The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
IRAN WAR RESOLUTION COULD BE PASSED BY HOUSE AS EARLY AS NEXT WEEK
Posted By: GoldenEagle <Send E-Mail>
Date: Monday, 23 June 2008, 10:51 p.m.
Rec'd following email from Antiwar.com:
Introduced less than a month ago, Resolution 362, also known as the Iran War Resolution, could be passed by the House as early as next week.
The bill is the chief legislative priority of AIPAC. On its Web site, AIPAC endorses the resolutions as a way to 'Stop Iran's Nuclear Program' and tells readers to lobby Congress to pass the bill. In the Senate, a sister resolution, Resolution 580, has gained co-sponsors with similar speed. The Senate measure was introduced by Indiana Democrat Evan Bayh on June 2. It has since gained 19 co-sponsors.
The bill's key section "demands that the president initiate an international effort to immediately and dramatically increase the economic, political, and diplomatic pressure on Iran to verifiably suspend its nuclear enrichment activities by, inter alia, prohibiting the export to Iran of all refined petroleum products; imposing stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains, and cargo entering or departing Iran; and prohibiting the international movement of all Iranian officials not involved in negotiating the suspension of Iran's nuclear program."
"Imposing stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains, and cargo entering or departing Iran" can be read to mean that the president should initiate a naval blockade of Iran. A unilateral naval blockade without UN sanction is an act of war.
Resolution 362 has already gained 170 co-sponsors, or nearly 40 percent of the House. It has been referred to the Foreign Affairs Committee, which has 49 members, 24 of whom, including the ranking Republican, are co-sponsors. The Iran Nuclear Watch Web site writes, "According to the House leadership, this resolution is going to 'pass like a hot knife through butter' before the end of June on what is called suspension - meaning no amendments can be introduced during the 20-minute maximum debate. It also means it is assumed the bill will pass by a 2/3 majority and is non-controversial."
Our national legislators deem it non-controversial to recommend to a president known for his recklessness and bad judgment that he consider engaging in an act of war against Iran.
H. Con. Res. 362
Introduced: May 22, 2008
Sponsor: Rep. Gary Ackerman [D-NY] http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=hc110-362
S. Res. 580:
Sponsor: Sen. Evan Bayh [D-IN]
Sen. Maria Cantwell [D-WA]
Sen. Robert Casey [D-PA]
Sen. Susan Collins [R-ME]
Sen. Kent Conrad [D-ND]
Sen. Bob Corker [R-TN]
Sen. John Cornyn [R-TX]
Sen. Michael Crapo [R-ID]
Sen. Elizabeth Dole [R-NC]
Sen. Amy Klobuchar [D-MN]
Sen. Mel Martinez [R-FL]
Sen. Barbara Mikulski [D-MD]
Sen. Patty Murray [D-WA]
Sen. Pat Roberts [R-KS]
Sen. Gordon Smith [R-OR]
Sen. Olympia Snowe [R-ME]
Sen. John Sununu [R-NH]
Sen. John Thune [R-SD]
Sen. David Vitter [R-LA]
Sen. Ron Wyden [D-OR] http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sr110-580
It's a Slippery Slope to War
Over the last three weeks, 77 House Democrats and 92 Republicans have agreed to cosponsor a new resolution against Iran that demands that President Bush “initiate an international effort” to impose a land, sea, and air blockade on Iran to prevent it from importing gasoline and to inspect all cargo entering or leaving Iran.
Such a blockade imposed without United Nations authority (which the resolution does not call for) would be widely construed as an act of war. Some congressional sources say the House could vote on the resolution, H.Con.Res. 362, as early as next week. http://capwiz.com/justforeignpolicy/issues/alert/?alertid=11518951