Watchmen-NWO justification for exterminating billions with false flag

[Unintelligable Name]

Sane that reads like what I would find on Wikipedia -- watered down crud.

http://www.illuminati-news.com/art-and-mc/aleister_crowley1.htm

http://www.illuminati-news.com/articles2/00261.html

[disinfomang]

Not an acid head. Never even tried it. Would like to under the proper circumstances.

Not a big Crowley fan, but an appreciator. Just because you read something doesn't mean it's true.

But alas,
 
What the thinker thinks, the prover proves.

No metaphysical right or wrong.

We've known since Darwin.


Parts of this place remind me of an old Irish proverb:
"Never teach a pig to sing. It'll waste your time and annoy the pig."


Continue to believe whatever fits your concept of reality and block out what doesn't.
Enlightenment comes from within, I'm not going to give it to you.

[Unintelligable Name]

No metaphysical right or wrong...

Yeah whatever buddy you read a little too much Illuminati propaganda -- poor thing.

Enjoy your stay here -- I'd ban you for such ignorance if I could.

[disinfomang]

I hope someone else sees the irony of what's happening to me right now. You are employing the same tactics you claim the so-called "mainstream media" uses on people with alternative viewpoints.

Much like many of you would be branded "conspiracy nuts" for disagreeing with "mainstream news propaganda," you are branding me a "kool-aid drinking sheep of the Illuminati" for disagreeing with some of your "conspiracy nuttery."

You're even going so far as to say I should be "banned for my ignorance."

You know who else wanted to get rid of people who disagreed with him?   

[squarepusher]

I do not think you should be banned - AFAIK Alex does not condone that stuff either.

But what is your point, really? You keep on saying 'oh, don't believe everything you read about Crowley', but what if it's double or triple-referenced and the source is good?

Furthermore, using this logic, we can exonerate anyone of charges brought against him. You could exonerate Hitler, because he really DID get everything he did from the West - the stigmatisation of Jews was started by Henry Ford's 'Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion', his race theology came from Blavatsky and Madison Grant's 'Passing Of The Race', the sterilization laws he adopted were a carbon copy of the US, the Aryan superiority theory came from the Americans (even President Calvin Coolidge believed that mixing other races with Nordic would lead to 'dysgenic stock'), George Bernard Shaw advocated in 1910 the use of gas chambers for the inferior breed.

[Dig]

I hope someone else sees the irony of what's happening to me right now. You are employing the same tactics you claim the so-called "mainstream media" uses on people with alternative viewpoints.

Much like many of you would be branded "conspiracy nuts" for disagreeing with "mainstream news propaganda," you are branding me a "kool-aid drinking sheep of the Illuminati" for disagreeing with some of your "conspiracy nuttery."

You're even going so far as to say I should be "banned for my ignorance."

You know who else wanted to get rid of people who disagreed with him?   

yeah really this place is like Auchwitz, wtf?

[Dig]

Not an acid head. Never even tried it. Would like to under the proper circumstances.

Not a big Crowley fan, but an appreciator. Just because you read something doesn't mean it's true.

But alas,
 
What the thinker thinks, the prover proves.

No metaphysical right or wrong.

We've known since Darwin.

But behold,

What the watchole bullshits, the reality based forum members expose.

No theosophical mumbojumbo.

We've definitely known it since the eugenicist's number one publication for psychotic egoistic fantasies: "The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life".

[Unintelligable Name]

No theosophical mumbojumbo.

Sane, you are rising in ranks on my E-scale.

 

In all seriousness, I value your opinion, as I did before that comment on reptiles -- which you could have cleared that up but you probably are like me in that occasionally when someone gets something wrong due to misunderstanding it's more entertaining to led it continue than to correct it. Bump in the road.

[disinfomang]

I do not think you should be banned - AFAIK Alex does not condone that stuff either.

But what is your point, really? You keep on saying 'oh, don't believe everything you read about Crowley', but what if it's double or triple-referenced and the source is good?

Furthermore, using this logic, we can exonerate anyone of charges brought against him. You could exonerate Hitler, because he really DID get everything he did from the West - the stigmatisation of Jews was started by Henry Ford's 'Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion', his race theology came from Blavatsky and Madison Grant's 'Passing Of The Race', the sterilization laws he adopted were a carbon copy of the US, the Aryan superiority theory came from the Americans (even President Calvin Coolidge believed that mixing other races with Nordic would lead to 'dysgenic stock'), George Bernard Shaw advocated in 1910 the use of gas chambers for the inferior breed.

The point, which all of you are missing, is to believe less and think more.

This is not about exonerating Hitler.

Hitler, as an example, is someone who knew how to take advantage of passion for belief. Get a group of people to believe in something without thinking and they will do whatever you want them to. Sociopaths like Hitler use this knowledge to conquer nations and people.

I already know I'm going to get flamed big-time for this but I can at least try:
"Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law" to me is about not letting powerful people/governments/organizations/businesses/etc. tell you what to believe and determine your reality. THOU, you, not "God" not Barack Obama, not Alex Jones, not Alan Moore, not your pastor, not the Pope. You. This is not a free license to do whatever you want regardless of other people, it is not permission to do what you want in the sense of running around killing people, it's about owning your own mind.

Many of you have come far just by being in a place like this talking about things that fall under the radar so-to-speak. But you've forgotten the most important person to challenge: yourself.

That's all I'm trying to say here.
No "Theosophical Mumbo Jumbo"
No "Illuminati support."
Not even sure the NWO exists. Maybe it does. Maybe we're all mistaken. Anything is possible.

[Dig]

Sane, you are rising in ranks on my E-scale.

 

In all seriousness, I value your opinion, as I did before that comment on reptiles -- which you could have cleared that up but you probably are like me in that occasionally when someone gets something wrong due to misunderstanding it's more entertaining to led it continue than to correct it. Bump in the road.

I really did not know that is what you thought, if I did, I would have cleared it up instantly.

BTW, frito lay is now also using the stuffed animal eyes in their commercials. "Sometimes it feels like..."

[Unintelligable Name]

Basically I'll sum it up like this:

There is right and wrong.

Crowley was an evil man who's goal was initiate the Apocalypse, destroy human decency and compassion, grease the wheels for the coming of the Anti-Christ, and he also called upon Satan while practiced satanic sex magic -- and much much more -- such as... human sacrifce and cannibalism.

"Do what thou wilt" is the tenet of Satanism. It is self deification. Luciferianism is the same avenue -- with tenets such as if someone asks you for help and you ask them to leave and they repeat the question -- you have the right of way to execute them for disturbing you. The right to decide who lives and who dies is a tenet of godhood.

Quantum physics has proven time and again that every person creates their own reality from the infinite amount of signals bombarding the brain

That is not Quantum Physics -- it is Metaphysics -- and if it were Quantum Physics as you suggest it certainly would not be proven.

I applaud Alan Moore for being man enough to rid himself of the Christian virus and enlighten himself.

He converses with demonic forces and is a Freemason Illuminist.

And you actually stop and wonder why I associate your posts with NWO theology... Alan Moore is enlightened [Also known as: illuminated]

That sums up what you're all about.

Now get the f**k out -- the NWO cult will hire you -- go apply.

[disinfomang]

Definitely not what I'm about.
 
Wrong again.

Try saying "maybe" a bit more in your life.

LOL @ converses with demonic forces. He apparently contacted "beings" and "entities" that even he said aren't "real" to anyone but him. All this anti-christ dungeons and dragons bullshit kills most of your argument. Where are the f**king unicorns, seriously? How could you forget about them?

And which "Satanism" are you talking about? LaVey? Scanned Wikipedia and found nothing relating Satanism (other than LaVey's silly group) condoning any of the bullshit your church told you. I do not support Satanists or Luciferians or whatever boogymen you think are trying to ruin the world. I also do not think they are in the same league as Christianity and Islam in terms of being dangerous for the world.

Your interpretation of the data is different from mine. Congratulations. You still don't get it. Constantly trying to tell me who I am when all you're really doing is telling me who YOU are and reminding me of what I am not.

[Unintelligable Name]

My church? Are you going to tell me I'm a fundamentalist Christian next? *Buzzzz* wrong. Buddhist if you care to know.

You concepts are Lucifierian whether you realize that or not. I am not suggesting that you support satanism or are a devil worshipper. However stating that Alan Moore is enlightened and you admire him and Aleister Crowley is right up there with saying Satanism is a good thing. Will you agree? Doubtful as the stigma is too strong to associate with it -- but you have done that whether you understand that or not.

Constantly trying to tell me who I am when all you're really doing is telling me who YOU are and reminding me of what I am not.

Glad I could help.

I also do not think they are in the same league as Christianity and Islam in terms of being dangerous for the world.

Satanism is less dangerous than Christianity. I see.

I grow tired of your bullshit -- let the record be clear -- Disinfomang literally is a Disinfo troll.

[disinfomang]

LOL WHAT KIND OF BUDDHIST DOESN'T KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT WHEN I SAY ENLIGHTENMENT??

I've noticed a pattern that I'm not surprised about at all, you've been ignoring much of the points I would like to get across, things about belief, questioning authority, yourself being the ultimate authority. You zero-in on the things you can get heated about and go on a tirade against me on and ignore the point time and time again.

But I'm patient like that. I enjoy Buddhism. So my opinions are not the same as yours about Satanism an Alan Moore or Crowley. Did you know much of what Crowley studied comes from various Buddhist and Hindi yogis? Just thought I'd throw that out there. Unimportant, right? He's an agent of the Apocalypse or whatever WHARGARBL you want to reiterate, right?

From what I know of them I do actually think Satanism is less dangerous to the world than Christianity, in general. Just by death toll alone. I can't think of any Satanist crusades or wars or an age of oppression that lasted for 1000+ years that still continues today. Never saw a Satanist bomb an abortion clinic. Satanists didn't put on white hoods and make racist killings. Doesn't mean they aren't potentially dangerous. But they're very low on the food chain so-to-speak. Hell I'd even say Mormons are more dangerous. Satanists don't even have a state in the US they can claim. Much less, a country or even a city.

Unless you've read something that you immediately now believe and will now unleash on me to prove how wrong I am and that I am "troll," of course.

Still missing the point.

LOL

[Unintelligable Name]

No I get your points thoroughly -- I had more important things to write than to say "Oh that sounds good" or "Hey that's somewhat obvious to a 14 year old, is it not?"

The New World Order and Vatican are Satanic. Do I have to give you the number of how many people they had a hand in killing in the past 2,000 years?

But I reiterate -- I grow tired of your bullshit, Troll.

I mean this with every ounce of sincerity I have in my body mind and soul:

You have been propagandized -- and you don't even realize it.

Have a nice life -- as only the grace of God will give me the patience to continue this tragedy of a debate.

[tamaraehawk]

i agreed with Alex's analysis of the film but one thing that really brought the (false flag terror is for our own good) message home *for me* was in the last scene..
scanning ground zero: a large banner reading,
"IN YOUR HEART, YOU KNOW IT'S RIGHT"
did anyone else catch that?

[disinfomang]

We have all been propagandized. You just don't want to include yourself in the "those that realize it" group.


To come full circle (I'm sure you'll turn that into something, won't you?) it sounds like both of us are trying to teach a pig to sing.

But once again, since I have the patience, I'll reiterate:

The New World Order (whose existence is debatable) and the Vatican are Satanic, according to YOU because you've read mountains of evidence that has proven it so far beyond a shadow of doubt for you that you question the sanity of anyone who disagrees with you. Maybe they are, maybe they aren't. There is ample evidence for both of those arguments and infinite arguments in-between each with their own piles of evidence. But you see the one you agree with the most tell everyone who disagrees with you that they're "propagandized and don't even realize it."

It is difficult being Agnostic. That's the point. But it is nice, I must say, to not be a slave to belief systems, or BS. I do enjoy the Buddhism, though, so good choice in religion for what that's worth.

I have only been polite, save a few lines, yet you still resort to name-calling and call everything I say bullshit.

Yet I could say the same exact things about you. That you're propagandized and don't even know it, that you're a troll, and everything you say is bullshit.

But then I would become you.

I'm sorry you didn't learn anything.

Seems I might have wasted my time and annoyed the pig.

[peepnklown]

Rorschach is the patriot killed by the elite.   

[janssen]

The movie keeps associating "lies = good". The ending is the most vicious part: the woman represents an innocent child (us), and the mother represents the lying parent (NWO). The child tells the parent that she knows that she lied - or kept secret - that the comedian was her father. She says "people do strange things and most of the time, they can't talk about them" (rationalizes lies). Then she adds: "i just want to tell you that by me... you didn't do anything wrong" (equals lies with goodness). The woman represents us, and when she learns of the lies, says that lies are good. Since we identify with her, we're made to go down the same path and "understand" that lies = good. We're made to feel empathy, love and understanding to the mother who symbolizes the NWO.

[Unintelligable Name]

mainly cause Jordan Maxwell has the most knowledge about that type of stuff

What the f**k?

[personguy]

sqarepusher, nothing personal but you just said that most of the people who've written books aren't worth a grain of salt and that the worlds most prevalant philosophers are BS yet you gauge your live devoted to a man (who's own works were blindly misappropriated in the last 2000 years) who's purpose in life was to spread the message "Don't be an ignorant prick". Bravo.

The business with Crowley is that people researching occult respect him as a scholar in that field. Much of what is known in these areas are attributed to what Crowley revealed.. much of someone like our knowledge on the subject of the Occult are because of his egoist blathering. I'll disagree with disinfomang on this one, I feel with my study towards.. who look into Crowley for answers not devotion are rampant and not necessarily evil themselves... they often only look to decipher how they operate. 
 Moore and others who try to study this and bring it to life with acknowledge this. They still think he's a douchebag like the rest of us. In fact, in Moore's next graphic novel series in focuses heavily on Crowley himself being the centric villain. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_League_of_Extraordinary_Gentlemen,_Volume_III. Whole point of the book is painting Crowley as the worst asshole ever, and with Moore's influence - should get the point across.  Myself, I think he's an asshole. Moore does too apparently.

There is no reference to him being a mason. I did exhaustive research in this regard and the only statement I can find is from a Wikipedia parody site. He even wrote one of the most slanderous pieces of literature produced towards them with his From Hell book. While this wasn't a book in the classic sense the comic / GN community, which shouldn't be as fractured from this one as it is.. much potential there.. it had a profound impact.
There is no reference to him acting with demons or what have you.. you are taking this information from this "hollywoods war" film where all he says is he studies the occult to make a better story. No more than Alex Jones has done in his Bohemian Grove doc.

Moore even made a book about a year after Watchmen in '88 wherein he wrote about an anthromorphic eagle as a personification of Nixon-Reagan-Bush America (reminds me of some of those old school Alex characters he used to make.. miss those) and all the drug running, murders and dirty deeds back in the 50s-80s. I posted a link to it earlier.. here it is again. It is accompanied by some mp3 tracks that follow the speech of the Eagle. Quite cool, would have been pimp back in '88. It even also features an early mention of FEMA camps in the secondary story and is a great reference if you are interested in the topic of CIA activities in that timeframe.
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=L65UN1CN

One thing that interested me about Watchmen was that he opened the idea of false flag terrorism by Occultic fascists back in '87.. as this graphic novel is looked at as one of the best. As I have said before I see him as actually a kind of white mage, the populaces acceptance of 911 being an inside job could actually have been strengthened by this work.
It's hard to gauge this as a fact, but studying this deeply from many angles I come to the conclusion that this is so.

Moore is much like a Jordan Maxwell who writes comic books. I remember Jones being a little iffy on Maxwell and now they are good acquaintances.

Alex, I hope you read my comments on this thread and make a statement accordingly. There is alot of hype right now but it can be used to drive alot of ideas forward.
Dude would probably agree with you on the negative aspects of the film you see. If he was trying to peddle NWO he wouldn't have signed off on the millions he would have made putting his name on V and Watchmen but he knew they were crap (albiet in the end they'll end up doing more good than harm anyway.. fallout from V helped Scientolgy.. gotta love when things like that happen!).
If you want Alan as a guest.. I think it could build alot of bridges and bring in some new blood. Treat him like you treat Jordan, they seem similar. I can see that you misunderstood him being as hardcore as you are but that's cool. Stay savvy.

[Unintelligable Name]

We have all been propagandized. You just don't want to include yourself in the "those that realize it" group.

You're right.

What I meant to say but failed at is to say:

You've been propagandized -- and you bought it.

I don't want to include myself in the "Those that realize it" group?

Huh? Say what?

[personguy]

. fallout from V helped Scientolgy.. gotta love when things like that happen

Should have said helped BREAK scientology but I screwed it up with my re-editing

[Unintelligable Name]

Should have said helped BREAK scientology but I screwed it up with my re-editing

All that has to do with scientology is the guys who are part of Anonymous wear Guy Fox masks because they don't understand the symbolism. Not exactly a plus or minus in Alan Moore's direction, know what I mean?

[Spacezombie]

I only just listened to Monday's show with Jones' "Watchmen" review.  I think he needs to take a step back.

I think it's pretty clear, with no ambiguity, that Rorschach is the hero of the piece.  Ozymandias is clearly the bad guy.

I've been going to a comic shop for a good long time now and every once in a while the topic of "Watchmen" comes up.  Friggin' everyone loves Rorschach.  Yes, he's a little effed up, but it's because he's seen the horror of what man is capable of.

I mean, essentially Rorschach wins because he got the truth out despite being killed.

Jones is always showing examples of NWO agendas coming up in movies and TV, but he acts like the writers are always trying to promote it instead of, oh... I dunno... saying how fuggin' evil it is.

I gotta take a Jones break myself, I think...

[Dig]

^^ check out all the stuff uncovered about the movie/author/etc.

[Brocke]

I only just listened to Monday's show with Jones' "Watchmen" review.  I think he needs to take a step back.

I think it's pretty clear, with no ambiguity, that Rorschach is the hero of the piece.  Ozymandias is clearly the bad guy.

I've been going to a comic shop for a good long time now and every once in a while the topic of "Watchmen" comes up.  Friggin' everyone loves Rorschach.  Yes, he's a little effed up, but it's because he's seen the horror of what man is capable of.

I mean, essentially Rorschach wins because he got the truth out despite being killed.

Jones is always showing examples of NWO agendas coming up in movies and TV, but he acts like the writers are always trying to promote it instead of, oh... I dunno... saying how fuggin' evil it is.

I gotta take a Jones break myself, I think...

With NWO Doublethink bad is good, cruel is kind, villains are heroes. To plant a thought you needn't slap someone in the face. There are multiple levels of messages in Watchmen. Look at how easily the sleepers have accepted man made global warming as fact and all through the same type of subliminal and subtle implanting of an idea to be accepted later when it is "activated" .

[Roarshock]

And he offered a retraction did he not?

Trying to distract people? ? ?

Can't he makes mistakes and retract them?

Geez...

Can anyone confirm that AJ made a retraction of his slander and falsehoods? I haven't heard or seen it.

[Dig]

Can anyone confirm that AJ made a retraction of his slander and falsehoods? I haven't heard or seen it.

I did not hear any retraction concerning Moore being some BS New Age Propogandist.  As far as being a freemason, who knows.  I think though it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he is definitely pushing the New World Order Theosophical agenda.

You would have to agree with that one right.

[37]

He apologized for The Sandman mistake.

[squarepusher]

Can anyone confirm that AJ made a retraction of his slander and falsehoods? I haven't heard or seen it.

Are you still here troll? As for the 'sources an indication of being a troll', you have offered no sources whatsoever, nor shown any interest in reading sources. Everything had to be spoonfed to you, and even then it was basically a mentality of 'Bwah, what do I care about youth culture documents or interviews where he states he's an Aleister Crowley lover? I love Alan Moore, I love my Sandman comic books, and I'm posting here in a Watchmen thread, so nothing else interests me) Quite the one-dimensional child we're dealing with in that case.

Anyway, we've got no time for little boys like you. Go back to your comic book fantasy world - we have a criminal government looting us right now and you're gonna be sleeping under a bridge SOON (VERY SOON) unless you get your head out of your ass. OK, buddy?

[Roarshock]

As far as being a freemason, who knows.  I think though it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he is definitely pushing the New World Order Theosophical agenda.

You would have to agree with that one right.

bo
No, I don't agree.  Moore obviously cast Ozymandias(the guy wearing the All-Seeing Eye) as the villain in his book.  Only people who have not read the book(like AJ) and speak out of ignorance would say otherwise.

[Roarshock]

Are you still here troll? As for the 'sources an indication of being a troll', you have offered no sources whatsoever, nor shown any interest in reading sources. Everything had to be spoonfed to you.

Anyway, we've got no time for little boys like you. Go back to your comic book fantasy world - we have a criminal government looting us right now and you're gonna be sleeping under a bridge SOON (VERY SOON) unless you get your head out of your ass. OK, buddy?

What did you need me to offer a source for?

Funny how you repeatedly act as if comic books are beneath you, yet you've posted in this comic book thread as much as anyone.  You're such a joke.

[squarepusher]

What did you need me to offer a source for?

Funny how you repeatedly act as if comic books are beneath you, yet you've posted in this comic book thread as much as anyone.  You're such a joke.

A guy who is upset at guys who demean his little comic book is quite honestly PATHETIC. The whole world's going bankrupt, every company is posting record losses, criminal bankers and politicians are looting the world right now and you're getting your panties in a bunch over a COMIC BOOK? My god man, grow up and get some priorities.

Anyway, done with you now. You have offered nothing substantial in your entire post history - just a bunch of strawmen how Watchmen is a wholesome comic book that is anti-establishment. You have offered no facts yourself - just basically Doublethink and pejoratives (not even original ones, an endless repetition of 'dumb' 'dumb' dumb').

[Roarshock]

A guy who is upset at guys who demean his little comic book is quite honestly PATHETIC. The whole world's going bankrupt, every company is posting record losses, criminal bankers and politicians are looting the world right now and you're getting your panties in a bunch over a COMIC BOOK? My god man, grow up and get some priorities.

Anyway, done with you now. You have offered nothing substantial in your entire post history - just a bunch of strawmen how Watchmen is a wholesome comic book that is anti-establishment. You have offered no facts yourself - just basically Doublethink and pejoratives (not even original ones, an endless repetition of 'dumb' 'dumb' dumb').

I've offered no strawmen.  I've just spoken facts about the book in question, you know, the one you're totally ignorant about, yet continue to give your opinion about.

You complain I've offered no sources, I offer to source anything you wish and you drop it, because your arguments are empty.  By your own admission, your posts mean nothing.  Please, do shut up.

Yes, the whole world is falling apart squarepusher, and look at you, you don't have time to read a comic book, you just have time to spend twelve hours a day posting on an internet messageboard where everyone present is already aware of the problem.  Good going, great use of your time there hero genius.

[squarepusher]

I've offered no strawmen.  I've just spoken facts about the book in question, you know, the one you're totally ignorant about, yet continue to give your opinion about.

You complain I've offered no sources, I offer to source anything you wish and you drop it, because your arguments are empty.  By your own admission, your posts mean nothing.  Please, do shut up.

No, I did not admit my posts mean nothing. What I SAID was that there was nothing to explain (especially that line 'You care more about your entertainment movie than your liberty, eh?'), because it was self-evident. Only a fluoridehead like you could possibly need an explanation for that.

And you honestly DO CARE more about your stupid entertainment movie/book than your civil liberties. Otherwise you wouldn't be wasting 36 of your posts (your entire post history) in a comic book thread. You're inside a little fantasy world where superheroes have supermagical powers and solve all your problems - grow up dude, your culture is controlled and meant to distract you from real issues. It's not some escapist paradise where you can just pretend reality doesn't exist and nothing affects you.

BTW, you're in no position here with your paltry post count to order anyone here to shut up. SO RIGHT BACK AT YE, BUDDY.

[Roarshock]

No, I did not admit my posts mean nothing. What I SAID was that there was nothing to explain (especially that line 'You care more about your entertainment movie than your liberty, eh?'), because it was self-evident. Only a fluoridehead like you could possibly need an explanation for that.

And you honestly DO CARE more about your stupid entertainment movie/book than your civil liberties. Otherwise you wouldn't be wasting 36 of your posts (your entire post history) in a comic book thread.

Wow you can discern that from some internet forum posts?  That's quite a talent you have there.  Perhaps you should apply for a position with the Thought Police.  Kook.

Weird, you figure comics mean so much to me because I've made 30+ posts in this thread, but what does that say about you?  You have just as many if not more posts than I in this thread.  Kook.

[squarepusher]

Wow you can discern that from some internet forum posts?  That's quite a talent you have there.  Perhaps you should apply for a position with the Thought Police.  Kook.

Weird, you figure comics mean so much to me because I've made 30+ posts in this thread, but what does that say about you?  You have just as many if not more posts than I in this thread.

Oh yeah, there comes the second word in your vocabulary: 'kook'. 'Dumb'. 'Kook'. Not quite Shakespeare I'm dealing with here.

You're probably some kind of New Ager - that's probably why the 'there's no good or bad' message in Watchmen appeals so much to you.

I probably know you better than you do yourself. And so does Alan Moore, the guy who's imprinting you with propaganda.

[Roarshock]

I'll post it again. http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/7932/watchmen1227.jpg

See that mushroom cloud covering the solar system model?  The statement Moore makes in this scene is that Ozy's false flag scheme ultimately fails. Doesn't seem very pro-NWO to me.

[Dig]

bo
No, I don't agree.  Moore obviously cast Ozymandias(the guy wearing the All-Seeing Eye) as the villain in his book.  Only people who have not read the book(like AJ) and speak out of ignorance would say otherwise.

But the entire premise promotes the idea of supermen all over the planet and that individual humans are powerless observers who have no impact on the supermen fights (just like the individuals have no impact on the Rothschild/Rockefeller wars).

The whole thing promotes saviour mentality and anti-individual freedom, human spirit, etc.