Earthquake Prediction (December 10-15th)

[Devotional Soul]

Because so many Biblical prophecies are happening now, that's why it keeps coming up.  I spent 25 years thinking the Bible was a bunch of lies until a few months ago when I realized that these prophecies are truly coming to pass.

The verses about earthquakes are here:

"For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places." - Matthew 24:7

"And great earthquakes shall be in divers places, and famines, and
pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be
from heaven." -Luke 21:11

[Drag0n]

Because people are created in GODs image not Lucifers.  Any prophecy is GODs prophecy. Everyone knows this. The reason the discussion defaults to something Theological is because we're all seekers. The good news is, some of the answers we need are just now coming out, because the truth is revealed to the few faithful. In GODs time. As it was written.

[Revolt426]

Because people are created in GODs image not Lucifers.  Any prophecy is GODs prophecy. Everyone knows this. The reason the discussion defaults to something Theological is because we're all seekers. The good news is, some of the answers we need are just now coming out, because the truth is revealed to the few faithful. In GODs time. As it was written.

How about keeping your religion to yourself and focusing on the real problems.

[theexcogitator]

Why does every thread on these boards revert to religion?

Revert isn't the appropriate word.  Revert would mean the topic was initially about religion, went to something else, then changed(reverted) back to religion.  No, the problem is, why does every topic degrade to a religious topic.  Its pretty simple.  When someone doesn't know of new, relevant deduction or data to add to a topic, and they still want to blather, they use generalities, like religion.

[zafada]

5.6 magnitude earthquake in Pakistan just now

Good job Liz Liz and Flur

[Drag0n]

I was focusing on the problem actually. I did see the rainbow clouds the other day and I reported on a near earth object that is going to amplify the super moon perigee thats going to happen this weekend. No one was interested in any of that.

I don't get real emotional when it comes to internet postings. I go with the flow of a topic. Do I believe there will be an earthquake here this weekend? Maybe. The last major quake to hit where I live happened in the 1920's so maybe we're about due. I would LOVE to see it rip the railway system and the Thruway to shreds. Better still I'd love to see it rip the NAFTA superhighway groundwork right out of the ground. Anywhere that damages the NWO infrastructure would suffice.

Maybe I'll pray for that instead of sharing with you Nay Sayers....  

[Avers]

Because so many Biblical prophecies are happening now, that's why it keeps coming up.  I spent 25 years thinking the Bible was a bunch of lies until a few months ago when I realized that these prophecies are truly coming to pass.

The verses about earthquakes are here:

"For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places." - Matthew 24:7

"And great earthquakes shall be in divers places, and famines, and
pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be
from heaven." -Luke 21:11

One can point to dozens of such occurences in history. Not a prophecy but a given, with humanity still mostly acting like thier animal ancestors. Give me a date (doesn't have to exact, but close enough) and then we'll talk prophecy, dealing in generalities won't cut it.

To get back to the topic and the possible relation to the occurence of the moon perigee: On 12-12 it is not just that the moon is close to the earth, as moon perigee occurs often enough, but that it is exceptionally close in combination with the alignment of the moon/earth and sun (as it is a full moon). As it isn't an instant event, one has to take into account a 30hour period before and after the maximum perigee, which falls nicely within the 10-15 dec time frame listed. Although I'm not a fan of the halfpasthuman website (their subscription fee is insane in my opinion), it does make it interesting.

[Deano]

Today was a busy day, I noticed many more earthquakes 5 and over.  Usually it's just small one's under 4.  The last one over 5 was in Pakistan 5.6

If you have firefox you can download an add-on e-quake if I remember correctly.  It makes you browser shake when an earthquake happens.  The stronger the quake the longer it shakes!!

I downloaded e-quake before midnight last night. My laptop has shook 4 times in the past hour(Southern California 3.1 @ 4:40am, Aluetian Islands Alaska 2.7 @ 4:53am, Central California 2.6 @ 5:07, Alaska Peninsula 2.7 @ 5:15am). All times are Eastern times

Since I've never been near when a earthquake hit, at what level does damage start to occur? Havent heard about the 3.6 quake that hit Greater LA Area(according to E-Quake) yestarday at 7:29(4:29 LA time). Anybody else have E-Quake?

[canandy]

yes ,i have had the earthquake monitor for about 2 years now, it is a firefox  add-on it works great shaking the browser  ahhahha   

[Dok]

I have nothing to add, just like to be on the predictive threads. 

[Triadtropz]

I have nothing to add, just like to be on the predictive threads. 

lol..just in case it happens, you can change the post later..

[canandy]

just a thought ,but i think HAARP is ready to crank it up big time soon?    ive seen a wack of chemtrails  lately

[strgzr]

I predict there will be an earthquake in Alaska in the next 24 hours.
Here's the last 24 hours or so.



131 Earthquakes Shown on This Page:
Local Time
   
Magnitude
   
Region
01:29 AM AKST Wednesday December 10th, 2008    0.92 ML    in the central region of Alaska
01:22 AM AKST Wednesday December 10th, 2008    Unknown    in the east-central region of Alaska
01:15 AM AKST Wednesday December 10th, 2008    2.68 ML    in the Alaska Peninsula region of Alaska
01:01 AM AKST Wednesday December 10th, 2008    2.40 ML    in the central region of Alaska
12:53 AM AKST Wednesday December 10th, 2008    2.72 ML    in the Andreanof Islands region of Alaska
12:41 AM AKST Wednesday December 10th, 2008    2.39 ML    in the Unimak Island region of Alaska
10:55 PM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    2.04 ML    in the central region of Alaska
08:38 PM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.89 ML    in the Kenai Peninsula region of Alaska
07:40 PM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    in the central region of Alaska
06:18 PM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    in the Alaska Peninsula region of Alaska
04:25 PM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.56 ML    in the central region of Alaska
03:35 PM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    2.29 ML    in the Kenai Peninsula region of Alaska
03:34 PM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.85 ML    in the central region of Alaska
03:23 PM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    2.20 ML    in the central region of Alaska
03:23 PM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    in the Cook Inlet region of Alaska
02:55 PM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    2.25 ML    in the Kenai Peninsula region of Alaska
01:52 PM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    PAKISTAN
01:33 PM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    2.06 ML    in the Prince William Sound region of Alaska
12:57 PM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.92 ML    in the central region of Alaska
11:47 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.84 ML    in the Cook Inlet region of Alaska
11:38 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.41 ML    in the Cook Inlet region of Alaska
11:28 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    3.03 ML    in the Andreanof Islands region of Alaska
11:28 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    in the Unimak Island region of Alaska
11:07 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    FIJI ISLANDS REGION
10:48 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    2.86 ML    in the north-central region of Alaska
10:47 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    2.53 ML    in the Unimak Island region of Alaska
10:33 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.39 ML    in the Yakutat Bay region of Alaska
10:30 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.82 ML    in the central region of Alaska
10:16 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    2.61 ML    in the Unimak Island region of Alaska
09:58 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    in the central region of Alaska
09:53 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    SICHUAN PROVINCE, CHINA
09:50 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    TONGA ISLANDS
09:26 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    2.61 ML    in southeastern Alaska
09:06 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    0.94 ML    in the Alaska Peninsula region of Alaska
09:02 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.80 ML    in the Alaska Peninsula region of Alaska
08:29 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    VANUATU ISLANDS
08:28 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    VANUATU ISLANDS
08:05 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    3.43 ML    in the Fox Islands region of Alaska
07:41 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.06 ML    in the Cook Inlet region of Alaska
06:31 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    NEAR N. COAST OF WEST IRIAN
06:09 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    SOUTHERN IRAN
05:50 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    0.86 ML    in the Alaska Peninsula region of Alaska
05:17 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.88 ML    in the Yakutat Bay region of Alaska
03:13 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.72 ML    in the central region of Alaska
02:58 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    2.76 ML    in the Prince William Sound region of Alaska
02:51 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    3.02 ML    in the Fox Islands region of Alaska
02:47 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    Unknown    in the central region of Alaska
01:48 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.71 ML    in the east-central region of Alaska
01:33 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    2.38 ML    in the Prince William Sound region of Alaska
12:59 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.11 ML    in the Alaska Peninsula region of Alaska
12:19 AM AKST Tuesday December 9th, 2008    1.62 ML    in the Cook Inlet region of Alaska

http://www.aeic.alaska.edu/Seis/recenteqs/index.html

[UK Lyn]

Yesterday, I had a bad attack of that weird hi-pitched tone that I get in my ears now and again.

Like the noise old televisions used to make when the picture went off.

Not regular tinnitus, no this came sharply on, then switched sharply off, about 20 seconds later.

I know there's been others mentioning a possible link with that and pre-quake stress

Anyone else have it?

[Boubear]

I downloaded e-quake before midnight last night. My laptop has shook 4 times in the past hour(Southern California 3.1 @ 4:40am, Aluetian Islands Alaska 2.7 @ 4:53am, Central California 2.6 @ 5:07, Alaska Peninsula 2.7 @ 5:15am). All times are Eastern times

Since I've never been near when a earthquake hit, at what level does damage start to occur? Havent heard about the 3.6 quake that hit Greater LA Area(according to E-Quake) yestarday at 7:29(4:29 LA time). Anybody else have E-Quake?

It varies, with the depth of the quake!!  Usually anything over 6.5 will cause damage, but like I said it depends on the depth of the earthquake.  Sometimes a quake in the high 5's will cause a bit of damage, because it is closer to the surface of the earth, and the area it hits, and if the structures are built proper or not!!

[Dok]

It wouldnt surprise me if we have a big quake, with today being Gay call off day.

[birgit]

It wouldnt surprise me if we have a big quake, with today being Gay call off day.

and sends rain on the just and the unjust" Matthew 5:45

might be  the same with earth quakes?

[Boubear]

Magnitude 6.2 - SANTA CRUZ ISLANDS
2008 December 10 13:15:38 UTC

190 km (120 miles) SSE of Lata, Santa Cruz Islands, Solomon Isl.
360 km (225 miles) NNW of Luganville, Espiritu Santo, Vanuatu
775 km (480 miles) ESE of HONIARA, Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands
2190 km (1360 miles) NE of BRISBANE, Queensland, Australia

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsww/Quakes/us2008akau.php

[Dok]

and sends rain on the just and the unjust" Matthew 5:45

might be  the same with earth quakes?

Yes it is. Look at what happens everytime we mess with dividing Israel.

[B_brave]

It wouldnt surprise me if we have a big quake, with today being Gay call off day.

I didnt know that was what today is. There are a few people that called in today. Very interesting...

[NWOSCUM]

It wouldnt surprise me if we have a big quake, with today being Gay call off day.

Please tell me you aren't really ignorant and hateful enough in your religion to believe that. 

[donnay]

Tsunami Warning Signs Pop Up Along Coast

http://laist.com/2008/11/30/tsunami_warning_signs.php

http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/signtech/signdel/tsunami.htm

[Dok]

Please tell me you aren't really ignorant and hateful enough in your religion to believe that. 

You research (so there is no inflection from me) just what happens here in Amerika everytime we go to make Israel divide up its lands. Also look at what happens when there are big gay celebrations. Its that simple. You draw your own conclussions.

[NWOSCUM]

You research (so there is no inflection from me) just what happens here in Amerika everytime we go to make Israel divide up its lands. Also look at what happens when there are big gay celebrations. Its that simple. You draw your own conclussions.

Wow so you think the earth shakes everytimes the gays party?  Wow....must be a good party!!

Anyways...you must be convinced.  I surely won't try to change your mind.  We are all entitled to our beliefs, no matter if others share the same view. 

[Dok]

Wow so you think the earth shakes everytimes the gays party?  Wow....must be a good party!!

Anyways...you must be convinced.  I surely won't try to change your mind.  We are all entitled to our beliefs, no matter if others share the same view. 

No not every time. Apparently your not going to look into it are you? Afraid to learn a little truth?

[NWOSCUM]

No not every time. Apparently your not going to look into it are you? Afraid to learn a little truth?

I honestly wouldn't know where to start but feel free to point me in the right direction/provide links and I WILL look into it.  Thanks.

[sociostudent]

Ok, I think this thread's been hijacked...when did we go from talking about earthquakes to talking about gay pride parades?

Oh well, another 2.8 in Alaska a few minutes ago  

[OldSchool]

From what I found, this moon will be an Extreme SuperMoon, as indicated by this chart. 100% closest apogee.

http://www.astropro.com/features/tables/cen21ce/suprmoon.html

We had one back on '05 apparently without catastrophic event, but there also was not an exra gravitational effect from another body (Planet X) to compound influence. We'll have to wait and see, that is, id there is no chemtrailing this weekend to blurr out the event  

[iamc]

Why does every thread on these boards revert to religion?

...the one who makes the earth quake...also allows this board...and He likes when people talk about him...whether right or wrong...i think He knows what goes on here and everywhere...now that should make us all "quake' just a little...i would continue: but my "Richter Scale" just went off...

[xTruthSeekerx]

Ok, I think this thread's been hijacked...when did we go from talking about earthquakes to talking about gay pride parades?

Oh well, another 2.8 in Alaska a few minutes ago  

[Boubear]

From what I found, this moon will be an Extreme SuperMoon, as indicated by this chart. 100% closest apogee.

http://www.astropro.com/features/tables/cen21ce/suprmoon.html

We had one back on '05 apparently without catastrophic event, but there also was not an exra gravitational effect from another body (Planet X) to compound influence. We'll have to wait and see, that is, id there is no chemtrailing this weekend to blurr out the event  

Can you explain what you mean by supermoon?  I've never heard that before, and it's really confusing me, and the link you gave doesn't tell me anything!!

[nofakenews]

Can you explain what you mean by supermoon?  I've never heard that before, and it's really confusing me, and the link you gave doesn't tell me anything!!

http://www.astropro.com/forecast/predict/2008-all.html#05

[NWOSCUM]

Ok, I think this thread's been hijacked...when did we go from talking about earthquakes to talking about gay pride parades?

Oh well, another 2.8 in Alaska a few minutes ago  

 I think he's talking about groups of gays somehow causing earthquakes........anyone else of the same belief?

[Dok]

I think he's talking about groups of gays somehow causing earthquakes........anyone else of the same belief?

No im not, I pm youd as the others are getting upset.

[scoffer]

From what I found, this moon will be an Extreme SuperMoon, as indicated by this chart. 100% closest apogee.

http://www.astropro.com/features/tables/cen21ce/suprmoon.html

We had one back on '05 apparently without catastrophic event, but there also was not an exra gravitational effect from another body (Planet X) to compound influence. We'll have to wait and see, that is, id there is no chemtrailing this weekend to blurr out the event  

In 2001 I questioned USGS regarding the effects of tides on earthquake prevalence and magnitude, the official USGS claim is that tides are of no relevence, however, others do not agree with this. USGS did acknowledge that there is some indication that rebound quakes occur, for example if land covered in ice for thousands of years experiences a melt the liklihood of earthquakes increases, so the same might hold true for trillions of gallons of water sloshing back and forth in a less that typical pattern, similar to what takes place on the earth during the occurance of apogee.

[NWOSCUM]

No im not, I pm youd as the others are getting upset.

Ok...but isn't a message board (especially the PP Forum) a place to express your views and opinions, regardless if others care?

[Boubear]

http://www.astropro.com/forecast/predict/2008-all.html#05

Thanks!

[Dok]

Ok...but isn't a message board (especially the PP Forum) a place to express your views and opinions, regardless if others care?

Then start a new thread about natural disasters and outside influence.

[shirteesdotnet]

Since I've never been near when a earthquake hit, at what level does damage start to occur? Havent heard about the 3.6 quake that hit Greater LA Area(according to E-Quake) yestarday at 7:29(4:29 LA time). Anybody else have E-Quake?

I just put e-quake on... interesting. Thanks to whomever recommended it. Damage usually starts occurring after 5.0 magnitude quakes from my experience. During the Whittier, CA quake around 1987 (10 miles east of Los Angeles)... I was going to a HS near there and my mom was driving... I think it was only a 5.8 quake but we were right at the epicenter. The big old chevy truck she was driving me t o school in started going all over the place and it felt like the tires all went flat. Very strange feeling. We were getting off the freeway and noticed all the lights and phone poles swaying. I got dropped off at school where everyone was gathering in the middle of the field and another quake, an aftershock hit and I remember seeing the windows of the gym flexing in and out, back and forth as if the window glass was made of liquid. Other windows simply shattered. That quake was felt as far away to Vegas.

The 1994 Northridge, CA quake was bigger, 6.7 magnitude. I was probably 15 miles away from that and felt it REALLY good. I remember it happened in the morning before waking up. I was living at my brothers house and it felt like the house was being picked up by a giant and rocked back and forth. I jumped out of bed into the hallway and I could stand straight, being pushed from one side of the hall to the other forcefully. You can read more about it here and check out some photos...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northridge_earthquake

Although I was in LA at the time, I think the 1989 San Francisco quake did more damage... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loma_Prieta_earthquake

[NWOSCUM]

Then start a new thread about natural disasters and outside influence.

 You are the one who "hijacked" the thread and now you want me to start a new thread.  Geeze.   

Anyways, I'm done with this discussion and the lack off proof you sent me in the PM's. Have a good day.