Trump probably has the right to order at least some some of what is in the EO, but his entitled and petulant tweets during this affair have done him no favors, and frankly, he continues to be an embarassment to the country.
What does Trump know about the law and constitution? The Constitution means nothing to Trump - he mentioned it 0 times during his inauguration speech, and during the campaign only seemed to know about the 2nd Amendment.
Ridiculous fearmongering complete garbage. Hey Trump, how many people from those countries have even arrested for any plots against this country, let alone been found to commit any terror acts? This is a question which Judge Robart asked at the hearing:
Just wait until Chapter 2 or 3 of this theatre which will be massive fearmongering of non-existent cyber threats. Non-existent in the context that they will SHOVE DOWN OUR THROATS, but real ONLY in the sense that once again, they will be FALSE FLAGS perpetrated by the TERRORIST US GOVERNMENT. This has been proven thousands of times on this forum.
Donald Trump says Americans should hold judge who blocked travel ban responsible if US is attacked
Why can't you and others see that this is the perfect setup
for a FALSE FLAG blamed yet again on some foreign patsy?
Shameless fearmongering. Just like Dubya's "you are with us, or you are with the terrorists" spiel.
OBAMA GAO REPORT BACKS TRUMP
ON TOUGHER AIRLINE SCREENING
Security expert warns there's no way to know how many threats slip through
02/06/2017 - LEO HOHMANN
A newly released Government Accounting Office study reveals more than 22,000 U.S.-bound foreign travelers were banned from boarding their flights in fiscal 2015.
These “high risk” travelers were interdicted by U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agents before boarding planes bound for the U.S. Among that group, 10,648 were deemed permanently inadmissible while the remaining 11,589 were told they could not board with the paperwork presented.
The GAO study goes on to lament that netting 22,000 suspect travelers reveals nothing about the pre-boarding program’s effectiveness. That’s because CPB has failed to develop a baseline system of assessing how many of the overall high-risk travelers are caught before boarding the planes and showing up at a U.S. airport, which is the last line of defense against potential terrorists.
The very existence of DHS/TSA is unconstitutional, they were fraudulently justified using problem reaction solution--US intel agencies, Goldman Sachs, AIG, US defense contractors carried out 9/11, sold the dumbass American sheep on the Saudi narrative to deflect attention from the aforementioned. Your entire post invokes the offical government terrorism fearmongering, "you have to let us take away all your rights or the terrorists will kill you!".
... why? Because we are involved in WAR in most or
all of those countries and are about to
BOMB THE SHIT OUT OF 'EM (ISIS).
Holy f*cking shit. ISIS, the rebadged name for the CIA's Al-Qaeda, you know the same CIA that Trump has "such respect for"? Yeah, Trump has great respect for THE TERRORISTS THAT ARE THE CIA, what does that make him? Here's a newsflash: ISIS is a euphemism for YOU, for ALL Americans, and ANYONE that is not part of the club.
We are not at war with ANY of those countries. Congress makes declarations of war. Rule by decree and Executive Order have become rather fashionable in some quarters since the Twitt-in-Chief was installed in office, but it is no less unconstitutional a manner to go about things now than under the Obama regime.
However we know how little Trump thinks of the Constitution, so I fear these concerns will not trouble him much. The very last thing we needed in the White House was a stooge of the zionists and neocons, following orders from his superior Netanyahoo, with very little knowledge and experience of his own and therefore entirely manipulable; but that is what we have unfortunately.
Any evidence for that... waffle...? And no, emotive pics and youtube videos do not count.
It's not my argument as it happens, which you would know if you had made sure you understood what was written before replying to it. However you are also wrong (imagine my surprise) about the case being made by the appellees, which of course you haven't read and/or understood. But in any case, you shouldn't even bother trying to debate the Constitution especially after your performance in this thread:
^ The only person in this thread that has actual critical thinking skills and doesn't spend hours a day listening to stupid podcasts to get their daily soundbites so they can imagine that they're bringing something substantive to the table.
Chris , I don't want to divert this thread into Israel/Palestine, but my reply to you is pretty much as it was here: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=318459.msg1615272#msg1615272
I did not say that Trump ignores the Constitution - he would need to know what is in the document first. I said he does not concern himsel with it - he does not care about it. How many times have you heard him talk about the Constitution? If you exclude his demagogic references to the 2nd amendment during the campaign, it is virtually none. Compare that to someone sensible and educated on the subject like Rand Paul, and you get the point. Also, as I have said before, Trump actively holds the constitution in contempt when, for example, he spoke in favor of the mass surveillance of the American people, which is a violation of the 4th amendment.
^^ Exactly. We all have the inalienable right to NOT be surveilled. Surveillance of the American people IS ILLEGAL. There is no justification of it, no matter how many people die
in the CIA's next FALSE FLAG ATTACK blamed on 'MUSLIMS' or 'hackers', or fictitious threats like "Adam Lanza" archetypes, 'homegrown' patsies. Surveillance is an act of war against the American people, it's purpose is to ENSLAVE, CONTROL, STEAL, COERCE, FORCE COMPLIANCE