PrisonPlanet Forum
June 19, 2013, 03:31:42 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Not-So-Dark Wings Of Eugenics: The Language Of God, Says Eugenecist.  (Read 1283 times)
MooseHunter
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 254


Huntin'em down..


« on: June 01, 2008, 06:02:07 AM »

http://www.islamicamagazine.com/Issue-20/The-Language-of-God-A-Scientist-Presents-Evidence-for-Belief.html

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." - Albert Einstein

In The Language of God, Dr. Francis Collins drafts a truce between the battling armies of science and religion. As director of the Human Genome Project, Collins has worked for decades at the forefront of scientific discovery, paving the way for the emergence of revolutionary breakthroughs in human genetics. However, one quality renders Collins unlikely to be among today's leading scientists in the eyes of many of his academic peers - his unshakeable faith.

Over the course of his career, Collins has withstood innumerable objections against the compatibility of his scientific and religious sentiments, and these attacks have questioned his ability to remain loyal to each camp while simultaneously embracing the other. In The Language of God, not only does Collins rationalize why science and faith are harmonious with each other, but he also demonstrates that each ideology is incomplete in the absence of the other. He argues that only together do science and spirituality enrich the human experience.

---

I need back-up from bible-thumping theologians/pastors/zealots/fanatics to raise an army, because there are fundamentalist and bigoted atheists here who will launch a lame counter-offensive. I need support. MoneyBoooooooomb!
Logged

Your contributions are welcome: http://striver.info/index.php/Main_Page
Virgil_Hilts
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 405


« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2008, 06:13:39 AM »

Give me an example of a scientific invention or theory that has ever relied upon religion in order to complete it. And I mean scientific theory as in a theory that has empirical proof, so creationism doesn't count, 'cos it has none.
Logged

Virgil Hilts was the main character from The Great Escape.
MooseHunter
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 254


Huntin'em down..


« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2008, 06:18:59 AM »

Give me an example of a scientific invention or theory that has ever relied upon religion in order to complete it. And I mean scientific theory as in a theory that has empirical proof, so creationism doesn't count, 'cos it has none.

Give me an example of a scientific invention or theory that has ever relied upon atheism in order to complete it. And I mean scientific theory as in a theory that has empirical proof, so atheism doesn't count, 'cos it has none.

Or

Put simply, is atheism backed by scientific evidence?

Or

Atheism is unscientific.
Logged

Your contributions are welcome: http://striver.info/index.php/Main_Page
Kilika
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8,865

Thank you Jesus!


« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2008, 06:55:51 AM »

The scientific community has faith that Einstein got his math right! Grin
Logged

"For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows."
1 Timothy 6:10 (KJB)
Virgil_Hilts
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 405


« Reply #4 on: June 01, 2008, 07:09:50 AM »

I never said that atheism was required to make scientific invention or theory. Rationalism, the real process through which these discoveries are made, requires neither religion or non-religion. If by chance a scientist were either an atheist or otherwise, that would be as irrelevant as the fact that he or she may have had blue or brown eyes, unless that scientist could empirically prove that either was unnecessary to provide the invention or theory, which has never happened.

And atheism does have evidence, but I'm not going into that because you are brainwashed and cannot be reasoned with.
Logged

Virgil Hilts was the main character from The Great Escape.
MooseHunter
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 254


Huntin'em down..


« Reply #5 on: June 01, 2008, 07:16:59 AM »

I need back-up. Someone is saying he has evidence that he will not produce. HELP! HELP! Gunner, fire at will!
Logged

Your contributions are welcome: http://striver.info/index.php/Main_Page
Virgil_Hilts
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 405


« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2008, 07:20:26 AM »

I'm not the keeper of all atheistic knowledge on planet Earth. Everything I know about it can easily be found for yourself, but that won't be sufficient for you because you are brainwashed.
Logged

Virgil Hilts was the main character from The Great Escape.
MooseHunter
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 254


Huntin'em down..


« Reply #7 on: June 01, 2008, 07:32:21 AM »

There is no such thing as "atheistic knowledge". There is only bunk theories and sophistry. They hate hijacked religions so much, and rightly so, that they just sit around and make things up about the central theme of religions: God.

When you not know whether something exists or not, you cannot just take a dive and say it doesn't.
Logged

Your contributions are welcome: http://striver.info/index.php/Main_Page
White Rose Sophie
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,994


« Reply #8 on: June 01, 2008, 09:30:52 AM »

I never said that atheism was required to make scientific invention or theory. Rationalism, the real process through which these discoveries are made, requires neither religion or non-religion. If by chance a scientist were either an atheist or otherwise, that would be as irrelevant as the fact that he or she may have had blue or brown eyes, unless that scientist could empirically prove that either was unnecessary to provide the invention or theory, which has never happened.

And atheism does have evidence, but I'm not going into that because you are brainwashed and cannot be reasoned with.

Please provide evidence, so that people can be "un-brainwashed."  Grin
Logged
Cruise4
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,386


« Reply #9 on: June 01, 2008, 04:26:40 PM »

Surely the relevant premise here is 'conciousness' from which both terms science and religion arise? I could pick apart that original post and show its completely meaningless gobbledegook, due to flowery and inexact language usage.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!