** Smart Meters Detrimental to Health - 1971 Navy Doc proves it!!!!!!

Author Topic: ** Smart Meters Detrimental to Health - 1971 Navy Doc proves it!!!!!!  (Read 1449 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jofortruth

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,598
    • The Great Deception
Biological Phenomena and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio Frequency Radiation - US Naval Medical Research Institute 1971 doc (PROVES THE TECHNOLOGY DETRIMENTALLY AFFECTS HEALTH):
http://www.magdahavas.com/wordpress/wp-con...owave_Brief.pdf

Smart Meter Health Complaints (75 pgs):
http://www.emfsafetynetwork.org/smart-mete...lth-complaints/


Quote
January 4, 2010

Ms. Susan Crane

Director, Meter to Bill Process

We Energies

231 W. Michigan Street

Milwaukee, WI 53203

susan.crane@we-energies.com

Dear Ms. Crane:

My patients, Shivani Arjuna and her husband Dan Small, have asked me to write to you with regard to how Shivani is affected by exposure to communication frequencies and “dirty electricity”

frequencies. They are deeply concerned that placement of one of We Energies’ new, radio-broadcasting meters on their property would be harmful to their health, especially to Shivani’s. I share their concern.

People who are aware of experiencing symptoms as soon as they are exposed to radio (RF) and microwave (MW) frequencies are currently termed “electrically hypersensitive,”

or EHS. Shivani is electrically hypersensitive. However, these individuals are by no means the only people actually being affected by such exposure, as ample, rigorous research done over a period of several decades shows chronic exposure causes health damage to people who note no immediate symptoms. Please see, for example, the bibliography of reported biological phenomena associated with radio-frequency and microwave radiation compiled by the US Navy Medical Research Institute in 1971, with over 2,000 references., at: (SEE LINK POSTED ABOVE) Also, please see the summary of EMF effects at: www.icswebsite.com/emf/emfissues.html with 62 more recent references.

The immense proliferation of wireless technologies in the past few years has given rise to health problems that cannot be successfully treated medically, as medicine cannot remove the underlying cause, the exposure to radiation.

Safety regulations of various nations vary widely regarding what level of exposure is supposedly safe. Unfortunately, most countries’ regulations are still based on the old, inaccurate assumption that non-ionizing radiation is not harmful unless it actually heats body tissues. The fact that a given technology adheres to the present standards is meaningless in terms of its actual biological effects. Even an EPA spokesperson has stated that present U.S. standards are not protecting citizens from harmful radiation. Research shows harmful effects at levels far below what is presently allowed.

Years of research also reveal a broad range of symptoms and diseases caused by RF exposure. This is hardly surprising, as the human body functions electrically from the cellular level on. Attached you will find a list of conditions caused by exposure to RF and therefore termed “radio wave sickness.”

There are probably more mechanisms underlying the damage done to health by manmade electromagnetic frequencies than we are presently aware of. (To date, the mechanism by which smoking tobacco causes cancer is unknown.)

However, here is brief information regarding a few known mechanisms:

o It is established from multiple, independent studies that EMR from ELF to RF/MW reduces melatonin in animals and human beings. Melatonin is not only vital for healthy sleep, it is the most potent, naturally produced antioxidant that helps to protect cells from genetic damage that leads to cancer, neurological, cardiac and reproductive damage, illness and death.

o Exposure to intensities and field strengths that are extremely low cause a biological effect called calcium ion efflux. Calcium ion alteration of cells by EMR is linked to neurological degeneration, to cancer and many other health effects. The heart is also an electromagnetic organ, with an electric pulse initiating a cascade of calcium ions that cause the cells in the heart to contract and produce a heartbeat. Exogenous electromagnetic signals can interfere with this regular, electrical pulse leading to heart disease and heart attack of the arrhythmic kind.

o Physiological changes that are bedrock indicators of allergic response and inflammatory conditions that are stimulated by EMF exposures include: overreaction of the immune system; morphological alterations of immune cells; profound increases in mast cells in the upper skin layers, increased degranulation of mast cells and larger size of mast cells in EHS individuals; presence of biological markers for inflammation that are sensitive to EMF exposure at non-thermal levels; changes in lymphocyte viability; decreased count of NK cells; decreased count of T-lymphocytes; negative effects on pregnancy (uteroplacental circulatory disturbances and placental dysfunction); suppressed or impaired immune function; and inflammatory responses that can result in cellular, tissue and organ damage if exposure occurs on a continuing basis over time. Mast cells are also found in the brain and heart, and this might account for some of the other symptoms commonly reported: headache, sensitivity to light, arrhythmias and other cardiac symptoms.

o Many studies have shown that RF/MW radiation and ELF fields cause increased DNA strand breakage and chromosome aberrations.

As was concluded by the authors of the Bioiniative Report (www.bioinitiative.org ), it is unwise from a public health perspective to continue “business-as-usual,”

deploying new technologies that increase RF exposures, particularly involuntary exposures.

Any company or industry whose products or operational methodologies cause involuntary exposure to RF radiation would do well to become more informed about these and other effects of such exposure, both to protect the public and to protect themselves from future liability suits.

Though it is no longer possible in today’s world to completely avoid exposure to communications frequencies, EHS individuals such as Shivani, need to live in a personal environment as clear of RF/MW as possible. This is recognized in Sweden, where the government creates safe working and living spaces for such individuals. In the U.S., EHS individuals have to do what they can to create their own safe living spaces. Certainly, these safe havens, on their own property, should not be denied them.

I have been Shivani Arjuna’s physician since 2002 and have noted how her specific symptoms and overall health have corresponded directly to her exposure to RF/MW radiation. Initially, she was experiencing incapacitating and life-threatening symptoms related to such exposure. At present, she is able to remain free of RF/MW exposure-induced symptoms as long as she remains in the safe home space that she and her husband have gone to considerable effort and expense to create. That she remains EHS is clear from how she responds to exposures when not in that safe environment.

It is my opinion that the placement of an RF-broadcasting device connected to the wiring on this property would be extremely detrimental to Shivani’s health and that it must not be allowed.

Such a device connected to their wiring, whether at or away from their house, would cause RF to be broadcast from the wiring throughout their home. I suggest the alternative of asking them to take regular meter readings from their present meter and call or mail these to you, with a We Energies employee checking the meter annually or semi-annually to ensure accuracy.

I look forward to your response and hope you will agree to this solution to ensure that Shivani’s health be respected and protected.

Sincerely,

Roy D. Ozanne, MD, HMD
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline jofortruth

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,598
    • The Great Deception
Re: ** Smart Meters Detrimental to Health - 1971 Navy Doc proves it!!!!!!
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2014, 01:03:28 PM »
Much more info on smart meters: (After reading the above info, allowing these to be installed in your family home is the stupidest thing you could ever do. STAND UP FOR YOUR FAMILIES HEALTH AND NOW! THEY WILL NOT STOP DOING THIS UNTIL YOU STOP TOLERATING THE INSANITY! GET A SPINE, AMERICA, AND EVERYWHERE ELSE WHERE THESE DEATH TRAPS ARE BEING INSTALLED!)
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showtopic=9513&st=0
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline One Revelator

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,675
Re: ** Smart Meters Detrimental to Health - 1971 Navy Doc proves it!!!!!!
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2014, 06:48:06 PM »
The propaganda from MSM/Corporations is thick in Florida ATM. The power companies don’t even need a wireless connection to communicate with the meter. They can and do already send and receive data through the power lines. As usual, federal funding is behind this and everybody's got their hand out.

"Moreover, the Florida Public Utility Commission that quickly approved the “smart meter” deployment was misled by FPL which, in its zeal to roll out its smart grid and collect federal subsidies supporting the operation, consciously omitted the abundance of published scientific investigations and failed to conduct adequate human health impact studies before implementation."

September 6, 2014

Florida Newspaper Touts “Smart Meters”, Ignores Scientific Data

By James F. Tracy

In a recent editorial, “Smart-Meter Phobia Sad, But Don’t Cut Power,” the Palm Beach Post hyped safety claims of Florida Power and Light / Next Era Energy accompanying the utility’s statewide “smart meter” deployment while condemning the roughly 6,000 Florida households that have declined such technology.

The Post often weighs in on regional and state affairs with a discriminating editorial voice. In this instance, however, the paper’s editorial staff has chosen to ignore hard scientific data that clearly lay out the health-related dangers of exposure to the non-ionizing microwave radiation emitted by smart meters and similar wireless technologies.

Indeed, the Post’s editorial reads almost as if it was authored by FPL’s own public relations department, for it is replete with most every poorly-conceived and quasi-scientific claim the utility transmits to its broad customer base.

According to the editorial, the fears of “smart meter” technology are rooted in a small segment of the public too easily influenced by internet fear-mongering that has characterized the debate over childhood vaccination and global warming. “One of the latest internet-fueled fears,” the editors argue, “is of utility company ‘smart meters.’ Using a battery, a modem and seconds-long pulses of UHF (ultra-high frequency radio waves) these meters transmit customers’ energy-use data for billing accuracy and service reliability … But some people fear them.”

The health-related concerns over the electrical meters are in fact well-founded, yet one must look beyond their given utility’s promotional paraphernalia to assess safety claims—something that journalists are supposed to do. This author has repeatedly communicated with Florida Power and Light regarding the safety of such devices (e.g. here, here, and here) and assiduously researched the topic (here, here, here, here, and here). In 2013 Project Censored, an organization comprised of knowledgeable scholars and journalists, recognized his research in this regard.

Most recently, the writer communicated with and interviewed FPL spokespersons, presenting them with the 2012 Bioinitiative Report—a comprehensive set of 1,800 new scientific studies documenting in no uncertain terms the dangers of non-ionizing radiation to human health—the type of radiation emitted by “smart meters” and like technology. “Cell phone users, parents-to-be, young children and pregnant women are at particular risk,” the Bioinitiative Working Group observes.

After forwarding the Bioinitiative Report to FPL representatives the author had established a rapport with, they refused to respond and severed further communication.

Ironically, both Florida Power and Light and the Palm Beach Post refuse to concede hard scientific findings demonstrated in the immense body of scientific research dating to the 1960s while claiming to occupy the scientific high ground. They can’t have it both ways, and by failing to even consider such data the Post in particular has chosen a poorly-informed and thus journalistically irresponsible stance.

Most disturbingly, there is little difference between FPL’s public relations pronouncements and the Post’s. Each entity reasons that because most of the utility’s “approximately 4.6 million customers have adopted the new technology without a second thought,” the technology is inherently safe.

In fact, FPL deployed such microwave technology on Florida homes and businesses without allowing its customers a second thought, apart from a postcard suggesting that the meter swap was basically a fait accompli.

Moreover, the Florida Public Utility Commission that quickly approved the “smart meter” deployment was misled by FPL which, in its zeal to roll out its smart grid and collect federal subsidies supporting the operation, consciously omitted the abundance of published scientific investigations and failed to conduct adequate human health impact studies before implementation. Instead, it relied on health impact guidelines that are close to 20 years old and overseen by an agency that has absolutely no mandate to oversee such concerns—the Federal Communications Commission.

The Post concludes that before FPL cuts off the power to what it mockingly deems “refuseniks” and “octagenarians,” who remain understandably wary of such technological ultimatums and refuse to pay FPL’s monthly “opt out” fees, it should consider the public relations consequences of such heavy-handedness. “Some people’s minds won’t be changed, no matter what the evidence.”

Indeed, given its journalistic role and duty to conscientiously inform public opinion, the Palm Beach Post should likewise consider much more than the “evidence” it has been spoon-fed by power industry spinmeisters.

Republished at GlobalResearch.ca on September 6, 2014.

http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/09/06/florida-newspaper-touts-smart-meter-safety-condemns-refuseniks/
The number one cause of all human poverty, misery, and death is not global warming. It’s GLOBAL LYING.

Offline jofortruth

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,598
    • The Great Deception
Re: ** Smart Meters Detrimental to Health - 1971 Navy Doc proves it!!!!!!
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2018, 03:41:16 PM »
Canadian 40+ yrs an Electrician, now a Professor teaching Doctors about  the dangers of electromagnetic radiation. He has had enough with the stupidity of politicians and greed, lies and collusion of utilities/govt and is exposing the dangers of electromagnetic radiation to everything on earth. He sees jail time coming for ALL who are going along with this danger to the public!
http://www.stayonthetruth.com/bennett-raises-his-voice-danger-emf-radiation-rf.php
http://www.thermoguy.com
http://www.stayonthetruth.com/bennett-raises-his-voice-danger-emf-radiation-rf.php

The utter failings of Canada Safety Code 6 that is used for utilities to install smart meters all over the country (FCC in the USA has the same lack of safety for the public)
http://www.stayonthetruth.com/5th-anniv-critical-error-or-omission-hc-sc-6.php


Videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhzFZLIgHKs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCvvcxWGUOk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AenC4s4xSTo
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline jofortruth

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,598
    • The Great Deception
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

Offline jofortruth

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,598
    • The Great Deception
Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!