ExposeTheInformation
Member
 Offline
Posts: 21
|
 |
« on: December 12, 2008, 02:35:33 PM » |
|
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1499087335913993078&hl=enThis video provides irrefutable evidence that explosives were used to blast Building 7 to the ground. A video taken by Rick Siegel caught a massive explosion on tape 9.5 seconds before the collapse. WTC7 proceeded to fall 100 meters in 4.5 seconds (Faster than the speed of gravity) and two more explosions were caught during the start of the tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TheGoodFight1984
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2008, 02:55:01 PM » |
|
At approx: 2:57 into that video you can see cutter charge flashes coming from either side of the Penthouse one after the other. Not on WTC7, but here goes anyway, in line with flashes: I haven't been able to find the stock footage of this clip but I cut a section from the film it is in (A Film To End All Wars by Richard Grove), undeniable cutter charge flashes can be seen throughout the whole collapse here. If anyone knows where the original footage of this can be found I'd love to know. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=WsjV0Oz3mPoand this one too, not sure how long before 'collapse' this was but again, clear evidence of multiple cutter charges, it's like a f'in sparkling christmas tree, smoking hot debris falling from the middle of the building, waaaay below where the plane hit.. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=cCAoJuDw2Ic |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Info_Trafficker
|
|
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2008, 03:10:47 PM » |
|
awesome video, ty for posting. i plan on getting this one for my collection for sure
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Condemnation without investigation is the highest form of ignorance."-Albert Einstein.
|
|
|
|
Xill
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2008, 03:20:07 PM » |
|
Hey that's an amazing video, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
iceman2
|
|
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2008, 12:00:08 AM » |
|
Now those film are good! Well, not good, but you know what I mean!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
deconstructmyhouse
Guest
|
|
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2008, 04:01:25 PM » |
|
SO good they got pulled off Youtube
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Xtorted
Member
Offline
Posts: 19
|
|
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2008, 11:27:10 PM » |
|
Sorry if this is a repost. I think this video is amazing. NIST responding directly to ae911truth.org. Listen to the way they stutter! And their non-answers are the kind of thing I thought only politicians could pull off. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
warren_pease
|
|
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2009, 07:17:32 AM » |
|
WTC7 really is the smoking gun. You can get lost in so many different theories about the twins that even I get confused- plane, no plane, military plane, microwave, etc. etc.
However, when it comes to WTC7, the whole plane context is gone. What you have is a building that is leveled symmetrically from the top down. It starts with the Penthouses on top, and then 100% straight down. There is no argument here. This can be taken as fact. Now, a few fires on different floors and the damage to the southeast corner of the WTC7 do not a symmetrical collapse make. This f**ker was brought down with explosives. It took time to rig the building. Even if they rigged it the same day- which is a silly argument, the fact remains the only way to have this building brought down in the manner it was brought down, top to bottom, is with explosives. There is no other logical explanation. To say fires brought it down and it has a very low probability just show how stupid NIST thinks we are. It looks and walks like a duck. You don't need the twins for debating this point. 93 shot down, No plane at Pentagon- pure speculation. You get lost in all the different theories.
FOCUS ON BUILDING 7. FOCUS ON BUILDING 7. FOCUS ON BUILDING 7.
Fire and planes did not bring this puppy down... and definitely not symmetrically. How the hell did the Penthouses collapse first- due to low probability of fire? NIST, do you think we are all baboons?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
schopi
|
|
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2009, 04:35:27 PM » |
|
Now, a few fires on different floors and the damage to the southeast corner of the WTC7 do not a symmetrical collapse make.
Just a tiny little correction: I suppose you're talking about the southwest corner of WTC7. That's the one which has been claimed to have been damaged. But there was no large scale damage to this corner. Go here: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=77153.msg431393#msg431393and go down to reply#18 And even if the SW corner had been blown away: Neither reality nor NIST suggest that the SW corner had anything to do with the onset of the collapse. But that is certainly just a little detail. NIST's confession that free fall occured actually ends all possible doubt. NIST inadvertently has proven that 9/11 was an inside job. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"More Light"
Johann Wolfgang Goethe, on his deathbed, 1832
|
|
|
|
warren_pease
|
|
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2009, 07:07:42 PM » |
|
duly noted. what a difference the camera angle makes!!! if there was no comparison photo, you would assume that the entire corner was gone. good job. post more photos from more angles if available.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
VulpesVafrae
|
|
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2009, 07:09:40 PM » |
|
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1499087335913993078&hl=enThis video provides irrefutable evidence that explosives were used to blast Building 7 to the ground. A video taken by Rick Siegel caught a massive explosion on tape 9.5 seconds before the collapse. WTC7 proceeded to fall 100 meters in 4.5 seconds (Faster than the speed of gravity) and two more explosions were caught during the start of the tape. Faster then the speed of gravity? Take that line out, its a miscalculation, The earth cannot pull anything faster then -9.8 m/s^2 . its an issue of mass, the earth did not get slightly more massive on 9/11. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
America is doubleplusgood today. It has always been doubleplusgood.
|
|
|
|
America2
|
|
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2009, 07:13:35 PM » |
|
I'll say this much - I feel very sorry for those who STILL believe that 9/11 was caused by mere few cookie box cutters.
I mean at one pre-trib end times MB I frequent, they have a posting rule where you can NOT talk about "conspiracy theories"(i.e. even ASKING QUESTIONS over 9/11)...as a result, most everyone there end up believing the 9/11 lies, and hence, fall for propaganda like we need to wipe out Iran to make this world a better place.
Again - good luck to those who think a few cookie box cutters did 9/11, and good luck falling for all the other propaganda like wiping out Iran that goes along with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
warren_pease
|
|
« Reply #12 on: September 24, 2009, 06:55:45 AM » |
|
The Proof is in the Penthouse.
Hello?!?!?! Is anybody in there? are you listening to me NIST?
Explain to me how a couple of fires and some corner damage destroyed the Penthouse first.
I'm waiting...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Berminator
Guest
|
|
« Reply #13 on: September 24, 2009, 06:59:34 AM » |
|
The Proof is in the Penthouse.
Hello?!?!?! Is anybody in there? are you listening to me NIST?
Explain to me how a couple of fires and some corner damage destroyed the Penthouse first.
I'm waiting...
Like your avatar buddy.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Finchie
|
|
« Reply #14 on: September 24, 2009, 02:35:22 PM » |
|
WTC7 really is the smoking gun. You can get lost in so many different theories about the twins that even I get confused- plane, no plane, military plane, microwave, etc. etc.
FOCUS ON BUILDING 7. FOCUS ON BUILDING 7. FOCUS ON BUILDING 7.
WTC7's collapse and NIST's quite abysmal explanation wins the argument. There can be no explanation for a free fall collapse. I really do think the 9/11 truth movement need to concentrate their effort here. When officials accept this argument the rest of the official story is thrown into doubt. WTC7 opened my eyes. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
