This goes a lot deeper than some of you imagine.
Illuminati Online. An Austin, Texas web-server. The official server host of George Bush, Jr.'s first Presidential campain website. See:http://web.archive.org/web/20000807083107/http://www.io.com/
The below Wired article mentions Illuminati Online being the server host of George Bush, Jr.'s official Presidential campain website:
"George W. Bush the Red?," Declan McCullagh, Wired News, October 19, 1999 http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/10/31986
Illuminati Online was owned by Steve Jackson of Steve Jackson Games at the time that it was the server host of George Bush, Jr.'s official Presidential campain website. Steve Jackson only recently sold Illuminati Online (soon after called Iocom) to PrismNet in September 2004. See:
"#25: What is Illuminati Online?" from "Steve Jackson Games: Frequently Asked Questions," Last updated December 21, 2004 http://www.sjgames.com/general/faq.html#25
"PrismNet buys IOCOM assets," American City Business Journals Inc., September 21, 2004 http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2004/09/20/daily12.html
The below cards are from the 1995 card game deck "Illuminati: New World Order" which is part of the "Illuminati" card game series by Steve Jackson Games (see http://www.sjgames.com/inwo
If you would like to confirm that the above cards actually come from the 1995 "Illuminati: New World Order" deck and not some new version, you can see a listing of the 1995 "Illuminati: New World Order" cards below:http://www.sjgames.com/inwo/lists/il_html2.html
Ever so interestingly, before the U.S. government's love affair with Steve Jackson's business ventures, the U.S. Secret Service raided the Austin, Texas headquarters of Steve Jackson Games on March 1, 1990:
"Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service," Wikipedia, September 8, 2007 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steve_Jackson_Games%2C_Inc._v._United_States_Secret_Service&oldid=156516954
My thoughts on this seemingly unbelievable turn of events (i.e., Steve Jackson being raided by the U.S. Secret Service, and then Steve Jackson going to work in serving U.S. government interests, i.e., the Bushes--keep in mind that Steve Jackson's company was raided by the U.S. Secret Service [which is part of the Executive Branch under the U.S. President] during George Bush, Sr.'s term) is that the U.S. government pulled a "Bill Gates" on Steve Jackson.
Let me explain that. The actual reason the U.S. government went after Bill Gates is because he wasn't "playing the game" right. That is, his company, Microsoft, wasn't giving "contributions" (i.e., bribes) to influential politicians in near the amounts that other big businesses were. That was a nearly unforgivable affront and sin against the U.S. government. So the U.S. government proceeded to show Bill Gates what happens when you neglect your superiors (with, e.g., United States v. Microsoft, filed on May 18, 1998 by the United States Department of Justice [DOJ] and twenty U.S. states).
Since that time, Bill Gates's Microsoft has been a dutiful servant of the U.S. government, with such niceties as the _NSAKEY:
"How NSA access was built into Windows: Careless mistake reveals subversion of Windows by NSA," Duncan Campbell, September 4, 1999 http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/5/5263/1.html
"Transcript of Internet Caucus Panel Discussion. Re: Administration's new encryption policy.," Tech Law Journal, September 28, 1999 http://www.techlawjournal.com/cong106/encrypt/19990928a.htm#weldon1
Rep. Curt Weldon: But the point is that when John Hamre briefed me, and gave me the three key points of this change, there are a lot of unanswered questions. He assured me that in discussions that he had had with people like Bill Gates and Gerstner from IBM that there would be, kind of a, I don't know whether it's a, unstated ability to get access to systems if we needed it. Now, I want to know if that is part of the policy, or is that just something that we are being assured of, that needs to be spoke. Because, if there is some kind of a tacit understanding, I would like to know what it is.
The reason why the U.S. government would put out such imagery before the 9/11 attacks is to induce in the masses cognitive dissonance in order to drive them further into denial. It's basically a form of mind-rape whereby they break-down people's resistance to more tyrannical measures and make them unable to think for themselves based upon the gamble that most people won't face up to the disturbing truth and will instead choose to deny reality, thereby inducing in said masses a schizoid-type personality who will let their government masters do their thinking for them. We are now in a phase of psychological warfare upon the masses whereby the ruling elite reveal what they are doing to us but in an underhanded or duplicitous way; a phase which is absolutely necessary before they can take absolute control over society and reduce us to the level of cattle (i.e., in the move from covert tyranny to overt tyranny).
The U.S. government knew at least since 1995 of plans to hijack planes and fly them into buildings:
"U.S. warned in 1995 of plot to hijack planes, attack buildings," CNN, September 18, 2001 http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/18/inv.hijacking.philippines/index.html
"'95 Philippine plot had echoes of September 11," CNN, March 14, 2002 http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/southeast/03/14/philippines.yousef.plot/index.html
Keep in mind that 1995 is the year that these cards were published. As well, the new 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 dollar bills, which chronologically (in order) show almost exactly how the twin towers would collapse and the the way the smoke would look when all of them are folded exactly the same way, were desinged after the Bojinka plot was known to the U.S. government:
"The New (1995) 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 U.S. Dollar Bills Tell the Story of the 9/11 Attacks," PsyOp911 http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/new-us-dollar-bills.html