>many of the links provided in-text
Here is a mainstream news clip of German professional meteorologists complaining about what they describe as illegal weather manipulation being carried out by the military in the form of artificial clouds. Video Here
One of the grandfathers of the H-Bomb, Edward Teller, discussed spraying Barium and Aluminium Oxides into the atmosphere for the purpose of changing the weather - "Barium, Aluminum, Thorium, Selenium were to be processed into a sub-micron particle dispensed from high-altitude aircraft, ionized with a specific electrical charge."
Local News Station in the US does their own investigation, finds massive amounts of Barium present following Chemtrail sprayingVideo Here
The HAARP (Highfrequency Active Auroral Research Program) facility's OWN Official Patent Report proposes leaving clouds of barium in the sky to aid its operation - "It has also been proposed to release large clouds of barium in the magnetosphere so that photo ionization will increase the cold plasma density, thereby producing electron precipitation through enhanced whistler-mode interaction."
Professor Chossoduvsky of the University of Ottawa wrote a report on weather warfare and HAARP, stating "Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction. Potentially, it constitutes an instrument of conquest capable of selectively destabilising agricultural and ecological systems of entire regions... surely the United Nations should be addressing the issue of "environmental warfare" alongside the debate on the climatic impacts of greenhouse gases..."
I was just wondering, with all this stated, on the record evidence of Artificial Weather Modification being presently implemented by both the civilian and military sectors, how does this affect what we perceive as 'climate change'? Here is a collection of stated endeavors, they can be searched for on the internet...Video Here
That's a fair question... isn't it? I mean, Congressional Bill HR 2977 explicitly lists
Chemtrails as exotic weapons http://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2001/hr2977.html
, introduced by Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich, this bill called for the peaceful uses of space, and a ban on "exotic weapons". Section 7 of the "Space Preservation Act of 2001" sought specifically to prohibit "chemtrails".
Kucinich told the Columbus Alive newspaper (Jan. 24, 2002) that despite official denials, as head of the Armed Services oversight committee he is well acquainted with chemtrail projects. "The truth is there's an entire program in the Department of Defense, 'Vision for 2020,' that's developing these weapons,
" Kucinich told reporter Bob Fitrakis. The U.S. Space Command's 2020 vision calls for "dominance" of space, land, sea and air.
And then you've got Congressional Bill HR 517 discussing weather modification.http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-517Zbigniew Brzezinski, key globalist and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission is quoted as saying
"Technology will make available to the leaders of modern nations techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of security forces need be appraised, technology of WEATHER MODIFICATION COULD BE EMPLOYED TO PRODUCE PROLONGED PERIODS OF DROUGHT OR STORM.
" - - Brzezinski, Between Two Ages.
- - this is the same individual who noted that it might be "more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.
" - - Brzezinski, American Primacy and Geostrategic Imperatives
And we wonder why the same elites fan the flames of fear over climate change, with the likes of Charles Schwab (1999 Bilderberg attendee - http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=17083
) being a major contributor to AdCouncil ( http://www.adcouncil.org/default.aspx?id=434
), a 'nonprofit' foundation which put up billboards such as this:
(Note the attempted connection between climate crisis and population, and the basic assertion that WE are the problem. Soon we might accept this with enough repetition and backing by such 'philanthropic' foundations, and welcome veiled de-pop programs with open arms. I suspect this billboard is operating on many levels of subliminal conditioning - the tickboxes are amazing suggestive psychological triggers within the context. The overhead 'trails' are reminiscent of the trademark 'artificial cirrus' we get in W.A. (and the rest of the world).
China are open about being able to stop rain as well as seed it, as evidenced in this CNN report
Planes, too, can be used to drop chemicals onto clouds to manipulate the weather. In the case of the Olympics, climate experts will pore over satellite images to find ways to dissolve the clouds rather than make it rain.
This is a great 2 minute chemtrail video. In the last 20 or so seconds of the video... see that sky? Interesting to note also the plane 'switching on' it's spray mid flight.Video HereThe 1995/96 Air Force University document
titled "Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025" )... note that it says in (by this date) 2025 the weather will be 'owned' militarily.
So what's going on now...and by whom?, and how does it affect our perceptions of the mainstream concept of 'climate change?'
These, I believe, are questions that we have a right to ask, especially with all the fear-mongering we are being expected to swallow.
Al Gore comes out with his piece and lands a Nobel Peace Prize.
Tim Flannery comes out saying my city Perth, Western Australia, will be the world's first ghost metropolis, the population having to flee because of no rain or access to water.
He gets Australian of the Year 2007. http://www.theweathermakers.com/about/
It is not enough to simply say that the Defense Department are conducting a program such as 'Vision for 2020', or any atmospheric manipulation or scalar warfare operations.... what agendas are ultimately at the helm?Military >>> Industrial Complex >>> Globalist Agendas
can anyone say end-game?