ANONYMOUS HACKS FEDERAL RESERVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[SCHOPENHAUER]

http://youtu.be/iknsdj34LIM

[Due_Process_NonNegotiable]

http://www.infowars.com/federal-reserve-hacked/

Hackers Break into Federal Reserve Internal Site

Fox Business
February 6, 2013
In the latest in a string of high-profile hacking disclosures, the Federal Reserve confirmed on Wednesday that one of its websites was broken into by cyber hackers in a breach that reportedly leaked the contact information of thousands of bankers.
While the central bank said the incident didn’t “affect critical operations” of the Federal Reserve System, the disclosure is sure to fuel concerns about the cyber security of government websites and critical financial infrastructure.
The Fed hack appears to be tied to an Anonymous group that published on Twitter the credentials of more than 4,000 commercial bankers early Monday morning. The group, Operation Last Resort, said it received the documents “via the FED.”

http://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/2013/02/06/fed-says-hackers-breached-internal-site/

[Valerius]

Government website?

[TonkaTim]

I smell false-flag.

[EvadingGrid]

So we are just days away from the exposure and collapse of the illuminati ?

I don't think so ....

[chris jones]

 OK, so what is the info released?
 Banksters are theiving the peons money, getting caught and paying fines  that are in comparison to the money stolen (amounts) are insignificant. A slap on the wrist, ITS AN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL SYNDICATE.
 A pig fest, but your will not see these parasite robbing the elites coffers, never happen. But they have an open door to the peons of this world, seems as they have the green light from the masters, the untouchable crew on high.
  We are the parasites feeding ground, now that they have accumilated trillions, the day will come when we have fullfiled their purpose and our numbers are usless to them, a hinderence,as we humans are an anoyance, they will  attempt to divide and conquer, the culling has begun we see it, the G.P. doesn't. 
 

[compguygene]

This is just a bit of a "publicity stunt" by Anonymous.  I know from my days of working as a Network Engineer that with the Federal Government and any associated Corporations, they have 2 types of computer security.
Type 1: Don't really care if this stuff gets out there, not really a worry or priority, just make it look secure.
Type 2: Extreme paranoia, this can never be seen, never get out.

Any decent hacker can get to type 1 stuff.  Nobody cares that much other than the obvious bad press.
To get type 2 stuff is the stuff of real spies gaining physical and logical access, not just hackers. 
You have to keep in mind some practical issues about computer security, they can only spend so much money on this stuff.  So, the tendency is to spend as little as needed on type 1 stuff, but spend most of the money budgeted for computer security on type 2 things, which is only the logical, sensible thing to do.

They might luck into some juicy bits of info just from the carelessness of Fed Employees.  However, I doubt they get any real evidence or damning documents.

[LoudMcCloud]

Anonymous could be government posing as hackers to get legislation passed.  Who knows what is going on.  Something is going on, but what?

[TonkaTim]

Anonymous could be government posing as hackers to get legislation passed.  Who knows what is going on.  Something is going on, but what?

That'd would be my bet. With all that has been going on... with the current gun grab effort. I wouldn't be suprised to see an effort to regulate & clamp down on the internet. Actually been expected a new internet regulation effort since the last one failed. Why I said - I smell a false-flag. They'll keep slinging "stuff" until it starts sticking.

[EvadingGrid]

This is just a bit of a "publicity stunt" by Anonymous.  I know from my days of working as a Network Engineer that with the Federal Government and any associated Corporations, they have 2 types of computer security.
Type 1: Don't really care if this stuff gets out there, not really a worry or priority, just make it look secure.
Type 2: Extreme paranoia, this can never be seen, never get out.

Any decent hacker can get to type 1 stuff.  Nobody cares that much other than the obvious bad press.
To get type 2 stuff is the stuff of real spies gaining physical and logical access, not just hackers. 
You have to keep in mind some practical issues about computer security, they can only spend so much money on this stuff.  So, the tendency is to spend as little as needed on type 1 stuff, but spend most of the money budgeted for computer security on type 2 things, which is only the logical, sensible thing to do.

They might luck into some juicy bits of info just from the carelessness of Fed Employees.  However, I doubt they get any real evidence or damning documents.

What was the setup (roughly) on these type 2 servers ?

[TonkaTim]

What was the setup (roughly) on these type 2 servers ?

I'm thinking the banks are pretty much on a different server setup like a type 2, such as the atm setup, for security reasons due to electronic "money" transfer. Why my first thought that this is some sort of false-flag for ulterior motives.

[TonkaTim]

I smell false-flag.

CISPA’s back: Hacking, online espionage resurrect cybersecurity bill
http://rt.com/usa/news/cispa-congress-reintroduce-act-825/

"The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection act (CISPA) will be reintroduced before the US House next week following a spate of cyber espionage and hacking attacks."

“An aggressor nation or extremist group could gain control of critical switches and derail passenger trains, or trains loaded with lethal chemicals," Panetta said. "They could contaminate the water supply in major cities, or shut down the power grid across large parts of the country."

[LoudMcCloud]

Anonymous is a fake.  They will use this false information to control the internet.  The funny thing about information, its hard to control.  I love a good cyberwar.

[compguygene]

What was the setup (roughly) on these type 2 servers ?

I never worked with them or saw them.  But, from prior experience in computer security, I do know a few basic things that are always done to protect them.  For one thing, if these things are connected to any kind of Internet connections (they usually are NOT), it is not the Internet like you think of it.  As one network security guy with a background in really secure stuff from military applications told me years ago, it is all customized stuff that just doesn't use any "normal" things like VPN tunnels etc.  Since the protocols are well known, they are considered to be inherently insecure for the real secret stuff.  Hackers like are being talked about here are only used to breaking via known weaknesses and poorly updated servers.  They are not gonna get the kinda stuff that we really want to see.

[EvadingGrid]

I never worked with them or saw them.  But, from prior experience in computer security, I do know a few basic things that are always done to protect them.  For one thing, if these things are connected to any kind of Internet connections (they usually are NOT), it is not the Internet like you think of it.  As one network security guy with a background in really secure stuff from military applications told me years ago, it is all customized stuff that just doesn't use any "normal" things like VPN tunnels etc.  Since the protocols are well known, they are considered to be inherently insecure for the real secret stuff.  Hackers like are being talked about here are only used to breaking via known weaknesses and poorly updated servers.  They are not gonna get the kinda stuff that we really want to see.

Well, my knowledge on these topics is a bit last century...

BUT, even back then, they did not use Public Networks, they had physically separate wires connecting there own private network. I doubt that principle has changed. I doubt that anything of importance is physically connected to the Public Networks.

I know most people think there is just the one big internet, and computers can only connect to that one big network, but that simply is not the case.

Conceptually, a simple model, is if two people use one phone line to directly dial to each others computers, then they never ever go through an ISP, and they never connect to the internet. In which case the only method a hacker could use is to clamber up a telephone pole and physically tap into the wires.

The protocol, is likely pretty stock standard, but with ridiculous encryption. I would guess they exchange keys via armed courier and not by electronic means. I would also take an educated guess that they do not use key exchange to agree on a one key both ways type method.

At least that is my best guess.

[compguygene]

Same educated guesses here, based on my limited knowledge and experience.

[iamc2]

The Federal Reserve has been 'HACKING' billions of dollars from the Hard Working American's since 1913!

If the F.R. was Hacked [which i doubt], I say "WHO CARES!"

 The Make Believe Money Magicians will just FIX the PROBLEM with more MONEY from QE FOREVER!!!!

[BlackMask]

Anonymous could be government posing as hackers to get legislation passed.  Who knows what is going on.  Something is going on, but what?

Good point. I distrust the "Robin Hood" image. It also too easily validates sitting on the sidelines doing nothing because Anon is out there supposedly fighting the system.

[egypt]

I'm smelling false flag as well.

1.  Why would "anonymous" be willing to take the heat for the Chase zero balance accounts, for instance.
2.  Or, take blame for what is happening in Cyprus...

False flag, to blame anonymous...

[LoudMcCloud]

Yep.  False flag cyberwarfare

[EvadingGrid]

Same educated guesses here, based on my limited knowledge and experience.

So the conclusion is . . .

Anonymous could not have hacked a real federal reserve computer, but just some box the intern did their website with wordpress on some go daddy account     

[LoudMcCloud]

Everyone is getting hacked with nothing taken of interest.  The government is just setting up to control the internet.  The population is so stupid.

[BlackMask]

The bondage of a population reflects the character of the powerful.

[Due_Process_NonNegotiable]

Government website?

You caught that too huh?  The Federal Reserve's web site is about as governmental as the McDonalds web site. 

[egypt]

yep, here it is - "government websites"   

__________________________________________________________________
http://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/2013/02/06/fed-says-hackers-breached-internal-site/


"...While the central bank said the incident didn’t “affect critical operations” of the Federal Reserve System, the disclosure is sure to fuel concerns about the cyber security of government websites and critical financial infrastructure..."

______________________________________________________________________

About the writer of the article Matt Egan (born in Bogota, Columbia)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/30/nyregion/30entry.html?_r=0

______________________________________________________________________

Write to Fox News and let them know you don't appreciate their "news" that does not correctly inform the public, nor Fox's employment of uneducated persons writing as if they know what they're talking about - specifically, the Federal Reserve is not governmental, nor federal - it is a private banking consorsium.  As such, the Federal Reserve website is not a "...government website..."

email: Comments@foxnews.com

Chairman and Chief Executive: Rupert Murdoch
News Corporation
1211 Avenue of Americas, 8th Floor
NY, NY 10036
Phone: 212.852.7000
email: rmurdoch@newscorp.com, murdochk.r@newscorporation.com
 
President of Fox News Channel: Roger Ailes
Fox News Channel
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Phone: 888.369.4762
email: Comments@foxnews.com