listen up mockingbird there is no evidence i am a sock puppet for anyone. ever.
there is..
where?
unlike you and your jref friends no part of me is anonymous. if i am a public figure then how by definition can i be a sock puppet?
first of all you are jumping ahead of the discussion, I did not say the jrefr's were my friends.. although there are quite a few I respect as logical thinkers..
yeah i'm sure people like parky76 are your hero.
now will you tell me how a public person can be a sock puppet and who i am a sock puppet for and where that evidence is?
why do you have to lie?
I have not intentionally lied.. it just seems rather coincidental that you started posting right after this thread was started.. possibly set up as a support player? as you so often insinuated on other threads about the debunkers?
wrong.
a member of the cit forums posted the link to this thread. when i saw what you and 'scootle' were passing off as pentagon "facts" i became infuriated and decided someone should step up to the plate and keep you from muddying the waters.
notice how you and scootle do everything possible to not talk about the eyewitnesses in the above presentation except to throw lloyde under the bus and call him senile. how sad bush defenders are.
yes because that is where i specialize my research. you can trace me back for years back to the first incarnation of the loose change forums and you will see that my 2 areas of interest in 9/11 were the pentagon and shanksville. so i can provide a couple links if anyone wants to verify that. again there was no cit or pilots for 911 truth then for me to be one of their sock puppets which they don't even do. there is no need for anyone of us to pretend we're someone else.
I'm not discounting your research into flight 93.. I just wanted to mention for all the readers.. that you are not a new poster and that you have a history with 911 research.. I think thats important for people to know..
then how can i be a sock puppet if i have an established history in the 9/11 truth community dating back 4 or 5 years?
THATS WHY I POSTED MY OWN NAME IN THIS THREAD. DUH.
LMAO!!!!
1984 alert!!!
laugh all you want..
bottom line : you're afraid to say who you are and i'm not. looks like the credibility ball is in my court.
i agree. it shows how quickly the other side falls apart when they resort to name calling, inventing theories and claims, and slandering both cit and pilots for 911 truth organizations.
name calling, invented theories, and slandering is rampant on BOTH sides..
it is the only line of defense against the work of cit.
why can't one of you people go out and find 13 or 14 out of the "104 impact witnesses" to agree to be filmed on location describing the southern approach which never goes over the navy annex or to the north side of the citgo station?
why can't one of you people go out and find 3 or 4 people from the "rush hour traffic" who saw a light pole impaled into a cab or saw an airplane tearing them out of the ground?
WHY? WHY? WHY?
none of which refute any of the eyewitness statements.
no they tend to refute themselves.. remember Boger's statement from 2001???
is there where your side wants to talk about boger's superman like bravery that when he sees a plane coming he just stands there and watches it crash right next to him even though he mentions hitting the deck in the cit vid?
it doesn't matter what a witness believes.
what matter is if what they saw was real.
again and again and again from before the navy annex to over the navy annex to the north side of the citgo station and close to anc the claim is corroborated.
fake anonymous jref'ers can write up whatever type of rubbish they like in regards to the "improbability" of the flight path but the bottom line is this is how this should be viewed :
anc & citgo station are the left & right poles of the goalposts.
did the ball go between the posts?
was the field goal good?
every single eyewitness says the field goal was good.
have sit down and draw where the ball went and some will say by the left goal post and some will say the right goal post and some will say down the middle but it doesn't matter. none of that matters.
the ball went in between the goal posts is the bottom line.
the plane flew between anc and the north side of the citgo.
again.
and again.
and again.
and again.
and again.
and again.
and again.
and like 6 more friggin times "again".
is it sinking in yet?
oh i'm craig? is that what your little italics is to imply?
no I highlighted the fact that it was you AND Craig..
what me and craig both talk about the amazing pentagon research cit has done?
i'll make you deal. i'll post my name and craig's name and photo's of each of us if you promise to post your name and a photo of yourself.
yeah like thats going to happen.. you can infer whatever you like from that answer.. but sensible people would understand why I would decline such a "gracious" invitation..
because you're a coward who attacks people with the shield of anonymity.
unlike me, craig, aldo, & rob balsamo you don't ever have to be held accountable to anything you say about us or the pentagon.
you are here to attempt to discredit research by attacking researchers. that is your only objective. so naturally you want to hide.
you don't want me telling people how you backed out of a televised debate that you initiated like i have about mark roberts again and again and again.
thats why i have a teensy bit more respect for him than individuals like you albeit he's a spook.
can't wait to hear the excuses for this one. in fact i already have them written down!! lol
add the above to your list.. are you a stalker?
no i just have a way of exposing the truth.
p.s me and my ip are banned at ats. more proof none of your allegations and beliefs can hold any water.
being banned is proof? hah! you had way too many T&C violations.. typical paranoia.. banned because I had the truth.. sheesh..
where did i say why i was banned?
and for the record i never had one single t&c violation at ats. i didn't even post there enough to get one.
so what happened at the pentagon on 9/11?
757 hit.. duh..
now everyone here knows where you stand.
if this evidence is such garbage you can ignore it.
see for example i don't believe that spacebeams and holograms were used on 9/11.
i spend zero amount of my time discussing/debunking that.
i don't believe in bigfoot or little green men or gods above and i spend zero percent of my time "debunking" or "ridiculing" people who do.
and you implied that i am a stalker?
since i already outted one jref'er let's get a second.
you haven't outed anyone.. Scootle (if thats who you mean) has demonstrated an ability to think coherently and examine the evidence from an objective view.. that doesn't make him any less of a truther.. it makes him a better one..
scootle thinks nist is garbage on the wtc and fema death camps is the holy grail on the pentagon.
scootle thinks "90%" of 9/11 truth has been debunked by a site that alleges truthers threaten to mass execute people, are holocaust deniers, are white supremacists and every other piece of rubbish that has been thrown at the truth movement.
it originates in the amazing randi's cesspool forums like a little cia training camp.
