NO PLANERS EXPOSED----->INSIDE+WeAreChangeColorado

[Voskhod3]

No planes is designed to bring ridicule to genuine 9/11 issues.

You have got to suspect anyone who persistently pushes even when the massive holes in what they are saying are stuck in front of them.

How do they explain how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded, or why they even thought they could do so beforehand?

[grapecrusher1]

No planes is designed to bring ridicule to genuine 9/11 issues.

You have got to suspect anyone who persistently pushes even when the massive holes in what they are saying are stuck in front of them.

How do they explain how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded, or why they even thought they could do so beforehand?

Yup --  completely ignore the facts(witnesses, chunks of airplanes, video (yes videos), extraneous corroborating info like this most recent guy Sonnenfeld surfacing saying he saw airplane pieces in the aftermath), always mention the same supposedly doctored videos as evidence, airplane melted into the building nonsense, nose out nonsense, other nonsense.

It does appear to a bit of a contrived mission on their part.
 

[Voskhod3]

They will have to stop using the "nose out" nonsense now that it's been totally debunked - (video on youtube).

[kushfiend]

The thing is, I actually remember the news coverage on Sept. 11, as well as the next 2 days.  It was just a smoking building, and footage of the World Trade Center buildings collapsing over and over.  It wasn't until the next few days after 9/11 that footage and images of the planes emerged, all from very mysterious sources, but I won't go into that now.

You'll never get me to believe that the gray shadowy blob that was shown on major news networks is real seen here:



That is impossible physics.  End of story.  I don't care what you tell me - I know the physical layout of interlocking steel girders would of made that plane bounce right off the building.

For example, when a car hits a wall, what happens?

You tell me...

[Voskhod3]

That is impossible physics.  End of story.  I don't care what you tell me - I know the physical layout of interlocking steel girders would of made that plane bounce right off the building.

Total bullsh*t.

You are busted.

The facade was 43% glass.

Go and measure it.

You're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

[kushfiend]

Total bullsh*t.

You are busted.

The facade was 43% glass.

Go and measure it.

You're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

43% glass - so what's the other 57%?  Hmm...Maybe super-reinforced interlocking steel girders, seen here:



Ya I can totally see how an aluminum plane would slice right through that...

[Voskhod3]

43% glass - so what's the other 57%?  Hmm...Maybe super-reinforced interlocking steel girders, seen here:

Super-reinforced?

Anyway the facade was 43% NOTHING and the airplane was travelling at 500mph and made of more than aluminium.

Ya I can totally see how an aluminum plane would slice right through that...

Shredded initially until sufficent mass travelling at 500mph built up it just went through.

So... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

[kushfiend]

Super-reinforced?

Anyway the facade was 43% NOTHING and the airplane was travelling at 500mph and made of more than aluminium.
Shredded initially until sufficent mass travelling at 500mph built up it just went through.

So... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

Ya super-reinforced steel.   http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=131020
Facts
- World's tallest building from 1972 - 1974; surpassed by the Sears Tower in Chicago.
- Replaced the Empire State Building as the city's and the world's tallest building.
- The building was destroyed in the terrorist attacks of September 11th 2001, when a Boeing 767 was flown into the building at the 85th floor at roughly 9:00 am. The building collapsed at 10:28 am.
- Faced with the difficulties of building to unprecedented heights, the engineers employed an innovative structural model: a rigid "hollow tube" of closely spaced steel columns with floor trusses extending across to a central core.
- The columns, finished with a silver-colored aluminum alloy, were 18 3/4" wide and set only 22" apart, making the towers appear from afar to have no windows at all.
- Also unique to the engineering design were its core and elevator system.
- Worried that the intense air pressure created by the buildings' high speed elevators might buckle conventional shafts, engineers designed a solution using a drywall system fixed to the reinforced steel core.


As to the old speed ploy, that really shows you don't understand basic physics.  Have you ever seen a Nascar race for example?  It doesn't matter that the car is going 250mph, it still bounces off the wall.

Why is this?  Because not only is the car hitting the wall at 250mph, but the wall is hitting the race car at 250mph too!

Try to understand:
= BULLSH*T!

[Voskhod3]

Ya super-reinforced steel. 

Super-reinforced NOTHING.

43% of it.

Did the plane not shred?

Is the plane more than aluminium?

So... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

[kushfiend]

Super-reinforced NOTHING.

43% of it.

Did the plane not shred?

Is the plane more than aluminium?

So... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

No, dumbass, the plane didn't shred, as you can clearly see from the video above. 

I feel like I'm in the 15th century and trying to explain to someone how the world isn't flat.

You see, there's these laws of motion discovered by this crazy guy Newton.  Basically, when an object, say a plane traveling at over 500mph [supposedly], hits another object, say a Steel building, both objects exert the same amount of force displaced evenly on both.

So, what I'm trying to tell you, is that even when a bullet hits a steel wall, it would still bounce off!  The plane would bounce off, not fuse into the building.

Obvious job of editing.

[Voskhod3]

No, dumbass, the plane didn't shred, as you can clearly see from the video above. 

Of course it shredded.

The path of least resistance, until the heavy parts smashed in.

43% nothing but glass.

So, what I'm trying to tell you, is that even when a bullet hits a steel wall, it would still bounce off!

It's not a steel wall.

It's steel and 43% nothing.

So... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

[Voskhod3]

43% nothing but glass.

Do the math.

[kushfiend]

dude, basic physics disputes what your claiming.

I'll just leave it at that.

[Voskhod3]

dude, basic physics disputes what your claiming.

I'll just leave it at that.

You don't know basic physics.

500mph aluminium doesn't bounce off nothing and will follow the path of least resistance.

Yeah... I bet you want to leave it at that.

Busted.

Oh and... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

[kushfiend]

You don't know basic physics.

500mph aluminium doesn't bounce off nothing and will follow the path of least resistance.

Yeah... I bet you want to leave it at that.

Busted.

Oh and... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

Wow, is that what would happen?   Really? 



wow that sure looks realistic to me!

Notice how the building re-forms itself after the plane wing had already gone through it.  Is that part of the past of least resistance too vok?

Admit this video is fake and tell the truth, or don't and continue to lie.

[Berminator]

Whoa!

[Voskhod3]

Admit this video is fake and tell the truth, or don't and continue to lie.

Admit you know nothing about video compression (Check out September Clues for some people who really know nothing about video images).

43% nothing.

Planes don't bounce off nothing.

Oh and... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

[Berminator]

Is the above video real footage from the day
or has some no planer tampered with it?

[kushfiend]

Admit you know nothing about video compression (Check out September Clues for some people who really know nothing about video images).

43% nothing.

Planes don't bounce off nothing.

Oh and... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

All lies which I have refuted in my earlier posts.  57% reinforced steel.  Laws of physics says planes DO bounce off buildings.

The world isn't flat.

The Main Stream Media did lie to us on 9/11, to further indoctrinate the govt's official version of the story of hijackers with boxcutters.

Not to mention:  No pilot could pull the G-Force maneuver it wouldve taken to hit the twin towers, and the supposed hijackers were horrible pilots!  Proven!

[kushfiend]

Is the above video real footage from the day
or has some no planer tampered with it?

It's real just blown up and magnified.

[Voskhod3]

It's real just blown up and magnified.

Yes a magnified video image.

You guys just don't have a clue.

(Maybe you do, but you're just bad).

Oh and... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

[Voskhod3]

All lies which I have refuted in my earlier posts.  57% reinforced steel.  Laws of physics says planes DO bounce off buildings.

Which law of physics says objects bounce off nothing?

Did you ever hear about the path of least resistance?

[Berminator]

It's real just blown up and magnified.

Well all i can say is the pod must have opened way for it.
though i do find the forementioned vid interesting.

[kushfiend]

Yes a magnified video image.

You guys just don't have a clue.

(Maybe you do, but you're just bad).

Oh and... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

It makes no difference if it's a video, a building can't repair itself after a plane supposedly smashes into it.  As far as your spam statement, I have seen plenty of reports of people who thought they saw a missile.  So explain that.

[Berminator]

I don't rule out no planers myself.
the jury is still out on the whole day's events.

[Voskhod3]

It makes no difference if it's a video, a building can't repair itself after a plane supposedly smashes into it.  As far as your spam statement, I have seen plenty of reports of people who thought they saw a missile.  So explain that.

v..i..d..e..o....c..o..m..p..r..e..s..s..i..o..n.

Magnified as well!

Wow - I wonder what algorhytms the computer used to do that!

Oh and... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

[Voskhod3]

I don't rule out no planers myself.
the jury is still out on the whole day's events.

Oh and... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

[Voskhod3]

I have seen plenty of reports of people who thought they saw a missile.  So explain that.

Lets examine them.

[Berminator]

Oh and... you're another one who can't explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

No i'm not a no planer,
i wouldn't be surprised though with all their black technology.

[Voskhod3]

No i'm not a no planer,
i wouldn't be surprised though with all their black technology.

Explain just how they controlled the thousands of witnesses and any images they recorded.

[Berminator]

audio video


Again i'm with AJ and Bermas on 911.

[Voskhod3]

audio video

eh?

[Berminator]

eh?

Holograms, speakers, thermate

[Voskhod3]

Holograms, speakers, thermate

F*ck.

I can't believe you said holograms.

Are people still spreading that sh*t?

Do you have any idea what a hologram is?

(Clue; It's nothing like Star Trek).

[kushfiend]

F*ck.

I can't believe you said holograms.

Are people still spreading that sh*t?

Do you have any idea what a hologram is?

(Clue; It's nothing like Star Trek).

google: project bluebeam for more on holograms Vok.

[Berminator]

F*ck.

I can't believe you said holograms.

Are people still spreading that sh*t?

Do you have any idea what a hologram is?

(Clue; It's nothing like Star Trek).

i'm in this for a discussion not a fight.
Are you aware of the technology they keep secret?
i'm not either.
I stand strong and say that if it wasn't real planes
i wouldn't be surprised.
That's all, 99.5% sure they were real planes,
not 100% though.
PEACE

[Voskhod3]

google: project bluebeam for more on holograms Vok.

Do you know how holograms work? (I do).

If so.. tell me how they managed that in the skies of NYC.

Tell me about the laws of physics in regards to light.

This is going to be good.

[xTruthSeekerx]

Uhmm digital cameras showed a bloody plane people i bet there are a lot of images people have not seen or uploaded scanned etc

[Voskhod3]

i'm in this for a discussion not a fight.
Are you aware of the technology they keep secret?

I know how holograms work and I know the laws of physics.
No holograms... impossible.

This is not Star Trek (which is only a TV program) real holograms are not like Star Trek holograms.

[kushfiend]

Do you know how holograms work? (I do).

If so.. tell me how they managed that in the skies of NYC.

Tell me about the laws of physics in regards to light.

This is going to be good.

Ya you know about the latest military technology Vok, because you're super connected to CIA black ops tech.

Dude, you don't know sh*t.  You've made that painfully obvious by insinuating that the past of least resistance for a solid object is through interlocking steel girders, rather than deflecting off.  You've seen video evidence of a building repairing itself after "a plane" hits it.

No one is buying it, least of all me.  Your arguments are to
-repeat something about witnesses over and over and over and over and over, literally prolly around 50+ times.  Wow.  A lot of people saw a lot of different things that day.

also, you like to name call, you've called me out for being a disinfo co-intel agent many times.

To that i say F You dude because you don't even know me.  I'm not buying your lies and it pisses u off I think.