PrisonPlanet Forum
May 18, 2013, 11:19:22 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Vatican's Holocaust  (Read 23169 times)
catholicportugalian
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,128


Isabel la Catolica


WWW
« Reply #80 on: January 16, 2009, 04:46:05 PM »

The Reichskonkordat helped the Nazi party immensely. The Catholic Church recognized the legitimacy of the Dictatorship and swore allegiance to it. After the Centre Party voted with the swing vote to institute that Dictatorship.

Even though the Party wasn't strictly sanctioned by the Church it was Catholic and at the time of the vote on the Enabling Act it was lead by a Catholic Priest Ludwig Kaas. Heinrich Brüning was the Chancellor preceding Hitler and he was a Member of the Centre Party. Kaas was advisor to Pius XII when he was Nuncio of Bavaria years before his coronation. He also wrote part of the Lateran Accord with Italy, and was heavily involved with the drawing up of the Reichskonkordat.

Here's what Kaas had to say on the Enabling Act,

Here's what Brüning had to say,

I'm not trying to say they weren't in a hard position, but rolling over and playing dead isn't the way. If you trade liberty for security you deserve neither. And that's exactly what they did.

Read these wiki articles. They will give you a better understanding of the political situation in late '20's early '30's Germany. Which is mirrored in the present situation today. The Reichstag Fire Decree and the Enabling Act are very similar to our present Patriot Act I and II. Similar rhetoric, similar legislation, similar result. We are very close to a Nazi style dictatorship here in the US. The camps are built, the police are being militarized, and dissidents are being intimidated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_Fire_Decree
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_Act
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleichschaltung
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Centre_Party
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Kaas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Br%C3%BCning

no the Catholic church did not swear allegiance to it.  The Bishops of Germany took an oath of loyalty to the constitution of Germany, not to the Nazis.

I don't trust wiki to be the most accurate authority on history.   Here is a great book that you can read online.  "The Myth of Hitler's Pope"  by Rabbi Joseph Dalin.

http://books.google.com/books?id=qAmKnonoAB0C&dq=Pius+XII+spoke+against+new+world+order&pg=PP1&ots=zzhs66WoK-&source=citation&sig=MoxtaePHO7qSuXijxGnxMzafBko&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=12&ct=result#PPP1,M1
Logged

My daughter, I see more Pharisees among Christians than there were around Pilate. -- St. Margaret of Cortona

You cannot please both God and the world at the same time, They are utterly opposed to each other in their thoughts, their desires, and their actions. -- St. John Vianney
Orgetorix
Guest
« Reply #81 on: January 16, 2009, 10:03:57 PM »

no the Catholic church did not swear allegiance to it.  The Bishops of Germany took an oath of loyalty to the constitution of Germany, not to the Nazis.

And who completely controlled that constitution? Who had the power to amend that constitution at any point, at any time, with out a vote? Who had a virtual monopoly on every facet of that government? The Nazis.

So you can quibble about technicalities all day long, but it doesn't change the facts. And I'm being fair here. The Pope wasn't Hitlers pet. But the Catholic Church was complacent in the face of clear and present danger.

Here's 5 points. I'd like to hear your response.

   1. Can you offer evidence that the pope and/or bishops of the Nazi countries ever excommunicated or even refused the sacraments to Adolf Hitler or any of the many other high-ranking Catholics in the Nazi leadership?
   
   2. Can you explain why the Vatican was one of the very first independent political entities to recognize Hitler's government, and why it was in such a rush to make its unwise "Reich Concordat" with Hitler, six months after he was in office, thereby giving it unwarranted moral legitimacy in the eyes of the rest of the world?
   
   3. Can you offer evidence that Pope Pius XI or XII ever put the Nazi Bible "Mein Kampf" on the Index of Forbidden Books?  (Instead, it was allowed to compete throughout the Hitler years with the Bible, as the best selling book in Germany.)
   
   4. Can you explain why the Church never repudiated the Reichskonkordat, once it became clear that it had "made a pact with the devil"?
   
5. Can you explain why the Church in Germany never recognized that the substantial subsidies that it received from the Nazi government in support of its schools and even its churches, was a form of bribery which made it very difficult, if not impossible, for the church to "bite the hand that was feeding it"?

Oh and I read a chapter in that book "The Myth of Hitlers Pope". He's wrong on so many levels about the Reichskonkordat. He mentions the Centre Party but doesn't mention the Enabling Act and fails to clearly describe why the Party dissolved. Basically he just minimizes the Party entirely. Then I went and looked up that Rabbi's bio. And he teaches at the Catholic, Ave Maria University.  So he's a little to tainted for me.
Logged
catholicportugalian
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,128


Isabel la Catolica


WWW
« Reply #82 on: January 16, 2009, 10:40:32 PM »

And who completely controlled that constitution? Who had the power to amend that constitution at any point, at any time, with out a vote? Who had a virtual monopoly on every facet of that government? The Nazis.

So you can quibble about technicalities all day long, but it doesn't change the facts. And I'm being fair here. The Pope wasn't Hitlers pet. But the Catholic Church was complacent in the face of clear and present danger.
It isn't like the Catholic church had any military defense in the face of clear and present danger.  The Catholic church was in a very difficult position at the time and had to consider its faithful throughout the world in all decisions.
Here's 5 points. I'd like to hear your response.

   1. Can you offer evidence that the pope and/or bishops of the Nazi countries ever excommunicated or even refused the sacraments to Adolf Hitler or any of the many other high-ranking Catholics in the Nazi leadership?
   it was wise not to.  When Henry the VII and Elizabeth I were excommunicated, they took revenge by going on a bloody massacre killing thousands of Catholics.
   2. Can you explain why the Vatican was one of the very first independent political entities to recognize Hitler's government, and why it was in such a rush to make its unwise "Reich Concordat" with Hitler, six months after he was in office, thereby giving it unwarranted moral legitimacy in the eyes of the rest of the world?
   the Catholic church wasn't the only one to sign the concordat.  It was to give the Vatican neutrality.  And perhaps it wasn't the Catholic church that was in a rush.  Pius XII was very uneasy about signing it but felt he had no choice.
   3. Can you offer evidence that Pope Pius XI or XII ever put the Nazi Bible "Mein Kampf" on the Index of Forbidden Books?  (Instead, it was allowed to compete throughout the Hitler years with the Bible, as the best selling book in Germany.) I am certain a good number of Catholic priests and bishops spoke from the pulpit to their faithful advising that they do not purchase or read the book.  Again to do this would be asking for trouble from Hitler.  To put Mein Kampf on the banned books list could create unintended consequences.  The faithful ought to know that it would not be approved reading.
   
   4. Can you explain why the Church never repudiated the Reichskonkordat, once it became clear that it had "made a pact with the devil"?
   because lives were at risk here.  The church had to be very careful so as not to lose it's state and it's ability to protect those who needed protection.  860,000 Jews were saved as a result of it.
5. Can you explain why the Church in Germany never recognized that the substantial subsidies that it received from the Nazi government in support of its schools and even its churches, was a form of bribery which made it very difficult, if not impossible, for the church to "bite the hand that was feeding it"?
I don't know anything about this.  Will have to look into it.  But I can see why Germany would do such a thing.  Most of its population was Catholic and therefore Hitler seemed to be doing his best to win over Germans.
Oh and I read a chapter in that book "The Myth of Hitlers Pope". He's wrong on so many levels about the Reichskonkordat. He mentions the Centre Party but doesn't mention the Enabling Act and fails to clearly describe why the Party dissolved. Basically he just minimizes the Party entirely. Then I went and looked up that Rabbi's bio. And he teaches at the Catholic, Ave Maria University.  So he's a little to tainted for me.
  How about Albert Einstein?  Or the Chief Rabbi of Rome at the time of the war?  Or the countless thousands of Jews who praised Pius XII after the war was over for his great effort on their behalf?  Read the rest of the book.
Logged

My daughter, I see more Pharisees among Christians than there were around Pilate. -- St. Margaret of Cortona

You cannot please both God and the world at the same time, They are utterly opposed to each other in their thoughts, their desires, and their actions. -- St. John Vianney
Orgetorix
Guest
« Reply #83 on: January 17, 2009, 08:17:21 AM »

In response to most of your responses. Lets see what the bible has to say on the subject of going along with the plans of Satan because of the danger to life and limb.

Quote
Matthew 10:26-40

26 Therefore fear them not. For nothing is covered that shall not be revealed: nor hid, that shall not be known. 27 That which I tell you in the dark, speak ye in the light: and that which you hear in the ear, preach ye upon the housetops. 28 And fear ye not them that kill the body, and are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him that can destroy both soul and body in hell. 29 Are not two sparrows sold for a farthing? and not one of them shall fall on the ground without your Father. 30 But the very hairs of your head are all numbered.

31 Fear not therefore: better are you than many sparrows. 32 Every one therefore that shall confess me before men, I will also confess him before my Father who is in heaven. 33 But he that shall deny me before men, I will also deny him before my Father who is in heaven. 34 Do not think that I came to send peace upon earth: I came not to send peace, but the sword. 35 For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

35 "I came to set a man at variance"... Not that this was the end or design of the coming of our Saviour; but that his coming and his doctrine would have this effect, by reason of the obstinate resistance that many would make, and of their persecuting all such as should adhere to him.

36 And as a man's enemies shall be they of his own household. 37 He that loveth father or mother more than me, is not worthy of me; and he that loveth son or daughter more than me, is not worthy of me. 38 And he that taketh not up his cross, and followeth me, is not worthy of me. 39 He that findeth his life, shall lose it: and he that shall lose his life for me, shall find it. 40 He that receiveth you, receiveth me: and he that receiveth me, receiveth him that sent me.

Your arguments are false in light of the scripture, and just highlights the fact again that the Catholic Church is a political organization first and foremost. Who's leaders neither read the bible nor follow it.

And please quit quoting Einstein. He left Germany in '33 and lived in the US for the entire war. Anything he comments on pertaining to Nazi Atrocities will be hearsay at best.

And on the subject of the Chief Rabbi Israel Zolli,

Quote
Zoller (Zolli), Israel (1881-1956), rabbi and apostate.  Born in Brody, Galicia, Zoller spent a great part of his life in Italy.  He was chief rabbi of Trieste after World War I, professor of Hebrew at the University of Padua from 1927 to 1938, and, from 1939, chief rabbi of Rome.  At the beginning of September 1943, when the Germans entered Rome, he abandoned the community and took refuge in the Vatican.  At the end of the hostilities he reappeared to assume his position as rabbi, but was rejected by the community because of his unworthy behavior at the time of the greatest danger.  On February 14, 1945, he converted to Catholicism, taking the name of Eugenio Maria (in homage to Pope Pius XII) and returned to the Vatican.- L.I.  Newman, A “Chief Rabbi” of Rome Becomes a Catholic (1945).

And you keep trying to move your arguments to a later period in the war. I'm looking at the early years when the Church had a chance to stop all of WWII and abrogated their responsibility to follow the teachings of God for mere physical and economic security. 

I'll ask you this question again, and please answer it. When they come to brand you and your husband and your children with the Mark of the Beast. Saying to you that if you don't accept this mark you will not be able to buy or sell. That you will be executed for defiance if you do not take the mark. Will you accept it because you will live if you do?
Logged
Puff1
Guest
« Reply #84 on: January 17, 2009, 08:43:01 AM »

Quote
Posted by: Orgetorix
I'm looking at the early years when the Church had a chance to stop all of WWII and abrogated their responsibility to follow the teachings of God for mere physical and economic security. 
 

Hi Orgetorix, the legacy of the RCC's involvement with Nazi Germany was not resistance, but cooperation; and not the defense of principle, but the defense of social power.
Logged
catholicportugalian
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,128


Isabel la Catolica


WWW
« Reply #85 on: January 17, 2009, 10:47:34 AM »

In response to most of your responses. Lets see what the bible has to say on the subject of going along with the plans of Satan because of the danger to life and limb.

Your arguments are false in light of the scripture, and just highlights the fact again that the Catholic Church is a political organization first and foremost. Who's leaders neither read the bible nor follow it.

And please quit quoting Einstein. He left Germany in '33 and lived in the US for the entire war. Anything he comments on pertaining to Nazi Atrocities will be hearsay at best.

And on the subject of the Chief Rabbi Israel Zolli,

And you keep trying to move your arguments to a later period in the war. I'm looking at the early years when the Church had a chance to stop all of WWII and abrogated their responsibility to follow the teachings of God for mere physical and economic security. 

I'll ask you this question again, and please answer it. When they come to brand you and your husband and your children with the Mark of the Beast. Saying to you that if you don't accept this mark you will not be able to buy or sell. That you will be executed for defiance if you do not take the mark. Will you accept it because you will live if you do?

signing an oath of loyalty to a country's constitution is not exactly going along with the plans of Satan.

And how exactly could the church have the power to stop WWII?  They are not a military force.  What about the countries that made Germany sign the treaty of Versailles and then turned a blind eye to what Germany was doing?  Why put all the blame for WWII on the Catholic church here?  Just because they signed a concordat.

I pray that God will give me the courage to refuse that mark.  I would rather be executed.  But that is very different from signing a concordat that did not leave the church agreeing to anything evil, only agreeing that the bishops of Germany would follow the constitution of Germany.  If the concordat said that the church must Hail Hitler and so forth, then it would have been impossible for the church to sign it.  A great man to study is St. Thomas More.  He said we must not go looking to become martyrs.  We must do everything that we can without our moral abilities to keep ourselves alive and our families.  Until the time comes when it is impossible to refuse martyrdom, we are obligated to refuse.  That is why until the moment he was sentenced to death he never spoke once about the marriage of Henry VIII or why he refused to sign the recognition of Henry VIII as supreme head of the church of England.  He remained silent.  That bought him time to get his family at least to safety.  He in the end did lose his head for his silence.  The actions of the church saved hundreds of thousands of lives.  At the same time 10 million Catholics were killed in WWII.  Pius XI and Pius XII spoke out against Nazism and Socialism and Communism and so forth numerous times from the beginning of the Nazi party.  That cost them an number of lives as it enraged Hitler and he punished many Catholics for it.
Logged

My daughter, I see more Pharisees among Christians than there were around Pilate. -- St. Margaret of Cortona

You cannot please both God and the world at the same time, They are utterly opposed to each other in their thoughts, their desires, and their actions. -- St. John Vianney
Orgetorix
Guest
« Reply #86 on: January 17, 2009, 12:08:18 PM »

Hi Orgetorix, the legacy of the RCC's involvement with Nazi Germany was not resistance, but cooperation; and not the defense of principle, but the defense of social power.

To be fair there was some resistance, but when the true test came they failed to determinedly defend their principles. Instead they rolled over and legitimized the Nazi Regime.
Logged
Puff1
Guest
« Reply #87 on: January 17, 2009, 12:15:08 PM »

To be fair there was some resistance, but when the true test came they failed to determinedly defend their principles. Instead they rolled over and legitimized the Nazi Regime.

There was resistance, but primarily because of individual effort.  From 1,000 to 2,000 Roman Catholic clergy also died in the Holocaust.  As an institution though, they were complicant with the nazis. 
Logged
Orgetorix
Guest
« Reply #88 on: January 17, 2009, 12:48:14 PM »

signing an oath of loyalty to a country's constitution is not exactly going along with the plans of Satan.

So signing an oath of loyalty to a constitution that is controlled by Hitler(Satan), isn't going along with the program? Sorry but I see that as intellectually dishonest. I couldn't swear allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. I know who runs this country and it isn't the people.

Quote
And how exactly could the church have the power to stop WWII?  They are not a military force.  What about the countries that made Germany sign the treaty of Versailles and then turned a blind eye to what Germany was doing?  Why put all the blame for WWII on the Catholic church here?  Just because they signed a concordat.

This gets back to your argument that the Church is the "Good Guys". I showed you how the Church was complicent in the rise of power of the Nazis by political inaction in the face of clear and present danger. This wasn't a strictly military action in early '30's Germany. But a war of political ideology's. By publicly denouncing the National Socialists, and marshaling the third of the population who was Catholic. They could have had a great effect. Hitler didn't pull his anti-Semite rhetoric out of no where. Read Mein-Kampf. It's clear what he was all about, all along if you had eyes to see and ears to hear.

As to the allied powers turning a blind eye. Can we say Zionism? All countries in WWII were either outright controlled or influenced. You're trying to say that the Catholic Church wasn't influenced or controlled until after 1958. All I'm trying to do is show you where the Church was influenced far earlier than that. Where in many respects their policies are self-serving, and not God-serving.

No one can argue that the 20th Century wasn't Satan Century. It was nothing but a series of Satanic Sacrifices from the beginning to end. Which have continued into this century. 1.5 million dead Iraqi's testify to that. All nations are influenced, all organizations are influenced. So when you say the Church are the Good Guys. Just remember that this is Satan's world until the second coming when the true kingdom is reestablished.

Quote
I pray that God will give me the courage to refuse that mark.  I would rather be executed. But that is very different from signing a concordat that did not leave the church agreeing to anything evil, only agreeing that the bishops of Germany would follow the constitution of Germany. If the concordat said that the church must Hail Hitler and so forth, then it would have been impossible for the church to sign it.

And so do I pray that I will have the fortitude to give my life for what I know is right. But it is not so different, when you swear allegiance to a constitution that by the Enabling Act was personified by Hitler. Then you are swearing allegiance to Hitler. And when those Bishops swore that oath. That's exactly what they were doing was Hailing Hitler. Look at the pictures in this thread of Catholic Bishops giving the Nazi Salute. "Seig Hail"!!! Do you say those pictures are faked? They clearly show the Bishops rolling into the fold.

Quote
A great man to study is St. Thomas More.  He said we must not go looking to become martyrs.  We must do everything that we can without our moral abilities to keep ourselves alive and our families.  Until the time comes when it is impossible to refuse martyrdom, we are obligated to refuse.  That is why until the moment he was sentenced to death he never spoke once about the marriage of Henry VIII or why he refused to sign the recognition of Henry VIII as supreme head of the church of England.  He remained silent.  That bought him time to get his family at least to safety.  He in the end did lose his head for his silence.

It's not seeking Martyrdom. It's doing what you know is right despite the cost. Read Matthew 10:36-39 again. Understand what you must do no matter the cost. Even if it means your life or those of your family.
 
Quote
The actions of the church saved hundreds of thousands of lives.  At the same time 10 million Catholics were killed in WWII.  Pius XI and Pius XII spoke out against Nazism and Socialism and Communism and so forth numerous times from the beginning of the Nazi party.  That cost them an number of lives as it enraged Hitler and he punished many Catholics for it.

Show me the quotes where they publicly decried Nazism and Hitler in the early '30's. And yes the Church saved Jewish lives after the fact. Instead of saving 6 million they saved at most 860,000. So for everyone they saved 7 died. Pretty bad odds especially when you add into the equation all the civilians and soldiers who died that weren't Jewish. At least they did something to remedy their error and unfaithfulness to God. Better then doing nothing at all.
Logged
catholicportugalian
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,128


Isabel la Catolica


WWW
« Reply #89 on: January 17, 2009, 01:06:37 PM »

How Pius XII Protected Jews

By Jimmy Akin
http://www.catholic.com/library/HOW_Pius_XII_PROTECTED_JEWS.asp
The twentieth century was marked by genocides on an monstrous scale. One of the most terrible was the Holocaust wrought by Nazi Germany, which killed an estimated six million European Jews and almost as many other victims.

During this dark time, the Catholic Church was shepherded by Pope Pius XII, who proved himself an untiring foe of the Nazis, determined to save as many Jewish lives as he could. Yet today Pius XII gets almost no credit for his actions before or during the war.

Anti-Catholic author Dave Hunt writes, "The Vatican had no excuse for its Nazi partnership or for its continued commendation of Hitler on the one hand and its thunderous silence regarding the Jewish question on the other hand. . . . [The popes] continued in the alliance with Hitler until the end of the war, reaping hundreds of millions of dollars in payments from the Nazi government to the Vatican."[1]

Jack Chick, infamous for his anti-Catholic comic books, tells us in Smokescreens, "When World War II ended, the Vatican had egg all over its face. Pope Pius XII, after building the Nazi war machine, saw Hitler losing his battle against Russia, and he immediately jumped to the other side when he saw the handwriting on the wall. . . . Pope Pius XII should have stood before the judges in Nuremberg. His war crimes were worthy of death."[2]

One is tempted simply to dismiss these accusations, so wildly out of touch with reality, as the deluded ravings of persons with no sense of historical truth. This would underestimate the power of such erroneous charges to influence people: Many take these writers at their word.

Stepping out of the nightmare fantasyland of Hunt and Chick and back into sunlight of the real world, we discover that, not only was Pius XII no friend of the Nazis, but that his opposition to them began years before the War, before he was elected to the papacy, when he was still Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli, the Vatican Secretary of State.

On April 28, 1935, four years before the War even started, Pacelli gave a speech that aroused the attention of the world press. Speaking to an audience of 250,000 pilgrims in Lourdes, France, the future Pius XII stated that the Nazis "are in reality only miserable plagiarists who dress up old errors with new tinsel. It does not make any difference whether they flock to the banners of social revolution, whether they are guided by a false concept of the world and of life, or whether they are possessed by the superstition of a race and blood cult."[3] It was talks like this, in addition to private remarks and numerous notes of protest that Pacelli sent to Berlin in his capacity as Vatican Secretary of State, that earned him a reputation as an enemy of the Nazi party.

The Germans were likewise displeased with the reigning pontiff, Pius XI, who showed himself to be a unrelenting opponent of the new German "ideals"—even writing an entire encyclical, Mit Brennender Sorge (1937), to condemn them. When Pius XI died in 1939, the Nazis abhorred the prospect that Pacelli might be elected his successor.

Dr. Joseph Lichten, a Polish Jew who served as a diplomat and later an official of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, writes: "Pacelli had obviously established his position clearly, for the Fascist governments of both Italy and Germany spoke out vigorously against the possibility of his election to succeed Pius XI in March of 1939, though the cardinal secretary of state had served as papal nuncio in Germany from 1917 to 1929. . . . The day after his election, the Berlin Morgenpost said: ‘The election of cardinal Pacelli is not accepted with favor in Germany because he was always opposed to Nazism and practically determined the policies of the Vatican under his predecessor.’ "[4]

Former Israeli diplomat and now Orthodox Jewish Rabbi Pinchas Lapide states that Pius XI "had good reason to make Pacelli the architect of his anti-Nazi policy. Of the forty-four speeches which the Nuncio Pacelli had made on German soil between 1917 and 1929, at least forty contained attacks on Nazism or condemnations of Hitler’s doctrines. . . . Pacelli, who never met the Führer, called it ‘neo-Paganism.’ "[5]

A few weeks after Pacelli was elected pope, the German Reich’s Chief Security Service issued a then-secret report on the new Pope. Rabbi Lapide provides an excerpt:

"Pacelli has already made himself prominent by his attacks on National Socialism during his tenure as Cardinal Secretary of State, a fact which earned him the hearty approval of the Democratic States during the papal elections. . . . How much Pacelli is celebrated as an ally of the Democracies is especially emphasized in the French Press."[6]

Unfortunately, joy in the election of a strong pope who would continue Pius XI’s defiance of the Nazis was darkened by the ominous political developments in Europe. War finally came on September 1, 1939, when German troops overran Poland. Two days later Britain and France declared war on Germany.

Early in 1940, Hitler made an attempt to prevent the new Pope from maintaining the anti-Nazi stance he had taken before his election. He sent his underling, Joachim von Ribbentrop, to try to dissuade Pius XII from following his predecessor’s policies. "Von Ribbentrop, granted a formal audience on March 11, 1940, went into a lengthy harangue on the invincibility of the Third Reich, the inevitability of a Nazi victory, and the futility of papal alignment with the enemies of the Führer. Pius XII heard von Ribbentrop out politely and impassively. Then he opened an enormous ledger on his desk and, in his perfect German, began to recite a catalogue of the persecutions inflicted by the Third Reich in Poland, listing the date, place, and precise details of each crime. The audience was terminated; the Pope’s position was clearly unshakable."[7]

The Pope secretly worked to save as many Jewish lives as possible from the Nazis, whose extermination campaign began its most intense phase only after the War had started. It is here that the anti-Catholics try to make their hay: Pius XII is charged either with cowardly silence or with outright support of the Nazi extermination of millions of Jews.

Much of the impetus to smear the Vatican regarding World War II came, appropriately enough, from a work of fiction—a stage play called The Deputy, written after the War by a little-known German Protestant playwright named Rolf Hochhuth.

The play appeared in 1963, and it painted a portrait of a pope too timid to speak out publicly against the Nazis. Ironically, even Hochhuth admitted that Pius XII was materially very active in support of the Jews. Historian Robert Graham explains: "Playwright Rolf Hochhuth criticized the Pontiff for his (alleged) silence, but even he admitted that, on the level of action, Pius XII generously aided the Jews to the best of his ability. Today, after a quarter-century of the arbitrary and one-sided presentation offered the public, the word ‘silence’ has taken on a much wider connotation. It stands also for ‘indifference,’ ‘apathy,’ ‘inaction,’ and, implicitly, for anti-Semitism."[8]

Hochhuth’s fictional image of a silent (though active) pope has been transformed by the anti-Catholic rumor mill into the image of a silent and inactive pope—and by some even into an actively pro-Nazi monster. If there were any truth to the charge that Pius XII was silent, the silence would not have been out of moral cowardice in the face of the Nazis, but because the Pope was waging a subversive, clandestine war against them in an attempt to save Jews.

"The need to refrain from provocative public statements at such delicate moments was fully recognized in Jewish circles. It was in fact the basic rule of all those agencies in wartime Europe who keenly felt the duty to do all that was possible for the victims of Nazi atrocities and in particular for the Jews in proximate danger of deportation to ‘an unknown destination.’ "[9] The negative consequences of speaking out strongly were only too well known.

"In one tragic instance, the Archbishop of Utrecht was warned by the Nazis not to protest the deportation of Dutch Jews. He spoke out anyway and in retaliation the Catholic Jews of Holland were sent to their death. One of them was the Carmelite philosopher, Edith Stein."[10]

While the armchair quarterbacks of anti-Catholic circles may have wished the Pope to issue, in Axis territory and during wartime, ringing, propagandistic statements against the Nazis, the Pope realized that such was not an option if he were actually to save Jewish lives rather than simply mug for the cameras.

The desire to keep a low profile was expressed by the people Pius XII helped. A Jewish couple from Berlin who had been held in concentration camps but escaped to Spain with the help of Pius XII, stated: "None of us wanted the Pope to take an open stand. We were all fugitives, and fugitives do not wish to be pointed at. The Gestapo would have become more excited and would have intensified its inquisitions. If the Pope had protested, Rome would have become the center of attention. It was better that the Pope said nothing. We all shared this opinion at the time, and this is still our conviction today."[11]

While the U.S., Great Britain, and other countries often refused to allow Jewish refugees to immigrate during the war, the Vatican was issuing tens of thousands of false documents to allow Jews to pass secretly as Christians so they could escape the Nazis. What is more, the financial aid Pius XII helped provide the Jews was very real. Lichten, Lapide, and other Jewish chroniclers record those funds as being in the millions of dollars—dollars even more valuable then than they are now.

In late 1943, Mussolini, who had been at odds with the papacy all through his tenure, was removed from power by the Italians, but Hitler, fearing Italy would negotiate a separate peace with the Allies, invaded, took control, and set up Mussolini again as a puppet ruler. It was in this hour, when the Jews of Rome themselves were threatened—those whom the Pope had the most direct ability to help—that Pius XII really showed his mettle.

Joseph Lichten records that on September 27, 1943, one of the Nazi commanders demanded of the Jewish community in Rome payment of one hundred pounds of gold within thirty-six hours or three hundred Jews would be taken prisoner. When the Jewish Community Council was only able to gather only seventy pounds of gold, they turned to the Vatican.

"In his memoirs, the then Chief Rabbi Zolli of Rome writes that he was sent to the Vatican, where arrangements had already been made to receive him as an ‘engineer’ called to survey a construction problem so that the Gestapo on watch at the Vatican would not bar his entry. He was met by the Vatican treasurer and secretary of state, who told him that the Holy Father himself had given orders for the deficit to be filled with gold vessels taken from the Treasury."[12]

Pius XII also took a public stance concerning the Jews of Italy: "The Pope spoke out strongly in their defense with the first mass arrests of Jews in 1943, and L’Osservatore Romano carried an article protesting the internment of Jews and the confiscation of their property. The Fascist press came to call the Vatican paper ‘a mouthpiece of the Jews.’ "[13]

Prior to the Nazi invasion, the Pope had been working hard to get Jews out of Italy by emigration; he now was forced to turn his attention to finding them hiding places. "The Pope sent out the order that religious buildings were to give refuge to Jews, even at the price of great personal sacrifice on the part of their occupants; he released monasteries and convents from the cloister rule forbidding entry into these religious houses to all but a few specified outsiders, so that they could be used as hiding places. Thousands of Jews—the figures run from 4,000 to 7,000—were hidden, fed, clothed, and bedded in the 180 known places of refuge in Vatican City, churches and basilicas, Church administrative buildings, and parish houses. Unknown numbers of Jews were sheltered in Castel Gandolfo, the site of the Pope’s summer residence, private homes, hospitals, and nursing institutions; and the Pope took personal responsibility for the care of the children of Jews deported from Italy."[14]

Rabbi Lapide records that "in Rome we saw a list of 155 convents and monasteries—Italian, French, Spanish, English, American, and also German—mostly extraterritorial property of the Vatican . . . which sheltered throughout the German occupation some 5,000 Jews in Rome. No less than 3,000 Jews found refuge at one time at the Pope’s summer residence at Castel Gandolfo; sixty lived for nine months at the Jesuit Gregorian University, and half a dozen slept in the cellar of the Pontifical Bible Institute."[15]

Notice in particular that the Pope was not merely allowing Jews to be hidden in different church buildings around Rome. He was hiding them in the Vatican itself and in his own summer home, Castel Gandolfo. His success in protecting Italian Jews against the Nazis was remarkable. Lichten records that after the War was over it was determined that only 8,000 Jews were taken from Italy by the Nazis[16] —far less than in other European countries. In June,1944, Pius XII sent a telegram to Admiral Miklos Horthy, the ruler of Hungary, and was able to halt the planned deportation of 800,000 Jews from that country.

The Pope’s efforts did not go unrecognized by Jewish authorities, even during the War. The Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem, Isaac Herzog, sent the Pope a personal message of thanks on February 28, 1944, in which he said: "The people of Israel will never forget what His Holiness and his illustrious delegates, inspired by the eternal principles of religion which form the very foundations of true civilization, are doing for us unfortunate brothers and sisters in the most tragic hour of our history, which is living proof of divine Providence in this world."[17]

Other Jewish leaders chimed in also. Rabbi Safran of Bucharest, Romania, sent a note of thanks to the papal nuncio on April 7, 1944: "It is not easy for us to find the right words to express the warmth and consolation we experienced because of the concern of the supreme pontiff, who offered a large sum to relieve the sufferings of deported Jews. . . . The Jews of Romania will never forget these facts of historic importance."[18]

The Chief Rabbi of Rome, Israel Zolli, also made a statement of thanks: "What the Vatican did will be indelibly and eternally engraved in our hearts. . . . Priests and even high prelates did things that will forever be an honor to Catholicism."[19]

After the war, Zolli became a Catholic and, to honor the Pope for what he had done for the Jews and the role he had played in Zolli’s conversion, took the name "Eugenio"—the Pope’s given name—as his own baptismal name. Zolli stressed that his conversion was for theological reasons, which was certainly true, but the fact that the Pope had worked so hard on behalf of the Jews no doubt played a role in inspiring him to look at the truths of Christianity.

Lapide writes: "When Zolli accepted baptism in 1945 and adopted Pius’s Christian name of Eugene, most Roman Jews were convinced that his conversion was an act of gratitude for wartime succor to Jewish refugees and, repeated denials not withstanding, many are still of his opinion. Thus, Rabbi Barry Dov Schwartz wrote in the summer issue, 1964, of Conservative Judaism: ‘Many Jews were persuaded to convert after the war, as a sign of gratitude, to that institution which had saved their lives.’ "[20]

In Three Popes and the Jews Lapide estimated the total number of Jews that had been spared as a result of Pius XII’s throwing the Church’s weight into the clandestine struggle to save them. After totaling the numbers of Jews saved in different areas and deducting the numbers saved by other causes, such as the praiseworthy efforts of some European Protestants, "The final number of Jewish lives in whose rescue the Catholic Church had been the instrument is thus at least 700,000 souls, but in all probability it is much closer to . . . 860,000."[21] This is a total larger than all other Jewish relief organizations in Europe, combined, were able to save. Lapide calculated that Pius XII and the Church he headed constituted the most successful Jewish aid organization in all of Europe during the war, dwarfing the Red Cross and all other aid societies.

This fact continued to be recognized when Pius XII died in 1958. Lapide’s book records the eulogies of a number of Jewish leaders concerning the Pope, and far from agreeing with Jack Chick that he deserved death because of his "war crimes," Jewish leaders praised the man highly:[22]

"We share the grief of the world over the death of His Holiness Pius XII. . . . During the ten years of Nazi terror, when our people passed through the horrors of martyrdom, the Pope raised his voice to condemn the persecutors and to commiserate with their victims" (Golda Meir, Israeli representative to the U.N. and future prime minister of Israel).

"With special gratitude we remember all he has done for the persecuted Jews during one of the darkest periods in their entire history” (Nahum Goldmann, president of the World Jewish Congress).

"More than anyone else, we have had the opportunity to appreciate the great kindness, filled with compassion and magnanimity, that the Pope displayed during the terrible years of persecution and terror" (Elio Toaff, Chief Rabbi of Rome, following Rabbi Zolli’s conversion).

Finally, let us conclude with a quotation from Lapide’s record that was not given at the death of Pius XII, but was given after the War by the most well-known Jewish figure of this century, Albert Einstein: "Only the Catholic Church protested against the Hitlerian onslaught on liberty. Up till then I had not been interested in the Church, but today I feel a great admiration for the Church, which alone has had the courage to struggle for spiritual truth and moral liberty."[23]

FOOTNOTES:
[1] Dave Hunt, A Woman Rides the Beast (Eugene, Oregon: Harvest House, 1994), 284.
[2] Jack Chick, Smokescreens (China, California: Chick Publications, 1983), 45.
[3] Robert Graham, S.J., ed., Pius XII and the Holocaust (New Rochelle, New York: Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, 1988), 106.
[4] Joseph Lichten, "A Question of Moral Judgement: Pius XII and the Jews," in Graham, 107.
[5] Pinchas E. Lapide, Three Popes and the Jews (New York: Hawthorn, 1967), 118.
[6] Ibid., 121.
[7] Lichten, 107.
[8] Graham, 18.
[9] Ibid., 19.
[10] Lichten, 30.
[11] Ibid., 99.
[12] Ibid., 120.
[13] Ibid., 125.
[14] Ibid., 126.
[15] Lapide, 133.
[16] Lichten, 127.
[17] Graham, 62.
[18] Lichten, 130.
[19] American Jewish Yearbook 1944-1945, 233.
[20] Lapide, 133.
[21] Ibid., 215.
[22] Ibid., 227-228.
[23] Ibid., 251.
Logged

My daughter, I see more Pharisees among Christians than there were around Pilate. -- St. Margaret of Cortona

You cannot please both God and the world at the same time, They are utterly opposed to each other in their thoughts, their desires, and their actions. -- St. John Vianney
Orgetorix
Guest
« Reply #90 on: January 17, 2009, 02:10:34 PM »

Pope Pius XII and the Holocaust

By Shira Schoenberg

Pope Pius XII's (1876-1958) actions during the Holocaust remain controversial. For much of the war, he maintained a public front of indifference and remained silent while German atrocities were committed. He refused pleas for help on the grounds of neutrality, while making statements condemning injustices in general. Privately, he sheltered a small number of Jews and spoke to a few select officials, encouraging them to help the Jews.

The Early Years

The Pope was born in 1876 in Rome as Eugenio Pacelli. He studied philosophy at the Gregorian University, learned theology at Sant Apollinare and was ordained in 1899. He entered the Secretariat of State for the Vatican in 1901, became a cardinal in 1929 and was appointed Secretary of State in 1930.

Pacelli lived in Germany from 1917, when he was appointed Papal Nuncio in Bavaria, until 1929. He knew what the Nazi party stood for, and was elected Pope in 1939 having said very little about Adolf Hitler’s ideology beyond a 1935 speech describing the Nazis as “miserable plagiarists who dress up old errors with new tinsel.” Pacelli told 250,000 pilgrims at Lourdes on April 28, “It does not make any difference whether they flock to the banners of the social revolution, whether they are guided by a false conception of the world and of life, or whether they are possessed by the superstition of a race and blood cult.”

Even as Cardinal, Pacelli's actions regarding Hitler were controversial. Hitler took power on January 30, 1933. On July 20 that same year, Pacelli and German diplomat Franz Von Papen signed a concordat that granted freedom of practice to the Roman Catholic Church. In return, the Church agreed to separate religion from politics. This diminished the influence of the Catholic Center Party and the Catholic Labor unions. The concordat was generally viewed as a diplomatic victory for Hitler.(1)

Pacelli was elected Pope on March 2, 1939, and took the name Pius XII. As Pope, he had three official positions. He was head of his church and was in direct communication with bishops everywhere. He was chief of state of the Vatican, with his own diplomatic corps. He was also the Bishop of Rome. In theory, at least, his views could influence 400 million Catholics, including those in all the occupied eastern territories - the Poles, Baltics, Croatians, Slovaks and others.(2)

As soon as he was appointed Pope, Pacelli did speak out against the 1938 Italian racial laws that dealt with mixed marriages and children of mixed marriages.(3) However, he issued no such condemnation of Kristallnacht (the night of broken glass) which occurred in November 1938, and which recent evidence shows he was informed of by Berlin's papal nuncio. As the security of the Jewish population became more precarious, Pius XII did intervene the month he was elected Pope, March 1939, and obtained 3,000 visas to enter Brazil for European Jews who had been baptized and converted to Catholicism. Two-thirds of these were later revoked, however, because of "improper conduct," probably meaning that the Jews started practicing Judaism once in Brazil. At that time, the Pope did nothing to save practicing Jews.(4)

Cries for Help

Throughout the Holocaust, Pius XII was consistently besieged with pleas for help on behalf of the Jews.

In the spring of 1940, the Chief Rabbi of Palestine, Isaac Herzog, asked the papal Secretary of State, Cardinal Luigi Maglione to intercede to keep Jews in Spain from being deported to Germany. He later made a similar request for Jews in Lithuania. The papacy did nothing.(5)

Within the Pope's own church, Cardinal Theodor Innitzer of Vienna told Pius XII about Jewish deportations in 1941. In 1942, the Slovakian charge d'affaires, a position under the supervision of the Pope, reported to Rome that Slovakian Jews were being systematically deported and sent to death camps.(6)

In October 1941, the Assistant Chief of the U.S. delegation to the Vatican, Harold Tittman, asked the Pope to condemn the atrocities. The response came that the Holy See wanted to remain "neutral," and that condemning the atrocities would have a negative influence on Catholics in German-held lands.(7)

In late August 1942, after more than 200,000 Ukrainian Jews had been killed, Ukrainian Metropolitan Andrej Septyckyj wrote a long letter to the Pope, referring to the German government as a regime of terror and corruption, more diabolical than that of the Bolsheviks. The Pope replied by quoting verses from Psalms and advising Septyckyj to "bear adversity with serene patience."(Cool

On September 18, 1942, Monsignor Giovanni Battista Montini, the future Pope Paul VI, wrote, "The massacres of the Jews reach frightening proportions and forms."(9) Yet, that same month when Myron Taylor, U.S. representative to the Vatican, warned the Pope that his silence was endangering his moral prestige, the Secretary of State responded on the Pope's behalf that it was impossible to verify rumors about crimes committed against the Jews.(10)

Wladislaw Raczkiewicz, president of the Polish government-in-exile, appealed to the Pope in January 1943 to publicly denounce Nazi violence. Bishop Preysing of Berlin did the same, at least twice. Pius XII refused.(11)

Papal Reasons and Responses

The Pope finally gave a reason for his consistent refusals to make a public statement in December 1942. The Allied governments issued a declaration, "German Policy of Extermination of the Jewish Race," which stated that there would be retribution for the perpetrators of Jewish murders. When Tittman asked Secretary of State Maglione if the Pope could issue a similar proclamation, Maglione said the papacy was "unable to denounce publicly particular atrocities."(12) One reason for this position was that the staunchly anti-communist Pope felt he could not denounce the Nazis without including the Communists; therefore, Pius XII would only condemn general atrocities.(13)

The Pope did speak generally against the extermination campaign. On January 18, 1940, after the death toll of Polish civilians was estimated at 15,000, the Pope said in a broadcast, "The horror and inexcusable excesses committed on a helpless and a homeless people have been established by the unimpeachable testimony of eye-witnesses."(14) During his Christmas Eve radio broadcast in 1942, he referred to the "hundreds of thousands who through no fault of their own, and solely because of their nation or race, have been condemned to death or progressive extinction."(15) The Pope never mentioned the Jews by name.

The Pope's indifference to the mistreatment of Jews was often clear. In 1941, for example, after being asked by French Marshal Henri Philippe Petain if the Vatican would object to anti-Jewish laws, Pius XII answered that the church condemned racism, but did not repudiate every rule against the Jews.(16) When Petain's French puppet government introduced "Jewish statutes," the Vichy ambassador to the Holy See informed Petain that the Vatican did not consider the legislation in conflict with Catholic teachings, as long as they were carried out with "charity" and "justice."(17)

In a September 1940 broadcast, the Vatican called its policy "neutrality," but stated in the same broadcast that where morality was involved, no neutrality was possible.(18) This could only imply that mass murder was not a moral issue.

On September 8, 1943, the Nazis invaded Italy and, suddenly, the Vatican was the local authority. The Nazis gave the Jews 36 hours to come up with 50 kilograms of gold or else the Nazis would take 300 hostages. The Vatican was willing to loan 15 kilos, an offer that eventually proved unnecessary when the Jews obtained an extension for the delivery.(19)

Pius XII knew that Jewish deportations from Italy were impending. The Vatican even found out from SS First Lieutenant Kurt Gerstein the fate of those who were to be deported.(20) Publicly, the Pope stayed silent. Privately, Pius did instruct Catholic institutions to take in Jews. The Vatican itself hid 477 Jews and another 4,238 Jews were protected in Roman monasteries and convents.(21)

On October 16, the Nazis arrested 1,007 Roman Jews, the majority of whom were women and children. They were taken to Auschwitz, where 811 were gassed immediately. Of those sent to the concentration camp, 16 survived.(22)

The Pope Protests

The Pope did act behind the scenes on occasion. During the German occupation of Hungary in March 1944, he, along with the papal nuncio in Budapest, Angelo Rotta, advised the Hungarian government to be moderate in its plans concerning the treatment of the Jews. Pius XII protested against the deportation of Jews and, when his protests were not heeded, he cabled again and again.(23) The Pope's demands, combined with similar protests from the King of Sweden, the International Red Cross, Britain and the United States contributed to the decision by the Hungarian regent, Admiral Miklos Horthy, to cease deportations on July 8, 1944.(24)

In the later stages of the war, Pius XII appealed to several Latin American governments to accept “emergency passports” that several thousand Jews had succeeded in obtaining. Due to the efforts of the Pope and the U.S. State Department, 13 Latin American countries decided to honor these documents, despite threats from the Germans to deport the passport holders.(25)

The Church also answered a request to save 6,000 Jewish children in Bulgaria by helping to transfer them to Palestine. At the same time, however, Cardinal Maglione wrote to the apostolic delegate in Washington, A.G. Cicognani, saying this did not mean the Pope supported Zionism.(26)

The Politics Behind the Policy

Historians point out that any support the Pope did give the Jews came after 1942, once U.S. officials told him that the allies wanted total victory, and it became likely that they would get it. Furthering the notion that any intervention by Pius XII was based on practical advantage rather than moral inclination is the fact that in late 1942, Pius XII began to advise the German and Hungarian bishops that it would be to their ultimate political advantage to go on record as speaking out against the massacre of the Jews. (27)

One of the only cases in which the Pope gave early support to the allies was in May 1940. He received information about a German plan, Operation Yellow, to lay mines to deter British naval support of Holland. Pius XII gave his permission to send coded radio messages warning papal nuncios in Brussels and The Hague of the plot. The German radio monitoring services decoded the broadcast and went ahead with the plan.(28) This papal intervention is surprising due to the Pope's persistent claim of neutrality, and his silence regarding almost all German atrocities.

Recent Developments

The International Catholic-Jewish Historical Commission (ICJHC), a group comprised of three Jewish and three Catholic scholars, was appointed in 1999 by the Holy See's Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews. In October of 2000, the group of scholars finished their review of the Vatican's archives, and submitted their preliminary findings to the Comission's then-President, Cardinal Edward I Cassidy. Their report, entitled "The Vatican and the Holocaust," laid to rest several of the conventional defenses of Pope Pius XII.

The often-espoused view that the Pontiff was unaware of the seriousness of the situation of European Jewry during the war was definitively found to be inaccurate. Numerous documents demonstrated that the Pope was well-informed about the full extent of the Nazi's anti-Semitic practices. A letter from Konrad von Preysing, Bishop of Berlin, that proved that the Pope was aware of the situation as early as January of 1941, particularly caught the attention of the commission. In that letter, Preysing confirms that "Your Holiness is certainly informed about the situation of the Jews in Germany and the neighboring countries. I wish to mention that I have been asked both from the Catholic and Protestant side if the Holy See could not do something on this subject...in favor of these unfortunates." The letter, which was a direct appeal to the Pope himself, without intermediaries, provoked no response. In 1942, an even more compelling eyewitness account of the mass-murder of Jews in Lwow was sent to the Pope by an archbishop; this, too, garnered no response.

The commission also revealed several documents that cast a negative light on the claim that the Vatican did all it could to facilitate emigration of the Jews out of Europe. Internal notes meant only for Vatican representatives revealed the opposition of Vatican officials to Jewish emigration from Europe to Palestine. "The Holy See has never approved of the project of making Palestine a Jewish home...[because] Palestine is by now holier for Catholics than for Jews." Some Catholic higher-ups violated this position of the Vatican by helping Jews to immigrate when they were able to; most did not.

Similarly, the attempts of Jews to escape from Europe to South America were sometimes thwarted by the Vatican. Vatican representatives in Bolivia and Chile wrote to the pontiff regarding the "invasive" and "cynically exploitative" character of the Jewish immigrants, who were already engaged in "dishonest dealings, violence, immorality, and even disrespect for religion." The commission concluded that these accounts probably biased Pius against aiding more Jews in immigrating away from

Nazi Europe.

The claim that the Vatican needed to remain neutral in the war has also been refuted in recent months. In January of 2001, a document recently declassified by the U.S. National Archives was discovered by the World Jewish Congress. The document was a report in which Monsignor Giovanni Battista Montini, Pope Pius XII's secretary of state, detailed and denounced several abuses committed by the Soviet Army against German inhabitants of the Soviet Union. The report was widely viewed as demonstrating that the Vatican had no compunctions about speaking out against atrocities, even when doing so would violate neutrality.

The preliminary report released by the IJCHC also asked the Vatican for access to non-published archival documents to more fully investigate the Pope's role in the Holocaust. This request was refused by the Vatican, which allowed them access only to documents from before 1923. As a result, the Commission suspended its study in July 2001, without issuing a final report. Dr. Michael Marrus, one of the three Jewish panelists and a professor of history at the University of Toronto, expained that the commission "ran up against a brick wall.... It would have been really halpful to have had support from the Holy See on this issue."(29)

In 2004, news was disclosed of a diary kept by James McDonald, the League of Nations high commissioner for refugees coming from Germany. In 1933, McDonald raised the treatment of the Jews with then Cardinal Pacelli, who was the Vatican secretary of state. McDonald was specifically interested in helping a group of Jewish refugees in the Saar region, a territory claimed by France and Germany that was turned over to the Germans in 1935. The Pope's defenders cite his intercession on these Jews' behalf as evidence of his sympathy for Jews persecuted by the Nazis. According to McDonald, however, when he disccused the matter with Pacelli, “The response was noncommittal, but left me with the definite impression that no vigorous cooperation could be expected.”(30) Pacelli did intercede in January 1935 to help the Jews, but only after McDonald agreed that American Jews would use their influence in Washington to protect church properties that were being threatened by the Mexican government.(31)

In 2005, the Italian daily, Corriere della Sera, discovered a letter dated November 20, 1946, showing that Pope Pius XII ordered Jewish babies baptized by Catholics during the Holocaust not to be returned to their parents. Some scholars said the disclosure was not new and that the Pope's behavior was not remarkable. The more important story, according to Rabbi David Rosen, international director of interreligious affairs for the American Jewish Committee, was that one of the recipients of the letter, Angelo Roncalli, the papal representative in Paris, ignored the papal directive.(32)

In 2006, an Israeli scholar, Dina Porat, discovered correspondence between Haim Barlas, an emissary of the Jewish Agency sent to Europe to save Jews in the 1940s, and Giuseppe Roncalli, who later became Pope John XXIII. Roncalli expressed criticism of the Vatican’s silence during the war. In June 1944, Barlas sent Roncalli a copy of a report compiled by two Jews who escaped from Auschwitz documenting the mass murder at the camp. Roncalli forwarded the report to the Vatican, which had claimed it did not know about the report until October. Earlier, Roncalli had written to the president of Slovakia at the behest of Barlas asking him to stop the Nazi deportations of Jews.(33)

Conclusion

The Pope's reaction to the Holocaust was complex and inconsistent. At times, he tried to help the Jews and was successful. But these successes only highlight the amount of influence he might have had, if he not chosen to remain silent on so many other occasions. No one knows for sure the motives behind Pius XII's actions, or lack thereof, since the Vatican archives have only been fully opened to select researchers. Historians offer many reasons why Pope Pius XII was not a stronger public advocate for the Jews: A fear of Nazi reprisals, a feeling that public speech would have no effect and might harm the Jews, the idea that private intervention could accomplish more, the anxiety that acting against the German government could provoke a schism among German Catholics, the church's traditional role of being politically neutral and the fear of the growth of communism were the Nazis to be defeated.(34) Whatever his motivation, it is hard to escape the conclusion that the Pope, like so many others in positions of power and influence, could have done more to save the Jews.


Bibliography

Berenbaum, Michael. The World Must Know: The History of the Holocaust as Told in the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. MA: Little, Brown and Co., 1993.

Gilbert, Martin. The Holocaust: A History of the Jews of Europe During the Second World War. NY: Henry Holt And Co., 1987.

Gilbert, Martin. The Second World War: A Complete History. NY: Henry Holt And Co., 1992.

Gutman, Israel. ed. Encyclopedia of the Holocaust. Vol. 3. NY: Macmillan, 1995.

Hilberg, Raul. The Destruction of the European Jews. NY: Holmes & Meier, 1985.

Hilberg, Raul. Perpetrators Victims Bystanders: The Jewish Catastrophe 1933-1945. NY: Harper Perennial Library, 1993.

Holocaust. Israel Pocket Library. Jerusalem: Keter Publishing House, 1974.

International Jewish Catholic-Jewish Historical Commission. The Vatican and the Holocaust: A Preliminary Report. Submitted to The Holy See's Commission for Religious Relations with Jews. October, 2000.

Perl, William R. The Holocaust Conspiracy: An International Policy of Genocide. NY: Shapolsky Publishers, 1989.

Reuters. "WJC Says it Has New Evidence Against Pius XII." By Joan Gralla. 1/11/01.
Notes

1. Berenbaum, Michael, The World Must Know, p. 40.

2. Perl, William, The Holocaust Conspiracy, p. 197.

3. Gutman, Israel, Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, p. 1136.

4. Gutman, Israel, Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, p. 1136.

5. Gutman, Israel, Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, p. 1136.

6. Gutman, Israel, Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, p. 1137.

7. Perl, William, The Holocaust Conspiracy, p. 206.

8. Hilberg, Raul, Perpetrators Victims Bystanders, p. 267.

9. Gutman, Israel, Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, p. 1137.

10. Israel Pocket Library, Holocaust, p. 133; Gutman, Israel, Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, p. 1137.

11. Israel Pocket Library, Holocaust, p. 134.

12. Hilberg, Raul, The Destruction of the European Jews, p. 315.

13. Gutman, Israel, Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, p. 1137; Hilberg, Raul, Perpetrators Victims Bystanders, p. 264.

14. Gilbert, Martin, The Second World War, p. 40.

15. Gutman, Israel, Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, p. 1137.

16. Gutman, Israel, Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, p. 1137.

17. Perl, William, The Holocaust Conspiracy, p. 200.

18. Perl, William, The Holocaust Conspiracy, p. 200.

19. Israel Pocket Library, Holocaust, p. 133.

20. Perl, William, The Holocaust Conspiracy, p. 202.

21. Gilbert, Martin, The Holocaust, p. 623.

22. Perl, William, The Holocaust Conspiracy, p. 201.

23. Gutman, Israel, Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, p. 1138.

24. Gilbert, Martin, The Holocaust, p. 701.

25. Perl, William, The Holocaust Conspiracy, p. 176.

26. Gutman, Israel. Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, p. 1138.

27. Israel Pocket Library, Holocaust, p. 136.

28. Gilbert, Martin. The Second World War, p. 59.

29. The Jerusalem Post. "Vatican Blocks Panel's Access to Holocaust Archives." By Melissa Radler. 7/24/01

30. Peter Carlson, “A Diplomat's Diary,” Washington Post, (April 22, 2004).

31. Jewish Telegraphic Agency, (April 23, 2004).

32. Jerusalem Report, (February 7, 2005).

33. Jerusalem Post, (December 4, 2006).

34. Gutman, Israel, Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, p. 1139.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/anti-semitism/pius.html#N_5_
Logged
clearmyst
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,604


« Reply #91 on: April 20, 2009, 11:05:26 PM »



Press Release:


JRI ANNOUNCEMENT OF ITS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE VATICAN BANK



THE JASENOVAC RESEARCH INSTITUTE

PO Box 332 Birmingham, Mi. 48012

The Time For Restitution Is At Hand For Serbs, Jews, Romas and Other Victims of Ustashe Genocide: The Vatican Bank and Others Must Return $2.325 Billion in Looted Assets.

On 19 January 2000 the Jasenovac Research Institute joined seven Serbian, Jewish and Ukrainian Holocaust victims in a class action lawsuit against the Vatican Bank, the Franciscan Order and several unnamed Austrian, Swiss, Argentine and other banking institutions. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco, seeks restitution of several hundred millions of dollars in looted property and assets taken in World War II Croatia by the clerical-fascist Croatian Nazi regime which the suit charges was subsequently deposited in the Vatican Bank and other institutions.

The original lawsuit was filed by U.S. attorneys Tom Easton and Jonathan Levy on 15 November 1999 in the San Francisco U.S. District Court on behalf of four Jewish and Ukrainian Holocaust victims. On 21 January 2000 the class action lawsuit was amended and re-filed to include the Jasenovac Research Institute, a non-profit organization committed to the study of the Holocaust in Yugoslavia, and three additional individuals as class-representative plaintiffs: Vladimir Brodich, a Serbian-American currently living in Arizona, whose family was dispossessed and murdered in wartime Croatia; William Dorich, a Serbian-American living in California who lost seventeen members of his family in the town of Vojinich; and Igor Najfeld, a Yugoslav Jew currently living in Vermont but born in wartime Croatia. Dr. Najfeld's family's business and property was stolen by the Croatian State authorities and fifty-six members of the Najfeld's family were slaughtered in the Croatian death-camp complex known as Jasenovac.

Following the Nazi invasion and dismemberment of Yugoslavia in April 1941, the Independent State of Croatia was established as a clerical-fascist state under the rule of the Croatian fascist party, the Ustashe. Some 700,000 Serbs, Jews, Romas and other anti-fascists were killed in the Jasenovac death-camp complex, while many more were killed in smaller camps or in local massacres. While the Ustashe regime set about to racially exterminate all Serbs, Jews and Romas living within its borders, it also carried out a systematic policy of plundering the assets of these three nationalities. These looted assets, the property of millions of people, were never recovered. The bulk of it was smuggled out of Croatia at the end of the war to the Vatican, and from there to still other destinations.   

There is no statute of limitations for claims against these crimes. There are two reasons for this: the 1968 international convention regarding the non-applicability of statutes of limitation for war crimes, and the concealment of vital information regarding the culpability of the accused parties in these crimes. Another law firm, Zimmerman and Reed, has filed a similar lawsuit seeking restitution for Holocaust victims from Yugoslavia on 27 January 2000 in Minneapolis. It is expected that still other law firms will join these two suits or file additional suits in the coming months. The JRI will offer its support to all such efforts and encourage others to do the same.

The lawsuit which the JRI has joined is based on evidence contained in recently declassified government documents from the United States, Britain and Argentina. Several of the declassified U.S. military intelligence reports obtained by the JRI clearly state that the majority of these looted assets was deposited in the Vatican "for safe-keeping." The June 1998 U.S. State Department "Supplement" to its 1997 Report on "Nazi Gold" contains a crucial chapter documenting the Vatican's role in the transfer of stolen assets entitled "The Fate of the Wartime Ustasha Treasury." Still newer reports are to be released in the coming months, including one from Argentina expected to detail the transfer of millions of dollars in gold from the Vatican to Argentina as payment for the emigration of Croatian Ustashe and other Nazi war criminals.

According to the most recent estimates, the total amount of stolen assets transferred out of Croatia by the Ustashe at the end of the war was at least $250 million. Based on conversion tables provided by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, this would now be worth $2.325 billion in December 1999 dollars. It is the position of the Jasenovac Research Institute that this entire amount plus interest must be paid to the remaining Survivors and their heirs, and to the heirs of all victims of the Ustashe genocide. This amount would only be a partial accounting for the crimes of genocide committed in wartime Yugoslavia by the Ustashe and other fascist forces; however it would provide the initial foundations for better relations in the future for the peoples of the region.

Several new plaintiffs have stepped forward since the re-filing to ask to be added to the suit. Among them is Eva Deutsch-Costabel, a Yugoslav Jew born in Zagreb and currently living in New York whose family's two businesses and home were stolen by the Ustashe regime and whose father was arrested and murdered. U.S. attorneys Easton and Levy are seeking additional plaintiffs for the case. To be added as a plaintiff to the lawsuit one needs to be either a Survivor of the Ustashe regime or a relative or heir of a victim of Ustashe crimes. If you are such an individual and you wish to become a plaintiff, or if you have vital information regarding this case, you are encouraged to contact either the Jasenovac Research Institute or the law firm of Thomas Easton at 707-464-4513 or tomeaston@earthlink.net 

The Jasenovac Research Institute urges everyone who is concerned with the search for justice for the victims of the Ustashe Holocaust to help us in our efforts to achieve a successful outcome of this historically important case.

CLICKHERE for updates about the lawsuit.

All this information has been very illuminating,
hope you will pop back to the forum some time, your contributions were particularly top quality especially on this issue which I knew little about.

http://www.vaticanbankclaims.com/5AC.pdf
Logged
Conspiracy Center
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 461



« Reply #92 on: May 23, 2009, 10:52:56 AM »

Video: Attorney suing the Vatican Bank on the Alex Jones Show 5/22/09

An interview with Dr. Jonathan Levy of http://www.vaticanbankclaims.com/

Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0A-1bjdrXm8


Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHonnJuNO18
Logged
Conspiracy Center
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 461



« Reply #93 on: November 26, 2011, 02:15:51 PM »

Quote

Quote

Quote
Logged
Conspiracy Center
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 461



« Reply #94 on: November 29, 2011, 09:41:08 AM »

Quote
Logged
Conspiracy Center
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 461



« Reply #95 on: November 29, 2011, 05:33:23 PM »

Quote
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/09/world/argentina-a-haven-for-nazis-balks-at-opening-its-files.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm

Argentina, a Haven for Nazis, Balks at Opening Its Files

By LARRY ROHTER
Published: March 09, 2003

Under fire because of a new book that documents for the first time how Juan Perón clandestinely maneuvered to bring Nazi and other war criminals to Argentina after World War II, the Peronist government here is resisting calls to release long-secret official records about the collaboration.

According to the Simon Wiesenthal Center here, both the Foreign Relations Ministry and the Interior Ministries have failed to respond to letters, sent to them shortly after the book was published here late last year, asking that the records be made public.

In addition, seven members of Congress have now called for an investigation into how crucial immigration records were apparently destroyed six years ago in defiance of existing laws.

The book that ignited the controversy, published in the United States as ''The Real Odessa: Smuggling the Nazis to Perón's Argentina'' (Granta Books: 2002), has become a best seller here. Its author, Uki Gońi, is an Argentine journalist who had to do much of his research in European archives after encountering closed doors here.

''This is an issue of credibility and transparency,'' Mr. Gońi said in an interview.

But he also said he recognized the political explosiveness of the documents since they demonstrated ''just how closely linked Argentina and the Third Reich were and prove the existence of a secret postwar organization that involved Perón and provided a safe haven to Nazis.''

According to records Mr. Gońi has uncovered here and abroad, Perón's government, which was in power from 1946 to 1955, shepherded nearly 300 war criminals into the country.

Besides such notorious figures as Adolf Eichmann, Josef Mengele and Klaus Barbie, dozens of French, Belgian, Italian, Croatian and Slovak fascists, many of them Nazi collaborators sought in their home nations, were also admitted, some under aliases, others under their real names.

The documents indicate that the covert network was run directly from the presidential palace here by Rodolfo Freude, a German-Argentine who was one of Perón's closest advisers. At the same time, Mr. Freude was both running Perón's propaganda apparatus and serving as director of the newly founded state intelligence service.

During his research in Europe, Mr. Gońi also discovered a confidential Foreign Ministry circular from 1938 whose effect was to close Argentina to Jewish refugees seeking to flee Germany.

It ordered Argentine embassies to turn down visa requests from all applicants who ''have abandoned their country as undesirables or expulsees, regardless of the motive of their expulsion.''

In 1992, the president at the time, Carlos Saúl Menem, also a Peronist, ordered that all documents relating to the Argentine government's dealings with the Nazis be made public. But that decree, like the findings of a Foreign Ministry commission set up in 1997 to examine similar links, appears to have produced little of use to historians or victims of the war criminals who settled here.

''It's an embarrassment,'' said Sergio Widder, who as the Latin American representative of the Simon Weisenthal Center sent the letters requesting that the documents mentioned in Mr. Gońi's book be made available. ''They are simply newspaper clippings.''

Argentina also has a law that makes official documents more than 30 years old the property of its National Archives. As a result, destroying such records without the express authorization of the Archives, as the immigration department is said to have done in 1996, is technically a criminal act, one that the congressmen, all Socialists, want investigated and accounted for.

''We believe that a lid was put on this during the Menem administration and that if archives about criminals of war still exist, they need to be made available to the public,'' said Rubén Giustiniani, sponsor of the resolution. ''Nazism-Fascism was one of the worst plagues ever to affect mankind, and a recognition of what happened here is essential, not just for history but for the present and the future.''

Of the three government agencies that Mr. Widder has contacted with requests for documents mentioned in the book, only the state intelligence service has responded, albeit ambiguously.

In a one-paragraph letter, Secretary of Intelligence Miguel Ángel Toma said simply that his agency ''does not possess the information solicited,'' without mentioning whether an archive even exists.

''We have reason to doubt this response, since it seems highly unlikely that the police would have a file on someone like Mengele, who was in the country under his real name, and the intelligence service would not,'' Mr. Widder said. ''Either they are lying or they are inept.''

According to the documents Mr. Gońi uncovered, the Roman Catholic Church was also deeply involved in the secret network. The Perón government authorized the arrival of the first Nazi collaborators here, he said, as a result of a meeting in March 1946 between Antonio Caggiano, an Argentine cardinal, and Eugene Tisserant, a French cardinal attached to the Vatican.

Because of that connection, Mr. Widder has also written to the Argentine Conference of Roman Catholic Bishops, asking that it make public all documents relating to the Argentine church's involvement in the smuggling network. The bishops' group, however, replied that it was unable to do so because ''it did not yet exist'' in 1946 and that ''the persons to whom we have turned have no recollection whatsoever'' of the two cardinals having met.

''The documentation I have seen shows that the church was the guarantor to the Red Cross for these criminals to get permission to emigrate to Argentina, and many of the applications are signed by priests or by the Pontifical Commission of Assistance, the pope's own entity for refugees,'' Mr. Gońi said. ''This couldn't and wouldn't have happened without the church.''
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!