That would be true if they were running some sort of criminal trial...but they're not, it's an investigation into an event. I've watched plenty of videos on both sides of the story and I have come to the honest conclusion that it was a plane, beyond a reasonable doubt.
I think this video is accurate-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTNRkb7AaQk
I think it's accurate too.
Claiming a missile hit the pentagon is only hurting the 9/11 truth movement. People point to it as proof "truthers" are not telling the truth and the movement is a fraud. Wake up, and realize it's BS started by webfairy, Nico, and the other no planers, it was the starting point for the BS "no plane" theory.
claim: It penetrated 6 walls and 3 rings and a plane couldn't do that.
Truth: it didn't.
The construction of the pentagon proves it went through two walls.http://www.pentagonresearch.com/118.html
Claim: CNN reporter Jamie Mcintyre reports no plane crashed near the pentagon, and no parts were found.
Truth: he reported on the crash of the plane and described parts of it.
he was responding to a question of a report that a plane crashed near
the pentagon not at it.
the edited clip: http://thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/index.html
Notice who has been promoting this from the start? webfairy the "no plane princess"
the unedited clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjlBpChvzD8
What McIntyre thinks of this... http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/05/16/transcript.wed/MCINTYRE: The Web sites often take statements out of context, such as this exchange from CNN in which I -- myself -- appear to be questioning whether a plane really hit the building: From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. In fact, I was answering a question based on a eyewitness account who thought the American Airlines plane landed short of the Pentagon. I was indicated there was no crash site near the pentagon only at the Pentagon
MCINTYRE: In fact there were thousands of tiny pieces of the plane, and I personally photographed a piece of the fuselage and what appeared to be part of the cockpit.Edited clips make truthers look like liars
. I don't think this helps a 9/11 truth movement
claim: witnesses describe a missile
truth: Not one witness described a missile
, and there were in fact lots of witnesses-it happened in broad daylight during rush hour traffic in a heavily populated area, which common sense would tell you they wouldn't fire a missile. People would see what happened.
People did see what happened and every single witness describes a plane.
An edited clip of Mike Walter is used for this claim, where he is in in fact describing an American Airlines passenger jet
. Some "truthers" then claim he is then "in on it" which not only makes truthers look like liars but rather repulsive ones.
Clip: where truthers claim M Walter is a liar who "changed his story"http://www.metacafe.com/watch/452570/september_11_pentagon_eye_witness_mike_walter_changes_his_story/
truth: he never changed his story. Truthers did. which makes them liars, isn't it time to stop destroying the truth movement with this BS?
Unedited clip: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1jqaz_pentagon-eyewitness-mike-walter_news
claim: no engine parts were not found nor were other parts recovered
truth: engine parts were found and other parts were recoveredhttp://www.pentagonresearch.com/110.htmlhttp://www.pentagonresearch.com/081.htmlhttp://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.htmlhttp://www.pentagonresearch.com/082.html
Claim: videos from the hotel and citgo station were never released
truth: video from hotel and citgo station were releasedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LJvFjsl6zkhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H285_DWX_bQ
claim: a passenger jet cannot fly that fast a few feet off the ground
truth: passenger jets can fly a few feet off the ground
otherwise they couldn't take off or land. The claim that it couldn't fly that fast that low is false as it was descending and only flew a few feet off the ground for the last second or two
Claim: witnesses all(yes every single one of them) confused a passenger jet with a missile.
truth: take a look at this video and ask yourself if that is a realistic claim...http://www.pentagonresearch.com/eye.html
claim: the damage at the pentagon was a 16 foot hole that a plane can't fit in.
truth: it wasn't a 16 foot hole,
it was the first and second floors.
this picture with the water from the firefighters hose obscuring the damage is used for this claimhttp://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/uploaded/pentagon-hole-20080331-431.jpg
this is first floor damage that is being obscured by the water from the hose http://www.911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/hole11.jpg
Claim: officials were secretly carting off evidence hidden under a blue tarp
truth: it's just one of several tents brought into the areahttp://www.rense.com/general70/bluett.htm
not to mention the lamp poles being knocked down could only be from a large aircraft....
All this easily debunked nonsense takes away from the real smoking guns at the pentagon.
The fact that the military knew we were under attack and hijacked planes were flying into buildings. And an hour after the first plane flew into the WTC (8:46 am) the military headquarters was hit(9:37 am). This is preposterous, and proves a stand down and gee whiz the area that was hit was the least populated area since that was where the construction was just finishing up to reinforce it against bombs(or a plane)hitting it. Gee...the area, that was the direct opposite side of where the high ranking officers (and Rumsfield) were at..and if you wanted to hit the pentagon the easiest and most effective way that would kill the most people and do the most damage would be just to dive into it, but instead a horrible pilot makes this incredible maneuver to slide into the first floor of the least important and least populated area of the pentagon an incredible pinpoint accurate hit by an incredibly horrible pilot. Maybe you should focus attention on that fact
rather than an easily debunked missile theory that goes against common sense if you think about it. The perps knew no one would have caught it on video or camera? How did they know that? They didn't.
There is no point in promoting this easily debunked theory that is backed up by no evidence and no witnesses, only lies and edited clips. How is that beneficial to a truth movement?On 9/11 planes flew into buildings
and the pentagon proves they were not piloted by "terrorists" who hate freedom.