FBI MANUAL says white male most dangerous?

[Red7Paladin]

You're upposed to be able to type that into a search engine and find something on it.  Anyone know of a link?

I tried:

FBI MANUAL says white male most dangerous

&

FBI manual "white male"  "most dangerous"

&

"FBI manual" "white male"  "most dangerous"

[Dig]

cannot find exactly what you are looking for, but this may assist:


US may scrap its fast-track entry scheme for Britons
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article1739246.ece
Sam Coates, Political Correspondent and Tom Baldwin in Washington May 3, 2007

The US Government has raised the possibility of cancelling the fast-track entry programme for British visitors amid concerns that radicalised British Muslims will exploit the scheme to organise an attack on American soil.  But it is believed that the Government has so far successfully staved off the threat to the visa waiver programme, which would mean hundreds of thousands of Britons wanting to visit the US being forced to undergo a lengthy advance-vetting procedure. Michael Chertoff, the US Homeland Security Secretary, met his British counterpart, John Reid, last month to discuss concerns that the next big terrorist attack on the US could be carried out by “clean-skin terrorists” in Europe who feel that they are treated as second-class citizens. The New York Times quoted British officials yesterday as saying the US had “put on the table” unpalatable options, including the cancellation of the entire visa waiver programme and singling out Britons of Pakistani descent for the visa vet-ting procedures. The US Department of Homeland Security said yesterday that it “flatly rejected” the newspaper’s report. Russ Knocke, a spokesman, said: “We do not profile people entering the US on the basis of race, religion or country of origin. But we do profile people based on behaviour. . . experience has shown that to do so on any other basis is not effective.” Although Mr Knocke refused to confirm details of operations, it is known that the FBI have visited Britain to collect intelligence on possible terrorist suspects. Asked if there had been any discussion about cancelling the visa waiver scheme, he said: “We constantly assess our programmes and instructions. We have clear commitment to strengthening the security of the visa waiver programme.” The US is pressing for improved exchange of information about passengers, more use of biometric data in passports and advance electronic authorisation of travel plans. The Government issued a denial yesterday over the existence of any proposal to introduce visas for Britons of Paki-stani descent. A Foreign Office source said: “We would sooner accept losing the entire waiver programme than embarking on anything that discriminates between British citizens.” Britain wants the US to continue with a “risk-based” option of deporting Britons who fail screening procedures on arrival. Sir David Manning, Britain’s Ambassador to Washington, said last week that there had been “concerns” over radicalised British Muslims, adding: “This is something we have to discuss all the time.” But he said that the impulse of both governments had been to “try to solve the problem together” otherwise “the visa waiver programme would have gone”. At the same time, the European Union is attempting to extend the visa waiver programme to include its 12 newest entrants. Only 15 out of the EU’s 27 nations are included in the programme. US officials say that Greece and most new EU members still fail to meet the criteria necessary for joining the scheme, which include having less than 3 per cent of visa applications rejected. Mike Gapes, chairman of the Commons Foreign Affairs committee, said that any suggestion of racially profiling British visitors was utterly unacceptable.

[bennyxbo]

From my experience, PDF's and scans of manuals are really tricky to google - Alex needs to open a museum of government corruption with all those docs he keeps in his shed - but have you seen the footage of the FBI ( or was it BATF? ) training session, where they were calling the founding father's "terrorists" ?... cant remember what AJ film that was in.

[rawiron1]

Aren't smart people dangerous?

Better keep an eye on them Asians.

Disclaimer: OK, my wife and girlfriend are Asian so shut up!

 

Jason

[Dig]

Aren't smart people dangerous?

Better keep an eye on them Asians.

Disclaimer: OK, my wife and girlfriend are Asian so shut up!

 

Jason

wife and girlfriend...nah, I ain't going there

[sid]

White males most dangerous?

Well, I hope so.  LE tends to pick on the least dangerous when given free choice.

[Melody]

From my experience, PDF's and scans of manuals are really tricky to google - Alex needs to open a museum of government corruption with all those docs he keeps in his shed - but have you seen the footage of the FBI ( or was it BATF? ) training session, where they were calling the founding father's "terrorists" ?... cant remember what AJ film that was in.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XC1fk_EO3c

[ringo78]

try this link

http://www.infowars.com/Images/fbi_flyer2.jpg

[J. Croft]

They just want everyone to accept that anyone else can be deemed a "terrorist" for "good reason".

[Dig]

try this link

http://www.infowars.com/Images/fbi_flyer2.jpg

"Make numerous references to the Constitution."

Well since all candidates have been Paulized, they have been saying "constitution" more than "9/11." And that is a very good thing!

[Red7Paladin]

Thanks for all the assistance.

[chris jones]

I appears Chertoff is flexing his power, of course he has the executive go ahead. or should I say FBI, or maby CIA, or DIA, or NSA, or CID, or SIC, or ATA, oh well, forget it.
Supposedly the figurehead gov. agency's are in tune with one another. With the exception of the shadow groups pulling the Ole strings.

The lines are drawn... there are the Government people(or whatever) and then there are the commoners. Don't believe me, huh?

Human nature, they, are  above the Rights of the commoners. the Americans. Right or wrong? How many agents are wandering around this nation, how many have a badge and gun, power over the peons.
I refrain from quoting a number that pops into my head, as It could be wrong and I don't want to face an onslaught of where did you get that, back it up.
 I will say it was shocking, and it takes a lot to suprise this old man. Maby someone will take a moment and back me up on this.
Sum it up old man, Government has bloated to the point we will need more White houses to distinguish from whom orders, rules , regulations, and laws have come from. That is if the new laws are exposed to us, wouldn't that be so kind of them.
There will be no book burning here we are not Nazis, only Constitutional burning will be allowed. If you don't like it, either your for us or against us.GB.

[boxcarro]

A FBI "TERRORISM" Repost conducted under the CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, at the time of the MURDERS of the BRANCH DAVIDISONS out side of Waco. The whole thing was to give CREEDENCE to the GOVERNMENT'S alledge EVANGELIST CHRISTIAN GROUPS are DANGERIOUS TERRORISTS" Mantra.