PrisonPlanet Forum
May 25, 2013, 07:10:55 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: NEW THEORY  (Read 3660 times)
NZer
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14



« on: September 10, 2008, 07:46:06 PM »

MAGNETIC FORCES-were to blame for the Towers collapse-

Please read-but try not to laugh

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/2/story.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10531590

Bob
Logged
Sadiq X
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2008, 08:37:25 PM »

Yea I saw this as well - crikey they'll be saying that the Emporer from Star Wars used the dark side of the force to bring it down...how bizarre - magnetics!  Again this actually may work in our hands because nothing like this is mentioned in the 'official' 911 report...keep making it up as it goes seems to be whats happening
Logged
Michal Ptacnik
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,623


« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2009, 05:40:32 AM »

It actually looks quite sound to me. It would explain why the collapse did not look exactly like a controlled demolition - for instance, the demolition did not start at the bottom but still the buildings crumbled like they did and did not fall on the side.
Logged
Thorson_
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2009, 10:39:18 AM »

It actually looks quite sound to me. It would explain why the collapse did not look exactly like a controlled demolition - for instance, the demolition did not start at the bottom but still the buildings crumbled like they did and did not fall on the side.

The linked blurb is pretty useless--sounds like a load of crap.  Even if we accept that magnetic fluctuations (how?  why?) caused the steel to soften at a lower temperature than it otherwise would have, it still doesn't explain the collapse mechanism.  And your use of the word "crumbled" is inappropriate.  These buildings exploded floor-by-floor.  Huge sections of inner columns were ejected into other buildings.  Without explosions the crumbs piling up would have have slowed, and finally stopped, the collapse, probably around the 30th floor.
Logged
KiwiClare
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,747


Either you're with us or with the terrorists


WWW
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2009, 11:11:23 PM »

The linked blurb is pretty useless--sounds like a load of crap.  Even if we accept that magnetic fluctuations (how?  why?) caused the steel to soften at a lower temperature than it otherwise would have, it still doesn't explain the collapse mechanism.  And your use of the word "crumbled" is inappropriate.  These buildings exploded floor-by-floor.  Huge sections of inner columns were ejected into other buildings.  Without explosions the crumbs piling up would have have slowed, and finally stopped, the collapse, probably around the 30th floor.

It does sound like a load of crap. It was in the NZ Herald too which is not known for running worthy stories about 9/11 Truth. In fact far from it.  The NZ Herald is a propaganda rag as far as 9/11 is concerned. It does not serve the public - it serves the criminals behind the crime.
Magnetic fluctuations.. Cheesy  What does this tell us? I think it tells us that the criminals in power were very keen to deflect attention away from the knowledge that explosives were used, as that would have led back to people at NIST, the Bush family - as Marvin Bush was in charge of security and exposed the 9/11 Commission Report to be nothing more than a whitewash.  It other words it shows that the crime leads back right back to criminals in the government!


This article is the kind of information the NZHerald should be printing, instead of that garbage:
The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites
KEVIN R. RYAN July 2, 2008
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/nist_thermite_connection.html
Logged

To be persuasive, we must be believable,
To be believable, we must be credible,
To be credible, we must be truthful.
- Edward R. Murrow
Michal Ptacnik
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,623


« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2009, 04:36:47 AM »

Well, it tells us a way how the steel could have softened, and it is enough for it to have softened, it did not have to melt.
Logged
KiwiClare
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,747


Either you're with us or with the terrorists


WWW
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2009, 02:05:16 AM »

Well, it tells us a way how the steel could have softened, and it is enough for it to have softened, it did not have to melt.

 Cheesy  Where is the evidence to support this magnetic forces theory? In Disney world?  I haven't seen any and as I mentioned, the Herald does not print the truth as far as 9/11 is concerned. As far as I know, it invariably prints hogwash.

Here is some truth.
The 9/11 dust was thick with red/gray chips, -nanothermite and they comprised about 0.1% of the weight of the dust.
Read this: http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/openaccess2.htm

Thermite accounts for the molten metal seen pouring out of the corner of the South Tower shortly before it collapsed - magnetic forces don't.
WTC2 South Tower on 9/11 Molten Metal North-East Corner
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmuzyWC60eE
Logged

To be persuasive, we must be believable,
To be believable, we must be credible,
To be credible, we must be truthful.
- Edward R. Murrow
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!