Radioactive Fertilizer—The Surprising Primary Cause of Lung Cancer in Smokers

Author Topic: Radioactive Fertilizer—The Surprising Primary Cause of Lung Cancer in Smokers  (Read 3553 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

EvadingGrid

  • Guest
Radioactive Fertilizer—The Surprising Primary Cause of Lung Cancer in Smokers
By Dr. Mercola
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/02/10/radioactive-fertilizer.aspx

    It's well-recognized that smoking cigarettes can cause lung cancer. What isn't clear is exactly what it is in the cigarette or its smoke that causes it. Interestingly, while it may seem obvious that added chemicals would be prime culprits, research suggests it may be something else entirely.

    This "something else" in turn could also have potential ramifications for our food supply, and might be an indicator of potential carcinogenicity in genetically engineered foods as well as tobacco, although there's no evidence of such a link as of yet.

    The factor I'm talking about is polonium-210—a highly radioactive element1 that releases alpha particles as it decays. It's also chemically toxic.2 While alpha particles cannot penetrate deeply into your body, they can cause serious damage to cells they do come into contact with.

    While naturally present in small amounts in the environment, one of the primary sources of exposure is via calcium phosphate fertilizers, used on tobacco fields and food crops respectively.

The Hidden Threat of Radioactive Fertilizer Contamination



    Research suggests that it's the radiation from these fertilizers that appear to cause the most lung damage, and are the primary cause of cancer in smokers.3, 4, 5 In fact, polonium is the only component of cigarette smoke shown to produce cancer in laboratory animals.6 As noted in a 2009 study:7

        "In a person smoking 1 1/2 packs of cigarettes per day, the radiation dose to the bronchial epithelium in areas of bifurcation is 8000 mrem per year -- the equivalent of the dose to the skin from 300 x-ray films of the chest per year."

    According to a 2011 report published in the journal Nicotine and Tobacco Research,8 secret internal documents obtained from the major tobacco industries in 1998 reveal that the industry was well aware of the presence of this radioactive element in cigarettes as early as 1959.

        "Acid wash was discovered in 1980 to be highly effectively in removing polonium-210 from the tobacco leaves; however, the industry avoided its use for concerns that acid media would ionize nicotine converting it into a poorly absorbable form into the brain of smokers thus depriving them of the much sought after instant 'nicotine kick' sensation," the researchers noted.

    The report concluded that "the evidence of lung cancer risk caused by cigarette smoke radioactivity is compelling enough to warrant its removal." Now, if tobacco leaves become a source of cancer-causing radioactivity due to the fertilizers used, what about food grown with these phosphate fertilizers?

    Remarkably, according to a report by the Florida Institute of Phosphate Research,9 American meat products and dairy may expose your organs to radiation doses that are equivalent to the dose received by smokers via cigarette smoke. I bet that might come as a huge shock to you.

Fluoridated Water—Another Hidden Source of Radioactive Polonium



    You can also consume polonium by drinking fluoridated water, courtesy of the fluorosilicic acid used. While pharmaceutical grade fluoride is a harmful-enough drug, this is not the type of fluoride being added to drinking water. If it was, at least then it would be a pure, uncontaminated form.

    Rather the fluoride that is typically used to fluoridate local water supplies is a frequently contaminated chemical byproduct created during the phosphate fertilizer manufacturing process. It's a concentrated, highly toxic chemical riddled with hazardous impurities, making it extremely expensive to safely dispose of when not sold for profit as a water additive.

    Uranium and radium are two known carcinogens found in fluorosilicic acid used for water fluoridation, and polonium-210 is one of two decay products of uranium. Furthermore, polonium decays into stable lead-206, which also has significant health risks—especially in children—and research has indeed shown that drinking fluoridated water increases lead absorption in your body.

    Back in 1983, the Deputy Administrator of the EPA Office of Water, Rebecca Hanmer, summarized and defended the EPA's policy on adding toxic fluoride to drinking water in the following manner,10 which is quite telling once you know where the fluoride comes from, and the origins of the idea behind water fluoridation as a public health policy:

        "In regard to the use of fluosilicic (fluorosilicic) acid as a source of fluoride for fluoridation, this agency regards such use as an ideal environmental solution to a long-standing problem. By recovering by-product fluosilicic acid from fertilizer manufacturing, water and air pollution are minimized, and water utilities have a low-cost source of fluoride available to them." [Emphasis mine]

How Polonium Affects Your Body



    But let's get back to phosphate fertilizers and its use on tobacco and food crops... According to the report in Nicotine and Tobacco Research,11 radioactivity in tobacco comes from two sources: the atmosphere and uptake through soil rich in calcium phosphate fertilizer contaminated with polonium phosphates. In 1995, the Florida Institute of Phosphate Research12 stated that:

        "It has been known for many years that phosphate fertilizer ore contains 50~150 parts per million (ppm) of natural Uranium, and hence its radioactive decay products [i.e. polonium and radon], when compared to most other soil and rocks - which average 1 or 2 ppm."

    A CNN article13 from last year addressed the health effects of polonium when the radioactive element was being investigated as a potential cause in the death of Yasser Arafat, the former leader of the Palestine Liberation Organization. According to their report:

        "If you ingest polonium-210, about 50 percent to 90 percent of the substance will exit the body through feces, according to a fact sheet from Argonne National Laboratory. What is left will enter the bloodstream. About 45 percent of polonium ingested gets into the spleen, kidneys and liver, and 10 percent is deposited in the bone marrow.

        Radiation poisoning from polonium-210 looks like the end stage of cancer... Liver and kidney damage ensue, along with extreme nausea and severe headaches. Victims often experience vomiting, diarrhea and hair loss. The alpha particles emitted from the decaying substance get absorbed in the body, which is what causes harm."

Phosphate Fertilizers Also Used in GMO Agriculture



    Phosphate fertilizers linked to lung cancer in smokers, via the route of inhaling the smoke from contaminated tobacco leaves, are also used on food crops. Granted, food-borne polonium may be absorbed and react differently in your body than that in tobacco smoke.

    Still, as stated by the International Atomic Energy Agency,14 internal exposure, which is more or less the only dangerous form, does occur primarily through food, water, and inhaling contaminated air. So it's possible that you might be exposed to greater levels of this (and other) radioactive elements than was previously thought, through the aggressive use of phosphate fertilizers in food production.

    While we may not be able to estimate the potential cancer risk from contaminated foods, and GMOs in particular, research has shown that dietary calcium phosphate has a detrimental effect on your gut health. According to a 2002 study in the Journal of Nutrition:15

        "Most Gram-positive bacteria are susceptible to the bactericidal action of fatty acids and bile acids. Because dietary calcium phosphate (CaP(i)) lowers the intestinal concentration of these antimicrobial agents, high CaP(i) intake may enhance intestinal colonization of Gram-positive pathogens and the subsequent pathogenesis."

    Interestingly, the adverse effect of dietary calcium phosphate was found to be dependent on the type of dietary fat consumed. In rats given diets containing corn oil, the calcium phosphate stimulated colonization of pathogenic bacteria, whereas this adverse effect was not found in animals given a diet with milk fat. There are many drawbacks to conventional fertilizers, and radioactive food can perhaps be added to that list (with or without radioactive fallout from Japan, which is a whole other story). While modern agricultural methods may appear to be the most cost effective and efficient strategy at first glance, it quickly becomes one of the most costly ways to produce food once you take into account the environmental and human health consequences.


READ MORE
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/02/10/radioactive-fertilizer.aspx

Online donnay

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,168
  • Live Free Or Die Trying!
Great info, EG!

"Logic is an enemy and truth is a menace." ~ Rod Serling
"Cops today are nothing but an armed tax collector" ~ Frank Serpico
"To be normal, to drink Coca-Cola and eat Kentucky Fried Chicken is to be in a conspiracy against yourself."
"People that don't want to make waves sit in stagnant waters."

Offline One Revelator

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,131
I found it interesting that smoking went from being widely promoted to being demonized about the same time as nuclear above-ground testing occurred.

From this...



...to ooga booga.



Nukes would clearly release radioactive particles with a very long half-life into the atmosphere. All it would take is a teeny radioactive particle stuck in lung tissue for years to cause a problem there. Like having a continual micro x-ray done.

The PR blitz in the 80s-90s to get people to quit actually worked. It reduced public smoking to around 20% max from something like 50%. Yet the cancer rates remained the same in the population.
The number one cause of all human poverty, misery, and death is not global warming. It’s GLOBAL LYING.

Online donnay

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,168
  • Live Free Or Die Trying!
That's why I think what Joe Vialls wrote was correct. 

Smoking Helps Protect Against Lung Cancer
http://www.sott.net/article/226999-Smoking-Helps-Protect-Against-Lung-Cancer

A caveat:  Only organic tobacco.
"Logic is an enemy and truth is a menace." ~ Rod Serling
"Cops today are nothing but an armed tax collector" ~ Frank Serpico
"To be normal, to drink Coca-Cola and eat Kentucky Fried Chicken is to be in a conspiracy against yourself."
"People that don't want to make waves sit in stagnant waters."

Offline One Revelator

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,131
Wow! Hadn't seen that before. It totally makes sense.

Always wondered how people in China could smoke like chimneys, yet we never hear about a cancer epidemic over there.

Curiously, they also don't seem to have any problems with obesity either.
The number one cause of all human poverty, misery, and death is not global warming. It’s GLOBAL LYING.

Online donnay

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,168
  • Live Free Or Die Trying!
Wow! Hadn't seen that before. It totally makes sense.

Always wondered how people in China could smoke like chimneys, yet we never hear about a cancer epidemic over there.

Curiously, they also don't seem to have any problems with obesity either.

I do not think they eat the prepackaged, pre-made preservative filled foods like we do too.
"Logic is an enemy and truth is a menace." ~ Rod Serling
"Cops today are nothing but an armed tax collector" ~ Frank Serpico
"To be normal, to drink Coca-Cola and eat Kentucky Fried Chicken is to be in a conspiracy against yourself."
"People that don't want to make waves sit in stagnant waters."

Offline Slackjaw

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 114
That's why I think what Joe Vialls wrote was correct. 

Smoking Helps Protect Against Lung Cancer
http://www.sott.net/article/226999-Smoking-Helps-Protect-Against-Lung-Cancer

A caveat:  Only organic tobacco.

I was still a smoker when I first read that from Joe Vialls, and it was a great tool to kid oneself that smoking was somehow protective. Then I found out about what Evadinggrid posted  so started ordering American Spirit Red from the US to Europe, at considerable expense. However what you finally realize is that all these are just smokers' excuses, and that smoking is a mug's game. It's not just cancer - what burning tobacco does to your throat, oesophagus, heart, and so on (organic or otherwise), is simply not worth the theoretical benefit, a benefit which could also be acquired by burning incense at home in any case.

Offline Jacob Law

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,101
  • Its the Law, face it!
Grow your own
« Reply #7 on: August 30, 2015, 05:10:03 AM »
Just shared this on Facebook. Great find, there are some brands out there that supposedly are organic but I think maybe growing your own is wise if you really want to smoke, maybe plant it for your love ones, but you can't sell it, only radio active cig are legal?.
What do you under-stand?