Webster Tarpley has become an intellectual prostitute for Hillary Clinton

Author Topic: Webster Tarpley has become an intellectual prostitute for Hillary Clinton  (Read 8513 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,995
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
Eight years ago Tarpley was warning everyone about what a warmonger, puppet of Wall Street, and all-around fascist Obama was:

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OygG10gaHTg

Now he's become an unpaid public relations official for Hillary Clinton, even though she's everything he accused Obama of being, only worse.

Did the Clinton mafia buy him off?

Did they promise him a cushy cabinet post if he promised to be a shill for Hillary?

Did they blackmail him with threats to inform his wife about his mistress?
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Al Bundy

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,105
Eight years ago Tarpley was warning everyone about what a warmonger, puppet of Wall Street, and all-around fascist Obama was:

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OygG10gaHTg

Now he's become an unpaid public relations official for Hillary Clinton, even though she's everything he accused Obama of being, only worse.

Did the Clinton mafia buy him off?

Did they promise him a cushy cabinet post if he promised to be a shill for Hillary?

Did they blackmail him with threats to inform his wife about his mistress?

This is so bad news and  noun disappointment. I can not believe.  :o

http://tarpley.net/putin-tragically-wrong-about-trump/http://

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,995
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
This is so bad news and  noun disappointment. I can not believe

If you listen to the last five or six editions of World Crisis Radio -- including today's -- you'll know why I was inspired to create this thread.

I'm disgusted beyond words.
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Al Bundy

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,105
If you listen to the last five or six editions of World Crisis Radio -- including today's -- you'll know why I was inspired to create this thread.

I'm disgusted beyond words.

   
Unbelievably. That shameless acts are happening in Serbia. Today brave man or woman who fights for people rights. Tomorrow "prostitute" of power politicians, oligarchs even agent of foreign Intelligence Agencies.  >:(

Offline CaptBebops

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 722
I'll have to check it out.  Thom Hartmann (who sometimes had Alex on a guest and they even did a couple of simulcasts) encouraged Sanders to run.  But now he is an unabashed Clinton supporter and hangs up on anyone who disagrees with him and calls them a Republican.   Many of his members do not like Hillary and said they would not vote for her if she got the nomination.  When I posted a topic expressing disappointment in Bernie endorsing Hillary on Hartmann's message board it got deleted and there two other topics asking what happened to it which got deleted too.  Hartmann has since closed the message board and only allows comments on his Hartmann Report site.

Offline TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,991
my take has pretty much always been -

1. Tarpley is a socialist
2. Tarpley is also a Globalist - silently
3. He made good history material  - slightly biased but better than most history written by Brits (Oxford etc...)

Was I wrong?

interesting:


http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message3245473/pg1?disclaimer=1
Webster Tarpley doubles down on protecting the Clinton-Obama wacrime regime, Still engaged in shilling Jarrett line the Obama a victim of Neocon

Obama is the Cabal. But you'd never hear tarpley speak of it.

He's now reduced to parroting Clinton campaign talking points.

It's a shame. His reporting on Syria and Ukraine used to be reality based. Now he just points at Trump and screams obscenities.

His anti-Trump tweets are beyond shrill and hysterical.


tarpley.net
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Offline chris jones

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,194
  I too have felt severely dissapointed in those who I felt were beyond reproach,. so I get it.
  Just to toss it in there , though it may not be revelant to the forementioned..
  Public figures of all shapes, sizes and philosophy have been under scrutiny, survellance, public & private...We are all humans who have at some point in our lives made mistakes, some miniscule and perhaps others that may taint the sainted ones.
  The clinton crew are far from alone in info gathering, digging up dirt, it is a timeless art to sway resistance. I'm not trying to indicate this was the case in these changes of philosophy.
   I can say this is a tactic that has proven it's strenght in either bringing down adversarys or blackmailing them  in order to control.

   
 

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,995
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
1. Tarpley is a socialist
2. Tarpley is also a Globalist - silently

If those were the primary reasons behind his implicit endorsement of Hillary Clinton, he would not have spent the entire 2008 campaign season trying desperately to warn anyone who would listen not to vote for Obama.

That's why I'm convinced this is not about "isms" or political ideology.

This is about being bought off and/or blackmailed.

There's simply no other rational way to explain the complete and utter contradiction between what he's doing now and what he was doing eight years ago.
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Letsbereal

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,616
  • Know Thyself
I always use to listen to Webster Tarpley's weekly World Crises Radio because of his great world political insights.

But as of late he's only rambling on about Trump and the coming elections so I stopped listening to him because I don't hear any balance anymore in his analyses.

I myself don't follow this election campaign in detail because I think it's a waste of time and it's too late in the game.

And even when Trump wins this election the system has already been taken over so he doesn't have the support to affect any positive change and they might even kill him.

Sorry to be so pessimistic here but I think I am just being real while I am more positive about the American people and their awakening in general.
->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-

Offline beardogg0524

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 205
Hartmann is a phony and a shill for the banksters and the war criminals. Just another hypocritical fake liberal sellout con artist. Screw him and his GMO-eating ass and his GMO-eating shill followers. And screw that fake liberal sellout con artist Webster Tarpley. Another GMO eating idiot.

Offline PeaceAndFreedom

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 712
The problem with Tarpley is that he believes Trump is far more fascist than Hillary, thus he cuts the latter a pass. He is historically a "good government" person who thinks the secret of America's past success was its mercantilism and protectionist policies, thus with the 'right' bureaucratic managers it can be so again. Tarpley views a small government or constitutional emphasis as an Austrian-libertarian plot to defeat the American model, and any attempts to reduce government as "austerity." One example of his analysis:

http://tarpley.net/how-dying-libertarianism-has-become-the-entrance-to-trump-fascism/

He has basically not forgiven Ron/Rand Paul for abandoning acknowledgng his support for the 9/11 truth movement, and suggests that withdrawal proves the rest of his thesis, that libertarianism is "fascism's front door." But here things get incoherent, because by associating Trump with a post-Paul collapse of the libertarian principle within the GOP, he fails to note Trump has been promoting some protectionist and pro-safety-net messages in his campaign, which is the opposite of what a libertarian would do. How then can Tarpley call Trump a fascist, if he is touting non-libertarian themes? Methinks Tarpley is not so much paid off, as mixed up.
"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered!... I am not a number, I am a free man!"

Offline TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,991
...
This is about being bought off and/or blackmailed.

There's simply no other rational way to explain the complete and utter contradiction between what he's doing now and what he was doing eight years ago.

I tend to agree ... his compass HAS moved from past views . Why? I dunno ..  I give up listening / reading to highly biased information  ... the signal to noise ratio is to high  ...
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Offline beardogg0524

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 205
WEBSTER TARPLEY: "ROTHSCHILDS ARE LOW-LEVEL", WTF?!

by Ognir http://theinfounderground.com

RENSE 2009-10-12, HOUR 2, 35:00 WEBSTER TARPLEY SAYS "ROTHSCHILDS ARE RELATIVELY LOW-LEVEL PEOPLE GIVEN DIRTY WORK TO DO!"

So let's listen to the cut I just made, actually 2 versions

Part 1 - 49 seconds
http://www.theinfounderground.com/archives/etc/disinfo/Shill_Tarpley_Part-1.mp3

Slightly longer segment
http://www.theinfounderground.com/archives/etc/disinfo/Shill_Tarpley_Part-3.mp3

Offline Al Bundy

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,105
WEBSTER TARPLEY: "ROTHSCHILDS ARE LOW-LEVEL", WTF?!

by Ognir http://theinfounderground.com

RENSE 2009-10-12, HOUR 2, 35:00 WEBSTER TARPLEY SAYS "ROTHSCHILDS ARE RELATIVELY LOW-LEVEL PEOPLE GIVEN DIRTY WORK TO DO!"

So let's listen to the cut I just made, actually 2 versions

Part 1 - 49 seconds
http://www.theinfounderground.com/archives/etc/disinfo/Shill_Tarpley_Part-1.mp3

Slightly longer segment
http://www.theinfounderground.com/archives/etc/disinfo/Shill_Tarpley_Part-3.mp3

It looks like Tarpley want to confuse anti-globalists do not they come out in the elections.

Offline Changeling

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Eight years ago, Tarpley's point was two-fold: the danger of Obama and his backers, and secondly the fact that McCain was such a tarnished and scandalised 'brand' that he would not be able to do the various horrors which people feared..but Obama would be able to do this under left cover; and he was largely correct.

This time, the same argument holds (although he has not openly made it yet), since Hillary is so exhausted by scandal and her various skeleton collections, she is arguably less of a danger to the US and the world than Trump. He also takes the view that pretty much anyone would be better than Trump - this may well be an unbalanced view but he may well be proven correct - I for one believe that Trump will be presidente because he is the covert establishment choice.

Offline TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,991
no ... Don't let Hillary select any GLOBALIST communist liberal Supremes ... SCOTUS must be saved  from that - Vote Trump...
Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty: For he maketh sore, and bindeth up: he woundeth, and his hands make whole ; He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee. - Job 5

Offline Rex

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
I quit listening to Tarpley months ago, when he said we should hold our noses and vote for the Democratic nominee.  Anyone with any discernment knew it would be Clinton, and Tarpley has more discernment than I do.  So I quit listening.

But I just listened to this week's show, and damn, he IS humping Hillary's leg, like a horny Chihuahua.

It's like some mass psychosis is at work in this presidential race--each side is convinced that the election of the other guy's candidate will mean the end of life as we know it.  And I can see both points of view.  Tarpley's always been a political pragmatist, and he's convinced that Trump is unfit to be president.  I disagree.  Alex Jones is convinced that Hillary Clinton's a monster, and I have to go along with that.  A vote for Hillary is certain destruction, but a vote for Trump means only POSSIBLE destruction.

Anyway, Tarpley kept talking about Sarah Silverman on this week's show.  She was one of the leaders of the Sanders Revolution, then at the Democratic convention she told his supporters to grow up.  A picture of Silverman and funnyman Al Franken:



I think that was taken at the moment when Silverman chastised her followers for following her.  She said it could be "fixed in post."  Well, this is part of the post-production, Sarah.

And the DNC emails had been leaked just 4-5 days before.  In them, the Clinton people talked about Sanders being a fake Jew.  Talked about painting him as an atheist to get votes.  Franken and Silverman are both Jewish.



Another picture of Tarpley's pinup girl.  I find it odd that Tarpley would slobber over this woman.

Trump has never signed or voted for fascist legislation.  Obamacare forces Americans to buy private health insurance or face ruinous legal action.  Government/corporate partnership is Mussolini's model of fascism.  Obamacare used to be called Hillarycare, so it's not hard to figure out who the fascists are in this rasslin' match.

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Webster Tarpley has been a disappointment.

While I agree that Trump is a NWO Trojan Horse.  Tarpley supports private central banks, the EU, open borders...  and now the witch herself.

It's a disappointment because he has done such great work exposing the Bush crime family, yet, falls short outing the Clinton crime family. 
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,995
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
But I just listened to this week's show, and damn, he IS humping Hillary's leg, like a horny Chihuahua.

He's humping her leg yet again on today's show.
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Valerius

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,866
Didn't hear it, but it would be quite a change.

http://www.voltairenet.org/article187315.html
"No man can put a chain about the ankle of his fellow man without at last finding the other end fastened about his own neck."  -Frederick Douglass

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,995
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
Didn't hear it, but it would be quite a change.

http://www.voltairenet.org/article187315.html

Something obviously happened between April of last year and now.

What that something is I don't know.

All I do know is that if Hillary were caught on video murdering someone in cold blood, Tarpley would try desperately to figure out a way to blame Trump for it.

That's how ridiculous it's gotten.
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Al Bundy

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,105
People, forget Tarply ("who sold his soul to the devil"). I bet he enjoys what is still writing about it.

This is nothing new and it happens all over the world throughout history.

In Serbia, S, Milosevic's propagandist who is in each "reportage" after 100 times repeated "New World order ", "Kosovo secret Serbian land ", "NATO fascists" ... he was came to proEU Vucic's Party (SNS), and on his orders to vote in parliament the extremely unfavorable agreement with "NATO fascists." >:(

Would be about such "people" to write and give them attention?  :o

Offline Changeling

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
I listened this week and I did not hear Tarpley 'humping Hillary's leg' - he is highly critical of most of her positions and her past crimes.

However Tarpley's main point is to stop Trump, and that almost anyone would be better than Trump; his positions are easier to understand in this context.

He makes a very good point vis a vis establishment terror attacks. Trump is overwhelmingly the political and electoral beneficiary of these terror attacks, so if we see more attacks like San Bernadino and Orlando in the run up to the election, then we will know without doubt that Trump is the covert establishment pick, as I suspect he is.

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,995
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
I listened this week and I did not hear Tarpley 'humping Hillary's leg'

Not overtly, no, but implicitly -- and by obvious act of omission -- he most certainly is.

Quote
he is highly critical of most of her positions and her past crimes.

Bernie Sanders publicly endorsed Hillary four weeks ago.

Since that time, has Tarpley ever asserted that Sanders was wrong for doing so?

If so, when and where?

If not, why not?

Such questions cannot be answered by begging them.

Quote
However Tarpley's main point is to stop Trump, and that almost anyone would be better than Trump; his positions are easier to understand in this context.

No they're not. Hillary is the war criminal with innocent blood on her hands, not Trump.

Quote
He makes a very good point vis a vis establishment terror attacks. Trump is overwhelmingly the political and electoral beneficiary of these terror attacks

Wrong again. Hillary is the main beneficiary, because she -- not Trump -- is the one who's in bed with the same false flag-orchestrating neocons who lied the American people into invading both Afghanistan and Iraq.

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4LKAt1t_8M

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCOv7C9g7xo

Does that mean Trump is a "peace" or "anti-war" candidate. Of course not. It means merely that it's ridiculous and absurd to even imply that Hillary is less of a warmonger -- and less prone to start World War III -- than Trump is.

It's time for Hillary supporters to wake up and smell the Kool-Aid they've been drinking.
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Changeling

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Not overtly, no, but implicitly -- and by obvious act of omission -- he most certainly is.

This becomes a specious argument, since how much would be enough? It is also subjective in this respect since this quotient would vary from person to person. Tarpley is on the record, on countless occasions, in pretty much every medium you can think of, pointing out the legion political and personal failings of Hillary Clinton.

Quote
Bernie Sanders publicly endorsed Hillary four weeks ago.

Since that time, has Tarpley ever asserted that Sanders was wrong for doing so?

If so, when and where?

If not, why not?

Such questions cannot be answered by begging them.

Tarpley lambasted Bernie week after week for failing to highlight Hillary's crimes, and failing to take advantage of the email scandal, and failing to fight the electoral cheating. Bernie sees Trump as the worst possible outcome for the presidency, and therefore he endorsed Clinton as the least worst (in his view) option. Only the hopelessly naive would attack Sanders for this exercise in logical inevitability.

Quote
Wrong again. Hillary is the main beneficiary, because she -- not Trump -- is the one who's in bed with the same false flag-orchestrating neocons who lied the American people into invading both Afghanistan and Iraq.
.

Simply wrong. It is Trump who benefits electorally from terror attacks and from deteriorating economic and security conditions. It is the establishment which controls the events and news cycle which propagates this news. Therefore if we see a spate of such leading up to the election then we can draw pretty safe conclusions as to the choice of the establishment in this election.

Quote
Does that mean Trump is a "peace" or "anti-war" candidate. Of course not. It means merely that it's ridiculous and absurd to even imply that Hillary is less of a warmonger -- and less prone to start World War III -- than Trump is.

It's time for Hillary supporters to wake up and smell the Kool-Aid they've been drinking

Trump describes himself as 'more militaristic then anybody', he advocated firing on Russian planes for buzzing US ships in the Black Sea, he infamously wants to torture prisoners and kill their families. There isn't much I can see to choose between them on the warmonger front, except that Hillary, being exhausted by scandal and various other things, is less likely to get away with doing something insane than Trump with his mass movement behind him.

Increasing terror threats and attacks along with worsening economic news means the establishment want Trump; the reverse means Hillary. I strongly suspect the former but we will see.

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,995
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
I could spend hours and hours writing a twenty-page essay explaining why your Hillary-is-the-lesser-evil argument is not only false, but incredibly stupid and naive, but I've been posting online long enough to know when not to waste my time on someone whose mind is already made up, so I won't bother. We'll just have to agree to disagree and be done with it.

For the benefit of silent onlookers who have not already made up their minds to vote for a psychopathic war criminal and slogan-parroting whore of Wall Street mega-banks, I offer the following as food for thought:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton-war-goddess-corporate-shill-anti-populist/5463042

Hillary Clinton: War Goddess, Corporate Shill, Anti-Populist

By Stephen Lendman
Global Research
July 17, 2015



All US presidential cycles are money controlled corrupted processes with no legitimacy whatever. Voters have no say despite believing otherwise.

They naively think electing new bums replacing old ones improves things. Their choices are among an array of long ago bought and paid for candidates supporting what most harms them.


The late Gore Vidal said “(b)y the time a (candidate) gets to be presidential material, (he or she has) been bought ten times over.”

“There is only one party in the United States, the Property Party (with) two right wings: Republican and Democrat,” he explained.

Hillary Clinton perhaps represents the worst choice among an array of aspirants looking more like a police lineup. Previous articles explained her warmongering lust for endless conflicts. She’s unabashedly hawkish.

As first lady, she urged husband Bill to bomb Belgrade. Yugoslavia’s rape and pillage followed. As a New York senator, she supported Bush’s war on Afghanistan. As Secretary of State, she urged escalating it.

She backed lawless aggression on Iraq based entirely on Big Lies. Her supportive Senate remarks included baseless fabrications about Saddam “continu(ing) to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and (efforts) to keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.” She got the war she wanted.

She backed military intervention to topple Libya’s Gaddafi. She urged more extensive drone bombings. She promoted war to oust Syria’s Assad.

She favors nuclear weapons use. She calls them peacekeeping deterrents. She wants US-dominated NATO used more aggressively.

Ukrainian oligarch Victor Pinchuk contributed at least $8.6 million to the Clinton Global Initiative – involved in “moderniz(ing) Ukraine” to harden fascist rule.

She’s hostile to Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela and other independent countries.

She urges more heavily arming Kiev fascists than already for continued war on Donbass freedom fighters wanting democratic governance everyone deserves.

As first lady, New York senator and Secretary of State, she’s been ideologically hardline – pro-war, pro-business, anti-populist, anti-labor.

As presidential aspirant, she’s selling a different image. Whether enough people buy it to get her nominated and elected remains to be seen. It’s a long time to November 2016. A lot can happen between now and then to derail her outsized ambitions.

On June 13, she launched her campaign in New York – at Roosevelt Island’s Four Freedoms Park, wrapping her candidacy in FDR’s New Deal.

As first lady, she supported so-called welfare reform signed into law by husband Bill – gutting social safety net protection for families with dependent children established in the 1930s.

Her rhetoric belies her hardline agenda – the same one duopoly power in Washington espoused for decades, notably post-9/11.

Days earlier at the New School for Social Research in New York, she sounded more Republican than self-styled populist saying:
    “I want to be the small business president, and I mean it. And throughout this campaign I’m going to be talking about how we empower entrepreneurs with less red tape, easier access to capital, tax relief and simplification.”
Like Washington’s bipartisan criminal class, she favors stimulating economic growth by corporate tax cuts and other business friendly measures.

She has no program to address mass unemployment, underemployment or reduce poverty. Nothing to stop  continued offshoring of US jobs to low-wage countries. Nothing to help ordinary Americans most in need.

Monied interests can feel safe in her hands – her underlying message despite its pseudo-populist rhetoric. As president, socialism for the rich and powerful contrasted with neoliberal harshness for most others will be the centerpiece of her agenda – along with continued endless war of aggression for wealth and dominance.

She shamelessly calls corporate tax cuts, credits and other handouts “the best anti-poverty program” – creating the illusion they stimulate jobs creation. They don’t. They’re used for self-serving interests.

Clinton exclusively supports Wall Street, war profiteers and other corporate favorites at the expense of serving everyone equitably and fairly – wrapped in disingenuous pseudo-populist rhetoric, pure demagoguery masking her business as usual agenda.

[Continued...]
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,995
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton-destroy-syria-for-israel-the-best-way-to-help-israel/5515741

Hillary Clinton: Destroy Syria for Israel: “The Best Way to Help Israel”

By The New Observer
Global Research, March 22, 2016
The New Observer 20 March 2016



A newly-released Hilary Clinton email confirmed that the Obama administration has deliberately provoked the civil war in Syria as the “best way to help Israel.”

In an indication of her murderous and psychopathic nature, Clinton also wrote that it was the “right thing” to personally threaten Bashar Assad’s family with death.

In the email, released by Wikileaks, then Secretary of State Clinton says that the “best way to help Israel” is to “use force” in Syria to overthrow the government.

The document was one of many unclassified by the US Department of State under case number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the uproar over Clinton’s private email server kept at her house while she served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.

Although the Wikileaks transcript dates the email as December 31, 2000, this is an error on their part, as the contents of the email (in particular the reference to May 2012 talks between Iran and the west over its nuclear program in Istanbul) show that the email was in fact sent on December 31, 2012.

The email makes it clear that it has been US policy from the very beginning to violently overthrow the Syrian government—and specifically to do this because it is in Israel’s interests.

[Continued...]
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,995
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obamas-humanitarian-bombing-campaign-against-the-islamic-state-isis/5533098

Obama’s “Humanitarian” Bombing Campaign “Against” the Islamic State (ISIS)

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research
June 27, 2016



Almost 2 years ago, August 8, 2014, Obama launched a bombing campaign against Syria and Iraq, in defiance of international law.

The US Air Force with the support of a coalition of 19 countries has relentlessly waged an intensified air campaign against Syria and Iraq allegedly targeting  the Islamic State (ISIS) brigades.   

The counterterrorism operation was granted a humanitarian R2P mandate: at the outset, the bombing campaign was allegedly directed against the Islamic State mercenaries (ISIS) with a view to protecting the Yazidis of Northern Iraq.


Obama: A Pack of Lies

According to Obama, military action was needed to protect innocent civilians and prevent ISIS’ advance on Erbil, the capital of the Kurdish autonomous region.

In his Nationwide address on August 7, 2014, Obama also intimated the need to send in US ground troops:

    Good evening. Today I authorized two operations in Iraq — targeted airstrikes to protect our American personnel, and a humanitarian effort to help save thousands of Iraqi civilians who are trapped on a mountain without food and water and facing almost certain death. Let me explain the actions we’re taking and why…. We can act, carefully and responsibly, to prevent a potential act of genocide. That’s what we’re doing on that mountain.

    I’ve, therefore, authorized targeted airstrikes, if necessary, to help forces in Iraq as they fight to break the siege of Mount Sinjar and protect the civilians trapped there. …

    ….

    Earlier this week, one Iraqi in the area cried to the world, “There is no one coming to help.” Well today, America is coming to help. We’re also consulting with other countries — and the United Nations — who have called for action to address this humanitarian crisis.

US Sponsored Genocide.

The humanitarian pretext is bogus, the air strikes are illegal, extensive war crimes have been committed, Obama is not protecting civilians. The civilian deaths resulting from the air strikes are deliberate. And Obama says America is “responsibly preventing a potential act of genocide.

Washington is Providing Support to Al Qaeda entities which are Fighting the Syrian Government

The unspoken objective of the US-led coalition is to PROTECT the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL Daesh) and other Al Qaeda affiliated groups which in large part are responsible for the destruction and killings of civilians.  In this regard, DoD documents (excerpt below) confirm unequivocally the US mandate to support rather than fight Al Qaeda affiliated terrorists.

[Continued...]
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,995
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44354.htm

Hillary Clinton Is A Psychopath And A War Criminal

By Prof. Francis Boyle - Dialogos Radio Interview

MN: Joining us today on Dialogos Radio and the Dialogos Interview Series is international lawyer and professor of international law at The University of Illinois Dr. Francis Boyle. Boyle has served as legal counsel to the Palestinian Authority, to Hawaiian independence groups, and served on the legal team which led to the conviction of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney for war crimes. Professor Boyle, welcome to our program today.

March 02, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - FB: Well, thank you very much for having me on, and my best to all my friends in Greece. Great country, great people. I spent about two weeks traveling around in 1974, and another two weeks traveling around in 1982.

MN: Wonderful…well, let’s get started by talking about the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission and the case which led to the conviction of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Alberto Gonzalez and others in absentia for war crimes. Tell us about this commission, and about this case that you were a part of, and its aftermath.

FB: Well, there were two different proceedings. The first one was against Bush and Tony Blair, for their war of aggression and Nuremburg crime against peace against Iraq. I was part of the team that helped get a unanimous conviction there. And then, the second proceeding was against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Gonzalez, and several others, for torture and war crimes. Again, I was part of the team that helped get a unanimous conviction, both for torture and for war crimes. Those materials have been filed with the International Criminal Court, and I’m doing the best I can to follow up on my own, tracking these people and staying in touch with all the lawyers to see if we could get them apprehended.

Now, Bush was about to go to Switzerland, and a Swiss parliamentarian aware of my work demanded that the Swiss prosecutor-general apprehend and prosecute Bush for torture and war crimes, under the domestic implementation of legislation for the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. So when word got back to Bush, he didn’t go to Switzerland. So that’s the way I’m proceeding, and other international human rights experts—I’m not the only one out there, I know the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York is involved, I believe Amnesty International is involved, and there’s some other human rights lawyers I stay in contact with around the world—we’ll keep after these people the best we can.

MN: Now, let’s look more closely at the role of United States foreign policy, its military, and the role of NATO in the world today…almost eight years ago, President Obama came to office promising to shut down Guantanamo Bay, promising to right the wrongs of the Bush administration, but instead, we’ve seen Guantanamo remain open, we’ve seen U.S. military involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Middle East continue and, in fact, intensify, and we’ve seen the growth of military operations using unmanned drones, in Yemen and elsewhere. How does international law view the actions of the Obama administration and the United States today?

FB: Well, actually I wrote a book that comprehensively covered all the violations of international law, human rights, the laws of war, and United States constitutional law by the Bush Jr. administration, called “Tackling America’s Toughest Questions,” and in the conclusion—I wrote the conclusion three weeks after Obama was inaugurated—I said it looked like we very well might be getting a third Bush term, and that’s what we’ve got here, two more Bush terms under Obama. He’s pretty much continued the Bush policies, both abroad and here at home, compounding and continuing the Bush police state here in the United States. At some point I guess I’ll get around to writing a book on the Obama administration’s violations of international law, but in the meantime you can read my book on the Bush violations, “Tacking America’s Toughest Questions,” and he’s basically continued the same policies.

MN: We are on the air with international law expert Francis Boyle here on Dialogos Radio and the Dialogos Interview Series… Years ago, you had written about the plans of the United States, the European Union and NATO for the Ukraine and indeed for the world, with a stated goal of destroying specific states and listing seven countries that were slated to be taken over. What were those plans and have they come into fruition?

FB: Yes they have. In my book, “The Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence,” I have in there a statement by deputy secretary of defense Wolfowitz, made right after 9/11/2001, that the United States government was going to get into the business of destroying states, and I analyze that sentence. It’s genocidal. And then soon thereafter, NATO general Wesley Clark was in the Pentagon and he was told they had a list of seven Muslim states that they were going to destroy. Basically, they’ve all been taken out now except for Iran. They’ve destroyed Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, Lebanon has been pretty much paralyzed, and they lopped out South Sudan from Sudan. So that process continues, and now they’re moving towards the Ukraine and China. They’re moving towards Russia from the Ukraine, and also China. They’re moving directly to confront China.

MN: Is there, in your view, any political candidate, any political force in the United States at the present time that can put an end to this foreign policy and to the U.S. military machine overseas? For instance, there’s many progressives who have placed their hope in Bernie Sanders as the man to do this. Is this hope misguided, in your view?

FB: Well I’m not going to criticize Senator Sanders here, I’ve dealt with him personally, but everyone had the same hope about Obama during his campaign. Now, Obama was behind me at Harvard Law School, and he moved to the Hyde Park area in Chicago with the University of Chicago, where I was an undergraduate, so I had my own sources out there in Chicago, and they told me not to trust Obama, so I never have. And indeed, I didn’t vote for him two times in a row and I was not deluded by Obama, which is why I said, three weeks into his administration, in my book, “Tackling America’s Toughest Question,” it looked to me like we were going to get a third Bush term. You know, hope springs eternal. Maybe Bernie Sanders will actually do something, I don’t know.

Hillary Clinton is a psychopath and a war criminal, [who said] “we came, we saw, he died,” mimicking Julius Ceasar and laughing hysterically after Colonel Kaddafi, my former client, was sodomized with a knife and beaten to death. She’s a certified psychopath and war criminal.

[Continued...]
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Changeling

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
I could spend hours and hours writing a twenty-page essay explaining why your Hillary-is-the-lesser-evil argument is not only false, but incredibly stupid and naive, but I've been posting online long enough to know when not to waste my time on someone whose mind is already made up, so I won't bother. We'll just have to agree to disagree and be done with it.

For the benefit of silent onlookers who have not already made up their minds to vote for a psychopathic war criminal and slogan-parroting servant of Wall Street mega-banks, I offer the following as food for thought:

I'm sure the essay would be enormous, but ultimately not worth much since it is impossible to prove or disprove such an argument, even after the fact.

The 'silent onlookers' probably already know how bad Hillary is, and how bad Trump's stated intentions and proclivities are, and can make their own decision as to who would be in a position to do most harm in the presidency.

However, the establishment have also made that assessment, and we will soon find out what their decision is - increasing terror threats and attacks along with worsening economic news means they want Trump; the reverse means Hillary.

Offline Rex

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
I didn't listen to Tarpley last time around and I doubt that I will anytime in the near future.  He's now a Clintonista.  Screw him.  Maybe they blackmailed him.  An old hippy like him would have a few skeletons that the FBI/DOJ/NSA could exploit.

Ran across this.  Tarpley's pinup girl Sarah Silverman singing a song called "F***ing Matt Damon."  Apparently she went out with talk show host Jimmy Kimmel for years, then she went on his show and did this.  Pretty funny:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPaVSeR_lt0

If Damon really did bag that hag then maybe they're blackmailing him too.  That could account for his anti-gun stuff lately.

Blackmail seems to be the coin of the realm in Clintonland.

Offline Rex

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Just listened to Tarpley's show from last Friday, or a large part of it.  Skipped around after the first 15 minutes, still got anti-Trump, anti-Trump, anti-Trump.  Made me think more of a slobbering bulldog than a Chihuahua.  I noticed that he has some daily thing now, couldn't get it to activate.  Might be a paid subscription.

I wish Alex Jones would have Tarpley on his show as a guest.  He used to be on the show, and they got along well enough.  I wonder how the interaction would go now?  Jones is virulently pro-Trump and Tarpley is virulently anti-Trump.

I haven't listened to Jones for a few days, since I heard him say goddam, f**kin' and pissing in your face over the span of about five minutes.  While he said two times that he was a Christian.  I'm no prude, but c'mon.

Sad times in radioland.

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,995
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
Just listened to Tarpley's show from last Friday, or a large part of it.  Skipped around after the first 15 minutes, still got anti-Trump, anti-Trump, anti-Trump.

My problem isn't that he criticizes Trump, but that he's clearly holding Hillary to a much lower standard than he is Trump. As I've said before, it's gotten so ridiculous that Hillary could murder someone in cold blood, and Tarpley would go on an insult-spewing tirade about what a violent extremist Trump is.

Quote
I wish Alex Jones would have Tarpley on his show as a guest.  He used to be on the show, and they got along well enough.

In 2009 they did, but Tarpley's last appearance on Alex's show in November 2012 didn't go well at all. Tarpley became so disgusted with how obnoxious and confrontational Alex was being that he ended the interview early:

       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SU4EbHvG7o0

Quote
I wonder how the interaction would go now?

Even worse than the last one did. It would be one mid-sentence interruption after another after another, and lots of shouting. It would generate all heat and no light, and therefore waste everyone's time.

Elections like this have a tendency to bring out the worst in people.
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Rex

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Posted on Tarpley's website:

"Clinton’s Efforts to Detach Centrist Republicans from Trump After Takeover of GOP by Breitbart and Alt-Right Extremists Can Defeat Republicans this Year, but Will Also Set the Stage for Splitting the Bloated Democrats in 2017..."

I was curious, so I downloaded this week's show and skipped around.  Tarpley seems clueless on this Alt-Right thing.  HE is a member of the Alt-right.  Basically, it's Hillary Clinton's enemies list, and anyone who objects to the juggernaut of big government.  And Tarpley hasn't been a friend to government in the past:





Anyway, Tarpley says we need to elect as many Democrats as possible this time around, I guess so they can have enough rope to hang themselves in the next election.

A little over a year ago, before the onset of her mad cow disease or whatever she has, Hillary Clinton joked about Fun Camps:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnqTCah_03g

A concentration camp by any other name.  I don't know why Tarpley is flatulating support for Clinton, but he should know that he can't curry favor with that demon.  He's on his way to a Fun Camp sure as sunrise if she moves her oxygen tent into the white house.

Offline Changeling

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Just listened to Tarpley's show from last Friday, or a large part of it.  Skipped around after the first 15 minutes, still got anti-Trump, anti-Trump, anti-Trump.  Made me think more of a slobbering bulldog than a Chihuahua.  I noticed that he has some daily thing now, couldn't get it to activate.  Might be a paid subscription.

I wish Alex Jones would have Tarpley on his show as a guest.  He used to be on the show, and they got along well enough.  I wonder how the interaction would go now?  Jones is virulently pro-Trump and Tarpley is virulently anti-Trump.

I haven't listened to Jones for a few days, since I heard him say goddam, f**kin' and pissing in your face over the span of about five minutes.  While he said two times that he was a Christian.  I'm no prude, but c'mon.

Sad times in radioland.

Tarpley has a new daily briefing audio for a paid sub of $7.99 monthly or $20 if you want to make an extra contribution. It was a good move imo, since I wouldn't be surprised if Jones was planning to kick Tarpley off GCN, in which case he would be better placed if his own network was already well established.

I would like to see Tarpley back on the Jones show, but I doubt he would do it unless there was allocated time for him to speak without interruption. Jones is a hopeless interviewer unless he agrees with everything the guest is saying, and even then he interrupts constantly to 'back them up', it's very painful to listen to.

The fact that we need to understand about Tarpley vis a vis this election, after which other facts are classified, is that he sees trump as the ultimate calamity which must be avoided at all costs.

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,995
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
Posted on Tarpley's website:

"Clinton’s Efforts to Detach Centrist Republicans from Trump After Takeover of GOP by Breitbart and Alt-Right Extremists Can Defeat Republicans this Year, but Will Also Set the Stage for Splitting the Bloated Democrats in 2017..."

I was curious, so I downloaded this week's show and skipped around.  Tarpley seems clueless on this Alt-Right thing. HE is a member of the Alt-right.

I don't know how you managed to draw that conclusion, because all Tarpley does is attack and vilify the so-called Alt-Right.

Quote
Basically, it's Hillary Clinton's enemies list, and anyone who objects to the juggernaut of big government.  And Tarpley hasn't been a friend to government in the past:

Again, this is simply false. It's true that Tarpley (to his credit) has always been a 9/11 truther, and that he tried desperately for most of 2008 to warn anti-Bush liberals and progressives about Obama being both a warmonger and puppet of Wall Street. But it hardly follows from either of those facts that he's not a friend of big government.

Can you name one federal agency -- e.g., the Department of "Education," the Department of Homeland "Security," the DEA, the BATFE, the CIA, FEMA, etc. -- that Tarpley has ever advocated the abolition of?

Can you name one tax he's ever called for eliminating or at least significantly reducing?
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Rex

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Tarpley pushed the MIHOP and LIHOP theories of 9/11.  The govt either Made It Happen On Purpose or Let It Happen On Purpose.  He said the government did that.  Killed 3000 Americans.  That's about as anti-government as you can get.  I believe he even coined those acronyms.

It's true he's a hopeless believer in the bureaucracy of the federal government, but the fact remains that he said the government murdered Americans in a false flag event.  Which makes him a member of the Alt-right.  Those whackos who say the government does false flag events.

And Tarpley has met very few federal bureaucracies he dislikes.  He loves the idea of big government.  He's still fighting the Civil War in his mind, wanting to push more and more carpetbagging rules and regulations on America.  And now Trump comes along and threatens to abolish bureaucracies, so the collectivists like Tarpley oppose him.

Offline Changeling

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Tarpley pushed the MIHOP and LIHOP theories of 9/11.  The govt either Made It Happen On Purpose or Let It Happen On Purpose.  He said the government did that.  Killed 3000 Americans.  That's about as anti-government as you can get.  I believe he even coined those acronyms.

It's true he's a hopeless believer in the bureaucracy of the federal government, but the fact remains that he said the government murdered Americans in a false flag event.  Which makes him a member of the Alt-right.  Those whackos who say the government does false flag events.

And Tarpley has met very few federal bureaucracies he dislikes.  He loves the idea of big government.  He's still fighting the Civil War in his mind, wanting to push more and more carpetbagging rules and regulations on America.  And now Trump comes along and threatens to abolish bureaucracies, so the collectivists like Tarpley oppose him.

That doesn't follow - after all the 'alt-right' are not the only 'wackos' who have conspiracy theories. Tarpley might share some common ground with the alt-right in some of these areas, but on most core issues, like economic and social policy, they are poles apart. So if anything, Tarpley would be alt-left.

Offline Rex

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
You can't apply traditional right-wing / left-wing thinking to the new alt-right designation.  If you read the various definitions of alt-right you see that "anarchists" are members of the group, according to some.  I've never met a conservative anarchist in my life.  Anarchists are far-left.  Political and economic beliefs have nothing to do with the alt-right designation.

Alt-right is nebulous, intentionally so.  And it is a work in progress.  It will become the next al qeada, which changed into ISIS or ISIL or IS or...where'd that group go?  And ANYONE could be a member of alt-right.  For Hillary Clinton the group consists of her opposition--Republican and right-wing types.  For Republicans it will come to mean something else.

The ultimate determination will be whether you're opposed to federalized government.  If you challenge the power structure in any way, then you'll be alt-right.  Cops will get a call to deal with an alt-right disturbance, and they'll go in picturing the KKK or Black Lives Matter or home schoolers...whatever they've been brainwashed to think.  We are witnessing the creation, from scratch, of a new bogeyman organization.

Offline CaptBebops

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 722
Who made up this alt-right thing?  Was it the Clinton campaign?  Someone claims that Pat Buchanan said something like it in 2009.  Sounds like a keyboard command or a USENET newsgroup.   What Alex claims Infowars is about is "alternative media" in contra distinction to the mainstream corporate run media.  And the term "alternative media" has been around for awhile.