s king can’t move in any direction on the chessboard, thus he’s trapped and has lost the game!

Setting a date to discuss the injunction on preventing congress from counting the Electoral College’s votes isn’t a moot issue; in this context any judgement is retroactive! So that even if congress has counted the Electoral College’s votes and have declared Obama the presidential winner; if the Supreme Court finds Obama ineligible to be a presidential candidate, they can retroactively cancel the results of the January 8th Electoral College’s vote count!

And that’s why the Supreme Court is allowing for a January 16th conference on Berg’s injunction to stop congress from counting the Electoral College’s vote on January 8th. It’s not a moot issue, it’s a very deliberate political game of entrapment or as in chess it can be seen as a move of checkmate. Because the Supreme Court is basically giving Obama no wiggle room to manoeuvre and escape from the January 9th’s conference of Berg’s Writ of Certiorari. The Supreme Court is ultimately saying to Obama, if you don’t hand over your evidence to us on January 9th, you will be forced to hand over your evidence to us on January 16th, otherwise we’ll retroactively cancel the results from the Electoral College’s votes that were counted back on January 8th!

Ok—Now I see the big picture! Part 2
written by Tom Waite, December 24, 2008

So now I see the big picture and the ultimate endgame that the Supreme Court has in mind for Barack Obama. Just like in chess, the winner is the person who sees many moves in advance; in this case the winner is the Supreme Court! They’ve set a checkmate legal trap for Obama, whereby even if there are no objections by any members of congress, the Electoral College’s votes are counted and Obama is declared the presidential winner on January 8th. The Supreme Court has deliberately chosen to wait until January 9th to discuss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari, whereby Berg’s legal standing (harm that can be done to him by Obama) becomes valid! And finally, the Supreme Court has made it perfectly clear to Obama by its deliberate action of allowing for a January 16th conference regarding Berg’s injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral College’s votes; that unless he hands over his evidence to them on January 9th—they’ll retroactively cancel the Electoral College’s voting results from January 8th!

I’m smiling so much now because all this time Barack Obama has hired teams of lawyers to go to court and ask to dismiss all these lawsuits that have one similar theme—show proof you were born in the United States. But now because just one of these ‘nuisance’ cases (as Obama sees it) has made it to the Supreme Court, the Justices have already out manoeuvred Obama and his team of high priced attorneys. First, they’ve cornered Obama with a move of check by setting a conference date of January 9th (24 hours after congress counts the Electoral College’s votes) to discuss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari; the case can’t be dismissed—Berg will have legal standing! And finally the Supreme Court has made its devastating move of checkmate by allowing a conference on January 16th to discuss Berg’s injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral College’s votes! There’s no more wriggle room left for Obama because essentially it’s a fait accompli by January 9th for him to hand over his evidence to the Justices otherwise, if he doesn’t comply by January 16th, the Justices’ will have it within their power to retroactively cancel the results from the January 8th Electoral College’s vote count!

So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Court—well guess what? Obama—you’ve already lost.

http://talkwisdom.blogspot.com/2008/12/seeing-big-picture.html

[Pheonix Renewed]

The answer to this is simple... it doesn't matter as long as Stanley Dunham is an American citizen. Any child of hers will be an American national, according to the legal precedents.

[Jackson Holly]

The answer to this is simple... it doesn't matter as long as Stanley Dunham is an American citizen. Any child of hers will be an American national, according to the legal precedents.

What legal precedents? Are you saying that his mother's citizenship qualifies Obama as a "natural born citizen"?

[lord edward coke]

OBAMA'S TRIFECTA: FOREIGN POLICY LINE IS RUN BY TRILATERAL FOUNDER ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI -OBAMA''S WIFE LINKED TO COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS


WASHINGTON DC -- Barack Obama's top economics adviser is a member of the super-secret Skull & Bones society of Yale University, of which George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, and John Kerry are also members, reliable sources confirmed tonight. Goolsbee is widely reported to have told Obama not to back a compulsory freeze on home mortgage foreclosures to help the struggling middle class in the current depression crisis, as demanded by former candidate John Edwards. Hillary Clinton has advocated a one-year voluntary freeze on foreclosures. Obama has offered counselors to comfort mortgage victims as they are dispossessed, citing the 'moral hazard' of protecting the public interest from Wall Street sharks.


By adding the infamous Skull & Bones secret society to his campaign roster, Obama, who bills himself as the candidate of change and hope, has attained a prefect trifecta of oligarchical and financier establishment backing for his attempt to seize the nomination of the Democratic Party for 2008. Obama's main overall image adviser and foreign policy adviser is Zbigniew Brzezinski, the co-founder of David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission, and the mastermind of the disastrous Carter administration. Obama's wife Michelle is reputed to be closely linked to the Council on Foreign Relations. Behind the utopian platitudes dished up by the Illinois senator, the face of the Wall Street money elite comes into clearer and clearer focus.


George Will, in an October 2007 Washington Post column saluted Goolsbee's "nuanced understanding" of traditional Democratic issues like globalization and income inequality; he "seems to be the sort of fellow -- amiable, empirical, and reasonable--you would want at the elbow of a Democratic president, if such there must be," wrote the arch-oligarchical apologist Will.


From Wikipedia: 'Austan D. Goolsbee is an economist and is currently the Robert P. Gwinn Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. He is also a Research Fellow at the American Bar Foundation[1], Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and a member of the Panel of Economic Advisors to the Congressional Budget Office. He has been Barack Obama's economic advisor since Obama's successful U.S. Senate campaign in Illinois. He is the lead economic advisor to the 2008 Obama presidential campaign
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbV8duHcXX0

[Nailer]

The answer to this is simple... it doesn't matter as long as Stanley Dunham is an American citizen. Any child of hers will be an American national, according to the legal precedents.

http://newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd420.htm
Citizenship qualification under the U.S. Constitution

The foolish people who work for the mainstream media and that includes cable news networks (CNN, MSNBC, FOX) have either excoriated anyone who believes a candidate running for president of these united States of America must prove his citizenship, or have completely ignored this issue, aren't even worth commenting on any longer. These networks and their anchors are nothing but a disgrace to their profession.

Obots (Obama faithful) continue to say it doesn't matter that Obama's father was foreign born and governed by Britain. They parrot because Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was a natural born citizen at birth, that automatically qualifies Obama as natural born at birth. Nothing could be further from the truth. On FactCheck.org, the official mouth piece for Obama, you will see this statement:

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children."

If you read (or listen) to the Wong Kim Ark case cited above, this is the case in a nutshell. Wong Kim Ark, was a young Chinese man born in San Francisco, California. His parents were subjects of the Emperor of China even though they were permanently domiciled in California. Ark left the U.S. for a short period of time for a visit to China. Upon his return, he was denied entry back into the U.S. because he was not a natural born citizen at birth. This was challenged in the U.S. Supreme Court.

The justices gave this case a thorough, historical scrubbing and in the end their decision was against Wong Kim Ark: "<>In other words, the fourteenth amendment does not exclude from citizenship by birth children born in the United States of parents permanently located therein, and who might themselves become citizens; nor, on the other hand, does it arbitrarily make citizens of children born in the United States of parents who, according to the will of their native government and of this government, are and must remain aliens. Tested by this rule, Wong Kim Ark never became and is not a citizen of the United States, and the order of the district court should be reversed."


Advertisement

The justices go into great detail about the Fourteenth Amendment as it relates to this issue as well as treaties. Obama's mother was born in the U.S. There is no disputing that fact. His father was Kenyan born. Obots claim that Obama never gave up his citizenship either as a result of his father being foreign born or when his mother married Lolo Soetoro. The Wong Kim Ark case covered that argument as well:

'That said Wong Kim Ark has not, either by himself or his parents acting for him, ever renounced his allegiance to the United States, and that he has never done or committed any act or thing to exclude him therefrom.'

That argument proved fruitless as the court ruled against Wong Kim Ark.

Is there other historical material on this? A considerable amount which is found on Leo Donofrio's web site which I have put on audio with his permission, i.e,:

"I'll leave you now with the relevant textbook definition of natural born citizen. The following was published in 1758. This definition, added to all of the above, certainly establishes a rational legal basis to hold that Barack Obama is not a natural born Citizen. And more than that, it puts the burden on those who deny it to don the tin foil hat of despair and bring forthwith to the table of honest debate their own bed of authority to lie in:

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

"The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."

Obots are very passionate about their support of this man who has sealed up his life tight as Scrooge. Obama slaps his supporters in the face with each passing day by refusing to address this issue other than spending a whopping one million dollars to date to fight the exposure of all his lies. But, what can one expect since Obama's base is Chicago, Illinois, a state that has produced some of the most corrupt elected officials in this history of this country.

Regular readers of my columns know that I sent a great deal of information to James Burrus, Chief of Election Fraud at the FBI in Washington, DC. I respectfully requested Burrus investigate Obama for violation of 18 U.S.C. §1343, wire fraud, for starters. In no uncertain terms, I told Burrus that Obama has always known he was not constitutionally eligible to be president of these united States of America, yet he still hustled for campaign donations in violation of the cited statute. Obama decided to gamble and use his massive power and influence to flim flam the American people. I'm sending this column and a CD to Burrus over night mail. The CD contains all five parts I just recorded (see first paragraph above). I am going to reinforce to Burrus that he must, if he hasn't already, open an investigation into the criminal activities of Barack Hussein Obama.

[Initiated]

What is so special about Friday? Why not post it now?
If it is accurate, why would you promote it before releasing it and take the chance that you would receive a visit from unpleasant individuals?

[Pheonix Renewed]

What legal precedents? Are you saying that his mother's citizenship qualifies Obama as a "natural born citizen"?

I'm not saying that. I'm saying that this is the stance that, as mentioned above, Obama faithfuls take. That there is "precedent" in the legal system that defines "natural born citizen" as any person born of a citizen of the US- even if they're not born in the US, and if only one parent is a US citizen.

So far, they've failed to display these precedents, so I cannot help you, there.

[Initiated]

Thursday, January 1, 2009
Final Update, This Article: Obama's Kenyan Birth Evidence to be Revealed...
http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2008/12/obamas-kenyan-birth-evidence-to-be.html

Update 1/1/2009, 3:36am CT - In his 7:45pm Plains Radio broadcast, this last night, Ed Hale backed down from his prior assertion of having gained even uncertain information about the Barack Sr. / Stanley Ann divorce decree containing language referring to Barack Jr. as being born in Kenya. Instead, Hale referred to an apparently tricky recollection... of an indeterminate person... referring to such a document's generally referring to the place of birth of the children of the divorced parents. That is not what I heard from Mr. Hale on the 31st.

Two people reported during the broadcast that they had contacted Hale's private investigator yesterday, who indicated he did not thoroughly read the documentation and does not know how it addresses Barack Obama Jr. -- nor did he make a copy for himself. It would appear that Hale will receive a valid copy of this decree, probably Friday, 1/2. What it states will be what it states. He promises to post and report, as described below.

While my article maintains a journalistic separation from the principals of this story and is a report of statements of others on the matter, I believed it worthy of "pushing out" to readers and those who would faithfully relay the story. That worth appears less merited at this point and I apologize for that, to them and you. However, this should mean the first public viewing of that divorce decree. If it does not include information pertinent to Barack Obama's birth, at least that will be known. And that is more than may be said of President Elect Obama's actual birth certificate. This also seems fitting for a politco who advanced to the U.S. Senate along a path of the convenient "mainstream media" reporting of scandals from two of his opponents' own divorce records and an "outing" of a family member of another; sauce for the goose.

I.O. emphasizes that place of birth aside, Barack Obama is clearly and thoroughly not a natural born Citizen and is therefore specifically ineligible to be our United States President. This is due to his U.K. citizenship at birth, passed from his father. That is referred to below and explained in the article, "The Donofrio 'Natural Born Citizen' Challenge."

I.O. also observes that even a valid hard copy of the kind of certificate of birth that Obama has ostensibly submitted is not the kind of birth certificate which is required for numerous purposes. Further, it is suspect that Obama has invested what some say is approximately $1M to keep his actual, Hawaiian birth certificate undisclosed -- seemingly thematic with "pleading the Fifth." At the very least, it would officially document his father and that is one wheel off his bike to the White House.

[TahoeBlue]

Keep in mind that the powers that be have thought this through 10x moves ahead. They know what BO is all about. This is a mass mind control program equal to JFK / RFK / MLK .  As far as I can see this is all going according to their plan. ie they knew there would be opposition and an eventual mass exposure. Watch as they control that exposure.

[nofakenews]

Keep in mind that the powers that be have thought this through 10x moves ahead. They know what BO is all about. This is a mass mind control program equal to JFK / RFK / MLK .  As far as I can see this is all going according to their plan. ie they knew there would be opposition and an eventual mass exposure. Watch as they control that exposure.

Yep I know how it works as long as obama keeps playing the game he will have nothing to worry about.. 

Still I wonder if Mr fitness will have a heart attack as you know the human body can only take so much abuse and if obama has done drugs and will be playing basketball at the white house and being a smoker he may not last to long with the stress as people push him over all the issues.

Sorry about that just sort of thinking out loud but it could happen that way.

[TahoeBlue]

It's like we are Wiley Coyote and they are the Road Runner. I can just see that ACME R_cket expl_de right in our faces as we fall to the canyon floor. Beep-Beep.

[nofakenews]

You can download the divorce papers now (need a pdf viewer) http://www.plainsradio.com/Home/SOETORO%20DIVORCE%20P%201-5.pdf

[Boubear]

You can download the divorce papers now (need a pdf viewer)http://www.plainsradio.com/Home/SOETORO%20DIVORCE%20P%201-5.pdf

There's nothing there!! Meaning, there's nothing about Obama in the divorce papers.

[Puff1]

Keep in mind that the powers that be have thought this through 10x moves ahead. They know what BO is all about. This is a mass mind control program equal to JFK / RFK / MLK .  As far as I can see this is all going according to their plan. ie they knew there would be opposition and an eventual mass exposure. Watch as they control that exposure.

Yep, that's exactly what I think. 

[nofakenews]

There's nothing there!! Meaning, there's nothing about Obama in the divorce papers.

Yes it does only the part that says 1 child above 18 and one below 18 and then it only lists maya.

[Matthew]

You can download the divorce papers now (need a pdf viewer) http://www.plainsradio.com/Home/SOETORO%20DIVORCE%20P%201-5.pdf

Those aren't the ones we're waiting for. Those are the divorce papers from her second husband. The divorce papers we're waiting for are from Obama's father.

[nofakenews]

Those aren't the ones we're waiting for. Those are the divorce papers from her second husband. The divorce papers we're waiting for are from Obama's father.

Yes your right oops

They had it listed for download on the main page and it was not on there before. 

[otero1]

B U M P -- For good measure.

[1776]

Divorce Papers Found-Obama Sr./ Ann Dunham says Obama Jr. born in Kenya


Plains Radio Network has posted that they have found, and are going to post it online, Obama Sr. VS Ann Dunham divorce papers, which lists Barack Obama Jr. as thier son, and as being born in Kenya..
I believe it's going to be posted online this Friday..
READ:www.investigatingobama.blogspot.com...
www.plainsradio.com

Forum:
http://pub29.bravenet.com/forum/2442810129/show/953026

Where does it state in these papers that Obama was born in Kenya? I saw nothing of the sort. Please advise

[Boubear]

Where does it state in these papers that Obama was born in Kenya? I saw nothing of the sort. Please advise

Those aren't the one's this is not Obama's father, but her second husband.  It doesn't mention Obama at all.  The papers are expected to be receive sometime today. 

[Boubear]

The Package has arrived. Ed has the document which he says is "full of goodies...."

He will fill us in tonight at 6pm on www.plainsradio.com.

Regulars of Plainsradio can get a glipse of the 9 page long document at
http://www.plainsradio.com/obama.html
Ed is in the process of uploading the document. The page will be password protected.

I have not seen the 9 page document. I am looking forward to seeing this,as far as I know, never before released document.

I will update here as soon as I do see it.

Chalice

[kingp43]

I'm very interested to see if this goes anywhere.  The Supreme Courts didn't want to touch any of the other citizenship arguments.