Re: Democrat-vs.-Republican-vs.-Tea Party: Yet another

Author Topic: Re: Democrat-vs.-Republican-vs.-Tea Party: Yet another  (Read 1886 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jacob Law

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,331
  • Its the Law, face it!
Re: Democrat-vs.-Republican-vs.-Tea Party: Yet another
« on: March 05, 2014, 05:05:54 AM »
So that everyone has at least some idea of what compelled me to create this thread in the first place, please consider the following hypothetical scenario.

It's October 2016. There's a nationally televised presidential debate between four candidates: (a) Hilldog, (b) Jeb Bush, (c) Rand Paul, and (d) a "progressive libertarian" candidate whom I'll call Bill Smith.

The first question posed to each of the four candidates is:

"Do you support the NEED Act?"

--  http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.2990.IH:

--  http://www.monetary.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/HR-2990.pdf

--  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-zarlenga/sequesters-shutdowns-and-_b_4086071.html

Bill Smith responds: "Yes, I do."

How do the other three candidates respond?

I am not sure why Bill smith responds Yes?

But Hilldog and Jeb would say yes too.

But Rand I think he may be like his father and say NO to all, unless he is play politics
What do you under-stand?

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,129
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
Re: Re: Democrat-vs.-Republican-vs.-Tea Party: Yet another
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2014, 08:49:50 AM »
I am not sure why Bill smith responds Yes?

But Hilldog and Jeb would say yes too.

Can you provide one shred of verifiable evidence that either Hilldog or Jeb would say "yes" to removing the power of money creation from private banks?

(Edit: And by verifiable evidence, I don't mean you saying, in effect, "Well, they both advocate such-and-such on all these other issues, so I'm conveniently assuming that they advocate such-and-such on this issue..." [blah blah blah], but actual statements and/or legislative actions indicating that they specifically support removing the power of money creation from private banks.)

If not, then I'll accept that as a grudging admission that you simply don't know what you're talking about.
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Highland

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 633
Re: Re: Democrat-vs.-Republican-vs.-Tea Party: Yet another
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2014, 09:22:15 AM »
Can you provide one shred of verifiable evidence that either Hilldog or Jeb would say "yes" to removing the power of money creation from private banks?

If not, then I'll accept that as a grudging admission that you simply don't know what you're talking about.
Republican-Democrat are apparently expecting-demanding to be lied to and they are apparently expecting things to continue along in the same way. Republican or Democrat can get away with numerous lies without any problem If Republican or Democrat came out and said we have to represent the entire nation as individuals, not just favored groups and every individual has to have the ability to defend himself against corporations in a court of law it would be a problem.

Things will probably not continue as usual for Republican-Democrat due to a combination of fiat currency inflation and austerity cuts etc..

Offline Jacob Law

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,331
  • Its the Law, face it!
Re: Re: Democrat-vs.-Republican-vs.-Tea Party: Yet another
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2014, 09:39:53 AM »
Can you provide one shred of verifiable evidence that either Hilldog or Jeb would say "yes" to removing the power of money creation from private banks?

(Edit: And by verifiable evidence, I don't mean you saying, in effect, "Well, they both advocate such-and-such on all these other issues, so I'm conveniently assuming that they advocate such-and-such on this issue..." [blah blah blah], but actual statements and/or legislative actions indicating that they specifically support removing the power of money creation from private banks.)

If not, then I'll accept that as a grudging admission that you simply don't know what you're talking about.

I was thinking it was their nature to add new laws that continue to muddle society and if these bills got this far their underlining reason was to put more restraints on such.
Other than that I don't think I would like to spend time think I could make any sense out of Hilldog and Jeb.
What do you under-stand?

Offline Geolibertarian

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,129
  • 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! www.911truth.org
Re: Re: Democrat-vs.-Republican-vs.-Tea Party: Yet another
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2014, 09:44:11 AM »
I don't think I would like to spend time think I could make any sense out of Hilldog and Jeb.

So then no one should take seriously your baseless assertion about their presumed "support" of the NEED Act.

Establishment Democrats, establishment Republicans, and Tea Party conservatives are all agreed (because they're so "different" from one another) -- the power of money creation must not be removed from private banks, and so the NEED Act should never be passed.

Glad we sorted that out.
"Abolish all taxation save that upon land values." -- Henry George

"If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill." -- Thomas Edison

http://schalkenbach.org
http://www.monetary.org
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=203330.0

Offline Geniocrat

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,874
Re: Re: Democrat-vs.-Republican-vs.-Tea Party: Yet another
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2014, 04:08:38 PM »
So then no one should take seriously your baseless assertion about their presumed "support" of the NEED Act.

Establishment Democrats, establishment Republicans, and Tea Party conservatives are all agreed (because they're so "different" from one another) -- the power of money creation must not be removed from private banks, and so the NEED Act should never be passed.

Glad we sorted that out.

Well now we know that we need the Constitution Party let's put our support into a party that shares our ideals.

Look the Tea-Party train is grinding to a halt.

The Constitution Party is still very pro-active.  The Globalists will never control us.

Offline Jacob Law

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,331
  • Its the Law, face it!
Re: Re: Democrat-vs.-Republican-vs.-Tea Party: Yet another
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2014, 09:37:07 PM »
So then no one should take seriously your baseless assertion about their presumed "support" of the NEED Act.

Establishment Democrats, establishment Republicans, and Tea Party conservatives are all agreed (because they're so "different" from one another) -- the power of money creation must not be removed from private banks, and so the NEED Act should never be passed.

Glad we sorted that out.

Not really so baseless but I do now understand your question, thank you.
What do you under-stand?