|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #520 on: June 18, 2009, 02:57:06 PM » |
|
No, anyone who reads my posts will be aware I said no such thing. I didn't give an answer.. you are a very strange person, anyone would think you were slip sliding.. dodging. However I do have an answer. Wait wait wait, first you dont have an answer. Then you didnt give an answer, now you have an answer. I think you need some help. Accept my challenge or admit that you didn't research that picture at all, that in fact you just believed what you read without much thought or any investigation, when you admit that you will have to stop posting in this thread. Im gonna stick with your first answer.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #521 on: June 18, 2009, 03:10:00 PM » |
|
Cut the cr*p... accept my challenge.
You are looking very silly, you don't want to defend your own posts.
People will think that you didn't research that picture at all, that in fact you just believed what you read without much thought or any investigation and now you are avoiding it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phasma
|
|
« Reply #522 on: June 18, 2009, 03:14:40 PM » |
|
Cut the cr*p... accept my challenge.
You are looking very silly, you don't want to defend your own posts.
People will think that you didn't research that picture at all, that in fact you just believed what you read without much thought or any investigation and now you are avoiding it.
With a name like yours i`m certain you have been "into" space for a long while ! Why don`t you just settle this? I think though that even if you can prove this point that the hoaxers here will find another, then another, then another thing to argue about. Its like trying to argue both sides of a mobius strip ! No matter what proof you might present - they will not accept it. Your energy could likely be better spent elsewhere !  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise - Surangama Sutra
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
|
« Reply #523 on: June 18, 2009, 03:19:55 PM » |
|
Cut the cr*p... accept my challenge.
You are looking very silly, you don't want to defend your own posts.
People will think that you didn't research that picture at all, that in fact you just believed what you read without much thought or any investigation and now you are avoiding it.
Uhm, i did defend the post. You just have a comprehension problem. I can only explain it to you, i cant comprehend it for you.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #524 on: June 18, 2009, 03:21:16 PM » |
|
Why don`t you just settle this? Nah.. I think I'll let them squirm a while longer. The claim in that picture commentary is out and out laughable.. the thing is.. I still don't think they're looked it up even while I've been posting. Their lack of the ability to question and research for themselves is staggering. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #525 on: June 18, 2009, 03:24:31 PM » |
|
Uhm, i did defend the post. You just have a comprehension problem. I can only explain it to you, i cant comprehend it for you. No you need to accept my challenge or admit that you didn't research that picture at all, that in fact you just believed what you read without much thought or any investigation, when you admit that you will have to stop posting in this thread. I can absolutely kill that picture commentary stone dead.. have you not done any research yourself whilst we've been arguing? Really? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
|
« Reply #526 on: June 18, 2009, 03:29:08 PM » |
|
Nah.. I think I'll let them squirm a while longer.
The claim in that picture commentary is out and out laughable.. the thing is.. I still don't think they're looked it up even while I've been posting.
Their lack of the ability to question and research for themselves is staggering.
you said you didnt have an answer as to why there are rover tracks before the rover was unloaded. Are you now changing your statement? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DAVIDENGLAND
|
|
« Reply #527 on: June 18, 2009, 03:30:53 PM » |
|
Jackson Holly thanks for digging out those brilliant photos |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The question isn't whether we are right or wrong, the question is, are we even in the conversation??
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #528 on: June 18, 2009, 03:31:14 PM » |
|
you said you didnt have an answer as to why there are rover tracks before the rover was unloaded. That is a lie.. and you call yourself a Christian? Accept my challenge. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #529 on: June 18, 2009, 03:33:21 PM » |
|
David England, Holly Jackson dug this out too:  Is this brilliant also? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
|
« Reply #530 on: June 18, 2009, 03:38:41 PM » |
|
That is a lie.. and you call yourself a Christian?
Accept my challenge.
not true sir. go back and read your answers. I asked if you didnt have an answer, you said No, anyone who reads my posts will be aware I said no such thing.
I didn't give an answer.. you are a very strange person, anyone would think you were slip sliding.. dodging.
However I do have an answer.
No, i didnt give an answer, and i do have an answer. Youd make a great politician. http://feedyouradhd.blogspot.com/2009/06/politicians-share-personality-traits.html |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DAVIDENGLAND
|
|
« Reply #531 on: June 18, 2009, 03:39:23 PM » |
|
David England, Holly Jackson dug this out too: Is this brilliant also? Ah I see you're still cherry picking I'm talking about the black and white ones. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The question isn't whether we are right or wrong, the question is, are we even in the conversation??
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #532 on: June 18, 2009, 03:41:05 PM » |
|
You sir are a liar.
There is a world of difference between "I didn't give an answer" and "I don't have an answer".
You claim to be a Christian.. this is dispictable.
Accept my challenge.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
|
« Reply #533 on: June 18, 2009, 03:41:56 PM » |
|
You sir are a liar.
There is a world of difference between "I didn't give an answer" and "I don't have an answer".
You claim to be a Christian.. this is dispictable.
Accept my challenge.
i didnt lie, i even showed exactly what you said. You just dont like your own answers now.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #534 on: June 18, 2009, 03:43:08 PM » |
|
Ah I see you're still cherry picking I'm talking about the black and white ones. So you agree this picture commentary is cr*p? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #535 on: June 18, 2009, 03:45:21 PM » |
|
i didnt lie, i even showed exactly what you said. You just dont like your own answers now. You sir are continuing the lie for all to see. Accept my challenge or admit that you didn't research that picture at all, that in fact you just believed what you read without much thought or any investigation, when you admit that you will have to stop posting in this thread. (Did you notice David England distancing himself away from that picture commentary)? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
|
« Reply #536 on: June 18, 2009, 03:47:54 PM » |
|
You sir are continuing the lie for all to see.
Accept my challenge or admit that you didn't research that picture at all, that in fact you just believed what you read without much thought or any investigation, when you admit that you will have to stop posting in this thread.
(Did you notice David England distancing himself away from that picture commentary)?
uhm, i didnt lie, i even showed your answers, to which you are distancing your self from. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #537 on: June 18, 2009, 03:49:19 PM » |
|
uhm, i didnt lie, i even showed your answers, to which you are distancing your self from. Yes you lied. Now accept my challenge. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Letsbereal
|
|
« Reply #538 on: June 18, 2009, 03:50:44 PM » |
|
 Why they are laughing so hysterical? Is it because the all know in fact it's all a big Joke? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<- |
|
|
|
|
|
DAVIDENGLAND
|
|
« Reply #540 on: June 18, 2009, 04:01:29 PM » |
|
So you agree this picture commentary is cr*p?
Why don't you just explain what you believe instead of issuing challenges? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The question isn't whether we are right or wrong, the question is, are we even in the conversation??
|
|
|
|
Jackson Holly
|
|
« Reply #541 on: June 18, 2009, 04:25:50 PM » |
|
The OFFICIAL NASA BUZZ and WOODY NEIL collector photo! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I made it from this one:  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ O ~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #542 on: June 19, 2009, 12:45:21 AM » |
|
Posted by Holly Jackson: [/quote] Accept my challenge or admit you don't research anything, you don't care about what's truth or what's not. Are you afraid? Holly Jackson, burlguy and doktorschnabelvonrom.. it's your big chance. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
iks83
|
|
« Reply #543 on: June 19, 2009, 01:09:48 AM » |
|
Accept my challenge or admit you don't research anything, you don't care about what's truth or what's not.
Are you afraid?
Holly Jackson, burlguy and doktorschnabelvonrom.. it's your big chance.
FFS Voskhod... this is a forum for information... so stop spamming your "accept my challenge" crap and debunk it and let people who bothered reading past your spams to make their own decision based on the information posted. let them jump from one issue to another... just post the f**king explanation! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
iks83
|
|
« Reply #544 on: June 19, 2009, 01:13:27 AM » |
|
The OFFICIAL NASA BUZZ and WOODY NEIL collector photo!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I made it from this one: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ O ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Great so now not only are NASA photos fake but the hoax believers start making faked pictures themselfes. And you suck at that big time. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jackson Holly
|
|
« Reply #545 on: June 19, 2009, 06:43:37 AM » |
|
^ ^ ^  I know, this one was for laughs only ... took about ten minutes. But I was trying to make a point, especially with reply #485, about the unreliability of the NASA photos ... they are suspicious for sure, even laughable. As I have said before, I have a lot of experience with film negatives and transparencies and I know the procedures they would have used to accomplish pretty much the same results as photoshop. And from my first posts here, I have been decrying the fact that NASA has 'lost' much of the original negs and trans. About the above 'buzz and woody' mashup ... I have my suspicions about the cinder cones in Haleakala crater ... hopefully, more on that later. Here's the link to online google books for Dark Moon - By: David S. Percy and Mary Bennet, for truthseekers with an open mind ... and please don't give me a lot of grief about how their research sucks ... we ARE talking about faked photos, and as have I just said, NASA HID THE ORIGINALS. All historians are limited to the public propaganda, etc, doled out by our masters. http://books.google.com/books?id=uqi7qKZ5dIMC&dq=Mary+Bennet+/+David+S.+Percy:+Dark+Moon%3Edownload&printsec=frontcover&source=bn&hl=en&ei=x_U6SsXTDof-sQPawpX9Cg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5 ~~~~~~~~~~ BTW iks83, what do you make of the 'suspended back wheels' photos above? And this one from APOLLO 11 ... you don't see that this is studio lit? The light is 'puddled', concentrated around the central area of interest and falls off dramatically all around ...I'm sorry, but this is not an 'available light' photograph.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
iks83
|
|
« Reply #546 on: June 19, 2009, 08:56:51 AM » |
|
Well with that one I can agree it looks really staged.
About the suspended back wheel photo... I dont know... isnt that tire just on some bump? Having it suspended by a crane by doing this photo is totally retarded... really... I say all wheels are on the ground and its a optical illusion.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #547 on: June 19, 2009, 11:15:35 AM » |
|
FFS Voskhod... this is a forum for information... so stop spamming your "accept my challenge" crap and debunk it and let people who bothered reading past your spams to make their own decision based on the information posted. let them jump from one issue to another... just post the f**king explanation!
No, they have to admit that they don't research anything and blindly accept the first thing they are told. With this picture it's clearly the case.. they must have investigated if for themselves by now.. but will they admit they are wrong? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #548 on: June 19, 2009, 11:16:37 AM » |
|
Posted by Holly Jackson: Hey guys how about it? Accept my challenge or admit you don't research anything, you don't care about what's truth or what's not. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phasma
|
|
« Reply #549 on: June 19, 2009, 12:13:36 PM » |
|
still arguing?
NASA are this minute headed to the moon at 22,000 mph ! they are gonna land and collect samples - they are having another manned mission in 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise - Surangama Sutra
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
|
« Reply #550 on: June 19, 2009, 03:30:17 PM » |
|
I wonder if they plan to crash the probe into the supposed Apollo landing sight? What a perfect cover up, upturn the area and then say all evidence of the prior moon landings was unfortunately buried under 30ft lunar dust....  wooops, its not rocket science ya know. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phasma
|
|
« Reply #551 on: June 19, 2009, 03:33:39 PM » |
|
no, they are not crashing into it as suggested, they are landing an unmanned probe.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise - Surangama Sutra
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #552 on: June 19, 2009, 03:45:02 PM » |
|
I wonder if they plan to crash the probe into the supposed Apollo landing sight? What a perfect cover up, upturn the area and then say all evidence of the prior moon landings was unfortunately buried under 30ft lunar dust.... Yeah.. we'll see if that happens.. what do you think? Are you ready to accept my challenge yet? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phasma
|
|
« Reply #553 on: June 19, 2009, 03:46:51 PM » |
|
Yeah.. we'll see if that happens.. what do you think?
Are you ready to accept my challenge yet?
voshkod - theyv`e had days and many opportunities to accept this - they haven`t, i dont think they will ! i think nasa site has live link to this mission. do you think they`ll deny that this thing lands this time? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise - Surangama Sutra
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #554 on: June 19, 2009, 03:48:07 PM » |
|
no, they are not crashing into it as suggested, they are landing an unmanned probe.
No.. they're actually crashing a probe to create a six mile high dust cloud (its not really a cloud but I can't think of a better word) and a trailing probe is going to check the it for water. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Voskhod3
|
|
« Reply #555 on: June 19, 2009, 03:49:07 PM » |
|
voshkod - theyv`e had days and many opportunities to accept this - they haven`t, i dont think they will !
Why would they not want to defend their own postings? Are they not interested in research and truth? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phasma
|
|
« Reply #556 on: June 19, 2009, 03:54:48 PM » |
|
Why would they not want to defend their own postings?
Are they not interested in research and truth?
apparently not
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise - Surangama Sutra
|
|
|
|
Jackson Holly
|
|
« Reply #557 on: June 19, 2009, 03:58:59 PM » |
|
^^^
I've looked through most of the photos on the NASA sites ... I don't see anything to explain it. If you have something that does, why don't you just let us know ... we're big boys, we can take it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phasma
|
|
« Reply #558 on: June 19, 2009, 04:00:42 PM » |
|
^^^
I've looked through most of the photos on the NASA sites ... I don't see anything to explain it. If you have something that does, why don't you just let us know ... we're big boys, we can take it.
just out of interest, if someone did have something convincing to show that they did land on the moon then would you change your point of view?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things are not what they appear to be: nor are they otherwise - Surangama Sutra
|
|
|
|
Jackson Holly
|
|
« Reply #559 on: June 19, 2009, 04:11:39 PM » |
|
I agree that the NASA storyline ... their written research reports, et al ... is very convincing and as a layman accept the science as "truth", as far as I know. However, at this point I believe they could have and did obtain that knowledge through the reported unmanned flights or black ops flights.
We haven't talked about the suspicious 'moon samples' - google 'fake moon rocks' or 'simulated moon dust' - you will be surprised at what you find out.
If I see convincing evidence of 1960s hardware that they left on the moon I will shut up ... however, I would be very hard to convince that they did not fake a lot of their photos, for whatever reason.
I do not trust the government.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
