Ottawa Shooting Film Raises More Doubts
March 12, 2015
On Oct 22, 2014, Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, left, supposedly shot an honor guard in Ottawa and then rushed the Parliament Building, where he was supposedly shot. Our correspondent "DD" believes the event was staged as a pretext to introduce increased police powers under "anti-terror" Bill C-51.
Last week, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) released a video
of events inside Parliament to give legitimacy to this false flag. Here, DD, tears it apart. The video purports to be "raw footage" but in fact it was partly staged and carefully edited. Cameramen were planted in advance and crisis actors used. There is no image of Bibeau's body.
Makow Comment- The real reason for totalitarian measures is not "terrorism" which they instigate or fake, but to protect the central banker's fraudulent credit monopoly. They create our currency as a debt to them and collect interest. (Our government could do this at no cost.) The central bankers intend that we remain their debt slaves in perpetuity.
After an analysis of the video, i believe crisis actors and reporters/cameramen were planted to make this video which advances their agenda for totalitarian government.
This video purports to be raw footage taken by three CBC cameramen who were in the Center Block at the time Michael Zehaf-Bibeau ran in. Two of these cameramen have worked abroad covering the wars that Canada are involved in. They are Jean Brousseau (starts), Mike dePaul (starts 7min 36sec) and Yves Levesque (starts 16min 46sec).
The CBC removed a five-minute section from dePaul's tape that showed MPs and journalists standing by an entrance on the west side of the building. This edit suppresses the fact that there were two long shootouts separated by a 90 sec lull.
Why would the CBC edit five minutes that, in my opinion, are critical? Is it to save the viewer time? No not really. Its already over 23min long. Is it because it is not relevant? Actually, its VERY relevant because if you watch the video you will find many parts of the video they could have cut out. These 5 minutes that CBC arbitrarily snipped was intentional to keep us ignorant and they have been CAUGHT!!
dailynews.pngJean Brousseau who provided the first part of the video was in the perfect position to catch the final shooting. Bibeau had no bullets left at this point as reported by MSM. Jean apparently was there when Bibeau ran down the Hall of Honour. Why didn`t he retreat towards the foyer by the House of Commons? Why perch yourself in a more vulnerable position?
This is an experienced cameraman who worked in the field in Afghanistan and would know a thing or two about safety. He did say on camera that he was more concerned about being safe than getting pictures and that he thought he might not make it that day. Really Jean? Jean`s decision to hide in the alcove can only be the result of pre-planning.
Next, we have Mike DePaul`s footage. Starts at 8min. This part exposes Josh Wingrove`s whereabouts and activities during the Center Block shooting. Josh claims to have flashback episodes from that day and after a couple of months, he is still reacting to things like a door being slammed. I find this hard to believe because in the video it is clear he is not panicked whatsoever after the first round of gunfire.
He looks relaxed while he is multi-tasking. He was an embedded reporter with the CDN military in Afghanistan and therefore he is accustomed to sudden loud sounds and bangs. Also, it seems some of the people there did not know who he was and you can hear one person ask, ``Who is this guy?`` He is the guy hiding in the alcove embedded to catch a video which will go viral and the only piece of video that gets looped by virtually all MSM.
Josh was planted. I have a read his articles and listened to him in interviews and he fails to focus on the first round of gunfire. Why? Bibeau enters, confronts guard, and then runs down the Hall of Honour. The police give chase and right behind him. All this is happening in a very short period of time. They quickly confront and kill Bibeau in the alcove by the library. So how does this fit into Jean Brousseau video? It doesn't! It was staged!!
Then we have Constable Samearn Son who is credited with confronting Bibeau and as a consequence was shot in the foot. His foot should have been blown clean off from the impact of a bullet from a 30-30 Winchester. Its been reported that the bullet was left in his foot because it would have been more dangerous to remove it! This video shows what a Winchester will do to a watermelon.
Bogus! There was no bullet and he never confronted Bibeau the way MSM reported. You see him in the video. Go to 19min 56sec. He is kneeled down. Look at his feet. Does he look like someone shot in the foot with a hunting rifle inches away? No blood. Nothing. It is obvious he wasn't shot and it was something else that is making him limp.
And finally the crisis actor. 18min 33sec. This is the plainclothes officer who runs up the stairs after he hears the second round of gunfire. Look at how he is holding his handgun. This is NOT the way to hold a handgun and there are NO circumstances you would hold it this way. The slide action at the top of the pistol would severely the fingers. Furthermore, he is holding the pistol in such a way that would make handling the recoil difficult. Do you still believe this was a real event? I think NOT.
Conclusion: There is so much evidence that the Ottawa Shooting was staged to pass more legislation that would legalize a totalitarian government with the veneer of democracy. This legislation "subverts basic principles of constitutional law, assaults rights of free speech and free assembly, and is viciously anti-democratic."
RCMP Chief Bob Paulson stated that it's the courts that are the current problem and would like to remove this obstruction. This is democracy? WAKE-UP CANADA!!
------ - See more at: http://henrymakow.com/#sthash.X87Pm3KJ.dpuf