PrisonPlanet Forum
April 21, 2014, 02:02:50 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Zionism...the Jesuit connection  (Read 9832 times)
Amishism
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,812


« on: September 12, 2008, 11:47:57 AM »


Zionism, not Jewish but Jesuit

All over Europe the Pope was called The Antichrist. This prophetic teaching (historicist) was playing havoc with the Roman church. Millions were escaping and obeying the Lord's command to "come out of her" (Rev. 18:4).


LIEola commissioned one of his Jesuits named Francisco Ribera (1537-1591) to write an opposing view. He wrote a 500 page commentary on the Book of Revelation. The main premise of his commentary was that:

(1) Antichrist was one man . . . not a dynasty.
(2) He would be an atheist or infidel.
(3) He would not be revealed until 7 years before the end of time.
(4) He would sit in a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem and make a covenant with the Jews.
(5) He would call himself God etc., etc.
(6) The Christians were hindering his appearance but they would be "caught up" raptured to Heaven before his appearance -- the "Left Behind" madness!!


This became the official Roman Catholic position on Antichrist. This new idea (futurism) very conveniently shifted the focus from the Papacy to some fanciful individual way off in the distant future. John Nelson Darby became its main proponent in the English speaking world.


In order to make this "prophecy" come true he had to "invent Jews" (Rothschilds) and somehow get them back to Palestine.


The mighty nation of ancient Israel perished by the Roman sword in 70 A.D., in exact fulfillment of the words of Jesus The Temple was leveled to the ground and not one stone was left upon another that was not thrown down.


Inventing "Jews" was no problem for Rome. Even at the time of Christ there was a whole nation that called themselves Jews . . . but were phonies. They were the Samaritans who lived to the north of Jerusalem. Jesus even had an interview with a Samaritan woman at a well. (Gospel of John ch. 4). One of them, Simon the Sorcerer, actually went to Rome and founded the Roman Catholic church.


Zionism began in earnest after WW I with the British Conquest of Palestine. Still, most of those Samaritan Jews were not interested in going there. After all, most of them were living comfortably in Germany and they had no interest in helping Ribera fulfill his futurism.


Hitler and WW II changed all that. In 1948, the State of Israel was declared and the survivors of the Holocaust had no where to go but to Palestine.


This set the stage for perpetual conflict....The Arabs had been living on that land for centuries and they were not about to give up their homes to help the Jesuits fulfill "Bible" prophesy.
www.reformation.org/mideast_crisis.html
www.reformation.org/synagogue-of-satan.html



Francisco Ribera
(1537-1591) was a Jesuit doctor of theology, born in Spain, who began writing a lengthy (500 page) commentary in 1585 on the book of Revelation (Apocalypse) titled In Sacrum Beati Ioannis Apostoli, & Evangelistiae Apocalypsin Commentarij, and published it about the year 1590. He died in 1591 at the age of fifty-four, so he was not able to expand on his work or write any other commentaries on Revelation. In order to remove the Catholic Church from consideration as the antichrist power, Ribera proposed that the first few chapters of the Apocalypse applied to ancient pagan Rome, and the rest he limited to a yet future period of 3 1/2 literal years, immediately prior to the second coming. During that time, the Roman Catholic Church would have fallen away from the pope into apostasy. Then, he proposed, the antichrist, a single individual, would:

-Persecute and blaspheme the saints of God.
-Rebuild the temple in Jerusalem.
-Abolish the Christian religion.
-Deny Jesus Christ.
-Be received by the Jews.
-Pretend to be God.
-Kill the two witnesses of God.
-Conquer the world.
Logged
Dok
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,713



WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2008, 05:17:05 AM »

Quote
Any tribes are irrelevant under the new covenant. Jesus came for us all.

True, as Christains we are partakers of that promise. But, that does not mean we have ursurped or raplaced the Jews in Gods time line. Ezk 37 the rebirth of the Israel as a nation. The Diaspora were Jews "Then the LORD will scatter you among all peoples, from one end of the earth to the other, and there you shall serve other gods, which neither you nor your fathers have known -- wood and stone. And among those nations you shall find no rest, nor shall the sole of your foot have a resting place; but there the LORD will give you a trembling heart, failing eyes, and anguish of soul..." (Deuteronomy 28:64-65)
By the Captivity of Jacob they were brought home each time. In Rev 7 god calls and seals the 12000 from each tribe, these are not Christians these are Jews.

You missed a little bit there in Romans,
Rom 11:16 For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump is also holy: and if the root be holy, so are the branches.

17 And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert grafted in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree;

18 Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee.

19 Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be grafted in.

20 Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:

21 For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.

22 Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.

23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be grafted in: for God is able to graft them in again.

24 For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert grafted contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree?

25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.

26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.

In Paul's parable of the Olive Tree, (borrowed from Jer. 11:16,17, 12:1,2), the wild branches (Gentiles) are grafted into the Good Olive Tree (Jewish remnant which began the Church), after SOME of the natural branches (unbelieving Jews) were broken off. Notice that the blindness upon Israel is "IN PART." Not all of Israel rejected Christ. The believing remnant were the first to enter into the blessings of the New Covenant. The Jews (the natural branches) who accepted Christ remain in the Olive Tree. All remaining Jews who survive the tribulation will be saved in one day and be grafted back into their own Olive Tree, the true Israel, at the revelation of Jesus Christ.

Logged

HOW TO BE SAVED
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/how_to_be_saved.html

Ye Must Be Born Again!
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Basics/ye_must_be_born_again.htm

True Salvation & the TRUE Gospel/Good News!
http://www.contendingfortruth.com/?p=1060

how to avoid censorship Wink
Doctor No NWO
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,397


I WiLL StiCK ThaT VaCCinE in YoUr EyeBaLL NWO!


« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2008, 09:07:31 AM »

 Wink Here > http://www.samliquidation.com/wallstreet.htm
Logged

DEATH to the NWO!
Amishism
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,812


« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2008, 10:23:49 AM »


Doc,
http://wikicompany.org/wiki/911:Knights_of_Malta#Pilgrim_Society
Logged
cold fusion
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,992


Sola Scriptura


WWW
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2008, 01:30:47 PM »

Quote
Whether you believe any of that or not, the country of Israel and return of these Jews was done by the Jesuits and it is unbiblical.

True, and we should not be surprised. However, God often uses the heathen to ultimately accomplish His purposes. Jerusalem has become a cup of trembling unto the whole world in fulfillment of prophecy (in large part because of the ungodly behavior of the government and people of "Israel"), and most of the "squatters" who live there will have no part of the inheritance promised to the Seed of Abraham, since they are not in Christ. God HAS NOT cast off the twelve tribes of Israel forever, and the Church has not replaced the remnant of the physical seed of Abraham who will in the future turn to the Redeemer in order to fulfill Zechariah 14.


The Tribulation’s Purpose Vs. The Church’s Nature
Logged

Livefreeordie
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,649


~ Matthew 5:11,12 ~


WWW
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2008, 01:49:05 PM »

True, and we should not be surprised. However, God often uses the heathen to ultimately accomplish His purposes. Jerusalem has become a cup of trembling unto the whole world in fulfillment of prophecy (in large part because of the ungodly behavior of the government and people of "Israel"), and most of the "squatters" who live there will have no part of the inheritance promised to the Seed of Abraham, since they are not in Christ. God HAS NOT cast off the twelve tribes of Israel forever, and the Church has not replaced the remnant of the physical seed of Abraham who will in the future turn to the Redeemer in order to fulfill Zechariah 14.


The Tribulation’s Purpose Vs. The Church’s Nature

Well said...and might I also add that God also said that He is doing this for HIS Glory, fulfilling Prophecy...not for the Jews.

Ezekiel 36:
36:22 Therefore say unto the house of Israel, thus saith the Lord GOD; I do not this for your sakes, O house of Israel, but for mine holy name's sake, which ye have profaned among the heathen, whither ye went.

36:23 And I will sanctify my great name, which was profaned among the heathen, which ye have profaned in the midst of them; and the heathen shall know that I am the LORD, saith the Lord GOD, when I shall be sanctified in you before their eyes.

36:24 For I will take you from among the heathen, and gather you out of all countries, and will bring you into your own land.


Israel Regathered

The Jews are God's People

The Devil hates God and all that is of God.  This is why Israel is so hated around the world, because they are God's chosen nation.  Sadly, MOST Jews are headed straight for Hell when they die to burn in the sulfuric flames of torment because they have arrogantly rejected Jesus Christ as the ONLY True Messiah.  Nevertheless, they are still God's chosen people.  I read a lot of anti-Jewish propaganda, even from professed Christians.  Say what you will, Israel is the Apple of God's eye...

"For thus saith the LORD of hosts; After the glory hath he sent me unto the nations which spoiled you: for he that toucheth you toucheth the apple of his eye." -Zechariah 2:8

I am not justifying Israel's evil deeds, they are accountable to God just as all nations are; I am just saying that the Jews are God's chosen people according to the Bible.  God in His sovereignty chose Israel as his ambassadors to the rest of the human race.  Israel was to be God's people, proclaiming God's saving grace of the gospel of Christ Jesus; but, they forsook God.
 

But, Most Jews are Not God's Children

Unfortunately, Israel rebelled and spit in God's face, even crucifying their Messiah.  God turned to the Gentiles instead to proclaim the Gospel.

A clear distinction MUST be made between God's people and God's children.  God divorced Himself from the nation of Israel in the Old Testament, but NOT from His children.  God finally gave up on Israel.  Jesus said that Rome would totally annihilate what remained of Israel in A.D. 70.  Look what Hitler did to Israel.  It is obvious that God is not defending Israel as He once did way back in the Old Testament when David was king.  Are the Jews still God's people?  Yes! However, and sadly, most of them are not God's children and will go to Hell when they die.  No one (not even Jews) can go to Heaven without being BORN AGAIN (John 3:3).  John Hagee is a heretic!

The Jews are God's people in a physical sense.  However, to be a Child of God means realizing one's own sinful condition and then turning to the Saviour in repentance, trusting upon Christ for the forgiveness of sins.  Hence, you also become a spiritual Jew.  Only saved Jews will be a part of the "remnant" which Paul speaks of in Romans 11:1-5.  Have you ever asked Jesus Christ to forgive all your sins?  Have you ever confessed your sins to Christ?  Do you believe that Jesus is the ONLY begotten Son of God, God manifest in the flesh?  Have you been born-again?

Most Jews deny that Jesus is even the Messiah.  They are NOT God's children.  You see friend, you can be a physical Jew and still not be a spiritual Jew.  I once witnessed to a Jewish woman who laughed in my face when I asked her if she was going to heaven.  She exclaimed..."Of course I'm going to heaven, I'm Jewish."  The Word of God teaches that ONLY through Jesus Christ can anyone get to heaven (John 10:1,9;14:6).  Don't be fooled by "another gospel" my friend, I don't care who you are...you will burn in hell if you don't get your sins forgiven.  I'm not talking about religion here, I'm talking about your sins.  Have your sins been forgiven by Jesus Christ?  Have you ever believed upon the Lord Jesus to save you from hell and forgive your sins?  If not, please do so NOW!
 

Israel Has NOT Been Regathered by God Yet

Jesus prophesied that Jerusalem would be completely destroyed in A.D. 70, and it was.  Just as Abraham doubted God's promise of a son, and took matters into his own hands; many Jews today are trying to HELP God rebuild Israel; but, it is not God's time.

I do NOT believe that the modern-day restoration of the nation of Israel is the fulfillment of Bible prophecy.  Why?  Well for one, God promised to re-gather Israel when He returns, not before.  Christ hasn't returned yet.  Israel will be regathered "In his days" according to the next verse.  In whose days?  In the days when Jesus Christ will reign from Jerusalem over the entire earth.

"Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.  In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS...they shall dwell in their own land." Jeremiah 23:5-8

Secondly, God clearly told Abraham what the boundaries of this land would be...

"In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:" -Genesis 15:18

So Israel basically has been promised every inch of presently occupied Arab land.  Everything from the Nile River down in Egypt, up to the Euphrates river in Syria belongs to Israel when Christ returns.  Israel does NOT possess their land yet in accordance with Biblical prophecy.  The Bible clearly teaches that God will firmly plant Israel in the land, a land MUCH bigger than what Israel presently owns.

Another reason I believe that modern-day Israel is not the Biblical fulfillment of prophecy is because Israel has NOT been restored to it's once incredible agricultural and beautiful status.  The following Scripture promises gardens, vineyards, and built-up cities (all of which Israel does not have yet).  Yes, there have been some agricultural developments in Israel, but nothing like it was in the days of King Solomon.  Israel will be restored when Christ returns to a paradise.

"And I will bring again the captivity of my people of Israel, and they shall build the waste cities, and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and drink the wine thereof; they shall also make gardens, and eat the fruit of them. And I will plant them upon their land, and they shall no more be pulled up out of their land which I have given them, saith the LORD thy God." (Amos 9:14-15)

Also, every born again Arab has as much right to the future Promised Land as does any saved Jew.  Galatians 3:7 states, "Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham."  The Promised Land isn't just for saved Jews; but, for all saved people.  Jesus Christ will reign from Jerusalem, and all believers will serve under our Eternal King.  There are those today who ignorantly claim that Jesus won't physically reign as King from Jerusalem, but He will according to Zechariah 14:9.  Then there are others who foolishly believed that even unsaved Jews will inherit the Promised Land.  Sorry, it won't happen!  John 3:3 couldn't be any clearer that "Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God."  Only through faith alone in Jesus Christ as your personal Savior can you go to Heaven (Acts 16:31).
 

The Star of David is NOT Found in the Bible

Also, the "Star of David" is NOT found in the Bible and is in fact the Satanic hexagram, no doubt resulting in part from the occult Masonic influences of the Rothschilds family who were instrumental in the re-birth of Israel.  I am not saying that God isn't working in Israel today, I am simply saying that Biblical prophecy paints a far different picture than what has happened to Israel over the past 50 years.  I love Jewish people, just as I love ALL people.  God is NO respecter of persons.  Jewish people are God's people and I believe that they are dear to the heart of God, but that in no way makes them any better or more privileged than anyone else.

Yes, the Jewish people are God's people according to the Bible.  However, the Biblical promises of regathering and restoration will ONLY be for born-again Israelites, not those Christ-rejecting Jews who adhered to the false religion of Judaism.  It's heaven or hell, turn or burn.  It's Jesus or hell my friend.  If you are a Jew and want to be part of the regathering of Israel someday, then you MUST receive Jesus Christ into your heart as your personal Saviour to be saved.

"And ye shall know that I am the Lord, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves, And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the Lord have spoken it, and performed it, saith the Lord" -(Ezekiel 37:13,14).

The above verse clearly teaches that the restored Israel will be inhabited by resurrected saints.

"Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved:" -Romans 9:27

How sad that only a small fraction of Israel will someday inhabit the Promised Land.  It is tragic indeed (and totally unnecessary), but us humans are stubborn and filled with sinful selfish pride.

"But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness." -Romans 9:31

"Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." -John 3:3


Logged

"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?" ~ {2 Corinthians 6:14}
Amishism
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,812


« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2008, 04:50:59 PM »


Aprox 90% of US christianity holds a false scofield christian zionist view, but certainly not all.

There is only one seed remaining and that is a spiritual seed. There is no future in any race or tribe.


Matt.21:43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.


Gal.3:16,28,29 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.....There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.


Ro.9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.


Ro.2:17 Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God.....25 For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision. 26 Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? 27 And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law? 28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: 29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.


Gal.3:7 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham.


Phil.3:3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.

Logged
Amishism
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,812


« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2008, 05:29:09 PM »

Well said...and might I also add that God also said that He is doing this for HIS Glory, fulfilling Prophecy...not for the Jews.

Ezekiel 36:
36:22 Therefore say unto the house of Israel, thus saith the Lord GOD; I do not this for your sakes, O house of Israel, but for mine holy name's sake, which ye have profaned among the heathen, whither ye went.

36:23 And I will sanctify my great name, which was profaned among the heathen, which ye have profaned in the midst of them; and the heathen shall know that I am the LORD, saith the Lord GOD, when I shall be sanctified in you before their eyes.

36:24 For I will take you from among the heathen, and gather you out of all countries, and will bring you into your own land.

Exodus 19:5, God said to Israel, "If you will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then you shall be a peculiar treasure to me above all people: for all the earth is mine." Thus Israel's being "a peculiar treasure … above all people" was conditional upon their obedience to God's voice.


Logged
Chocolaty
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 540


« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2008, 05:41:43 PM »

Yes i do thank you.

What's your understanding of it? Which kingdom is the fourth beast with initially 10 horns? Which kingdom do the legs of iron and the feet of iron and clay represent?
Logged
cold fusion
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,992


Sola Scriptura


WWW
« Reply #9 on: September 13, 2008, 06:30:19 PM »

Quote
There is only one seed remaining and that is a spiritual seed. There is no future in any race or tribe.

The verses that you quoted prove only that no Jew has any inheritance without faith in Christ. The Bible draws clear distinctions between Jew, Gentile, and Christian (1 Cor. 10:32). In the Church, we (Jew and Gentile alike) become one in Christ, but that doesn't erase the FACT that God distinguishes between the wild branch (Gentile) and the natural branch (Jew) when speaking of current conditions and future events. The natural branches are CURRENTLY broken off, but will be restored in the future, and the wild branches are presently being grafted into Christ, who bears BOTH. This is laid out plainly in Romans 11. According to Paul’s Letter to the Ephesians, the Church is nothing less than a new race of mankind, coming from among both Jew and Gentile but sharing a destiny with neither. (Ephe. 2:15-16)

The Greek preposition translated "from" in 1 Thess. 1:10 means "from the time, place or any relation to the event." The Church will be rescued from the time, place, or any relation to God’s wrath. (Click the link to read the entire article). This promise had first been made over 750 years earlier in Isaiah 26:20 and it’s still good today. The Tribulation is also called "The Time of Jacob's Trouble" and it is specifically directed toward Israel (Jacob) NOT THE CHURCH.

The nature of the Church is to be as though sinless. As Paul said we’re like a chaste virgin (2 Cor. 11:2), without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, holy and blameless. (Ephes. 5:27) We’ve been washed from our sins in the Lord’s own blood (Rev. 1:5).

Still quoting: (I have recently noticed a resurgence of the view that not all Christians will inherit eternal life with the Lord, but only those judged worthy by their works. This view holds that while saved, some born again believers will actually share the destiny of unbelievers, being cast into the outer darkness and away from the presence of God forever. Proponents of this view demonstrate a remarkable ignorance of New Testament Theology as summarized in the verses I’ve cited here.)

What’s the Point?
First, not needing purification, no purpose is fulfilled by having the Church endure the Great Tribulation. And even if purification was needed, how could the suffering of one generation of believers serve to purify all the generations of believers who have preceded us?

In Israel’s case the generations since the cross are lost, having rejected their Messiah. The last generation’s discipline is intended to finally bring them to that realization and to open their eyes and hearts to Jesus so that a remnant of God’s people can be preserved. (Zech. 12:10-13)

But all the generations of the Church have died in hope of spending eternity with the Lord as the Bible promised them. Is it only ours who will receive this promise and then only after sharing in Israel’s purification? Of course not.
Logged

Dok
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,713



WWW
« Reply #10 on: September 13, 2008, 06:59:42 PM »

Quote
What's your understanding of it? Which kingdom is the fourth beast with initially 10 horns? Which kingdom do the legs of iron and the feet of iron and clay represent?

Revived roman empire.
Logged

HOW TO BE SAVED
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/how_to_be_saved.html

Ye Must Be Born Again!
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Basics/ye_must_be_born_again.htm

True Salvation & the TRUE Gospel/Good News!
http://www.contendingfortruth.com/?p=1060

how to avoid censorship Wink
Amishism
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,812


« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2008, 12:49:53 AM »

Quote from: doktor
Revived roman empire.

The bible says the four beast are four kingdoms (Dan.7:23). Dan.2:33 says the 4th beast kingdom has two legs, while Dan.7:7 says the 4th beast has ten horns. Dan 7:8 says a little horn caused 3 of the ten to be plucked up by the roots. The little horn has eyes like the eyes of man and a mouth speaking great things. This little horn is papal Rome.

Like all biblical prophecy these are symbols that describe our historical timeline.

Due to the descriptors and timeline most all biblical scholars agree these four kingdoms are:

Babylon
Medio-Persia
Greece
Rome

The Roman Empire has two legs, Rome and Byzantine or western and eastern Orthodoxy. This 4th beast kingdom of Rome had 10 horns which were ten kingdoms. The small horn papacy arises subduing three of the ten (Dan.7:24).

Visigoths - Spain
Anglo Saxons - England
Franks - France
Alemani - Germany
Burgundians - Switzerland
Lombards - Italy
Suevi - Portugal
Heruli - extinct
Ostrogoths - extinct
Vandals - extinct

Here is how Dr.Mervyn Maxwell, a theologian and historian, described the results in volume 1, page 129, of his book God Cares: "The Catholic emperor Zeno(474-491) arranged a treaty with the Ostrogoths in 487 which resulted in the eradication of the kingdom of the Arian Heruls in 493. And Catholic emperor Justinian(527-565) exterminated the Arian Vandals in 534 and significantly broke the power of the Arian Ostrogoths in 538. Thus were Daniel's three horns-the Heruls, the Vandals and the Ostrogoths-'plucked up by the roots'"

Papal Rome began by Justinian decree in 538 ruling for 1260 prophetic year/days until 1798. Having received a deadly wound the wound was healed in 1929 with the concordate of Mussolini restoring Papal Rome to political power.

Whew!

The revived Holy Roman Empire New World Order is found Rev.17:12 and last one prophetic hour to make war with the Lamb.

This is a Truth forum.....

This little horn antichrist beast power has a mark that it's deceived followers have received, then, there is the spiritual seed, spiritual Israel, the saints, the remnant church that is the bride of Christ.

Rev.13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

Rev.14:1 And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads.

Hebrews 10:16 This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;

Exodus 13:9 And it shall be for a sign unto thee upon thine hand, and for a memorial between thine eyes, that the Lord's law may be in thy mouth.

Rev.7:3 Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads.

Rev.14:12 Here is the patience of the saints: Here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.

Rev.22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.

It's about authority. Either you will keep the law of God (including the fourth, which IDs God as creator of the universe and the commandments), accepting his seal or keep man's law.

Besides the babylonian sun worship coming out of Rome as her mark she has changed the sabbath and the ten commandments of God.

But you say, has not the law been nailed to the cross? Let us look.

What was nailed to the cross and done away with

Colossians 2:14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; 15 And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it. 16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: 17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.

This is mosaic ordinances (cerimonial law of the Jews) of burnt offerings and yearly sabbaths that were training and a shadow of the coming saviour, the final sacrifice. The Ten Commandemnts are completely different than the mosaic ordianances.

Ephesians 2:13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ. 15 Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances;

John 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

James 2:17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone. 26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.

There is no endtime seven year period, the 70 Weeks of Daniel prophecy having been fulfilled in our saviour Messiah Christ Jesus. The prophecy deals with the Messiah, not some future antichrist. The antichrist beast power is in ROME! Sitting on seven hills persecuting God's saints who keep the commandments including the sabbath.



There are several videos showing this much better than some guy on a web forum Anything from RemnantofGod or whitehorsemedia.
Logged
Col3_11n12
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 432


« Reply #12 on: October 11, 2008, 07:42:36 AM »

This is some very interesting stuff.   I have always held that Zionism is the major cause behind the events of today, but this Jesuit connection is an admitted black hole in my knowledge I have. 

Actually, I'm convinced that if we trace Zionism's roots back to its beginnings, really it's rooted even before the Jesuits--it's rooted back to Jewish nationalism.  That has always been around, ever since the Babylonian captivity.  This Jesuit connection is probably just another stepping stone along that path.
Logged
Amishism
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,812


« Reply #13 on: October 16, 2008, 02:48:57 PM »


Col3, While of course the Jews wanted Jerusalem in the past they haven't since the Muslim invasion. This new Zionism is evidenced to be a Jesuit creation and masonically ran. The Jesuits some have concluded were formed of the Gnostic Templars of Spain. Either way you slice it it is still the Roman Empire.
Logged
Amd304912
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,634


Ietsism (Dutch “ietsisme” - "Somethingism")


WWW
« Reply #14 on: October 16, 2008, 02:57:05 PM »

Col3, While of course the Jews wanted Jerusalem in the past they haven't since the Muslim invasion. This new Zionism is evidenced to be a Jesuit creation and masonically ran. The Jesuits some have concluded were formed of the Gnostic Templars of Spain. Either way you slice it it is still the Roman Empire.





















show me the pope riding a caterpillars into innocent muslims
Logged

faith basers make me as sick as free basers Surah 75 سورة القيامة - محمد [ http://powerofthadolla.freeforums.org/ ] An Almond for a Parrot
€∀§M_ ³ حتى الآلهة الحمار الاحتفاظ زنجي الخراء تمشيا   أنت كافر نكاح تفرز من الشيطان الاكبر يا  ح
Amd304912
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,634


Ietsism (Dutch “ietsisme” - "Somethingism")


WWW
« Reply #15 on: October 16, 2008, 03:02:33 PM »

dude im playing... if a jew kills a arab dont blame a chrisitan... all i was saying... before you freak out...
Logged

faith basers make me as sick as free basers Surah 75 سورة القيامة - محمد [ http://powerofthadolla.freeforums.org/ ] An Almond for a Parrot
€∀§M_ ³ حتى الآلهة الحمار الاحتفاظ زنجي الخراء تمشيا   أنت كافر نكاح تفرز من الشيطان الاكبر يا  ح
Dok
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,713



WWW
« Reply #16 on: October 16, 2008, 03:06:08 PM »

I love the way everyone sticks up for the 'Palestinaians" who has no claim to land that was owned by the Ottoman empire, but never cry over the Native Americans.
Logged

HOW TO BE SAVED
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/how_to_be_saved.html

Ye Must Be Born Again!
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Basics/ye_must_be_born_again.htm

True Salvation & the TRUE Gospel/Good News!
http://www.contendingfortruth.com/?p=1060

how to avoid censorship Wink
Col3_11n12
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 432


« Reply #17 on: October 16, 2008, 05:38:17 PM »

Two wrongs don't make a right.  But even the Native Americans' land wasn't stolen using the Lord's name and saying that they're just not "chosen" of God like their Israeli masters are.   If you're going to steal from an "inferior" race, at least do the courtesy of not bringing God into this.
Logged
Amd304912
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,634


Ietsism (Dutch “ietsisme” - "Somethingism")


WWW
« Reply #18 on: October 16, 2008, 06:01:55 PM »

I love the way everyone sticks up for the 'Palestinaians" who has no claim to land that was owned by the Ottoman empire, but never cry over the Native Americans.

AFRICAN AMERICANS DO THAT QUITE WELL YET SOME MEN SEEM TO SILENCE A WHOLE ETHNIC GROUP UNLIKE JEWISH CLAIMING RACE WARS.

i never knew JEWS were a race but followers of an ideology like other WHITES who can be classified as CHRISTIANS are of the same RACE AS JEWS-----WHITE.

either way jews will claim they are racial, they want to supersede the rest of their WHITE RACE>

 Shocked Tongue
Logged

faith basers make me as sick as free basers Surah 75 سورة القيامة - محمد [ http://powerofthadolla.freeforums.org/ ] An Almond for a Parrot
€∀§M_ ³ حتى الآلهة الحمار الاحتفاظ زنجي الخراء تمشيا   أنت كافر نكاح تفرز من الشيطان الاكبر يا  ح
Col3_11n12
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 432


« Reply #19 on: October 16, 2008, 09:34:20 PM »

Quote
Col3, While of course the Jews wanted Jerusalem in the past they haven't since the Muslim invasion. This new Zionism is evidenced to be a Jesuit creation and masonically ran. The Jesuits some have concluded were formed of the Gnostic Templars of Spain. Either way you slice it it is still the Roman Empire.

This Francisco guy is relatively new to me, but here's what's interesting:   we're talking Moorish Spain.  That was a real melting pot of Judeo-Christian-Muslim syncretistic belief.   The Inquisition happened here--which was basically an expulsion of non-Christian elements infiltrating the Christian Church in an attempt to manipulate it.  And around that same time, Rabbi Moshe de Leon wrote the Zohar--in Spain--which became Kabbalah.   The Hebrew word "Zohar", translated to English, means "illumination".  Translated to Latin, it's "Illuminati".  High degree Freemasons follow Kabbalah.

So this thing is all very highly interlinked, and it goes back further than Francisco.   Moshe de Leon claimed to have derived his Kabbalah writings from Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai, who basically lived around the time of the Bar Kochba rebellion (ca. 232 AD).   And Bar Kochba was yet another Antichrist figure, leading to yet another Jewish rebellion against Rome--because as always, Jews had this very nationalistic element to them.

So I don't doubt this Jesuit/Freemason connection.  But I think that connection goes back to another connection, which is Jewish infiltration of the Church.   That, too has roots going all the way back to Christianity's beginnings.  Read Acts 15.   So I still think Zionism still traces its roots back to Jewish nationalism; it's just evolved over the centuries into something more and more perverted.
Logged
Amishism
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,812


« Reply #20 on: October 17, 2008, 06:37:37 PM »


The Roman Empire ruled over the Jews and Jerusalem at the time of Christ and has always tried to keep the region for their own neurotic reasons not of zionism.

The Catholic Church was started by Constantine using a sect of Samaritans in Rome following Simon Magus with an early Gnostic form of Christianity.

Some Jews (Samaritans) were given the Maji spiritual doctrines while in captivity in Babylon, they did not invent the Kabala, just as Gnosticism has been added to Christianity, only developed upon it.

This is a good book on the origins and development of kabala and western civilization.

The Dying God

The most important cult to influence the thought of the Greek philosophers, particularly Pythagoras, and after him, Plato, was a cult dedicated to Dionysus, called Orphism, believed to have been founded by the legendary Orpheus. Dionysus was related to the goat-god Pan, and a Greek version of the dying-god of the Middle East, worshipped by the Phoenicians as Baal-Hercules. The original Babylonian Bel was assimilated by the Magi to their own Persian god named Mithras.

According to Heraclitus, a Greek philosopher of the sixth century BC, the rites of Dionysus were in imitation of the Magi. However, as R.C Zaehner has demonstrated, no such rites were found in orthodox Zoroastrianism. Rather, those Magi with whom the Greeks came into contact were sorcerers, who were often criticized in the Zoroastrian scriptures as devil-worshippers. In other words, these heretical Magi worshipped the dying-god, or the god of the underworld, in mystery rites, the same cult that was the basis of the Kabbalah.

The initial plan of the Kabbalists was to seek global domination, disguised by a Zionist interpretation of the Bible, according to which, at the advent of the Messiah, they would be instated as rulers of the world. But little development took place in the Kabbalah after its initial inception in Babylon. It was Plato who was the first to elaborate on the basic teachings of this new doctrine, outlined in the Timaeus, an exposition of Magian cosmology, the purpose of life was the study of the stars, by which man could discover number, the basis of all truth.

It was in the Republic though, that Plato established the basis of the future totalitarian New World Order, to be governed by Philosopher Kings, and ever since, has been referred in the occult as the great godfather of their tradition, and continues to be applied today by the pernicious political maneuverings of the Neo-Conservatives.

Logged
Amd304912
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6,634


Ietsism (Dutch “ietsisme” - "Somethingism")


WWW
« Reply #21 on: October 21, 2008, 12:07:22 PM »

10-21-2008 its on todays stream?

this is just like ZA. the chicken came before the egg....

i think that king tut came before rome was in power...

when will the madness end?
Logged

faith basers make me as sick as free basers Surah 75 سورة القيامة - محمد [ http://powerofthadolla.freeforums.org/ ] An Almond for a Parrot
€∀§M_ ³ حتى الآلهة الحمار الاحتفاظ زنجي الخراء تمشيا   أنت كافر نكاح تفرز من الشيطان الاكبر يا  ح
catholicportugalian
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,128


Isabel la Catolica


WWW
« Reply #22 on: October 27, 2008, 07:43:03 AM »

When will this blatant slander on the Jesuits end.  You people really don't know what you are talking about.  You believe anything that is thrown in front of you without given any benefit of doubt or reading anything in defense of the Jesuits.  You are no help to the truth movement.
Logged

My daughter, I see more Pharisees among Christians than there were around Pilate. -- St. Margaret of Cortona

You cannot please both God and the world at the same time, They are utterly opposed to each other in their thoughts, their desires, and their actions. -- St. John Vianney
lord edward coke
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,202


"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God"


WWW
« Reply #23 on: November 23, 2008, 10:51:52 AM »

Zionism, not Jewish but Jesuit

All over Europe the Pope was called The Antichrist. This prophetic teaching (historicist) was playing havoc with the Roman church. Millions were escaping and obeying the Lord's command to "come out of her" (Rev. 18:4).


LIEola commissioned one of his Jesuits named Francisco Ribera (1537-1591) to write an opposing view. He wrote a 500 page commentary on the Book of Revelation. The main premise of his commentary was that:

(1) Antichrist was one man . . . not a dynasty.
(2) He would be an atheist or infidel.
(3) He would not be revealed until 7 years before the end of time.
(4) He would sit in a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem and make a covenant with the Jews.
(5) He would call himself God etc., etc.
(6) The Christians were hindering his appearance but they would be "caught up" raptured to Heaven before his appearance -- the "Left Behind" madness!!


This became the official Roman Catholic position on Antichrist. This new idea (futurism) very conveniently shifted the focus from the Papacy to some fanciful individual way off in the distant future. John Nelson Darby became its main proponent in the English speaking world.


In order to make this "prophecy" come true he had to "invent Jews" (Rothschilds) and somehow get them back to Palestine.


The mighty nation of ancient Israel perished by the Roman sword in 70 A.D., in exact fulfillment of the words of Jesus The Temple was leveled to the ground and not one stone was left upon another that was not thrown down.


Inventing "Jews" was no problem for Rome. Even at the time of Christ there was a whole nation that called themselves Jews . . . but were phonies. They were the Samaritans who lived to the north of Jerusalem. Jesus even had an interview with a Samaritan woman at a well. (Gospel of John ch. 4). One of them, Simon the Sorcerer, actually went to Rome and founded the Roman Catholic church.


Zionism began in earnest after WW I with the British Conquest of Palestine. Still, most of those Samaritan Jews were not interested in going there. After all, most of them were living comfortably in Germany and they had no interest in helping Ribera fulfill his futurism.


Hitler and WW II changed all that. In 1948, the State of Israel was declared and the survivors of the Holocaust had no where to go but to Palestine.


This set the stage for perpetual conflict....The Arabs had been living on that land for centuries and they were not about to give up their homes to help the Jesuits fulfill "Bible" prophesy.
www.reformation.org/mideast_crisis.html
www.reformation.org/synagogue-of-satan.html



Francisco Ribera
(1537-1591) was a Jesuit doctor of theology, born in Spain, who began writing a lengthy (500 page) commentary in 1585 on the book of Revelation (Apocalypse) titled In Sacrum Beati Ioannis Apostoli, & Evangelistiae Apocalypsin Commentarij, and published it about the year 1590. He died in 1591 at the age of fifty-four, so he was not able to expand on his work or write any other commentaries on Revelation. In order to remove the Catholic Church from consideration as the antichrist power, Ribera proposed that the first few chapters of the Apocalypse applied to ancient pagan Rome, and the rest he limited to a yet future period of 3 1/2 literal years, immediately prior to the second coming. During that time, the Roman Catholic Church would have fallen away from the pope into apostasy. Then, he proposed, the antichrist, a single individual, would:

-Persecute and blaspheme the saints of God.
-Rebuild the temple in Jerusalem.
-Abolish the Christian religion.
-Deny Jesus Christ.
-Be received by the Jews.
-Pretend to be God.
-Kill the two witnesses of God.
-Conquer the world.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm  Huh Huh Huh

wonder why your kabbalah thread is locked?   Truth must be stiffled?  Cry

Jacob Rothschild (image right), the current head of the Rothschild dynasty, has intermarried with the Sinclair family, forging an important alliance between the head family of the Illuminati, and the supposed descendants of the Grail family.

As has been popularized recently by Dan Brown in the Da Vinci Code, or before him by the Holy Blood, Holy Grail, the Stuarts of Scotland are supposedly descended from King Arthur and Jesus Christ. These families are of course not descended from Jesus. The idea is preposterous. But they are related to the Holy Grail, and they are not Christians, but Kabbalists.

In reality, they, like all the aristocratic bloodlines that form the core of the Illuminati, are descended from Guillaume de Gellone of the eighth century AD. Guillaume's father was Rabbi Makhir, among the Exilarchs who ruled the Jews in Baghdad, who was sent West after a dispute over the successorship. In France, he took the name Theodoric, married Alda, the aunt of Charlemagne, and was appointed “King of the Jews” in the region of the Languedoc, with his capital the city of Narbonne.

Narbonne then became the heartland of the Medieval Kabbalah. The Kabbalists of Narbonne seem to have been responsible for instigating the Crusades, in order to retrieve sacred texts that had been buried there, but which had been inaccessible because of first the rule of the Romans, and then the Muslims. Once Jerusalem was conquered, a Kabbalistic order of knights known as the Templars conducted excavations, and discovered the text of the Sepher ha Bahir, which revived the lost mystical tradition, and set off the cultural revolution of the Medieval Kabbalah.

Another aspect of the penetration of these Kabbalistic ideas was the heresy of the Cathars.

 

The Cathar foothold was in the region of Tolouse, the bastion of the descendants of Guillaume, also known as the family of the Guilhemids, several of whom were ardent defenders of the heresy. However, the Cathars have been idealized by numerous Illuminati propagandists as having been innocent victims of Church persecutions, but the Cathars rejected the God of the Bible, in favor of the worship of Lucifer and practiced witchcraft. It was the Cathars who influenced the heretical aspects of the Templars, for which the order was disbanded in 1307.

Part of this Kabbalistic revolution was the legends of the Holy Grail, which included Cathar and Templar themes, and formulated in the region of Aquitaine, another stronghold of the Guilhemids. The Holy Grail, or San Greal, should have been translated as Sang Real, or Royal Blood, because it referred to the sacred bloodline that supposedly issued from Guillaume de Gellone, and ultimately King David, but which in reality, was understood to represent the descendants of the Fallen Angels, and their leader, Lucifer.

The Sinclairs were descendants of Guillaume de Gellone, through his great-great-granddaughter, Poppa of Bavaria, who married the Viking leader, Rollo Ragnvaldsson. Among Rollo's descendants was William the Conqueror of Normandy. The Sinclairs, or St. Clair, were given various other castles around France. However, they all went to England with the Conqueror. One Sinclair, though, named William, did not like the Conqueror, so with some other discontented barons, he went to Scotland and placed himself in the service of King Malcolm III of Scotland.

Malcolm III King of Scotland was the father of David I "the Saint" King of Scotland. In 1128, soon after the Council of Troyes, Hugh de Payens, the Templars' first Grand Master, met with King David I of Scotland. King David later surrounded himself with Templars, and appointed them as "the Guardians of his morals by day and night".

David married the grand-daughter of Lambert II, the brother of Godefroi de Bouillon, leader of the first crusade, and the sister of sister of William the Conqueror. Godefroi's younger brother, Eustace III, married David's sister, Mary Scots. Their daughter married Stephen I King of England, the son Adela de Normandie, the daughter of William the Conqueror. Adela's brother, Henry I King of England, married David's sister, Editha of Scotland. Their daughter, Mathilda Empress of England, married Geoffrey V, Comte d'Anjou, whose son Henry II married Eleanor of Aquitaine.

King David granted Hugues and his knights the lands of Balantrodoch, by the Firth of Forth, but now renamed Temple, near the site of Rosslyn. And, legend has it that, when the Templars came under trial, their leader de Molay arranged for the Templar to return to Scotland, where they assisted Robert the Bruce at the Battle of Bannockburn.

Robert the Bruce claimed the Scottish throne as a great-great-great-great grandson of David. Walter Stewart, the sixth High Steward of Scotland, also played an important part in the Battle of Bannockburn. Walter Stewart then married Majory, daughter of Robert the Bruce, and their son Robert II of Scotland was heir to the House of Bruce; he eventually inherited the Scottish throne after his uncle David II of Scotland died.

In Scotland, the Templars served Robert the Bruce as members of the Scots Guard, of which two prominent families were those of the Stuarts and the Sinclairs. Henry Sinclair was a supporter of Robert the Bruce, and one of his descendants, William Sinclair, designed Rosslyn Chapel, a church in the village of Roslin, replete with occult symbolism, and believed to be one of the sites where the Grail might be buried.

 

Finally, the Sinclairs became the Hereditary Grand Masters of the Masons of Scotland.

After Queen Elizabeth died without an heir, she was succeeded by the son of Mary Queen of Scots, James Stewart I of England, also known as King James. It is for this reason that the Freemasons of the eighteenth century conspired to back the Stuart cause, after their last monarch, James II Stuart, King of England, was deposed, and replaced by William of Orange.

 

The Stuart cause then became the essence of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, which regarded the Stuarts as the inheritors of the Templars, who had rescued the secret tradition of the East, otherwise known as the Kabbalah.

Since the late eighteenth century, however, the Illuminati have come under the leadership of the Rothschild family. The founder of the dynasty, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, ordered his sons to marry only their first cousins, continuing the careful intermarrying practiced by their predecessors.

However, the first exception was Hannah, the daughter of Amschel Mayer's son, the notorious Nathan Mayer Rothschild, who married the Rt. Hon. Henry Fitzroy, a direct descendant of Charles II Stuart King of England, the father of James II.

More recently, however, is the great-great-great grandson of Nathan Mayer, Nathaniel Charles Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild, who married Mary Serena Dunn. The mother of Mary Serena was Lady Mary Sybil St. Clair-Erskine, who was the daughter of James Francis Harry St. Clair-Erskine, 5th Earl of Rosslyn.

Jacob Rothschild is the current head of the UK Rothschild family, having inherited the fourth baronetcy from his father, Victor, an eminent zoologist, and sometime MI5 agent and friend of KGB agents Anthony Blunt and Guy Burgess. Jacob resigned from the family's bank NM Rothschilds in 1980, run by his cousin Evelyn, and started RIT Capital Partners.

Jacob Rothschild resigned from the family's bank NM Rothschilds in 1980, run by his cousin Evelyn, and started RIT Capital Partners. He is chairman of Yad Hanadiv, the Rothschild foundation, which built and gave the Knesset government buildings and the Supreme Court to Israel, and chairs the Jewish Policy Research, dedicated to promoting issues affecting Jews worldwide.

Jacob Rothschild is chairman of Yad Hanadiv, the Rothschild foundation, which chairs the Jewish Policy Research, dedicated to promoting issues affecting Jews worldwide. Yad Hanadiv was also responsible for building and granting the Knesset government buildings, and the Supreme Court of Israel, which prominently features Masonic symbolism and the pyramid and all-seeing eye of the Illuminati.

Jacob Rothschild was a close personal friend of the Princess Diana, and maintains strong personal and business links with Henry Kissinger. He knows Rupert Murdoch well, having been friends since the Australian newspaper proprietor first came to the UK in the 1960s. His country estate has been a regular venue for visiting heads of state including Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.

 

Margaret Thatcher received French President François Mitterrand there at a summit in 1990.

 

He hosted the European Economic Round Table conference in 2002, attended by such figures as James Wolfensohn, president of the World Bank, Nicky Oppenheimer, Warren Buffet and Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Logged

"Liberty has never come from government.  Liberty has always come from the subjects of government. The history of liberty is a history  of resistance. The history of liberty is a history of limitations of government power, not the increase of it." http://sedm.org/
catholicportugalian
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,128


Isabel la Catolica


WWW
« Reply #24 on: November 23, 2008, 06:18:29 PM »

you will all find out soon enough.  Don't be fooled by this nonsense.
Logged

My daughter, I see more Pharisees among Christians than there were around Pilate. -- St. Margaret of Cortona

You cannot please both God and the world at the same time, They are utterly opposed to each other in their thoughts, their desires, and their actions. -- St. John Vianney
Parentsfortruth
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,422



« Reply #25 on: November 23, 2008, 07:59:38 PM »

Anything coming out of "the vatican" post 1958, should rightly, be ignored.
Logged

Matthew 5:37

But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.
Dok
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 21,713



WWW
« Reply #26 on: November 24, 2008, 04:46:17 AM »

Anything coming out of "the vatican" post 1958, should rightly, be ignored.

What about everything before 1958? Is all of that OK?
Logged

HOW TO BE SAVED
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/how_to_be_saved.html

Ye Must Be Born Again!
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Basics/ye_must_be_born_again.htm

True Salvation & the TRUE Gospel/Good News!
http://www.contendingfortruth.com/?p=1060

how to avoid censorship Wink
Triadtropz
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,703


Gods army is real..join up..


« Reply #27 on: November 24, 2008, 04:54:17 AM »

What about everything before 1958? Is all of that OK?

Ignore all vatican orders..This is clearly the house of Satan...it has been for a long time.
Logged

one man with courage makes a majority..TJ
catholicportugalian
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,128


Isabel la Catolica


WWW
« Reply #28 on: November 24, 2008, 06:43:05 PM »

as mentioned before, the free masons held a cout d'etat on the Vatican in 1958 and took control of the papal election after the good Pope Pius XII (requiescat in pace) died of a sudden illness.  They elected an anti pope (John XXIII) and have been doing so since.  They managed to get rid of the Latin Mass and all valid sacraments and replaced it with what they wanted when they held the second Vatican Council in 1962.  about 90% of everything that comes out of the Vatican since then is blasphemy and heresy.
Logged

My daughter, I see more Pharisees among Christians than there were around Pilate. -- St. Margaret of Cortona

You cannot please both God and the world at the same time, They are utterly opposed to each other in their thoughts, their desires, and their actions. -- St. John Vianney
jrh47962
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 109


« Reply #29 on: November 25, 2008, 06:13:13 PM »

Quote
This became the official Roman Catholic position on Antichrist. This new idea (futurism) very conveniently shifted the focus from the Papacy to some fanciful individual way off in the distant future. John Nelson Darby became its main proponent in the English speaking world.

Futurism ? Ah you mean Christian Dispensationalists/Christian Zionists right?.
I was under the impression Futurism was some kind  of fascist belief started in Mussolinis 1920s Italy by this guy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filippo_Tommaso_MarinettiCool
Logged

"Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely"
 Lord Acton.
jrh47962
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 109


« Reply #30 on: November 26, 2008, 05:14:31 AM »

 Cool The jews are waiting for their Messiah still to rein from Solomans new and improved Temple.Their Messiah must be none other than than the anti Christ because the Messiah has already come & is only coming a second time to confront the anti Christ whom indeed occupies and rules from solomans just as the Jews claim their Messiah will and the bible predicts. Therefore i suspect the Jewish messiah must be the anti christ!.
Logged

"Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely"
 Lord Acton.
Triadtropz
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,703


Gods army is real..join up..


« Reply #31 on: November 26, 2008, 05:22:06 AM »

Cool The jews are waiting for their Messiah still to rein from Solomans new and improved Temple.Their Messiah must be none other than than the anti Christ because the Messiah has already come & is only coming a second time to confront the anti Christ whom indeed occupies and rules from solomans just as the Jews claim their Messiah will and the bible predicts. Therefore i suspect the Jewish messiah must be the anti christ!.

I think if war breaks out between Israel and Iran, you will see Christ and the anti-christ at war..thats why bush wont give olmhert the green light..he knows Christ is waiting for it..
Logged

one man with courage makes a majority..TJ
Parentsfortruth
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,422



« Reply #32 on: November 26, 2008, 08:23:22 PM »

What about everything before 1958? Is all of that OK?

Not exactly, because already, the forces were at work to make what happened in 1958 possible. We didn't have a papal crisis pre-1958.

There were plenty of warnings about this problem. One came from the pope himself, Pope St. Pius X. Here's a good read. I'm surprised this letter remains in the Vatican. I guess it's cover to pretend that nothing is wrong. Sorta reminds me of the 9/11 "lolinvestigation" to ignore the facts.

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_x/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-x_enc_19070908_pascendi-dominici-gregis_en.html

A prime example of someone that was already working before 1958, was Aniballe Bugnini, who was one of the authors of the "Novus Ordo Missae" (Interesting choice of words, isn't it? Novus ordo.... New Order.... New World Order... Novus Ordo Seculorum? I think so.)

Also, he was the one that was responsible for the changes to the Holy Week Services instituted in 1954. Hmm... Incidentally, he was a Freemason! (Go figure)


Logged

Matthew 5:37

But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.
lord edward coke
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,202


"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God"


WWW
« Reply #33 on: November 27, 2008, 09:28:19 AM »

The $9 billion a year video-game industry in America, which contributed mightily to the carnage at Littleton, Paducah, and Jonesboro, is far more than the mere commercial exploitation of techniques and technologies developed as ``legitimate'' training instruments for the military and law enforcement agencies. To understand the roots of this new form of ``Manchurian Candidate'' programmed terrorism, it is necessary to go back to World War II and the immediate postwar period, when there was a concerted effort launched, by the Frankfurt School and the London Tavistock Institute, to use the Marxist/Freudian perversion of psychology and other social sciences, as instruments for mass social control and brainwashing. The two pillars of the assault on the American intellectual tradition were cybernetics and the drug counterculture.

At that time, a number of prominent social scientists openly spelled out their goal, of using the wartime-tested techniques of mass psychological manipulation, to pervert and control the American people. And in most instances, their emphasis was on children, and the need to destroy the fabric of family life.

Lord Bertrand Russell, who joined with the Frankfurt School in this effort at mass social engineering, spilled the beans, in his 1951 book, The Impact of Science on Society. He wrote: ``Physiology and psychology afford fields for scientific technique which still await development. Two great men, Pavlov and Freud, have laid the foundation. I do not accept the view that they are in any essential conflict, but what structure will be built on their foundations is still in doubt. I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology.... Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called `education.' Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema, and the radio play an increasing part.... It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.''

Russell continued, ``The subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship.... The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray.''

Russell concluded with a warning: ``Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.''



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- Russell and the `Lethal Chamber' -
Russell had been working on the concept of the scientific dictatorship for decades. In his 1931 book, The Scientific Outlook, he had devoted a chapter to ``Education in a Scientific Society.'' Here, he was equally blunt about his oligarchical totalitarian vision. Drawing the parallel to the two levels of education provided by the Jesuits, Russell asserted: ``In like manner, the scientific rulers will provide one kind of education for ordinary men and women, and another for those who are to become holders of scientific power. Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented. Of these qualities probably contentment will be considered the most important. In order to produce it, all the researches of psycho-analysis, behaviourism, and biochemistry will be brought into play.... All the boys and girls will learn from an early age to be what is called `co-operative,' i.e., to do exactly what everybody is doing. Initiative will be discouraged in these children, and insubordination, without being punished, will be scientifically trained out of them.''

For the children chosen to be among the scientific ruling class, education was to be quite different. ``Except for the one matter of loyalty to the world State and to their own order,'' Russell explained, ``members of the governing class will be encouraged to be adventurous and full of initiative. It will be recognized that it is their business to improve scientific technique, and to keep the manual workers contented by means of continual new amusements.''

Russell, however, added one very strong caveat. ``On those rare occasions,'' he warned, ``when a boy or girl who has passed the age at which it is usual to determine social status shows such marked ability as to seem the intellectual equal of the rulers, a difficult situation will arise, requiring serious consideration. If the youth is content to abandon his previous associates and to throw in his lot whole-heartedly with the rulers, he may, after suitable tests, be promoted, but if he shows any regrettable solidarity with his previous associates, the rulers will reluctantly conclude that there is nothing to be done with him except to send him to the lethal chamber before his ill-disciplined intelligence has had time to spread revolt. This will be a painful duty to the rulers, but I think they will not shrink from performing it.''


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- Huxley's `Concentration Camp of the Mind' -
Russell's blunt description of a ``scientific dictatorship'' was matched by the account of Aldous Huxley, author of the utopian tract Brave New World, in a speech on the U.S. State Department's Voice of America, in 1961, of a world of pharmacologically manipulated slaves, living in a ``concentration camp of the mind,'' enhanced by propaganda and psychotropic drugs, learning to ``love their servitude,'' and abandoning all will to resist. ``This,'' Huxley concluded, ``is the final revolution.''

Speaking at the California Medical School in San Francisco, Huxley announced: ``There will be in the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak. Producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.''

Huxley's cohort in the 1950s experimentation with psychotropic drugs, Dr. Timothy Leary, of Harvard University's Psychology Department, provided another glimpse into the perverted minds of the Russell/Huxley/Frankfurt School crowd, in his autobiographical account of the Harvard University Psychedelic Drug Project, Flashback. Leary first quoted Huxley: ``These brain drugs, mass produced in the laboratories, will bring about vast changes in society. This will happen with or without you or me. All we can do is spread the word. The obstacle to this evolution, Timothy, is the Bible.'' Leary then added his own two cents: ``We had run up against the Judeo-Christian commitment to one God, one religion, one reality, that has cursed Europe for centuries and America since our founding days. Drugs that open the mind to multiple realities inevitably lead to a polytheistic view of the universe. We sensed that the time for a new humanist religion based on intelligence, good-natured pluralism and scientific paganism had arrived.''

As these monstrous notions of mass social engineering were being presented as the ``humanistic'' alternative to world war in the age of the atomic and hydrogen bomb, two crucial projects were being launched, that would shape the implementation of this Brave New World, and bring us, today, to the world of Littleton, Paducah, Jonesboro, Doom, Quake, and Duke Nukem.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- The Authoritarian Personality -
The first of the two projects was launched in January 1943, by a team of three social psychologists at the University of California at Berkeley, Else Frenkel-Brunswik (a founding member of the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research, known as the ``Frankfurt School''), Daniel J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford. What started out as a modest $500 grant to study the roots of anti-Semitism, would soon mushroom into the biggest mass social-profiling project ever undertaken in America, up until that time.

In May 1944, the American Jewish Committee established a Department of Scientific Research, which was headed by Frankfurt School director Max Horkheimer. Horkheimer established a project, called Studies in Prejudice, with generous funding from the AJC and other agencies, including the Rockefeller foundations. The Studies in Prejudice offered employment to a number of Frankfurt School members who, for various reasons, were not coopted directly into the war effort (for example, Herbert Marcuse and Franz Neumann were brought into the Research and Analysis Section of the Office of Strategic Services, or OSS, the forerunner to today's Central Intelligence Agency). Hedda Massing, Marie Jahoda, Morris Janowitz, and Theodor W. Adorno all worked on the Studies, and, under Horkheimer's direction, they all formally reconstituted the International Institute of Social Research, the transplanted incarnation of the original Frankfurt School of Weimar Germany.

The most significant of the five Studies in Prejudice, produced for the AJC during 1944-50, was The Authoritarian Personality (New York: Harper, 1950). Authors Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson, and Sanford assembled a large research team from the Berkeley Public Opinion Study and the International Institute of Social Research, to conduct thousands of interviews of Americans, to profile their allegedly deep-seated tendencies toward authoritarianism, prejudice, and anti-Semitism. Dr. William Morrow, the leading protégé of Dr. Kurt Lewin, who was one key, bridge figure between the Frankfurt School and the Tavistock Institute, was a research director for the Authoritarian Personality project.

The study was an exercise in self-fulfilling prophecy and Marxist/Freudian self-delusion. Long before the first survey questionnaire was drafted, Horkheimer and Adorno had written exhaustively about the ``authoritarian'' character of the American nuclear family, about the ``problem'' of the American people's belief in a transcendent monotheistic God, and about the underlying fascist character of all forms of American patriotism. They ``cooked'' the survey data, in advance, by devising a series of scales, purporting to measure the American population's tendency toward anti-Semitism, ethnocentricity, anti-democratic ideology, and, ultimately, fascism. Not surprisingly, the research team found the American public ``guilty as charged,'' and produced dire warnings that, unless a dramatic overhaul of the American ideology and mass culture were carried out, America would soon emerge as a Fourth Reich, repeating the horrors of Hitler on an even grander scale.

The authors of The Authoritarian Personality let it all hang out in the concluding chapter of the book, in which they summarized their findings and spelled out their recipe for social transformation:


``It seems obvious, that the modification of the potentially fascist structure cannot be achieved by psychological means alone. The task is comparable to that of eliminating neurosis, or delinquency, or nationalism from the world. These are products of the total organization of society and are to be changed only as that society is changed. It is not for the psychologist to say how such changes are to be brought about. The problem is one which requires the efforts of all social scientists. All that we would insist upon is that in the councils or round tables where the problem is considered and action planned the psychologist should have a voice. We believe that the scientific understanding of society must include an understanding of what it does to people, and that it is possible to have social reforms, even broad and sweeping ones, which though desirable in their own right would not necessarily change the structure of the prejudiced personality. For the fascist potential to change, or even to be held in check, there must be an increase in people's capacity to see themselves and to be themselves. This cannot be achieved by the manipulation of people, however well grounded in modern psychology the devices of manipulation might be.... It is here that psychology may play its most important role. Techniques for overcoming resistance, developed mainly in the field of individual psychotherapy, can be improved and adapted for use with groups and even for use on a mass scale.''

The authors conclude with this most revealing proposition: ``We need not suppose that appeal to emotion belongs to those who strive in the direction of fascism, while democratic propaganda must limit itself to reason and restraint. If fear and destructiveness are the major emotional sources of fascism, eros belongs mainly to democracy.''
Eros was precisely the weapon that the Frankfurt School and their fellow-travellers employed, over the next 50 years, to create a cultural paradigm shift away from the so-called ``authoritarian'' matrix of man in the living image of God (imago viva Dei), the sanctity of the nuclear family, and the superiority of the republican form of nation-state over all other forms of political organization. They transformed American culture toward an erotic, perverse matrix, associated with the present ``politically correct'' tyranny of tolerance for dehumanizing drug abuse, sexual perversion, and the glorification of violence. For the Marxist/Freudian revolutionaries of the Frankfurt School, the ultimate antidote to the hated Western Judeo-Christian civilization was to tear that civilization down, from the inside, by turning out generations of necrophiliacs.

If this statement seems harsh, consider the following. In his 1948 work on The Philosophy of Modern Music, Frankfurt School leader Theodor Adorno argued that the purpose of modern music is to literally drive the listener insane. He justified this by asserting that modern society was a hotbed of evil, authoritarianism, and potential fascism, and that, only by first destroying civilization, through the spread of all forms of cultural pessimism and perversity, could liberation occur. On the role of modern music, he wrote, ``It is not that schizophrenia is directly expressed therein; but the music imprints upon itself an attitude similar to that of the mentally ill. The individual brings about his own disintegration.... He imagines the fulfillment of the promise through magic, but nonetheless within the realm of immediate actuality.... Its concern is to dominate schizophrenic traits through the aesthetic consciousness. In so doing, it would hope to vindicate insanity as true health.'' Necrophilia, he added, is the ultimate expression of ``true health'' in this sick society.

Erich Fromm, another leading Frankfurt School figure, who was instrumental as early as the 1930s in devising the scales used in the Authoritarian Personality study, devoted much of his seminal 1972 work, The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness, to the analysis of necrophilia, which he pronounced to be the dominant trend in modern society. Fromm defined necrophilia as all forms of obsession with death and destruction, particularly those with intense sexual overtones. Ironically, his ostensible ``cure'' for this mass social perversion was the drug, rock, sex counterculture of the late 1960s. ``Simultaneously with the increasing necrophilous development,'' Fromm wrote in his chapter on ``Malignant Aggression: Necrophilia,'' ``the opposite trend, that of love of life, is also developing. It manifests itself in many forms: in the protest against the deadening of life, a protest by people among all social strata and age groups, but particularly by the young. There is hope in the rising protest against pollution and war.... This protest is also to be understood in the attraction to drugs among the young.''



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- Liberation through Drug Abuse -
It is noteworthy that one of the four directors of the Authoritarian Personality project, R. Nevitt Sanford, played a pivotal role in the 1950s and '60s experimentation and eventual mass usage of psychedelic drugs. In 1965, Sanford wrote the forward to Utopiates: The Use and Users of LSD 25, which was published by Tavistock Publications, the publishing arm of Great Britain's pre-eminent psychological warfare agency, the Tavistock Institute. Tavistock directed the Psychiatric Division of the British Army during World War II, and dispatched many of its top brainwashers to the United States in the immediate postwar period, to work on the secret mind-control projects of the CIA and the Pentagon, including the MK-Ultra project, devoted to the study of LSD and other psychedelics.

In his foreword to Utopiates, Sanford, who headed up the Stanford University Institute for the Study of Human Problems, a major outpost for MK-Ultra secret LSD experimentation, spelled out the argument for drug legalization that is, to this day, at the heart of the pro-drug movement's propaganda. ``The nation,'' Sanford wrote, ``seems to be fascinated by our 40,000 or so drug addicts who are seen as alarmingly wayward people who must be curbed at all costs by expensive police activity. Only an uneasy Puritanism could support the practice of focusing on the drug addicts (rather than our 5 million alcoholics) and treating them as a police problem instead of a medical one, while suppressing harmless drugs such as marijuana and peyote along with the dangerous ones.'' The leading propagandists of the drug lobby today--George Soros, Ethan Nadelman, et al.--base their argument for legalization on the exact same scientific quackery that Dr. Sanford spelled out in Utopiates 36 years ago.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- The Cybernetics Group -
One of the ``Big Lies'' permeating Fromm's Anatomy was the idea that the erotic drug-rock-sex counterculture was the antidote to the cybernetic, technetronic ``necrophilous'' society. In reality, the Frankfurt School and their closest allies among the Russell/Wells/Huxley British oligarchy, were the architects of both the cybernetics project and the counterculture project of the 1960s. In fact, the Cybernetics Group, sponsored by the Josiah Macy Foundation, was the umbrella, under which the CIA and British intelligence conducted their mass experimentation with mind-altering psychedelic drugs, including LSD-25, which experiment was, eventually, spilled out onto the streets of San Francisco, New York's Greenwich Village, and every American college campus, giving us the counterculture ``paradigm shift'' of 1966-72.

The Cybernetics Group, known among its members as the ``Man-Machine Project,'' was unofficially launched in May 1942 at a New York City conference called the Cerebral Inhibition Meeting, sponsored by the medical director of the Josiah Macy Foundation, Frank Fremont-Smith. Among the participants were Warren McCulloch, Arturo Rosenblueth, Gregory Bateson, Margaret Mead, and Lawrence K. Frank. Rosenblueth, a protégé of Norbert Wiener, set out the broad parameters of the proposed effort. Speaking on behalf of Wiener and John von Neumann, he proposed to draw together a group of engineers, biologists, neurologists, anthropologists, and psychologists, to devise experiments in social control, based on the quack claim that the human brain was nothing more than a complex input/output machine, and that human behavior could, in effect, be programmed, on both an individual and societal scale. [fn1]

World War II prevented the project from getting off the ground for four years. But shortly after the Japanese surrendered, McCulloch asked Fremont-Smith to convene a second gathering under the formal sponsorship of the Macy Foundation. The first of what would be a series of ten major conferences and year-long research efforts, between 1946 and 1953, took place in New York City on March 8-9, 1946, under the title, ``The Feedback Mechanisms and Circular Causal Systems in Biology and the Social Sciences Meeting.''

What came out of that first meeting was not only a demonic drive to create the ultimate engineered society, based on the fusion of man and machine. A core group of 20 people constituted themselves as a task force to carry out this mission, and would spawn a series of permanent institutions, where the work would continue, to the present day. A year after the founding session of the Macy project, Wiener would coin the term ``cybernetics'' to describe their effort.

Who were the ``Dr. Jekylls'' gathered around the table for the first of the Macy conferences?

Warren McCulloch was the titular chairman of all ten of the conferences. At the time of the first meeting, he was a professor of psychiatry and physiology at the University of Illinois, but he would soon move to the Research Laboratory of Electronics at MIT.

Walter Pitts, McCulloch's protégé, first at Illinois, and later at MIT.

Gregory Bateson, the anthropologist and then-spouse of Margaret Mead, who would soon become the director of research at the Veterans Hospital in Palo Alto, California, where he was a pivotal player in MK-Ultra and other secret government experiments with mind-altering drugs.

Margaret Mead, then the assistant curator of ethnology at the American Museum of Natural History in New York, who would function as the ``earth goddess'' of the Cybernetics Group, and would help launch the modern feminist movement, through her patronage of Betty Friedan, a student-protégé of Kurt Lewin.

Kurt Lewin, founder of the Research Center for Group Dynamics at MIT, a leading Frankfurt School fellow-traveller, whose work with Frankfurt School founder Karl Korsch on linguistics would form a foundation of the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Lewin's National Training Laboratory would later become part of the National Education Association, and would facilitate the transformation of public education in America into an approximation of Bertrand Russell's nightmarish scheme for teaching children that ``snow is black.''

Paul Lazarsfeld, the director of the Bureau of Applied Social Research at Columbia University, who had been the wartime head of the Radio Research Laboratory at Princeton University, and had been the patron there of the Frankfurt School's Theodor Adorno.

John Von Neumann.

Norbert Wiener.

An incredible collection of guests attended the Cybernetics Group sessions during their seven years of existence. Among them were Max Horkheimer, the head of the Frankfurt School, who collaborated with the Cybernetics Group, while directing the Studies in Prejudice.

Dr. Harold Abramson, one of the CIA's top scientists engaged in the secret LSD experimentation, not only attended the Sixth Cybernetics Group conference, but worked with Dr. Frank Fremont-Smith, the research director of the Macy Foundation, on a series of spinoff conferences, where all of the top personnel of MK-Ultra were able to convene under Macy Foundation cover and finances, to plot out their mass drugging of America. In return, Abramson dutifully provided Fremont-Smith with ample personal supplies of LSD-25.

The Macy Foundation also provided financing and publicity for the British social engineer Dr. William Sargant, whose 1957 book, Battle for the Mind, provided a ``how-to-do-it'' manual for mass brainwashing. Sargant spent 20 years in the United States, working on the MK-Ultra project and other secret mind-control efforts of the U.S. and British governments.

Among the nastiest of the projects launched by the Cybernetics Group was the World Federation of Mental Health (WFMH), whose first president, Brig. Gen. John Rawlings Rees, was the director of the Tavistock Institute, Britain's premier psychological warfare center.

Rees, Mead, Lawrence K. Frank, Fremont-Smith and Horkheimer were all in Paris together, in the summer of 1948, to launch the WFMH. Although he had died the previous year, Kurt Lewin had been involved in the preparations for launching the Federation, through his involvement, under Frank, in the National Committee for Mental Hygiene, and the London-centered International Committee for Mental Hygiene, with a half-dozen Cybernetics Group members on its board. Both bodies oversaw a network of over 4,000 ``psychiatric shock troops,'' in Rees's words, who would be at the heart of a worldwide social-engineering apparatus, penetrated into every community.

Margaret Mead and Lawrence K. Frank, two pillars of the Cybernetics Group, authored the founding statement of Rees's World Federation of Mental Health (both Mead and Frank would later succeed Rees as president), which they titled, ``Manifesto of the First International.'' Mead and Frank bluntly wrote: ``The goal of mental health has been enlarged from the concern for the development of healthy personalities to the larger tasks of creating a healthy society.... The concept of mental health is co-extensive with world order and world community.'' Frank even proposed to create a new religion of mental health.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- Computers and Artificial Intelligence -
For John von Neumann and Norbert Wiener, the core of the Cybernetics Group project was the development of computers, and the prospect of combining high-speed computers with so-called Artificial Intelligence, to literally ``program'' the human race. Underlying all of these efforts was the unshakable, albeit preposterous conviction, most avidly presented by von Neumann, that there was nothing sacred about the human mind, and that the human brain was a machine, whose functioning could be replicated, and eventually surpassed, by computers.

Dr. Jerome Wiesner, the president of MIT, which became the closest thing to the home of the Cybernetics Group, participated in several of the Macy Foundation sessions. He clearly stated this Luciferian view of man, in an interview with counterculture propagandist Stewart Brand, which appeared in Brand's 1987 book, The Media Lab: Inventing the Future at M.I.T.:


``I'm not arrogant enough to think that we're going to develop real thinking machines in a short time. But nerve signals travel at 300 meters a second. Electrical signals travel at ... 300 million meters a second. Also the components we make are much more reliable than neurons.... The higher degree of reliability of the components and the very much higher degree of speed of the impulses means to me you ought to be able to make machines that are just a hell of a lot better than the brain, if you knew how to do it.''

Brand asked Wiesner, ``You expect that?''

Wiesner: ``Yeah, not necessarily in my lifetime. No one has given a reason why it can't be done. They make all kinds of crazy arguments--`A computer doesn't have a soul.' How do we know that it won't have the same soul that we do? After all, humans will program it. I don't think questions about identity are very interesting.''

Dr. Wiesner not only participated in the Cybernetics Group efforts of the Macy Foundation. In 1952, he took over the directorship of the Research Laboratory of Electronics at MIT, where Wiener, McCulloch, and Pitts had all taken up residence. Soon, the RLE had spun off the Artificial Intelligence Lab, with Dr. Seymour Papert and Marvin Minsky taking up the task of programming human behavior and interaction.
By the 1980s, MIT had spawned the Media Lab, another direct outgrowth of the 1940s and 50s Cybernetics Group. Here, the social engineers worked hand in glove with the engineers and machine designers who were developing high-speed computers, computer graphics, holographics, and the first generation of computer simulators. Much of the work at MIT, and at the Artificial Intelligence labs at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, was funded through the Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

Steve Joshua Heims, the author of the semi-official history of the Macy conferences on cybernetics, The Cybernetics Group, reported that, by the 1980s, the cybernetics crowd had even spawned their own religion--an overtly pagan belief-system remarkably in keeping with Timothy Leary's call for a ``scientific paganism.'' ``James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis,'' Heims wrote, ``have examined how life--plants, animals, microorganisms--has influenced the chemistry of the atmosphere and the climate, and how life and climate have coevolved. Lovelock's Gaia hypothesis, which relies on a detailed cybernetic analysis, contends that all life on earth acts in concert with the atmosphere to make one self-regulating system that keeps the earth a liveable habitat.'' Heims did admit, ``The validity of the Gaia hypothesis is currently the subject of scientific controversy.''

Heims was far less guarded in his embrace of the work of the Media Lab, and the fact that the Media Lab was a direct outgrowth of the Macy Cybernetics project.

``McCulloch's and Pitts' 1943 approach to understanding mind and brain has had enthusiastic successors in the 1980s,'' he wrote. ``Consider next the new, transdisciplinary Media Lab instituted at MIT in the 1980s. Onetime Macy participant Jerome Wiesner (who was close to McCulloch, Pitts and Wiener), Seymour Papert and Marvin Minsky (important figures in the history of the artificial intelligence approach to mind and brain), are lab associates.... According to the initial proposal the lab was to provide for `the intellectual mix of two rapidly evolving and very different fields; information technologies and the human sciences'.... It deals with improvements in high-definition TV, satellite communications, fiber-optic cable TV, three-dimensional imaging, and data-compression to permit inexpensive transfers of full-length color film to a compact disk.''



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- LSD Freaks Meet Cyber-Hackers -
In 1974, Stewart Brand, chief propagandist for both the psychotropic drug revolution and the personal computer revolution, published a collection of his previously published essays under the title, II Cybernetic Frontiers. Two of the essays consisted of interviews he had conducted with Gregory Bateson, one of the architects of the psychedelic revolution in America, through his posting at the Palo Alto Veterans Hospital, where much MK-Ultra experimentation took place. Bateson was one of the four or five most influential members of the Cybernetics Group. The other, longer essay in the book, ``Fanatic Life and Symbolic Death Among the Computer Bums,'' was first published in the December 1972 issue of the leading counterculture publication, Rolling Stone.

Brand began the Rolling Stone piece with the startling boast: ``Ready or not, computers are coming to the people. That's good news, maybe the best since psychedelics.'' He continued, ``It's way off the track of the `Computers--Threat or Menace?' school of liberal criticism but surprisingly in line with the romantic fantasies of the fore-fathers of the science, such as Norbert Wiener, Warren McCulloch, J.C.R. Licklider, John von Neumann, and Vannevar Bush. The trend owes its health to an odd array of influences: the youthful fervor and firm dis-Establishmentarianism of the freaks who design computer science; an astonishingly enlightened research program from the very top of the Defense Department; an unexpected market-flanking movement by the manufacturers of small calculating machines; and an irrepressible midnight phenomenon known as Spacewar.''

Brand provided a detailed explanation of Spacewar, perhaps the very first computer war game to be designed. ``Ah, Spacewar. Reliably, at any night-time moment (i.e., non-business hours) in North America, hundreds of computer technicians are effectively out of their bodies, computer-projected onto cathode ray tube display screens, locked in life-or-death space combat for hours at a time, ruining their eyes, numbing their fingers in frenzied mashing of control buttons, joyously slaying their friends and wasting their employers' valuable computer time.''

If this sounds like a mild version of the latter-day souped-up sex and violence video games of today--it is!

Beginning in 1963, when the U.S. space program was moved out of the military and housed under NASA, J.C.R. Licklider convinced his boss at ARPA (what would later be called DARPA) to devote a fraction of the agency's budget to computer research. At the time, the Department of Defense was the world's largest consumer of computers. Licklider became the director of an ARPA unit called IPTO (Information Processing Techniques Office), and, over the next years, disbursed millions of dollars to a wide range of computer and Artificial Intelligence research centers.

Until 1969, when the Mansfield Amendment placed restrictions on how the Pentagon could spend its research and development money, there were no boundary conditions on the kinds of projects that IPTO could bankroll. Billions of dollars went into the early development of computer networking, computer graphics, ``virtual reality,'' simulation, and other key facets of what, today, is a $9-11 billion-a-year commercial industry of point-and-shoot video games. The Media Lab at MIT and the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Lab were two of the magnets for this money and the research work which fueled both the Pentagon training-simulation programs and the evolving video-game industry.

In his book On Killing, Lt. Col. David Grossman recounts how the advent of high-speed computers allowed the social engineers, responsible for training soldiers to overcome their aversion to killing, provided an unsurpassed technology for stimulus-response behavior modification. The increasingly realistic video graphics, the advanced work on neurological processes--all hallmarks of the cybernetic ``man-machine'' project--transformed the U.S. military into a force of programmed killers, and ultimately became the social engineers' ``weapon of choice'' for twisting the minds of millions of America's youth.

The social engineers seeking to fulfill Adorno, Horkheimer, Russell, and Huxley's visions of a perfectly engineered society, led by a ``scientific dictatorship,'' were never far removed from the computer and AI labs where the technologies were being developed and tested. It was only a matter of time that, like the LSD experiments of the 1960s, the secret military experimental phase ended, and the American population became the targets, this time, of the sex and violence self-programming of Doom, Quake, and the rest.

Logged

"Liberty has never come from government.  Liberty has always come from the subjects of government. The history of liberty is a history  of resistance. The history of liberty is a history of limitations of government power, not the increase of it." http://sedm.org/
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!