Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?

Author Topic: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?  (Read 80354 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #40 on: September 29, 2014, 09:06:50 PM »
"WHEN YOU REALIZE HOW FAKE IT ALL IS..."
-ALEX JONES

BUT, BUT, BUT OBUMMER / EU HAS PUT 'SANCTIONS' ON RUSSIA?
-----------------------------
US Exxon benefits from Russia oil filed: Columnist
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/09/29/380393/us-exxon-benefits-from-russia-oil-filed/

American columnist Dean Henderson says that Exxon Mobil, America’s largest energy company, seeks its own benefits by helping Russia finding new oil-rich areas.

Exxon Mobil has recently helped the government of Russian President Vladimir Putin discover oil in one of the world’s most remote areas.

A well drilled in the Kara Sea region of the Arctic Ocean, with the assistance from Exxon, struck oil. The region has the potential to become one of the world’s most important crude-producing areas.

Henderson said that the company “go(es) around politics” adding “they don’t even care what side you’re on as long as there is oil on the ground, they are going to make some money out of it.”

“This is real politic where you know capital always charms the interests of governments even if those interests are misguided, it does not matter you’ll find these corporations and their profiting it doesn’t matter which country,” he told Press TV on Sunday.

He also said “the United States really should nationalize the assets of Exxon Mobil and Chevron Texaco and turn it into a department of energy that is focused on alternative energy and domestic production.”

Henderson said this is not governments which run the world but rather multinationals and banks.

“The world isn’t really run by governments, governments can issue sanctions, they can even go to war, they can do things like that, but in the end it’s these multinational corporations and the banks that own them and the families that own these banks,” he opined.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #41 on: September 29, 2014, 09:52:16 PM »
"WHEN YOU REALIZE HOW FAKE IT ALL IS..."
-ALEX JONES

BUT, BUT, BUT OBUMMER / EU HAS PUT 'SANCTIONS' ON RUSSIA?
-----------------------------
US Exxon benefits from Russia oil filed: Columnist
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/09/29/380393/us-exxon-benefits-from-russia-oil-filed/

American columnist Dean Henderson says that Exxon Mobil, America’s largest energy company, seeks its own benefits by helping Russia finding new oil-rich areas.

Exxon Mobil has recently helped the government of Russian President Vladimir Putin discover oil in one of the world’s most remote areas.

A well drilled in the Kara Sea region of the Arctic Ocean, with the assistance from Exxon, struck oil. The region has the potential to become one of the world’s most important crude-producing areas.

Henderson said that the company “go(es) around politics” adding “they don’t even care what side you’re on as long as there is oil on the ground, they are going to make some money out of it.”

“This is real politic where you know capital always charms the interests of governments even if those interests are misguided, it does not matter you’ll find these corporations and their profiting it doesn’t matter which country,” he told Press TV on Sunday.

He also said “the United States really should nationalize the assets of Exxon Mobil and Chevron Texaco and turn it into a department of energy that is focused on alternative energy and domestic production.”

Henderson said this is not governments which run the world but rather multinationals and banks.

“The world isn’t really run by governments, governments can issue sanctions, they can even go to war, they can do things like that, but in the end it’s these multinational corporations and the banks that own them and the families that own these banks,” he opined.

Related?  Hmmm?

Frigid fighting: Russian Arctic war games top off new base voyage (VIDEO)
http://rt.com/news/191536-arctic-mission-drills-missile/

The Russian Northern Fleet convoy, which delivered troops and hardware to a rebuilt base in the Arctic, conducted fire drills before going home to test its resilience in the hostile frosty environment.

RT’s Murad Gazdiev witnessed the exercise staged near Kotelny Island, the first in a string of new military bases that would help Moscow project its power in the resource-rich region.

The goal of controlling the Arctic militarily may be trickier than it sounds. The harsh conditions take their toll not only on men, but also on the equipment.

Fuel, engines, ammunition and even hulls have to be designed specifically to function in sub-zero temperatures and withstand constant tear and wear.

Screenshot from RT video Screenshot from RT video

“Our main objective is research and evaluation of conditions in the Arctic and the suitability of our weapons and equipment this far north,” said Captain 1st Class Vladimir Kondratov, commander of the surface ships group of the Northern Fleet.

The drills were meant not only to test the destroyer Admiral Levchenko, the flag ship of the expedition, but also the new troops on the ground. They fired a cruise missile from Kotelny Island to demonstrate their targeting skills while the ship crew showed how well they can intercept missile attacks.

Screenshot from RT video Screenshot from RT video

“Almost the entire ship’s anti-air arsenal was put to use: missiles, turrets and deck guns,” Gazdiev reported from the scene.

The next part of the mission is a 4,000km journey back to Severemorsk in northwestern Russia, where the Navy’s entire Northern Fleet is stationed.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #42 on: October 01, 2014, 11:09:43 PM »
BUT, BUT, BUT OBUMMER / EU HAS PUT 'SANCTIONS' ON RUSSIA?

Have You Been Delphied?  ;)
------------------------------------------
Internet colossal eBay announces big plans for Russia
http://rt.com/business/191872-ebay-expanding-commerce-russia/

While Western nations continue to pile sanctions onto Russia, eBay the world's largest online marketplace is expanding in the country. On Tuesday, it opened up its platform to Russia’s biggest retailers, eBay’s first local overseas site in seven years.

Local Russian sellers like Wikimart and X5 Retail Group begins to sell products, ranging from electronics to women’s fashion, on eBay’s marketplace on Tuesday. To spur activity, sellers will have a zero percent fee during the first stage of development, as the company hopes to attract selling partners.

The move is part of the e-commerce company’s emerging markets strategy, which also includes Brazil, India, and China. Russia becomes the first country since Australia in 2007 where eBay has launched a dedicated site.

While Western nations continue to pile sanctions onto Russia, eBay sees value in the market.

“A year earlier when the eBay general director came here, he said that Russia is a top priority among the emerging markets, since then our plans in Russia haven’t changed,” Vladimir Dolgov, chief of eBay Russia, told RT.

Online shoppers increased 30 percent to 30 million in 2013. Though the figure is expected to plateau in the next couple years, it will still increase at 14 percent annually. Morgan Stanley has forecast volumes will triple by 2015 to $36 billion, up from $12 billion in 2012; the year eBay first entered the Russian market.

By the end of December 2013, eBay was receiving 90,000 orders per day, and had 1 million active users in Russia.
eBay’s biggest individual seller in Russia, online store Eforcity, believes the timing is perfect.

“eBay Russia reminds me of how we started on eBay in the US 14 years ago,” the company’s founder and CEO Jack Sheng, told RT.

This time last year, eBay’s partner PayPal began accepting the Russian ruble in transactions, making it the 26th currency it accepted.

Russia’s 146 million population could provide a plush market for eBay, however other concerns remain.

Economic growth isn’t expected to surpass 0.5 percent this year, and a weakening ruble and inflation may discourage would-be shoppers.

A softening in consumer spending won’t deter eBay, which Jones said will stand by its commitment when it first entered the market.

"Like everybody, we are working through some of the current changes," Vice President Wendy Jones told Reuters.

The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #43 on: October 05, 2014, 02:55:08 PM »
So, Why Is Fatherland Security Equipping The Police With All These Vehicles? (http://avaxnews.net/pictures/19934)  Oh Yeah!  The Death Of The Dollar.


Collapse Of The US Dollar BRICS VIDEO (John B Wells Interview)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUY6-VK8klg
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #44 on: October 05, 2014, 10:18:48 PM »
Hey, hey.  My, my.  Rockefeller / Rothschild's BANKING will never die.  There's more to the picture, than meets the eye.

RUSSIA IS THIS CLOSE TO BANNING BITCOIN
http://www.infowars.com/russia-is-this-close-to-banning-bitcoin/

Unclear how ban would be enforced against a community well-versed in use of encryption (AW SHUCKS)

It may soon be against the law for Russians to possess Bitcoin (BTC) or other digital currencies.

Legislation put forward by Russia’s Ministry of Finance would ban all digital currencies and impose a range of financial penalties on individuals and companies caught creating, generating, or using “quasi-money.”

Websites associated with the digital currency market are expected to be banned as well.

According to Russian media, the proposed penalties for using cryptocurrencies are: 50,000 rubles (US $1,251) for individuals, 100,000 rubles (US $2,503) for officials, and up to 1 million rubles (US $25,038) for businesses.

In August, reports surfaced that a bill targeting the use of cryptocurries was imminent, but the text of the legislation had not yet been made public. The Ministry of Finance said at the time that the use of the digital currencies, like Bitoin, created a “shadow economy” fueled by illegal goods and money laundering.

In a statement issued this year, the Russian Central Bank warned that the use of “money substitutes” is already prohibited by the country’s laws, the violation of which can result in harsh consequences.

Russian news site Lenta reports the ban will not affect electronic payments from Webmoney—the Russian equivalent of PayPal—or fictional currencies used in video games that are often purchased with actual money.

Slated for enactment next year, it’s unclear how the ban would be enforced against a community well-versed in the use of encryption and other technical means to hide their tracks.
-----------------------------------------
Who in the alt-media will come out to SUPPORT Russia's decision out of one side of their mouth while demonizing Rothschild's / Rockefeller central banks (i.e the fed) for wanting to do the same?  I'm listening.

The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #45 on: October 05, 2014, 10:55:20 PM »
Hey, hey.  My, my.  Rockefeller / Rothschild's BANKING will never die.  There's more to the picture, than meets the eye.

RUSSIA IS THIS CLOSE TO BANNING BITCOIN
http://www.infowars.com/russia-is-this-close-to-banning-bitcoin/

Unclear how ban would be enforced against a community well-versed in use of encryption (AW SHUCKS)

It may soon be against the law for Russians to possess Bitcoin (BTC) or other digital currencies.

Legislation put forward by Russia’s Ministry of Finance would ban all digital currencies and impose a range of financial penalties on individuals and companies caught creating, generating, or using “quasi-money.”

Websites associated with the digital currency market are expected to be banned as well.

According to Russian media, the proposed penalties for using cryptocurrencies are: 50,000 rubles (US $1,251) for individuals, 100,000 rubles (US $2,503) for officials, and up to 1 million rubles (US $25,038) for businesses.

In August, reports surfaced that a bill targeting the use of cryptocurries was imminent, but the text of the legislation had not yet been made public. The Ministry of Finance said at the time that the use of the digital currencies, like Bitoin, created a “shadow economy” fueled by illegal goods and money laundering.

In a statement issued this year, the Russian Central Bank warned that the use of “money substitutes” is already prohibited by the country’s laws, the violation of which can result in harsh consequences.

Russian news site Lenta reports the ban will not affect electronic payments from Webmoney—the Russian equivalent of PayPal—or fictional currencies used in video games that are often purchased with actual money.

Slated for enactment next year, it’s unclear how the ban would be enforced against a community well-versed in the use of encryption and other technical means to hide their tracks.
-----------------------------------------
Who in the alt-media will come out to SUPPORT Russia's decision out of one side of their mouth while demonizing Rothschild's / Rockefeller central banks (i.e the fed) for wanting to do the same?  I'm listening.

Is it JUST A COINCIDENCE that the Bank of England (AKA The Bank Of Rothschild) issued this statement in their report on bit coin the very same day the Russian central banks announced banning bit coin?
http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/quarterlybulletin/2014/qb14q3digitalcurrenciesbitcoin2.pdf

The greatest hypothetical risk to monetary stability that might be posed by digital currencies is if the economy were to become, for example, ‘Bitcoinised’ — where everybody sought to conduct the totality of their day-to-day transactions entirely within the alternative currency and switch into sterling only when strictly necessary for interaction with the state (such as to pay taxes). This would represent a significant change. Since in this extreme scenario all payments would be conducted away from sterling as base money for essentially all of the economy, the Bank’s ability to influence price-setting and real activity would be severely impaired.
-------------------------------------
I'm not here trying to push bit coin.  I'm trying to get people to understand that there are NOT very many degrees of separation from the central banks in Russia, China and the west as we are being told there are.

If you read the internal documents from the central banks on bit coin it is REALLY SIMPLE.  They absolutely hate the idea when digital currency empowers WE THE PEOPLE.  On the other hand, they love the idea of bit coin THEY CONTROL.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline jerryweaver

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,430
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #46 on: October 07, 2014, 11:37:20 AM »
The New “Multipolar” World and the “Golden Age” – They’re not what you think they are

http://redefininggod.com/2014/09/the-new-multipolar-world-and-the-golden-age-theyre-not-what-you-think-they-are/

My recent article on the farcical East/West conflict was kindly posted by Jean Haines on her blog, and she asked her readers for their opinions on it. Having looked at the various comments, I realize I’ll have to write several entries to adequately answer them, so I will. :-) But to start off, I thought I’d address the two ideas that most grabbed my attention:

1) That “a multi-polar world is going to be a far different picture” than what I’m forecasting.

2) That “we’re heading into the Golden Age.”

So to begin with the first point…

The multipolar / multilateral New World Order is the NWO the Globalist Banking Cabal have been planning all along.

But you don’t have to take my word for it. Take theirs:

Here is an article straight from the IMF website…




…So a global crisis that the globalist banksters engineered requires supranational solutions? Quelle surprise! Note that the globalist buzzwords, multipolar and multilateral, are also prominently featured.

And here is an excerpt from the foreword of a World Bank report titled Global Development Horizons 2011 – Multipolarity: The New Global Economy…



Continues:
http://redefininggod.com/2014/09/the-new-multipolar-world-and-the-golden-age-theyre-not-what-you-think-they-are/


Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #47 on: October 07, 2014, 08:47:18 PM »
Jerry Weaver.  This next post dovetails what you've posted above.....
----------------------------------------------
CIA Insider Robert David Steele On ALex Jones Show 'Delphied' audience on BRICS.

Robert David Steele said... BRICS is a separation of the "GOLDMAN SACHS' BANKSTERS.

Funny Robert David Steele mentioned the UN 'GREEN PROJECTS' as Americas savior.   ;)

I have posted in IMF / World Bank's OWN WORDS that they are deeply involved with BRICS.  GO BACK AND READ THEIR OWN WORDS YOURSELF.

While you are reading that note the revolving door at the BRICS partner 'World Bank'  Who's running it?  "GOLDMAN SACHS' PEOPLE!!! BWAHAHAHAHHA!!!  ;D
-----------------------------------------------
Former World Bank president rejoins Goldman Sachs  Say it isn't so!
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/08/us-goldman-advisoryboard-idUSBRE9970WF20131008

(Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N) said on Monday that former World Bank Group President Robert Zoellick will rejoin the investment bank as chairman of its international advisory board.

The appointment marks Zoellick's second stint at Goldman Sachs. Before taking the helm of the World Bank in 2007, he served as vice chairman, international, at the bank.

Zoellick stepped down from the World Bank after his term ended in 2012. President Barack Obama tapped Dr. Jim Yong Kim, the former president of Dartmouth College, to replace him.

Since leaving the World Bank, Zoellick has also joined the board of Temasek Holdings, the sovereign wealth fund of Singapore, as well as the international advisory board of the Rolls-Royce Group RROYC.UL.

Read rest of article at link
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #48 on: October 07, 2014, 09:02:33 PM »
IS BRICS A ROTHCHILD'S BANK?  WHO OWNS CHINA'S GOLD? WAS USA BUILT UP TO BE DESTROYED? WAS RUSSIA "KICKING OUT" THE ROTHCHILD'S THE MOTHER OF ALL DISTRACTIONS?


Please read this 1996 banking article (JPG IMAGE) on the Rothschilds gold banking SYSTEM with China going back as far as the post second world war.  The article admits the primary directive of the Rothschild banks is 'gold trading'.

BRICS will be a 'gold backed' banking system.
--------------------------------------------
What is the Rothschild Role in China's Gold Accumulation & Price-Fixing Scheme?
http://www.24hgold.com/english/contributor.aspx?article=5265537798H11690&contributor=Charleston+voice
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #49 on: October 07, 2014, 11:17:24 PM »
Another Joke ON YOU moment.

BRICS is a Goldman Sachs created name for the organization itself.
-------------------------------------
The Economist Who Invented The BRICs Just Invented A Whole New Group Of Countries: The MINTs

Former Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill is the one who popularized the term "BRICs in reference to the group of emerging-market economies made up of Brazil, Russia, India, and China....

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/jim-oneill-presents-the-mint-economies-2013-11#ixzz3FWH9KDdr
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline iamc2

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,810
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #50 on: October 08, 2014, 12:56:33 AM »
 America is dead economically [just as planned] and Russia with China [who already is taking over] will have a Economic & Military takeover [of the USA]; as planned by the New World Order Nazis'!
"When the Truth was murdered:
Common Sense ran away..."

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #51 on: October 08, 2014, 07:56:03 AM »
America is dead economically [just as planned] and Russia with China [who already is taking over] will have a Economic & Military takeover [of the USA]; as planned by the New World Order Nazis'!

... and you are NOT getting this in the alt-media either.    Why a Rothschild's BRICS scheme?  That would be one of them there 'conspiracy theories'.

The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline iamc2

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,810
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #52 on: October 08, 2014, 11:10:18 PM »
... and you are NOT getting this in the alt-media either.    Why a Rothschild's BRICS scheme?  That would be one of them there 'conspiracy theories'.
YES, my friend: "A Conspiracy Theory" and I thought of it with my Tin Foil Hat On  ;)

 Ya know what make me sick to my stomach is: most folks are A OK with a CASHLESS Society? What a Bunch of Schmucks! and most schmucks also don't have a clue about global monetary dealings anyways...as I said; a lot of schmucks out there...
"When the Truth was murdered:
Common Sense ran away..."

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #53 on: October 08, 2014, 11:45:44 PM »
YES, my friend: "A Conspiracy Theory" and I thought of it with my Tin Foil Hat On  ;)

 Ya know what make me sick to my stomach is: most folks are A OK with a CASHLESS Society? What a Bunch of Schmucks! and most schmucks also don't have a clue about global monetary dealings anyways...as I said; a lot of schmucks out there...

The Central Banks are drooling over a digital currency.  There ONLY obstacle is a FREE MARKET NEUTRAL internet because they can NOT control encryption.  HOWEVER, if THEY (the central banks) control THERE OWN internet for the public well, then everything changes.  ;)
-------------------------------------------------------------
HEY, HEY MY MY, BRIC Nations Plan Their own "Independent Internet"  THERE'S MORE TO THE PICTURE THAN MEETS THE EYE...
http://www.itworld.com/internet/377182/bric-nations-plan-their-own-independent-internet

The five of the fastest-growing economic nations are planning to build their own Internet where the U.S. can't spy on them.

October 04, 2013, 2:19 PM — (We're going to depart slightly from my usual semiconductor-related news because this is an interesting development. Back with AMD on Monday.)

The BRICS nations – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – are building their own high-speed Internet free of the U.S. influence. First announced last month by Brazil's President, Dilma Rousseff, BRICS Cable will have considerable bandwidth and room for growth and represents a middle finger at the U.S.

The majority of the backbone is underwater, as it runs from Vladivostock, Russia to Shantou, China to Chennai, India, passes through Singapore, on to Cape Town, South Africa to Fortaleza, Brazil. The network is said to be in its final phase of implementation.

The network is a 2 fibre pair with 12.8 Tbits/sec capacity, all under water. Such a network would take some time to build, especially laying that much underwater cable, so this has to have been going on for a while. The five nations all have their reasons for doing this, but Brazil in particular is doing this to divorce itself from the U.S.-centric Internet because of Washington’s online spying.

President Rousseff has ordered her nation take steps for greater online independence and security following revelations that the NSA intercepted her communications, hacked into the state-owned Petrobras oil company’s network and spied on Brazilians who using U.S. companies like Facebook and Google. Google's failed social network Orkut may be dead in the U.S. but it is enormously popular in Brazil.

The project is expected to go live in mid-2015. The immediate and most obvious beneficiary beyond the four founders would be Africa, since the backbone loops around lower half of the nation.

It would likely benefit Russia and China as well. Neither one of these countries is known as bastions of free speech, China in particular, and they would undoubtedly love an Internet that's easier to control and easier to track down individuals. If you don't think they have those controls built in, you aren't familiar with their track records.

It's a shame they won't be leaving the main Internet, because in all honesty, losing China and Russia from the main network would not be a bad thing when you consider how much piracy, malware, hacking, child porn and other vile materials originate in Russia. Remember the Russian Business Network? And then there's China's constant cyberattacks on the U.S., particularly our military and government.

Unfortunately, they are not leaving the main Internet. Creating their own Internet in isolation would be pointless. There is a connection to Miami, so traffic will flow from the Internet we all know and love and the BRICS Cable Internet. They just don't want traffic to be routed through the U.S. like it does now. The U.S. developed the Internet and holds the vast majority of IPv4 addresses. I once saw a statistic that showed Stanford University had more IPv4 addresses than were available to all of China. However, this was some years ago and before the mass rollout of IPv6.

This kind of Internet fragmentation would be problematic because it would enable bad actors like Russia, China, and a whole host of Middle Eastern nations to control their populaces and prevent any uprisings like the 2009 uprising in Iran or the Arab Spring of 2011.

But geographic isolation could ruin the effectiveness of popular software applications and services that rely on the Internet's open structure. For example, almost all of the major security and malware firms have honeypots on the Internet to catch malware and hackers out there, many of which originate in Russia. Now these bad actors can hide in the BRICS Cable network and we might not be able to find them, making zero-day threats harder to spot.

Brazil's anger is understandable. I'm rather bothered that the Brazilians were angrier at our government over the domestic spying than we were. America seemed to focus more on Snowden than what he was revealing.

The commitment from these countries seems clear. More may follow, which would result in a fragmenting and walling off of the Internet, and I fear that would benefit the bad players much more than it would stop any legitimate complaints of U.S. spying.
----------------------
Once you're gone you can never come back, when you're out of the blue and into the black...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cawk2cMTnGo
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #54 on: October 09, 2014, 12:54:38 AM »
BELOW IS A CLASSIC DELPHIED TECHNIQUE BEING USED TO EXPLAIN CHINA / (IMF) WORLD BANK / BRICS

OK, if China passing the USA as single largest economy marks the end of the IMF / World Bank then WHY ARE THE CHINESE BEGGING TO HAVE THE LARGEST CONTROL OF 'SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS' KNOWN AS SDR'S FROM THE IMF?

If you have followed this thread, what is going on is that (to make this as simple as possible) the IMF and World Bank is only 'rebranding' itself as BRICS by saying BRICS is separate from the two.  How could BRICS be separate if they are going to conduct commerce and trade in Rothschild's World Bank SDR's?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
China Overtakes US as World's Single Largest Economy

'The days when the IMF, World Bank, and U.S. Treasury could essentially dictate international finances and intimidate or crush opponents ... are drawing to a close.'  (Have you been 'delphied'?)

China has overtaken the United State to become the world's largest economy, according to new data and an analysis by the International Monetary Fund.

Calculated by looking at gross domestic product (GDP) alongside cost-of-living data, the IMF announced Tuesday that China is now larger economically than the U.S. for the first time in history with an adjusted GDP of $17.6 trillion compared to a U.S. GDP of $17.4 trillion.

The milestone has been forecast for some time, but the conclusion of the IMF—presented in its 2014 World Economic Outlook report—comes as other economic indicators suggest a global shakeup in the world economy may be upon us. As the Financial Times reports, "the speed of [China's] transformation" is what's most" breathtaking" considering that  "as recently as 2005, China’s economy was less than half the size of America’s." Additionally, the IMF now projects that "China’s economy will be 20 percent bigger than that of the U.S. by 2019."

The BusinessInsider explains how the IMF's announcement is only based on a certain set of calculations and does not translate to a direct, side-by-side comparison of the two economies:

The simple logic is that prices aren't the same in each country: A shirt will cost you less in Shanghai than in San Francisco, so it's not entirely reasonable to compare countries without taking this into account. Though a typical person in China earns a lot less than the typical person in the US, simply converting a Chinese salary into dollars underestimates how much purchasing power that individual, and therefore that country, might have. The Economist's Big Mac Index is a great example of these disparities.

So the IMF measures both GDP in market-exchange terms and in terms of purchasing power. On the purchasing-power basis, China is overtaking the US right about now and becoming the world's biggest economy. [...]

It's not all sour news for the US. It'll be some time yet until the lines cross over in raw terms, not adjusted for purchasing power. By that measure, China still sits more than $6.5 trillion lower than the US and isn't likely to overtake for quite some time.

As the relative size of world's largest economies are shifting, so too, are some of the world's most important economic alliances and institutions. Though the U.S. dollar continues to be the world's dominant currency and the World Bank and International Monetary Fund both maintain formidable influence on monetary policies, their singular hold on global financial is shifting in numerous ways.

On Wednesday, USA Today reports on ongoing Chinese efforts to have its currency, the renminbi, allowed into the IMF's Special Drawing Right (known as SDR), a global composite currency system that fosters international trade and maintenance of the world's top currencies —which currently includes only the U.S. dollar, the British pound, the Japanese Yen, and the Euro. According to the paper:

As the world's No. 2 economy after the U.S., China believes it is close to earning the status of a reserve money, the first time that an emerging market currency would attain this position. Chinese entry into the "magic circle" has been advanced by the British government's September decision to issue renminbi-denominated bonds, the first big government to take such a step, and allow the proceeds to be held as reserves by the Bank of England.

The main conditions for the renminbi to pass the SDR test are that it should be widely used in trade and be "freely usable" in international payments and asset management. Although a long way behind the dollar, the renminbi has made impressive strides recently and is challenging the euro in several key fields.


As Conn Hallinan, an analyst who writes for Foreign Policy In Focus, wrote on Tuesday, the rise of emerging of economies—with China the largest and most striking example—the global economic picture is changing in interesting, though not widely understood, ways. According to Hallinan:

This past summer, the BRICS countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—created an alternative to the largely U.S.-controlled World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) added 1.6 billion people to its rolls.

The BRICS’ construction of a Contingent Reserve Arrangement will give its members emergency access to foreign currency, which might eventually dethrone the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. The creation of a development bank will make it possible to bypass the IMF for balance-of-payment loans, thus avoiding the organization’s onerous austerity requirements.

Less than a month after the BRICS’ declaration of independence from the current strictures of world finance, the SCO—which includes China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan—approved India, Pakistan, Iran, and Mongolia for membership in the organization. It was the single largest expansion of the economic cooperation and security-minded group in its history, and it could end up diluting the impact of sanctions currently plaguing Moscow over the Ukraine crisis and Tehran over its nuclear program.

Given the deeply intertwined nature of the economic relationship between the American consumer-based economy and China's role as the world's leading manufactuter, the narrative about overall financial strength is never straight-forward.

However, as Hallinan concludes, "the days when the IMF, World Bank, and U.S. Treasury could essentially dictate international finances and intimidate or crush opponents" is swiftly "drawing to a close."
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline iamc2

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,810
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #56 on: October 09, 2014, 03:42:15 AM »
The link to the above article my apologies.
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2014/10/08/china-overtakes-us-worlds-single-largest-economy
Great info my friend and eye opening for many...this world will be CASHLESS in a very short time & China with Russia will have more Super Power than the USA! 

The West is spinning downward quickly! >:( ??? :-[ :'(
"When the Truth was murdered:
Common Sense ran away..."

Offline Outer Haven

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,923
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #57 on: October 09, 2014, 04:39:44 AM »
I won't beLIEve for a second that China isn't part of the NWO when almost everything in the West is manufactured there...
"I admire your faith [in evolution]. But I don't admire your intelligence."
-- Kent Hovind

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #58 on: October 09, 2014, 03:36:17 PM »
I won't beLIEve for a second that China isn't part of the NWO when almost everything in the West is manufactured there...

It's kind of a 'no brainer' huh?

So, how do you like all the nonsense that's online dissuading you from the realization that China (the very heart and soul of BRICS) and BRICS are ANYTHING BUT an "alternative" to the NWO IMF / World Bank?   

If, or should I say 'WHEN', Russia and China are going to 'have to' go to war with what is left of the USA, don't think for one second the same banisters that built America up is NOT behind destroying her for good.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #59 on: October 11, 2014, 09:36:12 PM »
When listening to these two 'gold bugs'.  Remember this, and remember it well.  Rothschild's centuries old gold trading empire owns the largest receives of gold in the world. 

The Rothschild's gold trading empire has been working with China since the end of the second world war (before that really) to become the worlds economic super power.  (A Rothschild communist puppet)
--------------------------------------------------------------

Jim Wille: Market Shock and Awe coming as Gold Repricing in works by China / Rothchilds [VIDEO}
http://marketsanity.com/jim-wille-market-shock-awe-coming-gold-repricing-works-china/
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #60 on: October 12, 2014, 10:30:31 PM »
We're Getting Tough On Russia With Sanctions! (BRICS) HE, HE, HAW HAW

BP Get's Into The Russian Action too!  Say Howdy Doo Queeny!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfbmjUQOFxs
----------------------------------------------------
Rosneft Signs $1.5 Billion Oil Deal With BP
BP Has Said it Will Continue Working With Rosneft Despite U.S. Sanctions Against its CEO

http://online.wsj.com/articles/rosneft-signs-1-5-billion-oil-deal-with-bp-1403861584

MOSCOW—Russian oil giant Rosneft, whose chief executive was put on the U.S. sanctions list, signed a deal worth at least $1.5 billion with its longtime partner BP PLC, the company said Friday.

After Moscow's annexation of Ukraine's Crimea region in mid-March and western sanctions against several individuals close to President Vladimir Putin, some U.S.-based companies tried to distant themselves from Russia. U.K.-based BP, which owns...

The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #61 on: October 26, 2014, 08:59:12 PM »
Watch the stock market for put option trades.

What would happen to USA if ebola went from a 'trial run' to 'HOT' operation?

Well, I think we all know the last legs of the American economy would be cut.  While USA is in an ebola disaster BRICS could 'EVENTUALLY' come in and save her. 

TERMS AND CONDITIONS MAY APPLY  ;)

--------------------------------------------
Scare factor
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/24/business/ebola-cost-warning/

But it is fear that could prove the most damaging for the countries' economies. According to Jim Yong Kim, World Bank president, the "tide of fear" triggered by the outbreak could cause 80% to 90% of the economic impact. This was the case for both the SARS and H1N1 outbreaks (ah, not really my comment), and it is proving true for Ebola too.

"The fear factor from the Ebola outbreak has reduced labor force participation, closed places of employment, disrupted transportation, and motivated some government and private decision makers to close seaports and airports," Kim said at a press conference last week.
Nearly 800 people died during the 2002 -- 2004 SARS outbreak, which the World Bank estimated cost more than $40 billion in economic losses. The slowdown was mainly caused by the flight of foreign investment and a travel to affected areas falling by up to 70%.
Ebola has killed more than three times as many people so far.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #62 on: October 26, 2014, 09:37:11 PM »
THE ROAD IS LOOOOOONG WITH MANY A WINDING TURNS FROM WHICH THERE IS NOOOOOO RETURN... HE AIN'T HEAVY HE'S MY BROTHER, SO ON WE GOOOOOOOOOO! HIS WELFARE IS OF MYYYYYYY CONCERN, NO BURDON IS HEEEEE TOOOOO BAAAAARE WE'LL GET THERE...HE AINT HEAVY HE'S MY BROTHER.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl5vi9ir49g&list=RDJl5vi9ir49g

SUNG WITH 'FEELING'.   ;D
--------------------------------------------------------------


World Bank chief welcomes new BRICS development bank
http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/07/23/worldbank-india-idINKBN0FS1MV20140723

(Reuters) - The World Bank welcomed a $100 billion development bank founded by the BRICS nations and is ready to provide it with technical assistance, the World Bank president said on Wednesday after a meeting with India's new prime minister, Narendra Modi.

The BRICS developing nations - Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa - announced the bank last week, saying it would fund infrastructure projects in developing nations - a reflection of their growing importance in the world economy.

The new bank was created in part as a challenge to the global financial order created by Western powers after World War Two, which revolved around the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. But World Bank President Jim Yong Kim, who is on a three-day visit to India, played down the challenge.

"The only competition we have is with poverty," he told reporters. "Any bank or any group of institutions that try to tackle the problem of infrastructure investment to fight poverty, we welcome."

The World Bank group was ready to increase its financial support to support job-oriented skills and infrastructure development in India to $15 billion to $18 billion over the next three years, Kim said, from $13.4 billion in the previous three years.

After meeting Kim, Modi said India was interested in the World Bank's knowledge and expertise "rather than dollars" and called on the Washington-based institution to speed up project execution.

"We live in a world where speed matters. Quick execution is essential," Modi said on his Twitter account.

The emerging powers represented by BRICS feel their newfound economic weight is not reflected in their decision-making power at the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

(Reporting by Aditya Kalra; Writing by Rajesh Kumar Singh; Editing by Larry King)
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #63 on: October 26, 2014, 10:53:07 PM »
"THE IMF NEEDS TO PAY 20 BILLION FOR WAR AGAINST RUSSIA!"
-George Soros
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-10-23/george-soros-slams-putin-warns-existential-threat-russia

Are you being delphied?
Money for war with Russia OR just more 'DEBT' for Ukraine?  BUT, BUT, BUT!!! It's NOT a 'bailout' the 20 billion is for the "war effort".

Is it just a coincidence that back in the beginning of September, the IMF was going to HAVE TO loan Ukraine, DRUM ROLL PLEASE... 20 billion dollars "if conflict continued".

No need for Soro's theatrics.  The 20 billion IMF loan was planned all along.  HOWEVER, we all know now who is MANAGING Ukraine's debt.  ;)
--------------------------------------------------
SEPTEMBER 2  2014
Ukraine bailout could need extra $19bn if conflict continues, warns IMF

Ukraine could need a further $19bn in emergency international funding by the end of next year if there is no resolution to the escalating conflict in the east of the country, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned.

Peace talks are scheduled to resume this week in Minsk as the humanitarian disaster deepens and the outlook for Ukraine's economy darkens. Factories are shutting down, the country's industrial heartlands are under attack and the currency has been in freefall, contributing to a sharp increase in prices.

The IMF last week approved a $1.4bn (£840m) loan to Ukraine, the second tranche of its $17bn bailout programme agreed in April to stave off default.

Ukraine urgently needs IMF loans to support its budget and prop up its faltering currency as its debts come up for repayment. Almost $4bn must be repaid before the end of the year, with $9bn due in 2015.

In exchange for IMF aid, Ukraine's government has agreed on sweeping economic reforms, including curbing public-sector wage increases, increasing energy prices to bring them more in line with market values, overhauling banking and currency regulations and tackling chronic graft that has made the country one of the most corrupt in the world.

The IMF praised Ukraine's progress, but said risks to the programme had increased. Since mid-July, the conflict has escalated, while Naftogaz, Ukraine's national gas company, and Gazprom, Russia's state energy group, have been locked in a standoff over the price of gas, which until recently the Russians supplied at a hefty discount. The dispute is likely to further increase Ukraine's debts.

Despite highlighting military and political turmoil, the IMF left unchanged its forecast that Ukraine's economy would shrink by 6.5% in 2014 – an estimate based on the assumption that fighting will abate in the coming months.

But it said that if fighting continued through next year, Ukraine would slide deeper into recession and its economy would shrink by up to 7.25%. With many independent economists pencilling in a 7.5%-8% slump and an extension to the bailout, the fund was accused of being too optimistic.

"The IMF are living in cloud cuckoo land," said Timothy Ash, of Standard Bank (I wonder if Rockefller's own that bank?  Hmmm?). The main question being asked by investors, he said, was "when, not if" Ukraine would be forced to restructure its debts.

The IMF has agreed to soften some of the bailout programme demands. Ukraine will be allowed to run a larger budget deficit this year, to reflect the drain on its finances from fighting Russia-backed separatists.

Ukraine's prime minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, said last week that the country was incurring billions of dollars of losses as a result of the war, costs that far exceeded the lost production in Ukraine's industrial heartlands.

The Donetsk and Luhansk regions at the centre of the conflict are the bedrock of Ukraine's coal, steel and chemicals industries. Although home to less than 9% of the population, these regions contribute 16% of the country's economic output. Yatsenyuk has accused separatists of attacking railways, roads, power stations, bridges and mines as part of a Russia-backed plan to stifle the economy.

In July, industrial output in Donetsk was down 29% on last year, in Luhansk 56%. ZAZ, Ukraine's largest carmaker, announced recently it had virtually ceased production because of the conflict and the erosion of consumer spending power as the currency has plummeted.

The hryvnia has rebounded after hitting an all-time low last week, but it has still lost more than a third of its value against the dollar this year.

A weaker currency also hurts Ukraine's highly dollar-dependent economy by making loans denominated in foreign currencies more expensive to repay, which in turn increases defaults, putting the banking system under stress.

Currency was a sensitive issue for Ukraine's 'dollarised' economy, said Olena Bilan, chief economist at Dragon Capital investment bank in Kiev. Currency strength was a sign of wider economy stability, she said, and "a psychological issue" for a population that remembered "the long period of economic problems that Ukraine experienced after the collapse of the Soviet Union".

Bilan thinks the population will back the IMF-mandated reforms. "People here are ready to accept some pain. There is understanding that the country was mismanaged and is in a critical situation now. It is no longer possible to keep [domestic energy] tariffs unchanged while paying very high gas prices to Russia."

But Elena Sniezhko, of Ukraine's Capital newspaper, said prolonged wage freezes and cuts at a time of high inflation were proving unpopular. According to a survey of economists by the paper, inflation was running at almost 13% in July but was expected to spike at 20% towards the end of the year.

Vasyl Povoroznyk, senior economist at the International Centre for Policy Studies, a Kiev-based thinktank, said that as the country prepared for parliamentary elections in October, the economy would remain a secondary concern behind the war. But the "most anticipated economic reform" was the demand that took protesters to Kiev's Independence Square – an end to corruption.

The IMF, which has seen Ukraine fail to complete its two previous reform programmes, said success hinged on whether the authorities can make "a decisive break with a past riddled with weak governance, widespread corruption and abysmal business climate".

Povoroznyk said the government had the will to carry out these reforms, but most overcome opposition from special interests in the bureaucracy and business world that have profited from siphoning off state funds.

"Why did people go to Maidan last year. It was for political and economic reforms. Unfortunately they have not been achieved yet."
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline Dude447

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,063
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #64 on: October 26, 2014, 11:40:23 PM »
Take a chill pill everyone the idea russia china is going to press the button BS is not going to happen

Offline Dude447

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,063
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #65 on: October 26, 2014, 11:44:04 PM »
In Fact have tangy Tangerine

Offline Dude447

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,063
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #66 on: October 27, 2014, 12:09:12 AM »
In  fact go join Lisa with her end of the world Christian Bs  All I need next is some fool talking about reptilians

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #67 on: October 27, 2014, 09:59:12 AM »
Take a chill pill everyone the idea russia china is going to press the button BS is not going to happen

That was so last century.

Today we just declare 'war' on our own population.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline iamc2

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,810
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #68 on: October 27, 2014, 06:14:53 PM »
 Russia & China have been running War Games against the USA since 1995[ check 'Jane's Military Quarterly.]'

 Russia and China are NON- CHRISTIAN---and thus HATE US As the People of Christ!

 this is a global WAR for the SOULS of Mankind---and folks had better figure this out before it is too LATE!

This Spiritual WAR has just begun my friends... ;)
"When the Truth was murdered:
Common Sense ran away..."

EvadingGrid

  • Guest
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #69 on: October 27, 2014, 07:56:00 PM »
Russia & China have been running War Games against the USA since 1995[ check 'Jane's Military Quarterly.]'

 Russia and China are NON- CHRISTIAN---and thus HATE US As the People of Christ!

 this is a global WAR for the SOULS of Mankind---and folks had better figure this out before it is too LATE!

This Spiritual WAR has just begun my friends... ;)

Erm ... about 75% of the population are Orthodox Christians (making years of Soviet CCCP athiest brainwashing an epic fail). Which gives the NWO a real headache, as they support Family, they dont hand out passports to anchor babies, they dont' let corps not pay taxes, they support Marriage with tax benefits, and they dont' allow the promotion of the LGB agenda, they dont' allow foreigners to buy up the media, etc .. .. ..

Oh and the number of people identifying themselves as Christians is going up year after year .. .. ..

Just thought I'd mention it.
 :)

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #70 on: October 27, 2014, 08:05:23 PM »
Russia & China have been running War Games against the USA since 1995[ check 'Jane's Military Quarterly.]'

 Russia and China are NON- CHRISTIAN---and thus HATE US As the People of Christ!

 this is a global WAR for the SOULS of Mankind---and folks had better figure this out before it is too LATE!

This Spiritual WAR has just begun my friends... ;)

If a PANDEMIC operation doesn't FIRST wipeout a great part of the US population (mostly in the quarantine camps) then YES a third world war is still on the table.  With the bankers financing both ALL sides.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline iamc2

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,810
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #71 on: October 27, 2014, 08:17:23 PM »
Erm ... about 75% of the population are Orthodox Christians (making years of Soviet CCCP athiest brainwashing an epic fail). Which gives the NWO a real headache, as they support Family, they dont hand out passports to anchor babies, they dont' let corps not pay taxes, they support Marriage with tax benefits, and they dont' allow the promotion of the LGB agenda, they dont' allow foreigners to buy up the media, etc .. .. ..

Oh and the number of people identifying themselves as Christians is going up year after year .. .. ..

Just thought I'd mention it.
 :)

I am with ya Mate! Our Faith will win in the end---GOD Bless ya Mate & Mary with the Cat-- king of your flat  ;)
"When the Truth was murdered:
Common Sense ran away..."

Offline iamc2

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,810
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #72 on: October 27, 2014, 08:19:22 PM »
If a PANDEMIC operation doesn't FIRST wipeout a great part of the US population (mostly in the quarantine camps) then YES a third world war is still on the table.  With the bankers financing both ALL sides.
always Spot on with your commentary  8)
"When the Truth was murdered:
Common Sense ran away..."

Offline Dude447

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,063
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #73 on: October 27, 2014, 08:36:00 PM »
EG  is not just a mod here for nothing .Talks alot of subjects and debate aswell

Offline iamc2

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,810
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #74 on: October 27, 2014, 08:44:10 PM »
EG  is not just a mod here for nothing .Talks alot of subjects and debate aswell
I am with ya Mate: EvadingGrid is a Man on a Mission  ;)!

 Good Man!  8)
"When the Truth was murdered:
Common Sense ran away..."

Offline PeaceAndFreedom

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 712
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #75 on: October 27, 2014, 09:19:27 PM »
Erm ... about 75% of the population are Orthodox Christians (making years of Soviet CCCP athiest brainwashing an epic fail). Which gives the NWO a real headache, as they support Family, they dont hand out passports to anchor babies, they dont' let corps not pay taxes, they support Marriage with tax benefits, and they dont' allow the promotion of the LGB agenda, they dont' allow foreigners to buy up the media, etc .. .. ..

Oh and the number of people identifying themselves as Christians is going up year after year .. .. ..

Just thought I'd mention it.
 :)

So glad somebody mentioned this. God is in control, and His body runs through peoples in all nations, regardless of attempts by the manicheans to create phony conflicts between civilizations. White hat West, vs. Black hat East, while the banksters on either side profit, it's all an NWO game, but the puppetmasters are trumped by the One who owns the stage.
"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered!... I am not a number, I am a free man!"

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #76 on: October 27, 2014, 11:12:13 PM »
So glad somebody mentioned this. God is in control, and His body runs through peoples in all nations, regardless of attempts by the manicheans to create phony conflicts between civilizations. White hat West, vs. Black hat East, while the banksters on either side profit, it's all an NWO game, but the puppetmasters are trumped by the One who owns the stage.

Ultimately yes.  WHY?  Because these SOB's actually hate the universe and existence itself. 

I unfortunately know them.  The are the dark one.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

Offline John_Back_From_The_Club_O

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,162
    • From Hell to Veins
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' On War With Russia, China & BRICS?
« Reply #77 on: October 28, 2014, 12:22:29 AM »
How China & (Rothschild) Gold Will Shape The Future (video series)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-10-26/how-china-gold-will-shape-future

Willem Middlekoop, author of The Big Reset – The War On Gold And The Financial Endgame, believes the current international monetary system has entered its last term and is up for a reset. Having predicted the collapse of the real estate market in 2006, (while Ben Bernanke didn't), Middlekoop asks (rhetorically) - can the global credit expansion 'experiment' from 2002 – 2008, which Bernanke completely underestimated, be compared to the global QE 'experiment' from 2008 – present? - the answer is worrisome. In the following presentation he shares his thoughts on the future of the global monetary system; and how gold, the US and China are paramount for its outcome.
The Crowd Shouted... “Give us Barabbas!” ... and People, The NWO Gave Him To You.
http://www.dominicanajournal.org/give-us-barabbas/

https://www.greatagain.gov

EvadingGrid

  • Guest
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' ?
« Reply #78 on: October 30, 2014, 03:32:12 PM »

Putin to Western elites: Play-time is over
A unilateral diktat and imposing one’s own models produces the opposite result


http://www.infowars.com/putin-to-western-elites-play-time-is-over/



 by Dmitry Orlov | Cluborlov | October 30, 2014



Most people in the English-speaking parts of the world missed Putin’s speech at the Valdai conference in Sochi a few days ago, and, chances are, those of you who have heard of the speech didn’t get a chance to read it, and missed its importance.

For your convenience, I am pasting in the full transcript of his speech below.) Western media did their best to ignore it or to twist its meaning. Regardless of what you think or don’t think of Putin (like the sun and the moon, he does not exist for you to cultivate an opinion) this is probably the most important political speech since Churchill’s “Iron Curtain” speech of March 5, 1946.

In this speech, Putin abruptly changed the rules of the game. Previously, the game of international politics was played as follows: politicians made public pronouncements, for the sake of maintaining a pleasant fiction of national sovereignty, but they were strictly for show and had nothing to do with the substance of international politics; in the meantime, they engaged in secret back-room negotiations, in which the actual deals were hammered out. Previously, Putin tried to play this game, expecting only that Russia be treated as an equal. But these hopes have been dashed, and at this conference he declared the game to be over, explicitly violating Western taboo by speaking directly to the people over the heads of elite clans and political leaders.

The Russian blogger chipstone summarized the most salient points from Putin speech as follows:


1. Russia will no longer play games and engage in back-room negotiations over trifles. But Russia is prepared for serious conversations and agreements, if these are conducive to collective security, are based on fairness and take into account the interests of each side.

2. All systems of global collective security now lie in ruins. There are no longer any international security guarantees at all. And the entity that destroyed them has a name: The United States of America.

3. The builders of the New World Order have failed, having built a sand castle. Whether or not a new world order of any sort is to be built is not just Russia’s decision, but it is a decision that will not be made without Russia.

4. Russia favors a conservative approach to introducing innovations into the social order, but is not opposed to investigating and discussing such innovations, to see if introducing any of them might be justified.

5. Russia has no intention of going fishing in the murky waters created by America’s ever-expanding “empire of chaos,” and has no interest in building a new empire of her own (this is unnecessary; Russia’s challenges lie in developing her already vast territory). Neither is Russia willing to act as a savior of the world, as she had in the past.

6. Russia will not attempt to reformat the world in her own image, but neither will she allow anyone to reformat her in their image. Russia will not close herself off from the world, but anyone who tries to close her off from the world will be sure to reap a whirlwind.

7. Russia does not wish for the chaos to spread, does not want war, and has no intention of starting one. However, today Russia sees the outbreak of global war as almost inevitable, is prepared for it, and is continuing to prepare for it. Russia does not war—nor does she fear it.

8. Russia does not intend to take an active role in thwarting those who are still attempting to construct their New World Order—until their efforts start to impinge on Russia’s key interests. Russia would prefer to stand by and watch them give themselves as many lumps as their poor heads can take. But those who manage to drag Russia into this process, through disregard for her interests, will be taught the true meaning of pain.

9. In her external, and, even more so, internal politics, Russia’s power will rely not on the elites and their back-room dealing, but onthe will of the people.

To these nine points I would like to add a tenth:

10. There is still a chance to construct a new world order that will avoid a world war. This new world order must of necessity include the United States—but can only do so on the same terms as everyone else: subject to international law and international agreements; refraining from all unilateral action; in full respect of the sovereignty of other nations.

To sum it all up: play-time is over. Children, put away your toys. Now is the time for the adults to make decisions. Russia is ready for this; is the world?

EvadingGrid

  • Guest
Re: Have You Been 'DELPHIED' ?
« Reply #79 on: October 30, 2014, 03:32:38 PM »
Text of Vladimir Putin’s speech and a question and answer session at the final plenary meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club’s XI session in Sochi on 24 October 2014.

It was mentioned already that the club has new co-organizers this year. They include Russian non-governmental organizations, expert groups and leading universities. The idea was also raised of broadening the discussions to include not just issues related to Russia itself but also global politics and the economy.

An organization and content will bolster the club’s influence as a leading discussion and expert forum. At the same time, I hope the ‘Valdai spirit’ will remain – this free and open atmosphere and chance to express all manner of very different and frank opinions.

Let me say in this respect that I will also not let you down and will speak directly and frankly. Some of what I say might seem a bit too harsh, but if we do not speak directly and honestly about what we really think, then there is little point in even meeting in this way. It would be better in that case just to keep to diplomatic get-togethers, where no one says anything of real sense and, recalling the words of one famous diplomat, you realize that diplomats have tongues so as not to speak the truth.

We get together for other reasons. We get together so as to talk frankly with each other. We need to be direct and blunt today not so as to trade barbs, but so as to attempt to get to the bottom of what is actually happening in the world, try to understand why the world is becoming less safe and more unpredictable, and why the risks are increasing everywhere around us.

Today’s discussion took place under the theme: New Rules or a Game without Rules. I think that this formula accurately describes the historic turning point we have reached today and the choice we all face. There is nothing new of course in the idea that the world is changing very fast. I know this is something you have spoken about at the discussions today. It is certainly hard not to notice the dramatic transformations in global politics and the economy, public life, and in industry, information and social technologies.

Let me ask you right now to forgive me if I end up repeating what some of the discussion’s participants have already said. It’s practically impossible to avoid. You have already held detailed discussions, but I will set out my point of view. It will coincide with other participants’ views on some points and differ on others.

As we analyze today’s situation, let us not forget history’s lessons. First of all, changes in the world order – and what we are seeing today are events on this scale – have usually been accompanied by if not global war and conflict, then by chains of intensive local-level conflicts. Second, global politics is above all about economic leadership, issues of war and peace, and the humanitarian dimension, including human rights.

The world is full of contradictions today. We need to be frank in asking each other if we have a reliable safety net in place. Sadly, there is no guarantee and no certainty that the current system of global and regional security is able to protect us from upheavals. This system has become seriously weakened, fragmented and deformed. The international and regional political, economic, and cultural cooperation organizations are also going through difficult times.

Yes, many of the mechanisms we have for ensuring the world order were created quite a long time ago now, including and above all in the period immediately following World War II. Let me stress that the solidity of the system created back then rested not only on the balance of power and the rights of the victor countries, but on the fact that this system’s ‘founding fathers’ had respect for each other, did not try to put the squeeze on others, but attempted to reach agreements.

The main thing is that this system needs to develop, and despite its various shortcomings, needs to at least be capable of keeping the world’s current problems within certain limits and regulating the intensity of the natural competition between countries.

It is my conviction that we could not take this mechanism of checks and balances that we built over the last decades, sometimes with such effort and difficulty, and simply tear it apart without building anything in its place. Otherwise we would be left with no instruments other than brute force.

What we needed to do was to carry out a rational reconstruction and adapt it the new realities in the system of international relations.

But the United States, having declared itself the winner of the Cold War, saw no need for this. Instead of establishing a new balance of power, essential for maintaining order and stability, they took steps that threw the system into sharp and deep imbalance.

The Cold War ended, but it did not end with the signing of a peace treaty with clear and transparent agreements on respecting existing rules or creating new rules and standards. This created the impression that the so-called ‘victors’ in the Cold War had decided to pressure events and reshape the world to suit their own needs and interests. If the existing system of international relations, international law and the checks and balances in place got in the way of these aims, this system was declared worthless, outdated and in need of immediate demolition.
Pardon the analogy, but this is the way nouveaux riches behave when they suddenly end up with a great fortune, in this case, in the shape of world leadership and domination. Instead of managing their wealth wisely, for their own benefit too of course, I think they have committed many follies.

We have entered a period of differing interpretations and deliberate silences in world politics. International law has been forced to retreat over and over by the onslaught of legal nihilism. Objectivity and justice have been sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. Arbitrary interpretations and biased assessments have replaced legal norms. At the same time, total control of the global mass media has made it possible when desired to portray white as black and black as white.

In a situation where you had domination by one country and its allies, or its satellites rather, the search for global solutions often turned into an attempt to impose their own universal recipes. This group’s ambitions grew so big that they started presenting the policies they put together in their corridors of power as the view of the entire international community. But this is not the case.

The very notion of ‘national sovereignty’ became a relative value for most countries. In essence, what was being proposed was the formula: the greater the loyalty towards the world’s sole power centre, the greater this or that ruling regime’s legitimacy.

We will have a free discussion afterwards and I will be happy to answer your questions and would also like to use my right to ask you questions. Let someone try to disprove the arguments that I just set out during the upcoming discussion.

The measures taken against those who refuse to submit are well-known and have been tried and tested many times. They include use of force, economic and propaganda pressure, meddling in domestic affairs, and appeals to a kind of ‘supra-legal’ legitimacy when they need to justify illegal intervention in this or that conflict or toppling inconvenient regimes. Of late, we have increasing evidence too that outright blackmail has been used with regard to a number of leaders. It is not for nothing that ‘big brother’ is spending billions of dollars on keeping the whole world, including its own closest allies, under surveillance.

Let’s ask ourselves, how comfortable are we with this, how safe are we, how happy living in this world, and how fair and rational has it become? Maybe, we have no real reasons to worry, argue and ask awkward questions? Maybe the United States’ exceptional position and the way they are carrying out their leadership really is a blessing for us all, and their meddling in events all around the world is bringing peace, prosperity, progress, growth and democracy, and we should maybe just relax and enjoy it all?

Let me say that this is not the case, absolutely not the case.

A unilateral diktat and imposing one’s own models produces the opposite result. Instead of settling conflicts it leads to their escalation, instead of sovereign and stable states we see the growing spread of chaos, and instead of democracy there is support for a very dubious public ranging from open neo-fascists to Islamic radicals.

Why do they support such people? They do this because they decide to use them as instruments along the way in achieving their goals but then burn their fingers and recoil. I never cease to be amazed by the way that our partners just keep stepping on the same rake, as we say here in Russia, that is to say, make the same mistake over and over.

They once sponsored Islamic extremist movements to fight the Soviet Union. Those groups got their battle experience in Afghanistan and later gave birth to the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The West if not supported, at least closed its eyes, and, I would say, gave information, political and financial support to international terrorists’ invasion of Russia (we have not forgotten this) and the Central Asian region’s countries. Only after horrific terrorist attacks were committed on US soil itself did the United States wake up to the common threat of terrorism. Let me remind you that we were the first country to support the American people back then, the first to react as friends and partners to the terrible tragedy of September 11.

During my conversations with American and European leaders, I always spoke of the need to fight terrorism together, as a challenge on a global scale. We cannot resign ourselves to and accept this threat, cannot cut it into separate pieces using double standards. Our partners expressed agreement, but a little time passed and we ended up back where we started. First there was the military operation in Iraq, then in Libya, which got pushed to the brink of falling apart. Why was Libya pushed into this situation? Today it is a country in danger of breaking apart and has become a training ground for terrorists.

Only the current Egyptian leadership’s determination and wisdom saved this key Arab country from chaos and having extremists run rampant. In Syria, as in the past, the United States and its allies started directly financing and arming rebels and allowing them to fill their ranks with mercenaries from various countries. Let me ask where do these rebels get their money, arms and military specialists? Where does all this come from? How did the notorious ISIL manage to become such a powerful group, essentially a real armed force?

As for financing sources, today, the money is coming not just from drugs, production of which has increased not just by a few percentage points but many-fold, since the international coalition forces have been present in Afghanistan. You are aware of this. The terrorists are getting money from selling oil too. Oil is produced in territory controlled by the terrorists, who sell it at dumping prices, produce it and transport it. But someone buys this oil, resells it, and makes a profit from it, not thinking about the fact that they are thus financing terrorists who could come sooner or later to their own soil and sow destruction in their own countries.

Where do they get new recruits? In Iraq, after Saddam Hussein was toppled, the state’s institutions, including the army, were left in ruins. We said back then, be very, very careful. You are driving people out into the street, and what will they do there? Don’t forget (rightfully or not) that they were in the leadership of a large regional power, and what are you now turning them into?

What was the result? Tens of thousands of soldiers, officers and former Baath Party activists were turned out into the streets and today have joined the rebels’ ranks. Perhaps this is what explains why the Islamic State group has turned out so effective? In military terms, it is acting very effectively and has some very professional people. Russia warned repeatedly about the dangers of unilateral military actions, intervening in sovereign states’ affairs, and flirting with extremists and radicals. We insisted on having the groups fighting the central Syrian government, above all the Islamic State, included on the lists of terrorist organizations. But did we see any results? We appealed in vain.

We sometimes get the impression that our colleagues and friends are constantly fighting the consequences of their own policies, throw all their effort into addressing the risks they themselves have created, and pay an ever-greater price.

Colleagues, this period of unipolar domination has convincingly demonstrated that having only one power centre does not make global processes more manageable. On the contrary, this kind of unstable construction has shown its inability to fight the real threats such as regional conflicts, terrorism, drug trafficking, religious fanaticism, chauvinism and neo-Nazism. At the same time, it has opened the road wide for inflated national pride, manipulating public opinion and letting the strong bully and suppress the weak.

Essentially, the unipolar world is simply a means of justifying dictatorship over people and countries. The unipolar world turned out too uncomfortable, heavy and unmanageable a burden even for the self-proclaimed leader. Comments along this line were made here just before and I fully agree with this. This is why we see attempts at this new historic stage to recreate a semblance of a quasi-bipolar world as a convenient model for perpetuating American leadership. It does not matter who takes the place of the centre of evil in American propaganda, the USSR’s old place as the main adversary. It could be Iran, as a country seeking to acquire nuclear technology, China, as the world’s biggest economy, or Russia, as a nuclear superpower.

Today, we are seeing new efforts to fragment the world, draw new dividing lines, put together coalitions not built for something but directed against someone, anyone, create the image of an enemy as was the case during the Cold War years, and obtain the right to this leadership, or diktat if you wish. The situation was presented this way during the Cold War. We all understand this and know this. The United States always told its allies: “We have a common enemy, a terrible foe, the centre of evil, and we are defending you, our allies, from this foe, and so we have the right to order you around, force you to sacrifice your political and economic interests and pay your share of the costs for this collective defense, but we will be the ones in charge of it all of course.” In short, we see today attempts in a new and changing world to reproduce the familiar models of global management, and all this so as to guarantee their [the US’] exceptional position and reap political and economic dividends.

But these attempts are increasingly divorced from reality and are in contradiction with the world’s diversity. Steps of this kind inevitably create confrontation and countermeasures and have the opposite effect to the hoped-for goals. We see what happens when politics rashly starts meddling in the economy and the logic of rational decisions gives way to the logic of confrontation that only hurt one’s own economic positions and interests, including national business interests.

Joint economic projects and mutual investment objectively bring countries closer together and help to smooth out current problems in relations between states. But today, the global business community faces unprecedented pressure from Western governments. What business, economic expediency and pragmatism can we speak of when we hear slogans such as “the homeland is in danger”, “the free world is under threat”, and “democracy is in jeopardy”? And so everyone needs to mobilize. That is what a real mobilization policy looks like.

Sanctions are already undermining the foundations of world trade, the WTO rules and the principle of inviolability of private property. They are dealing a blow to liberal model of globalization based on markets, freedom and competition, which, let me note, is a model that has primarily benefited precisely the Western countries. And now they risk losing trust as the leaders of globalization. We have to ask ourselves, why was this necessary? After all, the United States’ prosperity rests in large part on the trust of investors and foreign holders of dollars and US securities. This trust is clearly being undermined and signs of disappointment in the fruits of globalization are visible now in many countries.  

The well-known Cyprus precedent and the politically motivated sanctions have only strengthened the trend towards seeking to bolster economic and financial sovereignty and countries’ or their regional groups’ desire to find ways of protecting themselves from the risks of outside pressure. We already see that more and more countries are looking for ways to become less dependent on the dollar and are setting up alternative financial and payments systems and reserve currencies. I think that our American friends are quite simply cutting the branch they are sitting on. You cannot mix politics and the economy, but this is what is happening now. I have always thought and still think today that politically motivated sanctions were a mistake that will harm everyone, but I am sure that we will come back to this subject later.

We know how these decisions were taken and who was applying the pressure. But let me stress that Russia is not going to get all worked up, get offended or come begging at anyone’s door. Russia is a self-sufficient country. We will work within the foreign economic environment that has taken shape, develop domestic production and technology and act more decisively to carry out transformation. Pressure from outside, as has been the case on past occasions, will only consolidate our society, keep us alert and make us concentrate on our main development goals.

Of course the sanctions are a hindrance. They are trying to hurt us through these sanctions, block our development and push us into political, economic and cultural isolation, force us into backwardness in other words. But let me say yet again that the world is a very different place today. We have no intention of shutting ourselves off from anyone and choosing some kind of closed development road, trying to live in autarky. We are always open to dialogue, including on normalizing our economic and political relations. We are counting here on the pragmatic approach and position of business communities in the leading countries.

Some are saying today that Russia is supposedly turning its back on Europe – such words were probably spoken already here too during the discussions – and is looking for new business partners, above all in Asia. Let me say that this is absolutely not the case. Our active policy in the Asian-Pacific region began not just yesterday and not in response to sanctions, but is a policy that we have been following for a good many years now. Like many other countries, including Western countries, we saw that Asia is playing an ever greater role in the world, in the economy and in politics, and there is simply no way we can afford to overlook these developments.

Let me say again that everyone is doing this, and we will do so to, all the more so as a large part of our country is geographically in Asia. Why should we not make use of our competitive advantages in this area? It would be extremely shortsighted not to do so.

Developing economic ties with these countries and carrying out joint integration projects also creates big incentives for our domestic development. Today’s demographic, economic and cultural trends all suggest that dependence on a sole superpower will objectively decrease. This is something that European and American experts have been talking and writing about too.

Perhaps developments in global politics will mirror the developments we are seeing in the global economy, namely, intensive competition for specific niches and frequent change of leaders in specific areas. This is entirely possible.

There is no doubt that humanitarian factors such as education, science, healthcare and culture are playing a greater role in global competition. This also has a big impact on international relations, including because this ‘soft power’ resource will depend to a great extent on real achievements in developing human capital rather than on sophisticated propaganda tricks.

At the same time, the formation of a so-called polycentric world (I would also like to draw attention to this, colleagues) in and of itself does not improve stability; in fact, it is more likely to be the opposite. The goal of reaching global equilibrium is turning into a fairly difficult puzzle, an equation with many unknowns.
So, what is in store for us if we choose not to live by the rules – even if they may be strict and inconvenient – but rather live without any rules at all? And that scenario is entirely possible; we cannot rule it out, given the tensions in the global situation. Many predictions can already be made, taking into account current trends, and unfortunately, they are not optimistic. If we do not create a clear system of mutual commitments and agreements, if we do not build the mechanisms for managing and resolving crisis situations, the symptoms of global anarchy will inevitably grow.

Today, we already see a sharp increase in the likelihood of a whole set of violent conflicts with either direct or indirect participation by the world’s major powers. And the risk factors include not just traditional multinational conflicts, but also the internal instability in separate states, especially when we talk about nations located at the intersections of major states’ geopolitical interests, or on the border of cultural, historical, and economic civilizational continents.

Ukraine, which I’m sure was discussed at length and which we will discuss some more, is one of the example of such sorts of conflicts that affect international power balance, and I think it will certainly not be the last. From here emanates the next real threat of destroying the current system of arms control agreements. And this dangerous process was launched by the United States of America when it unilaterally withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002, and then set about and continues today to actively pursue the creation of its global missile defense system.

Colleagues, friends, I want to point out that we did not start this. Once again, we are sliding into the times when, instead of the balance of interests and mutual guarantees, it is fear and the balance of mutual destruction that prevent nations from engaging in direct conflict. In absence of legal and political instruments, arms are once again becoming the focal point of the global agenda; they are used wherever and however, without any UN Security Council sanctions. And if the Security Council refuses to produce such decisions, then it is immediately declared to be an outdated and ineffective instrument.

Many states do not see any other ways of ensuring their sovereignty but to obtain their own bombs. This is extremely dangerous. We insist on continuing talks; we are not only in favor of talks, but insist on continuing talks to reduce nuclear arsenals. The less nuclear weapons we have in the world, the better. And we are ready for the most serious, concrete discussions on nuclear disarmament – but only serious discussions without any double standards.

What do I mean? Today, many types of high-precision weaponry are already close to mass-destruction weapons in terms of their capabilities, and in the event of full renunciation of nuclear weapons or radical reduction of nuclear potential, nations that are leaders in creating and producing high-precision systems will have a clear military advantage. Strategic parity will be disrupted, and this is likely to bring destabilization. The use of a so-called first global pre-emptive strike may become tempting. In short, the risks do not decrease, but intensify.

The next obvious threat is the further escalation of ethnic, religious, and social conflicts. Such conflicts are dangerous not only as such, but also because they create zones of anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos around them, places that are comfortable for terrorists and criminals, where piracy, human trafficking, and drug trafficking flourish.

Incidentally, at the time, our colleagues tried to somehow manage these processes, use regional conflicts and design ‘color revolutions’ to suit their interests, but the genie escaped the bottle. It looks like the controlled chaos theory fathers themselves do not know what to do with it; there is disarray in their ranks.

We closely follow the discussions by both the ruling elite and the expert community. It is enough to look at the headlines of the Western press over the last year. The same people are called fighters for democracy, and then Islamists; first they write about revolutions and then call them riots and upheavals. The result is obvious: the further expansion of global chaos.

Colleagues, given the global situation, it is time to start agreeing on fundamental things. This is incredibly important and necessary; this is much better than going back to our own corners. The more we all face common problems, the more we find ourselves in the same boat, so to speak. And the logical way out is in cooperation between nations, societies, in finding collective answers to increasing challenges, and in joint risk management. Granted, some of our partners, for some reason, remember this only when it suits their interests.

Practical experience shows that joint answers to challenges are not always a panacea; and we need to understand this. Moreover, in most cases, they are hard to reach; it is not easy to overcome the differences in national interests, the subjectivity of different approaches, particularly when it comes to nations with different cultural and historical traditions. But nevertheless, we have examples when, having common goals and acting based on the same criteria, together we achieved real success.

Let me remind you about solving the problem of chemical weapons in Syria, and the substantive dialogue on the Iranian nuclear program, as well as our work on North Korean issues, which also has some positive results. Why can’t we use this experience in the future to solve local and global challenges?
What could be the legal, political, and economic basis for a new world order that would allow for stability and security, while encouraging healthy competition, not allowing the formation of new monopolies that hinder development? It is unlikely that someone could provide absolutely exhaustive, ready-made solutions right now. We will need extensive work with participation by a wide range of governments, global businesses, civil society, and such expert platforms as ours.

However, it is obvious that success and real results are only possible if key participants in international affairs can agree on harmonizing basic interests, on reasonable self-restraint, and set the example of positive and responsible leadership. We must clearly identify where unilateral actions end and we need to apply multilateral mechanisms, and as part of improving the effectiveness of international law, we must resolve the dilemma between the actions by international community to ensure security and human rights and the principle of national sovereignty and non-interference in the internal affairs of any state.

Those very collisions increasingly lead to arbitrary external interference in complex internal processes, and time and again, they provoke dangerous conflicts between leading global players. The issue of maintaining sovereignty becomes almost paramount in maintaining and strengthening global stability.

Clearly, discussing the criteria for the use of external force is extremely difficult; it is practically impossible to separate it from the interests of particular nations. However, it is far more dangerous when there are no agreements that are clear to everyone, when no clear conditions are set for necessary and legal interference.

I will add that international relations must be based on international law, which itself should rest on moral principles such as justice, equality and truth. Perhaps most important is respect for one’s partners and their interests. This is an obvious formula, but simply following it could radically change the global situation.

I am certain that if there is a will, we can restore the effectiveness of the international and regional institutions system. We do not even need to build anything anew, from the scratch; this is not a “greenfield,” especially since the institutions created after World War II are quite universal and can be given modern substance, adequate to manage the current situation.

This is true of improving the work of the UN, whose central role is irreplaceable, as well as the OSCE, which, over the course of 40 years, has proven to be a necessary mechanism for ensuring security and cooperation in the Euro-Atlantic region. I must say that even now, in trying to resolve the crisis in southeast Ukraine, the OSCE is playing a very positive role.

In light of the fundamental changes in the international environment, the increase in uncontrollability and various threats, we need a new global consensus of responsible forces. It’s not about some local deals or a division of spheres of influence in the spirit of classic diplomacy, or somebody’s complete global domination. I think that we need a new version of interdependence. We should not be afraid of it. On the contrary, this is a good instrument for harmonizing positions.

This is particularly relevant given the strengthening and growth of certain regions on the planet, which process objectively requires institutionalization of such new poles, creating powerful regional organizations and developing rules for their interaction. Cooperation between these centers would seriously add to the stability of global security, policy and economy.  But in order to establish such a dialogue, we need to proceed from the assumption that all regional centers and integration projects forming around them need to have equal rights to development, so that they can complement each other and nobody can force them into conflict or opposition artificially. Such destructive actions would break down ties between states, and the states themselves would be subjected to extreme hardship, or perhaps even total destruction.

I would like to remind you of the last year’s events. We have told our American and European partners that hasty backstage decisions, for example, on Ukraine’s association with the EU, are fraught with serious risks to the economy. We didn’t even say anything about politics; we spoke only about the economy, saying that such steps, made without any prior arrangements, touch on the interests of many other nations, including Russia as Ukraine’s main trade partner, and that a wide discussion of the issues is necessary. Incidentally, in this regard, I will remind you that, for example, the talks on Russia’s accession to the WTO lasted 19 years. This was very difficult work, and a certain consensus was reached.

Why am I bringing this up? Because in implementing Ukraine’s association project, our partners would come to us with their goods and services through the back gate, so to speak, and we did not agree to this, nobody asked us about this. We had discussions on all topics related to Ukraine’s association with the EU, persistent discussions, but I want to stress that this was done in an entirely civilized manner, indicating possible problems, showing the obvious reasoning and arguments. Nobody wanted to listen to us and nobody wanted to talk. They simply told us: this is none of your business, point, end of discussion. Instead of a comprehensive but – I stress – civilized dialogue, it all came down to a government overthrow; they plunged the country into chaos, into economic and social collapse, into a civil war with enormous casualties.

Why? When I ask my colleagues why, they no longer have an answer; nobody says anything. That’s it. Everyone’s at a loss, saying it just turned out that way. Those actions should not have been encouraged – it wouldn’t have worked. After all (I already spoke about this), former Ukrainian President Yanukovych signed everything, agreed with everything. Why do it? What was the point? What is this, a civilized way of solving problems? Apparently, those who constantly throw together new ‘color revolutions’ consider themselves ‘brilliant artists’ and simply cannot stop.

I am certain that the work of integrated associations, the cooperation of regional structures, should be built on a transparent, clear basis; the Eurasian Economic Union’s formation process is a good example of such transparency. The states that are parties to this project informed their partners of their plans in advance, specifying the parameters of our association, the principles of its work, which fully correspond with the World Trade Organization rules.

I will add that we would also have welcomed the start of a concrete dialogue between the Eurasian and European Union. Incidentally, they have almost completely refused us this as well, and it is also unclear why – what is so scary about it?

And, of course, with such joint work, we would think that we need to engage in dialogue (I spoke about this many times and heard agreement from many of our western partners, at least in Europe) on the need to create a common space for economic and humanitarian cooperation stretching all the way from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean.

Colleagues, Russia made its choice. Our priorities are further improving our democratic and open economy institutions, accelerated internal development, taking into account all the positive modern trends in the world, and consolidating society based on traditional values and patriotism.

We have an integration-oriented, positive, peaceful agenda; we are working actively with our colleagues in the Eurasian Economic Union, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, BRICS and other partners. This agenda is aimed at developing ties between governments, not dissociating. We are not planning to cobble together any blocs or get involved in an exchange of blows.

The allegations and statements that Russia is trying to establish some sort of empire, encroaching on the sovereignty of its neighbors, are groundless. Russia does not need any kind of special, exclusive place in the world – I want to emphasize this. While respecting the interests of others, we simply want for our own interests to be taken into account and for our position to be respected.

We are well aware that the world has entered an era of changes and global transformations, when we all need a particular degree of caution, the ability to avoid thoughtless steps. In the years after the Cold War, participants in global politics lost these qualities somewhat. Now, we need to remember them. Otherwise, hopes for a peaceful, stable development will be a dangerous illusion, while today’s turmoil will simply serve as a prelude to the collapse of world order.

Yes, of course, I have already said that building a more stable world order is a difficult task. We are talking about long and hard work. We were able to develop rules for interaction after World War II, and we were able to reach an agreement in Helsinki in the 1970s. Our common duty is to resolve this fundamental challenge at this new stage of development.

Thank you very much for your attention.