WOKE UP THIS MORNING, GOT MYSELF A GUN

[larsonstdoc]

http://soundpolitics.com/archives/012040.html
WOKE UP THIS MORNING, GOT MYSELF A GUN
I thought maybe he would feel better in the morning. Nope. I am still bothered by the many liberties to be lost under an Obama presidency and liberal Democratic Congress.

Starting January 20, I am going to keep a list of liberties lost. I'll probably seed a list of liberties likely to lose. Perhaps in all the excitement yesterday you missed the news that Chuck Schumer said he wants to bring back the Fairness Doctrine.

As those of us following along with actual issues are aware, Obama is going to be the most anti-gun President in history, if he follows through on his stated views, his voting history, and so on.

He supported the DC gun ban, which he admits was unconstitutional. He said the expiration of the so-called "assault weapons" ban was a "tragedy." He supports banning a lot of ammo, and making a lot more prohibitively expensive.

Despite his claim of supporting an "individual right" to keep and bear arms, it's obvious his definition of "right" means the government can restrict that "right" into oblivion.

And his friends in the Congress, like the aforementioned Schumer, will go along with any gun restriction they can get their hands on. That he came out on Election Day and talked about restricting the First Amendment tells you that these people are not afraid of anything right now.

So, it's time to stock up, while we still can. I am thinking M-4 carbine, a bunch of large clips, and as much inexpensive ammo as I can get my hands on.

Cross-posted on <pudge/*>.

Posted by pudge at November 05, 2008 08:28 AM | Email This

[larsonstdoc]

http://soundpolitics.com/archives/012040.html

WOKE UP THIS MORNING, GOT MYSELF A GUN
I thought maybe he would feel better in the morning. Nope. I am still bothered by the many liberties to be lost under an Obama presidency and liberal Democratic Congress.

Starting January 20, I am going to keep a list of liberties lost. I'll probably seed a list of liberties likely to lose. Perhaps in all the excitement yesterday you missed the news that Chuck Schumer said he wants to bring back the Fairness Doctrine.

As those of us following along with actual issues are aware, Obama is going to be the most anti-gun President in history, if he follows through on his stated views, his voting history, and so on.

He supported the DC gun ban, which he admits was unconstitutional. He said the expiration of the so-called "assault weapons" ban was a "tragedy." He supports banning a lot of ammo, and making a lot more prohibitively expensive.

Despite his claim of supporting an "individual right" to keep and bear arms, it's obvious his definition of "right" means the government can restrict that "right" into oblivion.

And his friends in the Congress, like the aforementioned Schumer, will go along with any gun restriction they can get their hands on. That he came out on Election Day and talked about restricting the First Amendment tells you that these people are not afraid of anything right now.

So, it's time to stock up, while we still can. I am thinking M-4 carbine, a bunch of large clips, and as much inexpensive ammo as I can get my hands on.


Posted by pudge at November 05, 2008 08:28 AM

[JonTheSavage]

Buy enough to start a small war.

[Neutron]

Get the gun that Patton said was the perfect weapon, the M1 Springfield Garand (in 308 caliber).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOsBg0HdPbA&feature=related

The Springfield M1 was meant for combat in less than ideal conditions. Good for long range shooting without the need of a scope. Imagine centering a scope with measured distance shots while NWO troops are looking for those with guns?  

[Fleahman]

Fairness Doctrine

Not familiar with this. do tell

[Dig]

WTF?

"I am still bothered by the many liberties to be lost under an Obama presidency and liberal Democratic Congress."

Not bothered by the liberties lost under LBJ, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, or Bush Jr.?

Is this a joke?

[JTCoyoté]

To expand on Sane's point a bit, everything has been ramped up since the coup in 1963. You must understand that Kennedy was about to put the federal government back to its pre-Civil War standing... he was poised to destroy the New World order. This is why he was killed. It wasn't just for his stand with Executive Order 11110 which would have given us back constitutional money, he was ready to expose all of the unconstitutional legislation. Unfortunately he didn't have a super majority mandate from the people, so it was easy for the bad guys to trump up a lone assassin and rid themselves of the thorn in their side.

The very first regulatory gun legislation came under Lyndon Johnson with the Gun Control Act of 1968. Under his watch there were three assassinations of constitutionally motivated leaders, and then he went after the guns. Each president since, has signed legislation further restricting the peoples Arms, all repugnant to the Second Amendment.

Coyoté

"The right of civilians in a free society to possess "military-looking," or even
actual military weapons, is essential if a monopoly of force is not to reside in
the hands of government, where modern history shows the potential for far
greater abuses and crimes exists than are possible for any deranged individual."
Aymette v. State, 21 Tenn. Reports 154 (1840)
cited in U.S. v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)